Significance
Successful chromosome segregation during meiosis relies on crossover recombination between homologous chromosomes. Meiotic recombination initiates with the formation of numerous DNA double-strand breaks, but only a few are ultimately selected to become crossovers. How this process is regulated to ensure that each homolog pair designates at least one crossover remains poorly understood. Here, we show that the Caenorhabditis elegans kinase CDK-2 partners with cyclin-like protein COSA-1 and promotes crossover designation through phosphorylation and activation of the MutSγ complex. Our data support a model in which scaffold-like properties of the MSH-5 C-terminal tail and its CDK-2–mediated phosphorylation combine to promote full recruitment and activity of crossover–promoting complexes, thereby generating positive feedback that contributes to the robustness of crossover designation.
Keywords: meiosis, recombination, CDK-2, MSH-5, crossover designation
Abstract
Crossover formation is essential for proper segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis. Here, we show that Caenorhabditis elegans cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK-2) partners with cyclin-like protein COSA-1 to promote crossover formation by promoting conversion of meiotic double-strand breaks into crossover–specific recombination intermediates. Further, we identify MutSγ component MSH-5 as a CDK-2 phosphorylation target. MSH-5 has a disordered C-terminal tail that contains 13 potential CDK phosphosites and is required to concentrate crossover–promoting proteins at recombination sites. Phosphorylation of the MSH-5 tail appears dispensable in a wild-type background, but when MutSγ activity is partially compromised, crossover formation and retention of COSA-1 at recombination sites are exquisitely sensitive to phosphosite loss. Our data support a model in which robustness of crossover designation reflects a positive feedback mechanism involving CDK-2–mediated phosphorylation and scaffold-like properties of the MSH5 C-terminal tail, features that combine to promote full recruitment and activity of crossover–promoting complexes.
Sexually reproducing organisms rely on proper chromosome segregation during meiosis to produce gametes with a complete genome. During meiotic prophase I, chromosomes pair and undergo crossover recombination with their homologous partners. This process, together with sister chromatid cohesion, leads to the formation of physical linkages between the homologs and enables their separation during meiosis I. Defects in crossover formation are disastrous, leading to miscarriages and congenital disorders, such as Down syndrome (1).
Meiotic recombination initiates with the generation of programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by the topoisomerase-like enzyme Spo11 (2). DSBs are resected to yield two 3′-end single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) overhangs, which are rapidly coated by RecA recombinases Dmc1 and Rad51. This nucleoprotein filament then seeks out homology and invades a homologous template, forming a metastable single-end invasion intermediate (D-loop) (3). The invading strand primes DNA synthesis and extends the D-loop. If the extended D-loop is captured by ssDNA on the other side of DSBs in a process known as second-end capture, a double Holliday junction (dHJ) forms (4). While dHJs can be resolved biochemically as either crossovers or non–crossovers (5), during meiosis, the majority of dHJs are specifically resolved as crossovers through the activity of MutLγ (MLH1-MLH3) (6–8) or other structure-selective endonucleases. Although a multitude of DSBs are generated during meiotic prophase, strikingly few are ultimately selected to become crossovers. Early recombination intermediates pare down in pachytene until each homolog pair receives at least one crossover, while the majority of DSBs are repaired as non–crossovers via synthesis-dependent strand annealing (9). However, how meiotic DSBs are chosen to become crossovers remains poorly understood.
Throughout eukaryotes, crossover recombination is primarily controlled by a group of proteins collectively termed “ZMM” (10). Notably, homologs of the yeast RING (Really interesting new gene) domain protein Zip3 [ZHP-1, ZHP-2, ZHP-3, and ZHP-4 in Caenorhabditis elegans (11–14), Drosophila Vilya and Narya/Nenya (15, 16), Hei10 in Arabidopsis (17), and Hei10 and RNF212 in mammals (18, 19)] initially localize as abundant foci or long stretches along the synaptonemal complex (SC) but eventually concentrate at crossover sites in late pachytene (20). These SUMO or ubiquitin ligases appear to promote crossover designation by stabilizing the ZMM proteins at crossover sites while removing them from other recombination intermediates (13, 14, 18, 19, 21, 22). Although many meiotic proteins are shown to be SUMO modified (23), key targets of the Zip3 family proteins remain largely unknown.
The meiosis-specific MutS homologs MSH4 and MSH5 form a heterodimeric MutSγ complex and play essential roles in crossover formation in diverse eukaryotes (24–31). MutSγ localizes to recombination intermediates as numerous foci but ultimately accumulates at sites that are destined to become crossovers (32, 33). Biochemical analyses using recombinant MSH4 and MSH5 have shown that MutSγ recognizes single-end invasion intermediates and HJs in vitro (34, 35). HJs activate the ATP hydrolysis of MutSγ and promote the exchange of bound ADP for ATP, inducing the formation of a sliding clamp that dissociates from HJs (35, 36). By iterative loading and embracing DNA duplexes within a dHJ, MutSγ is thought to stabilize crossover–specific recombination intermediates (33, 35). In addition, MutSγ recruits and activates the resolvase activity of MutLγ, enabling biased processing of dHJs into crossovers during meiosis (37, 38).
A genetic screen in C. elegans identified a cyclin-like protein COSA-1 as a component essential for processing meiotic DSBs into crossovers (39). The mammalian ortholog CNTD1 was subsequently identified (40), and both COSA-1 and CNTD1 have been shown to localize to crossover sites (39, 41, 42). In the absence of COSA-1/CNTD1, MutSγ components persist as numerous foci in pachytene, and crossover formation is eliminated or severely compromised (33, 40), demonstrating a crucial role of COSA-1/CNTD1 in converting early recombination intermediates into crossovers. Because both COSA-1 and CNTD1 are members of the cyclin family, it is plausible that they form a complex with a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and regulate the recombination process through phosphorylation.
Several lines of evidence have suggested that CDK2 might be a relevant kinase partner for CNTD1. CDK2 interacts with CNTD1 in yeast-two hybrid assays (41, 42) and localizes to interstitial chromosome sites (43, 44) in a CNTD1-dependent manner (40). Reduced CDK2 activity leads to a failure in crossover formation, while a hyperactive form of CDK2 causes an increased number of MLH1 foci (45). However, due to its requirement at telomeres in tethering chromosomes to the nuclear envelope, deletion of CDK2 leads to severe defects in SC assembly between paired homologs (synapsis) and pachytene arrest (46–49). Further, while a full-length CNTD1-specific protein of the excepted size was detected (using CNTD1 antibodies) in one study (42), a short CNTD1 isoform that cannot interact with CDK2 was the predominant isoform detected in another study (using hemagglutinin antibodies in Cntd1FH/FH mice with an epitope tag sequence inserted into the endogenous Cntd1 locus) (41), raising questions regarding the extent to which CDK2 and CNTD1 might act as functional partners. Thus, it has been difficult to determine the role of CDK2 in crossover recombination. Moreover, key meiotic targets of CDK2 have not yet been identified.
We reasoned that CDK-2, the C. elegans homolog of CDK2, might also localize and function at crossover sites. However, global knockdown of C. elegans CDK-2 by RNA interference leads to cell cycle arrest of mitotically proliferating germ cells (50), thereby precluding the analysis of its requirement during meiotic prophase. To overcome this limitation and establish the meiotic function of CDK-2, we use the auxin-inducible degradation system to deplete CDK-2 from the adult germline, demonstrating that CDK-2 partners with COSA-1 to promote crossover formation during C. elegans meiosis. Moreover, we identify MSH-5 as a key substrate for CDK-2 and provide evidence that CDK-2 and COSA-1 partner to promote crossover designation through phosphorylation and activation of the MutSγ complex.
Results
CDK-2 Colocalizes with COSA-1 Both at Early Recombination Intermediates and at Crossover Sites in Pachytene.
To establish the localization and function of CDK-2 during meiosis, we used CRISPR-mediated genome editing to modify the endogenous cdk-2 locus to express CDK-2 fused to an auxin-inducible degron (AID) and three tandem Flag epitopes (3×Flag). Self-progeny of this worm strain are fully viable (100% egg viability), indicating that the AID tag does not interfere with essential CDK-2 functions. Immunofluorescence in whole-mount adult hermaphrodite germlines (XX) revealed that CDK-2 localizes to six distinct foci per nucleus in late pachytene, which correspond to crossover–designated recombination sites as marked by COSA-1 (Fig. 1A and SI Appendix, Fig. S1A). In male germlines (XO), CDK-2 appears as five foci in pachytene nuclei (SI Appendix, Fig. S1B), consistent with its localization to crossover sites on the five autosomes.
We used nuclear spreading and three-dimensional structured illumination microscopy (3D-SIM) to examine the localization of CDK-2 in relation to an axis component, HTP-3, and other crossover factors during meiotic progression. This cytological approach shows COSA-1 localizing to numerous early recombination intermediates as faint foci prior to transition to late pachytene (32). We likewise detected 7 to 17 CDK-2 foci in early pachytene nuclei, colocalizing with COSA-1 (Fig. 1 B and D). Upon transition to late pachytene, CDK-2 and COSA-1 are lost from most recombination sites and enriched together at six crossover–designated sites (Fig. 1 C and D). Recent evidence has further shown that a distinct substructure emerges at the crossover site, in which MSH-5 doublets appear orthogonal to chromosome axes, flanking a central COSA-1 focus (33). CDK-2 was similarly detected as a single focus positioned between two MSH-5 foci at the crossover site (Fig. 1E). Thus, CDK-2 colocalizes with COSA-1 at early recombination intermediates as well as at crossover–designated sites in both hermaphrodite and male germlines.
CDK-2 Is Required for Crossover Formation.
To assess CDK-2 function during meiosis, we generated a strain in which CDK-2::AID::3×Flag is expressed in conjunction with germline-expressed plant F-box protein TIR1, which forms an SCF (Skp1-Cul1-F-box) E3 ubiquitin ligase to target AID-tagged proteins for degradation in the presence of auxin (51) (Fig. 2A). Within 6 h of 1 mM auxin treatment, CDK-2 was no longer detected in pachytene nuclei by immunofluorescence, demonstrating its rapid and efficient degradation (Fig. 2B). The signal for COSA-1 was also completely lost in CDK-2–depleted germlines, indicating that COSA-1 localizes to recombination sites in a CDK-2–dependent manner. Likewise, CDK-2 was not detected in pachytene nuclei of animals homozygous for a null mutation of cosa-1 (SI Appendix, Fig. S2A), demonstrating their mutual dependence.
Depletion of CDK-2 resulted in loss of crossover–based connections (chiasmata) that maintain associations between homologs in oocytes at diakinesis, the last stage of meiotic prophase. Six DAPI-stained bodies corresponding to six pairs of homologs connected by chiasmata (bivalents) are observed in wild-type diakinesis oocytes. However, following 24-h auxin treatment, CDK-2–depleted oocytes displayed 8 to 12 DAPI-stained bodies, reflecting failure to form crossovers (Fig. 2 C and D). Further, the RING domain–containing protein ZHP-3, which normally becomes restricted to six crossover sites in late pachytene nuclei (12), failed to become restricted to foci in CDK-2–depleted gonads and instead persisted along the SC (Fig. 2E), reflecting a requirement for CDK-2 in crossover formation.
Consistent with previous studies implicating C. elegans CDK-2 in the mitosis-to-meiosis decision and in promoting the proliferative fate of germline stem cells (50, 52), depletion of CDK-2 by 24-h auxin treatment dramatically reduced the number of germ cells in the premeiotic region of the gonad (Fig. 3B and SI Appendix, Fig. S2 B and C). However, these CDK-2–depleted gonads exhibited normal pairing of HIM-8, a protein that binds a special region on X chromosomes known as the pairing center (53), and robust synapsis (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 D and E). The sole RecA recombinase in C. elegans, RAD-51 (54, 55), was also detected as numerous foci in both control and CDK-2–depleted gonads (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 F and G). Thus, meiotic DSBs are induced in CDK-2–depleted germlines but cannot be processed into crossovers in the absence of CDK-2.
CDK-2 Is Required for Formation or Stabilization of Crossover–Specific Recombination Intermediates.
Next, we used a partial nuclear spreading protocol that maintains the temporal and spatial organization of the gonad (33, 56) to visualize the effects of CDK-2 depletion on the progression and architecture of meiotic recombination sites. To this end, we tagged MSH-5 at its C terminus with the 14-amino acid (aa)–long V5 epitope in a strain expressing CDK-2::AID::3×Flag and TIR1::mRuby and visualized MSH-5::V5 together with DSB-2 [a marker of early meiotic prophase (57)], HTP-3, and/or an SC component SYP-2. As previously demonstrated (33, 39), MSH-5 localized as numerous foci corresponding to nascent recombination sites in early pachytene nuclei and ultimately pared down to six robust crossover site foci in late pachytene in controls (Fig. 3 A and B). In CDK-2–depleted germlines, however, MSH-5 persisted longer as multiple foci, and the early pachytene region positive for DSB-2 staining or phosphorylation of pairing center proteins (pHIM-8/ZIMs) was extended (Fig. 3 A and B and SI Appendix, Fig. S3A), reflecting delayed meiotic progression due to failure to form crossover intermediates (57–59). Further, although CDK-2–depleted germ cells did eventually lose the DSB-2 signal and transition into the late pachytene stage, multiple faint MSH-5 foci persisted along chromosome axes (Fig. 3B), implying a failure of crossover designation in the absence of CDK-2. We note that abnormally large puncta of MSH-5 (white arrowheads) were detected in late pachytene nuclei of CDK-2–depleted germlines, which likely represent pathological aggregates of MSH-5 formed in the absence of CDK-2 (Discussion).
Examination of spread nuclei using 3D-SIM further revealed a failure to establish normal crossover site architecture in CDK-2–depleted germlines. Recent work has shown that crossover–designated sites display a distinct spatial organization of recombination factors (33, 60). Specifically, cohorts of MSH-5 and the Bloom helicase HIM-6 are each detected as orthogonally localized doublets. This orientation is interpreted to reflect their association with different parts of an underlying dHJ, with COSA-1 localizing at the center of the cross formed by the HIM-6 and MSH-5 doublets (33). Whereas this organization was detected in late pachytene in controls, MSH-5 and HIM-6 were not detected as doublets in CDK-2–depleted germ cells (Fig. 3 C and D), consistent with a failure to form crossover–specific intermediates. Additionally, bubble-like SC structures have been detected at crossover–designated sites and are proposed to promote crossover maturation by encapsulating and protecting crossover–designated sites from anti–crossover activities (33). While SC bubbles surrounding MSH-5 foci were detected in controls, such structures were not found in CDK-2–depleted germlines (Fig. 3E). Taken together, our data support that CDK-2 is required for maturation of early recombination sites into crossover–specific recombination intermediates.
Phosphorylation of MSH-5 Depends on Both CDK-2 and COSA-1 In Vivo.
Given the requirement for CDK-2 in crossover designation, we hypothesized that CDK-2 might phosphorylate pro–crossover factors, such as the MutSγ complex and the ZHP proteins, to modulate their functions. Moreover, given the colocalization and functional interdependence of CDK-2 and COSA-1, we hypothesized that COSA-1 might partner with CDK-2 to promote target phosphorylation. Experiments in which we coexpressed recombinant CDK-2–6×His and glutathione S-transferase–COSA-1 in insect cells provided evidence consistent with CDK-2 and COSA-1 being able to form a complex in vitro (SI Appendix, Fig. S4 A and B); however, we did not pursue this in vitro approach further as both proteins were largely insoluble. Instead, we sought to identify a relevant in vivo phosphorylation target.
We focused on MSH-5, as it contains numerous CDK consensus motifs ([S/T]P) in an extended and highly disordered C-terminal tail (Fig. 4A) and was previously demonstrated to be phosphorylated by human CDK1 in vitro (39). Using mass spectrometry, we mapped three sites on the MSH-5 C-terminal tail (T1009, T1109, and S1278) that are phosphorylated by human CDK1 in vitro (SI Appendix). We successfully generated phospho-specific antibodies against only one of these sites (MSH-5 pT1009), and we used these antibodies to demonstrate that MSH-5 is indeed phosphorylated in vivo in a CDK-2– and COSA-1–dependent manner. Immunofluorescence on spread nuclei revealed that the MSH-5 pT1009 signal was found at numerous recombination sites in early pachytene and became enriched at crossover–designated sites in late pachytene, colocalizing with MSH-5 and COSA-1 throughout meiotic progression (SI Appendix, Fig. S4C and Fig. 4B). Further, this phospho–MSH-5 signal is lost in worms expressing a mutant version of MSH-5 that includes a T1009A substitution (SI Appendix, Fig. S4D). Importantly, the MSH-5 pT1009 signal was abolished from recombination sites in both CDK-2–depleted and cosa-1–mutant gonads (Fig. 4 B and C), indicating that the MSH-5 C-terminal tail is phosphorylated in vivo in a manner dependent on both CDK-2 and COSA-1.
The C-Terminal Tail of MSH-5 Is Essential for Accumulation of Pro–Crossover Factors at Recombination Sites.
Whereas the N-terminal 60% of the MSH-5 protein shows a high level of conservation with its orthologs throughout the eukaryotic kingdoms, the long C-terminal tail is unique to its Caenorhabditis orthologs (SI Appendix, Fig. S5A). Moreover, primary sequence conservation within this tail domain is very low among the Caenorhabditis MSH-5 orthologs, which are similar primarily in that they contain multiple (8–23) CDK consensus motifs embedded within a protein segment predicted to be highly disordered (SI Appendix, Fig. S5B). These features of the MSH-5 C-terminal tail suggest that the presence of the disordered tail and/or its ability to serve as a substrate for CDK-2 might contribute to the essential functions of MSH-5 in meiosis.
To address this, we used CRISPR to generate worm strains expressing a series of MSH-5 C-terminal truncations by inserting V5 coding sequences followed by premature stop codons (Fig. 5A). Western blotting analysis showed that all four truncated proteins (Δ178 aa, Δ270 aa, Δ339 aa, and Δ414 aa) are expressed at their expected sizes, albeit at modestly reduced (50 to 70%) levels (SI Appendix, Fig. S6 A and B). Strikingly, truncations of MSH-5 led to a marked reduction in egg viability, and the percentage of males among surviving progeny also increased, reflecting meiotic impairment (SI Appendix, Fig. S6C). In particular, animals harboring two large truncations (msh-5::V5Δ339 aa and msh-5::V5Δ414 aa) displayed an average of ∼11 DAPI bodies in diakinesis oocytes (Fig. 5 B and C and SI Appendix, Fig. S6D) and only zero to one bright COSA-1 foci in late pachytene nuclei (Fig. 5D and SI Appendix, Fig. S6E). As msh-5 is not haploinsufficient (28), these data indicate that the C-terminal tail of MSH-5 is crucial for its function in crossover formation. Immunofluorescence of spread gonads from msh-5Δ339aa mutants revealed that COSA-1 was diffusely present in the nucleoplasm (Fig. 5E and SI Appendix, Fig. S6F). Additionally, after spreading, dim COSA-1 foci were detected at up to six sites along chromosome axes, which colocalized with ZHP-3 and the truncated MSH-5 (Fig. 5 E and F and SI Appendix, Fig. S6F). However, ZHP-3 signal persisted along the SC in msh-5Δ339 aa mutants (Fig. 5F), and most recombination intermediates failed to mature into crossovers. Thus, the C-terminal tail of MSH-5 is essential for accumulation of pro–crossover factors at COSA-1–marked recombination sites.
Phosphosites within the MSH-5 C-Terminal Tail Contribute to the Pro–Crossover Activity of the MutSγ Complex.
To determine the significance of phosphorylation of the MSH-5 tail, we sequentially mutated the codons corresponding to the 13 predicted and/or mapped CDK phosphorylation sites in its C terminus using CRISPR (Fig. 6A and SI Appendix, Fig. S7A). Contrary to our initial expectations based on the truncation mutants, animals homozygous for msh-5 phosphomutations (4A, 11A, and 13A) did not show obvious phenotypes in meiosis, exhibiting nearly normal progeny viability (SI Appendix, Fig. S7B). Even the msh-5::V513A mutant, in which all 13 CDK consensus sites were mutated to alanines, was able to designate crossovers and form bivalents as in wild type (SI Appendix, Fig. S7 C–E and Fig. 6B).
As the conserved presence of multiple CDK phosphorylation sites suggests a functional importance, we hypothesized that preventing phosphorylation of the MSH-5 C terminus did not cause overt phenotypes because phosphorylation is only one of multiple parallel pathways that converge to ensure a robust outcome of meiosis. Thus, we used a temperature-sensitive allele of him-14/msh-4, which encodes the heterodimeric partner of MSH-5 in the MutSγ complex, as a sensitized genetic background to reveal a functional deficit for msh-5 phosphomutants. him-14(it44) harbors a missense mutation (D406N) within its conserved DNA-binding domain and is characterized by a temperature-sensitive reduction in crossover formation (24, 61). Analysis of phosphosite mutations in this sensitized context provided clear evidence that phosphorylation of the MSH-5 tail functions to augment the pro–crossover activity of MutSγ in vivo.
First, we found that the msh-5::V513A mutation showed strong synthetic phenotypes with him-14(it44) at 15 °C, a temperature that is normally permissive for him-14(it44) (Fig. 6 C and D). Whereas DAPI staining of diakinesis oocytes did not reveal meiotic defects in him-14(it44); msh-5::V5WT control animals at 15 °C, 12 univalents were consistently observed in him-14(it44); msh-5::V513A oocytes, indicating a failure of crossover formation. Further, nuclear spreading and immunofluorescence revealed that while wild-type MSH-5 pared down to colocalize with six bright COSA-1 foci at crossover–designated sites in him-14(it44) at 15 °C, the MSH-513A protein persisted as numerous foci throughout pachytene in the him-14(it44); msh-5::V513A double mutant (Fig. 6E), similar to the phenotypes observed in CDK-2–depleted germlines (Fig. 3). Moreover, in him-14(it44); msh-5::V513A animals, one to three COSA-1 foci initially associated with MSH-5, but this colocalization was lost in late pachytene (only 33% of COSA-1 signals colocalized with MSH-5 in him-14(it44); msh-5::V513A versus 98% in him-14(it44); msh-5::V5WT; Fig. 6E and SI Appendix, Fig. S8A). Interestingly, ZHP-3 was detected together with COSA-1 in late pachytene nuclei of him-14(it44); msh-5::V513A (SI Appendix, Fig. S8B), suggesting that phosphorylation of the MSH-5 C terminus is required for retaining the association of MutSγ with other pro–crossover factors in him-14(it44) animals.
Second, analysis of him-14(it44)–double mutant animals carrying phospho-null mutations at 1, 7, or 11 phosphosites (1A, 7A, and 11A) further revealed that multiple phosphorylation sites in the MSH-5 tail can contribute to promoting MutSγ activity (Fig. 6 A and D and SI Appendix, Fig. S8C). The him-14(it44); msh-5::V511A mutant was particularly informative, as analysis of diakinesis oocytes revealed only mild meiotic impairment at 15 °C, in striking contrast to the complete failure of crossover formation observed in him-14(it44); msh-5::V513A oocytes under the same conditions. This suggests that phosphorylation of as few as two sites within the MSH-5 tail can sustain sufficient pro–crossover activity of the partially compromised MutSγ complexes. However, severe impairment of crossover formation is observed in both him-14(it44); msh-5::V511A and him-14(it44); msh-5::V57A when MutSγ function is further compromised at the semipermissive temperature of 20 °C (Fig. 6D, Right). This suggests that phosphorylation at additional sites can contribute to augmentation of MutSγ activity.
MSH-5 Phosphosites Are Required for Suppression of the him-14(it44) Crossover Deficit by Elevated COSA-1 Levels.
The meIs8 transgene expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP)::COSA-1 can partially alleviate the crossover deficit observed at semipermissive temperatures in the him-14(it44) mutant (62). Using qRT-PCR, we determined that cosa-1 mRNA levels are up-regulated by twofold in mels8 worms compared to wild-type controls (SI Appendix, Fig. S8D). Thus, we hypothesized that this suppression might reflect elevated activity of a putative CDK-2/COSA-1 complex, which compensates for the impaired MutSγ activity in him-14(it44) through hyperphosphorylation of downstream targets, including MSH-5. To test whether suppression of him-14(it44) by meIs8 was dependent on phosphosites in the MSH-5 C-terminal tail, we compared the effect of meIs8 in him-14(it44); msh-5::V5WT and him-14(it44); msh-5::V57A genetic backgrounds, reasoning that reducing the number of available phosphosites might abrogate suppression. Experiments were conducted at 22 °C, a semipermissive temperature at which the suppression of him-14(it44) by meIs8 is evident. At 22 °C, him-14(it44); msh-5::V5WT diakinesis oocytes displayed an average of 9.8 DAPI bodies, reflecting a mixture of bivalents and univalents resulting from a partial impairment of crossover formation, but the number of DAPI bodies was reduced to 8.5 in the presence of the meIs8 transgene (Fig. 6F and SI Appendix, Fig. S8E), indicating an increase in bivalent formation reflecting increased success in crossover formation. However, there was no significant difference in the number of DAPI bodies, with or without the meIs8 transgene, in the him-14(it44); msh-5::V57A background (Fig. 6F and SI Appendix, Fig. S8E). This finding strongly suggests that phosphorylation of the MSH-5 C-terminal tail is required for suppression of him-14(it44) phenotypes by elevated CDK-2 activity, supporting the conclusion that the MSH-5 tail is the major CDK-2 target whose phosphorylation is responsible for augmenting the residual MutSγ activity in him-14(it44) animals.
Discussion
C. elegans CDK-2 Partners with COSA-1 to Promote Crossover Formation.
Here, we demonstrate that C. elegans CDK-2 localizes to recombination intermediates and partners with COSA-1 to promote crossover formation. Using superresolution microscopy, we show that CDK-2 and COSA-1 colocalize together within the same subcompartment at crossover sites, with a spatial positioning distinct from those exhibited by other recombination factors, such as MutSγ and Bloom helicase. Further, we show that CDK-2 and COSA-1 are interdependent for localization, are both required for in vivo phosphorylation of MutSγ, and their absence/depletion has identical consequences for the progression of recombination. Based on these collective findings and conservation of the predicted cyclin/CDK interface (39), the most parsimonious explanation is that CDK-2 and COSA-1 combine to form a dedicated meiotic CDK/cyclin complex that functions to convert a subset of meiotic DSBs into interhomolog crossovers by stabilizing crossover–specific recombination intermediates.
While our data strongly support C. elegans CDK-2 and COSA-1 working together as a functional unit in promoting meiotic crossover formation, it remains unresolved whether this functional partnership is conserved in mammalian spermatocyte meiosis. On the one hand, mouse CNTD1 and CDK2 colocalize at late crossover sites (41, 42), and loss of Cntd1 function (40, 42), a Cntd1Q allele that disrupts a Y2H interaction between CNTD1 and CDK2 (42), and a partial loss-of-function Cdk2T160A allele (45) all cause very similar phenotypes, including elevated/persistent MSH4 foci, loss of late crossover markers, and a deficit of chiasmata. While these findings support a functional partnership, however, no immunoprecipitation studies to date have detected in vivo association between CNTD1 and CDK2. Further, detection of a short isoform of CNTD1 lacking a domain essential for cyclin/CDK interaction has led to the proposal that CNTD1 might function through alternative binding partners independently of CDK (41).
Evidence That CDK-2 Promotes Crossover Designation through Phosphorylation of MSH-5.
Here, we identify MutSγ as a key meiotic target of CDK-2 and demonstrate that MSH-5 is phosphorylated in a COSA-1– and CDK-2–dependent manner within its disordered C-terminal tail. As mutating all 13 C-terminal CDK motifs in MSH-5 does not alone result in meiotic defects, CDK-2 likely has additional substrates essential for crossover formation. However, severe consequences of phosphosite loss are evident when the activity of MutSγ is compromised, indicating the importance of phosphorylation within the MSH-5 tail for enabling success of meiosis under suboptimal conditions. The significance of this kinase–substrate relationship is further supported by dosage suppression, in which extra copies of the cosa-1 gene enable him-14(it44) animals to form higher levels of crossovers at a semipermissive temperature (62). We have shown that suppression of him-14(it44) phenotypes by COSA-1 overexpression requires MSH-5 phosphorylation within its C-terminal region. Thus, we propose that MSH-5 is a key substrate of CDK-2/COSA-1 and that phosphorylation within the MSH-5 C-terminal tail potentiates the overall activity of MutSγ in stabilizing crossover–specific recombination intermediates (Fig. 7).
The C-Terminal Tail of MSH-5 as a Scaffold to Accumulate Other Pro–Crossover Factors.
CDK phosphorylation sites in MSH-5 are clustered within its disordered C-terminal domain, which we have shown to be essential for crossover formation. Because the MSH-5 C-terminal tail is outside of its enzymatic core or the dimerization interface mapped for human MSH4 and MSH5 (36), it is unlikely that deleting the C-terminal tail affects the ATP hydrolysis rate or the formation of the HIM-14/MSH-5 heterodimer. In worms expressing a truncated MSH-5 (msh-5Δ339 aa), MSH-5 localizes to no more than six COSA-1–marked recombination sites, suggesting that crossover site designation may have occurred. However, pro–crossover factors do not accumulate to wild-type levels at these sites, depletion of ZHP-3 from along the length of the SC does not occur, and lack of chiasmata connecting homologs at diakinesis indicates a failure to process these recombination intermediates into crossovers (Fig. 5). We propose that the C-terminal tail of MSH-5 serves as a scaffold to accumulate proteins required for crossover formation. Indeed, intrinsically disordered proteins frequently contain short linear motifs that mediate interactions with diverse targets and have emerged as major hubs in cellular signaling (63). Recent work in mice has identified a novel proline-rich protein, PRR19, that functions with CNTD1 to promote crossover formation (42). Intriguingly, the MSH-5 tail is also enriched in prolines (CDK is a proline-directed kinase) and thus may act as a functional substitute for PRR19 to stably recruit CDK-2/COSA-1 in C. elegans. Determining how the MSH-5 tail mediates higher-order assemblies of pro–crossover factors will be an important topic for future research.
The phenotype observed in msh-5Δ339 aa animals is in sharp contrast to that in msh-5::V513A; him-14(it44), where one to three bright foci of COSA-1 initially localize to a subset of MutSγ-positive recombination intermediates but lose their association in late pachytene (Fig. 6E). Thus, although the MSH-5 C-terminal tail itself is required for concentrating pro–crossover factors at recombination sites, it appears to have deleterious effects on their retention in its unphosphorylated form. We speculate that the C-terminal tail of MSH-5 may also act as a scaffold for recruiting antirecombinases, which is counteracted by CDK-2–dependent phosphorylation. Recent evidence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae has demonstrated that phosphorylation of the N-terminal degron within Msh4 protects it from proteolysis at recombination sites, thereby activating its pro–crossover activity (64). However, phosphorylation of the MSH-5 C-terminal tail does not seem to have similar stabilizing effects, as we did not observe an increased level of MSH-5 in our C-terminal truncation mutants. As ZHP-3 is depleted from the SC in msh-5::V513A; him-14(it44) mutants while colocalizing with COSA-1, CDK-2/COSA-1 may also phosphorylate ZHP-3/4 and trigger their relocation from the SC to crossover–designated sites (Fig. 7).
Multisite Phosphorylation, Positive Feedback, and Propensity for Aggregation Provide a Robust Mechanism for Crossover Designation.
CDK phosphorylation sites are often clustered in disordered regions (65), and multisite phosphorylation by CDK can set a threshold to elicit an ultrasensitive response (66, 67). Our analysis of msh-5 phosphosite mutants revealed that crossover formation becomes highly sensitive to the number of phosphorylation sites available in the MSH-5 C-terminal tail when the activity of MutSγ is compromised by a temperature-sensitive mutation in him-14. At more permissive temperatures where HIM-14 is largely functional, fewer phosphosites are needed to achieve a threshold level of MutSγ activity required to ensure crossover formation. Conversely, under more restrictive conditions where HIM-14 is less functional, more phosphosites are required to achieve a threshold level of MutSγ activity. Although all MSH-5 orthologs in the Caenorhabditis species possess numerous CDK consensus motifs in the disordered C-terminal region, these sites are poorly conserved. Thus, we speculate that the number of phosphorylation sites, rather than their exact position, influences the pro–crossover activity of MutSγ, in line with several precedents controlled by multisite phosphorylation (68, 69). Further, as phosphorylation within the MSH-5 tail promotes the stable association of CDK-2/COSA-1 to recombination sites, it can also generate positive feedback that further enhances MSH-5 phosphorylation, thereby conferring a switch-like behavior that contributes to the robustness of crossover designation.
We further speculate that the propensity for MSH-5 to form aggregates in late pachytene germ cells, revealed upon CDK-2 depletion, may also be a feature that promotes robustness of the crossover designation mechanism. Given the intrinsically disordered protein sequence in which phosphosites are embedded, we hypothesize that the MSH-5 C-terminal tail may have a capacity to undergo phase separation that can be modulated by phosphorylation, which could potentially contribute to the formation of ellipsoidal protein structures that have long been recognized as “recombination nodules” (70). The idea that formation of biomolecular condensates may contribute to crossover designation is supported by recent modeling of cytological data from Arabidopsis, in which HEI10 is proposed to accumulate at few sites through diffusion-mediated coarsening at the expense of smaller foci (71). By enriching pro–crossover factors at crossover–designated intermediates while depleting them from other recombination sites, the formation of biomolecular condensates can serve as a general mechanism for controlling both crossover designation and positioning.
Materials and Methods
C. elegans Genetics, Genome Engineering, and Auxin-Mediated Depletion of CDK-2.
All strains used in this study were maintained on NGM (nematode growth medium) plates seeded with OP50-1 bacteria under standard conditions as described in ref. 72. All experiments were performed at 20 °C except where noted. All C. elegans strains were derived from a Bristol N2 background. SI Appendix, Tables S1 and S3 summarize all mutations and strains used in this study. The strains expressing CDK-2::AID::3×Flag and variants of MSH-5::V5 were generated by Cas9/CRISPR-mediated homologous recombination (73). Details of procedures, CRISPR RNAs, repair templates, and genotyping primers (SI Appendix, Table S2) are provided in the SI Appendix.
Auxin-mediated degradation of CDK-2 from the C. elegans germline was performed as previously described (51). Briefly, auxin plates were prepared by diluting a 400 mM auxin solution (indole-3-acetic acid in ethanol) into NGM (cooled after autoclaving) to a final concentration of 1 mM. Plates were dried at room temperature and stored at 4 °C protected from light for up to 1 wk prior to use. Plates were spread with concentrated OP50-1 bacterial cultures and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Age-matched young-adult hermaphrodites were picked and left for various hours at 20 °C prior to immunofluorescence.
Scoring DAPI-Staining Bodies in Diakinesis Oocytes of him-14(it44) Animals.
All strains carrying him-14(it44) unc-4(e120) were maintained at 20 °C with the mnC1 balancer. unc-4(e120), closely linked to him-14 on chromosome II, was used as a marker for easy genotyping and does not elicit meiotic phenotypes. Homozygote fourth larval (L4) stage worms (Unc, nongreen) were picked and transferred to experimental temperatures (15 °C, 20 °C, or 22 °C) for ∼44 h. To score DAPI-staining bodies in diakinesis oocytes, worms were picked on to a slide with a minimal volume of M9. Excess liquid was wicked away, and animals were fixed in 15 µL of 95% ethanol. Once dry, ethanol was reapplied, and this process was repeated a total of three times. The slides were mounted using VECTASHIELD containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories, H-1200-10) and sealed. Slides were stored at 4 °C for no longer than 4 d before imaging using a standard fluorescent microscope. DAPI bodies in the nuclei of diakinesis oocytes in the −1 to −3 positions were counted.
Phosphopeptide Antibody Production and Affinity Purification.
A synthetic phosphopeptide (TAIHIP[pT]PIQMGEAC) corresponding to the C. elegans MSH-5 sequence flanking threonine 1009 was generated using standard methods. The phosphopeptide was conjugated to keyhole limpet hemacyanin and injected into rabbits (Covance). To affinity purify polyclonal MSH-5 pT1009 antibodies, immune sera was first passed through SulfoLink coupling resins (Thermo Fisher, 20401) coupled to a nonphosphopeptide (TAIHIPTPIQMGEAC). Flow-through was then bound and eluted from phosphopeptide-coupled resins. The specificity of the antibodies was verified by dot blot and immunofluorescence of worm strains carrying phosphorylation-defective mutations in msh-5.
Immunofluorescence.
Immunofluorescence experiments involving whole-mount gonads and spread nuclei were conducted as in refs. 33 and 56 with modifications. The antibodies used, details of procedures, and imaging acquisition and processing are provided in the SI Appendix. Additional methods are described in the SI Appendix.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank N. Bhalla, A. Dernburg, and D. Libuda for antibodies. We thank Amelia Alessi for assistance in qRT-PCR analysis and Catcher Salazar for sequence analysis of MSH-5 orthologs. We also thank Yana Li at the Eukaryotic Tissue Culture Facility at Johns Hopkins for baculovirus production in insect cells and members of the Y.K. and A.M.V. laboratories for critical reading of this manuscript. N2 worms were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is funded by the NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Program (P40OD010440). J.H. is supported by the NIH Predoctoral Fellowship (F31HD100142). This work was supported by funding from the NIH to S.A. (R01GM98200), A.M.V. (R01GM067268 and R35GM126964), and Y.K. (R35GM124895) and by an American Cancer Society Research Professor Award (128725-RP-15-209-01-DDC) to A.M.V.
Footnotes
Reviewers: P.C., Cornell University; G.C., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
The authors declare no competing interest.
This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2117865119/-/DCSupplemental.
Data Availability
All study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix. Materials used in this research are available on request from A.M.V. and Y.K.
References
- 1.MacLennan M., Crichton J. H., Playfoot C. J., Adams I. R., Oocyte development, meiosis and aneuploidy. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 45, 68–76 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Keeney S., Giroux C. N., Kleckner N., Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88, 375–384 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hunter N., Kleckner N., The single-end invasion: An asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-Holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106, 59–70 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schwacha A., Kleckner N., Identification of double Holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination. Cell 83, 783–791 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Matos J., West S. C., Holliday junction resolution: Regulation in space and time. DNA Repair 19, 176–181 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Allers T., Lichten M., Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 106, 47–57 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Marsolier-Kergoat M.-C., Khan M. M., Schott J., Zhu X., Llorente B., Mechanistic view and genetic control of DNA recombination during meiosis. Mol. Cell 70, 9–20 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zakharyevich K., Tang S., Ma Y., Hunter N., Delineation of joint molecule resolution pathways in meiosis identifies a crossover-specific resolvase. Cell 149, 334–347 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gray S., Cohen P. E., Control of meiotic crossovers: From double-strand break formation to designation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 50, 175–210 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pyatnitskaya A., Borde V., De Muyt A., Crossing and zipping: Molecular duties of the ZMM proteins in meiosis. Chromosoma 128, 181–198 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jantsch V., et al. , Targeted gene knockout reveals a role in meiotic recombination for ZHP-3, a Zip3-related protein in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 7998–8006 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bhalla N., Wynne D. J., Jantsch V., Dernburg A. F., ZHP-3 acts at crossovers to couple meiotic recombination with synaptonemal complex disassembly and bivalent formation in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000235 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nguyen H., Labella S., Silva N., Jantsch V., Zetka M., C. elegans ZHP-4 is required at multiple distinct steps in the formation of crossovers and their transition to segregation competent chiasmata. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007776 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang L., Köhler S., Rillo-Bohn R., Dernburg A. F., A compartmentalized signaling network mediates crossover control in meiosis. eLife 7, e30789 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lake C. M., et al. , Vilya, a component of the recombination nodule, is required for meiotic double-strand break formation in Drosophila. eLife 4, e08287 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lake C. M., et al. , Narya, a RING finger domain-containing protein, is required for meiotic DNA double-strand break formation and crossover maturation in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 15, e1007886 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chelysheva L., et al. , The Arabidopsis HEI10 is a new ZMM protein related to Zip3. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002799 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ward J. O., et al. , Mutation in mouse Hei10, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, disrupts meiotic crossing over. PLoS Genet. 3, e139 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Reynolds A., et al. , RNF212 is a dosage-sensitive regulator of crossing-over during mammalian meiosis. Nat. Genet. 45, 269–278 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Agarwal S., Roeder G. S., Zip3 provides a link between recombination enzymes and synaptonemal complex proteins. Cell 102, 245–255 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rao H. B., et al. , A SUMO-ubiquitin relay recruits proteasomes to chromosome axes to regulate meiotic recombination. Science 355, 403–407 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Qiao H., et al. , Antagonistic roles of ubiquitin ligase HEI10 and SUMO ligase RNF212 regulate meiotic recombination. Nat. Genet. 46, 194–199 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bhagwat N. R., et al. , SUMO is a pervasive regulator of meiosis. eLife 10, e57720 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zalevsky J., MacQueen A. J., Duffy J. B., Kemphues K. J., Villeneuve A. M., Crossing over during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis requires a conserved MutS-based pathway that is partially dispensable in budding yeast. Genetics 153, 1271–1283 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.de Vries S. S., et al. , Mouse MutS-like protein Msh5 is required for proper chromosome synapsis in male and female meiosis. Genes Dev. 13, 523–531 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ross-Macdonald P., Roeder G. S., Mutation of a meiosis-specific MutS homolog decreases crossing over but not mismatch correction. Cell 79, 1069–1080 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hollingsworth N. M., Ponte L., Halsey C., MSH5, a novel MutS homolog, facilitates meiotic reciprocal recombination between homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not mismatch repair. Genes Dev. 9, 1728–1739 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kelly K. O., Dernburg A. F., Stanfield G. M., Villeneuve A. M., Caenorhabditis elegans MSH-5 is required for both normal and radiation-induced meiotic crossing over but not for completion of meiosis. Genetics 156, 617–630 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Higgins J. D., et al. , AtMSH5 partners AtMSH4 in the class I meiotic crossover pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana, but is not required for synapsis. Plant J. 55, 28–39 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Higgins J. D., Armstrong S. J., Franklin F. C. H., Jones G. H., The Arabidopsis MutS homolog AtMSH4 functions at an early step in recombination: Evidence for two classes of recombination in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 18, 2557–2570 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Milano C. R., et al. , Mutation of the ATPase domain of MutS homolog-5 (MSH5) reveals a requirement for a functional MutSγ complex for all crossovers in mammalian meiosis. G3 (Bethesda) 9, 1839–1850 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kneitz B., et al. , MutS homolog 4 localization to meiotic chromosomes is required for chromosome pairing during meiosis in male and female mice. Genes Dev. 14, 1085–1097 (2000). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Woglar A., Villeneuve A. M., Dynamic architecture of DNA repair complexes and the synaptonemal complex at sites of meiotic recombination. Cell 173, 1678–1691 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lahiri S., Li Y., Hingorani M. M., Mukerji I., MutSγ-induced DNA conformational changes provide insights into its role in meiotic recombination. Biophys. J. 115, 2087–2101 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Snowden T., Acharya S., Butz C., Berardini M., Fishel R., hMSH4-hMSH5 recognizes Holliday junctions and forms a meiosis-specific sliding clamp that embraces homologous chromosomes. Mol. Cell 15, 437–451 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Snowden T., Shim K.-S., Schmutte C., Acharya S., Fishel R., hMSH4-hMSH5 adenosine nucleotide processing and interactions with homologous recombination machinery. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 145–154 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cannavo E., et al. , Regulation of the MLH1-MLH3 endonuclease in meiosis. Nature 586, 618–622 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kulkarni D. S., et al. , PCNA activates the MutLγ endonuclease to promote meiotic crossing over. Nature 586, 623–627 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yokoo R., et al. , COSA-1 reveals robust homeostasis and separable licensing and reinforcement steps governing meiotic crossovers. Cell 149, 75–87 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Holloway J. K., Sun X., Yokoo R., Villeneuve A. M., Cohen P. E., Mammalian CNTD1 is critical for meiotic crossover maturation and deselection of excess precrossover sites. J. Cell Biol. 205, 633–641 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gray S., Santiago E. R., Chappie J. S., Cohen P. E., Cyclin N-terminal domain-containing-1 coordinates meiotic crossover formation with cell-cycle progression in a cyclin-independent manner. Cell Rep. 32, 107858 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bondarieva A., et al. , Proline-rich protein PRR19 functions with cyclin-like CNTD1 to promote meiotic crossing over in mouse. Nat. Commun. 11, 3101 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ashley T., Walpita D., de Rooij D. G., Localization of two mammalian cyclin dependent kinases during mammalian meiosis. J. Cell Sci. 114, 685–693 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Liu W., et al. , Phosphorylation of CDK2 at threonine 160 regulates meiotic pachytene and diplotene progression in mice. Dev. Biol. 392, 108–116 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Palmer N., et al. , A novel function for CDK2 activity at meiotic crossover sites. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000903 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Viera A., et al. , CDK2 is required for proper homologous pairing, recombination and sex-body formation during male mouse meiosis. J. Cell Sci. 122, 2149–2159 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Viera A., et al. , CDK2 regulates nuclear envelope protein dynamics and telomere attachment in mouse meiotic prophase. J. Cell Sci. 128, 88–99 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ortega S., et al. , Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 is essential for meiosis but not for mitotic cell division in mice. Nat. Genet. 35, 25–31 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Berthet C., Aleem E., Coppola V., Tessarollo L., Kaldis P., Cdk2 knockout mice are viable. Curr. Biol. 13, 1775–1785 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jeong J., Verheyden J. M., Kimble J., Cyclin E and Cdk2 control GLD-1, the mitosis/meiosis decision, and germline stem cells in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001348 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhang L., Ward J. D., Cheng Z., Dernburg A. F., The auxin-inducible degradation (AID) system enables versatile conditional protein depletion in C. elegans. Development 142, 4374–4384 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Fox P. M., et al. , Cyclin E and CDK-2 regulate proliferative cell fate and cell cycle progression in the C. elegans germline. Development 138, 2223–2234 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Phillips C. M., et al. , HIM-8 binds to the X chromosome pairing center and mediates chromosome-specific meiotic synapsis. Cell 123, 1051–1063 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Alpi A., Pasierbek P., Gartner A., Loidl J., Genetic and cytological characterization of the recombination protein RAD-51 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Chromosoma 112, 6–16 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Colaiácovo M. P., et al. , Synaptonemal complex assembly in C. elegans is dispensable for loading strand-exchange proteins but critical for proper completion of recombination. Dev. Cell 5, 463–474 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pattabiraman D., Roelens B., Woglar A., Villeneuve A. M., Meiotic recombination modulates the structure and dynamics of the synaptonemal complex during C. elegans meiosis. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006670 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Rosu S., et al. , The C. elegans DSB-2 protein reveals a regulatory network that controls competence for meiotic DSB formation and promotes crossover assurance. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003674 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Stamper E. L., et al. , Identification of DSB-1, a protein required for initiation of meiotic recombination in Caenorhabditis elegans, illuminates a crossover assurance checkpoint. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003679 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kim Y., Kostow N., Dernburg A. F., The chromosome axis mediates feedback control of CHK-2 to ensure crossover formation in C. elegans. Dev. Cell 35, 247–261 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jagut M., et al. , Separable roles for a Caenorhabditis elegans RMI1 homolog in promoting and antagonizing meiotic crossovers ensure faithful chromosome inheritance. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002412 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zetka M. C., Rose A. M., Mutant rec-1 eliminates the meiotic pattern of crossing over in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 141, 1339–1349 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Girard C., Akerib C. C., Villeneuve A. M., Suppression of him-14(it44ts) by a transgene insertion expressing GFP::COSA-1. MicroPub Biol., 10.17912/micropub.biology.000430 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wright P. E., Dyson H. J., Intrinsically disordered proteins in cellular signalling and regulation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 18–29 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.He W., et al. , Regulated proteolysis of MutSγ controls meiotic crossing over. Mol. Cell 78, 168–183 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Holt L. J., et al. , Global analysis of Cdk1 substrate phosphorylation sites provides insights into evolution. Science 325, 1682–1686 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Nash P., et al. , Multisite phosphorylation of a CDK inhibitor sets a threshold for the onset of DNA replication. Nature 414, 514–521 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.J. E. Ferrell, Jr, Ha S. H., Ultrasensitivity part II: Multisite phosphorylation, stoichiometric inhibitors, and positive feedback. Trends Biochem. Sci. 39, 556–569 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Doan T., Mendez A., Detwiler P. B., Chen J., Rieke F., Multiple phosphorylation sites confer reproducibility of the rod’s single-photon responses. Science 313, 530–533 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Strickfaden S. C., et al. , A mechanism for cell-cycle regulation of MAP kinase signaling in a yeast differentiation pathway. Cell 128, 519–531 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Carpenter A. T. C., Electron microscopy of meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster females: II. The recombination nodule—a recombination-associated structure at pachytene? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 3186–3189 (1975). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Morgan C., et al. , Diffusion-mediated HEI10 coarsening can explain meiotic crossover positioning in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 12, 4674 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Brenner S., The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77, 71–94 (1974). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Dokshin G. A., Ghanta K. S., Piscopo K. M., Mello C. C., Robust genome editing with short single-stranded and long, partially single-stranded DNA donors in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 210, 781–787 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix. Materials used in this research are available on request from A.M.V. and Y.K.