Skip to main content
NCBI home page
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2022 Jun 7;10:e13571. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13571

Cuticular hydrocarbons as caste-linked cues in Neotropical swarm-founding wasps

Rafael Carvalho da Silva 1, Amanda Prato 1, Ivelize Tannure-Nascimento 1,2, Cintia Akemi Oi 3,4, Tom Wenseleers 3, Fabio Nascimento 1,✉
Editor: Joseph Gillespie
PMCID: PMC9186331  PMID: 35694385

Abstract

Wasps (Vespidae) are important organisms to understand the evolution of social behaviour. Wasps show different levels of sociality, which includes solitary to highly eusocial organisms. In social insect species, queens and workers differ in physiology and morphology. The Neotropical swarm-founding wasps (Epiponini) show a variety of caste syndromes. In this clade, the caste-flexibility is a unique characteristic, in which workers can become queens and swarm to start a new nest. The investigation of the caste system comparing several Epiponini species show a clear-cut morphological distinction between queens and workers, with a morphological continuum between queens and workers. However, whether cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) are used as cues for caste recognition in swarm-founding wasps is still unknown. We studied whether CHCs may display caste-linked differences in eleven species of Epiponini wasps and if CHCs differences would follow morphological patterns. Our results suggest that queens and workers of Epiponini wasps are chemically different from each other at two levels, qualitatively and quantitatively, or merely quantitatively. This variation seems to exist regardless of their morphological traits and may be useful to help us understanding how chemical communication evolved differently in these species.

Keywords: Chemical signaling, Castes, Queen pheromones, Reproduction

Introduction

The evolution of reproductive castes is important for the organization of social insects (Queller & Strassmann, 1998). Among the hymenopteran social insects, the division of reproductive and nonreproductive labour was a fundamental step for their ecological success in most environments. In this context, Vespidae wasps are a key group for understanding the evolution of social behaviour because of their degrees of sociality, from solitary to highly eusocial (West-Eberhard, 1978; West-Eberhard, 1996; Wilson, 1985; Spradbery, 1991). They are important to understand the evolution of social behaviour as they are considered monophyletic, and a double origin of eusociality was recently supported in this group (Piekarski et al., 2018).

Within the subfamily Polistinae, the Neotropical tribe Epiponini (hence after epiponine) has perennial colonies and several inseminated breeders with a variable number of workers start new colonies (Jeanne, 1991; Jeanne, 2020). Epiponine and Polistes paper wasps are sister groups sharing a common caste-based ancestor (Menezes, Lloyd & Brady, 2020). It is then expected a conserved function of cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) in caste signalling and similarities of physiology and behaviour (Kelstrup et al., 2014a). The phenotype of reproductive individuals in several species of epiponine wasps is expressed by ovary activation (and insemination), which suggests post-imaginal caste determination (West-Eberhard, 1996), and retention of reproductive totipotence (Strassmann, Sullender & Queller, 2002; Mateus, Noll & Zucchi, 2004). For example, in Parachartergus fraternus, females with activated ovarioles play typical worker roles in their colonies (Mateus, Noll & Zucchi, 2004). However, in other species, caste fate seems to be determined by differential nourishment during larval development (Hunt et al., 1996).

During the colony cycle of epiponine, there is a reduction in the number of breeders (cyclical olygogyny) and workers evaluate queens’ fertility through aggressive solicitation, namely queen dance. In the queen dance, the queen reacts against workers. Then, submissive females bend their abdomen to perform a ritualized set of aggressive movements (West-Eberhard, 1978; Nascimento, Tannure-Nascimento & Zucchi, 2004; Kelstrup et al., 2014b). Yet, it is unknown if reproductive dominance is also pheromone-based in epiponine wasps, but past studies have shown that dominance signalling is likely to occur in two distinct epiponine species, Polybia micans and Synoeca surinama (Kelstrup et al., 2014a, 2014b). CHCs have been shown to function as queen pheromones across several lineages of social Hymenoptera (Holman et al., 2010; Holman, Lanfear & D’Ettorre, 2013; Oi et al., 2015; Oliveira et al., 2015; Van Oystaeyen et al., 2014; Holman et al., 2017). Most studies investigating CHCs as fertility cues in social insects are focused on ants (Holman, Lanfear & D’Ettorre, 2013; Van Oystaeyen et al., 2014; Monnin & Peeters, 1998; Liebig et al., 1999; Cuvillier-Hot et al., 2002), bees (Oliveira et al., 2015; Van Oystaeyen et al., 2014; Ayasse et al., 1995; Bloch & Hefetz, 1999; Andrade-Silva & Nascimento, 2015) and Polistinae or Vespinae wasps (Oi et al., 2016; Van Oystaeyen et al., 2014; Antonialli-Junior et al., 2021; da Silva et al., 2021; Sledge, Boscaro & Turillazzi, 2001; Sledge et al., 2004; Tannure-Nascimento, Nascimento & Zucchi, 2008; Oi et al., 2019). These studies demonstrated a correlation between the reproductive status of breeders and the presence of specific CHCs (Oi et al., 2015; Sledge et al., 2004; Tannure-Nascimento, Nascimento & Zucchi, 2008; Oi et al., 2019; Blomquist & Bagnères, 2010), and some of them evaluated the bioactivity of some CHCs (Oi et al., 2016; Van Oystaeyen et al., 2014; Holman et al., 2010). The correlative and empirical evidence support the hypothesis that the signals produced by reproductive females are likely honest messages of fertility rather than active inhibitors of workers’ reproduction (Keller & Nonacs, 1993; Beekman, 2004). For instance, in the common wasp Vespula vulgaris, two linear alkanes (n-C27 and n-C29) and one branched alkane (3-MeC29), which are present in relative higher quantities over the cuticular surface of queens, were found to reduce ovary activation in workers acting as queen pheromones (Van Oystaeyen et al., 2014). In the Saxon wasp, Dolichovespula saxonica, daily applications for two weeks of a mix of queen-characteristic CHCs (compounds overexpressed over the cuticular surface of queens), represented by three linear and two branched alkanes (n-C29, 3-MeC29, n-C30, n-C31, and 3-MeC31) resulted in reducing the proportion of workers with activated ovaries when compared with the solvent treated ones, meaning that one or more of the CHCs present in the tested blend, act as queen pheromones (Oi et al., 2016). Among the Polistes paper wasps, odd linear alkanes (from n-C27 to n-C35), methyl-branched alkanes (such as 7-MeC27; 7-MeC33; 13, 15, 17-C33), and some alkenes (C27:1, 9-C29:1, 9-C31:1, C35:2) seem to be candidates to signal reproductive status (Sledge, Boscaro & Turillazzi, 2001; Sledge et al., 2004; Tannure-Nascimento, Nascimento & Zucchi, 2008; Oi et al., 2019; Dapporto, Sledge & Turillazzi, 2005). Higher proportions of alkanes and dimethyl-alkanes were observed in breeders of hover wasps (Turillazzi et al., 2004). Among the few evidences available for Mischocyttarus wasp (Ferreira et al., 2022), two branched alkanes (8,12-diMeC32, and 6-MeC32) were found in higher proportions over the cuticular surface of queens (females engaged in reproductive tasks) and in females expressing ovary activation (but not necessarily involved in reproductive tasks), in Mischocyttarus parallelogrammus (da Silva et al., 2020a). In Mischocyttarus cerberus, 5-MeC29 and C33:1 were detected exclusively in samples of alpha females from pre-worker emergence nests, whereas in samples from post-worker emergent nests, a dimethyl and two methyl alkanes were found either exclusively or higher in proportion in alpha females (da Silva et al., 2020b). Finally, in the epiponine species, CHCs such as 3-MeC25 and n-C25 appeared to be queen-associated in Polybia micans (Kelstrup et al., 2014b), and the linear alkanes n-C18, n-C25, and n-C26 are more abundant in queens of Polybia sericea (Soares et al., 2021). In the warrior wasp, Synoeca ilheensis (previously called Synoeca septentrionalis) (Lopes & Menezes, 2017) three linear alkanes were also found in greatest abundances in queens of three unrelated colonies (n-C25, n-C29, and n-C31) (Santos et al., 2018), whereas older queens of its sister species, Synoeca surinama, a single alkene C25:1 was spotted as queen-characteristic (Kelstrup et al., 2014a).

Even though epiponine wasps contains about 250 species—distributed in 19 genera—which are almost exclusive to the Neotropical region (Carpenter, Kojima & Wenzel, 2000; Noll, 2013; Menezes, Lloyd & Brady, 2020), this tribe remains poorly explored concerning their chemical ecology. In the present work, we aimed to study the CHC diversity in eleven species from different genera and explore caste-linked differences. For that, we asked whether CHCs distinguish reproductive (queens) and non-reproductive (workers) individuals of epiponine wasps—including species with and without morphological caste differences. We hypothesized that CHCs are expressed differently between queens and workers, despite their morphological caste differences, similar to what is seen for other hymenopteran species, whether CHCs act as badges of caste in epiponine wasps. Additionally, we expected to find a clear chemical variation between queens and workers in species where reproductive females and non-reproductive females also differ in morphology, and a chemical discrete variation in species where morphological features are similar between queens and workers.

Material and Methods

Field sampling

Mature colonies of eleven epiponine species (a total of 388 wasps were collected) were sampled in four localities in Brazil (Table 1). The species Agelaia pallipes, Apoica flavissima, Metapolybia docilis and Polybia paulista were collected in Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo State, Brazil. The species Brachygastra augusti, Chartergerllus communis, Nectarinella xavantinensis and Parachartergus fraternus were collected in Nova Xavantina, Mato Grosso state, Brazil. The species Charterginus sp. and Clypearia sulcata were sampled in Novo Airão, Amazonas state, Brazil. Synoeca surinama was sampled in São Cristóvão, Sergipe state, Brazil. The comparisons between queens and workers were performed for females collected from the same nest. The classification of the eleven species in caste syndromes, according to Noll et al. (2020) is shown in Table 1. According to Noll et al. (2020) the caste syndromes consist of three different categories (I) all females are morphological similar, (II) reproductive females (queens) are isometrically larger (big versions of workers) than non-reproductive ones (workers), and (III) reproductive females (queens) allometrically different (they have some body structures that are disproportionally larger than in workers) from non-reproductive ones (workers). All females were frozen-killed and, then individually separated from the brood and kept in a freezer (−20 °C) for posterior CHCs extraction and dissection. To extract the CHCs, each female was added to a glass vial which was then filled with hexane for two minutes, then the bodies were removed from the glass vial and were preserved in a plastic tube containing alcohol 70% until the dissections, to check ovarian status and insemination.

Table 1. Collected species of epiponine wasps and morphological group syndromes.

Species Locality Year Caste-syndrome group
Chartergerllus communis Nova Xavantina - MT, Brazil 2010 Group I
Metapolybia docilis Ribeirão Preto - SP, Brazil 2010 Group I
Nectarinella xavantinensis Nova Xavantina - MT, Brazil 2010 Group I
Synoeca surinama São Cristóvão - SE, Brazil 2013 Group I
Parachartergus fraternus Nova Xavantina - MT, Brazil 2010 Group I
Clypearia sulcata Novo Airão - AM, Brazil 2017 Group I
Brachygastra augusti Nova Xavantina - MT, Brazil 2010 Group II
Polybia paulista Ribeirão Preto - SP, Brazil 2016 Group II
Charterginus sp. Novo Airão - AM, Brazil 2017 Group II
Agelaia pallipes Ribeirão Preto - SP, Brazil 2010 Group III
Apoica flavissima Ribeirão Preto - SP, Brazil 2010 Group III
Open in a new tab

Note:

Descriptive general features according to Noll et al. (2020): Group I, all females morphologically similar; Group II, reproductive females isometrically different from non-reproductive ones; Group III, reproductive females allometrically different from non-reproductive ones. Physiological features of Chartergerllus communis, Nectarinella xavantinensis and Parachartergus fraternus-all females can have activated ovaries; physiological features of Metapolybia docilis, Synoeca surinama, Clypearia sulcata, Polybia paulista and Apoica flavissima-only queens have activated ovaries; physiological features of Brachygastra augusti, Charterginus sp. and Agelaia pallipes-queens and a few females can have activated ovaries.

Ovarian activation for caste assignment

Females were dissected and assigned to two different groups (i) queens, or (ii) workers based on their ovarian status. For the ovarian activity status, most of the females were dissected under a stereomicroscope Leica MZ75, however due to the difficult to sample rare species, some of the samples were dissected in the field after the sampling, for that, a LCD Digital microscope inskam-307 was used. Considering that not all species were collected at the same time, pictures are not available for all the eleven species (due to fieldwork constraints), however, the same parameters were adopted during the female assignment (see example Fig. 1). Ovaries were classified into two different categories without apparent activation—threadlike or filamentous ovarioles—(for workers), and with apparent activation—ovarioles with full mature oocytes—(for queens) (Fig. 1—The number of queens and workers per species is provided in Table S1). Only two categories of ovary activation were adopted in order to avoid misclassification. We were not able to check the spermatheca status for all the females; however, when possible, this information was used to confirm the group assignment (queen or worker together with their ovary status). To check whether the females were inseminated or not, the spermatheca was removed and prepared on a glass slide. The presence of yellow lines indicated that the spermatheca was inseminated, whereas the absence represented not inseminated.

Figure 1. Queen and workers ovaries.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Examples of queen worker ovaries found during the dissection section. (A) Parachartergus fraternus; (B) Apoica flavissima. White arrows are indicating the absence of oocytes (worker) and one mature of oocyte (queen) in A. flavissima.

CHCs analysis

Glass vials containing CHCs were resuspended with 200 µl of hexane, and 2 µl was injected in the machine. The samples were analysed in a Gas Chromatography system coupled to SHIMADZU Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS), model GCMS-QP2010, equipped with a 25 m silicon capillary column (Rtx-5MS) and helium as carrier gas at 1 ml/min, using chemical ionization (CI) methods and electronic ionization (EI) to determine the peak molecular spectrum and provide information about the structures. Subsequently, the chromatograms were analysed to check the mass spectrum and identify the chemical compounds. Equivalent chain lengths were determined using standard n-alkanes (n-C21 to n-C40) (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MI, USA), and quantification was based on the peak areas obtained by the chromatograms (Singer, Camann & Espelie, 1992). Considering the samples were collected in different times and that we aimed to compare quantitative levels of CHCs across the castes, the adjustments in the temperature parameters for GC-MS analyses were different per species to optimize their chromatogram resolution (for specific methods see Table 2). Analyses were performed in splitless mode.

Table 2. GCMS parameters used in this study.

Species Caste-syndrome group IT (°C) TD FT
Chartergerllus communis Group I 150 Increased to 280 °C - rate 10 °C/min 280 °C - held for 20 min
Metapolybia docilis Group I 150 Increased to 280 °C - rate 10 °C/min 280 °C - held for 20 min
Nectarinella xavantinenesis Group I 150 Increased to 280 °C - rate 10 °C/min 280 °C - held for 12 min
Synoeca surinama Group I 150 Increased to 280 °C - rate 10 °C/min 280 °C - held for 20 min
Parachartergus fraternus Group I 150 Increased to 280 °C - rate 10 °C/min 280 °C - held for 12 min
Clypearia sulcata Group I 150 Increased to 270 °C - rate 5 °C/min; increased to 310 °C - rate 4 °C/ min; increased to 320 °C - rate 1 °C/min 320 °C - held for 10 min
Brachygastra augusti Group II 150 Increased to 280 °C - rate 10 °C/min 280 °C - held for 20 min
Polybia paulista Group II 180 Increased to 260 °C - rate 12 °C/min - held 5 min; increased to 300 °C - rate 5 °C/min 300 °C - held for 5 min
Charterginus sp. Group II 180 Increased to 260 °C - rate 3 °C/min; increased to 270 °C - rate 1 °C/min; increased to 310 °C - rate 5 °C/min 310 °C - held for 10 min
Agelaia pallipes Group III 150 Increased to 280 °C - rate 10 °C/min 280 °C - held for 20 min
Apoica flavissima Group III 150 Increased to 300 °C - rate 5 °C/min 300 °C - held for 25 min
Open in a new tab

Note:

Specific parameters used to analyze cuticular hydrocarbons in the GC-MS for the eleven species. IT, initial temperature; TD, temperature during the analyse; FT, final temperature.

Statistical analysis

Peak areas of each compound identified in the chromatograms of queens and workers of all studied species were transformed in relative amounts. First, we ran a permutation analysis (PERMANOVA) to check whether the two groups of females of all species (queen and workers) differed based on their chemical profiles, in addition to that, the same test was run separately considering only compounds per class (linear alkanes, methyl alkanes, dimethyl alkanes, trimethyl alkanes, alkenes and alkadienes). For this analysis we used the adonis function from the vegan package and 9,999 permutations were adopted (Oksanen et al., 2013). Finally, we run a multivariate similarity analysis (SIMPER) using the Bray-Curtis distance and adopting 999 permutations to check how much each chemical variable contributed to the observed differences between queens and workers. In the output of SIMPER, it is possible to access the average in which each CHC contribute to the average overall dissimilarity. For this analysis, we used the simper function from the vegan package (Oksanen et al., 2013). All statistical analyses were performed using R (version 4.0.2) (R Core Team, 2018). We also included the differentiation in relative amount per group of compounds, using linear alkanes, methyl-alkanes, dimethyl-alkanes, trimethyl-alkanes, alkenes and alkadienes.

Field experiments were approved by the Research Council of the Universidade de São Paulo (Process 2010/10027-5) and Sisbio #46555-5.

Results

The CHC analysis revealed 232 compounds in total, mostly hydrocarbons, which included linear alkanes, methyl-alkanes, dimethyl-alkanes, trimethyl-alkanes, alkenes and alkadienes (Table 3, Tables S1 and S2). These compounds ranged from 18 to 40 of carbon length. Only four compounds were common to all study species, n-C25, n-C27, n-C28 and n-C29. The species with the highest chemical diversity was Charterginus sp., which expressed 64 chemical compounds, while the species with the least chemical diversity was N. xavantinensis with 21 chemical compounds. The percentage of CHC classes expressed by queens and workers of each species are shown in Fig. 2, Table 3 and Table S2.

Table 3. Classes of cuticular hydrocarbons and wasp species.

C.S. Species Group Linear alkanes Methyl alkanes Dimethyl alkanes Trimethyl alkanes Alkenes Alkadienes
Group I Chartergerllus communis G 93.54 4.30 2.16 0.00 0.00 0.00
Q 92.14 4.06 3.80 0.00 0.00 0.00
W 93.92 4.37 1.71 0.00 0.00 0.00
Metapolybia docilis G 97.76 1.62 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.00
Q 96.27 2.80 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.00
W 98.40 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.00
Nectarinella xavantinensis G 65.56 29.54 4.90 0.00 0.00 0.00
Q 80.39 16.27 3.34 0.00 0.00 0.00
W 62.14 32.60 5.26 0.00 0.00 0.00
Synoeca surinama G 58.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 41.18 0.00
Q 51.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.44 0.00
W 63.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.01 0.00
Parachartergus fraternus G 32.60 46.74 19.78 0.00 0.88 0.00
Q 29.30 46.28 23.32 0.00 1.10 0.00
W 34.71 47.04 17.52 0.00 0.73 0.00
Clypearia sulcata G 15.48 37.06 47.46 0.00 0.00 0.00
Q 9.03 36.60 54.37 0.00 0.00 0.00
W 16.72 37.15 46.13 0.00 0.00 0.00
Group II Brachygastra augusti G 49.91 42.18 4.38 0.00 3.21 0.32
Q 73.99 15.33 5.01 0.00 5.07 0.60
W 32.25 61.88 3.92 0.00 1.85 0.10
Polybia paulista G 41.32 48.98 6.54 0.00 3.16 0.00
Q 44.82 45.86 7.00 0.00 2.32 0.00
W 37.81 52.10 6.09 0.00 4.00 0.00
Charterginus sp. G 35.10 33.89 12.36 2.53 12.32 3.80
Q 27.29 13.94 45.44 7.10 5.54 0.69
W 36.98 38.67 4.42 1.43 13.95 4.55
Group III Agelaia pallipes G 20.54 46.77 23.70 0.00 8.99 0.00
Q 22.73 47.09 22.74 0.00 7.44 0.00
W 19.36 46.60 24.22 0.00 9.82 0.00
Apoica flavissima G 24.48 69.28 5.38 0.00 0.86 0.00
Q 18.05 75.17 5.98 0.00 0.80 0.00
W 30.10 64.14 4.86 0.00 0.90 0.00
Open in a new tab

Note:

Percentage of cuticular hydrocarbon class found in samples of queens and workers of the eleven species of Epiponini wasps. C.S., Caste Syndrome; Group I, all females morphologically similar; Group II, reproductive females isometrically different from workers; Group III, reproductive females allometrically different from workers. G, general values per species; Q, values per queens; W, values per workers.

Figure 2. Schematic proportion of cuticular compounds found in queen and workers Epiponini species.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Queens and workers of epiponine wasps express different of proportions of cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs). Schematic representation of CHCs classes identified in the species of the present study. Each bar plot represents the average CHC composition expressed by queens and workers of the eleven studied species. Numbers within the grey boxes correspond to the study species. Group I, all females morphologically similar; Group II, reproductive females isometrically different from workers; Group III, reproductive females allometrically different from workers. The group classification is based on Noll et al. (2020).

Furthermore, we performed the chemical analyses according to caste syndromes that are depicted below:

All females morphologically similar

Queens and workers of C. communis have the same cuticular composition, with compounds ranging from 19 to 31 carbon lengths (Table S1). Permutation analysis revealed that queens and workers of C. communis are similar to each other in terms of chemical cuticular composition (Table 4). The ten most relevant compounds according to the SIMPER analysis included mostly linear alkanes and a few branched alkanes (Table 5). Two compounds were significantly different between queens and workers (n-C27 and n-C31) (Table 5). Queens and workers of M. docilis shared the same compounds, which ranged from CHCs with 20 to 33 carbon lengths (Table S1). According to permutation analysis, queens and workers of M. docilis do not differ based on their chemical profile composition (Table 4). The ten most important compounds according to SIMPER analysis included majority linear alkanes and one methyl-alkane (Table 5). Only one compound differed significantly between queens and workers (n-C24) (Table 5). Queens and workers of N. xavantinensis shared the same compounds, which ranged from CHCs with 24 to 31 carbon lengths (Table S1). Permutation analysis revealed that queens and workers of N. xavantinensis are not different based on their chemical composition (Table 4). The ten most relevant compounds according to SIMPER included mostly linear alkanes, followed by methyl-alkanes and one dimethyl-alkane (Table 5). Two compounds were significantly different between queens and workers (n-C29 and n-C31) (Table 5). Queens and workers of S. surinama have almost the same cuticular composition, with exception for n-C37, which was found in a low proportion in queens, their CHCs ranged from 21 to 37 carbon lengths (Table S1). According to permutation analysis, queens and workers of S. surinama can be distinguished based on their chemical cuticular composition (Table 4). The ten most relevant compounds according to SIMPER included linear alkanes and linear alkenes (Table 5). Almost all ten compounds differed significantly between queens and workers (C25:1-1, C31:1, n-C31, C33:1, n-C33, n-C27, n-C29, C27:1 and n-C23) (Table 5). Queens and workers of P. fraternus shared the same compounds, which ranged from CHCs with 18 to 30 carbon lengths (Table S1). Queens and workers of P. fraternus are chemically distinct according to permutation analysis (Table 4). The ten most relevant compounds according to SIMPER included linear and branched alkanes (Table 5). Of this, six were significantly different between queens and workers (the mixture of 3,11-; 7,9-diMeC29 and n-C30, 11,13-diMeC29, 13,17-diMeC28, 5-MeC25, 9-MeC25 and n-C25) (Table 5). Lastly, queens and workers of C. sulcata did not share the same CHCs. Their compounds consisted of CHCs having 23 to 39 carbon lengths (Table S1). Queens and workers of C. sulcata are different from each other in terms of chemical composition according to permutation analysis (Table 4). The ten most important compounds according to SIMPER included mostly dimethyl-alkanes, but also methyl-alkanes and linear alkanes (Table 5). Five compounds were significantly different between queens and workers (17-;15-;13-;11-;9-;7-MeC35, n-C31, 13,17-diMeC33, 7,11-diMeC35 and x,y-diMeC37) (Table 5).

Table 4. Permutation analysis of cuticular hydrocarbons.

C.S. Species Groups F value R² p value
Group I Chartergerllus communis All compounds 1.995 0.142 0.087
Linear alkanes 2.344 0.163 0.072
Methyl alkanes 0.811 0.063 0.535
Dimethyl alkanes 1.699 0.124 0.177
Metapolybia docilis All compounds 1.481 0.156 0.249
Linear alkanes 1.516 0.159 0.248
Methyl alkanes 1.108 0.121 0.312
Alkenes 0.567 0.066 0.711
Nectarinella xavantinensis All compounds 3.024 0.177 0.072
Linear alkanes 2.597 0.156 0.078
Methyl alkanes 2.49 0.151 0.098
Dimethyl alkanes 0.836 0.056 0.408
Synoeca surinama All compounds 105.65 0.399 0.0001
Linear alkanes 57.593 0.265 0.0001
Alkenes 167.53 0.513 0.0001
Parachartergus fraternus All compounds 6.133 0.277 0.0003
Linear alkanes 4.235 0.209 0.011
Methyl alkanes 5.757 0.264 0.0002
Dimethyl alkanes 9.238 0.366 0.001
Alkenes 5.909 0.269 0.005
Clypearia sulcata All compounds 7.634 0.208 0.001
Linear alkanes 10.241 0.26 0.0001
Methyl alkanes 4.462 0.133 0.024
Dimethyl alkanes 7.897 0.214 0.002
Group II Brachygastra augusti All compounds 22.043 0.478 0.0001
Linear alkanes 16.989 0.414 0.0001
Methyl alkanes 15.352 0.39 0.0001
Dimethyl alkanes 13.611 0.361 0.0001
Alkenes 10.387 0.302 0.0008
Alkadienes – – –
Polybia paulista All compounds 6.764 0.183 0.0013
Linear alkanes 10.092 0.251 0.0005
Methyl alkanes 2.66 0.081 0.07
Dimethyl alkanes 7.089 0.191 0.0007
Alkenes 4.595 0.132 0.0004
Charterginus sp. All compounds 62.517 0.683 0.0001
Linear alkanes 12.866 0.307 0.0001
Methyl alkanes 52.962 0.646 0.0001
Dimethyl alkanes 98.247 0.772 0.0001
Trimethyl alkanes – – –
Alkenes 85.595 0.746 0.0001
Group III Agelaia pallipes All compounds 9.129 0.221 0.0001
Linear alkanes 9.721 0.233 0.0001
Methyl alkanes 8.01 0.2 0.0001
Dimethyl alkanes 7.817 0.196 0.0004
Alkenes 12.558 0.281 0.0001
Apoica flavissima All compounds 3.277 0.201 0.052
Linear alkanes 3.596 0.216 0.044
Methyl alkanes 2.689 0.171 0.054
Dimethyl alkanes 3.442 0.209 0.049
Alkenes 0.543 0.04 0.683
Open in a new tab

Note:

Comparisons between queens and workers considering all compounds and compound classes separately. C.S, caste-syndrome group. Degrees of freedom equals to 1.

Bold numbers are significant values. Italics denote wasp species.

Table 5. Most important contributor compounds to separate queens and workers of epiponine wasps.

Average Sd Ratio Av. worker Av. queen Cum. sum p-value Sig. level
(a) Chartergerllus communis
n-C29 0.032 0.021 1.532 32.613 36.935 0.202 0.538 n.s
n-C27 0.028 0.016 1.790 44.290 38.949 0.379 0.032 *
n-C30 0.014 0.020 0.705 1.540 3.203 0.471 0.514 n.s
n-C25 0.013 0.009 1.486 3.637 2.103 0.555 0.215 n.s
n-C31 0.011 0.007 1.595 3.967 6.003 0.627 0.046 *
n-C28 0.008 0.005 1.606 2.933 3.536 0.679 0.604 n.s
15-;13-;11-MeC29 0.008 0.006 1.257 1.453 1.206 0.729 0.469 n.s
9,13-diMeC24 0.007 0.005 1.293 1.590 0.561 0.773 0.057 n.s
11,13-diMeC27 0.005 0.006 0.829 1.083 0.249 0.803 0.084 n.s
13-;11-MeC27 0.004 0.005 0.800 0.767 0.151 0.826 0.057 n.s
(b) Metapolybia docilis
n-C31 0.044 0.035 1.270 30.340 38.664 0.287 0.311 n.s
n-C29 0.036 0.025 1.430 44.240 44.079 0.519 0.678 n.s
n-C27 0.021 0.016 1.304 6.587 3.454 0.658 0.098 n.s
n-C30 0.006 0.004 1.620 3.947 3.137 0.696 0.571 n.s
n-C28 0.006 0.003 1.989 2.923 2.050 0.733 0.324 n.s
n-C32 0.005 0.004 1.332 1.713 1.134 0.767 0.597 n.s
n-C24 0.005 0.003 1.470 1.683 0.814 0.797 0.033 *
n-C25 0.004 0.005 0.760 0.337 0.896 0.821 0.917 n.s
15-;13-MeC27 0.004 0.004 0.866 0.773 0.219 0.844 0.243 n.s
n-C33 0.003 0.004 0.929 1.090 1.387 0.865 0.824 n.s
(c) Nectarinella xavantinenis
n-C29 0.084 0.054 1.573 28.100 13.315 0.238 0.019 *
n-C25 0.058 0.033 1.722 20.990 25.521 0.400 0.221 n.s
n-C31 0.040 0.022 1.830 11.203 3.178 0.514 0.003 **
15-;13-MeC29 0.038 0.025 1.514 5.727 11.944 0.619 0.344 n.s
15-;13-MeC27 0.036 0.024 1.490 4.720 11.468 0.719 0.091 n.s
n-C27 0.029 0.020 1.448 14.617 15.723 0.800 0.982 n.s
15,17-diMeC29 0.015 0.013 1.198 2.400 4.650 0.843 0.863 n.s
11-;9-MeC27 0.010 0.008 1.262 2.207 3.488 0.871 0.877 n.s
n-C24 0.007 0.006 1.109 1.563 1.118 0.890 0.220 n.s
13-;11-MeC25 0.005 0.004 1.214 0.743 1.735 0.904 0.343 n.s
(d) Synoeca surinama
C25:1-1 0.059 0.030 1.994 16.919 5.596 0.211 0.001 ***
C31:1 0.037 0.021 1.745 23.972 16.593 0.345 0.001 ***
n-C31 0.035 0.023 1.504 20.710 19.224 0.469 0.005 **
n-C25 0.026 0.023 1.141 13.108 14.316 0.563 1.000 n.s
C33:1 0.022 0.009 2.397 0.761 5.167 0.642 0.001 ***
n-C33 0.022 0.011 1.978 1.598 5.956 0.719 0.001 ***
n-C27 0.016 0.008 2.030 4.214 7.263 0.775 0.001 ***
n-C29 0.010 0.007 1.334 9.199 8.029 0.809 0.001 ***
C27:1 0.009 0.008 1.196 2.868 4.336 0.841 0.001 ***
n-C23 0.007 0.007 1.081 0.318 1.704 0.866 0.001 ***
(e) Parachartergus fraternus
n-C27 0.035 0.039 0.885 14.574 21.112 0.155 0.268 n.s
15-;13-;11-;9-MeC27 0.020 0.015 1.375 19.657 18.198 0.247 0.841 n.s
n-C29 0.017 0.012 1.385 8.961 7.241 0.323 0.171 n.s
3,11-; 7,9-diMeC29 + n.C30 0.014 0.006 2.416 4.976 2.258 0.383 0.001 ***
11,13-diMeC29 0.012 0.008 1.615 8.284 5.826 0.438 0.004 **
12-;10-;8-MeC28 0.012 0.011 1.043 11.270 9.345 0.491 0.364 n.s
13,17-diMeC28 0.010 0.006 1.739 4.813 2.835 0.536 0.001 ***
5-MeC25 0.010 0.005 1.791 1.439 3.387 0.579 0.004 **
9-MeC25 0.009 0.005 1.821 1.227 2.956 0.620 0.012 *
n-C25 0.008 0.006 1.416 0.671 2.306 0.658 0.013 *
(f) Clypearia sulcata
15,19-; 13,7-diMeC35 0.026 0.019 1.417 18.625 23.908 0.126 0.072 n.s
17-;15-;13-;11-;9-;7-MeC35 0.022 0.009 2.394 15.370 19.862 0.233 0.001 ***
n-C31 0.019 0.010 1.813 5.798 2.160 0.322 0.013 *
13,21-;13,19-;11,15-diMeC37 0.015 0.009 1.590 10.904 8.882 0.392 0.438 n.s
13,17-diMeC33 0.013 0.006 2.397 3.950 6.594 0.455 0.001 ***
n-C29 0.010 0.009 1.170 6.715 5.776 0.503 0.646 n.s
7,11-diMeC35 0.008 0.001 11.915 0.000 1.604 0.542 0.001 ***
x,y-diMeC37 0.008 0.004 2.162 1.593 0.000 0.580 0.001 ***
15-;13-;11-;9-MeC31 0.008 0.014 0.569 1.926 0.602 0.617 0.999 n.s
15-;13-;11-;9-;7-MeC37 0.008 0.005 1.470 10.168 8.922 0.654 0.215 n.s
(g) Brachygastra augusti
n-C29 0.098 0.062 1.562 27.995 9.434 0.158 0.001 ***
15-;13-;11-MeC31 0.094 0.035 2.693 1.319 19.967 0.310 0.001 ***
15-;13-MeC33 0.066 0.028 2.379 2.550 15.597 0.418 0.001 ***
13-;11-MeC29 0.057 0.022 2.544 1.557 12.950 0.511 0.001 ***
n-C27 0.054 0.030 1.791 16.252 8.273 0.599 0.001 ***
n-C31 0.039 0.049 0.783 10.605 4.064 0.662 0.001 ***
13-MeC35 0.023 0.011 2.102 0.981 5.371 0.699 0.001 ***
C29:1-1 0.019 0.021 0.895 3.216 1.239 0.729 0.063 n.s
5,11-diMeC30 0.017 0.018 0.986 3.124 1.038 0.757 0.038 *
17-;16-;14-;11-MeC34 0.016 0.013 1.207 2.781 2.186 0.783 0.002 **
(h) Polybia paulista
n-C29 0.065 0.037 1.755 20.967 9.590 0.235 0.001 ***
15-;13-;11-MeC29 0.030 0.020 1.498 22.563 23.836 0.343 0.142 n.s
n-C27 0.022 0.026 0.853 16.988 16.171 0.424 0.038 *
13-;11-MeC27 0.021 0.014 1.538 6.429 9.369 0.501 0.006 **
n-C25 0.016 0.011 1.374 1.884 4.631 0.558 0.001 ***
n-C23 0.014 0.030 0.458 0.221 2.894 0.608 0.002 **
3-MeC27 0.011 0.008 1.333 5.036 5.166 0.647 0.284 n.s
C31:1 0.009 0.015 0.593 0.245 1.748 0.679 0.040 *
n-C31 0.009 0.005 1.772 2.444 1.414 0.711 0.006 **
C27:1 0.008 0.016 0.515 0.773 1.124 0.740 0.600 n.s
(i) Charterginus sp.
11,21-;11,19-diMeC39 0.114 0.008 15.145 1.903 24.688 0.196 0.001 ***
11,21-;11,19-diMeC37 0.049 0.010 5.085 1.427 11.160 0.279 0.001 ***
C29:1-1 0.036 0.008 4.601 8.296 1.185 0.341 0.001 ***
n-C29 0.034 0.016 2.146 9.772 3.020 0.399 0.001 ***
3-MeC27 0.031 0.007 4.115 7.806 1.668 0.451 0.001 ***
n-C27 0.021 0.019 1.103 18.390 15.195 0.488 0.682 n.s
5,19-;5,17-diMeC39 0.020 0.001 19.728 0.000 3.955 0.522 0.001 ***
9-MeC27 0.017 0.008 2.070 3.860 0.408 0.552 0.001 ***
15-;13-;11-MeC29 0.016 0.008 2.037 3.640 0.465 0.579 0.001 ***
3-MeC29 0.014 0.004 3.205 3.234 0.520 0.602 0.001 ***
(j) Agelaia pallipes
x,y-diMeC28 0.015 0.012 1.291 6.785 4.421 0.086 0.181 n.s
15-;13-;11-MeC33 0.010 0.007 1.434 11.346 11.083 0.147 0.998 n.s
n-C29 0.010 0.009 1.104 8.190 8.242 0.204 1.000 n.s
n-C30 0.009 0.003 3.030 1.772 3.665 0.259 0.001 ***
15-;13-;11-;9-;.7-MeC31 0.009 0.007 1.306 16.766 15.819 0.312 0.531 n.s
13,17-;11,15-diMeC33 0.008 0.005 1.506 7.037 7.378 0.359 0.970 n.s
17-;15-;13-;11-MeC35 0.008 0.008 0.954 2.680 3.085 0.404 0.431 n.s
15-;13-;11-;9-MeC29 0.007 0.009 0.822 6.692 6.382 0.444 0.966 n.s
13,17-;11,15-diMeC31 0.006 0.005 1.382 4.545 5.139 0.481 0.499 n.s
13,19-;13,17-diMeC35 0.006 0.004 1.512 2.727 3.212 0.514 0.579 n.s
(k) Apoica flavissima
n-C27 0.039 0.042 0.931 10.479 17.139 0.206 0.243 n.s
11-MeC40 0.034 0.031 1.097 31.541 26.364 0.386 0.268 n.s
n-C29 0.026 0.026 0.991 4.836 9.564 0.521 0.106 n.s
17-;13-;11-MeC38 0.024 0.020 1.176 17.564 14.459 0.646 0.376 n.s
15-;13-;11-MeC31 0.010 0.010 0.988 9.291 7.716 0.700 0.357 n.s
13-MeC40 0.009 0.006 1.564 2.097 3.763 0.747 0.025 *
3-MeC29 0.009 0.004 2.409 3.561 2.505 0.792 0.037 *
13,15-;11,13-diMeC33 0.004 0.004 1.189 3.017 2.248 0.815 0.064 n.s
15-;13-;11-MeC29 0.004 0.003 1.147 1.599 1.465 0.834 0.949 n.s
17-;15-;13-MeC33 0.003 0.004 0.891 3.764 3.186 0.851 0.246 n.s
Open in a new tab

Notes:

Contribution of the first ten most important compounds discriminating queens and workers using SIMPER Bray-Curtis dissimilarities (999 permutations). (a) Chartergerllus communis; (b) Metapolybia docilis; (c) Nectarinella xavantinensis; (d) Synoeca surinama; (e) Parachartergus fraternus; (f) Clypearia sulcata; (g) Brachygastra augusti; (h) Polybia paulista; (i) Charterginus sp.; (j) Agelaia pallipes; (k) Apoica flavissima. sd, standard deviation; av. worker, compound average present in workers; av. queens, compound average present in queens; cum. sum, cumulative contribution (%) of each compound for differentiation; sig. level, significance level (n.s., non-significant).

*

p < 0.05.

**

p < 0.01.

***

p < 0.001.

Reproductive females isometrically different from workers

Queens and workers of B. augusti express the same CHC composition, which includes compounds ranging from 20 to 35 carbon lengths (Tables S1 and S2). According to permutation analysis, queens and workers of B. augusti are chemically different (Table 4). The ten most important compounds according to SIMPER analysis comprised mostly methyl-alkanes, but also linear alkanes, one linear alkene and one dimethyl-alkane (Table 5). Nine out of 10 compounds were significantly different between queens and workers (n-C29, 15-;13-;11-MeC31, 15-;14-;13-MeC33, 13-;11-,MeC29, n-C27, n-C31, 13-MeC35, 5,11-diMeC30 and 17-;16-;14-;11-MeC34) (Table 5). Queens and workers of P. paulista shared almost the same CHCs, with only a few divergences (Table S1), the cuticular profiles included CHCs ranging from 22 to 33 carbon lengths. Queens and workers of P. paulista are chemically distinct (Table 5). The ten most relevant compounds according to SIMPER included mostly linear alkanes, but also linear alkenes and methyl-alkanes (Table 5). Seven compounds were significantly different between queens and workers (n-C29, n-C27, 13-;11-MeC27, n-C25, n-C23, C31:1 and n-C31) (Table 5). Finally, according to the permutation analysis, queens and workers of Charterginus sp. can be distinguished based on their chemical profiles (Table 4). Queens and workers of Charterginus sp. do not share the exact same CHCs (Table S1), their chemical profiles included CHCs ranging from 23 to 39 carbon lengths. According to SIMPER analysis the ten most relevant compounds responsible for promoting group differentiation included linear alkanes, methyl-alkanes, dimethyl-alkanes and one linear alkene (Table 5). Almost all compounds highlighted as the most relevant indeed differed significantly between queens and workers (11,21-; 11,19-diMeC39, 11,21-; 11,19-diMeC37, C29:1-1, n-C29, 3-MeC27, 5,19-; 5,17-diMeC39, 9-MeC27, 15-;13-;11-MeC29 and 3-MeC29) (Table 5).

Reproductive females allometrically different from workers

Queens and workers of A. pallipes express almost the same CHCs, with only a few exceptions (Table S1), their chemical profiles include CHCs ranging from 21 to 35 carbon lengths. Queens and workers of A. pallipes can be chemically distinguished according to permutation analysis (Table 4). The ten most important compounds according to SIMPER included methyl and dimethyl-alkanes, and also linear alkanes (Table 5). A single compound was significantly different between queens and workers (n-C30) (Table 5). We found that queens and workers of A. flavissima express the same CHC profiles, which includes compounds ranging from 23 to 40 carbon lengths (Table S1). Lastly, according to permutation analysis, queens and workers of A. flavissima are not chemically distinct (Table 4). The ten most relevant compounds according to SIMPER included mostly methyl-alkanes, but also linear alkanes and one dimethyl-alkane (Table 5). Only two compounds were indeed different between queens and workers (13-MeC40 and 3-MeC29) (Table 5).

In five species (C. sulcata, P. paulista, Charterginus sp., A. pallipes and A. pallens) queens and workers differed both qualitatively and quantitively in terms of their CHC composition. We summarized which CHCs were present and absent in either of the castes (Table S2).

Discussion

Overall, we confirmed our initial hypothesis that females belonging to different castes (queens and workers) express CHCs differently in epiponine wasps, seven out of eleven analyzed species were statistically different based on their overall chemical composition. Queens and workers expressed some caste specific CHCs (qualitative variation) in addition to different proportions of the shared compounds (quantitative variation), whereas in some other species the variation between queens and workers was subtle, consisting solely of quantitative variation. Contrary to our expectation, in species where females lack differential morphological traits, CHCs were either highly divergent but also similar between queens and workers depending on the species. As expected, species where females are morphologically distinct in caste, CHCs were majority distinct between queens and workers (with exception of A. pallipes). In this sense, CHCs are potential cues linked with caste in epiponine wasps.

CHCs have been demonstrated to be tightly connected with female fertility, and thus they are the candidates to act as queen pheromones in several unrelated lineages of social insects (Holman et al., 2010; Oliveira et al., 2015; Van Oystaeyen et al., 2014; Holman, 2018; Funaro et al., 2018; Layton, Camann & Espelie, 1994; Oliveira et al., 2017; Oi et al., 2016). In the case of epiponine queens, we found that in some species queens expressed exclusively certain CHCs, whereas in the remaining species, queens at least upregulate some of the CHCs that they share with workers. Interestingly, we reported four linear alkanes (n-C25, n-C27, n-C28, and n-C29) shared by females of all studied species, and overall, they were more abundant in the cuticular surface of queens rather than in workers. Considering the known properties of such compounds in advanced species of social wasps (V. vulgaris and D. saxonica) (Oi, 2022; Oi et al., 2016; Van Oystaeyen et al., 2014), these CHCs could potentially work as queen pheromones in swarm-founding species. From the literature, studies in epiponine wasps have revealed some specific compounds to be associated to queens. The results reported for S. ilheensis revealed that the overall proportion of linear alkanes was higher in queens compared to workers and males (Santos et al., 2018). In addition to that, three linear alkanes n-C25, n-C29, and n-C31, were consistently overexpressed by queens (Santos et al., 2018). In the species P. sericea, qualitative and quantitative variation were found between queens and workers, including females with and without ovary activation (Soares et al., 2021). For instance, the CHCs 3-MeC18, 9-MeC21, 14-;12-;10-MeC28, and n-C29 were found only in queens and workers with activated ovaries, whereas n-C20, 3-MeC25, and 2-MeC26 were identified exclusively in females with inactivated ovaries (Soares et al., 2021). Similarly, in P. micans, the linear alkane n-C25 and the branched alkane 3-MeC25, were significantly higher in queens (Kelstrup et al., 2014b). For now, the indication of putative queen pheromones in epiponine wasps is merely speculative and bioassays using synthetic versions of these chemicals should be conducted to test this hypothesis that linear alkanes act as queen pheromones in the swarm-founding wasps.

In epiponine wasps, it is still unknown whether the juvenile hormone (JH) plays a role regulating both queen fertility and queen signal production as it was shown in Vespinae wasps (Oliveira et al., 2017; Oi et al., 2021a; Oi et al., 2020). JH acts as a gonadotropic hormone and modulates CHCs expression in S. surinama (Kelstrup et al., 2014a), however, in Polybia micans (Kelstrup et al., 2014b), although it seems to control ovary activation, it does not have any correlation with CHCs expression. In Polybia occidentalis, JH regulates multiple factors in workers, such as age polyethism, ovarian status and CHCs expression (Prato et al., 2021). It was recently demonstrated that JH may also control female fertility and subtle modifications in CHCs in the primitively eusocial wasps Polistes and Mischocyttarus genera (Oi et al., 2021b). For the most part of our study species, epiponine queens were chemically distinguished from workers, it is possible that JH also controls CHCs production in these swarm-founding wasps, however, empirical evidence is needed. A systematic effort including species from different social insect taxa would be important to establish whether JH has a conserved function across the epiponine wasps.

We found a high chemical diversity among the epiponine wasp species, and each of them expressed a higher or lower CHC diversity. Even though queens and workers share similar proportions of CHCs classes, a species-specific qualitative variation was evident when the species were compared in Fig. 2. The chemical profiles of three species belonging to the Group I were majority composed by linear alkanes (C. communis, M. docilis and N. xavantinensis), while for S. surinama linear alkanes and alkenes were represented at similar proportional levels between castes, with queens being expressing more alkenes and workers linear alkanes, which is in line with the results previously published for the species (Kelstrup et al., 2014a). For the species P. fraternus and C. sulcata, which also belong to Group I, chemical profiles were more represented by branched alkanes. Females from Group II represented the ones with the most diversity in compound classes (Charterginus sp. = 6; B. augusti = 5; P. paulista = 4). Queens of Charterginus sp. exhibit branched alkanes in higher proportions whether compared to workers, which express linear and branched alkanes in similar proportions, on the other hand, in B. augusti the opposite pattern was seen, with queens being more represented by linear and workers by branched alkanes. Queens and workers of P. paulista show similar proportions of all compound classes. Lastly, females from both species comprising Group III were mainly characterized by branched alkanes (mostly methyl alkanes). More than 50% of the identified compounds comprise branched alkanes (methyl and dimethyl) and in a specific case (S. surinama), a high diversity of alkenes was found. Future studies could use CHCs as chemotaxonomic markers in epiponine, as most of our study species show a unique chemical signature. The use of CHCs as chemotaxonomic markers is common in the Hymenoptera order (Kather & Martin, 2015; Martin & Drijfhout, 2009; Dos Santos & Do Nascimento, 2015; Pokorny et al., 2014), solitary insects from Diptera (Ye et al., 2007; Moore et al., 2021), Hemiptera (Gemeno et al., 2012), and Orthoptera (Chapman, Espelie & Sword, 1995). For example, the chemical traits could also have a similar phylogenetic value compared to other often used characters, such as morphological, genetic or behavioural to build relationships among epiponine wasps.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we demonstrated that queens and workers of epiponine wasps are chemically distinct based on their CHC profiles—and this dissimilarity exists regardless of their caste-syndromes—which includes qualitative and quantitative variation, but also only quantitative differences. To date, considering that Neotropical swarm-founding wasps remained less explored whether compared with other groups of social insects, the results presented here reinforce that CHCs may act as reliable cues of castes in different unrelated groups of social insects. To strengthen the understanding of their chemical variation, future studies need to study the CHCs dynamics of queens and workers on a broader scale and a higher diversity of species, controlling the age of the sampled females. Overall, our correlative results suggest that division of labour within epiponine societies may be mediated by CHCs, queens and workers may benefit from these chemical dissimilarities and use this information to maintain their colonies functioning cohesively.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1. Cuticular chemical composition of studied epiponine wasp species.

Relative contribution (%) of cuticular hydrocarbon composition in Epiponini wasps from the present study. In parenthesis is presented the number of individuals analyzed per group from each species. sd = standard deviation. Considering that we did not perform the derivatization of the chemical samples, we could not confirm the right position of the double bounds for the alkenes identified. Thus, each of them was represented as unique in the table.

Click here for additional data file. (111.4KB, docx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13571/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) that were found exclusively in queens or workers in the epiponine wasp species.

Queens and workers of the remaining species shared the same CHC composition.

Click here for additional data file. (23.9KB, docx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13571/supp-2

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the three reviewers for their useful remarks and suggestions.

Funding Statement

This study was financially supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001 and grant 2018/22461–3 São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) to Rafael Carvalho da Silva. Funding was provided from Bilateral grant FWO-FAPESP to Cintia Oi, Fabio Nascimento, and Tom Wenseleers (processes: 2018/10996–0 and 2021/05598-8 FAPESP and FWO: GOF8319N), Research Foundation Flanders to Cintia Oi (postdoctoral fellowship FWO-12V6318N and research grant FWO-1513219 N), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico to Fabio Nascimento (307702/2018–9) and to Amanda Prato (142285/2018-8.) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Rafael Carvalho da Silva performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Amanda Prato performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Ivelize Tannure-Nascimento performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Cintia Akemi Oi conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Tom Wenseleers conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Fabio Nascimento conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Field experiments were approved by the Research Council of the Universidade de São Paulo (Processo 2010/10027-5).

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are available in the Supplemental File.

References

  • Andrade-Silva & Nascimento (2015).Andrade-Silva ACR, Nascimento FS. Reproductive regulation in an orchid bee: social context, fertility and chemical signalling. Animal Behaviour. 2015;106(6):43–49. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.05.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Antonialli-Junior et al. (2021).Antonialli-Junior WF, de Oliveira Torres V, Tannure-Nascimento IC, Nascimento FS. Cuticular hydrocarbon studies in Neotropical social wasps. In: Prezoto F, Nascimento FS, Barbosa BC, Somavilla A, editors. Neotropical Social Wasps. Cham: Springer; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • Ayasse et al. (1995).Ayasse M, Marlovits T, Tengö J, Taghizadeh T, Francke W. Are there pheromonal dominance signals in the bumblebee Bombus hypnorum L (Hymenoptera, Apidae)? Apidologie. 1995;26(3):163–180. doi: 10.1051/apido:19950301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Beekman (2004).Beekman M. Is Her Majesty at home? Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2004;19(10):505–506. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bloch & Hefetz (1999).Bloch G, Hefetz A. Regulation of reproduction by dominant workers in bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) queenright colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1999;45(2):125–135. doi: 10.1007/s002650050546. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Blomquist & Bagnères (2010).Blomquist GJ, Bagnères AG. Insect hydrocarbons: biology, biochemistry and chemical ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 492. [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter, Kojima & Wenzel (2000).Carpenter JM, Kojima JI, Wenzel JW. Polybia, paraphyly, and polistine phylogeny. American Museum Novitates. 2000;2000:1–24. doi: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)298&#x0003c;0001:PPAPP&#x0003e;2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Chapman, Espelie & Sword (1995).Chapman RF, Espelie KE, Sword GA. Use of cuticular lipids in grasshopper taxonomy: a study of variation in Schistocerca shoshone (Thomas) Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 1995;23(4):383–398. doi: 10.1016/0305-1978(95)00032-P. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Cuvillier-Hot et al. (2002).Cuvillier-Hot V, Gadagkar R, Peeters C, Cobb M. Regulation of reproduction in a queenless ant: aggression, pheromones and reduction in conflict. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 2002;269(1497):1295–1300. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • da Silva et al. (2020b).da Silva RC, Prato A, Oi CA, Turatti ICC, do Nascimento FS. Dominance hierarchy, ovarian activity and cuticular hydrocarbons in the primitively eusocial wasp Mischocyttarus cerberus (Vespidae, Polistinae, Mischocyttarini) Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2020b;46(9):835–844. doi: 10.1007/s10886-020-01206-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • da Silva et al. (2020a).da Silva RC, Togni OC, Giannotti E, do Nascimento FS. Cues of dominance hierarchy, fertility and nestmate recognition in the primitively eusocial wasp Mischocyttarus parallelogrammus (Vespidae: Polistinae: Mischocyttarini) Chemoecology. 2020a;30(5):269–276. doi: 10.1007/s00049-020-00316-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • da Silva et al. (2021).da Silva RC, Brown RL, do Nascimento FS, Wenseelers T, Oi CA. Cuticular hydrocarbons as cues of caste and sex in the German wasp Vespula germanica. Insectes Sociaux. 2021;68:261–276. doi: 10.1007/s00040-021-00817-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Dapporto, Sledge & Turillazzi (2005).Dapporto L, Sledge FM, Turillazzi S. Dynamics of cuticular chemical profiles of Polistes dominulus workers in orphaned nests (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) Journal of Insect Physiology. 2005;51(9):969–973. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2005.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dos Santos & Do Nascimento (2015).Dos Santos AB, Do Nascimento FS. Cuticular hydrocarbons of orchid bees males: interspecific and chemotaxonomy variation. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(12):1–11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ferreira et al. (2022).Ferreira HM, da Silva RC, do Nascimento FS, Wenseleers T, Oi CA. Reproduction and fertility signalling under joint juvenile hormone control in primitively eusocial Mischocyttarus wasps. Chemoecology. 2022;32:105–116. doi: 10.1007/s00049-022-00370-y. (in press) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Funaro et al. (2018).Funaro CF, Böröczky K, Vargo EL, Schal C. Identification of a queen and king recognition pheromone in the subterranean termite Reticulitermes flavipes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2018;115(15):1–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721419115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gemeno et al. (2012).Gemeno C, Laserna N, Riba M, Valls J, Castañé C, Alomar O. Cuticular hydrocarbons discriminate cryptic Macrolophus species (Hemiptera: Miridae) Bulletin of Entomological Research. 2012;102(6):624–631. doi: 10.1017/S0007485312000193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Holman (2018).Holman L. Queen pheromones and reproductive division of labor: a meta-analysis. Behavioral Ecology. 2018;29:1199–1209. doi: 10.1093/beheco/ary023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Holman et al. (2010).Holman L, Jørgensen CG, Nielsen J, d’Ettorre P. Identification of an ant queen pheromone regulating worker sterility. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2010;277(1701):3793–3800. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Holman, Lanfear & D’Ettorre (2013).Holman L, Lanfear R, D’Ettorre P. The evolution of queen pheromones in the ant genus Lasius. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2013;26(7):1549–1558. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Holman et al. (2017).Holman L, van Zweden JS, Oliveira RC, Van Oystaeyen A, Wenseleers T. Conserved queen pheromones in bumblebees: a reply to Amsalem et al. PeerJ. 2017;5(Pt 11):e3332. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hunt et al. (1996).Hunt JH, Schmidt DK, Mulkey SS, Williams MA. Caste dimorphism in the wasp Epipona guerini (Hymenoptera: Vespidae; Polistinae, Epiponini): further evidence for larval determination. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 1996;69(4):362–369. [Google Scholar]
  • Jeanne (1991).Jeanne RL. The swarm-founding Polistinae. In: Ross KG, Matthews RW, editors. The Social Biology of Wasps. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1991. pp. 191–231. [Google Scholar]
  • Jeanne (2020).Jeanne RL. Encyclopedia of Social Insects. Cham: Springer; 2020. Swarm-founding wasps; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  • Kather & Martin (2015).Kather R, Martin SJ. Evolution of cuticular hydrocarbons in the hymenoptera: a meta-analysis. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2015;41(10):871–883. doi: 10.1007/s10886-015-0631-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Keller & Nonacs (1993).Keller L, Nonacs P. The role of queen pheromones in social insects: queen control or queen signal? Animal Behaviour. 1993;45(4):787–794. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1993.1092. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelstrup et al. (2014a).Kelstrup HC, Hartfelder K, Nascimento FS, Riddiford LM. The role of juvenile hormone in dominance behavior, reproduction and cuticular pheromone signaling in the caste-flexible epiponine wasp, Synoeca surinama. Frontiers in Zoology. 2014a;11(1):1–19. doi: 10.1186/s12983-014-0078-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelstrup et al. (2014b).Kelstrup HC, Hartfelder K, Nascimento FS, Riddiford LM. Reproductive status, endocrine physiology and chemical signaling in the Neotropical, swarm-founding eusocial wasp Polybia micans. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2014b;217:2399–2410. doi: 10.1242/jeb.096750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Layton, Camann & Espelie (1994).Layton JM, Camann MA, Espelie KE. Cuticular lipid profiles of queens, workers, and males of social wasp Polistes metricus say are colony-specific. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1994;20(9):2307–2321. doi: 10.1007/BF02033205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liebig et al. (1999).Liebig J, Peeters C, Hölldobler B, Liebig J, Peeters C, Hîlldobler B. Worker policing limits the number of reproductives in a ponerine ant. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 1999;266(1431):1865–1870. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0858. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Lopes & Menezes (2017).Lopes RB, Menezes RS. Synoeca ilheensis sp. nov., a new social wasp (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Polistinae) from Brazilian lowland Atlantic Forest. Zootaxa. 2017;4300(3):445–450. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4300.3.8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Martin & Drijfhout (2009).Martin S, Drijfhout F. A review of ant cuticular hydrocarbons. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2009;35(10):1151–1161. doi: 10.1007/s10886-009-9695-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mateus, Noll & Zucchi (2004).Mateus S, Noll FB, Zucchi R. Caste flexibility and variation according to the colony cycle in the swarm-founding wasp, Parachartergus fraternus (Gribodo) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Epiponini) Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 2004;77(4):470–483. doi: 10.2317/E-40.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Menezes, Lloyd & Brady (2020).Menezes RS, Lloyd MW, Brady SG. Phylogenomics indicates Amazonia as the major source of Neotropical swarm-founding social wasp diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2020;287(1928):20200480. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Monnin & Peeters (1998).Monnin T, Peeters C. Monogyny and regulation of worker mating in the queenless ant Dinoponera quadriceps. Animal Behaviour. 1998;55(2):299–306. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moore et al. (2021).Moore HE, Hall MJR, Drijfhout FP, Cody RB, Whitmore D. Cuticular hydrocarbons for identifying Sarcophagidae (Diptera) Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87221-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nascimento, Tannure-Nascimento & Zucchi (2004).Nascimento FS, Tannure-Nascimento IC, Zucchi R. Behavioral mediators of cyclical oligogyny in the Amazonian swarm- founding wasp Asteloeca ujhelyii (Vespidae, Polistinae, Epiponini) Insectes Sociaux. 2004;51(1):17–23. doi: 10.1007/s00040-003-0696-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Noll (2013).Noll FB. Marimbondos: a review on the neotropical swarm-founding polistines. Sociobiology. 2013;60:347–354. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v60i4.347-354. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Noll et al. (2020).Noll FB, da Silva M, Soleman RA, Lopes RB, Grandinete YC, Almeida EAB, Wenzel JW, Carpenter JM. Marimbondos: systematics, biogeography, and evolution of social behaviour of neotropical swarm-founding wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Epiponini) Cladistics. 2020;37(4):1–19. doi: 10.1111/cla.12446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oi (2022).Oi CA. Honeybee queen mandibular pheromone fails to regulate ovary activation in the common wasp. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 2022;208(2):297–302. doi: 10.1007/s00359-021-01531-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oi et al. (2020).Oi CA, Brown RL, da Silva RC, Wenseleers T. Reproduction and signals regulating worker policing under identical hormonal control in social wasps. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76084-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oi et al. (2021b).Oi CA, da Silva RC, Stevens I, Ferreira HM, Nascimento FS, Wenseleers T. Hormonal modulation of reproduction and fertility signaling in polistine wasps. Current Zoology. 2021b;67(5):519–530. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoab026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oi et al. (2021a).Oi CA, Ferreira HM, da Silva RC, Bienstman A, do Nascimento FS, Wenseleers T. Effects of juvenile hormone in fertility and fertility-signaling in workers of the common wasp Vespula vulgaris. PLOS ONE. 2021a;16:e0250720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oi et al. (2016).Oi CA, Millar JG, van Zweden JS, Wenseleers T. Conservation of queen pheromones across two species of vespine wasps. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2016;42(11):1175–1180. doi: 10.1007/s10886-016-0777-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oi et al. (2019).Oi CA, Oliveira RC, van Zweden JS, Mateus S, Millar JG, Nascimento FS, Wenseleers T. Do primitively eusocial wasps use queen pheromones to regulate reproduction? A case study of the paper wasp Polistes satan. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 2019;7:1–10. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00199. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Oi et al. (2015).Oi CA, van Zweden JS, Oliveira RC, Van Oystaeyen A, Nascimento FS, Wenseleers T. The origin and evolution of social insect queen pheromones: novel hypotheses and outstanding problems. BioEssays. 2015;37(7):808–821. doi: 10.1002/bies.201400180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oksanen et al. (2013).Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Oksanen MJ. Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology package. 2013. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan pp. 1–295.https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan version 2.
  • Oliveira et al. (2015).Oliveira RC, Oi CA, Do Nascimento MMC, Vollet-Neto A, Alves DA, Campos MC, Nascimento F, Wenseleers T. The origin and evolution of queen and fertility signals in Corbiculate bees. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2015;15(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12862-015-0509-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oliveira et al. (2017).Oliveira RC, Vollet-Neto A, Akemi Oi C, van Zweden JS, Nascimento F, Sullivan Brent C, Wenseleers T. Hormonal pleiotropy helps maintain queen signal honesty in a highly eusocial wasp. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01794-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Piekarski et al. (2018).Piekarski PK, Carpenter JM, Lemmon AR, Lemmon EM, Sharanowski BJ. Phylogenomic evidence overturns current conceptions of social evolution in wasps (vespidae) Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2018;35(9):2097–2109. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pokorny et al. (2014).Pokorny T, Lunau K, Quezada-Euan JJG, Eltz T. Cuticular hydrocarbons distinguish cryptic sibling species in Euglossa orchid bees. Apidologie. 2014;45(2):276–283. doi: 10.1007/s13592-013-0250-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Prato et al. (2021).Prato A, da Silva RC, Assis DS, Mateus S, Hartfelder K, Nascimento FS. Juvenile hormone affects age polyethism, ovarian status, and cuticular hydrocarbon profile in workers of a Polybia occidentalis wasp. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2021;224(13):jeb240200. doi: 10.1242/jeb.240200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Queller & Strassmann (1998).Queller DC, Strassmann JE. Kin selection and social insects: social insects provide the most surprising predictions and satisfying tests of kin selection. Bioscience. 1998;48(3):165–175. doi: 10.2307/1313262. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team (2018).R Core Team R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2018. http://www.R-project.org/ http://www.R-project.org/ Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Santos et al. (2018).Santos EB, Shemilt S, de Carvalho CA, Martin SJ. Life history and chemical ecology of the Warrior wasp Synoeca septentrionalis (Hymenoptera: Vespidae, Epiponini) PLOS ONE. 2018;13(3):e0194689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Singer, Camann & Espelie (1992).Singer TL, Camann MA, Espelie KE. Discriminant analysis of cuticular hydrocarbons of social wasp Polistes exclamans Viereck and surface hydrocarbons of its nest paper and pedicel. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1992;18(5):785–797. doi: 10.1007/BF00994615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sledge, Boscaro & Turillazzi (2001).Sledge MF, Boscaro F, Turillazzi S. Cuticular hydrocarbons and reproductive status in the social wasp Polistes dominulus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2001;49(5):401–409. doi: 10.1007/s002650000311. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Sledge et al. (2004).Sledge MF, Trinca I, Massolo A, Boscaro F, Turillazzi S. Variation in cuticular hydrocarbon signatures, hormonal correlates and establishment of reproductive dominance in a polistine wasp. Journal of Insect Physiology. 2004;50:73–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2003.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Soares et al. (2021).Soares ERP, Antonio DS, Michelutti KB, Torres VO, Cardoso CAL, Antonialli WF. Intraspecific variation of cuticular hydrocarbons in the eusocial wasp Polybia sericea (Hymenoptera : Vespidae) Chemoecology. 2021;31(6):343–354. doi: 10.1007/s00049-021-00355-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Spradbery (1991).Spradbery JP. Evolution of queen number and queen control. In: Ross KG, Matthews RW, editors. The Social Biology of Wasps. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1991. pp. 191–231. [Google Scholar]
  • Strassmann, Sullender & Queller (2002).Strassmann JE, Sullender BW, Queller DC. Caste totipotency and conflict in a large-colony social insect. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 2002;269(1488):263–270. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tannure-Nascimento, Nascimento & Zucchi (2008).Tannure-Nascimento IC, Nascimento FS, Zucchi R. The look of royalty: visual and odour signals of reproductive status in a paper wasp. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2008;275(1651):2555–2561. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Turillazzi et al. (2004).Turillazzi S, Sledge MF, Dapporto L, Landi M, Fanelli D, Fondelli L, Zanetti P, Dani FR. Epicuticular lipids and fertility in primitively social wasps (Hymenoptera Stenogastrinae) Physiological Entomology. 2004;29(5):464–471. doi: 10.1111/j.0307-6962.2004.00418.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Oystaeyen et al. (2014).Van Oystaeyen A, Oliveira RC, Holman L, van Zweden JS, Romero C, Oi CA, d’Ettorre P, Khalesi M, Billen J, Wäckers F, Millar JG, Wenseleers T. Conserved class of queen pheromones stops social insect workers from reproducing. Science. 2014;343(6168):287–291. doi: 10.1126/science.1244899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • West-Eberhard (1978).West-Eberhard MJ. Temporary queens in Metapolybia wasps: non-reproductive helpers without altruism? Science. 1978;200(4340):441–443. doi: 10.1126/science.200.4340.441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • West-Eberhard (1996).West-Eberhard MJ. Wasp societies as microcosms for the study of development and evolution. In: Turillazzi S, West-Eberhard MJ, editors. Natural History and Evolution of Paper-Wasps. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996. pp. 290–317. [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson (1985).Wilson EO. The sociogenesis of insect colonies. Science. 1985;228(4707):1489–1495. doi: 10.1126/science.228.4707.1489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ye et al. (2007).Ye G, Li K, Zhu J, Zhu G, Hu C. Cuticular hydrocarbon composition in pupal exuviae for taxonomic differentiation of six necrophagous flies. Journal of Medical Entomology. 2007;44(3):450–456. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/44.3.450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information 1. Cuticular chemical composition of studied epiponine wasp species.

Relative contribution (%) of cuticular hydrocarbon composition in Epiponini wasps from the present study. In parenthesis is presented the number of individuals analyzed per group from each species. sd = standard deviation. Considering that we did not perform the derivatization of the chemical samples, we could not confirm the right position of the double bounds for the alkenes identified. Thus, each of them was represented as unique in the table.

Click here for additional data file. (111.4KB, docx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13571/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) that were found exclusively in queens or workers in the epiponine wasp species.

Queens and workers of the remaining species shared the same CHC composition.

Click here for additional data file. (23.9KB, docx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13571/supp-2

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are available in the Supplemental File.

Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES