Skip to main content
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine logoLink to Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
. 2022 Apr 9;10(6):e1948. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1948

Microcornea, iris and choroidal coloboma, and global developmental delay caused by TENM3 pathogenic variants in a Chinese patient

Youfeng Zhou 1, Ke Xu 2, Weiyue Gu 2, Yan Huang 3,
PMCID: PMC9184666  PMID: 35397152

Abstract

Background

Biallelic TENM3 pathogenic variants cause isolated or syndromic microphthalmia. Syndromic microphthalmia 15 (MCOPS15) is characterized by microphthalmia, coloboma, and developmental delay. Currently, only four cases of MCOPS15 have been reported and the clinical features varied among the patients indicating potential broad phenotypic spectrum.

Methods

The present case was a 6‐month‐old male at diagnosis. The patient exhibited long philtrum, large ears, bilateral ptosis, and nystagmus. Ophthalmic tests showed that he had microcornea, iris and choroidal coloboma. The patient presented with global developmental delay (GDD). Trio‐whole exome sequencing and genome copy number sequencing were conducted to explore the disease‐causing mutations.

Results

Exome sequencing and genome copy number sequencing showed the presence of L1471F and E661G compound mutations in TENM3, which were inherited from the mother and father, respectively. Sanger sequencing was conducted to verify association of the mutations with the disease in the present family.

Conclusion

Two TENM3 variants were identified in a patient with Syndromic microphthalmia 15 in the present study. However, further studies should be conducted to explore the pathogenicity of the variants.

Keywords: congenital heart defects, global developmental delay, Microphthalmia, TENM3


To date, only four cases of MCOPS15 were reported and the clinical features of the patients were variable, which indicate potential broad phenotypic spectrum. In this study, using trio‐whole exome sequencing, we identified biallelic variants (L1471F and E661G) of TENM3, in a 6 months Chinese boy. Our findings expand the mutational spectrum of the TENM3 gene, which might help increases understanding of the heterogeneity of clinical manifestations of diseases.

graphic file with name MGG3-10-e1948-g002.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Syndromic microphthalmia 15 (MCOPS15, MIM: #615145) is an extremely rare disease caused by homozygous or compound pathogenic variants of the TENM3 gene. Currently, only four cases of MCOPS15 have been previously reported and the clinical features of the patients varied, indicating potential broad phenotypic spectrum (Chassaing et al., 2016; Singh et al., 2019; Stephen et al., 2018). The previous cases presented with microphthalmia, hence the name of the disease. The genotype–phenotype correlation of MCOPS15 has not been fully elucidated and the reported cases showed distinct phenotype associated with TENM3 variants without specific biological pathogenicity. Previous studies report high genotype and phenotype variation in MCOPS15 patients.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Patient

The patient in the present study was a 1‐year‐old male who was previously presented in our hospital at 6 months of age due to acute respiratory infection. The patient was the second child born to a non‐consanguineous couple without family history of congenital diseases. Perinatal and prenatal examinations were normal, and there was no history of exposure to toxic substances. The height and weight of the patient were within the normal range for children of the same age. He underwent normal breast feeding and received infant feeding. The patient had no history of previously unexpected or abnormal treatment. The patient presented with long philtrum, large ears, bilateral ptosis, and nystagmus (his guardian did not allow publication of the photos) and mild hypertonia of lower limbs. The patient could not crawl or sit without assistance at 1 year of age. In addition, his cognitive and emotional responses were severely impaired, indicating possible severe global developmental delay (GDD). The patient underwent the full program of developmental assessment because he was not cooperating during the tests. Ophthalmic tests showed that he had microcornea, iris and choroidal coloboma (Figure 1a,b). Furthermore, the patient had bilateral NLP (no light perception) at age 1 and the follow‐up examination showed significant iris and choroidal coloboma (Figure 1c).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Eye examination in the patient. (a) Iris coloboma. (b) Ophthalmoscope shows the choroidal coloboma. (c) Ophthalmic ultrasound showed vitreous opacity in both eyes and left retinal detachment

Blood and biochemical tests at the time of admission showed WBC (white blood cell) count of 7.13 × 109/L, elevated NE (neutrophilic granulocyte) ratio of 47.2%, platelet count of 384 × 109/L, and CRP (C‐reactive protein) level of 12.79 mg/L. Liver and kidney function, enzyme, and metabolic tests of the patient were normal. His urine and stool tests were normal.

Doppler ultrasound showed that the patient had congenital heart defects (CHDs) including: atrial septal defect, patent foramen ovale, patent ductus arteriosus, mildly dilated right atrium and ventricle, mild right ventricular hypertrophy, mild tricuspid valve regurgitation, and pulmonary arterial hypertension (Figure 2). EEG and brain MRI examination of the patient were normal.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Doppler ultrasound showed multiple heart defects in the patient

Differential diagnosis was conducted to review diseases of syndromic ocular coloboma with CHDs. The reviewing criteria were retrieved from the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database and previous research articles (Chang et al., 2006; Lingam et al., 2021; Prichard, 1992).

Furthermore, a comparison of clinical characteristics in the present patient and previously reported MCOPS15 cases was performed (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Clinical characteristic comparison of the patient and previously reported patients diagnosed with MCOPS15

Patient 1 (Aldahmesh et al., 2012) Patient 2 (Aldahmesh et al., 2012) Patient 3 (Chassaing et al., 2016) Patient 4 (Stephen et al., 2018) Patient 5 (Stephen et al., 2018) Patient 6 (Singh et al., 2019) Patient 7 (Maddirevula et al., 2020) Present study
Age at diagnosis 11 years 9 years 9 years 5 years 6 months 4 years 3 months 6 years 6 months
Sex Male Female Male Female Female Male Female Male
Consanguinity Yes Yes Yes No No No NA No
Facial abnormality NA NA NA Broad eyebrows, hypertelorism, narrow palpebral fissures, long philtrum, low‐set flared pinnae Broad eyebrows, hypertelorism, narrow palpebral fissures, long philtrum, low‐set flared pinnae Plagiocephaly, low anterior hairline, supraorbital flattening, large ears NA Long philtrum, large ears, nystagmus
Microphthalmia Present Present Present Absent Absent Present Present Absent
ACM NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Disappear (left), shallow (right)
Microcornea Present Present Present Present Present Bilateral sclerocornea Present Present
Corneal shape NA NA NA Vertically oval Vertically oval NA NA Round
Pupils NA NA NA Keyhole shaped Keyhole shaped NA NA Irregular
Iris coloboma Present Present Inferior Inferonasal Inferonasal NA NA Inferior
Fundus coloboma Severe discs and macula coloboma Severe discs and macula coloboma choroidal coloboma
VO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Present
Cataract NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Present
VA 20/50 left eye, HM right eye 20/200 right eye, 20/300 left eye HM both eyes 6/36 both eyes 6/36 both eyes NA NLP
Ptosis NA NA Absent Unilateral (left) Bilateral (partial) Absent NA Bilateral
Development Normal Normal GDD GDD MDD GDD NA GDD with hypertonia
Pathogenic variants Hom. c.2083dup/p.T695Nfs*5 Hom. c.2083dup/p.T695Nfs*5 Hom. c.2968‐2A > T/p.V990Cfs*13 Hom. c.1857 T > A/p. C619* Hom. c.1857 T > A/p. C619* c.7687C > T/p. R2563W and c.4046C > G; p. A1349G Hom. c.6006_6009del/p.Gln2003Phefs*10 c.4411C > T p.L1471F and c.1982A > G/p.E661G

Abbreviations: ACM, anterior chamber malformation; GDD, global developmental delay; HM, hand movement; Hom., homozygous; MDD, motor developmental delay; NA, not available; NLP, no light perception; TR, tricuspid insufficiency; VA, visual acuity; VO, vitreous opacities.

The patient was discharged at 1 year of age.

2.2. Genetic tests and in silico analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood of the triad and whole exome sequencing (WES) and copy number variation sequencing (CNV‐seq) were performed (Xie & Tammi, 2009). The libraries for WES were prepared using the xGen Exome Research Panel v1.0 (IDT, USA) kit, and sequencing was conducted on a NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). CNV‐seq was performed as previously described (Xie & Tammi, 2009). Sequences were aligned using VarMap (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/thornton‐srv/databases/cgi‐bin/VarSite/GetPage.pl?varmap=TRUE), an online protein structural annotation tool hosted by EMBL's European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL‐EBI). The three‐dimensional protein structure of TENM3 has not been experimentally solved, therefore, the homolog structure of notch1 (pdb id: 5uk5), a Rattus norvegicus protein was used, and E661 was matched to E352 in the PDB structure.

3. RESULTS

The findings showed the presence of the compound TENM3 variants, NM_001080477.3: c.4411C > T (chr4:183675931C > T, hg19, p.L1471F, dbSNP: rs569985378) and c.1982A > G (chr4: 183603114A > G, hg19, p.E661G, dbSNP: rs766092012) in the patient and the variants were further verified through Sanger sequencing (Figure 3a). Sanger sequencing was performed using primers F‐ATCAGTTGGAGACGCAACTTCATA, R‐AAAATTAACCGGATAAGGCAGGTC, and F‐TCATGGTGTGTGTATCCACGG, R‐AACTGGCTAAGCCTGGTTCCT for c.4411 and c.1982 sequencing, respectively. CNV‐seq showed no disease‐causing CNV. Variants L1471F and E661G have been previously documented only in Asian population with minor allele frequencies (MAFs) of 0.023% in 48,574 samples, and 0.021% in 48,570 samples (gnomAD), respectively. Pathogenicity of the two variants was reported as “variant of uncertain significance” according to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) clinical guidelines with evidence PP3 (several computational studies support a deleterious effect). L1471F was predicted as damaging or possibly damaging using Provean, SIFT, Polyphen2, mutationtaster, M‐CAP, and REVEL tools. Analysis using Provean, SIFT, and mutationtaster tools indicated that E661G was deleterious. Multiple sequence alignment results showed a high conservation of L1471 (Figure 3b). Structural analysis indicated that E352G (E661G) disrupts the protein–metal interaction in the at the active site of the protein (Figure 3c). Analysis of L1471F after homology modeling showed no potential intuitive damage. In addition, no pathogenic variation in the genes listed in Table 1 or in other disease‐associated genes and chromosome regions were associated with the patient phenotype.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

(a) Sanger sequencing confirm TENM3 variants in the patient and his parents. (b) Conservation of L1471 and E661, generated by VarMap, EMBL‐EBI. Bar colors green, yellow, orange, and red indicate the low, medium, high, and highest conservation across species, respectively. (c) Three‐dimensional demonstration of E661G, mapped to E352G (pdb id: 5uk5). The green ball shows calcium ion, dashed lines in purple show protein–metal interaction

TABLE 1.

Inherited diseases with congenital heart disease and iris coloboma with or without choroidal coloboma for differential diagnosis in this study

Diseases OMIM ID Systemic phenotypes Genetic locus
Kapur–Toriello syndrome % 244300 CHD, cleft lip, cleft palate, distinctive nose Unknown
Chime syndrome #280000 CHD, migratory ichthyosiform dermatosis, ID, deafness PIGL
Townes Brocks syndrome 1 #107480 CHD, imperforate anus, polydactyly, triphalyngeal thumb, dysplastic ears, renal abnormalities SALL1
Steinfeld syndrome 184705 CHD, cleft palate, holoprosencephaly, dysplastic ears, vertebral anomalies, kidney malformations Unknown
Kabuki syndrome 1 #147920 CHD, facial deformation: long palpebral fissures, prominent eyelashes, arched eyebrows with lateral thinning, epicanthus, eversion of the lateral third of the lower eyelid, renal defects KMT2D
Syndromic microphthalmia with CHD9 #309800, #601186, #615877, #206900 CHD, ID, palatal and dental anomalies, renal defects NAA10, STRA6, MAB21L2, SOX2

Abbreviations: CHD, congenital heart disease; ID, intellectual disability.

4. DISCUSSION

Facial deformation, ocular coloboma, and central nervous impairment symptoms observed in the present patient are consistent with syndromic microphthalmia 15 (MCOPS15) diagnosis. However, microphthalmia was not observed. Stephen et al.(Stephen et al., 2018) reported cases of two sisters presenting with DD and ocular coloboma, without microphthalmia (Table 1), which is consistent with the findings that microphthalmia is not mandatory for MCOPS15 diagnosis. This may be attributed to the young age (<5 years old) at the time diagnosis and the microphthalmia was not significant in the present and previously reported cases (Stephen et al., 2018). Microcornea, iris coloboma, and visual impairment were observed in the present and previous cases, indicating the core phenotype of MCOPS15 disease. Fundus/choroidal coloboma was reported in a study by Aldahmesh et al. (Aldahmesh et al., 2012) and the present study, indicating that fundus/choroidal coloboma is a key symptom in MCOPS15 cases. Occurrence of global or motor developmental delay is a common feature in MCOPS15 patients. However, normal development was observed in the previously siblings at age 9 and 11 years (Aldahmesh et al., 2012). In addition, long philtrum and large ear are common facial deformation in previously reported cases (Singh et al., 2019; Stephen et al., 2018) and the present case. The unexplained CHDs observed in the current case may be attributed to nonhereditary perinatal abnormalities, based on the genetic tests and the absence of CHD family history.

Presence CHDs and coloboma in the same patient can prompt to diagnosis of several diseases (Table 1). The genetic factors of Kapur–Toriello syndrome (MIM: % 244300) and Steinfeld syndrome (MIM: 184705) have not been fully elucidated, reducing effectiveness of the genetic tests (gene panel sequencing) and potentially increasing medical costs. Therefore, affordable, comprehensive sequencing methods including, WES and CNV‐seq, were applied in the current study.

Pathogenicity of the two TENM3 variants, L1471F and E661G, in the present case has not been reported previously. In addition, pathogenicity of R2563W and A1349G variants reported in a previous study has not been fully elucidated (Singh et al., 2019). This is partly attributed to lack comprehensive analysis of TENM3 protein. In silico analysis using the 3D structure of the protein showed that E661 is located in a calcium‐binding EGF domain and E661G disrupts the protein–metal interaction at this site. The calcium‐binding EGF domain is an EGF‐like domain of approximately 40 amino‐acid residues initially reported in EGF. Calcium ion binding plays a key role in most of the calcium‐binding EGF‐containing proteins (Appella et al., 1988; Davis, 1990; Doolittle et al., 1984). In human, TENM3 is encoded by the TENM3 (also as known as ODZ3, located on chromosome 4q) gene and is expressed in interconnected areas of the developing nervous system and nonneural tissues (Levine et al., 1994; Minet et al., 1999). In mice embryo, Odz3 expression has been reported in the nervous system and mesoderm‐derived tissues (Ben‐Zur et al., 2000). Glendining et al. reported that deletion of Odz3 causes significant disruption of binocular visual alignment and function, indicating downstream changes in axonal guidance (Glendining et al., 2017). Moreover, Berns et al. demonstrated that topographic circuit assembly in mouse hippocampus is regulated by Odz3, implying that Odz3 plays an important role in development of the complex distributed circuit in the mammalian brain (Berns et al., 2018). However, these findings do not explain human developmental disorder associated with TENM3 defects. Therefore, further studies should be conducted to explore the protein structure and effects of TENM3 variants.

Lack of information on the pathogenicity of TENM3 L1471F and E661G may be a potential cause of the low prevalence of TENM3 disease. In the current study, diagnosis of MCOPS15 was not originally considered due to the uncertain significance of the variants and the absence of microphthalmia, until the other genetic and nongenetic factors were excluded through differential diagnosis. In addition, the presence of CHDs in the patient complicates differential diagnosis. Notably, L1471F and E661G have only been documented among Asian population with relatively high MAFs (0.023% and 0.021%, respectively) indicating potentially higher risk of TENM3 disease in China. Currently, Chinese ophthalmologists lack the skills for genetic tests required for accurate diagnosis of the disease.

5. CONCLUSION

The TENM3 L1471F and E661G variants were identified in a Chinese patient with MCOPS15. The findings of the current study showed a relatively high MAFs of these variants in East‐Asian population and the potential absence of neurological disorder, implying that TENM3 disease may be underreported in China and other East‐Asian countries.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial and financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Youfeng Zhou was involved in writing—original draft, investigation, and resources. Ke Xu was involved in formal analysis and visualization. Weiyue Gu was involved in formal analysis, visualization, and writing—review and editing. Yan Huang was involved in conceptualization, resources, methodology, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition, and project administration.

ETHICS STATEMENT

The study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank the patient and his family members for their willingness to participate in this study.

Zhou, Y. , Xu, K. , Gu, W. & Huang, Y. (2022). Microcornea, iris and choroidal coloboma, and global developmental delay caused by TENM3 pathogenic variants in a Chinese patient. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, 10, e1948. 10.1002/mgg3.1948

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The variants have been submitted to the NCBI ClinVar database (Accession number: SCV001911503 and SCV001911504). The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

REFERENCES

  1. Aldahmesh, M. A. , Mohammed, J. Y. , Al‐Hazzaa, S. , & Alkuraya, F. S. (2012). Homozygous null mutation in ODZ3 causes microphthalmia in humans. Genetics in Medicine, 14(11), 900–904. 10.1038/gim.2012.71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Appella, E. , Weber, I. T. , & Blasi, F. (1988). Structure and function of epidermal growth factor‐like regions in proteins. FEBS Letters, 231(1), 1–4. 10.1016/0014-5793(88)80690-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ben‐Zur, T. , Feige, E. , Motro, B. , & Wides, R. (2000). The mammalian Odz gene family: Homologs of a drosophila pair‐rule gene with expression implying distinct yet overlapping developmental roles. Developmental Biology, 217(1), 107–120. 10.1006/dbio.1999.9532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berns, D. S. , DeNardo, L. A. , Pederick, D. T. , & Luo, L. (2018). Teneurin‐3 controls topographic circuit assembly in the hippocampus. Nature, 554(7692), 328–333. 10.1038/nature25463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang, L. , Blain, D. , Bertuzzi, S. , & Brooks, B. P. (2006). Uveal coloboma: clinical and basic science update. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 17(5), 447–470. 10.1097/01.icu.0000243020.82380.f6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chassaing, N. , Ragge, N. , Plaisancié, J. , Patat, O. , Geneviève, D. , Rivier, F. , Malrieu‐Eliaou, C. , Hamel, C. , Kaplan, J. , & Calvas, P. (2016). Confirmation of TENM3 involvement in autosomal recessive colobomatous microphthalmia. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 170(7), 1895–1898. 10.1002/ajmg.a.37667 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davis, C. G. (1990). The many faces of epidermal growth factor repeats. The New Biologist, 2(5), 410–419 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2288911 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Doolittle, R. F. , Feng, D. F. , & Johnson, M. S. (1984). Computer‐based characterization of epidermal growth factor precursor. Nature, 307(5951), 558–560. 10.1038/307558a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Glendining, K. A. , Liu, S. C. , Nguyen, M. , Dharmaratne, N. , Nagarajah, R. , Iglesias, M. A. , Sawatari, A. , & Leamey, C. A. (2017). Downstream mediators of Ten‐m3 signalling in the developing visual pathway. BMC Neuroscience, 18(1), 78. 10.1186/s12868-017-0397-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Levine, A. , Bashan‐Ahrend, A. , Budai‐Hadrian, O. , Gartenberg, D. , Menasherow, S. , & Wides, R. (1994). Odd Oz: A novel drosophila pair rule gene. Cell, 77(4), 587–598. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90220-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lingam, G. , Sen, A. C. , Lingam, V. , Bhende, M. , Padhi, T. R. , & Xinyi, S. (2021). Ocular coloboma‐a comprehensive review for the clinician. Eye (London, England), 35(8), 2086–2109. 10.1038/s41433-021-01501-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Maddirevula, S. , Shamseldin, H. E. , Sirr, A. , AlAbdi, L. , Lo, R. S. , Ewida, N. , al‐Qahtani, M. , Hashem, M. , Abdulwahab, F. , Aboyousef, O. , Kaya, N. , Monies, D. , Salem, M. H. , al Harbi, N. , Aldhalaan, H. M. , Alzaidan, H. , Almanea, H. M. , Alsalamah, A. K. , al Mutairi, F. , … Alkuraya, F. S. (2020). Exploiting the autozygome to support previously published Mendelian gene‐disease associations: An update. Frontiers in Genetics, 11, 580484. 10.3389/fgene.2020.580484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Minet, A. D. , Rubin, B. P. , Tucker, R. P. , Baumgartner, S. , & Chiquet‐Ehrismann, R. (1999). Teneurin‐1, a vertebrate homologue of the drosophila pair‐rule gene ten‐m, is a neuronal protein with a novel type of heparin‐binding domain. Journal of Cell Science, 112(Pt 12), 2019–2032 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10341219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Prichard, H. M. (1992). Mortality among workers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Health Physics, 62(3), 260 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1735648 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Singh, B. , Srivastava, P. , & Phadke, S. R. (2019). Sequence variations in TENM3 gene causing eye anomalies with intellectual disability: Expanding the phenotypic spectrum. European Journal of Medical Genetics, 62(1), 61–64. 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stephen, J. , Nampoothiri, S. , Kuppa, S. , Yesodharan, D. , Radhakrishnan, N. , Gahl, W. A. , & Malicdan, M. C. V. (2018). Novel truncating mutation in TENM3 in siblings with motor developmental delay, ocular coloboma, oval cornea, without microphthalmia. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 176(12), 2930–2933. 10.1002/ajmg.a.40658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Xie, C. , & Tammi, M. T. (2009). CNV‐seq, a new method to detect copy number variation using high‐throughput sequencing. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 80. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-80 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The variants have been submitted to the NCBI ClinVar database (Accession number: SCV001911503 and SCV001911504). The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.


Articles from Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES