Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2022 Feb 27;45(4):1419–1429. doi: 10.1007/s10753-022-01637-w

Lactylation: a Passing Fad or the Future of Posttranslational Modification

Qi Xin 1,#, Hai Wang 1,#, Qinglin Li 1, Sinan Liu 1, Kai Qu 1,, Chang Liu 1,2,, Jingyao Zhang 1,2,
PMCID: PMC9197907  PMID: 35224683

Abstract

Lactate is a glycolytic product and a significant energy source. Moreover, it regulates gene transcription via lactylation of histones and non-histone proteins, i.e., a novel posttranslational modification. This review summarizes recent advances related to lactylation in lactate metabolism and diseases. Notably, lactylation plays a vital role in cancer, inflammation, and regeneration; however, the specific mechanism remains unclear. Histone lactylation regulates oncogenic processes by targeting gene transcription and inflammation via macrophage activation. Eventually, we identified research gaps and recommended several primary directions for further studies.

Key Words: lactylation, lactate, posttranslational modification, gene transcription, cancer, inflammation

INTRODUCTION

Lactate formation due to hypoxia was first recognized in the nineteenth century [1]. Recent studies indicate that lactate is a significant energy source and major gluconeogenic precursor during metabolism and a signaling molecule [2]. Herein, we summarize recent advances in lactate metabolism and lactylation of histones and non-histone proteins.

Lactate Production with Warburg Effect

As a vital carbon metabolite produced during glycolysis, lactate has been extensively investigated due to the Warburg effect of aerobic glycolysis in cancer. Of note, cancer cells produce lactate and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) via glycolysis even under completely aerobic conditions, a phenomenon termed the Warburg effect [3, 4]. Accumulating studies show that the Warburg effect increases the rate of lactate production and acidify the tumor microenvironment (TME) because of the defective mitochondria and impaired adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production; this benefits cell growth and survival [4]. Lactate is predominantly cleared by the liver through gluconeogenesis (the Cori cycle) and ATP production (oxidative phosphorylation, the Krebs cycle). As a chiral compound, lactate has two enantiomers, i.e., L-lactate and D-lactate. L-lactate is a primary product of glycolysis in mammals and is continuously used in various cells, tissues, and organs. In contrast, D-lactate, primarily produced by glyoxalase to metabolize methylglyoxal, is an atypical mammalian metabolite with low concentration at the nanomolar level in normal cells. Carlos et al. revealed that L-lactate but not D-lactate is used in histone lysine lactylation (Kla) [5].

Lactate Shuttles via MCTs

Accumulation of lactate in the extracellular fluid causes the loss of bicarbonate anions (HCO3-) and the gain of lactate anions (C3H5O3-), which in turn induces lactic acidosis and aggravates sepsis [68]. Moreover, lactate shuttles include both intracellular and cell–cell shuttles, which regulate energy delivery and communication. The intracellular lactate shuttles include the cytosol-mitochondrial and cytosol-peroxisome shuttles, whereas the cell–cell lactate shuttles include lactate exchange between white (glycolytic) and red (oxidative) fibers within a muscle bed and between skeletal muscle and organs [2]. Lactate shuttles are mediated by concentration gradients, pH gradients, and redox states. Lactate is transported across the plasma membrane by several monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs), mainly MCT1 and MCT4 [9]. The primary physiological function of MCT1 is lactate importation, while that of MCT4 is lactate exportation. Additionally, the direction of lactate transfer in vivo by MCTs depends on lactate and proton concentration gradients [10]. Therefore, lactate importation into the cell is stimulated by reducing both intracellular lactate concentration and pH gradients. CD147, a cochaperone of MCTs, promotes proper expression and localization of MCT1 and MCT4 at the cell surface [2, 9]. Studies indicate that besides lactate, butyrate, and testosterone, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) stimulate MCT1 promoter activity [11]. The presence of MCT1, CD147, and LDH in mitochondria promotes lactate importation and oxidation in the mitochondrial reticulum as well as supports the presence of a mitochondrial lactate oxidation complex[12].

Lactate Receptor Including GPR81

Moreover, the lactate receptor GPR81, a G protein-coupled receptor regulates the trafficking of lactate between the plasma membrane and intracellular compartment, which suppresses cAMP and protein kinase A (PKA)-mediated signaling to inhibit lipolysis primarily in adipocytes [9]. GPR81 is activated to quickly respond to high plasma lactate during intense exercise. Nonetheless, physiological concentrations of lactate are sufficient to activate GPR81 [9, 13]. Madaan et al. revealed that lactate attenuates inflammation and ensuing preterm birth during labor by activating GPR81 in the uterus [14]. Moreover, cancer cell–generated lactate activates GPR81 to promote angiogenesis, immune evasion, and chemoresistance in tumors, thereby promoting the potential development of novel anticancer therapeutics [15]. Although it remains unclear whether GPR81 is expressed on the mitochondrial membrane, GPR81 knockdown causes a significant reduction in mitochondrial activity and a significant increase in cell death [15]. Lactate is transported across the cell nuclear membrane through simple diffusion and regulated by lactate concentration gradients.

Histone Modifications

Histones are unique compounds comprising proteins (called the nucleosome core) and DNA in chromatin; their various posttranslational modifications (PTMs) regulate gene expression. Classical PTMs, including acetylation, malonylation, and succinylation, disrupt the spatial structure of proteins to regulate numerous processes in cellular physiology and biochemistry. Malonylation is an evolutionarily conserved post-translational modification (PTM) promoted by malonyl-CoA to add a malonyl group to lysine residues and change its charge from + 1 to –1 [16]. SIRT5 regulates malonylation as a demalonylase and removes succinylation and glutarylation [17, 18]. Moreover, GAPDH and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) undergo malonylation during macrophage activation, which regulates the production of proinflammatory cytokines [19]. Succinate accumulation promotes succinylation, which transfers a succinyl-CoA moiety to a lysine residue. In LPS-activated macrophages, succinylation of pyruvate kinase 2 at lysine residue K311 impairs glycolytic activity and induces nuclear translocation, where it promotes the transcription of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-dependent genes and produces IL-1β [18, 20]. Different PTMs mediating glycometabolism is shown in Table 1. Histone lactylation is a novel form of PTM; lactate was first discovered by Zhang et al. as a signaling molecule that stimulates gene transcription via histone lysine lactylation in M1 macrophages [21] (Fig. 1). Also, Zhang et al. demonstrated that modulation of intracellular lactate production affects histone Kla levels in a dose-dependent manner; besides, they detected 13C-labeled atoms on histones by isotopically tracing the labeled glucose. Therefore, histone lactylation is a product of glycolysis and is regulated by lactate. Furthermore, intracellular metabolic perturbations are associated with the capacities of an epigenetic writer and eraser enzymes, which are regulated by histone acetylation and lactylation [4].

Table 1.

PTMs in Glycometabolism

PTM Metabolite Residue modified Protein targets Function References
Lactylation Lactyl CoA Lysine Histones Promotes M2-like polarization in M1 macrophages [21]
HMGB1 Induces vascular endothelial cell injury [22]
Acetylation Acetyl CoA Lysine Histones cGAS Prevents self-DNA induced autoimmunity [23]
NLRP3 Activates macrophages [24]
GAPDH Drives glycolysis and boosts rapid memory CD8+ T cell response [25]
HMGB1 Induces vascular endothelial cell injury [22]
Malonylation Malonyl CoA Lysine GAPDH Controls the production of proinflammatory cytokines [16]
mTOR Controls the production of proinflammatory cytokines [26]
Succinylation Succinyl CoA Lysine PKM2 Promotes the transcription of HIF-dependent genes and produces IL-1β [18, 20]

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Lactate acts as a signaling molecule to stimulate gene transcription via histone lysine lactylation in M1 macrophages. Tumors, infection, ischemia, or reperfusion promote the movement of lactate into macrophages. Moreover, HIFs stimulate an increase of lactate by upregulating glycolysis and suppressing the Krebs cycle under hypoxic conditions. Nonetheless, lactyl-CoA synthetase or transferase activating lactate to lactyl-CoA remains unconfirmed. Microbiota contains enzymatic machinery that might convert lactate to lactyl-CoA with the help of lactyl-CoA synthetase. In return, lactyl-CoA stimulates histone Kla at the promoter DNA sequence, regulated by writer, eraser, and reader enzymes. Besides the enzyme-dependent transfer of the lactyl group from lactyl-CoA to lysine residues, non-enzymatic lactyl group transfer from LGSH to protein lysine residues generate a “LactoylLys” modification of proteins. Histone Kla is high in gene promoter regions for upregulating gene transcription, thereby promoting homeostatic M2-like polarization in M1 macrophages.

Non-enzymatic Lysine Lactylation

In addition to the enzyme-dependent transfer of lactyl group from lactyl coenzyme A (lactyl-CoA) to lysine residues, lysine acylation derived from the non-enzymatic reaction with lactoylglutathione (LGSH) has been demonstrated [27, 28]. Methylglyoxal, a glycolytic by-product, binds to glutathione via thioesterase glyoxalase I (GLO1) and generate LGSH, which is hydrolyzed to glutathione and D-lactate by GLO2. Gaffney et al. recently found that a non-enzymatic lactyl group transfer from LGSH to protein lysine residues generates a “LactoylLys” modification in proteins, which can be inhibited by GLO2 and regulate glycolytic in return [27]. Moreover, in mitochondrial proteins, non-enzymatic lysine acetylation by acetyl-CoA and acetylglutathione is promoted via a proximal S-acetylated thiol intermediate, which can be inhibited by GLO2 [29].

Lactyl-CoA in Physiological and Pathological Conditions

Enzymatic lysine lactylation depends on both the presence of lysine acetyltransferase (KAT) enzymatic P300 and lactyl-CoA [21]. Nevertheless, a lactyl-CoA synthetase or transferase that activates lactate to lactyl-CoA in mammalian biochemistry has not been confirmed. Varner et al. recently showed that lactyl-CoA is quantifiable at 0.011 pmol 10–6 cells in HepG2 cells and 0.0172 pmol mg-1 tissue wet weight in the mouse heart; this is significantly less abundant (27–335 times lower) than other actyl-CoAs, including acetyl-, succinyl-, and propionyl-CoA [28]. Thus, a lower abundance of lactyl-CoA might limit the enzymatic lysine lactylation rate more than the KAT enzymatic P300. The modulation of lactyl-CoA under several important physiological conditions, including cancer and immune cell activation, makes lactylation an exciting signaling link between metabolism and cell signaling; however, additional research into its biochemistry and physiological roles are necessary [30, 31]. Microbiota such as Escherichia coli contains enzymatic machinery that may convert lactate to lactyl-CoA with the help of lactyl-CoA synthetase [32]. Zhang et al. found five efficient lactate CoA-transferases and a selective basis for the conversion of lactate into lactyl-CoA from Clostridium propionicum and Megasphaera elsdenii, which are important for regulating physiological and/or pathological conditions [33]. In the TME, the availability of lactyl-CoA may be linked to the nature of microbiotas equipped with lactyl-CoA synthetase [32]. Additionally, dysbacteriosis may promote lactyl-CoA production, which subsequently causes M2 macrophage polarization in sepsis [21]. Therefore, lactate and lactyl-CoA may shuttle between cancer cells, microbiota, and immune cells. Increased lactate production drives malignant cells toward excessive biomass production to fuel uncontrolled cell growth, a phenomenon known as the Warburg effect. Lactyl-CoA and acetyl-CoA levels potentially reflect histone lactylation and acetylation levels, the ratio of which marks the outlet of pyruvate and determines cell fate toward malignancy [34].

Upstream and Downstream Mechanisms of Histone Lactylation

Since it was first discovered by Vidali et al. in the 1960s, lysine acetylation (Kac) is an important modification of chromatin structure and modulator of gene transcription through histone regulation [35]. HIFs regulate various physiological processes by targeting transcription and translation during hypoxia, characterized by lactate production [36]. Under hypoxic conditions, HIFs stimulate the increase of lactate by upregulating glycolysis and suppressing the citric acid cycle [36]. However, whether HIFs also undergo lactylation under hypoxic conditions remains to be uncovered. Previous studies indicate that the acetylation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) by ARD1 improves the interaction of HIF-1α with von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene product (pVHL) and HIF-1α ubiquitination, which destabilize HIF-1α via proteasomal degradation [37]. Under normoxic conditions, HIF-1α binds to pVHL via hydroxylation of prolines. During hypoxia, HIF-1α phosphorylation triggers HIF-1 activation. Nevertheless, whether HIF-1α lactylation would induce destabilization remains unclear. Homeostasis of HIF-1α is regulated by these PTMs, including lactylation, acetylation, hydroxylation, ubiquitination, and phosphorylation. Lactylation might coordinate with other PTMs to maintain the homeostasis of HIF-1α. Zhang et al. identified 26 and 16 histone Kla sites in human HeLa cells and mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs), respectively [21]. Furthermore, Gao et al. identified 273 Kla sites in 166 proteins by analyzing the global lysine lactylome using LC–MS/MS [38]. Hagihara et al. identified 63 lactylated proteins in the mouse brain and noted that increased lactate levels, induced by neural excitation and social defeat stress, promote histone Kla in brain cells [39]. Accumulating studies indicate that acetylation and lactylation also exist in diverse non-histone proteins [38, 40]. Nonetheless, the modified function of non-histone lactylation, including modulating gene transcription, DNA damage repair, cell division, signal transduction, protein folding, autophagy, and metabolism, needs further research. Yang et al. recently demonstrated that lactate promotes lactylation and acetylation of high mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1), and its release from macrophages via exosomes to induce vascular endothelial cell injury and aggravate sepsis [22].

However, the enzymes producing lactyl-CoA and mechanisms by which histone Kla is regulated by writer, eraser, and reader enzymes remain to be studied. Carlos et al. revealed that class I histone deacetylases (HDAC1‒3) are histone lysine delactylases in vivo [5]. Lactylation and delactylation influence various physiological and pathological processes via epigenetic regulation and other mechanisms. For instance, lysine lactylation (Kla) is high in gene promoter regions, which promotes the binding of related transcription factors and gene promoters to upregulate gene transcription. Moreover, these metabolite PTMs, regulated by lactylation and delactylation influence protein function by targeting protein localization, conformation, stability, or interactions with other proteins or by competing with other PTMs [26]. Using M1 macrophages, Zhang et al. demonstrated that histone lactylation has different temporal dynamics from acetylation [21]. Histone Kac reached a peak at 3 h and a steady-state at 6 h, whereas histone Kla increased over a 24-h period [21]. ChIP-seq data obtained by Zhang et al. revealed that increased H3K18la marked more genes than decreased H3K18la, whereas H3K18ac was reversed [21]. In addition, most genes marked by increased H3K18la were specific, because 68% of these genes did not display significantly increased H3K18ac [21]. However, H3K18ac-specific genes remain to be identified [21]. Gene Ontology analysis revealed that these H3K18la-specific genes are enriched in biological pathway independent of inflammation, including Arginase 1 (ARG1) [21]. Additionally, a positive correlation has been observed between ARG1 expression and histone Kla levels, but not histone Kac levels in tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) [21]. Lactate metabolism and epigenetic reprogramming are a result of maintaining cellular homeostasis and inducing cancer cells to acquire various behaviors, including progression and invasiveness. The involvement of lactylation in different diseases is illustrated in Table 2.

Table 2.

Lactylation in Diseases

Disease Enzyme regulation Histone modification Cell proliferation Protein targets Gene targets References
SCC SIRT6 TPCs GSH [41]
Ocular melanoma Lysine YTHDF2 m6A [42]
Lung fibrosis Lysine Macrophage [43]

It has been demonstrated that glycolysis can proliferate TPCs in SCC. However, the mechanism of lactylation in SCC is unclear

The Function of Histone Lactylation in Cancer

Dysregulation of histone Kla by lactate disrupts the balance of gene transcription and causes diseases including cancer. Choi et al. recently discovered that the absence of NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase sirtuin 6 (SIRT6) enriches tumor-propagating cells (TPCs) by improving lactate production, in turn causing a much more aggressive tumorigenic phenotype in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) [41]. TPCs regulate survival, recurrence, metastasis, therapeutic resistance, and immune resistance in various malignant tumors. Therefore, a hypothesis that SIRT6 may regulate tumor proliferation by histone lactylation in TPCs warrants additional research. Another study demonstrated that histone Kla is essential in the oncogenic process. Yu et al. revealed that histone lactylation promotes tumorigenesis by facilitating the transcription of YTH N6-methyladenosine RNA-binding protein 2 (YTHDF2), which recognizes the m6A modification site in the mRNA of two tumor suppressor genes, PER1 and TP53, and promotes their degradation in ocular melanoma [42]. For example, a consistently increased population of lactic acid bacteria in gastric cancer patients demonstrates that these bacteria potentially promote gastric cancer by supplying lactate and lactylation may be implicated in this process [44]. Moreover, tumor-related lactate induces robust production of alpha-ketoglutarate and is eventually associated with widespread epigenomic reprogramming in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [45].

Stem Cell Regulation in Histone Lactylation

Lactate and histone lactylation significantly improve the survival, self-renewal, and reprogramming capacity of stem cells. High serum lactate dehydrogenase activating lactate to pyruvic acid, could be considered a predictor of poor patient survival in pre-and post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [46]. Moreover, increasing evidence indicates that hypoxic preconditioning improves the survival of stem cells [47, 48]. Yang et al. revealed that leptin improves mitochondrial fusion-mediated glycolysis via sodium-glucose symporter 1-activated optic atrophy 1 to promote the survival of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) [47]. Lee et al. further discovered that microbiota-derived lactate stimulates stem cell factor secretion by leptin receptor-expressing MSCs and subsequently activates hematopoiesis and erythropoiesis [49]. C-terminal binding proteins (CTBPs) are glycolytic sensors linking changes in metabolism to gene expression via NADH [48, 50]. CTBP dimerization promotes OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG expression to regulate the self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) [48]. Arthur et al. found that glycolysis regulates hESC self-renewal and CTBPs by modulating HIF-2α expression [48]. Recent studies indicate that glycolysis promotes stem cell-like properties in cancer cells. For instance, Yang et al. showed that the glycolytic enzyme enolase 1 could stimulate the stemness of gastric cancer cells to increase self-renewal, invasion, migration, and chemoresistance by enhancing glycolysis [51]. Also, Mamouni et al. found that the scaffold protein β-arrestin1 regulates the metabolic preference of stem cell-like bladder cancer cells toward glycolysis by inhibiting the mitochondrial pyruvate carrier MPC1 and promoting glucose transporter GLUT1 [52]. Histone lactylation and acetylation are vital processes linking metabolism and epigenetics. Gli-like transcription factor 1 upregulates glycolysis by opening glycolytic genes and closing somatic genes, which produce more lactate and acetyl-CoA [53]. Subsequently, improved acetylation and lactylation facilitate cellular reprogramming, which induces senescence in pluripotent stem cells [53].

Histone Lactylation Protects Against Inflammation and Promotes Tumor Growth via Macrophages

Macrophages protect against inflammation by remodeling tissue and removing cellular debris. They are divided into two subtypes, i.e., proinflammatory (termed M1) and anti-inflammatory (termed M2). Lactate directly inhibits signaling pathways and modifies histones to suppress inflammatory macrophage activation and promotes homeostatic M2-like polarization via several mechanisms at several subcellular locations [21, 54]. Different histone modifications implicated in the regulation of macrophage activation are shown in Table 3 [55]. Methylation and demethylation occur on the lysine and arginine residues of histones to regulate gene transcription, catalyzed primarily by lysine-specific demethylases and Jumonji C (JmjC) domain containing demethylases family demethylases [62]. Interferons (IFNs) significantly increase the host immunity for viral clearance and cancer immune surveillance. Moreover, lactate inhibits RLR signaling by binding the mitochondrial antiviral-signaling protein (MAVS) transmembrane domain and preventing MAVS aggregation, thereby promoting homeostatic macrophage polarization by indirectly suppressing type I IFN production [54, 63]. Macrophages detect bacterial pathogens through Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which induce early inflammation and pathogen elimination. Irizarry-Caro et al. recently demonstrated that the TLR signaling adapter B-cell adapter for PI3K (BCAP) inactivates glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) and forkhead box protein O1 (FOXO1) and regulates the transition of macrophages from the inflammatory to the reparatory phenotype by promoting histone lactylation [64]. Zhang et al. discovered that histone Kla via the potential histone Kla writer protein p300 promotes the expression of M2-like genes in the late phase of M1 macrophage polarization after an inflammatory response to repair collateral damage [21]. Lactate-induced histone lactylation mediated by P300 promotes the expression of many profibrotic genes by macrophages in the lungs [43].

Table 3.

Histone Modifications in the Regulation of Macrophage Activation

Histone modification Function Protein References
Acetylation Promotes M2 gene activation P300 [56]
Deacetylation Promotes M2 macrophage polarization HDAC3 [57]
Deacetylation Promotes insulin resistance via M1 macrophage polarization SIRT6 [58]
Demethylation Promotes M2 polarization via regulation of IRF4 JMJD3 [59]
Demethylation Enhances M2 polarization JMJD3 [60]
Demethylation Induces M2 polarization in microglia through TrkA activation JMJD3 [61]
Lactylation Promotes homeostatic M2-like polarization P300 [21]

Accumulating studies indicate that TAMs increase tumor progression in the highly lactate TME. Tumor-cell-derived lactate triggers the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, Arg1, and the M2-like polarization of TAMs, mediated by HIF-1α, and promotes tumor growth [65]. Moreover, Liu et al. found that tumor-cell-derived lactate actively downregulates the expression of the macrophage lysosomal gene V-type proton ATPase subunit d2 (ATP6V0D2) via mTOR-dependent inhibition of TFEB, which subsequently targets HIF-2α for lysosome-mediated degradation [66]. The lactate-ATP6V0D2-HIF-2α axis causes improved tumor vascularization and growth [66]. Macrophages are crucial to various immune responses and are immunoregulatory cells within the tumor. Bohn et al. found an immune evasion mechanism where lactate-derived acidification causes macrophage G protein-coupled receptor-dependent expression of the transcriptional repressor ICER, which promotes TAM polarization toward a non-inflammatory phenotype and generates a permissive TME [67].

Additional studies on histone Kla are necessary to discover novel therapeutic targets and strategies for inflammation and tumors. Also, whether lactylation/acetylation/methylation ratio between different diseases or disease processes influence the prognosis remains unclear.

UNSOLVED AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Lactate accumulating during metabolic processes is used as a precursor for histone Kla and participates in the regulation of M1 macrophage homeostasis, which in turn regulates inflammation, cancer, and other diseases. Nonetheless, these findings have raised many questions, and additional details warrant further research.

General Questions

Zhang et al. reported that histone lactylation is cause by lactate accumulation and is sensitive to lactate levels [21]. However, whether histone lactylation is a necessary consequence of lactate accumulation, or a result of lactate analogs remains unclear. It remains unclear whether lactate concentration in the nucleus causes histone lactylation. Moreover, succination occurs at cysteine residues, and palmitoylation occurs at threonine residues [19]. It is also unclear whether lactylation occurs at amino acid residues other than lysine. Lactate is continuously produced in all types of cells in the body. Nonetheless, whether lactylation can be constitutively utilized in diverse cells, tissues, and organs in addition to under pathological conditions remains puzzling.

Lactylation and Delactylation

Studies demonstrate that the nuclear receptor Nur77 promotes signal transducer and activates transcription (STAT3) acetylation by recruiting P300 and reducing HDAC1 expression to improve the transcriptional activity of STAT3 via Nε acetylation [69]. In the nucleus, the transcriptional activity of STAT3 is inhibited by the interaction of lysyl oxidase-like 3 with STAT3 to deacetylate multiple acetyllysine sites [70]. Whether there is a specific writer or eraser for lactylation remains unclear. The factors influencing lactylation and delactylation may be regulated by the expression of P300, HDAC1, and lysyl oxidase-like 3. However, it remains unclear whether P300 catalyzes the transfer of lactyl from lactyl-CoA to histones in vivo.

Lactylation in Gene Transcription

Acetylation causes chromatin decondensation, allowing access of transcription factors and other transcriptional coactivators to regions of gene transcription [68]. Histone acetylation neutralizes the positive charge of lysine residues, inducing chromatin remodeling to facilitate DNA access by the transcriptional machinery [68, 71]. Histone acetylation regulates the functions of transcription factors by improving their stability and transcriptional activity [72]. Whether similar mechanisms exist for lactate remains unclear. Moreover, mechanisms by which the cytoplasm and nucleus communicate to respond to changes in PTMs remain unclear.

Lactylation in Treg Cells

Regulatory T (Treg) cells are vital in maintaining immune tolerance, controlling immune rejection, and preventing autoimmune diseases. Nonetheless, Treg cells help tumors evade the body immune surveillance and anticancer immunity. Accumulating studies indicate that lactate and glycolytic activity are essential regulators of Treg cell function in the tumor microenvironment [73, 74]. Tumors deprive effector T cells of nutrition to prevent destruction and provide lactate for Treg cells to resist effector T cells [73]. Zappasodi et al. demonstrated that glycolytic activity in tumors and Treg cells block cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), an immune checkpoint of Treg cells and that glycolysis-low tumors might be more sensitive than glycolysis-high tumors to anti-CTLA-4 treatment [74]. Therefore, the function of histone Kla in regulating Treg cells warrants further study and maybe an essential reference point in the future.

Drugs Targeting Histone Lactylation

Several drugs targeting histone PTMs have been clinically applied against various diseases and have achieved significant therapeutic effects. For instance, drugs decreasing histone methylation by inhibiting histone methyltransferases, those that decrease histone deacetylation by inhibiting HDACs, and the ones increasing histone crotonylation are beneficial to kidney injury [75]. Class I HDAC inhibitors (e.g., valproic acid) and activators influence many physiological processes mediated by lactylation and may be applied to treat diseases, similar to P300. Zhao et al. recently demonstrated that lactate promotes ferroptosis resistance in HCC tumor cells by activating the AMPK-SREBP1-SCD1 pathway, and whether lactylation that participates in this process remains unknown [76]. Taking control over the glycolytic switch from lactate production and lactylation to acetyl-CoA production and the TCA cycle may provide numerous opportunities to target cancer [34]. Therefore, comprehensive mechanisms of lactylation require additional research to identify more targets beneficial to drug research and development.

CONCLUSION

For future clinical applications, it is crucial to understand the function and regulatory mechanism of histone lactylation in physiological and pathological processes highly dependent on glycolysis and lactate; these include tumor development, ischemic heart and brain disease, immune cell activation, and metabolic demands of anaerobic exercise. Generally, the discovery of histone lactylation provides a reference point for additional studies, including research on the site-specific functions of protein lactate modifications and the use of anti-lactate antibodies combined with LC–MS/MS techniques to study histone lactylation. Besides, histone lactylation could be beneficial for the in-depth study of many diseases and their processes.

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to all individuals who participated in or helped with this research project.

Author Contribution

All authors wrote the manuscript. Xin Q. participated in the collecting and reviewing published articles, and writing of the paper, Wang H. participated in designing. They contributed equally to the paper. Li Q. L. participated in revision; Liu S. N. participated in drawing. Qu K., Liu C., and Zhang J. Y. provided substantial advice in designing the study, writing, and revising the paper.

Funding

This study was supported by funding from “the National Nature Science Foundation of China” (Grant No. 82072145).

Availability of Data and Materials

The data related to WB data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Declarations

Ethics Approval

The review was written in accordance with ethical standards.

Consent for Publication

All authors consent for publication.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Qi Xin and Hai Wang contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Kai Qu, Email: joanne8601@163.com.

Chang Liu, Email: liuchangdoctor@163.com.

Jingyao Zhang, Email: you12ouy@163.com.

References

  • 1.Brooks GA. Cell-cell and intracellular lactate shuttles. Journal of Physiology. 2009;587:5591–5600. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.178350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brooks, G.A. 2020. Lactate as a fulcrum of metabolism. Redox Biology 35:101454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 3.Warburg O, Wind F, Negelein E. The metabolism of tumors in the body. Journal of General Physiology. 1927;8:519–530. doi: 10.1085/jgp.8.6.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sharma NK, Pal JK. Metabolic ink lactate modulates epigenomic landscape: a concerted role of pro-tumor microenvironment and macroenvironment during carcinogenesis. Current Molecular Medicine. 2021;21:177–181. doi: 10.2174/1566524020666200521075252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Carlos, M.Y., Zhang, D., Wei, W., Michael, B., Gao, J.J., Alexander, L.N. et al. 2021. Class I histone deacetylases (HDAC1‒3) are histone lysine delactylases. bioRxiv. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 6.Kamel KS, Oh MS, Halperin ML. L-lactic acidosis: Pathophysiology, classification, and causes; emphasis on biochemical and metabolic basis. Kidney International. 2020;97:75–88. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Mulder PG, Rommes JH, Schieveld SJ, Bakker J. The prognostic value of blood lactate levels relative to that of vital signs in the pre-hospital setting: a pilot study. Critical Care. 2008;12:R160. doi: 10.1186/cc7159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kruse O, Grunnet N, Barfod C. Blood lactate as a predictor for in-hospital mortality in patients admitted acutely to hospital: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2011;19:74. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sun, S., Li, H., Chen, J., Qian, Q. 2017. Lactic acid: No longer an inert and end-product of glycolysis. Physiology (Bethesda) 32:453–463. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 10.Tasdogan A, Faubert B, Ramesh V, Ubellacker JM, Shen B, Solmonson A, et al. Metabolic heterogeneity confers differences in melanoma metastatic potential. Nature. 2020;577:115–120. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1847-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kennedy KM, Dewhirst MW. Tumor metabolism of lactate: The influence and therapeutic potential for MCT and CD147 regulation. Future Oncology. 2010;6:127–148. doi: 10.2217/fon.09.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hashimoto T, Hussien R, Brooks GA. 331 Colocalization of MCT1, CD147, and LDH in mitochondrial inner membrane of L6 muscle cells: Evidence of a mitochondrial lactate oxidation complex. American Journal of Physiology, Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2006;290:E1237–E1244. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00594.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liu C, Wu J, Zhu J, Kuei C, Yu J, Shelton J, et al. Lactate inhibits lipolysis in fat cells through activation of an orphan G-protein-coupled receptor, GPR81. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009;284:2811–2822. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806409200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Madaan A, Nadeau-Vallee M, Rivera JC, Obari D, Hou X, Sierra EM, et al. Lactate produced during labor modulates uterine inflammation via GPR81 (HCA1) American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017;216(60):e1–e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brown, T.P., Ganapathy, V. 2020. Lactate/GPR81 signaling and proton motive force in cancer: Role in angiogenesis, immune escape, nutrition, and Warburg phenomenon. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 206:107451. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16.Galvan-Pena S, Carroll RG, Newman C, Hinchy EC, Palsson-McDermott E, Robinson EK, et al. Malonylation of GAPDH is an inflammatory signal in macrophages. Nature Communications. 2019;10(1):338. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08187-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tan M, Peng C, Anderson KA, Chhoy P, Xie Z, Dai L, et al. Lysine glutarylation is a protein posttranslational modification regulated by SIRT5. Cell Metabolism. 2014;19(4):605–617. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang F, Wang K, Xu W, Zhao S, Ye D, Wang Y, et al. SIRT5 Desuccinylates and activates pyruvate kinase M2 to block macrophage IL-1beta production and to prevent DSS-induced colitis in mice. Cell Reports. 2017;19(11):2331–2344. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Diskin C, Ryan TAJ, O'Neill LAJ. Modification of proteins by metabolites in immunity. Immunity. 2021;54:19–31. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Palsson-McDermott EM, Curtis AM, Goel G, Lauterbach MA, Sheedy FJ, Gleeson LE, et al. Pyruvate kinase M2 regulates Hif-1alpha activity and IL-1beta induction and is a critical determinant of the warburg effect in LPS-activated macrophages. Cell Metabolism. 2015;21(1):65–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang D, Tang Z, Huang H, Zhou G, Cui C, Weng Y, et al. Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lactylation. Nature. 2019;574:575–580. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1678-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yang, K., Fan, M., Wang, X., Xu, J., Wang, Y., Tu, F. et al. 2021. Lactate promotes macrophage HMGB1 lactylation, acetylation, and exosomal release in polymicrobial sepsis. Cell Death & Differentiation. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 23.Dai, J., Huang, Y.J., He, X., Zhao, M., Wang, X., Liu, Z.S. et al. 2019. Acetylation blocks cGAS activity and inhibits Self-DNA-induced autoimmunity. Cell 176(6):1447–1460 e1414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.He, M., Chiang, H.H., Luo, H., Zheng, Z., Qiao, Q. et al. 2020. An acetylation switch of the NLRP3 inflammasome regulates aaging-associated chronic inflammation and insulin resistance. Cell Metabolism 31(3):580–591 e585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 25.Balmer ML, Ma EH, Bantug GR, Grahlert J, Pfister S, et al. Memory CD8(+) T cells require increased concentrations of acetate induced by stress for optimal function. Immunity. 2016;44(6):1312–1324. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Figlia G, Willnow P, Teleman AA. Metabolites regulate cell signaling and growth via covalent modification of proteins. Developmental Cell. 2020;54:156–170. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.06.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gaffney, D.O., Jennings, E.Q., Anderson, C.C., Marentette, J.O., Shi, T., Schou Oxvig, A.M. et al. Non-enzymatic lysine lactoylation of glycolytic enzymes. Cell Chemical Biology 27(2):206–213 e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 28.Varner, E.L., Trefely, S., Bartee, D., von Krusenstiern, E., Izzo, L., Bekeova, C. et al. 2020. Quantification of lactoyl-CoA (lactyl-CoA) by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry in mammalian cells and tissues. Open Biology 10(9):200187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.James AM, Hoogewijs K, Logan A, Hall AR, Ding S, Fearnley IM, et al. Non-enzymatic N-acetylation of lysine residues by acetylCoA often occurs via a proximal S-acetylated thiol intermediate sensitive to glyoxalase II. Cell Reports. 2017;18(9):2105–2112. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Izzo LT, Wellen KE. Histone lactylation links metabolism and gene regulation. Nature. 2019;574(7779):492–493. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03122-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Trefely, S., Lovell, C.D., Snyder, N.W., Wellen, K.E. 2020. Compartmentalised acyl-CoA metabolism and roles in chromatin regulation. Molecular Metabolism 38:100941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 32.Rushikesh, Patel., Ajay Kumar, Kiran Bharat Lokhande, K.V. Swamy, Jayanta K. Pal, Nilesh Kumar Sharma. 2020. Molecular docking and simulation studies predict lactyl-CoA as the substrate for P300 directed lactylation. Biological and Medicinal Chemistry. 10.26434/chemrxiv.12770360.v1
  • 33.Zhang X, Mao Y, Wang B, Cui Z, Zhang Z, Wang Z, et al. Screening, expression, purification and characterization of CoA-transferases for lactoyl-CoA generation. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2019;46(7):899–909. doi: 10.1007/s10295-019-02174-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dai, X., Lv, X., Thompson, E.W., Ostrikov, K.K. 2021. Histone lactylation: Epigenetic mark of glycolytic switch. Trends in Genetics. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 35.Vidali, G., Gershey, E.L., Allfrey, V.G. 1968. Chemical studies of histone acetylation. The distribution of epsilon-N-acetyllysine in calf thymus histones. Journal of Biological Chemistry 243:6361–6366. [PubMed]
  • 36.Cassavaugh J, Lounsbury KM. Hypoxia-mediated biological control. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 2011;112:735–744. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jeong JW, Bae MK, Ahn MY, et al. Regulation and destabilization of HIF-1alpha by ARD1-mediated acetylation. Cell. 2002;111(5):709–720. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01085-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gao, M., Zhang, N., Liang, W. 2020. Systematic analysis of lysine lactylation in the plant fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Frontiers in Microbiology 11:594743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 39.Hagihara, H., Shoji, H., Otabi, H., Toyoda, A., Katoh, K., Namihira, M. et al. 2021. Protein lactylation induced by neural excitation. Cell Reports 37(2):109820. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 40.Notarangelo G, Haigis MC. Sweet temptation: From sugar metabolism to gene regulation. Immunity. 2019;51(6):980–981. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Choi, J.E., Sebastian, C., Ferrer, C.M., Lewis, C.A., Sade-Feldman, M., LaSalle, T. et al. 2021. A unique subset of glycolytic tumour-propagating cells drives squamous cell carcinoma. Nature Metabolism 3:182–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 42.Yu J, Chai P, Xie M, Ge S, Ruan J, Fan X, et al. Histone lactylation drives oncogenesis by facilitating m(6)A reader protein YTHDF2 expression in ocular melanoma. Genome Biology. 2021;22:85. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02308-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cui H, Xie N, Banerjee S, Ge J, Jiang D, Dey T, et al. Lung myofibroblasts promote macrophage profibrotic activity through lactate-induced histone lactylation. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. 2020;64:115–125. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2020-0360OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vinasco, K., Mitchell, H.M., Kaakoush, N.O., Castano-Rodriguez, N. 2019. Microbial carcinogenesis: Lactic acid bacteria in gastric cancer. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Reviews on Cancer 1872:188309. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 45.Bhagat, T.D., Von Ahrens, D., Dawlaty, M., Zou, Y., Baddour, J., Achreja, A. et al. 2019. Lactate-mediated epigenetic reprogramming regulates formation of human pancreatic cancer-associated fibroblasts. Elife 8:e50663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 46.Roshandel E, Parkhideh S, Ghaffari Nazari H, et al. Pre-and post-transplant serum lactate dehydrogenase levels as a predictive marker for patient survival and engraftment in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Reports of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology. 2021;10(2):204–215. doi: 10.52547/rbmb.10.2.204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yang F, Li B, Yang Y, et al. Leptin enhances glycolysis via OPA1-mediated mitochondrial fusion to promote mesenchymal stem cell survival. International Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2019;44(1):301–312. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2019.4189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Arthur SA, Blaydes JP, Houghton FD. Glycolysis regulates human embryonic stem cell self-renewal under hypoxia through HIF-2alpha and the glycolytic sensors CTBPs. Stem Cell Reports. 2019;12(4):728–742. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lee YS, Kim TY, Kim Y, Kim S, Lee SH, Seo SU, et al. Microbiota-derived lactate promotes hematopoiesis and erythropoiesis by inducing stem cell factor production from leptin receptor+ niche cells. Experimental & Molecular Medicine. 2021;53(9):1319–1331. doi: 10.1038/s12276-021-00667-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Schaeper U, Boyd JM, Verma S, Uhlmann E, Subramanian T, Chinnadurai G. Molecular cloning and characterization of a cellular phosphoprotein that interacts with a conserved C-terminal domain of adenovirus E1A involved in negative modulation of oncogenic transformation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 1995;92(23):10467–10471. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.23.10467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yang T, Shu X, Zhang HW, Sun LX, Yu L, Liu J, et al. Enolase 1 regulates stem cell-like properties in gastric cancer cells by stimulating glycolysis. Cell Death & Disease. 2020;11(10):870. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-03087-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mamouni, K., Kim, J., Lokeshwar, B.L., Kallifatidis, G. 2021. ARRB1 regulates metabolic reprogramming to promote glycolysis in stem cell-like bladder cancer cells. Cancers (Basel). 13(8). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 53.Li L, Chen K, Wang T, Wu Y, Xing G, Chen M, et al. Glis1 facilitates induction of pluripotency via an epigenome-metabolome-epigenome signalling cascade. Nature Metabolism. 2020;2(9):882–892. doi: 10.1038/s42255-020-0267-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ivashkiv LB. The hypoxia-lactate axis tempers inflammation. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2020;20:85–86. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0259-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Daskalaki MG, Tsatsanis C, Kampranis SC. Histone methylation and acetylation in macrophages as a mechanism for regulation of inflammatory responses. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2018;233:6495–6507. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tikhanovich I, Zhao J, Bridges B, Kumer S, Roberts B, et al. Arginine methylation regulates c-Myc-dependent transcription by altering promoter recruitment of the acetyltransferase p300. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2017;292(32):13333–13344. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.797928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mullican SE, Gaddis CA, Alenghat T, Nair MG, Giacomin PR, et al. Histone deacetylase 3 is an epigenomic brake in macrophage alternative activation. Genes & Development. 2011;25(23):2480–2488. doi: 10.1101/gad.175950.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lee Y, Ka SO, Cha HN, Chae YN, Kim MK, et al. Myeloid sirtuin 6 deficiency causes insulin resistance in high-fat diet-fed mice by eliciting macrophage polarization toward an M1 phenotype. Diabetes. 2017;66(10):2659–2668. doi: 10.2337/db16-1446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Satoh T, Takeuchi O, Vandenbon A, Yasuda K, Tanaka Y, et al. The Jmjd3-Irf4 axis regulates M2 macrophage polarization and host responses against helminth infection. Nature Immunology. 2010;11(10):936–944. doi: 10.1038/ni.1920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tang Y, Li T, Li J, Yang J, Liu H, et al. Jmjd3 is essential for the epigenetic modulation of microglia phenotypes in the immune pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease. Cell Death and Differentiation. 2014;21(3):369–380. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2013.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Alexaki VI, Fodelianaki G, Neuwirth A, Mund C, Kourgiantaki A, et al. DHEA inhibits acute microglia-mediated inflammation through activation of the TrkA-Akt1/2-CREB-Jmjd3 pathway. Molecular Psychiatry. 2018;23(6):1410–1420. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Liu L, Liu J, Lin Q. Histone demethylase KDM2A: Biological functions and clinical values (Review) Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2021;22(1):723. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zhang, W., Wang, G., Xu, Z.G., Tu, H., Hu, F., Dai, J. et al. 2019. Lactate is a natural suppressor of RLR signaling by targeting MAVS. Cell 178(1):176–189 e15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 64.Irizarry-Caro RA, McDaniel MM, Overcast GR, Jain VG, Troutman TD, Pasare C. TLR signaling adapter BCAP regulates inflammatory to reparatory macrophage transition by promoting histone lactylation. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2020;117:30628–30638. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009778117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Colegio OR, Chu NQ, Szabo AL, Chu T, Rhebergen AM, Jairam V, et al. Functional polarization of tumour-associated macrophages by tumour-derived lactic acid. Nature. 2014;513(7519):559–563. doi: 10.1038/nature13490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Liu N, Luo J, Kuang D, Xu S, Duan Y, Xia Y, et al. Lactate inhibits ATP6V0d2 expression in tumor-associated macrophages to promote HIF-2alpha-mediated tumor progression. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2019;129(2):631–646. doi: 10.1172/JCI123027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bohn T, Rapp S, Luther N, Klein M, Bruehl TJ, Kojima N, et al. Tumor immunoevasion via acidosis-dependent induction of regulatory tumor-associated macrophages. Nature Immunology. 2018;19(12):1319–1329. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0226-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Xia C, Tao Y, Li M, Che T, Qu J. Protein acetylation and deacetylation: An important regulatory modification in gene transcription (Review) Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2020;20:2923–2940. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Chen Y, Wu R, Chen HZ, Xiao Q, Wang WJ, He JP, et al. Enhancement of hypothalamic STAT3 acetylation by nuclear receptor Nur77 dictates leptin sensitivity. Diabetes. 2015;64:2069–2081. doi: 10.2337/db14-1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ma L, et al. Lysyl Oxidase 3 Is a Dual-391 Specificity enzyme involved in STAT3 deacetylation and deacetylimination modulation. Molecular Cell. 2017;65:296–309. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.O’Garro, C., Igbineweka, L., Ali, Z., Mezei, M., Mujtaba, S. 2021. The biological significance of targeting acetylation-mediated gene regulation for designing new mechanistic tools and potential therapeutics. Biomolecules 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 72.Sheikh BN, Akhtar A. The many lives of KATs — detectors, integrators and modulators of the cellular environment. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2019;20:7–23. doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0072-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Watson MJ, Vignali PDA, Mullett SJ, Overacre-Delgoffe AE, Peralta RM, Grebinoski S, et al. Metabolic support of tumour-infiltrating regulatory T cells by lactic acid. Nature. 2021;591:645–651. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03045-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Zappasodi R, Serganova I, Cohen IJ, Maeda M, Shindo M, Senbabaoglu Y, et al. CTLA-4 blockade drives loss of Treg stability in glycolysis-low tumours. Nature. 2021;591:652–658. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03326-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Fontecha-Barriuso M, Martin-Sanchez D, Ruiz-Andres O, Poveda J, Sanchez-Nino MD, Valino-Rivas L, et al. Targeting epigenetic DNA and histone modifications to treat kidney disease. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation. 2018;33:1875–1886. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zhao, Y., Li, M., Yao, X., Fei, Y., Lin, Z., Li, Z. et al. 2020. HCAR1/MCT1 regulates tumor ferroptosis through the lactate-mediated AMPK-SCD1 activity and its therapeutic implications. Cell Reports 33:108487. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data related to WB data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Inflammation are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES