Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Jun 9;12:9538. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13765-2

Differences in the plasma phospholipid profile of patients infected with tick-borne encephalitis virus and co-infected with bacteria

Monika Groth 1, Wojciech Łuczaj 2,, Justyna Dunaj-Małyszko 1, Elżbieta Skrzydlewska 2, Anna Moniuszko-Malinowska 1
PMCID: PMC9184562  PMID: 35680957

Abstract

Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is an infectious viral disease, the pathogenesis of which is still not fully understood. Additionally, TBE can be complicated by co-infections with various bacteria that are also transmitted by ticks, which can affect the proper diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate changes in the plasma phospholipid (PL) and ceramide (CER) profile of patients with TBE and patients with bacterial co-infection (B. burgdorferi or A. phagocytophilum) in relation to healthy subjects. For this purpose, a high-resolution LC-QTOF-MS/MS platform as well as univariate and multivariate statistics were used. The results of this study showed that the levels of phosphatidylcholines (PC) and lysophosphatidylcholines (LPC) species were increased in the plasma of patients with TBE and patients with TBE co-infected with bacteria. On the other hand, observed differences in the content of phosphoethanolamines (PE) and sphingomyelins (SM) make it possible to distinguish TBE patients from patients with co-infections. The opposite direction of changes was also observed in the CER content. This study showed significant modifications to the metabolic pathways of linoleic (LA) and arachidonic acid (AA), as confirmed by the quantitative analysis of these fatty acids. The obtained results allow to distinguish the pathomechanism of TBE from TBE with bacterial co-infection, and consequently may improve the diagnostic process and enable more efficient pharmacotherapy against both pathogens.

Subject terms: Biochemistry, Infection

Introduction

TBE is a vector-borne disease endemic in Europe caused by TBE virus (TBEV) which belongs to Flaviviridae family. TBEV is transmitted by Ixodes ricinus ticks, which are common in Europe. The number of TBE cases in Europe and Asia varies depending on country and ranges from a few cases up to 10,000–12,000 cases per year1. TBE may take clinical course of meningitis, meningoencephalitis or meningoencephalomyelitis2. Meningitis is usually mild and patients recover after 2–3 weeks of symptomatic treatment. In patients with meningoencephalitis and meningoencephalomyelitis the course of the disease is more severe. Unfortunately, the pathogenesis of TBE is still not fully clarified. However, it is well known that the infection caused by TBEV promotes immune deregulation associated with pro-inflammatory reactions, which shift cellular redox homeostasis to oxidative processes3. Such situation usually leads to oxidative stress, which is accompanied by an increase in oxidative modifications of main cellular components, including lipids, and in particular polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). PLs are the main reservoirs of PUFAs, as precursors for lipid mediators and signaling molecules4. PUFAs are believed to be involved in the development of viral infections, including COVID-19, and involvement of AA in the passivation of viruses has been also suggested5. Our previous study has shown enhanced PL peroxidation in the course of TBE6. Consequently, elevated levels of PUFAs oxidative fragmentation products, such as small molecule aldehydes, including malondialdehyde (MDA), 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE) and 4-hydroxy-2-hexenal (4-HHE), and PUFA oxidative cyclization products such as isoprostanes and neuroprostans were observed in plasma, cerebrospinal fluid and urine of patients with tick-borne encephalitis.

In order to comprehensively assess the changes in the structure and functions of PLs, omics studies have been used for several years, which have been proven especially useful in the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic tools in the case of diseases with ambiguous clinical picture7,8. To date, only one metabolomics study has been published indicating PL species that may be involved in metabolic pathways altered in TBE3. Despite the data presented in the literature, the pathogenesis of TBE, as well as its relationship with lipid metabolism is still not fully understood. The situation is further complicated by the fact that tick is a vector of various pathogens, not only TBEV, but also many bacteria, including Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, A. phagocytophilum and protozoa Babesia spp. which may lead to co-infection9. This may result in changes in the pathomechanism of the disease and different spectrum of clinical symptoms making the diagnostic process and pharmacotherapy more challenging. Since non-specific symptoms are observed in TBE as well as Lyme disease (LD) caused by Borrelia burgdorferi and human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA) caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum, co-infection with these diseases should be considered in the differential diagnosis, especially in patients residing or with travel history to areas endemic for tick-borne diseases10,11.

Considering the above, a better understanding of metabolic changes, particularly those related to PLs in the course of TBE, especially in the case of co-infection with other pathogens (in particular bacterial infection), is of key importance for the correct diagnosis and effective pharmacotherapy. Therefore, the aim of the study was to assess lipidomic changes accompanying both the development of TBE and bacterial co-infections with B. burgdorferi or A. phagocytophilum. We used LC-QTOF-MS/MS based lipidomics to analyze differences and similarities in the plasma PL and CER profiles of patients with TBE and TBE patients with bacterial co-infections, as well as healthy subjects.

Materials and methods

Samples collection

Blood samples were obtained from 16 patients with tick-borne encephalitis (5 female and 11 men), mean age: 40 (age range: 23–58) and 6 patients with TBE co-infection with other tick-borne pathogens including Borrelia burgdorferi (LD) or A. phagocytophilum infection (4 female and 2 men, mean age: 45 (age range: 22–63) treated in the Department of Infectious Diseases and Neuroinfections, Medical University of Bialystok, Poland. TBE was diagnosed according to European Academy of Neurology (EAN) guidelines [EUR-Lex 2021], based on clinical symptoms, positive serology and lymphocytic pleocytosis in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Co-infection was diagnosed if one patient was infected with at least two different pathogens. LD was defined on the basis of clinical presentation of erythema migrans or fulfilled criteria for neuroborreliosis12,13. The control group comprised of 8 healthy donors (2 female and 6 men, mean age: 37 (28–50). HGA was diagnosed according to the case definition by CDC when all 3 criteria were fulfilled (https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/conditions/ehrlichiosis-and-anaplasmosis/case-definition): 1. Clinical presentation; 2. Exposure to a tick bite. 3. Laboratory Criteria for Diagnosis: Detection of A. phagocytophilum DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay.

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol for the collection of all blood samples was approved by the Local Bioethics Committee in Medical University of Bialystok (Poland), No. R-I-002/169/2018. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

The blood was taken twice: at admission and after treatment. The mean time between these two examinations in TBE patients was 26 ± 12 days, min 7 days, max 43 days, while the mean time between these two examinations in co-infected patients was 33 ± 4 days, min 28 days, max 39 days.

Control group consisted of 13 healthy blood donors from Regional Centre for Transfusion Medicine, Bialystok, Poland.

Blood samples were collected into ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes and next were centrifuged at 3000×g (4 °C) for 5 min to obtain the plasma. Aliquots (0.5 mL) of the plasma samples were transferred to Eppendorf tubes and Butylhydroxytoluene (BHT), as an antioxidant was added (at final concentration of 20 μM) to all plasma samples to prevent oxidation. The samples were then stored at –80 °C until analysis.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients and control, as well as comparison of their laboratory data are presented in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with TBE and co-infections (TBE + LD/HGA) compared to healthy subjects.

Control TBE TBE + LD/HGA
Average age (age range) 37 (28–50) 40 (23–58) 42 (22–63)
Sex (% of participants)

2/8 female (25%)

6/8 male (75%)

5/16 female (33%)

11/16 male (67%)

4/6 female (67%)

2/6 male (33%)

Noticeable tick bite (% of participants) NA 5/16 (33%) 5/6 (83%)
Time since tick bite (days) NA 34 ± 24 18 ± 5
Duration of hospitalization (days) NA 14 ± 2 12 ± 2
Duration of symptoms prior to hospital admission (days) NA 8 ± 10 4 ± 3
Clinical form (% of participants)
Meningitis NA 7/16 (44%) 5/6 (83%)
Meningoencephalitis 9/16 (56%) 1/6 (17%)
Meningoencephalomyelitis 0/16 (0%) 0/6 (0%)

NA not applicable.

Table 2.

Comparison of laboratory data of patients with TBE and co-infections (TBE + LD) compared to healthy subjects. Values are means ± SD.

Normal range Control Group TBE TBE + LD/HGA
At admission At admission
Complete blood count
WBC [103/μL] 4.00–10.00 6.35 ± 0.97 10.09 ± 2 7.27 ± 1.36
Neutrophils [%] 40.0–72.0 70.8 ± 9.50 60.33 ± 7.07
Lymphocytes [%] 18.0–48.0 18.48 ± 8.02 27.37 ± 6.11
Monocytes [%] 2.50–10.00 9.55 ± 2.8 10.15 ± 2.61
RBC [106/μL] 4.00–5.50 5 ± 0.31 4.37 ± 0.35 4.28 ± 0.56
HGB [g/dl] 12.00–16.00 14.56 ± 0.94 13.08 ± 1.05 12.67 ± 1.26
PLT [103/μL] 130–350 246.53 ± 50.17 255 ± 51 263 ± 67
CRP [mg/L] 0.00–5.00 8.29 ± 14.27 2.69 ± 2.24
Glucose [mg/dL] 70–110 99.8 ± 10.7 97 ± 5.66
Creatinine [mg/dL] 0.50–0.90 0.90 ± 0.13 0,79 ± 0.08
ALT [U/I] 0–31 23 ± 25 18 ± 11
AST [U/I] 0–32 16.47 ± 6.35 17 ± 4
CSF analysis
Cytosis [cells/µl] 0–5 163 ± 99 102 ± 135
Protein [mg/dl] 15–45 75.13 ± 22.30 71.2 ± 65.11

Extraction of lipids and quantification of PL content

Lipid extracts from plasma samples were obtained using the modified Folch method14, by adding 1.5 ml of ice-cold methanol and 3 ml of chloroform to each 200 μl of plasma samples After addition of 1.25 ml H2O (miliQ) samples were vortexed and centrifuged at 2500 × g for 10 min at room temperature and the organic (bottom) phase was collected. The PL content of each lipid extract was calculated by the colorimetric phosphorus assay15. In short, the method included acidic hydrolysis with perchloric acid followed by incubation with ammonium molybdate in the presence of ascorbic acid. The amount of total PL present in each sample was calculated from the absorbance measured at 800 nm, in a microplate UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Multiskan GO, Thermo Scientific, Hudson, NH, USA). All experimental procedures concerning lipid extraction and PL quantification described in detail in previously published studies16,17.

Determination of free and PL fatty acid level

The plasma level of PL fatty acids was analyzed by GC with a flame ionization detector (FID)18. First, the lipids were isolated by Folch extraction using chloroform/methanol mixture (2:1, v/v) in the presence of 0.01% butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). TLC separated PL fatty acids with the mobile chase heptane—diisoprophyl ether—acetic acid (60:40:3, v/v/v) and transmetylated to fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) with boron trifluoride in methanol reagent under nitrogen atmosphere at 100 °C for 30 min for PLs. Two standards were used, including 1,2-dinonadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (PC(19:0/19:0)) (Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL, USA) to assess the overall recovery of the extraction method, and methyl nonadecanoate (MeC19:0) (Supelco, North Harrison Road, Bellefonte, PA, USA) as an internal standard (ISTD) for the GC analysis. The FAMES were analyzed by gas chromatography with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID; Clarus 500, PerkinElmer, Shelton, CT, USA) using a capillary column coated with CP-Sil 88 stationary phase (50 m × 0.25 mm × 0.20 μm; Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The injector and FID detector temperatures were kept at 260 °C. The column temperature was programmed from 150 °C (2 min)–230 °C (10 min) at 4 °C/min. Identification of FAMEs was made by comparison with their retention time with standards.

PL profiling by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (HILIC-MS/MS)

PLs were separated by HILIC using a UPLC system (Agilent 1290; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) coupled with a QTOF mass spectrometer (Agilent 6540; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Internal standards of PC(14:0/14:0), LPC(19:0), PE(14:0/14:0), PI(16:0/16:0) and PS(14:0/14:0) were used for the quantification and assessment of the ions variations. The mixture composed of solvent A [ACN/MeOH/water 50:25:25 (v/v/v) with 1 mM ammonium acetate] and solvent B [ACN/MeOH 60:40 (v/v) with 1 mM ammonium acetate] was used as mobile phase. The gradient elution was applied started with 0% of A, increased linearly to 100% of A within 20 min and held for 15 min, then returned to 0% of A in 10 min. Twenty-five μg of each PL extract corresponding to a volume of 10 μL was mixed with 90 μL of mobile phase (60% of A and 40% of B). A volume of 10 μL of diluted sample was loaded into the Ascentis® Si column (15 cm × 1 mm, 3 μm, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) with the mobile phase flow rate of 40 μL per min. The QTOF mass spectrometer operated using a negative-ion mode (electrospray voltage, − 3000 V) with capillary temperature, 250 °C and sheath gas flow of 13 L/min. Data-dependent acquisition mode (DDA) was used for data collecting in the range of m/z 100–1500 with a fixed collision energy of 35 eV.. All LC–MS/MS analysis was performed in negative ionization mode. Although LPC, PC and SM are sensitive to be detected in positive ion mode, thanks to the addition of ammonium acetate to mobile phase these PLs can be analyzed in the negative mode as adducts with acetate anions [M + CH3COO]-. However, PI, PE and PS are preferentially analyzed in negative ion mode as deprotonated [M-H]- ions. Furthermore, LC–MS/MS analysis in negative mode used in this study allows identification the fatty acyl residues esterified to the glycerol backbone at sn-1 and sn-2 position seen in the MS spectra after decomposition of molecular ions corresponding to each PL species. MS/MS spectra of some identified PL species are included in supplementary materials. Data acquisition was carried out with the use of Mass Hunter data software (version B0.8.0, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The relative content of each PL ion species was achieved by normalization the area of each peak to the peak area of the corresponding internal standard. The retention times and obtained MS/MS spectra were the basis for PL identification.

CER profiling by reversed-phase chromatography coupled with high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry RPLC-MS/MS

An Agilent UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS system (Agilent 1290; Agilent 6540; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to characterize the CER profiles. The mobile phase was composed of solvent A (water with 20 mM ammonium formate pH 5) and solvent B (methanol). Initially, 70% of B was held isocratically for 1 min, followed by a linear increase to 100% of B within 75 min, and return to initial conditions in 5 min. The CERs were separated on an RP C18 column (Acquity BEH Shield 2.1 × 100 mm; 1.7 μm; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) with a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The QTOF mass spectrometer was operated in positive ion mode (electrospray voltage 3.5 kV) with a capillary temperature of 300 °C and a sheath gas flow rate of 8 L/min. The data was collected in DDA mode. Identification of CER species was based on the presence of the [M + H]+ molecular ion, retention time and characteristic fragmentation patterns observed in MS/MS spectra, which was previously described in detail19. Cermide internal standards, N-lignoceroyl-d-erythro-sphingosine and N-lignoceroyl-d-erythro-sphinganine (Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL, USA) were used for quantification of CERs.

Data processing

The filtering, peak detection, alignment and integration as well as the assignment of each PL species was carried out by the MZmine 2.30 software for the data obtained20.

Statistical analysis

Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed using Metaboanalyst version 4.0 online tool (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/)21. The data obtained by MS/MS analysis were autoscaled before Principal component analysis (PCA). Univariate statistical analysis was carried out using the ANOVA test with Tukey’s post hoc test with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The heatmaps were created using "Euclidean" as the clustering distance and "Ward" as the clustering algorithm.

The Metaboanalyst was also applied for the pathway analysis identified highly enriched metabolic pathway of differential lipids via the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database.

Results

In this study HILIC-LC–MS/MS platform and the RP–HPLC–MS/MS technique were applied to evaluate the changes in plasma PL and CER profiles of TBE patients, TBE patients with co-infection and healthy volunteers. PL species belonging to seven different classes were identified in the analyzed samples. These were PC, PE, phosphatidylinositols (PI), phosphatidylserine (PS), lyso-phosphatidylethanolamine (LPE), lyso- LPC, and SM. The lists of most abundant PL species which were identified and quantified are presented in Supplementary Table S3 (supplementary materials).

Comparison of the plasma PL profile of healthy subjects (control) and TBE patients (TBE) and TBE patients with co-infections (TBE + LD/HGA)

PCA analysis was used to confirm the quality of the datasets and to visualize differences between groups of samples in the unsupervised analysis. PCA score plot corresponding to PL data set (Fig. 1) demonstrated clear separation of three analyzed groups. The model captured 56.2% of the total variance. The first component PC1 (33,2%), which accounts for the greatest variation of the model, describes the discrimination between plasma samples from healthy subjects scattered in the left region of the plot and both groups of patients scattered in the right region. However, the second component PC2 (23%) is responsible for observed separation of co-infected TBE patient’s plasma samples from the other two groups (control and TBE).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Two-dimensional principal component analysis (2D PCA) scores plot of the relative PL content in the plasma of healthy subjects (Control) and TBE patients (TBE) and TBE patients with co-infections (TBE + LD/HGA).

We also performed univariate analysis in order to evaluate the variation in the relative abundance of PL species belonging to each class. We sorted PL molecular species using the p values from the One-way ANOVA test (Table 3, Figs. 2, 3).

Table 3.

The alteration observed in the molecular species of 20 most discriminating (according to One-way ANOVA) PL species from PC, LPC, PE and SM class in the plasma of healthy subjects (Control) and TBE patients (TBE) and TBE patients with co-infections (TBE + LD/HGA); mean difference was significant at the 0.05 level (p < 0.0001****; p < 0.001***; n.s.–not significant; the up arrows represent up-regulation and down arrows represent down-regulation.

PL class PL specie PL molecular specie Log2 (fold-change)
TBE
vs
Control
p-value TBE + LD/HGA
vs
Control
p-value TBE + LD/HGA
vs
TBE
p-value
PC PC(38:3) PC(18:1/18:2) 2.66 ↑ **** 3.18 ↑ **** ns
PC PC(40:6) PC(18:0/22:6) 2.71 ↑ **** 3.16 ↑ **** ns
PC PC(40:5) PC(18:0/22:5) 2.70 ↑ **** 2.99 ↑ **** ns
PC PC(42:5) PC(20:0/22:5) 2.75 ↑ **** 2.94 ↑ **** ns
SM SM(d36:1) SM(d18:1/18:0) 1.59 ↓ **** 1.55 ↑ **** 3.14 ↑ ****
SM SM(d34:1) SM(d18:1/16:0) 2.20 ↓ **** ns 2.85 ↑ ****
PC PC(38:6) PC(16:0/22:6) 2.99 ↑ **** 3.65 ↑ **** ns
SM SM(d42:2) SM(d18:1/24:1) 1.71 ↓ **** 1.32 ↑ **** 3.03 ↑ ****
PC PC(38:5) PC(18:1/20:4) 2.40 ↑ **** 3.02 ↑ **** ns
SM SM(d42:3) SM(d18:1/24:2) 1.54 ↓ **** 1.43 ↑ **** 2.96 ↑ ****
LPC LPC(16:0) LPC(16:0) 2.92 ↑ **** 2.41 ↑ **** ns
SM SM(d40:2) SM(d18:1/22:1) 2.06 ↓ **** 1.07 ↑ *** 3.13 ↑ ****
PC PC(38:4) PC(18:0/20:4) 3.10 ↑ **** 3.94 ↑ **** ns
LPC LPC(18:0) LPC(18:0) 3.41 ↑ **** 2.35 ↑ **** 1.06 ↓ ***
LPC LPC(18:1) LPC(18:1) 3.63 ↑ **** 3.12 ↑ **** ns
PC PC(36:1) PC(16:0/20:1) 2.11 ↑ **** 2.88 ↑ **** ns
PE PE(38:6) PE(16:0/22:6) 3.20 ↑ **** 1.65 ↑ **** 1.55 ↓ ****
PC PCp(38:4) PC(P-18:0/20:4) 1.97 ↑ **** 2.31 ↑ **** ns
PE PE(38:5) PE(16:0/22:5) 2.16 ↑ **** ns 2.01 ↓ ****
PE PE(38:4) PE(16:0/22:4) 1.99 ↑ **** ns 1.99 ↓ ****

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Two-dimensional hierarchical clustering heat map of the 20 most discriminating PL species (according to One-way ANOVA) identified in the plasma of healthy subjects (Control) and TBE patients (TBE) and TBE patients with co-infections (TBE + LD/HGA).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Relative abundances of differential (according to One-way ANOVA) PL species in the plasma samples collected from patients and healthy subjects. (red box: control group; blue box: TBE patients co-infected with LD/HGA; green box: TBE patients).

We observed statistically significant decrease of SM species, namely SM(d36:1), SM(d42:2), SM(d42:3) and SM(d40:2), in the plasma of TBE patients, when compared to control group (Fig. 2). In contrast, the relative content of these SM species in the plasma of TBE patients co-infected with bacteria was higher than in the plasma of healthy subjects. We also found that PC species, namely PC(38:3), PC(40:6), PC(40:5), PC(42:5), PC(38:6), PC(38:5), PC(38:4) and PC(36:1), were more abundant in the plasma of both groups of patients (TBE and TBE + LD/HGA), in comparison to the relative contents of these species in the plasma of control group. Moreover, observed up-regulation of PC in both groups of patients was accompanied by an increase in the relative levels of lyso-PC species LPC(16:0), LPC(18:0) and LPC(18:1). In addition to the above, observations up-regulation of certain PE species (PE(38:5), PE(38:4) and PE(38:6)) was found in the plasma of TBE patients (Fig. 2).

Comparison of the plasma CER profile of healthy subjects (control) and TBE patients (TBE) and TBE patients with co-infections (TBE + LD/HGA)

We have identified CER species from two most abundant classes identified in examined plasma samples, namely CERs containing non-hydroxy fatty acids [N] and sphingosine [S] (CER[NS]) and CERs containing non-hydroxy fatty acids [N] and dihydrosphingosine [DS] (CER[NDS]) (Supplementary Table S4).

The 2D PCA scores plot corresponding to the data from CER profiling shows clear discrimination of the three analyzed groups of plasma samples. The model captured 68% of the total variance (Fig. 4) with the PC1 component (58.5%) and the second component PC2 accounted for 9.5%.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Two-dimensional principal component analysis (2D PCA) scores plot of the relative CER content in the plasma of healthy subjects (Control) and TBE patients (TBE) and TBE patients with co-infections (TBE + LD/HGA).

The variation between the groups is most pronounced along with the PC1 component (58.5%), which mainly describes the discrimination between plasma samples from TBE patients scattered in the right region of the plot and plasma samples from the other two groups (control and TBE patients co-infected with LD/HGA). The control group was scattered in the central region of the plot between both groups of patients (TBE and TBE + LD/HGA) indicating on an opposite direction of changes in the content of CER species, that has been confirmed by the univariate statistical analysis.

Obtained results also showed that changes in the SM content observed in the plasma of patients induced changes in the CERs relative levels. Univariate analysis of data set comprising CER species revealed an opposite direction of changes of their relative abundances in the plasma of two groups of patients (TBE and TBE + LD/HGA) in comparison to healthy subjects (Fig. 5). We found that almost all relevant CER species (Table 4) belonging to CER[NS] and CER[NDS] classes were up-regulated in the plasma of TBE patients, while general tendency to decrease of relative content of these CER species was observed in TBE + LD patients. Among all relevant CERs only one CER[NDS] CER specie, namely Cer(d18:0/26:1) was significantly down-regulated in the plasma of TBE patients.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Two-dimensional hierarchical clustering heat map of the 20 most discriminating ceramide species (according to One-way ANOVA) identified in the plasma of healthy subjects (Control) and TBE patients (TBE) and TBE patients co-infected with LD (TBE + LD/HGA).

Table 4.

The alterations observed in the 20 most discriminating (according to the one-way ANOVA) CER species (CER[NS], CER[NDS]) in the plasma of healthy subjects (Control) and TBE patients (TBE) and TBE patients with co-infections (TBE + LD/HGA).

CER class CER specie Log2 (fold-change)
TBE
vs
Control
p-value TBE + LD/HGA
vs
Control
p-value TBE + LD/HGA
vs
TBE
p-value
CER[NS] Cer(d18:1/22:0) 4.97 ↑ **** 2.21 ↓ * 7.18 ↓ ****
CER[NS] Cer(d18:1/24:1) 5.28 ↑ **** 3.33 ↓ **** 8.62 ↓ ****
CER[NS] Cer(d18:1/26:1) 1.94 ↑ **** 4.37 ↓ ** 6.31 ↓ ****
CER[NS] Cer(d18:1/26:0) 1.43 ↑ **** 3.77 ↓ ** 5.20 ↓ ****
CER[NS] Cer(d18:1/16:0) 2.31 ↑ **** 2.75 ↓ ** 5.07 ↓ ****
CER[NS] Cer(d18:2/22:0) 4.56 ↑ **** 1.97 ↓ ** 6.53 ↓ ****
CER[NS] Cer(d18:1/24:0) 4.03 ↑ **** 4.01 ↓ * 8.05 ↓ ****
CER[NS] Cer(d18:1/20:0) 2.46 ↑ **** 2.14 ↓ * 4.60 ↓ ****
CER[NDS] Cer(d18:0/18:0) 2.42 ↑ **** 1.21 ↓ * 3.63 ↓ ****
CER[NS] Cer(d18:1/18:1) 2.02 ↑ **** 1.45 ↓ * 3.48 ↓ ****
CER[NS] Cer(d18:2/16:0) 1.83 ↑ **** 1.50 ↓ * 3.34 ↓ ****
CER[NDS] Cer(d18:0/22:0) 2.28 ↑ **** 1.29 ↓ * 3.56 ↓ ****
CER[NDS] Cer(d18:0/16:0) 2.17 ↑ **** ns 3.14 ↓ ****
CER[NS] Cer(d18:1/18:0) 1.67 ↑ * 2.41 ↓ ** 4.08 ↓ ****
CER[NDS] Cer(d18:0/18:1) 1.41 ↑ **** 1.14 ↓ * 2.56 ↓ ****
CER[NS] Cer(d18:2/18:1) ns ns 1.94 ↓ ***
CER[NDS] Cer(d18:0/24:0) ns 2.30 ↓ ** 2.98 ↓ **
CER[NDS] Cer(d18:0/26:1) 1.19 ↓ * 2.83 ↓ * 1.63 ↓ *
CER[NDS] Cer(d18:0/20:0) 1.86 ↑ ** ns 2.67 ↓ **
CER[NDS] Cer(d18:0/24:1) 1.82 ↑ * 2.56 ↓ * 4.39 ↓ ***

All the alterations are significant at the P < 0.05 level. (non-hydroxy fatty acid [N], α-hydroxy fatty acid [A], dihydrosphingosine [DS], sphingosine [S]); mean difference was significant at the 0.05 level (p < 0.0001****; p < 0.001***; p < 0.01**; p < 0.05*; n.s. – not significant; the up arrows represent up-regulation and down arrows represent down-regulation.

Finally, we performed pathway analysis, by subjecting differentiating PLs to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome (KEGG) database via the Metaboanalyst online website. A graphical representation of all matched pathways according to p-values is shown in the Fig. 6. The results of the pathway analysis revealed differences in lipid metabolism between TBE and TBE + LD/HGA patients. Differentiating PL species were more significantly enriched in the LA metabolism, AA metabolism and sphingolipid metabolic signaling pathways in the TBE group when compared to TBE + LD/HGA group (P < 0.05) (Supplementary Table S5). However, differential PLs were to the similar extent enriched in glycerophospholipid metabolism both in TBE patients and TBE patients co-infected with bacteria (Fig. 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Graphical representation of the pathway analysis of TBE patients vs healthy subjects; left panel pathway analysis of differentiating lipids in the TBE vs control group, right panel pathway analysis of differentiating lipids in the TBE + LD/HGA vs control group. The gradual color of each circle reperesents the p-value (the lower p-value the color changes from yellow to red), while the size of each circle represents pathway impact (a combination of the centrality and number of PL species enriched in the pathway).

We also quantified fatty acids by GC-FID in all groups of plasma samples examined in the study (Fig. 7). Obtained results showed that the levels of free and PL linoleic acid (LA) were significantly lower in the plasma of both TBE and TBE-bacteria-coinfected patients in comparison to their levels in healthy people, while decrease in the level of free LA was observed only in TBE patients co-infected with and B. burgdorferi or A. phagocytophilum. In the case of PL docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (AA), an opposite direction of changes was observed. Total plasma level of PL AA was elevated only in TBE patients, while an increase in the level of PL DHA was also observed in co-infected TBE patients when compared to healthy subjects (Fig. 7).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

The levels of arachidonic (AA), linoleic (LA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in the plasma of healthy subjects (Control), TBE patients (TBE) and TBE patients co-infected with LD and HGA; left panel PL fatty acids, right panel free fatty acids, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

Discussion

It is well known that viruses have developed numerous strategies to take control of essential cellular factors and functions. Enveloped viruses use their membrane PLs to enable viral apoptotic mimicry, a process in which viruses due to external exposure of PS on the viral membrane, can easily enter into host macrophages through phagocytosis 22. However, during viral infection, viruses rely on the host cells to reproduce. They reprogram cellular metabolism to produce macromolecules required for virion replication and assembly23. It is well known that there are strong relationships between flavivirus infections and host cell, including reprograming PL synthesis and metabolism to create a favorable environment for viral multiplication24. PLs of the host cells have been also shown as critical to viral replication25. Importantly, the flaviviruses, the family of viruses which includes the TBEV, by formation of replication complexes with proteins of the host promote PL synthesis leading to their extensive rearrangement in cell membrane24. In addition, more recently it has been revealed that PLs, as reservoir of fatty acids, may be involved in viral attachment and penetration of the host organism26. Therefore, the assessment of the host PL metabolism seems to be very important in the context of TBEV infection.

However, so far, only single metabolomics study has been presented to identify metabolites involved in the acute inflammatory response or immune regulation in TBEV infection, but the exact mechanisms of metabolic changes, especially in lipids, are still not fully understood3,27. This is especially true for cases of co-infections with bacteria transmitted simultaneously with TBEV by ticks.

Results of the present study indicate that plasma PLs show significant variation between healthy subjects and two groups of TBE patients. We found increased relative content of phosphatidylcholines (PCs) in the plasma of TBE patients and patients co-infected with bacteria. PCs constitute about 50% of cellular membrane PLs, therefore they are considered as the main reservoir of PUFAs28. The results of the metabolic pathway analysis obtained in this study confirmed that the LA (18: 2, ω-6) and AA (20: 4, ω-6) pathways are modified in both groups of patients (TBE and TBE + LD/HGA). This observation is supported by quantitative fatty acids analyses which revealed significant elevation of the level of PL AA in the plasma of TBE patients analyzed in the study. These is in partial accordance with the results of PL profiling which showed that PC containing AA, namely PC(18:1/20:4) and PC(18:0/20:4) were more abundant in the plasma of TBE patients and TBE + LD/HGA patients than in the plasma of healthy subjects. In contrast to AA, the level of total LA in PL fraction was significantly lower in the plasma of TBE patients and co-infected patients when compared to healthy subjects. Interestingly, significant decrease of free LA level was observed only in the plasma of TBE patients with coinfections. It is well known that PL bearing LA and AA are the main source of 4-HNE and isoprostanes, which are considered to be one of the major end products of lipid peroxidation29,30. Increased levels of isoprostanes, free 4-HNE and adducts of 4-HNE with protein, were found not only in the plasma of TBE patients but also in the plasma of subjects infected by Borrelia burgdorferi, the main cause of LD6,31.

Moreover, it is well known that free PUFAs are involved in the regulation of inflammatory processes as precursors of eicosanoids. Overall, eicosanoids derived from AA and LA are pro-inflammatory and promote an inflammatory response aimed at eliminating the pathogen with minimal damage to the host organism32. Furthermore, PUFAs, in particular AA and LA, are known to be involved in antiviral activity through various mechanisms33. Fatty acid synthesis has been shown to be related to viral replication24. In particular, PUFAs have antimicrobial properties, mainly by targeting microbial cell membranes, generating free radicals and formation of cytotoxic lipid peroxides or bioactive immuno-modulating metabolites34. Therefore, the above mentioned effects may to some extent explain observed in this study increase in the amount of PCs containing AA and LA in the plasma of TBE patients but also patients co-infected with bacteria. Enhanced PC synthesis has also been found during infection with various viruses including Dengue virus35, Flock House virus36, and poliovirus37. Results of recent metabolomic study also confirmed up-regulation of PC species in the serum of TBE patients3. It has been shown that flaviviruses stimulate host PCs synthesis at viral replication sites38. In addition, it was also found that poliovirus promotes the import of fatty acids mainly incorporated into PCs to the viral replication sites37. Considering above, it may be suggested that increased content of PC containing AA and LA is required in order to provide appropriate response to TBE infection and co-infection with bacteria since both PUFAs have been shown to possess antimicrobial action (against gram-negative, as well as gram-positive bacteria) and have been suggested to inactivate enveloped viruses in the passivation process5,39.

An increase in PC content observed in our study was accompanied by up-regulation of LPC species in the plasma of both TBE and bacterial-coinfected patient groups. The literature reports indicate that viral infections cause increase in the activity of several enzymes critical to PL biosynthesis and metabolism, including phospholipase A2 responsible for the formation of lysophospholipids, which have also been suggested to be essential for flavivirus replication40. Another enzyme that hydrolyzes the long-chain PUFAs at the sn-2 position of the glycerol backbones of PLs is PAF-AH. Significantly increased PAF-AH activity has been previously reported in the plasma of patients with TBE6. Since the specific substrates for PAF-AH include complex oxidized PLs, such as isoprostanes—containing phosphatidylcholines41, this enzyme can be considered the main factor stimulating the increase in free isoprostanes production observed in the plasma of TBE patients6. Considering the above and the up-regulation of LPC species observed in the present study, accompanied by increased synthesis of PC containing PUFAs, it can be assumed that PL hydrolysis is also crucial in TBEV replication. Therefore, this specific host membrane PL rearrangement most likely can be used by TBEV for replication.

Although the directions of changes in the above-mentioned classes of PLs are similar in the plasma of patients with TBEV and those infected with TBEV and bacteria, our study identified a different regulation of PL content that determines the discrimination between the two groups of patients. Firstly, we found that SM species were less abundant in the plasma of TBE patients compared to healthy subjects, while the plasma SM content of TBE patients co-infected with bacteria was higher than that of healthy subjects. This was reflected by the pathway analysis which showed that sphingolipid metabolic signaling pathway had different enrichment in SM species in the TBE group compared to the group of patients with co-infection. So far, SM has been shown to play a key role in virus formation and pathogenesis24. This may explain the increase in plasma levels of SM species in TBE patients observed in this study. However, the observed differential regulation of SM depending on the absence or existence of co-infection may be related to the demyelination of neurons, as previously suggested in studies on neuroborreliosis42. It has been suggested that B. burgdorferi can induce an autoimmune response by acting on myelin sheaths, since the major component of myelin glycolipid galactocerebroside, has structural similarities to the B. burgdorferi glycolipid antigen BbGL-243. As a consequence, in co-infected patients, SM synthesis may be induced by activation of the SM-CER pathway as indicated by the changes in CER content identified in this study. We found that almost all relevant CERs species belonging to CER[NS] and CER[NDS] classes were up-regulated in the plasma of TBE patients, while general tendency to decrease of relative content of these CER species was observed in co-infected TBE patients. The observed increase in the CER content may explain the reduction in the level of SM in patients with TBE. In addition, a significant decrease in the relative content of SM in the plasma of TBE patients, accompanied by an increase in CERs, may indicate their participation in the propagation of infection with TBE virus. Previously, it has been also suggested that increased activity of sphingomyelinase, the enzyme responsible for the hydrolysis of SM to CER, leads to increased CER synthesis accompanied by a dramatically enhanced infection with Japanese encephalitis virus, and its progression44.

The second class of PLs that distinguish TBE patients from co-infected TBE patients is PE. This study showed that some PE species are up-regulated in plasma of TBE patients, while plasma levels of PE in patients co-infected with bacteria are similar to that in healthy subjects. So far, it has been found that PEs are involved in the entry of flaviviruses24. On the other hand, it is known that the accumulation of PE in the host cells results in a significant inhibition of the inflammatory responses induced by flaviviruses, including the dengue virus45. These effects may serve as a possible explanation for the increased levels of PE species in the plasma of patients with TBE observed in this study, especially since PE are considered to be highly anti-inflammatory lipids that can reduce inflammation caused by both bacteria and viruses45. On the other hand, the lack of significant differences between the PE content in the plasma of TBE patients co-infected with bacteria and healthy people can be explained by the fact that, as previously suggested in the literature, Borrelia spp. inhibits viral replication in individuals susceptible to tick-borne encephalitis46. Nevertheless, this problem is still not fully understood.

Conclusion

Results of this study show differences in the plasma PL profile of patients with TBE and patients with TBE co-infected with bacteria (B. burgdorferi or A. phagocytophilum). At the same time, it should be emphasized that the differences in the lipidomic signature concerning PE, SM and CER species distinguish TBE patients from TBE patients co-infected with bacteria and may help to better understand the complex pathomechanisms resulting from viral and bacterial co-infection. Moreover, the opposite direction of changes in SM and CER contents may be useful in development of diagnostic tools allowing for the differentiation of patients with tick-borne encephalitis from patients with TBE co-infected with bacteria. We also believe that drugs, which may modify CER metabolism by modulation of sphingomyelinase activity or by promoting de novo CER synthesis, may contribute to the effective pharmacotherapy of TBE, also in the case of co-infection with bacteria.

Supplementary Information

Author contributions

M.G. contributed in data acquisition, interpretation and writing manuscript; W.Ł. performed the research and wrote first draft of the manuscript; J.DM. biological samples collection and clinical data interpretation; E.S. contributed in conception, design of the study and writing manuscript; A.MM. funding acquisition and revised the final version of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This research was funded by National Science Centre Poland (NCN) grant no. 2017/26/E/NZ6/00277.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available online as supplementary material.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-13765-2.

References

  • 1.WHO. Tick-borne encephalitis. https://www.who.int/westernpacific/health-topics/tick-borne-encephalitis (2021).
  • 2.Kohlmaier B, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with tick-borne encephalitis (TBE): A European multicentre study from 2010 to 2017. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1420. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9071420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Du Y, et al. Insights into the molecular basis of tick-borne encephalitis from multiplatform metabolomics. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021;15:e0009172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cai T, Yang F. Lipidomics in Health & Disease. Springer; 2018. Phospholipid and phospholipidomics in health and diseases; pp. 177–202. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Das UN. Can bioactive lipids inactivate coronavirus (COVID-19)? Arch. Med. Res. 2020;51:282–286. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Łuczaj W, et al. Tick-borne encephalitis–lipid peroxidation and its consequences. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 2016;76:1–9. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2015.1084040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Han X. Lipidomics for precision medicine and metabolism: A personal view. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2017;1862:804–807. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2017.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yang K, Han X. Lipidomics: Techniques, applications, and outcomes related to biomedical sciences. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2016;41:954–969. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Diuk-Wasser MA, Vannier E, Krause PJ. Coinfection by the tick-borne pathogens Babesia microti and Borrelia burgdorferi: Ecological, epidemiological and clinical consequences. Trends Parasitol. 2016;32:30–42. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2015.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bobe JR, et al. Recent progress in lyme disease and remaining challenges. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 2021;8:666554. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.666554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mosel MR, et al. Molecular testing of serial blood specimens from patients with early lyme disease during treatment reveals changing coinfection with mixtures of borrelia burgdorferi genotypes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e00237–e319. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00237-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mygland A, et al. EFNS guidelines on the diagnosis and management of European Lyme neuroborreliosis. Eur. J. Neurol. 2010;17(8–16):e1–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02862.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stanek G, et al. Lyme borreliosis: Clinical case definitions for diagnosis and management in Europe. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011;17:69–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03175.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 1957;226:497–509. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)64849-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bartlett EM, Lewis DH. Spectrophotometric determination of phosphate esters in the presence and absence of orthophosphate. Anal. Biochem. 1970;36:159–167. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(70)90343-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Łuczaj W, et al. Cannabidiol-mediated changes to the phospholipid profile of UVB-irradiated keratinocytes from psoriatic patients. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:6592. doi: 10.3390/ijms21186592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Łuczaj W, et al. Plasma lipidomic profile signature of rheumatoid arthritis versus Lyme arthritis patients. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2018;654:105–114. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2018.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Christie WW. Preparation of ester derivatives of fatty acids for chromatographic analysis. Adv. Lipid Methodol. 1993;2:e111. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Łuczaj W, Wroński A, Domingues P, Domingues MR, Skrzydlewska E. Lipidomic analysis reveals specific differences between fibroblast and keratinocyte ceramide profile of patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Molecules. 2020;25:2. doi: 10.3390/molecules25030630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pluskal T, Castillo S, Villar-Briones A, Orešič M. MZmine 2: Modular framework for processing, visualizing, and analyzing mass spectrometry-based molecular profile data. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11:395. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chong J, Wishart DS, Xia J. Using MetaboAnalyst 4.0 for comprehensive and integrative metabolomics data analysis. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2019;68:e86. doi: 10.1002/cpbi.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Amara A, Mercer J. Viral apoptotic mimicry. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015;13:461–469. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Thaker SK, Chng J, Christofk HR. Viral hijacking of cellular metabolism. BMC Biolo. 2019;17:2. doi: 10.1186/s12915-018-0620-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Martín-Acebes MA, Vázquez-Calvo Á, Saiz J-C. Lipids and flaviviruses, present and future perspectives for the control of dengue, Zika, and West Nile viruses. Prog. Lipid Res. 2016;64:123–137. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2016.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mazzon M, Mercer J. Lipid interactions during virus entry and infection. Cell. Microbiol. 2014;16:1493–1502. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Toelzer C, et al. Free fatty acid binding pocket in the locked structure of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Science. 2020;370:725–730. doi: 10.1126/science.abd3255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhang M, et al. Serum metabolomics of tick-borne encephalitis based on orbitrap-mass spectrometry. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2021;14:7995–8005. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S331374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.van Meer G, Voelker DR, Feigenson GW. Membrane lipids: where they are and how they behave. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008;9:112–124. doi: 10.1038/nrm2330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Galano J-M, et al. Isoprostanes, neuroprostanes and phytoprostanes: An overview of 25years of research in chemistry and biology. Prog. Lipid Res. 2017;68:83–108. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2017.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Łuczaj W, Gęgotek A, Skrzydlewska E. Antioxidants and HNE in redox homeostasis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017;111:87–101. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Łuczaj W, et al. Lipid peroxidation products as potential bioindicators of Lyme arthritis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2011;30:415–422. doi: 10.1007/s10096-010-1102-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bhattacharyya S. Inflammation during virus infection: Swings and roundabouts. Dyn. Immune Activ Viral Dis. 2019 doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-1045-8_3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ripon MdAR, Bhowmik DR, Amin MT, Hossain MS. Role of arachidonic cascade in COVID-19 infection: A review. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2021;154:106539. doi: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2021.106539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Das UN. Arachidonic acid and other unsaturated fatty acids and some of their metabolites function as endogenous antimicrobial molecules: A review. J. Adv. Res. 2018;11:57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2018.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Perera R, et al. Dengue virus infection perturbs lipid homeostasis in infected mosquito cells. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002584. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Castorena KM, Stapleford KA, Miller DJ. Complementary transcriptomic, lipidomic, and targeted functional genetic analyses in cultured Drosophila cells highlight the role of glycerophospholipid metabolism in Flock House virus RNA replication. BMC Genom. 2010;11:183. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nchoutmboube JA, et al. Increased long chain acyl-Coa synthetase activity and fatty acid import is linked to membrane synthesis for development of picornavirus replication organelles. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003401. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhang J, et al. Positive-strand RNA viruses stimulate host phosphatidylcholine synthesis at viral replication sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:E1064–E1073. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1519730113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yoon BK, Jackman JA, Valle-González ER, Cho N-J. Antibacterial free fatty acids and monoglycerides: Biological activities, experimental testing, and therapeutic applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:1114. doi: 10.3390/ijms19041114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Liebscher S, et al. Phospholipase A2 activity during the replication cycle of the flavivirus West Nile virus. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1007029. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Stafforini DM, et al. Release of free F2-isoprostanes from esterified phospholipids is catalyzed by intracellular and plasma platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolases. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:4616–4623. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M507340200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Łuczaj W, Domingues P, Domingues MR, Pancewicz S, Skrzydlewska E. Phospholipidomic analysis reveals changes in sphingomyelin and lysophosphatidylcholine profiles in plasma from patients with neuroborreliosis. Lipids. 2017;52:93–98. doi: 10.1007/s11745-016-4212-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Blewett MM. Hypothesized role of galactocerebroside and NKT cells in the etiology of multiple sclerosis. Med. Hypotheses. 2008;70:826–830. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2007.07.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tani H, et al. Involvement of ceramide in the propagation of japanese encephalitis virus. J. Virol. 2010;84:2798–2807. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02499-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ireland R, et al. Unique francisella phosphatidylethanolamine acts as a potent anti-inflammatory lipid. J. Innate Immun. 2018;10:291–305. doi: 10.1159/000489504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Alekseev AN, Dubinina EV, Vashukova MA, Volkova LI. Borreliae as possible antagonists of tick-borne encephalitis virus: parasitologic and clinical aspects. Med. Parazitol. (Mosk) 2001;2:3–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available online as supplementary material.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES