Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2022 May 24;23(11):5892. doi: 10.3390/ijms23115892

Preparation of Novel Pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[1,5-b][1,2,4]triazine Sulfonamides and Their Experimental and Computational Biological Studies

Mateusz Kciuk 1,2,*, Somdutt Mujwar 3, Anna Szymanowska 4, Beata Marciniak 1, Karol Bukowski 1, Mariusz Mojzych 4, Renata Kontek 1
Editor: Claudiu T Supuran
PMCID: PMC9180621  PMID: 35682571

Abstract

Pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[1,5-b][1,2,4]triazine sulfonamides constitute a novel class of heterocyclic compounds with broad biological activity, including anticancer properties. Investigated in this study, MM-compounds (MM134, MM136, MM137, and MM139) exhibited cytotoxic and proapoptotic activity against cancer cell lines (BxPC-3, PC-3, and HCT-116) in nanomolar concentrations without causing cytotoxicity in normal cells (L929 and WI38). In silico predictions indicate that tested compounds exhibit favorable pharmacokinetic profiles and may exert anticancer activity through the inhibition of BTK kinase, the AKT-mTOR pathway and PD1-PD-L1 interaction. Our findings point out that these sulfonamide derivatives may constitute a source of new anticancer drugs after optimization.

Keywords: cancer cells; cytotoxicity; apoptosis; pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[1,5-b][1,2,4]triazine; sulfonamides

1. Introduction

The chemistry of heterocyclic compounds is still a developing field that offers many opportunities for novel drug discovery, which is confirmed by the fact that many modern drugs used in medicine contain a heterocyclic core. Moreover, new methods of synthesis and modern organic chemistry techniques have led to the rapid expansion of this branch of science. Anticancer drug development is one of the main objectives of heterocyclic chemistry [1].

One of the common strategies used in anticancer drug development is the synthesis of antimetabolites that structurally resemble naturally occurring key substrates of metabolic processes. Blocking of these crucial processes slows down the proliferation of cells and triggers their apoptotic cell death [2,3,4]. Apoptosis is considered to be a crucial component of the vital processes of living organisms. It is responsible for the proper development and functioning of the immune system. Apoptosis deregulation results in the development of a multitude of human conditions, including neurodegenerative diseases, autoimmune disorders, and many types of cancer. Apoptosis is a genetically designed process of active cell destruction. Cells undergoing apoptosis remain intact without lysis, inflammation, and causing damage to neighboring cells. The activation of apoptosis pathways is a key mechanism of action for many cytotoxic drugs. Moreover, defects in apoptosis signaling contribute to drug resistance in many tumors. Cytotoxic drugs activate either the mitochondrial (intrinsic) or death receptor (extrinsic) apoptosis pathway [5,6]. Nowadays, most anticancer drugs exhibit proapoptotic properties. Moreover, the majority of them are designed to take advantage of cell division in order to achieve selective action. The selectivity is based on the more rapid division of cancer cells compared to their normal counterparts. However, these molecules are not sufficiently selective for cancer cells and result in toxicity to normal cells, which provokes serious consequences for patients [6]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore both the cytotoxic and proapoptotic properties of new potential anticancer drugs. One of the characteristic changes occurring during apoptosis is the translocation of phosphatidylserine from the inner side of a cell membrane to the surface of a cell. This allows rapid and accurate estimation of proapoptotic properties of anticancer compounds with the use of annexin V, which forms conjugates with a fluorescent dye (FITC) and allows the detection of phosphatidylserine exposition on the cell surface with the use of flow cytometry [7,8].

Pyrazolotriazines were identified as biologically active compounds with inhibitory activity towards histone deacetylases [9], metalloproteinases [10], tubulin [11], urease and tyrosinase [12,13]. Moreover, some of them inhibit protein kinases engaged in pivotal signaling pathways driving cancer cell proliferation, including ABL kinase [14,15], cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) [16,17], casein kinase 2 (CK2) [18,19], and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) [20]. The addition of the sulfonamide moiety to the pyrazolotriazine scaffold allowed for the broadening of the array of possible molecular targets of these compounds [21]. For example, pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazine derivatives have been shown to have ABL protein kinase inhibitory activity in the micromolar concentration range (IC50 = 5.8–5.9 µM). Furthermore, sulfonamide-bearing compounds are the most abundant class of carbonic anhydrase (CA) inhibitors. The inhibition of tumor isoforms of CA (CA-IX and XII) has been shown to significantly reduce the survival of hypoxic tumors. Nowadays, sulfonamide compounds have been tested in clinical trials, with SLC-0011 being one of the most prominent examples of this type of agents [22]. The best results against hCA-IX were observed with pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazines with dissociation constants (KI values) of 23.7 and 26.5 nM, which were similar to reference sulfonamide compound acetazolamide (KI = 25 nM). In contrast, all derivatives tested in these studies showed a good inhibition of CA-XII with KIs in the range of 5.3 nM to 9.0 nM [23,24].

The findings of experimental research published to date have demonstrated that a variety of derivatives of the pyrazolo-triazine heterocyclic system exhibit a wide range of biological activity, including anticancer activity. Tricyclic pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4] triazines fused with a triazole or tetrazole ring are of special interest. They represent novel heterocyclic systems with strong anticancer activity and suggest that they may be a source of new chemotherapeutic drugs in the future. The biological activity of a number of the pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazines described in the literature was recently reviewed by the Mojzych group [16].

More recently, a novel MM129 (pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[1,5-b][1,2,4]triazine sulfonamide) has been shown to efficiently suppress cell viability through the inhibition of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK). Activation of antiapoptotic pathways has been shown to play a significant role in the growth of tumors, and BTK has been implicated in this process. In turn, BTK inhibition can trigger apoptosis activation in a variety of cell types. Compared to the routinely used chemotherapeutic agent (5-fluorouracil, 5-FU), MM129 exhibited a substantially higher anticancer efficacy at a relatively low dose. Apoptosis was found to be the primary response of colorectal cancer cells (DLD-1 and HT-29 cell lines) to MM129 treatment. MM129 also inhibited tumor development in a zebrafish embryo xenograft model, where it had a notably synergistic anticancer impact when given in conjunction with 5-FU [25].

It was found that MM129 possesses antitumor activity in xenograft mouse models of colon cancer. The mechanistic analysis found that MM129 not only has the potential to inhibit intracellular pathways that promote carcinogenesis but also has the potential to decrease the protein levels of PD-L1 [26]. Immune checkpoint pathways, such as the programmed death receptor-1 and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) signaling pathway, are critical in regulating self-tolerance and controlling self-damage, and can be manipulated by cancer cells to avoid immune surveillance [27,28]. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1-targeted therapy in a variety of malignancies, heralding the beginning of a new era in cancer immunotherapy [29]. Furthermore, the treatment of cells with this novel derivative in combination with 5-FU appears to sensitize tumor cells to this extensively used chemotherapeutic agent. In both DLD-1 and HT-29 cells, exposure to MM129 resulted in a decrease in the expression of AKT and mTOR serine/threonine-protein kinases [26]. The AKT/mTOR pathway plays a crucial role in the regulation of a variety of processes associated with cell growth, metabolism, survival, and proliferation. Increased expression of the mTOR kinase is observed in many types of cancer. The activation of the mTOR pathway is responsible for the stimulation of tumor growth and metastasis. A total of 60–70% of human colon malignancies have been found to have over-activated AKT-mTOR signaling [30,31,32]. Many mTOR inhibitors have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of cancer, but a large number of them are still being investigated in numerous clinical trials [33,34]. Both MM-129 and 5-FU treatment resulted in a significant upregulation of cellular tumor antigen p53 (TP53), as well as a corresponding downregulation of CDK2, in both cell lines after 24 h exposure to the compounds. This alteration was most likely the cause of the cell cycle arrest [26].

MM129 possesses good pharmacokinetic properties, with rapid absorption and bioavailability of 68.6% after intraperitoneal administration. There have been no reports of significant adverse events associated with the use of MM129, confirming that this chemical has a positive safety profile in mice. At an anticancer-effective dose of 10 µM/kg, it was not lethal or harmful to mice, and it exhibited no toxicity [35].

Another new pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[1,5-b][1,2,4]triazine sulfonamide (MM131) demonstrated promising anticancer potential. It exhibited an inhibitory effect on the viability and proliferation of the DLD-1 and HT-29 cells. The stimulation of both extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways is thought to be the molecular mechanism of action for this compound. This is associated with increased activity of caspase-8 and caspase-9 enzymes. Inhibition of key proteins involved in the progression and metastasis of colorectal cancer, such as sICAM-1, cathepsin B, and mTOR kinase, following incubation of cells with MM131, was observed. After 24 h of incubation, MM131 was able to significantly lower mTOR concentrations in both colon cancer cell lines as compared to untreated cells, and the inhibitory impact was significantly larger than that of the reference drug. In addition, sICAM-1, which is elevated in the sera of patients with various malignancies and is thought to be a prognostic marker in patients with colorectal cancer, is an important molecule that is reduced following exposure to MM131. Moreover, it reduced cathepsin B implicated in enhanced invasion and angiogenesis of cancer cells, while at the same time increasing levels of beclin with tumor-suppressing properties [36].

In this paper, we present preparation of new pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[1,5-b][1,2,4]triazine sulfonamide derivatives (Figure 1) and their anticancer activity including cytotoxic and proapoptotic potential. To estimate the cytotoxic effect of tested compounds, the MTT assay was used [37].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Chemical structure of investigated sulfonamides MM134, MM136, MM137, and MM139. Created with Biorender.com.

Moreover, in our research, we focused on the detection of apoptosis by membrane alterations (externalization of phosphatidylserine on the outer plasma membrane of apoptotic cells). Double staining with acridine orange and ethidium bromide was additionally applied to visualize the morphological features of apoptosis and/or necrosis in cancer cells incubated with tested compounds. The changes in the mitochondria membrane potential (MMP; ΔΨm) following incubation with tested compounds were assessed with MitoTracker Red [38] as an indicator of mitochondrial function and apoptosis activation [39,40].

Additionally, using molecular docking and molecular dynamics techniques, selectivity for molecular targets with an established role in cancer pathogenesis was evaluated. Molecular docking results and predicted physicochemical parameters of the tested compounds were compared with the results obtained for the MM129 and MM131 derivatives that have been previously described in the literature [26,35,36].

2. Results

2.1. Chemistry

The multi-step preparation of compound 1, which is a crucial intermediate for the synthesis of the pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[1,5-b][1,2,4]triazine sulfonamides (MMs), has been described in detail in our earlier work [41]. Chlorosulfone 1 readily reacts with cyclic amines to give the corresponding sulfone 2a-d which undergo nucleophilic substitution reaction with sodium azide to provide the final tricyclic derivatives of the pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[1,5-b][1,2,4]triazine ring system (MM-sulfonamides). Sulfonamide 3d with a piperidine substituent in the C5 position was formed as a by-product of the synthesis of the corresponding sulfonamide 2d (Figure 2). The NMR spectrum for 3d lacks at δ = 3.63 ppm the characteristic singlet for the SO2CH3 group which is present on the NMR spectrum for the derivative 2d. Instead of the singlet, there is a multiplet for the hydrogens of the piperidine ring in the range 1.6–1.8 ppm, which corresponds to 10 protons. The structure of all obtained compounds was confirmed by spectroscopic methods.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Reagents and conditions: (a) appropriate amine, MeCN, rt, overnight; (b) NaN3, EtOH, reflux.

Many previous studies show that fused derivatives of the pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[1,5-b][1,2,4]triazine in solution exist in tautomeric equilibrium with the corresponding 5-azido derivative of the pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazine ring system [25,36,41,42,43,44,45]. The 1H NMR spectrum recorded immediately after dissolution of the compound MM134 in deuterated chloroform exhibited one singlet at δ = 2.92 ppm for CH3 group and two triplets at δ = 3.06 ppm and δ = 3.77 pp which can only relate to the morpholine ring and two doublets in aromatic region at 7.98 ppm and 8.50 ppm corresponding to protons in the phenyl ring of the tetrazole form MM134 (Figure 3A). Moreover, there is one small singlet at 2.75 ppm and two very small doublets at 7.94 and 8.65 ppm that correspond to the methyl group and aromatic protons present in the appropriate azide form 4a. The 1H NMR measurement for the same sample repeated after 24 h showed the shift of the tautomeric equilibrium toward the slight dominance of the azide form relative to tetrazole form (Figure 3B). Much more effective increase in the azide form was observed after 48 h and the ratio of the populations was 1:0.7 in favor of azide structure (Figure 3C). However, despite the partial decomposition of the investigated sample, the 1H NMR spectrum recorded after 2 weeks shows that in the solution again tetrazole derivative exists as the main form and the azide tautomer accounts for about 34%. A similar effect was observed for other presented tetrazole derivatives. It should be noted that these experiments showed that the tetrazole form was predominant after tautomeric equilibrium was established, which is consistent with earlier research results and literature data [42,43,44,45]. The 1H NMR spectra were also presented in Figure S1 of the SM1.PDF file in the Supplementary Material section.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The 1H NMR spectrum (A) recorded immediately after solution of the compound MM134 in deuterated chloroform and repeated (B) after 24 h and (C) after 48 h.

2.2. Biological Studies

2.2.1. MTT Assay

The MTT assay used to determine cell viability showed that all tested novel pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazine-containing compounds possess cytotoxic activity towards cancer cell lines (BxPC-3, HCT-116, and PC-3) and, to a lesser extent, towards normal mouse (L929 cell line) and human (WI-38 cell line) fibroblasts. A reduction in cell viability after 72 h incubation with tested compounds was observed in all experimental series. The IC50 values obtained in the MTT assay are shown in Table 1. The cytotoxic effect was specific to cancer cells. Dose–response curves obtained from two independent experiments after 72 h exposure of cancer cells (BxPC-3, HCT-116, PC-3) and normal mouse (L929 cell line) and human (WI-39 cell line) fibroblasts to MM-compounds in shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. The decrease in cell viability correlates with the increasing concentration of the compounds. The PC-3 cell line was more sensitive to the tested compounds than BxPC-3 and HCT-116 cells, which may indicate some degree of selectivity of the tested compounds for this cell line. MM-compounds exhibited more cytotoxic activity in the cancer cells than in normal mouse and human fibroblasts.

Table 1.

Mean IC50 obtained after a 72 h incubation of tested cells with MM-compounds in MTT assay ± SD.

MM-Compounds Cell Lines
Mean IC50 [µM]
BxPC-3 HCT-116 PC-3 L929 WI-38
MM134 0.32 ± 0.1 0.38 ± 0.03 0.16 ± 0.02 0.58 ± 0.005 0.65 ± 0.07
MM136 0.25 ± 0.08 0.25 ± 0.07 0.13 ± 0.01 0.22 ± 0.08 0.48 ± 0.09
MM137 0.16 ± 0.04 0.14 ± 0.02 0.11 ± 0.007 0.18 ± 0.0008 0.27 ± 0.04
MM139 0.33 ± 0.14 0.35 ± 0.05 0.17 ± 0.003 0.26 ± 0.02 0.54 ± 0.06
Figure 4.

Figure 4

Determination of relative cancer cell viability of pancreas adenocarcinoma cell line (BxPC-3), colorectal carcinoma cell line (HCT-116) and prostate adenocarcinoma cell line (PC-3) treated with MM-compounds; ±SEM.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Determination of relative cell viability of mouse fibroblast cell line (L929) and human normal fibroblast cell line (WI-38) treated with MM-compounds; ±SEM.

2.2.2. Annexin V and Propidium Iodide Flow Cytometry Analysis

Tested cell lines that exhibited the most sensitivity to the cytotoxic effects of MM-compounds were selected for the study of their proapoptotic properties. The values obtained in the MTT test for the HCT-116 and BxPC-3 lines were very similar. It was decided that the pancreatic cancer line, which belongs to the neoplasms with a high mortality rate and a very aggressive course, will be used for further research. The apoptotic status of BxPC-3 and PC-3 cells after 24 and 48 h of incubation with triazine derivatives used in IC50 and 2xIC50 concentrations obtained in the MTT assay was determined utilizing flow cytometry using dual annexin V and propidium iodide staining (Figure 6 and Figure 7). Flow cytometry Supplementary Materials can be found in Figure S2 (BxPC-3 cell line) and Figure S3 (PC-3 cell line) of SM1.PDF file.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Determination of apoptosis induction in BxPC-3 cell line treated with IC50 and 2xIC50 concentrations of MM-compounds measured with Annexin V FITC. Data are presented as mean percentage of apoptotic cells (early and late apoptotic) ± SD values. The differences between the experimental samples and vehicle control were evaluated by the ANOVA test followed by Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). * significant difference compared to the negative control (24 h incubation time); # significant difference compared to the negative control (48 h incubation time); p < 0.05; N = 1 × 104.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Determination of apoptosis induction in PC-3 cell line treated with IC50 and 2xIC50 concentrations of MM-compounds measured with Annexin V FITC following 24 and 48 h incubation time. Data are presented as mean percentage of apoptotic cells (early and late apoptotic) ± SD values. The differences between the experimental samples and vehicle control were evaluated by the ANOVA test followed by Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). # significant difference compared to the negative control (48 h incubation time); p < 0.05; N = 1 × 104.

A very high increase in the apoptotic cell fraction was observed after 24 and 48 h incubation of BxPC-3 cells with 2xIC50 concentrations of all MM-compounds (from 68.1 ± 7.33% to 95.1 ± 1.48%), compared to the control group: 10.3 ± 2.09% (24 h incubation) and 8.3 ± 1.13% (48 h incubation).

The apoptotic response increased in order of MM137 (18.9 ± 2.95%), MM136 (41.7 ± 0.17%), MM139 (59.6 ± 7.42%), and MM134 (65.3 ± 9.1%) after 24 h incubation with IC50 concentrations of tested compounds and in analogous order of MM137 (40.8 ± 1.36%), MM136 (56.33 ± 4.96%), MM139 (85.4 ± 6.25%), and MM134 (86.9 ± 1.16%) after 48 h incubation. The number of necrotic cells following 24 and 48 h incubation of BxPC-3 cells with MM-compounds did not exceed 10% in all experimental series.

For 24 h incubation of PC-3 cells, no statistically significant increase in % of apoptotic cells was observed compared to negative control (6.5 ± 2.05%). In contrast, MM134 (20.37 ± 2.5%), MM137 (38.93 ± 4%), and MM139 (15 ± 2.42%) used in 2xIC50 concentrations induced a statistically significant increase in mean percentage of apoptotic cells compared with negative control (8.37 ± 1.06%) after 48 h incubation of PC-3 cells. Moreover, a statistically significant increase in apoptosis was observed after 48 h incubation of cells with MM137 (22.57 ± 3.18%) used in IC50 concentration. No statistically significant differences were observed in other experimental series after 48h incubation. The number of necrotic cells following 24 and 48 h incubation of PC-3 cells and BxPC-3 with MM-compounds did not exceed 10% in all experimental series. The obtained results indicate that the BxPC-3 cancer cells were more sensitive to the proapoptotic activity of the tested compounds used in both concentrations than the PC-3 cell line. Additionally, the MM134 and MM139 compounds had the most profound pro-apoptotic effects on BxPC-3 cancer cells.

2.2.3. Dual Acridine Orange/Ethidium Bromide (AO/EB) Fluorescent Staining

Apoptosis induction estimated by flow cytometry analysis was confirmed with acridine orange/ethidium bromide staining (Figure 8 and Figure 9). This method combines the differential uptake of fluorescent DNA-binding dyes AO and EB with the morphologic aspect of chromatin condensation in the stained nucleus, allowing one to distinguish viable, apoptotic, and necrotic cells (Figure 10) [46].

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Determination of apoptosis induction in PC-3 cell line treated with IC50 and 2xIC50 concentrations of MM-compounds measured with AO/EB double staining following 24 and 48 h incubation time. Data are presented as mean percentage of apoptotic cells (early and late apoptotic) ± SD values. The differences between the experimental samples and vehicle control were evaluated by the ANOVA test followed by Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). * significant difference compared to the negative control (24 h incubation time); # significant difference compared to the negative control (48 h incubation time); p < 0.05; N = 200.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Determination of apoptosis induction in PC-3 cell line treated with IC50 and 2xIC50 concentrations of MM-compounds measured with AO/EB double staining following 24 and 48 h incubation time. Data are presented as mean percentage of apoptotic cells (early and late apoptotic) ± SD values. The differences between the experimental samples and vehicle control were evaluated by the ANOVA test followed by Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). # significant difference compared to the negative control (48 h incubation time); p < 0.05; N = 200.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Typical morphological features of apoptosis in BxPC-3 following treatment with MM136 compound. Characteristic membrane blebbing can be observed in cancer cells after the treatment with the tested compound in 2xIC50 concentration compared with cells from control group in which cells are rounded and exhibit uniformly distributed nucleus. Cells were visualized under a fluorescence microscope OLYMPUS BX60, magnification 40×.

Similarly to the flow cytometry results, a high increase in the apoptotic cell fraction was observed after 24 and 48 h incubation of BxPC-3 cells with 2xIC50 concentrations of all MM-compounds (from 28.8 ± 3.46% to 70.35 ± 7.57%), compared to the control group: 5 ± 4.24% (24 h incubation) and 2.5 ± 0.7% (48 h incubation). MM134 and MM139 used in both tested concentrations induced a statistically significant increase in the apoptotic cell fraction following 24 and 48 h incubation of BxPC-3 cells. Only MM136 and MM137 used in IC50 concentrations did not induce a significant increase in apoptotic fraction following 24 h incubation of BxPC-3 cells with the compounds.

No statistically significant increase in apoptosis % was detected following 24 h incubation of PC-3 cells with tested compounds. MM134, MM137, and MM139 induced a statistically significant increase in % of apoptotic cells in the PC-3 line following 48 h incubation compared to control group (1.5 ± 0.7%) in both tested concentrations. The mean % of apoptotic cells did not exceed 30% following 48 h incubation with tested compounds and were: MM134 IC50 (8.5 ± 0.7%), MM134 2xIC50 (11 ± 1.41%), MM136 2xIC50 (14.5 ± 0.7%), MM137 IC50 (15 ± 2.82%), MM137 2xIC50 (24 ± 1.41%), MM139 IC50 (13.5 ± 3.53%), and MM139 2xIC50 (12.5 ± 0.7%). Again, a stronger apoptotic response was observed in BxPC-3 cells following 24 and 48 h incubation with the tested compounds.

2.2.4. Changes in Transmembrane Mitochondrial Potential-MitoTracker Red

The fitness of the mitochondria and changes in MMP were assessed using MitoTracker Red. Data for experimental groups were presented as mean percentage of control group fluorescence intensity ± SD value (Figure 11, Table 2).

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Changes in the mitochondria membrane potential (MMP) after 24 h and 48 h incubation with MM-compounds in all tested cancer cell lines; ±SD value.

Table 2.

Results of MitoTracker Red analysis in tested cancer cell lines. Data for individual compounds are presented as mean percentage of control group fluorescence intensity ± SD value.

BxPC-3
24 h incubation
Compound/Concentration 0.5IC50 IC50 2xIC50
MM134 88.19 ± 13.62 81.23 ± 11.94 78.31 ± 14.34
MM136 82.83 ± 13.02 65.68 ± 4.58 57.67 ± 5.56
MM137 89.34 ± 5.91 79.5 ± 3.34 79.22 ± 2.22
MM139 81.28 ± 14.44 66.73 ± 3.72 64.23 ± 6.08
48 h incubation
MM134 79.98 ± 11.47 66.04 ± 16.7 68.95 ± 7.78
MM136 69.08 ± 4.40 62.37 ± 0.05 61.83 ± 0.46
MM137 84.62 ± 9.01 79.8 ± 6.76 73.8 ± 2.58
MM139 76.9 ± 6.40 60.35 ± 0.91 65.95 ± 12.53
PC-3
24 h incubation
MM134 100.35 ± 1.57 82.5 ± 2.21 82.34 ± 2.13
MM136 96.3 ± 5.74 92.78 ± 0.9 86.9 ± 7.22
MM137 96.26 ± 2.83 87.9 ± 2.71 82.5 ± 7.99
MM139 89.2 ± 6.28 87.28 ± 15.8 78.14 ± 6.55
48 h incubation
MM134 82.1 ± 14.45 80.26 ± 13.44 64.56 ± 3.33
MM136 81.34 ± 0.4 61.24 ± 3.62 47.38 ± 2.74
MM137 78.26 ± 2.62 75.49 ± 5.55 64.19 ± 8.72
MM139 78.91 ± 15.21 65.93 ± 19.56 61.28 ± 9.16

After 24 and 48 h incubation of BxPC-3 and PC-3 cells with tested compounds used in concentrations followed by IC50 values (0.5xIC50, IC50, and 2xIC50), a decrease in fluorescence intensity reflecting a reduction in MMP was observed. Following 24 and 48 h incubation of BxPC-3 cells with tested compounds used in 2IC50 concentrations, MMP decreased with an increase in compound concentration in the order of MM137, MM134, MM139 and MM136. For the 48 h incubation of BxPC-3 cell lines, a decrease in MMP was observed after use of MM134 and MM139 compounds in 0.5xIC50 and IC50 concentrations with an increase in MMP following incubation with 2xIC50 concentrations. After both 24 and 48 h incubation times, the MM136 used in 2xIC50 concentrations induced the highest reduction in MMP (% of control were: 57.67 ± 5.56% and 61.83 ± 0,46% for 24 h and 48 h incubation, respectively).

The 24 and 48 h incubation of PC-3 cells also led to a decrease in MMP. MM139 (78.14 ± 6.56%) and MM136 (47.38 ± 2.74%) used in the concentration of 2xIC50 induced the highest reduction in MMP among the MM-compounds in PC-3 cells after 24 and 48 h incubation, respectively.

2.3. Data Analysis

2.3.1. MTT Assay

A statistical program (Graphpad Prism 7) was used to analyze obtained data (MTT test). The dose–response analysis was performed to estimate the inhibitory concentration (IC50) of the tested compounds. The IC50 value is defined as a concentration of the tested compound that leads to a reduction in cell pool viability by 50% compared to the negative control (accepted as 100%).

% cell viability=Absorbance value of treated cellsAbsorbance value of blankAbsorbance value of untreated cellsAbsorbance value of blank×100%

2.3.2. Apoptosis Detection

Data are presented as mean percentage of apoptotic cells (early and late apoptotic) ± SD values. The differences between the experimental samples and vehicle control were evaluated by the ANOVA test followed by Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Experiments were performed in triplicate. For flow cytometry analysis with Annexin V-FITC staining, the approximate number of analyzed cells was (N = 1 × 104), contrasting with the dual acridine orange/ethidium bromide (AO/EB) fluorescent staining (N = 200).

2.4. Computational Studies

2.4.1. Molecular Docking Simulation

The PDB codes for the downloaded proteins were 4wa9 [47], 2xyn [48], 3mvh [49], 3d0e [50], 2x18 [51], 5n7e [52], 3gen [53], 6qn5 [54], 6qnl [54], 3bhu [55], 2w9z [56], 5l2s [57], 1ua2 [58], 5mza [59], 6bcx [60], 6zwo [61], 7bea [62] for ABL1, ABL2, AKT1, AKT2, AKT3, BCR, BTK, CA-IX, CA-XII, CDK2, CDK4, CDK6, CDK7, ICAM-1, mTOR1, mTOR2 and PD-L1, respectively. Downloaded macromolecular targets were prepared for molecular docking simulation by addition of hydrogens, removal of redundant water molecules, computing Gasteiger charge, and assigning Autodock-4 (AD4) [63,64] atom type followed by saving them in the default autodock format PDBQT [65,66].

All the rotatable, non-rotatable, and un-rotatable bonds were assigned in all the six triazine sulfonamide derivatives, followed by saving their structures in the protein databank (PDB) format.

A suitable grid box covering all the extending conformations of the complexed reference ligands as well as the majority of the interacting macromolecular residues were formed for the examined molecular targets. The grid parameters for each of the targets were saved in a respective grid parameter file (GPF) for each anticancer target to be utilized by the Autogrid utility of the Autodock suite for the generation of map files required for performing molecular docking simulations. The grid parameters for each of the anticancer targets used in this study are tabulated in Table 3.

Table 3.

The coordinates of the grid box for all the anticancer targets used in the current study.

Drug
Target
PDB Code x-D y-D z-D Spacing (Ả) x Center y Center z Center
ABL1 4wa9 40 40 40 0.431 23.95 127.557 14.335
ABL2 2xyn 40 40 40 0.536 −54.025 48.668 −7.666
AKT1 3mvh 40 40 40 0.453 17.948 −1.885 27.56
AKT2 3d0e 40 40 40 0.475 22.521 −19.611 7.41
AKT3 2x18 40 40 40 0.458 25.066 66.608 −19.071
BCR 5n7e 40 40 40 0.636 22.531 −2.925 111.276
BTK 3gen 40 40 40 0.492 −16.796 6.794 −14.126
CA-IX 6qn5 40 40 40 0.375 −29.939 −3.656 0.027
CA-XII 6qnl 40 40 40 0.375 −41.046 6.288 31.866
CDK2 3bhu 40 40 40 0.375 −7.638 20.962 −21.4
CDK4 2w9z 50 50 50 0.453 20.281 25.506 8.713
CDK6 5l2s 50 50 50 0.403 22.452 38.566 −8.687
CDK7 1ua2 40 40 40 0.375 41.304 −4.892 23.033
ICAM-1 5mza 40 40 40 0.531 6.393 −16.531 9.728
mTOR1 6bcx 40 40 40 0.625 247.93 204.864 264.981
mTOR2 6zwo 40 40 40 0.625 249.818 191.487 206.7
PD-L1 7bea 40 40 40 0.492 −5.537 −10.417 19.104

The map files for various atom types of the macromolecular target as well as ligands generated by the Autogrid utility were utilized by the Autodock software to perform the molecular docking simulation. The molecular docking simulation process for each macromolecular target was validated by considering the chemical resemblance as well as the overlay of the docked conformation of the ligand regarding its bioactive conformation [67,68].

Once the molecular docking simulation process was validated by considering the above-stated parameters, similar parameters were utilized to perform the simulation studies of the newly designed triazine sulfonamide analogs.

Molecular docking simulation-based screening of the designed triazine analogs against the anticancer drug targets, which are actively involved in the pathophysiology of human cancers, revealed that the molecules MM136 and MM139 were the most potent inhibitors of all the anticancer targets considered in the current experimental study [66,69,70,71]. The binding scores of four new triazine sulfonamide analogs and previously studied compounds (MM129 and MM131) as well as all the reference ligands for all the macromolecular targets are shown in Table 4.

Table 4.

Molecular docking results of six triazine sulfonamide analogs as well as all the reference ligands.

S. No. Ligand Binding Energy
ABL1
(4wa9)
Binding Energy
ABL2
(2xyn)
Binding Energy
AKT1
(3mvh)
Binding Energy
AKT2
(3d0e)
Binding Energy
AKT3
(2x18)
Binding Energy
BCR
(5n7e)
Binding Energy
BTK
(3gen)
Binding Energy
CA-IX
(6qn5)
Binding Energy
CA-XII
(6qnl)
Binding Energy
CDK2
(3bhu)
Binding Energy
CDK4
(2w9z)
Binding Energy
CDK6
(5ls2)
Binding Energy
CDK7
(1ua2)
Binding Energy
ICAM-1
(5mza)
Binding Energy
mTOR1
(6bcx)
Binding Energy
mTOR2
(6zwo)
Binding Energy
PD-L1
(7bea)
1 Reference Ligand −9.35
(AXI)
−9.28
(VX6)
−10.51
(WFE)
−9.54
(G93)
−4.4
(EPE)
- −9.31
(B43)
−8.18
(J8N)
−7.63
(J92)
−7.67
(MHR)
−5.7
(NAG)
−9.4
(6ZV)
−7.64
(ATP)
- −3.26
(ATP)
−4.71
(AGS)
−10.09
(TK2)
3 MM129 −9.71 −9.17 −10.70 −9.52 −6.68 −8.63 −8.52 −8.44 −8.21 −9.61 −8.97 −10.83 −10.04 −6.86 −8.31 −8.12 −9.86
4 MM131 −9.48 −9.23 −9.92 −9.62 −6.74 −8.62 −8.76 −7.90 −7.87 −8.80 −8.52 −9.01 −8.74 −6.51 −7.19 −7.44 −9.88
5 MM134 −9.88 −10.08 −11.35 −11.81 −6.94 −9.51 −10.11 −8.01 −8.04 −9.63 −8.08 −9.69 −9.14 −7.20 −8.45 −7.64 −10.30
6 MM136 −9.53 −9.81 −12.42 −9.93 −6.63 −9.04 −9.55 −8.39 −8.54 −8.60 −8.97 −9.26 −9.40 −7.68 −9.08 −8.79 −12.33
7 MM137 −10.11 −10.46 −11.51 −10.79 −6.84 −8.49 −10.06 −7.86 −8.52 −8.31 −8.78 −8.31 −9.78 −7.19 −8.57 −7.95 −11.54
8 MM139 −10.42 −9.84 −12.16 −10.55 −7.24 −8.52 −10.51 −9.34 −9.06 −10.02 −9.62 −9.68 −9.88 −7.68 −8.46 −8.29 −11.43

MM134 was found to inhibit AKT2 (binding energy of −11.81) the strongest of the tested compounds. Based upon the binding score obtained after performing molecular docking simulation-based virtual screening of MM136 against all macromolecular anticancer targets, it was observed that the MM136 molecule strongly interacts with AKT1, mTOR1, mTOR2, and PD-L1 (respective binding scores: −12.42, −9.08, −8.79, and −12.33), and is supposed to give anticancer activity through the inhibition of the given enzymes. MM137 is the most potent inhibitor of ABL2 (binding score: −10.46) of all tested compounds. In contrast, MM139 was found to be a potent inhibitor of nine of all seventeen macromolecular anticancer drug targets, i.e., ABL1, AKT3, BTK, CA-IX, CA-XII, CDK2, CDK4, CDK7, or ICAM-1, considered in the current study [72,73]. MM134, MM136, MM137, and MM139 derivatives exhibited better molecular docking results than the previously described MM129 and MM131 derivatives in terms of binding to ABL2, AKT1, AKT2, BTK, ICAM-1, mTOR1, and PD-L1, while MM129 exhibited the highest binding activity towards CDK6 (binding energy of −10.83) and CDK7 (binding energy of −10.04).

The two-dimensional binding interactions of MM136 against human AKT1 and PD-L1 are shown in Figure 12A,B, respectively, while the two-dimensional binding interactions of MM139 against human AKT1 and PD-L1 are shown in Figure 13A,B, respectively.

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Two-dimensional binding interactions of the triazine sulfonamide analog MM136 against human AKT1 (A) and PD-L1 (B).

Figure 13.

Figure 13

Two-dimensional binding conformation of the triazine sulfonamide analog MM139 against human AKT1 (A) and PD-L1 (B).

2.4.2. Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Molecular dynamics simulations revealed that the macromolecular complexes of ligands MM136 and MM139 against AKT1 as well as PD-L1 enzymes were found to be most stable throughout the simulation time concluding that both of these ligands are supposed to be potent anticancer agents and their therapeutic effect is executed via synergistic targeting of both the AKT1 and PD-L1 enzyme.

The target enzyme AKT1 has 300 residues distributed in a macromolecular chain consisting of 2450 heavy atoms out of a total of 4885 atoms. The macromolecular target has 40% of secondary structures in the form of 26% of alpha helices and 17% of beta-strands, which were found to be conserved during the simulation process. MM136 possesses 28 heavy atoms out of a total of 43 atoms. Dynamic simulation of the macromolecular complex of MM136 against the AKT1 target clearly showed that the root mean square deviation (RMSD) for the fluctuation of the protein backbone was in-between 1.2 and 1.8 Å which is well within the acceptable range. Similarly, the ligand MM136 showed some initial fluctuations up to 20 ns while making certain moves within the active site to achieve the stable conformation followed by its stabilized vibrations within the range of 1.8–2.4 Å. Afterward, the complexed ligand had attained the most stable conformation and remained stable throughout the simulation process with very little fluctuation. The root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) of the macromolecular backbone was found to be well within the range of 0.9–1.2 Å throughout the simulation process. Macromolecular residues such as Val164, Ala177, Ala230, Met281, Asp292, Asp439, and Phe442 of AKT1 were found to be interacting with the ligand MM136 throughout the simulation process.

MM139 has 28 heavy atoms out of a total of 47 atoms. Dynamic simulation of the macromolecular complex of MM139 against AKT1 clearly showed RMSD in-between 1.5 and 2.8 Å which is well within the acceptable range of 3 Å. Similarly, the ligand MM139 showed minimal fluctuations throughout the simulation process and remained stable within the 0.8–1.8 Å range throughout the simulation process. The RMSF value observed for the AKT1 macromolecule was found to be in-between 0.8 and 2.0 while the RMSF for MM139 was found to be within 1.0–2.1 Å throughout the simulation process. Residues such as Leu156, Phe161, Ala177, Ala230, Glu234, Met281, Tyr437, Phe438, Asp439, and Phe442 of AKT1 were found to be interacting with the ligand MM139.

The target enzyme PD-L1 has 249 residues distributed in two macromolecular chains consisting of 1906 heavy atoms out of a total of 3791 atoms. The macromolecular target has 40% of secondary structures in the form of 2% alpha helices and 39% of beta-strands, which were found to be conserved during the simulation process. MM136 possesses 28 heavy atoms out of a total of 43 atoms. Dynamic simulation of the macromolecular complex of MM136 has clearly shown that the RMSD for the fluctuation of the protein backbone was in-between 1.8 and 4.8 Å which is well within the acceptable range of 3 Å. Similarly, the ligand MM136 showed some little fluctuations in-between the range of 1.8 Å in the initial 10 ns timeframe, while making certain moves within the active site to achieve the stable conformation. Afterward, the complexed ligand had attained the most stable conformation and remained it throughout the simulation process with very little fluctuation. Except for a few residues, the RMSF of the macromolecular backbone was found to be well within the range of 0.8–2.4 Å. The two macromolecular residues showing the RMSF value up to 5.6 Å were found, which is common in all the simulation processes. The RMSF value observed for MM136 was found to be within 0.5–1.5 Å throughout the simulation process. Macromolecular residues such as Ile54, Tyr56, Met115, Ser117, Ala121, Asp122, and Tyr123 of chain-A as well as Tyr56, Val68, and Tyr123 of chain-B of PD-L1 were found to be interacting with the ligand MM136 throughout the simulation process.

MM139 has 28 heavy atoms out of a total of 47 atoms. Dynamic simulation of the macromolecular complex of MM139 has clearly shown RMSD in-between 2.4 and 4.8 Å which is well within the acceptable range of 3 Å. Similarly, the ligand MM139 showed minimal fluctuations throughout the simulation process and remained stable within the 1.0–3.2 Å range. The RMSF value observed for MM139 was found to be within 1.5–2.2 Å throughout the simulation process. Residues such as Ile54, Tyr56, Ala121, Asp122, Tyr123, and Lys124 of chain-A as well as Ile54, Tyr56, Ser117, and Tyr123 of chain-B of PD-L1 were found to be interacting with the ligand MM139.

Dynamics simulations of the macromolecular complexes of MM136 as well as MM137 against both AKT1 and PD-L1 target enzymes revealed that both of the ligands were interacting strongly within the active site of the target enzyme and that both the target enzymes as well as complex ligands remained stable throughout the simulation process. The dynamic simulation of MM136 and MM139 complexed with AKT1 enzyme has shown strong binding interactions of the complexed ligand with adequate stability observed during the simulation process when compared with the macromolecular complex of ligands MM136 and MM139 against PD-L1 enzyme.

The computational results have revealed that these compounds are found to be potent anticancer agents and they are supposed to execute their therapeutic effect by interacting with the human AKT1 and PD-L1 enzymes.

The detailed reports of molecular dynamics simulation of MM-compounds can be found in Supplementary Materials for MM136 with AKT1 (SM2.PDF) and PD-L1 (SM3.PDF), MM139 with AKT1 (SM4.PDF) and PD-L1 (SM5.PDF) and MM137 with PD-L1 (SM6.PDF).

2.4.3. Drug Likeness and ADMET

Swiss-ADME (http://www.swissadme.ch, accessed on 1 May 2022) [74] was used to estimate drug likeness and ADMET properties of MM-compounds. The bioavailability of compounds is estimated based on five critical parameters indicating drug lipophilicity, size, polarity, insolubility, flexibility, and insaturation. The optimal range for each property is as follows: flexibility (no more than nine rotatable bonds), lipophilicity (XLOGP3 between −0.7 and +5.0), size: molecular weight (MW between 150 and 500 g/mol), polarity (topological polar surface area (TPSA) between 20 and 130 Å2), solubility (LogS not higher than 6), and saturation (fraction of carbons in the sp3 hybridization (Csp3) not less than 0.25). The tested compounds may not be orally bioavailable due to high polarity and TPSA, considering sulfur and phosphorus as polar atoms (Table 5). Tested MM-compounds may not be orally bioavailable due to high polarity (too high TPSA values; TPSA > 130 Å2).

Table 5.

Chosen physicochemical properties of tested compounds.

Property Parameter MM129 MM131 MM134 MM136 MM137 MM139
Flexibility Num. rotatable bonds 5 5 6 3 3 3
Lipophilicity XLOGP3 −0.31 −0.21 −0.30 −0.15 0.04 1.07
Molecular weight MW 459.44 g/mol 389.39 g/mol 444.47 g/mol 401.40 g/mol 414.44 g/mol 399.43 g/mol
Polarity TPSA 178.97 Å2 161.46 Å2 153.70 Å2 141.67 Å2 135.68 Å2 132.44 Å2
Saturation Fraction Csp3 0.35 0.29 0.41 0.33 0.38 0.38

The tested compounds showed no BBB permeability. Moreover, derivatives may constitute the substrate for glycoprotein P (PGP) that belongs to ABC-transporters that restrict the compounds from entering the central nervous system and are involved in tumor multidrug resistance. MM137 and MM139 showed good overall HIA.

50 to 90% of therapeutic molecules are the substrates of isoforms of cytochrome P450, including CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. The MM137 molecule possesses the best pharmacokinetic parameters, including high GI absorption and no inhibitory activity against CYP enzymes. The ADMET properties predicted by using Swiss-ADME (http://www.swissadme.ch, accessed on 1 May 2022) [74] are tabulated in Table 6.

Table 6.

Predicted ADMET properties of tested compounds.

Compound MM129 MM131 MM134 MM136 MM137 MM139
GI absorption Low Low Low Low High High
BBB permeant No No No No No No
P-gp substrate Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
CYP2D6
Inhibitor
No No No No No No
CYP3A4
Inhibitor
No No Yes No No No

Again, MM137 showed the best drug-likeness properties with one violation according to the Lipiński rule (number of nitrogen or oxygen atoms (NorO) > 10) (Table 7).

Table 7.

Predicted molecular properties related to Lipinski’s rule of five.

Compound MM129 MM131 MM134 MM136 MM137 MM139
Molecular weight 459.44 g/mol 389.39 g/mol 444.47 g/mol 401.40 g/mol 414.44 g/mol 399.43 g/mol
Num. H-bond acceptors 12 10 11 10 10 9
Num. H-bond donors 1 2 1 0 0 0
Consensus Log Po/w 0.07 0.28 0.35 0.51 0.41 1.31
Lipinski violation 1 1 1 1 1 1

3. Discussion

The MTT assay used to determine cell viability showed that all tested MM-compounds possess cytotoxic activity towards cancer cell lines (BxPC-3, HCT-116, PC-3) and to a lesser extent towards the normal mouse fibroblast (L929) cell line and human fibroblasts (WI-38 cell line). The cytotoxic effect was specific for cancer cells. The MM137 compound exhibited the highest cytotoxic activity with IC50 values in cancer cells ranging from 0.11 to 0.16 μM. The highest difference between the cytotoxic activity of compounds between cancer and normal cells was observed for the MM134 compound, where the compound exhibited 4 times higher cytotoxic activity in the PC-3 cell line compared to normal human fibroblasts (WI-38 cell line).

In our study, the activation of apoptosis was detected after 24 and 48 h exposure of BxPC-3 and PC-3 cells to tested compounds in IC50 and 2xIC50 concentrations. Tested compounds were used in concentrations followed by IC50 values to establish whether the cytotoxic effects were due to apoptosis induction. MM134, MM136, MM137, and MM139 induced increase in number of apoptotic cells both in BxPC3 and PC-3 cell lines; however, the effect was more profound in the BxPC-3 cell line where tested compounds induced apoptosis of 18.9–65.3% cells for 24 h incubation with tested compounds in IC50 values, and 40.8–86.9% following 48 h incubation with the derivatives as indicated by flow cytometry analysis using annexin V-FITC staining. The percentage of apoptotic cells following incubation of BxPC-3 cells with tested compounds increased in order of MM137, MM136, MM139 and MM134.

No statistically significant increase in the number of apoptotic cells was observed following 24 h incubation of PC-3 cells with IC50 or 2xIC50 concentrations of MM-compounds. In contrast, MM134 (20.37 ± 2.5%), MM137 (38.93 ± 4%), and MM139 (15 ± 2.42%) used in 2xIC50 concentrations induced as statistically significant increase in mean percentage of apoptotic cells compared with negative control after 48 h incubation of PC-3 cells.

Similar results were obtained with acridine orange/ethidium bromide double staining; however, the mean percentage of apoptotic cells was lower than this indicated by annexin V-FITC staining. This may be due to the large sample size in annexin V-FITC analysis (10,000 cells) compared with 200 cells analyzed in the acridine orange/ethidium bromide double staining. Moreover, annexin V-FITC cytometry analysis uses automate cell sorting, and therefore remains a more reliable method of apoptosis detection than manual counting and identification of apoptotic cells using fluorescence microscopy. Despite that, the apoptosis induction was seen using acridine orange/ethidium bromide double staining.

It is one of the initial alterations linked with programmed cell death to observe a decrease in MMP. It is known that the mitochondrial membrane permeability increases during apoptosis. As a result, mitochondrial proteins such as cytochrome c and apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) are released into the cytosol, leading to the activation of the intrinsic apoptosis pathway. After both 24 and 48 h incubation times, MM136 used in the 2xIC50 concentration induced the highest reduction in MMP in the BxPC-3 cell line. MM139 and MM136 used in the concentration of 2xIC50 induced the highest reduction in MMP among MM compounds in PC-3 cells after 24 and 48 h incubation, respectively. However, the induction of intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis pathways needs to be elucidated.

Based on previously identified potential targets of pyrazolo-triazine derivatives (MM129, MM131), we performed molecular docking to identify the most potent compound among the newly designed pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[1,5-b][1,2,4]triazine sulfonamides (MM134, MM136, MM137 and MM139) and to establish the most probable molecular mechanism of these molecules. For this purpose, we estimated the binding capacity of the tested MM-compounds to a multitude of molecular targets with established roles in cancer: ABL1, ABL2, AKT1, AKT2, AKT3, BCR, BTK, CA-IX, CA-XII, CDK2, CDK4, CDK6, CDK7, ICAM-1, mTOR, mTOR2, and PD-L1. MM134 was found to be the most potent inhibitor of AKT2, while MM136 strongly bound to AKT1, mTOR1, mTOR2, and PD-L1. In contrast, MM139 was found to be the most potent inhibitor (of all MM-compounds included in the docking screening) of nine of seventeen targets evaluated in this study, including: ABL1, AKT3, BTK, CA-IX, CA-XII, CDK2, CDK4, CDK7 and ICAM-1. MM134, MM136, MM137, and MM139 exhibited better binding scores in dockings towards ABL2, AKT2, BTK, ICAM-1, mTOR1 and PD-L1, than MM129 and MM131 compounds. MM129 exhibited the highest binding activity towards CDK6 and CDK7 enzymes. This may suggest that MM134, MM136, MM137 and MM139 compounds may exert biological activity through the inhibition of the AKT-mTOR pathway, while MM129 and MM131 may exhibit antiproliferative potential through their binding with CDK enzymes. Moreover, MM134, MM136, MM137, and MM139 compounds were shown to strongly bind to AKT1 and PD-L1. The stability of complexes formed between macromolecule targets and ligands preselected in a docking procedure was assessed during molecular dynamics simulation. The macromolecular complex of AKT1 with MM136 and MM139 was found to be highly stable throughout the simulation timeframe of 100 ns. This clearly indicates the inhibitory potential of MM136 and MM139 against the AKT1. The molecular dynamics simulation also revealed that MM136 and MM139 compounds bind to the PD-L1 active site and form the most stable complexes. The comparative analysis of the molecular dynamic simulation of AKT1 and PD-L1 against MM136 and MM139 indicates that these ligands are found to be more stable while interacting with the AKT1 target as compared with PD-L1. These results indicate that MM134, -6, -7, and -9 may work as potential dual AKT-mTOR and PD-L1 inhibitors, with MM136 exhibiting the best in silico results.

Furthermore, in in vivo studies, MM129 exhibited a good pharmacokinetics profile with rapid absorption and bioavailability of 68.6% following intraperitoneal administration. Therefore, we decided to compare the computationally estimated pharmacokinetic properties of MM129 and MM131 with MM134, MM136, MM137, and MM139 compound profiles using the Swiss-ADME web tool (http://www.swissadme.ch, accessed on 1 May 2022) [74]. We have shown that tested compounds may exhibit better bioavailability than MM129 and MM131. Moreover, MM137 and MM139 showed good gastrointestinal absorption in silico. Furthermore, MM137 showed no inhibitory activity against CYP enzymes and the best drug likeliness properties of all compounds. This may limit potential drug–drug interactions in the living organisms [75,76,77]. However, all tested derivatives included in the study were shown not to be BBB-permeable and may work as substrates for the PGP enzyme, limiting their use in the central nervous system, and this may restrict their antitumor effects [78,79]. These estimates need confirmation in the following in vivo studies.

Many questions regarding the MM derivatives remain unanswered. First, the reduction in MMP levels may indicate the activation of an intrinsic pathway of apoptosis. However, further investigations, e.g., exploration of caspase levels associated with activation of intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis pathways, need to be performed. Studies of MM137 derivative in DLD-1 and HT-29 cell lines suggest the activation of both apoptosis pathways [41]. The inhibitory activity of compounds associated with the AKT-mTOR pathway and the PD1-PD-L1 association needs to be confirmed in screening assays and biological systems in in vivo conditions. The exploration of biological activity of other analogs of MM derivatives may lead to optimization and discovery of novel, safe and potent inhibitors of AKT-mTOR or PD1-PD-L1 interaction. The probable mechanism of action of MM134, MM136, MM137, and MM139 compounds is shown in Figure 14.

Figure 14.

Figure 14

Probable mechanism of action of pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[4,5-b][1,2,4]triazine sulphonamides (MM-compounds). Abbreviations: AKT—protein kinase B BTK—Bruton’s tyrosine kinase; JAK—tyrosine-protein kinase JAK; mTOR—mammalian target of rapamycin; PI3K—phosphoinositide 3-kinases; PD-1—Programmed cell death protein 1; PD-L1—Programmed death-ligand 1. Created with Biorender.com.

Moreover, it has been found that the addition of 5-FU to MM129 exhibited a synergistic effect on cancer cells with reduced PD-L1 mRNA and protein levels in DLD-1 and HT-29 cell lines [26]. Previously, Kim et al., reported that AKT activation may lead to the development of resistance to 5-FU [80]. In accordance with these findings, the use of MM129 with 5-FU led to a decrease in phosphorylation of AKT compared with 5-FU alone [26]. According to a study conducted by Lastwika et al., the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is involved in the formation of tumor cell immune resistance. mTOR kinase activation is substantially related to the surface expression of the tumor suppressor protein PD-L1 in human lung cancer cells, and the stimulation of the AKT/mTOR axis facilitates immune evasion through increased PD-L1 expression. PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibition restricts cell proliferation, migration, and survival, at the same time facilitating immune surveillance and immune-cell-dependent tumor cell killing [81].

Increased expression of PD-L1 is a critical mechanism by which tumor cells are able to evade T-cell immunity. According to emerging evidence, chemotherapeutic drugs can affect the expression of PD-L1 on cancer cells, which may have an influence on immune evasion. Human colon cancer cell lines usually do not express the PD-L1 protein on their cell surfaces, but treatment with 5-FU induces its expression significantly. Therefore, the combination of drugs may enhance the effectiveness of colon cancer treatment [82]. AKT/PI3K activation can boost PD-L1 expression by increasing extrinsic signaling or decreasing the expression of negative regulators such as phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN). It is possible that downregulation of PTEN may result in the activation of PI3K/AKT, which will then facilitate the production of PD-L1. Furthermore, blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in gastrointestinal stromal tumors can reduce the apoptosis of CD8+ T cells by governing the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. In addition, it has been found that the overexpression of PD-L1 in colorectal cancer cells may result in the activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway [83]. Moreover, inhibition of mTOR kinase may enhance the expression of PD-L1 on cancer cell surfaces, contributing to the reduced efficacy of mTOR inhibitors. Therefore, the increased expression of PD-L1 in cancer cells may increase the availability of epitopes to which anti-PD-L1 antibodies may bind. Similarly, CDK4/6 inhibition may increase PD-L1 levels in cancer cells, making them substantially more sensitive to PD-1 blocking therapy [84]. Taken together, these findings of dual inhibition of AKT-mTOR or CDK4/6 and PD-L1 may constitute an important way of targeting cancer [85].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemical Synthesis

Melting points were determined on a Mel-Temp apparatus and were uncorrected. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian spectrometer (400 MHz for 1H and 100 MHz for 13C). The chemical shift values were expressed in ppm (part per million) with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal reference. Molecular weight of final compounds was assessed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI/MS) on an Agilent Technologies 6538 UHD Accurate Mass Q-TOF LC/MS (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). Elemental compositions were within ±0.4% of the calculated values. For preparation and spectroscopic data of compound 1, see the literature [86].

4.1.1. Synthesis of Sulfonamides (2ad)

Derivative 1 (194 mg, 0.5 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous acetonitrile (5 mL) and appropriate amine (1.75 mmol) was added. The reaction was stirred overnight at room temperature; then, the reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo to afford the crude sulfonamide, as a yellow solid. The residue was purified on silica gel using a mixture of CH2Cl2:EtOH (25:1) as eluent to give the titled compounds as a yellow solid.

N-(2-morpholinoeth-1-yl)-4-(3-methyl-5-methylsulfonyl-1H-pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazyn-1-yl)benzenesulfonamide (2a).

Yield 77%. Melting point: 209–212 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO) δ: 2.80 (s, 3H), 2.93–2.96 (m, 4H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 3.64–3.67 (m, 4H), 8.06 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 8.63 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz); 13C NMR (DMSO) δ: 11.11, 40.77, 45.94, 65.30, 120.13, 129.72, 132.33, 138.45, 141.18, 146.33, 148.45, 161.06; HRMS (ESI, m/z) Calcd for C16H19N6O5S2 [M+ + H] 439.08529. Found [M+ + H] 439.08567. Anal. Calcd for C16H18N6O5S2: C, 43.82; H, 4.13; N, 19.16. Found: C, 43.55; H, 4.18; N, 19.04.

N-(morpholin-1-yl)-4-(3-methyl-5-methylsulfonyl-1H-pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazyn-1-yl)benzenesulfonamide (2b).

Yield 80%. Melting point: 266–269 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO) δ: 2.79 (s, 3H), 3.10–3.20 (m, 8H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 3.70–4.00 (m, 4H), 8.15 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 8.28 (bs, 1H, exchanged with D2O), 8.58 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz); 13C NMR (DMSO) δ: 11.12, 36.85, 40.78, 51.24, 55.22, 63.08, 120.19, 128.71, 137.61, 138.29, 140.62, 146.17, 148.34, 161.01; HRMS (ESI, m/z) Calcd for C18H24N7O5S2 [M+ + H] 482.12748. Found [M+ + H] 482.12792. Anal. Calcd for C18H23N7O5S2: C, 46.43; H, 4.97; N, 21.06. Found: C, 46.08; H, 5.02; N, 20.89.

N-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)-4-(3-methyl-5-methylsulfonyl-1H-pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazyn-1-yl)benzenesulfonamide (2c).

Yield 60%. Melting point:231–235 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO) δ: 1.66–1.69 (m, 4H), 2.79 (s, 3H), 3.19–3.23 (m, 4H), 3.33 (s, 3H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 8.13 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 8.59 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz); 13C NMR (DMSO) δ: 11.11, 40.74, 41.86, 43.10, 51.49, 120.21, 129.69, 132.21, 138.47, 141.38, 146.41, 148.47, 161.08; HRMS (ESI, m/z) Calcd for C17H22N7O4S2 [M+ + H] 452.11692. Found [M+ + H] 452.11728. Anal. Calcd for C17H21N7O4S2: C, 45.22; H, 4.68; N, 21.71. Found: C, 44.86; H, 4.74; N, 21.54.

N-(1-piperidinyl)-4-(3-methyl-5-methylsulfonyl-1H-pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazyn-1-yl)benzenesulfonamide (2d).

Yield 70%. Melting point: 215–220 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO) δ: 1.35–1.41 (m, 2H), 1.53–1.60 (m, 4H), 2.79 (s, 3H), 2.96 (t, 4H, J = 5.2 Hz), 3.63 (s, 3H), 8.05 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 8.60 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz); 13C NMR (DMSO) δ: 11.11, 22.83, 24.70, 40.77, 46.65, 120.11, 129.45, 133.51, 138.37, 140.87, 146.24, 148.39, 161.03; HRMS (ESI, m/z) Calcd for C17H21N6O4S2 [M+ + H] 437.10602. Found [M+ + H] 437.10638. Anal. Calcd for C17H20N6O4S2: C, 46.77; H, 4.61; N, 19.25. Found: C, 46.39; 4.67; N, 19.09.

N-(1-piperidinyl)-4-(3-methyl-5-piperidine-1H-pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazyn-1-yl)benzene-sulfonamide (3d).

Yield 7%. Melting point: 192–196 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 1.40–1.44 (m, 2H), 1.60–1.80 (m, 10H), 2.61 (s, 3H), 3.02 (t, 4H, J = 5.6 Hz), 3.98 (t, 4H, J = 5.6 Hz), 7.87 (d, 2H, J =8.8 Hz), 8.55 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz).

4.1.2. Synthesis of Tricyclic Suflonamides (MMs)

Sulfonamide derivative with a methylsulfonyl group (0.33 mmole) was dissolved in anhydrous ethanol (15 mL), and sodium azide (21 mg, 0.33 mmole) was added. The reaction mixture was refluxed until the substrate disappeared (control TLC). Then, the solvent was evaporated and the crude product was purified using column chromatography and CH2Cl2: MeOH (50:1) mixture as eluent to give the final compounds as a yellow solid.

N-(2-morpholinoeth-1-yl)-4-[7-methyl-5H-pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[1,5-b][1,2,4]triazin-5-yl)]benzenesulfonamide (MM-134):

Yield 80%. Melting point: 200–202 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 2.92 (s, 3H), 3.06 (t, 4H, J = 4.8 Hz), 3.77 (t, 4H, J = 4.8 Hz), 7.98 (d, 2H, J = 9.2 Hz), 8.50 (d, 2H, J = 9.2 Hz); HRMS (ESI, m/z) Calcd for C15H16N9O3S [M+ + H] 402.10186. Found [M+ + H] 402.10189. Anal. Calcd for C14H15N9O3S: C, 43.18; H, 3.88; N, 32.37. Found: C, 42.98; H, 3.91; N, 32.22.

N-(morpholin-1-yl)-4-[7-methyl-5H-pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[1,5-b][1,2,4]triazin-5-yl)]benzenesulfonamide (MM-136):

Yield 84%. Melting point: 150–155 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 2.32 (t, 4H, J = 4.4 Hz), 2.46 (t, 2H, J = 5.6 Hz), 2.91 (s, 3H), 3.09 (t, 2H, J = 5.6 Hz), 3.64 (t, 4H, J = 4.4 Hz), 8.12 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 8.46 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ: 11.45, 38.92, 52.95, 56.23, 66.73, 119.26, 128.91, 137.83, 140.33, 140.71, 144.37, 145.14, 147.52; HRMS (ESI, m/z) Calcd for C17H21N10O3S [M+ + H] 445.15131. Found [M+ + H] 445.15107. Anal. Calcd for C17H20N10O3S: C, 45.93; H, 4.53; N, 31.51. Found: C, 45.75; H, 4.56; N, 31.38.

N-(morpholin-1-yl)-4-[7-methyl-5H-pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[1,5-b][1,2,4]triazin-5-yl)]benzenesulfonamide (MM-137):

Yield 90%. Melting point: 210–212 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 2.27 (s, 3H), 2.49 (t, 4H, J = 4.8 Hz), 2.91 (s, 3H), 3.08 (t, 4H, J = 4.8 Hz), 7.94 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ: 11.45, 29.68, 45.95, 53.99, 118.92, 129.59, 132.80, 133.43, 140.50, 144.38, 145.20, 147.56; HRMS (ESI, m/z) Calcd for C16H19N10O2S [M+ + H] 415.14080. Found [M+ + H] 415.14029. Anal. Calcd for C16H18N10O2S: C, 46.36; H, 4.37; N, 33.79. Found: C, 46.16; H, 4.40; N, 33.65.

N-(morpholin-1-yl)-4-[7-methyl-5H-pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[1,5-b][1,2,4]triazin-5-yl)]benzenesulfonamide (MM-139):

Yield 86%. Melting point:212–214 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 1.43 (t, 2H, J = 5.6 Hz), 1.65 (q, 4H, J = 5.6 Hz), 2.91 (s, 3H), 3.02 (t, 4H, J = 5.6 Hz); HRMS (ESI, m/z) Calcd for C16H18N9O2S [M+ + H] 400.12991. Found [M+ + H] 400.12969. Anal. Calcd for C16H17N9O2S: C, 48.11; H, 4.28; N, 31.56. Found: C, 47.89; H, 4.33; N, 31.34.

4.2. Biological Studies

4.2.1. Chemicals

Trypsin-EDTA and all culture media (RPMI-1640, DMEM-F12, MEM) were purchased from Biowest (CytoGen, Zgierz, Poland). Acridine orange/ethidium bromide (AO/BE), amino acids solution (MEM), buffered saline (PBS), β-mercaptoethanol, penicillin-streptomycin solution stabilized, fetal bovine serum (FBS), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and MTT 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,3-diphenyltetrazolium bromide were supplied by Merck/Sigma Aldrich Chemical Co (Burlington, MA, USA). FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I was purchased from B.D. Biosciences (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). MitoTracker Red was purchased from Invitrogen (Waltham, MA, USA).

4.2.2. Cell Culture

Cancer cell lines: BxPC-3 (pancreas adenocarcinoma, ATCC® CRL-1687TM), HCT-116 (colorectal carcinoma, ATCC® CCL-247™), PC-3 (prostate cancer, ATCC® CRL-1435TM), and normal cell lines: L929 (mouse fibroblast, ATCC® CCL-1™) and WI-38 (human lung fibroblasts, ATCC® CCL-75TM) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA). Compositions of culture media used to cultivate cells are presented in Table 8.

Table 8.

Compositions of culture media used to cultivate cells.

Type of Cells Medium Supplements
BxPC-3
HCT-116
RPMI-1640 10% (v/v) FBS, L-Glutamine, 25 mM Hepes,
1% penicillin-streptomycin
PC-3 DMEM-F12 10% (v/v) FBS, L-Glutamine, 15 mM Hepes
1% penicillin-streptomycin
L929 RPMI-1640 10% (v/v) FBS, L-Glutamine, 25 mM Hepes,
1% penicillin-streptomycin
1% β-mercaptoethanol
WI-38 MEM 10% (v/v) FBS, L-Glutamine, 25 mM Hepes
1% penicillin-streptomycin

Cells were grown at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in the air. The culture medium was changed every 24–48 h. Subculture was performed using 0.25% trypsin/EDTA after cells reached confluence.

4.2.3. MTT Assay

To estimate cell viability following 72 h incubation with the tested MM-compounds (MM134, MM136, MM137, and MM139), the MTT test was used according to the PN-EN ISO 10993-5. It is a quantitative method based on the tetrazolium yellow dye MTT [3(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide], which is converted by living cells to a purple product, formazan, the concentration of which was measured colorimetrically. The MTT assay was performed according to the procedure described by Mosmann [87] with modifications. At a density of approximately 8 × 103 cells per 100 µL/well, 96-well plates were seeded. Following the given incubation period in controlled conditions (37 °C; 5% CO2), cells were exposed to different concentrations of tested compounds in DMSO (range 0.05–3 µM) in a volume of 100 µL medium per well. Final solvent concentration of DMSO was < 0.5% v/v [88]. The experimental design included vehicle controls and blanks (wells without cells).

After 72 h of incubation of cells with tested MM-compounds, 20 µL of MTT tetrazolium salt (5 mg/mL in PBS) was added to each well, and plates were incubated once again in a humidified atmosphere for 3 h (37 °C; 5% CO2). Following the incubation time, the solutions were removed and 100 µL of DMSO was added to dissolve the formazan complexes. Subsequently, a spectrophotometer (microplate reader Power Wave XS BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA) reading was performed at 570 nm. The experiments were performed in duplicates.

4.3. Apoptosis Detection

4.3.1. Flow Cytometry Analysis with Annexin V-FITC Staining

The Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit was used to estimate the apoptosis induction following 24 and 48 h incubation with the tested MM-compounds. During apoptosis, phosphatidylserine is transformed from the inner cell membrane to the cell surface, which can be detected by the annexin-FITC complex. The addition of propidium iodide to the reaction mixture allows the assessment of cell membrane integrity. Using flow cytometry analysis, four subpopulations of cells can be distinguished: alive (non-stained), necrotic (propidium iodide stained), early apoptotic (annexin V stained cells), or late-apoptotic cells (propidium iodide and annexin V stained) [89]. BxPC-3 and PC-3 cells were seeded at appropriate density on a 6-well plate (Table 9).

Table 9.

Density of BxPC-3 and PC-3 cells used in the experimental series in Annexin V-FITC staining (the white panel), MitoTracker Red (the yellow panel) and dual acridine orange/ethidium bromide fluorescent staining (the grey panel).

Cancer Cell Lines Cell Density/2 mL Culture Medium
Annexin V-FITC
24 h Incubation 48 h Incubation
BxPC-3 6 × 105 5 × 105
PC-3 7 × 105 5 × 105
Cell density/200 µL culture medium
MitoTracker Red
24 h incubation 48 h incubation
BxPC-3 2 × 104 1.5 × 104
PC-3 1.2 × 104 1.5 × 104
Cell density/mL culture medium
AO/EB
24 h incubation 48 h incubation
BxPC-3 1.5 × 105 1 × 105
PC-3 1.5 × 105 1 × 105

After 24 h, cells were exposed to two concentrations of tested MM-compounds obtained in the 72 h MTT assay: IC50, and 2xIC50. The experimental design included vehicle control (final solvent concentration was < 0.5% v/v DMSO), and cells treated with 2 µM SN-38 (active metabolite of irinotecan) used as a positive compensation control. Cells were left for incubation for another 24 or 48 h (37 °C; 5% CO2). After exposure, cells were trypsinized and transferred to cytometric tubes, left for 40 min, and centrifuged at 1400 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. Afterward, the supernatant was removed, and the precipitate was diluted in 1 mL of PBS. The rest of the procedure was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The results were obtained from three independent experiments.

4.3.2. Dual Acridine Orange/Ethidium Bromide (AO/EB) Fluorescent Staining

Acridine orange/ethidium bromide (AO/EB) staining is used to detect nuclear alterations and the development of apoptotic bodies, which are both indicative of apoptosis. Acridine orange penetrates into living cells, emitting green fluorescence after intercalation into DNA. The second dye, ethidium bromide, emits red fluorescence in cells with an altered cell membrane. The cells are divided into three categories as follows: living cells (green nucleus with red orange cytoplasm); apoptotic (green irregularly nuclei with chromatin condensation or fragmentation); and necrotic cells (uniformly orange-stained cell nuclei) [90]. Programmed cell death is measured by counting the number of cells that undergo apoptosis under a fluorescent microscope [46].

BxPC-3 and PC-3 cells were seeded at an appropriate density on 12-well plates (Table 9). After 24 h, cells were exposed to MM134, MM136, MM137 and MM139 in concentrations followed by IC50 values obtained in the MTT assay (IC50 and 2xIC50 concentration) for 24 or 48 h. Following the incubation period, cells were incubated with fluorochromes (AO/EB: 100 µM; 1:1, v/v) for 5 min at 37 °C in the dark.

Viable, apoptotic, or necrotic cells were distinguished using this method based on differential uptake of fluorescent DNA-binding dyes (AO/EB) with the structural aspect of chromatin condensation in the stained nucleus. Cells were analyzed using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus BX60 F5 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd., Nagano, Japan) at 360 nm. The results were obtained from three independent experiments.

4.3.3. Changes in Transmembrane Mitochondrial Potential-MitoTracker Red (ΔΨm)

Mitotracker Red is deposited in the mitochondrial matrix in response to changes in the inner transmembrane potential of the mitochondria. The intensity of fluorescence reflects the fitness of the mitochondria and alters with changes in MMP [91]. BxPC-3 and PC-3 cells were seeded at appropriate density on a 96-well plates (Table 9).

Cells were incubated with the following concentrations of MM134, MM136, MM137, and MM139: 0.5xIC50, IC50 and 2xIC50. After appropriate incubation time, cells were incubated with MitoTracker Red (0.1 µM/200 µL PBS/well) for 40 min. Afterward, MitoTracker Red solution was removed from the wells and PBS (200 µL/well) was added. Fluorescence was read at an absorbance/emission of 581/644 nm using the SpectraMax® i3x Multi-Mode Detection Platform.

4.4. Computational Studies

4.4.1. Molecular Docking Simulations

Triazine sulfonamide derivatives were designed and evaluated for their binding interactions with various drug targets involved in cancer pathophysiology with the intent of identifying their probable mechanism of action for their anticancer potential. Three-dimensional structures of all triazine sulfonamide derivatives, i.e., MM129, MM131, MM134, MM136, MM137, and MM139, were prepared by using the ChemDraw Ultra 9.0 tool. These designed ligands were computationally screened against ABL tyrosine-protein kinases (ABL1, ABL2), serine/threonine-protein kinases (AKT1, AKT2, AKT3), breakpoint cluster region protein (BCR), tyrosine-protein kinase (BTK), carbonic anhydrases (CA-IX and CA-XII), cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK2, CDK4, CDK6, and CDK7), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), mechanistic target of the rapamycin (mTOR1 and mTOR2) and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) by using molecular docking simulation [69].

Three-dimensional structure models of all macromolecular targets having an active involvement in cancer pathophysiology in humans were procured from the protein data bank (PDB) [51].

For the process validation of molecular docking simulation, the structure models of all the prepared macromolecular targets were initially docked against their reference ligands, which were already complex in their structural models. All the reference ligands, i.e., J8N, J92, MHR, and ATP were docked against their respective macromolecular targets, i.e., ABL1, ABL2, AKT1, AKT2, AKT3, BCR, BTK, CA-IX, CA-XII, CDK2, CDK4, CDK6, CDK7, ICAM-1, mTOR, mTOR2 and PD-L1 for the process validation [67].

After successful validation of all the macromolecular targets used in the current study, the designed triazine sulfonamide analogs were screened against them to identify their affinities against each of the macromolecular targets.

4.4.2. Molecular Dynamics Simulations

The obtained docking results were further validated for the stability of the macromolecular drug–receptor complex concerning time by performing molecular dynamics simulation. Based upon the best docking score, the macromolecular complexes of the ligands MM136, MM137, and MM139 against AKT1 and PD-L1 enzyme were shortlisted given the best docking results for performing a dynamics simulation at the molecular level for a time frame of 100 nanoseconds (ns) at constant temperature and pressure conditions [69,92].

4.4.3. Drug Likeness and ADMET Prediction

The potential drug-like molecule needs to possess distinct properties that facilitate long-lasting therapeutic effects inside the human body. In the drug development process, it is crucial to estimate the ADME parameters (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) of a given molecule. Computer models are reliable for the prediction of the pharmacokinetic profile of a newer ligand and may constitute an alternative to biological experiments, leading to a reduction in animal use in drug research, but they cannot fully replace them. Swiss-ADME web tool (http://www.swissadme.ch, accessed on 1 May 2022) [74] was used to estimate critical physicochemical, pharmacological, and drug-like properties of tested compounds based on the Lipiski rule, which states that orally active agents are prohibited from having more than one violation of the following rules: (1) the log P of the octanol/water partition coefficient (log P) should not be higher than five; (2) the molecular weight of the compound should be less than 500 Da; (3) the number of hydrogen bond donors should not be greater than five; and (4) the number of hydrogen donors should not be greater than ten [93,94]. SwissADME allows easy estimation of major pharmacokinetic parameters including, passive human gastrointestinal absorption (HIA) and blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeation [95]. SwissADME allows screening compounds for their cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibitory activity. This is an important issue given that CYP isoforms are involved in drug elimination through metabolic biotransformation and thus impact the efficiency of therapy and affect the drug toxicity and adverse effects [93].

5. Conclusions

The conducted research provides the necessary information on the biological response of cancer and normal human cells to MM-compounds with an innovative, modified chemical structure, showing oncotherapeutic potential. Pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[1,5-b][1,2,4]triazine sulfonamides are emerging as an important scaffold for drug discovery. Here we have shown the utility of four pyrazolo-triazine derivatives (MM134, MM136, MM137, and MM139) as potential anticancer compounds with selective cytotoxic and proapoptotic properties in various cancer cell line models. Our data indicate that antitumor potential may result from the dual inhibition of AKT-mTOR and PD-1-PD-L1 pathways in cancer cells. The exploration of biological activity of other analogs of MM derivatives may lead to optimization and discovery of novel, safe and potent inhibitors of these pathways with more selective action against neoplastic cells and minimized cytotoxicity against normal human cells.

Abbreviations

ABL ABL tyrosine-protein kinase
AIF apoptosis-inducing factor
AKT serine/threonine-protein kinase
AO/EB Acridine orange/ethidium bromide
BBB blood–brain barrier
BTK Bruton’s tyrosine kinase
CA carbonic anhydrase
CDK cyclin-dependent kinases
Csp3 carbons in the sp3 hybridization
CYP cytochrome P450
DMSO dimethyl sulfoxide
FBS fetal bovine serum
HIA human gastrointestinal absorption
ICAM-1 intercellular adhesion molecule 1
MEM amino acids solution
MMP mitochondria membrane potential
mTOR mechanistic target of the rapamycin
MTT 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,3-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
MW molecular weight
PBS buffered saline
PD-1 programmed death receptor-1
PDB protein data bank
PD-L1 programmed death ligand-1
PGP glycoprotein P
PI3K phosphoinositide-3-kinase
PTEN phosphatase and tensin homolog
RMSD root mean square deviation
RMSF root mean square fluctuation
TP53 cellular tumor antigen p53
TPSA topological polar surface area

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23115892/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.M., M.K., M.M. and R.K.; collected literature, B.M., M.K. and R.K.; wrote the manuscript, A.S., K.B., M.K. and S.M.; supervised project and proofread the paper, M.K., M.M. and R.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the main text of this article/supplementary materials of this article or on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Lee C.-I., Lee C.-L., Hwang J.-F., Lee Y.-H., Wang J.-J. Monascus-fermented red mold rice exhibits cytotoxic effect and induces apoptosis on human breast cancer cells. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012;97:1269–1278. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4279-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hatse S., De Clercq E., Balzarini J. Role of antimetabolites of purine and pyrimidine nucleotide metabolism in tumor cell differentiation. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1999;58:539–555. doi: 10.1016/S0006-2952(99)00035-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Parker W.B. Enzymology of Purine and Pyrimidine Antimetabolites Used in the Treatment of Cancer. Chem. Rev. 2009;109:2880–2893. doi: 10.1021/cr900028p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pizzorno G., Diasio R.B., Cheng Y.-C. Holland-Frei Cancer Medicine. 6th ed. BC Decker; Hamilton, ON, Canada: 2003. [(accessed on 1 May 2022)]. Pyrimidine and Purine Antimetabolites. Chapter 50. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK13028/ [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brunelle J.K., Zhang B. Apoptosis assays for quantifying the bioactivity of anticancer drug products. Drug Resist. Updates. 2010;13:172–179. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2010.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.D’Arcy M.S. Cell death: A review of the major forms of apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy. Cell Biol. Int. 2019;43:582–592. doi: 10.1002/cbin.11137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vermes I., Haanen C., Steffens-Nakken H., Reutellingsperger C. A novel assay for apoptosis Flow cytometric detection of phosphatidylserine expression on early apoptotic cells using fluorescein labelled Annexin V. J. Immunol. Methods. 1995;184:39–51. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(95)00072-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Crowley L., Marfell B.J., Scott A.P., Waterhouse N.J. Quantitation of Apoptosis and Necrosis by Annexin V Binding, Propidium Iodide Uptake, and Flow Cytometry. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2016;2016:pdb-rot087288. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot087288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bouchain G., Delorme D. Novel hydroxamate and anilide derivatives as potent histone deacetylase inhibitors: Synthesis and antiproliferative evaluation. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003;10:2359–2372. doi: 10.2174/0929867033456585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cheng X.-C., Wang Q., Fang H., Xu W.-F. Role of sulfonamide group in matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors. Curr. Med. Chem. 2008;15:368–373. doi: 10.2174/092986708783497300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lu Y., Chen J., Xiao M., Li W., Miller D.D. An Overview of Tubulin Inhibitors That Interact with the Colchicine Binding Site. Pharm. Res. 2012;29:2943–2971. doi: 10.1007/s11095-012-0828-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mojzych M., Dolashki A., Voelter W. Synthesis of pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazine sulfonamides, novel Sildenafil analogs with tyrosinase inhibitory activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014;22:6616–6624. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2014.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mojzych M., Tarasiuk P., Kotwica-Mojzych K., Rafiq M., Seo S.-Y., Nicewicz M., Fornal E. Synthesis of chiral pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazine sulfonamides with tyrosinase and urease inhibitory activity. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2016;32:99–105. doi: 10.1080/14756366.2016.1238362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mojzych M., Šubertová V., Bielawska A., Bielawski K., Bazgier V., Berka K., Gucký T., Fornal E., Kryštof V. Synthesis and kinase inhibitory activity of new sulfonamide derivatives of pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazines. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014;78:217–224. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.03.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cowan-Jacob S.W., Fendrich G., Floersheimer A., Furet P., Liebetanz J., Rummel G., Rheinberger P., Centeleghe M., Fabbro D., Manley P.W. Structural biology contributions to the discovery of drugs to treat chronic myelogenous leukaemia. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2006;63:80–93. doi: 10.1107/S0907444906047287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bernat Z., Szymanowska A., Kciuk M., Kotwica-Mojzych K., Mojzych M. Review of the Synthesis and Anticancer Properties of Pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazine Derivatives. Molecules. 2020;25:3948. doi: 10.3390/molecules25173948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Byth K.F., Cooper N., Culshaw J.D., Heaton D.W., Oakes S.E., Minshull C.A., Norman R.A., Pauptit R.A., Tucker J.A., Breed J., et al. Imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazines: A potent and selective class of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004;14:2249–2252. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nie Z., Perretta C., Erickson P., Margosiak S., Almassy R., Lu J., Averill A., Yager K.M., Chu S. Structure-based design, synthesis, and study of pyrazolo[1,5-a][1,3,5]triazine derivatives as potent inhibitors of protein kinase CK2. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007;17:4191–4195. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.05.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Filhol O., Cochet C. Protein Kinase CK2 in Health and Disease. Exp. 2009;66:1830–1839. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-9151-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sciú M.L., Sebastián-Pérez V., Martinez-Gonzalez L., Benitez R., Perez D.I., Pérez C., Campillo N.E., Martinez A., Moyano E.L. Computer-aided molecular design of pyrazolotriazines targeting glycogen synthase kinase 3. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2018;34:87–96. doi: 10.1080/14756366.2018.1530223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Scozzafava A., Owa T., Mastrolorenzo A., Supuran C.T. Anticancer and Antiviral Sulfonamides. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003;10:925–953. doi: 10.2174/0929867033457647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kciuk M., Gielecińska A., Mujwar S., Mojzych M., Marciniak B., Drozda R., Kontek R. Targeting carbonic anhydrase IX and XII isoforms with small molecule inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2022;37:1278–1298. doi: 10.1080/14756366.2022.2052868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mojzych M., Bielawska A., Bielawski K., Ceruso M., Supuran C.T. Pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazine sulfonamides as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors with antitumor activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014;22:2643–2647. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2014.03.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mojzych M., Karczmarzyk Z., Wysocki W., Ceruso M., Supuran C.T., Kryštof V., Urbańczyk-Lipkowska Z., Kalicki P. New approaches to the synthesis of sildenafil analogues and their enzyme inhibitory activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015;23:1421–1429. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2015.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hermanowicz J.M., Szymanowska A., Sieklucka B., Czarnomysy R., Pawlak K., Bielawska A., Bielawski K., Kalafut J., Przybyszewska A., Surazynski A., et al. Exploration of novel heterofused 1,2,4-triazine derivative in colorectal cancer. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2021;36:535–548. doi: 10.1080/14756366.2021.1879803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hermanowicz J., Pawlak K., Sieklucka B., Czarnomysy R., Kwiatkowska I., Kazberuk A., Surazynski A., Mojzych M., Pawlak D. MM-129 as a Novel Inhibitor Targeting PI3K/AKT/mTOR and PD-L1 in Colorectal Cancer. Cancers. 2021;13:3203. doi: 10.3390/cancers13133203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jiang Y., Chen M., Nie H., Yuan Y. PD-1 and PD-L1 in cancer immunotherapy: Clinical implications and future considerations. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2019;15:1111–1122. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1571892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Salmaninejad A., Valilou S.F., Shabgah A.G., Aslani S., Alimardani M., Pasdar A., Sahebkar A. PD-1/PD-L1 pathway: Basic biology and role in cancer immunotherapy. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019;234:16824–16837. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Guan J., Lim K.S., Mekhail T., Chang C.-C. Programmed Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Expression in the Programmed Death Receptor-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 Blockade: A Key Player Against Various Cancers. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2017;141:851–861. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0361-RA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hassan B., Akcakanat A., Holder A.M., Meric-Bernstam F. Targeting the PI3-Kinase/Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathway. Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2013;22:641–664. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2013.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yu J.S.L., Cui W. Proliferation, survival and metabolism: The role of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling in pluripotency and cell fate determination. Development. 2016;143:3050–3060. doi: 10.1242/dev.137075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu R., Chen Y., Liu G., Li C., Song Y., Cao Z., Li W., Hu J., Lu C., Liu Y. PI3K/AKT pathway as a key link modulates the multidrug resistance of cancers. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-02998-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ersahin T., Tuncbag N., Cetin-Atalay R. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR interactive pathway. Mol. BioSyst. 2015;11:1946–1954. doi: 10.1039/C5MB00101C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Porta C., Paglino C., Mosca A. Targeting PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling in Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2014;4:64. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hermanowicz J.M., Kalaska B., Pawlak K., Sieklucka B., Miklosz J., Mojzych M., Pawlak D. Preclinical Toxicity and Safety of MM-129—First-in-Class BTK/PD-L1 Inhibitor as a Potential Candidate against Colon Cancer. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:1222. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13081222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gornowicz A., Szymanowska A., Mojzych M., Czarnomysy R., Bielawski K., Bielawska A. The Anticancer Action of a Novel 1,2,4-Triazine Sulfonamide Derivative in Colon Cancer Cells. Molecules. 2021;26:2045. doi: 10.3390/molecules26072045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Stockert J.C., Horobin R.W., Colombo L.L., Blázquez-Castro A. Tetrazolium salts and formazan products in Cell Biology: Viability assessment, fluorescence imaging, and labeling perspectives. Acta Histochem. 2018;120:159–167. doi: 10.1016/j.acthis.2018.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chazotte B. Labeling Mitochondria with MitoTracker Dyes. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2011;2011:990–992. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot5648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ricci J.E., Muñoz-Pinedo C., Fitzgerald P., Bailly-Maitre B., Perkins G.A., Yadava N., Scheffler I.E., Ellisman M.H., Green D.R. Disruption of Mitochondrial Function during Apoptosis Is Mediated by Caspase Cleavage of the p75 Subunit of Complex I of the Electron Transport Chain. Cell. 2004;117:773–786. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Krysko D.V., Roels F., Leybaert L., D’Herde K. Mitochondrial Transmembrane Potential Changes Support the Concept of Mitochondrial Heterogeneity During Apoptosis. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2001;49:1277–1284. doi: 10.1177/002215540104901010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gornowicz A., Szymanowska A., Mojzych M., Bielawski K., Bielawska A. The Effect of Novel 7-methyl-5-phenyl-pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[4,5-b][1,2,4]triazine Sulfonamide Derivatives on Apoptosis and Autophagy in DLD-1 and HT-29 Colon Cancer Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:5221. doi: 10.3390/ijms21155221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mojzych M., Karczmarzyk Z., Rykowski A. Synthesis and structure of 7-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[4,5-b][1,2,4]triazine(1) J. Chem. Crystallogr. 2005;35:151–155. doi: 10.1007/s10870-005-2805-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Karczmarzyk Z., Mojzych M., Rykowski A. Synthesis and structure of a novel mesomeric betaine 6,7-dimethyl-2H-pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[4,5-b][1,2,4]triazine. J. Mol. Struct. 2007;829:22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2006.06.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mojzych M., Karczmarzyk Z., Wysocki W., Urbańczyk-Lipkowska Z., Żaczek N. Valence tautomerism of new pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazole[4,5-b][1,2,4]triazines. J. Mol. Struct. 2014;1067:147–153. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2014.03.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Deev S.L., Shestakova T.S., Charushin V.N., Chupakhin O.N. Synthesis and azido-tetrazole tautomerism of 3-azido-1,2,4-triazines. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2017;53:963–975. doi: 10.1007/s10593-017-2157-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kasibhatla S., Amarante-Mendes G.P., Finucane D., Brunner T., Bossy-Wetzel E., Green D.R. Acridine Orange/Ethidium Bromide (AO/EB) Staining to Detect Apoptosis. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. :2006. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot4493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pemovska T., Johnson E., Kontro M., Repasky G.A., Chen J., Wells P., Cronin C.N., McTigue M., Kallioniemi O., Porkka K., et al. Axitinib effectively inhibits BCR-ABL1(T315I) with a distinct binding conformation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015;519:102–105. doi: 10.1038/nature14119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Salah E., Ugochukwu E., Barr A.J., von Delft F., Knapp S., Elkins J.M. Crystal Structures of ABL-Related Gene (ABL2) in Complex with Imatinib, Tozasertib (VX-680), and a Type I Inhibitor of the Triazole Carbothioamide Class. J. Med. Chem. 2011;54:2359–2367. doi: 10.1021/jm101506n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Freeman-Cook K.D., Autry C., Borzillo G., Gordon D., Barbacci-Tobin E., Bernardo V., Briere D., Clark T., Corbett M., Jakubczak J., et al. Design of Selective, ATP-Competitive Inhibitors of Akt. J. Med. Chem. 2010;53:4615–4622. doi: 10.1021/jm1003842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Heerding D.A., Rhodes N., Leber J.D., Clark T.J., Keenan R.M., Lafrance L.V., Li M., Safonov I.G., Takata D.T., Venslavsky J.W., et al. Identification of 4-(2-(4-Amino-1,2,5-oxadiazol-3-yl)-1-ethyl-7-{[(3S)-3-piperidinylmethyl]oxy}-1H-imidazo [4,5-c]pyridin-4-yl)-2-methyl-3-butyn-2-ol (GSK690693), a Novel Inhibitor of AKT Kinase. J. Med. Chem. 2008;51:5663–5679. doi: 10.1021/jm8004527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Berman H.M., Westbrook J., Feng Z., Gilliland G., Bhat T.N., Weissig H., Shindyalov I.N., Bourne P.E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:235–242. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Reckel S., Gehin C., Tardivon D., Georgeon S., Kükenshöner T., Löhr F., Koide A., Buchner L., Panjkovich A., Reynaud A., et al. Structural and functional dissection of the DH and PH domains of oncogenic Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02313-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Marcotte D.J., Liu Y.-T., Arduini R.M., Hession C.A., Miatkowski K., Wildes C.P., Cullen P.F., Hong V., Hopkins B.T., Mertsching E., et al. Structures of human Bruton’s tyrosine kinase in active and inactive conformations suggest a mechanism of activation for TEC family kinases. Protein Sci. 2010;19:429–439. doi: 10.1002/pro.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zakšauskas A., Čapkauskaitė E., Jezepčikas L., Linkuvienė V., Paketurytė V., Smirnov A., Leitans J., Kazaks A., Dvinskis E., Manakova E., et al. Halogenated and di-substituted benzenesulfonamides as selective inhibitors of carbonic anhydrase isoforms. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020;185:111825. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.111825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bettayeb K., Tirado O.M., Lambot S.M., Ferandin Y., Lozach O., Morris J., Mateo-Lozano S., Drueckes P., Schächtele C., Kubbutat M.H., et al. Meriolins, a New Class of Cell Death–Inducing Kinase Inhibitors with Enhanced Selectivity for Cyclin-Dependent Kinases. Cancer Res. 2007;67:8325–8334. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Day P.J., Cleasby A., Tickle I.J., O’Reilly M., Coyle J.E., Holding F.P., McMenamin R.L., Yon J., Chopra R., Lengauer C., et al. Crystal structure of human CDK4 in complex with a D-type cyclin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:4166–4170. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809645106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chen P., Lee N.V., Hu W., Xu M., Ferre R.A., Lam H., Bergqvist S., Solowiej J., Diehl W., He Y.-A., et al. Spectrum and Degree of CDK Drug Interactions Predicts Clinical Performance. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2016;15:2273–2281. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lolli G., Lowe E.D., Brown N.R., Johnson L.N. The Crystal Structure of Human CDK7 and Its Protein Recognition Properties. Structure. 2004;12:2067–2079. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2004.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lennartz F., Adams Y., Bengtsson A., Olsen R.W., Turner L., Ndam N.T., Ecklu-Mensah G., Moussiliou A., Ofori M.F., Gamain B., et al. Structure-Guided Identification of a Family of Dual Receptor-Binding PfEMP1 that Is Associated with Cerebral Malaria. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;21:403–414. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yang H., Jiang X., Li B., Yang H.J., Miller M., Yang A., Dhar A., Pavletich N.P. Mechanisms of mTORC1 activation by RHEB and inhibition by PRAS40. Nature. 2017;552:368–373. doi: 10.1038/nature25023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Scaiola A., Mangia F., Imseng S., Boehringer D., Berneiser K., Shimobayashi M., Stuttfeld E., Hall M.N., Ban N., Maier T. The 3.2-Å resolution structure of human mTORC2. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eabc1251. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc1251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Butera R., Ważyńska M., Magiera-Mularz K., Plewka J., Musielak B., Surmiak E., Sala D., Kitel R., de Bruyn M., Nijman H.W., et al. Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Imidazopyridines as PD-1/PD-L1 Antagonists. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2021;12:768–773. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.1c00033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Morris G.M., Huey R., Lindstrom W., Sanner M.F., Belew R.K., Goodsell D.S., Olson A.J. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem. 2009;30:2785–2791. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bitencourt-Ferreira G., Pintro V.O., de Azevedo W.F. Docking with AutoDock4. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019;2053:125–148. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9752-7_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jain R., Mujwar S. Repurposing metocurine as main protease inhibitor to develop novel antiviral therapy for COVID-19. Struct. Chem. 2020;31:2487–2499. doi: 10.1007/s11224-020-01605-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Mujwar S., Kumar V. Computational Drug Repurposing Approach to Identify Potential Fatty Acid-Binding Protein-4 Inhibitors to Develop Novel Antiobesity Therapy. ASSAY Drug Dev. Technol. 2020;18:318–327. doi: 10.1089/adt.2020.976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Shah K., Mujwar S., Krishna G., Gupta J.K. Computational Design and Biological Depiction of Novel Naproxen Derivative. ASSAY Drug Dev. Technol. 2020;18:308–317. doi: 10.1089/adt.2020.977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Shah K., Mujwar S., Gupta J.K., Shrivastava S.K., Mishra P. Molecular Docking and In Silico Cogitation Validate Mefenamic Acid Prodrugs as Human Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitor. ASSAY Drug Dev. Technol. 2019;17:285–291. doi: 10.1089/adt.2019.943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Mujwar S., Deshmukh R., Harwansh R.K., Gupta J.K., Gour A. Drug Repurposing Approach for Developing Novel Therapy Against Mupirocin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. ASSAY Drug Dev. Technol. 2019;17:298–309. doi: 10.1089/adt.2019.944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mishra I., Mishra R., Mujwar S., Chandra P., Sachan N. A retrospect on antimicrobial potential of thiazole scaffold. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2020;57:2304–2329. doi: 10.1002/jhet.3970. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Mujwar S., Shah K., Gupta J.K., Gour A. Docking based screening of curcumin derivatives: A novel approach in the inhibition of tubercular DHFR. Int. J. Comput. Biol. Drug Des. 2021;14:297. doi: 10.1504/IJCBDD.2021.118830. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Sharma K.K., Singh B., Mujwar S., Bisen P., Kaushal S.K., Brijendra S., Prakash B.S. Molecular Docking Based Analysis to Elucidate the DNA Topoisomerase IIβ as the Potential Target for the Ganoderic Acid; A Natural Therapeutic Agent in Cancer Therapy. Curr. Comput. Aided-Drug Des. 2020;16:176–189. doi: 10.2174/1573409915666190820144759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Minaz N., Razdan R., Hammock B.D., Mujwar S., Goswami S.K. Impact of diabetes on male sexual function in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats: Protective role of soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitor. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019;115:108897. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.SwissADME. [(accessed on 4 May 2022)]. Available online: http://www.swissadme.ch.
  • 75.Dresser G.K., Spence J.D., Bailey D. Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Consequences and Clinical Relevance of Cytochrome P450 3A4 Inhibition. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2000;38:41–57. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200038010-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Fontana E., Dansette P.M., Poli S.M. Cytochrome P450 Enzymes Mechanism Based Inhibitors: Common Sub-Structures and Reactivity. Curr. Drug Metab. 2005;6:413–451. doi: 10.2174/138920005774330639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zhou S.-F. Drugs Behave as Substrates, Inhibitors and Inducers of Human Cytochrome P450 3A4. Curr. Drug Metab. 2008;9:310–322. doi: 10.2174/138920008784220664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Miller D.S., Bauer B., Hartz A.M.S. Modulation of P-Glycoprotein at the Blood-Brain Barrier: Opportunities to Improve Central Nervous System Pharmacotherapy. Pharmacol. Rev. 2008;60:196–209. doi: 10.1124/pr.107.07109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Robinson K., Tiriveedhi V. Perplexing Role of P-Glycoprotein in Tumor Microenvironment. Front. Oncol. 2020;10:265. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kim E.-J., Kang G.-J., Kang J.-I., Boo H.-J., Hyun J.W., Koh Y.S., Chang W.-Y., Kim Y.R., Kwon J.-M., Maeng Y.H., et al. Over-activation of AKT signaling leading to 5-Fluorouracil resistance in SNU-C5/5-FU cells. Oncotarget. 2018;9:19911–19928. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lastwika K.J., Wilson W., III, Li Q.K., Norris J., Xu H., Ghazarian S.R., Kitagawa H., Kawabata S., Taube J.M., Yao S., et al. Control of PD-L1 Expression by Oncogenic Activation of the AKT–mTOR Pathway in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancer Res. 2016;76:227–238. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Van Der Kraak L., Goel G., Ramanan K., Kaltenmeier C., Zhang L., Normolle D.P., Freeman G.J., Tang D., Nason K.S., Davison J.M., et al. 5-Fluorouracil upregulates cell surface B7-H1 (PD-L1) expression in gastrointestinal cancers. J. Immunother. Cancer. 2016;4:65. doi: 10.1186/s40425-016-0163-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Han Y., Liu D., Li L. PD-1/PD-L1 Pathway: Current Researches in Cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2020;10:727–742. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Sun S.-Y. Searching for the real function of mTOR signaling in the regulation of PD-L1 expression. Transl. Oncol. 2020;13:100847. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Langdon S., Hughes A., Taylor M.A., Kuczynski E.A., Mele D.A., Delpuech O., Jarvis L., Staniszewska A., Cosulich S., Carnevalli L.S., et al. Combination of dual mTORC1/2 inhibition and immune-checkpoint blockade potentiates anti-tumour immunity. OncoImmunology. 2018;7:e1458810. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1458810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Mojzych M., Rykowski A. Synthesis of Functionalized 1H-Pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazines and Their Fused Derivatives via Ipso-Substitution of Methylsulfonyl Group with O-, N-, S- and C-Nucleophiles. Heterocycles. 2004;63:1829–1838. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods. 1983;65:55–63. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Da Violante G., Zerrouk N., Richard I., Provot G., Chaumeil J.C., Arnaud P. Evaluation of the Cytotoxicity Effect of Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) on Caco2/TC7 Colon Tumor Cell Cultures. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2002;25:1600–1603. doi: 10.1248/bpb.25.1600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Wlodkowic D., Skommer J., Darzynkiewicz Z. Apoptosis. Volume 559. Humana Press; Totowa, NJ, USA: 2009. Flow Cytometry-Based Apoptosis Detection; pp. 19–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Kontek R., Jakubczak M., Matlawska-Wasowska K. The antioxidants, vitamin A and E but not vitamin C and melatonin enhance the proapoptotic effects of irinotecan in cancer cells in vitro. Toxicol. Vitr. 2014;28:282–291. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Xiao B., Deng X., Zhou W., Tan E.-K. Flow Cytometry-Based Assessment of Mitophagy Using MitoTracker. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2016;10:76. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Mujwar S. Computational repurposing of tamibarotene against triple mutant variant of SARS-CoV-2. Comput. Biol. Med. 2021;136:104748. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Daina A., Michielin O., Zoete V. SwissADME: A free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:42717. doi: 10.1038/srep42717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Daina A., Zoete V. Application of the SwissDrugDesign Online Resources in Virtual Screening. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:4612. doi: 10.3390/ijms20184612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Daina A., Zoete V. A BOILED-Egg To Predict Gastrointestinal Absorption and Brain Penetration of Small Molecules. ChemMedChem. 2016;11:1117–1121. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201600182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the main text of this article/supplementary materials of this article or on request from the corresponding author.


Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES