Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2022 Jun 7;78:143–144. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.06.001

The association of health behaviors and mental health during COVID-19

Elke Humer 1,, Afsaneh Gächter 1, Rachel Dale 1, Thomas Probst 1, Christoph Pieh 1
PMCID: PMC9173823  PMID: 35690481

It has been previously reported that the COVID-19 pandemic and governmental restrictions to combat the spreading of the virus, are associated with an increase in mental health symptoms in the general population [1]. Health behavior has an important influence on physical and mental health. The COVID-19 pandemic and the associated restrictions negatively impacted health behaviors, such as a decrease in physical activity and an increase in smartphone usage [2].

This study evaluated the association of health behaviors with the prevalence of mental health indicators in the Austrian general population after two years of the COVID-19 pandemic.

An online survey (N = 1031, 50.3% females) was conducted on a representative population sample according to age, gender, region, and educational level from April 19 to 26, 2022 in Austria. The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki and the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) reporting guideline. It was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University for Continuing Education Krems, Austria (Ethical number: EK GZ 26/2018–2021). All participants gave electronic informed consent prior to participation.

Health behaviors (smartphone-use, physical activity) and mental health indicators (depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 [3]), anxiety symptoms (GAD-7 [4]), sleep quality (ISI [5]), alcohol abuse (CAGE [6]), disordered eating (SCOFF [7]) and stress (PSS-10 [8])) were assessed. SPSS version 26 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) was used to perform chi-squared tests for univariate analyses and p-values <0.05 (2-sided) were considered statistically significant. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to adjust the data for smartphone usage (4 categories) and physical activity (two categories: physically inactive vs. physically active). Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to assess statistical uncertainty.

The prevalence of depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥ 11 in 14- to 17-year-old and ≥ 10 in ≥18-year-olds) ranged from 16% (< 1 h smartphone usage/d) to 48% (≥ 5 h smartphone usage/d) and from 44% (no physical activity) to 21% (one day of physical activity per week). Similarly, the prevalence of anxiety symptoms (GAD-7 ≥ 11 in 14- to 17-year-old and ≥ 10 in ≥18-year-olds) ranged from 8% (< 1 h smartphone usage/d) to 29% (≥ 5 h smartphone usage/d) and from 25% (no physical activity) to 12% (one day of physical activity per week; Supplementary Table 1). Depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, insomnia, alcohol abuse, disordered eating and stress were positively correlated with smartphone usage (p < 0.05; Supplementary Table 1). Odds ratios (ORs) for ≥5 h vs. < 1 h smartphone usage/d ranged from 2.5 to 8.0 (Fig. 1). According to multivariable analyses (Fig. 1), physical inactivity was associated with greater likelihood of depression, anxiety, and stress (aORs from 1.6 to 2.2) compared to being physically active at least one day per week for ≥1 h. No statistically significant differences were observed for insomnia, alcohol abuse, or disordered eating (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals for smartphone usage and physical activity.

The prevalence of depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥ 11 in 14- to 17-year-old and ≥ 10 in ≥18-year-olds) ranged from 16% (< 1 h smartphone usage/d) to 48% (≥ 5 h smartphone usage/d) and from 44% (no physical activity) to 21% (one day of physical activity per week). Similarly, the prevalence of anxiety symptoms (GAD-7 ≥ 11 in 14- to 17-year-old and ≥ 10 in ≥18-year-olds) ranged from 8% (< 1 h smartphone usage/d) to 29% (≥ 5 h smartphone usage/d) and from 25% (no physical activity) to 12% (one day of physical activity per week; Supplementary Table 1). Depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, insomnia, alcohol abuse, disordered eating and stress were positively correlated with smartphone usage (p < 0.05; Supplementary Table 1). Odds ratios (ORs) for ≥5 h vs. < 1 h smartphone usage/d ranged from 2.5 to 8.0 (Fig. 1). According to multivariable analyses (Fig. 1), physical inactivity was associated with greater likelihood of depression, anxiety, and stress (aORs from 1.6 to 2.2) compared to being physically active at least one day per week for ≥1 h. No statistically significant differences were observed for insomnia, alcohol abuse, or disordered eating (Fig. 1).

Overall, the incidence of depressive or anxiety symptoms was three to four times higher among heavy smartphone users (≥ 5 h/d) compared to those using their smartphone <1 h/d. In contrast, the prevalence of depressive or anxiety symptoms was reduced half among those who exercised at least once a week compared to those who did not exercise.

Several prior cross-sectional and longitudinal studies point to a negative association between smartphone usage and psychological well-being [9]. Smartphone use, however, has had potential benefits, as it has turned out to be a medium to circumvent the measures of physical distancing. The use of smartphone applications also holds great potential to offer immediate access to evidence-based mental health care [10]. The present study underscores the need for appropriate approaches to facilitate responsible smartphone usage, to mitigate multiple health problems, as well as the need to develop and test better methods of promoting physical activity.

The following are the supplementary data related to this article.

Supplementary Table 1

Proportion of participants exceeding the cut-off scores for moderate depression/anxiety/insomnia/alcohol abuse/eating disorders and stress by smartphone usage and physical activity (n = 1031).

mmc1.docx (19.1KB, docx)

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.06.001.

Author contributions

EH, CP: conceptualization and methodology. EH: formal analysis. EH: investigation. EH: data curation. EH and AG: writing—original draft preparation. RD, TP and CP: writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Open Access Funding by the University of Continuing Education Krems.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors without undue reservation.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  • 1.Pieh C., Probst T., Budimir S., Humer E. Diminished well-being persists beyond the end of the COVID-19 lockdown. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2021;70:137–138. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sañudo B., Fennell C., Sánchez-Oliver A.J. Objectively-assessed physical activity, sedentary behavior, smartphone use, and sleep patterns pre- and during-COVID-19 quarantine in young adults from Spain. Sustainability. 2020;12:5890. doi: 10.3390/su12155890. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Spitzer R.L. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MDThe PHQ primary care study. JAMA. 1999;282:1737. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.18.1737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Spitzer R.L., Kroenke K., Williams J.B.W., Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1092. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Morin C.M., Belleville G., Bélanger L., Ivers H. The insomnia severity index: psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases and evaluate treatment response. Sleep. 2011;34:601–608. doi: 10.1093/sleep/34.5.601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dhalla S., Kopec J.A. The CAGE questionnaire for alcohol misuse: a review of reliability and validity studies. CIM. 2007;30:33. doi: 10.25011/cim.v30i1.447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Morgan J.F., Reid F., Lacey J.H. The SCOFF questionnaire: assessment of a new screening tool for eating disorders. BMJ. 1999;319:1467–1468. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cohen S., Kamarck T., Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:385. doi: 10.2307/2136404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Abi-Jaoude E., Naylor K.T., Pignatiello A. Smartphones, social media use and youth mental health. CMAJ. 2020;192:E136–E141. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.190434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Torous J., Huffman J. Mobile mental health: bridging psychiatry and neurology through engaging innovations. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2022;75:90–91. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1

Proportion of participants exceeding the cut-off scores for moderate depression/anxiety/insomnia/alcohol abuse/eating disorders and stress by smartphone usage and physical activity (n = 1031).

mmc1.docx (19.1KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors without undue reservation.

Data will be made available on request.


Articles from General Hospital Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES