Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Jun 13;12:9811. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14027-x

Mesenchymal stem cells exert their anti-asthmatic effects through macrophage modulation in a murine chronic asthma model

Ruth Lee Kim 1,2,#, Ji-Young Bang 1,2,#, Jeonghyeon Kim 1,2, Yosep Mo 1,2, Yujin Kim 1,2, Chun-Geun Lee 3, Jack A Elias 3, Hye Young Kim 1,5, Hye-Ryun Kang 1,2,4,
PMCID: PMC9192777  PMID: 35697721

Abstract

Despite numerous previous studies, the full action mechanism of the pathogenesis of asthma remains undiscovered, and the need for further investigation is increasing in order to identify more effective target molecules. Recent attempts to develop more efficacious treatments for asthma have incorporated mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based cell therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the anti-asthmatic effects of MSCs primed with Liproxstatin-1, a potent ferroptosis inhibitor. In addition, we sought to examine the changes within macrophage populations and their characteristics in asthmatic conditions. Seven-week-old transgenic mice, constitutively overexpressing lung-specific interleukin (IL)-13, were used to simulate chronic asthma. Human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (hUC-MSCs) primed with Liproxstatin-1 were intratracheally administered four days prior to sampling. IL-13 transgenic mice demonstrated phenotypes of chronic asthma, including severe inflammation, goblet cell hyperplasia, and subepithelial fibrosis. Ly6C+M2 macrophages, found within the pro-inflammatory CD11c+CD11b+ macrophages, were upregulated and showed a strong correlation with lung eosinophil counts. Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs showed enhanced ability to downregulate the activation of T helper type 2 cells compared to naïve MSCs in vitro and reduced airway inflammation, particularly Ly6C+M2 macrophages population, and fibrosis in vivo. In conclusion, intratracheal administration is an effective method of MSC delivery, and macrophages hold great potential as an additional therapeutic target for asthma.

Subject terms: Innate immunity, Monocytes and macrophages, Immunology, Interleukins, Asthma, Stem-cell therapies, Mesenchymal stem cells

Introduction

Asthma, characterized by airway hyperresponsiveness, shortness of breath, and excessive mucus production, is a chronic airway inflammatory disease that shows an increasing prevalence rate every year1. Advanced research in drug development and drug delivery has led to improvements in asthma treatment for the past 50 years. However, currently available drugs still face issues of limited efficacy, sustained morbidity, and notable adverse effects2.

Recent attempts to develop a more efficacious treatment for asthma have incorporated mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), multipotent stromal cells that have extensive abilities to differentiate into a variety of cell types. Their cross-species immunosuppressive activities and reparative immunoregulatory properties make them an attractive therapeutic agent for asthma3,4, and many studies have successfully demonstrated the anti-inflammatory and anti-asthmatic effects of MSCs with various origins, dosages, and frequencies. Early studies, however, were limited to injecting the MSCs intravenously5,6. This method, however, possesses a disadvantage in delivery efficiency, as a large number of cells are lost before reaching the lung7. To address this limitation, an intratracheal administration method was introduced, targeted to improve the delivery efficacy and augment the therapeutic effects of the MSCs.

Another method that attempts to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs is priming, exposing the MSCs to diverse molecules prior to administration. MSCs with high glutathione (GSH) have an improved stem cell function and showed an enhanced therapeutic effect in asthma8,9. Liproxstatin-1, a known ferroptosis inhibitor, can enhance stem cell function by effectively suppressing lipid peroxidation10. Therefore, we hypothesized that Liproxstatin-1 could improve the therapeutic effect of stem cells on asthma by reducing reactive oxygen species mediated damage in the membrane lipid of MSC.

Although the underlying mechanisms leading to the pathology of asthma are still unclear, it has long been considered a T helper type 2 (TH2)-dominant disease11,12. Interleukin (IL)-13, one of the most predominant TH2 cytokines, is known to play pivotal roles in exhibiting asthmatic phenotypes, including, but not limited to, eosinophilia in the respiratory organs, mucus hypersecretion, and airway remodeling. Consistent with findings in animal models, it has been clinically proven that asthma patients showed elevated levels of IL-13 in the blood and sputum1316. Reduced IL-13 secretion from TH2 cells, however, does not always lead to an alleviation of asthma. Here, we hypothesized that there exists another cell population that induces TH2-like responses and contributes significantly to the pathogenesis of asthma. M2 macrophages, characterized by their expression of Mrc1, Arg1, and Chil3 are well-qualified candidates as they secrete IL-13, are known to activate T cells13,17,18 and are upregulated in the blood of asthma patients19,20.

Using a murine chronic asthma model with genetically modified transgenic (TG) mice that constitutively overexpress IL-13 in the lung, the study aimed to evaluate the anti-asthmatic effects of human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (hUC-MSCs) primed with Liproxstatin-1. Additionally, we sought to further evaluate the changes within macrophage populations and their characteristics in asthmatic conditions.

Results

Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs reduced airway inflammation and fibrosis in a murine chronic asthma model

In this study, we used Liproxstatin-1-primed MSCs since Liproxstatin-1-primed MSCs have been shown to exhibit enhanced overall potential anti-asthmatic capacities compared to naïve MSCs, and their therapeutic effects were retained in xenogeneic recipients. (Figs. S1, S2).

The anti-asthmatic abilities of Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs were further assessed using a murine model of chronic asthma. Compared to the healthy control group, the disease control group showed a significant increase in total inflammatory cell counts with a rise in the numbers of macrophages, neutrophils, and eosinophils in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid (Fig. 1A–C). No significant difference was observed between the two Wild type (WT) mice groups. Among the two disease groups, the MSC-treated IL-13 mice showed a significant decrease in the numbers of all analyzed cell types, especially eosinophils.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs alleviated airway inflammation mitigated pulmonary fibrosis in vivo. (a) Shows the result of total cell counts and (b) shows differential counts of macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils, and lymphocytes in BAL fluid. (c) Shows microscopic images of Diff-Quick-stained slides of cytocentrifuged BAL fluid (× 40). Samples from IL-13 TG groups were diluted with doubled amount of PBS compared with the samples from the wild type groups. (de) shows histological comparison between the groups at a power of 20. H&E (d) and PAS (e) stains were used. (f) Shows Masson’s Trichrome-stained slides of each group at low power (× 20). (gh) shows semi-quantitative grading results of H&E staining (g) and PAS staining (h). Sircol collagen assay was performed to quantify the soluble collagen contents in the homogenates of the lungs (i). (jn) represents relative gene expressions of Muc5ac (j), Fgf1 (k), Fn1 (l), Mmp-9 (m), and Mmp-12 (n) compared to the housekeeping, Gapdh. Each value in these panels is from a different individual and the mean ± SEM are illustrated. All results are representative of at least three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, ns not significant. (by Kruskal–Wallis test using GraphPad Prism 7, https://www.graphpad.com).

In accordance with the BAL fluid differential count data, histological analysis with Hematoxylin/eosin (H&E) staining displayed slight decrease of inflammatory cell recruitment around the vessels and airways in the MSC-treated disease group, compared to the disease control group (Fig. 1D,G). The quasi-absence of goblet cell hyperplasia (Fig. 1E,H) and the reduced gene expression of Muc5ac, a gene linked to mucus secretion, in the MSC-treated IL-13 TG mice (Fig. 1J) also indicated that Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs exert anti-inflammatory effects in a murine model of chronic asthma.

Masson's trichrome (MT)-stained slides revealed excessive collagen deposition in the airway of the disease control group. In the MSC-treated disease group, on the other hand, a significant reduction of the collagen fibers was observed (Fig. 1F), and the Sircol assay confirmed that approximately 30% of soluble collagen was reduced in the disease group upon MSC injection (Fig. 1I). A remarkable downregulation in the mRNA levels of airway remodeling-related genes, such as fibrosis growth factor-1 (Fgf-1), fibronectin-1 (Fn-1), matrix metallopeptidase-9 (Mmp-9), and Mmp-12, in the MSC-treated IL-13 TG mice confirmed that Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs not only mitigated inflammation, but also abated airway remodeling at the genetic level (Fig. 1K–N).

Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs led to alterations in lung macrophage populations

The most evident differences between the WT and IL-13 TG mice were observed within the macrophage populations. The disease control group showed diminished CD11bintF4/80high macrophage counts and a nearly doubled number of CD11bhighF4/80int macrophages compared to those of the wild-type groups (Fig. 2A–C). Upon administration of Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs, partial recovery of the dissipated CD11bintF4/80high macrophage population and downregulation of CD11bhighF4/80int macrophages were observed in the IL-13 TG mice, indicating that Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs caused alterations in the macrophage populations in the lung.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs altered macrophage populations in the lung. (a) Flow cytometry data showing two distinct macrophage populations that differ by levels of CD11b and F4/80 expression. Numbers represent percentages among total CD45+ leukocytes, excluding SiglecF+CD11c eosinophils. Based on the flow cytometry representations shown in (a), percentages of CD11bhighF4/80int macrophages (b) and CD11bintF4/80high macrophages (c) are each portrayed in graphs. (d) Represents a histogram of Ly6C and CX3CR1 expression levels of CD11bintF4/80high macrophages and CD11bhighF4/80int macrophages. (e) Represents the MFI of Ly6C of CD11bhighF4/80int macrophages and (f) shows the MFI of CX3CR1 of CD11bintF4/80high macrophages. (g) Shows the percentages of Ly6+ macrophages among CD11bhighF4/80int macrophages. Flow cytometry data were analyzed by the FlowJo Software v10.6, https://www.flowjo.com. Each value in these panels is from a different individual and the mean ± SEM are illustrated. All results are representative of at least three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, ns not significant. (by Kruskal–Wallis test using GraphPad Prism 7, https://www.graphpad.com).

To further characterize the CD11bintF4/80high macrophages and the CD11bhighF4/80int macrophages, the expression levels of Ly6C and CX3CR1 were analyzed, in order to distinguish between different macrophage populations21. All CD11bintF4/80high macrophages from the healthy control group expressed low levels of Ly6C and high levels of CX3CR1. On the other hand, CD11bhighF4/80int macrophages were divided into Ly6C+ and Ly6C populations and their CX3CR1 expression levels were low regardless of their Ly6C expression (Fig. 2D). The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CD11bhighF4/80intLy6C+ macrophages, as well as the percentages of CD11bhighF4/80intLy6C+ macrophages, were upregulated in the disease control group, and that of CD11bintF4/80highCX3CR1+ macrophages remained constant in all groups. Both the MFI and the percentages of CD11bhighF4/80intLy6C+ macrophages showed a significant reduction upon intratracheal administration of hUC-MSCs (Fig. 2E–G).

CD11c+CD11b+ macrophages are upregulated in asthmatic conditions

CD11bint to CD11bhigh macrophages were then subdivided based on CD11c expression. In the wild-type mice groups, the CD11c+CD11b macrophages constituted approximately 20%–25% of the total macrophages, in contrast to the two disease groups where they constituted less than 5% of the population (Fig. 3A,B). This population has a correspondence with SiglecF+CD11c+ macrophage population which is regarded as resident alveolar macrophages (Fig. S3). The majority of the macrophages in the disease groups were found to express both CD11c and CD11b, which showed a remarkable decrease after MSC injection (Fig. 3A,C). In accordance with the CD11c+CD11b+ macrophages, lung eosinophils counts were elevated in IL-13 TG mice and were downregulated upon MSC treatment (Fig. 3D). When the CD11c+CD11b+ macrophages were further characterized by their SiglecF expression, that of both wild-type groups showed high SiglecF expression, whereas those of the disease control group showed low expression. In the disease group injected with Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC MSCs, a co-existence of SiglecF+ and SiglecF- macrophages was discovered (Fig. 3E,F). Although the observation was not statistically significant, the phenomenon was clearly represented by two distinct peaks in the histograms produced by flow cytometry. The conspicuous difference in SiglecF expression between the WT and IL-13 TG mice was not seen in the rest of the populations.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs caused a reduction in the number of CD11c+CD11b+ pro-inflammatory macrophages. (a) shows a flow cytometric representation of macrophage populations divided into four groups by their expression of CD11b and CD11c. (b, c) show percentages of CD11c+CD11b (b) and CD11c+CD11b+ macrophages (c) among total macrophages. (d) Percentage of lung eosinophils out of total CD45+ cells are represented in (d). (e) shows the absolute counts of CD11c+CD11b+SiglecF+ macrophages and (f) represents a histogram of SiglecF expressions of CD11c+CD11b+, CD11cCD11b+, CD11c+CD11b, and CD11cCD11b macrophages. Flow cytometry data were analyzed by the FlowJo Software v10.6, https://www.flowjo.com. Each value in these panels is from a different individual and the mean ± SEM are illustrated. All results are representative of at least three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ns, not significant. (by Kruskal–Wallis test using GraphPad Prism 7, https://www.graphpad.com).

Ly6C+M2 macrophages among CD11c+CD11b+ macrophages are potential markers for asthma

Next, the polarization status of CD11c+CD11b+ macrophages was assessed. To avoid a possible misleading interpretation, the F4/80+ CD11c+CD11b alveolar macrophages were excluded, as they express surface markers for both M1 and M2 macrophages. CD86+CD206 M1, CD86CD206+ M2, and CD86+CD206+ types of CD11c+CD11b+ macrophages were upregulated in the disease control group. IL-13 TG mice that received hUC-MSCs showed reductions in M2 macrophages and CD86+CD206+ populations (Fig. 4A–D). M2 macrophages expressed more IL-5 than M1 macrophages (Fig. 4E). It was found that neither M1 nor M2 macrophages from the healthy WT groups showed upregulated Ly6C expression. The disease groups, on the other hand, showed inflated Ly6C expression levels in the M2 macrophages, while showing no changes within the M1 macrophages (Fig. 4F). These results suggested that M2 macrophages adopt Ly6C expression under IL-13 enriched conditions. It was also found that the ratio of the Ly6C+M2 macrophages was significantly lower in the disease group treated with MSC injection than in the disease group without MSC injection (Fig. 4G–H), implying that the Ly6C+M2 macrophages may be highly associated with the pathogenesis of asthma and the therapeutic mechanism of hUC-MSCs.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Ly6C+M2 macrophages are key mediators of asthmatic phenotypes. (a) Flow cytometric data on M1 and M2 macrophages of CD11c+CD11b+ macrophages. The percentages of CD86+CD206 M1 (b), CD86CD206+ M2 macrophages (c), and CD86+CD206+ macrophages (d) are represented in scatter plots. (e) the MFI of IL-5 in CD86+CD206 M1 and CD86CD206+ M2 macrophages in IL-13 TG mice. (f) Shows Ly6C expression levels in M1 and M2 macrophages of WT and IL-13 TG mice. (g, h) shows the ratio of Ly6C+M2 and LY6CM2 macrophage populations among the CD11c+CD11b+ macrophages. Flow cytometry data were analyzed by the FlowJo Software v10.6, https://www.flowjo.com. Each value in these panels is from a different individual and the mean ± SEM are illustrated. All results are representative of at least three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ns not significant. (by Kruskal–Wallis test using GraphPad Prism 7, https://www.graphpad.com).

The anti-asthmatic effects of liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs were carried out by macrophages

To confirm the direct effects of hUC-MSCs on macrophage polarization, ex vivo alveolar macrophages (Fig. 5A) and bone marrow-derived macrophages (Fig. 5B,C) obtained from WT C57BL/6 mice were stimulated with IL-13 and co-cultured with/without Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs. The data suggested that MSCs can work solely with M2 macrophages to reduce expression of genes related to M2 polarization and airway remodeling, which together mitigate chronic asthma (Fig. 5A,B). Whereas, expression of Nos2, M1 macrophages related gene in bone marrow-derived macrophages, was upregulated by MSC (Fig. 5C).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Effects of Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs on murine macrophages. (ac) Murine macrophages were co-cultured with hUC-MSCs in a trans-well system and ex vivo alveolar macrophages (a) and bone marrow-derived macrophages (b, c) were subjected to RT-qPCR analysis for mRNA evaluation of markers of polarized macrophages. Gapdh and Hprt1 were used as internal controls. Values in all the panels are mean ± SEM. All results are representative of at least three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ns stands for not significantly different (by Kruskal Wallis test using GraphPad Prism 7, https://www.graphpad.com). Il-13 interleukin 13, Mmp-12 matrix metallopeptidase 12, Tgf-β transforming growth factor beta.

Discussion

In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic abilities of Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs against chronic asthmatic conditions and elucidated their effects on the modulation of macrophage phenotypes.

Starting from an in vitro experiment with human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC), this study proved that Liproxstatin-1-primed MSCs, compared to naïve MSCs, exerted greater abilities to inhibit activation of TH2 and TH17 cells and to promote differentiation into Tregs. As TH2 and TH17 cells are known to significantly contribute to asthmatic phenotypes2226, it was proven that Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs hold a greater therapeutic potential for treating asthma than do naïve MSCs.

Through in vivo studies with IL-13 TG mice displaying a majority of the features seen in chronic asthma patients, we confirmed the intratracheal delivery method retained anti-asthmatic abilities, while ensuring the absence of xenogeneic effects, as already proven by previous studies27,28. Intratracheal injection of Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs into IL-13 TG mice resulted in a remarkable decrease in eosinophil and other immune cell infiltrations into the respiratory tissues. Reduced mucus production and assuaged airway remodeling further substantiated the ability of Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs to mitigate asthma in vivo.

We also corroborated that macrophages play key roles in the pathogenesis of asthma. The constitutive IL-13 overexpressing mice showed no signs of activation or proliferation of T cells and innate lymphoid cells (ILC) (data not shown), indicating that the observed anti-asthmatic and anti-fibrotic effects of Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs were not mainly manifested through changes in T cells or ILCs, as is commonly acknowledged in allergen asthma models. Here, we presumed that there must be other cell types that are activated by excess IL-13. Macrophages are one of the top candidates, as their polarization status is known to be altered under asthmatic conditions and they are also highly associated with TH2 cells18. We hypothesized that the changes in macrophage modulation could partially explain the anti-asthmatic responses of Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs that cannot be explained by TH2 cells or ILCs.

A pronounced difference in macrophages was noted between the healthy and disease groups, as we hypothesized. The CD11bhighF4/80int macrophages, which were nearly doubled in the IL-13 TG mice, were further divided into two distinct populations: Ly6Chigh monocyte-derived pro-inflammatory macrophages and homeostatic Ly6Clow interstitial macrophages29,30. The CD11bhighF4/80intLy6Chigh macrophages showed low levels of CX3CR1, which corresponded to the phenotypes of pro-inflammatory classical monocytes that differentiate into macrophages upon detecting extravasation of pro-inflammatory cytokines31,32. The population in the disease control group showed that CD11bhighF4/80intLy6Chigh macrophages may reflect, at least to some extent, the severity of asthma. The IL-13 TG mice also showed an increased population of CD11c+CD11b+ macrophages, which are pro-inflammatory and secrete IL-6, IL-12, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α33,34. Their strong correlation with lung eosinophils suggests that this population may be in charge of crosstalk with TH2 cells, which leads to asthmatic phenotypes.

SiglecF is a marker specific for murine lung-resident alveolar macrophages that is not expressed by interstitial or inflammatory macrophages35,36. Eosinophils also express SiglecF but can be differentiated by their lack of CD11c expression differently from macrophages. Although the function of SiglecF on macrophages is not fully understood, it is often used as a marker for immunoregulation in inflammatory environments since SiglecF-expressing alveolar macrophages are mainly associated with maintaining homeostasis and their absence aggravate lung inflammation37,38. The homeostatic role of alveolar macrophages is well known by macrophage depletion experiments with clodronate, which resulted in the increase of eosinophils and the concentration of Th2 cytokines in BAL fluid39. In addition, the adoptive transfer of alveolar macrophages abrogated bronchial hyperresponsiveness40. In our experiment, CD11c+CD11b- macrophages, the main population expressing SiglecF in wild type control, were depleted in IL-13 TG mice. In addition, CD11c+CD11b+ macrophages also expressed SiglecF in a lesser degree in wild type control, which was abrogated in IL-13 TG mice but restored by intratracheal MSCs. Therefore, the recovery of SiglecF+ macrophages by MSCs in IL-13 TG mice might contribute to anti-asthmatic effect in part by replenishing homeostatic alveolar macrophages.

The polarization status of the CD11c+CD11b+ macrophages revealed that Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs resulted in a reduction of both M1 and M2 CD11c+CD11b+ macrophage population sizes. Additionally, CD86+CD206+ populations showed the same trends in both M1 and M2 macrophages: upregulated in the disease control group and downregulated upon MSC injection. This population was inferred to be alveolar macrophage-derived populations as they express both CD86 and CD206, but further studies are needed to investigate their origins. Together with the phenotypic alterations observed in CD11c+CD11b+ macrophages, it can be suggested that the MSCs stimulate phenotype shifts among macrophages towards a healthy status.

Among CD11c+CD11b+ macrophages, the M2 populations were also upregulated in the disease control group, which was consistent with the trends observed in the clinical data of the asthma patients13,18. The administration of the Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs resulted in a significant reduction in the M2 macrophage population, while causing no notable change in the M1 macrophage population. This could be controversial, as M2 macrophages are generally considered to play regulatory roles and are involved in wound healing41. However, recent studies have revealed that asthma has also been found to be associated with an upregulation of M2 macrophages19,20, and M2 macrophages are known to express MRC1 on their surface and secrete FGF, Transforming growth factor- β (TGF-β), and MMP, which are highly associated with the airway remodeling seen in chronic asthma patients4244. Arg1 downregulated by MSC in M2 macrophages is known to contribute to the pathogenesis of asthma by inducing cytokine secretion in asthmatic conditions45 Furthermore, the effect of MSCs might be related to the reduction of Chil3 on macrophages contributing to the development of eosinophilic lung inflammation and expression of Th2 cytokines46,47.

It was found that M2 macrophages exhibit high Ly6C expression only under disease conditions, and Ly6C is often appreciated as a marker for pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic phenotypes48. As Ly6Chigh monocytes have been shown to acquire both inflammatory and regulatory phenotypes depending on exposure to the milieu49, it can be understood that Ly6CM2 macrophages of wild-type mice may be devoted to maintaining homeostasis50, whereas the Ly6C+M2 macrophages of the IL-13 TG mice may have adapted pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic phenotypes in response to the asthmatic environment. When the Ly6C+M2 macrophages of the total macrophages were back-traced, it was found that the majority were positioned within the CD11c+CD11b+ regions (data not shown). A strong correlation between the Ly6C+M2 macrophages and lung eosinophil counts substantiated that the population may be highly associated with TH2 cells, which appear to play key roles in the aggravation of asthma.

This study has some limitations. First, although we proved that MSCs can directly suppress M2 activation, the exact mechanism was not revealed in this study. Second, we have emphasized the importance of Ly6C+M2 macrophages in the pathogenesis of asthma, but the direct immunologic effect of Ly6C+M2 macrophages has not been proven experimentally. Additional experimentation will be required to address these limitations. It is also important to note that the exact mechanism or signaling pathway that Liproxstatin-1-priming uses to enhance the functionality of naïve MSCs in anti-asthmatic activity. Although we speculate that the anti-oxidant activity of Liproxstatin-1 as an inhibitor of ferroptosis, further clarification of Liproxstatin-1 regulation of MSCs functionality would be important and needs to be determined through additional experimental settings and advanced analytic tools such as single cell or bulk expression profiling.

In conclusion, this study demonstrated the anti-asthmatic effects of Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs and spotlighted the Ly6C+M2 macrophage-directed explanations of the pathogenesis of asthma. The study elucidated that the altered modulation in macrophage populations resulting from the MSC treatment could partially uncover the pathogenesis of asthma and, therefore, we suggest that macrophages may be considered as an additional therapeutic target for asthma.

Materials and methods

Liproxstatin-1-primed human umbilical cord-derived MSCs

MSCs were primed with Liproxstatin-1 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at a 10:1 ratio 24 h prior to injection.

IL-13 TG mice

The transgenic mice were generated and kindly donated by Professor Jack A. Elias (Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Brown University, RI, USA)42,51.

Preparation of the animal model and MSC injection

Seven-week-old WT and IL-13 TG C57BL/6 mice were intratracheally injected with PBS or Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs (1 × 105/50 µL), resulting in four experimental groups: a healthy control group (WT/PBS), an MSC-treated healthy group (WT/MSC), a disease control group (IL-13 TG/PBS), and an MSC-treated disease group (IL-13 TG/MSC). The mice were sacrificed four days after MSC treatment. WT or IL-13 TG C57BL/6 mice were injected intraperitoneally with a mixture of 90 mg/kg ketamine and 10 mg/kg xylazine before sacrifice, and BAL fluid and lung samples were collected for analysis.

Collection of BAL fluid

The trachea of the mice was exposed, and the lavage was performed twice with 1 mL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) through an incision made in the upper trachea. BAL fluid samples were cytocentrifugated and the pellets obtained were placed on slides for differential cell counting. Further preparation methods are introduced in the online method sections.

Histological analysis

H&E, periodic acid Schiff52, or MT staining processes were performed by experts at the pathology core facility at the Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute.

Collagen assay

A Sircol Soluble Collagen Assay kit (Biocolor, Antrim, U.K.) was purchased and subsequent steps followed the protocols provided by the manufacturer without any modification.

Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was isolated with Trizol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA.) and chloroform, and reverse transcription was performed with the SensiFAST cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bioline, London, U.K.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-qPCR was performed using the SensiFAST SYBR No-ROX Kit (Bioline, London, U.K.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each gene was normalized to the expression level of the housekeeping gene Gapdh, Hprt1 and the relative gene expression was calculated using the − ΔΔCt method. The primers used in this study are listed in Supplemental Table I.

Flow cytometry

Minced lung tissues were incubated in 5 mL of RPMI1640 with 10% Type IV collagenase (Worthington Biochemical Corporation, Lakewood, NJ, USA) at 37 °C for 90 min and sorted through a sterile cell strainer for single cell preparation. Cells were blocked with Fc receptor binding inhibitor antibody at room temperature for 5 min, and then incubated with fluorochrome-labelled antibodies against cell surface markers for 30 min at 4 °C. All antibodies were purchased from BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA). Flow cytometry was performed with the BD LSRFortessa X-20 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and analyzed using FlowJo v10.6 software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA; https://www.flowjo.com).

Co-culture of MSCs with human peripheral blood mononuclear cell

Heparinized blood samples from house dust mite-sensitized allergic rhinitis patients were kindly donated for research purposes only. Samples were prepared as previously reported53. The experiment with human samples followed the guidelines of the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University. 1 × 105 PBMCs and 10 ng/mL of house dust mite (HDM) extracts (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Derp-1); Stallergenes Greer, Cambridge, MA, USA) were seeded in a well plate coated with 0.5 μg/mL of CD3 and 1 μg/mL of CD28 for 24 h at 4 °C. After another 24 h incubation at 37 °C, Liproxstatin-1-primed hUC-MSCs were added at a 1:1 ratio. Activated PBMCs were co-cultured with MSCs for 48 h at 37 °C and harvested for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).

Culture of AMJ2-C11

1 × 105 cells of alveolar macrophage cell line (AMJ2-C11; ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were seeded in a well plate. After 6 h, the cells were treated either with PBS or 20 ng/mL of recombinant IL-13 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). Naïve or Liproxstatin-1 primed-MSCs were added 12 h later. The cells were harvested after another 24 h.

Culture of ex vivo murine alveolar macrophages and bone marrow-derived macrophages

1 × 105 of ex vivo murine alveolar macrophages obtained from WT C57BL/6 mice were co-cultured with hUC-MSCs in a trans-well with a pore density of 0.4 μm (Corning, Corning, NY, USA). Six hours after seeding hUC-MSCs in the top chambers, cells in the bottom chambers were treated either with PBS or 20 ng/mL of recombinant IL-13 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). Cells were harvested 24 h after treatment for evaluation.

1 × 105 of ex vivo bone marrow cells obtained from the WT C57BL/6 mouse were seeded and stimulated by 25 ng/mL of macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) with or without 1 × 104 cell of hUC-MSCs for 5 days. Cells were treated either with PBS or 20 ng/mL of recombinant IL-13 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). Cells were harvested after another 24 h.

Statistical analysis

All statistical and graphic data were presented with Kruskal–Wallis analysis using GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA, https://www.graphpad.com) unless stated otherwise. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical approval

All hUC-MSCs used in this study were cultured, prepared, and primed by Professor In-kyu Kim's laboratory (College of Biomedicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea) with the approval of the Seoul National University Hospital’s Institutional Review Board (SNUH IRB No. 1708-083-878). All the experiment involving human subjects was also carried out by the approval of the Seoul National University Hospital’s Institutional Review Board (SNUH IRB No. 2006-142-113) in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and blood samples were collected after obtaining written informed consent from the patients. The experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources at Seoul National University (IACUC No. SNU-200525-1-1). Less than Five mice were housed in each cage under standard conditions of temperature and humidity, according to the guidelines of Biomedical Center for Animal Resource Development at the Seoul National University in compliance with ARRIVE guideline and regulations.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2017M3A9B4061887).

Author contributions

R.L.K. performed the experiments, wrote the main manuscript text, and prepared figures. J.-Y.B. performed the experiments, prepared figures, curated data, and revised the manuscript. J.K. assisted in performing the main experiments, and curated data. Y.M. participated in the experiment for revision and curated data. Y.K. participated in the experiment for revision and curated data. C.-G.L. supported performing the experiments and supervised writing the manuscript. J.A.E. supported performing the experiments and writing the manuscript. H.Y.K. supported performing the experiments and writing the manuscript. H.-R.K. conceptualized the idea, supervised the experiment, and supported the experiments, and co-wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Ruth Lee Kim and Ji-Young Bang.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-14027-x.

References

  • 1.Caress SM, Steinemann AC. Asthma and chemical hypersensitivity: Prevalence, etiology, and age of onset. Toxicol. Ind. Health. 2009;25:71–78. doi: 10.1177/0748233709102713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tattersfield AE. Limitations of current treatment. Lancet. 1997;350(Suppl 2):24–27. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)90033-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mathias LJ, et al. Alveolar macrophages are critical for the inhibition of allergic asthma by mesenchymal stromal cells. J. Immunol. 2013;191:5914–5924. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhou Y, Yamamoto Y, Xiao Z, Ochiya T. The immunomodulatory functions of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells mediated via paracrine activity. J. Clin. Med. 2019;8:1025. doi: 10.3390/jcm8071025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang CY, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells without c-Myc reduce airway responsiveness and allergic reaction in sensitized mice. Transplantation. 2013;96:958–965. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a53ef7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ou-Yang HF, Huang Y, Hu XB, Wu CG. Suppression of allergic airway inflammation in a mouse model of asthma by exogenous mesenchymal stem cells. Exp. Biol. Med. 2011;236:1461–1467. doi: 10.1258/ebm.2011.011221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Abreu SC, et al. Bone marrow mononuclear cell therapy in experimental allergic asthma: Intratracheal versus intravenous administration. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2013;185:615–624. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2012.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jeong EM, et al. Real-time monitoring of glutathione in living cells reveals that high glutathione levels are required to maintain stem cell function. Stem Cell Rep. 2018;10:600–614. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lim J, et al. Glutathione dynamics determine the therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells for graft-versus-host disease via CREB1-NRF2 pathway. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:1334. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba1334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang B, et al. Liproxstatin-1 attenuates unilateral ureteral obstruction-induced renal fibrosis by inhibiting renal tubular epithelial cells ferroptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-03229-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fort MM, et al. IL-25 induces IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 and Th2-associated pathologies in vivo. Immunity. 2001;15:985–995. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00243-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Paul WE, Zhu J. How are T(H)2-type immune responses initiated and amplified? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010;10:225–235. doi: 10.1038/nri2735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Girodet PO, et al. Alternative macrophage activation is increased in asthma. Am. J. Respir. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2016;55:467–475. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2015-0295OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Berry MA, et al. Sputum and bronchial submucosal IL-13 expression in asthma and eosinophilic bronchitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2004;114:1106–1109. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.08.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Alasandagutti ML, Ansari MS, Sagurthi SR, Valluri V, Gaddam S. Role of IL-13 genetic variants in signalling of asthma. Inflammation. 2017;40:566–577. doi: 10.1007/s10753-016-0503-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wong CK, et al. Proinflammatory cytokines (IL-17, IL-6, IL-18 and IL-12) and Th cytokines (IFN-gamma, IL-4, IL-10 and IL-13) in patients with allergic asthma. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2001;125:177–183. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2001.01602.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brinchmann BC, et al. A possible role of chitin in the pathogenesis of asthma and allergy. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2011;18:7–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Martinez FO, Helming L, Gordon S. Alternative activation of macrophages: An immunologic functional perspective. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2009;27:451–483. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Qian F, et al. The transcription factor PU1 promotes alternative macrophage polarization and asthmatic airway inflammation. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015;7:557–567. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjv042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Goplen N, et al. Combined sensitization of mice to extracts of dust mite, ragweed, and Aspergillus species breaks through tolerance and establishes chronic features of asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009;123:925–932. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Geissmann F, Jung S, Littman DR. Blood monocytes consist of two principal subsets with distinct migratory properties. Immunity. 2003;19:71–82. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00174-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bosnjak B, Stelzmueller B, Erb KJ, Epstein MM. Treatment of allergic asthma: Modulation of Th2 cells and their responses. Respir. Res. 2011;12:114. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-12-114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jiang Z, Zhu L. Update on the role of alternatively activated macrophages in asthma. J. Asthma Allergy. 2016;9:101–107. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S104508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Al-Ramli W, et al. T(H)17-associated cytokines (IL-17A and IL-17F) in severe asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009;123:1185–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Newcomb DC, et al. Human TH17 cells express a functional IL-13 receptor and IL-13 attenuates IL-17A production. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011;127(1006–1013):e1001–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.11.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chien JW, et al. Increased IL-17A secreting CD4+ T cells, serum IL-17 levels and exhaled nitric oxide are correlated with childhood asthma severity. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2013;43:1018–1026. doi: 10.1111/cea.12119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li J, Ezzelarab MB, Cooper DK. Do mesenchymal stem cells function across species barriers? Relevance for xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation. 2012;19:273–285. doi: 10.1111/xen.12000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mansilla E, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells are tolerized by mice and improve skin and spinal cord injuries. Transplant. Proc. 2005;37:292–294. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.01.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Landsman L, Jung S. Lung macrophages serve as obligatory intermediate between blood monocytes and alveolar macrophages. J. Immunol. 2007;179:3488–3494. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.6.3488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schyns J, Bureau F, Marichal T. Lung interstitial macrophages: Past, present, and future. J. Immunol. Res. 2018;2018:5160794. doi: 10.1155/2018/5160794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rahman K, et al. Inflammatory Ly6Chi monocytes and their conversion to M2 macrophages drive atherosclerosis regression. J. Clin. Invest. 2017;127:2904–2915. doi: 10.1172/JCI75005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bianchini M, et al. PD-L1 expression on nonclassical monocytes reveals their origin and immunoregulatory function. Sci. Immunol. 2019;4:3054. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aar3054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lafuse WP, et al. Identification of an increased alveolar macrophage subpopulation in old mice that displays unique inflammatory characteristics and is permissive to mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J. Immunol. 2019;203:2252–2264. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1900495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Duan M, et al. CD11b immunophenotyping identifies inflammatory profiles in the mouse and human lungs. Mucosal. Immunol. 2016;9:550–563. doi: 10.1038/mi.2015.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Macauley MS, Crocker PR, Paulson JC. Siglec-mediated regulation of immune cell function in disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014;14:653–666. doi: 10.1038/nri3737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Joshi N, et al. A spatially restricted fibrotic niche in pulmonary fibrosis is sustained by M-CSF/M-CSFR signalling in monocyte-derived alveolar macrophages. Eur. Respir. J. 2020;55:1900646. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00646-2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Misharin AV, Morales-Nebreda L, Mutlu GM, Budinger GR, Perlman H. Flow cytometric analysis of macrophages and dendritic cell subsets in the mouse lung. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2013;49:503–510. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2013-0086MA. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Feng YH, Mao H. Expression and preliminary functional analysis of Siglec-F on mouse macrophages. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B. 2012;13:386–394. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1100218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bang B-R, et al. Alveolar macrophages modulate allergic inflammation in a murine model of asthma. Exp. Mol. Med. 2011;43:275–280. doi: 10.3858/emm.2011.43.5.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Careau E, Bissonnette EY. Adoptive transfer of alveolar macrophages abrogates bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2004;31:22–27. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2003-0229OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jantsch J, Binger KJ, Muller DN, Titze J. Macrophages in homeostatic immune function. Front. Physiol. 2014;5:146. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zheng T, et al. Inducible targeting of IL-13 to the adult lung causes matrix metalloproteinase- and cathepsin-dependent emphysema. J. Clin. Invest. 2000;106:1081–1093. doi: 10.1172/JCI10458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fehrenbach H, Wagner C, Wegmann M. Airway remodeling in asthma: what really matters. Cell Tissue Res. 2017;367:551–569. doi: 10.1007/s00441-016-2566-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Khalil N, Xu YD, O'Connor R, Duronio V. Proliferation of pulmonary interstitial fibroblasts is mediated by transforming growth factor-beta1-induced release of extracellular fibroblast growth factor-2 and phosphorylation of p38 MAPK and JNK. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:43000–43009. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M510441200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cloots RH, et al. Arginase 1 deletion in myeloid cells affects the inflammatory response in allergic asthma, but not lung mechanics, in female mice. BMC Pulm. Med. 2017;17:1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0490-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Draijer C, Robbe P, Boorsma CE, Hylkema MN, Melgert BN. Dual role of YM1+ M2 macrophages in allergic lung inflammation. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23269-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cai Y, Kumar RK, Zhou J, Foster PS, Webb DC. Ym1/2 promotes Th2 cytokine expression by inhibiting 12/15 (S)-lipoxygenase: Identification of a novel pathway for regulating allergic inflammation. J. Immunol. 2009;182:5393–5399. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Borthwick LA, et al. Macrophages are critical to the maintenance of IL-13-dependent lung inflammation and fibrosis. Mucosal. Immunol. 2016;9:38–55. doi: 10.1038/mi.2015.34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Grainger JR, et al. Inflammatory monocytes regulate pathologic responses to commensals during acute gastrointestinal infection. Nat. Med. 2013;19:713–721. doi: 10.1038/nm.3189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yang J, Zhang L, Yu C, Yang XF, Wang H. Monocyte and macrophage differentiation: Circulation inflammatory monocyte as biomarker for inflammatory diseases. Biomark. Res. 2014;2:1–9. doi: 10.1186/2050-7771-2-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhu Z, et al. IL-13-induced chemokine responses in the lung: Role of CCR2 in the pathogenesis of IL-13-induced inflammation and remodeling. J. Immunol. 2002;168:2953–2962. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.6.2953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zotzel J, et al. Activated transglutaminase from Streptomyces mobaraensis is processed by a tripeptidyl aminopeptidase in the final step. Eur. J. Biochem. 2003;270:4149–4155. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03809.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Corkum CP, et al. Immune cell subsets and their gene expression profiles from human PBMC isolated by vacutainer cell preparation tube (CPT™) and standard density gradient. BMC Immunol. 2015;16:1–18. doi: 10.1186/s12865-015-0113-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES