Skip to main content
JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques logoLink to JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques
. 2022 Jan 7;12(1):e20.00038. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.20.00038

The Technique for Performing Posterior Vertebral Column Resection with En-Bloc Fixation/Reduction in Adult Spine Deformity Surgery

Micheal Raad 1, Kevin Wang 1, Khaled Kebaish 1,a
PMCID: PMC9173554  PMID: 35685239

Background:

Posterior vertebral column resection (pVCR) is a powerful tool for correcting rigid spinal deformity; however, it is a technically demanding procedure and may be associated with a substantial rate of complications1. pVCR is often reserved for appropriately selected patients with severe focal deformity, in whom soft-tissue releases and posterior column osteotomies alone are unlikely to achieve satisfactory correction. Surgeon experience has also been shown to be correlated with outcomes2, placing further emphasis on appropriate training and practice before performing pVCR.

Description:

All surgeries are performed with the patient in the prone position under continuous neuromonitoring. The posterior approach to the spine and spinal instrumentation are performed in a standard fashion3. The S2-alar-iliac technique is utilized for sacropelvic fixation when indicated4. A minimum of 6 fixation points above and 6 below the level of resection are obtained, resulting in 2 instrumented blocs proximally and distally. A wide decompressive laminectomy with foraminotomies is then performed at the resection level, allowing for visualization of the spinal cord and exiting nerve roots. In the thoracic spine, disarticulating 3 to 4 cm of the medial rib at the resection level allows for better visualization and accessibility. Temporary fixation is then obtained by a unilateral rod spanning the osteotomy site. Focus is then directed toward the inferior and superior articular facets and pedicle, which are resected in a piecemeal manner from lateral to medial. Care must be taken to avoid damaging nearby nerve roots, especially at the inferomedial aspect of the pedicle. Cancellous bone removal from the vertebral body is then performed in a piecemeal manner through a lateral extra-cavitary approach from each side. This step necessitates transferring temporary fixation to the contralateral side in order to ensure adequate resection bilaterally. Posterior cortex is then resected. The anterior dura is carefully freed of any ligament or bone. Resection of the discs above and below the resection level is then performed, and the end plates are prepared for arthrodesis. The next step is to measure the defect. The sizing of the cages must be kept in line with the desired degree of correction, preventing overlengthening of the spinal column and subsequent stretching of the spinal cord. An en-bloc reduction-fixation across the osteotomy site is performed with use of intercalary connecting rods in order to achieve the desired correction. In situ benders at this stage may be utilized to manipulate the intercalary rods in order to widen the resection space anteriorly. The rods will subsequently be replaced. This technique minimizes stress on the junctional segments through load distribution across the various fixation points in the proximal and distal blocs. Finally, after decortication of the posterior elements, the bone graft is placed prior to layered closure in the standard manner.

Alternatives:

Alternative treatments to the pVCR include a standard pedicle-subtraction osteotomy.

Rationale:

A standard pedicle-subtraction osteotomy offers a substantial amount of correction; however, correction is limited to the sagittal plane because the wedge osteotomy is hinged on the anterior cortex. This limitation makes the pVCR a better candidate for patients with severe biplanar deformities.

Expected Outcomes:

pVCR is a complicated and technically challenging procedure that offers substantial correction in the coronal and sagittal planes for patients with rigid spinal deformities. It has also been shown to significantly improve patient quality of life5 Complication rates, however, are reportedly as high as 25% among older patients with poor physiologic reserve, with postoperative risks including medical complications, neurological deficiencies, surgery-related complications and others6. Previous studies have demonstrated improved outcomes with increasing surgeon experience2.

Important Tips:

  • Medial rib resection in the thoracic spine allows easy access to the lateral vertebral column.

  • En-bloc fixation-reduction minimizes fixation failure above and below the level of resection and provides a rigid foundation during the correction maneuver.

  • Ensure that the anterior column is disconnected all the way across in order to avoid excessive shortening of the spinal cord and the potential neurologic sequelae.

  • Complete resection of the posterior cortex and scar tissue anterior to the dural sac is required prior to the correction maneuver.

  • Ensure an adequate number of fixation points above and below the resection level.


Download video file (37.3MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJSST2000038.vid1
Download video file (13.7MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJSST2000038.vid2
Download video file (9.4MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJSST2000038.vid3
Download video file (2.6MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJSST2000038.vid4
Download video file (7.8MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJSST2000038.vid5
Download video file (5.7MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJSST2000038.vid6
Download video file (10.3MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJSST2000038.vid7
Download video file (15.4MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJSST2000038.vid8
Download video file (33.1MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJSST2000038.vid9
Download video file (43.2MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJSST2000038.vid10
Download video file (16.7MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJSST2000038.vid11
Download video file (40.8MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJSST2000038.vid12
Download video file (10MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJSST2000038.vid13
Download video file (4MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJSST2000038.vid14

Published outcomes of this procedure can be found at: Spine J. 2019;19(12):1926-33, Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(23):E703-10, and Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(14):1682-7.

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland

Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSEST/A357).

References

  • 1.Lee BH, Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, Jahng TA, Kim YJ, Kim HJ. Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Posterior Vertebral Column Resection for Severe Spinal Deformities. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2018. Mar;61(2):251-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Raad M, Puvanesarajah V, Harris A, El Dafrawy MH, Khashan M, Jain A, Hassanzadeh H, Kebaish KM. The learning curve for performing three-column osteotomies in adult spinal deformity patients: one surgeon’s experience with 197 cases. Spine J. 2019. Dec;19(12):1926-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Suk SI, Chung ER, Lee SM, Lee JH, Kim SS, Kim JH. Posterior vertebral column resection in fixed lumbosacral deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005. Dec 1;30(23):E703-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chang TL, Sponseller PD, Kebaish KM, Fishman EK. Low profile pelvic fixation: anatomic parameters for sacral alar-iliac fixation versus traditional iliac fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009. Mar 1;34(5):436-40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Riley MS, Lenke LG, Chapman TMJ, Jr, Sides BA, Blanke KM, Kelly MP. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Posterior Vertebral Column Resection for Severe Spinal Deformity with Five-Year Follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018. Mar 7;100(5):396-405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lau D, Osorio JA, Deviren V, Ames CP. The relationship of older age and perioperative outcomes following thoracolumbar three-column osteotomy for adult spinal deformity: an analysis of 300 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018. Jun;28(6):593-606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES