Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2022 Feb 11;70(3):276–288. doi: 10.1007/s12026-022-09267-y

Research progress on drugs targeting the TGF-β signaling pathway in fibrotic diseases

Ning Shi 1,2,#, Zhihong Wang 3,#, Hecheng Zhu 4, Weidong Liu 1,2, Ming Zhao 4, Xingjun Jiang 1, Jin Zhao 1,2, Caiping Ren 1,2,, Yan Zhang 5,, Longlong Luo 3,
PMCID: PMC9197809  PMID: 35147920

Abstract

Tissue fibrosis is a key factor leading to disability and death worldwide; however, thus far, there are no approved treatments for fibrosis. Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β is a major pro-fibrotic cytokine, which is expected to become a target in the treatment of fibrosis; however, since TGF-β has a wide range of biological functions involving a variety of biological processes in the body, a slight change in TGF-β may have a systematic effect. Indiscriminate inhibition of TGF-β can lead to adverse reactions, which can affect the efficacy of treatment. Therefore, it has become very important to explore how both the TGF-β signaling pathway is inhibited and the safe and efficient TGF-β small molecule inhibitors or neutralizing antibodies are designed in the treatment of fibrotic diseases. In this review, we mainly discuss the key role of the TGF-β signaling pathway in fibrotic diseases, as well as the development of fibrotic drugs in recent years, and explore potential targets in the treatment of fibrotic diseases in order to guide subsequent drug development.

Keywords: TGF-β, TGF-β antibodies, TGF-β signaling pathways, Fibrosis disease

Introduction

According to relevant statistics, in the USA, nearly 45% of deaths for patients who suffered from various diseases can be attributed to tissue fibroproliferative diseases [1]. Thus far, there is no approved treatment effective against fibrosis. Although the average life expectancy has been greatly improved as medical technology continues to develop, there is an increasing incidence of organ fibrotic diseases among younger patients and more generalized disease patterns [26]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop effective drugs for the treatment of fibrosis.

There are many factors leading to fibrosis, including occupation, hereditary disease, lifestyle, aging [7, 8], as well as physical, chemical, and biological factors, etc. [6, 9, 10]. For example, silicosis is a serious occupational disease in China. Due to the long-term exposure to the environment containing silica dust, these particles will accumulate in the lungs and will not be metabolized by the body. Workers who work for a long time will form nodules in the lungs, forming inflammatory lesions and inducing pulmonary fibrosis, and eventually causing irreversible damage to the body [11, 12]. In addition to the above reasons, studies have also reported that the lack of neuraminidase 1(NEU1) is closely related to the formation of fibrosis in muscles, kidneys, liver, heart, and lungs[13]. There is also a genetic link between rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [14, 15]. Finally, a poor lifestyle is also the main cause of chronic inflammation and even organ fibrosis.

In the process of fibrosis formation, a variety of molecular mechanisms and changes in the microenvironment are involved. For example, TGF-β, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-13 (IL-13), and other cytokineshave chemotactic effects on fibroblasts and regulate the synthesis and degradation of collagen, which in turn is closely related to the occurrence and development of fibrosis [1619]. In addition, oxidative stress and inflammation can promote the formation of fibrosis [1821]. Among the above factors that cause fibrosis, TGF-β plays a vital role. As shown in Fig. 1, TGF-β will be overactivated in persistent inflammation such as tissue damage. The activated TGF-β not only mediates SMAD signaling pathway but also activates the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway for transcriptional regulation, which in turn promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and triggers the accumulation of extracellular matrix [22, 23]. On the other hand, TGF-β can also regulate the activity of RhoA, promoting the activation of Rho-related kinase (ROCK) and inhibiting cofilin (CFL) [24]. Rac and Cdc42 are also involved in the non-Smad signaling pathway mediated by TGF-β signaling [2529]. Most notably, TGF-β1 is the strongest profibrotic cytokine discovered to date [3034]; many studies have shown that blocking the TGF-β1 pathway can improve organ fibrosis [32, 35]. However, TGF-β participates in the regulation of a variety of other signal pathways in the body and has an important role in maintaining physiological homeostasis (including immune regulation and tumor suppression) [32]. Therefore, in the drug design process, it is necessary to consider minimizing the potential adverse effects of systemic blocking of TGF-β.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of TGF-β signaling pathway. A Synthesis of TGF-β precursor and activation of mature TGF β. In the cytoplasm, SLC and LTBP combine to form a large latent complex (LLC) that is secreted into the peripheral circulation of the cells. LTBP can mediate the non-covalent binding of LLC to fibrillin and promote the release of TGF-β by different means such as proteases, integrins, pH, and reactive oxygen species-mediated ways as mentioned above. B Nonclassical Smad signaling pathway mediated by TGF-β. TGF-β phosphorylates downstream adaptor molecules such as RhoA, Ras, TAK1, and P13K and activates the downstream signal amplification cascade including MKKs and MEKs, JNK/SPAK, p38, and other pathways. C Classical Smad signaling pathway mediated by TGF-β. TβRIII presents TGF-β to TβRII, and TβRII combined with TGF-β recruits and phosphorylates TβRI. Finally, the dimerized TβRI and the dimerized TβRII are cross-linked and then trigger the intracellular TGF-β signaling pathway

Judging from the current clinical incidence rate of fibrotic diseases, pulmonary fibrosis, renal fibrosis, and liver fibrosis are the most common fibrotic diseases, and there is an enormous need for the treatment of these diseases clinically which is not being met [3638]. An understanding of fibrotic disease mechanisms has accelerated the research and development of its clinical treatment. Currently, dozens of anti-fibrosis drugs with different targets are under development. The main treatments are listed below. (1) Chemically synthesized oligonucleotides as miRNA inhibitors or analogs. Since studies have shown that some miRNAs could upregulate or downregulate the transcription of specific genes related to fibrosis [3943]. For example, it was found that the injection of miR-326 into mice with bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis caused significant downregulation of TGF-β1, Smad3, matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), and upregulation of Smad7, which in turn have good anti-fibrosis effects [39]. (2) Recombinant serum amyloid P (Pentraxin-2), which has the function of regulating the natural immune response, has the function of inhibiting the differentiation of monocytes into fibroblasts or fibrosis-promoting phenotypes and activating macrophage subpopulations. It is located at the injury site and has a dual effect by inhibiting fibrosis and promoting repair. PRM-151 is a recombinant protein of Pentraxin-2, which has shown good efficacy in the treatment of pulmonary fibrosis and is currently undergoing phase III clinical trials in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) [22, 44]. (3) Another potential therapeutic target is LoxL2 (a lysyl oxidase family member), which plays a key role in ECM cross-linking, affecting the expression of certain specific genes, which are related to fibrosis and carcinogenesis [4550]. GS-6624 is a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody that targets LoxL2, blocks the activity of LoxL2, reduces the production of ECM by myofibroblasts, and has shown good efficacy in treating fibrosis [51]. (4) Drugs that target IL-4 and IL-13; IL-4 and IL-13 are also potential targets in the treatment of fibrosis, which are important for mediating innate immune activation and helper T-cell 2 (Th-2) cell response[16]. Studies have shown that IL-13 participates in the generation of TGF-β1 by regulating IL-13 Ralpha2 receptors and promotes the process of fibrosis [5254]. (5) Drugs that target TGF-β [33, 55, 56]. For example, it has been found that the small molecular inhibitor LY364947 selectively inhibits TGF-β1 could effectively block the activation and proliferation of mouse cardiac fibroblasts with fewer side effects and is safer than pan-TGF-β blocking in vivo [33]. In order to avoid harmful effects, choosing appropriate inhibitory strength, drug duration, combination with other drugs that can reduce side effects [57], and local inhibition of TGF-β1 signaling may be good drug development strategies. For example, designing bifunctional antibodies to make the drug more enriched at the lesion site may be a good choice. Since TGF-β has a high degree of pleiotropy, there are still many problems to be resolved in fibrosis treatment by targeting TGF-β. However, it is clear that this cytokine has great therapeutic value. In this paper, we will outline the application and potential of targeting TGF-β in the treatment of tissue fibrosis by introducing advances made in scientific research involving mechanisms that TGF-β may be involved in.

TGF-β superfamily signaling pathway

TGF-β superfamily members

TGF-β superfamily members can regulate the proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, adhesion, and migration of a variety of cells, such as macrophages, T cells, B cells, immature hematopoietic cells, neutrophils, and dendritic cells, etc. [5861]. The TGF-β family consists of 33 members, including TGF-β, growth differentiation factors (GDFs), bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), activin, NODAL, and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) [53, 62].

TGF-β has three subtypes in mammals, namely TGF-β1, TGF-β2, and TGF-β3. Although their structures are highly similar, they perform different functions. TGF-β1 plays an important role in maintaining the stability of the body. It can activate fibroblasts and promote the synthesis of the extracellular matrix [63]. Studies have also shown that loss of TGF-β1 may cause defects in hematopoietic and endothelial cell differentiation or autoimmune diseases [64], and lack of TGF-β2 can affect epithelial-mesenchymal interactions, cell growth, extracellular matrix production, and result in tissue remodeling disorders, causing defects in the heart, lungs, cranium and face, limbs, spine, eyes, inner ears, and urogenital system [65]. TGF-β3 plays an important role in the normal morphogenesis of the palate and lungs and participates in epithelial-mesenchymal interaction [66], in which it can reduce scar formation during wound healing [67]. Among the three TGF-β subtypes, TGF-β1 is the most fully studied member of the transforming growth factor family, which plays a major role in tumor development and tissue fibrosis.

TGF-β receptors

TGF-β receptors are divided into three categories: transforming growth factor-β type I receptor (TβRI), transforming growth factor-β type II receptor (TβRII), and transforming growth factor-β type III receptor (TβRIII)[68, 69]. TβRII contains a serine/threonine-rich sequence, which can undergo autophosphorylation. TβRI contains a conservative serine/glycine-rich sequence (TTSGSGSGLP, also known as GS region), which plays a key part in TβRI activation. Both TβRI and TβRII can directly participate in the signal transmission process [69]. TβRIII is a co-receptor of the TGF-β superfamily. The extracellular domain of TβRIII contains an independent amino terminal domain, a zona pelucida domain (ZPD) potentially involved in the oligomerization reaction of the receptor, and two independent TGF-β ligand-binding domains [70]. TβRIII can mediate both the classic Smad signaling pathway and the non-classical Smad signaling pathway to regulate the downstream signaling of TGF-β [7173] and plays a role in ligand presentation in the TGF-β classic signaling pathway. However, in many diseases, TβRIII can block the TGF-β signaling pathway by forming a complex with TβRI and TβRII [74]. In the classical TGF-β pathway, active TGF-β can first bind to TβRIII, then be presented to the receptor complex composed of TβRI and TβRII, and initiate downstream signaling pathways (Fig. 1) [75, 76].

TGF-β secretion and activation

The TGF-β family members are composed of latency-related peptide (LAP), precursor domain, and C-terminal TGF-β fragment, where the precursor domain and growth factor are connected by a cleavage site of proprotein convertase (PC) [77, 78]. The TGF-β precursor is first synthesized on the rough endoplasmic reticulum [79]. After being transferred into the Golgi complex and cleaved by the invertase furin, it is bound with LAP homodimer in a non-covalent form and forms a symmetrical heterotetrameric structure, which is called small latent complex (SLC) [79]. This SLC functions as a cover to prevent mature TGF-β from binding to cell surface receptors. SLC can be hydrolyzed by protease or non-protease to form mature TGF-β with biological activity [80, 81]. During the process, the homodimer part of LAP is connected by two disulfide bonds, and the interaction of the mature TGF-β part is also stabilized by disulfide bonds [82].

The activation of latent TGF-β complex involves several important molecular mechanisms as shown in Fig. 1. (1) The arginine-glycine-aspartate (RGD) motif in TGF-β precursor fragment bound with integrin β chain via non-covalent bonds. When integrin αvβ6/αvβ8 on stromal cells binds to RGD sequence on the TGF-β precursor domain, under the combined action of mechanical force of cytoskeleton and the reaction force of the extracellular matrix or cells presenting TGF-β, the closed loop of precursor domain opens and mature TGF-β with biological function is released [79, 81, 83]. (2) The TGF-β precursor fragment is cleaved by proteases such as metalloprotease MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9, and plasmin to release mature TGF-β [79, 84]. (3) Reactive oxygen species (ROS); in the process of liver fibrosis, activated hepatic stellate cells release a large amount of ROS, and a high level of ROS can promote the release of transforming growth factor-β [85]. (4) Changes in pH; in a tissue microenvironment with a low pH, mature TGF-β is released more easily [54, 86, 87]. (5) Studies have shown that the small latent complex can also bind to glycoprotein-A repetitions predominant (GARP, usually overexpressed on the membrane of the Treg cells) on cell surfaces, leading to the release of active TGF-β and the regulation of the proliferation and differentiation of Treg cells [80, 83] (Fig. 1).

TGF-β signaling pathway

Once activated, mature TGF-β initiates transmembrane signaling by binding itself to two distinct transmembranes Ser/Thr protein kinases, termed as TβRI and TβRII receptors. Among them, transforming growth factor-β can also bind to the helper receptor TβRIII, and then the signal molecules are transmitted to TβRI and TβRII by T-β RIII. TβRII can phosphorylate specific cytoplasmic GS domains of TβRI, leading to conformational regulation of TβRI so as to phosphorylate Smad2 and Smad3 proteins. Subsequently, phosphorylated Smad2 and Smad3 proteins bind to Smad4 protein to form heterologous complexes, with the formed heterotrimers translocating into the nucleus and bound to DNA to regulate the transcription of multiple target genes [62, 8890]. In the nucleus, with the participation of certain DNA-binding proteins, Smad molecules act on specific target genes to regulate their expression. For example, phosphorylated Smad2/3/4 heterocomplexes can form complexes with p300 and CREB-binding proteins (CBP) to promote the transcription of target genes such as plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), collagen type I alpha 1 (COL1A1), and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) [91] to regulate the production of the extracellular matrix. In addition to interacting with transcription factors, Smad complexes have been shown to regulate epigenetic modifications by transferring histone acetyl and methyltransferases to specific gene sites. Phosphorylated Smad2/3 protein can bind to M6A methyltransferase complex to regulate m6A RNA methylation modification of target genes, thus exerting the biological function of DNA repair and posttranscriptional regulation [62, 92].

More and more pieces of evidence clearly demonstrate that in addition to activating classic Smad-dependent signaling, TGF-β also participates in nonclassical signaling pathways, which mainly include MAP kinases, PI-3 kinase-Akt, and Rho-like GTPase [9396]. Figure 1 depicts the classic TGF-β signaling pathway and nonclassical TGF-β signaling pathway.

The role of TGF-β in the progression of tissue fibrosis

It has been well known that fibrosis is not a disease but a result of tissue damage repair dysfunction [54]. TGF-β plays an important role in this process. During tissue damage repair, mesenchymal cells undergo significant metabolic changes to promote energy-consuming cell functions including cell proliferation and protein synthesis [9799]. The increased glycolysis activity of fibroblasts results in the synthesis of pyruvic acid and lactic acid. The generated lactic acid reduces extracellular pH, which induces the activation of potential TGF-β1 [54, 100]. Meanwhile, integrin-mediated TGF-β activation promotes the expression of IL-17A, which increases the expression of TGF-β receptors in fibroblasts, thereby promoting the response of fibroblasts to TGF-β signals [54, 101103]. In addition, in fibroblasts stimulated by TGF-β1, the increase in the level of glutaminase promotes the decomposition of glutamine, endows the cells with antiapoptotic properties [104], finally promotes the production and stability of collagen through mTOR signal transduction [105]. Studies have shown that inhibiting glutaminase I can improve the symptoms of pulmonary fibrosis induced by bleomycin and TGF-β1 in vivo [106]. And TGF-β is one of the main regulators of cell differentiation, migration, proliferation, and gene expression [107]. In injured or diseased tissues, sustained, dysregulated, or hyperactive TGF-β transcriptional activation leads to enhanced fibrogenesis, which impairs normal tissue regeneration and may cause dysfunction by interfering with the structure of organ structural units [108]. The specific cell source of TGF-β in the body is unclear. Epithelial cells, platelets, T cells, fibroblasts, and mast cells can all produce TGF-β [109112]. In the study of acute and chronic fibrotic injury models, it was found that disrupting the pathways involved in the recruitment of macrophages can reduce the synthesis of TGF-β and relieve fibrosis, which indicates that macrophages are also an important source of TGF-β [113, 114]. The continuous increase in TGF-β will further deepen the degree of fibrosis and form a serious vicious circle (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic diagram of the partial sources of TGF-β. Under the conditions of organ or tissue damage, TGF-β can increase its own expression by inducing the secretion of TGF-β from epithelial cells, immune cells, fibroblasts, etc., thereby promoting the excessive production of extracellular matrix

Anti-fibrosis drug research

Fibrosis is a common manifestation of chronic tissue damage. A further understanding of the mechanisms of fibrotic diseases will help accelerate the development of its clinical treatment. At present, the main mechanism of action used by drugs under development against fibrosis is related to the inhibition of various factors in the formation of fibrosis, including inhibition of the signaling of cytokines such as TGF-β, PDGF, and CTGF, inhibition of fibroblast division and proliferation, regulation of collagen synthesis and degradation, and regulation of oxidative stress, inflammation, and other reaction processes that contribute to the formation of fibrosis [17, 38, 54, 115]. For example, HSC activation is a key step in the formation of liver fibrosis, so HSC is regarded as an important target in the development of drugs used against liver fibrosis [44]. Since the discovery of the importance of TGF-β in fibrotic diseases, drug research targeting the TGF-β signaling pathway has increased significantly [58, 67, 90]. Related drug types include antisense oligonucleotides (AON), neutralizing antibodies, cyclic RGD pentapeptides, TGF-β ligand traps, and small molecule kinase inhibitors (SKIs), etc.[80, 116118]. In early anti-fibrosis drug research, researchers found that pan-TGF-β antibody drugs might cause cardiotoxicity [54, 119]. Through the mouse model experiments, it was found that the cardiotoxicity caused by pan-TGF-β antibody drugs may be related to the indiscriminate blocking of TGF-β2 and TGF-β3 signaling pathways [119], the results also provide guidance for the design of selective targeting of TGF-β drugs. There are already a variety of drugs targeting TGF-β superfamily members or their receptors under development, such as the highly selective antibody SRK-181 developed by Scholar Rock, which targets the TGF-β1 precursor. The main mechanism of SRK-181 is to prevent the cleavage of TGF-β1 precursor and release mature TGF-β by binding to TGF-β1 precursor [120]. In the 4-week repeated-dose rat toxicity study of SRK-181 (the highest dose was 100 mg/kg, which was much higher than the dose required to induce a strong antitumor response in combination with PD-1 antibody), the researchers did not observe other histological features of cardiac valvulopathy or cardiotoxicity. This indicates that selective blocking of TGF-β1 activation may avoid the dose-limiting toxicity caused by the indiscriminate TGF-β inhibitor drugs to a certain extent [119, 121]. The AVID200 developed by Forbius has also attracted widespread attention [122, 123]. AVID200 is a highly effective and selective inhibitor specifically targeting TGFβRII mutant that enhances the binding activity of TGFβRII to TGF-β1 and TGF-β3 and thus greatly reduces the binding activity to TGF-β2 [123]. In clinical phase I trials, researchers found that AVID200 has a good anti-fibrosis effect, and preclinical models showed that blocking TGF-β signal transduction can reverse myelofibrosis and restore hematopoietic function without safety risks [122124]. Other than that, a polypeptide drug HTPEP-001 targeting TGF-β1 for the treatment of IPF, which was developed by Chengdu Huitai Biotechnology has also shown good results in preclinical experiments [125]. The study found that by inhibiting the production of active TGF-β1 and Smad signaling, aerosol inhalation of HTPEP-001 effectively blocked the fibrosis process in the rat model of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis, and there were no obvious adverse events related to immunological or histological changes [125]. The above studies all support selective targeting TGF-β as a promising direction for the treatment of fibrotic diseases. The table below summarizes some of the drugs under development for the treatment of fibrotic diseases (Table 1).

Table 1.

Summary of some drugs under development for fibrosis

Drug Disease Target Phase Identifier Supplement
Drugs targeting TGF-β signaling pathway for fibrosis treatment
Pirfenidone Pulmonary fibrosis TGF-β Phase II/III already listed NCT04461587 NCT04607928 NCT02958917 NCT02161952 NCT01366209 Broad-spectrum anti-fibrosis drugs
NIS793 Myelofibrosis TGF-β1 Phase II NCT04097821 Single drug or combined with PDR001, MBG453, or other drugs to treat myelofibrosis
Fluorofenidone Liver fibrosis TGF-β Phase I 2016L09979 Same target as pirfenidone
KER-050 Myelofibrosis TGF-β Phase II NCT04419649 KER-050 works by inhibiting TGF-β signaling and is being developed for the treatment of cell tumors, myelodysplastic syndrome, and myelofibrosis
AVID200 Myelofibrosis TGF-β1/3 Phase I NCT03895112 It was found in preclinical models that blocking TGF-β signal transduction can reverse myelofibrosis and restore hematopoietic function
P144 Skin fibrosis TGF-β1 Phase II NCT00781053 NCT00574613 TGF-β1 inhibitors are used to block the interaction between TGF-β1 and TGF-βRIII receptors, thereby blocking its biological effects
HTPEP-001 Pulmonary fibrosis TGF-β1 Preclinical experiment HTPEP-001 can effectively block the fibrosis process of the rat lung fibrosis induced by bleomycin
SB-431542 Fibrosis TGF-βRI Preclinical experiment Can inhibit the kinase activity of ALK5 (IC50 = 94 nmol·L-1) and ALK4 and ALK7 in vitro but has no effect on ERK, JNK, and p38 MAPK signaling pathways
A83-01 Fibrosis TGF-βRI Preclinical experiment A83-01 is a selective small-molecule inhibitor that inhibits TGF-β type I receptors
IN-1130 Renal fibrosis TGF-βRI Preclinical experiment In the rat renal fibrosis model, IN-1130 can reduce the expression levels of phosphorylated Smad2, fibronectin, α-SMA, and type I collagen, significantly inhibiting the process of renal fibrosis
STX-100 Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis αVβ6 Phase II NCT01371305 STX-100 cannot inhibit inactive TGFβ but selectively inhibits activated TGF-β in pathological tissues
PLN-74809 Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis αVβ1/αVβ6 Phase II NCT04396756 By inhibiting integrins, it can specifically antagonize the TGF-β signaling pathway in fibrotic tissues
Drugs targeting other pathways for fibrosis treatment
Sorafenib Liver fibrosis VEGFR2/PDGF-β Phase III NCT01849588 Can significantly improve liver damage and liver fibrosis and promote angiogenesis
Imatinib Liver fibrosis PDGFR Phase I NCT00025415 Can significantly reduce the proliferation of HSC in the short term. Effective in the early stages of liver fibrosis
BMS-986036 Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis/liver fibrosis FGF21 analogs Phase II NCT02413372 Has mild adverse reactions, such as diarrhea, nausea, and frequent bowel movements
Hydronidone Liver fibrosis FGFR1 Phase II NCT02499562 Food intake will reduce the absorption rate of hydronidone
Simvastatin Liver fibrosis HMG-CoA reductase Already listed Representative statin drugs
VBY-376 Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis/fibrosis Cathepsin B Phase I NCT00557583 Inhibit the activity of cathepsin B. Can slow down or inhibit the proliferation of HSC
Obeticholic acid Liver fibrosis FXR Phase III NCT02548351 NCT03979417 Significant improvement in fibrosis. Only a few patients have mild adverse reactions such as itching
PRM-151 Pulmonary fibrosis/myelofibrosis/liver fibrosis, etc Pentraxin-2 Phase III NCT04594707 NCT04552899 PRM-151 can activate macrophages and reduce tissue fibrosis
GS-6624 Pulmonary fibrosis LoxL2 monoclonal antibody Phase II NCT01759511 NCT01672879 By binding to lysyl oxidase, it has an immunomodulatory effect
Liraglutide Liver Fibrosis GLP-1 Phase III NCT02654665 GLP-1 can increase insulin release and reduce glucagon secretion, reduce liver steatosis, and improve liver fibrosis

It is well known that the tissues surrounding the tumor microenvironment are rich in dense fibrotic cells, which are usually referred to as cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) [126]. Therefore, the occurrence and development of tumors are closely related to fibrosis. The progress of drugs targeting TGF-β for tumor therapy under development is also summarized in Table 1. More and more drugs targeting TGF-β are being developed to treat diseases such as fibrosis and tumors, which expand our understanding of the TGF-β signaling pathway and its mechanism of action and further promote the development of new anti-fibrotic drugs targeting TGF-β with few or no side effects.

Conclusions

With increasing in-depth research on the pathogenesis of fibrotic diseases, it has been shown that the TGF-β signaling pathway is closely related to organ fibrosis [54, 57, 67, 83, 91]. Since TGF-β participates in the regulation of multiple signaling pathways in the body, and TGF-β is closely related to the body’s metabolism, aging, circadian rhythm, epigenetics, EMT, and other cellular processes, learning how to regulate the TGF-β signaling pathway for the treatment of fibrosis while avoiding toxic side effects has become key to drug development [68, 127129]. At present, by targeting different action sites of TGF-β and receptors, the search, design, and screening of various efficient and low-toxic novel small molecule inhibitors have become a research hotspot. Although some preclinical and clinical drug candidates for blocking TGF-β signaling pathway exhibit some side effects, such as pirfenidone (drug details are shown in Table 1), its anti-fibrosis effect is still quite encouraging [130], which provides some enlightenment for the development of new inhibitors of the TGF-β signaling pathway. However, a single drug often leads to obvious adverse reactions due to factors such as a single target and a large dose; hence, combination therapy has become the treatment trend of fibrosis disease. In addition, the use of the abovementioned inhibitors targeting the TGF-β signaling pathway reasonably combined with other drugs of different action mechanisms to treat a variety of fibrosis-related diseases has also attracted the attention of many researchers. In short, with the continuous improvement of drug development strategies and the increasing number of safe and effective small molecule inhibitors, it is believed that more effective drugs targeting TGF-β signaling for the treatment of fibrosis will enter the clinical practice.

Since a group of abnormal proliferation cells with high fibrotic characteristics also exists in most tumor microenvironments in addition to being a popular target for fibrotic diseases, TGF-β signaling is also one of the most popular targets in the field of tumor immunotherapy in recent years [97]. The bifunctional antibody drug M7824, which is being developed by Merck, has attracted widespread attention in the pharmaceutical industry due to its good synergistic therapeutic mechanism for tumors [131, 132]. The drug can effectively reduce the formation of cell matrix around the tumor tissue by targeting TGF-β and anti-PD-L1 to further promote the penetration of T cells into the center of the tumor and trigger a more effective anti-tumor immune effect [131133]. It also has fewer adverse effects on the tumor microenvironment and is safer compared with pan-TGF-β blocking. In this review, we illuminate that the specific blocking of TGF-β1 is a good way to avoid the uncertainty caused by the indiscriminate suppression of TGF-β signal pathways. However, we still face great challenges in the future. For example, how to design and screen drugs targeting TGF-β1 and how to further reduce or eliminate the side effects of targeted drugs. All of these problems require more in-depth thinking and more effective solution strategies.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81773179, 82071399, 21976210), Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Hunan (2020JJ4771), Incubation Project of Medical Science and Technology Youth Training Program (Item Number: 20QNPY143), and Independent Exploration and Innovation Project for Postgraduate of Central South University (Item Number: 2021zzts0929) for providing financial support for this research.

Author contribution

LLL, RCP, and ZY conceived and designed the study. SN and WZH wrote the paper. ZHC, LWD, ZM, JXJ, and ZJ critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript. SN and WZH contributed equally to this manuscript.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Ning Shi and Zhihong Wang contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Caiping Ren, Email: rencaiping@csu.edu.cn.

Yan Zhang, Email: 3348929253@qq.com.

Longlong Luo, Email: luolong_long@126.com.

References

  • 1.Wynn TA. Fibrotic disease and the T(H)1/T(H)2 paradigm. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4(8):583–594. doi: 10.1038/nri1412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barber CM, Fishwick D. Importance of past occupational exposures in the rising incidence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the U.K. Thorax. 2012;67(3):264. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Navaratnam V, Fleming KM, West J, et al. The rising incidence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the U.K. Thorax. 2011;66(6):462–7. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.148031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lai CC, Wang CY, Lu HM, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Taiwan - a population-based study. Respir Med. 2012;106(11):1566–1574. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mocumbi AO, Ferreira MB, Sidi D, et al. A population study of endomyocardial fibrosis in a rural area of Mozambique. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):43–49. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Agrawal A, Agarwal A, Mehta D, et al. Nationwide trends of hospitalizations for cystic fibrosis in the United States from 2003 to 2013. Intractable & rare diseases research. 2017;6(3):191–198. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2017.01043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Krizhanovsky V, Yon M, Dickins RA, et al. Senescence of activated stellate cells limits liver fibrosis. Cell. 2008;134(4):657–667. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Campisi J, d’Adda di Fagagna F. Cellular senescence: when bad things happen to good cells. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2007;8(9):729–40. doi: 10.1038/nrm2233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ray JG, Chatterjee R, Chaudhuri K. Oral submucous fibrosis: a global challenge. Rising incidence, risk factors, management, and research priorities. Periodontology 2000. 2019;80(1):200–212. doi: 10.1111/prd.12277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schneider KM, Mohs A, Kilic K, et al. Intestinal microbiota protects against MCD diet-induced steatohepatitis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019;20(2). 10.3390/ijms20020308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 11.Krefft S, Wolff J, Rose C. Silicosis: an update and guide for clinicians. Clin Chest Med. 2020;41(4):709–722. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2020.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shtraichman O, Kramer MR. Artificial stone silicosis: the Israel epidemic, current view. Harefuah. 2017;156(8):517–521. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.van de Vlekkert D, Demmers J, Nguyen X, et al. Excessive exosome release is the pathogenic pathway linking a lysosomal deficiency to generalized fibrosis. Science advances. 2019;5(7):eaav70. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav3270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Seibold MA, Wise AL, Speer MC, et al. A common MUC5B promoter polymorphism and pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(16):1503–1512. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1013660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Makino S. Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: a new concept and indication of nintedanib. Mod Rheumatol. 2021;31(1):13–19. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2020.1826665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Su S, Zhao Q, He C, et al. miR-142-5p and miR-130a-3p are regulated by IL-4 and IL-13 and control profibrogenic macrophage program. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8523. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Parola M, Pinzani M. Liver fibrosis: pathophysiology, pathogenetic targets and clinical issues. Mol Aspects Med. 2019;65:37–55. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2018.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kisseleva T, Brenner DA. Mechanisms of fibrogenesis. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2008;233(2):109–122. doi: 10.3181/0707-mr-190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ma J, Sanchez-Duffhues G, Goumans MJ, et al. TGF-β-Induced endothelial to mesenchymal transition in disease and tissue engineering. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology. 2020;8:260. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Berman B, Maderal A, Raphael B. Keloids and hypertrophic scars: pathophysiology, classification, and treatment. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al] 2017;43(Suppl 1):S3–s18. doi: 10.1097/dss.0000000000000819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ahmed S, Misra DP, Agarwal V. Interleukin-17 pathways in systemic sclerosis-associated fibrosis. Rheumatol Int. 2019;39(7):1135–1143. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04317-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Raghu G, van den Blink B, Hamblin MJ, et al. Long-term treatment with recombinant human pentraxin 2 protein in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an open-label extension study. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(8):657–664. doi: 10.1016/s2213-2600(19)30172-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cho N, Razipour SE, McCain ML. Featured article: TGF-β1 dominates extracellular matrix rigidity for inducing differentiation of human cardiac fibroblasts to myofibroblasts. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2018;243(7):601–612. doi: 10.1177/1535370218761628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Knipe RS, Probst CK, Lagares D, et al. The Rho kinase isoforms ROCK1 and ROCK2 each contribute to the development of experimental pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2018;58(4):471–481. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2017-0075OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Xiu A, Ding Q, Li Z, et al. Doxazosin attenuates liver fibrosis by inhibiting autophagy in hepatic stellate cells via activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2021;15:3643–3659. doi: 10.2147/dddt.S317701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xue Y, Zhang M, Liu M, et al. via8-Gingerol ameliorates myocardial fibrosis by attenuating reactive oxygen species, apoptosis, and autophagy the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:711701. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.711701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lei H, Wu D, Wang J, et al. C1q/tumor necrosis factor-related protein-6 attenuates post-infarct cardiac fibrosis by targeting RhoA/MRTF-A pathway and inhibiting myofibroblast differentiation. Basic Res Cardiol. 2015;110(4):35. doi: 10.1007/s00395-015-0492-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ge J, Burnier L, Adamopoulou M, et al. RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 differentially regulate αSMA and collagen I expression in mesenchymal stem cells. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(24):9358–9369. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fritsch R, de Krijger I, Fritsch K, et al. Ras and Rho families of GTPases directly regulate distinct phosphoinositide 3-kinase isoforms. Cell. 2013;153(5):1050–1063. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Walton KL, Johnson KE, Harrison CA. Targeting TGF-β mediated SMAD signaling for the prevention of fibrosis. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:461. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yoshida K, Matsuzaki K. Differential regulation of TGF-β/Smad signaling in hepatic stellate cells between acute and chronic liver injuries. Front Physiol. 2012;3:53. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kim KK, Sheppard D, Chapman HA. TGF-β1 signaling and tissue fibrosis. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology. 2018;10(4). 10.1101/cshperspect.a022293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 33.Ding J, Tang Q, Luo B, et al. Klotho inhibits angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and dysfunction in mice through suppression of transforming growth factor-β1 signaling pathway. Eur J Pharmacol. 2019;859:172549. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Khalil H, Kanisicak O, Prasad V, et al. Fibroblast-specific TGF-β-Smad2/3 signaling underlies cardiac fibrosis. J Clin Investig. 2017;127(10):3770–3783. doi: 10.1172/jci94753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Klass BR, Grobbelaar AO, Rolfe KJ. Transforming growth factor beta1 signalling, wound healing and repair: a multifunctional cytokine with clinical implications for wound repair, a delicate balance. Postgrad Med J. 2009;85(999):9–14. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.069831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Glassberg M. Overview of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, evidence-based guidelines, and recent developments in the treatment landscape. Am J Manag Care. 2019;25:S95–S203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang Y, Xing QQ, Tu JK, et al. Involvement of hydrogen sulfide in the progression of renal fibrosis. Chin Med J. 2019;132(23):2872–2880. doi: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000000537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Roehlen N, Crouchet E, Baumert TF. Liver fibrosis: mechanistic concepts and therapeutic perspectives. Cells. 2020;9(4). 10.3390/cells9040875 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 39.Das S, Kumar M, Negi V, et al. MicroRNA-326 regulates profibrotic functions of transforming growth factor-β in pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2014;50(5):882–892. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2013-0195OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Liang H, Xu C, Pan Z, et al. The antifibrotic effects and mechanisms of microRNA-26a action in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy. 2014;22(6):1122–1133. doi: 10.1038/mt.2014.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yang S, Cui H, Xie N, et al. miR-145 regulates myofibroblast differentiation and lung fibrosis. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2013;27(6):2382–2391. doi: 10.1096/fj.12-219493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Loboda A, Sobczak M, Jozkowicz A, et al. TGF-β1/Smads and miR-21 in Renal fibrosis and inflammation. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:8319283. doi: 10.1155/2016/8319283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Inui M, Martello G, Piccolo S. MicroRNA control of signal transduction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(4):252–263. doi: 10.1038/nrm2868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tzouvelekis A, Tzilas V, Antoniou KM, et al. Human pentraxin 2 protein treatment for IPF. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(8):640–641. doi: 10.1016/s2213-2600(19)30173-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhao W, Yang A, Chen W, et al. Inhibition of lysyl oxidase-like 1 (LOXL1) expression arrests liver fibrosis progression in cirrhosis by reducing elastin crosslinking. Biochimica et biophysica acta Molecular basis of disease. 2018;1864(4 Pt A):1129–37. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Liu SB, Ikenaga N, Peng ZW, et al. Lysyl oxidase activity contributes to collagen stabilization during liver fibrosis progression and limits spontaneous fibrosis reversal in mice. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2016;30(4):1599–1609. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-268425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Aumiller V, Strobel B, Romeike M, et al. Comparative analysis of lysyl oxidase (like) family members in pulmonary fibrosis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):149. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00270-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dongiovanni P, Meroni M, Baselli GA, et al. Insulin resistance promotes lysyl oxidase like 2 induction and fibrosis accumulation in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Clinical science (London, England : 1979). 2017;131(12):1301–15. 10.1042/cs20170175 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 49.Harlow CR, Wu X, van Deemter M, et al. Targeting lysyl oxidase reduces peritoneal fibrosis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(8):e0183013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ikenaga N, Peng ZW, Vaid KA, et al. Selective targeting of lysyl oxidase-like 2 (LOXL2) suppresses hepatic fibrosis progression and accelerates its reversal. Gut. 2017;66(9):1697–1708. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chen W, Yang A, Jia J, et al. Lysyl oxidase (LOX) family members: rationale and their potential as therapeutic targets for liver fibrosis. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD) 2020;72(2):729–741. doi: 10.1002/hep.31236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fichtner-Feigl S, Strober W, Kawakami K, et al. IL-13 signaling through the IL-13alpha2 receptor is involved in induction of TGF-beta1 production and fibrosis. Nat Med. 2006;12(1):99–106. doi: 10.1038/nm1332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Diaz A, Tan K, He H, et al. Keloid lesions show increased IL-4/IL-13 signaling and respond to Th2-targeting dupilumab therapy. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV. 2020;34(4):e161–e164. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Henderson NC, Rieder F, Wynn TA. Fibrosis: from mechanisms to medicines. Nature. 2020;587(7835):555–566. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2938-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Giannelli G, Mikulits W, Dooley S, et al. The rationale for targeting TGF-β in chronic liver diseases. Eur J Clin Invest. 2016;46(4):349–361. doi: 10.1111/eci.12596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Liu L, Shi Q, Liu X, et al. Attenuation of myocardial fibrosis using molecular hydrogen by inhibiting the TGF-β signaling pathway in spontaneous hypertensive rats. Am J Hypertens. 2021 doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpab159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rosenbloom J, Ren S, Macarak E. New frontiers in fibrotic disease therapies: the focus of the Joan and Joel Rosenbloom Center for Fibrotic Diseases at Thomas Jefferson University. Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology. 2016;51:14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2016.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hu HH, Chen DQ, Wang YN, et al. New insights into TGF-β/Smad signaling in tissue fibrosis. Chem Biol Interact. 2018;292:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2018.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Akhurst RJ, Hata A. Targeting the TGFβ signalling pathway in disease. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2012;11(10):790–811. doi: 10.1038/nrd3810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Eser P, Jänne PA. TGFβ pathway inhibition in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;184:112–130. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Nickel J, Ten Dijke P, Mueller TD. TGF-β family co-receptor function and signaling. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. 2018;50(1):12–36. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmx126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Derynck R, Budi EH. Specificity, versatility, and control of TGF-beta family signaling. Sci Signal. 2019;12(570). 10.1126/scisignal.aav5183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 63.Xu F, Liu C, Zhou D, et al. TGF-β/SMAD pathway and its regulation in hepatic fibrosis. The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society. 2016;64(3):157–167. doi: 10.1369/0022155415627681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Dickson MC, Martin JS, Cousins FM, et al. Defective haematopoiesis and vasculogenesis in transforming growth factor-beta 1 knock out mice. Development (Cambridge, England) 1995;121(6):1845–1854. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.6.1845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sanford LP, Ormsby I, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, et al. TGFbeta2 knockout mice have multiple developmental defects that are non-overlapping with other TGFbeta knockout phenotypes. Development (Cambridge, England) 1997;124(13):2659–2670. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.13.2659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kaartinen V, Voncken JW, Shuler C, et al. Abnormal lung development and cleft palate in mice lacking TGF-beta 3 indicates defects of epithelial-mesenchymal interaction. Nat Genet. 1995;11(4):415–421. doi: 10.1038/ng1295-415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lichtman MK, Otero-Vinas M, Falanga V. Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) isoforms in wound healing and fibrosis. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2016;24(2):215–222. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Peng C. The TGF-beta superfamily and its roles in the human ovary and placenta. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2003;25(10):834–44. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30674-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Chen W, Wahl SM. TGF-beta: receptors, signaling pathways and autoimmunity. Curr Dir Autoimmun. 2002;5:62–91. doi: 10.1159/000060548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Gatza CE, Oh SY, Blobe GC. Roles for the type III TGF-beta receptor in human cancer. Cell Signal. 2010;22(8):1163–1174. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Chaikuad A, Bullock AN. Structural basis of intracellular TGF-β signaling: receptors and Smads. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2016;8(11). 10.1101/cshperspect.a022111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 72.López-Casillas F, Cheifetz S, Doody J, et al. Structure and expression of the membrane proteoglycan betaglycan, a component of the TGF-beta receptor system. Cell. 1991;67(4):785–795. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90073-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Mendoza V, Vilchis-Landeros MM, Mendoza-Hernández G, et al. Betaglycan has two independent domains required for high affinity TGF-beta binding: proteolytic cleavage separates the domains and inactivates the neutralizing activity of the soluble receptor. Biochemistry. 2009;48(49):11755–11765. doi: 10.1021/bi901528w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Tazat K, Hector-Greene M, Blobe GC, et al. TβRIII independently binds type I and type II TGF-β receptors to inhibit TGF-β signaling. Mol Biol Cell. 2015;26(19):3535–3545. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E15-04-0203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Beck SE, Jung BH, Fiorino A, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein signaling and growth suppression in colon cancer. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;291(1):G135–G145. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00482.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.López-Casillas F, Wrana JL, Massagué J. Betaglycan presents ligand to the TGF beta signaling receptor. Cell. 1993;73(7):1435–1444. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90368-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lodyga M, Hinz B. TGF-β1 - a truly transforming growth factor in fibrosis and immunity. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2020;101:123–139. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Gómez-Gil V. Therapeutic implications of TGFβ in cancer treatment: a systematic review. Cancers. 2021;13(3). 10.3390/cancers13030379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 79.Robertson IB, Rifkin DB. Regulation of the bioavailability of TGF-β and TGF-β-related proteins. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology. 2016;8(6). 10.1101/cshperspect.a021907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 80.Neuzillet C, Tijeras-Raballand A, Cohen R, et al. Targeting the TGFβ pathway for cancer therapy. Pharmacol Ther. 2015;147:22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Buscemi L, Ramonet D, Klingberg F, et al. The single-molecule mechanics of the latent TGF-β1 complex. Current biology : CB. 2011;21(24):2046–2054. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Gray AM, Mason AJ. Requirement for activin A and transforming growth factor–beta 1 pro-regions in homodimer assembly. Science (New York, NY) 1990;247(4948):1328–1330. doi: 10.1126/science.2315700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Zhang YE. Mechanistic insight into contextual TGF-β signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2018;51:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2017.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Maeda S, Dean DD, Gomez R, et al. The first stage of transforming growth factor beta1 activation is release of the large latent complex from the extracellular matrix of growth plate chondrocytes by matrix vesicle stromelysin-1 (MMP-3) Calcif Tissue Int. 2002;70(1):54–65. doi: 10.1007/s002230010032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zhang D, Jin W, Wu R, et al. High glucose intake exacerbates autoimmunity through reactive-oxygen-species-mediated TGF-β cytokine activation. Immunity. 2019;51(4):671–81.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kottmann RM, Kulkarni AA, Smolnycki KA, et al. Lactic acid is elevated in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and induces myofibroblast differentiation via pH-dependent activation of transforming growth factor-β. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(8):740–751. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201201-0084OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Lin L, Gong H, Li R, et al. Nanodrug with ROS and pH dual-sensitivity ameliorates liver fibrosis via multicellular regulation. Advanced Science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) 2020;7(7):1903138. doi: 10.1002/advs.201903138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Muraoka RS, Dumont N, Ritter CA, et al. Blockade of TGF-β inhibits mammary tumor cell viability, migration, and metastases. J Clin Investig. 2002;109(12):1551–1559. doi: 10.1172/jci200215234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Carthy JM. TGFβ signaling and the control of myofibroblast differentiation: implications for chronic inflammatory disorders. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233(1):98–106. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Samarakoon R, Overstreet JM, Higgins PJ. TGF-β signaling in tissue fibrosis: redox controls, target genes and therapeutic opportunities. Cell Signal. 2013;25(1):264–268. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Piersma B, Bank RA, Boersema M. Signaling in fibrosis: TGF-β, WNT, and YAP/TAZ converge. Front Med. 2015;2:59. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2015.00059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Bertero A, Brown S, Madrigal P, et al. The SMAD2/3 interactome reveals that TGFβ controls m(6)A mRNA methylation in pluripotency. Nature. 2018;555(7695):256–259. doi: 10.1038/nature25784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Luo K. Signaling cross talk between TGF-β/Smad and other signaling pathways. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology. 2017;9(1). 10.1101/cshperspect.a022137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 94.Zhang YE. Non-Smad pathways in TGF-beta signaling. Cell Res. 2009;19(1):128–139. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wenner CE, Yan S. Biphasic role of TGF-beta1 in signal transduction and crosstalk. J Cell Physiol. 2003;196(1):42–50. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Atfi A, Djelloul S, Chastre E, et al. Evidence for a role of Rho-like GTPases and stress-activated protein kinase/c-Jun N-terminal kinase (SAPK/JNK) in transforming growth factor beta-mediated signaling. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(3):1429–1432. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.3.1429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Batlle E, Massagué J. Transforming growth factor-β signaling in immunity and cancer. Immunity. 2019;50(4):924–40. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Hsu HS, Liu CC, Lin JH, et al. Involvement of ER stress, PI3K/AKT activation, and lung fibroblast proliferation in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14272. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14612-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Shah D, Mital K. The role of trypsin:chymotrypsin in tissue repair. Adv Ther. 2018;35(1):31–42. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0648-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Xie N, Tan Z, Banerjee S, et al. Glycolytic reprogramming in myofibroblast differentiation and lung fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192(12):1462–1474. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201504-0780OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Park MJ, Moon SJ, Lee EJ, et al. IL-1-IL-17 signaling axis contributes to fibrosis and inflammation in two different murine models of systemic sclerosis. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1611. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Wilson MS, Madala SK, Ramalingam TR, et al. Bleomycin and IL-1beta-mediated pulmonary fibrosis is IL-17A dependent. J Exp Med. 2010;207(3):535–552. doi: 10.1084/jem.20092121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Meng F, Wang K, Aoyama T, et al. Interleukin-17 signaling in inflammatory, Kupffer cells, and hepatic stellate cells exacerbates liver fibrosis in mice. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(3):765–76.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Bai L, Bernard K, Tang X, et al. Glutaminolysis epigenetically regulates antiapoptotic gene expression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis fibroblasts. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2019;60(1):49–57. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2018-0180OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Ge J, Cui H, Xie N, et al. Glutaminolysis promotes collagen translation and stability via α-ketoglutarate-mediated mTOR activation and proline hydroxylation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2018;58(3):378–390. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2017-0238OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Cui H, Xie N, Jiang D, et al. Inhibition of glutaminase 1 attenuates experimental pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2019;61(4):492–500. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2019-0051OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Zi Z. Molecular engineering of the TGF-β signaling pathway. J Mol Biol. 2019;431(15):2644–2654. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Marrone G, Shah VH, Gracia-Sancho J. Sinusoidal communication in liver fibrosis and regeneration. J Hepatol. 2016;65(3):608–617. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.04.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Meyer A, Wang W, Qu J, et al. Platelet TGF-β1 contributions to plasma TGF-β1, cardiac fibrosis, and systolic dysfunction in a mouse model of pressure overload. Blood. 2012;119(4):1064–1074. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-09-377648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Celada LJ, Kropski JA, Herazo-Maya JD, et al. PD-1 up-regulation on CD4(+) T cells promotes pulmonary fibrosis through STAT3-mediated IL-17A and TGF-β1 production. Science translational medicine. 2018;10(460). 10.1126/scitranslmed.aar8356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 111.Nevers T, Salvador AM, Velazquez F, et al. Th1 effector T cells selectively orchestrate cardiac fibrosis in nonischemic heart failure. J Exp Med. 2017;214(11):3311–3329. doi: 10.1084/jem.20161791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Gordon JR, Galli SJ. Promotion of mouse fibroblast collagen gene expression by mast cells stimulated via the Fc epsilon RI. Role for mast cell-derived transforming growth factor beta and tumor necrosis factor alpha. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 1994;180(6):2027–37. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.6.2027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Young LR, Gulleman PM, Short CW, et al. Epithelial-macrophage interactions determine pulmonary fibrosis susceptibility in Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome. JCI insight. 2016;1(17):e88947. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.88947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Juban G, Saclier M, Yacoub-Youssef H, et al. AMPK activation regulates LTBP4-dependent TGF-β1 secretion by pro-inflammatory macrophages and controls fibrosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Cell Rep. 2018;25(8):2163–76.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Klinkhammer BM, Floege J, Boor P. PDGF in organ fibrosis. Mol Aspects Med. 2018;62:44–62. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2017.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Shah M, Foreman DM, Ferguson MW. Neutralising antibody to TGF-beta 1,2 reduces cutaneous scarring in adult rodents. J Cell Sci. 1994;107(Pt 5):1137–1157. doi: 10.1242/jcs.107.5.1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Cordeiro MF, Mead A, Ali RR, et al. Novel antisense oligonucleotides targeting TGF-beta inhibit in vivo scarring and improve surgical outcome. Gene Ther. 2003;10(1):59–71. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Leask A. Potential therapeutic targets for cardiac fibrosis: TGFbeta, angiotensin, endothelin, CCN2, and PDGF, partners in fibroblast activation. Circ Res. 2010;106(11):1675–1680. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.110.217737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Martin CJ, Datta A, Littlefield C, et al. Selective inhibition of TGFβ1 activation overcomes primary resistance to checkpoint blockade therapy by altering tumor immune landscape. Science translational medicine. 2020;12(536). 10.1126/scitranslmed.aay8456 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 120.de Streel G, Bertrand C, Chalon N, et al. Selective inhibition of TGF-β1 produced by GARP-expressing Tregs overcomes resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in cancer. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4545. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17811-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Cully M. TGFβ1-specific antibody spurs anti-tumour immunity. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2020;19(5):310. doi: 10.1038/d41573-020-00058-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Tremblay D, Mascarenhas J. Next Generation therapeutics for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Cells. 2021;10(5). 10.3390/cells10051034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 123.Varricchio L, Iancu-Rubin C, Upadhyaya B, et al. TGF-β1 protein trap AVID200 beneficially affects hematopoiesis and bone marrow fibrosis in myelofibrosis. JCI insight. 2021;6(18). 10.1172/jci.insight.145651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 124.Kim BG, Malek E, Choi SH, et al. Novel therapies emerging in oncology to target the TGF-β pathway. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01053-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Ding Y, Xiao L, Chen R, et al. Efficacy and safety of inhaled anti-fibrotic peptide HTPEP-001 in rat models. A64 THERAPEUTICS, DRUG DELIVERY, AND TISSUE ENGINEERING. p. A2286-A. 10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2020.201.1_MeetingAbstracts.A2286
  • 126.Roy A, Bera S. CAF cellular glycolysis: linking cancer cells with the microenvironment. Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine. 2016;37(7):8503–8514. doi: 10.1007/s13277-016-5049-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Walshe TE. TGF-beta and microvessel homeostasis. Microvasc Res. 2010;80(1):166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2010.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Morikawa M, Derynck R, Miyazono K. TGF-β and the TGF-β family: context-dependent roles in cell and tissue physiology. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology. 2016;8(5). 10.1101/cshperspect.a021873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 129.Dewidar B, Meyer C, Dooley S, et al. TGF-β in hepatic stellate cell activation and liver fibrogenesis-updated 2019. Cells. 2019;8(11). 10.3390/cells8111419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 130.Sathiyamoorthy G, Sehgal S, Ashton RW. Pirfenidone and nintedanib for treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Southern Med J. 2017;110(6):393–398. 10.14423/smj.0000000000000655 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 131.Lan Y, Zhang D, Xu C, et al. Enhanced preclinical antitumor activity of M7824, a bifunctional fusion protein simultaneously targeting PD-L1 and TGF-β. Sci Translat Med. 2018;10(424). 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan5488 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 132.Strauss J, Heery CR, Schlom J, et al. Phase I trial of M7824 (MSB0011359C), a bifunctional fusion protein targeting PD-L1 and TGFβ, in advanced solid tumors. Clinical Cancer Research. 2018;24(6):1287–1295. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-17-2653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Knudson KM, Hicks KC, Luo X, et al. M7824, a novel bifunctional anti-PD-L1/TGFβ trap fusion protein, promotes anti-tumor efficacy as monotherapy and in combination with vaccine. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7(5):e1426519. doi: 10.1080/2162402x.2018.1426519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunologic Research are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES