Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2022 Jun 12;82:100934. doi: 10.1016/j.resmer.2022.100934

A national survey of early treatment seeking behavior among those with incident SARS-CoV-2 infection

Noah Kojima a,, Matthew Brobeck b, Vladimir Slepnev b, Jeffrey D Klausner c
PMCID: PMC9188821  PMID: 35908524

COVID-19 continues to cause severe disease, hospitalization, and death. Despite effective means to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, molnupiravir, monoclonal antibodies, and remdesivir [1], [2], [3], [4], the early treatment seeking behavior of those newly diagnosed with infection is not clear. We surveyed users of a national SARS-CoV-2 testing company to assess the frequency and correlates of early treatment seeking behavior for a positive test result.

We recruited adults (18 years or older) who had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR at a large clinical laboratory (Curative, San Dimas, CA). To be eligible, individuals had to have a positive test result within 7 days of enrollment. Surveys were anonymous and voluntary. We collected data on demographic characteristics, general health care access and utilization, awareness of treatment for COVID-19, treatment seeking behavior, and treatments received. Questions were developed to be answered in a multiple choice fashion for user ease. Descriptive statistics and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated on StataSE (StataCorp, College Station, TX). Chi-squared tests and linear regression analysis were used to compare categorical variables and continuous variables between groups, respectively. Advarra granted the study IRB exempt (Pro00059961).

Participants were surveyed from 3-7 January 2022: among the 15,991 who viewed a survey request, 7,647 individuals were eligible and provided responses. The median age of a respondent was 42 years (interquartile range: 32 to 54), 68.9% of respondents were women, and respondents represented 33 different states, districts, and territories. Among those surveyed, 66.7% identified as White, 30.6% as Hispanic, 12.1% as Black or African American, 6.2% as Asian, and 1.2% as Pacific Islander or Native American. Most respondents reported they were vaccinated (89.3%).

Among respondents, 23.1% reported they had sought treatment or medical advice for their current COVID-19 diagnosis (Table 1 ). Of those who were very aware of treatment for COVID-19, 31.0% sought treatment versus 16.7% who were unaware (p-value< 0.001). The odds of treatment seeking behavior were higher for those that were contacted by a medical professional after their diagnosis (OR: 4.57 [95% CI: 3.89 to 5.37]), those with a primary doctor (OR: 2.94 [95% CI: 2.52 to 3.43]), those who self-measured their oxygen saturation (OR: 2.53 [95% CI: 2.25 to 2.84]), and those over 65 years of age (OR: 2.36 [95% CI: 2.02 to 2.76]).

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics, health care access and utilization, awareness of treatment and treatment seeking behavior for COVID-19 among a national cohort of survey respondents that recently tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection, 3 January 2022 to 7 January 2022.

Variable Group (N) % Sought Treatment
All 7,647 23.1%
Of those that sought treatment
Age 65 years and under 6,876 21.3%
Age over 65 years* 771 39.0%
Female* 2,375 23.8%
Heritage
 American Indian or Alaskan Native 60 28.3%
 Asian 472 21.0%
 Black or African American 925 25.3%
 Multiracial 343 22.5%
 Native Hawaiian 28 14.3%
 White 5,099 23.5%
Ethnicity
 Hispanic or Spanish Origin 2,343 22.5%
 Not Hispanic or Spanish Origin 4,750 23.4%
Vaccinated 6,828 23.5%
Not Vaccinated 819 20.3%
Prior COVID 1,872 25.5%
Contacted by Health Department 2,432 24.6%
Asked about contact tracing 1,930 24.2%
Contacted by a medical professional* 678 53.5%
Has a primary doctor* 5,723 27.1%
Last saw primary doctor
 within 12 months* 4,466 30.1%
 12 to 24 months 822 17.0%
 over 24 months 411 14.1%
Type of insurance
 Private (e.g., United, Anthem, Blue Cross) 5,519 23.1%
 Government (Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs)* 473 34.3%
 Kaiser 406 30.5%
 None 1,249 16.6%
Awareness of treatment for COVID-19
 Very aware* 2,125 31.0%
 Aware 1,380 19.6%
 Not very aware 1,496 25.4%
 Somewhat aware 1,326 18.0%
 Unaware 1,320 16.7%
Measure home oxygen saturation* 1,827 36.9%
Political affiliation of state or district
 Won for Biden 6,388 23.2%
 Won for Trump 1,023 23.2%

p-value < 0.001

There was no difference in those seeking treatment based on heritage, ethnicity, prior COVID-19 diagnosis, state political affiliation, or vaccination status. The odds of seeking treatment were lower among men (OR: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.78 to 0.99]) and those without insurance (OR: 0.62 [95% CI: 0.52 to 0.72]). The most common treatment locations were clinics and most common treatments were Vitamin C, Vitamin D, Zinc, Tylenol, and NSAIDs (Table 2 ).

Table 2.

Treatment locations and treatments used for COVID-19 among survey respondents who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection in the prior 7 days, among 1767 persons reporting seeking treatment, 3 January 2022 to 7 January 2022.

Variable Number %
Location of treatment or medical advice
 Clinic 855 48.4%
 Urgent Care 157 8.9%
 Emergency Department 88 5.0%
 Mobile Clinic 71 4.0%
 Free Clinic 28 1.6%
Treatment used
 Vitamin C 825 46.7%
 Vitamin D 685 38.8%
 Zinc 636 36.0%
 Acetaminophen 546 30.9%
 NSAIDs (e.g., Ibuprofen or Naproxen) 522 29.5%
 Azithromycin 203 11.5%
 Dexamethasone or prednisone or inhaled budesonide 179 10.1%
 Aspirin 169 9.6%
 Monoclonal antibodies* 100 5.7%
 Ivermectin 50 2.8%
 Hydroxychloroquine 21 1.2%
 Oxygen 14 0.8%
 Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 13 0.7%
 Fluvoxamine 13 0.7%
 Remdesivir 10 0.6%
 Convalescent plasma 2 0.1%
 Colchicine 2 0.1%
 Molnupiravir 1 0.1%

(casiriviman-imdevimab, sotrovimab, and bamlanivimab-etesevimab.

Due to the timing of the survey, infection was most likely due to the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2, which might be less severe in those with prior immunity [5]. The most commonly used treatments were over-the-counter medications for symptom relief which are not FDA authorized for effective treatment of COVID-19. Few had received therapies known to reduce risk of disease progression like nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, molnupiravir, monoclonal antibodies, and remdesivir [4,6]. There were also continued reports of non-beneficial medication use, i.e., ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.

Individuals that recovered from COVID-19 before did not seem to have different behavior patterns when compared to those who were naïve to SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is possible that a history of COVID could be reassuring to individuals, therefore there was no change in treatment seeking behavior. Additionally, those with prior infection might have had milder symptoms due to their prior exposure to COVID-19 [7].

The main limitation of this study is that it is subject to response bias. Many of the eligible respondents did not provide survey data, so the results we found may be biased. Also, given that the survey was sent electronically and answered in an electronic format, it may have skewed responses to individuals that have better access to internet or better electronic literacy. Due to the timing of this survey, some medicines that have been found to be effective for COVID-19 may have not been available or medically rationed due to supply chain problems.

More public outreach is needed to raise awareness of the benefits of effective treatment for COVID-19 with FDA authorized treatments like nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, molnupiravir, monoclonal antibodies, and remdesivir, and limit the use of medications that are not effective for COVID-19. We found that people who were more aware about treatment for COVID-19 were more likely to seek medical advice or therapy, however the majority of individuals that had sought medical advice or therapy did not ultimately use effective treatments for COVID-19. Efforts to increase awareness of effective treatments for COVID-19 and their indications might increase the use of early effective treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection, while reducing the use of medications that do not provide benefit. Additionally, those who were contacted by a health professional were more likely to seek treatment or medical advice for COVID-19. Increased outreach with treatment facilitation from medical professionals and/or public health staff to those with newly detected SARS-CoV-2 infections, particularly among those at higher-risk of complications, might also be helpful to educate individuals about effective medications and non-effective medications for COVID-19.

Funding

Curative Inc. and by a gift to the Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California by the W.M. Keck Foundation.

Declaration of Competing Interest

NK is a consultant for Curative. MB and VS are employed by Curative. JDK is an independent consultant and serves as the Medical Director of Curative.

Acknowledgements

To the participants that donated their time.

References

  • 1.O'Brien M.P., Forleo-Neto E., Musser B.J., Isa F., Chan K.C., Sarkar N., Bar K.J., Barnabas R.V., Barouch D.H., Cohen M.S., Hurt C.B., Burwen D.R., Marovich M.A., Hou P., Heirman I., Davis J.D., Turner K.C., Ramesh D., Mahmood A., Hooper A.T., Hamilton J.D., Kim Y., Purcell L.A., Baum A., Kyratsous C.A., Krainson J., Perez-Perez R., Mohseni R., Kowal B., DiCioccio A.T., Stahl N., Lipsich L., Braunstein N., Herman G., Yancopoulos G.D., Weinreich D.M., T. Covid-19 Phase 3 Prevention Trial Subcutaneous REGEN-COV Antibody Combination to Prevent Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(13):1184–1195. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2109682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gupta A., Gonzalez-Rojas Y., Juarez E., Crespo Casal M., Moya J., Falci D.R., Sarkis E., Solis J., Zheng H., Scott N., Cathcart A.L., Hebner C.M., Sager J., Mogalian E., Tipple C., Peppercorn A., Alexander E., Pang P.S., Free A., Brinson C., Aldinger M., Shapiro A.E., C.-I. Investigators Early Treatment for Covid-19 with SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Sotrovimab. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(21):1941–1950. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Whitley R. Molnupiravir - A Step toward Orally Bioavailable Therapies for Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021 doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2117814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Reis G., Dos Santos Moreira-Silva E.A., Silva D.C.M., Thabane L., Milagres A.C., Ferreira T.S., Dos Santos C.V.Q., de Souza Campos V.H., Nogueira A.M.R., de Almeida A., Callegari E.D., de Figueiredo Neto A.D., Savassi L.C.M., Simplicio M.I.C., Ribeiro L.B., Oliveira R., Harari O., Forrest J.I., Ruton H., Sprague S., McKay P., Glushchenko A.V., Rayner C.R., Lenze E.J., Reiersen A.M., Guyatt G.H., Mills E.J., T. investigators Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of emergency care and hospitalisation among patients with COVID-19: the TOGETHER randomised, platform clinical trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2022;10(1):e42–e51. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00448-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Christie B. Covid-19: Early studies give hope omicron is milder than other variants. BMJ. 2021;375:n3144. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n3144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mahase E. Covid-19: Pfizer's paxlovid is 89% effective in patients at risk of serious illness, company reports. BMJ. 2021;375:n2713. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mallajosyula V., Ganjavi C., Chakraborty S., McSween A.M., Pavlovitch-Bedzyk A.J., Wilhelmy J., Nau A., Manohar M., Nadeau K.C., Davis M.M. CD8(+) T cells specific for conserved coronavirus epitopes correlate with milder disease in COVID-19 patients. Sci Immunol. 2021;6(61) doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abg5669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Respiratory Medicine and Research are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES