Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2022 Jun 7;15(6):e248001. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-248001

Inborn error of metabolism precipitated by COVID-19: challenges in the absence of an expanded newborn screening as state health programmes

Priyanka Olety 1, Gundyadka Moideen Safwan 1,, Rathika Damodara Shenoy 1
PMCID: PMC9174768  PMID: 35672054

Abstract

Inborn errors of metabolism constitute a differential diagnosis in infants presenting with encephalopathy in developing countries where expanded newborn screening is not a state health programme. Acute neurological presentation with encephalopathy is documented in paediatric COVID-19. The pandemic has also altered parents' healthcare-seeking behaviour, leading to delays in emergency care. We illustrate the challenges faced in diagnosing and managing an 18-month-old child who presented with acute metabolic crisis due to methylmalonic acidaemia on the background of the COVID-19 pandemic. We discuss the current global status of expanded newborn screening services for inborn error of metabolism and the impact of the pandemic on the healthcare of children.

Keywords: COVID-19, Congenital disorders

Background

Inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) result from deficiency of a critical enzyme or cofactor in the intermediary pathways of carbohydrate, protein and fat metabolism. These complex inherited disorders numbering >1000 have diverse clinical presentations and are rare individually.1 The global prevalence of IEM is 50.9 per 100 000 live births contributing to 0.4% of all childhood deaths.2 The true prevalence in India is not known but is higher than the global estimate due to the high birth rate and consanguinity.3 4

About 140 million infants are born every year worldwide. Newborn screening (NBS) programmes for detecting presymptomatic infants with selected endocrine, hematologic, and metabolic disorders became available several decades ago.5 The introduction of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) in the 1990s helped to ‘expand’ the screening to more than 40 IEMs from dried blood spots collected on filter paper by heel prick. Expanded NBS is a state health programme in developed countries. India is yet to implement any form of NBS as a universal state health programme.4 6 The three Indian states that offer NBS have excluded IEM in their panel.6 Expanded NBS is offered only to the urban affordable in private health sectors, thus benefiting less than 3% of all newborns born in the country.

The COVID-19 pandemic has altered healthcare seeking behaviour, leading to delays in emergency care, especially for conditions like IEM.7 In addition, acute neurological manifestations with encephalopathy are reported in children with COVID-19 complicating the clinical scenario.8 9 We present a child with acute metabolic crisis due to methylmalonic acidaemia (MMA) precipitated by COVID-19. On the background of the pandemic and delayed healthcare-seeking behaviour, we discuss the challenges in diagnosis and management of children in a developing country where expanded NBS for IEM is not a state health programme. We also discuss the current status of NBS services in India and the global scenario.

Case presentation

An 18-month-old male child was brought to the emergency department with a 48-hour history of recurrent vomiting, fast breathing and altered consciousness. He was a previously well child, third in order, born of consanguinity; the two previous conceptions were spontaneous abortions. About 4 weeks before this acute episode, he had an influenza-like illness diagnosed as COVID-19 by throat swab RT-PCR. Soon after, he started to regress in motor milestones. The child who was walking unsupported could only stand with support and had head lag. His parents did not seek medical attention at this time. On examination, the child had signs of encephalopathy with a modified infant Glasgow Coma Scale of 10 over 15. He also had tachycardia, delayed capillary filling, tachypnoea and acidotic breathing. All growth measurements and occipitofrontal circumference were within the normal percentile range. He had bilateral pyramidal signs and firm hepatomegaly.

Investigations (table 1) showed partially compensated metabolic acidosis with moderate hyperammonaemia, wide anion gap and ketosis suggestive of organic acidaemia. Serum lactate and sugar levels, liver and renal function were normal. MRI of the brain showed hyperintensity in globus pallidus in T2/fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images with diffusion restriction (figure 1). Tandem mass spectroscopy revealed high propionyl carnitine with a differential diagnosis of propionic acidaemia or MMA.

Table 1.

Laboratory profile at admission

Parameter Observed value Reference range
Haemoglobin (mg/L) 1.6 1.63–2.17
Leucocyte count (×109 cells/L) 18.5
Neutrophilia (80%) 6.0–14.0
Platelet count (×109/L) 648 150–400
Blood glucose (mmol/L) 6.6 3.3–5.5
Calcium (mmol/L) 2.2 2.2–2.7
Magnesium (mmol/L) 0.71 0.65–1.05
Urea (mmol/L) 15.1 1.8–6.4
Creatinine (µmol/L) 50.3 2.65–44.2
Alanine transaminase (U/L) 34.6 12–45
Aspartate transaminase (U/L) 41.5 22–63
Sodium (mmol/L) 137 134–143
Potassium (mmol/L) 4.05 3.3–4.6
Chloride (mmol/L) 98.1 98–106
Arterial blood gas
pH
PaCO2 (mm Hg)
Bicarbonate (mmol/L)
Lactate (mmol/L)
6.9
9
<3
1.9
7.35–7.45
27–41
21–28
0.8–1.5
Anion gap (mmol/L) 36 7–16
Ammonia (µmol/L) 163.7 11–35
Urine ketone bodies 2 + Nil

Figure 1.

Figure 1

MRI of the brain (A) T2 coronal, and (B) diffusion-weighted sequences showing symmetric hyperintensity and diffusion restriction in bilateral globus pallidi.

We managed the acute metabolic crisis with bicarbonate correction, empirical megavitamin therapy (pending MS/MS report), carnitine, sodium benzoate and broad-spectrum antibiotics. Encephalopathy and metabolic acidosis resolved over 72 hours of admission. During recovery, extrapyramidal features such as rigidity, dystonia and tremors were prominent. The child had lost all his motor milestones. We confirmed the diagnosis of MMA by whole-exome sequencing. A novel homozygous, likely pathogenic, missense variant, c.1996G>A [p.(Val666Met)] was observed in exon 12 of the MMUT gene; both the parents were carriers of the same variant.

We initiated specific therapy with protein restriction, vitamin B12 (1000 mcg/day) and carnitine (100 mg/kg/day in divided doses) daily with metronidazole (30 mg/kg/day in divided doses) for ten days a month. At 6-month follow-up, the child has regained head control and can sit with support. He is yet to regain age-appropriate milestones but has not had a metabolic crisis. He has residual dystonia of the limbs. Hyperintensity of globus pallidus in MRI T2 images is a feature of MMA but not unique to it. Symmetric basal ganglion is specifically reported in metabolic disorders. Basal ganglion involvement is not reported in COVID-19.8 In the index case, screening at birth or early health-seeking might have prevented neurological sequelae.

Global health problem list

  • With 25 million births per year (18% of global annual births) and an approximate 10% consanguinity rate, India is yet to establish any form of NBS as a nationwide public health programme.

  • There is a low priority for establishing universal IEM screening by spectrometry analysis compared with endocrine and haematological conditions.

  • COVID-19 has impacted healthcare-seeking behaviour of the parents; further acute neurological manifestations with encephalopathy are seen with infection add to the challenges in diagnosis and management of children presenting to the emergency department.

Global health problem analysis

The infant mortality rate in India has declined from 47.3 to 28.3 per 1000 live births between 2009 and 2019.10 Notably, the newborn mortality rate among infant deaths has increased from 70.2% (33.2 per 1000 live births) to 76.7% (21.7 per 1000 live births) during the same period. India strengthened newborn care with special care units in all districts, which helped bring down infant mortality.11 With the declining proportion of newborn deaths due to prematurity, sepsis and birth asphyxia, any further reduction in newborn deaths requires the implementation of NBS.

The Indian Council of Medical Research, Government of India, funded a multicentric study that screened 100 000 children between 2008 and 2013 and established congenital hypothyroidism and congenital adrenal hyperplasia as priority disorders for NBS.11 The prevalence of IEM in India was not established in this study.4 11 The Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, launched the National Inherited Diseases Administration (NIDAN) kendras (centres) to manage inherited disorders.12 The NIDAN kendras are to function as regional centres for NBS. The NBS panel does not yet include IEM screening.

Expanded NBS for IEM is believed to make only a minor contribution to the global burden of infant mortality and morbidity, especially in a populous country like India.13 Also, MS/MS does not detect all IEMs. Presently, only three of the 28 Indian states offer NBS as a state-sponsored health programme.4 6 The Goa state screened IEM until 2014; presently, expanded NBS is selectively offered only to the symptomatic.6 It is crucial to diagnose IEM in a presymptomatic state to prevent neurologic morbidity and mortality. However, there are concerns that many of the disorders detected by MS/MS are untreatable or require special diets. Lack of metabolic specialists, cost and low priority are other key issues.14

At present, IEM screening is offered only to those who can afford this. Today, India boasts several laboratories that provide expanded NBS in the private health sector.6 Despite two previous pregnancy losses, the index case with MMA was not screened at birth. Vitamin B12 responsive MMAs have favourable outcomes with early diagnosis15 and in our own experience.16

Table 2 summarises the current global status of expanded NBS for IEM as part of national health services.17–20 There is no uniformity in the screening panel in developed countries, and the primary and secondary targets are variable.17 Several factors, including political will, policy development, fund allocation, infrastructure, logistics and technical advancement, exist in implementing universal screening in low-income and middle-income countries.18

Table 2.

Worldwide status of newborn screening for inborn errors of metabolism by tandem mass spectrometry

Region The approximate number of countries and annual births Screening status
North America17 19 Two and 4.5 million
  • The states of the USA have a consensus on primary target metabolites to be screened; there is a wide variation for screening secondary target metabolites

  • MS/ MS screening is only partially funded by most states and requires health insurance coverage

  • In Canada, only a few provinces like Ontario offer IEM screening, and it is yet to be a federal programme

Latin American and Caribbean islands17–19 20 and 11 million
  • Offered by Costa Rica

  • In most other countries, available partially under public health services/ pilot projects/private sector

Europe17 19 48 and 9.5 million
  • Diversity among European countries for the conditions screened; under national health service or a statutory health insurance

  • Very few countries like Austria, Hungary, Iceland, Portugal, Spain and Sweden screen for both primary and secondary target metabolites

  • In the UK, only primary target metabolites are screened

  • France started IEM screening as recent as 2015 and limited primary targets; not covered by National Health Services

  • Screening is non-existent in Southeast European countries like Bulgaria, Croatia, Serbia

Middle East & North Africa (MENA)17 18 20 21 and 11 million
  • Available in Israel, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and other Arab countries

  • Pilot programme completed in Lebanon, Jordan, and Tunisia

  • Non-existent in Sudan and Somalia

Sub-Saharan Africa (Eastern, Western and Southern)17–19 50 and 38 million
  • None offer as a national health programme; available in the private sector in countries like South Africa

Asia Pacific17–19 24 and 67 million
  • Offered by Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, China, South Korea, Taiwan and Japan

  • A pilot programme in the Philippines

  • In India, available in the private sector to the affordable; not covered by health insurances

IEM, inborn errors of metabolism; MS/MS, mass spectrometry.

The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic saw a decline in paediatric outpatient and emergency room visits and a decline in inpatient admissions. In multicentre studies from paediatric hospitals, Lee et al21 and Markham et al22 report around 35% decline in emergency room visits during the COVID-19 period compared with the corresponding pre-COVID 19 year. Children with new-onset diabetes mellitus,23 appendicitis,24 and cancers25 were brought late with complications and suboptimal outcomes.

Children with rare metabolic disorders require continuity of clinical care, biochemical monitoring, special diets and medications. The COVID-19 pandemic impacted healthcare delivery to IEM, which included disruption of clinical and laboratory services, non-availability of special diets, metabolic crisis due to infection and discontinuation of therapy.7 26–29 Online surveys show increased missed follow-up appointments by 3.2 times during the first wave.7 26 Demographic determinants that influenced parental healthcare-seeking behaviour included travel restrictions, fear of exposure when visiting a healthcare facility, affordability and poor communication on restructured clinical services.30

Learning points.

  • The current global review suggests that newborn screening (NBS) for inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) is a low priority in developing countries and requires focused efforts from all stakeholders.

  • Promoting a prospective approach for healthy newborn by presymptomatic screening is essential rather than adhering to a reactive approach to a clinically abnormal child.

  • IEM screening should be offered to the affordable until the time expanded NBS becomes a national health programme.

  • COVID-19 has disrupted the continuity of healthcare delivery to children, especially those with rare disorders requiring specialised care.

Footnotes

Twitter: @gmsafwan

Contributors: All the authors were responsible for the management and diagnosis of the infant. All the authors contributed equally in literature search and drafting the manuscript. RDS will be the guarantor.

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.

Competing interests: None declared.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Consent obtained from parent(s)/guardian(s).

References

  • 1.Ferreira CR, van Karnebeek CDM, Vockley J, et al. A proposed nosology of inborn errors of metabolism. Genet Med 2019;21:102–6. 10.1038/s41436-018-0022-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Waters D, Adeloye D, Woolham D, et al. Global birth prevalence and mortality from inborn errors of metabolism: a systematic analysis of the evidence. J Glob Health 2018;8:021102. 10.7189/jogh.08.021102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sharma SK, Kalam MA, Ghosh S, et al. Prevalence and determinants of consanguineous marriage and its types in India: evidence from the National family health survey, 2015–2016. J Biosoc Sci 2021;53:566–76. 10.1017/S0021932020000383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kapoor S, Thelma BK. Status of newborn screening and inborn errors of metabolism in India. Indian J Pediatr 2018;85:1110–7. 10.1007/s12098-018-2681-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Castiñeras DE, Couce M-L, Marín JL, et al. Newborn screening for metabolic disorders in Spain and worldwide. Anales de Pediatría 2019;91:128e.1–128e.14. 10.1016/j.anpede.2019.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mookken T. Universal implementation of newborn screening in India. IJNS 2020;6:24. 10.3390/ijns6020024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Elmonem MA, Belanger-Quintana A, Bordugo A, et al. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis and management of inborn errors of metabolism: a global perspective. Mol Genet Metab 2020;131:285–8. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2020.09.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Abdel-Mannan O, Eyre M, Löbel U, et al. Neurologic and radiographic findings associated with COVID-19 infection in children. JAMA Neurol 2020;77:1440–5. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lin JE, Asfour A, Sewell TB, et al. Neurological issues in children with COVID-19. Neurosci Lett 2021;743:135567. 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.The World Bank . IBRD-IDA. Data, India. Available: https://data.worldbank.org/country/india [Accessed : 16 Aug 2021].
  • 11.Neogi SB, Malhotra S, Zodpey S, et al. Assessment of special care newborn units in India. J Health Popul Nutr 2011;29:500–9. 10.3329/jhpn.v29i5.8904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dutta R. ICMR to conduct first nationwide newborn screening for genetic disorders. Express Healthcare Management [Internet], 2005. Available: http://www.expresshealthcaremgmt.com/20050915/coverstory01.shtml [Accessed 16 Aug 2021].
  • 13.UMMID . Unique methods of management and treatment of inherited disorders. Available: https://static.pib.gov.in/WriteReadData/userfiles/Final%20-UMMID%20Booklet.pdf [Accessed 16 Aug 2021].
  • 14.Miller F. The complex promise of newborn screening. Indian J Med Ethics 2009;6:142–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Manoli I, Sloan JL, Venditti CP. Isolated Methylmalonic Acidemia. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, et al., eds. GeneReviews® [Internet. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Seattle, 2005: 1993–2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sindgikar SP, Shenoy KD, Kamath N, et al. Audit of organic acidurias from a single centre: clinical and metabolic profile at presentation with long term outcome. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:SC11–14. 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28793.10632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Therrell BL, Padilla CD, Loeber JG, et al. Current status of newborn screening worldwide: 2015. Semin Perinatol 2015;39:171–87. 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Therrell BL, Padilla CD. Newborn screening in the developing countries. Curr Opin Pediatr 2018;30:734–9. 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000683 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Castiñeras DE, Couce M-L, Marín JL, et al. [Newborn screening for metabolic disorders in Spain and worldwide]. Anales de Pediatría 2019;91:128e.1–14. 10.1016/j.anpede.2019.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Skrinska V, Khneisser I, Schielen P, et al. Introducing and expanding newborn screening in the Mena region. IJNS 2020;6:12. 10.3390/ijns6010012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lee L, Mannix R, Guedj R, et al. Paediatric ED utilisation in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerg Med J 2021;38:100–2. 10.1136/emermed-2020-210124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Markham JL, Richardson T, DePorre A. Teufel RJ 2nd, Hersh AL, Fleegler EW, et al. Inpatient use and outcomes at children’s hospitals during the early COVID-19 pandemic. Pediatrics 2021;147:e2020044735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cherubini V, Gohil A, Addala A, et al. Unintended consequences of coronavirus disease-2019: remember General pediatrics. J Pediatr 2020;223:197–8. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Snapiri O, Rosenberg Danziger C, Krause I, et al. Delayed diagnosis of paediatric appendicitis during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Acta Paediatr 2020;109:1672–6. 10.1111/apa.15376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Offenbacher R, Knoll MA, Loeb DM. Delayed presentations of pediatric solid tumors at a tertiary care hospital in the Bronx due to COVID‐19. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021;68:e28615. 10.1002/pbc.28615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lampe C, Dionisi-Vici C, Bellettato CM, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on rare metabolic patients and healthcare providers: results from two MetabERN surveys. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2020;15:341. 10.1186/s13023-020-01619-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Caciotti A, Procopio E, Pochiero F, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in a patient with propionic acidemia. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2020;15:306. 10.1186/s13023-020-01563-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kaur S, Campbell SL, Stockton DW. Management of COVID ‐19 infection in organic acidemias. Am J Med Genet A 2021;185:1854–7. 10.1002/ajmg.a.62161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zubarioglu T, Ahmadzada S, Yalcinkaya C, et al. COVID-19 triggered encephalopathic crisis in a patient with glutaric aciduria type 1. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2021;34:1611–4. 10.1515/jpem-2021-0474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Aishworiya R, Biswas A, Tan MLN, et al. COVID-19 Pandemic and Children's Health - Mitigating Unintended Consequences. Ann Acad Med Singap 2020;49:1031–3. 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2020345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES