Skip to main content
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology logoLink to Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
. 2022 May 31;10:920162. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.920162

Progress of Nanomaterials in Photodynamic Therapy Against Tumor

Lei Chen 1,, Jiahui Huang 2,, Xiaotong Li 3, Miaoting Huang 3, Shaoting Zeng 3, Jiayi Zheng 3, Shuyi Peng 3, Shiying Li 4,*
PMCID: PMC9194820  PMID: 35711646

Abstract

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an advanced therapeutic strategy with light-triggered, minimally invasive, high spatiotemporal selective and low systemic toxicity properties, which has been widely used in the clinical treatment of many solid tumors in recent years. Any strategies that improve the three elements of PDT (light, oxygen, and photosensitizers) can improve the efficacy of PDT. However, traditional PDT is confronted some challenges of poor solubility of photosensitizers and tumor suppressive microenvironment. To overcome the related obstacles of PDT, various strategies have been investigated in terms of improving photosensitizers (PSs) delivery, penetration of excitation light sources, and hypoxic tumor microenvironment. In addition, compared with a single treatment mode, the synergistic treatment of multiple treatment modalities such as photothermal therapy, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy can improve the efficacy of PDT. This review summarizes recent advances in nanomaterials, including metal nanoparticles, liposomes, hydrogels and polymers, to enhance the efficiency of PDT against malignant tumor.

Keywords: photodynamic therapy, tumor microenvironment, nanomaterials, tumor-targeting, photosensitizers

1 Introduction

PDT mainly relies on PSs to generate 1O2 from O2 under the induction of specific wavelengths of light, causing oxidative damage to tumor cells and killing them, and even triggering immunogenic cell death (ICD). However, the insufficient supply of key factors such as PSs, light, and O2 in tumor tissue greatly reduces the therapeutic effect of PDT (Lee et al., 2022). Nanoparticles (NPs) as drug carriers have received extensive attention in the field of tumor therapy. They can achieve high-efficiency delivery of PSs to tumor tissues through physicochemically optimized passive targeting, ligand-modified active targeting, and stimulus-responsive release (Zhao et al., 2021). Attempts have been made to overcome the unfavorable tumor microenvironment through photocatalytic oxygen production, Fenton reaction, and combination with other chemical drugs (Wan et al., 2021). In this review, we first describe the composition and tumor-promoting mechanisms of the tumor microenvironment, and then introduce metal NPs, nanoliposomes, mesoporous silica NPs, dendrimers, hydrogels, polymer micelles and these creative methods to solve the problems faced by tumor PDT. In particular, in this review, we focus on recent advances in diverse metal NPs including metal-organic frameworks (MOF), which provide a promising approach for the design of integrative therapeutics in clinical treatments.

2 Tumor Microenvironment

TME refers to the non-cancerous cells and components presented in the tumor, including blood vessels, extracellular matrix (ECM), fibroblasts, the surrounding immune cells, molecules produced and released by them (Figure 1) (Chang et al., 2021). Hypoxic and acidic microenvironment, caused by tumor vascular tissue distribution disorder and structural abnormality, is the most important supporting component in TME and immunosuppressive microenvironment and has offered a favorable niche for tumor growth, proliferation and invasion (Yuan X. et al., 2022). The immune cells, including granulocytes, lymphocytes, and macrophages, are involved in various immune responses and activities orchestrated by the tumor to promote tumor survival. Among them, the macrophages abundantly infiltrating TME are called tumor-associated macrophages (tumor-associated macrophages, TAMs), which are the most prominent immune cell type in the TME. According to the difference of phenotype and function, activated macrophages can be divided into M1 and M2, and their polarization direction is regulated by microenvironment (Wang et al., 2021a). For example, tissue microenvironment, external factors and inflammatory response factors can activate macrophages in different forms (Cenowicz et al., 2021). The macrophages that promote tumor growth are M2 phenotype and have the function of repairing injury and inhibiting inflammatory response in normal tissues. The macrophages that inhibit tumor growth are M1 phenotype, which can induce inflammatory response and activate immune response to kill tumor cells (Chen J. et al., 2021). In the process of tumorigenesis, TAMs can often stimulate angiogenesis, promote tumor cell migration and invasion, and mediate tumor immune escape (De Lerma et al., 2021). In the site of tumor metastasis, TAMs promote tumor cell exosmosis, survival and follow-up activity. At the same time, TAMs affect the clinical therapeutic effect of tumors by enhancing the genetic instability of tumor cells, nourishing tumor stem cells, and promoting infiltration and metastasis, and they are the key driving force for tumor growth. The degree of macrophage infiltration in tumor tissues is related to the poor prognosis of patients, and the number of TAMs is negatively related to the survival time of patients (Munir et al., 2021). In addition, an increase in neutrophils in blood also accounts for a sign of poor prognosis for cancer. Imitating the naming method used to define macrophages (M1-like and M2-like/TAM), tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) can obtain at least two different phenotypes: N1 neutrophils, endowed with anti-tumor activities, and N2 neutrophils endowed with immunosuppressive and pro-angiogenic properties to support tumor progression (Li et al., 2020). The tumor-promoting activity of TAN can cover a variety of mechanisms (Taucher et al., 2021). TAN can’t only promote tumor angiogenesis by secreting matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) from the extracellular matrix (ECM), but also inhibit CD8T cells and produce immunosuppressive environment by secreting arginase 1 (Xiao et al., 2021).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Schematic representation of the tumor microenvironment in solid tumors.

Cancer cells harbor a different metabolic profile with respect to healthy cells (Chou and Yang, 2021). Cancer cells can maintain a high rate of glycolysis even in the presence of O2, consume large amounts of glucose and significant areas in tumors exhibit lactic acidosis. This phenomenon known as “aerobic glycolysis” or the “Warburg effect” (Yuan et al., 2021). The tumor-promoting mechanisms of TME include: 1) HIF-1α nuclear transport pathway: Hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) is a key transcriptional activator responsible for regulating target genes that contribute to survival and growth of cells in hypoxia condition (You et al., 2021). It consists of two subunits (HIF-1β and HIF-1α) and HIF-1α is sensitive to hypoxia. Under hypoxic conditions, HIF-1 becomes a stable and transcriptionally active dimer and then induces transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of target genes. In addition, overexpression of HIF-1α also promotes the transcription and activation of angiogenic factors, such as angiogenin, platelet-derived growth factors, plasminogen activator inhibitors and VEGF (Sun et al., 2022). 2) STAT3 phosphorylation pathway: Acidic TME inhibits T cell activation and cytotoxicity by inducing STAT3 phosphorylation (Liang et al., 2021). 3) mTOR signaling pathway: The persistent stress of hypoxic TME leads to excessive activation of mTOR signaling in NK cells, mitochondrial fission, and impaired metabolism, ultimately leading to NK cell depletion and reduced anti-tumor ability (Liang et al., 2021). 4) VEGF pathway and nuclear transcription factor (NF-κB) pathway: Enriching cytokines such as VEGF and eosinophil chemokine (Eotaxin) in tumor tissue, inducing macrophage polarization into M2 type. M2 TAMs further produce factors such as CC motif chemokine 2 (CCL2), CC motif chemokine 5 (CCL5) or macrophage colony stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1) to participate in immunosuppression (Huang et al., 2021). 5) Promote the production of factors such as hyaluronic acid (HA) and VEGF, thereby maintaining tumor growth and migration (Niu et al., 2021).

3 Photodynamic Therapy

Taking advantage of the fact that PSs can’t generate ROS in the dark environment, and is not toxic to cells and tissues. By finely controlling the illumination area, the PDT process can be confined within the tumor tissue, achieving highly selective killing of tumor cells and reducing the side effects of normal cell death (Lee et al., 2020). According to the different types and production methods of ROS, PDT can be divided into two mechanisms, type I and type II (Algorri et al., 2021). Type I reactions can directly react with biomolecules to produce radicals by transferring protons or electrons. In Type II reactions, the excited PS transfers energy to oxygen molecules to produce singlet oxygen (1O2). Both oxygen-containing free radicals and 1O2 have extremely high reactivity, which can damage a variety of biomolecules and kill tumor cells. Type II PDT requires PSs to generate ROS. However, PSs are often excited by visible light, which limits the efficacy of PDT for deep tumors. Furthermore, due to the short intracellular half-life of ROS (≈10–320 ns), the light penetration depth and the distribution of PSs in tumor tissue limit the efficacy of PDT (Lee et al., 2022). Nanomaterials provide a powerful tool to overcome many drawbacks of PSs in cancer PDT, such as hydrophobicity, short blood circulation time after intravenous injection, which lead to insufficient accumulation, retention and internalization in tumor tissues (Silva et al., 2021). Furthermore, some multifunctional nanomaterials can increase the levels of O2 and ROS in tissues by mediating photocatalytic oxygen production and Fenton reaction. In addition, upconverting NPs can enhance light delivery in tumor tissues by converting more penetrating NIR to visible light or preparing them as persistent luminescent NPs (Liu B. et al., 2021). In addition to enhancing PSs in tumor tissues through physicochemically optimized passive targeting, ligand-modified active targeting, and stimulus-responsive release. Nanomaterials can also be combined with chemotherapy, gene therapy, immunotherapy, photothermal therapy, hyperthermia/magnetothermal therapy, radiotherapy, sonodynamic therapy to overcome the limitations of PDT (Yang G. et al., 2021; Zhang P. et al., 2022). This study focuses on the commonly used PSs nanomodification techniques and the application of different types of novel nanomaterials for cancer treatment and diagnosis, such as nanoparticles, liposomes, hydrogels, polymers, etc.

4 Strategies for Nanoparticle-Based Photocontrolled Delivery

4.1 Metal Nanoparticles

Among the NPs, metal NPs have the advantages of high biocompatibility and stability, adjustable size, good optical properties, easy surface functionalization, and a long activity period (Desai et al., 2021). They can be used as PSs, delivery carriers and up-conversion tools to improve the delivery of chemotherapy, radionuclides and antibody drugs to tumor cells.

4.1.1 Metal Based Nanoparticles

4.1.1.1 Au Based Nanoparticles

Au NPs have surface plasmon resonance (SPR), chemical inertness and excellent biocompatibility, which are mainly used as passivation agents, drug delivery agents, imaging agents, and photothermal agents, which have different characteristic shapes, such as particles, rod-shaped, cluster-shaped, shell-shaped, spike-shaped and star, etc., (Younis et al., 2021). In PDT, gold nanoparticles can be used alone or as part of a multifunctional nanomaterial hybrid system for PSs delivery.

DNA is considered to be one of the best components for building nanomaterials due to its excellent sequence specificity and programmable supramolecular self-assembly. Among them, functional modification of nanomaterials can significantly improve the cellular stability of DNA nanomaterials. Based on this, Yu et al. utilized doxorubicin (Dox), antisense DNA (target Survivin mRNA) that could inhibit Survivin expression, photosensitizer (ZnPc), and Au NPs with excellent plasmonic properties, to develop a multifunctional nanotherapeutic platform with both diagnostic and therapeutic functions, termed Apt-DNA-Au nanomachines, for in situ imaging and targeted PDT/PTT/CDT synergistic therapy of breast cancer (Figure 2) Yu et al. (2021). Moreover, the tightly packed DNA sequences on the surface of nanomaterials were used as highly specific aptamers, which not only resisted the enzymatic hydrolysis of DNA sequences, but also improved the tumor targeting of PDT (Lv et al., 2021). Su et al. took persistent luminescent nanoparticles (PLNPs) as the core, and formed a novel nanoprobe TCPP-gDNA-Au/PLNP for persistent luminescence imaging-guided photodynamic therapy by coupling DNA sequences containing AS1411 aptamers through AuNPs Su et al. (2021). PLNPs could emit long-term fluorescence under near-infrared light irradiation. The AS1411 aptamer could specifically recognize the overexpressed nucleolin in cancer cells and improve the tumor targeting of the photosensitizer TCPP. Furthermore, increasing the types of DNA modified on the surface of NPs can improve the accuracy of PDT tumor identification. Cai et al. designed and synthesized a nano-therapeutic platform for fully automatic diagnosis and treatment of Au/Pd nanomachines with the main marker miRNA-21 and two auxiliary markers miRNA-224 and TK-1 mRNA as the targeted detection unit (Au/Pd ONP-DNA nanomachine) Cai X. et al. (2021). Using ONPs as a carrier, when all specified targets were detected [logic system input was (1, 1, 1), output was (1, 1)], the 808 nm laser could be programmed to automatically irradiate the tumor and perform PDT and PTT. However, the stability of the Au-S bond is poor, and the DNA is non-specifically detached from the surface of AuNPs, resulting in false positive signals and severe side effects. Zhang et al. used a simple and highly stable amide bond (-CO-NH-) instead of the Au-S bond and combined the DNA probe on Au@graphene (AuG) to prepare Label-rcDNA-AuG Zhang J. et al. (2021). Label-rcDNA-AuG could improve the anti-interference ability of nanoprobes against nucleases, GSH and other biological agents. By accurately monitoring the level of intracellular miR-21, Label-rcDNA-AuG could identify positive cancer cells even in a mixture of cancer cells and normal cells, improving the precision of PDT treatment and reducing damage to normal cells.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Multifunctional Apt-DNA-Au nanomachines for in situ imaging and targeted multimodal synergistic cancer therapy. (A) Schematic diagram of the structure of the Apt-DNA-Au nanomachine. MUC1 segment is an aptamer that specifically recognizes MCF-7 cells; A segment and Fd segment contain G-quadruplex structure for loading photosensitizer (ZnPc); C segment is labeled with Cy5 for in situ fluorescence imaging; D segment is incorporated into antisense DNA that inhibits Survivin expression for inhibiting tumor cell proliferation; TD segment is an A/C/D mixture loaded with Dox. (B) Working principle of the Apt-DNA-Au nanomachine. (C) Apt-DNA-Au nanomachines specifically recognize and internalize to target cancer cells, and monitor tumor therapeutic effects in real time through in situ fluorescence imaging and multimodal anticancer therapy (combined with chemotherapy, gene therapy, PDT, and PTT). Reproduced with permission from (Yu et al., 2021).

Besides DNA modification, surface modification of biotin (Bt) is also an effective way to improve the tumor targeting of NPs (Li J. et al., 2021). The targeting of Bt-modified Au-NPs (BT@Au-NPs) to C6 glioma cells was more than 2 times that of Au-NPs (He F. et al., 2021). Modification of arginine (R)-glycine (G)-aspartic acid (D) (RGD) on the surface of NPs, which could bind to integrin αvβ3 integrin with high affinity, could not only improve the anticancer ability of NPs, but also reduced tumor migration rate. The HB-AuNRs@cRGD prepared by Liu et al. had a tumor inhibition rate of up to 77.04% in the ECA109 esophageal cancer model, and significantly reduced the migration and invasion of cancer cells in ECA109 cells Liu D. et al. (2021).

Besides improving the PDT efficiency of Au-NPs in combination with other nanomaterials, oxygen production can also be optimized by changing the physical structure of Au-NPs. By adjusting the ratio of silicon core radius and gold shell thickness, Sajid et al. enhanced the field strength of Au nanoshells with 40/20 core radius/shell thickness by 35 times and increased 1O2 yield by 320% compared to before optimization (Farooq and de Araujo, 2021). Furthermore, the introduction of ionic complexes assembled by heterometallic colloids (Mo6-Au2) can affect the cytotoxicity, cellular internalization and PDT activity of NPs by regulating the order of their supramolecular stacking (Kirakci et al., 2021). For example, through the 1:1 binding of [Mo6I8(L′)6]2− (L′ = I-, CH3COO-) with [Au2L2]2+ (L was the ligand of cyclic double amines and phosphine), Faizullin et al. synthesized a heterometallic colloids composed of positively and negatively charged metal-organic complexes Faizullin et al. (2021). Among them, the cellular internalization of Mo6-Au2 (L′ = CH3COO-) assembled with poly-DL-lysine (PL) exhibited a three-fold enhancement when L′ = CH3COO- and could accumulates in the cytoplasm by fast endo-lysosomal escape. In addition, the photodynamic effect of [Mo6I8 (L′)6]2− clusters was much higher at L′ = CH3COO- than at L′ = I-. In recent years, bimetallic NPs are also improving the therapeutic efficiency of PSs due to the inherent properties of the introduced metal elements and the interaction between two metal atoms (Park et al., 2021). He et al. synthesized Au1Bi1-SR NPs by introducing Bi into captopril-coated Au NPs (Au-SR NPs) by utilizing the X-ray CT signal enhancement effect of Bi He G. et al. (2021). Au1Bi1-SR NPs not only exhibited higher ROS yield than Au-SR NPs, but also enabled CT imaging-guided and light-mediated PDT for synergistic tumor therapy. In addition, Jia et al. further modified Au-Bi bimetallic nanoparticles with IR808 fuel and prepared Au-BiGSH@IR808 to obtain higher NIR photon capture ability, which effectively solved the problem of low absorption rate of Au-Bi nanoparticles in the near-infrared region Jia et al. (2021). Noble metal Pt nanozymes have catalase-like activity (Cao et al., 2021). Truncated octahedral Au (ToHAu) can enhance LSPR by increasing the spatial separation and realizing the simultaneous participation of holes and electrons in the reaction due to the special structure of twin planes and stacking faults (Yoon et al., 2017). Accordingly, Bu and his team designed and synthesized a comprehensive phototherapy nanomodulator (ToHAu@Pt-PEG-Ce6/HA) based on the enhanced LSPR effect Bu et al. (2021). Pt was deposited on ToHAu to form a spatially separated structure, which enabled the reactive molecules to freely enter the hot holes and electron fluxes, and had strong photothermal and photodynamic properties. The antitumor effect of NPs is also closely related to their size. For example, large NPs (>100 nm), despite their enhanced permeability and penetration (EPR) effect, cannot fully infiltrate into tumor tissue due to dense extracellular matrix and elevated interstitial fluid pressure (Zmerli et al., 2021). In contrast, small NPs (<20 nm) exhibited better tumor penetration but were easily cleared by the blood circulation. Therefore, it is particularly important to design a TME-responsive size-tunable NPs. To this end, Liu et al. designed and prepared Au-MB-PEG NPs by exploiting the efficient polymerization ability of AuNPs and the excellent performance of TME ROS-triggered HOCl-responsive platform Liu H. et al. (2021). Small-sized Au-MB-PEG NPs responded to highly expressed HOCl in the tumor region through a HOCl-sensitive molecule (FDOCl-24). After reaching the tumor tissue, Au-MB-PEG NPs were cleaved by HOCI to release Au NPs that rapidly aggregated into larger aggregates in the tumor through electrostatic interactions, and simultaneously released methylene blue as a photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy (PDT). The aggregated AuNPs red-shifted the light absorption to the NIR region, resulting in enhanced photoacoustic imaging (PAI) and PTT under laser irradiation.

4.1.1.2 Ag Based Nanoparticles

Ag NPs have higher 1O2 yield than Au NPs and Pt NPs due to stronger SPR (Younis et al., 2021). Inspired by the ability of ICD to transform tumors from cold to heat by inducing tumor cells to release tumor antigens and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and then enhance T cell proliferation and infiltration (Xu et al., 2022). Jin et al. developed a corn-like Au/Ag nanorod (Au/Ag NR) that could induce ICD in tumor cells under NIR-II (1064 nm) light irradiation (Figure 3) Jin F. et al. (2021). They covered the Ag shell on Au NRs, and by changing the amount of Ag+, the SPR band in the vertical region with higher 1O2 yield was red-shifted to the NIR-II window. In addition, Au/Ag NRs could maintain the immune memory effect for up to 40 days in animal experiments by enhancing the therapeutic effect of immune checkpoint blocking (ICB). Wang and his team further used DNA probe technology to prepare the DNA-functionalized nanoprobe Au-AgNP-Ag-HM loaded with the photosensitizer hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether (HMME) Wang et al. (2021b). Au-AgNP-Ag-HM not only had the ROS production mediated by the LSPR signal change of Au-Ag-HM and photosensitizer HMME, but also had fluorescent probe technology mediated by caspase-3 specific recognition sequence (DEVD), which effectively integrate the functions of pro-apoptosis and detection, and can be used for the treatment and efficacy evaluation of tumor cells.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Illustration of Corn-like Au/AgNR-mediated antitumor immune responses. Corn-like Au/Ag NR-mediated NIR-II PTT/PDT significantly increased the expression of calreticulin, high-mobility group box 1, and adenosine triphosphate in tumor cells, reprogramming the immunosuppressive cold tumor microenvironment to immunogenic heat tumor, which achieve the combined anti-cancer activity with the ICB antibody and effectively inhibit the growth of distant tumors and prevent tumor recurrence. Reproduced with permission from (Jin L. et al., 2021).

4.1.1.3 Cu Based Nanoparticles

Cu-based Fenton reagents have superior ROS yields to Fe-based systems (Zhu F. et al., 2021). In addition, Cu-doped layered double hydroxide (Cu-LDH) nanosheets can not only further enhance the yield of ROS, but also take advantage of the small size and positive charge to actively infiltrate cancer cells for deep tumor therapy (Wu et al., 2021). But positively charged NPs have a shorter residence time in the blood circulation than negatively charged NPs (Smith et al., 2019). To this end, Wu and his team used negatively charged liposomes to encapsulate Cu-LDH (Cu-LDH@Lips) and embedded HMME into the bilayer of CuLDH@Lips, forming a dual size/charge switchable reactive oxygen species generator (Cu-LDH/HMME@Lips) (Figure 4) Wu et al. (2021). Liposomes could prolong the residence time in the circulatory system by reducing the clearance of Cu-LDH/HMME@Lips by immune cells, and HMME could disintegrate Cu-LDH/HMME@Lips in response to ultrasound to release positively charged Cu-LDH, which could penetrate deep into tumor cells and then caused oxidative stress damage to tumor cells through Fenton-like reaction. Similarly, Wang et al. prepared ICG/CAC-LDH nanosheets by intercalating indocyanine green (ICG) into a hydrophobic bilayer of Ce-doped Cu-Al layered double hydroxide (CAC-LDH) Wang X. et al. (2021). ICG/CAC-LDH could not only induce the depletion of intracellular GSH, but also decompose to generate Cu+ and Ce3+ to stimulate the Fenton-like reaction to generate OH.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Schematic diagram of the synthesis and working principle of Cu-LDH/HMME@Lips. (A) Schematic diagram of the synthesis of Cu-LDH/HMME@Lips. (B) Schematic diagram of the working principle of Cu-LDH/HMME@Lips. Dual-size/charge-switchable Cu-LDH/HMME@Lips utilizes negatively charged liposomes to prolong circulation residence time in low-permeability solid tumor models, and then HMME decompose Cu-LDH/HMME@Lips in response to ultrasound to release positively charged Cu-LDH, which can penetrate deep into tumor cells. HMM generates 1O2 under ultrasound irradiation, while Cu-LDH infiltrates deep in tumor generates ROS through a Fenton-like reaction. Reproduced with permission from (Wu et al., 2021).

4.1.1.4 Ruthenium Based Nanoparticles

Ru complexes are commonly used as PDT PSs due to their high water solubility, photostability, and high ROS yield (Smithen et al., 2020). However, it has the disadvantages of dark toxicity, DNA mutation and being excited only by short-wave visible light, which limit its clinical application (Chen M. et al., 2021). To this end, He et al. synthesized a new red light-responsive Ru complex PSs (Ru-I) without two-photon activation, by using large conjugated indolepyridine benzopyrans as ligands He Y. et al. (2021). Positively charged Ru-I could effectively target cancer cell lysosomes and activate PSs under 660 nm red light to induce apoptosis. In addition, Karges et al. proposed to wrap Ru (II) polypyridine complexes with amphiphilic polymer DSPE-PEG2000-folate to prepare nanoparticles without dark toxicity, which could target cancer cells overexpressing the folate receptor Karges et al. (2021). It exhibited significant phototoxicity under irradiation at 480 or 595 nm and induced tumor cell apoptosis through the caspase3/7 pathway. Furthermore, this complex not only shown the highest 1- and 2-photon absorption to date, but also exhibited properties of inhibiting multidrug-resistant tumors in a rat model. In addition to the introduction of folate groups, bio-orthogonal labels such as copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) are also effective methods to improve tumor cell recognition (Kappenberg et al., 2022). Lin et al. prepared the first bio-orthogonal two-photon PSs based on Ru (II) complexes by bio-orthogonally labeling Ru-alkynyl-2 Lin C.-C. et al. (2021). In addition to generating ROS to exert cytotoxic effects, it could also exert anti-tumor effects by specifically binding to cancer cell membranes and inducing membrane damage.

4.1.1.5 Iridium Based Nanoparticles

In recent years, new photoredox catalyst systems based on Ir compounds have been widely used in catalysis and PDT, and can also be used to prepare new PSs (Raza et al., 2021). Liu and his team prepared two Ir (III) complex dimers that could self-assemble into NPs in aqueous media, named Ir1 and Ir2 Liu J. et al. (2021). Ir1 and Ir2 not only enhance cancer cell uptake through positive charges on the surface, but also exhibit type I and type II PDT activity in the 350–500 nm (UV-Vis spectrum) range, even in hypoxic microenvironments. Ir NPs might be promising alternatives to traditional organic PSs. Ir (III) complexes show great potential in the construction of oxygen-sensitive sensing probes due to their unique oxygen quenching pathway (Yasukagawa et al., 2021). Xiao et al. designed and synthesized a red light-excited Ir (III) complex encapsulated in the hydrophobic pocket of Cyanine7-modified β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) Xiao and Yu (2021). Ir (III) complexes achieved different degrees of oxygen quenching according to the change of oxygen concentration in the environment. β-CD could not only be used to improve the water solubility of Ir (III) complexes, but also be used to carry Cyanine7 to establish a proportional oxygen fluorescent probe. The results of in vitro and in vivo experiments shown that the prepared probe had remarkable oxygen sensitivity and could be used for quantitative determination of the oxygen level in the hypoxic microenvironment of solid tumors. Mitochondria are not only the decisive regulators of cellular metabolic function and apoptosis, but also the organelles with the highest intracellular oxygen concentration (Tabish and Narayan, 2021). Therefore, the preparation of PSs that target the mitochondria of cancer cells will be the key to maximize the therapeutic potential of PDT. Recently, Redrado et al. prepared four novel mitochondria-selective trackable PSs, which are called bifunctional Ir (III) complexes of the type [Ir (CˆN)2 (NˆN-R)]+, where NˆC is either phenylpyridine (PPY) or benzoquinoline (BZQ), NˆN is 2,20-dipyridylamine (Dpa), and R either anthracene (1 and 3) or acridine (2 and 4) (Redrado et al., 2021). Only complex 4 ([Ir (Bzq)2 (dpa-acr)]+) clearly shown a dual emission mode. The organic luminescent chromophore (acridine) could display the cellular localization of the complexes under irradiation at 407–450 nm. Ir (III) had more than 110-fold higher photosensitivity values under 521–547 nm irradiation than under dark conditions, and promoted apoptotic cell death and a possible apoptotic pathway by generating ROS. Although two-photon near-infrared photoactivation can partially overcome the lack of absorption or weak absorption of Ir (III) complexes in the red to near-infrared region, the requirements of ultrafast femtosecond laser source and small irradiation area limits its application in solid tumor therapy. To this end, Liu and his team designed and synthesized bifunctional micelles (Micelle-Ir) for synergistic PDT and PTT therapy in vivo (Figure 5) Liu N. et al. (2021). They were prepared by micellization of a neutral Ir (III) complex (BODIPY-Ir) containing a distyryl boron-dipyrrole methylene group (BODIPY-Ir). BODIPY enabled BODIPY-Ir to acquire the ability to absorb in the far-red/near-infrared region, and micellization enabled BODIPY-Ir to acquire the ability to synergize PDT and PTT therapy, not only destroying primary 4T1-Luc tumors, but also preventing lung metastases.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Schematic diagram of synthesis of BODIPY-IR and schematic diagram of PDT/PTT synergistic therapy mechanism. (A) Schematic synthesis of BODIPY-IR: Reagents and conditions: 1) 1-(4-ethynylphenyl)-1H-benzo [d]imidazole, CuI, Pd (PPh3)4, THF, TEA, 50°C, 16 h; 2) MeI, THF, 100°C, 24 h; 3) [Ir (benzo [h]quinoline)2 (µ-Cl)]2, Ag2O, 1,2-dichloroethane, reflux, 24 h. (B–D) Schematic representations of Encapsulation of BODIPY-Ir into micelles for constructing Micelle-Ir. (B) PEG-PCL-encapsulated BODIPY-Ir self-assembles into Micelle-Ir. (C) Photophysical processes of PDT and PTT. (D) Michelle-Ir-mediated PDT/PTT synergistic therapy in vivo. Reproduced with permission from (Liu S. et al., 2021).

4.1.2 Metal Oxide-Based Nanoparticles

Metal oxide nanomaterials have found promising biomedical applications for fluorescent labeling due to the advantages of high photostability, large extinction coefficient, high emission quantum yield and easy surface modification (Younis et al., 2021). In view of the fact that nano-heterostructures can promote photo-induced electron-hole separation and the generation of ROS, 2D nano-heterostructure-based PSs can provide a major advancement in PDT. Qiu et al. designed and synthesized a bismuthene/bismuth oxide (Bi/BiOx)-based lateral nano-heterostructure synthesized by a regioselective oxidation process Qiu et al. (2021). Upon irradiation at 660 nm, the heterostructure could effectively generates 1O2 under normal oxygen conditions but produces cytotoxicity OH and H2 under hypoxic conditions, which synergistically improves the intensity of PDT. In addition, this Bi/biox nano-heterostructure had biocompatibility and biodegradability, with the surface molecular engineering used here, it improved the penetrability of tumor tissue and increased the cellar uptake, and then produced an excellent oxygen-independent tumor ablation effect. Iridium dioxide (IrO2) with semiconductor behavior has high catalytic activity for oxygen release reaction (OER) in a wide pH range, and also has excellent photocatalytic efficiency (Arias-Egido et al., 2021). For this, Yuan et al. synthesized IrO2-Gox@HA NPs that could target TME by combining glucose oxidase (GOx) and IrO2 NPs on hyaluronic acid (HA) Yuan Y. et al. (2022). First, Gox converted the high levels of glucose in tumors to H2O2, and then IrO2 NPs converted H2O2 to O2, thereby enhancing type II PDT, which could effectively alleviate hypoxia in tumor tissues.

Relevant literature points out that the larger the specific surface area of the sheet-like structure, the higher the zeta potential, and the greater the drug-carrying capacity of nanomaterials (Duo et al., 2021). Dai et al. synthesized a radiosensitizer based on 4-layer O-Ti7O13 nanosheets by using two-dimensional titanium peroxide nanomaterials with mesoporous structure to support DOX Dai Y. et al. (2021). O-Ti7O13 could quickly load the drug within 5 min while other nanomaterials need 24 h and release the drug continuously in an acidic microenvironment. In addition, under the action of high-energy X-rays, titanium dioxide could absorb radiation energy to synthesize ROS and kill tumor cells. O-Ti7O13 could reduce the X-ray dose and irradiation frequency, and reduce damage to normal tissues while ensuring the therapeutic effect. Mn3+-rich oxides (MnOx) can be decomposed into catalytically competent Mn3+ and Mn2+ in TME, accelerating the conversion of endogenous O2 into highly toxic 1O2 and OH. Meanwhile, the released Mn2+ can be used as a magnetic resonance imaging agent with higher spatial resolution. Studies have shown that Zinc gallogermanate (ZGGO) persistent luminescent NPs can be loaded with therapeutic drugs to achieve long-term imaging tracking of drugs and significant tumor treatment effects. To improve the poor resolution of ZGGO, Ding et al. used MnOx to coat chromium-doped ZGGO NPs (Mn-ZGGO) Ding D. et al. (2021). Mn-ZGGO could not only generate 1O2 and OH without light, but also serve as a diagnostic tool for MR, US, and sustained luminescence to guide precise cancer therapy. Similarly, Li and his team used MnO2 and IrO2 to prepare nanozymes (MnO2/IrO2-PVP, MIP NPs) to combine photothermal effect, catalytic effect and magnetic resonance imaging function Li R. et al. (2021). IrO2 enabled the photothermal conversion efficiency of MIP NPs to reach 27.57%. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) enabled the Ce6 loading efficiency of MIP NPs to be as high as 76.07 ± 0.52%, and could shed PVP from the surface of MIP NPs in an acidic microenvironment, realizing the local enrichment of MIP NPs at tumor. Besides MnO2, CeO2 also has similar functions to catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (Yang Y.-L. et al., 2021). Zeng et al. prepared a dual-targeted tumor drug delivery system (ICG@PEI−PBA−HA/CeO2) by using ICG, inorganic nanozyme (HA/CeO2) and pH-sensitive cationic polymer carrier phenylboronic acid-modified polyethyleneimine-4-carboxyphenylboronate (PEI-PBA) Zeng et al. (2021). After ICG@PEI−PBA−HA/CeO2 targeted cancer cells with HA, the CeO2 released from the pH cleavage reaction of phenylboronic acid catalyzeed H2O2 to generate O2 through the cerium valence cycle of Ce3+/Ce4+. The regenerable CAT-like nanozyme activity of CeO2 increased the bioavailability of ICG and promoted tumor cell apoptosis by improving the tumor hypoxic microenvironment.

The efficacy of PDT/PTT combination therapy was better than that of PDT or PTT monotherapy. Traditional PDT/PTT synergistic therapy requires two light sources to excite the PSs of PDT and the thermosensitive agent of PTT respectively, which increases the difficulty of nanoparticle preparation. Guo and his team used B-TiO2 with oxygen vacancies and narrow band gaps to prepare a nanothermosensitive system (B-TiO2@SiO2-HA) with full-spectrum response to light stimulation Guo et al. (2021). Under NIR-II laser irradiation, B-TiO2@SiO2-HA could not only provide PDT/PTT synergistic therapy for tumors, but also perform high-resolution photoacoustic imaging (PAI) to achieve precise nanothermothermal effects. Similarly, Gao and his team used SnO2-x with oxygen vacancies to prepare a multifunctional nano-thermosensitive material (SnO2-x@SiO2-HA) with a target-specific synergistic PDT/PTT with full spectrum response Gao et al. (2021a). In addition to exerting precise PDT/PTT synergistic antitumor therapeutic effect through PAI, SnO2-x@SiO2-HA also had antibacterial effect, which effectively promotes the healing of skin wounds. But most metal or carbon NPs are toxic to normal cells or tissues. Sengupta et al. used the biosafety and magnetic properties of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles to synthesize a new PS E-NP with anti-inflammatory and immunoprotective effects Sengupta et al. (2022). E-NP could not only upregulate the expression of cyclin kinase inhibitory protein p21, but also inhibit cancer cell cycle arrest in sub-G0G1 phase. It also acted as an anti-inflammatory by reducing macrophage myeloperoxidase (MPO) and nitric oxide (NO) release, thereby minimizing collateral damage to healthy cells.

4.1.3 Upconversion Nanoparticles

UCNPs have nonlinear anti-Stokes properties and can emit high-energy photons under low-energy NIR light excitation through lanthanide ion doping. UCNPs also have the advantages of low toxicity, narrow emission bandwidth, large decay time, resistance to photobleaching, and no autofluorescence background (Liu et al., 2022). The emission wavelength of UCNPs can be controllably adjusted from ultraviolet light to near-infrared light to match PSs with different absorption wavelengths, which provides a new method to solve the problem of PDT light penetration depth (Zhang L. et al., 2021). The photosystem-I/photosystem-II (PS-I/PS-II) PDT system can only be excited by red light to generate O2, so that it can quickly supply its own O2 consumption in 1O2 production, showing a spatiotemporal synchronous system of O2 self-supply and ROS production. However, the tissue penetration ability of red light is unsatisfactory, so it is unsuitable for the removal of deep tissue tumors (Fakurnejad et al., 2019). Recently, Cheng et al. used the ability of UCNPs can emit red light to activate PS-I and PS-II under NIR light, decorated thylakoid membrane of chloroplasts on UCNPs to form UCTM NPs, and developed a new photosynthesis-based PDT strategy for realizing spatiotemporally synchronous O2 self-supply and ROS production (Figure 6) Cheng X. et al. (2021). Both in vitro and in vivo assessments prove that UCTM NPs can effectively relieve hypoxia, induce cell apoptosis, and eliminate tumors with NIR light irradiation. A large amount of APT produced during the ICD process can be hydrolyzed by the extracellular enzyme CD73 into ADO (immunosuppressant), which prevents the cytotoxic T-cell immune response (Workenhe et al., 2021). To this end, Jin and his team prepared cancer-cell-biomimetic UCNPs (CM@UCNP-Rb/PTD) by exploiting the properties of anti-CD73 antibody to block the adenosine pathway Jin F. et al. (2021). CM@UCNP-Rb/PTD utilized the cancer cell membrane (CM) to target cancer cells and avoid macrophage uptake. After reaching the tumor tissue, UCNPs converted NIR into visible light to generate ROS, and released DOX to achieve a Chemo-PDT synergistic combination therapy. CD73-blocked CM@UCNP-Rb/PTD enhanced spontaneous antitumor immunity through the combined effect of chemotherapeutic drugs, PDT-triggered ICD and CD73 blockade. In immunotherapy, ligands that block PD-L1 can also directly prevent PD-1/PD-L1 immune blockade (Lee et al., 2021). Liu and his team modified UCNPs with MIPs formed by Pd-L1 peptide phase transfer imprinting, and prepared MC540/MNPs@MIPs/UCNP composite imprinted particles Lin M. et al. (2021). MC540/MNPs@MIPs/UCNP utilized MIPs to target tumor cells, which improved the binding rate to tumor cells and achieved targeted PDT. The nucleus is the control center of cellular biological activities, and targeting PDT to the nucleus can lead to severe DNA damage and inactivation of nuclear enzymes (Teng et al., 2021). Base on this, Chen and his team proposed a PDT strategy of “one treatment, multiple irradiation” Chen X. et al. (2021). They modified hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles with amine group with acidification effect and loaded RB and UCNPs to synthesize UCNP/RB@mSiO2-NH based on the lysosome-nucleus pathway. After UCNP/RB@mSiO2-NH entered the lysosome, it entered the nucleus through the nuclear pore by generating ROS and destroying the lysosome under the first 980 nm (3 min) NIR irradiation. Subsequently, efficient nuclear-targeted PDT was achieved under a second 980 nm NIR irradiation. Dual PSs PDT is also one of the effective strategies to improve ROS yield. Pham and his team utilized SiO2-coated core-shell UCNPs to support two PSs (Rb and Ce6) to form UCNP/RB, Ce6 Pham et al. (2021). UCNP/RB, Ce6 produced a large amount of 1O2 under 1550 nm NIR-IIb irradiation, which had higher PDT efficiency than single PS. However, the application of UCNPs in the biomedical field still faces challenges due to the low quantum yield and superheating effect of the 980 nm light source, and the low drug loading capacity (Lee et al., 2020).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Schematic illustration of the PDT effect of UCTM NPs on hypoxic TME. (A) The fabrication process of UCTM NPs. The corresponding electron transfer of UCTM NPs under NIR laser irradiation and the mechanism for realizing spatiotemporally synchronized O2 self-supply and ROS production. (B) The therapeutic process of oxygen supply and ROS generation by UCTM NPs under NIR laser irradiation. Reproduced with permission from (Cheng Y. et al., 2021).

4.1.4 Carbon-Based Nanoparticles

However, g-C3N4NSs have poor PDT efficacy due to wide band gap and low utilization of visible light (He F. et al., 2021). Graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets (g-C3N4NSs) are a recently reported promising carbon-based nanomaterial with the advantages of high biocompatibility, high photoluminescence quantum yield and surface modifiability. However, g-C3N4NSs have poor PDT efficacy due to wide band gap and low utilization of visible light (Younis et al., 2021). It has been proposed that the PDT efficiency of g-C3N4NSs can be enhanced by doping metal ions or UCNPs.

Although Ru (II) polypyridine complexes have high 1O2 generation and stability, the hypoxic microenvironment limits their PDT efficacy (Karges et al., 2020). Therefore, Wei’s group synthesized a novel oxygen self-sufficient PS (Ru-g-C3N4) by grafting [Ru (Bpy)2]2+ onto g-C3N4 nanosheets through Ru-N bonds Wei et al. (2021). The incorporation of [Ru (Bpy)2]2+ enabled Ru-g-C3N4 to obtain high loading capacity, narrow bandgap and high stability, thereby greatly improving the PDT efficiency. In addition, Ru-g-C3N4 not only had catalase-like activity in hypoxic environment, but also could effectively react with H2O2 to generate free radicals, causing oxidative stress damage to tumor cells. Molybdenum carbide (MoxC) has an electronic structure similar to that of noble metals, among which, Mo2C nanospheres can simultaneously induce PTT and PDT under illumination in the entire near-infrared radiation region due to their metallic properties and interband/intraband transitions, exhibiting highly efficient redox capacity (Zhang et al., 2019). Based on this, Hou and his team prepared a novel nanocomposite, Mo2C@N-Carbon-3@PEG, by combining Mo2C nanospheres with N-carbon. N-carbon could improve the photogenerated charge separation of Mo2C@N-Carbon-3@PEG, which doubles its photocatalytic performance Hou et al. (2022). However, the doping of metal ions and integration with other nanomaterials increases the risk of biological toxicity and side effects on the one hand, and increases the complexity of the PSs multistep synthetic protocols on the other hand. Based on this, Liu’s group had designed and synthesized a nitrogen-rich graphitic carbon nitride nanomaterial, 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (3-AT) derived g-C3N5NSs Liu X. et al. (2021). The photocatalytic activity of g-C3N5NSs was 9.5 times higher than that of g-C3N4NSs. Compared with g-C3N4, the nitrogen-rich triazole group could achieve low-energy transition by reducing the band gap of g-C3N5NSs conjugation, thereby improving the utilization efficiency of visible light.

4.1.5 Sulfur-Based Nanoparticles

Metal sulfides are often used as photothermal agents for photothermal therapy, among which Ni3S2, CuS and Co3S4 nanoparticles can be used to synthesize semiconductor PSs, which is an effective way to combine PTT/CDT/PDT (Shukla et al., 2021).

Co3S4 NPs will be degraded in the acidic microenvironment and trigger a Fenton-like reaction to generate hydroxyl radicals (·OH), which exerts the efficacy of CDT. Based on this, Jiang and his group prepared a nanocomposite Co3S4-ICG, which could responsively release PSs in an acidic microenvironment and realize the synergistic antitumor effect of CDT/PTT/PDT under NIR by loading indocyanine green (ICG) into hollow Co3S4 Jiang Y. et al. (2021). The combination of Fenton-like reaction and PDT enhanced ROS production and antitumor effect. Similarly, Feng and his team designed and prepared a nanocomposite FeS2@SRF@BSA with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a carrier to encapsulate FeS2 NPs and SRF, for combining CDT, PTT and PDT to achieve trimodal synergistic tumor therapy Feng et al. (2021). In addition, the Z-scheme heterostructure possesses both narrow band gap and highly oxidative holes, which are helpful for inducing near-infrared photocatalytic oxygen production (Mafa et al., 2021). Based on this, Sang’s group had designed and synthesized a Z-scheme nanoheterostructures, Ni3S2/Cu1.8S@HA Sang et al. (2021). The doping of Cu improves the near-infrared absorption and photothermal conversion efficiency by 7.7% compared with Ni3S2. It not only had catalase/peroxidase-like activity to generate endogenous O2 to relieve hypoxic internal environment, but also had a targeted recognition effect on cancer cells with high CD44 receptor expression, showing good anti-cancer properties effect.

4.1.6 Phosphorus-Based Nanoparticles

Black phosphorus (BP) is a kind of post-graphene two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials with special structural in-plane anisotropy, which have better optical and electrical properties than carbon-based metal NPSs and sulfur-based metal NPSs (Younis et al., 2021). In recent years, microorganisms with photosynthetic properties and biocompatibility, such as cyanobacteria, have been rapidly developed and used in cancer therapy and other diseases related to oxygen tension (Dahiya et al., 2021; Qamar et al., 2021). Qi and his team hybridized cyanobacterial cells with 2D BP nanosheets to form a microbe-based nanoplatform, Cyan@BPNSs Qi et al. (2021). In vivo experiments, Cyan@BPNSs could effectively increase the oxygenation level in the tumor and maintain a tumor inhibition rate of more than 100%.

Although black phosphorus quantum dots (BPQDs) have larger surface area and higher 1O2 quantum yield than BP (up to 0.91 in oxygen-saturated solution), the instability and poor tumor targeting of BPQDs in physiological environment limit their further research and clinical applications (Ding S. et al., 2021; Liu Y. et al., 2021). To this end, Liu and his team used the cationic polymer polyethyleneimine (PEI) to modify BPQDs, and modified RGD peptides targeting tumor cells on their surfaces to prepare BPQDs@PEI + RGD-PEG + DMMA, which had pH-responsive charge-switching and tumor-targeting properties Liu et al. (2021i). The results shown that BPQDs@PEI + RGD-PEG + DMMA had good stability in vivo, and could increase the uptake of BPQDs by tumor cells through charge conversion under light, and achieved tumor target enrichment. Most tumor microenvironment-responsive nanoparticles improve the targeting of nanomaterials by responding to the hypoxic microenvironment, but many tumor tissues do not exhibit hypoxia (Huang C. et al., 2020). The hypoxic sites of tumors are mostly located deep in the core of metabolically active tumor tissues, but traditional nanomaterials have the disadvantage of weak tissue penetration (Chen et al., 2019). To this end, Ding and his team were the first to combine BPQDs and genetically engineered E. coli expressing catalase by electrostatic adsorption to form hybrid engineered E. coli/BPQDs (EB) Ding D. et al. (2021). EB could dissolve the cell membrane of E. coli carrying catalase under light exposure, and then the released catalase could generate oxygen to improve hypoxia in the tumor.

Besides BP, red phosphorus (RP) can also generate reactive oxygen species under visible light irradiation (Zhang P. et al., 2021). Among them, Z-type RP/BP nanosheets prepared by exploiting the high separation efficiency of electron-hole pairs not only have photocatalytic activity, but also ROS can be generated with higher efficiency (Liu et al., 2019). To this end, Kang and his team prepared M-RP/BP@ZnFe2O4 NSs hybrid nanomaterials with higher stability and tumor targeting by loading Z-type RP/BP nanosheets with ZnFe2O4 and tumor cell membranes Kang et al. (2022). Among them, ZnFe2O4 could not only increase the productivity of ROS by catalyzing the Fenton reaction, but also induced apoptosis of MB-231 cells through oxidative stress.

4.1.7 Metal-Organic Frameworks

MOFs are a new class of molecular crystal materials, composed of metal ions or clusters bridged by organic connectors. MOFs can integrate NPs and/or biomolecules into a single framework hierarchically through taking advantage of their synthetic tunability and structural regularity, and can be used as highly active sites for multifunctional therapy (Gao et al., 2021b). Focusing on the key factors of O2 production, Ren et al. designed and assembled a novel two-stage intelligent oxygen generation nanoplatform based on metal organic framework core modified by Pt and CaO2 NPs (UIO@Ca-Pt) Ren et al. (2021). It was based on the porphyrin metal-organic framework (UIO), and at the same time loaded by CaO2 NPs with polydopamine (PDA), and then used Pt to further improve biocompatibility and efficiency. In TME, CaO2 could react with water to increase the content of H2O2. These H2O2 were further decomposed into O2 by Pt NPs, thereby promoting the TCPP in the nanometer parent nucleus to convert the surrounding O2 into 1O2 under laser irradiation. On the other hand, as the most toxic ROS,·OH has stronger oxidizing property and better therapeutic properties than 1O2 (Manivasagan et al., 2022). Recently, the strategy to induce in situ generation of OH has been proposed by introducing Fenton-based agents into tumor cells to induce over-expressed H2O2 in tumor cells. Chen et al.’s research focused on designing nanocarriers for the transport of Fenton catalysts or metal ions such as iron ions. They synthesized MIL-101(Fe)@TCPP using nanoscale iron-based metal-organic framework MIL-101(Fe) loaded with 5,10,15,20-tetrakis (4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin (TCPP) PS Chen et al. (2021d). MIL-101(Fe) catalyzed the conversion of H2O2 to OH through Fenton reaction under acidic TME, and served as a nanocarrier to deliver TCPP PS to generate photoactivated 1O2 for tumor-specific therapy without serious side effects, showing antitumor great potential for applications.

Iron-based MOFs have the advantages of high drug loading capacity, adjustable degradability and flexible structure. Porphyrin-based MOFs can be used as PSs for high-efficiency PDT with high stability (Ren et al., 2021). Hypoxic TME and endogenous antioxidant defense (AOD) (such as high expression of glutathione and GSH) can weaken the therapeutic effect of PDT. Therefore, breaking cellular redox balance through ROS enrichment and AOD inactivation may lead to effective tumor suppression with high clinical significance (Zhao et al., 2020). By combining iron with porphyrin-based MOFs, the maximum anti-tumor efficacy can be exerted by intelligently responding to exogenous and endogenous stimuli. Inspired by all this, Yu et al. first prepared a metal organic framework nanosystem (NMOF) based on coordination between Fe (III) and TCPP by a one-pot method (Fe-TCPP NMOF). Then, after capping the surface of silk fibroin (SF) to form NMOF@SF NPs, this nanoplatform can load a hypoxia-activated precursor tirapazamine (TPZ) to form NMOF@SF/TPZ (NST) Yu et al. (2022). Utilizing Fe (III) in Fe-TCPP, NST could effectively react with tumorous GSH to generate glutathione disulfide (GSSG) and Fe (II), for the ineffectiveness of AOD system. On the other hand, Fenton-like activity of Fe (II) and TCPP-mediated PDT promoted the accumulation of OH and ROS, and aggravated the intracellular oxidative stress under light laser irradiation. The redox metabolism disorder caused by the ineffective AOD and the enrichment of ROS might cause irreversible tumor cell damage. In addition, the deoxygenation of PDT led to an increase in hypoxia and then activated TPZ to transform into cytotoxic benzotriazinyl (BTZ) for tumor-specific chemotherapy. NST could achieve complete tumor elimination in vitro and in vivo. Similarly, Wang et al. also prepared nano-carrier system Zr-MOF@PPa/AF@PEG based on the consideration that PDT oxygen consumption could activate chemotherapy (CT) drugs to solve the hypoxic challenge and improve anti-tumor effect Wang Y. et al. (2021). Nano-carrier system Zr-MOF@PPa/AF@PEG included zirconium ion metal organic framework (UIO-66, carrier), pyropheophorbide-a (PPa, PS) and 6-amino flavone (AF, hypoxic-sensitive drug). Under ultraviolet light, although Zr-MOF@PPa/AF@PEG accepted part energy of PPa, leading to the 1O2 yield (40%) was lower than that of PPa (60%), it solved the problem of self-agglomeration caused by hydrophobicity of PPa, thereby improving the PDT effect. In addition, Zr-MOF@PPa/AF@PEG produced 1O2 under light stimulation with temporal-spatial selectivity. Therefore, Zr-MOF@PPa/AF@PEG took advantage of the PDT-induced hypoxia to activate HIF-1 inhibitor AF to enhance the anti-tumor effect and achieve the synergistic PDT-chemotherapy (PDT-CT) therapeutic effects. In addition, tuning the PDT efficiency by adjusting the thickness of the MOF shell is also a good approach. The Au@MOF core-shell hybrids prepared by Cai et al. could tune the thickness of the MOF shell by controlling the interlayer coordination reaction Cai Z. et al. (2021). As the MOF shell thickness increased, the percentage of TCPP and the efficiency of PDT also increased.

The use of solar energy to drive the photocatalytic reaction has always been considered an ideal way to obtain O2 (Liu et al., 2021j). Compared with the previous oxygen-generating substances, water-splitting materials have the unique advantage of the O2 self-supply and generation of ROS, because there is abundant water in the organism. At present, ultraviolet (UV) light, visible light (Nguyen et al., 2021) and a limited region of the first near-infrared (NIR-I) (650–950 nm) light (Huang L. et al., 2020) can activate water-splitting materials to achieve light-driven endogenous water oxidation (photocatalytic water-splitting reaction) to obtain O2 and ROS, but water splitting materials with NIR-II light triggered molecular O2 generators have not been reported for tumor therapeutics, even though NIR-II can provide deeper tissue penetration. For this, Liu et al. synthesized a new type of plasmonic Ag-AgCl@Au core-shell nanomushrooms (NMs) by selectively photodepositing plasmonic Au at the bulge sites of the Ag-AgCl nanocubes (NCs) (Figure 7) Liu B. et al. (2021). Under NIR-II light irradiation, the plasma effect of the Au nanostructure could overcome hypoxia to oxidize endogenous H2O to produce O2, thereby alleviating the hypoxic microenvironment. Almost at the same time, O2 could react with the electrons on the AgCl nuclear conduction band to generate superoxide anion radicals (O2 ) for photodynamic therapy. In addition, the combination index value of PDT for Ag-AgCl@Au NMs was 0.92, indicating that Ag-AgCl@Au NMs with excellent PDT properties toward further and promoting the PDT effect in deep O2-deprived tumor tissues. It is also a research hotspot in recent years to use the functionalization of NMOFs with stimuli-responsive gating units to develop signal-controlled drug delivery systems for biomedical applications. One important subcategory of gated drug-loaded NMOF includes stimulus-responsive nucleic acid-locked drug-loaded NMOF, gaining from the remarkable versatility of nucleic acid sequences to generate recognition elements and structural elements (Zhao et al., 2020). For this, Zhang et al. designed and synthesized the UIO-66 metal-organic framework nanoparticles (NMOF) modified with aptamer-functionalized DNA tetrahedra functionalized by ATP-aptamer or VEGF-aptamer could be loaded with the DOX, which responded to ATP or VEGF to release the drug Zhang S. et al. (2021). They utilized VEGF-responsive tetrahedral-gated NMOFs to load the photosensitizer Zn (II) protoporphyrin IX (Zn (II)-PPIX) to synthesize Zn (II)-PPIX/G-quadruplex VEGF aptamer-tetrahedral nanostructures. VEGF triggered the release of Zn (II)-PPIX from the complex. Association of the released Zn (II)-PPIX with the G-quadruplex structure yielded a highly fluorescent supramolecular Zn (II)-PPIX/G-quadruplex VEGF aptamer-tetrahedral structure, enabling efficient PDT treatment of malignant cells.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Synthesis of Ag-AgCl@Au NMs and schematic diagram of PDT/PTT synergistic therapy under NIR-II irradiation. (A) Schematic diagram of the synthesis of Ag-AgCl@Au NMs. Schematic diagram and electron energy level diagram of O2 reacting with electrons in AgCl nuclear conduction band to generate superoxide anion radical (O2 -). (B) Schematic diagram of PDT/PTT synergistic therapy under in vivo NIR-II light irradiation of Ag-AgCl@Au NMs. Under NIR-II light irradiation, the plasmonic effect of Au nanostructures generates O2 through photocatalysis and enhances the yield of O2 . Reproduced with permission from (Liu D. et al., 2021).

4.2 Nanoliposomes

Nanoliposomes are single-lamellar or multilamellar nano-systems formed spontaneously when phospholipids are dispersed in aqueous medium. Except biocompatibility and biodegradability, liposomes have high structural flexibility, which can combine a variety of hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs to improv their solubility and pharmacokinetics (Cheng X. et al., 2021). In addition, liposome nanotechnology can also co-package a variety of PSs and/or drugs, provide sufficient binding sites for conjugation with a variety of functional ligands.

Several mechanisms have demonstrated that high concentrations of soluble NKG2DLs derived from tumor cells may inhibit tumor immunity and NK cell-mediated target cell lysis by downregulating the expression of NKG2DL, thereby contributing to tumor immune escape (Curio et al., 2021). Based on this, Wang’s group had designed and synthesized a Chlorin-based photoactivable Galectin-3-inhibitor nanoliposome (PGIL), which could combine photosensitizer chlorin e6 (Ce6) and low molecular citrus pectin (LCP) (Figure 8) Wang et al. (2019). The intracellular release of LCP inhibits the activity of galectin-3, which increases the affinity of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins on tumor cell membrane for NKG2D on NK cell membranand, and then increases the tumor cell apoptosis, inhibits the invade ability, and enhances the recognition ability of NK cells to tumor cells in melanoma cells after PDT. In addition, pharmacological inhibition of MMPs reduce the level of released NKG2DLs, which could increase the tumor cell surface expression of NKG2DLs, reverse their immunosurveillance escape properties, and make them easier to be cleared by immune cells (mainly NK cells) (Tampa et al., 2021). Based on this, Liu’s group had designed and synthesized a PS-MMP inhibitor nanoliposome (i.e., Ce6-SB3CT@Liposome [Lip-SC]), which combines the PS, Ce6, and a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor (i.e., SB3CT) Liu H. et al. (2021). Nanoliposomes have significant anti-tumor proliferation and metastasis efficacy after laser irradiation in A375 cells. The relatively fast internalization of Lip-SC could accumulate in the tumor area under 660 nm light irradiation, induce apoptosis in cancer cells, which could trigger an immune response. In addition, it could also induce the expression of NK group 2 member D ligand (NKG2DL), while activate NKG2D, thus, NK cells could better recognize and kill tumor cells. The subsequent release of SB-3CT could further activate NK cells effectively and strengthen the immune system though inhibiting the shedding of soluble NKG2D ligands. As a result, Lip-SC caused induce apoptosis in cancer cells regardless of the presence or absence of irradiation. In the process of PDT agents inducing tumor cell necrosis and apoptosis, local inflammation occur and a variety of tumor cell antigens are exposed, thereby inducing local immune responses. Therefore, by supplementing immunomodulators to enhance immune activity, the anti-tumor effect of PDT can be increased. Dual-ligand-modified NPs increased the number of total liposomes bound to cancer cells through dual-ligand modification, and had higher tumor enrichment capacity and PDT efficiency than single-ligand-modified NPs. For example, Li and his team prepared Fru-Bio-Lip by co-modifying liposomes with fructose (targeting fructose transporter) and biotin (targeting multivitamin transporter) ligands Li J. et al. (2021). Besides targeted aptamer modification, the combination with near-infrared light-activated photon thermodynamic therapy (PTDT), PTT and other phototherapy methods is also an effective strategy to improve the tumor killing effect of PDT. Dai et al. synthesized thiadiazoloquinoxaline semiconductor polymer (PTT), 2, 2′-azobis [2-(2-imidazolin-2-yl) propane] dihydrochloride (AIPH) (PTDT prodrug) and γ-aminoacetic acid (GA, heat shock protein inhibitor) were incorporated into thermosensitive liposomes, which were then modified with targeting aptamers to form Lip(PTQ/GA/AIPH) Dai Z. et al. (2021). Under NIR-II laser irradiation, Lip (PTQ/GA/AIPH) could achieve precise diagnosis and effective suppression of deep triple-negative breast cancer. However, the clinical application of nanoliposomes in PDT still faces challenges due to poor stability in vivo and low drug loading (Cheng Y. et al., 2021).

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Structure of prostacyclin and its sensitizing effect in tumor cells. After PGIL is taken up by cancer cells, 1O2 generated by Ce6 triggered by NIR causes the liposomes in the outer layer to rupture, releasing Ce6 and LCP. Ce6 mediates PDT, while LCP enhances PDT-induced apoptosis, inhibits cell metastasis, and activates NK cell-mediated immune clearance by inhibiting galectin-3. Abbreviations: Gal-3, galectin-3 protein. Reproduced with permission from (Wang et al., 2019).

4.3 Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles

Among various nanomaterials, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) have become an important nano-delivery system for PDT and multiple combination therapy due to their unique physical and chemical advantages, such as high loading capacity, controllable pore size and morphology, versatile surface chemistry, satisfying biocompatibility and biodegradability, which can ensure stable and efficient loading of PSs, targeted delivery of PSs, and regulation of drug release and cellular uptake behavior (Wang Z. et al., 2021). Hypoxia is a typical feature of tumor TME, which seriously affects the efficacy of PDT. The development of nano-enzymes with the ability to produce oxygen is a promising strategy to overcome the oxygen-dependent of PDT. In this regard, Chen’s group had designed and synthesized a dual-nanozymes based cascade reactor HMSN@Au@MnO2-Fluorescein Derivative (HAMF), which was composed of hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles (HMSN), high-efficiency photosensitizer 4-DCF-MPYM (4-FM), ultra-small Au-NPs and MnO2 Chen et al. (2021e). 4-Fm was a thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) fluorescein derivative with high fluorescence quantum yield, photostability, two-photon excitation and low biological toxicity. Au NPs exhibited glucose oxidase (GOx)-mimic ability that could catalyze glucose into gluconic acid and H2O2, simultaneously, the consumption of glucose could cut off the energy supply of tumor cells (Zhang Y. et al., 2021). With the response to the hypoxic microenvironment, MnO2 could catalyze H2O2 into O2 and accelerate the oxidation of glucose by Au NPs to generate additional H2O2, which was used as a substrate for the catalytic reaction of MnO2, which can be used in light irradiation, thereby constantly producing 1O2 for enhanced PDT upon light irradiation. HAMF could alleviate tumor hypoxia and achieve an effective tumor inhibition in vitro and in vivo studies. Yin’s team had also designed and synthesized a kind of H2O2-responsive and oxygen-producing nanozyme by loading a large number of gold nanoclusters (AuNCs) into MSNs to form nanoassembly, and wrapped MnO2 nanosheets in the form of a switch shielding shell (denoted as AuNCs@mSiO2@MnO2) Yin et al. (2021). In a neutral physiological environment, stable MnO2 shells could switch off PDT by eliminating the generation of 1O2. However, in an acidic TME, the MnO2 shell reacted with H2O2, and simultaneously sufficient O2 generation guaranteed a 74% high 1O2 yield, which showing strong PDT performance. In addition, multifunctional NPs loading with chemotherapeutic drugs and PSs are also a promising method for effective tumor combination therapy. Zhang’s group had designed and synthesized a novel pH-sensitive and bubble-generating mesoporous silica-based drug delivery system (denoted as M (A) D@PI-PEG-RGD) (Figure 9) Zhang Z. et al. (2021). DOX and NH4HCO3 were loaded into MSNs pores, MSNs was coated with polydopamine (PDA) layer, and then ICG as a photothermal and photodynamic agent was loaded onto the PDA layer surface, finally the nanoparticles were modified with polyethylene glycol (PEG) and RGD. RGD is a ligand for the recognition site of integrins and displays great adhesion capacity between extracellular matrix cells and cells, which can improve the accuracy of M (A)D@PI-PEG-RGD. Under NIR irradiation, M (A)D@PI-PEG-RGD could generate ROS and induce the temperature rise performed by ICG. In addition, acidic environment and high temperature would also decompose NH4HCO3, thereby accelerating the release of DOX. In summary, the multifunctional pH-sensitive and bubble-producing M (A)D@PI-PEG-RGD combines chemotherapy, PTT and PDT to improve the therapeutic effect of tumors.

FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 9

Schematic illustration of M (A)D@PI-PEG-RGD for enhanced tumor combination therapy. M(A)D@PI-PEG-RGD targets tumor cells through RGD, generates ROS and induces temperature increase through ICG under NIR irradiation. In addition, the acidic microenvironment accelerates the release of DOX by breaking down NH4HCO3, which combine chemotherapy, PTT and PDT to enhance the therapeutic effect. Reproduced with permission from (Zhang J. et al., 2021).

4.4 Dendrimers

Dendrimers are synthetic high molecular polymers with tree-like and highly branched structure. They are composed of the small initial core, the internal cavity formed by multiple branches, and the peripheral functional groups. Due to their special structure, dendrimers have the advantages of easy surface modification with PSs along with other functional moieties and structural configuration with other components or nanoformulations via the hyperbranched units for enhanced tumor accumulation and penetration (Ouyang et al., 2021). The combination of molecular targeted therapy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and photodynamic therapy PDT can combat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with effective synergistic results (Qiao et al., 2021). However, the hypoxic TME not only affects the efficacy of PDT, but also induces EGFR-TKIs resistance. In this regard, Zhu and researchers had designed a nanocomplex APFHG by loading gefitinib (Gef) and PS hematoporphyrin (Hp) into an aptamer modified fluorinated dendrimer (APF) Zhu L. et al. (2021). Due to the targeting effect of EGFR-TKIs and the good oxygen-carrying capacity of APF, APFHG could specifically recognize EGFR-positive NSCLC cells and release Gef and Hp in response to the hypoxic acidic microenvironment. Under laser irradiation, APFHG could significantly increase the production of intracellular ROS, effectively improve the tumor hypoxia microenvironment, and overcome hypoxia-related drug resistance. In other work, X-ray-induced photodynamic therapy (XPDT) is overwhelmingly superior in treating deep-seated cancers (Chuang et al., 2020). However, low energy transfer efficiency of the therapeutic nanoplatform and hypoxic environment presented in the tumor tissue limits the therapeutic effect of XPDT. In order to improve the therapeutic effect of XPDT in deep-seated cancers, it is necessary to develop a delicate architecture to support the organization of nanoscintillator and multiple agents to improve the effectiveness of XPDT (Ahmad et al., 2019). In this regard, Zhao and researchers developed a dual-core-satellite architecture nanosmart system (CCT-DPRS) that the polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimer would be used as an intermediate framework with nanoscintillator, PSs, and sunitinib (SU) (Figure 10) (Jiang Z. et al., 2021). It had high XPDT and antiangiogenetic capabilities by systematic optimizing the scintillation efficiency and nanoplatform structure. After exposure to ultralow dose radiation, the codoped CaF2NPs converted the trapped energy into green emission, which enable further excitation of Rb to produce 1O2 to kill malignant tumor cells. At the same time, the antiangiogenic drug SU effectively blocked tumor vascularization aggravated by XPDT-mediated hypoxia, rendering a pronounced synergy effect. However, PAMAM dendrimer and indocyanine green (ICG) have inevitable interaction with proteins and cells, which induces biological toxicity and reduces therapeutic efficacy in vivo (Mindt et al., 2018). To overcome these shortcomings, Cui and researchers had designed a new drug delivery system G5MEK7C (n)-ICG with a “stealth” layer Cui et al. (2021). The surface of G5MEK7C (n)-ICG was modified with p (EK) peptide, which was double-layer super hydrophilic zwitterionic material. When the pH was lower than 6.5, the surface of G5MEK7C (n)-ICG showed a positive charge, which made it more likely to interact with the cell membrane in the tumor tissue. Therefore, under laser irradiation in vitro and in vivo, due to the good targeting effect of G5MEK7C(70)-ICG, G5MEK7C(70)-ICG was more effective in killing tumors than free ICG, while the damage to the liver was less than free ICG. The combination of chemotherapy and other therapeutic modalities can overcome chemoresistance through different mechanisms of action to achieve the purpose of enhancing anti-tumor efficacy. Furthermore, adding chemicals during mitosis to block cell division may be a promising approach to promote nuclear uptake of PSs. Recently, based on dendrimers and phenylboronic acid-sialic acid interactions, Zhong and researchers modified phenylboronic acid (PBA) into the surface of dendrimers, which can selectively recognize the sialic acids, meanwhile, conjugated lipoic acid modified Ps onto the core of dendrimer Zhong D. et al. (2021). In this work, a novel tumor targeting and penetrating, GSH/ROS heterogeneity responsive and PTX-loaded dendrimeric nanoparticles (P-NPs) was developed for mutually synergetic chemo-photodynamic therapy of PTX-resistant tumors. Lentinan was coated on the periphery of dendrimers through boronate bonds, which could avoid non-specific binding of P-NPs with normal cells during blood circulation. P-NPs penetrated into tumor tissues and actively entered into the cells through the PBA-SA interactions, showing enhanced cellular uptake and tumor penetration. Subsequently, P-NPs released PTX in response to high concentrations of glutathione and H2O2 in tumor cells, arresting the cells in the G2/M phase and exerting anti-tumor effects. At the same time, the time of nuclear membrane disintegration increased caused the enhanced intranuclear photosensitizer accumulation, thereby increasing the efficiency of PDT by increasing nuclear DNA damage.

FIGURE 10.

FIGURE 10

Schematic diagram of the construction and function of CCT-DPRS. (A) CCT-DPRS is prepared using PAMAM as an intermediate framework to load nanoscintillator, PSs, and SU. (B) Mechanism of combined therapy of XPDT and SU. After exposure to ultra-low dose radiation, Rb produces 1O2 to kill malignant tumor cells. Meanwhile, SU effectively block XPDT-mediated hypoxia-exacerbated tumor angiogenesis, with a clear synergistic effect. Reproduced with permission from (Jiang Y. et al., 2021).

4.5 Hydrogels

Hydrogel is a type of nano-delivery carrier system formed by a hydrophilic polymer material with a three-dimensional network structure through chemical cross-linking or physical cross-linking. Hydrogels are biocompatible and have similar physical properties like living tissues. Some drugs are easily dispersed in the hydrogel matrix (Hu et al., 2022). Therefore, hydrogels have been widely used for the delivery of hydrophilic drugs. Among them, local injection of hydrogels has received special attention in tumor treatment and prevention of tumor recurrence, because this injection method can achieve desired drug accumulation in tumors. Compared with oxygen-generating nanomaterials, prodrugs that can be activated by external light show the unique advantages of highly consistent responsiveness and high temporal and spatial selectivity (Rapp and DeForest, 2021). Recently, Liu’s group constructed a kind of original oxygen-generating hydrogel (OPeH) with photoactivated enzyme activity by loading the oxygen-generating MnO2 nanoparticles conjugated with protoporphyrin IXpt (PPIX), and the proenzyme nanoparticles (PeN) crosslinked by a 1O2 cleavable linker into alginate hydrogels (Figure 11) Liu J. et al. (2021). Under NIR laser irradiation, MnO2 NPs converted H2O2 into O2, which further promoted the production of 1O2 from PpIX and improved the efficiency of 1O2 generation. In addition, after PEN was cross-linked with the 1O2 cleavable linker, it induced cell death and suppressed metastasis by inhibiting the extracellular trap (NET) of neutrophils. In animal experiments, it was found that OPeH integrates PDT and NIR light-activated enzymes to achieve the combined therapeutic effect of inhibiting tumor growth and lung metastasis. In addition, phototherapy against deep tumors may greatly limited by the lack of light flux and the chemotherapy drugs against tumor cells may limited by insufficient resident time. Therefore, Zhong’s group developed a dual drug carrying system DOX-CA4P@Gel, which achieved the best curative effect, efficacy and safety through local sequential delivery of drugs Zhong Y. et al. (2021). With dextran oxide, chitosan, porphyrin and hollow mesoporous silica (HMSN), DOX-CA4P@Gel was constructed, in which combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P) and DOX were both loaded. In weakly acidic condition, the degradation rate of the hydrogels increased significantly. CA4P was released rapidly at the early stage and relatively stable after 48, while DOX released slowly at first and then quickly released after 48 h, showing an obvious sequential release behavior. The porphyrin in hydrogel could trigger the formation of ROS, DOX could kill cancer cells at different stages of proliferation, while CA4P could inhibit the establishment of blood vessels around the tumor and increase the sensitivity of cancer cells to DOX.

FIGURE 11.

FIGURE 11

Schematic diagram of the preparation and treatment principle of OPeH. (A) Schematic diagram of the preparation of OPeH. (B) Mechanism of oxygen production and NIR photoactivation of OPeH. OPeH integrates PDT and NIR light-activated enzymes to achieve the combined therapeutic effect of inhibiting tumor growth and lung metastasis. Reproduced with permission from (Liu N. et al., 2021).

4.6 Polymers

Due to the designability and diversity of composition, structure and function, polymers have become one of the preferred carrier materials for nanomedicine. Conjugated polymers can control tissue penetration by adjusting the conjugation length. Among them, the integration of multichromophoric conjugated polymer base NPs into PSs enhanced ROS generation by improving PSs solubility, permeability, and targeting (Jiang and McNeill, 2017). According to the characteristics of carbon-based fluorescent nanomaterials such as carbon dots (CDs) and carbon-based polymer dots (CPDs) with good biocompatibility and high fluorescence yield, Sajjad et al. conjugated green-emitting CPDs to PPa to enhance the photocatalytic performance of PSs through covalent and π-π interactions Sajjad et al. (2022). Semiconducting polymer NPs (PSBTBT NPs) can’t only load PSs, but also act as photothermal agents for PDT/PTT synergistic therapy. Inspired by “biomarker-triggered image”-guided therapy, Bao et al. loaded the fluorescence quenchers Rhodamine B (Rhod B) and Ce6 on PSBTBT NPs to prepare a smart “Sensing and Healing” nanoplatform for PTT/PDT combination therapy (PSBTBT-Ce6@Rhod NPs) (Figure 12) Bao et al. (2021). Similarly, IR780 iodide can generate heat and oxygen for PDT/PTT synergistic therapy. In addition, it has strong fluorescence intensity and inherent specificity for various tumor cells, which is suitable for near-infrared imaging of tumor cells. In view of this, Potara et al. used temperature-sensitive block copolymer Pluronic F127 to wrap IR780 iodide, and coupled folic acid (FA) to Plu-IR780 micelles through chitosan to designe a thermoresponsive and thermal reversible size distribution and spectral properties of a novel FA-targeted near-infrared phototherapy NPs (Plu-IR780-chit-FA) Potara et al. (2021). Plu-IR780-chit-FA not only retained the PTT, PDT and NIR imaging properties of IR780 iodide, but also adjusted the size of the nanocapsules to the smallest (30 nm) at physiological temperature to ensue cellular uptake, while also had maximum absorption and fluorescence emission intensity.

FIGURE 12.

FIGURE 12

Schematic representation of PSBTBT-Ce6@Rhod NPs-mediated PLD-activatable tumor images and combined PTT/PDT therapy. PSBTBT-Ce6@Rhod NPs can kill MCF-7 cells only under light conditions. Among them, PSBTBT-Ce6 NPs mediate PTT/PDT synergistic therapy, and can also cleave Rhod in response to overexpressed phospholipase D (PLD) in tumor tissue, resulting in the fluorescence recovery of Rhod B, thereby exerting biomarker-triggered fluorescence imaging and targeting PDT. Reproduced with permission from (Bao et al., 2021).

Polymeric micelles, which constructed by amphiphilic polymers, have been regarded as ideal carriers for nanomedicine due to their good biocompatibility, degradability, easy modification of the structure, and special “core-shell” structure (Tian and Mao, 2012). Using perfluorocarbons (PFCs) as oxygen carriers to directly deliver oxygen to tumors is a common way to relieve tumor hypoxia and enhance the PDT effect. Recently, Tseng et al. developed a folate-conjugated fluorinated polymeric micelle (PFFA)-Ce6 micellar system, which exhibited a higher ROS production, good long-term stability, higher oxygen carrying capacity and improved PDT efficacy in inhibiting tumor growth as compared to those of non-PFC system Tseng et al. (2021). The fluorinated segment in PFFA-Ce6 could not only maintain the oxygen carrying capacity of polymer micelle without the problem of PFC molecule leakage, but also acted as a reservoir to accommodate the hydrophobic Ce6 to enhance its solubility. The folic moiety in PFFA-Ce6 provided a function as a specific targeting ligand for cancer cells. In the in vitro cell study, due to the selective internalization of PFFA-Ce6, the cell growth inhibition of HeLa cells after irradiation was higher. Cancer cells are accustomed to oxidative stress caused by PDT through overexpressing glutathione (GSH) and other antioxidants. Therefore, preferentially amplifying the oxidative stress of tumor cells by consuming GSH or producing ROS is a reasonable treatment strategy to enhance the efficacy of PDT. To this end, Xia et al. designed a GSH-scavenging and ROS- generating polymeric micelle mPEG-S-S-PCL-Por (MSLP), which was composed of methoxy polyethylene glycol (MPEG)-SS-poly (ε-caprolactone)-protoporphyrin (POR) amphiphilic polymer and the anticancer drug DOX, for amplifying oxidative stress and enhanced anticancer therapy of PDT Xia et al. (2021). MSLP combined Chemotherapy-photodynamic therapy (Chemo-PDT)-based synergy therapy exhibited significant antitumor activity both in vitro (IC50 = 0.041 μg/ml) and much better antitumor efficacy than that of mPEG- PCL-Por (MLP) micelles in vivo. In addition, Yang et al. also designed a GSH-responsive dual receptor targeting nanomicelle system, which could be used for precise fluorescent bioimaging and superior synergistic chemo-phototherapy of tumors Yang Y. et al. (2021). IR780/PTX/FHSV micelles were composed of amphiphilic hyaluronic acid derivative (FHSV), paclitaxel (PTX) and photosensitizer IR780 iodide (IR780). Once they accumulated at the tumor site through enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effects, IR780/PTX/FHSV micelles could effectively enter tumor cells through receptor-mediated endocytosis, and then rapidly release PTX and IR780 in the GSH-rich tumor microenvironment. Under near-infrared laser irradiation, IR780 generated local high temperature and sufficient reactive oxygen species to promote tumor cell apoptosis and necrosis. The results of in vivo and in vitro experiments consistently shown that compared with single chemotherapy and phototherapy, IR780/PTX/FHSV micelle-mediated chemo-phototherapy could more effectively synergize anti-tumor effects to kill tumor cells. However, further clinical applications of polymers are limited due to the disadvantages of poor storage stability, potential tissue toxicity, limited loading capacity for hydrophilic drugs, and complicated preparation processes (Deng et al., 2021).

5 The Applications and the Photosensitizers for Clinical Tumor Treatment

PDT has been used to treat a variety of cancers, including lung, head and neck, brain, pancreas, peritoneal cavity, breast, prostate, skin, and liver cancer (Kubrak et al., 2022).

The first-generation PS are hematoporphyrin derivative. They have long plasma half-life and lack of sensitivity. For example, Photofrin® has been licensed for use in the oesophagus, lung, stomach, cervix and bladder. Since the absorption spectrum of Porfimer sodium peaks at 405 nm, its depth of action is limited to 0.5 cm (Ramsay et al., 2021).

The second-generation PSs are single compound synthesized, derived from porphyrin, bacteriochlorophyll, phthalocyanine, chlorin, benzoporphyrin, curcumin, methylene blue derivatives, etc., Compared with the first-generation PSs, the second-generation PSs have longer absorption spectrum (visible-near-infrared region), higher 1O2 yields, and better tumor targeting. For example, 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) has been successfully used in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma, actinic keratosis and oral premalignant disorder, Meso-tetrahydroxyphenyl chlorin (mTHPC-Foscan®) has been commonly used for advanced head and neck cancers (Zhang S. et al., 2022). Other second-generation PSs that have received clinical approval or are in clinical trials include Temoporfin (Foscan®), Motexafin lutetium, Palladium bacteriopheophorbide, Purlytin®, Verteporfin (Visudyne®), and Talaporfin (Laserphyrin®) (Baskaran et al., 2018).

The third-generation PS are characterized by combining the second-generation PSs with targeting entities or moieties, such as antibodies, amino acids, polypeptides, or by encapsulation into highly biocompatible nanocarriers to improve the ability of PS improve accumulation of PSs at the targeted tumor sites (Baskaran et al., 2018). Now, third-generation PSs that can significantly improve cancer targeting efficiency through chemical modification, nano-delivery systems, or antibody conjugation are widely studied for preclinical studies, and if satisfactory results are obtained, then more third-generation PSs will be promoted to enter the clinical research stage (Mfouo-Tynga et al., 2021).

6 Conclusion and Perspective

In summary, we have introduced the advantages and disadvantages (Tables 1, 2)and recent studies (Table 3) based on Metal NPs, Nanoliposomes, MSNs, Dendrimers, Hydrogels, Polymers, which overcome the obstacles of PDT in tumor tissues, such as poor biocompatibility and low delivery efficiency of PSs, compromising poor light transmittance of deep tissues, and hypoxia, reactive oxygen species scavenging and immunosuppression in tumor TME (Lee et al., 2022). Insufficient supply of pivotal factors including PSs, light, and O2 highly reduces the therapeutic efficacy of PDT. Therefore, the primary source of photodynamic therapy should be optimized by setting parameters such as input dose, intratumoral drug level, light source, and tissue oxygen conditions. Based on recent progress in the combination of nano- and biotechnology, various kinds of NPs have been developed for PDT, and they showed promising potential to overcome these obstacles. PSs are an indispensable key ingredient in photodynamic therapy. In most cases, PSs are aggregated inside the nanoparticles, and 1O2 has the disadvantages of short half-life (<40 ns) and short intracellular distance (<20 nm), resulting in 1O2 needing time and space to diffuse out from NPs to attack cells of biomolecules and further impairs the efficiency of PDT (Deng et al., 2021). Therefore, it is very necessary to release free PSs from nanoparticles before irradiating cancer cells or tumor tissue with light. In addition to the optimization of the physical structure and chemical composition of passive targeting of PSs and the modification of active targeting ligands for efficient, safe, and better tissue penetration, improving drug delivery and combination therapy are also effective strategies. In recent years, stimuli-responsive nanomaterials have received increasing attention because they can react to both endogenous stimuli (low pH, enzymes, redox agents, hypoxia) and exogenous stimuli (light, temperature, magnetic field, ultrasonic) and other stimuli to change its physicochemical properties and release PSs (Chang et al., 2021). However, the release of PSs from endogenous stimuli-responsive nanocarriers is slow due to weak stimulation intensity. In contrast, exogenous stimuli are easily modulated remotely in intensity and timing to release drugs on demand in diseased tissues or cells. However, the poor penetration of drugs into deep tumor tissue and the poor penetration of excitation light source into deep tumor tissue are important issues that need to be solved for NPs delivery systems. The use of UCNPs, XPDT, and fluorescence imaging techniques provides clues for efficient light delivery to deep tissues. Among them, the potential toxicity of heavy metals is a serious limitation, and their potential toxicity needs to be carefully considered, and favorable distribution, degradation and excretion should be achieved (Medici et al., 2021). Attempts to overcome hypoxia caused by hypoxia in tumor tissues include artificial oxygen production, Fenton reaction, and the combined application of chemical drugs related to hypoxia. In addition to promising results, combined with the latest methods to normalize tumor blood vessels and reduce hypoxia itself, it is also expected to become an effective method for PDT to treat tumors. Although many of these ideas are at the level of cell experiments and animal experiments, these studies have made significant progress over traditional PDT research. Therefore, we hope that the results of these trials can maximize the clinical efficacy of PDT in the future. In addition, future research and development of new nanomaterials should focus on targeted therapy and personal medicine. In order to improve the specificity and safety of drugs, targeted delivery and on-demand controlled/triggerable release are still the focus of drug delivery platform development.

TABLE 1.

Summary of the advantages and disadvantages of Metal NPs.

Metal NPs Advantages Disadvantages
Au based NPs ●Utilization for PTT, PAI ●Limited stability under aqueous conditions
●Controllable size and structure and easy surface modification
●Optical quenching ability
●Chemical inertness and excellent biocompatibility
Ag based NPs ●Tuning optoelectronic properties according to size and shape ●Ag NPs with diameters less than 200 nm are prone to aggregation
●High 1O2 yield
Cu based NPs ●High photothermal conversion efficiency ●Potential toxicity
●Low price
●Simple synthesis
●Controllable morphology and size
●Microwaves-induced PDT
Ru based NPs ●Low-lying excitation energy states and high ROS yield ●Dark toxicity
●Good photophysical and photochemical properties ●DNA mutation
●Controllable photophysical properties ●Being excited only by short-wave visible light
●Low photobleaching rates
●High water solubility
Ir based NPs ●Unique oxygen quenching pathway ●Most Ir complexes are water-insoluble
●Excellent electrocatalytic performance
●Long triplet state lifetime and good photophysical properties
●Significant tumor targeting ability
Metal oxide-based NPs ●Utilization for PDT, PTT ●Limited stability under aqueous conditions
●Clinical used MRI contrast agent ●Toxicity accumulation of NPs
●Magnetic hyperthermia and PAI ●Physical damage from magnetic guidance
●Easy surface modification
●High photostability
●Large extinction coefficient
●High emission quantum yield
UCNPs ●Utilization for PDT, PTT, bioimaging, diagnosis, and therapy ●Potential toxicity
●Narrow emission bandwidth, large decay time, resistance to photobleaching, and no autofluorescence background ●Limited biodegradability
●Unique optical property and utilization for luminescence imaging ●Low drug loading capacity
●Easy surface modification and functionalization ●Low quantum yield and superheating effects under 980 nm light source
●Ability to absorb light in the NIR region
Carbon-Based NPs ●Strong optical absorbance and utilization for PTT, PAI ●Induce inflammatory reactions and cytotoxicity
●Unique electrical property ●Limited biodegradability
●Easy surface modification ●Low utilization of visible light
●High surface-to-volume ratio ●Expensive and complex synthetic method
●Thermal stability
●High photoluminescence quantum yield
Sulfur-based NPs ●Utilization for PTT, CDT, PDT ●The degradation products have potential toxicity
●Good biocompatibility ●Killing efficiency on hypoxic tumor cells is limited
●High photothermal conversion efficiency
●Cheap and simple manufacturing method
●Biodegradability and rapid metabolism
Phosphorus-based NPs ●Optical and electrical properties better than carbon-based metal NPSs and sulfur-based metal NPSs ●Weak absorption in the biowindow and low photo catalytic activity in a TME
●For making photosensitizers ●The inherent instability of BP NSs and BP QDs in water–air environments
MOFs ●Facile diffusion of ROSs through their porous structures ●Complex design, lengthy preparation steps and high operating costs
●High specific surface area ●Early clearance by body immune system
●Controllable size, shape and function of the pore ●Off-target accumulation
●Effectively enhance the ROS generation effect ●Untimely drug release ability
●High PSs loadings

TABLE 2.

Advantages and disadvantages of other representative nanomaterials.

Type Advantages Disadvantages
Nanoliposomes ●Biocompatibility and biodegradability ●Low drug loading capacity
●High structural flexibility ●Limited stability in vivo
●Targeted delivery and triggered release ●Uncontrolled drug leakage
●Easy and diverse surface modification ●The inevitable self-quenching effect of water-insoluble PSs
●Prolonged tissue penetration and retention of PSs
MSNs ●Large specific surface area and huge specific pore volume ●The larger the specific surface area, the greater the cytotoxicity
●Easy and diverse internal and external surface modification
●High loading efficiency
●High targeting
Dendrimers ●Controllable molecular size ●High molecular weight, high-density surface positive charge increases the toxicity of dendrimers
●Large number of terminal functional groups
●Large number of cavities in the molecule
Hydrogels ●Good biocompatibility ●Low mechanical strength
●Efficient adhesion to biotic surfaces ●Poor repeatability of material properties
●Delivery of hydrophilic drugs
Polymers ●The designability and diversity of composition, structure and function ●Limited storage stability
●Diverse surface modification ●Potential toxicity
●High loading efficiency and sustained release ●Limited loading capacity for hydrophilic drugs
●Good circulation stability ●Complex synthesis process
●Improve PSs solubility, permeability, and targeting

TABLE 3.

Summary of recently developed NPs to overcome the obstacles of current photodynamic therapy in tumor.

Obstacles to overcome NP type Name Strategy Year
PSs delivery DNA-modified NPs Apt-DNA-Au nanomachines (Yu et al., 2021) Tumor-associated TK1 mRNA-responsive PSs release and survivin targeting by antisense DNA 2021
DNA-modified NPs TCPP-gDNA-Au/PLNP (Su et al., 2021) Nucleolin targeting by AS1411 aptamer 2021
DNA-modified NPs Au/Pd ONP-DNA nanomachine (Cai et al., 2021a) Using the primary marker miRNA-21 and two auxiliary markers miRNA-224 and TK-1 mRNA to improve the accuracy of tumor identification 2021
DNA-modified NPs Label-rcDNA-AuG (Zhang et al., 2021b) Recognition of cancer cells by miR-21 2021
Biotin-modified NPs BT@Au-NPs (He et al., 2021b) Movement to cellular sites and efficient binding sites in tumor cell lines by biotin 2021
AuNRs-grafted RGD HB-AuNRs@cRGD (Liu et al., 2021f) Binding of RGD to integrin avb3 in tumor cells and tumor neovascular endothelial cells 2021
Au nanoshells 40/20 core radius/shell thickness optimized gold nanoshell (Farooq and de Araujo, 2021) Optimization of nanoshells structure (silica core radius and gold shell thickness) to increase the singlet oxygen production 2021
Heterometallic colloids (L' = I−, CH3COO−) Mo6Au2 colloids (Faizullin et al., 2021) Affecting NPs cytotoxicity, cellular internalization, and PDT activity by modulating the order of supramolecular stacking by Mo6-Au2 2021
Polymer-coated AuNRs Au-MB-PEG NPs (Liu et al., 2021g) Response to highly expressed HOCl in the tumor region via FDOCl-24 2021
Cu-based Fenton reagents Cu-LDH/HMME@Lips (Wu et al., 2021) Active infiltration of cancer cells by Cu-LDH for deep tumor therapy. Extended circulatory residence time by liposome encapsulation 2021
Hollow mesoporous silica supported UCNPs UCNP/RB@mSiO2-NH (Chen et al., 2021a) “One treatment, multiple irradiation” PDT strategy for efficient nuclear-targeted PDT 2021
Metal-organic frameworks Zn (II)-PPIX/G-quadruplex VEGF aptamer-tetrahedra structures (Zhang et al., 2021c) Release of PSs in response to VEGF via VEGF-aptamer-functionalized DNA tetrahedra 2021
Nanoliposomes Fru-Bio-Lip (Li et al., 2021b) Increased total number of liposomes bound to cancer cells by dual-ligand modification of fructose and Bt 2021
Fluorinated dendrimer APFHG (Zhu et al., 2021a) EGFR-TKI specifically recognizes EGFR-positive NSCLC cells and releases Gef and Hp in response to a hypoxic acidic microenvironment 2021
Polyamidoamine Dendrimers G5MEK7C(n)-ICG (Cui et al., 2021) p (EK) converts to positive charge in response to acidic TME and interacts more readily with tumor cell membranes 2021
Light delivery Bimetallic NPs Au-BiGSH@IR808 (Jia et al., 2021) Modified by IR808 fuel for higher NIR photon capture capability 2021
Ultra-thin two-dimensional nanosheets 4-layer O-Ti7O13 nanosheets (Dai et al., 2021a) X-ray irradiation-induced ROS generation by OTi7O13 nanosheets and chemotherapy mediated by DOX 2021
Ti-based targeting agent B-TiO2@SiO2-HA (Guo et al., 2021) Simultaneous generation of ROS and hyperthermia under NIR-II laser irradiation and full spectral response to light stimulation obtained by B-TiO2 2021
Semiconductor metal oxide SnO2-x@SiO2-HA (Gao et al., 2021a) SnO2-x-mediated full-spectrum response target-specific synergistic PDT/PTT 2021
Block copolymer Plu-IR780-chit-FA (Potara et al., 2021) PTT/PDT synergistic therapy under NIR via IR780 2021
UCNP UCNP/RB, Ce6 (Pham et al., 2021) Dual PSs have higher PDT efficiency than single PS 2021
New PSs Ru complex Ru-I (He et al., 2021c) Red-Light-Responsive Ru Complex PSs for lysosome localization PDT 2021
Amphiphilic polymer DSPE-PEG2000-Folic encapsulated Ru (II) polypyridine complex (Karges et al., 2021) Enhanced tumor cell selectivity by DSPE-PEG2000-Folic 2021
Ru (II) complex Ru (II) complex-based bioorthogonal two-photon PSs (Lin et al., 2021a) Anti-tumor effects by specifically binding to cancer cell membranes and inducing cell membrane damage 2021
Ir compounds Ir (III) complexes (Xiao et al., 2021) Different degrees of oxygen quenching via Ir (III) complexes 2021
Bifunctional Ir (III) complexes 4 ([Ir(Bzq)2 (dpa-acr)]+ (Redrado et al., 2021) Targeted mitochondrial and cellular imaging via organic chromophores and Ir (III) complexes 2021
Superparamagnetic Fe3O4 NPs E-NP (Sengupta et al., 2022) E-NP show immunoprotective and anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting MPO and down-regulating NO 2022
Ru (II) polypyridine complexes Ru-g-C3N4 (Sengupta et al., 2022) Oxygen self-sufficient PSs generated by grafting metal complexes onto g-C3N4 2021
Graphitic carbon nitride g-C3N5NSs (Liu et al., 2021h) Due to the addition of nitrogen-rich triazole groups, the visible light utilization and photocatalytic activity of g-C3N5NSs are higher than those of g-C3N4NSs 2021
nanoheterostructures Ni3S2/Cu1.8S@HA (Sang et al., 2021) Production of ROS and O2 by Ni3S2/Cu1.8S 2021
BPQDs BPQDs@PEI + RGD-PEG + DMMA (Liu et al., 2021i) Enrichment of tumor targets through pH-responsive charge switching 2021
2D black phosphorus nanosheets Cyan@BPNSs (Qi et al., 2021) Continuous oxygen supply through cyanobacterial photosynthesis 2021
Red/black phosphorus composite nanosheet M-RP/BP@ZnFe2O4 (Kang et al., 2022) ZnFe2O4 enhances the productivity of ROS through the Fenton reaction and can also induce apoptosis in MB-231 cells through oxidative stress 2022
Carbon-based polymer dots PPa-CPD (Sajjad et al., 2022) PPa enhances the photocatalytic performance of photosensitizers via covalent and π-π interactions 2021
Unfavorable TME Hyaluronic acid-Bimetallic NPs ToHAu@Pt-PEG-Ce6/HA (Bu et al., 2021) Oxygen enrichment in tumor and PDT by Pt 2021
Bimetallic NPs Au/Ag NR (Jin et al., 2021b) Increases heat and ROS production by altering the amount of Ag+, triggering ICD in tumor cells 2021
lateral nano-heterostructure (Bi/BiOx)-based lateral nano-heterostructure (Qiu et al., 2021) Oxygen-independent PDT using BiOx 2021
Nanozyme IrO2-Gox@HA NPs (Yuan et al., 2022a) Enhancement of type II PDT by GOx and IrO2 NPs 2022
ZGGO durable luminescent NPs Mn-ZGGO (Ding et al., 2021b) Oxygen-independent PDT using MnOx shell 2021
Nanozyme ICG@PEI-PBA-HA/CeO2 (Zeng et al., 2021) CeO2 catalyzes H2O2 to O2 through Ce3+/Ce4+ cerium valence cycling 2021
UCNPs UCTM NPs (Cheng et al., 2021a) Oxygen-enriching role of thylakoid membranes of chloroplasts in tumors and photodynamic therapy 2021
UCNPs CM@UCNP-Rb/PTD (Jin et al., 2021a) PEG-TK-DOX releases DOX in response to ROS and prevention of tumor metastasis by CD73 antibody 2021
MIPs modify UCNPs MC540/MNPs@MIPs/UCNP (Lin et al., 2021b) Using MIPs to target tumor cells and prevent PD-1/PD-L1 immune blockade 2021
Molybdenum Carbide Mo2C@N-Carbon-3@PEG (Hou et al., 2022) Photocatalytic Oxygen Generation by Mo2C 2022
Engineered bacteria EB (Ding et al., 2021a) Targeting anoxic TME and catalyzing H2O2 to produce O2 using engineered Escherichia coli 2021
Metal-organic frameworks UIO@Ca-Pt (Ren et al., 2021) Increase intracellular oxygen content by endogenous oxygen through CaO2 and Pt 2021
Nanoscale iron-based metal organic frameworks MIL-101(Fe)@TCPP (Chen et al., 2021b) Fenton reaction increases intracellular oxygen levels 2021
Metal Organic Framework Nanosystems NMOF@SF/TPZ (NST) (Yu et al., 2022) Disturbed redox metabolism in tumor cells caused by GSH depletion and Fenton reaction oxygen enrichment 2021
Metal-organic frameworks Ag-AgCl@Au NMs (Liu et al., 2021j) Au nanorods produces O2 through a photocatalytic reaction 2021
Nanoliposomes Ce6-SB3CT@Liposome (Lip-SC) (Liu et al., 2021a) The released SB-3CT can effectively activate NK cells and enhance the immune system by inhibiting the shedding of soluble NKG2D ligands 2021
Double nanozyme modified HMSN HMSN@Au@MnO2-Fluorescein Derivative (HAMF) (Chen et al., 2021c) Enhancement of intracellular oxygen level by catalytic reaction of MnO2 and Au NPs 2021
Double nanozyme modified HMSN AuNCs@mSiO2@MnO2 (Yin et al., 2021) Acid-TME-responsive dual nanozyme-catalyzed reaction to enhance intracellular oxygen level via MnO2 nanosheets 2021
Polyamidoamine Dendrimers CCT-DPRS (Mindt et al., 2018) CaF2NPs convert low-dose X-radiation to Wei-green light to excite Rb to generate ROS, while releasing SU to inhibit tumor angiogenesis 2021
Hydrogels OPeH (Liu et al., 2021b) MnO2 NPs convert H2O2 to O2, which further promotes the generation of 1O2 from PpIX and improves the generation efficiency of 1O2 2021
Fluorinated polymer micelles (PFFA)-Ce6 (Tseng et al., 2021) Using perfluorocarbons to increase intracellular oxygen levels 2021
Amphiphilic polymer micelles MPEG-S-S-PCL-Por (MSLP) (Xia et al., 2021) Amplifies oxidative stress in tumor cells by depleting GSH and producing ROS 2021
Synergistic therapy layered double hydroxides ICG/CAC-LDH (Wang et al., 2021a) Induces intracellular GSH depletion through redox reactions, and can also be decomposed to generate Cu+ and Ce3+, which stimulates Fenton-like reactions to generate OH 2021
Bimetallic NPs Au1Bi1-SR NPs (He et al., 2021a) The photothermal effect of NPs is enhanced by the introduction of Bi 2021
Bifunctional micelles Micelle-Ir (Liu et al., 2021c) Promotion of singlet oxygen generation and photothermal effect via BODIPY-Ir 2021
Nanozyme MIP/Ce6 (Li et al., 2021a) PTT by IrO2 and TME-responsive PDT by MnO2 2021
zeolitic imidazole framework-67 NPs Co3S4-ICG (Jiang et al., 2021b) Promoting Fenton reaction to generate ROS through PTT 2021
Bovine serum albumin (BSA) NP FeS2@SRF@BSA (Feng et al., 2021) The combination of Fenton-like reaction and PDT enhanced ROS production and antitumor effect 2021
Metal-Organic Framework Zr-MOF@PPa/AF@PEG (Wang et al., 2021b) Zr-MOF@PPA/AF@PEG take advantage of the PDT-induced hypoxia to activate HIF-1 inhibitor AF to enhance the anti-tumor effect and achieve the synergistic PDT- chemotherapy (PDT-CT) therapeutic effects 2021
Metal-Organic Framework Core-Shell Hybrid Materials Au@MOF-FA (Cai et al., 2021b) Fe3O(OAc)6(H2O)3+-mediated Fenton reaction and Au nanorod-mediated PTT 2021
Nanoliposomes Lip(PTQ/GA/AIPH) (Dai et al., 2021b) PTDT/PTT/PDT synergistic therapy via PTT, PTDT prodrug and GA 2021
PEGylated MSNs M(A)D@PI-PEG-RGD (Zhang et al., 2021d) Synergistic treatment of chemotherapy, PTT and PDT by ICG and DOX 2021
Phenylboronic acid modified dendrimers P-NPs (Zhong et al., 2021a) Synergistic chemophotodynamic therapy that releases PTX in response to high concentrations of glutathione and H2O2 in tumor cells increases intranuclear PSs through nuclear membrane disassembly 2021
Hydrogels DOX-CA4P@Gel (Zhong et al., 2021b) The gel can be slowly degraded under acidic TME, and DOX and CA4P are released in different time sequences for tumor therapy 2021
Polymer micelles IR780/PTX/FHSV micelles (Yang et al., 2021a) Release of PTX and IR780 in response to GSH for chemophototherapy 2021
“ Sensing and Healing” nanoplatform Bimetallic NPs Au-AgNP-Ag-HM (Wang et al., 2021c) The imaging of intracellular caspase-3 and ROS by DEVD and Au-Ag-HM differentiates cancer cells from normal cells 2021
Semiconducting polymer NPs PSBTBT-Ce6@Rhod NPs (Bao et al., 2021) PSBTBT NPs loaded with Rhodamine B and Ce6 for combined PTT/PDT therapy 2021

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written through the contributions of all authors. LC, JH, and SL conceived this work. LC and JH mainly wrote the manuscript. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Ahmad F., Wang X., Jiang Z., Yu X., Liu X., Mao R., et al. (2019). Codoping Enhanced Radioluminescence of Nanoscintillators for X-Ray-Activated Synergistic Cancer Therapy and Prognosis Using Metabolomics. Acs Nano 13, 10419–10433. 10.1021/acsnano.9b04213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Algorri J. F., Ochoa M., Roldán-Varona P., Rodríguez-Cobo L., López-Higuera J. M. (2021). Photodynamic Therapy: A Compendium of Latest Reviews. Cancers 13, 4447. 10.3390/cancers13174447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arias-Egido E., Laguna-Marco M. A., Piquer C., Jiménez-Cavero P., Lucas I., Morellón L., et al. (2021). Dimensionality-driven Metal-Insulator Transition in Spin-Orbit-Coupled IrO2. Nanoscale 13, 17125–17135. 10.1039/d1nr04207f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bao B., Su P., Song K., Cui Y., Zhai X., Xu Y., et al. (2021). A Smart "Sense-And-Treat" Nanoplatform Based on Semiconducting Polymer Nanoparticles for Precise Photothermal-Photodynamic Combined Therapy. Biomacromolecules 22, 1137–1146. 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c01567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baskaran R., Lee J., Yang S.-G. (2018). Clinical Development of Photodynamic Agents and Therapeutic Applications. Biomater. Res. 22, 25. 10.1186/s40824-018-0140-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bu Y., Huang R., Li Z., Zhang P., Zhang L., Yang Y., et al. (2021). Anisotropic Truncated Octahedral Au with Pt Deposition on Arris for Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance-Enhanced Photothermal and Photodynamic Therapy of Osteosarcoma. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 13, 35328–35341. 10.1021/acsami.1c07181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cai X., Zhao Y., Wang L., Hu M., Wu Z., Liu L., et al. (2021a). Synthesis of Au@MOF Core-Shell Hybrids for Enhanced Photodynamic/photothermal Therapy. J. Mat. Chem. B 9, 6646–6657. 10.1039/d1tb00800e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cai Z., Fu Y., Qiu Z., Wang Y., Wang W., Gu W., et al. (2021b). Multitarget Reaction Programmable Automatic Diagnosis and Treatment Logic Device. Acs Nano 15, 19150–19164. 10.1021/acsnano.1c07307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cao H., Yang Y., Liang M., Ma Y., Sun N., Gao X., et al. (2021). Pt@polydopamine Nanoparticles as Nanozymes for Enhanced Photodynamic and Photothermal Therapy. Chem. Commun. 57, 255–258. 10.1039/d0cc07355e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cendrowicz E., Sas Z., Bremer E., Rygiel T. P. (2021). The Role of Macrophages in Cancer Development and Therapy. Cancers 13, 1946. 10.3390/cancers13081946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chang D., Ma Y., Xu X., Xie J., Ju S. (2021). Stimuli-Responsive Polymeric Nanoplatforms for Cancer Therapy. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 707319. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.707319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen C., Ni X., Jia S., Liang Y., Wu X., Kong D., et al. (2019). Massively Evoking Immunogenic Cell Death by Focused Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress Using an AIE Luminogen with a Twisted Molecular Structure. Adv. Mat. 31, 1904914. 10.1002/adma.201904914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen J., Wang Y., Niu H., Wang Y., Wu A., Shu C., et al. (2021a). Metal-Organic Framework-Based Nanoagents for Effective Tumor Therapy by Dual Dynamics-Amplified Oxidative Stress. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 13, 45201–45213. 10.1021/acsami.1c11032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen M., Song J., Zhu J., Hong G., An J., Feng E., et al. (2021b). A Dual‐Nanozyme‐Catalyzed Cascade Reactor for Enhanced Photodynamic Oncotherapy against Tumor Hypoxia. Adv. Healthc. Mat. 10, 2101049. 10.1002/adhm.202101049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen X., Zhang Y., Zhang X., Zhang Z., Zhang Y. (2021c). Rationally Designed Upconversion Nanoparticles for NIR Light-Controlled Lysosomal Escape and Nucleus-Based Photodynamic Therapy. Microchim. Acta 188, 349. 10.1007/s00604-021-04915-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen Y., Bai L., Zhang P., Zhao H., Zhou Q. (2021d). The Development of Ru(II)-Based Photoactivated Chemotherapy Agents. Molecules 26, 5679. 10.3390/molecules26185679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen Y., Jin H., Song Y., Huang T., Cao J., Tang Q., et al. (2021e). Targeting Tumor‐associated Macrophages: A Potential Treatment for Solid Tumors. J. Cell.Physiol. 236, 3445–3465. 10.1002/jcp.30139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cheng X., Gao J., Ding Y., Lu Y., Wei Q., Cui D., et al. (2021a). Multi‐Functional Liposome: A Powerful Theranostic Nano‐Platform Enhancing Photodynamic Therapy. Adv. Sci. 8, 2100876. 10.1002/advs.202100876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cheng Y., Zheng R., Wu X., Xu K., Song P., Wang Y., et al. (2021b). Thylakoid Membranes with Unique Photosystems Used to Simultaneously Produce Self‐Supplying Oxygen and Singlet Oxygen for Hypoxic Tumor Therapy. Adv. Healthc. Mat. 10, 2001666. 10.1002/adhm.202001666 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chou M.-Y., Yang M.-H. (2021). Interplay of Immunometabolism and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in the Tumor Microenvironment. Ijms 22, 9878. 10.3390/ijms22189878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chuang Y.-C., Chu C.-H., Cheng S.-H., Liao L.-D., Chu T.-S., Chen N.-T., et al. (2020). Annealing-modulated Nanoscintillators for Nonconventional X-Ray Activation of Comprehensive Photodynamic Effects in Deep Cancer Theranostics. Theranostics 10, 6758–6773. 10.7150/thno.41752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cui T., Li S., Chen S., Liang Y., Sun H., Wang L. (2021). "Stealth" Dendrimers with Encapsulation of Indocyanine Green for Photothermal and Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer. Int. J. Pharm. 600, 120502. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Curio S., Jonsson G., Marinović S. (2021). A Summary of Current NKG2D-Based CAR Clinical Trials. Immunother. Adv. 1, b18. 10.1093/immadv/ltab018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dahiya R., Dahiya S., Fuloria N. K., Jankie S., Agarwal A., Davis V., et al. (2021). Natural Thiazoline-Based Cyclodepsipeptides from Marine Cyanobacteria: Chemistry, Bioefficiency and Clinical Aspects. Cmc 28, 7887–7909. 10.2174/0929867328666210526095436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dai Y., Zhao H., He K., Du W., Kong Y., Wang Z., et al. (2021a). NIR‐II Excitation Phototheranostic Nanomedicine for Fluorescence/Photoacoustic Tumor Imaging and Targeted Photothermal‐Photonic Thermodynamic Therapy. Small 17, 2102527. 10.1002/smll.202102527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dai Z., Xu X., Guo Z., Zheng K., Song X.-Z., Qi X., et al. (2021b). Effect of ROS Generation on Highly Dispersed 4-layer O-Ti7O13 Nanosheets toward Tumor Synergistic Therapy. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 120, 111666. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111666 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. De Lerma Barbaro A., Palano M. T., Cucchiara M., Gallazzi M., Mortara L., Bruno A. (2021). Metabolic Rewiring in the Tumor Microenvironment to Support Immunotherapy: A Focus on Neutrophils, Polymorphonuclear Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells and Natural Killer Cells. Vaccines 9, 1178. 10.3390/vaccines9101178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Deng K., Yu H., Li J.-M., Li K.-H., Zhao H.-Y., Ke M., et al. (2021). Dual-step Irradiation Strategy to Sequentially Destroy Singlet Oxygen-Responsive Polymeric Micelles and Boost Photodynamic Cancer Therapy. Biomaterials 275, 120959. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ding D., Feng Y., Qin R., Li S., Chen L., Jing J., et al. (2021a). Mn3+-rich Oxide/persistent Luminescence Nanoparticles Achieve Light-free Generation of Singlet Oxygen and Hydroxyl Radicals for Responsive Imaging and Tumor Treatment. Theranostics 11, 7439–7449. 10.7150/thno.62437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ding S., Liu Z., Huang C., Zeng N., Jiang W., Li Q. (2021b). Novel Engineered Bacterium/Black Phosphorus Quantum Dot Hybrid System for Hypoxic Tumor Targeting and Efficient Photodynamic Therapy. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 13, 10564–10573. 10.1021/acsami.0c20254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Duo Y., Luo G., Li Z., Chen Z., Li X., Jiang Z., et al. (2021). Photothermal and Enhanced Photocatalytic Therapies Conduce to Synergistic Anticancer Phototherapy with Biodegradable Titanium Diselenide Nanosheets. Small 17, 2103239. 10.1002/smll.202103239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Faizullin B. A., Strelnik I. D., Dayanova I. R., Gerasimova T. P., Kholin K. V., Nizameev I. R., et al. (2021). Structure Impact on Photodynamic Therapy and Cellular Contrasting Functions of Colloids Constructed from Dimeric Au(I) Complex and Hexamolybdenum Clusters. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 128, 112355. 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Fakurnejad S., Krishnan G., van Keulen S., Nishio N., Birkeland A. C., Baik F. M., et al. (2019). Intraoperative Molecular Imaging for Ex Vivo Assessment of Peripheral Margins in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front. Oncol. 9, 1476. 10.3389/fonc.2019.01476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Farooq S., de Araujo R. E. (2021). Identifying High Performance Gold Nanoshells for Singlet Oxygen Generation Enhancement. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 35, 102466. 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Feng M., Li M., Dai R., Xiao S., Tang J., Zhang X., et al. (2021). Multifunctional FeS2 @SRF@BSA Nanoplatform for Chemo-Combined Photothermal Enhanced Photodynamic/chemodynamic Combination Therapy. Biomater. Sci.-Uk 10, 258. 10.1039/d1bm01597d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gao C., Guo W., Guo X., Ding Z., Ding Y., Shen X.-C. (2021a). Black SnO2−x Based Nanotheranostic for Imaging-Guided Photodynamic/photothermal Synergistic Therapy in the Second Near-Infrared Window. Acta Biomater. 129, 220–234. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.05.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gao C., Lyu F., Yin Y. (2021b). Encapsulated Metal Nanoparticles for Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 121, 834–881. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Guo X., Wen C., Xu Q., Ruan C., Shen X.-C., Liang H. (2021). A Full-Spectrum Responsive B-TiO2@SiO2-HA Nanotheranostic System for NIR-II Photoacoustic Imaging-Guided Cancer Phototherapy. J. Mat. Chem. B 9, 2042–2053. 10.1039/d0tb02952a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. He F., Ji H., Feng L., Wang Z., Sun Q., Zhong C., et al. (2021a). Construction of Thiol-Capped Ultrasmall Au-Bi Bimetallic Nanoparticles for X-Ray CT Imaging and Enhanced Antitumor Therapy Efficiency. Biomaterials 264, 120453. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. He G., Xu N., Ge H., Lu Y., Wang R., Wang H., et al. (2021b). Red-Light-Responsive Ru Complex Photosensitizer for Lysosome Localization Photodynamic Therapy. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 13, 19572–19580. 10.1021/acsami.0c22551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. He Y., Gao Q., Lv C., Liu L. (2021c). Improved Photothermal Therapy of Brain Cancer Cells and Photogeneration of Reactive Oxygen Species by Biotin Conjugated Gold Photoactive Nanoparticles. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 215, 112102. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2020.112102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hou H., Wang Z., Ma Y., Yu K., Zhao J., Lin H., et al. (2022). NIR-driven Intracellular Photocatalytic Oxygen-Supply on Metallic Molybdenum carbide@N-Carbon for Hypoxic Tumor Therapy. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 607, 1–15. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.08.177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hu S., Zhi Y., Shan S., Ni Y. (2022). Research Progress of Smart Response Composite Hydrogels Based on Nanocellulose. Carbohydr. Polym. 275, 118741. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Huang C., Chen T., Zhu D., Huang Q. (2020a). Enhanced Tumor Targeting and Radiotherapy by Quercetin Loaded Biomimetic Nanoparticles. Front. Chem. 8, 225. 10.3389/fchem.2020.00225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Huang L., Liu J., Zhu Y., Zhou Q., Xiao B., Sun Z., et al. (2021). The Role of Nuclear Receptor Transcription Factor NR2F6 in Tumor. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao 37, 2595–2602. 10.13345/j.cjb.200488 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Huang L., Wu W., Li Y., Huang K., Zeng L., Lin W., et al. (2020b). Highly Effective Near-Infrared Activating Triplet-Triplet Annihilation Upconversion for Photoredox Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 18460–18470. 10.1021/jacs.0c06976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Jia P., Ji H., Liu S., Zhang R., He F., Zhong L., et al. (2021). Integration of IR-808 and Thiol-Capped Au-Bi Bimetallic Nanoparticles for NIR Light Mediated Photothermal/photodynamic Therapy and Imaging. J. Mat. Chem. B 9, 101–111. 10.1039/d0tb02378g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Jiang Y., Lu Y., Lei L., Zhou S., Yang L., Yang X., et al. (2021a). Near-infrared Light-Triggered Synergistic Antitumor Therapy Based on Hollow ZIF-67-Derived Co3S4-Indocyanine Green Nanocomplex as a Superior Reactive Oxygen Species Generator. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 130, 112465. 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Jiang Y., McNeill J. (2017). Light-Harvesting and Amplified Energy Transfer in Conjugated Polymer Nanoparticles. Chem. Rev. 117, 838–859. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Jiang Z., He L., Yu X., Yang Z., Wu W., Wang X., et al. (2021b). Antiangiogenesis Combined with Inhibition of the Hypoxia Pathway Facilitates Low-Dose, X-Ray-Induced Photodynamic Therapy. Acs Nano 15, 11112–11125. 10.1021/acsnano.1c01063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Jin F., Qi J., Liu D., You Y., Shu G., Du Y., et al. (2021a). Cancer-cell-biomimetic Upconversion Nanoparticles Combining Chemo-Photodynamic Therapy and CD73 Blockade for Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. J. Control. Release 337, 90–104. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.07.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Jin L., Shen S., Huang Y., Li D., Yang X. (2021b). Corn-like Au/Ag Nanorod-Mediated NIR-II Photothermal/photodynamic Therapy Potentiates Immune Checkpoint Antibody Efficacy by Reprogramming the Cold Tumor Microenvironment. Biomaterials 268, 120582. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kang Y., Li Z., Lu F., Su Z., Ji X., Zhang S. (2022). Synthesis of Red/black Phosphorus-Based Composite Nanosheets with a Z-Scheme Heterostructure for High-Performance Cancer Phototherapy. Nanoscale 14, 766–779. 10.1039/d1nr07553e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Kappenberg Y. G., Stefanello F. S., Zanatta N., Martins M. A. P., Nogara P. A., Rocha J. B. T., et al. (2022). Hybridized 4‐Trifluoromethyl‐(1,2,3‐triazol‐1‐yl)quinoline System: Synthesis, Photophysics, Selective DNA/HSA Bio‐interactions and Molecular Docking. Chembiochem 23, e202100649. 10.1002/cbic.202100649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Karges J., Kuang S., Maschietto F., Blacque O., Ciofini I., Chao H., et al. (2020). Rationally Designed Ruthenium Complexes for 1- and 2-photon Photodynamic Therapy. Nat. Commun. 11, 3262. 10.1038/s41467-020-16993-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Karges J., Tharaud M., Gasser G. (2021). Polymeric Encapsulation of a Ru(II)-Based Photosensitizer for Folate-Targeted Photodynamic Therapy of Drug Resistant Cancers. J. Med. Chem. 64, 4612–4622. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c02006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Kirakci K., Pozmogova T. N., Protasevich A. Y., Vavilov G. D., Stass D. V., Shestopalov M. A., et al. (2021). A Water-Soluble Octahedral Molybdenum Cluster Complex as a Potential Agent for X-Ray Induced Photodynamic Therapy. Biomater. Sci. 9, 2893–2902. 10.1039/d0bm02005b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Kubrak T., Karakuła M., Czop M., Kawczyk-Krupka A., Aebisher D. (2022). Advances in Management of Bladder Cancer-The Role of Photodynamic Therapy. Molecules 27, 731. 10.3390/molecules27030731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Lee D., Kwon S., Jang S.-y., Park E., Lee Y., Koo H. (2022). Overcoming the Obstacles of Current Photodynamic Therapy in Tumors Using Nanoparticles. Bioact. Mater. 8, 20–34. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Lee M.-H., Thomas J., Li J.-A., Chen J.-R., Wang T.-L., Lin H.-Y. (2021). Synthesis of Multifunctional Nanoparticles for the Combination of Photodynamic Therapy and Immunotherapy. Pharmaceuticals 14, 508. 10.3390/ph14060508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lee S. Y., Lee R., Kim E., Lee S., Park Y. I. (2020). Near-Infrared Light-Triggered Photodynamic Therapy and Apoptosis Using Upconversion Nanoparticles with Dual Photosensitizers. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 275. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Li J., Zhou C., Zhang J., Xu F., Zheng Y., Wang S., et al. (2021a). Photo-induced Tumor Therapy Using MnO2/IrO2-PVP Nano-Enzyme with TME-Responsive Behaviors. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 205, 111852. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111852 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Li P., Lu M., Shi J., Hua L., Gong Z., Li Q., et al. (2020). Dual Roles of Neutrophils in Metastatic Colonization Are Governed by the Host NK Cell Status. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–14. 10.1038/s41467-020-18125-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Li R., Peng Y., Pu Y., Zhao Y., Nie R., Guo L., et al. (2021b). Fructose and Biotin Co-modified Liposomes for Dual-Targeting Breast Cancer. J. Liposome Res., 1–10. 10.1080/08982104.2021.1894171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Li Y., Zhao P., Gong T., Wang H., Jiang X., Cheng H., et al. (2020). Redox Dyshomeostasis Strategy for Hypoxic Tumor Therapy Based on DNAzyme‐Loaded Electrophilic ZIFs. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 22537–22543. 10.1002/anie.202003653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Liang L., Sui R., Song Y., Zhao Y. (2021). Acidic Microenvironment Enhances MT1-MMP-mediated Cancer Cell Motility through Integrin β1/cofilin/F-actin axis. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. (Shanghai) 53, 1558–1566. 10.1093/abbs/gmab130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Lin C.-C., Lin H.-Y., Thomas J. L., Yu J.-X., Lin C.-Y., Chang Y.-H., et al. (2021a). Embedded Upconversion Nanoparticles in Magnetic Molecularly Imprinted Polymers for Photodynamic Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Biomedicines 9, 1923. 10.3390/biomedicines9121923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Lin M., Zou S., Liao X., Chen Y., Luo D., Ji L., et al. (2021b). Ruthenium(II) Complexes as Bioorthogonal Two-Photon Photosensitizers for Tumour-specific Photodynamic Therapy against Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells. Chem. Commun. 57, 4408–4411. 10.1039/d1cc00661d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Liu B., Jiao J., Xu W., Zhang M., Cui P., Guo Z., et al. (2021a). Highly Efficient Far‐Red/NIR‐Absorbing Neutral Ir(III) Complex Micelles for Potent Photodynamic/Photothermal Therapy. Adv. Mat. 33, 2100795. 10.1002/adma.202100795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Liu D., Liu L., Liu F., Zhang M., Wei P., Yi T. (2021b). HOCl‐Activated Aggregation of Gold Nanoparticles for Multimodality Therapy of Tumors. Adv. Sci. 8, 2100074. 10.1002/advs.202100074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Liu F., Shi R., Wang Z., Weng Y., Che C. M., Chen Y. (2019). Direct Z‐Scheme Hetero‐phase Junction of Black/Red Phosphorus for Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 11791–11795. 10.1002/anie.201906416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Liu H., Yao C., Zhang L., Xin J., Zhang Z., Wang S. (2021c). Nanoliposomes Co-encapsulating Ce6 and SB3CT against the Proliferation and Metastasis of Melanoma with the Integration of Photodynamic Therapy and NKG2D-Related Immunotherapy on A375 Cells. Nanotechnology 32, 455102. 10.1088/1361-6528/ac1afd [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Liu J., Qing X., Zhang Q., Yu N., Ding M., Li Z., et al. (2021d). Oxygen-producing Proenzyme Hydrogels for Photodynamic-Mediated Metastasis-Inhibiting Combinational Therapy. J. Mat. Chem. B 9, 5255–5263. 10.1039/d1tb01009c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Liu N., Chen X., Sun X., Sun X., Shi J. (2021e). Persistent Luminescence Nanoparticles for Cancer Theranostics Application. J. Nanobiotechnol. 19, 113–124. 10.1186/s12951-021-00862-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Liu Q., Wu B., Li M., Huang Y., Li L. (2022). Heterostructures Made of Upconversion Nanoparticles and Metal-Organic Frameworks for Biomedical Applications. Adv. Sci. 9, 2103911. 10.1002/advs.202103911 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Liu S., Chai J., Sun S., Zhang L., Yang J., Fu X., et al. (2021f). Site-Selective Photosynthesis of Ag-AgCl@Au Nanomushrooms for NIR-II Light-Driven O2- and O2--Evolving Synergistic Photothermal Therapy against Deep Hypoxic Tumors. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 13, 46451–46463. 10.1021/acsami.1c16999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Liu X., Xing S., Xu Y., Chen R., Lin C., Guo L. (2021g). 3-Amino-1,2,4-triazole-derived Graphitic Carbon Nitride for Photodynamic Therapy. Spectrochimica Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 250, 119363. 10.1016/j.saa.2020.119363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Liu Y., Zhu D., Xie Z. (2021h). Ir(III) Complex Dimer Nanoparticles for Photodynamic Therapy. Acs Med. Chem. Lett. 12, 1374–1379. 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.1c00362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Liu Z., Xie F., Xie J., Chen J., Li Y., Lin Q., et al. (2021i). New-generation Photosensitizer-Anchored Gold Nanorods for a Single Near-Infrared Light-Triggered Targeted Photodynamic-Photothermal Therapy. Drug Deliv. 28, 1769–1784. 10.1080/10717544.2021.1960923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Liu Z., Xie Z., Wu X., Chen Z., Li W., Jiang X., et al. (2021j). pH-responsive Black Phosphorus Quantum Dots for Tumor-Targeted Photodynamic Therapy. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 35, 102429. 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Lv Z., Zhu Y., Li F. (2021). DNA Functional Nanomaterials for Controlled Delivery of Nucleic Acid-Based Drugs. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 720291. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.720291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Mafa P. J., Malefane M. E., Idris A. O., Mamba B. B., Liu D., Gui J., et al. (2021). Cobalt Oxide/copper Bismuth Oxide/samarium Vanadate (Co3O4/CuBi2O4/SmVO4) Dual Z-Scheme Heterostructured Photocatalyst with High Charge-Transfer Efficiency: Enhanced Carbamazepine Degradation under Visible Light Irradiation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 603, 666–684. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.06.146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Manivasagan P., Joe A., Han H.-W., Thambi T., Selvaraj M., Chidambaram K., et al. (2022). Recent Advances in Multifunctional Nanomaterials for Photothermal-Enhanced Fenton-based Chemodynamic Tumor Therapy. Mater. Today Bio 13, 100197. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Medici S., Peana M., Pelucelli A., Zoroddu M. A. (2021). An Updated Overview on Metal Nanoparticles Toxicity. Seminars Cancer Biol. 76, 17–26. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.06.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Mfouo-Tynga I. S., Dias L. D., Inada N. M., Kurachi C. (2021). Features of Third Generation Photosensitizers Used in Anticancer Photodynamic Therapy: Review. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 34, 102091. 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Mindt S., Karampinis I., John M., Neumaier M., Nowak K. (2018). Stability and Degradation of Indocyanine Green in Plasma, Aqueous Solution and Whole Blood. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 17, 1189–1196. 10.1039/c8pp00064f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Munir M. T., Kay M. K., Kang M. H., Rahman M. M., Al-Harrasi A., Choudhury M., et al. (2021). Tumor-Associated Macrophages as Multifaceted Regulators of Breast Tumor Growth. Ijms 22, 6526. 10.3390/ijms22126526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Neha Desai N., Momin M., Khan T., Gharat S., Ningthoujam R. S., Omri A. (2021). Metallic Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery System for the Treatment of Cancer. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 18, 1261–1290. 10.1080/17425247.2021.1912008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Nguyen N. T., Xia M., Duchesne P. N., Wang L., Mao C., Jelle A. A., et al. (2021). Enhanced CO2 Photocatalysis by Indium Oxide Hydroxide Supported on TiN@TiO2 Nanotubes. Nano Lett. 21, 1311–1319. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Niu D., Luo T., Wang H., Xia Y., Xie Z. (2021). Lactic Acid in Tumor Invasion. Clin. Chim. Acta 522, 61–69. 10.1016/j.cca.2021.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Ouyang Z., Gao Y., Shen M., Shi X. (2021). Dendrimer-based Nanohybrids in Cancer Photomedicine. Mater. Today Bio 10, 100111. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Park C., Koo W. T., Chong S., Shin H., Kim Y. H., Cho H. J., et al. (2021). Confinement of Ultrasmall Bimetallic Nanoparticles in Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworks via Site‐Specific Nucleation. Adv. Mat. 33, 2101216. 10.1002/adma.202101216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Pham K.-Y., Wang L.-C., Hsieh C.-C., Hsu Y.-P., Chang L.-C., Su W.-P., et al. (2021). 1550 Nm Excitation-Responsive Upconversion Nanoparticles to Establish Dual-Photodynamic Therapy against Pancreatic Tumors. J. Mat. Chem. B 9, 694–709. 10.1039/d0tb02655g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Potara M., Nagy-Simon T., Focsan M., Licarete E., Soritau O., Vulpoi A., et al. (2021). Folate-targeted Pluronic-Chitosan Nanocapsules Loaded with IR780 for Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging and Photothermal-Photodynamic Therapy of Ovarian Cancer. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 203, 111755. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Qamar H., Hussain K., Soni A., Khan A., Hussain T., Chénais B. (2021). Cyanobacteria as Natural Therapeutics and Pharmaceutical Potential: Role in Antitumor Activity and as Nanovectors. Molecules 26, 247. 10.3390/molecules26010247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Qi F., Ji P., Chen Z., Wang L., Yao H., Huo M., et al. (2021). Photosynthetic Cyanobacteria‐Hybridized Black Phosphorus Nanosheets for Enhanced Tumor Photodynamic Therapy. Small 17, 2102113. 10.1002/smll.202102113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Qiao M., Jiang T., Liu X., Mao S., Zhou F., Li X., et al. (2021). Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: Dusk or Dawn? J. Thorac. Oncol. 16, 1267–1288. 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.04.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Qiu M., Wang D., Huang H., Yin T., Bao W., Zhang B., et al. (2021). A Regioselectively Oxidized 2D Bi/BiOx Lateral Nano‐Heterostructure for Hypoxic Photodynamic Therapy. Adv. Mat. 33, 2102562. 10.1002/adma.202102562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Ramsay D., Stevenson H., Jerjes W. (2021). From Basic Mechanisms to Clinical Research: Photodynamic Therapy Applications in Head and Neck Malignancies and Vascular Anomalies. Jcm 10, 4404. 10.3390/jcm10194404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Rapp T. L., DeForest C. A. (2021). Targeting Drug Delivery with Light: A Highly Focused Approach. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 171, 94–107. 10.1016/j.addr.2021.01.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Raza M. K., Noor A., Samantaray P. K. (2021). Ir(III) and Ru(II) Complexes in Photoredox Catalysis and Photodynamic Therapy: A New Paradigm towards Anticancer Applications. Chembiochem 22, 3270–3272. 10.1002/cbic.202100469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Redrado M., Benedi A., Marzo I., Gimeno M. C., Fernández-Moreira V. (2021). Dual Emissive Ir(III) Complexes for Photodynamic Therapy and Bioimaging. Pharmaceutics 13, 1382. 10.3390/pharmaceutics13091382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Ren S.-Z., Zhu X.-H., Wang B., Liu M., Li S.-K., Yang Y.-S., et al. (2021). A Versatile Nanoplatform Based on Multivariate Porphyrinic Metal-Organic Frameworks for Catalytic Cascade-Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy. J. Mat. Chem. B 9, 4678–4689. 10.1039/d0tb02652b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Sajjad F., Jin H., Han Y., Wang L., Bao L., Chen T., et al. (2022). Incorporation of Green Emission Polymer Dots into Pyropheophorbide-α Enhance the PDT Effect and Biocompatibility. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 37, 102562. 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Sang D., Wang K., Sun X., Wang Y., Lin H., Jia R., et al. (2021). NIR-driven Intracellular Photocatalytic O2 Evolution on Z-Scheme Ni3S2/Cu1.8S@HA for Hypoxic Tumor Therapy. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 13, 9604–9619. 10.1021/acsami.0c21284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Sengupta D., Das S., Sharma D., Chattopadhyaya S., Mukherjee A., Mazumdar Z. H., et al. (2022). An Anti‐inflammatory Fe 3 O 4 ‐Porphyrin Nanohybrid Capable of Apoptosis through Upregulation of P21 Kinase Inhibitor Having Immunoprotective Properties under Anticancer PDT Conditions. Chemmedchem 17, e202100550. 10.1002/cmdc.202100550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Shukla S., Pandey P. C., Narayan R. J. (2021). Tunable Quantum Photoinitiators for Radical Photopolymerization. Polymers 13, 2694. 10.3390/polym13162694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Silva L. B., Castro K. A. D. F., Botteon C. E. A., Oliveira C. L. P., Da Silva R. S., Marcato P. D. (2021). Hybrid Nanoparticles as an Efficient Porphyrin Delivery System for Cancer Cells to Enhance Photodynamic Therapy. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 679128. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.679128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Smith S. A., Selby L. I., Johnston A. P. R., Such G. K. (2019). The Endosomal Escape of Nanoparticles: Toward More Efficient Cellular Delivery. Bioconjugate Chem. 30, 263–272. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Smithen D. A., Monro S., Pinto M., Roque J., Diaz-Rodriguez R. M., Yin H., et al. (2020). Bis[pyrrolyl Ru(ii)] Triads: a New Class of Photosensitizers for Metal-Organic Photodynamic Therapy. Chem. Sci. 11, 12047–12069. 10.1039/d0sc04500d [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Su Y.-B., Zhao X., Chen L.-J., Qian H.-L., Yan X.-P. (2021). Fabrication of G-Quadruplex/porphyrin Conjugated Gold/persistent Luminescence Theranostic Nanoprobe for Imaging-Guided Photodynamic Therapy. Talanta 233, 122567. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Sun Y., Zhou Z., Yang S., Yang H. (2022). Modulating Hypoxia Inducible Factor‐1 by Nanomaterials for Effective Cancer Therapy. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 14, e1766. 10.1002/wnan.1766 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Tabish T. A., Narayan R. J. (2021). Mitochondria-targeted Graphene for Advanced Cancer Therapeutics. Acta Biomater. 129, 43–56. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Tampa M., Georgescu S. R., Mitran M. I., Mitran C. I., Matei C., Caruntu A., et al. (2021). Current Perspectives on the Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in the Pathogenesis of Basal Cell Carcinoma. Biomolecules 11, 903. 10.3390/biom11060903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Taucher E., Taucher V., Fink-Neuboeck N., Lindenmann J., Smolle-Juettner F.-M. (2021). Role of Tumor-Associated Neutrophils in the Molecular Carcinogenesis of the Lung. Cancers 13, 5972. 10.3390/cancers13235972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Teng F.-Y., Jiang Z.-Z., Guo M., Tan X.-Z., Chen F., Xi X.-G., et al. (2021). G-quadruplex DNA: a Novel Target for Drug Design. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 78, 6557–6583. 10.1007/s00018-021-03921-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Tian Y., Mao S. (2012). Amphiphilic Polymeric Micelles as the Nanocarrier for Peroral Delivery of Poorly Soluble Anticancer Drugs. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 9, 687–700. 10.1517/17425247.2012.681299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Tseng T.-H., Chen C.-Y., Wu W.-C., Chen C.-Y. (2021). Targeted and Oxygen-Enriched Polymeric Micelles for Enhancing Photodynamic Therapy. Nanotechnology 32, 365102. 10.1088/1361-6528/ac020d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Wan Y., Fu L. H., Li C., Lin J., Huang P. (2021). Conquering the Hypoxia Limitation for Photodynamic Therapy. Adv. Mat. 33, 2103978. 10.1002/adma.202103978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Wang K., Lu J., Li J., Gao Y., Mao Y., Zhao Q., et al. (2021a). Current Trends in Smart Mesoporous Silica-Based Nanovehicles for Photoactivated Cancer Therapy. J. Control. Release 339, 445–472. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Wang K., Zhang F., Wei Y., Wei W., Jiang L., Liu Z., et al. (2021b). In Situ Imaging of Cellular Reactive Oxygen Species and Caspase-3 Activity Using a Multifunctional Theranostic Probe for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy. Anal. Chem. 93, 7870–7878. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00385 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Wang S., Liu H., Xin J., Rahmanzadeh R., Wang J., Yao C., et al. (2019). Chlorin-Based Photoactivable Galectin-3-Inhibitor Nanoliposome for Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy and NK Cell-Related Immunity in Melanoma. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 11, 41829–41841. 10.1021/acsami.9b09560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Wang X., Wang Z., Ma W., Wu X., Fang W., Guo C., et al. (2021c). Construction of a Nanotheranostic System Zr-MOF@PPa/AF@PEG for Improved Photodynamic Therapy Effects Based on the PDT-oxygen C-onsumption and H-ypoxia S-ensitive C-hemotherapeutic D-rug. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 222, 112274. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2021.112274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Wang Y., Yu J., Luo Z., Shi Q., Liu G., Wu F., et al. (2021d). Engineering Endogenous Tumor‐Associated Macrophage‐Targeted Biomimetic Nano‐RBC to Reprogram Tumor Immunosuppressive Microenvironment for Enhanced Chemo‐Immunotherapy. Adv. Mat. 33, 2103497. 10.1002/adma.202103497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Wang Z., Fu L., Zhu Y., Wang S., Shen G., Jin L., et al. (2021e). Chemodynamic/photothermal Synergistic Therapy Based on Ce-Doped Cu-Al Layered Double Hydroxides. J. Mat. Chem. B 9, 710–718. 10.1039/d0tb02547j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Wei F., Kuang S., Rees T. W., Liao X., Liu J., Luo D., et al. (2021). Ruthenium(II) Complexes Coordinated to Graphitic Carbon Nitride: Oxygen Self-Sufficient Photosensitizers Which Produce Multiple ROS for Photodynamic Therapy in Hypoxia. Biomaterials 276, 121064. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Workenhe S. T., Pol J., Kroemer G. (2021). Tumor-intrinsic Determinants of Immunogenic Cell Death Modalities. Oncoimmunology 10, 1893466. 10.1080/2162402X.2021.1893466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Wu W., Pu Y., Shi J. (2021). Dual Size/Charge‐Switchable Nanocatalytic Medicine for Deep Tumor Therapy. Adv. Sci. 8, 2002816. 10.1002/advs.202002816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Xia H., Liang Y., Chen K., Guo C., Wang M., Cao J., et al. (2021). Reduction-sensitive Polymeric Micelles as Amplifying Oxidative Stress Vehicles for Enhanced Antitumor Therapy. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 203, 111733. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Xiao P., Liu C., Ma T., Lu X., Jing L., Hou Y., et al. (2021). A Cyclodextrin‐Hosted Ir(III) Complex for Ratiometric Mapping of Tumor Hypoxia In Vivo . Adv. Sci. 8, 2004044. 10.1002/advs.202004044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Xiao Y., Yu D. (2021). Tumor Microenvironment as a Therapeutic Target in Cancer. Pharmacol. Ther. 221, 107753. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Xu Y., Guo Y., Zhang C., Zhan M., Jia L., Song S., et al. (2022). Fibronectin-Coated Metal-Phenolic Networks for Cooperative Tumor Chemo-/Chemodynamic/Immune Therapy via Enhanced Ferroptosis-Mediated Immunogenic Cell Death. Acs Nano 16, 984–996. 10.1021/acsnano.1c08585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Yang G., Ji J., Liu Z. (2021a). Multifunctional MnO 2 Nanoparticles for Tumor Microenvironment Modulation and Cancer Therapy. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 13, e1720. 10.1002/wnan.1720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Yang Y.-L., Lin K., Yang L. (2021b). Progress in Nanocarriers Codelivery System to Enhance the Anticancer Effect of Photodynamic Therapy. Pharmaceutics 13, 1951. 10.3390/pharmaceutics13111951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Yang Y., Yun K., Li Y., Zhang L., Zhao W., Zhu Z., et al. (2021c). Self-assembled Multifunctional Polymeric Micelles for Tumor-specific Bioimaging and Synergistic Chemo-Phototherapy of Cancer. Int. J. Pharm. 602, 120651. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120651 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Yasukagawa M., Shimada A., Shiozaki S., Tobita S., Yoshihara T. (2021). Phosphorescent Ir(III) Complexes Conjugated with Oligoarginine Peptides Serve as Optical Probes for In Vivo Microvascular Imaging. Sci. Rep. 11, 4733. 10.1038/s41598-021-84115-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Yin Z., Ji Q., Wu D., Li Z., Fan M., Zhang H., et al. (2021). H2O2-Responsive Gold Nanoclusters @ Mesoporous Silica @ Manganese Dioxide Nanozyme for "Off/On" Modulation and Enhancement of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Photodynamic Therapy. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 13, 14928–14937. 10.1021/acsami.1c00430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Yoon J., Jang H.-J., Jung I., Park S. (2017). A Close-Packed 3D Plasmonic Superlattice of Truncated Octahedral Gold Nanoframes. Nanoscale 9, 7708–7713. 10.1039/c7nr02856c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. You L., Wu W., Wang X., Fang L., Adam V., Nepovimova E., et al. (2021). The Role of Hypoxia‐inducible Factor 1 in Tumor Immune Evasion. Med. Res. Rev. 41, 1622–1643. 10.1002/med.21771 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Younis M. R., He G., Qu J., Lin J., Huang P., Xia X. H. (2021). Inorganic Nanomaterials with Intrinsic Singlet Oxygen Generation for Photodynamic Therapy. Adv. Sci. 8, 2102587. 10.1002/advs.202102587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Yu H., Li Y., Zhang Z., Ren J., Zhang L., Xu Z., et al. (2022). Silk Fibroin-Capped Metal-Organic Framework for Tumor-specific Redox Dyshomeostasis Treatment Synergized by Deoxygenation-Driven Chemotherapy. Acta Biomater. 138, 545–560. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.11.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Yu S., Zhou Y., Sun Y., Wu S., Xu T., Chang Y. C., et al. (2021). Endogenous mRNA Triggered DNA‐Au Nanomachine for In Situ Imaging and Targeted Multimodal Synergistic Cancer Therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 5948–5958. 10.1002/anie.202012801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Yuan C.-S., Deng Z.-W., Qin D., Mu Y.-Z., Chen X.-G., Liu Y. (2021). Hypoxia-modulatory Nanomaterials to Relieve Tumor Hypoxic Microenvironment and Enhance Immunotherapy: Where Do We Stand? Acta Biomater. 125, 1–28. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.02.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Yuan X., Cen J., Chen X., Jia Z., Zhu X., Huang Y., et al. (2022a). Iridium Oxide Nanoparticles Mediated Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy Combined with Photothermal Therapy in the Treatment of Breast Cancer. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 605, 851–862. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.07.136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Yuan Y., Li H., Pu W., Chen L., Guo D., Jiang H., et al. (2022b). Cancer Metabolism and Tumor Microenvironment: Fostering Each Other? Sci. China Life Sci. 65, 236–279. 10.1007/s11427-021-1999-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Zeng L., Cheng H., Dai Y., Su Z., Wang C., Lei L., et al. (2021). In Vivo Regenerable Cerium Oxide Nanozyme-Loaded pH/H2O2-Responsive Nanovesicle for Tumor-Targeted Photothermal and Photodynamic Therapies. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 13, 233–244. 10.1021/acsami.0c19074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Zhang J., Lu L., Song Z.-L., Song W., Fu Z., Chao Q., et al. (2021a). Covalent Amide-Bonded Nanoflares for High-Fidelity Intracellular Sensing and Targeted Therapy: A Superstable Nanosystem Free of Nonspecific Interferences. Anal. Chem. 93, 7879–7888. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Zhang L., Jin D., Stenzel M. H. (2021b). Polymer-Functionalized Upconversion Nanoparticles for Light/Imaging-Guided Drug Delivery. Biomacromolecules 22, 3168–3201. 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Zhang P., Fischer A., Ouyang Y., Wang J., Sohn Y. S., Nechushtai R., et al. (2021c). Aptamer-modified DNA Tetrahedra-Gated Metal-Organic Framework Nanoparticle Carriers for Enhanced Chemotherapy or Photodynamic Therapy. Chem. Sci. 12, 14473–14483. 10.1039/d1sc04229g [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Zhang P., Han T., Xia H., Dong L., Chen L., Lei L. (2022a). Advances in Photodynamic Therapy Based on Nanotechnology and its Application in Skin Cancer. Front. Oncol. 12, 836397. 10.3389/fonc.2022.836397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Zhang Q., Huang W., Yang C., Wang F., Song C., Gao Y., et al. (2019). The Theranostic Nanoagent Mo2C for Multi-Modal Imaging-Guided Cancer Synergistic Phototherapy. Biomater. Sci. 7, 2729–2739. 10.1039/c9bm00239a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Zhang S., Ma S., Hao X., Wang Y., Cao B., Han B., et al. (2021d). Controllable Preparation of Crystalline Red Phosphorus and its Photocatalytic Properties. Nanoscale 13, 18955–18960. 10.1039/d1nr06530k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Zhang S., Wang J., Kong Z., Sun X., He Z., Sun B., et al. (2022b). Emerging Photodynamic Nanotherapeutics for Inducing Immunogenic Cell Death and Potentiating Cancer Immunotherapy. Biomaterials 282, 121433. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Zhang Y., Elechalawar C. K., Hossen M. N., Francek E. R., Dey A., Wilhelm S., et al. (2021e). Gold Nanoparticles Inhibit Activation of Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts by Disrupting Communication from Tumor and Microenvironmental Cells. Bioact. Mater. 6, 326–332. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Zhang Z., Huang C., Zhang L., Guo Q., Qin Y., Fan F., et al. (2021f). pH-Sensitive and Bubble-Generating Mesoporous Silica-Based Nanoparticles for Enhanced Tumor Combination Therapy. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 11, 520–533. 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.08.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Zhao X., Liu J., Fan J., Chao H., Peng X. (2021). Recent Progress in Photosensitizers for Overcoming the Challenges of Photodynamic Therapy: from Molecular Design to Application. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 4185–4219. 10.1039/d0cs00173b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Zhong D., Wu H., Wu Y., Li Y., Yang J., Gong Q., et al. (2021a). Redox Dual-Responsive Dendrimeric Nanoparticles for Mutually Synergistic Chemo-Photodynamic Therapy to Overcome Drug Resistance. J. Control. Release 329, 1210–1221. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.10.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Zhong Y., Zhang L., Sun S., Zhou Z., Ma Y., Hong H., et al. (2021b). Sequential Drug Delivery by Injectable Macroporous Hydrogels for Combined Photodynamic-Chemotherapy. J. Nanobiotechnol 19, 333. 10.1186/s12951-021-01066-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Zhu F., Xu L., Li X., Li Z., Wang J., Chen H., et al. (2021a). Co-delivery of Gefitinib and Hematoporphyrin by Aptamer-Modified Fluorinated Dendrimer for Hypoxia Alleviation and Enhanced Synergistic Chemo-Photodynamic Therapy of NSCLC. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 167, 106004. 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.106004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Zhu L., Dai Y., Gao L., Zhao Q. (2021b). Tumor Microenvironment-Modulated Nanozymes for NIR-II-Triggered Hyperthermia-Enhanced Photo-Nanocatalytic Therapy via Disrupting ROS Homeostasis. Ijn 16, 4559–4577. 10.2147/IJN.S309062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Zmerli I., Ibrahim N., Cressey P., Denis S., Makky A. (2021). Design and Synthesis of New PEGylated Polydopamine-Based Nanoconstructs Bearing ROS-Responsive Linkers and a Photosensitizer for Bimodal Photothermal and Photodynamic Therapies against Cancer. Mol. Pharm. 18, 3623–3637. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES