Skip to main content
Current Medical Mycology logoLink to Current Medical Mycology
. 2021 Dec;7(4):6–11. doi: 10.18502/cmm.7.4.8405

Characterization of Candida species isolated from vulvovaginal candidiasis by MALDI-TOF with in vitro antifungal susceptibility profiles

Narges Aslani 1, Roya Kokabi 2, Fatemeh Moradi 3, Kiana Abbasi 4, Narges Vaseghi 5, Mohammad Hosein Afsarian 3,6*
PMCID: PMC9175151  PMID: 35747735

Abstract

Background and Purpose:

Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is an opportunistic infection due to Candida species, one of the most common genital tract diseases among reproductive-age women. The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence of VVC among non-pregnant women and identify the epidemiology of the involved Candida species with the evaluation of antifungal susceptibilities.

Materials and Methods:

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) was performed to identify Candida species isolated from the genital tract of 350 non-pregnant women. Moreover, antifungal susceptibility testing was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution method guidelines (M27-A3 and M27-S4).

Results:

Vaginal swab cultures of 119 (34%) women yielded Candida species. Candida albicans was the most frequently isolated species (68%), followed by Candida glabrata (19.2%). Voriconazole was the most active drug against all tested isolates showing an MIC50/MIC90 corresponding to 0.016/0.25 µg/mL, followed by posaconazole (0.031/1 µg/mL). Overall, resistance rates to fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole were 2.4%, 4.8% and, 0.8% respectively. However, posaconazole showed potent in vitro activity against all tested isolates.

Conclusion:

Results of the current study showed that for the effectual therapeutic outcome of candidiasis, accurate identification of species, appropriate source control, suitable antifungal regimens, and improved antifungal stewardship are highly recommended for the management and treatment of infection with Candida, like VVC.

Keywords: Antifungal susceptibility, Candida species, MALDI-TOF, Vulvovaginal candidiasis

Introduction

Abnormal growth of different Candida species in the genital tract of the female leads to an infection called vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC). It is estimated that VVC, as an inflammatory disease of the vulva and vagina, is the second most frequent vaginal infection after bacterial vaginosis [ 1 - 3 ]. The signs and symptoms of VVC include vulvar pruritus, vaginal itching, abnormal curd-like vaginal discharge, irritation, burning sensation, pain during intercourse, and vaginal erythema [ 4 ].

Common predisposing risk factors of VVC comprise of socio-demographic characteristics, pregnancy, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, oral contraceptives, sexual activity, extensive use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, poor personal hygiene, and specific immunological defect. Overall, the reasons for the global importance of the VVC are the high frequency of occurrence, sexually transmitted infections, ascending genital tract infections, and direct and indirect economic costs [ 5 , 6 ].

Several studies reported that Candida albicans is predominantly involved in VVC, followed by Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, and Pichia kudriavzevii (Candida krusei) [ 4 , 6 , 7 ]. Nevertheless, the increasing prevalence of non-albicans Candida species with a reduced susceptibility acquired resistance or intrinsic resistance to the antifungal drugs currently administered has become the most important issue of treatment failure, over the past decade [ 4 , 8 ]. Therefore, appropriate and precise identification of Candida to the species level and determination of their drug susceptibility patterns to azole compounds as the most commonly used class of drug agents can be useful for the provision of effective treatment of Candida infections.

With this background in mind, the purpose of the current study was to identify Candida species responsible for VVC among non-pregnant women using Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) as a reliable and rapid technique for the identification of cryptic species. Additionally, the isolates were subjected to in vitro antifungal susceptibility profiles via microdilution broth.

Materials and Methods

During 2 years, 350 samples among immunocompetent non-pregnant women have been selected to examine for vaginal secretion, considering the presence of vulvovaginitis symptoms suggestive of vaginitis, including vulvar burning, pruritus vulvae, dyspareunia, vaginal soreness and irritation, pain or discomfort during urination, and abnormal vaginal discharge referred to the department of obstructive and gynecology at the Fasa Valiasr Hospital, Fasa, Iran.

All samples were obtained from the posterior fornix of the vagina with sterilized vaginal swabs and initially examined by gram stain, followed by inoculation on malt extract agar (Difco) supplemented with chloramphenicol (50 mg/ml), CHROMagar Candida medium (CHROMagar Company, Paris, France) to ensure purity, and incubated at 35-37 °C for 48 h [ 7 ]. Approval of the research was acquired from the Research Ethics Committee of the Fasa University of Medical Sciences (IR.FUMS.REC.1395.85), and written consent was obtained from all patients involved.

The MALDI-TOF MS-based identification of all isolates to the species level was performed according to Bruker Daltonics (Biotyper RTC software, version 3.0 (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany)) using the ethanol (EtOH)/ formic acid (FA) extraction protocol [ 9 , 10 ]. In addition, discrimination of the C. albicans species complex, i.e., C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. africana, and C. stellatoidea was performed by the amplification of the hyphal wall protein 1 (HWP1) gene as previously described [ 11 , 12 ].

In vitro antifungal susceptibility was performed for identified isolates according to the recommendations in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution method (CLSI) reference guidelines M27-A3 and M27-S4 [ 13 , 14 ]. Antifungal drugs tested were fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole (All, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). P. kudriavzevii ATCC 6258 and C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 were utilized as quality control for all antifungal susceptibility tests.

Results

In total, 125 (35.7%) strains of Candida were isolated from vaginal secretion samples collected from 350 non-pregnant women with signs or/and symptoms of vaginal infection. The mean age of the patients with a positive culture for Candida species was 35.8 years, ranging from 20 to 52 years (n=2 <20 and n=5 >52). Vulvovaginal itching (71%), vaginal discharge (49%), vulvovaginal burning sensation (34%), and pain (17%) were among the most common described signs and symptoms. However, recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis was not obtained among women in the present study.

The results of identification based on the conventional method (CHROMagar) were confirmed by the MALDI-TOF assessment. Conventional method and MALDI-TOF assessment identified 125 isolates as C. albicans (n=86), C. glabrata (n=24), P. kudriavzevii (n= 8), Cyberlindnera fabianii (previously Hansenula fabianii, Pichia fabianii, and Lindnera fabianii, n=4), Kluyveromyces marxianus (Candida kefyr, n=2), and C. parapsilosis (n=1).

However, PCR amplification of the hwp1 gene was performed for 86 of C. albicans which has been identified by MALDI-TOF, and only one species was recognized as Candida africana (n=1). This was confirmed by DNA sequencing assessment (Figure 1. Supplementary). It is noteworthy all four strains of C. fabianii strains were reconfirmed using a dual-function PCR as well [ 15 ]. It is noteworthy that MALDI-TOF is unable to robustly distinguish species belonging to C. albicans complexes, such as C. dubliniensis, C. africana, and C. stellatoidea.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Species specific amplification of the hwp1 gene; Lane 1 for C. Africana (~ 740 bp); Lane 2 for C. albicans (~ 941 bp); Lane M, a molecular size marker

Table 1 summarizes the MIC50, MIC90 and geometric mean MIC (GM) for each species. In total, 125 isolates of Candida species were analyzed for their susceptibility to fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. The uniform patterns of low MIC ranges in all clinical strains were voriconazole (0.016-1 µg/mL), posaconazole (0.016-2 µg/mL), itraconazole (0.016-8 µg/mL), and fluconazole (0.125-64 µg/mL) in increasing order. In terms of MIC50/MIC90, voriconazole was the most active drugs against all isolates (0.016/0.25 µg/mL) followed by posaconazole (0.031/1 µg/mL), itraconazole (0.063/2 µg /mL), and fluconazole (0.5/16 µg /mL).

Table 1.

In vitro susceptibility testing of 125 VVC clinical isolates of Candida species to four triazole antifungal agents (MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration range, geometric (G) mean, MIC50, and MIC90 values are expressed in µg/ml)

Strains (no.) and Antifungal drugs S SDD R Range MICs (μg/ml) MIC50 / MIC90 (μg/ml) Mode G mean
Candida albicans (n=85)
FLC 80 2 3 0.125-32 0.25/0.5 0.25 0.36
ITC 77 4 4 0.016-8 0.063/0.125 0.063 0.05
VRC 81 3 1 0.016-1 0.016/0.016 0.016 0.01
POS 80 1 4 0.016-1 0.016/0.125 0.016 0.03
Candida glabrata (n=24)
FLC - 24 - 2-32 4/16 4 5.82
ITC 4 14 6 0.25-4 1/4 1 1.09
VRC 24 - - 0.031-0.5 0.063/0.25 0.063 0.09
POS 18 4 2 0.25-4 0.5/2 0.5 0.53
Pichia kudriavzevii (n=8)
FLC - - 8 16-64 - - -
ITC 3 2 3 0.25-1 - - -
VRC 8 - - 0.125-0.25 - - -
POS 7 1 - 0.125-1 - - -
Cyberlindnera fabianii (n=4)
FLC 2 1 1 0.25-16 - - -
ITC 1 - 3 0.016-2 - - -
VRC 4 - - 0.016-0.125 - - -
POS 1 2 1 0.031-1 - - -
Kluyveromyces marxianus (n=2)
FLC 1 1 - 0.5-4 - - -
ITC 1 - 1 0.25-2 - - -
VRC 2 - - 0.016-0.063 - - -
POS 2 - - 0.125-0.5 - - -
Candida africana (n=1)
FLC - 1 - 4 - - -
ITC - - 1 2 - - -
VRC 1 - - 0.125 - - -
POS - - 1 1 - - -
Candida parapsilosis (n=1)
FLC - - 1 8 - - -
ITC - - 1 1 - - -
VRC - 1 - 0.5 - - -
POS - - 1 1 - - -

VRC: Voriconazole; FLC: Fluconazole; ITC: Itraconazole; POS: Posaconazole

The results showed the widest range and highest MICs of Candida species were observed for fluconazole (0.125-64 µg/ml). In total, 80 C. albicans (94.2%) were sensitive, 2 (2.3%) were susceptible-dose-dependent (SDD), and 3 (3.5%) were resistant to fluconazole. However, all of the C. glabrata, the second common isolates, were SDD to fluconazole. Notably, a single clinical isolate of C. parapsilosis was resistant to fluconazole and two isolates of C. fabianii, a rare and uncommon Candida species, showed high fluconazole MIC (4 and 16 μg/ml).

All clinical isolates of P. kudriavzevii were intrinsically considered resistant to fluconazole; however, their breakpoint was not provided by CLSI guidelines. Nevertheless, all of P. kudriavzevii isolates were susceptible to voriconazole and posaconazole. Notably, three (37.5%) of the P. kudriavzevii were resistant to itraconazole. Moreover, resistance to voriconazole was observed among C. albicans isolates 1 (1.2%), while 81 (95.3%) of the C. albicans and 8 (100%) of the P. kudriavzevii isolates were susceptible. Remarkably, three (3.5%) of the C. albicans and single clinical isolate of the C. parapsilosis isolates were SDD to voriconazole. Susceptibility of C. albicans with respect to itraconazole was analyzed as follows: itraconazole sensitivity rate was in 77 (90.6 %), SDD in 4 (4.7%), and resistance in 4 (4.7%) of isolates.

Candida albicans complex isolate (C. africana) showed susceptiblity to voriconazole; however, it was SDD to fluconazole and resistant to itraconazole and posaconazole. Overall, in terms of geometric means (GM) MICs, voriconazole was the most active agent against all isolates (n=125), followed by posaconazole in comparison with itraconazole and fluconazole. Moreover, GM elevated of C. glabrata was observed for fluconazole (5.82 μg/ml) in comparison to voriconazole (0.01 μg/ml) in C. albicans. Both K. marxianus isolates were found to have low MICs to voriconazole, while one isolate was resistant to itraconazole and SDD to fluconazole and posaconazole. However, another isolate was shown to be SDD to only itraconazole.

Discussion

The correct and precise identification of Candida species and evaluation of their drug susceptibility profiles provide helpful information for the effectual therapeutic outcome and cause a remarkable economic impact on the public health system. We investigated the distribution and susceptibility profiles of 125 Candida species obtained from patients with VVC in Fasa, Iran. The prevalence rates of VVC in the present study (41.6%) among women within the age rang e of 30-39 years old had differences, compared to a recent study that reported the highest VVC rates in the age range of 18-29 years old in Greek women [ 6 ]. The data are shown in our study consistent with a previously published report from Iran epidemiological survey comprising 559 patients [ 16 ].

The findings of the current study revealed that the prevalence rate of Candida vaginitis among non-pregnant women was 34% (119/350). However, in some studies, such as the one performed by Mushi et al. in Tanzania, 65.6% of the pregnant women were affected with Candida vaginitis (197/300) [ 3 ]. The frequency of VVC varied from 5.4% to 60% and 8.2%-75% in reports from different regions of the world as well as Iran, respectively [ 17 - 27 ]. Overall, this different frequency of VVC around the world may be related to social and cultural factors, hygiene customs, locations, population analyzed, and diagnostic techniques [ 28 ] in such studies.

Among the seven species identified by MALDI-TOF MS in the current study, C. albicans was the predominant one accounting for 68% (85/125) isolates obtained from vaginal secretions. This finding was in concordance with the studies of Ghajari et al. (67.7%) and Bonyadpour et al. (66.6%) [ 16 , 29 ]. The highest recovery rates of C. albicans in patients with VVC have been reported in Iran (88.2%) [ 25 ].

In the current study, non-albicans Candida species were isolated from 32% (40/125) of the suffering women, which was in agreement with earlier studies [ 29 , 30 ]. Nevertheless, several recent studies reported comparatively higher recovery rates of VVC caused by non-albicans Candida, which are less susceptible or resistant to currently administered antifungals than common Candida species [ 4 , 18 , 31 - 34 ].

In the present study, C. glabrata was the most common among non-albicans Candida species followed by P. kudriavzevii. Moreover, C. glabrata accounted for more than half of the cases of non-albicans VVC. Nevertheless, the recovery rate of C. glabrata (19.2%) in the present study was lower, compared to that reported in previous studies [ 19 , 21 , 29 , 30 ].

As already mentioned in most epidemiologic studies worldwide, among Candida species, C. albicans and C. glabrata were the most common causes of VVC [ 6 , 16 , 20 - 22 , 30 ]. However, some studies reported that C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, and C. krusei were the second most common cause of vaginal infection [ 3 , 4 , 18 , 35 ]. Notably, K. marxianus, C. lusitaniae, C. inconspicua, C. guilliermondii, and C. dubliniensis were previously reported as a rare and unusual cause of VVC by several investigators [ 4 , 16 , 19 , 27 , 35 - 37 ].

Along with these findings, we recovered emerging species of Candida from VVC patients, such as C. fabianii and C. africana. It seems that the widespread use of antifungal agents inappropriately has contributed to the emergence of such more azole-resistant non-albicans Candida species [ 38 , 39 ].

Similar to other studies, co-isolation with two species of Candida isolated from one sample was seen in 4.8% (n=6) of our VVC patients, all of which were C. albicans and C. glabrata. Mixed infection of C. albicans and C. glabrata with prevalence rates of 1.2% and 4.4% were reported by Maraki et al. and Gharaghani et al. respectively [ 6 , 30 ]. Despite our study, these investigators also reported co-isolation with two species of C. albicans and P. kudriavzevii, C. glabrata, and C. tropicalis and C. albicans and K. marxianus [ 6 , 30 ].

Since correct identification of different Candida species using rapid and reliable molecular tests in mixed infection can contribute to both successful treatment and better knowledge in species distribution, laboratories should be able to correctly identify these species in mixed infection [ 40 - 42 ]. MALDI-TOF MS is a strong technique to definitively identify emerging or cryptic Candida species that exhibit resistance patterns to the few available antifungal agents. Nevertheless, identification using MALDI-TOF MS is expensive, usually not available in routine clinical mycology laboratories, and requires highly expert and trained personnel.

Given that the development of antifungal drugs resistance in Candida isolates is increasing, the assessment of the antifungal resistance pattern against Candida species isolated from clinical samples is becoming increasingly important to choose the proper antifungal drug for the management of candidiasis [ 45 - 43 ].

In this study, the antifungal susceptibility profile of all Candida isolates was inquired against four azole drugs. As shown in Table 1, fluconazole (the recommended drug of choice for VVC) was susceptible against 94.2% (80/85) C. albicans isolates. Of note, 2.3% (2/85) of the C. albicans isolates were SDD and 3.5% (3/85) of them were resistant to fluconazole, which is in concordance with the findings of Maraki et al. [ 6 ].

The overall resistance rate of Candida species in our study against fluconazole was 3.2% (4/125). However, the higher overall resistance rate on fluconazole against Candida species isolated from VVC was reported by Bitew et al. [ 4 ] and Adjapong et al. [ 46 ] (17.2% and 26.6%, respectively). Regarding non-albicans Candida species, our study demonstrated that 32.5% (13/40) of non-albicans Candida species exhibited high MIC values (>4) to fluconazole except for P. kudriavzevii. Generally, we observed only 5% (2/40) fluconazole resistance among non-albicans Candida species in our study.

In contrast to our study, results of earlier studies in Greece and Ghana indicated the high fluconazole resistance (15.6% and 31.9%, respectively) against non-albicans Candida species isolated from VVC [ 6 , 46 ]. Resistance to voriconazole was observed only among vaginal C. albicans isolates 0.8% (1/125), while all other vaginal Candida species were susceptible or SDD to voriconazole. Maraki et al. [ 6 ] presented similar rates of resistance to voriconazole (1.6%) against all Candida species causing VVC. However, this is much lower, compared to the findings of a previously reported study by Adjapong et al. [ 46 ] that reported rates of up to 10.8%. Nejat et al. and Hasanvand et al. reported that itraconazole (MIC50 / 90, 0.063/0.125 μg/mL) was active against all Candida species [ 21 , 36 ].

In our study, the resistance rate to itraconazole was 4.7% (n=4) among C. albicans isolates. The overall resistance rate of Candida species in our study against itraconazole was 7.2% (9/125). The study of Adjapong et al. showed that the resistance rate to itraconazole was 10% among C. albicans isolates [ 46 ]. While resistance rate to itraconazole in a study conducted by Khan et al. was higher at 40.7% against all vaginal Candida isolates [ 47 ].

Conclusion

Results of this study suggested that clinical isolates of Candida species need to be properly identified and their antifungal susceptibility profiles were determined to help clinicians to choose an appropriate antifungal drug with the high outcome of successfully treating VVC.

Acknowledgement

This research was financially supported by the Fasa University of Medical Sciences in Fasa, Iran (ethical code: IR.FUMS.REC.1395.85).

Authors’ contribution

M.H A. conceived the study. M.H A., R. K., and F. M. prepared the strains. M.H. A., K. A., and F. M. performed experiments. N. A. and M.H A. prepared the manuscript. N. A., M.H A., and N. V. analyzed the data and edited the final article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have anything to disclose regarding funding or conflict of interest concerning this manuscript.

Financial disclosure

No financial interests related to the material of this manuscript have been declared.

References

  • 1.Ahmad A, Khan AU. Prevalence of Candida species and potential risk factors for vulvovaginal candidiasis in Aligarh, India. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009; 144(1):68–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ameen F, Moslem M, Al Tami M, Al-Ajlan H, Al-Qahtani N. Identification of Candida species in vaginal flora using conventional and molecular methods. J Mycol Med. 2017; 27(3):364–8. doi: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2017.04.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mushi MF, Mmole A, Mshana SE. Candida vaginitis among symptomatic pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in Mwanza, Tanzania. BMC Res Notes. 2019; 12(1):1–5. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4793-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bitew A, Abebaw Y. Vulvovaginal candidiasis: species distribution of Candida and their antifungal susceptibility pattern. BMC Womens Health. 2018; 18(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0607-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Donders GG, Vereecken A, Bosmans E, Dekeersmaecker A, Salembier G, Spitz B. Definition of a type of abnormal vaginal flora that is distinct from bacterial vaginosis: aerobic vaginitis. BJOG. 2002; 109(1):34–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.00432.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Maraki S, Mavromanolaki VE, Stafylaki D, Nioti E, Hamilos G, Kasimati A. Epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility patterns of Candida isolates from Greek women with vulvovaginal candidiasis. Mycoses. 2019; 62(8):692–7. doi: 10.1111/myc.12946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Brandao LDS, Boniek D, Resende Stoianoff MA, da Mata FMR, de Azevedo PRM, Fernandes JV, et al. Prevalence and antifungal susceptibility of Candida species among pregnant women attending a school maternity at Natal, Brazil. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2018; 67(3):285–91. doi: 10.1111/lam.13034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fazeli A, Kordbacheh P, Nazari A, Daie Ghazvini R, Mirhendi H, Safara M, et al. Candiduria in Hospitalized Patients and Identification of Isolated Candida Species by Morphological and Molecular Methods in Ilam, Iran. Iran J Public Health. 2019; 48(1):156–61. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bader O, Weig M, Taverne-Ghadwal L, Lugert R, Gross U, Kuhns M. Improved clinical laboratory identification of human pathogenic yeasts by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011; 17(9):1359–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03398.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Marklein G, Josten M, Klanke U, Muller E, Horre R, Maier T, et al. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for fast and reliable identification of clinical yeast isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 47(9):2912–7 . doi: 10.1128/JCM.00389-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shokohi T, Badram L, Badali H, Ataollahi MR, Afsarian MH. Molecular Identification of Clinically Common and Uncommon Yeast Species. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2018; 11(10):e66240. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Romeo O, Criseo G. First molecular method for discriminating between Candida africana, Candida albicans, and Candida dubliniensis by using hwp1 gene. diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008; 62(2):230–3. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Reference Method for Broth Dlution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of yeasts. Approved Standard M27-A3, 3rd ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts: fourth informational supplement M27-S4. Wayne: CLSI; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Arastehfar A, Fang W, Al-Hatmi AMS, Afsarian MH, Daneshnia F, Bakhtiari M, et al. Unequivocal identification of an underestimated opportunistic yeast species, Cyberlindnera fabianii, and its close relatives using a dual-function PCR and literature review of published cases. Med Mycol. 2019; 57(7):833–40. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myy148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ghajari A, Ahmadi NA, Nazer Fassihi P, Shahmohammadi N, Ansari S, Norouzi M, Arab-Mazar Z, et al. Isolation of Different Species of Candida in Patients with Vulvovaginal Candidiasis from Damavand, Iran. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2018; 13(6):e59291. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Roshan R, Badali H. Identification of Candida species isolated from vulvovaginal candidiasis using PCR-RFLP. Int J Mol Clin Microbiol. 2018; 11(8):e65359. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lakshmi PM. Isolation and Speciation of Candida from Vaginitis Cases attending Gynaecology OPD in a Tertiary Care Hospital A.P. India. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2016; 5(10):229–232. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hedayati MT, Tahery Z, Galinimoghadam T, Aghili SR, Yazdani J, Mosayebi E, et al. Isolation of Different Species of Candida in Patients With Vulvovaginal Candidiasis From Sari, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015; 8(4):e15992. doi: 10.5812/jjm.8(4)2015.15992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Roudbary M, Bakhshi B, Farhadi Z, Nikoomanesh F. Identification of Candida species isolated from Iranian women with vaginal candidiasis by PCR-RFLP method. Eur J Exp Biol. 2013;3(6):365–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hasanvand S, Kord M, Didehdar M. Molecular Epidemiology and In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility of Candida Isolates from Women with Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Northern Cities of Khuzestan Province, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2017; 10(8):e12804. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pouladian S, Mohammadi R. Clinical and Mycological Study of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis (VVC); Identification of Clinical Isolates by Polymerase Chain Reaction-Fragment Size Polymorphyim (PCR-FSP) Technique. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2017; 12(2):e62761. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kengne M, Shu SV, Nwobegahay JM, Achonduh O. Antifungals susceptibility pattern of Candida spp. isolated from female genital tract at the Yaounde Bethesda Hospital in Cameroon. Pan Afr Med J. 2017; 28:294. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.28.294.11200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Luo X, Dong X, Pen Z. Distribution and Drug Susceptibility of Candida spp. Associated With Female Genital Tract Infection, Chongqing, China. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2016; 9(10): e19386. doi: 10.5812/jjm.19386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rezaei-Matehkolaei A, Zarei-Mahmoudabadi A. Isolation, Molecular Identification, and Antifungal Susceptibility Profiles of Vaginal Isolates of Candida Species. Iran J Microbiol. 2016; 8(6):410–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lopes PHS, Pacini VL, Norberg AN. Genital infection by gardnerella vaginalis and Candida spp. Among women in Nova Iguacu city, Rio de Janeiro Province, Brazil. OALib Journal. 2017; 4(3):1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hashemi SE, Shokohi T, Abastabar M, Aslani N, Ghadamzadeh M, Haghani I. Species distribution and susceptibility profiles of Candida species isolated from vulvovaginal candidiasis, emergence of C. lusitaniae. Curr Med Mycol. 2019; 5(4):26–34. doi: 10.18502/cmm.5.4.2062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Esim Buyukbayrak E, Kars B, Karsidag AY, Karadeniz BI, Kaymaz O, Gencer S, et al. Diagnosis of vulvovaginitis: comparison of clinical and microbiological diagnosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010; 282(5):515–9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1498-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bonyadpour B, Mohagheghzadeh A. A Descriptive Study on the Prevalence of Vulvovaginal Infections and Species-specific Distribution of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Married Women of the South of Iran. J Midwifery Reprod Health. 2016; 4(4):741–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gharaghani M, Taheripour Sisakht M, Ilami O, Aramesh S, Mouhamadi F, Barati Z, et al. Identification of Candida Species Isolated from Vulvovaginal Candidiasis Patients by Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) in Yasuj Southwestern Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2018; 11(8):e65359. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mahmoudi Rad M, Zafarghandi S, Abbasabadi B, Tavallaee M. The epidemiology of Candida species associated with vulvovaginal candidiasis in an Iranian patient population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011; 155(2):199–203. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Olanrewaju Jimoh HII, Sabo E, Yakubu Steve J, Ankuma Adebola T Olayinka. Prevalence and Speciation of Non-albican Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Zaria. J Nat Sci Res. 2016; 6:51–6 . [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Haleim E, Sayed A, Ismail DK, Sayed AM, Abdella A. Provence of non albicans species associated with vulvovaginal candidiasis in Egyptian women. Int j adv health sci. 2015; 12:304–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kumari V, Banerjee T, Kumar P, Pandey S, Tilak R. Emergence of non-albicans Candida among candidal vulvovaginitis cases and study of their potential virulence factors, from a tertiary care center, North India. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2013; 56(2):144–7. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.118703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Alizadeh M, Kolecka A, Boekhout T, Zarrinfar H, Ghanbari Nahzag MA, Badiee P, et al. Identification of Candida species isolated from vulvovaginitis using matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Curr Med Mycol. 2017; 3(4):21–5. doi: 10.29252/cmm.3.4.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Abbasi Z, Nejat SF, Falahati M, Ashrafi Khozani M, Hosseini F, Faiazy A, et al. Molecular Identification and Antifungal Susceptibility Pattern of Non-albicans Candida Species Isolated from Vulvovaginal Candidiasis. Iran Biomed J. 2018; 22(1):33–41. doi: 10.22034/ibj.22.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Theill L, Dudiuk C, Morano S, Gamarra S, Nardin ME, Mendez E, et al. Prevalence and antifungal susceptibility of Candida albicans and its related species Candida dubliniensis and Candida africana isolated from vulvovaginal samples in a hospital of Argentina. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2016; 48(1):43–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ram.2015.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Khadka S, Sherchand JB, Pokhrel BM, Parajuli K, Mishra SK, Sharma S, et al. Isolation, speciation and antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida isolates from various clinical specimens at a tertiary care hospital, Nepal. BMC Res Notes. 2017; 10(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2547-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Taei M, Chadeganipour M, Mohammadi R. An alarming rise of non-albicans Candida species and uncommon yeasts in the clinical samples; a combination of various molecular techniques for identification of etiologic agents. BMC Res Notes. 2019; 12(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4811-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Afsarian SM, Badali H, Shokohi T, Najafipour S. Molecular Diversity of Candida albicans Isolated from Immuno-compromised Patients, Based on MLST Method. Iran J Public Health. 2015; 44(9):1262–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Aslani N, Janbabaei G, Abastabar M, Meis JF, Babaeian M, Khodavaisy S, et al. Identification of uncommon oral yeasts from cancer patients by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. BMC Infect Dis. 2018; 18(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2916-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tamai IA, Pakbin B, Fasaei BN. Genetic diversity and antifungal susceptibility of Candida albicans isolates from Iranian HIV-infected patients with oral candidiasis. BMC Res Notes. 2021; 14(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05498-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shokohi T, Badali H, Amirrajab N, Ataollahi MR, Kouhpayeh SA, Afsarian MH, et al. In vitro activity of five antifungal agents against Candida albicans isolates, Sari, Iran. Curr Med Mycol. 2016; 2(2):34–9. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.cmm.2.2.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Amirrajab N, Badali H, Didehdar M, Afsarian MH, Mohammadi R, Lotfi N, Shokohi T, et al. In Vitro Activities of Six Antifungal Drugs Against Candida glabrata Isolates: An Emerging Pathogen. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2016; 9(5):e36638. doi: 10.5812/jjm.36638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Aslani N, Shokohi T, Ataollahi MR, Ansari S, Gholampour Y, Khani Jeihooni A, et al. In vitro activity of four triazole antifungal drugs against clinically common and uncommon yeast species. Curr Med Mycol. 2019; 5(4):14–9. doi: 10.18502/cmm.5.4.1949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Adjapong G, Hale M, Garrill A. A comparative investigation of azole susceptibility in Candida isolates from vulvovaginal candidiasis and recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis patients in Ghana. Med Mycol. 2017; 55(6):686–9. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myw122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Khan M, Ahmed J, Gul A, Ikram A, Lalani FK. Antifungal susceptibility testing of vulvovaginal Candida species among women attending antenatal clinic in tertiary care hospitals of Peshawar. Infect Drug Resist. 2018; 11:447–56. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S153116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Medical Mycology are provided here courtesy of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES