Skip to main content
NeuroImage : Clinical logoLink to NeuroImage : Clinical
. 2022 Jun 6;35:103076. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103076

Task- and resting-state fMRI studies in multiple sclerosis: From regions to systems and time-varying analysis. Current status and future perspective

Maria A Rocca a,b,e,, Menno M Schoonheim f, Paola Valsasina a, Jeroen JG Geurts f, Massimo Filippi a,b,c,d,e
PMCID: PMC9194954  PMID: 35691253

Highlights

  • Functional MRI is able to detect adaptive and maladaptive abnormalities at different MS stages.

  • Increased fMRI activity is a feature of early MS, while progressive exhaustion of adaptive mechanisms is detected later on in the disease.

  • Collapse of long-range connections and impaired hub integration characterize MS network reorganization.

  • Time-varying connectivity analysis provides useful and complementary pieces of information to static functional connectivity.

  • New perspectives might be the use of multimodal MRI and artificial intelligence.

Keywords: Multiple sclerosis, Functional MRI, Resting-state fMRI, Task fMRI

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurological disorder affecting the central nervous system and features extensive functional brain changes that are poorly understood but relate strongly to clinical impairments. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a non-invasive, powerful technique able to map activity of brain regions and to assess how such regions interact for an efficient brain network. FMRI has been widely applied to study functional brain changes in MS, allowing to investigate functional plasticity consequent to disease-related structural injury. The first studies in MS using active fMRI tasks mainly aimed to study such plastic changes by identifying abnormal activity in salient brain regions (or systems) involved by the task. In later studies the focus shifted towards resting state (RS) functional connectivity (FC) studies, which aimed to map large-scale functional networks of the brain and to establish how MS pathology impairs functional integration, eventually leading to the hypothesized network collapse as patients clinically progress. This review provides a summary of the main findings from studies using task-based and RS fMRI and illustrates how functional brain alterations relate to clinical disability and cognitive deficits in this condition. We also give an overview of longitudinal studies that used task-based and RS fMRI to monitor disease evolution and effects of motor and cognitive rehabilitation. In addition, we discuss the results of studies using newer technologies involving time-varying FC to investigate abnormal dynamism and flexibility of network configurations in MS. Finally, we show some preliminary results from two recent topics (i.e., multimodal MRI analysis and artificial intelligence) that are receiving increasing attention. Together, these functional studies could provide new (conceptual) insights into disease stage-specific mechanisms underlying progression in MS, with recommendations for future research.

1. Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS), commonly featuring severe cognitive and motor impairments. In the past decades, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been largely applied to improve the understanding of the pathophysiology of MS. Structural MRI techniques provided accurate maps of macro- and microscopic tissue damage of the CNS occurring in this condition. (Enzinger et al., 2015, Filippi et al., 2017) However, associations between structural MRI injury and clinical findings remain still suboptimal. (Filippi et al., 2019) This might be due to the presence of a variable extent of functional brain plasticity across disease phases: at early MS stages, adaptive mechanisms might play a role in maintaining an efficient brain function despite an increasing structural damage, while later on in the disease, maladaptive mechanisms may be prevalent and lead to worsening of developing clinical symptoms. (Schoonheim et al., 2010, Rocca et al., 2016).

Functional MRI (fMRI) is a non-invasive technique allowing to explore CNS function by exploiting the blood-oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) effect. (Ogawa et al., 1990) Such an effect permits to map the vascular response to neuronal activation by using differences of MRI signal due to changes of deoxyhemoglobin concentration, cerebral blood flow, and volume. FMRI can be applied to highlight cerebral activity evoked by the performance of a given task (Friston et al., 1995, Ogawa et al., 1993) or, alternatively, to investigate spontaneous signal fluctuations occurring at low frequency during resting state (RS) conditions. (Biswal et al., 1995, Biswal et al., 2010) Task-related fMRI experiments have been principally used to map activation of specific brain regions and circuits during the performance of various tasks. (Ogawa et al., 1993, Kim et al., 1993, Cordes et al., 2000) RS fMRI studies usually aim at reconstructing functional connectivity (FC) networks, i.e., patterns of spatially distinct brain regions subserving different functions. (Biswal et al., 2010, Fox et al., 2005) RS fMRI has the advantage of avoiding confounds due to subjects’ inability to comply with the task, and can therefore be applied to people with MS and severe disability. Thanks to this versatility, fMRI is a powerful tool to investigate plasticity mechanisms in the brain, and is therefore suitable to map in vivo functional reorganization occurring in MS, which could drastically improve our understanding of clinical impairments.

This narrative review aims at summarizing the main findings from studies that used fMRI to investigate brain plasticity across different MS disease stages. We searched PubMed with the terms “functional MRI”, “fMRI”, “resting state fMRI”, “functional networks”, “multiple sclerosis”. Only articles published in English were considered. This search produced approximately 1500 results, from which clinical trials, review articles, technical reports and meta-analyses were excluded. From remaining results (approximately 600), the final reference list was generated on the basis of originality and relevance to the broad scope of this review. Our review is structured as follows: in section 2, we discuss findings from studies applying task-based fMRI in people with MS to map abnormalities of brain activity in strategic regions and circuits subserving sensory, motor and cognitive functions. In section 3, we present results of studies applying RS fMRI to explore the brain as an integrated system composed by interacting FC networks, and we give an overview of how the hypothesized large-scale network collapse might provide key insights into MS pathophysiology to explain the heterogeneous clinical manifestations driven by structural damage. In section 4, a summary of findings from longitudinal task-based and RS fMRI studies monitoring the effect of different interventions is given. In section 5, we introduce a novel way of analyzing functional connectivity, time-varying FC analysis, which helps to derive information about FC changes occurring at very fast time scales, and we will discuss how time-varying FC abnormalities characterize clinical and cognitive deficits of MS. Finally, in section 6, we present some new perspectives of fMRI analysis, including multimodal data integration and the use of machine learning to improve disease monitoring and prediction at an individual level.

2. Using fMRI to explore MS-related functional reorganization within salient regions and functional systems

Task-based fMRI experiments, using both sensorimotor and cognitive stimulations, have been widely applied in the last two decades to characterize cortical plasticity across the different phases of MS. Overall, widespread fMRI activation changes have been described across disease course, having both an adaptive and maladaptive role.

2.1. Exploring MS-related functional reorganization of the sensorimotor system

It is more than two decades that active fMRI has been successfully used to map brain plasticity in MS using sensory or motor tasks, both after an acute clinical attack (Rombouts et al., 1998, Mezzapesa et al., 2008, Werring et al., 2000) and in clinically stable people. (Rocca et al., 2005, Rocca et al., 2002a, Rocca et al., 2003a, Rocca et al., 2002b) A list of relevant studies evaluating functional reorganization of the sensory and motor systems using task-based fMRI is provided in Table 1.

Table 1.

Summary of the most important functional magnetic resonance imaging studies using sensory and motor active tasks to investigate brain activation in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Study Subjects Task Main findings
Active sensorimotor tasks
Rocca et al. 2002 14 people with RRMS
15 HC
Flexion-extension of the last four fingers of the right, dominant hand People with MS showed increased fMRI activation in several contralateral and bilateral regions of the sensorimotor network, correlated with structural damage
Reddy et al., 2002 14 people with RRMS
8 HC
Task 1: flexion–extension of the last four fingers
Task 2: flexion–extension of the third finger (actively or passively)
Increased fMRI activity was present in RRMS people in ipsilateral premotor, motor and parietal cortex with increasing EDSS score and with increasing hand motor impairment (assessed using FT). Brain activity patterns differed according to structural injury and hand disability
Rocca et al., 2002b 30 people with PPMS
15 HC
Task 1: flexion–extension of the last four fingers of the right, dominant hand
Task 2: flexion–extension of the right foot
Task 3: tasks 1 & 2 together
People with PPMS showed increased fMRI activation vs HC of brain regions within both traditional motor planning and execution regions, and several multimodal cortical regions in the temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes
Rocca et al., 2003a 13 people with SPMS
15 HC
Task 1: flexion–extension of the last four fingers of the right, dominant hand
Task 2: flexion–extension of the right foot
During hand movement, people with SPMS showed more significant activations of fronto-parietal regions. During foot movement, people with SPMS had more significant activations of sensorimotor cortex and thalamus. Increased fMRI activation correlated with structural damage
Rocca et al., 2003b 16 people with CIS
15 HC
Flexion-extension of the last four fingers of the right, dominant hand People with CIS had more significant fMRI activations of primary and secondary sensorimotor cortex, correlated with axonal injury
Filippi et al., 2004 16 people with RRMS
16 HC
Task 1: flexion–extension of the last four fingers of the right, dominant hand
Task 2: manipulation of various daily-life objects
Regions activated by people with MS during the performance of the simple motor task (cerebellar, parietal and frontal regions) were part of more complex pathways, recruited by HC when performing the object manipulation task
Rocca et al., 2004 76 people with MS
15 HC
Flexion-extension of the last four fingers of the right, dominant hand People with MS and lesions in the pyramidal tract had more significant activations of contralateral/ipsilateral sensorimotor regions and ipsilateral precuneus. Pyramidal tract lesion load correlated with primary sensorimotor activity
Saini et al., 2004 14 people with RRMS
11 HC
Writing “8″ repeatedly on a paper in a cursive manner During the writing task, people with MS had higher fMRI activity in bilateral motor cortex. They also had lower FC between motor regions and contralateral cerebellum, and higher FC with the ipsilateral cerebellum
Rocca et al., 2005 57 people with MS and different phenotypes
15 HC
Flexion-extension of the last four fingers of the right, dominant hand Early in MS disease course, increased and more widespread activation of areas typically devoted to motor tasks was found. With increasing disability and in progressive MS, bilateral activation of these regions was seen, as well as recruitment of areas that HC use for novel/complex tasks
Ciccarelli et al., 2006 14 people with PPMS
18 HC
Auditory-cued and passive dorsi-plantar flexion of the right foot People with PPMS showed greater fMRI activation than HC with passive ankle movements in temporal, insular and subcortical regions. fMRI response to active and passive ankle movements in frontal regions was lower in patients with higher EDSS score and greater lesion load. Cerebellar activation was inversely correlated with T25FW
Lenzi et al., 2007 18 people with RRMS
18 HC
Right index finger to thumb opposition Greater fMRI activity was found in people with MS in motor, cingulate, thalamic and insular regions during a motor task. A positive correlation between ipsilateral motor cortex activity and corpus callosum damage was detected
Rocca et al., 2008 16 people with RRMS
14 HC
Task 1: flexion–extension of the last four fingers of the right, dominant hand
Task 2: mirror neuron system task: observation of a movie showing the hand of another subject performing task 1
During the simple motor task, people with MS had more significant fMRI activation of sensorimotor regions, as well as of several visual, parietal and frontal areas that HC activated during the mirror neuron system task
Wegner et al., 2008 56 people with MS
60 HC
Flash light-cued flexion–extension of the last four fingers of the right, dominant hand Increased fMRI activation was found in people with MS in the bilateral motor circuit, with a stronger modulatory effect of age in MS vs HC. Increased activation in fronto-striatal regions correlated with higher 9HPT scores.
Manson et al., 2008 56 people with MS
60 HC
Flash light-cued flexion–extension of the last four fingers of the right, dominant hand In the same MS group as (Wegner et al., 2008), decreased task-associated deactivation was found during a motor task in regions specialized to hand movement control
Rocca et al., 2009 61 people with MS
74 HC
Flash light-cued flexion–extension of the last four fingers of the right, dominant hand Increased effective connectivity was found during a motor task among regions of the sensorimotor network, which correlated with lesional and corticospinal tract damage
Rocca et al., 2010 17 people with BMS
15 people with SPMS
17 HC
Flexion-extension of the last four fingers of the right, dominant hand Increased fMRI activity in classical motor regions was found in both people with BMS and PMS. Compared with people with BMS, SPMS had increased activations of inferior frontal and middle occipital regions
Rico et al., 2011 15 people with CIS
10 HC
Auditory-cued flexion–extension of the fingers of one hand In people with CIS, during a simple movement task, fMRI activity was detected in the anterior cingulate cortex, usually involved in complex movements
Petsas et al., 2013 31 people with MS
15 HC
Passive flexion–extension of the metacarpo-phalangeal joints The ipsilateral motor cortex was more activated during active and passive movements, with a gradient across phenotypes (SPMS > RRMS > HC). Motor regions were less deactivated and DMN areas were more deactivated in RRMS, but not in SPMS vs HC
Pardini et al., 2013 14 people with RRMS Finger to thumb opposition with the right hand (index, medium, ring and little fingers) During the finger tapping task, temporal accuracy of task execution was higher in fatigued MS and correlated with higher cerebellar and orbitofrontal fMRI activity
Faivre et al., 2015 13 people with RRMS
14 HC
Auditory-cued flexion–extension of the fingers of one hand Compared to HC, people with MS presented higher fMRI activation during a motor task (especially when executed with non-dominant hand) and higher RS FC. Levels of hyper-activation and hyper-connectivity at RS were inter-related
Rocca et al., 2016 79 people with MS
26 HC
Flexion-extension of the last four fingers of the right, dominant hand Fatigued MS people showed reduced activation of sensorimotor, temporal and basal ganglia regions, and increased frontal activation compared to non-fatigued MS. Time-modulation analysis showed reduced fMRI activity over time in non-fatigued MS only
Hubbard et al., 2016 25 people with RRMS
20 HC
Press and release both thumb-buttons at presentation of a checkerboard stimulus Amplitude of the BOLD response in the visual and motor cortex was reduced in people with MS vs HC, and correlated with microstructural damage
Bonzano et al., 2017 14 people with RRMS Finger to thumb opposition with the right hand (index, medium, ring and little fingers) fMRI activity in basal ganglia regions (known to be involved in fatigue) and amygdala was high during the non-demanding finger tapping task, decreased during the execution of the highly demanding finger tapping task, and returned to baseline after a resting period
Tacchino et al., 2017 17 people with CIS
20 people with RRMS
20 HC
Squeeze (and imagine to squeeze) a foam ball with the dominant and non-dominant hand Reduced performance of motor imagery varied according to disease stage (i.e., in CIS vs RRMS), and inversely associated with fMRI activations of occipital, frontal and parietal regions (which were stronger with the non-dominant hand)
Svolgaard et al., 2018 44 people with RRMS
25 HC
Press a pincer grip a force sensitive device, and produce a force matching that showed on a screen In people with MS, during the precision grip task, fMRI activity of the cerebellum was proportional to fatigue. Linear increase of activity over time in premotor and frontal regions was impaired in MS according to fatigue severity
Boonstra et al., 2020 59 people with MS
15 HC
Task 1: play a paddle under a ball to bounce it up
Task 2: watch a ball moving on the screen
Task 3: move the joystick to the left and right, while the ball is frozen on the screen
FMRI activation was higher, during the joystick task, in patients with MS and tremor than in HC and non-tremor MS, in parietal, premotor and supplementary motor cortex. Higher fMRI activation was associated with lower tremor severity
Alahmadi et al., 2021 14 people with RRMS
14 HC
To squeeze a rubber ball with varying grip force levels using the right hand In response to the variable grip force task, fMRI activation was increased in MS vs HC both in anterior and posterior BA4. However, non-linear analysis showed abnormal non-linear responses to increasing grip forces in MS in posterior BA4
Bonzano et al., 2021 18 people with MS
18 HC
Writing a sentence in cursive Hand-writing elicited fMRI activity was lower in people with MS vs HC in temporal, parietal, insular and basal ganglia regions. Preserved fMRI activity in these regions was associated with better writing performances
Strik et al., 2021 28 people with RRMS
17 HC
To follow a target force line by squeezing and releasing the right fingers, or by pulling up and down the right foot During the lower limb force matching task, lower fMRI activity was detected in people with MS vs HC in cerebellar, occipital and superior parietal cortices. Reduced activity was associated with more erroneous/delayed lower limb tracking
West et al., 2021 32 people with RRMS
17 HC
Auditory-cued press-release of bilateral thumb buttons Calibrated fMRI during the finger tapping task showed a significant increase of blood flow and oxygen consumption in the central region activated by the task. Poor MS performers at the 9HPT, compared to remaining people, had lower blood flow and oxygen consumption in the surrounding region
Visual tasks
Rombouts et al., 1998 9 people with RRMS and ON
8 HC
Red light stimulation of both eyes simultaneously, then of each eye, separately Upon stimulation, people with MS showed reduced activation of the affected eye (33% on average) and unaffected eye (61% on average) compared to HC
Werring et al., 2000 7 people with MS recovering from ON
7 HC
Red photic stimulation to the whole visual field Extensive fMRI activation of visual, parietal, insular and thalamic regions was found when stimulating the recovered eye. FMRI activation of visual and insular regions was found when stimulating the unaffected eye
Colorado et al., 2012 22 people with RRMS
23 HC
Visual task: focus on a red crosshair, and press a key at the beginning of the flashing checkerboards
Motor task: visually-cued flexion–extension of the last four finger of left or right hand
Memory task: 0-back and 2-back task
During visual, motor and working memory fMRI tasks, an enhanced fMRI activity of regions belonging to the cognitive control system (dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices) was found in people with MS vs HC
Hubbard et al., 2017 12 people with MS Press and release both thumb-buttons at change in the luminance of the fixation cross Calibrated fMRI demonstrated altered cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption in the visual cortex during the visual task, which was associated with microstructural damage of occipital tracts

Abbreviations: CIS = clinically isolated syndrome; MS = multiple sclerosis; RR = relapsing-remitting; PP = primary progressive; SP = secondary progressive; ON = optic neuritis; HC = healthy controls; FC = functional connectivity; RS = resting state; BA = Brodmann area; DMN = default-mode network; FT = finger tapping; 9HPT = nine-hole peg test; T25FW = timed 25 foot walk; BOLD = blood-oxygenation level dependent.

Studies using motor tasks mostly employed upper limb tasks, and results are generally concordant in showing significantly higher fMRI activity in all MS phenotypes compared to healthy controls (HC), (Rocca et al., 2005) especially - but not exclusively - in regions subserving the motor function and at early disease stages (Fig. 1). An increased activation of the primary sensorimotor cortex is a typical feature of people with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) (Rico et al., 2011, Rocca et al., 2003b) and of people with non-disabling (Rocca et al., 2002a) or mildly disabling relapsing-remitting (RR) MS. (Reddy et al., 2002, Rocca et al., 2010, Rocca et al., 2004) However, during simple tasks, people with RRMS tend to activate not only classical motor regions, but also frontal and parietal areas devoted to motor control, (Reddy et al., 2002, Colorado et al., 2012, Lenzi et al., 2007) which are generally engaged in HC during more complex tasks, such as object manipulation (Filippi et al., 2004) or action observation (Rocca et al., 2008) (Fig. 1). In people with RRMS, an increased fMRI activity has been considered to play a compensatory role, since it was related to maintaining a good task performance despite the presence of widespread structural damage. (Rocca et al., 2002a, Rocca et al., 2004, Lenzi et al., 2007) During motor tasks, progressive MS phenotypes often present increased fMRI activations of high-order, integrative areas. (Rocca et al., 2003a, Rocca et al., 2002b, Ciccarelli et al., 2006) This recruitment of additional areas may for instance indicate exhaustion of functional competence of classical motor circuits, possibly leading to a need to also bring in higher-order areas to maintain some measure of clinical functioning, or simply maladaptive changes due to a loss of inhibition (Fig. 1). However, decreased fMRI activity has also been detected in progressive MS, especially in case of high disability and poor task performance, which could indicate maladaptation, possibly due to structural disconnection of areas or regional metabolic exhaustion and/or neurodegeneration. (Ciccarelli et al., 2006).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic representation of findings from the main studies using task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate reorganization of brain activity in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). A) During upper limb motor tasks, the sensorimotor system usually shows an increased fMRI activation of primary sensorimotor regions in early MS, which is followed by increased activation of supplementary motor areas and fronto-parietal areas devoted to motor control in mildly disabled people with MS. At later disease stages and in progressive MS, a decreased fMRI activity in the classical motor circuit is detected, together with increased fMRI activations of high-order, integrative areas. B) During cognitive tasks, an increased fMRI activity of fronto-parietal regions is usually detected in people with MS and intact task performance or no cognitive impairment. The same circuit shows decreased fMRI activity in people with MS and cognitive deficits. Abbreviations: SMC = sensorimotor cortex; SMA = supplementary motor area; IFG = inferior frontal gyrus; IPL = inferior parietal lobule; MTG = middle temporal gyrus; MFG = middle frontal gyrus; ACC = anterior cingulate cortex.

Aforementioned patterns have since been extensively replicated in additional work. Abnormally high and widespread activation -more evident with increasing age- was confirmed by multicenter motor fMRI studies. (Rocca et al., 2009, Wegner et al., 2008) Also, a decreased deactivation of the motor circuit (Manson et al., 2008, Petsas et al., 2013) and increased deactivation of the default-mode network system was found during motor tasks. (Petsas et al., 2013) Overall, patterns of increased fMRI activations, both in primary motor and associative regions, were obtained by studies investigating motor functions using different tasks, such as motor imagery, (Tacchino et al., 2017) hand writing, (Bonzano et al., 2021, Saini et al., 2004) grip force (Alahmadi et al., 2021, Strik et al., 2021) and joystick tasks. (Boonstra et al., 2020) A few studies also detected selective associations between increased motor fMRI activity and higher upper limb (Reddy et al., 2002, Wegner et al., 2008) or lower limb (Ciccarelli et al., 2006) clinical impairment.

Studies of the visual system were less consistent than those employing sensorimotor tasks, showing mixed findings of decreased (Rombouts et al., 1998) or increased (Werring et al., 2000, Colorado et al., 2012, West et al., 2021) activity in occipital cortices, probably depending from disease stage and from closeness to clinical attacks.

FMRI activity is also influenced by the presence of fatigue, which has been consistently related to the presence of abnormal recruitment of a fronto-striatal circuit (Bonzano et al., 2017, Pardini et al., 2013) and impaired modulation of fMRI activity over time. (Rocca et al., 2016, Svolgaard et al., 2018).

More advanced methods have also been used to further elaborate underlying cellular mechanisms. Recent studies using calibrated fMRI (West et al., 2021, Hubbard et al., 2017) showed that abnormal task-related fMRI activation is due to both altered cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption. This was seen during visual (Hubbard et al., 2017) and finger tapping (West et al., 2021) tasks, where increased blood flow/oxygen consumption were detected in the central region of task activation, while the surrounding region was characterized by an opposite behavior, especially in people with MS and upper limb impairment. (West et al., 2021) This reinforces the notion that impairment in recruiting supplementary areas might be among the reasons explaining poor performances of people with MS.

2.2. Exploring MS-related functional reorganization in cognitive systems

A list of relevant studies evaluating functional reorganization within circuits involved in different cognitive functions using task-based fMRI is provided in Table 2. The mostly investigated cognitive domains are sustained attention, information processing speed and working memory, thanks to the use of fMRI tasks based on the paced auditory serial addition test (PASAT), (Audoin et al., 2003, Chiaravalloti et al., 2005, Forn et al., 2006, Hillary et al., 2003, Mainero et al., 2004, Nelson et al., 2017, Staffen et al., 2002) symbol digit modalities test (SDMT), (Forn et al., 2013, Leavitt et al., 2012) N-back (Cader et al., 2006, Rocca et al., 2014, Sweet et al., 2006, Sweet et al., 2004, Vacchi et al., 2017, Wishart et al., 2004, Penner et al., 2003) task and Go-NoGo (Koini et al., 2016, Loitfelder et al., 2011) task.

Table 2.

Summary of the most important functional magnetic resonance imaging studies using cognitive active tasks to investigate brain activation in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Study Subjects Task Main findings
PASAT/PVSAT tasks
Staffen et al., 2002 21 people with RRMS
21 HC
PVSAT task People with MS exhibited increased fMRI activation vs HC of the right hemispheric frontal cortex and of the angular gyrus
Audoin et al., 2003 8 people with MS
2 people with CIS
10 HC
PASAT task Compared to HC, people with MS exhibited higher activity of frontopolar cortex, lateral prefrontal cortex and cerebellum. HC and CIS did not differ in terms of activation
Mainero et al., 2004 22 people with RRMS
22 HC
PASAT task
Recall task: before fMRI, listen to 7 unrelated pairs of words. Try to recall the second word, when the first is presented on the screen
During both PASAT and recall tasks, RRMS people exhibited significantly greater brain fMRI activation than HC. Task-related fMRI changes were more significant in well-performer than in poor MS performers
Audoin et al., 2005 18 people with CIS
18 HC
PASAT task In the subgroup of CIS with normal PASAT performance, fMRI showed larger activations in bilateral inferior frontal regions compared to HC. BA45 activation was inversely related to normal-appearing white matter damage
Au Duong et al., 2005 18 people with CIS
18 HC
PASAT task People with CIS presented lower effective connectivity than HC from right BA46 to left BA46 and from left anterior cingulate to left BA46. They also had higher effective connectivity from right anterior cingulate cortex to right BA46, from left right to left anterior cingulate and vice versa
Chiaravalloti et al., 2005 11 people with MS
5 HC
PASAT task HC and people with MS without working memory impairment showed fMRI activations lateralized to the left frontal hemisphere. Conversely, impaired MS people showed greater right frontal and right parietal activity vs HC
Forn et al., 2006 15 people with RRMS
10 HC
PASAT task Well-performer MS people showed a stronger activation in the left prefrontal cortex when compared with HC
Forn et al., 2012 18 people with CIS
15 HC
PASAT task CI CIS people had more significant fMRI activations and stronger effective connectivity in parietal, cerebellar and frontal regions than HC and CP CIS people
SDMT task
Leavitt et al., 2012 16 people with MS
17 HC
SDMT task During a modified SDMT task, people with MS showed more effective connectivity connections from multiple brain regions to the frontal cortex
Forn et al., 2013 18 people with CIS
15 HC
SDMT task Compared to HC, people with CIS exhibited an enhanced deactivation of the “task-negative” (DMN) network, whereas no differences between groups were found when comparing the “task-positive” activity network
N-back task
Penner et al., 2003 14 people with MS
7 HC
Task 1: 2-back task
Task 2: tonic alertness task
Task 3: incompatibility task
People with MS with mild cognitive impairment showed increased frontal and parietal fMRI activity vs HC in the three different attention tasks. Severely impaired MS did not show any additional prefrontal/premotor activation
Wishart et al., 2004 10 people with RRMS
10 HC
0-, 1-, and 2-back task People with MS exhibited decreased activation vs HC in core prefrontal/parietal regions of working memory circuitry, and increased activation within and beyond typical working memory circuitry
Sweet et al., 2004 15 people with MS
15 HC
0- and 2-back Compared to 0-back, during the 2-back condition people with MS and HC exhibited fMRI activity in inferior frontal, supplementary motor, premotor and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices. People with MS showed greater cortical activity than HC in sensorimotor cortices and several frontal regions
Sweet et al., 2006 15 people with RRMS
15 HC
0-, 1-, 2-, and 3-back task People with MS exhibited significantly greater fMRI activity in anterior frontal regions compared to HC during a 1-back task, while superior frontal, cingulate, and parahippocampal regions were relatively less active at 2- and 3-back
Cader et al., 2006 21 people with RRMS
16 HC
0-, 1-, 2-, and 3-back task At the N-back task, people with MS showed a smaller increase in activation than HC with greater task complexity. HC showed significantly greater FC between dorsolateral prefrontal and superior frontal/anterior cingulate activations
Amann et al., 2011 15 people with RRMS
15 HC
Working memory task: 1-, 2- and 3-back task
Attention task: to react as quickly as possible by pressing a button to digit “2″
During attention and working memory fMRI experiments, HC showed a linear in- or decrease in fMRI activation paralleling the changing task complexity, while people with MS showed stronger activations at simple task levels and a saturation effect of (de-)activation at the highest task load
Rocca et al., 2014 42 people with RRMS
52 HC
0-, 1-, 2-, and 3-back task Compared to HC and CI MS, people with CP MS had increased dorsolateral prefrontal fMRI recruitment. With increasing task difficulty, people with CI MS had reduced activations of fronto-parieto-temporal areas, as well as reduced deactivations of the DMN
Vacchi et al., 2017 12 people with CIS
38 people with RRMS
22 people with SPMS
24 HC
0-, 1-, 2-, and 3-back task During the N-back load contrast, compared to HC, all MS phenotypes had decreased parietal and frontal activation. Increased activations in people with CIS vs the remaining groups were found in superior frontal/anterior cingulate cortices. People with SPMS selectively activated parahippocampal and superior temporal pole regions
Spiteri et al., 2019 40 people with MS
22 HC
1-, and 2-back task Using a fatigue-inducing N-back task, effort-independent fatigue (i.e., fatigue not depending from task execution) was reflected by increased fMRI activity in fronto-striatal-subcortical networks. Effort-dependent fatigue (i.e., task-related fatigue) leaded to activity decreases in attention-related cortical and subcortical networks
Go-Nogo task
Loitfelder et al., 2011 10 people with CIS
10 people with RRMS
10 people with SPMS
28 HC
Go-Nogo task Widespread fMRI activation was found in frontal, parietal, insular, basal ganglia and cerebellar regions. Task performance was similar between phenotypes, but activation pattern deviated with disease progression. People with SPMS demonstrated the most abnormal network function
Koini et al., 2016 26 people with RRMS
32 HC
Go-Nogo task Compared with HC, people with MS showed increased activation in a fronto-parietal network, including both thalami. Thalamic volume and thalamic activation were the best predictors of information processing speed and executive function scores
Stroop task
Parry et al., 2003 10 people with MS
11 HC
Stroop task Left medial prefrontal regions were more active in people with MS than in HC, while the inferior frontal cortex and basal ganglia were more active in HC than in MS
Rocca et al., 2012 17 people with RRMS
17 people with BMS
23 people with SPMS
18 HC
Stroop task People with RRMS had abnormal fronto-parietal fMRI activations, people with SPMS had abnormal recruitment of cingulum and precuneus, and people with BMS had increased activation of the right prefrontal cortex, and increased interaction between frontal/parietal regions and cerebellum
Dobryakova et al., 2016 33 people with RRMS
18 people with BMS
33 people with SPMS
37 HC
Stroop task People with MS exhibited connectivity abnormalities depending on phenotype, reflecting weaker shared connections, extra connections, connection reversal, and loss. In SPMS and BMS, but not in RRMS people, extra connections were associated with deficits in the Stroop task performance
Other tasks
Hillary et al., 2003 8 people with MS
5 HC
To press a button if the presented letter was included in the previously presented string Increased right prefrontal and temporal lobe activation was found in people with MS compared to HC during a working memory task
Lazeron et al., 2004 23 people with MS
18 HC
Planning condition: to respond about the minimum number of necessary moves to reach the target People with MS and HC showed fMRI activity in frontal, parietal and cerebellar regions during the planning task. Although visual inspection suggested a larger extent of activation in MS, no formal differences were found. At ROI analysis, significantly larger cerebellar activation was found
Jehna et al., 2011 15 people with RRMS
15 HC
To indicate the gender of the presented subjects People with MS demonstrated abnormally high fMRI activations during facial recognition compared to HC in the posterior and anterior cingulate cortices, precuneus and occipital fusiform gyrus
Hulst et al., 2012 50 people with MS
30 HC
Encoding phase: to decide whether images were “tropical” or “non-tropical”
Retrieval phase: to indicate whether the picture was seen before
An episodic memory fMRI task elicited increased brain activation in parahippocampal and anterior cingulate regions in CP MS people vs HC. CI MS showed decreased parahippocampal and prefrontal activation, as well as increased posterior cingulate/precuneus activation
Rocca et al., 2017 11 people with CIS
40 people with RRMS
24 people with SPMS
22 HC
To remember the presented faces for a subsequent test of face recognition outside the scanner All subjects activated brain regions belonging to face perception and encoding network. Compared to HC/RRMS, people with CIS showed increased fMRI recruitment of posterior-visual areas. Thalami, parahippocampal gyri and anterior cingulum were more active in RRMS, while increased frontal recruitment was found in SPMS
Nelson et al., 2017 50 people with MS
Immediated (I) and delayed (D) memory task (MT) During the DMT task, CP MS people had significantly greater working memory activation than CI MS in the left prefrontal cortex and supplementary motor area
Dobryakova et al., 2018 19 people with MS
14 HC
To guess whether the value on the front of the card was higher or lower than 5, to win a monetary bonus During a gambling task with potential monetary gain (outcome condition) or not, a significant decrease of fatigue was found during the outcome condition, associated with abnormal fMRI activation of striatum and prefrontal cortex
Spirou et al., 2018 17 people with MS
13 HC
To guess whether the value on the front of the card was higher or lower than 5, to win a monetary bonus During the same gambling task as in (Dobryakova et al., 2018), people with MS exhibited greater activation in the putamen, hippocampus, and posterior cingulate cortex during outcome anticipation compared to HC

Abbreviations: PASAT = Paced Auditory Serial Addition test; PVSAT = Paced Visual Serial Addition test; SDMT = symbol digit modalities test; CIS = clinically isolated syndrome; RR = relapsing-remitting; SP = secondary progressive; B = benign; CP = cognitively preserved; CI = cognitively impaired; MS = multiple sclerosis; HC = healthy controls; FC = functional connectivity; DMN = default-mode network; ROI = region of interest.

Results of these studies were concordant between cognitive but also motor tasks in showing abnormal fMRI activity in people with MS vs HC. Specifically, during the PASAT task there was a set of regions, belonging to the attention and working memory circuits, mostly showing increased fMRI activation, including the medial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices, (Audoin et al., 2003, Chiaravalloti et al., 2005, Forn et al., 2006, Mainero et al., 2004, Staffen et al., 2002) inferior frontal gyri, (Chiaravalloti et al., 2005) angular gyri and other parietal areas, (Chiaravalloti et al., 2005, Mainero et al., 2004, Staffen et al., 2002, Forn et al., 2012) and the cerebellum. (Audoin et al., 2003, Forn et al., 2012) Overall, increased fMRI activity was more evident in people with MS with intact task performance or no cognitive impairment (Fig. 1), (Forn et al., 2006, Mainero et al., 2004, Penner et al., 2003) even if some evidence of higher, erratic activity in regions outside the classical attention/working memory circuits was found in poor performers. (Chiaravalloti et al., 2005, Forn et al., 2012) During the N-back task, the most evident change of cortical activity found in people with MS compared to HC was a “saturation” effect, consisting in abnormally high fronto-parietal fMRI activity at low task complexity (i.e., at 1- and 2-back). (Cader et al., 2006, Rocca et al., 2014, Sweet et al., 2006, Penner et al., 2003, Amann et al., 2011) In addition, people presenting with cognitive deficits showed an impaired ability to increase task-specific fMRI activation with increasing task complexity (Fig. 1), as well as lowered proficiency to suppress default-mode network activity. (Rocca et al., 2014, Amann et al., 2011) Once again, regions mostly involved were the dorsolateral prefrontal, premotor and supplementary motor cortices, belonging to the working memory circuit, as well as medial and lateral parietal cortices, and abnormal fMRI activity was more evident in cognitively preserved than in cognitively impaired people with MS. (Rocca et al., 2014) However, also in this task, erratic activity outside the classic working memory circuit was described, (Wishart et al., 2004) which was more evident in people with secondary progressive (SP) MS compared to RRMS. (Vacchi et al., 2017) During the N-back task, fatigued MS people tended to exhibit increased activity in fronto-striatal-subcortical networks. (Spiteri et al., 2019).

An adaptive increase of frontal, parietal and thalamic fMRI activations in people with MS vs HC was found also during the Go-NoGo (Koini et al., 2016, Loitfelder et al., 2011) and Stroop tasks, (Parry et al., 2003) which activate the sustained attention circuit. On the other hand, maladaptive activations outside such circuit, associated with higher levels of clinical disability, were also found, especially in people with SPMS. (Loitfelder et al., 2011) Finally, during episodic memory tasks a selective increase of fMRI activation in the hippocampus and anterior cingulate cortex (involved in the memory circuit) was detected, (Hulst et al., 2012) while selectively increased fMRI activation was seen in posterior parietal regions during face recognition/encoding tasks. (Jehna et al., 2011, Rocca et al., 2017) Once again, an effect of phenotype was observed contributing to the pattern of observed abnormalities, and maladaptive activity in the frontal cortex detected in people with SPMS. (Rocca et al., 2017).

3. From segregation to integrated functional networks: The role of a large-scale network collapse to understand MS pathophysiology

While task-based paradigms can highlight which regions are active during specific tasks, this inherently does not hold information on how this active region is communicating with the rest of the brain. This is typically quantified by assessing FC, i.e., by correlating activation patterns of different regions. This information is (at least partly) independent from activation levels, since relatively inactive regions can still strongly communicate with other regions and vice versa. As mentioned, this approach has been applied mostly using RS fMRI paradigms, typically requesting participants to lie still with their eyes closed, and letting the mind wander. Early RS fMRI studies have shown increased FC in CIS, (Liu et al., 2016, Liu et al., 2017, Shu et al., 2016, Roosendaal et al., 2010) and decreased FC in progressive MS. (Rocca et al., 2010) This combination of findings led to the hypothesis (Schoonheim et al., 2010) that RS FC would follow the same indicated pattern as task-based activation, i.e., an early compensatory increase and a subsequent maladaptive decrease. However, subsequent work found confusing combinations of increased and decreased FC, often in the same patients’ group. (Rocca et al., 2018) Although there are indications that specific connectivity patterns are peculiar to distinct disease-stages, (Meijer et al., 2018) longitudinal works remain rare. Most studies have performed RS fMRI studies during remission, given concerns of relapse-driven inflammation influencing signal stability, however, some relapse studies have been done. (Wu et al., 2020) Findings below explore disability and cognition, but it should be noted similar results have also been found for other symptoms such as fatigue (Manjaly et al., 2019) and social cognition. (Chalah and Ayache, 2020).

3.1. Exploring RS FC abnormalities related to disability

A list of relevant studies evaluating RS FC modifications occurring in people with MS in relation with disability is provided in Table 3. In principle, it could be hypothesized that mechanisms associated with clinical disability (which is mostly quantified by the expanded disability status scale [EDSS] score and mainly driven by physical impairment) would be more straightforward compared to the complex interplay of many brain regions involved in cognitive processing, but results demonstrated that this was not necessarily the case. In fact, contrasting findings showed the involvement of many RS networks in explaining clinical disability in MS. (Rocca et al., 2012) Indeed, many studies have related abnormal RS FC within the sensorimotor system to disability, (Pinter et al., 2019) for instance showing that both increased and decreased RS FC of the motor cortices, cerebellum and other areas explain physical and motor impairment. (Dogonowski et al., 2013, Zhong et al., 2016, Tona et al., 2018, Fu et al., 2019, Cordani et al., 2021, Tommasin et al., 2018) This suggests a co-occurrence of adaptive and maladaptive mechanisms within sensorimotor networks (SMN), which may vary according to patients’ clinical characteristics. Of note, lower RS FC was found to be associated with more severe upper limb clinical impairment, (Cordani et al., 2020, Zhong et al., 2017) while preserved upper limb function has been associated with higher RS FC in motor and extra-motor regions. (d'Ambrosio et al., 2017, Pasqua et al., 2021, Tommasin et al., 2020) Interestingly, the involvement of extra-SMN regions has also become apparent, such as occipito-temporal areas. (Bollaert et al., 2018) Also, cognitive networks like the default-mode network (DMN) and fronto-parietal network (FPN) (Cordani et al., 2020, Tommasin et al., 2020, Faivre et al., 2012) have been shown to play a role. Some studies even found effects of specific structures to relate differently to cognition and disability based on the affected cortical area. (Rocca et al., 2018, Carotenuto et al., 2020) The same applies to RS FC patterns of structures like the cerebellum (Pasqua et al., 2021, Sbardella et al., 2017) and thalamus. (d'Ambrosio et al., 2017, Giannì et al., 2021, Schoonheim et al., 2022) Together, these findings have lead the field to re-evaluate the complexity of physical disability, which is influenced by injury of several mechanisms and systems.

Table 3.

Summary of the most important resting state (RS) functional magnetic resonance imaging studies analyzing brain functional connectivity (FC) in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) in relation to clinical disability.

Study Subjects Main findings
Faivre et al., 2012 13 people with MS
14 HC
Increased RS FC was seen for many networks, no decrease. MSFC was related to increased FC of fronto-parietal and salience networks
Rocca et al., 2012 85 people with MS
40 HC
MS showed decreased RS FC within and between many networks, but also increased FC of executive control and auditory networks. Decreased RS FC was related to higher EDSS score
Dogonowski et al., 2013 27 people with RRMS
15 people with SPMS
Premotor RS FC was positively related to EDSS score, but in RRMS only
Schoonheim et al., 2014 128 people with MS
50 HC
Ventral stream decreased eigenvector centrality related to worse cognition, sensorimotor decreases related to worse EDSS scores. Regions with altered centrality showed increased thalamic RS FC
Zhong et al., 2016 26 people with MS and motor impairment
17 people with MS and no motor impairment
20 HC
Right hand impairment was explored. Impaired people with MS showed lower SMN RS FC. FC was retained in a multivariate model explaining hand motor disability, assessed by using the 9HPT
Sbardella et al., 2017 54 people with MS
24 HC
Dentate nucleus RS FC was higher with fronto-parietal areas in people with MS compared to HC. Increased RS FC was related to better cognition, but worse EDSS score
d'Ambrosio et al., 2017 187 people with MS
94 HC
Different thalamic subnuclei FC profiles were investigated. Increased thalamic RS FC with temporal areas was seen in people with MS and CI. Decreased thalamic RS FC with caudate and cingulate cortex was related to worse 9HPT scores, while higher thalamus-insula RS FC was related to better 9HPT scores
Zhong et al., 2017 25 people with MS and motor impairment
26 people with MS and no motor impairment
21 HC
Upper limb impairment groups, evaluated using 9HPT, were explored. Support vector machines were able to distinguish subgroups based on structural and RS FC measures
Tona et al., 2018 25 people with MS
20 HC
RS FC of the dentate nucleus was explored, showing both increased and decreased FC compared to HC. Worse balance (determined by means of center of pressure scores) was related to lower dentate-caudate RS FC
Meijer et al., 2018 121 people with early RRMS
122 people with late RRMS
53 people with SPMS
96 HC
Early RRMS showed no RS FC changes. Late RRMS and SPMS showed increased deep GM RS FC, which was related to both cognition and EDSS scores. SPMS showed decreased within-cortex RS FC compared to early RRMS, which was only related to EDSS scores
Tommasin et al., 2018 119 people with MS
42 HC
Higher frontal and lower cerebellar RS FC was related to worse EDSS scores. A peculiar contribution of cerebellar RS FC decrease was identified in multivariate models
Rocca et al., 2018 215 people with MS
98 HC
MS showed a complex mixture of increased and decreased RS FC within the main large-scale networks. Lower thalamic RS FC was especially related to less severe CI, while other networks mainly showed relations of reduced FC with worse CI and EDSS/functional system scores
Zurita et al., 2018 107 people with MS
50 HC
Multivariate models including RS FC were better able to distinguish MS from HC than MS subgroups based on EDSS scores. Functional measures were more important than diffusion-based measures for the classification
Bollaert et al., 2018 29 people with MS In this one-group correlation study, T25FW was related to temporo-occipital RS FC
Fu et al., 2019 26 people with MS
23 HC
Postcentral RS FC was both increased and decreased depending on which cortical area and was related to the Fugl-Meyer sensory score and EDSS score
Pinter et al., 2019 180 people with MS Subgroups based on lesion/atrophy severity indicate that patients with predominant white matter damage show increased SMN RS FC compared to those with predominant GM damage (atrophy). Lower SMN FC was related to worse EDSS
Carotenuto et al., 2020 19 people with MS
24 HC
RS FC of specific neurotransmitter networks were related to cognitive impairment, disease duration and EDSS scores
Cordani et al., 2020 366 people with MS
134 HC
Decreased RS FC was seen in people with MS compared to HC. Decreased RS FC of frontal/executive and cerebellar areas was related to 9HPT performance
Tommasin et al., 2020 119 people with MS
42 HC
Within-network RS FC was higher in people with MS than in HC for DMN, FPN and ECN, and was related to less severe EDSS scores, better 9HPT and T25FW scores and milder PASAT impairment. Between-network FC and whole-brain RS FC were also lower, but related to worse impairments at the same tests
Dekker et al., 2021 295 people with MS
96 HC
Event-based model showed an early involvement of DMN centrality changes related to more severe EDSS scores and cognitive progression
Chiang et al., 2021 20 people with MS RS FC of areas frequently showing atrophy based on meta-analysis was evaluated. Deviation from optimal in this model was related to EDSS score
Cordani et al., 2021 250 people with RRMS
114 people with PMS
144 HC
RS FC related to clinical disability only in people with PMS, where increased FC of motor areas predicted EDSS. Conversely, in people with RRMS, EDSS score was only predicted by structural damage
Pasqua et al., 2021 119 people with MS
42 HC
Increased cerebellar RS FC related to lower cognitive impairment and physical disability, assessed by using EDSS, 9HPT and T25FW scores
Strik et al., 2021 185 people with MS patientsand low disability (EDSS score ≤ 3.5)37 people with MS and high disability
(EDSS score ≥ 6.0)
82 HC
People with high EDSS score showed higher network efficiency (based on RS FC) of the primary sensorimotor cortex (S1), pallidum and premotor cortex, of which only S1 was significant in a multivariate model. S1 RS FC was increased with prefrontal and secondary sensory areas
Giannì et al., 2021 36 people with MS
39 HC
Thalamo-cortical RS FC was higher, while intra-thalamic FC was lower in people with MS compared to HC. Finger movement speed was impaired and related to both abnormalities of thalamic RS FC
Rocca et al., 2021 233 people with MS
77 HC
At clinical follow-up, 45% of MS patients progressed, 16% of RRMS evolved to SPMS. Decreased DMN RS FC and increased SMN RS FC predicted clinical worsening, defined basing on EDSS score increase over time. SPMS conversion was mostly predicted by GM atrophy. Adding network measures improved prediction
Schoonheim et al., 2022 512 people with MS
161 HC
Thalamic RS FC was explored. EDSS was related to increased thalamus-SMN FC, which was especially high in people with MS and more severe disability. Thalamic RS FC was related to cortical network atrophy, but not thalamic atrophy, nor lesions

Abbreviations: RR = relapsing-remitting; SP = secondary progressive; P = progressive; CI = cognitively impaired; MS = multiple sclerosis; HC = healthy controls; MSFC = multiple sclerosis functional composite; EDSS = expanded disability status scale; T25FW = timed 25 foot walk; GM = grey matter; SMN = sensorimotor network; 9HPT = nine-hole peg test; DMN = default mode network; FPN = fronto-parietal network; ECN = executive control network; PASAT = paced auditory serial addition test.

3.2. Exploring RS FC abnormalities related to cognition

A list of relevant studies evaluating RS FC modifications occurring in people with MS in relation with cognition is provided in Table 4. Historically, the field of cognition in MS has evolved drastically, moving from the PASAT, a sub-test of the multiple sclerosis functional composite (MSFC), to more expansive research batteries. (Benedict et al., 2020) The field of RS FC has evolved drastically as well, moving from individual connections to network analysis. In stark contrast to the cognitive task literature, RS fMRI studies identifying FC changes related to preserved/better cognitive performance remain rare. (Loitfelder et al., 2012, Prakash et al., 2011) Most of RS FC correlates of cognitive dysfunction revolve around a dysfunctional DMN, a collection of regions commonly de-activated during specific tasks. (Bassett and Sporns, 2017) Interestingly, RS FC of the DMN has been observed to be increased in some studies, (Tommasin et al., 2020, Hawellek et al., 2011, Has Silemek et al., 2020, Meijer et al., 2017, Veréb et al., 2022, Soares et al., 2021) but decreased in others, (Rocca et al., 2010, Leavitt et al., 2014, Bonavita et al., 2011, Janssen et al., 2013, Jandric et al., 2021, Louapre et al., 2014) a finding that might be explained by the fact that both phenomena can co-occur at the same time. (Conti et al., 2021) However, regardless of directionality, almost all DMN changes were related to the severity of cognitive impairment, indicating that both a hyper- and hypo-connected DMN would indicate an inefficient network for cognition. Later insights into the DMN have placed these findings in clearer context. Initially, the DMN was seen as a “default state” of the brain where the network would reside in when doing nothing, leading to the controversial term “task-negative network”. (Spreng, 2012) Next, it was seen as a purely “intrinsic” system, featuring cognitively relevant processes but not actively processing during a cognitive task. Later on, however, it became clear that the DMN does have a crucial role in cognitive processing, namely the integration of higher-order extrinsic and intrinsic information over long timescales. (Yeshurun et al., 2021) Such a role could also explain why the DMN has been related to so many neurological and psychiatric disorders beyond MS, especially in relation to impaired cognition.

Table 4.

Summary of the most important resting state (RS) functional magnetic resonance imaging studies analyzing brain functional connectivity (FC) in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) in relation to cognition.

Study Subjects Main findings
Roosendaal et al., 2010 14 people with CIS
31 people with MS
41 HC
CIS showed no CI, but increased RS FC in many networks. MS showed CI but no RS FC changes compared to HC. RS FC changes were related to white matter damage
Rocca et al., 2010 33 people with SPMS
24 people with PPMS
24 HC
Lower RS FC was found in progressive MS in anterior DMN areas, most pronounced in cognitively impaired vs preserved people with MS. DMN reductions were related to PASAT and word list scores, and to white matter damage
Roosendaal et al., 2010 25 people with MS
30 HC
In memory-preserved people with MS, hippocampal connectivity was reduced, in relation to hippocampal atrophy
Hawellek et al., 2011 16 people with MS
16 HC
DMN showed increased RS FC in relation to the severity of CI. Results were especially significant for inferior parietal, posterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex
Prakash et al., 2011 45 people with MS In this one-group correlational study, higher hippocampal connectivity was related to better relational memory
Bonavita et al., 2011 18 cognitively impaired people with MS
18 cognitively preserved people with MS
18 HC
Reduced ACC-DMN RS FC was worst in cognitively impaired compared to preserved people with MS, but was also seen in all people with MS vs HC. RS FC was not related to lesions or global atrophy, but did relate to local atrophy
Loitfelder et al., 2012 31 people with MS
31 HC
Rest phases of a task were used to analyze ACC RS FC with task-related areas. Increased ACC RS FC was related to better processing speed performance
Schoonheim et al., 2012 30 people with MS
30 HC
Results showed worst RS FC and cognitive changes in male people, showing reduced connectivity which was related to visuospatial memory
Janssen et al., 2013 28 people with MS
28 HC
DMN and attention network integration (within-network RS FC) was reduced and related to the severity of CI
Cruz-Gómez et al., 2014 30 cognitively impaired people with MS
30 cognitively preserved people with MS
18 HC
Cognitively impaired people with MS showed reduced RS FC compared to preserved MS across all resting state networks. Preserved people with MS showed lower RS FC in the FPN compared to HC. RS FC was related to atrophy and lesions
Louapre et al., 2014 15 cognitively impaired people with MS
20 cognitively preserved people with MS
20 HC
RS FC was increased in cognitively preserved people with MS vs HC, but decreased in cognitively impaired vs preserved MS. Results were mainly seen in the DMN and attention networks
Gamboa et al., 2014 16 people with MS
20 HC
Increased network modularity was related to worse PASAT performance
Leavitt et al., 2014 20 memory impaired people with MS
23 memory preserved people with MS
Memory impairment was related to lower DMN RS FC
Schoonheim et al., 2014 128 people with MS
50 HC
Ventral stream decreased eigenvector centrality related to worse cognition, sensorimotor decreases related to worse EDSS scores. Regions with altered centrality showed increased thalamic RS FC
Tona et al., 2014 48 people with MS
24 HC
Worse PASAT scores were related to lower thalamic RS FC with thalamus, cerebellum and widespread cortical areas
Wojtowicz et al., 2014 18 people with MS
16 HC
Worse reaction time parameters were related to reduced RS FC of (pre)frontal areas
Hulst et al., 2015 57 people with MS
28 HC
Increased RS FC between hippocampus and posterior cingulate cortex was related to memory impairment. Hippocampal activation was not related to hippocampal RS FC
Sbardella et al., 2015 30 people with MS
24 HC
People with MS showed reduced RS FC in five networks and changes to between-network FC. RS FC changes were related to white matter damage and processing speed
Schoonheim et al., 2015 108 cognitively preserved people with MS
22 mild cognitively impaired people with MS
27 cognitively impaired people with MS
Thalamic RS FC was increased with cortical areas, but only in cognitively impaired people with MS. Multivariate regression included thalamic volume, RS FC and MD as predictors of CI
Rocca et al., 2016 246 people with MS
55 HC
Graph analytical properties based on RS FC patterns were able to differentiate cognitively impaired from preserved people with MS, but were not related to phenotype. Global network properties were altered by changing patterns and locations of hubs
Petracca et al., 2017 25 people with PPMS
20 HC
CI was related to reduced RS FC and increased within-region variability of BOLD amplitude. Cortical lesions were related to the severity of functional changes
Sbardella et al., 2017 54 people with MS
24 HC
Dentate nucleus RS FC was higher with fronto-parietal areas, which was related to better cognition, but worse motor performance
d'Ambrosio et al., 2017 187 people with MS
94 HC
Different thalamic subnuclei RS FC profiles were seen. Increased thalamic RS FC with temporal areas was seen in people with MS and CI. Decreased thalamic RS FC with caudate and cingulate cortex was related to worse motor performance, while higher thalamus-insula RS FC was related to better motor performance
Eijlers et al., 2017 87 cognitively impaired people with MS
65 mild cognitively impaired people with MS
180 cognitively preserved people with MS
96 HC
Eigenvector centrality, a graph measure indicating hubness based on RS FC profiles, was increased within DMN networks in people with MS and mild and severe CI. Cognitively preserved people with MS only showed changes in occipital and sensorimotor areas, which was related to disability
Meijer et al., 2017 87 cognitively impaired people with MS
65 mild cognitively impaired people with MS
180 cognitively preserved people with MS
96 HC
Hub networks (DMN and FPN) showed increased RS FC with the rest of the brain, but no within-network alterations. Higher hub RS FC was related to worse cognition. DMN RS FC increases were related to attention, processing speed and working memory, while increased FPN FC was related to attention
González Torre et al., 2017 64 people with MS
18 HC
Memory impairment was related to higher RS FC for posterior hippocampus and cortical areas. People with MS and no impairment already showed some increased RS FC
Meijer et al., 2018 121 people with early RRMS
122 people with late RRMS
53 people with SPMS
96 HC
Early RRMS showed no RS FC changes. Late RRMS and SPMS showed increased deep GM RS FC, which was related to both cognition and disability. SPMS showed decreased within-cortex RS FC compared to early RRMS, which was only related to disability
Rocca et al., 2018 215 people with MS
98 HC
People with MS showed a complex mixture of increased and decreased RS FC vs HC. Lower thalamic RS FC was especially related to less severe CI, while other networks mainly showed relations for reduced RS FC with worse CI and disability
Meijer et al., 2018 330 people with MS
96 HC
Processing speed impairment was related to increased RS FC. CI variations in people with similar severities of structural damage could be related to the severity of increased RS FC
Cocozza et al., 2018 29 people with progressive MS
22 HC
Progressive MS showed reduced cerebellar RS FC for Crus II, but increased cerebellar FC for Lobule VIIb, which was related to memory impairment
Fuchs et al., 2019 74 people with MS
29 HC
Higher cognitive reserve was related to normal RS FC and cognition. This effect attenuated the impact of structural disconnection on CI
Karavasilis et al., 2019 31 people with MS
16 HC
Memory impairment was related to reduced hippocampal RS FC
Lin et al., 2019 64 people with MS
26 HC
Thalamic subnuclei showed different patterns of RS FC alterations, which were related to CI
Carotenuto et al., 2020 19 people with MS
24 HC
RS FC of specific neurotransmitter networks were related to CI
Has Silemek et al., 2020 33 people with MS
29 HC
Decreased structural FC was related to increased RS FC and worse cognitive performance. Effects were mostly seen in the DMN
Meijer et al., 2020 133 people with MS
48 HC
In people with MS and a long disease duration, structural connectivity loss was worst in long-distance connections, and was related to a more abnormal RS FC. Both functional and structural RS FC changes related to worse CI
Riccitelli et al., 2020 37 people with benign MS
50 HC
Increased RS FC in fronto-temporo-parietal regions was seen in MS, but was not included as a predictor of worse CI in a multivariate model
Wu et al., 2020 17 people with MS and relapse
24 people with MS in remission
23 HC
People with MS undergoing a relapse had more severe RS FC changes, which were related to worse PASAT scores compared to remitting people with MS and HC
Tommasin et al., 2020 119 people with MS
42 HC
Within-network RS FC was higher in MS for DMN, FPN and ECN and were related to less severe disability and PASAT impairment. Lower between-network and whole-brain RS FC was also lower, but related to worse impairments
Bizzo et al., 2021 28 people with MS
28 HC
Better cognitive reserve was related lower RS FC of the dorsal anterior insula with cuneus and parieto-occipital areas
Jandric et al., 2021 55 cognitively impaired people with MS
47 cognitively preserved people with MS
27 HC
Decreased DMN but increased FPN FC was found in cognitively impaired vs preserved people with MS, combined with altered cerebral blood flow and structural disconnection
Dekker et al., 2021 295 people with MS
96 HC
Event-based model showed early involvement of DMN centrality changes related to disability and cognitive progression
Marchesi et al., 2021 116 people with MS
65 HC
RS FC of working memory, ECN, salience network and DMN related to worse Wisconsin card sorting outcomes
Pasqua et al., 2021 119 people with MS
42 HC
Increased cerebellar RS FC related to lower cognitive and physical disability
Soares et al., 2021 21 people with MS
17 HC
Lower RS FC was related to white matter lesion load and information processing
Buyukturkoglu et al., 2021 181 people with early MS Machine learning approaches were able to differentiate low- and high-performing SDMT groups. Predictors included measures of atrophy, white matter damage and hub RS FC
Conti et al., 2021 84 cognitively impaired people with MS
192 cognitively preserved people with MS
102 HC
Regression models included atrophy and FA-based disconnection, but did not include RS FC as measures of importance for explaining CI
Veréb et al., 2021 24 people with MS
25 HC
The significantly increased leftward laterality of the angular gyrus in MS related to higher BVMT-R scores

Abbreviations: CIS = clinically isolated syndrome; SP = secondary progressive; PP = primary progressive; CI = cognitive impairment; PASAT = paced auditory serial addition test; EDSS = expanded disability status scale; SDMT = symbol digit modalities test; BVMT-R = brief visuospatial memory test- revised; GM = grey matter; DMN = default mode network; FPN = fronto-parietal network; ECN = executive control network; ACC = anterior cingulate cortex; PCC = posterior cingulate cortex; MD = mean diffusivity; FA = fractional anisotropy; BOLD = blood-oxygenation level dependent.

Of course, cognitively relevant RS FC changes in MS are not limited to the DMN. Ongoing work has identified the involvement of many networks, (Cruz-Gómez et al., 2014, Sbardella et al., 2015, Marchesi et al., 2021) among which a prominent role is played by the FPN, (Tommasin et al., 2020, Meijer et al., 2017, Marchesi et al., 2021, Wojtowicz et al., 2014, Petracca et al., 2017, Riccitelli et al., 2020) that also exhibit a combination of increased and decreased RS FC related to cognitive dysfunction. (Jandric et al., 2021) The FPN, also known as the central executive network (CEN), is a network classically related to active cognitive processing, coordinating behavior, attention, working memory and executive functioning. (Marek and Dosenbach, 2018) For this reason, it has also been named as the “task-positive” network, together with the dorsal attention network (DAN). (Spreng, 2012) The DMN and FPN contain most of the strongly connected regions, i.e., the functional hubs of the brain. (Bassett and Sporns, 2017) Despite their rather different role, the DMN and FPN both show similar patterns in MS, consisting of a disturbed RS FC especially with non-hub regions. (Meijer et al., 2017) This hub disruption could lead to an altered balance between the DMN and FPN, as both should normally be highly flexible and form opposing systems. (Douw et al., 2016) Together, these large-scale RS FC changes could lead to the hypothesized “network collapse” in MS (Fig. 2), where normal network flexibility is lost, with probable detrimental effects on cognitive processing. (Schoonheim et al., 2015).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic representation of the behavior of network functional connectivity (FC), assessed using graph theoretical analysis, in relation to cognitive impairment in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) (see (Schoonheim et al., 2015) for details). At the beginning of the disease and/or when structural damage is still limited, network metrics show some compensatory abnormalities, mainly consisting in a loss of long-range connections and increased modularity, as well as regional hyperactivation, which contribute to maintain network efficiency. As disease and structural damage progresses, further loss of functional connections leads to a loss of network efficiency and eventually a network collapse and cognitive impairment.

One aspect that still deserves further investigations is why some studies find increased and others decreased RS FC in core brain functional networks. While some methodological choices may play a role, it has to be noted that investigating specific structures like the hippocampus, (Roosendaal et al., 2010, Hulst et al., 2015, González Torre et al., 2017, Karavasilis et al., 2019) thalamus, (Rocca et al., 2018, Conti et al., 2021, Tona et al., 2014, Schoonheim et al., 2015) and cerebellum, (Pasqua et al., 2021, Sbardella et al., 2017, Cocozza et al., 2018) led to similar results as large-scale network analysis, again showing both increased and decreased RS FC related to cognitive impairment, but with some more specificity in the association with distinct symptoms. Even investigations of small sub-structures, such as individual thalamic nuclei, showed a similar variation of increased and decreased RS FC. (d'Ambrosio et al., 2017, Lin et al., 2019) Interestingly, cortical areas showing altered RS FC with these individual structures are mostly part of the DMN and FPN. Taken together, previous literature is concordant in showing extensive RS FC changes with different directionalities, mostly associated to MS cognitive dysfunction. Combined with task studies, the field currently hypothesizes that beneficial changes in brain function might solely appear in the form of hyperactivation, and that RS FC patterns should remain as normal as possible. The prowess of maintaining a normal connectivity patterns to preserve cognition was also related to cognitive reserve, in the form of higher levels of education. (Fuchs et al., 2019, Bizzo et al., 2021) Since an abnormally low (or high) RS FC within critical large-scale networks is essential to explain cognitive deficits, the focus of recent research was to find the best way to quantify “network deviance”. One way to do this was to quantify how strong functional connections deviates from those derived from an healthy control network, and put such deviations in relationship with cognitive impairment. (Meijer et al., 2018, Meijer et al., 2020) However, this approach does have limited information, as it cannot describe precise network functions.

3.3. Advanced network analyses

Studies mentioned in the previous section assessed RS FC in the main large-scale functional networks of the brain with different approaches. These include independent component analysis and seed-to-voxel correlation analysis, with a consequent variability of included regions and associated connectivity scores. One possible way to overcome such limitations might be to integrate raw RS FC measures into a more complex system, and analyze “whole-network” features rather than individual connections. (Schoonheim et al., 2015) In the field of network neuroscience (Bassett and Sporns, 2017) this can be done using graph theoretical analysis. Here, the brain is represented as a network (graph) of interconnected brain regions (nodes). This approach is interesting because it allows to analyze several graph parameters, quantifying the level of integration (e.g., path length) and segregation (e.g., clustering coefficient), how integrated sub-networks are into the entire network (e.g., modularity) or how hub-like a region is (e.g., centrality). Early work in MS showed a more random path length, (Hardmeier et al., 2012) indicating a loss of network efficiency in relation to cognitive dysfunction, especially in men. Modularity analyses showed that more segregated subnetworks are related to worse PASAT performance. (Gamboa et al., 2014).

Overall, trajectories of network changes in MS seem to follow the scheme presented in Fig. 2. At early disease stages, or when structural damage is still limited, network abnormalities mainly consist in a loss of long-range connections and increased local efficiency/modularity as well as hyperactivation, which together may have a compensatory role and help to maintain preserved cognitive abilities. Later on in the disease, as structural damage progresses, a failure of functional compensation occurs, characterized by severe loss of connections and network efficiency and hypoactivation. This leads to a “network collapse” (Schoonheim et al., 2015) and cognitive impairment, although this concept likely also applies to other clinical symptoms such as disability.

Hub analyses indicated vastly altered hub patterns related to cognitive impairment (both in terms of spatial location and strength). (Rocca et al., 2016, Buyukturkoglu et al., 2021) Centrality analyses showed that specific subsystems of the whole-brain functional network were related to specific MS disease features, for instance DMN and ventral stream changes were related to cognition, while sensorimotor changes were related to disability. (Schoonheim et al., 2014, Eijlers et al., 2017, Dekker et al., 2021) Of note, segregation (quantified by means of the inverse of path length) was associated to disability, indicating that increasing connectivity within the motor system leads to a loss of normal “local efficiency”. Effects were centered around the thalamus and primary sensorimotor cortex. (Strik et al., 2021) As this field continues to grow with new measures developed continuously, the search for an optimal measure of “efficiency” continues.

4. fMRI to explore changes over time of activation patterns and RS FC in MS

Longitudinal fMRI studies have been performed to monitor changes over time of task-related fMRI activation or RS FC, and to monitor the effects of rehabilitative or pharmacological treatments. A list of relevant studies evaluating longitudinal task-based fMRI and RS FC changes occurring in people with MS is provided in Table 5.

Table 5.

Summary of the most important task-based and resting state (RS) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies analyzing longitudinal changes over time of brain activation and functional connectivity (FC) in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Task-based fMRI studies
Study Subjects Task Main findings
Reddy et al., 2000 1 MS after the new onset of hemiparesis from relapse Index finger-thumb opposition Clinical improvement was associated with recovery of N-acetylaspartate, and with reduction of abnormally large fMRI activation with movement
Parry et al., 2003 5 people with MS
4 HC
Stroop task BOLD signal intensity change was 56% lower after rivastigmine administration in left medial prefrontal regions compared with placebo for the patients
Morgen et al., 2004 9 people with MS
9 HC
Visually-cued thumb flexion–extension Before training, thumb movements elicited more prominent fMRI activation of the contralateral premotor cortex in people with MS than in HC. After training, unlike HC, people with MS did not exhibit task-specific fMRI reductions
Mainero et al., 2004 12 people with RRMS Index finger-thumb opposition FMRI activity was higher after receiving 3,4-diamionopyridine than under placebo in the ipsilateral sensorimotor and supplementary motor cortex
Pantano et al., 2005 18 people with MS
9 HC
Finger to thumb opposition with the right hand (index, medium, ring and little fingers) People with MS exhibited greater bilateral fMRI activation than HC at baseline and follow-up. In younger MS people and in those with lower structural damage, follow-up fMRI activity decreased vs baseline in motor and cerebellar areas
Rocca et al., 2007 22 people with RRMS Task 1: flexion–extension of the last four fingers of the right hand
Task 2: flexion–extension of the right hand and right foot
After interferon-beta 1a injection, people with MS with reversible fatigue showed an abnormal recruitment of the fronto-thalamic circuitry
Mezzapesa et al., 2008 12 people with RRMS
15 HC
Flexion-extension of the last four fingers of the right hand In people with MS and a pseudo-tumoral lesion, baseline ipsilateral sensorimotor cortex fMRI activity was higher with the impaired than the unimpaired hand. FMRI recovery in the contralateral primary sensorimotor cortex at follow-up was found in clinically improved MS people
Audoin et al., 2008 13 people with CIS
19 HC
PASAT task People with MS improving at PASAT performance after one year showed larger increase in fMRI activation between month 0 and month 12 in the right lateral prefrontal cortex compared to stable/worsening people
Pantano et al., 2011 32 people with RRMS
(19 after onset of a clinical relapse, 13 stable)
Flexion-extension of the last four fingers of the right hand During a motor task, patients acquired within 48 h from the beginning of a clinical relapse showed a significant difference of fMRI activation in the ipsilateral precentral gyrus compared to stable MS people, indicating reduced deactivation. Longitudinal changes in precentral gyrus activity over two months were significantly greater in relapsing than in stable MS people
Sastre-Garriga et al., 2011 15 people with MS
5 HC
PASAT task After cognitive rehabilitation, people with MS and cognitive impairment increased their fMRI activation in several cerebellar areas
Filippi et al., 2012 20 people with RRMS
(10 treatment group, 10 control group)
Stroop task In a group of people with MS undergoing 12-week cognitive rehabilitation, fMRI demonstrated modifications of activity of the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex compared to a control group
Ernst et al., 2012 8 people with RRMS
15 HC
Evocation of unique personal past events After undergoing a facilitation session to potentiate autobiographic memory functions, people with MS showed significant increase of fMRI activations in occipital, temporal and precuneus regions during a memory task
Tomassini et al., 2012 23 people with MS
12 HC
Visuomotor task: to track vertical movements of a computer-controlled bar People with MS undergoing two sessions of the visuomotor task (session I: short-term practice; session II: longer-term practice, after 2 weeks of daily practice with the same task) showed an association between short-term improvements and lower sensorimotor, parietal and hippocampal fMRI activation
Chiaravalloti et al., 2012 16 people with MS
(8 treatment group, 8 control group)
Word learning task
Word recognition task
In people with MS undergoing behavioral treatment for memory deficits, greater activation was evident during performance of a memory task within a widespread cortical network involving frontal, parietal, precuneus, temporal and parahippocampal regions
Cerasa et al., 2013 23 people with MS
(12 treatment group, 11 control group)
PASAT task After a 6-week attention training, treated people with MS, compared with control people, showed enhanced performance in attention abilities, which was associated with increased fMRI activity in the cerebellum and in the superior parietal lobule
Loitfelder et al., 2014 13 people with RRMS
15 HC
Go-NoGo task At baseline and after 20 months of follow-up, people with MS showed increased activation vs HC in the insular, parietal, occipital and cerebellar cortex. Over time, people with MS (but not HC) demonstrated fMRI activity increments in the inferior parietal lobule
Dobryakova et al., 2014
8 people with MS (6-month follow-up of the treated group in (Chiaravalloti et al., 2012) Word learning task
Word recognition task
Greater fMRI activity in parietal, occipital, cerebellar and prefrontal regions vs baseline was confirmed after 6 months from the end of training
Huiskamp et al., 2016 16 people with MS
(7 treatment group, 9 control group)
0-, 1-, and 2-back task During a N-back task, significant increases in fMRI activation were seen in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, supplementary motor area and inferior parietal lobule at follow-up in the treatment group. No significant changes were noted in the control group
Tavazzi et al., 2018 29 people with MS Plantar dorsiflexion of the left and right foot After a 4-week neurorehabilitation, people with MS showed a less widespread activation, and a more focused activation of sensorimotor areas. fMRI changes were not maintained after 3 months from rehabilitation end
Rocca et al., 2019 41 people with MS
(20 action-observation training, 21 control training)
46 HC
(23 action-observation training, 23 control training)
Right hand object manipulation After 2 weeks of training, compared to HC-Control, action observation training HC had greater fMRI activation of the left precentral gyrus. Compared to MS-Control, MS undergoing action observation training had greater fMRI activation of bilateral inferior frontal and left insular regions, which correlated with improved motor scores
Bonzano et al., 2019 30 people with MS
(15 training voluntary movements, 15 training passive movements)
Index finger-thumb opposition After 8-week upper limb training based on voluntary movements, people with MS showed increased lateralization of fMRI activity compared to people with MS undergoing passive movement training
Peran et al., 2020 30 people with progressive MS Mental simulation of actions, mime of actions and passive movements After multidisciplinary rehabilitation, decreased fMRI activation was found in MS in circuits that are normally activated by the tasks
Zuber et al., 2020 24 people with relapse-onset MS
24 HC
Motor sequence learning task After multidisciplinary rehabilitation, decreased fMRI activation was found in MS in the left cerebellum and right prefrontal lobe, which was maintained at longer-term follow-up
Sulpizio et al., 2021 9 people with MS
(4 undergoing standard rehabilitation, 5 undergoing rehabilitation with a exoskeleton)
Go-NoGo task After 6-week rehabilitation, the group treated using the exoskeleton showed decreased fMRI activation in inferior frontal regions compared to the standard rehabilitation group
RS fMRI studies
Faivre et al., 2016 38 people with MS
24 HC
At baseline, RS FC was higher in people with MS vs HC and related to less severe disability. During follow-up, RS FC decreases were related to worse disability progression
Cui et al., 2017 20 people with MS
15 HC
Striatal subregions were explored, showing relations with EDSS for dorsal striatal-prefrontal and parietal connections. After 7 months, stable results were found
Parisi et al., 2014 10 people with MS + treatment
10 people with MS - treatment
ACC-parietal RS FC increased during the program, while ACC-temporal RS FC decreased. ACC-parietal RS FC was related to improved PASAT performance
Leavitt et al., 2014 7 people with MS + treatment
7 people with MS - treatment
Hippocampal RS FC increases correlated with memory rehabilitation
Parisi et al., 2014 9 people with MS + treatment
9 people with MS - treatment
Longer-term follow-up compared to the previous paper. (Parisi et al., 2014) DMN RS FC predicted cognitive performance
Bonavita et al., 2015 18 cognitively impaired people with MS + treatment
14 cognitively impaired people with MS - treatment
Following cognitive rehabilitation, RS FC and cognitive performance was increased. Stroop improvement was related to increased PCC RS FC
Koubiyr et al., 2019 32 people with CIS
10 HC
Coupling of structure and function within modules declined after one year in patients with CIS preserved cognition.
Welton et al., 2020 37 people with MS
23 HC
Graph analytical parameters based on RS FC indicated that network segregation was positively related to processing speed, while integration was inversely related. Re-scan after one month showed good reliability
Huiskamp et al., 2020 15 intervention people with MS
14 waiting-list people with MS
Longitudinal increases in hippocampus-DMN RS FC were related to improved visuospatial memory, but only in people with MS undergoing exercise therapy
Meng et al., 2021 52 people with MS
36 HC
Cross-sectionally reduced effective connectivity of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was related to worse PASAT scores. Follow-up measurement after eight months was stable
Huiskamp et al., 2021 123 cognitively preserved people with MS
32 mild cognitively impaired people with MS
72 cognitively impaired people with MS
59 HC
DMN centrality was higher in cognitively preserved people with MS (cross-sectionally), while ventral attention network centrality longitudinally increased in cognitively preserved people with MS converting to mild cognitively impaired
Koubiyr et al., 2021 32 people with CIS
10 HC
Structural-functional coupling (assessed by means of correlation between connectivity strengths) went up after five years. Such increase related to cognitive and disability progression

Abbreviations: MS = multiple sclerosis; RR = relapsing-remitting; CIS = clinically isolated syndrome; HC = healthy controls; PASAT = paced auditory serial addition test; BOLD = blood-oxygenation level dependent; EDSS = expanded disability status scale; DMN = default-mode network; ACC = anterior cingulate cortex; PCC = posterior cingulate cortex.

4.1. Task-based studies

Longitudinal active fMRI studies have been performed to investigate several aspects of MS, including clinical recovery from relapses (Pantano et al., 2011, Reddy et al., 2000) or pseudo-tumoral lesions, (Mezzapesa et al., 2008) effects of pharmacological treatments, (Parry et al., 2003, Mainero et al., 2004, Rocca et al., 2007) and effects of motor and cognitive rehabilitation. (Bonzano et al., 2019, Cerasa et al., 2013, Chiaravalloti et al., 2012, Dobryakova et al., 2014, Ernst et al., 2012, Filippi et al., 2012, Huiskamp et al., 2016, Morgen et al., 2004, Péran et al., 2020, Rocca et al., 2019, Sastre-Garriga et al., 2011, Sulpizio et al., 2021, Tavazzi et al., 2018, Tomassini et al., 2012, Zuber et al., 2020) Also, observational studies simply monitoring how patterns of fMRI activation evolve over time in these patients have been performed. (Audoin et al., 2008, Loitfelder et al., 2014, Pantano et al., 2005).

Overall, results showed that at the time of an acute clinical relapse, people with MS experienced abnormally high baseline fMRI activity in homologous regions of the unaffected hemisphere, (Mezzapesa et al., 2008, Pantano et al., 2011, Reddy et al., 2000) which tended to return to normal levels during follow-up, (Mezzapesa et al., 2008, Reddy et al., 2000) especially in people with good clinical recovery. (Mezzapesa et al., 2008, Pantano et al., 2011, Reddy et al., 2000) A “normalization” of fMRI activation was also observed when administering symptomatic treatments such as rivastigmine and 3,4-diaminopyridine. (Parry et al., 2003, Mainero et al., 2004) On the other hand, reversible fatigue due to interferon-beta 1a treatment was associated with dynamic abnormal recruitment of fronto-thalamic pathways during motor tasks. (Rocca et al., 2007).

Studies using fMRI to monitor the effect of motor rehabilitation were all concordant in showing a more “efficient” pattern of fMRI activation at follow-up compared to baseline, mainly consisting in a decreased activity of high-order, integrative regions, (Péran et al., 2020, Tomassini et al., 2012, Zuber et al., 2020) a more focused activation of the sensorimotor network, (Morgen et al., 2004, Péran et al., 2020, Tavazzi et al., 2018, Zuber et al., 2020) and restoration of lateralization of sensorimotor network activity. (Bonzano et al., 2019) When increased brain activation was found at follow-up vs baseline, as in the case of an action-observation training (AOT), (Rocca et al., 2019) such an increase was correlated with amelioration at motor scores following treatment. (Rocca et al., 2019).

Findings from studies assessing fMRI changes after cognitive rehabilitation mainly showed increased fMRI activation at follow-up vs baseline, which involved superior and inferior parietal regions, temporal and hippocampal regions, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the precuneus, (Cerasa et al., 2013, Chiaravalloti et al., 2012, Dobryakova et al., 2014, Ernst et al., 2012, Filippi et al., 2012, Huiskamp et al., 2016, Sastre-Garriga et al., 2011) in coherence with the trained cognitive functions, i.e., attention, information processing speed, working memory and executive functions. (Cerasa et al., 2013, Chiaravalloti et al., 2012, Dobryakova et al., 2014, Ernst et al., 2012, Filippi et al., 2012, Huiskamp et al., 2016, Sastre-Garriga et al., 2011) Increased fMRI activation was probably observed in all these studies because enrolled people with MS were cognitively impaired, and showed abnormally low fMRI activity at study entry. In fact, increased fMRI activity was beneficial in all cases, since it was correlated with improved cognitive functions after rehabilitation. (Cerasa et al., 2013, Chiaravalloti et al., 2012, Dobryakova et al., 2014, Ernst et al., 2012, Filippi et al., 2012, Huiskamp et al., 2016, Sastre-Garriga et al., 2011) As such, these studies provide key insights seemingly confirming the adaptive nature of hyperactivation in MS.

Finally, observational studies using motor (Pantano et al., 2005) and cognitive (Audoin et al., 2008, Loitfelder et al., 2014) fMRI paradigms showed patterns of functional reorganization resembling those obtained during motor and cognitive rehabilitation, with decreased sensorimotor activation over time in younger people with MS, or in people with less severe structural damage, (Pantano et al., 2005) and with increased fronto-parietal activation over time in people with MS improving their cognitive performances. (Audoin et al., 2008) However, some maladaptive increments of fMRI activity in the inferior parietal lobule, correlated with worse SDMT performance, have also been described. (Loitfelder et al., 2014).

4.2. RS FC studies

Longitudinal patterns of RS FC changes in relation with MS clinical disability have been investigated in two studies so far. (Faivre et al., 2016, Cui et al., 2017) The first was performed by Faivre et al., showing that a higher RS FC at baseline was related to preserved motor function, but that this mechanism was lost over time, suggesting that longitudinal RS FC decreases are associated to a loss of beneficial plastic changes, or to maladaptation. (Faivre et al., 2016) The second, by Cui et al., showed that striatal RS FC was related to EDSS at baseline, and remained stable after 7 month follow-up. (Cui et al., 2017).

With regard to cognition, longitudinal RS FC patterns have been explored in ten studies. Of these, the first four published were all related to cognitive rehabilitation. Parisi et al. published two papers of the same three-month computerized cognitive rehabilitation trial involving attention, information processing and executive functions, and showed that within-DMN RS FC increased during the program and was related to improved PASAT performance. (Parisi et al., 2014) In addition, longer-term follow-up outcomes were predicted by DMN RS FC levels. (Parisi et al., 2014) Two subsequent studies by Leavitt et al. (hippocampal RS FC and memory rehabilitation) and Bonavita et al. (Bonavita et al., 2015) (DMN RS FC and computerized cognitive rehabilitation of attention, executive and logical functions) also showed increasing RS FC following rehabilitation, in relation to improving cognitive performance. Such treatment effects were further explored in later studies, for instance Huiskamp et al., (Huiskamp et al., 2020) who related increasing longitudinal hippocampal-DMN RS FC to improved memory after an exercise rehabilitation.

Subsequent work has mostly focused on describing patterns of RS FC changes over time in relation to clinical progression. Welton et al. (Welton et al., 2020) showed that network segregation alterations related to processing speed remained stable after a one-month scan-rescan. Similarly, Meng et al. (Meng et al., 2021) showed that reduced frontal RS FC was related to worse PASAT performance, which remained stable after eight months. Longitudinal studies showing the actual progression of network changes related to worsening cognition remain rare. Koubiyr et al. (Koubiyr et al., 2021, Koubiyr et al., 2019) recently published on people with CIS, (Koubiyr et al., 2021) identified that the correlation between structural and functional connectivity was increased after five years, and was related to cognitive and disability progression. In addition, relations of more advanced modularity-based graph measures decoupled in people with CIS with preserved cognition after one year. (Koubiyr et al., 2019) The most recent paper investigating longitudinal network changes related to cognitive progression was performed by Huiskamp et al. (Huiskamp et al., 2021) This study investigated network patterns in different subgroups transitioning between cognitively preserved, mild cognitively impaired and cognitively impaired subgroups. Results showed that cognitively preserved and mild cognitively impaired people with MS with worsening cognition showed also increasing ventral attention (salience) network RS FC over time, while cognitively impaired people with MS mainly showed increased DMN RS FC. The ventral attention network is mainly composed of the insula and anterior cingulate cortex, whose role is especially related to balancing of intrinsic and extrinsic stimuli. (Uddin, 2015) As such, it is thought to be the balancing factor between the DMN and FPN, ensuring a normal network efficiency during different requirements. This suggests that different networks could be affected with evolving disease, perhaps starting with an overloaded salience system, leading towards DMN and FPN disruption. However, as mentioned previously, further longitudinal studies in MS remain crucially needed to be able to disentangle the distinct processes leading to clinical progression in the different disease stages.

5. Spatiotemporal profiles of functional reorganization: time-varying analysis of resting state functional connectivity

While MS functional network mapping continued, it became clear from work on the healthy brain that the balance between different networks shifts during specific cognitive requirements and that these shifts are clinically relevant. (Braun et al., 2015) Moreover, neurophysiological techniques have consistently shown that brain FC varies at very fast time scales also during resting conditions. This “dynamic” or “time-varying” reconfiguration of brain networks also became technically feasible to be evaluated in recent years. (Bassett and Sporns, 2017) Traditionally, FC among brain regions or networks has been assessed using the whole dataset of fMRI scans acquired during a session. This setting, which was used in all studies described in sections 2–4, relies on the assumption that FC is stationary across the whole fMRI examination. (Biswal et al., 2010) Time-varying connectivity (TVC, also termed “dynamic” FC) is a novel technique aiming at quantifying how variable FC is during the course of fMRI acquisition, and at detecting reoccurring connectivity patterns among functional brain networks or regions. (Hutchison et al., 2013, Calhoun et al., 2014) TVC usually consists in assessing FC over a series of shifting temporal segments of the fMRI acquisition (sliding windows), and then calculating summary metrics of FC dynamism over windows, or using clustering techniques to characterize reoccurring states of FC across windows. (Calhoun et al., 2014, Valsasina et al., 2019) TVC has provided significant information on intrinsic functional brain properties, both in HC and in different psychiatric and neurological diseases, that complements data derived by static FC analysis. (Calhoun et al., 2014, Filippi et al., 2019, Hutchison et al., 2013, Valsasina et al., 2019).

This section summarizes findings of studies examining TVC abnormalities of people with MS (reported in Table 6), with a particular focus on disability and neuropsychological correlates of detected TVC modifications.

Table 6.

Summary of the most important resting state (RS) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies analyzing time-varying functional connectivity (TVC) in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Study Subjects Main findings
Leonardi et al., 2013 22 people with RRMS
14 HC
Compared to HC, people with MS showed increased TVC in parietal regions and decreased TVC in prefrontal regions and amygdala
Zhou et al., 2016 34 people with RRMS
34 HC
Brain entropy was increased in people with MS vs HC in motor, executive control, coordination and memory regions; increased entropy correlated with higher clinical disability
Bosma et al., 2018 31 people with MS
31 HC
Compared to HC, people with MS had greater TVC, especially in the salience and nociceptive network. Abnormal TVC correlated with the presence of neuropathic pain
Lin et al., 2018 55 people with RRMS
15 HC
People with MS had lower network variations but higher flexibility of interhemispheric connections vs HC. A higher connectivity dynamism was associated with better cognitive scores
Van Geest et al., 2018 29 people with MS
18 HC
TVC of the DMN was increased in the task vs resting condition in people with MS compared to HC. Such increase was associated with better information processing speed scores
Van Geest et al., 2018 38 people with MS
29 HC
Decreased TVC in the hippocampus was associated with better cognitive performances at different memory tests
Huang et al., 2019 22 people with RRMS
22 HC
People with MS showed increased TVC between attention networks, but decreased TVC within attention networks, which was correlated with a higher lesion load
Eijlers et al., 2019 87 people with CI MS (MCI was excluded)
180 people with CP MS
96 HC
CI versus CP MS showed reduced centrality dynamics in DMN, FPN and visual networks. DMN and visual dynamics were anti-correlated in HC, but this was lost in CI
d’Ambrosio et al., 2020 62 people with RRMS
65 HC
People with CI MS had reduced TVC between subcortical network and DMN compared to CP MS, and spent less time in a connectivity state characterized by high FC strength
Rocca et al., 2020 50 people with CIS
13 HC
People with CIS exhibited decreased TVC in networks hit by the clinical attack, and increased FC dynamism over two-years of follow-up
Lin et al., 2020 25 people with RRMS
41 HC
In people with MS, higher stationary and dynamic interhemispheric FC between homologous regions was associated with higher scores at different neuropsychological tests
Cordani et al., 2021 41 people with MS
46 HC
Increased TVC in sensorimotor and cognitive networks was found in people with MS following two weeks of action-observation training and, to a lesser extent, following control training
Tijhuis et al., 2021 35 people with RRMS
19 HC
People with MS had higher global TVC compared to HC; in MS, TVC strength between the basal ganglia and DMN explained the presence/absence of fatigue
Hidalgo de la Cruz et al., 2021 128 people with MS
40 HC
People with MS exhibited overall lower TVC, but also marginal increase of TVC in sensorimotor and cognitive networks vs HC in middle/highly connected states. TVC abnormalities were more severe in progressive MS and in CI MS people
Bommarito et al., 2021 22 people with progressive MS
25 HC
Reduced TVC in the anterior DMN and increased TVC in the executive control network was found in people with progressive MS compared to HC. Decreased anterior DMN TVC explained cognitive disability
Schoonheim et al., 2021 278 people with MS
41 HC
SPMS showed cerebellar connectivity changes, compared to RRMS and HC, including lower static FC in the fronto-parietal network and DMN, and higher TVC in dorsal and ventral attention, DMN and deep grey matter networks. Cerebellar atrophy and higher TVC explained disability and cognitive variance

Abbreviations: MS = multiple sclerosis; CIS = clinically isolated syndrome; RR = relapsing-remitting; SP = secondary progressive; HC = healthy controls; TVC = time-varying connectivity; FC = functional connectivity; DMN = default-mode network; CI = cognitively impaired; CP = cognitively preserved.

5.1. TVC analysis in MS: disability correlates

The first study assessing TVC abnormalities in MS was that from Leonardi et al., (Leonardi et al., 2013) who mainly found increased FC dynamism of parietal regions of the DMN, as well as decreased FC dynamism in frontal and subcortical regions in people with RRMS and mild-to-moderate disability. Similar results were obtained by Bosma et al., (Bosma et al., 2018) who showed increased FC variability in posterior DMN regions in people with MS vs HC, together with an association between higher TVC of salience-nociceptive networks and neuropathic pain. The first study depicting the presence of a significant association between clinical disability and TVC abnormalities in MS was that of Zhou et al., (Zhou et al., 2016) who found increased TVC (expressed as brain entropy) in angular, prefrontal and sensorimotor brain regions, this latter correlated with a higher EDSS score. Conversely, decreased entropy in parahippocampal and temporal regions were correlated with lower fatigue severity scores.

Recent TVC studies characterized heterogeneity of dynamic FC abnormalities across different MS phenotypes. This was achieved by using a more advanced TVC analysis, which looks at re-occurring states of FC patterns (also termed “states”), (Allen et al., 2014) and quantifies their temporal features, such as their occurrence and frequency of transitions. Using this approach, people with CIS showed, early after the first demyelinating attack, a decrease of TVC in the functional networks mostly affected by the attack. (Rocca et al., 2020) During the subsequent two years, however, TVC tended to increase in most of relevant networks, including the DMN, sensorimotor and cognitive networks. (Rocca et al., 2020) In RRMS, a study based on clustering techniques evidenced a widespread decrease of TVC in reoccurring states characterized by low FC, involving the sensorimotor, cerebellar and cognitive networks. (Hidalgo de la Cruz et al., 2021) However, a selective increase of TVC in middle/high-connected states was also detected. (Hidalgo de la Cruz et al., 2021) Such a pattern was confirmed by a recent study focusing on cerebellar connections, which found a selective increase of TVC between the cerebellum and basal ganglia in this phenotype. (Schoonheim et al., 2021) When looking at people with progressive MS, mixed patterns of TVC abnormalities were detected. Overall, decreased TVC in the DMN, (Hidalgo de la Cruz et al., 2021, Bommarito et al., 2021) as well as in sensorimotor and visual networks (Hidalgo de la Cruz et al., 2021) was found in progressive MS. However, more severe disability in people with MS was also characterized by abnormally high TVC in frontal/attention networks (Hidalgo de la Cruz et al., 2021) and between cerebellum and DMN, attention and basal ganglia networks, (Schoonheim et al., 2021) suggesting a maladaptive mechanism.

5.2. TVC analysis in MS: Cognitive correlates

The field of cognitive analyses is still young. As mentioned in the static RS FC section, there are clear insights from earlier work leading to the hypothesis that the balance between DMN, FPN and salience networks is disrupted in cognitively impaired people with MS. Given the above-mentioned methodological innovation, TVC could provide unique insights into this hypothesis. The first study relating TVC to cognition in MS was by Lin et al., showing that reduced network variations was related to worse cognition. (Lin et al., 2018) Overall, as in static FC, also in TVC studies network abnormalities were more severe in cognitively impaired people with MS. (Hidalgo de la Cruz et al., 2021) For instance, a higher RS TVC in the hippocampus was related to poorer cognition, (van Geest et al., 2018) which was also seen for homologous interhemispheric TVC. (Lin et al., 2020) More recently, the network neuroscience field gained interest in alterations of network balance occurring not only at rest, but also between task and rest, which was shown to provide crucial information on a person’s cognitive ability, especially for the DMN and FPN. (Douw et al., 2016) In MS, higher TVC in task-states compared to rest was related to better cognitive functioning. (van Geest et al., 2018) Finally, centrality techniques (described in section 3.3) were also evaluated dynamically, showing that cognitive impairment in people with MS was related to a marked reduction of dynamic centrality in the DMN, FPN and visual systems. Relations between networks (i.e., dynamic network interplay) were lost in cognitively impaired MS, which could indicate an impaired proficiency for other networks to “reactivate” and/or “suppress” the DMN. (Eijlers et al., 2019) Finally, TVC states were also related to cognitive impairment, with evidence that patients with cognitive deficits had reduced deep GM and DMN dynamics, with less time spent in a highly connected state. (d’Ambrosio et al., 2020).

TVC abnormalities seem to have also some associations with other symptoms, such as fatigue. (Tijhuis et al., 2021) In a recent study, non-fatigued people with MS had a higher TVC between the basal ganglia and DMN compared to fatigued MS, (Tijhuis et al., 2021) suggesting that increased TVC in this circuit may protect against fatigue. Finally, it was recently shown that TVC can be used in longitudinal studies to monitor plasticity mechanisms occurring after rehabilitative treatments. In MS people undergoing AOT or control trainings, a significant increase of TVC was found in motor and cognitive networks, especially after AOT, (Cordani et al., 2021) which correlated with concomitant clinical improvements.

6. New perspectives for fMRI analysis

6.1. Multimodal data integration

MS is a complex condition, with several pathological processes contributing to clinical and cognitive disability. Therefore, it is likely that integrating information from different MRI modalities, sensitive to distinct pathological substrates, improves disease characterization across various stages. In line with this, recent studies have shown that multivariable models incorporating both functional and structural MRI measures of brain damage (these latter including voxel-based, (Cordani et al., 2020, Conti et al., 2021) region-based (Riccitelli et al., 2020, Hulst et al., 2015, Schoonheim et al., 2015, Fuchs et al., 2019) or source-based morphometry (Cordani et al., 2021, Rocca et al., 2021) of grey matter atrophy, as well as damage to white matter tracts derived from diffusion tensor MRI (Cordani et al., 2020, Conti et al., 2021, Marchesi et al., 2021, Schoonheim et al., 2015, Cordani et al., 2021)) were able to explain motor impairment, (Cordani et al., 2020, Cordani et al., 2021) cognitive dysfunction (Conti et al., 2021, Marchesi et al., 2021, Riccitelli et al., 2020, Hulst et al., 2015, Schoonheim et al., 2015, Fuchs et al., 2019) and medium-term disease prognosis. (Rocca et al., 2021) Also, studies using advanced network analysis showed that there is a complex interplay between structural and functional network alterations, (Has Silemek et al., 2020, Jandric et al., 2021, Meijer et al., 2020, Koubiyr et al., 2021) with structural disconnection (assessed by means of diffusion-weighted MRI tractography between pairs of brain regions) and functional network abnormalities both contributing to cognitive impairment (Has Silemek et al., 2020, Jandric et al., 2021, Meijer et al., 2020) and medium-term disability progression. (Koubiyr et al., 2021).

Most of previous studies integrated structural MRI and fMRI using multivariate statistical models. However, a direct integration of structural MRI and fMRI while performing data post-processing might be beneficial to produce features improved by shared information between modalities. This is the aim of recently proposed methods, e.g., joint independent component analysis, (Sui et al., 2014) multilayer network analysis, (Kivela et al., 2014) or virtual brain modeling, (Ritter et al., 2013) which were already successfully applied to other neurological and psychiatric conditions. Such approaches hold great promise for an application to MS, since they might be more powerful than single-modality analyses to depict the different pathological substrates associated to this condition.

6.2. Application of artificial intelligence to fMRI data

Artificial intelligence (AI) is an emerging area of computer science, which is able to learn solving various tasks from training examples without an explicit human encoding of prior knowledge. Thanks to its good performance and versatility, AI is increasingly being applied to MRI data of people with MS. In particular, machine learning and deep learning techniques have been successfully employed for a variety of tasks, including lesion and brain tissue segmentation, analysis of different MRI data modalities, differential diagnosis with other white matter disorders and disease prognosis. (Vrenken et al., 2021) To date, most of studies applying AI to MRI data in MS used T2- and T1-weighted imaging, or advanced structural MRI techniques, such as susceptibility-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging. (Vrenken et al., 2021, Moazami et al., 2021) Nevertheless, recent investigations showed promising results also when applying AI to fMRI data. For instance, Saccà et al. (Saccà et al., 2019) applied five different machine learning techniques to maps of the sensorimotor network (reconstructed by independent component analysis) in 18 people with early MS and 19 HC. Results showed that all five machine learning techniques were able to correctly classify people with MS from HC, with the best accuracies (85.7% in both cases) obtained using random forest and support vector machine. Another study (Buyukturkoglu et al., 2021) applied machine learning to different sets of data (the first one including only clinical and demographic data, the second including lesion information, the third including atrophy metrics, the fourth including diffusion tensor MRI metrics and the fifth one including RS FC measures) derived from 183 people with early MS, divided into “poor” and “good performance” groups according to their SDMT performance. Results showed that a composite classifier, including RS FC among core hubs of seven large-scale networks, together with other atrophy and diffusion tensor MRI features, reached the best classification performance between poor and good SDMT performers (area under the curve = 0.90). Finally, there was some preliminary evidence that different machine learning principles can be used to detect specific RS FC configurations allowing an accurate classification of 113 people with MS with different clinical phenotypes from HC (balanced accuracy of HC vs RRMS classification = 72.5%; HC vs progressive MS classification = 85.2%; RRMS vs progressive MS classification = 76%). (Rocca et al., 2021) These preliminary results encourage a more extensive application of AI to fMRI data of people with MS, especially for further improvements of classification according to disease severity and for a better prediction of disease prognosis. On the other hand, some limitations should be kept in mind when planning to use AI on medical image data. First, there might be a strong dependence of algorithm performances from selected training data (and from training features, in case of machine learning analysis), leading to a bias in the results. Second, deep learning approaches are affected by the “black-box” issue: since they do not provide information on the features relevant for the classification/prediction task, it might be not easy to correctly interpret or generalize results. Finally, an extensive application of AI to medical data might raise ethical concerns, related to data ownership, security, privacy and AI-based decision making. (Safdar et al., 2020)

7. Conclusions

MS features a combination of adaptive and maladaptive functional brain changes, as seen by the large body of work using FMRI to map MS-related cortical reorganization. Active fMRI studies found abnormal activation patterns in people with MS vs HC during motor and cognitive tasks, with a trend towards possibly beneficial higher fMRI activity at early MS stages and maladaptive decreased fMRI activity later on in the disease, suggesting a disease phase-specific progressive exhaustion of adaptive mechanisms. Functional network architecture, as explored by RS FC, was also abnormal in people with MS vs HC, and was mainly characterized by a progressive collapse of long-range connections and impaired hub integration, driving motor and cognitive disability through a loss of network efficiency. TVC analysis provided significant information on intrinsic brain organization, complementary to that produced by static RS FC, and indicated a peculiar involvement of sensorimotor and salience networks, as well as of DMN and FPN, indicating a loss of network stability as patients progress. Finally, new interesting perspectives might be the use of multimodal MRI analysis approaches, for a better characterization of network abnormalities. More advanced methods of quantifying structure–function interaction, and the application of AI to fMRI data, may lead to optimized disease classification, monitoring and prognosis.

Funding

None.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Maria A. Rocca: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Menno M. Schoonheim: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Paola Valsasina: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Jeroen J.G. Geurts: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. Massimo Filippi: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

M.A. Rocca received speaker honoraria from Bayer, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, and Teva, and receives research support from the MS Society of Canada and Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla. M.M. Schoonheim serves on the editorial boards of Neurology and Frontiers in Neurology, receives research support from the Dutch MS Research Foundation and has served as a consultant for or received research support from Atara Biotherapeutics, Biogen, Celgene, Genzyme, MedDay and Merck. P. Valsasina received speaker honoraria from Biogen Idec. J.J.G. Geurts has served as a consultant for or received research support from Biogen, Celgene, Genzyme, MedDay, Merck, Novartis and Teva. M. Filippi is Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Neurology and Associate Editor of Human Brain Mapping, Neurological Sciences, and Radiology; received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from Almiral, Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries; and receives research support from Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Italian Ministry of Health, Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla, and ARiSLA (Fondazione Italiana di Ricerca per la SLA).

References

  1. Alahmadi A.A.S., Pardini M., Samson R.S., D’Angelo E., Friston K.J., Toosy A.T., Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott C.A.M. Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Response to Multiple Grip Forces in Multiple Sclerosis: Going Beyond the Main Effect of Movement in Brodmann Area 4a and 4p. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2021;15 doi: 10.3389/fncel.2021.616028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen E.A., Damaraju E., Plis S.M., Erhardt E.B., Eichele T., Calhoun V.D. Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. Cereb. Cortex. 2014;24:663–676. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Amann M., Dössegger L.S., Penner I.-K., Hirsch J.G., Raselli C., Calabrese P., Weier K., Radü E.-W., Kappos L., Gass A. Altered functional adaptation to attention and working memory tasks with increasing complexity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2011;32(10):1704–1719. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Au Duong M.V., Boulanouar K., Audoin B., Treseras S., Ibarrola D., Malikova I., Confort-Gouny S., Celsis P., Pelletier J., Cozzone P.J., Ranjeva J.P. Modulation of effective connectivity inside the working memory network in patients at the earliest stage of multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage. 2005;24(2):533–538. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Audoin B., Ibarrola D., Ranjeva J.P., et al. Compensatory cortical activation observed by fMRI during a cognitive task at the earliest stage of MS. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2003;20:51–58. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Audoin B., Van Au Duong M.y., Ranjeva J.-P., Ibarrola D., Malikova I., Confort-Gouny S., Soulier E., Viout P., Ali-Chérif A., Pelletier J., Cozzone P.J. Magnetic resonance study of the influence of tissue damage and cortical reorganization on PASAT performance at the earliest stage of multiple sclerosis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2005;24(3):216–228. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Audoin B., Reuter F., Duong M.V.A., Malikova I., Confort-Gouny S., Cherif A.A., Cozzone P.J., Pelletier J., Ranjeva J.P. Efficiency of cognitive control recruitment in the very early stage of multiple sclerosis: a one-year fMRI follow-up study. Mult. Scler. 2008;14(6):786–792. doi: 10.1177/1352458508089360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bassett D.S., Sporns O. Network neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 2017;20(3):353–364. doi: 10.1038/nn.4502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Benedict R.H.B., Amato M.P., DeLuca J., Geurts J.J.G. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: clinical management, MRI, and therapeutic avenues. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(10):860–871. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30277-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Biswal B.B., Mennes M., Zuo X.-N., Gohel S., Kelly C., Smith S.M., Beckmann C.F., Adelstein J.S., Buckner R.L., Colcombe S., Dogonowski A.-M., Ernst M., Fair D., Hampson M., Hoptman M.J., Hyde J.S., Kiviniemi V.J., Kötter R., Li S.-J., Lin C.-P., Lowe M.J., Mackay C., Madden D.J., Madsen K.H., Margulies D.S., Mayberg H.S., McMahon K., Monk C.S., Mostofsky S.H., Nagel B.J., Pekar J.J., Peltier S.J., Petersen S.E., Riedl V., Rombouts S.A.R.B., Rypma B., Schlaggar B.L., Schmidt S., Seidler R.D., Siegle G.J., Sorg C., Teng G.-J., Veijola J., Villringer A., Walter M., Wang L., Weng X.-C., Whitfield-Gabrieli S., Williamson P., Windischberger C., Zang Y.-F., Zhang H.-Y., Castellanos F.X., Milham M.P. Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010;107(10):4734–4739. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911855107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Biswal B., Zerrin Yetkin F., Haughton V.M., Hyde J.S. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 1995;34(4):537–541. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910340409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bizzo B.C., Arruda‐Sanchez T., Tobyne S.M., Bireley J.D., Lev M.H., Gasparetto E.L., Klawiter E.C. Anterior Insular Resting-State Functional Connectivity is Related to Cognitive Reserve in Multiple Sclerosis. J. Neuroimaging. 2021;31(1):98–102. doi: 10.1111/jon.12779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bollaert R.E., Poe K., Hubbard E.A., Motl R.W., Pilutti L.A., Johnson C.L., Sutton B.P. Associations of functional connectivity and walking performance in multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychologia. 2018;117:8–12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bommarito G., Tarun A., Farouj Y., et al. Altered anterior default mode network dynamics in progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2021;13524585211018116 doi: 10.1177/13524585211018116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bonavita S., Gallo A., Sacco R., Corte M.D., Bisecco A., Docimo R., Lavorgna L., Corbo D., Costanzo A.D., Tortora F., Cirillo M., Esposito F., Tedeschi G. Distributed changes in default-mode resting-state connectivity in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2011;17(4):411–422. doi: 10.1177/1352458510394609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bonavita S., Sacco R., Della Corte M., Esposito S., Sparaco M., d’Ambrosio A., Docimo R., Bisecco A., Lavorgna L., Corbo D., Cirillo S., Gallo A., Esposito F., Tedeschi G. Computer-aided cognitive rehabilitation improves cognitive performances and induces brain functional connectivity changes in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients: an exploratory study. J. Neurol. 2015;262(1):91–100. doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7528-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bonzano L., Pardini M., Roccatagliata L., Mancardi G.L., Bove M. How people with multiple sclerosis cope with a sustained finger motor task: A behavioural and fMRI study. Behav. Brain Res. 2017;325:63–71. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bonzano L., Pedullà L., Tacchino A., Brichetto G., Battaglia M.A., Mancardi G.L., Bove M. Upper limb motor training based on task-oriented exercises induces functional brain reorganization in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neuroscience. 2019;410:150–159. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bonzano L., Bisio A., Pedulla L., Brichetto G., Bove M. Right Inferior Parietal Lobule Activity Is Associated With Handwriting Spontaneous Tempo. Front. Neurosci. 2021;15 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.656856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Boonstra F.MC., Noffs G., Perera T., Jokubaitis V.G., Vogel A.P., Moffat B.A., Butzkueven H., Evans A., van der Walt A., Kolbe S.C. Functional neuroplasticity in response to cerebello-thalamic injury underpins the clinical presentation of tremor in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2020;26(6):696–705. doi: 10.1177/1352458519837706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bosma R.L., Kim J.A., Cheng J.C., Rogachov A., Hemington K.S., Osborne N.R., Oh J., Davis K.D. Dynamic pain connectome functional connectivity and oscillations reflect multiple sclerosis pain. Pain. 2018;159(11):2267–2276. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Braun U., Schäfer A., Walter H., Erk S., Romanczuk-Seiferth N., Haddad L., Schweiger J.I., Grimm O., Heinz A., Tost H., Meyer-Lindenberg A., Bassett D.S. Dynamic reconfiguration of frontal brain networks during executive cognition in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2015;112(37):11678–11683. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1422487112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Buyukturkoglu K., Zeng D., Bharadwaj S., Tozlu C., Mormina E., Igwe K.C., Lee S., Habeck C., Brickman A.M., Riley C.S., De Jager P.L., Sumowski J.F., Leavitt V.M. Classifying multiple sclerosis patients on the basis of SDMT performance using machine learning. Mult Scler. 2021;27(1):107–116. doi: 10.1177/1352458520958362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cader S., Cifelli A., Abu-Omar Y., Palace J., Matthews P.M. Reduced brain functional reserve and altered functional connectivity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2006;129:527–537. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Calhoun V., Miller R., Pearlson G., Adalı T. The chronnectome: time-varying connectivity networks as the next frontier in fMRI data discovery. Neuron. 2014;84(2):262–274. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Carotenuto A., Wilson H., Giordano B., Caminiti S.P., Chappell Z., Williams S.C.R., Hammers A., Silber E., Brex P., Politis M. Impaired connectivity within neuromodulatory networks in multiple sclerosis and clinical implications. J. Neurol. 2020;267(7):2042–2053. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09806-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cerasa A., Gioia M.C., Valentino P., Nisticò R., Chiriaco C., Pirritano D., Tomaiuolo F., Mangone G., Trotta M., Talarico T., Bilotti G., Quattrone A. Computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation of attention deficits for multiple sclerosis: a randomized trial with fMRI correlates. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair. 2013;27(4):284–295. doi: 10.1177/1545968312465194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Chalah M.A., Ayache S.S. A Scope of the Social Brain in Multiple Sclerosis: Insights From Neuroimaging Studies. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2020;33:90–102. doi: 10.1097/WNN.0000000000000227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Chiang F.L., Feng M., Romero R.S., Price L., Franklin C.G., Deng S., Gray J.P., Yu F.F., Tantiwongkosi B., Huang S.Y., Fox P.T. Disruption of the Atrophy-based Functional Network in Multiple Sclerosis Is Associated with Clinical Disability: Validation of a Meta-Analytic Model in Resting-State Functional MRI. Radiology. 2021;299(1):159–166. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Chiaravalloti N.D., Hillary F.G., Ricker J.H., Christodoulou C., Kalnin A.J., Liu W.-C., Steffener J., DeLuca J. Cerebral activation patterns during working memory performance in multiple sclerosis using FMRI. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 2005;27(1):33–54. doi: 10.1080/138033990513609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chiaravalloti N.D., Wylie G., Leavitt V., DeLuca J. Increased cerebral activation after behavioral treatment for memory deficits in MS. J. Neurol. 2012;259(7):1337–1346. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6353-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ciccarelli O., Toosy A.T., Marsden J.F., Wheeler-Kingshott C.M., Miller D.H., Matthews P.M., Thompson A.J. Functional response to active and passive ankle movements with clinical correlations in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. 2006;253(7):882–891. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-0125-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Cocozza S., Pontillo G., Russo C., Russo C.V., Costabile T., Pepe A., Tedeschi E., Lanzillo R., Brescia Morra V., Brunetti A., Inglese M., Petracca M. Cerebellum and cognition in progressive MS patients: functional changes beyond atrophy? J. Neurol. 2018;265(10):2260–2266. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8985-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Colorado R.A., Shukla K., Zhou Y., Wolinsky J.S., Narayana P.A. Multi-task functional MRI in multiple sclerosis patients without clinical disability. Neuroimage. 2012;59(1):573–581. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Conti L., Preziosa P., Meani A., Pagani E., Valsasina P., Marchesi O., Vizzino C., Rocca M.A., Filippi M. Unraveling the substrates of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: A multiparametric structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur. J. Neurol. 2021;28(11):3749–3759. doi: 10.1111/ene.15023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Cordani C., Meani A., Esposito F., Valsasina P., Colombo B., Pagani E., Preziosa P., Comi G., Filippi M., Rocca M.A. Imaging correlates of hand motor performance in multiple sclerosis: A multiparametric structural and functional MRI study. Mult Scler. 2020;26(2):233–244. doi: 10.1177/1352458518822145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Cordani C., Hidalgo de la Cruz M., Meani A., Valsasina P., Esposito F., Pagani E., Filippi M., Rocca M.A. MRI correlates of clinical disability and hand-motor performance in multiple sclerosis phenotypes. Mult Scler. 2021;27(8):1205–1221. doi: 10.1177/1352458520958356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Cordani C., Valsasina P., Preziosa P., Meani A., Filippi M., Rocca M.A. Action observation training promotes motor improvement and modulates functional network dynamic connectivity in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2021;27(1):139–146. doi: 10.1177/1352458519887332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Cordes D., Haughton V.M., Arfanakis K., et al. Mapping functionally related regions of brain with functional connectivity MR imaging. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1636–1644. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Cruz-Gómez Á.J., Ventura-Campos N., Belenguer A., Ávila C., Forn C. The link between resting-state functional connectivity and cognition in MS patients. Mult. Scler. 2014;20(3):338–348. doi: 10.1177/1352458513495584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Cui F., Zhou L.i., Wang Z., Lang C., Park J., Tan Z., Yu Y., Sun C., Gao Y., Kong J. Altered Functional Connectivity of Striatal Subregions in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Front. Neurol. 2017;8 doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. d’Ambrosio A., Valsasina P., Gallo A., De Stefano N., Pareto D., Barkhof F., Ciccarelli O., Enzinger C., Tedeschi G., Stromillo M.L., Arévalo M.J., Hulst H.E., Muhlert N., Koini M., Filippi M., Rocca M.A. Reduced dynamics of functional connectivity and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2020;26(4):476–488. doi: 10.1177/1352458519837707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. d'Ambrosio A., Hidalgo de la Cruz M., Valsasina P., Pagani E., Colombo B., Rodegher M., Comi G., Filippi M., Rocca M.A. Structural connectivity-defined thalamic subregions have different functional connectivity abnormalities in multiple sclerosis patients: Implications for clinical correlations. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2017;38(12):6005–6018. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Dekker I., Schoonheim M.M., Venkatraghavan V., Eijlers A.J.C., Brouwer I., Bron E.E., Klein S., Wattjes M.P., Wink A.M., Geurts J.J.G., Uitdehaag B.M.J., Oxtoby N.P., Alexander D.C., Vrenken H., Killestein J., Barkhof F., Wottschel V. The sequence of structural, functional and cognitive changes in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage Clin. 2021;29:102550. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Dobryakova E., Wylie G.R., DeLuca J., Chiaravalloti N.D. A pilot study examining functional brain activity 6 months after memory retraining in MS: the MEMREHAB trial. Brain Imaging Behav. 2014;8:403–406. doi: 10.1007/s11682-014-9309-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Dobryakova E., Rocca M.A., Valsasina P., Ghezzi A., Colombo B., Martinelli V., Comi G., DeLuca J., Filippi M. Abnormalities of the executive control network in multiple sclerosis phenotypes: An fMRI effective connectivity study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2016;37(6):2293–2304. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Dobryakova E., Hulst H.E., Spirou A., Chiaravalloti N.D., Genova H.M., Wylie G.R., DeLuca J. Fronto-striatal network activation leads to less fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2018;24(9):1174–1182. doi: 10.1177/1352458517717087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Dogonowski A.-M., Siebner H.R., Soelberg Sørensen P., Paulson O.B., Dyrby T.B., Blinkenberg M., Madsen K.H. Resting-state connectivity of pre-motor cortex reflects disability in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2013:n/a–n/a. doi: 10.1111/ane.12121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Douw L., Wakeman D.G., Tanaka N., Liu H., Stufflebeam S.M. State-dependent variability of dynamic functional connectivity between frontoparietal and default networks relates to cognitive flexibility. Neuroscience. 2016;339:12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.09.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Eijlers A.J.C., Meijer K.A., Wassenaar T.M., Steenwijk M.D., Uitdehaag B.M.J., Barkhof F., Wink A.M., Geurts J.J.G., Schoonheim M.M. Increased default-mode network centrality in cognitively impaired multiple sclerosis patients. Neurology. 2017;88(10):952–960. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Eijlers A.J.C., Wink A.M., Meijer K.A., Douw L., Geurts J.J.G., Schoonheim M.M. Reduced Network Dynamics on Functional MRI Signals Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis. Radiology. 2019;292(2):449–457. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Enzinger C., Barkhof F., Ciccarelli O., Filippi M., Kappos L., Rocca M.A., Ropele S., Rovira À., Schneider T., de Stefano N., Vrenken H., Wheeler-Kingshott C., Wuerfel J., Fazekas F. Nonconventional MRI and microstructural cerebral changes in multiple sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2015;11(12):676–686. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Ernst, A., Botzung, A., Gounot, D., Sellal, F., Blanc, F., de Seze, J., Manning, L., 2012. Induced brain plasticity after a facilitation programme for autobiographical memory in multiple sclerosis: a preliminary study. Mult Scler Int 2012, 820240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  54. Faivre A., Rico A., Zaaraoui W., Crespy L., Reuter F., Wybrecht D., Soulier E., Malikova I., Confort-Gouny S., Cozzone P.J., Pelletier J., Ranjeva J.-P., Audoin B. Assessing brain connectivity at rest is clinically relevant in early multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2012;18(9):1251–1258. doi: 10.1177/1352458511435930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Faivre A., Rico A., Zaaraoui W., Reuter F., Confort-Gouny S., Guye M., Pelletier J., Ranjeva J.-P., Audoin B. Brain functional plasticity at rest and during action in multiple sclerosis patients. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2015;22(9):1438–1443. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.02.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Faivre A., Robinet E., Guye M., Rousseau C., Maarouf A., Le Troter A., Zaaraoui W., Rico A., Crespy L., Soulier E., Confort-Gouny S., Pelletier J., Achard S., Ranjeva J.-P., Audoin B. Depletion of brain functional connectivity enhancement leads to disability progression in multiple sclerosis: A longitudinal resting-state fMRI study. Mult. Scler. 2016;22(13):1695–1708. doi: 10.1177/1352458516628657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Filippi M., Rocca M.A., Mezzapesa D.M., Falini A., Colombo B., Scotti G., Comi G. A functional MRI study of cortical activations associated with object manipulation in patients with MS. Neuroimage. 2004;21(3):1147–1154. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Filippi M., Riccitelli G., Mattioli F., Capra R., Stampatori C., Pagani E., Valsasina P., Copetti M., Falini A., Comi G., Rocca M.A. Multiple sclerosis: effects of cognitive rehabilitation on structural and functional MR imaging measures–an explorative study. Radiology. 2012;262(3):932–940. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11111299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Filippi M., Preziosa P., Rocca M.A. Microstructural MR Imaging Techniques in Multiple Sclerosis. Neuroimaging Clin. N. Am. 2017;27:313–333. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2016.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Filippi M., Spinelli E.G., Cividini C., Agosta F. Resting State Dynamic Functional Connectivity in Neurodegenerative Conditions: A Review of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings. Front. Neurosci. 2019;13:657. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Filippi M., Brück W., Chard D., Fazekas F., Geurts J.J.G., Enzinger C., Hametner S., Kuhlmann T., Preziosa P., Rovira À., Schmierer K., Stadelmann C., Rocca M.A. Association between pathological and MRI findings in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(2):198–210. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30451-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Forn C., Barros-Loscertales A., Escudero J., Belloch V., Campos S., Parcet M.A., Ávila C. Cortical reorganization during PASAT task in MS patients with preserved working memory functions. Neuroimage. 2006;31(2):686–691. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Forn C., Rocca M.A., Valsasina P., Boscá I., Casanova B., Sanjuan A., Ávila C., Filippi M. Functional magnetic resonance imaging correlates of cognitive performance in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis at presentation: an activation and connectivity study. Mult Scler. 2012;18(2):153–163. doi: 10.1177/1352458511417744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Forn C., Rocca M.A., Boscá I., Casanova B., Sanjuan A., Filippi M. Analysis of “task-positive” and “task-negative” functional networks during the performance of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test in patients at presentation with clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Exp. Brain Res. 2013;225(3):399–407. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3380-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Fox M.D., Snyder A.Z., Vincent J.L., Corbetta M., Van Essen D.C., Raichle M.E. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005;102(27):9673–9678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504136102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Friston K.J., Holmes A.P., Poline J.-B., Grasby P.J., Williams S.C.R., Frackowiak R.S.J., Turner R. Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited. Neuroimage. 1995;2(1):45–53. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1995.1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Fu J., Chen X., Gu Y., Xie M., Zheng Q., Wang J., Zeng C., Li Y. Functional connectivity impairment of postcentral gyrus in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with somatosensory disorder. Eur. J. Radiol. 2019;118:200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.07.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Fuchs T.A., Benedict R.H.B., Bartnik A., Choudhery S., Li X., Mallory M., Oship D., Yasin F., Ashton K., Jakimovski D., Bergsland N., Ramasamy D.P., Weinstock‐Guttman B., Zivadinov R., Dwyer M.G. Preserved network functional connectivity underlies cognitive reserve in multiple sclerosis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2019;40(18):5231–5241. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Gamboa O.L., Tagliazucchi E., von Wegner F., Jurcoane A., Wahl M., Laufs H., Ziemann U. Working memory performance of early MS patients correlates inversely with modularity increases in resting state functional connectivity networks. Neuroimage. 2014;94:385–395. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Giannì C., Belvisi D., Conte A., Tommasin S., Cortese A., Petsas N., Baione V., Tartaglia M., Millefiorini E., Berardelli A., Pantano P. Altered sensorimotor integration in multiple sclerosis: A combined neurophysiological and functional MRI study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2021;132(9):2191–2198. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. González Torre J.A., Cruz-Gómez Á.J., Belenguer A., Sanchis-Segura C., Ávila C., Forn C. Hippocampal dysfunction is associated with memory impairment in multiple sclerosis: A volumetric and functional connectivity study. Mult Scler. 2017;23(14):1854–1863. doi: 10.1177/1352458516688349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Hardmeier M., Schoonheim M.M., Geurts J.J.G., Hillebrand A., Polman C.H., Barkhof F., Stam C.J., Valdes-Sosa P.A. Cognitive dysfunction in early multiple sclerosis: altered centrality derived from resting-state functional connectivity using magneto-encephalography. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(7):e42087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Has Silemek A.C., Fischer L., Pöttgen J., Penner I.-K., Engel A.K., Heesen C., Gold S.M., Stellmann J.-P. Functional and structural connectivity substrates of cognitive performance in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis with mild disability. Neuroimage Clin. 2020;25:102177. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Hawellek D.J., Hipp J.F., Lewis C.M., Corbetta M., Engel A.K. Increased functional connectivity indicates the severity of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011;108(47):19066–19071. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110024108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Hidalgo de la Cruz M., Valsasina P., Sangalli F., Esposito F., Rocca M.A., Filippi M. Dynamic Functional Connectivity in the Main Clinical Phenotypes of Multiple Sclerosis. Brain Connect. 2021;11(8):678–690. doi: 10.1089/brain.2020.0920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Hillary F.G., Chiaravalloti N.D., Ricker J.H., Steffener J., Bly B.M., Lange G., Liu W.C., Kalnin A.J., DeLuca J. An investigation of working memory rehearsal in multiple sclerosis using fMRI. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 2003;25(7):965–978. doi: 10.1076/jcen.25.7.965.16490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Huang M., Zhou F., Wu L., Wang B.o., Guo L., Zhao Y., Wan H., Li F., Zeng X., Gong H. White matter lesion loads associated with dynamic functional connectivity within attention network in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2019;65:59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.03.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Hubbard N.A., Turner M., Hutchison J.L., Ouyang A., Strain J., Oasay L., Sundaram S., Davis S., Remington G., Brigante R., Huang H., Hart J., Frohman T., Frohman E., Biswal B.B., Rypma B. Multiple sclerosis-related white matter microstructural change alters the BOLD hemodynamic response. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2016;36(11):1872–1884. doi: 10.1177/0271678X15615133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Hubbard N.A., Turner M.P., Ouyang M., Himes L., Thomas B.P., Hutchison J.L., Faghihahmadabadi S., Davis S.L., Strain J.F., Spence J., Krawczyk D.C., Huang H., Lu H., Hart J., Frohman T.C., Frohman E.M., Okuda D.T., Rypma B. Calibrated imaging reveals altered grey matter metabolism related to white matter microstructure and symptom severity in multiple sclerosis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2017;38(11):5375–5390. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Huiskamp M., Dobryakova E., Wylie G.D., DeLuca J., Chiaravalloti N.D. A pilot study of changes in functional brain activity during a working memory task after mSMT treatment: The MEMREHAB trial. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2016;7:76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Huiskamp M., Moumdjian L., van Asch P., Popescu V., Schoonheim M.M., Steenwijk M.D., Vanzeir E., van Wijmeersch B., Geurts J.JG., Feys P., Hulst H.E. A pilot study of the effects of running training on visuospatial memory in MS: A stronger functional embedding of the hippocampus in the default-mode network? Mult Scler. 2020;26(12):1594–1598. doi: 10.1177/1352458519863644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Huiskamp M., Eijlers A.J.C., Broeders T.A.A., Pasteuning J., Dekker I., Uitdehaag B.M.J., Barkhof F., Wink A.-M., Geurts J.J.G., Hulst H.E., Schoonheim M.M. Longitudinal Network Changes and Conversion to Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology. 2021;97(8):e794–e802. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Hulst H.E., Schoonheim M.M., Roosendaal S.D., Popescu V., Schweren L.J.S., van der Werf Y.D., Visser L.H., Polman C.H., Barkhof F., Geurts J.J.G. Functional adaptive changes within the hippocampal memory system of patients with multiple sclerosis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2012;33(10):2268–2280. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Hulst H.E., Schoonheim M.M., Van Geest Q., Uitdehaag B.MJ., Barkhof F., Geurts J.JG. Memory impairment in multiple sclerosis: Relevance of hippocampal activation and hippocampal connectivity. Mult Scler. 2015;21(13):1705–1712. doi: 10.1177/1352458514567727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Hutchison R.M., Womelsdorf T., Allen E.A., Bandettini P.A., Calhoun V.D., Corbetta M., Della Penna S., Duyn J.H., Glover G.H., Gonzalez-Castillo J., Handwerker D.A., Keilholz S., Kiviniemi V., Leopold D.A., de Pasquale F., Sporns O., Walter M., Chang C. Dynamic functional connectivity: promise, issues, and interpretations. Neuroimage. 2013;80:360–378. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Jandric D., Lipp I., Paling D., Rog D., Castellazzi G., Haroon H., Parkes L., Parker G.J.M., Tomassini V., Muhlert N. Mechanisms of Network Changes in Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology. 2021;97(19):e1886–e1897. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Janssen A.L., Boster A., Patterson B.A., Abduljalil A., Prakash R.S. Resting-state functional connectivity in multiple sclerosis: an examination of group differences and individual differences. Neuropsychologia. 2013;51(13):2918–2929. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Jehna M., Langkammer C., Wallner-Blazek M., Neuper C., Loitfelder M., Ropele S., Fuchs S., Khalil M., Pluta-Fuerst A., Fazekas F., Enzinger C. Cognitively preserved MS patients demonstrate functional differences in processing neutral and emotional faces. Brain Imaging Behav. 2011;5(4):241–251. doi: 10.1007/s11682-011-9128-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Karavasilis E., Christidi F., Velonakis G., Tzanetakos D., Zalonis I., Potagas C., Andreadou E., Efstathopoulos E., Kilidireas C., Kelekis N., Evdokimidis I. Hippocampal structural and functional integrity in multiple sclerosis patients with or without memory impairment: a multimodal neuroimaging study. Brain Imaging Behav. 2019;13(4):1049–1059. doi: 10.1007/s11682-018-9924-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Kim S.G., Ashe J., Georgopoulos A.P., Merkle H., Ellermann J.M., Menon R.S., Ogawa S., Ugurbil K. Functional imaging of human motor cortex at high magnetic field. J. Neurophysiol. 1993;69(1):297–302. doi: 10.1152/jn.1993.69.1.297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Kivela M., Arenas A., Barthelemy M., Gleeson J.P., Moreno Y., Porter M.A. Multilayer networks. J Complex. Networks. 2014;2(3):203–271. [Google Scholar]
  92. Koini M., Filippi M., Rocca M.A., Yousry T., Ciccarelli O., Tedeschi G., Gallo A., Ropele S., Valsasina P., Riccitelli G., Damjanovic D., Muhlert N., Mancini L., Fazekas F., Enzinger C. Correlates of Executive Functions in Multiple Sclerosis Based on Structural and Functional MR Imaging: Insights from a Multicenter Study. Radiology. 2016;280(3):869–879. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016151809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Koubiyr I., Besson P., Deloire M., Charre-Morin J., Saubusse A., Tourdias T., Brochet B., Ruet A. Dynamic modular-level alterations of structural-functional coupling in clinically isolated syndrome. Brain. 2019;142(11):3428–3439. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Koubiyr I., Deloire M., Brochet B., Besson P., Charré-Morin J., Saubusse A., Tourdias T., Ruet A. Structural constraints of functional connectivity drive cognitive impairment in the early stages of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2021;27(4):559–567. doi: 10.1177/1352458520971807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Lazeron R.HC., Rombouts S.A., Scheltens P., Polman C.H., Barkhof F. An fMRI study of planning-related brain activity in patients with moderately advanced multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2004;10(5):549–555. doi: 10.1191/1352458504ms1072oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Leavitt V.M., Wylie G., Genova H.M., Chiaravalloti N.D., DeLuca J. Altered effective connectivity during performance of an information processing speed task in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2012;18(4):409–417. doi: 10.1177/1352458511423651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Leavitt V.M., Wylie G.R., Girgis P.A., DeLuca J., Chiaravalloti N.D. Increased functional connectivity within memory networks following memory rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Brain Imaging Behav. 2014;8(3):394–402. doi: 10.1007/s11682-012-9183-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Leavitt V.M., Paxton J., Sumowski J.F. Default network connectivity is linked to memory status in multiple sclerosis. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2014;20(9):937–944. doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Lenzi D., Conte A., Mainero C., Frasca V., Fubelli F., Totaro P., Caramia F., Inghilleri M., Pozzilli C., Pantano P. Effect of corpus callosum damage on ipsilateral motor activation in patients with multiple sclerosis: a functional and anatomical study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2007;28(7):636–644. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Leonardi N., Richiardi J., Gschwind M., Simioni S., Annoni J.-M., Schluep M., Vuilleumier P., Van De Ville D. Principal components of functional connectivity: a new approach to study dynamic brain connectivity during rest. Neuroimage. 2013;83:937–950. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Lin S.-J., Vavasour I., Kosaka B., Li D.K.B., Traboulsee A., MacKay A., McKeown M.J. Education, and the balance between dynamic and stationary functional connectivity jointly support executive functions in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2018;39(12):5039–5049. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Lin S.-J., Kolind S., Liu A., McMullen K., Vavasour I., Wang Z.J., Traboulsee A., McKeown M.J. Both Stationary and Dynamic Functional Interhemispheric Connectivity Are Strongly Associated With Performance on Cognitive Tests in Multiple Sclerosis. Front. Neurol. 2020;11 doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Lin F., Zivadinov R., Hagemeier J., Weinstock-Guttman B., Vaughn C., Gandhi S., Jakimovski D., Hulst H.E., Benedict R.HB., Bergsland N., Fuchs T., Dwyer M.G. Altered nuclei-specific thalamic functional connectivity patterns in multiple sclerosis and their associations with fatigue and cognition. Mult Scler. 2019;25(9):1243–1254. doi: 10.1177/1352458518788218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Liu Y., Dai Z., Duan Y., Huang J., Ren Z., Liu Z., Dong H., Shu N.i., Vrenken H., Wattjes M.P., Barkhof F., He Y., Li K. Whole brain functional connectivity in clinically isolated syndrome without conventional brain MRI lesions. Eur. Radiol. 2016;26(9):2982–2991. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4147-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Liu Y., Wang H., Duan Y., Huang J., Ren Z., Ye J., Dong H., Shi F., Li K., Wang J. Functional Brain Network Alterations in Clinically Isolated Syndrome and Multiple Sclerosis: A Graph-based Connectome Study. Radiology. 2017;282(2):534–541. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Loitfelder M., Fazekas F., Petrovic K., Fuchs S., Ropele S., Wallner-Blazek M., Jehna M., Aspeck E., Khalil M., Schmidt R., Neuper C., Enzinger C. Reorganization in cognitive networks with progression of multiple sclerosis: insights from fMRI. Neurology. 2011;76(6):526–533. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820b75cf. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Loitfelder M., Filippi M., Rocca M., Valsasina P., Ropele S., Jehna M., Fuchs S., Schmidt R., Neuper C., Fazekas F., Enzinger C., Oreja-Guevara C. Abnormalities of resting state functional connectivity are related to sustained attention deficits in MS. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(8):e42862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Loitfelder M., Fazekas F., Koschutnig K., Fuchs S., Petrovic K., Ropele S., Pichler A., Jehna M., Langkammer C., Schmidt R., Neuper C., Enzinger C., Aktas O. Brain activity changes in cognitive networks in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis - insights from a longitudinal FMRI study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(4):e93715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Louapre C., Perlbarg V., García-Lorenzo D., Urbanski M., Benali H., Assouad R., Galanaud D., Freeman L., Bodini B., Papeix C., Tourbah A., Lubetzki C., Lehéricy S., Stankoff B. Brain networks disconnection in early multiple sclerosis cognitive deficits: an anatomofunctional study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2014;35(9):4706–4717. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Mainero C., Inghilleri M., Pantano P., Conte A., Lenzi D., Frasca V., Bozzao L., Pozzilli C. Enhanced brain motor activity in patients with MS after a single dose of 3,4-diaminopyridine. Neurology. 2004;62(11):2044–2050. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000129263.14219.a8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Mainero C., Caramia F., Pozzilli C., Pisani A., Pestalozza I., Borriello G., Bozzao L., Pantano P. fMRI evidence of brain reorganization during attention and memory tasks in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage. 2004;21(3):858–867. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Manjaly Z.-M., Harrison N.A., Critchley H.D., Do C.T., Stefanics G., Wenderoth N., Lutterotti A., Müller A., Stephan K.E. Pathophysiological and cognitive mechanisms of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2019;90(6):642–651. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-320050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Manson S.C., Wegner C., Filippi M., Barkhof F., Beckmann C., Ciccarelli O., De Stefano N., Enzinger C., Fazekas F., Agosta F., Gass A., Hirsch J., Johansen-Berg H., Kappos L., Korteweg T., Polman C., Mancini L., Manfredonia F., Marino S., Miller D.H., Montalban X., Palace J., Rocca M., Ropele S., Rovira A., Smith S., Thompson A., Thornton J., Yousry T., Frank J.A., Matthews P.M. Impairment of movement-associated brain deactivation in multiple sclerosis: further evidence for a functional pathology of interhemispheric neuronal inhibition. Exp. Brain Res. 2008;187(1):25–31. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1276-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Marchesi O., Bonacchi R., Valsasina P., Preziosa P., Pagani E., Cacciaguerra L., Meani A., Conti L., Mistri D., Rocca M., Filippi M. Functional and structural MRI correlates of executive functions in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2021;429:117647. doi: 10.1177/13524585211033184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Marek S., Dosenbach N.U.F. The frontoparietal network: function, electrophysiology, and importance of individual precision mapping. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2018;20(2):133–140. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2018.20.2/smarek. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Meijer K.A., Eijlers A.J.C., Douw L., Uitdehaag B.M.J., Barkhof F., Geurts J.J.G., Schoonheim M.M. Increased connectivity of hub networks and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2017;88(22):2107–2114. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Meijer K.A., van Geest Q., Eijlers A.J.C., Geurts J.J.G., Schoonheim M.M., Hulst H.E. Is impaired information processing speed a matter of structural or functional damage in MS? Neuroimage Clin. 2018;20:844–850. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.09.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Meijer K.A., Eijlers A.J.C., Geurts J.J.G., Schoonheim M.M. Staging of cortical and deep grey matter functional connectivity changes in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2018;89(2):205–210. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-316329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Meijer K.A., Steenwijk M.D., Douw L., Schoonheim M.M., Geurts J.J.G. Long-range connections are more severely damaged and relevant for cognition in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2020;143:150–160. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Meng D., Welton T., Elsarraj A., et al. Dorsolateral prefrontal circuit effective connectivity mediates the relationship between white matter structure and PASAT-3 performance in multiple sclerosis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2021;42:495–509. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Mezzapesa D.M., Rocca M.A., Rodegher M., Comi G., Filippi M. Functional cortical changes of the sensorimotor network are associated with clinical recovery in multiple sclerosis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2008;29(5):562–573. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Moazami F., Lefevre-Utile A., Papaloukas C., Soumelis V. Machine Learning Approaches in Study of Multiple Sclerosis Disease Through Magnetic Resonance Images. Front. Immunol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.700582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Morgen K., Kadom N., Sawaki L., et al. Training-dependent plasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2004;127:2506–2517. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Nelson F., Akhtar M.A., Zúñiga E., Perez C.A., Hasan K.M., Wilken J., Wolinsky J.S., Narayana P.A., Steinberg J.L. Novel fMRI working memory paradigm accurately detects cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2017;23(6):836–847. doi: 10.1177/1352458516666186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Ogawa S., Lee T.M., Kay A.R., Tank D.W. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1990;87(24):9868–9872. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.24.9868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Ogawa S., Menon R.S., Tank D.W., Kim S.G., Merkle H., Ellermann J.M., Ugurbil K. Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model. Biophys. J . 1993;64(3):803–812. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81441-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Pantano P., Mainero C., Lenzi D., Caramia F., Iannetti G.D., Piattella M.C., Pestalozza I., Di Legge S., Bozzao L., Pozzilli C. A longitudinal fMRI study on motor activity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2005;128(9):2146–2153. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Pantano P., Bernardi S., Tinelli E., Pontecorvo S., Lenzi D., Raz E., Tona F., Gasperini C., Pozzilli C. Impaired cortical deactivation during hand movement in the relapsing phase of multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional and longitudinal fMRI study. Mult. Scler. 2011;17(10):1177–1184. doi: 10.1177/1352458511411757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Pardini M., Bonzano L., Roccatagliata L., Mancardi G.L., Bove M. The fatigue-motor performance paradox in multiple sclerosis. Sci. Rep. 2013;3:2001. doi: 10.1038/srep02001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Parisi L., Rocca M.A., Valsasina P., Panicari L., Mattioli F., Filippi M. Cognitive rehabilitation correlates with the functional connectivity of the anterior cingulate cortex in patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain Imaging Behav. 2014;8(3):387–393. doi: 10.1007/s11682-012-9160-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Parisi L., Rocca M.A., Mattioli F., Copetti M., Capra R., Valsasina P., Stampatori C., Filippi M. Changes of brain resting state functional connectivity predict the persistence of cognitive rehabilitation effects in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2014;20(6):686–694. doi: 10.1177/1352458513505692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Parry A.M., Scott R.B., Palace J., Smith S., Matthews P.M. Potentially adaptive functional changes in cognitive processing for patients with multiple sclerosis and their acute modulation by rivastigmine. Brain. 2003;126:2750–2760. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Pasqua G., Tommasin S., Bharti K., Ruggieri S., Petsas N., Piervincenzi C., Pozzilli C., Pantano P. Resting-state functional connectivity of anterior and posterior cerebellar lobes is altered in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2021;27(4):539–548. doi: 10.1177/1352458520922770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Penner I.-K., Rausch M., Kappos L., Opwis K., Radu E.W. Analysis of impairment related functional architecture in MS patients during performance of different attention tasks. J. Neurol. 2003;250(4):461–472. doi: 10.1007/s00415-003-1025-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Péran P., Nemmi F., Dutilleul C., Finamore L., Falletta Caravasso C., Troisi E., Iosa M., Sabatini U., Grazia Grasso M. Neuroplasticity and brain reorganization associated with positive outcomes of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in progressive multiple sclerosis: A fMRI study. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020;42:102127. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Petracca M., Saiote C., Bender H.A., Arias F., Farrell C., Magioncalda P., Martino M., Miller A., Northoff G., Lublin F., Inglese M. Synchronization and variability imbalance underlie cognitive impairment in primary-progressive multiple sclerosis. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1) doi: 10.1038/srep46411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Petsas N., Tinelli E., Lenzi D., Tomassini V., Sbardella E., Tona F., Raz E., Nucciarelli V., Pozzilli C., Pantano P., Fujinami R.S. Evidence of impaired brain activity balance after passive sensorimotor stimulation in multiple sclerosis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e65315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Pinter D., Beckmann C.F., Fazekas F., Khalil M., Pichler A., Gattringer T., Ropele S., Fuchs S., Enzinger C. Morphological MRI phenotypes of multiple sclerosis differ in resting-state brain function. Sci. Rep. 2019;9(1) doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52757-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Prakash R.S., Patterson B., Janssen A., Abduljalil A., Boster A. Physical activity associated with increased resting-state functional connectivity in multiple sclerosis. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2011;17(6):986–997. doi: 10.1017/S1355617711001093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Reddy H., Narayanan S., Matthews P.M., Hoge R.D., Pike G.B., Duquette P., Antel J., Arnold D.L. Relating axonal injury to functional recovery in MS. Neurology. 2000;54(1):236–239. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.1.236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Reddy H., Narayanan S., Woolrich M., et al. Functional brain reorganization for hand movement in patients with multiple sclerosis: defining distinct effects of injury and disability. Brain. 2002;125:2646–2657. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Riccitelli G.C., Pagani E., Meani A., Valsasina P., Preziosa P., Filippi M., Rocca M.A. Cognitive impairment in benign multiple sclerosis: a multiparametric structural and functional MRI study. J. Neurol. 2020;267(12):3508–3517. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10025-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Rico A., Zaaraoui W., Franques J., Attarian S., Reuter F., Malikova I., Confort-Gouny S., Soulier E., Pouget J., Cozzone P.J., Pelletier J., Ranjeva J.-P., Audoin B. Motor cortical reorganization is present after a single attack of multiple sclerosis devoid of cortico-spinal dysfunction. MAGMA. 2011;24(2):77–84. doi: 10.1007/s10334-010-0232-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Ritter P., Schirner M., McIntosh A.R., Jirsa V.K. The virtual brain integrates computational modeling and multimodal neuroimaging. Brain Connect. 2013;3(2):121–145. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Rocca M.A., Falini A., Colombo B., Scotti G., Comi G., Filippi M. Adaptive functional changes in the cerebral cortex of patients with nondisabling multiple sclerosis correlate with the extent of brain structural damage. Ann. Neurol. 2002;51(3):330–339. doi: 10.1002/ana.10120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Rocca M.A., Matthews P.M., Caputo D., Ghezzi A., Falini A., Scotti G., Comi G., Filippi M. Evidence for widespread movement-associated functional MRI changes in patients with PPMS. Neurology. 2002;58(6):866–872. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.6.866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Rocca M.A., Gavazzi C., Mezzapesa D.M., Falini A., Colombo B., Mascalchi M., Scotti G., Comi G., Filippi M. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage. 2003;19(4):1770–1777. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00242-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Rocca M.A., Mezzapesa D.M., Falini A., Ghezzi A., Martinelli V., Scotti G., Comi G., Filippi M. Evidence for axonal pathology and adaptive cortical reorganization in patients at presentation with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage. 2003;18(4):847–855. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00043-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Rocca M.A., Gallo A., Colombo B., Falini A., Scotti G., Comi G., Filippi M. Pyramidal tract lesions and movement-associated cortical recruitment in patients with MS. Neuroimage. 2004;23(1):141–147. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Rocca M.A., Colombo B., Falini A., Ghezzi A., Martinelli V., Scotti G., Comi G., Filippi M. Cortical adaptation in patients with MS: a cross-sectional functional MRI study of disease phenotypes. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4(10):618–626. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70171-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Rocca M.A., Agosta F., Colombo B., et al. fMRI changes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients complaining of fatigue after IFNbeta-1a injection. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2007;28:373–382. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Rocca M.A., Tortorella P., Ceccarelli A., Falini A., Tango D., Scotti G., Comi G., Filippi M. The “mirror-neuron system” in MS: A 3 tesla fMRI study. Neurology. 2008;70(4):255–262. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000284667.29375.7e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Rocca M.A., Absinta M., Valsasina P., Ciccarelli O., Marino S., Rovira A., Gass A., Wegner C., Enzinger C., Korteweg T., Sormani M.P., Mancini L., Thompson A.J., De Stefano N., Montalban X., Hirsch J., Kappos L., Ropele S., Palace J., Barkhof F., Matthews P.M., Filippi M. Abnormal connectivity of the sensorimotor network in patients with MS: a multicenter fMRI study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009;30(8):2412–2425. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Rocca M.A., Valsasina P., Absinta M., Riccitelli G., Rodegher M.E., Misci P., Rossi P., Falini A., Comi G., Filippi M. Default-mode network dysfunction and cognitive impairment in progressive MS. Neurology. 2010;74(16):1252–1259. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181d9ed91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Rocca M.A., Ceccarelli A., Rodegher M., Misci P., Riccitelli G., Falini A., Comi G., Filippi M. Preserved brain adaptive properties in patients with benign multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2010;74(2):142–149. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c91a00. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Rocca M.A., Valsasina P., Martinelli V., Misci P., Falini A., Comi G., Filippi M. Large-scale neuronal network dysfunction in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2012;79(14):1449–1457. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826d5f10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Rocca M.A., Bonnet M.C., Meani A., Valsasina P., Colombo B., Comi G., Filippi M. Differential cerebellar functional interactions during an interference task across multiple sclerosis phenotypes. Radiology. 2012;265(3):864–873. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Rocca M.A., Valsasina P., Hulst H.E., Abdel-Aziz K., Enzinger C., Gallo A., Pareto D., Riccitelli G., Muhlert N., Ciccarelli O., Barkhof F., Fazekas F., Tedeschi G., Arévalo M.J., Filippi M. Functional correlates of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: A multicenter fMRI Study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2014;35(12):5799–5814. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Rocca M.A., Valsasina P., Meani A., Falini A., Comi G., Filippi M. Impaired functional integration in multiple sclerosis: a graph theory study. Brain Struct. Funct. 2016;221(1):115–131. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0896-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Rocca M.A., De Meo E., Filippi M. Functional MRI in investigating cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2016;134(Suppl 200):39–46. doi: 10.1111/ane.12654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Rocca M.A., Meani A., Riccitelli G.C., Colombo B., Rodegher M., Falini A., Comi G., Filippi M. Abnormal adaptation over time of motor network recruitment in multiple sclerosis patients with fatigue. Mult. Scler. 2016;22(9):1144–1153. doi: 10.1177/1352458515614407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Rocca M.A., Vacchi L., Rodegher M., Meani A., Martinelli V., Possa F., Comi G., Falini A., Filippi M. Mapping face encoding using functional MRI in multiple sclerosis across disease phenotypes. Brain Imaging Behav. 2017;11(5):1238–1247. doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9591-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Rocca M.A., Valsasina P., Leavitt V.M., Rodegher M., Radaelli M., Riccitelli G.C., Martinelli V., Martinelli-Boneschi F., Falini A., Comi G., Filippi M. Functional network connectivity abnormalities in multiple sclerosis: Correlations with disability and cognitive impairment. Mult Scler. 2018;24(4):459–471. doi: 10.1177/1352458517699875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Rocca M.A., Meani A., Fumagalli S., Pagani E., Gatti R., Martinelli-Boneschi F., Esposito F., Preziosa P., Cordani C., Comi G., Filippi M. Functional and structural plasticity following action observation training in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2019;25(11):1472–1487. doi: 10.1177/1352458518792771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Rocca M.A., Hidalgo de La Cruz M., Valsasina P., Mesaros S., Martinovic V., Ivanovic J., Drulovic J., Filippi M. Two-year dynamic functional network connectivity in clinically isolated syndrome. Mult. Scler. 2020;26(6):645–658. doi: 10.1177/1352458519837704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Rocca M., Valsasina P., Marchesi O., Preziosa P., Sona D., Tessadori J., Yamin M.A., Filippi M. The role of brain network functional connectivity and machine learning for the classification and characterization of disease phenotypes in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2021;429:117770. [Google Scholar]
  167. Rocca M.A., Valsasina P., Meani A., Pagani E., Cordani C., Cervellin C., Filippi M. Network Damage Predicts Clinical Worsening in Multiple Sclerosis: A 6.4-Year Study. Neurol Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2021;8(4):e1006. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000001006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Rombouts S.A.R.B., Lazeron R.H.C., Scheltens P.h., Uitdehaag B.M.J., Sprenger M., Valk J., Barkhof F. Visual activation patterns in patients with optic neuritis: an fMRI pilot study. Neurology. 1998;50(6):1896–1899. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.6.1896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Roosendaal S.D., Schoonheim M.M., Hulst H.E., Sanz-Arigita E.J., Smith S.M., Geurts J.J.G., Barkhof F. Resting state networks change in clinically isolated syndrome. Brain. 2010;133(6):1612. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Roosendaal S.D., Hulst H.E., Vrenken H., Feenstra H.E.M., Castelijns J.A., Pouwels P.J.W., Barkhof F., Geurts J.J.G. Structural and functional hippocampal changes in multiple sclerosis patients with intact memory function. Radiology. 2010;255(2):595–604. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Saccà V., Sarica A., Novellino F., Barone S., Tallarico T., Filippelli E., Granata A., Chiriaco C., Bruno Bossio R., Valentino P., Quattrone A. Evaluation of machine learning algorithms performance for the prediction of early multiple sclerosis from resting-state FMRI connectivity data. Brain Imaging Behav. 2019;13(4):1103–1114. doi: 10.1007/s11682-018-9926-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Safdar N.M., Banja J.D., Meltzer C.C. Ethical considerations in artificial intelligence. Eur. J. Radiol. 2020;122:108768. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Saini S., DeStefano N., Smith S., et al. Altered cerebellar functional connectivity mediates potential adaptive plasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2004;75:840–846. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.016782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Sastre-Garriga J., Alonso J., Renom M., Arévalo M.J., González I., Galán I., Montalban X., Rovira A. A functional magnetic resonance proof of concept pilot trial of cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2011;17(4):457–467. doi: 10.1177/1352458510389219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Sbardella E., Tona F., Petsas N., Upadhyay N., Piattella M.C., Filippini N., Prosperini L., Pozzilli C., Pantano P. Functional connectivity changes and their relationship with clinical disability and white matter integrity in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2015;21(13):1681–1692. doi: 10.1177/1352458514568826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Sbardella E., Upadhyay N., Tona F., Prosperini L., De Giglio L., Petsas N., Pozzilli C., Pantano P. Dentate nucleus connectivity in adult patients with multiple sclerosis: functional changes at rest and correlation with clinical features. Mult Scler. 2017;23(4):546–555. doi: 10.1177/1352458516657438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Schoonheim M.M., Geurts J.J.G., Barkhof F. The limits of functional reorganization in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2010;74(16):1246–1247. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181db9957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Schoonheim M.M., Geurts J.J.G., Wiebenga O.T., De Munck J.C., Polman C.H., Stam C.J., Barkhof F., Wink A.M. Changes in functional network centrality underlie cognitive dysfunction and physical disability in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2014;20(8):1058–1065. doi: 10.1177/1352458513516892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Schoonheim M.M., Hulst H.E., Brandt R.B., Strik M., Wink A.M., Uitdehaag B.M.J., Barkhof F., Geurts J.J.G. Thalamus structure and function determine severity of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2015;84(8):776–783. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Schoonheim M.M., Meijer K.A., Geurts J.J. Network collapse and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Front. Neurol. 2015;6:82. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Schoonheim M.M., Douw L., Broeders T.AA., Eijlers A.JC., Meijer K.A., Geurts J.JG. The cerebellum and its network: Disrupted static and dynamic functional connectivity patterns and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2021;27(13):2031–2039. doi: 10.1177/1352458521999274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Schoonheim M.M., Pinter D., Prouskas S.E., Broeders T.AA., Pirpamer L., Khalil M., Ropele S., Uitdehaag B.MJ., Barkhof F., Enzinger C., Geurts J.JG. Disability in multiple sclerosis is related to thalamic connectivity and cortical network atrophy. Mult. Scler. 2022;28(1):61–70. doi: 10.1177/13524585211008743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Shu N.i., Duan Y., Xia M., Schoonheim M.M., Huang J., Ren Z., Sun Z., Ye J., Dong H., Shi F.-D., Barkhof F., Li K., Liu Y. Disrupted topological organization of structural and functional brain connectomes in clinically isolated syndrome and multiple sclerosis. Sci. Rep. 2016;6(1) doi: 10.1038/srep29383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Soares J.M., Conde R., Magalhães R., Marques P., Magalhães R., Gomes L., Gonçalves Ó.F., Arantes M., Sampaio A. Alterations in functional connectivity are associated with white matter lesions and information processing efficiency in multiple sclerosis. Brain Imaging Behav. 2021;15(1):375–388. doi: 10.1007/s11682-020-00264-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Spirou A., Liu P.P., Natsheh J.Y., Neuteboom E., Dobryakova E. Neural Correlates of Outcome Anticipation in Multiple Sclerosis. Front. Neurol. 2018;9:572. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Spiteri S., Hassa T., Claros-Salinas D., Dettmers C., Schoenfeld M.A. Neural correlates of effort-dependent and effort-independent cognitive fatigue components in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2019;25(2):256–266. doi: 10.1177/1352458517743090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Spreng R.N. The fallacy of a “task-negative” network. Front. Psychol. 2012;3:145. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Staffen W., Mair A., Zauner H., Unterrainer J., Niederhofer H., Kutzelnigg A., Ritter S., Golaszewski S., Iglseder B., Ladurner G. Cognitive function and fMRI in patients with multiple sclerosis: evidence for compensatory cortical activation during an attention task. Brain. 2002;125(6):1275–1282. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Strik M., Shanahan C.J., van der Walt A., et al. Functional correlates of motor control impairments in multiple sclerosis: A 7 Tesla task functional MRI study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2021;42:2569–2582. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Strik M., Chard D.T., Dekker I., Meijer K.A., Eijlers A.JC., Pardini M., Uitdehaag B.MJ., Kolbe S.C., Geurts J.JG., Schoonheim M.M. Increased functional sensorimotor network efficiency relates to disability in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2021;27(9):1364–1373. doi: 10.1177/1352458520966292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Sui J., Huster R., Yu Q., Segall J.M., Calhoun V.D. Function-structure associations of the brain: evidence from multimodal connectivity and covariance studies. Neuroimage. 2014;102(Pt 1):11–23. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Sulpizio V., Berchicci M., Di Russo F., Galati G., Grasso M.G., Iosa M., Lucci G., Paolucci S., Ripani M., Pitzalis S. Effect of Exoskeleton-Assisted Rehabilitation Over Prefrontal Cortex in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Neuroimaging Pilot Study. Brain Topogr. 2021;34(5):651–663. doi: 10.1007/s10548-021-00858-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Svolgaard O., Andersen K.W., Bauer C., Madsen K.H., Blinkenberg M., Selleberg F., Siebner H.R., Paul F. Cerebellar and premotor activity during a non-fatiguing grip task reflects motor fatigue in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(10):e0201162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Sweet L.H., Rao S.M., Primeau M., Mayer A.R., Cohen R.A. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of working memory among multiple sclerosis patients. J. Neuroimaging. 2004;14:150–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Sweet L.H., Rao S.M., Primeau M., Durgerian S., Cohen R.A. Functional magnetic resonance imaging response to increased verbal working memory demands among patients with multiple sclerosis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2006;27(1):28–36. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Tacchino A., Saiote C., Brichetto G., Bommarito G., Roccatagliata L., Cordano C., Battaglia M.A., Mancardi G.L., Inglese M. Motor Imagery as a Function of Disease Severity in Multiple Sclerosis: An fMRI Study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2017;11 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Tavazzi E., Bergsland N., Cattaneo D., Gervasoni E., Laganà M.M., Dipasquale O., Grosso C., Saibene F.L., Baglio F., Rovaris M. Effects of motor rehabilitation on mobility and brain plasticity in multiple sclerosis: a structural and functional MRI study. J. Neurol. 2018;265(6):1393–1401. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8859-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Tijhuis F.B., Broeders T.A.A., Santos F.A.N., Schoonheim M.M., Killestein J., Leurs C.E., van Geest Q., Steenwijk M.D., Geurts J.J.G., Hulst H.E., Douw L. Dynamic functional connectivity as a neural correlate of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage Clin. 2021;29:102556. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Tomassini V., Johansen-Berg H., Jbabdi S., Wise R.G., Pozzilli C., Palace J., Matthews P.M. Relating brain damage to brain plasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair. 2012;26(6):581–593. doi: 10.1177/1545968311433208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Tommasin S., De Giglio L., Ruggieri S., Petsas N., Giannì C., Pozzilli C., Pantano P. Relation between functional connectivity and disability in multiple sclerosis: a non-linear model. J. Neurol. 2018;265(12):2881–2892. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-9075-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Tommasin S., De Giglio L., Ruggieri S., Petsas N., Giannì C., Pozzilli C., Pantano P. Multi-scale resting state functional reorganization in response to multiple sclerosis damage. Neuroradiology. 2020;62(6):693–704. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02393-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Tona F., Petsas N., Sbardella E., Prosperini L., Carmellini M., Pozzilli C., Pantano P. Multiple sclerosis: altered thalamic resting-state functional connectivity and its effect on cognitive function. Radiology. 2014;271(3):814–821. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14131688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Tona F., De Giglio L., Petsas N., Sbardella E., Prosperini L., Upadhyay N., Giannì C., Pozzilli C., Pantano P. Role of Cerebellar Dentate Functional Connectivity in Balance Deficits in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Radiology. 2018;287(1):267–275. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Uddin L.Q. Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2015;16(1):55–61. doi: 10.1038/nrn3857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Vacchi L., Rocca M.A., Meani A., Rodegher M., Martinelli V., Comi G., Falini A., Filippi M. Working memory network dysfunction in relapse-onset multiple sclerosis phenotypes: A clinical-imaging evaluation. Mult Scler. 2017;23(4):577–587. doi: 10.1177/1352458516656809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. van Geest Q., Hulst H.E., Meijer K.A., Hoyng L., Geurts J.J.G., Douw L. The importance of hippocampal dynamic connectivity in explaining memory function in multiple sclerosis. Brain Behav. 2018;8(5):e00954. doi: 10.1002/brb3.954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  207. Valsasina P., Hidalgo de la Cruz M., Filippi M., Rocca M.A. Characterizing Rapid Fluctuations of Resting State Functional Connectivity in Demyelinating, Neurodegenerative, and Psychiatric Conditions: From Static to Time-Varying Analysis. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:618. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. van Geest Q., Douw L., van 't Klooster S., Leurs C.E., Genova H.M., Wylie G.R., Steenwijk M.D., Killestein J., Geurts J.J.G., Hulst H.E. Information processing speed in multiple sclerosis: Relevance of default mode network dynamics. Neuroimage Clin. 2018;19:507–515. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Veréb D., Kovács M.A., Kocsis K., Tóth E., Bozsik B., Király A., Kincses B., Faragó P., Fricska-Nagy Z., Bencsik K., Klivényi P., Kincses Z.T., Szabó N. Functional Connectivity Lateralisation Shift of Resting State Networks is Linked to Visuospatial Memory and White Matter Microstructure in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. Brain Topogr. 2022;35(2):268–275. doi: 10.1007/s10548-021-00881-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  210. Vrenken H., Jenkinson M., Pham D.L., Guttmann C.R.G., Pareto D., Paardekooper M., de Sitter A., Rocca M.A., Wottschel V., Cardoso M.J., Barkhof F. Opportunities for Understanding MS Mechanisms and Progression With MRI Using Large-Scale Data Sharing and Artificial Intelligence. Neurology. 2021;97(21):989–999. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. Wegner C., Filippi M., Korteweg T., Beckmann C., Ciccarelli O., De Stefano N., Enzinger C., Fazekas F., Agosta F., Gass A., Hirsch J., Johansen-Berg H., Kappos L., Barkhof F., Polman C., Mancini L., Manfredonia F., Marino S., Miller D.H., Montalban X., Palace J., Rocca M., Ropele S., Rovira A., Smith S., Thompson A., Thornton J., Yousry T., Matthews P.M. Relating functional changes during hand movement to clinical parameters in patients with multiple sclerosis in a multi-centre fMRI study. Eur. J. Neurol. 2008;15(2):113–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2007.02027.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Welton T., Constantinescu C.S., Auer D.P., Dineen R.A. Graph Theoretic Analysis of Brain Connectomics in Multiple Sclerosis: Reliability and Relationship with Cognition. Brain Connect. 2020;10(2):95–104. doi: 10.1089/brain.2019.0717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Werring D.J., Bullmore E.T., Toosy A.T., et al. Recovery from optic neuritis is associated with a change in the distribution of cerebral response to visual stimulation: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2000;68:441–449. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.68.4.441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  214. West K.L., Sivakolundu D.K., Zuppichini M.D., Turner M.P., Spence J.S., Lu H., Okuda D.T., Rypma B. Altered task-induced cerebral blood flow and oxygen metabolism underlies motor impairment in multiple sclerosis. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2021;41(1):182–193. doi: 10.1177/0271678X20908356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Wishart H.A., Saykin A.J., McDonald B.C., Mamourian A.C., Flashman L.A., Schuschu K.R., Ryan K.A., Fadul C.E., Kasper L.H. Brain activation patterns associated with working memory in relapsing-remitting MS. Neurology. 2004;62(2):234–238. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000103238.91536.5f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  216. Wojtowicz M., Mazerolle E.L., Bhan V., Fisk J.D. Altered functional connectivity and performance variability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2014;20(11):1453–1463. doi: 10.1177/1352458514524997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Wu L., Huang M., Zhou F., Zeng X., Gong H. Distributed causality in resting-state network connectivity in the acute and remitting phases of RRMS. BMC Neurosci. 2020;21:37. doi: 10.1186/s12868-020-00590-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Yeshurun Y., Nguyen M., Hasson U. The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2021;22(3):181–192. doi: 10.1038/s41583-020-00420-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. Zhong J., Nantes J.C., Holmes S.A., Gallant S., Narayanan S., Koski L. Abnormal functional connectivity and cortical integrity influence dominant hand motor disability in multiple sclerosis: a multimodal analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2016;37(12):4262–4275. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  220. Zhong J., Chen D.Q., Nantes J.C., Holmes S.A., Hodaie M., Koski L. Combined structural and functional patterns discriminating upper limb motor disability in multiple sclerosis using multivariate approaches. Brain Imaging Behav. 2017;11(3):754–768. doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9551-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  221. Zhou F., Zhuang Y., Gong H., Zhan J., Grossman M., Wang Z.e., Linker R.A. Resting State Brain Entropy Alterations in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0146080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  222. Zuber P., Tsagkas C., Papadopoulou A., Gaetano L., Huerbin M., Geiter E., Altermatt A., Parmar K., Ettlin T., Schuster-Amft C., Suica Z., Alrasheed H., Wuerfel J., Kesselring J., Kappos L., Sprenger T., Magon S. Efficacy of inpatient personalized multidisciplinary rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: behavioural and functional imaging results. J. Neurol. 2020;267(6):1744–1753. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09768-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  223. Zurita M., Montalba C., Labbé T., Cruz J.P., Dalboni da Rocha J., Tejos C., Ciampi E., Cárcamo C., Sitaram R., Uribe S. Characterization of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients using support vector machine classifications of functional and diffusion MRI data. Neuroimage Clin. 2018;20:724–730. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from NeuroImage : Clinical are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES