Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2022 Feb 24;126(12):1755–1764. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01750-5

Allium vegetables intake and the risk of gastric cancer in the Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project

Michela Dalmartello 1, Federica Turati 1,2,, Zuo-Feng Zhang 3, Nuno Lunet 4,5,6, Matteo Rota 7, Rossella Bonzi 1, Carlotta Galeone 8, Georgia Martimianaki 1,9, Domenico Palli 10, Monica Ferraroni 1, Guo-Pei Yu 11, Samantha Morais 4,5,6, Reza Malekzadeh 12, Lizbeth López-Carrillo 13, David Zaridze 14, Dmitry Maximovitch 14, Nuria Aragonés 15,16, Guillermo Fernández-Tardón 17, Vicente Martin 15,18, Jesus Vioque 15,19, Manoli Garcia de la Hera 15,19, Maria Paula Curado 20, Felipe Jose Fernandez Coimbra 21, Paulo Assumpcao 22, Mohammadreza Pakseresht 12,23,24, Jinfu Hu 25, Raúl Ulises Hernández-Ramírez 26, Mary H Ward 27, Farhad Pourfarzi 12,28, Lina Mu 29, Shoichiro Tsugane 30,31, Akihisa Hidaka 30, Pagona Lagiou 32,33, Areti Lagiou 34, Antonia Trichopoulou 9, Anna Karakatsani 9,35, Paolo Boffetta 36,37, M Costanza Camargo 27, Eva Negri 1,37, Carlo La Vecchia 1, Claudio Pelucchi 1
PMCID: PMC9174191  PMID: 35210588

Abstract

Background

The role of allium vegetables on gastric cancer (GC) risk remains unclear.

Methods

We evaluated whether higher intakes of allium vegetables reduce GC risk using individual participant data from 17 studies participating in the “Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project”, including 6097 GC cases and 13,017 controls. Study-specific odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using a two-stage modelling approach.

Results

Total allium vegetables intake was inversely associated with GC risk. The pooled OR for the highest versus the lowest study-specific tertile of consumption was 0.71 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.56–0.90), with substantial heterogeneity across studies (I2 > 50%). Pooled ORs for high versus low consumption were 0.69 (95% CI, 0.55–0.86) for onions and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75–0.93) for garlic. The inverse association with allium vegetables was evident in Asian (OR 0.50, 95% CI, 0.29–0.86) but not European (OR 0.96, 95% CI, 0.81–1.13) and American (OR 0.66, 95% CI, 0.39–1.11) studies. Results were consistent across all other strata.

Conclusions

In a worldwide consortium of epidemiological studies, we found an inverse association between allium vegetables and GC, with a stronger association seen in Asian studies. The heterogeneity of results across geographic regions and possible residual confounding suggest caution in results interpretation.

Subject terms: Gastric cancer, Cancer epidemiology, Gastric cancer

Introduction

Despite the decreasing incidence and mortality trends in most areas of the world [1], gastric cancer remains a major public health issue, being the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide in 2020 [2].

The major established determinant of gastric cancer is Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection [3]. Tobacco smoking [4] and selected dietary habits also play a role in the development of gastric cancer [5, 6]. Heavy alcohol intake [7], a high consumption of salt-preserved foods [5] and red and processed meat [8] are positively associated with the disease, while diets rich in fruit [9] and vegetables [10], including healthy dietary patterns such as the Mediterranean diet [11, 12], have been inversely related with the risk.

There has been longstanding interest in the favourable effects of allium vegetables intake on human health; still, details of the associations and their underlying mechanisms are not fully understood [13]. The most widely used allium vegetables include garlic, onions, leeks, chives and scallions, which are rich in flavonoids and organosulfur compounds [14]. Epidemiological studies support a protective role of allium vegetables intake on several cancers [15, 16], particularly those of the gastrointestinal tract [17, 18]. Previous meta-analyses indicated a protective role of allium vegetables intake on gastric cancer [1820]. In particular, a meta-analysis of 22 case–control and 4 cohort studies updated through 2013, and including over 10,000 cases, reported overall relative risks between 0.55 (onions) and 0.78 (total allium vegetables) for the highest level of consumption; results were, however, inconsistent by study design, with case–control studies reporting a significant inverse association and cohort studies null association. Recently, a pooled analysis of two US cohorts indicated no consistent relation [21].

The “Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project” is a global collaborative consortium of epidemiological investigations on gastric cancer. The StoP project aims to examine and quantify the role of lifestyle and genetic determinants on the aetiology of gastric cancer [22]. To date, the StoP Project includes more than 30 case–control studies (or case–control studies derived from cohort investigations) conducted in areas around the world with different rates of gastric cancer, distribution of risk factors for the disease, dietary patterns and lifestyle habits. The StoP Project includes patient-level data on allium vegetables intake for approximately 6000 gastric cancer cases and 13,000 controls, providing a unique opportunity to finely quantify the association between allium vegetables intake and gastric cancer.

The present investigation within the StoP Project aims to evaluate whether a higher intake of allium vegetables, including onions and garlic, is associated with a reduced risk of gastric cancer.

Materials and methods

Study population

The StoP Project is a consortium of epidemiological investigations on gastric cancer (http://www.stop-project.org/). Studies eligible for participation in the consortium are those with a case–control design, including case–control studies nested within cohort studies, with at least 80 cases of incident, histologically confirmed gastric cancer (both cardia and non-cardia anatomical subsites). Details on the StoP Project methods have been previously reported [22]. Principal investigators of the studies included in the StoP Project agreed to participate in the consortium by providing a signed data transfer agreement and the original dataset to the coordinating centre. One study from Greece computed its own results locally (through standardised analyses) and then provided estimates for the second-stage meta-analysis to the StoP Project consortium [23]. Questionnaires used for data collection and any further information useful for data handling (e.g., codebooks, labels) were also obtained from the participating studies. All data were harmonised according to a pre-specified format at a centralised pooling centre. The participating studies were conducted in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and guidelines for the protection of human subjects, and the StoP Project was approved by the University of Milan Review Board (reference 19/15 on 01/04/2015). Informed consent was not obtained from all studies because some of them were carried out during the 1980s and 1990s.

Of the 34 studies included in the v.3.2 release of the StoP Project, 17 studies—accounting for a total of 6097 gastric cancer cases and 13,017 controls—had information on allium vegetables intakes and were included in the present analysis (Supplementary Fig. S1). These included two studies from Greece [23, 24], two from Italy [25, 26], two from Spain [27, 28], one from Portugal [29], one from Russia [30], two from Iran [31, 32], three from China [3335], one from Japan [36], two from Mexico [37, 38] and one from Brazil (unpublished data).

One study from the USA [39] was excluded from the analysis because of the high number of missing information on allium vegetables intake, and one study from Canada [40] was excluded because it only collected qualitative information on the frequency of onions and garlic intake (i.e., seldom or never, sometimes, often or always).

Allium vegetable intake

In all studies, dietary intake was assessed by means of food frequency questionnaires, asking participants to report the consumption of foods and beverages at least 1 year before diagnosis (for cases), hospital admission (for controls in hospital-based case–control studies) or recruitment (for controls in population-based case–control studies).

Total allium vegetables intake was obtained by combining the available information on the intake of single allium vegetable items, including onions, garlic, chives, leeks and scallions, in each study. Onion (available from 15 studies) and garlic (8 studies) intakes were also considered separately. Allium vegetables consumption was converted into grams per week, taking into account the serving size and the frequency of consumption indicated in each study-specific food frequency questionnaire. When consumption was not expressed in grams, the amount of allium vegetables reported was converted into grams by considering the following average weight for each vegetable: 150 g for leeks, 40 g for onions and 15 g for garlic or scallions.

Allium vegetables intake was then categorised into study‐specific tertiles (based on the study‐specific distribution among controls). Onion and garlic intakes were categorised into above and below the study-specific median value as the distribution of intake did not allow meaningful computation of tertiles in some studies.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was based on subjects with complete information on allium vegetables intake (5892 cases and controls 12,493). The association between total allium vegetables, onion and garlic intake, and gastric cancer was assessed through a two-stage modelling approach [41]. First, the odds ratios (ORs) of gastric cancer and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) according to study-specific categories of intake were derived for each study using multivariable unconditional logistic regression models. Subjects with missing information on allium vegetables intake (3.4% among cases and 4.0% among controls) were excluded from the analyses. Models included, when available and applicable, terms for age (5-year age groups: <40; 40–44; …; 70–74; ≥75), sex, education/social class (low, intermediate or high, as defined in each original study based on education, income and/or occupation), tobacco smoking (never, former, and current smokers of ≤10 cigarettes/day, >10–20 cigarettes/day and >20 cigarettes/day), alcohol drinking (never, low: ≤12 g of ethanol/day, intermediate: >12–47 g of ethanol/day, high consumption: >47 g of ethanol/day), fruit and vegetable consumption (study‐specific tertiles), family history of gastric cancer in first degree relatives, study centre (for multicentric studies) and matching study area/hospital (for matched studies). Missing values on covariates were imputed as the study-specific modal category when the proportion of missing values on that covariate was low (i.e. <5%) in that specific study. Otherwise, they were retained in the model by including them in a separate ad hoc category of the variable. At the second stage, summary ORs were obtained by pooling the study-specific ORs using random-effects models [42]. Heterogeneity across studies was tested with the Cochran’s Q test statistic and quantified using the I2 statistic, which measures the percentage of total variation due to heterogeneity rather than chance (values of 25%, 50% and 75% were considered to represent low, moderate and considerable heterogeneity, respectively) [43].

The functional form of the relation between allium vegetable intake (grams per week) and gastric cancer risk was modelled using one‐order and two‐order fractional polynomial models, adjusting for the aforementioned confounders. The best-fitting model, i.e., the one minimising the model deviance, was selected.

A number of sensitivity analyses were conducted: (i) including total energy intake in the models for further adjustment; (ii) estimating the associations between allium vegetables, onion and garlic intake and gastric cancer using a one-stage approach (i.e., generalised linear mixed effect models with a logistic link function and a random intercept for each study, with adjustment factors as previously described); (iii) estimating the ORs for any intake versus no intake based on studies in which the proportion of non-consumers was higher than 10%; (iv) examining whether the number of single allium vegetable items considered in each study and the proportion of onion intake on the total allium vegetable consumption in each study had different effects on gastric cancer risk by using meta-regression models; and (v) assessing the impact of individual studies on the pooled ORs by removing one study at a time from the two-stage procedure.

Stratified analyses were conducted to evaluate whether the effect of total allium vegetables intake on gastric cancer differed across subgroups defined by age, sex, geographic area, socioeconomic status, smoking habits, alcohol drinking, total fruit and vegetable intake, family history of gastric cancer and markers of HP serostatus, and according to the type of controls (hospital-based, population-based), cancer anatomical subsite (cardia, non-cardia) and histological type (intestinal, diffuse and unspecified, according to the Lauren classification). In analyses by cancer anatomical subsite and histological type, multinomial logistic regression models were used to estimate the study-specific ORs for each type of cancer respectively. Heterogeneity across groups was evaluated by Cochran’s Q test statistic.

Analyses were carried out using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), Stata version 14 (StataCorp., College Station, Texas, USA) and RStudio version 1.2.5019 (RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA, USA). P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Table 1 shows the distribution of sociodemographic characteristics and selected lifestyle factors of the 6097 gastric cancer cases and 13,017 controls considered in the present analysis. About 56% of cases were from Europe, 30% from Asia and 14% from the Americas. The distribution of age was similar among cases and controls. Compared to controls, cases were more often males, heavy smokers and alcohol drinkers, and more frequently reported a low socioeconomic status, a family history of gastric cancer and a low consumption of fruit and vegetables. There was a moderate correlation between onion and garlic consumption (Pearson’s r = 0.23, consistent among cases and controls).

Table 1.

Distribution of gastric cases and controls according to study centre, sex, age and other selected variables in the Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project consortium.

Cases (n = 6097) Controls (n = 13,017)
N %a N %a
Study (StoP ID. Country (Reference))
Europe
  03. Italy 1 [25] 230 3.8 547 4.2
   05. Italy 2 [26] 1016 16.7 1159 8.9
   06. Greece 1 [24] 110 1.8 100 0.8
   09. Russia [30] 450 7.4 611 4.7
   17. Portugal [29] 692 11.3 1667 12.8
   21. Spain 1 [27] 441 7.2 3440 26.4
   23. Spain 2 [28] 401 6.6 455 3.5
   33. Greece 2 [23] 82 1.3 410 3.1
 Asia
   02. China 1 [35] 266 4.4 533 4.1
   08. China 2 [33] 206 3.4 415 3.2
   10. Iran 1 [31] 217 3.6 394 3.0
   11. Iran 2 [32] 286 4.7 304 2.3
   12. China 3 [34] 711 11.7 711 5.5
   30. Japan [36] 153 2.5 303 2.3
 The Americas
   25. Mexico 1 [37] 248 4.1 478 3.7
  26. Mexico 2 [38] 220 3.6 752 5.8
  36. Brazil 368 6.0 738 5.7
 Sex
   Men 3870 63.5 7423 57.0
   Women 2227 36.5 5594 43.0
Age (years)
   <40 288 4.7 671 5.2
   40–44 245 4.0 724 5.6
   45–49 387 6.3 1008 7.7
   50–54 539 8.8 1265 9.7
   55–59 761 12.5 1588 12.2
   60–64 904 14.8 1947 15.0
   65–69 1111 18.2 2155 16.6
   70–74 1063 17.4 1888 14.5
   ≥75 799 13.1 1771 13.6
 Socioeconomic statusb
   Low 3647 60.6 6275 48.6
   Intermediate 1764 29.3 4213 32.6
   High 603 10.0 2416 18.7
 Smoking habitsb
   Never smoker 2791 46.6 6397 49.9
   Former smoker 1478 24.7 3203 25.0
   Current smoker, number of cigarettes/day
    ≤10 475 7.9 1231 9.6
    >10–20 672 11.2 1076 8.4
    >20 574 9.6 912 7.1
 Alcohol drinking (g/day)b
   Never 1488 30.4 3716 33.5
   ≤12 983 20.1 3353 30.2
   >12–47 1657 33.9 2907 26.2
   >47 759 15.5 1111 10.0
 Family history of gastric cancerb,c
   No 2814 79.5 7348 91.4
   Yes 726 20.5 692 8.6
 Total fruit and vegetables intakeb,d
   Low 1905 32.4 3485 28.6
   Intermediate 1987 33.8 4172 34.2
   High 1985 33.8 4545 37.2

aPercentages may not add to 100 due to rounding.

bFrequencies do not sum up to the total beacuse of missing values.

cIn first degree relatives.

dBased on study-specific tertiles.

Table 2 provides the pooled ORs and the corresponding 95% CIs of gastric cancer according to the intakes of total allium vegetables, onions and garlic. The corresponding forest plots with study-specific and pooled ORs for the highest versus the lowest level of intake are provided in Fig. 1 (panel a for total allium vegetables, panel b for onions and panel c for garlic). For total allium vegetables intake, compared with the first tertile of intake, pooled ORs were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69–0.93) for the second and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.56–0.90) for the third tertile (Table 1), in the presence, respectively, of moderate (I2 = 59.5%) and substantial (I2 = 82.2%) heterogeneity across studies. The study-specific ORs for the third versus the first tertile of intake were below unity in 13 out of the 17 studies analysed (Fig. 1a). As for specific allium vegetables, the ORs for high versus low intake were 0.69 (95% CI, 0.55–0.86; I2 = 86.6%) for onions and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75–0.93; I2 = 0%) for garlic. Further adjustment for total energy intake in studies with available information did not affect the results (Supplementary Table S1). No significant changes in the effects emerged when removing one study at a time; ORs varied between 0.70 (95% CI, 0.67–0.92) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.73–0.96) for the second versus the first tertile, and between 0.67 (95% CI, 0.53–0.85) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.64–0.96) for the third versus the first tertile of allium vegetables intake.

Table 2.

Two-stage pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for gastric cancer according to allium vegetables consumption in the Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project consortium.

Cases Controls
n %a n %a OR (95% CI) I2 (%)
Allium vegetablesb
  1st tertile 2278 37.4 4200 32.3 1
  2nd tertile 1827 30.0 3956 30.4 0.80 (0.69–0.93) 59.5%
  3rd tertile 1787 29.3 4337 33.3 0.71 (0.56–0.90) 82.2%
  Missing 205 3.4 524 4.0
Onionsc
  Below the median 3071 53.4 5730 47.5 1
  Above the median 2467 42.9 5817 48.2 0.69 (0.55–0.86) 86.6%
  Missing 211 3.7 527 4.4
Garlicd
  Below the median 1729 58.4 3678 54.0 1
  Above the median 1108 37.4 2704 39.7 0.83 (0.75–0.93) 0.0%
  Missing 123 4.2 426 6.3

aPercentages may not add to 100 due to rounding.

bIncluded studies: StoP ID #2, #3, #5, #6, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #17, #21, #23, #25, #26, #30, #33, #36.

cIncluded studies: StoP ID #3, #5, #6, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #17, #21, #23, #25, #26, #30, #36.

dIncluded studies: StoP ID #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #21, #23, #25.

Fig. 1. Forest plot of allium vegetables consumption and gastric cancer risk.

Fig. 1

Study‐specific and pooled odds ratios (ORs) of gastric cancer, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), for the highest compared to the lowest category of consumption1 of allium vegetables (a), onions (b) and garlic (c) in the Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project consortium. Footnote: 1Comparisons: highest versus lowest study-specific tertile of consumption for allium vegetables, and above versus below the study-specific median consumption for onions and garlic. The numbers of cases and controls reported in the forest plots for each study refer to subjects in the highest category of consumption.

In sensitivity analyses, results derived using a one-stage modelling approach were similar to those obtained through the two-stage modelling approach, although the magnitude of association with onion intake was slightly decreased (Supplementary Table S2). In another analysis comparing any consumption versus no consumption, the pooled ORs were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.66–1.08) for allium vegetables, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77–1.01) for onions and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.80–1.06) for garlic (Supplementary Table S3). The number of specific allium vegetable types included in each study or the proportion of onions in the total allium vegetables variable did not influence the association of allium vegetables with gastric cancer (ORs from meta-regression models: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.70–1.51 for the addition of 1 vegetable and 1.00, 95% CI: 0.99–1.01 for 1-point percent increment in the proportion of onions, when considering the highest versus the lowest tertile of consumption). In stratified analyses (Table 3), similar effects of allium vegetables intake (third versus the first tertile) were observed in subgroups of sex, age, socioeconomic status, intake of fruit and vegetables, smoking status, HP serostatus, and cancer anatomical subsite and histological type. The inverse association appeared stronger in never/low alcohol drinkers, subjects with a family history of gastric cancer, and studies using population-based controls. There was significant heterogeneity across geographic areas (P = 0.04), with no association in studies from Europe and a strong inverse association in studies from Asia.

Table 3.

Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of gastric cancer for the highest compared to the lowest study-specific tertile of allium vegetables intake in strata of selected variables in the Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project consortium.

Cases/controls (number of included studies) OR (95% CI) I2 (%)
Area
  Europe 3422/8389 (8) 0.96 (0.81–1.13) 38.3
  Asia 1839/2660 (6) 0.50 (0.29–0.86) 89.5
  The Americas 836/1968 (3) 0.66 (0.39–1.11) 78.7
p-value heterogeneity = 0.042
Sex
  Men 3870/7423 (17) 0.71 (0.56–0.90) 73.9
  Women 2227/5594 (17) 0.76 (0.58–1.01) 63.2
p-value heterogeneity = 0.700
Age (years)
  <60 2220/5256 (17) 0.74 (0.57–0.95) 61.0
  ≥60 3877/7761 (17) 0.70 (0.54–0.91) 77.5
p-value heterogeneity = 0.79
Socioeconomic status
  Low-intermediate 3680/6311 (17) 0.72 (0.54–0.96) 77.9
  High 2373/6640 (17) 0.73 (0.58–0.92) 581
p-value heterogeneity = 0.933
Smoking habit
  Never-former 4376/9798 (17) 0.73 (0.59–0.91) 73.1
  Smoker 1721/3219 (17) 0.67 (0.48–0.94) 66.3
p-value heterogeneity = 0.690
Alcohol drinking (g/day)
  Never-low (≤12) 2498/7112 (15) 0.74 (0.57–0.96) 71.3
  Intermediate (>12–47)–High (>47) 2427/4020 (12) 0.93 (0.80–1.10) 7.4
p-value heterogeneity = 0.136
History of gastric cancer in first degree relatives
  No 2871/7410 (12) 0.71 (0.50–1.00) 84.4
  Yes 718/691 (11) 1.01 (0.73–1.40) 0.0
p-value heterogeneity = 0.138
Total fruit and vegetable intakea
  Low-Intermediate 3824/7520 (16) 0.73 (0.56–0.95) 76.2
  High 2003/4598 (17) 0.68 (0.49–0.94) 75.1
p-value heterogeneity = 0.701
Type of controls
  Hospital-based 1978/3287 (7) 0.82 (0.67–1.00) 36.3
  Population-based 4119/9730 (10) 0.64 (0.45–0.91) 88.9
p-value heterogeneity = 0.237
HP infection
  Seronegative 668/1378 (8) 0.66 (0.43–0.99) 43.1
  Seropositive 1738/4588 (9) 0.57 (0.32–1.03) 89.8
p-value heterogeneity = 0.716
 Histological typeb (9)
  Intestinal 1689/9315 0.74 (0.48–1.14) 84.6
  Diffuse 989/9315 0.80 (0.56–1.14) 67.0
  Unspecified 846/9315 0.60 (0.39–0.94) 72.5
p-value heterogeneity = 0.628
 Siteb (12)
  Cardia 613/10196 0.73 (0.42–1.27) 77.6
  Non-cardia 3158/10196 0.67 (0.47–0.97) 86.4
p-value heterogeneity = 0.808

HP Helicobacter pylori.

aStudy-specific tertiles.

bAnalysed using multinomial multivariable logistic model.

Figure 2 provides the exposure-response relationships between intake of allium vegetables (Fig. 2a), onions (Fig. 2b) and garlic (Fig. 2c), and gastric cancer risk. A trend towards decreasing gastric cancer risk with higher consumption of allium vegetables and onions emerged; the favourable effect of garlic intake increased progressively until 50–60 g/day and levelled off thereafter. The analysis in strata of geographic area (Supplementary Fig. S2) indicates a stronger favourable effect in Asian Countries.

Fig. 2. Exposure-response relation between allium vegetables consumption and gastric cancer.

Fig. 2

Best-fitting fractional polynomial models describing the relationship (solid line) with its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) (dashed lines) between the intake (g/week) of allium vegetables (a), onions (b) and garlic (c) with gastric cancer risk in the Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project consortium1,2. OR odds ratio. Footnotes: 1Details of the models are given in Supplementary Table S4 (Supplementary materials). 2Study StoP ID #33 (Greece 2) excluded due to policy reasons on the transfer of original data.

Discussion

In this uniquely large database, derived from a worldwide consortium of epidemiological investigations on gastric cancer, we found an inverse association between allium vegetables intake, including garlic and onions, and gastric cancer. The association was evident in studies from Asia and, to a lesser extent, in those from America, but not in studies from Europe. Results were fairly consistent in strata of cancer anatomical subsites (cardia and non-cardia) and histological type (intestinal and diffuse), and across the other subgroups analysed.

The anticancer effects of allium vegetables have been mainly attributed to various organosulfur compounds, mainly allyl derivatives [14]. In experimental animal studies, diallylsulfide, diallyldisulfide, allylmethyldisulfide, allylmercaptan, diallyltrisulfide and allylmethylsulfide inhibited forestomach cancer [44]. Cancer protection by allium vegetables may arise from several mechanisms, including modulation of the activities of metabolising enzymes that activate (cytochrome P450s) or detoxify (glutathione S-transferases) carcinogens, inhibition of DNA adduct formation, and inhibition of cell proliferation and tumour growth by apoptosis and alteration of the cell cycle [14, 44]. In addition, allium vegetables, in particular garlic, showed antibacterial effects against HP infection—a key risk factor for gastric cancer [45]—in in vitro [46] and animal studies [47]. However, evidence from observational and experimental human studies is not consistent [48]. In particular, among trials on HP infected subjects, the Shandong Intervention Trial from China did not find a reduced HP prevalence after long-term administration (7.3 years) of garlic supplements compared to the placebo [49], while one smaller trial from Turkey found a significantly increased HP eradication rate when allicin (a major compound of garlic) was added to the standard eradication regimen [50]. In this study, the association between allium vegetables intake and gastric cancer was similar among subjects with and without HP infection, suggesting independent effects on gastric cancer.

The heterogeneity of results across geographical regions can be explained by the different consumption quantities and patterns of allium vegetables. Preparation or processing methods influence the bioavailability and activity of bioactive compounds of allium vegetables [51, 52]. Cutting, chopping or crushing fresh garlic lead to the formation of organosulfur compounds but heating destroys garlic’s active allyl sulfur compound formation [53]; a previous study showed a 30% reduction in the content of quercetin (i.e., the major flavonoid present in onions) when onions are boiled [52]. In Mediterranean countries, onions are consumed both raw (added to salads) and cooked, while garlic is often cooked in combination with other foods or used for dressings, and is unfrequently eaten raw. Studies from this area generally reported null associations, particularly with garlic intake. In Asian countries, an inverse relation between allium vegetables and gastric cancer was found, with, however, substantial heterogeneity among studies. Again, consumption patterns differ widely across countries: in China, onions are consumed almost exclusively cooked, whereas in Iran, where we observed a stronger inverse association with onions intake in two studies, onions are consumed both raw and cooked. Conversely, for garlic, the inverse association was similar among Asian studies where it is consumed mainly as raw (i.e., China) or cooked (i.e., other Asian countries). However, the available information from studies included in the present investigation did not allow us to conduct separate analyses for raw versus cooked allium vegetables, nor according to cooking methods. Differences in the genetic background and possibly in microbiome composition across populations may also partly or largely account for the difference in the results across geographic areas. With reference to familial, and hence likely genetic, related neoplasms, no heterogeneity was observed across strata of family history and the association was, if anything, stronger among subjects without family history of gastric cancer.

Besides the case–control studies included in the StoP Project database, other case–control studies worldwide indicated an inverse association between allium vegetables intake and gastric cancer [5457]. However, available prospective cohort studies have provided essentially null results. A lack of a significant association was reported by the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS), which focused on garlic [21], the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study [58], the Shanghai Women’s and Men’s Health studies (SWHS and SMHS) [59], the Swedish Mammography Cohort and Cohort of Swedish Men [60], and the Netherlands Cohort Study (NCS) [61]. In the double-blind randomised Shandong Intervention Trial, 7.3 years of oral supplementation with garlic extract and oil was associated with a non-statistically significant reduction in gastric cancer incidence (OR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.53–1.20) and mortality (hazard ratio, 0.65, 95% CI: 0.35–1.20) over 14.7 years of follow-up [62]. The only case–control study derived from a cohort study included in the present analysis [23] reported an OR of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.43–2.08) for high versus low total allium intake. Case–control studies are generally more prone to selection and recall bias than cohort studies. In addition, the presence of symptoms of the disease and pre-neoplastic lesions in the stomach may have led to a decrease in the intake of allium vegetables among cases (reverse causation), and this may explain part of the inverse association observed in retrospective studies. Nevertheless, cohort studies might suffer from exposure misclassification because they typically measure diet at one point in time only.

It is possible that, at least in Europe, subjects with high allium vegetables intake also have a diet richer in vegetables and a healthier lifestyle. Fruit and vegetable intake has been associated with decreased risk of gastric cancer [6, 63]. Although we adjusted our models for total fruit and vegetable intake, socioeconomic status, tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking, and, in sensitivity analyses, we found similar ORs after adjusting for total energy intake, some residual confounding cannot be ruled out.

The major strengths of this study are that it is based on a pooled analysis from a worldwide consortium of epidemiological studies and it includes a large number of cases. Individual participant data pooled analyses allowed to overcome some of the limitations of meta-analyses of published data [64, 65], allowing the harmonisation of information and analyses, consistency in adjustment factors and multivariate models, and a thorough investigation of heterogeneity across subgroups [66]. For this study, we obtained the most complete data available on allium vegetables intake and other variables of interest, including possible confounding factors, from the original studies of the StoP Project, and we were able to apply uniform criteria to the variable definition and statistical analysis. The number of studies and participants allowed us to perform stratified analyses considering various factors, including cancer anatomical subsite and histological type, and to address the exposure-response relationships. In addition, we included in the analysis studies that did not specifically assess the association of allium vegetables with gastric cancer in previous reports, and this prevented publication bias.

Among the limitations, this analysis was based almost exclusively on case–control studies. However, all the studies enrolled incident gastric cancer cases and collected dietary data in a period preceding diagnosis (for cases) of at least 1 year. Allium vegetables are typically used in mixed dishes in varying amounts or as garnishes (e.g., shallots and chives); in some countries, they are added as flavouring ingredients and then removed before food consumption. Deriving accurate estimates of their usual intake through food frequency questionnaires is therefore challenging. Notably, allium vegetables intake may have been underestimated in studies collecting information on a few types only. However, based on the meta-regression, the number of specific vegetables included in the total allium vegetables variable did not significantly affect the observed association. Further, information on HER2 expression in gastric cancer cases was not available for most studies and thus we could not assess whether the association with allium vegetables differed by HER2 status.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the present investigation within a worldwide consortium of epidemiological studies found an inverse association between allium vegetables consumption, including onions and garlic, and gastric cancer risk. The apparent heterogeneity across geographic areas, likely attributable to different patterns of consumption across populations, and the possibility of residual confounding suggest the need for caution in the interpretation of our findings.

Supplementary information

Supplementary materials (122.5KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the European Cancer Prevention (ECP) Organization for providing support for the StoP Project meetings and all MCC-Spain study collaborators (CIBERESP, ISCIII, ISGlobal, ICO, University of Huelva, University of Oviedo, University of Cantabria, ibs.Granada, Instituto Salud Pública de Navarra, FISABIO, Murcia Regional Health Authority and cols).

Author contributions

MD performed the statistical analysis, interpreted the data and revised the manuscript; FT drafted the manuscript; MR and GM contributed to the statistical analysis; MR, CP, RB and CG harmonised the data, as part of the Stomach Cancer Pooling (StoP) Project; ZFZ, NL, DP, MF, GPY, SM, RM, LLC, DZ, DM, NA, GFT, VM, JV, MGH, MPC, FJFC, PA, MP, JH, RUHR, MW, FP, LM, ST, AH, PL, AL, AT, AK, PB, MCC, EN and CLV supplied the data as part of the StoP Project; CLV and CP supervised the analysis and interpretation of data, and reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content; CP defined the study hypotheses and designed the investigation, and had primary responsibility for final content. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Fondazione AIRC per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Project no. 21378 (Investigator Grant), and by the Italian League for the Fight Against Cancer (LILT), which did not play a role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of the results or in the writing of this manuscript. The Unidade de Investigação em Epidemiologia—Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto (EPIUnit; UIDB/04750/2020) was funded by the Foundation for Science and Technology—FCT (Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education). SM was also funded by the project “NEON-PC—Neuro-oncological complications of prostate cancer: a longitudinal study of cognitive decline” (POCI-01–0145-FEDER-032358; ref. PTDC/SAU-EPI/32358/2017), which is funded by FEDER through the Operational Programme Competitiveness and Internationalisation, national funding from FCT, and the EPIUnit – Junior Research – Prog Financing (UIDP/04750/2020). The Brasilian study was funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo-FAPESP number 2014/26897-0 SaoPaulo Brasil.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of our study are available from the StoP Project but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study and so are not publicly available. Data are, however, available from the authors upon reasonable request and permission of the Steering Committee of the StoP Project.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The participating studies were performed in accordance with laws, regulations and guidelines for the protection of human subjects (including consent from the participants) applicable at the time of study conduction, and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All identifying information was removed before data were pooled at the study coordinating centre located at the University of Milan. The StoP Project received ethical approval from the University of Milan Review Board (reference 19/15 on 01/04/2015).

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41416-022-01750-5.

References

  • 1.Santucci C, Carioli G, Bertuccio P, Malvezzi M, Pastorino U, Boffetta P, et al. Progress in cancer mortality, incidence, and survival: a global overview. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2020;29:367–81.. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Peleteiro B, La Vecchia C, Lunet N. The role of Helicobacter pylori infection in the web of gastric cancer causation. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2012;21:118–25. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32834a7f66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Smyth EC, Nilsson M, Grabsch HI, van Grieken NC, Lordick F. Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2020;396:635–48.. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31288-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Continuous Update Project Expert Report 2018. Diet, nutrition, physical activity and stomach cancer. Available at dietandcancerreport.org.
  • 6.Fang X, Wei J, He X, An P, Wang H, Jiang L, et al. Landscape of dietary factors associated with risk of gastric cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:2820–32.. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bagnardi V, Rota M, Botteri E, Tramacere I, Islami F, Fedirko V, et al. Alcohol consumption and site-specific cancer risk: a comprehensive dose-response meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2015;112:580–93.. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ferro A, Rosato V, Rota M, Costa AR, Morais S, Pelucchi C, et al. Meat intake and risk of gastric cancer in the Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) project. Int J Cancer. 2020;147:45–55. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bertuccio P, Alicandro G, Rota M, Pelucchi C, Bonzi R, Galeone C, et al. Citrus fruit intake and gastric cancer: the stomach cancer pooling (StoP) project consortium. Int J Cancer. 2019;144:2936–44. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bertuccio P, Rosato V, Andreano A, Ferraroni M, Decarli A, Edefonti V, et al. Dietary patterns and gastric cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:1450–8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Buckland G, Agudo A, Lujan L, Jakszyn P, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Palli D, et al. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and risk of gastric adenocarcinoma within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91:381–90. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Praud D, Bertuccio P, Bosetti C, Turati F, Ferraroni M, La, et al. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet and gastric cancer risk in Italy. Int J Cancer. 2014;134:2935–41.. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Guercio V, Galeone C, Turati F, La Vecchia C. Gastric cancer and allium vegetable intake: a critical review of the experimental and epidemiologic evidence. Nutr Cancer. 2014;66:757–73. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2014.904911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nicastro HL, Ross SA, Milner JA. Garlic and onions: their cancer prevention properties. Cancer Prev Res. 2015;8:181–9. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-14-0172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Galeone C, Pelucchi C, Levi F, Negri E, Franceschi S, Talamini R, et al. Onion and garlic use and human cancer. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:1027–32.. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.5.1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Galeone C, Turati F, Zhang ZF, Guercio V, Tavani A, Serraino D, et al. Relation of allium vegetables intake with head and neck cancers: evidence from the INHANCE consortium. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2015;59:1641–50.. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201500042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Turati F, Guercio V, Pelucchi C, La Vecchia C, Galeone C. Colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps in relation to allium vegetables intake: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2014;58:1907–14.. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201400169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Turati F, Pelucchi C, Guercio V, La Vecchia C, Galeone C. Allium vegetable intake and gastric cancer: a case-control study and meta-analysis. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2015;59:171–9. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201400496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhou Y, Zhuang W, Hu W, Liu GJ, Wu TX, Wu XT. Consumption of large amounts of Allium vegetables reduces risk for gastric cancer in a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:80–9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.03.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kodali RT, Eslick GD. Meta-analysis: Does garlic intake reduce risk of gastric cancer? Nutr Cancer. 2015;67:1–11. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2015.967873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kim H, Keum N, Giovannucci EL, Fuchs CS, Bao Y. Garlic intake and gastric cancer risk: results from two large prospective US cohort studies. Int J Cancer. 2018;143:1047–53. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pelucchi C, Lunet N, Boccia S, Zhang ZF, Praud D, Boffetta P, et al. The stomach cancer pooling (StoP) project: study design and presentation. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2015;24:16–23. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Benetou V, Trichopoulou A, Orfanos P, Naska A, Lagiou P, Boffetta P, et al. Conformity to traditional Mediterranean diet and cancer incidence: the Greek EPIC cohort. Br J Cancer. 2008;99:191–5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lagiou P, Samoli E, Lagiou A, Peterson J, Tzonou A, Dwyer J, et al. Flavonoids, vitamin C and adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15:67–72. doi: 10.1023/B:CACO.0000016619.18041.b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lucenteforte E, Scita V, Bosetti C, Bertuccio P, Negri E, La Vecchia C. Food groups and alcoholic beverages and the risk of stomach cancer: a case-control study in Italy. Nutr Cancer. 2008;60:577–84. doi: 10.1080/01635580802054512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Buiatti E, Palli D, Decarli A, Amadori D, Avellini C, Bianchi S, et al. A case-control study of gastric cancer and diet in Italy. Int J Cancer. 1989;44:611–6. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910440409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Castano-Vinyals G, Aragones N, Perez-Gomez B, Martin V, Llorca J, Moreno V, et al. Population-based multicase-control study in common tumors in Spain (MCC-Spain): rationale and study design. Gac Sanit. 2015;29:308–15.. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2014.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Santibanez M, Alguacil J, de la Hera MG, Navarrete-Munoz EM, Llorca J, Aragones N, et al. Occupational exposures and risk of stomach cancer by histological type. Occup Environ Med. 2012;69:268–75. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lunet N, Valbuena C, Vieira AL, Lopes C, Lopes C, David L, et al. Fruit and vegetable consumption and gastric cancer by location and histological type: case-control and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2007;16:312–27. doi: 10.1097/01.cej.0000236255.95769.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zaridze D, Borisova E, Maximovitch D, Chkhikvadze V. Alcohol consumption, smoking and risk of gastric cancer: case-control study from Moscow, Russia. Cancer Causes Control. 2000;11:363–71.. doi: 10.1023/A:1008907924938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pourfarzi F, Whelan A, Kaldor J, Malekzadeh R. The role of diet and other environmental factors in the causation of gastric cancer in Iran-a population based study. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:1953–60. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pakseresht M, Forman D, Malekzadeh R, Yazdanbod A, West RM, Greenwood DC, et al. Dietary habits and gastric cancer risk in north-west Iran. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22:725–36. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9744-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mu LN, Lu QY, Yu SZ, Jiang QW, Cao W, You NC, et al. Green tea drinking and multigenetic index on the risk of stomach cancer in a Chinese population. Int J Cancer. 2005;116:972–83.. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Setiawan VW, Yu GP, Lu QY, Lu ML, Yu SZ, Mu L, et al. Allium vegetables and stomach cancer risk in China. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2005;6:387–95. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Deandrea S, Foschi R, Galeone C, La Vecchia C, Negri E, Hu J. Is temperature an effect modifier of the association between green tea intake and gastric cancer risk? Eur J Cancer Prev. 2010;19:18–22. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328330eb1a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Machida-Montani A, Sasazuki S, Inoue M, Natsukawa S, Shaura K, Koizumi Y, et al. Association of Helicobacter pylori infection and environmental factors in non-cardia gastric cancer in Japan. Gastric Cancer. 2004;7:46–53. doi: 10.1007/s10120-004-0268-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hernandez-Ramirez RU, Galvan-Portillo MV, Ward MH, Agudo A, Gonzalez CA, Onate-Ocana LF, et al. Dietary intake of polyphenols, nitrate and nitrite and gastric cancer risk in Mexico City. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:1424–30.. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lopez-Carrillo L, Hernandez Avila M, Dubrow R. Chili pepper consumption and gastric cancer in Mexico: a case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;139:263–71.. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ward MH, Sinha R, Heineman EF, Rothman N, Markin R, Weisenburger DD, et al. Risk of adenocarcinoma of the stomach and esophagus with meat cooking method and doneness preference. Int J Cancer. 1997;71:14–9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970328)71:1&#x0003c;14::AID-IJC4&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mao Y, Hu J, Semenciw R, White K, Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Research G. Active and passive smoking and the risk of stomach cancer, by subsite, in Canada. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2002;11:27–38. doi: 10.1097/00008469-200202000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Burke DL, Ensor J, Riley RD. Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ. Stat Med. 2017;36:855–75.. doi: 10.1002/sim.7141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–88. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bianchini F, Vainio H. Allium vegetables and organosulfur compounds: do they help prevent cancer? Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109:893–902. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wroblewski LE, Peek RM, Jr., Wilson KT. Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer: factors that modulate disease risk. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23:713–39. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00011-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sivam GP, Lampe JW, Ulness B, Swanzy SR, Potter JD. Helicobacter pylori-in vitro susceptibility to garlic (Allium sativum) extract. Nutr Cancer. 1997;27:118–21. doi: 10.1080/01635589709514512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Iimuro M, Shibata H, Kawamori T, Matsumoto T, Arakawa T, Sugimura T, et al. Suppressive effects of garlic extract on Helicobacter pylori-induced gastritis in Mongolian gerbils. Cancer Lett. 2002;187:61–8. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3835(02)00401-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Li Z, Ying X, Shan F, Ji J. The association of garlic with Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Helicobacter. 2018;23:e12532. doi: 10.1111/hel.12532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gail MH, Pfeiffer RM, Brown LM, Zhang L, Ma JL, Pan KF, et al. Garlic, vitamin, and antibiotic treatment for Helicobacter pylori: a randomized factorial controlled trial. Helicobacter. 2007;12:575–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2007.00528.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kockar C, Ozturk M, Bavbek N. Helicobacter pylori eradication with beta carotene, ascorbic acid and allicin. Acta Med (Hradec Kralove) 2001;44:97–100. doi: 10.14712/18059694.2019.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Farhat Z, Hershberger PA, Freudenheim JL, Mammen MJ, Hageman Blair R, Aga DS, et al. Types of garlic and their anticancer and antioxidant activity: a review of the epidemiologic and experimental evidence. Eur J Nutr. 2021;60:3585–609. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 52.Ioku K, Aoyama Y, Tokuno A, Terao J, Nakatani N, Takei Y. Various cooking methods and the flavonoid content in onion. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 2001;47:78–83. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.47.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Song K, Milner JA. The influence of heating on the anticancer properties of garlic. J Nutr. 2001;131:1054S–7S. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.3.1054S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kim HJ, Chang WK, Kim MK, Lee SS, Choi BY. Dietary factors and gastric cancer in Korea: a case-control study. Int J Cancer. 2002;97:531–5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yuan P, Lin L, Zheng K, Wang W, Wu S, Huang L, et al. Risk factors for gastric cancer and related serological levels in Fujian, China: hospital-based case-control study. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e042341. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tuyns AJ, Kaaks R, Haelterman M, Riboli E. Diet and gastric cancer. A case-control study in Belgium. Int J Cancer. 1992;51:1–6. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910510102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Boeing H, Jedrychowski W, Wahrendorf J, Popiela T, Tobiasz-Adamczyk B, Kulig A. Dietary risk factors in intestinal and diffuse types of stomach cancer: a multicenter case-control study in Poland. Cancer Causes Control. 1991;2:227–33. doi: 10.1007/BF00052138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gonzalez CA, Lujan-Barroso L, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Jenab M, Duell EJ, Agudo A, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of gastric adenocarcinoma: a reanalysis of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-EURGAST) study after a longer follow-up. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:2910–9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Epplein M, Shu XO, Xiang YB, Chow WH, Yang G, Li HL, et al. Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of distal gastric cancer in the Shanghai Women’s and Men’s Health studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172:397–406. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Larsson SC, Bergkvist L, Wolk A. Fruit and vegetable consumption and incidence of gastric cancer: a prospective study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2006;15:1998–2001. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Steevens J, Schouten LJ, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA. Vegetables and fruits consumption and risk of esophageal and gastric cancer subtypes in the Netherlands Cohort Study. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:2681–93. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ma JL, Zhang L, Brown LM, Li JY, Shen L, Pan KF, et al. Fifteen-year effects of Helicobacter pylori, garlic, and vitamin treatments on gastric cancer incidence and mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:488–92. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ferro A, Costa AR, Morais S, Bertuccio P, Rota M, Pelucchi C, et al. Fruits and vegetables intake and gastric cancer risk: a pooled analysis within the Stomach cancer Pooling Project. Int J Cancer. 2020;147:3090–101.. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Smith SJ, Steinberg KK, Thacker SB. Methods for pooled analyses of epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology. 1994;5:381–3. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199405000-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ferro A, Morais S, Rota M, Pelucchi C, Bertuccio P, Bonzi R, et al. Alcohol intake and gastric cancer: meta-analyses of published data versus individual participant data pooled analyses (StoP Project) Cancer Epidemiol. 2018;54:125–32.. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ioannidis JP, Schully SD, Lam TK, Khoury MJ. Knowledge integration in cancer: current landscape and future prospects. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2013;22:3–10. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials (122.5KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of our study are available from the StoP Project but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study and so are not publicly available. Data are, however, available from the authors upon reasonable request and permission of the Steering Committee of the StoP Project.


Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES