The authors wish to make a change to the published paper [1]. In the original manuscript, the authors made a mistake in Figure 1. The tecoflex graft image in the first week of observation moved to the place of the pellethane graft image at the 12th week of observation. Additionally, the image of the pellethane graft at the 12th week of observation moved to the place of the image of the tecoflex graft in the first week of observation. The corrected Figure 1 is presented below.
Figure 1.
The vascular graft (VG) view during explantation at different points of observation (Carl Zeiss OPMI Pico surgical microscope). The arrows demonstrate the ingrowth of tissues from the outer VG side.
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused, and the change does not affect the scientific results. The manuscript will be updated.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Reference
- 1.Gostev A.A., Shundrina I.K., Pastukhov V.I., Shutov A.V., Chernonosova V.S., Karpenko A.A., Laktionov P.P. In Vivo Stability of Polyurethane-Based Electrospun Vascular Grafts in Terms of Chemistry and Mechanics. Polymers. 2020;12:845. doi: 10.3390/polym12040845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]