Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2022 Jun 15;17(6):e0269559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269559

Decolorization of azo dyes by a novel aerobic bacterial strain Bacillus cereus strain ROC

Anum Fareed 1, Habiba Zaffar 2, Muhammad Bilal 2, Jamshaid Hussain 1, Colin Jackson 3, Tatheer Alam Naqvi 1,*
Editor: Faisal Mamhood4
PMCID: PMC9200318  PMID: 35704650

Abstract

Synthetic dyes are widely used as colorant compounds in various industries for different purposes. Among all the dyestuffs, azo dyes constitute the largest and the most used class of dyes. These dyes and their intermediate products are common contaminants of ground water and soil in developing countries. Biological methods have been found to be promising for the treatment and degradation of these compounds. In the present study, we focused on the biological removal of azo dyes (Reactive orange 16 and Reactive black 5) under aerobic conditions using an indigenous bacterial strain isolated from contaminated industrial areas. The bacterial isolate was identified as Bacillus cereus strain ROC. Degradation experiments under agitation with both free and immobilized cells indicates that this strain degrades both azo- dyes in 5 days. The immobilized cells were more proficient than their free cell counterparts. The toxicity of the biotransformation products formed after decolorization were assessed by conducting bacteriotoxic and phytotoxic assays. All the toxicity assays indicate that the dyes’ degraded products were non-toxic in nature, as compared to the dyes themselves. The kinetics of the azo dyes’ degradation was also studied at various initial concentration ranges from 50 mg/L to 250 mg/L by growth independent kinetic models. Zero-order kinetics were fit to the experimental data, producing values of least squares regression (R2) greater than 0.98, which indicates that the bacterial strain degrades both dyes by co-metabolism rather than utilizing them as sole energy source. These results indicate that the Bacillus cereus ROC strain has great potential to degrade dye-contaminated water and soil.

Introduction

Dyes are colored compounds (often synthetic) and are extensively used in pharmaceutical, leather, textile, cosmetics, food and paint manufacturing industries [1]. The annual global production of synthetic dyes is approximately 700,000 tons [2]. Dyes can be broadly classified according to their chemical structures, applications, and origin i.e., natural, or synthetic [3]. Based on their chemical structures, they can be broadly classified as triphenylmethane, anthraquinone, phthalocyanines and azo dyes. Furthermore, they can be classified according to their usage as anionic, non-ionic, and cationic [4]. A dye is generally composed of one or more benzene rings called chromogens, chromophores, and auxochromes [5]. The chromophore, also known as the color bearing group, is responsible for giving color to a dye, whereas auxochromes strengthen the color of chromophores and make them soluble in water [6].

Azo dyes are the most used class of dyes, constituting more than half of all the dyes produced [7]. The chemical structure of these dyes is characterized by the presence of azo bonds (-N = N-), connected with naphthalene or benzene rings [1]. These aromatic rings can have different substituents such as sulfonic acid (SO3H), chloro (-Cl), hydroxyl (-OH), methyl (-CH3), carboxyl (-COOH) nitro (-NO2) and amino (NH2) groups [6]. These substituents make azo dyes the most structurally flexible and diverse group of dyes by making them water soluble and resistant to degradation under environmental conditions [8]. The use of azo dyes is preferred in textile industries because of their economically attractive features such as easy application, strong covalent binding to textile fibers, high photolytic structural stability, the availability of a variety of shades, and minimal energy requirements for their production [7].

Due to increased industrialization and the increasing use of colors in the textile and clothing industry, dyes are frequently discharged into the environment in large quantity and therefore constitute an important component of wastewater effluent, especially in developing countries where most of the textiles are produced [9]. During the manufacturing process, approximately 10–15% of the total amount of these dyes is released into the environment via textile wastewater [1]. These dyes are difficult to decolorize because of their complex structures and they bio-accumulate in ecosystems, causing serious health problems [9]. The presence of these dyes can cause adverse effect on all the organisms present in an ecosystem, as these dyes and their intermediate products (e.g. benzidine [1,1’-biphenyl-4,4’-diamine], 1-amino-2-naphthol, 6-amino naphthalene sulfonic acid, o-tolidine) are highly mutagenic and carcinogenic in nature [10]. In humans and animals, they cause bladder cancer, skin dermatoses, allergic responses, eczema, and have adverse effects on the lungs, liver, circulatory, reproductive, and immune system [11]. These dyes also affect the rate of photosynthesis in aquatic life by decreasing the intensity of light penetration and have been found to be toxic to aquatic organisms including animals and plants due to the formation of intermediate aromatic compounds [10].

Several physical and chemical methods such as precipitation, adsorption, filtration, coagulation, oxidation, electrochemical destruction, ozonation, and photo-catalysis have been used for the destruction of dyes, but these methods generally involve complicated procedures and are not economically feasible [12]. Microbial decolorization and degradation of these dyes is cost effective, efficient and an ecofriendly alternative to physical and chemical decomposition [13]. The usefulness of microbial processes for the biodegradation of these dyes depends on the activity and the adaptability of the selected microbes. The activity and adaptability of the microorganisms towards the recalcitrant pollutants depends upon the activities of the enzymes that they synthesize [12,13].

Many microorganisms such as algae, yeast, fungi, and bacteria, have been reported to decolorize and degrade azo dyes. However, most of these studies describe the decolorization of azo dyes under anoxic conditions, leading to the formation of colorless toxic metabolites. On the other hand, aerobic degradation offers a comparatively easier method for azo dye degradation. While aerobic degradation holds great promise, there is still a need to assess the extent of degradation of the toxic intermediate products formed by these dyes under aerobic conditions. In this study, we describe the isolation and identification of a bacterial strain with the capacity to degrade azo dyes i.e., Reactive black 5 and Reactive orange 16 under aerobic conditions. The effects of different environmental conditions i.e., temperature, pH and the concentration of dye were also studied to fully characterize the biological degradation of these molecules. Furthermore, cell immobilization was used to study the rate of dye decolorization in comparison with freely suspended bacterial cells. Cell immobilization was found to protect the cells from the lethal effects of dyes and their by-products, maintain high biomass concentration, was cost-effective and re-usable [14]. The biodegradation kinetics of the azo dyes with respect to the degradation potential of microbial communities has not been studied in detail, yet can provide a deeper understanding of the specific biodegradation mechanisms. Thus, the present study investigated the decolorization efficiency of the bacterial strain at various initial dyes concentrations using zero order, first order and second order growth independent models [15]. Finally, phytotoxicity and biotoxicity assays were also performed to assess the toxic nature of the dissolved metabolites formed by the biotransformation of RB-5 and RO-16.

Research methodology

Chemicals and microbiological media

All chemicals and reagents of analytical grade with 99% purity unless otherwise mentioned. Azo dyes i.e., RB-5 and R0-16 were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, USA. The stock solutions (1000 mg/L) of each dye were prepared by dissolving 1 g of dye in 1 L HPLC grade water. The working solutions of each dye were prepared by diluting the stock solutions and the initial pH were adjusted by using HCl and NaOH solutions (1N). Nutrient broth and nutrient agar were used as enrichment and isolation media.

Isolation, screening, and identification of azo dyes’ degrading bacteria

Soil samples were collected from the disposal areas of textile-based industries in Faisalabad and its adjacent locations mainly the Paharan drain carrying textile effluents which is situated at a latitude of 31.476677° and longitude of 73.070585°. Moreover, the site is not the private entity of any person or group or industry and does not contain any endangered or protected species therefore, there is no need of any special permit for sampling. All the samples were collected aseptically and were preserved at 4°C until use. To obtain the dye-degrading bacterial strains, 10 g of soil sample was inoculated into 100 mL of LB medium supplemented with 25 mg/L of each respective dye i.e., Reactive black 5 and Reactive orange 16. The flasks were incubated under aerobic conditions with aeration and agitation at 37°C. After 3 days of incubation, an equal amount of each dye i.e., 25 mg/L was added to the flasks followed by incubation under similar aerobic conditions. The successive acclimatization of the enriched microbial consortium was carried out till the final concentration of dyes reached to 250 mg/L [12]. The adapted microbial culture was serially diluted and 50 μl suspension was then spread on nutrient agar plates containing azo dye (100 mg/l).

Screening was performed to find out the most efficient bacterial strain capable of decolorizing both dyes using LB medium containing different concentrations of each dye. The bacterial strain that showed prominent growth on the highest concentration was selected to carry out further research.

Strain identification and phylogenetic analysis

Bacterial strain was identified by 16S rRNA technique. The 16S rRNA genes were amplified with a pair of universal primers i.e 1492R (5’ -TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT- 3’) and 27F (5’ -AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG- 3’) using 2720 Thermal cycler of Applied Biosystems by following the protocol as mentioned by Pushpa et al., (2019) [16]. The amplified sequence was subjected to nucleotide blast to find similarity between existing sequences available in NCBI data base. MEGA 7 software was used to construct the phylogenetic tree based on obtained blast results.

Agar entrapment of bacterial cells

Bacterial cells were immobilized by using the agar entrapment method [15]. Briefly, 0.1 g/ml agar was dissolved in 0.9% NaCl solution and sterilized for 15 min at 121°C. After cooling the molten agar solution (15 ml) was mixed with cell slurry and poured into sterilized petri plates. The solidified agar containing bacterial cells was cut into small cubes and placed in 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) and was cured at 4°C for 1 h. The buffer was removed after curing immobilized cells were preserved at 4°C till further use.

Dye decolorization experiments and quantitative analysis

Dye decolorization experiments were carried out using the free and immobilized cells of the bacterial strain ROC at different concentrations of Reactive black 5 and Reactive orange 16, i.e., 0, 50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 mg/L. Before performing decolorization experiments, the environmental factor i.e., pH was optimized for bacterial growth. The bacterial strain was incubated in LB medium with wide range of pH (5–11). Afterwards, the dye decolorization experiments were conducted at pre-optimized pH (7) while incubated at various temperatures i.e., 25, 32, 37 and 45 ˚C with different concentrations of each dye on a shake flask incubator at 220 rpm for 6 days. Each experiment was conducted individually with each temperature using both free and IMC. All experiments were conducted in replicates of three. Samples were drawn after every 24 hours for measuring the decolorization activity of the free and IMC of the strain. The samples were centrifuged at 8,000 rpm for 20 min and the residual dye left in the supernatant was measured at λmax of 597 nm using T80 UV/Vis spectrophotometer. For further quantification, the residual dyes left in control and samples were extracted with ethyl acetate [17]. The extracts were dried by adding Na2SO4 (anhydrous) and then evaporated. The dried residues were dissolved in HPLC grade ethyl acetate and were analyzed.

The decolorization activity was expressed by following Eq.

PercentageDecolorization=(InitialabsorbanceFinalabsorbanceInitalabsorbance)*100

Phytotoxic effects

Phytotoxic effects of the parent dyes and their metabolites i.e., pre and post bioremediation samples were studied for the germination of commercially important Solanum lycopersicum (Riogrande) seeds. The concentrations of the dyes used were 50 ppm, 150 ppm and 250 ppm. The metabolites of both dyes (Reactive black 5 and Reactive orange 16) were extracted in ethyl acetate followed by air drying. Afterwards, the extracted metabolites were dissolved in 15 mL of distilled water. Prior to experiment, the seeds were soaked in mercuric chloride 0.1% for 5 min and then washed with distilled water. The seeds were left on filter paper (Whatman No.1) for drying. Consequently, the sterile petri plates having filter papers were moistened with pre and post treated samples and controls (distilled water). The 15 seeds were placed onto a soaked filter paper in each single plate followed by incubation at 22–24°C under light. The seed germination was counted at 3rd day of incubation, while the mean value of root and shoot length was recorded after 5 days of incubation [18].

Bacteriotoxic effects

Pre- and post-bioremediation toxicity of dyes samples was assessed by performing agar well diffusion assay as mentioned by Jamil et al., (2012) with minor modifications [19]. The assay was performed against three reference bacterial strains i.e., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. All the reference bacterial strains were primarily enriched via repetitive culturing in Luria Bertani (LB) medium and then incubated for three successive days in shaking incubator (220 rpm). Afterwards, an aliquot (750 μL) from each culture broth (optical density equal to 0.5 MacFarland’s turbidity standard) was added to nutrient agar medium as inoculum and poured into sterile petri plates. The solidified media was then used for the preparation of wells (8mm) using sterilized cork borer. An aliquot of 100 μL from each treated and untreated dye samples were added to the wells whereas ampicillin (200 μg) and autoclaved water were also added to each plate as a negative and positive control respectively. All the plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs. On successive day, the petri plates were noticed for the appearance of zones around each well. The zone diameters were measured and recorded.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 20 software was used for statistical analysis. The comparisons among different treatments were made using one way ANOVA and Duncan test with 95% confidence level (p<0.05)

Modeling and degradation kinetics

In the present study, the Kinetic Models (zero, first and second order) were studied using dye decolorization data by following the studies carried out by [20,31].

The following equation was used to determine Zero order kinetic rate

C/Co=kt

Whereas,

First kinetic order was studied by using following form of equation

LnCo/Ct=kt

Where (Co) is the initial concentrations of reactive black 5 and reactive orange 16 and (Ct) is concentration of residues of both the azo dyes at that time. ‘k’ is the degradation rate constant, and its value was determined by the slope of straight line.

The second kinetic order can be determined by applying the following equation.

kt=1Ct1C1

The value of second order kinetic constant was defined by plotting dc/dt against time [21].

The Selection of the kinetic model that offered the best fit to the experimental data was established on the value of the coefficient of determination and the significance of the linear coefficient and slope of the curve (equation parameters).

Results and discussion

Isolation, screening, and identification of bacterial isolate

The enrichment of the soil samples collected from the disposal areas of textile-based industries led to the isolation of an efficient dye-degrading bacterial strain, which we have called ROC in this study. The bacterial strain ROC was capable of growth on the highest concentration of both dyes (Reactive black 5 and Reactive orange 16), which was 250 mg/L. The bacterial strain was identified as B. cereus strain ROC by 16S rRNA technique, which exhibited 99% similarity with other Bacillus cereus strain 16S rRNA sequences when compared using the nucleotide BLAST (basic local alignment search tool) in NCBI. The sequence was submitted to the genbank database with accession number ON063239. A multiple sequence alignment was then constructed based on blast results as shown in Fig 1, showing close homology to several other related Bacillus strains.

Fig 1. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of the representative bacterial strain ROC and its related species based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences.

Fig 1

Previous studies described the degradation of azo dyes by various groups of anaerobic bacteria i.e. Nocardiopsis alba, Nocardiopsis sp. strain dassonvillei, Enterococcus faecalis sp. strain YZ 66, Aeromonas hydrophila Pseudomonas putida, B. subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but aerobes are seldom reported to possess this activity [2226]. A previous study described the biodegradation of the Reactive Orange 16 in a mixed culture of Pleurotus ostreatus (bacteria) and a suspension of Candida zeylanoides (yeast) [27]. Recently, it has been reported that a consortium of three haloalkaliphilic isolates belonged to the genus Halomonas exhibited a remarkable ability of decolorizing the Reactive Black 5 (87%) [28]. Previously, Bacillus cohnii, Bacillus sp. YZU1 and Bacillus pumilus were also reported to decolorize direct dyes in anerobic conditions [2932].

Immobilization and biodegradation experiments

Biodegradation experiments were conducted at various temperatures (32, 37 and 45 ˚C) using free and immobilized cells of B. cereus ROC and the decolorization was monitored after every 24 hours of incubation. The results indicate that the decolorization was significantly higher in immobilized cells as compared to their free-cell counter parts. In the case of immobilized cells (IMC) 100% decolorization was recorded at all the concentrations of both dyes, while ~80% decolorization was observed when free cells were employed for the same concentrations of both dyes. Increasing the temperature significantly increases the rate of decolorization and it was observed that the decolorization was significantly faster at 37°C, as compared to 30°C in case of both the free cells as well as IMC as shown in Figs 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B, S1A, S1B, S2A and S2B.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Decolorization of Reactive orange 16 by free and immobilized cells of bacterial strain (A) by free cells at 37 ˚C (B) by immobilized cells at 37 ˚C. Different alphabets show the significant differences (p < 0.05) between different treatments.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Decolorization of Reactive black 5 by free and immobilized cells of bacterial strain (A) by free cells at 37 ˚C (B) by immobilized cells at 37 ˚C. Different alphabets show the significant differences (p < 0.05) between different treatments.

Any residual dye left in the liquid media after degradation was extracted after every 24 hours and quantified by using UV/Vis spectrophotometry. Significant degradation of these dyes was observed at 37°C, as compared with the dyes’ removal at 30°C both by free and IMC as shown in Figs 4A, 4B, 5A and 5B, S4A and S4B. However, when the temperature was increased to 45°C, a considerable decrease in the decolorization was observed for both free cells as well as the IMC, suggesting loss of viable cells and/or denaturation of the enzymes responsible [29,33,34]. An increased concentration of both dyes has no effect on the decolorizing ability of the bacterium but it takes more time to decolorize them, as expected. Similar findings were also observed when the temperature was increased to 45°C with the increased dye concentrations i.e., a significant reduction in the decolorization ability of the bacterial strains. Indeed, in previous studies, Micrococcus sp. showed greater decolorizing ability at 37 ˚C than in higher temperatures [10]. Another report also supports our findings where the bacterial strains Bacillus cohnii and Deinococcus radiodurans lost their ability to decolorize dyes when temperature was increased beyond 37 ˚C [30].

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Concentrations of Reactive orange 16 degraded after treatment with free and immobilized cells of the bacterial strain (A) Degraded by free cells at 37 ˚C (B) Degraded by immobilized cells at 37 ˚C. Different alphabets show the significant differences (p < 0.05) between different treatments.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Concentrations of Reactive black 5 degraded after treatment with free and immobilized cells of the bacterial strain (A) Degraded by free cells at 37 ˚C (B) Degraded by immobilized cells at 37 ˚C Different alphabets show the significant differences (p < 0.05) between different treatments.

In the present study, the IMC displayed significantly higher decolorizing ability, which might be due to their stability and greater mechanical strength (due to protection from immobilization), as compared to their free counterparts. The free cells also required sufficient growth time to acclimate in the new environment, which might be a reason of their slower rate of decolorization. Previous findings have shown that the immobilized cells were a viable option for the degradation of various hazardous compounds [25,3538]. Similar findings were also observed in previous studies carried out on the anaerobic degradation of different dyes (Reactive Red 22, Reactive Blue 172, bromothymol blue, methylene, crystal violet, Congo red and Direct Red), where immobilized cells of the bacterial strains degraded these dyes faster than their free counterparts [32,3941]. Another study carried out by Pandey et al., (2020) in which the biodegradation potential of immobilized cells of Bacillus sp. and Lysinibacillus sp. against two azo dyes i.e., Reactive Orange 16 and Reactive Blue 250 was reported [14]. Free cells of Bacillus. sp. decolorized 92% of RO-16, whereas its immobilized cells decolorized 97% of RO-16. Similarly, the free cells of Lysinibacillus sp decolorized 95% of RB 250 but on immobilization, dye decolorization occurred more rapidly i.e. 99%. The residual dyes left in the liquid media after degradation were also extracted after every 24 hours and quantified by using UV/Vis spectrophotometry.

Estimation of kinetic parameters for dye degradation

According to the correlation coefficient values (R2) obtained from dye decolorization experiments, the kinetic model that best fit to the decolorization data is a zero-order kinetic model. It is clear from the Table 1 that the R2 values obtained in zero order kinetic model are higher than the values obtained in first and second-order kinetic models. The data were fit to the equation lnCt/Co, where Ct is the dye concentration at a specific time and Co is the initial dye concentration, and further verified by the regression coefficient R2 (Table 1). The regression coefficient (R2) was calculated for each initial concentration (50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 mg/l) with both free and IMC. These results indicates that the bacterial strain did not utilize both azo dyes as their sole energy source, but rather can degrade the azo dyes by co-metabolism.

Table 1. Growth independent kinetic models for the azo dyes’ degradation at different initial concentrations.

Initial concentrations(mg/l) Bacterial strain (ROC) Zero order (R2) First order (R2) Second order (R2)
RO-16 RB-5 RO-16 RB-5 RO-16 RB-5
50 Free cells 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.91 0.91 0.94
IMC 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.89
100 Free cells 1.00 0.99 0.90 0.95 0.81 0.81
IMC 0.99 0.99 0.93 0.97 0.86 0.97
150 Free cells 0.98 0.99 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.69
IMC 0.98 0.99 0.90 0.98 0.80 0.97
200 Free cells 0.99 0.99 0.81 0.88 0.66 0.66
IMC 0.97 0.99 0.88 0.98 0.76 0.69
250 Free cells 0.99 0.99 0.91 0.93 0.71 0.71
IMC 0.99 0.99 0.91 0.8 0.72 0.61

Phytotoxic effects

Various toxic natural and synthetic pollutants, including dyes, are known to inhibit the activity of plant hormones (gibberellins, auxins, and cytokinins). These phytohormones play a crucial role in seed germination as well as seedling growth [42,43]. The phytotoxic effects of both treated and untreated dyes samples generated in this study were tested for seed germination and determination of growth parameters (shoot and root length) of the commercially important plant Solanum lycopersicum (Riogrande), i.e., tomato. The experimental findings were notable: the treated water, in which the dyes were decolorized by B. cereus ROC, exhibited a significantly increased percentage of seed germination as compared to the untreated water that retained various concentration of dyes (Reactive black or Reactive Orange; Figs 6 and 7). In this experiment, simple distilled water was used as a positive control alongside the treated water as well as untreated water containing dyes. As far as the germination of seeds is concerned, there was no significant difference observed in case of distilled water (positive control) and bacterium treated dye samples initially containing 50 ppm dye (either RB-5 or RO-16), with a percentage germination of approximately 93%. In contrast, a significant decrease in germination was observed when untreated water containing 50 ppm dye was applied to plants, where the seed germination was 85% as shown in Tables 2 and 3. Similarly, seed germination was up to 86% when treated water was used with samples of initial concentrations of 150 and 250 ppm, while in untreated dyes (with initial concentrations of 150 and 250 ppm) only 6% of seeds germinated.

Fig 6. Comparison of phytotoxicity on growth parameter of plant Solanum lycopersicum (Riogrande).

Fig 6

While treating it with various concentrations of reactive orange 16, treated reactive orange 16 with ROC (T) and control (dH2O).

Fig 7. Comparison of phytotoxicity on growth parameter of plant Solanum lycopersicum (Riogrande).

Fig 7

While treating it with various concentrations of reactive black 5, treated reactive orange 5 with ROC (T) and control (dH2O).

Table 2. Phytotoxicity comparison of Reactive orange 16 and its extracted metabolites.

Treatments Shoot Length Root length (cm) Percentage Germination
Control (Water) 0.9±0.01 a 2.2±0.07 a 92.6±0.7 a
Pure dye RO-16
50 ppm 0.8±0.09 b 1.7±0.02 c 86.1±0.4 c
150 ppm 0.1±0.06 d 0.1±0.01 e 12.5±0.5 c
250 ppm 0.1±0.04 d 0.1±0.02 e 6.04±0.5 e
Degraded dye
50 ppm 0.9±0.09 a 1.8±0.02 b 91.8±0.7 b
150 ppm 0.8±0.02 b 1.7±0.06 c
86.5±0.4 c
250 ppm 0.6±0.01 c 1.0±0.01 d 80.5±0.8 d

Values are means of three replicates ± SD by two-way ANOVA P < 0.005 where Duncan test was applied within the groups.

Table 3. Phytotoxicity comparison of Reactive black 5 and its extracted metabolites.

Treatments Shoot length (cm) Root length (cm) Percentage germination
Control (Water) 0.9±0.01 a 2.2±0.07 a 92.6±0.7 a
Pure dye RB-5
50 ppm 0.8±0.02 b 2.±0.01 b 85.8±0.8 d
150 ppm 0.1±0.01 e 0.4±0.5 d 13±0.2 d
250 ppm 0.1±0.02 e 0.1±0.01 e 6.1±0.4 e
Degraded dye
50 ppm 0.8±0.01 b 2.1±0.09 a 91.8±0.7 b
150 ppm 0.7±0.01 c 2.±0.12 b 86.5±0.4 c
250 ppm 0.6±0.02 d 1.1±0.06 c 85.8±0.8 d

Values are means of three replicates ± SD by two-way ANOVA P < 0.005 where Duncan test was applied within the groups.

The root and shoot growth were also measured in treated and untreated dye samples along with water as a positive control (Figs 6 and 7). The results revealed that the shoot and root growth was inhibited by the application of the untreated dye samples, especially at concentrations of 150 and 250 ppm, while in bacteria-treated samples the shoot and root lengths were comparable to those of plants treated with distilled water (positive control), as shown in Tables 2 and 3. This confirmed that the treated samples have no toxic effect on the growth of selected plants. It was obvious that the metabolites produced by the bacterium have no toxic effect on plant growth and hence the water treated with the bacterium can be used for irrigation purposes. A previous study conducted by Kurade et al., (2016) also reported similar findings where the metabolites obtained after decolorization of Disperse red (DR54) dye showed no toxicity as compared to the parent dye indicating the detoxification of the DR54 by Bacillus laterosporus [44]. Kurade et al., (2013) also found that the intermediate metabolites formed after the biodegradation of Disperse brown 118 exhibited no toxic effects on the seed germination of R. raphanistrum [45,46]. Prasad et al., (2013) reported the less toxic effects on the shoot and root lengths of seeds of Vigna mungo, Sorghum bicolor and Vigna radiata exposed to the degraded metabolites of Direct Blue-1 azo dye compared to the parent dye itself [30]. The phytotoxicity test with untreated dye (5,000 mg l⁻1) showed 70% and 80% inhibition of seed germination in V. radiata, V. mungo and S. bicolor plants, whereas no inhibition of seed germination was observed when bacterial treated dyes carrying various metabolites were applied on these plants [34].

Bacteriotoxic effects

The bacteriotoxic assays of treated and untreated dyes were performed on three reference bacterial strains i.e., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. It was found that the post-treatment (6 days) dye samples i.e., that retain the metabolites of the dyes, exhibit no toxic effects against all the three reference bacterial strains, while dyes at all tested concentrations (50 ppm, 150 ppm, 250 ppm) inhibited the growth of bacterial strains (Tables 4 and 5). The result of the present study clearly indicates that the B. cereus strain ROC can detoxify both dyes and the metabolites that are generated after treatment have no toxic effect on selected bacterial strains although the parent dyes significantly inhibited their growth. The antimicrobial activity with the untreated RO-16 and RB-5 at 250 ppm concentration sample could be due to the toxic nature of these dyes. A study carried out by Ajaz et al., (2019) reported that the Alcaligenes aquatilis 3c (bacterium) treated dye water was also found nontoxic for microbial growth [47]. Similarly, Phulpoto et al., (2018) reported the reduction in toxicity of post treated oil-based paint against bacterial and fungal strains [18].

Table 4. Antimicrobial activity of treated and untreated Reactive black 5 samples against bacteria.

Reactive Black 5
Tested Bacterial strains
Antimicrobial effect of treated vs. untreated dye samples (zone of inhibition in mm±Std. Dev.)
0 day (untreated samples) 6 days (treated samples)
50 ppm 150 ppm 250 ppm 50 ppm 150ppm 250ppm
Pseudomonas aurignosa 8.0±0.5 h 11.0±0.2 e 13.0±0.5 c 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i
E.coli 9.0±0.3 g 11.0±0.2 e 14.0±0.2 b 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i
Staphyloccous aureus 8.0±0.2 h 12.0±0.3 d 13.0±0.3 c 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i
Positive Control 10.0±0.5 f 15.0±0.5 a 15.0±0.3 a 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i
Negative Control 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i

Positive control used is antibiotic (ampicillin) and negative control used is water. Different alphabets show the significant differences (p < 0.05) between the treatments.

Table 5. Antimicrobial activity of treated and untreated Reactive orange 16 samples against bacteria.

Reactive orange 16
Tested Bacterial strains Antimicrobial effect of treated vs. untreated dye samples (zone of inhibition in mm±Std. Dev.)
0 day (untreated samples) 6 days (treated samples)
50 ppm 150 ppm 250 ppm 50 ppm 150 ppm 250 ppm
Pseudomonas aurignosa 9.0±0.5 g 11.0±0.2 f 13.0±0.5 d 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i
E.coli 9.5±0.3 g 11.3±0.2 f 14.0±0.2 c 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i
Staphyloccous aureus 8.0±0.2 h 12.0±0.3 e 13.0±0.3 d 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i
Positive Control 10.0±0.5 g 16.0±0.5 a 15.0±0.3 b 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i
Negative Control 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i 0.0±0.0 i

Positive control used is antibiotic (ampicillin) and negative control used is water. Different alphabets show the significant differences (p < 0.05) between the treatments.

Conclusion

The present study was focused on bacterial degradation of the two most abundantly used azo dyes throughout the world. The bacterium B. cereus strain ROC is shown to be highly proficient in degrading both dyes i.e., RO-16 and RB-5. Growth independent kinetic models were applied which also revealed that the bacterium was able to degrade the azo dyes co-metabolically. Furthermore, immobilized cells of strain ROC degraded these dyes more efficiently as compared to their free cell counter parts. Thus, this study provides support for the practical application of B. cereus ROC in aerobic environments that are contaminated with azo dyes. Future work, will focus on the identification and characterization of the dye-degrading enzymes from the isolated bacterium.

Supporting information

S1 Fig

Decolourization of Reactive orange 16 by free and immobilized cells of bacterial strain (A) by free cells at 30 ˚C (B) by immobilized cells at 30 ˚C.

(TIF)

S2 Fig

Decolorization of Reactive black 5 by free and immobilized cells of bacterial strain (A) by free cells at 30 ˚C (B) by immobilized cells at 30 ˚C.

(TIF)

S3 Fig

Concentrations of Reactive orange 16 degraded after treatment with free and immobilized cells of the bacterial strain (A) Degraded by free cells at 30 ˚C (B) Degraded by immobilized cells at 30 ˚C.

(TIF)

S4 Fig

Concentrations of Reactive black 5 degraded after treatment with free and immobilized cells of the bacterial strain (A) Degraded by free cells at 30 ˚C (B) Degraded by immobilized cells at 30 ˚C.

(TIF)

Abbreviations

RO-16

Reactive Orange 16

RB-5

Reactive black 5

IMC

Immobilized cells

mg/L

milligram per litre

HPLC

High performance liquid chromatography

ppm

part per million

mM

milli mole

μl

micro litre

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Popli S, Patel U D. Destruction of azo dyes by anaerobic–aerobic sequential biological treatment: a review. Int J Environ Sci. 2015; 12(1): 405–420. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Garg SK, Tripathi M, Microbial strategies for discoloration and detoxification of azo dyes from textile effluents. Res J Microbiol. 2017; 12(1): 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vikrant K, Giri BS, Raza N, Roy K, Kim KH, Rai BN, et al. Recent advancements in bioremediation of dye: current status and challenges. Bioresour Technol. 2018; 253: 355–367. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Uday USP, Choudhury P, Bandopadhyay TK, Bhunia B. Classification, mode of action and production strategy of xylanase and its application for biofuel production from water hyacinth. Int J Biol. 2016; 82:1041–1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gurses A, Açıkyıldız M, Guneş K, Gurses MS. Dyes and pigments: their structure and properties. In Dyes and Pigments. Springer, Cham. 2016; 13–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mishra S, Maiti A. The efficacy of bacterial species to decolourise reactive azo, anthroquinone and triphenylmethane dyes from wastewater: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018; 25: 8286–8314. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1273-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bruschweiler BJ, Merlot C. Azo dyes in clothing textiles can be cleaved into a series of mutagenic aromatic amines which are not regulated yet. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017; 88: 214–226. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.06.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Senthilkumar KT, Nesme A, Mollier S, Pellerin, Regional-scale phosphorus flows and budgets within France: The importance of agricultural production systems, Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst. 2012; 92: 145– 159. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Buntic AV, Pavlovic MD, Antonovic DG, Siler-Marinkovic SS, Dimitrijevic-Brankovic SI. A treatment of wastewater containing basic dyes by the use of new strain Streptomyces microflavus CKS6. J Clean Prod. 2017;148: 347–354. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Singh RL, Singh PK, Singh RP. Enzymatic decolorization and degradation of azo dyes–A review. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2015; 104:21–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sandin G, Peters GM. Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling: a review. J Clean Prod. 2018; 184: 353–365. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lade H, Govindwar S, Paul D. Mineralization and detoxification of the carcinogenic azo dye Congo red and real textile effluent by a polyurethane foam immobilized microbial consortium in an upflow column bioreactor. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015; 12(6): 6894–6918. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120606894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mahmood S, Khalid A, Arshad M, Mahmood T, Crowley DE. Detoxification of azo dyes by bacterial oxidoreductase enzymes. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016; 36(4): 639–651. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2015.1004518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pandey K, Saha P, Rao KB. A study on the utility of immobilized cells of indigenous bacteria for biodegradation of reactive azo dyes. Prep Biochem Biotechnol. 2020; 50(4): 317–329. doi: 10.1080/10826068.2019.1692219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zaffar H, Ahmad R, Pervez A, Naqvi TA. A newly isolated Pseudomonas sp. can degrade endosulfan via hydrolytic pathway. Pesticide Biochem Physiol. 2018; 152:69–75. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2018.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pushpa V, Yogendra K, Mahadevan KM, Mahesh M. Isolation and identification of azo dye degrading microbes using 16s r RNA sequencing. J Appl Nat Sci. 2019;11(2), 245–249. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fareed A, Zaffar H, Rashid A, Shah MM, Naqvi TA. Biodegradation of N- methylated carbamates by free and immobilized cells of newly isolated strain Enterobacter cloacae strain TA7. Biorem. J. 2017; 21(3–4): 119–127. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kalme SD, Parshetti GK, Jadhav SU, Govindwar SP. Biodegradation of benzidine based dye Direct Blue-6 by Pseudomonas desmolyticum NCIM 2112. Bioresour. Technol. 2007; 98(7): 1405–1410. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.05.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Phulpoto AH, Qazi MA, Haq IU, Phul AR, Ahmed S, Kanhar NA. Ecotoxicological assessment of oil-based paint using three-dimensional multi-species bio-testing model: pre-and post-bioremediation analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018; 25(17): 16567–16577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jamil M, Ul Haq I, Mirza B, Qayyum M. Isolation of antibacterial compounds from Quercus dilatata L. through bioassay guided fractionation. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2012; 11(1): 1–11. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-11-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Behnajady MA, Modirshahla N, Ghanbary F. A kinetic model for the decolorization of C.I. Acid Yellow 23 by Fenton process. J Hazard Mater. 2007; 148(1–2): 98–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dehghani HM, Fadaei A. Sonochemical kinetic model of diazinon and malathion pesticides degradation in aqueous solution. Ind J Sci Technol. 2013; 6 (1): 3876–3881. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sugumar S, Thangam EB. Biodegradation and decolorization of Reactive orange 16 by Nocardiopsis alba soil isolate. J. Bioremediat. Biodegrad. 2012; 3(6). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chittal V, Gracias M, Anu A, Saha P, Rao KB. Biodecolorization and Biodegradation of Azo Dye Reactive Orange-16 by Marine Nocardiopsis sp. Iran J Biotechnol. 2019; 17(3): 1551. doi: 10.29252/ijb.1551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sahasrabudhe MM, Pathade GR. Biodegradation of sulphonated azo dye CI reactive orange 16 by Enterococcus faecalis strain YZ 66. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2011; 1(1): 163–173. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.El Bouraie M, El Din WS. Biodegradation of Reactive Black 5 by Aeromonas hydrophila strain isolated from dye-contaminated textile wastewater. Sustain Environ Res. 2016; 26(5): 209–216. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shah MP. Biodegradation of azo dyes by three isolated bacterial strains: an environmental bioremedial approach. J Microb Biochem. 2014; 6(Special Issue). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Slosarcikova P, Placha D, Malachova K, Rybkova Z, Novotny C. Biodegradation of Reactive Orange 16 azo dye by simultaneous action of Pleurotus ostreatus and the yeast Candida zeylanoides. Folia Microbiol. 2020; 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s12223-019-00767-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Seyedi ZS, Zahraei Z, Jookar, Kashi F. Decolorization of reactive black 5 and reactive red 152 Azo dyes by new haloalkaliphilic bacteria isolated from the textile wastewater. Curr Microbiol. 2020; 77: 2084–2092. doi: 10.1007/s00284-020-02039-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lv GY, Cheng JH, Chen XY, Zhang ZF, Fan LF. Biological decolorization of malachite green by Deinococcus radiodurans R1. Bioresour Technol. 2013; 144: 275–280. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Prasad ASA, Rao KVB. Aerobic biodegradation of azo dye by Bacillus cohnii MTCC 3616; an obligately alkaliphilic bacterium and toxicity evaluation of metabolites by different bioassay systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013; 97:7469–7481. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4492-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang ZW, Liang JS, Liang Y. Decolorization of Reactive Black 5 by a newly isolated bacterium Bacillus sp. YZU1. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2013; 76: 41–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Al-Shareef WA, Afifi SS, Ramadan MA, Sakr NR. Improvement of the Decolorization of Azo Dye (Direct Red 81) by Immobilized Cells of Bacillus pumilus and Free Cells of Aspergillus clavatus in Textile Waste Waters. Int J Curr Microbiol. 2018; 7(5): 1690–1707. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Çetin D, Donmez G. Decolorization of reactive dyes by mixed cultures isolated from textile effluent under anaerobic conditions. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2006; 38(7): 926–930. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Prasad ASA, Satyanarayana VSV, Rao KVB. Biotransformation of Direct Blue 1 by a moderately halophilic bacterium Marinobacter sp. strain HBRA and toxicity assessment of degraded metabolites. J Hazard Mater. 2013; 262: 674–684. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.09.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Farag S, Soliman NA, Abdel-Fattah YR. Enhancement of crude oil biodegradation by immobilized bacterial consortium in small batch and continuous bioreactor Modes. Egypt J Chem. 2018; 61(6): 1019–1030. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kadakol JC, Kamanavalli CM, Shouche Y. Biodegradation of carbofuran phenol by free and immobilized cells of Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC13883T. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 27(1): 25–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vijayalakshmi P, Usha MS. Degradation of chlorpyrifos by free cells and calcium alginate immobilized cells of Pseudomonas putida. Adv Appl Sci Res. 2012; 3(5): 2796–2800. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Xue J, Wu Y, Liu Z, Li M, Sun, Wang H, Liu B. Characteristic assessment of diesel-degrading bacteria immobilized on natural organic carriers in marine environment: the degradation activity and nutrient. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1): 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chang JS, Chou C, Chen SY. Decolorization of azo dyes with immobilized Pseudomonas luteola. Process Biochem. 2001; 36(8–9): 757–763. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Saratale RG, Saratale GD, Chang JS, Govindwar SP. Decolorization and degradation of reactive azo dyes by fixed bed bioreactors containing immobilized cells of Proteus vulgaris NCIM-2027. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2011; 16(4): 830. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Akpor OB. Dye Decolouration by Immobilized and Free Bacterial Cells at Different Glucose Concentration. Res J Environ Sci. 2018; 12 (5): 33–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bharagava RN, Saxena G, Mulla SI, Patel DK. Characterization and identification of recalcitrant organic pollutants (ROPs) in tannery wastewater and its phytotoxicity evaluation for environmental safety. Arch Environ Con Tox. 2017; 27(1): 25–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chandra R, Abhishek A, Sankhwar M. Bacterial decolorization and detoxification of black liquor from rayon grade pulp manufacturing paper industry and detection of their metabolic products. Bioresour Technol. 2011; 102: 6429–6436. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kurade MB, Waghmode TR, Khandare RV, Jeon BH, Govindwar SP. Biodegradation and detoxification of textile dye Disperse Red 54 by Brevibacillus laterosporus and determination of its metabolic fate. J Biosci Bioeng. 2016; 121(4): 442–449. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2015.08.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kurade MB, Waghmode TR, Kabra AN, Govindwar SP. Degradation of a xenobiotic textile dye, disperse brown 118, by Brevibacillus laterosporus. Biotechnol Lett. 2013; 5: 1593–1598. doi: 10.1007/s10529-013-1253-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ajaz M, Rehman A, Khan Z, Nisar MA, Hussain S. Degradation of azo dyes by Alcaligenes aquatilis 3c and its potential use in the wastewater treatment. AMB Express. 2019; 9(1):1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Faisal Mamhood

17 Mar 2022

PONE-D-22-01377Decolorization of Azo dyes by a novel aerobic bacterialPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Naqvi,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 01 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Faisal Mamhood

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service. 

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

3. In your Methods section, please provide additional location information about your sampling sites, including geographic coordinates for the data set if available.

4. In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained for the work. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the field site access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why.

Additional Editor Comments:

Please find below the reviewers comments 

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript titled "Decolorization of azo dyes by a novel bacterial' has been reviewed and I found it an interesting piece of research; however, a lot of flaws have been indicated and are necessary to be taken care of before the further consideration.

Comments:

The title of the paper is not complete ‘bacterial isolate………..name…..?? What is the novel in the bacterial strain, a huge number of bacillus species have been reported to decolorize the dyes. The word Novel is confusing here.

Abstract………azo dyes…not azo- dyes

Introduction contain a lot of grammar and structural mistakes. Please take care of…

Methodology

All chemicals and reagents of analytical grade…..this is not a complete sentence

What is the rational to select 37 C temperature and why the aerobic conditions were provided especially when it is established that the azo dye decolorization is an anaerobic process?

16S rRNA gene….should be written correctly….Which primers were used?.....the mention the protocol description

Phylogenetic tree should be correctly drawn. All the bacterial strain should be italicized. The isolated bacterial strain should be indicated as bold or red. A control group should be added in the tree

In decolorization graphs, if decolorization was not measured at 0, then 0 time should not be added in the graphs. There is no need to add 0

There should be an accession number of the identified strain

The discussion is all over the place. The mere repetition of results should not be the part. Discussion should logically narrate the results by comparting with relevant literature.

The manuscript should be checked with the native English speaker to improve the grammar, syntax, sentence structure etc.

Reviewer #2: This is a well designed and clearly written study. The authors have performed that experiments in a logical manner and reported the results with comparison to the available studies in the literature. The quality of English language is also adequate. Therefore, this study has my recommendation for publication as such.

I have a minor question though. Did the authors test the growth potential of the isolated strain against the azo dyes at concentrations levels higher than the 250 mg/l? If not, why?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Jun 15;17(6):e0269559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269559.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


22 Apr 2022

Respond to Reviewers

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Manuscript was checked thoroughly and follow the instructions provided by the journal site.

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service

Professor Colin Jackson who is a coauthor in this research article, has reviewed this manuscript for scientific as well as for English errors, whose native language is English.

3. In your Methods section, please provide additional location information about your sampling sites, including geographic coordinates for the data set if available.

The required information is given on Page #7, line # 145-146.

4. In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained for the work. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the field site access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why.

The information is given on page #7, line # 146-148.

Reviewer #1: The manuscript titled "Decolorization of azo dyes by a novel bacterial' has been reviewed and I found it an interesting piece of research; however, a lot of flaws have been indicated and are necessary to be taken care of before the further consideration.

Comments:

1. The title of the paper is not complete ‘bacterial isolate………..name…..?? What is the novel in the bacterial strain, a huge number of bacillus species have been reported to decolorize the dyes. The word Novel is confusing here.

Answer: The name of the bacterial isolate is added in the title Page # 1, 2, line # 2, 23. The word novel is used for this strain as it decolorize the dyes aerobically.

2. Abstract………azo dyes…not azo- dyes

Answer: It has been corrected in the abstract. Page # 2, line # 29

3. Introduction contain a lot of grammar and structural mistakes. Please take care of…

Answer:

Methodology

4. All chemicals and reagents of analytical grade…..this is not a complete sentence

Answer: The sentence has been revised. Page # 7 , line #119

5. What is the rational to select 37 C temperature and why the aerobic conditions were provided especially when it is established that the azo dye decolorization is an anaerobic process?

Answer: Optimization of azo dyes degradation was done at various temperature i.e., 25,32,37ºC and 45ºC. but maximum decolorization with short period of time was observed at 37ºC.

Although the azo dyes are extremely stable under aerobic conditions and the spontaneous reduction of the azo bond under anaerobic conditions leads to highly carcinogenic and mutagenic colorless aromatic amines so the present study focused on the degradation of azodyes under aerobic conditions.

6. 16S rRNA gene….should be written correctly….Which primers were used?.....the mention the protocol description

Answer: The protocol has been described. Page # 8, Line #143, 144, 145

7. Phylogenetic tree should be correctly drawn. All the bacterial strain should be italicized. The isolated bacterial strain should be indicated as bold or red. A control group should be added in the tree

Answer:

8. In decolorization graphs, if decolorization was not measured at 0, then 0 time should not be added in the graphs. There is no need to add 0

Answer: The decolorization was also measured at 0, that’s why the 0 time is added in the graphs.

9.There should be an accession number of the identified strain

Answer: The accession number of the strain has been added. Page # 12, Line # 232.

10. The discussion is all over the place. The mere repetition of results should not be the part. Discussion should logically narrate the results by comparting with relevant literature.

Answer:

11. The manuscript should be checked with the native English speaker to improve the grammar, syntax, sentence structure etc.

Answer:

Reviewer #2: This is a well designed and clearly written study. The authors have performed that experiments in a logical manner and reported the results with comparison to the available studies in the literature. The quality of English language is also adequate. Therefore, this study has my recommendation for publication as such.

1. I have a minor question though. Did the authors test the growth potential of the isolated strain against the azo dyes at concentrations levels higher than the 250 mg/l? If not, why?

Answer: The growth potential of the isolated strain against the azo dyes at concentrations levels higher than 250 mg/l was also tested but no degradation was observed it is not mentioned in the article.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Faisal Mamhood

17 May 2022

PONE-D-22-01377R1Decolorization of Azo dyes by a novel aerobic bacterial strain Bacillus cereus strain ROCPLOS ONE

Dear author

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Faisal Mamhood

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Some answers are not given in the revised version, e.g, question raised by reviewer 1 as mentioned by the author as question number 10 and 11 in file response to reviewers comments. Give the answers of these questions.

Moreover make a separate file regarding response to reviewers comments for both reviewers, in which question raised by reviewers and answer of that question should be clearly readable

In the manuscript also highlight the text which is added regarding the answers of the reviewers comments throughout the manuscript

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Jun 15;17(6):e0269559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269559.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


18 May 2022

Respond to Reviewers

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Manuscript was checked thoroughly and follow the instructions provided by the journal site.

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service

Professor Colin Jackson who is a coauthor in this research article, has reviewed this manuscript for scientific as well as for English errors, whose native language is English.

3. In your Methods section, please provide additional location information about your sampling sites, including geographic coordinates for the data set if available.

The required information is given on Page #7, line # 145-146.

4. In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained for the work. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the field site access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why.

The information is given on page #7, line # 146-148.

Reviewer #1: The manuscript titled "Decolorization of azo dyes by a novel bacterial' has been reviewed and I found it an interesting piece of research; however, a lot of flaws have been indicated and are necessary to be taken care of before the further consideration.

Comments:

1. The title of the paper is not complete ‘bacterial isolate………..name…..?? What is the novel in the bacterial strain, a huge number of bacillus species have been reported to decolorize the dyes. The word Novel is confusing here.

Answer: The name of the bacterial isolate is added in the title Page # 1, 2, line # 2, 23. The word novel is used for this strain as it decolorize the dyes aerobically.

2. Abstract………azo dyes…not azo- dyes

Answer: It has been corrected in the abstract. Page # 2, line # 29

3. Introduction contain a lot of grammar and structural mistakes. Please take care of…

Answer:

Methodology

4. All chemicals and reagents of analytical grade…..this is not a complete sentence

Answer: The sentence has been revised. Page # 7 , line #119

5. What is the rational to select 37 C temperature and why the aerobic conditions were provided especially when it is established that the azo dye decolorization is an anaerobic process?

Answer: Optimization of azo dyes degradation was done at various temperature i.e., 25,32,37ºC and 45ºC. but maximum decolorization with short period of time was observed at 37ºC.

Although the azo dyes are extremely stable under aerobic conditions and the spontaneous reduction of the azo bond under anaerobic conditions leads to highly carcinogenic and mutagenic colorless aromatic amines so the present study focused on the degradation of azodyes under aerobic conditions.

6. 16S rRNA gene…should be written correctly….Which primers were used?.....the mention the protocol description

Answer: The protocol has been described. Page # 8, Line #143, 144, 145

7. Phylogenetic tree should be correctly drawn. All the bacterial strain should be italicized. The isolated bacterial strain should be indicated as bold or red. A control group should be added in the tree

Answer:

8. In decolorization graphs, if decolorization was not measured at 0, then 0 time should not be added in the graphs. There is no need to add 0

Answer: The decolorization was also measured at 0, that’s why the 0 time is added in the graphs.

9.There should be an accession number of the identified strain

Answer: The accession number of the strain has been added. Page # 12, Line # 232.

10. The discussion is all over the place. The mere repetition of results should not be the part. Discussion should logically narrate the results by comparting with relevant literature.

Answer: Discussion has been improved as according to the suggestions made by the reviewer (Section: Results and Discussion). But as the section is Results along with discussion so we make try our best to not repeat results during discussion and solely discuss results after showing the results of the experiments.

11. The manuscript should be checked with the native English speaker to improve the grammar, syntax, sentence structure etc.

Answer: Professor Dr. Colin Jackson who belongs to Australia (Native English speaker) has checked the whole manuscript and improve the language as well as technical errors if there is any. He has read the manuscript thoroughly and incorporate the changes as shown in Revised Manuscript with Track Changes

Reviewer #2: This is a well-designed and clearly written study. The authors have performed that experiments in a logical manner and reported the results with comparison to the available studies in the literature. The quality of English language is also adequate. Therefore, this study has my recommendation for publication as such.

1. I have a minor question though. Did the authors test the growth potential of the isolated strain against the azo dyes at concentrations levels higher than the 250 mg/l? If not, why?

Answer: The growth potential of the isolated strain against the azo dyes at concentrations levels higher than 250 mg/l was also tested but no degradation was observed it is not mentioned in the article.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers (Reviewer 1).docx

Decision Letter 2

Faisal Mamhood

24 May 2022

Decolorization of Azo dyes by a novel aerobic bacterial strain Bacillus cereus strain ROC

PONE-D-22-01377R2

Dear authors

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Faisal Mamhood

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Faisal Mamhood

30 May 2022

PONE-D-22-01377R2

Decolorization of Azo dyes by a novel aerobic bacterial strain Bacillus cereus strain ROC

Dear Dr. Naqvi:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Faisal Mamhood

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig

    Decolourization of Reactive orange 16 by free and immobilized cells of bacterial strain (A) by free cells at 30 ˚C (B) by immobilized cells at 30 ˚C.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig

    Decolorization of Reactive black 5 by free and immobilized cells of bacterial strain (A) by free cells at 30 ˚C (B) by immobilized cells at 30 ˚C.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig

    Concentrations of Reactive orange 16 degraded after treatment with free and immobilized cells of the bacterial strain (A) Degraded by free cells at 30 ˚C (B) Degraded by immobilized cells at 30 ˚C.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig

    Concentrations of Reactive black 5 degraded after treatment with free and immobilized cells of the bacterial strain (A) Degraded by free cells at 30 ˚C (B) Degraded by immobilized cells at 30 ˚C.

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers (Reviewer 1).docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES