Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Jun 15;12:10012. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14714-9

Author Correction: The Association Between Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance T1 Mapping and Myocardial Dysfunction in Diabetic Rabbits

Mu Zeng 1, Yingyan Qiao 2, Zhaoying Wen 3, Jun Liu 1, Enhua Xiao 1, Changlian Tan 1, Yibin Xie 4, Jing An 5, Zishu Zhang 1,, Zhanming Fan 3, Debiao Li 4
PMCID: PMC9200801  PMID: 35705622

Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/srep44937, published online 24 March 2017

This Article contains errors.

It does not specify that the cohort of rabbits used were the same as that in Qiao et al.1, and that, therefore, some of the data in Table 1 (including LA, IVS, LVPW, LVIDd, LVIs, EF, and FS) had already been published.

As a result, in the Methods section, under the subheading ‘Experimental model’,

“A total of 42 one-year-old male New Zealand white rabbits with a mean weight of 2.5 kg were used, and all animals were provided by the Animal Experiment Center of Clean Grade of Beijing Anzhen Hospital.”

should read:

“The same cohort of 42 one-year-old male New Zealand white rabbits as that presented in Qiao et al.1 were used. The animals had a mean weight of 2.5 kg, and were provided by the Animal Experiment Center of Clean Grade of Beijing Anzhen Hospital.”

In addition, in the Results section, under the subheading ‘Echocardiography’,

“The morphology and function of the left ventricle (LV) were assessed via conventional echocardiography in both the DM and control groups (Table 1).”

should read:

“The morphology and function of the left ventricle (LV) were assessed via conventional echocardiography in both the DM and control groups (Table 1). Some data (including LA, IVS, LVPW, LVIDd, LVIDs, EF and FS) were republished from our previous article, Qiao et al.1.

Table 1.

Ultrasonography and CMR parameters.

DM group Control group
Baseline 3 months 6 months 9 months Baseline 3 months 6 months 9 months
LA (mm)1 9.56 ± 0.98 10.56 ± 0.58 9.97 ± 0.86 11.36 ± 0.82 9.95 ± 0.68 9.79 ± 0.81 10.61 ± 0.58 11.56 ± 0.67
IVS (mm)1 2.32 ± 0.41 2.43 ± 0.32 2.42 ± 0.51 2.52 ± 0.62 2.63 ± 0.24 2.34 ± 0.32 2.75 ± 0.31 2.86 ± 0.63
LVPW (mm)1 2.33 ± 0.51 2.56 ± 0.32 2.78 ± 0.67 2.89 ± 0.43 2.35 ± 0.19 2.67 ± 0.41 2.78 ± 0.53 2.89 ± 0.67
LVIDd (mm)1 15.67 ± 0.59 16.67 ± 0.81 16.65 ± 0.78 17.67 ± 0.55 14.75 ± 0.87 15.68 ± 0.85 16.64 ± 0.54 16.98 ± 0.67
LVIDs (mm)1 11.67 ± 1.21 12.87 ± 1.16 12.45 ± 1.13 12.67 ± 1.41 11.78 ± 1.32 11.97 ± 1.21 13.67 ± 1.29 12.67 ± 1.26
EF (%)1 60.33 ± 4.51 61.33 ± 4.23 62.33 ± 3.57 62.67 ± 4.53 61.53 ± 4.23 63.33 ± 5.51 63.73 ± 4.35 62.37 ± 4.54
FS (%)1 31.33 ± 3.16 32.33 ± 3.23 32.78 ± 3.45 34.33 ± 3.32 30.67 ± 3.15 31.54 ± 3.24 35.33 ± 4.51 34.33 ± 3.36
SR 18.63 ± 1.25 18.06 ± 1.50 18.83 ± 1.42 14.33 ± 1.60* 18.46 ± 1.37 18.54 ± 1.60 18.71 ± 1.33 18.35 ± 1.14*
SrR -8.24 ± 0.64 -8.33 ± 0.53 -6.60 ± 1.17* -5.01 ± 1.11* -8.19 ± 0.72 -8.26 ± 0.42 -8.11 ± 1.01* -8.16 ± 0.60*
ECV 29.96 ± 1.33 32.31 ± 1.54* 35.82 ± 1.41* 39.81 ± 1.63* 30.01 ± 1.21 30.05 ± 1.59* 29.83 ± 1.47* 30.33 ± 1.75*

*p < 0.05 vs. the control group at the same time point.

Finally, an updated version of Table 1, with appropriate referencing is listed below.

Reference

  • 1.Qiao YY, et al. Layer-specific myocardial strain analysis: investigation of regional deformation in a rabbit model of diabetes mellitus during different stages. Med. Ultrason. 2016;18(3):339–344. doi: 10.11152/mu.2013.2066.183.qia. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES