Abstract
The systematic documentation of sexual orientation and gender identity data in electronic health records can improve patient-centered care and help to identify and address health disparities affecting sexual and gender minority populations. Although there are existing guidelines for sexual orientation and gender identity data among adult patients, there are not yet standard recommendations for pediatric patients. In this article, we discuss methods that pediatric primary care organizations can use to collect and document sexual orientation and gender identity information with children and adolescents in electronic health records. These recommendations take into consideration children’s developmental stages, the role of caregivers, and the need to protect the privacy of this information. We also focus on the current limitations of electronic health records in capturing the nuances of sexual and gender minority identities and make suggestions for addressing these limitations.
Keywords: gender identity, electronic health records, health disparities, sexual orientation, SOGI data
INTRODUCTION
Routine and standardized documentation of patient sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) in the electronic health record (EHR) enables healthcare organizations to create a more patient-centered care experience, and to identify, monitor, and address health disparities of sexual and gender minority (SGM) people.1–6 Although there are guidelines for collecting and documenting SOGI data among adult patients,7,8 none yet exist for pediatric patients in primary care. In the United States, an estimated 9.5% of adolescents aged 13–17 years old identify as SGM,9 and children as young as 2 or 3 years old may declare a transgender or gender diverse (TGD) identity.10,11 Pervasive stigma and discrimination in school, family, and healthcare settings have been linked to a range of health disparities among SGM youth, including mood disorders, disordered eating, cigarette smoking, substance use disorders, suicidality, violence victimization, HIV, and sexually transmitted infections.12–20 To promote more positive health outcomes, it is beneficial for pediatric primary care clinicians to know their patients’ SOGI so they can provide space for discussing concerns, make appropriate referrals, and encourage family acceptance of SGM identities, which is critical for positive psychosocial outcomes.21,22 Developing clinical decision tools in EHRs to prompt providers to ask about and update a pediatric patient’s SOGI can further support these important conversations.6
While SOGI documentation in EHRs has clear advantages for pediatric primary care, it also poses potential challenges. In particular, certain healthcare policies and EHR technical factors make it difficult to prevent unwanted disclosure of SOGI information to a pediatric patient’s caregivers.23 In this article, we present strategies for pediatric primary care clinicians to elicit and document the SOGI of minors in the EHR with the goal of promoting better health outcomes while navigating privacy issues. These recommendations are based on our extensive clinical, consulting, and research experience with SOGI data in large and small primary care practices, pediatric gender clinics, and hospital adolescent clinics in urban and rural areas across all 50 US states.1–7,24–30 We have further grounded our recommendations in research findings and guidance from the peer-reviewed literature.8,31–42
CREATING A SUPPORTIVE AND SAFE ENVIRONMENT
Before launching a SOGI data collection system, it is critical to first create safe and affirming clinical environments for SGM pediatric patients and their families. There are resources to support organizations in making important changes to forms, policies, and physical spaces,43,44 as well as many options for training all staff members on culturally sensitive, nonjudgmental communication with SGM patients and families.45 Healthcare teams should also prepare a list of SGM-supportive referrals, and clinicians should access continuing education on promoting the health and development of SGM children and adolescents, and on cultivating family acceptance. Developing a SOGI data system also requires collaboration across medical, behavioral health, information technology, and patient registration departments to set up effective workflows and confidentiality practices. See the Supplementary Appendix for resources.
WHEN AND HOW TO ASK ABOUT SOGI
Clinicians can introduce SOGI during the social history of the pediatric well-visit, with a brief explanation of the purpose of the questions (Table 1). When to ask depends on the age of the child. For adolescents aged 11–17 years, the history is typically elicited in private, without a caregiver present. For children under age 11 years, SOGI questions are likely to be asked in the presence of a caregiver. Some but not all families are aware and supportive of their child’s SGM identity.46,47 SGM children who feel unsafe disclosing SOGI information in front of their caregiver may not answer truthfully, yet it is nevertheless important to provide the opportunity. Additionally, patients should always have the option to not answer.
Table 1.
Clinician introduction: “I am going to ask you some questions that I ask all patients your age, because it helps me provide you the best care possible.” If patient is alone without parents/guardians and the law permits: “I will not share this information with your parents/guardians or anyone else unless you give me permission to.” |
Gender identity questions (3–13 years) |
“Some kids feel like a girl on the inside, some kids feel like a boy on the inside, and some kids feel like neither, both, or someone else. What about you? How do you feel on the inside? There’s no right or wrong answer.” |
If you do not know the patient’s sex assigned at birth: |
“What sex were you (was your child) assigned at birth? Girl or boy, or another sex?” |
Gender identity questions (14–17 years) |
“What is your current gender identity? Some teens feel like a girl or woman on the inside, some feel like a boy or man on the inside, and some feel like neither, both, or another gender. What about you? There’s no right or wrong answer.” |
If you do not know the patient’s sex assigned at birth: |
“What sex were you assigned at birth? Female, male, or another sex?” |
Sexual orientation questions (10–13 years) |
“Have you ever had a crush on someone?” |
If yes: “Was this crush on a boy, a girl, both, or someone of another gender?” |
Sexual orientation questions (14–17 years) |
“Are you sexually attracted to boys, girls, both, neither, another gender, or are you not sure?” |
Gender identity questions
Gender identity refers to a person’s inner sense of being a girl/woman/female, a boy/man/male, nonbinary, genderqueer, beyond girl/woman/female or boy/man/male, or having no gender.
Asking about gender identity can begin around age 3 years, the age at which most children are able to verbalize their gender identity. Some children can self-label their gender identity as young as 18 months.10,11,48 In addition to gender identity, it is best practice to ask about and document sex assigned at birth; this practice enables EHR systems to identify TGD patients whose gender identity and sex assigned at birth are not congruent.8,38 If a patient’s sex assigned at birth is not yet documented, clinicians can ask patients or their caregivers for this information.
The collection of sex assigned at birth data is evolving. As of 2022, some countries and US jurisdictions now permit a third sex option beyond female or male on a child’s original birth certificate. This additional sex option is usually written as X. Although most EHRs do not yet accommodate a third sex option, organizations may be able to work with their EHR vendor to make this change. It is important to note that X sex is not equivalent to intersex. A person born with an intersex variation, also known as a variation in sex development, could be assigned X at birth, but most infants are assigned female or male. Intersex traits should be assessed separately from gender identity. Routine clinical or research data collection questions about intersex variations have not yet been developed, but groups of intersex health experts and advocates are working on creating and validating questions.49
Sexual orientation questions
Sexual orientation questions can begin between ages 10 and 13 years, depending on the clinician’s judgment of the child’s developmental readiness.50 Sexual orientation is a multidimensional construct that comprises sexual orientation identity, attraction, and behavior. Although adolescents may not know their sexual orientation identity or engage in sexual behavior, many experience romantic or sexual attractions. Asking about attractions, therefore, may increase the comprehension and accuracy of the answer.51 Based on cognitive interviews and field tests, an expert panel has recommended using the term crush to indicate attractions with children aged 10–13 years, and the phrase sexual attractions with adolescents aged 14–17 years.52
DOCUMENTING SOGI IN THE EHR
All EHRs certified under the Office of National Coordinator of Health Information Technology (ONC) are required to have the capacity to record SOGI data. Many EHRs therefore provide built-in SOGI fields, but these fields tend to capture only identity dimensions. To capture the nuances of a patient’s answers about sexual attractions and gender identity, pediatric primary care clinicians can use the EHR notes field. Clinicians can also follow-up with questions about how a patient identifies their SOGI, if they believe the child is ready. Table 2 includes recommended identity questions and terms, most of which were field tested with middle and high school students in 2016–2017,52 and considered acceptable by adolescents for primary care settings.29 Additional terms (ie, queer, nonbinary, and pansexual) were added by the authors to reflect current common identities among youth.53
Table 2.
Introduction for forms: We are asking the following information to understand whom we are serving and to provide you with more patient-centered healthcare. This information will be entered into your electronic health record, which may be accessed by parents/guardians and by members of your healthcare team. |
Parents/guardians: If you are answering these questions on behalf of your child, please answer to the best of your knowledge. |
Gender identity (ages 3+ years) |
What is your current gender identity? (Check all that apply) or (Please choose the option that best describes you. Currently our system allows only one option.)
|
What sex were you assigned at birth? (Check one.)
|
What sex is listed on your health insurance?
|
Sexual orientation (for ages 10+ years) |
Do you think of yourself as: (Check all that apply) or (Please choose the option that best describes you. Currently our system allows only one option.)
|
Include if a third sex option is accepted by insurance companies.
Concepts related to gender and sexuality evolve over time, and inevitably lead to changes in SOGI terminology. Moreover, SGM adolescents may find a short list of SOGI categories to be limiting.37 A national sample of SGM adolescents reported 26 different SOGI categories.54 For these reasons, EHRs should maintain open text fields for SO and GI, and clinicians should never judge or doubt a patient’s reported SOGI. If a SOGI term is new to a clinician, they can follow-up by asking what the term used means to the patient. Accommodating diverse SOGI identities requires balancing inclusive SOGI options with the space and technical limitations of EHR systems. The SOGI categories in Table 2 attempt to encompass a range of identities without creating an overwhelming number of fields. Nonetheless, organizations may wish to collaborate with local stakeholders to refine and add terms, and to translate terms into languages used by their patient population.
Consent, confidentiality, and the EHR
Prior to documenting the SOGI of children and adolescents in the EHR, it is critical that clinicians ask patients for consent, with a clear explanation of who can access the information. The intentional or accidental disclosure of a child’s SOGI to a legal guardian can pose a grave risk to that child’s safety and wellbeing, particularly in contexts where SGM people are highly stigmatized or criminalized. An organization can potentially program flags in the EHR to deter employees from accidental disclosure of SOGI when handling medical release forms. As of 2022, however, maintaining the confidentiality of a minor patient’s SOGI and other health information in the EHR has its challenges. Because the 21st Century Cures Act prevents the blocking of guardians’ electronic access to their children’s clinical information, standard information protection methods, such as labeling SOGI or other sensitive information as confidential, may not sufficiently protect a pediatric patient’s privacy.23 For this reason, healthcare organizations may need to solicit legal counsel to understand if their clinical workflow and EHR systems protect minors from unwanted disclosure of SOGI. This discussion should also consider ways that the use of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) billing codes, such as those for gender incongruence, could potentially “out” children to caregivers.41 Additionally, different jurisdictions within the United States have varying statutes with regard to the rights of minors to consent to their own healthcare services.55 It is possible that a jurisdiction will make it illegal to even discuss SOGI without guardian consent. Again, legal counsel is advised as laws continue to change.
More sophisticated EHR protections of confidential information are being created. For example, some EHRs may allow for different visibility of clinical information on patient portals for adolescents, or have controls that enable visibility of data only to those permitted by the patient.38 Organizations can contact their EHR vendor about their capacity to provide these services. The Protecting Privacy to Promote Interoperability (PP2PI) Workgroup is a voluntary national interest group that is developing recommendations to protect sensitive health information across systems.
SOGI ON REGISTRATION FORMS
Primary care organizations may choose to ask structured SOGI questions, similar to those in Table 2, on paper or electronic registration forms to enable routine and systematic data collection.2,7,43 Data entered on tablets or in patient portals can flow directly into the EHR, while data from paper forms can be entered into the EHR by registration staff. Because parents and guardians often complete forms on behalf of their children, SOGI collected through forms can lead to less reliable answers. To improve privacy and data quality, minors with literacy skills can fill out SOGI questions away from the oversight of parents and guardians, if space allows.31 Handing out youth-friendly pamphlets that define SOGI categories can help improve comprehension of the questions. Still, SGM youth may not want to disclose their identities on forms that may be accessed by their parents or guardians from the EHR. If organizations decide to ask about SOGI on forms, they should consider also checking with the patient during the clinical visit to verify the information.
DOCUMENTING PRONOUNS AND NAMES
To further provide an affirming clinical experience in which SGM patients feel safe to discuss their SOGI, it is recommended to also ask all patients at least annually for their pronouns and the name they want their healthcare providers to use.44,53 The clinician can ask: “I would like to be respectful. What name would you like me to call you?” and “What pronouns would you like me to use?” TGD patients may not have pronouns that correspond with the sex recorded on their insurance records or government-issued identification documents; any patient, regardless of gender identity, may use a name that differs from what is on official documents. To normalize name and pronoun disclosure, clinicians can wear a pin with their pronouns or greet new patients with: “Hello, I’m [Name]. My pronouns are […].” To protect privacy, pediatric patients should be asked which name and pronouns they want used in front of family and staff members, and whether to document the information in the EHR. Currently, EHRs do not have controls for indicating context-specific pronouns and names, but this ought to be a goal for future system upgrades.
If the patient consents, name used and pronouns should appear in a high-visibility location in the EHR, such as on a banner and in bold font, or through a pop-up alert, so that all staff members can readily see and use the correct information. Care should be taken to ensure that name used and pronouns appear correctly and consistently in all parts of the EHR, including scheduling views, particularly if more than one EHR system is used. Additionally, registration forms should include fields for names and pronouns to systematically capture this information (eg, What name do you go by? What name is listed on your health insurance? What are your pronouns? she/her/hers, he/him/his, they/them/theirs, another set of pronouns—please describe).
ADDRESSING TECHNICAL CHALLENGES WITH THE EHR
Diverse and evolving SOGI terminology comes with questions about how to optimize interoperable health information exchange. International value sets and coding systems, such as Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine, ICD, Current Procedural Terminology, and Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes, will ideally be consistently updated and standardized, to the extent possible.39 Total standardization, however, may not be feasible in the near future given the prioritization of cultural responsiveness over interoperability.
Another technical challenge relates to fixed-choice questions with only one answer option. Some children and adolescents have more than one gender identity or sexual orientation and may experience having to choose just one option as too limiting. Not all EHR systems, however, allow for selecting more than one option. In such cases, the clinician can explain the constraints of the system and then ask patients if they want to choose one option that best describes them, or if they want the clinician to check “another identity/something else” and enter these terms in the notes field.
Because a patient’s SOGI can change over time, it is important for pediatric primary care clinicians to ask SOGI questions at least annually.56 Changes in SOGI may reflect developmental processes or may indicate a fluid sexual orientation or gender identity. Organizations will need to develop EHR data entry systems that enable easy updating to responsively accommodate patient changes in SOGI and promptly alert staff members to these changes. At the same time, it is important to have safeguards for preventing staff from inadvertently making changes to SOGI fields across different EHR functions and clinical activities, for example from a primary care visit to a laboratory order.
Studies have found that clinicians do not consistently ask about SOGI24: one reason for this is forgetting to ask.57 EHR systems can be programmed to prompt clinicians to ask annually about gender identity starting at age 3 years, and about sexual orientation at age 10 or 11 years. EHR systems could also provide guidance for psychosocial affirmation of SGM patients from early childhood onward. For TGD children and adolescents, EHR systems could remind clinicians to consider discussion of pubertal suppression prior to Tanner Stage 2, and of gender-affirming hormones prior to age 14 years.6 To best inform clinical decisions and recommendations, however, it is important for future EHR systems to be set up to use SOGI data in combination with other clinical indicators. For example, clinical decisions traditionally made only based on the binary sex assigned at birth can be further informed by GI, hormone therapy levels, and an anatomical (organ) inventory that tracks surgical procedures and the presence of specific organs.4
SHARING INFORMATION ACROSS SYSTEMS
For primary care practices that share an EHR with an inpatient hospital system, sharing name, pronoun, and SOGI information across systems can reduce patient and clinician burden, and can support the provision of affirming care. Children and adolescents, however, may wish to use a different name and pronouns depending on the setting; therefore, patients should be asked at inpatient intake for name and pronouns, even if this information is already in the system from outpatient care, and vice versa. To promote affirming care, this information should appear along with any mandated identifiers on ID bracelets, census lists, EHR shortcuts, digital white boards and banner bars, meal orders, discharge summaries, scheduling systems, and any other documents provided to the patient.58
CONCLUSIONS
Asking age-appropriate SOGI questions in primary care can bring about important, life-enhancing, and affirming conversations with pediatric patients and their families that set SGM children and adolescents on a positive developmental course. Equally important is the need to implement EHR systems that protect the privacy of SGM minors who are not ready to disclose their identities to their families, or risk harm in doing so. The suggestions presented in this article will likely require adjustments based on local cultural and linguistic contexts, and jurisdictional differences in policies and practices for minors. To improve SOGI systems for the future, research is needed to assess the validity and feasibility of SOGI questions among children and adolescents, and to measure patient outcomes related to collecting SOGI data.
FUNDING
This work was supported by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, grant number AD-2017C1-6271, to The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health. The funder was not involved in the writing of the article or in the decision to submit the article for publication. This work was also supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, grant number K01DA054357.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
ASK and CG conceived of the article, and all other authors (HG, ARG, SLK-W, KT) contributed substantially to the intellectual content of the work. HG wrote the first draft of the article; all authors critically revised and edited the work, reviewed and approved of the final version of the submission, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
Supplementary material is available at Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association online.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
Dr. Keuroghlian declares royalties from McGraw Hill as editor of a textbook on transgender and gender diverse health care. Dr. Katz-Wise is a diversity consultant for McGraw Hill and Viacom/CBS, neither of whom were involved with this article. Ms. Goldhammer, Ms. Grasso, Dr. Thomson, and Dr. Gordon have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
DATA AVAILABILITY
No new data were generated or analyzed in support of this research.
Supplementary Material
Contributor Information
Hilary Goldhammer, The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Chris Grasso, The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sabra L Katz-Wise, Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Katharine Thomson, Department of Psychiatry, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Allegra R Gordon, Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Alex S Keuroghlian, The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
REFERENCES
- 1. Almazan AN, King D, Grasso C, et al. Sexual orientation and gender identity data collection at US health centers: impact of city-level structural stigma in 2018. Am J Public Health 2021; 111 (11): 2059–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Cahill S, Makadon H. Sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in clinical settings and in electronic health records: a key to ending LGBT health disparities. LGBT Health 2014; 1 (1): 34–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Cahill S, Grasso C, Keuroghlian A, Sciortino C, Mayer K. Sexual and gender minority health in the COVID-19 Pandemic: why data collection and combatting discrimination matter now more than ever. Am J Public Health 2020; 110 (9): 1360–1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Grasso C, Goldhammer H, Thompson J, Keuroghlian AS. Optimizing gender-affirming medical care through anatomical inventories, clinical decision support, and population health management in electronic health record systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (11): 2531–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Grasso C, Goldhammer H, Brown RJ, Furness BW. Using sexual orientation and gender identity data in electronic health records to assess for disparities in preventive health screening services. Int J Med Inform 2020; 142: 104245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Keuroghlian AS. Electronic health records as an equity tool for LGBTQIA+ people. Nat Med 2021; 27 (12): 2071–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Grasso C, McDowell MJ, Goldhammer H, Keuroghlian AS. Planning and implementing sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (1): 66–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Deutsch MB, Buchholz D. Electronic health records and transgender patients–practical recommendations for the collection of gender identity data. J Gen Intern Med 2015; 30 (6): 843–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Conron K. LGBT Youth Population in the United States: Fact Sheet. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA School of Law Williams Institute; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Handler T, Hojilla JC, Varghese R, Wellenstein W, Satre DD, Zaritsky E. Trends in referrals to a pediatric transgender clinic. Pediatrics 2019; 144 (5): e20191368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Bonifacio HJ, Rosenthal SM. Gender variance and dysphoria in children and adolescents. Pediatr Clin North Am 2015; 62 (4): 1001–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Katz-Wise SL, Scherer EA, Calzo JP, et al. Sexual minority stressors, internalizing symptoms, and unhealthy eating behaviors in sexual minority youth. Ann Behav Med 2015; 49 (6): 839–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Katz-Wise SL, Blood EA, Milliren CE, et al. Sexual orientation disparities in BMI among U.S. adolescents and young adults in three race/ethnicity groups. J Obes 2014; 2014: 537242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Goldhammer HB, Maston ED, Keuroghlian AS. Addressing eating disorders and body dissatisfaction in sexual and gender minority youth. Am J Prev Med 2019; 56 (2): 318–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Baams L. Disparities for LGBTQ and gender nonconforming adolescents. Pediatrics 2018; 141 (5): e20173004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Raifman J, Charlton BM, Arrington-Sanders R, et al. Sexual orientation and suicide attempt disparities among US adolescents. Pediatrics 2020; 145 (3): 2009–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Fish JN, Turner B, Phillips G 2nd, Russell ST. Cigarette smoking disparities between sexual minority and heterosexual youth. Pediatrics 2019; 143 (4): e20181671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Murchison GR, Agenor M, Reisner SL, Watson RJ. School restroom and locker room restrictions and sexual assault risk among transgender youth. Pediatrics 2019; 143 (6): e20182902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Baams L. Sexual orientation disparities: starting in childhood and observable in adolescence? J Adolesc Health 2019; 64 (2): 145–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Katz-Wise SL, Everett B, Scherer EA, Gooding H, Milliren CE, Austin SB. Factors associated with sexual orientation and gender disparities in chronic pain among U.S. adolescents and young adults. Prev Med Rep 2015; 2: 765–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Westwater JJ, Riley EA, Peterson GM. What about the family in youth gender diversity? A literature review. Int J Transgend 2019; 20 (4): 351–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hagan J, Shaw J, Duncan P, eds. Bright Futures Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescent. 4th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Carlson JG, Hoover K, Tyson N. North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology (NASPAG) and the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine (SAHM) Statement: The 21st Century Cures Act & adolescent confidentiality: Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine; 2021. https://www.adolescenthealth.org/Advocacy/Advocacy-Activities/2019-(1)/NASPAG-SAHM-Statement.aspx. Accessed March 17, 2022.
- 24. Grasso C, Goldhammer H, Funk D, et al. Required sexual orientation and gender identity reporting by US health centers: first-year data. Am J Public Health 2019; 109 (8): 1111–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Cahill S, Singal R, Grasso C, et al. Do ask, do tell: high levels of acceptability by patients of routine collection of sexual orientation and gender identity data in four diverse American community health centers. PLoS One 2014; 9 (9): e107104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Eiduson R, Murchison GR, Agénor M, Suarez L, Gordon AR. Sexual healthcare experiences of nonbinary young adults [published online ahead of print October 17, 2021]. Cult Health Sex 2021; 1–17. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2021.1946595. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 27. Katz-Wise SL, Budge SL, Fugate E, et al. Transactional pathways of transgender identity development in transgender and gender nonconforming youth and caregivers from the Trans Youth Family Study. Int J Transgend 2017; 18 (3): 243–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Katz-Wise SL, Rosario M, Calzo JP, Scherer EA, Sarda V, Austin SB. Endorsement and timing of sexual orientation developmental milestones among sexual minority young adults in the growing up today study. J Sex Res 2017; 54 (2): 172–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Guss CE, Eiduson R, Khan A, Dumont O, Forman SF, Gordon AR. “It’d be great to have the options there”: a mixed-methods study of gender identity questions on clinic forms in a primary care setting. J Adolesc Health 2020; 67 (4): 590–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Jolly D, Boskey ER, Thomson KA, Tabaac AR, Burns MTS, Katz-Wise SL. Why are you asking? Sexual orientation and gender identity assessment in clinical care. J Adolesc Health 2021; 69 (6): 891–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Lau JS, Kline-Simon A, Sterling S, Hojilla JC, Hartman L. Screening for gender identity in adolescent well visits: is it feasible and acceptable? J Adolesc Health 2021; 68 (6): 1089–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Deutsch MB. Collection of sexual orientation and gender identity data on the front lines of health care: more than meets the eye. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2020; 46 (10): 547–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Deutsch MB, Feldman JL. Updated recommendations from the world professional association for transgender health standards of care. Am Fam Physician 2013; 87 (2): 89–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Deutsch MB, Green J, Keatley J, et al. Electronic medical records and the transgender patient: recommendations from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health EMR Working Group. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20 (4): 700–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Deutsch MB, Keatley J, Sevelius J, Shade SB. Collection of gender identity data using electronic medical records: survey of current end-user practices. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 2014; 25 (6): 657–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Ogden SN, Scheffey KL, Blosnich JR, Dichter ME. “Do I feel safe revealing this information to you?”: patient perspectives on disclosing sexual orientation and gender identity in healthcare. J Am Coll Health 2020; 68 (6): 617–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Scheffey KL, Ogden SN, Dichter ME. “The idea of categorizing makes me feel uncomfortable”: university student perspectives on sexual orientation and gender identity labeling in the healthcare setting. Arch Sex Behav 2019; 48 (5): 1555–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Vance SR Jr, Mesheriakova VV. Documentation of gender identity in an adolescent and young adult clinic. J Adolesc Health 2017; 60 (3): 350–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. McClure RC, Macumber CL, Kronk C, et al. Gender harmony: improved standards to support affirmative care of gender-marginalized people through inclusive gender and sex representation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 29 (2): 354–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Kronk CA, Everhart AR, Ashley F, et al. Transgender data collection in the electronic health record: current concepts and issues. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 29 (2): 271–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Ram A, Kronk CA, Eleazer JR, Goulet JL, Brandt CA, Wang KH. Transphobia, encoded: an examination of trans-specific terminology in SNOMED CT and ICD-10-CM. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 29 (2): 404–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Thompson HM, Kronk CA, Feasley K, Pachwicewicz P, Karnik NS. Implementation of gender identity and assigned sex at birth data collection in electronic health records: where are we now? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18 (12): 6599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Goldhammer H, Smart AC, Kissock LA, Keuroghlian AS. Organizational strategies and inclusive language to build culturally responsive health care environments for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer people. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2021; 32 (1): 18–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Morenz AM, Goldhammer H, Lambert CA, Hopwood R, Keuroghlian AS. A blueprint for planning and implementing a transgender health program. Ann Fam Med 2020; 18 (1): 73–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Ard KL, Keuroghlian AS. Training in sexual and gender minority health – expanding education to reach all clinicians. N Engl J Med 2018; 379 (25): 2388–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Clark KA, Mennies RJ, Olino TM, Dougherty LR, Pachankis JE. Parent versus child report of children’s sexual orientation: associations with psychiatric morbidity in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study. Ann Epidemiol 2020; 45: 1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. van Bergen DD, Wilson BDM, Russell ST, Gordon AG, Rothblum ED. Parental responses to coming out by lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, pansexual, or two-spirited people across three age cohorts. J Marriage Fam 2021; 83 (4): 1116–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Martin CL, Ruble DN. Patterns of gender development. Annu Rev Psychol 2010; 61: 353–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Tamar-Mattis S, Gamarel KE, Kantor A, Baratz A, Tamar-Mattis A, Operario D. Identifying and counting individuals with differences of sex development conditions in population health research. LGBT Health 2018; 5 (5): 320–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Calzo JP, Blashill AJ. Child sexual orientation and gender identity in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Cohort Study. JAMA Pediatr 2018; 172 (11): 1090–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Austin SB, Conron K, Patel A, Freedner N. Making sense of sexual orientation measures: findings from a cognitive processing study with adolescents on health survey questions. J LGBT Health Res 2007; 3 (1): 55–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Temkin D, Belford J, McDaniel T, Stratford B, Parris D. Improving Measurement of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity among Middle and High School Students. Bethesda, MD: Child Trends; 2017. Contract No.: 2017–22. [Google Scholar]
- 53. Vance SR Jr. The importance of getting the name right for transgender and other gender expansive youth. J Adolesc Health 2018; 63 (4): 379–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Watson RJ, Wheldon CW, Puhl RM. Evidence of diverse identities in a large national sample of sexual and gender minority adolescents. J Res Adolesc 2020; 30 (Suppl 2): 431–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.American Medical Association. Confidential Health Care for Minors: Code of Medical Ethics Opinion 2.2.2. https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/confidential-health-care-minors. Accessed March 17, 2022.
- 56. Ott MQ, Corliss HL, Wypij D, Rosario M, Austin SB. Stability and change in self-reported sexual orientation identity in young people: application of mobility metrics. Arch Sex Behav 2011; 40 (3): 519–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Newsom KD, Carter GA, Hille JJ. Assessing whether medical students consistently ask patients about sexual orientation and gender identity as a function of year in training. LGBT Health 2022; 9 (2): 142–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Acosta W, Qayyum Z, Turban JL, van Schalkwyk GI. Identify, engage, understand: supporting transgender youth in an inpatient psychiatric hospital. Psychiatr Q 2019; 90 (3): 601–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
No new data were generated or analyzed in support of this research.