Skip to main content
Open Biology logoLink to Open Biology
. 2022 Jun 8;12(6):210379. doi: 10.1098/rsob.210379

Reversible bacteriophage resistance by shedding the bacterial cell wall

Véronique Ongenae 1,2, Adam Sidi Mabrouk 1,2, Marjolein Crooijmans 1,2, Daniel Rozen 1, Ariane Briegel 1,2,, Dennis Claessen 1,2,
PMCID: PMC9174709  PMID: 35673854

graphic file with name rsob210379.thumb.jpg

Keywords: cell wall, bacteriophage, L-forms, cell wall deficiency, antibiotics

Abstract

Phages are highly abundant in the environment and pose a major threat for bacteria. Therefore, bacteria have evolved sophisticated defence systems to withstand phage attacks. Here, we describe a previously unknown mechanism by which mono- and diderm bacteria survive infection with diverse lytic phages. Phage exposure leads to a rapid and near-complete conversion of walled cells to a cell-wall-deficient state, which remains viable in osmoprotective conditions and can revert to the walled state. While shedding the cell wall dramatically reduces the number of progeny phages produced by the host, it does not always preclude phage infection. Altogether, these results show that the formation of cell-wall-deficient cells prevents complete eradication of the bacterial population and suggest that cell wall deficiency may potentially limit the efficacy of phage therapy, especially in highly osmotic environments or when used together with antibiotics that target the cell wall.

1. Introduction

Bacteria are routinely exposed to a wide range of stresses in their environment, such as changes in temperature, pH, salt concentration or nutrient limitation. To withstand such fluctuating conditions, almost all bacteria are enveloped by a stress-bearing cell wall. Another serious threat are bacteriophages, which outnumber bacteria in the environment by a factor of 10 [1]. Phages recognize their host by interacting with specific receptors, especially sugars and proteins, present in the cell wall or exposed on the cell surface. Following binding and infection, lytic phages will kill their host, while lysogenic phages persist as prophages inside the bacterium [2,3]. In order to counteract phage attack, bacteria have evolved multiple highly specific escape mechanisms, such as restriction-modification, abortive infection, or CRISPR/Cas systems, among many others [413]. Another common and effective strategy to overcome phage attack is by modifying or masking surface-associated phage receptors [1416]. However, these strategies are permanent and often effective only against specific phages.

Here, we present a robust response that occurs when diverse lytic phages infect bacterial hosts in osmoprotective environments. We show that upon phage exposure, the bacteria transiently shed their cell wall, leading to the formation of viable cell-wall-deficient (CWD) cells that increase survival of the bacterial population.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Strains, bacteriophage isolation and sequencing

Bacterial strains and phages used in this work are listed in electronic supplementary material, table S1. Actinobacteriophages were isolated from soil samples collected in the Netherlands at longitude 52°23′31″ N and latitude 4°34′49″ E. The soil samples were collected at a depth of three cm and stored at 4°C before processing. Actinobacteriophage isolation was performed as described before using Streptomyces lividans (phage LA7 and LD10), Streptomyces coelicolor (phage CE2 and CE10) and Streptomyces griseus (phage GA3) as bacterial hosts in Difco Nutrient Broth (DNB) [17]. High viral titre stocks were obtained by picking streak purified plaques until confluent lysis was observed. Plates were flooded with DNB broth and lysates were filtered through a 0.22 µm filter. Concentration and activity of these lytic phages was confirmed using a spot assay. Phages were serial diluted and 3 µl was spotted on a DNB double agar overlay plate containing the host strain. After 24 h, PFU's were quantified. Genomic material of bacteriophage LA7 was isolated using the Phage DNA Isolation Kit from Norgen (Thorold, Canada) according to the manufacturers protocol. Whole-genome sequencing of phage LA7 followed by de novo assembly was performed by BaseClear (Leiden, The Netherlands) and the sequencing data are available on NCBI (GenBank accession no. OK412919). Phage LA7 was later named Pablito, an unclassified phage in the genus Arequatrovirus [18].

2.2. Characterization of bacteria-phage interactions

L-phase broth (LPB) was used to identify if Streptomyces, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis were able to form CWD cells after phage infection. LPB is an osmoprotective medium, which consists of a mixture of TSBS and YEME (1 : 1v/v) supplemented with 25 mM MgCl2 [19]. For Streptomyces strains, 106 spores ml−1 were inoculated in 10 ml LPB medium with 1000 phages ml−1. OD600 was measured after 24 h of incubation at 30°C, 200 RPM. To test if E. coli and B. subtilis could form CWD cells, an overnight culture was diluted to OD = 0.01 in LPB and incubated at 30°C until OD = 0.5 was reached. Subsequently, phages T4 or φ29 were added at a MOI of 2.0. The culture was incubated for 24 h at 30°C, 200 RPM before imaging.

To produce protoplasts, MBT86 was grown in a mixture of TSBS and YEME (1 : 1 v/v) supplemented with 5 mM MgCl2 and 0.5% glycine for 48 h at 30°C, 100 RPM. Protoplasts were prepared by incubating the mycelial pellet in 10 mg ml−1 lysozyme solution for one hour [20]. The culture was filtered through an EcoCloth filter, centrifuged at 1000 g for seven minutes and resuspended in one ml P+ buffer [20]. Protoplasts of B. subtilis were produced using an overnight culture that was diluted to OD = 0.01 in LPB medium supplemented with 25 mM MgCl2, 1.2 mg ml−1 penicillin G sodium from Duchefa Biochemie (Haarlem, The Netherlands) and 8 mg ml−1 lysozyme, and grown for 24 h at 30°C. For E. coli spheroplasts, an overnight culture was diluted to OD = 0.01 in LPB medium supplemented with 25 mM MgCl2 and 0.4 mg ml−1 penicillin G sodium, and was grown for 24 h at 30°C. Subsequently, MBT86 protoplasts were inoculated with 1000 phages ml−1, while E. coli spheroplasts and B. subtilis protoplasts were inoculated with phages T4 or φ29 at a MOI of 1.0 and incubated for 24 h at 30°C, 200 RPM before imaging.

To determine if proteins extruded after phage infection can initiate the formation of CWD cells, an overnight B. subtilis culture was inoculated in LPB medium until OD = 0.5 and subsequently infected with φ29 at a MOI of 10. The medium was filtered after 24 h using an Amicon ultra-15 centrifugal filter unit (30 kDa, Millipore) and the supernatant was added to a fresh overnight grown B. subtilis culture at OD = 0.5. After 24 h, CWD cell formation was assessed.

2.3. Viability after phage infection

To verify the viability of the CWD cells from MBT86 observed after phage infection, 100 µl of the phage-infected culture in DNB or LPB medium was plated in triplicate on MYM medium [21]. The plates were grown for 3 days at 30°C before analysing morphology. CFU's of E. coli and B. subtilis were determined using serial dilution of the phage infected culture on LB plates. After one day of growth at 30°C, CFUs were calculated. To calculate the concentration of phages after infection, 1 ml of a phage-infected culture (triplicates) was filtered through 0.22 µm, serial diluted and PFU's were quantified with a spot assay.

2.4. Microscopy

The Zeiss Axio Lab A1 upright Microscope, equipped with an Axiocam 105 colour (resolution of 5 megapixel) or Axiocam MRc (resolution of 64.5 nm pixel−1) camera was used to take bright field images. The Zeiss Axio observer Z1 microscope was used to visualize stained bacteria on a thin layer of LPB soft agar covering the glass slide. All stains (Molecular Probes) were added directly to 25 µl of liquid culture. The membrane dye FM5–95 was used at a final concentration of 0.02 mg ml−1 and the nucleic acid dye SYTO-9 at 0.5 µM. Peptidoglycan was visualized using 0.02 mg ml−1 Wheat Germ Agglutinin (WGA) Oregon. SYTO-9 and WGA Oregon were excited using a 488 nm laser and monitored in the region between 505–600 nm, while FM5–95 was excited at 561 nm and detected using a 595 nm long pass filter. Images were adjusted using OMERO software [22].

Fluorescent labelling of φ29 phages was accomplished by adding 475 µl phage with 25 µl Alexa Fluor 488 NHS-Ester (Thermo Fisher) at a final concentration of 0.05 mg ml−1 (10 mM). The labelled phages were gently shaken at room temperature for 3 h and washed with an Amicon ultra-0.5 centrifugal filter unit (100 kD, Millipore) in phage storage buffer (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgSO4, 10 mM Tris-HCl and 1 mM EDTA) and stored at 4°C until use.

The OrganoPlate 2-lane 96 wells plate was used to visualize phage-host interaction over time. An overnight grown culture of MBT86, E. coli and B. subtilis was inoculated in 0.5% DNB or LB soft agar, while greater than 106 phages ml−1 were inoculated on the other side of the PhaseGuide to allow free interaction between the channels. Time lapses were recorded using the Lionheart FX Automated Microscope with temperature set at 30°C for at least 48 h. Images were analysed using Gen5 software. These movies were used to quantify CWD cell formation. To exclude rod-shaped bacteria, only particles with a circularity of 0.8–1.00 were included and every image was checked to prevent that rod-shaped bacteria were included in the analysis.

2.5. Cryo-electron microscopy

E. coli spheroplasts and B. subtilis protoplasts were produced as described before. After 24 h, the cultures were centrifuged at 300 RPM for 30 min and the pellet was resuspended with 10 nm gold fiducial markers (Cell Microscopy Core, UMC Utrecht) at a 1 : 10 ratio. After 10 min of incubation, approximately 108 to 1010 phages were added to visualize initial interaction. Of this sample, 3 µl was added to a glow-discharged R2/2 200 mesh holey carbon EM grid (Quantifoil) for 30 s and the sample was blotted for 1 s, after which the grid was plunged in liquid ethane using the Leica GP automated freeze-plunger. The vitrified samples were observed at the Netherlands Center for Nanoscopy (NeCEN, Leiden). Tilt series of E. coli were collected with the 300 kV Titan Krios 2 TEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using a X-FEG electron gun and Gatan K2 Summit DED (Gatan Pleasanton). The tilt series ranged from −60 to +60 with a two-degree increment, had a defocus of 8, a pixel size of 4.4 Å and a cumulative dose of 100 electrons per Å2. Tilt series of B. subtilis were collected with the 300 kV Titan Krios 1 TEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using a S-FEG electron gun and K3 bioquantum (Gatan Pleasanton). The tilt series settings are the same as for E. coli. Tomography software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to record the data and IMOD software [23] to reconstruct tomograms.

3. Results

3.1. Filamentous actinobacteria can switch to a CWD state after phage infection

Many filamentous actinobacteria have a natural ability to form CWD cells in response to environmental stressors, after which they can revert to filamentous growth upon the removal of stress [19,24,25]. As part of our work to understand the functions of the transition to CWD cells, we focused on Streptomyces strain MBT86, a natural isolate from the Qinling mountains, China [26], which has previously been shown to readily produce CWD cells [19]. When bacteria were grown in osmoprotective conditions (LPB medium) in the presence of phage LA7 for at least 24 h, we observed that all remaining cells are CWD after lysis of the dominant mycelial population (figure 1a,b; electronic supplementary material, figure S1, movie S1). These cells lacked most of their peptidoglycan-based cell wall and were only enveloped by their cell membrane (figure 1c,d). Quantification revealed that the number of CWD cells after 24 h was more than 34 times higher in the presence of phage LA7 (204 ± 125 CWD cells, n = 3) compared to samples without the phage (6 ± 5 CWD cells n = 3). When phage LA7 was added to MBT86 in DNB medium (without osmoprotectants), no CWD cells were found (figure 1e; electronic supplementary material, figure S1A). Consistent with this observation, the optical density (OD600) of MBT86 culture decreased to undetectable levels within 24 h after addition of the phage, while cultures of MBT86 grown in osmoprotective LPB medium with phage reached significantly higher densities (OD600 = 0.285 ± 0.05 after 24 h). CWD cells were also observed when pre-grown mycelium was exposed to LA7 (electronic supplementary material, figure S1C). Viability of CWD cells after phage infection was assessed by determining the number of colony forming units (CFU) after plating mixtures of liquid cultures that still contained the phages. On average 4.1 × 103 CFU ml−1 were observed. This translated to approximately 4% of the expected CFU's based on the initial number of spores. As seen in figure 1f,g, more bacteria could survive phage infection in osmoprotective LPB medium compared to DNB medium. Furthermore, these colonies consisted of filamentous cells, indicating that the CWD cells had reverted to the canonical mycelial mode-of-growth. Importantly, this demonstrates that a considerable fraction of the population survives phage attack. Moreover, fewer new phages were produced in osmoprotective LPB medium compared to DNB medium with the same starting concentration of approximately 1000 phages ml−1 (figure 1h). Taken together, these results show that osmoprotective conditions provide MBT86 with a survival mechanism against phage attack, coinciding with a drop in the number of new progeny phages that are produced.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Formation of CWD cells after phage infection in the actinomycete MBT86. (a) Morphology of MBT86 after 48 h in LPB medium. Scale bar represent 100 µm. (b) Morphology of MBT86 in LPB medium 24 h after phage LA7 infection. (c) Morphology of MBT86 with and without phage LA7 24 h after infection. Cells were stained with the DNA dye SYTO-9 (green) and FM5-95 (red) to dye membranes. Intensity of fluorescence was adjusted for visualization purposes. Scale bars represent 20 µm. (d) After 24 h of phage LA7 infection, the resulting CWD cells of MBT86 were stained with the peptidoglycan stain WGA Oregon. Some cells already start to rebuild their peptidoglycan layer. Scale bar represent 10 µm. (e) OD600 measurement 24 h after phage LA7 infection in DNB medium and LPB medium. The experiment was performed in triplicates with standard deviation presented as error bars. In LPB medium after phage infection, the OD600 was still 0.285 ± 0.05. (f) Regrowth of MBT86 after phage infection in DNB medium. Note that small mycelial fragments grew back into colonies. (g) Regrowth of MBT86 CWD cells after phage infection in LPB medium. Note that these colonies have developmental defects, as seen by a mixture of white and grey colonies. (h) Plaque assay showing PFUs of LA7 on DNB and osmoprotective LPB medium. Images were taken 24 h after LA7 infection.

To determine if the response of MBT86 was specific to LA7, we exposed this strain to three other lytic phages to which MBT86 was susceptible (CE2, CE10 and LD10). In all cases, we observed a qualitatively similar response and a marked increase in CWD cells (figure 2a,b). However, exposure to phage LA7 yielded more CWD cells compared to exposure to the other phages CE2, CE10 and LD10. This difference might be explained by a variance of virulence between the phages. A lower population size of LA7 phages was observed after 24 h (figure 2c), which implies that the bacteria probably had more time to grow into longer mycelial filaments that subsequently resulted in more CWD cells. Next, we tested whether other Streptomyces strains than MBT86 would also behave similarly to phage exposure. Notably, the number of CWD cells increased after phage infection in all other tested species (figure 2d; electronic supplementary material, figure S1D).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Formation of CWD cells after phage infection is independent of bacteriophage and common in actinomycetes. (a) Morphology of MBT86 24 h after infection with phages GA3 (non-susceptible), CE2, CE10, LD10 and LA7 in LPB medium. Phages LD10 and LA7 provoke more CWD cell formation compared to phages CE2 and CE10. Scale bar represents 10 µm. (b) Spot assay of the five phages used in panel A. Plaques indicate susceptibility to the host strain MBT86. (c) Phage burst measured 24 h after MBT86 infection in DNB medium. (d) Morphology of CWD cells after phage infection of Streptomyces albus, Streptomyces coelicolor and several actinomycetes from our culture collection (referred to with the prefix MBT). Cells were stained with the DNA dye SYTO-9 (green) and FM5-95 (red) to dye membranes. Note that here, the merged image is shown. Scale bars represent 10 µm.

3.2. Exposure to phages leads to CWD Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis cells

Since the formation of CWD cells after phage infection was observed in different Streptomyces strains, we wanted to test if this behaviour is also found in other genera. Therefore, we extended our studies to the phylogenetically distant species Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli, which split from Streptomyces roughly three billion years ago [27]. Both species were inoculated in osmoprotective LPB medium and exposed to the lytic phages φ29 and T4, respectively. 24 h after the addition of the phage, both cultures contained CWD cells, which did not appear to proliferate (figure 3). To quantify CWD cell formation after phage infection in soft agar (another osmoprotective environment), samples with and without the addition of phages were analysed. We observed that all B. subtilis cells embedded in soft agar adopted a CWD lifestyle approximately 12 h after φ29 phage infection (figure 4a; electronic supplementary material, movie S2). Without addition of the phage, no CWD cells were observed. A comparable response was observed with E. coli, where almost 93% of the surviving cells had adopted a wall-deficient state after 24 h (figure 5a; electronic supplementary material, movie S3). To explore whether the formation of CWD cells was due to endolysins extruded by lysed bacteria, a phage infected B. subtilis culture in LPB was filtered and only the supernatant was added to a fresh bacterial culture in LPB. However, this did not give rise to CWD cells, suggesting there are insufficient free lytic agents secreted in the medium to induce this response.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Formation of CWD cells after phage infection of E. coli and B. subtilis in LPB medium. (a) E. coli and B. subtilis were inoculated in LPB medium for 24 h with phages T4 and φ29, respectively. CWD cells were stained with WGA Oregon to visualize peptidoglycan. Note that E. coli CWD cells still have some peptidoglycan, while B. subtilis cells have none. (b) Morphology of E. coli with and without phage T4 after 24 h in LPB medium. Cells were stained with the DNA dye SYTO-9 (green) and FM5-95 (red) to dye membranes. (c) Morphology of B. subtilis with and without phage φ29 after 24 h in LPB medium. Cells were stained with the DNA dye SYTO-9 (green) and FM5-95 (red) to dye membranes. Scale bars represent 10 µm. Note that CWD cells from B. subtilis are smaller than CWD cells from E. coli and MBT86.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Growth, cryo-ET and infection rate of B. subtilis after φ29 phage infection. (a) Time lapse of B. subtilis after φ29 phage infection followed for 48 h. Individual micrographs were taken from electronic supplementary material, movie S1. Scale bars represent 50 µm. (b) Four φ29 phages with full capsid heads attaching to the membrane of a CWD B. subtilis cell. Scale bar represents 30 nm. (c) A tomography snapshot of B. subtilis protoplasts with φ29, see electronic supplementary material, movie S3 for the full tomography. On the bottom is an empty phage attaching to a protoplast, while on top there is a protoplast filled with filaments associated with phage φ29 DNA assembly. Scale bar represents 100 nm. (d) CFUs of B. subtilis 24 h after phage infection with φ29 in LB medium and LPB medium. Significantly more cells survive in LPB medium (p < 0.0001). (e) Phage φ29 production measured in plaque forming units (PFU)/ml in LB and LPB media with protoplasts as a negative control. The φ29 production in LB media compared to LPB media is significantly different (p < 0.027) at t = 24. Statistical analysis was performed with a Student's t-test.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Growth and infection rate of E. coli after T4 phage infection. (a) Time lapse of green fluorescence E. coli after T4 phage infection followed for 48 h. Individual micrographs were taken from electronic supplementary material, movie S1, in which more details are visible. Scale bars represent 100 µm and 10 µm for the inlays. (b) CFUs of E. coli over time after phage infection with T4 in LB medium and LPB medium. More cells survive after 24 h in LPB medium (p = 0.09). (c) T4 phage production measured in PFU ml−1 in LB and LPB media with spheroplasts as a negative control. The T4 production in LB media compared to LPB media is significantly different (p < 0.05) for each timepoint after t = 0. All statistical analysis was performed with a Student's t-test. (d) Typical view of E. coli tomography data showing empty vesicles and outer membrane fragments. No attached phages were observed in any of the datasets. (e) Spheroplasts with both an inner and outer membrane, without phages in proximity. Scale bars represent 200 nm.

3.3. Artificially produced CWD cells survive phage infection

To test whether artificially produced CWD cells were susceptible to phage infection, the cell wall was stripped away using lysozyme and/or antibiotics. These cells are referred to as protoplasts for monoderm bacteria and spheroplasts for diderm bacteria, and they do not proliferate without their cell wall. Protoplasts of MBT86 and B. subtilis as well as spheroplasts of E. coli were seemingly unaffected by phage infection and did not disappear from the culture after exposure to phages LA7, φ29 and T4, respectively (electronic supplementary material, figure S2). These results provide direct evidence that wall-deficiency provides protection against lytic phages. Interestingly, phages were found near artificially produced spheroplasts of E. coli (electronic supplementary material, figure S3A). This raised the question whether the phages could attach and maybe even eject their genomic material into wall-deficient cells.

3.4. Phages cannot attach to CWD cells of E. coli but can attach and propagate in B. subtilis CWD cells

To address this question, we used cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET). The resulting three-dimensional data of E. coli spheroplasts with phage T4 revealed a highly heterogeneous sample with an inconsistent appearance of CWD cells and outer membrane vesicles (electronic supplementary material, figure S3B-C, movie S4). However, no phage attachment was observed for any of the CWD cells or cell fragments that were imaged. Interestingly, cryo-ET data of B. subtilis showed that bacteriophage φ29 was not only able to attach to protoplasts of B. subtilis (figure 4b) but could also eject DNA into the cells and propagate. We observed attached phages with filled as well as empty capsid heads (indicating DNA ejection). Furthermore, we detected filaments inside some protoplasts that were surrounded by phages (figure 4c; electronic supplementary material, figure S4, movie S5). These filaments strongly resemble p1 proteins that are associated with φ29 DNA replication [28].

In both B. subtilis and E. coli, significantly more bacteria survived a phage infection in the osmoprotective LPB medium compared to LB medium (figures 4d and 5b). In addition, B. subtilis grown in LPB medium and pre-made protoplasts produced similar amounts of φ29 progeny, in contrast to LB medium, where a significantly higher phage titre was observed over time (figure 4e). When the same experiment was performed with E. coli, we again noticed increased levels of phage T4 in LB medium and significantly fewer T4 progeny in LPB medium over time, as opposed to spheroplasts, that did not produce any progeny at all (figure 5c). These results are in line with our cryo-ET data showing that phage φ29 was able to attach and propagate in protoplasts of B. subtilis, while phage T4 was not observed in association with any E. coli spheroplasts remnants (figure 5d,e).

Altogether, our results imply that transiently lacking or shedding a cell wall is a common and general escape mechanism against phage attack.

4. Discussion

The arms race between bacteria and bacteriophages has resulted in the evolution of many antiphage-defence mechanisms, which we recently started to uncover [29,30]. In this study, we have discovered a yet unknown general escape mechanism against phage attack for both the diderm model organism E. coli, the monoderm B. subtilis, and various filamentous actinomycetes. By contrast to L-forms, the CWD cells produced after phage infection are not able to proliferate and will switch back to the walled mode-of-growth in favourable conditions [19,31]. Besides the species tested here, many more bacteria may be capable of surviving phage infection in osmoprotective medium. In standard hypotonic cultivation media without high levels of osmolytes, phages produce endolysins that degrade the bacterial cell wall and cause lysis. For B. subtilis it has been shown that prophage-encoded endolysins in LB medium resulted in the release of membrane vesicles that immediately burst [32]. However, our results show that the addition of spent media from cultures exposed to phages did not result in the formation of CWD cells in LPB medium. We hypothesize that the concentration of endolysins in the supernatant is either not high enough to initiate the conversion to CWD cells, or these wall-deficient cells are simply a result of the initial attachment or DNA ejection of phages in supportive medium. However, the exact mechanism behind the phenomena of bacteria shedding their cell wall in response to bacteriophages in osmoprotective medium remains to be uncovered. In nature, bacteria may encounter such osmoprotective environments, such as inside eukaryotic host cells, plant sap with high levels of osmolytes or in soil after rain [3337].

Cryo-ET allowed us to observe the distinct interaction between bacteriophages and CWD cells. To our knowledge, this is the first time the interaction of CWD cells and bacteriophages was captured in detail. We showed that φ29 was able to attach, eject DNA and even produce new progeny phages in B. subtilis protoplasts, as indicated by the observed filaments inside protoplasts [28]. Phage φ29 normally binds to glycosylated teichoic acid in the cell wall [38], but can sporadically also attach to fragments of lipoteichoic acids in the membrane of protoplasts [39,40]. For CWD E. coli cells, it was hypothesized that T4 could recognize OmpC and lipopolysaccharide on the remaining outer membrane [41]. However, three-dimensional cryo-ET imaging revealed that T4 phages were not attached to remnants of E. coli spheroplasts. On the other hand, a recent paper from Petrovic Fabijan et al. showed that T4 was able to eject DNA in L-forms of E. coli, but no cells were lysed [42]. Perhaps the difference in attachment of phages could be explained by the fact that L-forms are able to proliferate, whereas spheroplasts cannot. However, no new progeny phages were produced in either L-forms or spheroplasts of E. coli and we observed an increased survivability in both forms of CWD cells. Not only E. coli, but also MBT86 and B. subtilis have a significantly higher survival after phage attack in osmoprotective medium by adopting a CWD state, compared to walled cells in normal medium.

Phage therapy is considered a promising alternative to treat antibiotic-resistant infections [35]. However, in this study, we have shown that both diderm and monoderm bacteria can escape phage attack by adopting a cell-wall-deficient lifestyle. These CWD cells can arise in osmoprotective environments in nature, or in the presence of cell wall targeting antibiotics. Whereas commonly known phage defence mechanisms like restriction modification or CRISPR/Cas can protect bacteria against specific phages, CWD cells might be resistant to a broad range of phages, which warrants a careful analysis of the interaction between phages and their host.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr J. J. Willemse for the help with analysing images on ImageJ (FIJI) and Dr W. Noteborn for assisting and obtaining cryo-ET data. We are also thankful to Eline Duits for isolating Streptomyces phages and Dr Franklin Nobrega for sending us phage φ29.

Contributor Information

Ariane Briegel, Email: a.briegel@biology.leidenuniv.nl.

Dennis Claessen, Email: d.claessen@biology.leidenuniv.nl.

Data accessibility

All data are available in the main text and electronic supplementary material [43]. Phage genome sequencing data are available on NCBI (GenBank accession no. OK412919).

Authors' contributions

V.O.: conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; A.S.M.: formal analysis, investigation, methodology, writing—review and editing; M.C.: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, writing—review and editing; D.R.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, writing—review and editing; A.B.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, methodology, resources, supervision, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; D.C.: conceptualization, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, project administration, resources, supervision, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing.

All authors gave final approval for publication and agreed to be held accountable for the work performed therein.

Conflict of interest declaration

Authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This work was funded by a Vici grant from the Dutch Research Council (NWO) to D.C. (grant no. VI.C.192.002) and an NWO XS grant to A.B. (grant no. OCENW.XS.041). Microscope access was supported by the Netherlands Center for Electron Nanoscopy and partially funded by the Netherlands Electron Microscopy Infrastructure grant 84.034.014.

References

  • 1.Salmond GP, Fineran PC. 2015. A century of the phage: past, present and future. Nature Reviews Microbiology 13, 777-786. ( 10.1038/nrmicro3564) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Das A, Mandal S, Hemmadi V, Ratre V, Biswas M. 2020. Studies on the gene regulation involved in the lytic–lysogenic switch in Staphylococcus aureus temperate bacteriophage Phi11. J. Biochem. 168, 659-668. ( 10.1093/jb/mvaa080) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Edgar R, Rokney A, Feeney M, Semsey S, Kessel M, Goldberg MB, Adhya S, Oppenheim AB. 2008. Bacteriophage infection is targeted to cellular poles. Mol. Microbiol. 68, 1107-1116. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06205.x) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dy RL, Przybilski R, Semeijn K, Salmond GPC, Fineran PC. 2014. A widespread bacteriophage abortive infection system functions through a type IV toxin-antitoxin mechanism. Nucleic Acids Research. 42, 4590-4605. ( 10.1093/nar/gkt1419) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Harms A, Brodersen DE, Mitarai N, Gerdes K. 2018. Toxins, targets, and triggers: an overview of toxin-antitoxin biology. Molecular Cell 70, 768-784. ( 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hille F, Richter H, Wong SP, Bratovič M, Ressel S, Charpentier E. 2018. The biology of CRISPR-Cas: backward and forward. Cell 172, 1239-1259. ( 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.032) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Johnson CM, Harden MM, Grossman AD. 2020. An integrative and conjugative element encodes an abortive infection system to protect host cells from predation by a bacteriophage.
  • 8.Lopatina A, Tal N, Sorek R. 2020. Abortive infection: bacterial suicide as an antiviral immune strategy. Annu. Rev. Virol. 7, 371-384. ( 10.1146/annurev-virology-011620-040628) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Makarova KS, et al. 2020. Evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas systems: a burst of class 2 and derived variants. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 67-83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Malone LM, Birkholz N, Fineran PC. 2021. Conquering CRISPR: how phages overcome bacterial adaptive immunity. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 68, 30-36. ( 10.1016/j.copbio.2020.09.008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Qiu Y, Wang S, Chen Z, Guo Y, Song Y. 2016. An active type I-E CRISPR-cas system identified in Streptomyces avermitilis. PLoS ONE 11, e0149533. ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0149533) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tock MR, Dryden DT. 2005. The biology of restriction and anti-restriction. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 8, 466-472. ( 10.1016/j.mib.2005.06.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wu X, Zhu J, Tao P, Rao VB. 2021. Bacteriophage T4 escapes CRISPR attack by minihomology recombination and repair. mBio 12, e01361-21. ( 10.1128/mbio.01361-21) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Harvey H, Bondy-Denomy J, Marquis H, Sztanko KM, Davidson AR, Burrows LL. 2018. Pseudomonas aeruginosa defends against phages through type IV pilus glycosylation. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 47-52. ( 10.1038/s41564-017-0061-y) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rostøl JT, Marraffini L. 2019. (Ph)ighting phages: how bacteria resist their parasites. Cell Host Microbe 25, 184-194. ( 10.1016/j.chom.2019.01.009) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Scholl D, Adhya S, Merril C. 2005. Escherichia coli K1's capsule is a barrier to bacteriophage T7. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 4872-4874. ( 10.1128/AEM.71.8.4872-4874.2005) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dowding JE. 1973. Characterization of a bacteriophage virulent for Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). J. Gen. Microbiol. 76, 163-176. ( 10.1099/00221287-76-1-163) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lefkowitz EJ, Dempsey DM, Hendrickson RC, Orton RJ, Siddell SG, Smith DB. 2018. Virus taxonomy: the database of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV). Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D708-D717. ( 10.1093/nar/gkx932) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ramijan K, et al. 2018. Stress-induced formation of cell wall-deficient cells in filamentous actinomycetes. Nat. Commun. 9, 1-13. ( 10.1038/s41467-018-07560-9) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kieser T, Bibb MJ, Buttner MJ, Chater KF, Hopwood DA. 2000. Practical streptomyces genetics, p. 291. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stuttard C. 1982. Temperate phages of Streptomyces venezuelae: lysogeny and host specificity shown by phages SV1 and SV2. J. Gen. Microbiol. 128, 115-121. ( 10.1099/00221287-128-1-115) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Allan C, et al. 2012. OMERO: flexible, model-driven data management for experimental biology. Nat. Methods 9, 245-253. ( 10.1038/nmeth.1896) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kremer JR, Mastronarde DN, McIntosh JR. 1996. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71-76. ( 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Du Toit A. 2019. Living without the cell wall. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 65. ( 10.1038/s41579-018-0142-9) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ultee E, Ramijan K, Dame RT, Briegel A, Claessen D. 2019. Stress-induced adaptive morphogenesis in bacteria. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 74, 97-141. ( 10.1016/bs.ampbs.2019.02.001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhu H, Swierstra J, Wu C, Girard G, Choi YH, Van Wamel W, Sandiford SK, van Wezel GP. 2014. Eliciting antibiotics active against the ESKAPE pathogens in a collection of actinomycetes isolated from mountain soils. Microbiology (United Kingdom) 160, 1714-1726. ( 10.1099/mic.0.078295-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Battistuzzi FU, Feijao A, Hedges SB. 2004. A genomic timescale of prokaryote evolution: insights into the origin of methanogenesis, phototrophy, and the colonization of land. BMC Evol. Biol. 4, 1-14. ( 10.1186/1471-2148-4-44) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bravo A, Salas M. 1998. Polymerization of bacteriophage ø29 replication protein p1 into protofilament sheets. EMBO J. 17, 6096-6105. ( 10.1093/emboj/17.20.6096) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Isaev AB, Musharova OS, Severinov KV. 2021. Microbial arsenal of antiviral defenses. part II. Biochemistry (Moscow) 86, 449-470. ( 10.1134/S0006297921040064) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Isaev AB, Musharova OS, Severinov KV. Microbial arsenal of antiviral defenses–part i. Biochemistry (Moscow) 86, 319-337. ( 10.1134/s0006297921030081) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Errington J. 2013. L-form bacteria, cell walls and the origins of life. Open Biology 3, 120143. ( 10.1098/rsob.120143) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Toyofuku M, et al. 2017. Prophage-triggered membrane vesicle formation through peptidoglycan damage in Bacillus subtilis. Nat. Commun. 8, 1-10. ( 10.1038/s41467-016-0009-6) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Germano F, Testi D, Campagnolo L, Scimeca M, Arcuri C. 2020. Cell-wall-deficient bacteria in oral biofilm: association with periodontitis. medRxiv. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Grosboillot V. 2021. Revertant Listeria monocytogenes and conditions for their persistence as intracellular L-forms. See https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/490596?show=full.
  • 35.Mickiewicz KM, et al. 2019. Possible role of L-form switching in recurrent urinary tract infection. Nat. Commun. 10, 1-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Paton AM, Innes CMJ. 1991. Methods for the establishment of intracellular associations of L-forms with higher plants. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 71, 59-64. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1991.tb04663.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wood JM. 2015. Bacterial responses to osmotic challenges. J. General Physiol. 145, 381. ( 10.1085/jgp.201411296) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Young FE. 1967. Requirement of glucosylated teichoic acid for adsorption of phage in Bacillus subtilis 168. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 58, 2377-2384. ( 10.1073/pnas.58.6.2377) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Farley MM, Tu J, Kearns DB, Molineux IJ, Liu J. 2017. Ultrastructural analysis of bacteriophage Φ29 during infection of Bacillus subtilis. J. Struct. Biol. 197, 163. ( 10.1016/j.jsb.2016.07.019) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jacobson ED, Landman OE. 1977. Adsorption of bacteriophages phi 29 and 22a to protoplasts of Bacillus subtilis 168. J. Virol. 21, 1223-1227. ( 10.1128/jvi.21.3.1223-1227.1977) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Washizaki A, Yonesaki T, Otsuka Y. 2016. Characterization of the interactions between Escherichia coli receptors, LPS and OmpC, and bacteriophage T4 long tail fibers. MicrobiologyOpen 5, 1003-1015. ( 10.1002/mbo3.384) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Petrovic Fabijan A, Kamruzzaman M, Martinez-Martin D, Venturini C, Mickiewicz K, Flores-Rodriguez N, Errington J, Iredell JR. 2021. L-form switching confers antibiotic, phage and stress tolerance in pathogenic Escherichia coli. bioRxiv. 2021:.06.21.449206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 43.Ongenae V, Mabrouk AS, Crooijmans M, Rozen D, Briegel A, Claessen D. 2022. Reversible bacteriophage resistance by shedding the bacterial cell wall. Figshare. ( 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6006296) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. Ongenae V, Mabrouk AS, Crooijmans M, Rozen D, Briegel A, Claessen D. 2022. Reversible bacteriophage resistance by shedding the bacterial cell wall. Figshare. ( 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6006296) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Data Availability Statement

All data are available in the main text and electronic supplementary material [43]. Phage genome sequencing data are available on NCBI (GenBank accession no. OK412919).


Articles from Open Biology are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES