Abstract
Oligodendrocytes are the myelinating cells of the central nervous system. The physiological importance of oligodendrocytes is highlighted by diseases such as multiple sclerosis, in which the myelin sheaths are degraded and the axonal signal transmission is compromised. In a healthy brain, spontaneous remyelination is rare, and newly formed myelin sheaths are thinner and shorter than the former ones. The myelination process requires the migration, proliferation, and differentiation of oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) and is influenced by proteins of the extracellular matrix (ECM), which consists of a network of glycoproteins and proteoglycans. In particular, the glycoprotein tenascin-C (Tnc) has an inhibitory effect on the differentiation of OPCs and the remyelination efficiency of oligodendrocytes. The structurally similar tenascin-R (Tnr) exerts an inhibitory influence on the formation of myelin membranes in vitro. When Tnc knockout oligodendrocytes were applied to an in vitro myelination assay using artificial fibers, a higher number of sheaths per single cell were obtained compared to the wild-type control. This effect was enhanced by adding brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) to the culture system. Tnr−/− oligodendrocytes behaved differently in that the number of formed sheaths per single cell was decreased, indicating that Tnr supports the differentiation of OPCs. In order to study the functions of tenascin proteins in vivo Tnc−/− and Tnr−/− mice were exposed to Cuprizone-induced demyelination for a period of 10 weeks. Both Tnc−/− and Tnr−/− mouse knockout lines displayed a significant increase in the regenerating myelin sheath thickness after Cuprizone treatment. Furthermore, in the absence of either tenascin, the number of OPCs was increased. These results suggest that the fine-tuning of myelin regeneration is regulated by the major tenascin proteins of the CNS.
Keywords: tenascin-C, tenascin-R, myelin, oligodendrocyte, myelin lesion, cuprizone
1. Introduction
Oligodendrocytes are the myelinating cells in the central nervous system (CNS). It is known that the production of myelin is essential for the normal functioning of the vertebrate CNS [1]. The oligodendrocytes derive from oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs). These have a bipolar morphology at the beginning of their development and become progressively more complex with ongoing differentiation [2,3]. Finally, one single mature oligodendrocyte forms myelin membranes which can wrap around up to 40 different axons [4]. Oligodendrocytes fulfill many tasks, including the isolation of axons for better signal transmission with a top speed of 200 m/s [5], or the energy supplement of axons and the storage of glycogen [6]. The importance of oligodendrocytes is highlighted by demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis, polyneuropathy, or neuromyelitis optica, for example [7]. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and demyelinating disease that affects the CNS by demyelinating the axons [8,9]. MS belongs to the autoimmune diseases and is the most common autoimmune disease in the world [10]. More than 2.8 million people are affected worldwide, especially young adults between the ages of 20 and 40 [11,12]. Interestingly, women are affected two to three times more often than men. During the course of the disease, oligodendrocytes are attacked and myelin membranes are destroyed by T-lymphocytes and activated macrophages, which results in demyelination and finally in damage of axons [10]. Furthermore, it recently became clear that B-cells also play an important role in MS by activating T-cells [10]. In a healthy organism, spontaneous remyelination processes occur in the demyelinated CNS, however, these do not suffice for a complete regeneration [13]. With regard to the clinical picture of MS, we focused on toxicity-based demyelination, namely the cuprizone model [14]. Cuprizone is a toxic copper chelator and induces demyelination, especially in the corpus callosum and the hippocampus of the rodent CNS. After the withdrawal of cuprizone, remyelination can be observed [14,15,16]. In this way, the mechanisms of remyelination or factors relevant for a higher remyelination efficiency can be analyzed in more detail. Referring to oligodendrocyte development, glycoproteins of the extracellular matrix (ECM) have been described to alter the differentiation and migration of oligodendrocytes [17,18]. The ECM is a gel-like network which consists of glycoproteins and proteoglycans and modulates parameters such as proliferation, migration, differentiation, morphology, and survival of cells. The ECM is synthesized and released by individual cells and allows the cohesion of tissue and organs [19,20,21]. Earlier studies revealed that the glycoproteins tenascin-C (Tnc) and tenascin-R (Tnr) similarly interfered with the formation of myelin membranes [22]. In general, tenascins constitute a subgroup of glycoproteins of the ECM and in mammals the four members tenascin-C, tenascin-R, tenascin-X, and tenascin-W are known [23]. Tnc has a hexameric structure and is synthesized by neural stem cells and immature astrocytes at the early postnatal stages of the CNS [24,25]. Previous studies showed that the glycoprotein Tnc has an inhibitory effect on the migration and differentiation of OPCs [22,26]. Furthermore, it has been reported that Tnc is upregulated in MS plaques which are characterized by demyelination of axons, and might convey inhibitory influences on oligodendrocytes [27]. Different from Tnc, Tnr is expressed during the late postnatal development of the CNS by a subclass of neurons and mature oligodendrocytes. Tnr has a similar structure to Tnc and its monomers assemble to dimers and trimers [22,24,28,29]. Tnr promotes cell adhesion and cell differentiation of oligodendrocytes, but also blocks the migration of OPCs [30]. So far it is known that both Tnc and Tnr exert a negative influence on the formation of myelin membranes and act antagonistically on the differentiation of oligodendroglia. [22]. Recently, it could be documented that both tenascins interfere with remyelination processes using an ex vivo model of organotypic cerebellar slice cultures [31]. In the light of these observations, we tested the hypothesis that these tenascins interfere with remyelination in vivo.
2. Materials and Methods
All performed experiments conformed to the relevant regulatory standards.
2.1. Animals and Genotyping
This study was carried out in accordance with the European Community Council Directive of 22 September 2010 (2010/63/EU) for care of laboratory animals and after approval of the local ethics committee (Landesamt für Umweltschutz, Naturschutz und Verbraucherschutz, Nordrhein Westphalen, LANUV: AZ 84-02.04. 2014.A332). All efforts were made to reduce the number of animals for this study in the best possible way. Mice (Mus musculus) were housed with a constant 12-h light–dark cycle and access to food and water ad libitum. For de- and remyelination, studies using cuprizone homozygous Tnc−/− and Tnr−/− mice were compared to in-house bred SV129 wild-type mice (Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany). All experiments and animal handling were approved by the LANUV, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany (AZ 84-02.04-2014.A332) and conducted according to German animal protection laws. For the cultivation of primary OPC cultures, heterozygous Tnc+/− and Tnr+/− mice were mated and the outcoming litters were genotyped after preparation. On this account, it was guaranteed that the cells used for the in vitro experiments had the same genetic background. In favor of the isolation of genomic DNA, mouse tail tips were lysed in 200 µL DirectPCR® Tail Lysis Reagent (Cat. No.: 31-101-T, Peqlab, VWR Life Science; Radnor, PA, USA) containing 0.2 mg/mL Proteinase K (Cat. No.: EO0491, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 55 °C overnight. Then the tubes were incubated at 85 °C for 30 min and centrifuged at 16,000× g for 10 s. Therefore 0.5 µL of lysed genomic DNA was used as template for PCR analysis. The Tnr wild-type could be amplified by a Tnr primer (5′-AACTCCATGCTGGCTACCAC-3′) and Tnr Exon 1 primer (5′-TTTT GGGGAGGTT GATCTTG-3′), resulting in a PCR product of 420 bp. The amplification of the mutant allele with the Tnr primer combined with a Tnr Neo primer (5′-ACCGCTTCCTCGTGCTT-3′) resulted in a PCR product of approximately 429 bp. Tnr wildtype mice will be referred to as Tnr+/+, whereas Tnr knockout will be referred to as Tnr−/−.
2.2. Immunological Reagents
The following primary antibodies were used: APC (clone CC1, mouse IgG2b, IF: 1:100, Cat. No.: Ab16794, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), GFAP (1:300, DAKO, Cat. No.: Z0334; AB_10013382), Iba1 (019–19741; Wako and ab5076; Abcam), MBP (mouse IgG, IF: 1:50, Bio-Rad (MCA409) RRID: AB325004, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), Olig2 (rabbit polyclonal IgG, IF: 1:500, Merck (AB9610) RRID: AB_570666, Millipore) and antibodies against platelet-derived growth factor alpha receptor (PDGFRα) (rabbit polyclonal IgG, IF 1:300, Cat. No.: AB2174987, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Species-specific secondary antibodies coupled to Cy2 AF488 (1:250) and Cy3 (1:500) were all obtained from Dianova GmbH (Hamburg, Germany).
2.3. Isolation and Cultivation of Primary Murine OPCs
As described in previous studies with minor modifications murine OPCs were isolated by immunopanning with a CD140a antibody [32,33]. First, the postnatal P6–P9 brains from the different genotypes Tnc−/−, Tnc+/+, Tnr−/− and Tnr+/+ obtained by breeding of heterozygote mice were dissected. Then, the meninges were removed and enzymatically dissected in MEM containing 30 U/mL Papain (Cat. No.: LS003126, Worthington, Columbia, NJ, USA), 0.24 mg/mL L-cysteine (Cat. No.: C2529, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 40 µg/mL DNAse I (Cat. No.: DNASE70, Worthington,) for 1 h at 37 °C. By the addition of the same amount of ovomucoid, the digestion was stopped. The cells were resuspended in panning buffer (PBS, 200 µg/mL (w/v) BSA fraction V (Cat. No.: A4919, Sigma-Aldrich), 5 µg/mL insulin (Cat. No.: 91077C, Sigma-Aldrich) and transferred to a culture dish pre-coated with anti-BSL1 Griffonia simplicifolia lectin (Cat. No.: B-1105, Vector Laboratories, Biozol, Eching, Germany), incubating 15 min at RT as negative selection. Then, the cells were relocated to a second dish pre-coated with AffiniPure goat anti-rat IgG (H + L) (Cat. No.: ab7481, Abcam) as a secondary antibody and rat anti-mouse CD140a (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) as a primary antibody for positive selection. After 45 min of incubation culture dishes were washed with DMEM (Life Technologies by Thermo Fisher Scientific) and bound OPCs were detached with cell scrapers. In the following OPCs were cultivated in OPC SATO Medium DMEM (Cat. No.:41966029, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), Pen/Strep (Cat. No.: P4333, Sigma-Aldrich), 50 µg/mL (w/v) N-acetyl-cysteine, 10 ng/mL D-biotin (Cat. No.: B4639, Sigma-Aldrich), 5 µg/mL insulin (Cat. No.: I9278-5ML, Sigma-Aldrich), 2 µg/mL forskolin (Cat. No.: F6886, Sigma-Aldrich) and modified SATO 100 µg/mL apo-transferrin (Cat. No.: ab198654, Abcam), 100 µg/mL BSA (Cat. No.:8076.2, Carl Roth GmbH & Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany), 6.25 µg/mL progesterone (Cat. No.; P8783, Sigma-Aldrich), 16 µg/mL putrescine (Cat. No.: P5780, Sigma-Aldrich), 4 µg/mL sodium selenite (Cat. No.: 10102-18-8, Sigma-Aldrich) in the presence of 10 ng/mL platelet-derived growth factor AA (PDGF-AA) (Cat. No.: 100-13A, Peprotech, Waltham, MA, USA) and 5 ng/mL NT3 (Cat. No.: 450-03, Peprotech) in T-75 flasks (Cat. No.: 83.3911.002, Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) precoated with 10 µg/mL poly-D-lysine (PDL, Cat. No.: P0899, Sigma-Aldrich) at 37 °C and 7.5% CO2. After 1 week of cultivation, a sufficient number of OPCs proliferated and were ready for further experiments. During this period media were changed every 2–3 days and PDGF-AA was added daily. To detach the OPCs the dishes were washed once with PBS, then 5 mL of 0.25% Trypsin/EDTA (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Cat. No.: 25300054) was added to OPCs for trypsinization. This process was stopped by the addition of an equal amount of ovomucoid (Leibovitz’s L15 medium (Cat. No.: L5520, Sigma-Aldrich), 1 mg/mL soybean trypsin inhibitor (Cat. No.: T6522, Sigma-Aldrich), 50 µg/mL BSA fraction V, 40 µg/mL DNAse I (Cat. No.: LS0020007, Worthington Biochem. Corp., Lakewood, NJ, USA)). After centrifugation for 5 min at 1000 rpm, the cell pellet was resuspended in OPC SATO medium and plated at a density of 20,000 cells per 12 mm coverslip. These were coated with 10 µg/mL (w/v) PDL beforehand. In the following cells were cultivated in the presence of 10 ng/mL PDGF-AA (Peprotech GmbH, Cat. No.: 100-13A) and 5 ng/mL NT3 (Cat. No.: 450-03, Peprotech) to maintain proliferation conditions. Alternatively, 400 ng/mL T3 (Cat. No.: T6397, Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.5% (v/v) horse serum (HS, Cat. No.: S9135, Peprotech) were added to start differentiation. The cells could be used for cultivation jointly with artificial fibers for 14 div and finally characterized by immunocytochemistry.
2.4. Immunocytochemistry
Cells were stained immunocytochemically as previously described [34,35]. Medium from primary oligodendrocytes was removed and then the cells were washed twice with PBS and subsequently fixed with 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (PFA) (Cat. No.:4235.1, Carl Roth) in PBS for 10 min at RT. Thereafter, fixed oligodendrocytes were washed three times with PBT1 (PBS, 1% (w/v) BSA, 0.1% (v/v) Triton-X 100 (Cat. No.: A4975, AppliChem GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany)) and primary antibodies (anti-MBP, anti-GFAP) were diluted in PBT1 and incubated with the cells for 1 h at RT. Ensuing, oligodendrocytes were washed thrice with PBS/A before species-specific antibodies coupled to AF488, Cy2, or Cy3, and the nuclear marker Hoechst, which were diluted in PBS/A, were added to the oligodendrocytes for at least 1 h at RT. In the end, three washing steps in PBS were followed before the cells were mounted with Fluoromount-G (Cat. No.: 0100-01, Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL, USA) and subjected to microscopy.
2.5. Myelination of Electrospun Fibers
For the analysis of the impact of the EMC molecules Tnc and Tnr on myelination in vitro, Tnc+/+, Tnc−/−, Tnr+/+, Tnr−/− and wildtype OPCs were plated onto parallelly aligned, 2 µm thick electrospun fibers. Those fibers are composed of poly-L-lactic acid (The Electrospinning Company, Didcot, UK) and presented in 12 well dishes [36]. First, the fibers were soaked in 70% (v/v) ethanol, followed by a coating with 10 µg/mL PDL for 1 h at 37 °C. After coating, the fibers were washed three times with H2O to remove the excess PDL. Then, OPCs were plated onto the fibers in a density of 45,000 cells per well in myelination medium (DMEM (Cat. No.: 41966029, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.): Neurobasal (Cat. No.: 21103-049, Sigma-Aldrich) (1:1), Pen/Strep, B27 (Cat. No.: 17504044, Thermo Fisher Scientific), ITS supplement (Cat. No.: I3146, Sigma-Aldrich), 5 μg/mL N-acetyl-cysteine (Cat. No.: A8199, Sigma-Aldrich), 10 ng/mL D-biotin (Cat. No.: B4639, Sigma-Aldrich), and modified SATO (100 μg/mL BSA fraction V, 60 ng/mL progesterone, 16 μg/mL putrescine, 400 ng/mL tri-iodothyronine [T3]; 400 ng/mL L-thyroxine [T4]) and cultivated at 37 °C and 7.5% CO2 for 14 days. Medium was changed three times per week. For immunocytochemical analysis, fibers were washed once in PBS and then fixed in 4% (w/v) PFA (Cat. No.:4235.1, Carl Roth) in PBS for 15 min at RT, followed by three washes in PBS. Additionally, the cells were permeabilized with 0.1% (v/v) Triton-X 100 in PBS for 15 min at RT. The primary antibodies were diluted in PBS and incubated at 4 °C overnight. On the next day, the primary antibody was removed, and fibers were washed three times with PBS. Next, the secondary antibodies were also diluted in PBS and added to the cells for 1 h at RT. After incubation, three washes with PBS followed. Last, fibers were mounted between glass slides and coverslips with Fluoromount-G (Cat. No.: 0100-01, Southern Biotech). Finally, the confocal images were obtained on a Zeiss LSM 510 Meta with an X40 oil objective. As many as necessary Z-steps of 0.37 μm were taken to image complete myelin sheaths. Analysis of the sheath lengths was determined with ImageJ by measuring the length of continuous membranes wrapping in a tube-like structure around the fibers. The number of sheaths formed by a single OL was also determined.
2.6. Cuprizone Model Induced Demyelination
In contrast to other models, the cuprizone model is a suitable model to study demyelination as well as remyelination [37]. For the analysis of demyelination and remyelination studies, 8-week-old male 129/SV, Tnc−/− and Tnr−/− mice were fed with 0.2% (w/w) cuprizone (Cat. No.: 370-81-0, Sigma-Aldrich) mixed with powdered chow for 10 weeks to induce demyelination [38], followed by a diet without cuprizone [33] for 2, 4, and 6 weeks to allow for a short- and long-term remyelination. Typically, mice are treated for 10 until 12 weeks to induce demyelination in a chronic way [39,40,41]. However, it could also be shown that after a 12-week cuprizone treatment remyelination is very sparse, resulting in a model of chronic demyelination [42] and remyelination that in some cases is insufficient, or even fails [43,44,45]. To ensure successful remyelination, we therefore decided to treat the mice for 10 weeks with cuprizone to mimic a more chronic course of demyelination. All in all, 12 mice per genotype were used for each condition, so that in total 180 mice were included in this study. However, not all individual animals were analyzed. During demyelination control mice received a normal diet of powdered chow (Suppl. Figure S2), once a week cuprizone treated mice also received a normal diet to minimize the severity of intoxication. The weight of all animals was recorded three times a week. Here, one can see that the Tnc−/− mice have the least weight loss, yet also lose a lot of weight as demyelination increases. At the end of the experiment mice of each group were perfused intracardially with 20 mL PBS under deep anesthesia (800 µL 0.9% (w/v) NaCl (Cat. No.: 7647-14-5, Thermo Fisher Scientific), 50 µL Xylazin (10 mg/mL weight) (Cat. No.: 1205, CP-Pharma, Handelsgesellschaft GmbH, Burgdorf, Germany) and 150 µL Ketamin (150 mg/mL weight) (Cat. No.: 1202, CP-Pharma, Handelsgesellschaft GmbH). Brains were removed and cut sagittally in two halves, or the whole brain was used for electron microscopy analysis. For immunohistochemical stainings, one hemisphere was fixed with 4% (w/v) PFA (Cat. No.:4235.1, Carl Roth) in PBS at 4 °C for 48 h before embedding in tissue-freezing medium for cryosectioning. The second hemisphere was frozen in liquid nitrogen for RNA analysis, in particular for RT-PCR.
2.7. Histochemistry of the Brain Slices
After the two-day fixation in 4% (w/v) PFA (Cat. No.:4235.1, Carl Roth), the hemispheres were dehydrated in 30% (w/v) sucrose (Cat. No.: 4072-01, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) before embedding in tissue freezing medium (Cat. No.: 14020108926, Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany) on dry ice. Afterwards, cryosections of 14 μm were cut from one hemisphere on a cryostat and stored at −20 °C. Here, the area on sagittal sections was focused on the corpus callosum (CC) above the hippocampus (HC) (according to Bregma: lateral 0.32–0.48 mm), where myelination is highest [46]. In order to provide proof for the efficacy of the induced demyelination with cuprizone, the Luxol-Fast-Blue-Periodic Acid Schiff (LFB-PAS) staining was used. Luxol fast blue marked myelin in blue and Periodic Acid and Schiff reagent was applied to label the axons in red color. In addition, hematoxylin was used to stain the cell nuclei dark blue. For the Schiff reagent staining with LFB-PAS cryosections were dehydrated in an increasing alcohol series starting at 30% (v/v), up to 96% (v/v) and stained in 0.1% (w/v) LFB solution (Cat. No.: 1328-51-4, Thermo Fisher Scientific), in 96% (v/v) ethanol (Cat. No.: 64-17-5, Carl Roth) for 24 h at 60 °C. Afterwards cryosections were briefly rinsed in 96% (v/v) ethanol before they were washed for 30 s in 0.05% (w/v) Lithium-Carbonate (LiCO3, Cat. No.: 554-13-2, Sigma-Aldrich). A staining with 1% (w/v) periodic acid for 7 min and afterwards with Schiff’s reagent (Cat. No.: 1789, Carl Roth) for 20 min followed. After cryosections had been washed hematoxylin staining was performed for 2 min. Finally, dehydration was carried out in an increasing series of alcohols from 70% (v/v) up to 100% (v/v) and cryosections were immobilized using Euparal mounting medium (Cat. No.: 7356.1, Carl Roth). For each condition and animal at least 2 sections were analyzed and at least 500 cells were examined.
For immunohistochemistry cryosections were first rehydrated in PBS before they were boiled in 0.01M citrate buffer for 70 min by 70 °C. Then the incubation with blocking solution (PBS, 1% (w/v) BSA, 0.1% (v/v) Triton-X 100, 5% (v/v) goat serum (Cat. No.: 005-000-121, Dianova GmbH) for 1 h at RT in a humid chamber followed. Primary antibodies were diluted in a blocking solution with goat serum and incubated at 4 °C overnight. After three consecutive washing steps in PBS, secondary antibodies were diluted in PBS/A (PBS, 0.1% (w/v) BSA) and incubated for 2 h at RT. Finally, stained cryosections were washed three times with PBS and mounted using ImmuMount (Cat. No.: 9990402, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The fluorescence stainings were recorded using the Axio Zoom.V16 (Cat. No.: 495010-0001-000, Carl Zeiss AG, Wetzlar, Germany), with a focus on the area of the corpus callosum. Here, the caudal part as well as the rostral part of the corpus callosum was analyzed in more detail, because these are the most affected areas. The corpus callosum is known to be subject to severe demyelination [15,47].
2.8. Molecular Biology
RNA Isolation, cDNA Synthesis, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
In order to monitor myelin-specific genes in the corpus callosum corresponding tissue was isolated from a half-frozen state of brain halves of mice exposed to cuprizone. Immediately after perfusion the isolated corpus callosum was stored at −80 °C until RNA was isolated. Total RNA from corpus callosum was obtained using the GeneElute™ Mammalian Total RNA MiniPrep Kit (Cat. No.: RTN350, Sigma-Aldrich) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For analysis 0.5 µg RNA was transcribed into cDNA in a volume of 40 µL using the First strand cDNA synthesis Kit (Cat. No.: K1622, Thermo Fisher Scientific). For each condition (10 weeks control, 10 weeks demyelination, 2 weeks remyelination, 4 weeks remyelination, 6 weeks remyelination) cDNA samples from three different animals were prepared. We performed RT-PCR for the analysis of several genes which are relevant for oligodendrocyte development. In all conditions the housekeeping gene β-Actin was used as a control. Moreover, in each condition four animals with the following genes were investigated: platelet-derived growth factor receptor A (PDGFRα), myelin-basic protein (MBP), and ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba1). Following primers were used: β-Actin forward: 5′-tatgccaacacagtgctgtctgg-3′, β-Actin reverse: 5′-agaagcacttgcggtgcacgatg-3′, PDGFRα forward: 5′-gcaccaagtcaggtcccatt-3′, PDGFRα reverse: 5′-cttcactggtggcatggtca-3′, MBP forward: 5′-tctcagccctgacttgttcc-3′, MBP reverse: 5′-atcaaccatcacctgccttc-3′, Iba1 forward: 5′-ggatttgcagggaggaaaag-3′, Iba1 reverse: 5′-tgggatcatcgaggaattg-3′. All RT-PCR results were analyzed with the rectangle tool ImageJ. In this context, the mean gray value of each sample was measured, the background was subtracted, and the resulting values were set in relation to the actin signal.
2.9. Electron Microscopy
Following the animal experimentation license the mice were anesthetized before they were first perfused intracardially with 10 mL PBS, followed by perfusion with 4% (w/v) PFA (Cat. No.: 4235.1, Carl Roth) and 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde (Cat. No.: 111-30-8, Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH = 7.4). The Brains were removed and kept in fixative for further 4 days. Subsequently, brains were cut in the coronal plane into 1 mm thick slices and the corpora callosa were dissected between Bregma −2.12 and 1.28 [33,48].
For each condition at least 8 sections were collected. Next the dissected corpora callosa were embedded in glycidether 100 (Cat. No.: 90529-77-4, Carl Roth). In the following ultrathin sections of the corpora, callosa were prepared, before they were stained with 2% (w/v) uranyl acetate (Cat. No.: 77870.02, Serva Electrophoresis GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) for 5 min at RT and lead citrate (1.33 g Pb(NO3)2, 1.76 g Na3(C6H5O7) × 2 H2O, ad. 50 mL A. bidest) [49]. Finally, the sections were acquired on an electron microscope Sigma VP500 (Carl Zeiss AG, Wetzlar, Germany). The g-ratio (axon diameter divided by the total axon diameter including the myelin sheath) was determined. At least 200 axons for each condition per individual animal were evaluated. Overall, three animals for each condition (10 weeks control, 10 weeks demyelination, 10 weeks demyelination with 2, 4, or 6 weeks of remyelination) were examined. In each condition, the g-ratios of the knockouts were compared to the wildtypes.
2.10. Statistics
In order to examine the effects of the individual tenascins on the respective conditions, we always compared the results of the knockout situations with those of the wild types. Statistical analyses were carried out using the GraphPad Prism 7 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). All results are provided as Mean ± SEM if not declared otherwise. Furthermore, the type of statistical tests and the number of performed experiments are provided in the figure legends. The significances were determined using ONE-way ANOVA with subsequent Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. In pairwise comparisons also the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test was used. The tests used are indicated in the figure legends. All statistical differences were considered as significantly different when p ≤ 0.05, p-values are referred as * for p ≤ 0.05, ** for p ≤ 0.01 and *** p ≤ 0.001.
3. Results
3.1. Tenascins Intervene in Myelination of Artificial Microfibers
The reformation of myelin sheaths after damage requires the recruitment of OPCs to lesions and their local differentiation [7]. The ability to remyelinate axons seems to be an intrinsic property of oligodendrocytes [36]. In order to test if the elimination of tenascin genes affects the myelination capacity, Tnc+/+, Tnc−/−, Tnr+/+, and Tnr−/− oligodendrocytes were tested in a fiber myelination assay (Figure 1A). To this end, oligodendrocytes were cultivated in the presence of artificial fibers, and the cultures were investigated by immunocytochemistry using antibodies against GFAP and MBP (Figure 1B). Myelination could be revealed in each genotype and condition. Both the average number of fibers myelinated by a single cell which identifies the amount of myelin formed, as well as the numbers of sheaths extended per single oligodendrocyte were analyzed (Figure 1C–F). By comparing the average number of fibers ensheathed by single cells from Tnr+/+ and Tnr−/− mice, it became clear that Tnr seemed to exert no influence on the extent of myelination of artificial fibers (Tnr+/+: 3.9 ± 0.2, Tnr−/−: 4.6 ± 0.2, Tnr−/− + BDNF: 7.2 ± 0.2, p < 0.0001; Tnr−/− vs. Tnr−/− + BDNF: p < 0.0001). However, it could be shown that Tnr seemed to have a positive influence on the number of sheaths formed per single cell. In the absence of Tnr the number of sheaths per single cell was reduced in comparison to the wildtype (Tnr+/+: 9.7 ± 0.7, Tnr−/−: 7.8 ± 1, p = 0.0049). This could indicate that Tnr promotes the outgrowth of myelin lamellae, a support that was not available when Tnr−/− were tested. The structural homologue Tnc interferes with membrane extension by oligodendrocytes in vitro [22] and was probed for influence on myelin sheath formation in the fiber assay. When OPCs prepared from Tnc−/− or wildtype mice were compared the number of myelinated fibers did not differ (Figure 1E) while the number of sheaths per single cell was increased (Figure 1F).
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor is known to promote myelin repair in vivo [50]. Here, we wanted to test if BDNF has an influence on the knockout conditions and if knockout effects can even be boosted. Therefore, we supplemented the co-cultures with 10 ng/mL BDNF. Under these conditions, the average number of individual myelinated fibers more than doubled (Tnc+/+: 5.4 ± 0.2, Tnc−/−: 5.5 ± 0.2, Tnc−/− + BDNF: 14.7 ± 0.7; Tnc−/− vs. Tnc−/− + BDNF: p < 0.0001) (Figure 1D,F). When the number of sheaths per individual cell was considered, BDNF likewise caused a significant increase (Tnc+/+: 6.4 ± 0.4, Tnc−/−: 7.9 ± 0.5, p = 0.027; Tnc−/− + BDNF: 11.7 ± 0.1, p < 0.0001; Tnc−/− vs. Tnc−/− + BDNF: 0.0086) (Figure 1F). Summarizing these results, the average number of ensheathed artificial fibers per cell did not depend on the genotype. However, Tnr and Tnc displayed opposite effects with regard to the number of individual sheaths per oligodendrocyte formed, in that Tnr−/− displayed a reduced and Tnc−/− OPCs an increased propensity to extend myelin lamellae. This is in agreement with our earlier report that Tnc interferes with while Tnr promotes OPC differentiation in culture [22]. The myelination capacity of OPCs could be strongly boosted by the addition of BDNF.
3.2. Electron Microscopy Analysis Revealed That Remyelination Is Accelerated in the Absence of Tenascins in the Cuprizone Animal Model
The result of the in vitro fiber myelination assay suggested that tenascin genes could intervene in remyelination after lesion. To test this aspect, both wildtype and knockout mice were subjected to cuprizone-mediated demyelination for a period of 10 weeks, modeling chronic demyelination [14,15]. The cuprizone model places the focus on the remyelination process in the absence of activated T-cells. Along this path we intended to analyze a more severe demyelination followed by a longer course of remyelination so that the influence of both tenascins on remyelination efficiency in what appears closer to a chronic setting could also be determined. Selected tissue arrays of the corpus callosum were analyzed at high resolution. To determine whether the cuprizone-induced demyelination as well as the remyelination efficiency after cuprizone withdrawal are working we performed LFB-PAS staining. As expected, the corpora callosa were stained in blue in the untreated control condition and the staining appeared weaker upon demyelination (Figure 2). Electron microscopy analysis revealed that the cuprizone-mediated demyelination was successful (Figure 3). The g-ratio, that is the ratio of the axon diameter divided by the diameter of the axon including the myelin sheath was plotted for the different experimental conditions (control, demyelination, remyelination 2, 4, and 6 weeks) using 129/SV wildtype and Tnr and Tnc knockout mice. The quantitative analysis of the three genotypes in each condition confirmed the impression that myelin sheaths were thinner in SV129 wildtype mice. Under control conditions (Figure 3a–c Tnc−/− and Tnr−/−− mice displayed thicker myelin membranes, as reflected by a significantly lower g-ratio (g-ratio C: 129/SV: 0.787 ± 0.004; Tnc−/−: 0.707 ± 0.005, p < 0.0001; Tnr−/−: 0.766 ± 0.004, p = 0.0001; Tnc−/− vs. Tnr−/−: p = 0.0344). The cuprizone treatment was effective, because upon demyelination the myelin sheaths appeared strongly reduced (Suppl. Figure S1), as could be ascertained using histochemical LFB-PAS staining of sections (Figure 2). Disrupted and degraded myelin sheaths were visible in the treated tissues (Figure 3). Still, also upon demyelination both tenascin knockout lines revealed significantly thicker myelin sheaths than 129/SV mice (g-ratio D: 129/SV: 0.900 ± 0.002; Tnc−/−: 0.783 ± 0.005, p < 0.0001; Tnr−/−: 0.829 ± 0.005, p < 0.0001; Tnc−/− vs. Tnr−/−: p < 0.0001). After the withdrawal of cuprizone, remyelination occurred. After 2 weeks of remyelination thicker myelin sheaths could be observed in both tenascin knockouts (g-ratio 2R: SV/129: 0.835 ± 0.004, Tnc−/−: 0.763 ± 0.005, p < 0.0001; Tnr−/−: 0.812 ± 0.004, p = 0.0007; Tnc−/− vs. Tnr−/−: p < 0.0001).
After 4 weeks of remyelination this effect was even more pronounced in both tenascin knockout lines (g-ratio 4R: SV/129: 0.826 ± 0.004, Tnc−/−: 0.785 ± 0.004, p < 0.0001; Tnr−/−: 0.788 ± 0.004, p < 0.0001). With increasing duration of remyelination, the myelin membranes progressively recovered (Figure 3g–o). Consistently the lowest g-ratios were measured in Tnc−/− and in Tnr−/− mice (g-ratio 6R: SV/129: 0.809 ± 0.004; Tnc−/−: 0.763 ± 0.004, p < 0.0001; Tnr−/−: 0.797 ± 0.004; Tnc−/− vs. Tnr−/−: p < 0.0001) (Figure 3t). By comparing the g-ratios of the several remyelination conditions to demyelination, it became clear that remyelination is successful as the g-ratios in all three remyelination conditions (RM2, RM4, and RM6) were significantly reduced in wildtype mice (Suppl. Figure S1A) and decreased with ongoing remyelination time (g-ratio 129/SV 2R vs. 6R: p < 0.0001; 4R vs. 6R: p = 0.0023). This effect could also be observed in the knockout mice (g-ratios Tnc−/− DM vs. 2R: p = 0.004; DM vs. 6R: p = 0.0034; 2R vs. 4R: p = 0.0028; 4R vs. 6R: p = 0.0024 and for Tnr−/− 2R vs. 4R: p < 0.0001; 2R vs. 6R: p = 0.0023) (Suppl. Figure S1B,C). However, in Tnr−/− mice the effective remyelination only evolved at the 4th week with a significant difference (g-ratios Tnr−/− D vs. 4R: p < 0.0001; D vs. 6R: p < 0.0001) (Suppl. Figure S1C). Taken together the analysis revealed that in each condition the g-ratios of both knockouts were lower compared to the wildtype condition. This suggested that the ablation of Tnc as well as Tnr favored remyelination, possibly revealing inhibitory effects of tenascin proteins on myelin repair. The analysis of the axon diameter (Figure 4A) showed that upon demyelination conditions significantly smaller axon diameters were observable in both knockout genotypes (axon diameter D; SV129: 0.8496 ± 0.008, Tnc−/−: 0.6105 ± 0.012, p < 0.0001; Tnr−/−: 0.5751 ±0.0113, p < 0.0001). Also, in the untreated control condition there were significant differences with regard to axon diameters (axon diameter C; SV/129: 0.6241 ± 0.01, Tnc−/−: 0.5935 ± 0.01, p = 0.0323; Tnr−/−: 0.8714 ± 0.007, p < 0.0001; Tnc−/− vs. Tnr−/−: p < 0.0001) (Figure 4A). Interestingly, these differences were not detected after 2 weeks of remyelination (axon diameter RM2; SV/129: 0.57 ± 0.01, Tnc−/−: 0.5 ± 0.01, Tnr−/−: 0.6 ± 0.014). However, after 4 weeks of remyelination significantly lower axon diameters were detectable in Tnc−/− mice (axon diameter RM4; SV/129: 0.6254 ± 0.011, Tnc−/−: 0.5562 ± 0.006, p < 0.0001; Tnr−/−: 0.63 ± 0.01; Tnc−/− vs. Tnr−/−: p < 0.0001). Finally, after 6 weeks of remyelination significantly lower axon diameters were observed in both tenascin knockouts (axon diameter RM6; SV/129: 0.7631 ± 0.017, Tnc−/−: 0.6077 ± 0.01, p < 0.0001; Tnr−/−: 0.5728 ± 0.0105, p < 0.0001). Moreover, we plotted the g-ratios obtained against multiple axon diameters (Figure 4B–F). The linear regression slopes correlate axon diameter with g-ratios. The analysis of g-ratios that present the relation of myelin sheath thickness to axon diameter indicated differences between the mouse lines under study, both under control conditions and after demyelination (Figure 2). Although the lines have comparable SV129 backgrounds the independent breeding of the colonies may have resulted in small differences. Previous studies carefully worked out that both the Tnc−/− and the Tnr−/− knockout lines apparently do not display visible myelination deficits [51,52]. Thereby, an ascending slope indicates that the myelin sheath grows at a slower rate than the axon diameter while a descending slope reflects an increased growth of the myelin sheath with a growing axon diameter.
Concerning this parameter, our results confirmed that linear regression lines differed significantly, especially with regard to the Tnr−/− tissue (Figure 4B–F). Interestingly, after 4 weeks of remyelination the axons of the Tnc−/− and Tnr−/− mouse lines have acquired relatively larger myelin sheaths than the wildtype (Figure 4E). According to this parameter, the myelin sheaths in relation to the axon diameter were thinner in the wildtype than in the mutants also in the samples after demyelination and two weeks of remyelination (Figure 4C,D). The best fit lines which were obtained by using linear regression differed in each condition significantly between Tnr−/− and the 129/SV wildtype mice. However, in the untreated control condition, during demyelination, and in the early stage of remyelination the best fit lines between Tnc−/− and 129/SV wildtype mice were not significantly different (Figure 4B–D). Only after 4 weeks and 6 weeks of remyelination were the best fit lines between Tnc−/− and 129/SV wildtype mice significantly different (Figure 4E,F).
3.3. Tnc and Tnr Modulate Recruitment of OPCs to and Their Maturation in Myelin Lesions
To determine the role of both tenascins with regard to oligodendroglia recovery and myelin regeneration the markers Olig2 for the oligodendrocyte lineage in general and CC1 for differentiated oligodendrocytes were monitored by immunocytochemistry. Five experimental groups (10 weeks control (C), 10 weeks demyelination (DM), 2, 4, and 6 weeks of remyelination (RM)) including three different genotypes (SV/129, Tnc−/−, Tnr−/−) were analyzed (Figure 5). In the control group the expression of Olig2 in Tnr−/− mice was significantly reduced (C: SV/129: 84.77 ± 4.04%, C: Tnc−/−: 84.03 ± 6.46%, C: Tnr−/−: 65.29 ± 6.83%, p < 0.0001; Tnc−/− vs. Tnr−/−, p = 0.0002). This effect was also observable upon demyelination (Figure 5A(d–f),B), where also Tnc−/− possessed a lower number of Olig2 positive cells (DM: SV/129: 71.27 ± 7.77%, Tnc−/−: 60.45 ± 9.86%, Tnr−/−: 49.91 ± 10.71%, p = 0.0027) (Figure 5). Interestingly, in the early stage of recovery after 2 weeks of remyelination a significantly decreased number of Olig2 positive cells was detected in Tnc−/− (2RM: SV/129: 79.4 ± 7.2%, Tnc−/−: 41.2 ± 12.5%, p < 0.0001; Tnr−/−: 73.6 ± 6.5%; Tnc−/− vs. Tnr−/−, p < 0.0001) (Figure 5B). After 4 weeks of remyelination no significant differences between the genotypes were seen (4RM: SV/129: 74.4 ± 11.7%, Tnc−/−: 87.8 ± 2.6%, Tnr−/−: 79 ± 2.8%). This result persisted over a remyelination period of 6 weeks (6RM: SV/129: 83.3 ± 3.7%, Tnc−/−: 80.5 ± 2.4%, Tnr−/−: 90.2 ± 3%) (Figure 5B). As the maturation of OPCs is a prerequisite for myelin regeneration, we also determined the number of CC1-positive cells. In the untreated control it seems that more CC1 positive cells were present in Tnc−/− mice, however, this effect could not be statistically proven (C: SV/129: 55 ± 2.5%, Tnc−/−: 66.6 ± 6.2%, Tnr−/−: 51.9 ± 2.5%; Tnc−/− vs. Tnr−/−, p = 0.0352). During demyelination, the number of CC1 positive cells in each genotype was decreased in comparison to the untreated control condition. Initially, the genotypes did not differ (DM: SV/129: 40.6 ± 3.1%, Tnc−/−: 38.9% ± 3%, Tnr−/−: 47.3 ± 2.2%). However, in the early stage of recovery after 2 weeks of remyelination CC1-positive cells were significantly less in both Tnc−/− and Tnr−/− in comparison to SV/129 wildtype tissue (2RM: SV/129: 51.2 ± 3.6%, Tnc−/−: 32.3 ± 3%, p = 0.0024; Tnr−/−: 30.3 ± 2.6%, p = 0.0008) (Figure 5C). This effect vanished after further 2 weeks of remyelination, where the number of CC1-positive cells was equivalent in Tnr−/− and SV129 wildtype mice. Interestingly, at that stage Tnc−/− tissue displayed substantially more CC1-positive than the Tnr−/− and SV/129 wildtype (4RM: SV/129: 55.2 ± 3%, Tnc−/−: 79.3 ± 2.7%, p = 0.0001; Tnr−/−: 55.8 ± 1.1%; Tnc−/− vs. Tnr−/−, p < 0.0001). Finally, after 6 weeks of remyelination Tnc−/− and SV/129 mice were comparable, while the fraction of mature oligodendrocytes appeared elevated in Tnr−/− mice (6RM: SV/129: 65.4 ± 2.9%, Tnc−/−: 67.4 ± 2.6%, Tnr−/−: 88.02 ± 1.9%, p < 0.0001; Tnc−/− vs. Tnr−/−, p < 0.0001) (Figure 5C). The myelination process involves membrane extension, initial axonal contact, and subsequent stabilization [53]. Consequent to contact the proteolipid-protein 1 (PLP) and MBP mRNA are transported to the plasma membrane where the MBP synthesis is carried out [54,55]. The analysis of mRNA levels for MBP was performed to obtain more insight into oligodendrocyte maturation in our samples (Figure 5D). MBP represents a well-established biomarker for the maturation of myelin membranes [56,57]. There were no apparent differences between the genotypes of the untreated controls (C: SV129: 2 ± 0.4, Tnc−/−: 2.8 ± 0.4, Tnr−/−: 1.97 ± 0.4) and after demyelination (DM: SV129: 1.6 ± 0.1, Tnc−/−: 1.8 ± 0.2, Tnr−/−: 1.9 ± 0.2). Interestingly, in the early stage of recovery after 2 weeks of remyelination the MBP expression was significantly increased in Tnc−/− (p = 0.0342) as well as in Tnr−/− (p = 0.0187) in comparison to wild-type mice (2R: SV129: 1.9 ± 0.01, Tnc−/−: 2.4 ± 0.1, p = 0.0342; Tnr−/−: 2.4 ± 0.1, p = 0.0187). This might indicate that MBP was upregulated to compensate for the delay in maturation towards CC1-positive cells observed during that phase (Figure 5C). After 4 weeks of remyelination, no differences were visible (4RM: SV129: 2.1 ± 0.3, Tnc−/−: 2.4 ± 0.2, Tnr−/−: 2.5 ± 0.1). Thereafter, MBP message levels increased further in both tenascin knockouts, paralleling the advent of CC1-positive cells (6RM: SV129: 2.1 ± 0.1, Tnc−/−: 2.5 ± 0.1, p = 0.0135; Tnr−/−: 2.5 ± 0.1, p = 0.1311) (Figure 5C,D). The analysis of the oligodendrocyte population was complemented by an investigation of oligodendrocyte precursor cells using the marker platelet-derived growth factor alpha (PDGFRα), which is an established marker for OPCs (Figure 6). Under control conditions more PDGFRα-positive cells were visible (Figure 6A(a–c)) in both tenascin knockout lines (C: SV/129: 11.3 ± 1.5%, Tnc−/−: 20.2 ± 1.2%, p = 0.0019; Tnr−/−: 21.3 ± 2.6%, p = 0.0115).
These results could also be observed in demyelination condition, in which especially in Tnc−/− mice the number of OPCs increased substantially in comparison to the SV/129 wildtype and untreated condition. Furthermore, in Tnr−/− mice the number of OPCs was also significant increased (DM: SV/129: 9.8 ± 2%, Tnc−/−: 21.3 ± 2.6%, p = 0.0005; Tnr−/−: 19.4 ± 2%, p = 0.0091). The largest number of PDGFRα positive oligodendrocytes was detected in the early stage of recovery in Tnc−/− mice after 2 weeks of remyelination (Figure 6B), whereas there were no significant differences between the Tnr−/− and SV/129 measurable (2RM: SV/129: 20.4 ± 1.2, Tnc−/−: 39.5 ± 2%, p < 0.0001; Tnr−/−: 28.6 ± 0.8, p = 0.0004; Tnc−/− vs. Tnr−/−: p = 0.0117).
After 4 weeks of remyelination no differences between the several genotypes were detectable (4RM: SV/129: 23.4 ± 1.2%, Tnc−/−: 23.4 ± 1.5%, Tnr−/−: 24.2 ± 1%). These relations remained unchanged even after 6 weeks of remyelination (6RM: SV/129: 20.3 ± 2.1%, Tnc−/−: 22 ± 2.3%, Tnr−/−: 14.6 ± 3%). Taken together these results show that especially in the absence of Tnc significantly more OPCs were detectable. The analysis of the PDGFRα expression was also performed on the message level (Figure 6C). The determination of relative message levels indicated no differences between the genotypes in the control (C: SV129: 0.355 ± 0.017, Tnc−/−: 0.348 ± 0.023, Tnr−/−: 0.448 ± 0.09) and after demyelination (DM: SV129: 0.36 ± 0.05, Tnc−/−: 0.29 ± 0.05, Tnr−/−: 0.28 ± 0.013). The sole differences that emerged with regard to the message level were the stages of 2 weeks (2RM: SV129: 0.393 ± 0.033, Tnc−/−: 0.663 ± 0.12, Tnr−/−: 0.29 ± 0.024, p = 0.0413) and 4 weeks (4RM: SV129: 0.473 ± 0.036, Tnc−/−: 0.868 ± 0.114, p = 0.0161; Tnr−/−: 0.378 ± 0.041) of regeneration. Thus, after 4 weeks a clearly increased upregulation occurred in the Tnc−/− mutant (Figure 6C). Interestingly, this was also reflected in the number of PDGFRα-positive genotypes tested (6RM: SV129: 0.45 ± 0.04, Tnc−/−: 0.48 ± 0.05, Tnr−/−: 0.59 ± 0.10).
3.4. The Loss of Tnc Enhances Astrocyte Reactivity in Cuprizone-Induced CNS Lesions
The reactivity of astrocytes is a hallmark of tissue lesions in the CNS [58]. The distribution of astrocytes was determined by using GFAP as a marker (Figure 7). Under control conditions, less astrocytes were counted in both knockout lines (C: SV/129: 23.45 ± 2.3%, Tnc−/−: 7.8 ± 1.8%, p = 0.0016; Tnr−/−: 9.1 ± 1.4%, p = 0.0017) (Figure 7B). As the myelin was degraded by the cuprizone diet, the response to lesions was of particular interest. There, we observed a smaller fraction of GFAP-positive cells (Figure 7A(d–f),B) in the Tnr−/− after demyelination (DM: SV/129: 22.33 ± 3.3%, Tnc−/−: 33.8% ± 7.2%, Tnr−/−: 10.12 ± 1.2%, p = 0.0136; Tnc−/− vs. Tnr−/−: p = 0.0115). Within the first two weeks of remyelination, however, a strong increase of GFAP-positive cells could be noted in the Tnc−/− tissue, and a higher proportion of GFAP-positive cells was seen in the Tnr−/− (2RM: SV/129: 11.6% ± 1.9%, Tnc−/−: 38.1 ± 7.8%, p = 0.0165; Tnr−/−: 21.45 ± 2.8%, p = 0.0266) (Figure 7B). These differences were no longer visible after 4 weeks (4RM: SV/129: 17.6 ± 3.8%, Tnc−/−: 21.3 ± 1.6%, Tnr−/−: 8 ± 1%, p = 0.0508; Tnc−/− vs. Tnr−/−: p = 0.0110) and 6 weeks of regeneration (6RM: SV/129: 17.1% ± 3.6%, Tnc−/−: 14.8 ± 1.4%, Tnr−/−: 18.3 ± 1.6%) (Figure 7A(j–o) and Figure 2B). Thus, astrocyte reactivity was increased in both tenascin knockout lines within the first two weeks after the lesion.
3.5. Tenascins Modulate Microglia and Leucocytes in Cuprizone-Induced Lesions
Increasing evidence indicates that the ECM and tenascins regulate also the immune reactions upon lesion to the CNS [59,60]. Therefore, we investigated the local immune response including microglia and macrophages using the markers Iba1 and CD68 expression in our demyelination model (Figure 8). Interestingly, in the untreated condition the number of Iba1 positive cells appeared significantly increased in both tenascin knockouts (C: SV/129: 8.9 ± 0.8%, C: Tnc−/−: 15.3 ± 1%, p = 0.001; C: Tnr−/−: 11.74 ± 0.9%, p = 0.0443) (Figure 8B). It is known that microglia are repulsed by anti-adhesive Tnr in vitro [61]. Upon demyelination the number of Iba1-positive cells overall augmented, most extensively in the Tnr−/− (DM: SV/129: 22.04 ± 1.4%, Tnc−/−: 26.22 ± 1.7%, Tnr−/−: 30.16 ± 2.8%, p = 0.0329) (Figure 8B). In the first recovery phase, the microglia stayed elevated, though less so in the Tnc−/− tissue (2RM: SV/129: 24.62 ± 1.12%, Tnc−/−: 20.6 ± 1.03%, p = 0.0292; Tnr−/−: 27.38 ± 0.71%). Microglia populations were comparable after 4 weeks recovery (4RM: SV/129: 26.14 ± 2.8%, Tnc−/−: 22.58 ± 1.21%, Tnr−/−: 19.36 ± 1,08%) and decreased further after 6 weeks, with relatively higher proportion of microglia in the Tnc−/− (6RM: SV/129: 13.98 ± 0.93%, Tnc−/−: 17.76 ± 1.08%, p = 0.0295; Tnr−/−: 16.54 ± 1.85%) (Figure 8A(j–o),B). The microglia and macrophage compartment were investigated further using the marker CD68 that was evaluated by RT-PCR analysis (Figure 8C). CD68 is a highly glycosylated glycoprotein which is expressed by mononuclear phagocytes and used to detect the response of activated microglia as well as macrophages that accumulate in acute lesions [62]. In the untreated situation CD68 expression was higher in Tnr−/− mice (C: SV/129: 0.46 ± 0.06, Tnc−/−: 0.58 ± 0.12, Tnr−/−: 0.86 ± 0.14). Demyelination strongly boosted CD68 expression in all genotypes, most intensely so in the wildtype and the Tnc−/− mouse line (DM: SV/129: 2.24 ± 0.15, Tnc−/−: 2.28 ± 0.19, Tnr−/−: 1.16 ± 0.12, p = 0.0005; Tnc−/− vs. Tnr−/−: p = 0.0023). Thereafter, CD68 expression steadily decreased with ongoing recovery, although more rapidly in the Tnr−/− knockout after 2weeks (2RM: SV/129: 1.9 ± 0.18, Tnc−/−: 1.45 ± 0.23, Tnr−/−: 1.37 ± 0.1, p = 0.0288). After 4 weeks of recovery CD68 went further down in all genotypes (4RM: SV/129: 1.33 ± 0.19, Tnc−/−: 1.53 ± 0.3, Tnr−/−: 0.97 ± 0.11) and reached basal level in the wildtype after 6 weeks (6RM: SV/129: 0.61 ± 0.13, Tnc−/−: 2.1 ± 0.5, p = 0.0172; Tnr−/−: 1.02 ± 0.02, p = 0.0234). The knockout lines still showed enhanced activation with elevated CD68 at that stage. Clearly, the demyelination by cuprizone treatment led to an activation of the microglia compartment that appeared more accentuated in several instances in the absence of Tnc or Tnr.
4. Discussion
In the present study, we investigated the influence of the glycoproteins Tnc and the structurally related Tnr on the regenerative response of oligodendroglia in a myelin lesion paradigm using cuprizone. Previous studies in the laboratory had revealed that the Tnc protein of the tenascin family of ECM glycoproteins exerts inhibitory effects on the motility and differentiation of oligodendrocyte precursor cells in vitro [22,26,63]. Although both glycoproteins have a similar structure, their expression patterns differ. Tnc is expressed by neural stem and astrocyte precursor cells and down-regulated postnatally. Tnr is restricted to the CNS and expressed postnatally by maturing oligodendrocytes and a subpopulation of neurons [22,25,64]. By comparing Tnc+/+ and Tnc−/− OPC cultures in the artificial fiber assay we obtained evidence that Tnc has a negative impact on the number of myelin sheaths per oligodendrocyte and thereby the extent of myelin formation. This is consistent with previous reports that showed an interference of Tnc with oligodendrocyte membrane extension [22]. Thus, as expected, Tnc−/− OPCs generated a higher number of myelin extensions per cell than the wildtype. This beneficial effect was strongly boosted by the addition of BDNF, a neurotrophin that is known to support myelin regeneration in vivo [50,65,66,67]. Inhibition of membrane extension may be rooted in the fact that Tnc prevents RhoA activation [68,69], because the reduction of RhoA activation by deletion of the nucleotide exchange factor Vav3 led to reduced myelination, also in vivo [70,71]. In the artificial fiber myelination assay Tnr−/− OPCs behaved differently in that the number of myelin extensions per cell was reduced. At first sight, this was unexpected because Tnr also suppresses RhoA activation and membrane formation, similar to Tnc [22].
However, both Tnc and Tnr have opposite effects on oligodendrocyte maturation in that Tnc prevents whereas Tnr promotes the maturation of OPCs towards the expression of MBP [22,30]. Thus, the tampered ability of Tnr−/− OPCs to extend membranes may result from a maturation deficit towards the myelinating stage, a process that conversely would benefit from a deficit of Tnc. Tnc is known to modulate the adhesion of various cell types to culture substrates [72], yet the Tnc−/− mouse lines are viable and fertile, in the absence of gross morphological or functional deficits [73], and in particular the myelin compartment appeared developmentally unperturbed [52]. On the other hand, several studies revealed subtle developmental modifications in the radial glia and oligodendrocyte compartments that were compensated for in the adult CNS [74,75]. Furthermore, recent studies suggested functional roles of Tnc in response to lesions, in particular in the CNS [76,77,78,79], reviewed in [80]. Therefore, we decided to investigate the roles of Tnc and Tnr in a myelin lesion model based on the application of cuprizone to the chow [81,82]. In this approach, the newly formed myelin sheaths are generally thinner and shorter than the former ones [48,83,84]. The effects on myelin formation were monitored by electron microscopy and by examining well-established markers of oligodendrocyte progenitor maturation and the major macroglial cell types. A strong demyelination could be achieved by dispensing a cuprizone-rich diet for 6 weeks [31,81]. In our study, this effect was clearly visible after 10 weeks of treatment, which we consider to mimic chronic demyelination. Thereafter, remyelination ensued as expected [85,86]. Currently, chronic demyelination is induced by a 12-week cuprizone treatment [40,41]. However, in these cases, the remyelination fails or is insufficient [43,44,45,87] due to the reduced expression of Trem2 resulting in an impaired clearance of myelin debris from microglia. Therefore, we opted for a 10-week cuprizone treatment to mimic a chronic course of demyelination. According to the g-ratio, remyelination was more efficient in the tenascin knockouts than in the wildtype, and most effective in the absence of Tnc. This does not exclude a differential sensitivity to Cuprizone treatment. Interestingly, known effects concern the roles of Tnc in regulating the proliferation and migration of OPCs [74]. Furthermore, an anti-apoptotic effect of Tnc for oligodendrocytes in vitro has been reported [63]. Less is known in this regard about Tnr. Therefore, the question remains open whether some of the differences in de- and remyelination observed are due to a differential susceptibility of the mouse lines towards Cuprizone treatment.
The phenotype in the Tnc−/−-line most probably reflects the inhibitory properties of Tnc for maturation and membrane extension observed in vitro. This effect of Tnc was accompanied by a strong upregulation of GFAP, reflecting enhanced astrocyte reactivity in this situation. Interestingly, a strong upregulation of GFAP had also been observed in a stab wound model to the cortex of the Tnc−/− mouse line [88]. Interestingly, our laboratory has shown that the proliferation of astrocytes is augmented in the embryonic Tnc−/− spinal cord, which may be responsible for the enhanced astroglial reactivity observed in lesions [89]. Reactive astrocytes can also be considered a source for the release of Tnc in lesioned tissue [90]. Of note, it has been proposed that astrocyte-derived Tnc contributes to the inhibitory environment for remyelination in Multiple Sclerosis lesions [91,92]. It has been shown that alphaV integrins are upregulated during remyelination, in conjunction with Tnc and Tnr that may represent functional ligands in that context [27]. Integrins are considered important receptors for tenascin functions [93,94]. Beyond its role in perineuronal nets where it serves as a major scaffolding protein [95], Tnr has also been studied in lesion situations. In this context, it has been proposed as an inhibitory axonal guidance molecule, notably in the optic nerve [29] and in the spinal cord [96]. As Tnr is expressed by adult oligodendrocytes it may be part of degraded myelin that abounds in demyelinating lesions. There, it also seems to interfere with remyelination, as the Tnr−/− mice showed an improved recovery in the cuprizone model, albeit not as effectively as the Tnc−/− counterpart. Both tenascins interact with various chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs) of the lectican family such as versican and brevican and thus partake in the inhibitory environment that restricts regeneration of myelin, in particular in multiple sclerosis lesions [97,98,99]. The copper chelator cuprizone sets a metabolic insult that preferentially leads to the elimination of mature oligodendrocytes by apoptosis [15,82]. The elimination of oligodendrocytes was particularly effective in the Tnc−/− tissue where the lowest number of Olig2-positive cells was recorded. This is in agreement with the former report that OPC proliferation is reduced in the Tnc knockout [74]. Repair of the deficit requires the recruitment of OPCs to the lesion site, where the cells have to differentiate towards the myelin-forming stage [7,8]. Tnc is known to interfere with OPC motility in vitro [26,100] and Tnc−/− knockout mice revealed an accelerated invasion of OPCs into the optic nerve [74]. Similarly, in our current study more PDGFR-positive OPCs [101,102] were detected upon demyelination and in the first two weeks of remyelination in the absence of Tnc. Tnr embodies anti-adhesive properties for different neural cell types [103]. While its impact on migration has not explicitly been studied this may explain the increased immigration of PDGFR-positive OPCs observed upon demyelination and during the first two weeks of remyelination, analogous to albeit not as extensive as in the Tnc−/− situation. Once on site, the OPCs have to engage in differentiation in order to remyelinate the axon. Myelin basic protein (MBP) is very important for the compaction of the myelin sheaths [56]. Tnc is known to delay the maturation of OPCs towards the MBP-expressing mature state [22]. This effect is mediated by the receptor contactin-1 (Cntn1), the activation of downstream signaling pathways, and the suppression of the RNA-binding protein Sam68, an oligodendrocyte maturation factor [34]. In agreement with these inhibitory properties, we observed an increase in mature CC1-positive oligodendrocytes and MBP expression within two to four weeks of remyelination in the Tnc−/− system. Tnr, different from Tnc promotes the acquisition of MBP and has been proposed as an autocrine maturation factor of oligodendrocytes in vitro [22,30]. Notwithstanding, the maturation of OPCs in the absence of Tnr was not compromised, which might indicate that the loss of Tnr was compensated by axon-derived signals in the in vivo situation.
It is interesting to compare our results with studies that focused on autoimmune processes in tenascin knockout mutants. Thus, in an experimental autoimmune encephalitis elicited by the injection of the myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG), the encephalitogenic response of Th1 and Th17 immune cells was substantially reduced in the absence of Tnc [76]. Likewise, in an autoimmune glaucoma model, the ablation of Tnc resulted in amelioration of outcome [78]. These observations conform with a recent report that Tnc belongs to the damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and is as efficient regarding the activation of microglia as lipopolysaccharides [104]. These findings stage Tnc as an important modulator of immune responses in the CNS [17,60]. For example, Tnc associated with exosomes has been found to suppress T-cell activation [105] and the extracellular matrix appears involved in the immune response to ischemia [59,106]. In our studies, we saw several differences between the genotypes regarding the number of Iba1-positive cells and the expression of CD68, that was particularly upregulated after six weeks of remyelination in the Tnc−/− lesions. Interestingly, a recent report emphasized a regulatory role of Tnc for microglia surveillance and leucocyte infiltration in ischemic CNS infarct territory [106].
Summarizing our findings, it seems that the elimination of Tnc and Tnr exerts a clear impact on the remyelination of cuprizone-induced myelin degradation. Both the recruitment of OPCs to the lesion territory and their local differentiation to myelinating cells are promoted in the absence of tenascins. Consequently, remyelination is supported and myelin repair is accelerated in the mutants.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Marion Voelzkow and Sandra Lata for technical support.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells11111773/s1, Figure S1: G-ratios under control, de- and remyelination conditions; Figure S2: Body weights under control, de- and remyelination conditions.
Author Contributions
A.F. and J.B designed and supervised the study. J.B. performed the experiments, quantified, and interpreted the data. A.F. and J.B. interpreted the data. J.B. drafted and A.F. and J.B. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The animal study protocol was approved by LANUV, North Rhine-Westfalia, Germany (AZ 84-02.04.2014.A332) and conducted according to German animal protection laws and Federation for Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA) standards.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be constructed as a potential conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
The work was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG, FA 159/24-1, grant Nr. 407698736 to AF). We acknowledge support from the DFG Open Access Publication Funds of the Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Bradl M., Lassmann H. Oligodendrocytes: Biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119:37–53. doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0601-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Barateiro A., Fernandes A. Temporal oligodendrocyte lineage progression: In vitro models of proliferation, differentiation and myelination. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2014;1843:1917–1929. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Goldman S.A., Kuypers N.J. How to make an oligodendrocyte. Development. 2015;142:3983–3995. doi: 10.1242/dev.126409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Miron V.E., Kuhlmann T., Antel J.P. Cells of the oligodendroglial lineage, myelination, and remyelination. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2011;1812:184–193. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nave K.A. Myelination and support of axonal integrity by glia. Nature. 2010;468:244–252. doi: 10.1038/nature09614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nave K.A., Werner H.B. Ensheathment and Myelination of Axons: Evolution of Glial Functions. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2021;44:197–219. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-100120-122621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Franklin R.J.M., Ffrench-Constant C. Regenerating CNS myelin—From mechanisms to experimental medicines. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2017;18:753–769. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Franklin R.J., Ffrench-Constant C. Remyelination in the CNS: From biology to therapy. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008;9:839–855. doi: 10.1038/nrn2480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hagemeier K., Bruck W., Kuhlmann T. Multiple sclerosis—Remyelination failure as a cause of disease progression. Histol. Histopathol. 2012;27:277–287. doi: 10.14670/HH-27.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sospedra M. B cells in multiple sclerosis. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2018;31:256–262. doi: 10.1097/WCO.000000000000563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pugliatti M., Sotgiu S., Rosati G. The worldwide prevalence of multiple sclerosis. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2002;104:182–191. doi: 10.1016/S0303-8467(02)00036-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Walton C., King R., Rechtman L., Kaye W., Leray E., Marrie R.A., Robertson N., La Rocca N., Uitdehaag B., van der Mei I., et al. Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: Insights from the Atlas of MS, third edition. Mult. Scler. 2020;26:1816–1821. doi: 10.1177/1352458520970841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Patani R., Balaratnam M., Vora A., Reynolds R. Remyelination can be extensive in multiple sclerosis despite a long disease course. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2007;33:277–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00805.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kipp M., Clarner T., Dang J., Copray S., Beyer C. The cuprizone animal model: New insights into an old story. Acta Neuropathol. 2009;118:723–736. doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0591-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Matsushima G.K., Morell P. The neurotoxicant, cuprizone, as a model to study demyelination and remyelination in the central nervous system. Brain Pathol. 2001;11:107–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2001.tb00385.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ransohoff R.M. Animal models of multiple sclerosis: The good, the bad and the bottom line. Nat. Neurosci. 2012;15:1074–1077. doi: 10.1038/nn.3168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jakovcevski I., Miljkovic D., Schachner M., Andjus P.R. Tenascins and inflammation in disorders of the nervous system. Amino Acids. 2013;44:1115–1127. doi: 10.1007/s00726-012-1446-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wheeler N.A., Fuss B. Extracellular cues influencing oligodendrocyte differentiation and (re)myelination. Exp. Neurol. 2016;283:512–530. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.03.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dityatev A., Schachner M., Sonderegger P. The dual role of the extracellular matrix in synaptic plasticity and homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010;11:735–746. doi: 10.1038/nrn2898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Barros C.S., Franco S.J., Muller U. Extracellular matrix: Functions in the nervous system. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011;3:a005108. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a005108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Faissner A., Reinhard J. The extracellular matrix compartment of neural stem and glial progenitor cells. Glia. 2015;63:1330–1349. doi: 10.1002/glia.22839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Czopka T., Von Holst A., Schmidt G., Ffrench-Constant C., Faissner A. Tenascin C and tenascin R similarly prevent the formation of myelin membranes in a RhoA-dependent manner, but antagonistically regulate the expression of myelin basic protein via a separate pathway. Glia. 2009;57:1790–1801. doi: 10.1002/glia.20891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tucker R.P., Drabikowski K., Hess J.F., Ferralli J., Chiquet-Ehrismann R., Adams J.C. Phylogenetic analysis of the tenascin gene family: Evidence of origin early in the chordate lineage. BMC Evol. Biol. 2006;6:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-6-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bartsch S., Bartsch U., Dorries U., Faissner A., Weller A., Ekblom P., Schachner M. Expression of tenascin in the developing and adult cerebellar cortex. J. Neurosci. 1992;12:736–749. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-03-00736.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Faissner A., Roll L., Theocharidis U. Tenascin-C in the matrisome of neural stem and progenitor cells. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2017;81:22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2016.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kiernan B.W., Gotz B., Faissner A., Ffrench-Constant C. Tenascin-C inhibits oligodendrocyte precursor cell migration by both adhesion-dependent and adhesion-independent mechanisms. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 1996;7:322–335. doi: 10.1006/mcne.1996.0024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhao C., Fancy S.P., Franklin R.J., Ffrench-Constant C. Up-regulation of oligodendrocyte precursor cell alphaV integrin and its extracellular ligands during central nervous system remyelination. J. Neurosci. Res. 2009;87:3447–3455. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fuss B., Wintergerst E.S., Bartsch U., Schachner M. Molecular characterization and in situ mRNA localization of the neural recognition molecule J1-160/180: A modular structure similar to tenascin. J. Cell Biol. 1993;120:1237–1249. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.5.1237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Becker T., Anliker B., Becker C.G., Taylor J., Schachner M., Meyer R.L., Bartsch U. Tenascin-R inhibits regrowth of optic fibers in vitro and persists in the optic nerve of mice after injury. Glia. 2000;29:330–346. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(20000215)29:4<330::AID-GLIA4>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pesheva P., Gloor S., Schachner M., Probstmeier R. Tenascin-R is an intrinsic autocrine factor for oligodendrocyte differentiation and promotes cell adhesion by a sulfatide-mediated mechanism. J. Neurosci. 1997;17:4642–4651. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-12-04642.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bauch J., Vom Ort S., Ulc A., Faissner A. Tenascins interfere with remyelination in an ex vivo cerebellar explant model of demyelination. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022. in press . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.Watkins T.A., Emery B., Mulinyawe S., Barres B.A. Distinct stages of myelination regulated by gamma-secretase and astrocytes in a rapidly myelinating CNS coculture system. Neuron. 2008;60:555–569. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Albrecht S., Hagemeier K., Ehrlich M., Kemming C., Trotter J., Kuhlmann T. Recovery from Toxic-Induced Demyelination Does Not Require the NG2 Proteoglycan. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0163841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Czopka T., von Holst A., Ffrench-Constant C., Faissner A. Regulatory mechanisms that mediate tenascin C-dependent inhibition of oligodendrocyte precursor differentiation. J. Neurosci. 2010;30:12310–12322. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4957-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sallouh M., Jarocki M., Sallouh O., Degen P., Faissner A., Weberskirch R. The Synergistic Effect of Cationic Moieties and GRGDSF-Peptides in Hydrogels on Neural Stem Cell Behavior. Macromol. Biosci. 2017;17I:1600178. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201600178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bechler M.E., Byrne L., Ffrench-Constant C. CNS Myelin Sheath Lengths Are an Intrinsic Property of Oligodendrocytes. Curr. Biol. CB. 2015;25:2411–2416. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ghaiad H.R., Nooh M.M., El-Sawalhi M.M., Shaheen A.A. Resveratrol Promotes Remyelination in Cuprizone Model of Multiple Sclerosis: Biochemical and Histological Study. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017;54:3219–3229. doi: 10.1007/s12035-016-9891-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hillis J.M., Davies J., Mundim M.V., Al-Dalahmah O., Szele F.G. Cuprizone demyelination induces a unique inflammatory response in the subventricular zone. J. Neuroinflamm. 2016;13:190. doi: 10.1186/s12974-016-0651-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Blakemore W.F. Remyelination of the superior cerebellar peduncle in old mice following demyelination induced by cuprizone. J. Neurol. Sci. 1974;22:121–126. doi: 10.1016/0022-510X(74)90059-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Poliani P.L., Wang Y., Fontana E., Robinette M.L., Yamanishi Y., Gilfillan S., Colonna M. TREM2 sustains microglial expansion during aging and response to demyelination. J. Clin. Investig. 2015;125:2161–2170. doi: 10.1172/JCI77983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhan J., Mann T., Joost S., Behrangi N., Frank M., Kipp M. The Cuprizone Model: Dos and Do Nots. Cells. 2020;9:843. doi: 10.3390/cells9040843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ludwin S.K. Chronic demyelination inhibits remyelination in the central nervous system. An analysis of contributing factors. Lab. Investig. 1980;43:382–387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Armstrong R.C., Le T.Q., Flint N.C., Vana A.C., Zhou Y.X. Endogenous cell repair of chronic demyelination. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2006;65:245–256. doi: 10.1097/01.jnen.0000205142.08716.7e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Harsan L.A., Steibel J., Zaremba A., Agin A., Sapin R., Poulet P., Guignard B., Parizel N., Grucker D., Boehm N., et al. Recovery from chronic demyelination by thyroid hormone therapy: Myelinogenesis induction and assessment by diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 2008;28:14189–14201. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4453-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Safaiyan S., Besson-Girard S., Kaya T., Cantuti-Castelvetri L., Liu L., Ji H., Schifferer M., Gouna G., Usifo F., Kannaiyan N., et al. White matter aging drives microglial diversity. Neuron. 2021;109:1100–1117. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Reyes-Haro D., Mora-Loyola E., Soria-Ortiz B., Garcia-Colunga J. Regional density of glial cells in the rat corpus callosum. Biol. Res. 2013;46:27–32. doi: 10.4067/S0716-97602013000100004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mason J.L., Jones J.J., Taniike M., Morell P., Suzuki K., Matsushima G.K. Mature oligodendrocyte apoptosis precedes IGF-1 production and oligodendrocyte progenitor accumulation and differentiation during demyelination/remyelination. J. Neurosci. Res. 2000;61:251–262. doi: 10.1002/1097-4547(20000801)61:3<251::AID-JNR3>3.0.CO;2-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jarjour A.A., Boyd A., Dow L.E., Holloway R.K., Goebbels S., Humbert P.O., Williams A., Ffrench-Constant C. The polarity protein Scribble regulates myelination and remyelination in the central nervous system. PLoS Biol. 2015;13:e1002107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Reynolds E.S. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 1963;17:208–212. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Fletcher J.L., Wood R.J., Nguyen J., Norman E.M.L., Jun C.M.K., Prawdiuk A.R., Biemond M., Nguyen H.T.H., Northfield S.E., Hughes R.A., et al. Targeting TrkB with a Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Mimetic Promotes Myelin Repair in the Brain. J. Neurosci. 2018;38:7088–7099. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0487-18.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Montag-Sallaz M., Montag D. Severe cognitive and motor coordination deficits in tenascin-R-deficient mice. Genes Brain Behav. 2003;2:20–31. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-183X.2003.00003.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kiernan B.W., Garcion E., Ferguson J., Frost E.E., Torres E.M., Dunnett S.B., Saga Y., Aizawa S., Faissner A., Kaur R., et al. Myelination and behaviour of tenascin-C null transgenic mice. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1999;11:3082–3092. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00729.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Simons M., Trotter J. Wrapping it up: The cell biology of myelination. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2007;17:533–540. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2007.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Simons M., Kramer E.M., Thiele C., Stoffel W., Trotter J. Assembly of myelin by association of proteolipid protein with cholesterol- and galactosylceramide-rich membrane domains. J. Cell Biol. 2000;151:143–154. doi: 10.1083/jcb.151.1.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Muller C., Bauer N.M., Schafer I., White R. Making myelin basic protein -from mRNA transport to localized translation. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2013;7:169. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2013.00169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Boggs J.M. Myelin basic protein: A multifunctional protein. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS. 2006;63:1945–1961. doi: 10.1007/s00018-006-6094-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Krugmann B., Radulescu A., Appavou M.S., Koutsioubas A., Stingaciu L.R., Dulle M., Forster S., Stadler A.M. Membrane stiffness and myelin basic protein binding strength as molecular origin of multiple sclerosis. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:16691. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73671-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Escartin C., Galea E., Lakatos A., O’Callaghan J.P., Petzold G.C., Serrano-Pozo A., Steinhauser C., Volterra A., Carmignoto G., Agarwal A., et al. Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions. Nat. Neurosci. 2021;24:312–325. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-00783-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Dzyubenko E., Manrique-Castano D., Kleinschnitz C., Faissner A., Hermann D.M. Role of immune responses for extracellular matrix remodeling in the ischemic brain. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2018;11:1756286418818092. doi: 10.1177/1756286418818092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wiemann S., Reinhard J., Faissner A. Immunomodulatory role of the extracellular matrix protein tenascin-C in neuroinflammation. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2019;47:1651–1660. doi: 10.1042/BST20190081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Angelov D.N., Walther M., Streppel M., Guntinas-Lichius O., Neiss W.F., Probstmeier R., Pesheva P. Tenascin-R is antiadhesive for activated microglia that induce downregulation of the protein after peripheral nerve injury: A new role in neuronal protection. J. Neurosci. 1998;18:6218–6229. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-16-06218.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wijesundera K.K., Juniantito V., Golbar H.M., Fujisawa K., Tanaka M., Ichikawa C., Izawa T., Kuwamura M., Yamate J. Expressions of Iba1 and galectin-3 (Gal-3) in thioacetamide (TAA)-induced acute rat liver lesions. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2013;65:799–808. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2012.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Garwood J., Garcion E., Dobbertin A., Heck N., Calco V., Ffrench-Constant C., Faissner A. The extracellular matrix glycoprotein Tenascin-C is expressed by oligodendrocyte precursor cells and required for the regulation of maturation rate, survival and responsiveness to platelet-derived growth factor. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004;20:2524–2540. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03727.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Rathjen F.G., Hodge R. Early Days of Tenascin-R Research: Two Approaches Discovered and Shed Light on Tenascin-R. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:612482. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.612482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.VonDran M.W., Singh H., Honeywell J.Z., Dreyfus C.F. Levels of BDNF impact oligodendrocyte lineage cells following a cuprizone lesion. J. Neurosci. 2011;31:14182–14190. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6595-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Fulmer C.G., VonDran M.W., Stillman A.A., Huang Y., Hempstead B.L., Dreyfus C.F. Astrocyte-derived BDNF supports myelin protein synthesis after cuprizone-induced demyelination. J. Neurosci. 2014;34:8186–8196. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4267-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Saitta K.S., Lercher L.D., Sainato D.M., Patel A., Huang Y., McAuliffe G., Dreyfus C.F. CHPG enhances BDNF and myelination in cuprizone-treated mice through astrocytic metabotropic glutamate receptor 5. Glia. 2021;69:1950–1965. doi: 10.1002/glia.24003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wenk M.B., Midwood K.S., Schwarzbauer J.E. Tenascin-C suppresses Rho activation. J. Cell Biol. 2000;150:913–920. doi: 10.1083/jcb.150.4.913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Czopka T., Hennen E., von Holst A., Faissner A. Novel conserved oligodendrocyte surface epitope identified by monoclonal antibody 4860. Cell Tissue Res. 2009;338:161–170. doi: 10.1007/s00441-009-0868-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ulc A., Gottschling C., Schäfer I., Wegrzyn D., van Leeuwen S., Luft V., Reinhard J., Faissner A. Involvement of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor Vav3 in central nervous system development and plasticity. Biol. Chem. 2017;398:663–675. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2016-0275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ulc A., Zeug A., Bauch J., van Leeuwen S., Kuhlmann T., Ffrench-Constant C., Ponimaskin E., Faissner A. The guanine nucleotide exchange factor Vav3 modulates oligodendrocyte precursor differentiation and supports remyelination in white matter lesions. Glia. 2019;67:376–392. doi: 10.1002/glia.23548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Chiquet-Ehrismann R., Tucker R.P. Tenascins and the importance of adhesion modulation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011;3:a004960. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a004960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Mackie E.J., Tucker R.P. The tenascin-C knockout revisited. J. Cell Sci. 1999;112 Pt 22:3847–3853. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112.22.3847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Garcion E., Faissner A., Ffrench-Constant C. Knockout mice reveal a contribution of the extracellular matrix molecule tenascin-C to neural precursor proliferation and migration. Development. 2001;128:2485–2496. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.13.2485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Garcion E., Halilagic A., Faissner A., Ffrench-Constant C. Generation of an environmental niche for neural stem cell development by the extracellular matrix molecule tenascin C. Development. 2004;131:3423–3432. doi: 10.1242/dev.01202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Momcilovic M., Stamenkovic V., Jovanovic M., Andjus P.R., Jakovcevski I., Schachner M., Miljkovic D. Tenascin-C deficiency protects mice from experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2017;302:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2016.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Nakano F., Kawakita F., Liu L., Nakatsuka Y., Nishikawa H., Okada T., Shiba M., Suzuki H. Link Between Receptors That Engage in Developing Vasospasm After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Mice. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 2020;127:55–58. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-04615-6_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Wiemann S., Reinhard J., Reinehr S., Cibir Z., Joachim S.C., Faissner A. Loss of the Extracellular Matrix Molecule Tenascin-C Leads to Absence of Reactive Gliosis and Promotes Anti-inflammatory Cytokine Expression in an Autoimmune Glaucoma Mouse Model. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:566279. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.566279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Wiemann S., Yousf A., Joachim S.C., Peters C., Mueller-Buehl A.M., Wagner N., Reinhard J. Knock-Out of Tenascin-C Ameliorates Ischemia-Induced Rod-Photoreceptor Degeneration and Retinal Dysfunction. Front. Neurosci. 2021;15:642176. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.642176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Roll L., Faissner A. Tenascins in CNS lesions. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019;89:118–124. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Skripuletz T., Lindner M., Kotsiari A., Garde N., Fokuhl J., Linsmeier F., Trebst C., Stangel M. Cortical demyelination is prominent in the murine cuprizone model and is strain-dependent. Am. J. Pathol. 2008;172:1053–1061. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.070850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Torkildsen O., Brunborg L.A., Myhr K.M., Bo L. The cuprizone model for demyelination. Acta Neurol. Scand. Suppl. 2008;188:72–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2008.01036.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Dubois-Dalcq M., Williams A., Stadelmann C., Stankoff B., Zalc B., Lubetzki C. From fish to man: Understanding endogenous remyelination in central nervous system demyelinating diseases. Brain A J. Neurol. 2008;131:1686–1700. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Brown T.L., Macklin W.B. The Actin Cytoskeleton in Myelinating Cells. Neurochem. Res. 2020;45:684–693. doi: 10.1007/s11064-019-02753-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Lindner M., Heine S., Haastert K., Garde N., Fokuhl J., Linsmeier F., Grothe C., Baumgartner W., Stangel M. Sequential myelin protein expression during remyelination reveals fast and efficient repair after central nervous system demyelination. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2008;34:105–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00879.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Sachs H.H., Bercury K.K., Popescu D.C., Narayanan S.P., Macklin W.B. A new model of cuprizone-mediated demyelination/remyelination. ASN Neuro. 2014;6:1759091414551955. doi: 10.1177/1759091414551955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Sen M.K., Mahns D.A., Coorssen J.R., Shortland P.J. The roles of microglia and astrocytes in phagocytosis and myelination: Insights from the cuprizone model of multiple sclerosis. Glia. 2022;70:1215–1250. doi: 10.1002/glia.24148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Steindler D.A., Settles D., Erickson H.P., Laywell E.D., Yoshiki A., Faissner A., Kusakabe M. Tenascin knockout mice: Barrels, boundary molecules, and glial scars. J. Neurosci. 1995;15:1971–1983. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-03-01971.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Karus M., Denecke B., Ffrench-Constant C., Wiese S., Faissner A. The extracellular matrix molecule tenascin C modulates expression levels and territories of key patterning genes during spinal cord astrocyte specification. Development. 2011;138:5321–5331. doi: 10.1242/dev.067413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Roll L., Eysel U.T., Faissner A. Laser Lesion in the Mouse Visual Cortex Induces a Stem Cell Niche-Like Extracellular Matrix, Produced by Immature Astrocytes. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2020;14:102. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.00102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Gutowski N.J., Newcombe J., Cuzner M.L. Tenascin-R and C in multiple sclerosis lesions: Relevance to extracellular matrix remodelling. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 1999;25:207–214. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2990.1999.00176.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Nash B., Thomson C.E., Linington C., Arthur A.T., McClure J.D., McBride M.W., Barnett S.C. Functional duality of astrocytes in myelination. J. Neurosci. 2011;31:13028–13038. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1449-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Liao H., Huang W., Schachner M., Guan Y., Guo J., Yan J., Qin J., Bai X., Zhang L. Beta 1 integrin-mediated effects of tenascin-R domains EGFL and FN6-8 on neural stem/progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:27927–27936. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M804764200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Tucker R.P., Chiquet-Ehrismann R. Tenascin-C: Its functions as an integrin ligand. Int. J. Biochem. Cell B. 2015;65:165–168. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2015.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Dzyubenko E., Gottschling C., Faissner A. Neuron-Glia Interactions in Neural Plasticity: Contributions of Neural Extracellular Matrix and Perineuronal Nets. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:5214961. doi: 10.1155/2016/5214961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Apostolova I., Irintchev A., Schachner M. Tenascin-R restricts posttraumatic remodeling of motoneuron innervation and functional recovery after spinal cord injury in adult mice. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:7849–7859. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1526-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Lau L.W., Keough M.B., Haylock-Jacobs S., Cua R., Doring A., Sloka S., Stirling D.P., Rivest S., Yong V.W. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans in demyelinated lesions impair remyelination. Ann. Neurol. 2012;72:419–432. doi: 10.1002/ana.23599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Keough M.B., Rogers J.A., Zhang P., Jensen S.K., Stephenson E.L., Chen T., Hurlbert M.G., Lau L.W., Rawji K.S., Plemel J.R., et al. An inhibitor of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan synthesis promotes central nervous system remyelination. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:11312. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Ghorbani S., Yong V.W. The extracellular matrix as modifier of neuroinflammation and remyelination in multiple sclerosis. Brain A J. Neurol. 2021;144:1958–1973. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Kakinuma Y., Saito F., Osawa S., Miura M. A mechanism of impaired mobility of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells by tenascin C through modification of wnt signaling. FEBS Lett. 2004;568:60–64. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Pringle N.P., Mudhar H.S., Collarini E.J., Richardson W.D. PDGF receptors in the rat CNS: During late neurogenesis, PDGF alpha-receptor expression appears to be restricted to glial cells of the oligodendrocyte lineage. Development. 1992;115:535–551. doi: 10.1242/dev.115.2.535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Nishiyama A., Lin X.H., Giese N., Heldin C.H., Stallcup W.B. Co-localization of NG2 proteoglycan and PDGF alpha-receptor on O2A progenitor cells in the developing rat brain. J. Neurosci. Res. 1996;43:299–314. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19960201)43:3<299::AID-JNR5>3.0.CO;2-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Pesheva P., Spiess E., Schachner M. J1-160 and J1-180 are oligodendrocyte-secreted nonpermissive substrates for cell adhesion. J. Cell Biol. 1989;109:1765–1778. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.4.1765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Haage V., Elmadany N., Roll L., Faissner A., Gutmann D.H., Semtner M., Kettenmann H. Tenascin C regulates multiple microglial functions involving TLR4 signaling and HDAC1. Brain Behav. Immun. 2019;81:470–483. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.06.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Mirzaei R., Sarkar S., Dzikowski L., Rawji K.S., Khan L., Faissner A., Bose P., Yong V.W. Brain tumor-initiating cells export tenascin-C associated with exosomes to suppress T cell activity. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7:e1478647. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1478647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Manrique-Castano D., Dzyubenko E., Borbor M., Vasileiadou P., Kleinschnitz C., Roll L., Faissner A., Hermann D.M. Tenascin-C preserves microglia surveillance and restricts leukocyte and, more specifically, T cell infiltration of the ischemic brain. Brain Behav. Immun. 2020;91:639–648. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.