Skip to main content
Journal of Dental Sciences logoLink to Journal of Dental Sciences
. 2021 Oct 30;17(2):744–749. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.09.033

An evaluation of the prevalence of elongated styloid process in Taiwanese population using digital panoramic radiographs

Gin Chen a,b,c,, Pei-Cheng Yeh a, Sung-Ling Huang d
PMCID: PMC9201539  PMID: 35756808

Abstract

Background/purpose

Styloid process (SP) was an anatomical structure located in front of the stylomastoid foramen and the occurrence of styloid process elongation was uncertainly reported. The purpose of this study was to survey, using digital panoramic radiography, the lengths of styloid process (SP) and the prevalence of elongated SP in the Taiwanese population. Their relationships with age, gender and laterality were also determined.

Materials and methods

A total of 539 patients (including 53 that were referred from the Department of Otorhinolarygngology with clinical symptoms) were studies retrospectively. Panoramic radiographic examinations were performed on all these patients at the Outpatient clinics of the Department of Stomatology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital between January 2019 and December 2019. Patients were divided into groups according to their age and gender. The length of SP from the base of temporal bone junction to the tip of the process was measured using the Sirona software. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22.0 based on tests of Chi-square, Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis tests. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

A total of 539 (240 males and 299 females) digital panoramic radiographs were measured and evaluated in this study. The mean length of SP was 30 ± 0.7 mm on the right side and 29 ± 0.7 mm on the left side. The average length of SP on both sides was 29.5 ± 0.7 mm. In those cases with symptomatic Eagle syndrome, the mean length of SP was 32 ± 0.8 mm on the right side and 33 ± 0.8 mm on the left side (average 32.5 ± 0.8 mm). These lengths were statistically different between the general population and the symptomatic patients. Furthermore, the mean length of SP was 29 ± 0.7 mm in females and 30 ± 0.7 mm in males. The length of the SP grew progressively with age, and was more clearly seen within subjects from 41 to >60 years of age (p < 0.005). Meanwhile, the prevalence of elongated SP in our study was 41.5% on the right side and 36.2% on the left side, with female predominance.

Conclusion

The mean length of SP was 30 ± 0.7 mm (right side) and 29 ± 0.7 mm (left side). The prevalence of elongated SP was 41.5% on the right side, and 36.2% on the left side. Our findings were consistent with some previous studies that were differences related with age, and were more prominent in those patients with symptoms.

Keywords: Styloid process, Eagle syndrome, Elongated styloid process, Panoramic radiography

Introduction

The styloid process (SP) is a cylindrical cartilaginous bone arising from the posterior site of the temporal bone. SP is located in front of the stylomastoid foramen. Together with the styloid ligament and the small horn of the hyoid bone of the styloid process, they form the styloid apparatus.1, 2, 3 It is typically 16–30 mm long with variations across individuals, and even between the left and right sides of the same person.4

The elongation of SP is an anatomical feature in the general population. It may cause compression on nerves and blood vessels leading to neck symptoms, orofacial pain, dysphagia and referred otalgia that are characteristic symptoms of Eagle syndrome as first reported by WW Eagle in 1937.4, 5, 6 Styloid process is normally 16–30 mm in length with variations related to ethnic groups and geographical regions. About 2%–4% of the general populations are estimated to have elongated styloid processes. The majority of them are asymptomatic.3,7, 8, 9 In the past, morphological aspects of SP were evaluated using different methods like measurements on human skulls,10, 11, 12 digital panoramic radiographs,2, 3, 4,7,13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 computed tomography (CT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).19,20 Although CBCT has high precision with 3D measurements, digital panoramic radiography remains the primary resource for epidemiological studies because of its easy calibration despite compromised accuracy.

In the lack of any radiological investigation specifically focused on elongated styloid process in Asia region, the aim of this study was to evaluate the average length of SP and the prevalence of elongated SP using the digital orthopantomography in a Taiwanese population. We also analyzed its variation and relationship with gender, age and laterality and compared results particularly with those in patients with symptomatic Eagle syndrome.

Materials and methods

Our study protocol was ethical approved by the Institutional Review Board of Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan. Digital radiological images of a total of 539 patients (240 males and 299 females), including 53 patients (26 male and 27 female) referred from the Department of Otorhinolaryngology with suspicious of symptomatic Eagle syndrome were retrospectively reviewed and evaluated. These patients all received digital panoramic radiographic examinations at the outpatient clinics of the Department of Stomatology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital between January 2019 and December 2019. Patients were divided into groups according to their age and gender. Patients had ages ranging from 18 to 99 years (mean 48.2 years). Radiographic examinations were taken from a digital panoramic system (Dentsply Sirona, Orthophos XG, Bensheim, Germany) under the exposure settings (8 MA, 69Kvp and 14s) as recommended by the manufacturers. X-ray images were display directly on a 4G monitor. The length of the styloid process was measured from the point where the styloid process left the bottom of the tympanic plate to the tip of the process, regardless of whether or not the styloid process had been segmented (Fig. 1). The measurements were done with the manufacturer supplied software (EBM dental, Taichung, Taiwan). Data were confirmed by an oral radiologist and a dentist of our hospital. Intra- or inter-observer variability was determined at the limit of <5%. The data were collected, recorded and analyzed using standard statistical software (IBM SPSS version 22.0, New York, NY, USA). Bivariate associations between the gender and both sides of SP were evaluated with the Chi-square and Mann–Whitney U tests. Kruskal Wallis and Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc tests were used to determine the association with age. Statistical significance was set at <0.05.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Panoramic radiography is commonly used to measure the length of styloid process (blue arrow) from the tympanic plate to the tip of the process.

Results

A total of 539 patients (240 males and 299 females) were included in this one year retrospective study. Their mean of age was 48.2 ± 17.7 years old (range from 18 to 99 years). Their mean SP length was 29 ± 0.7 mm for female and 29.5 ± 0.7 mm for male (Table 1). Measurements were 30 ± 0.7 mm on the right side, and 29 ± 0.7 mm on the left side. Average length on both sides was 29.5 ± 0.7 mm (range from 13.9 to 52.2 mm). Among the general population, the SP equal in length was found in 1.44% (7/486), right > left side was found in 56.17% (273/486), and left > right side was found in 42.39% (230/486). For those patients with symptomatic Eagle syndrome, SP length on their right side was 32 ± 0.8 mm, and on their left side was 33 ± 0.8 mm. Moreover, right > left side was 54.72% (29/53), and left > right side was 45.28% (24/53) (Table 2). Comparisons of SP lengths between gender and across ages are shown in Table 2, Table 3 respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between SP lengths of right versus left side, and for age groups <20 and 21–40 years. More prevalent and longer SP appeared in the age groups of 41–60 years, and in those >60 years (Table 3). SP lengths were clearly longer in older patients, and also longer for patients with symptomatic Eagle syndrome (32.5 ± 0.8 mm) when compared with the general population (29.5 ± 0.7 mm). Finally, the prevalence of elongated SP in our study was 41.5% on the right side, and 36.2% on the left side, and with female predominance (Table 1).

Table 1.

Means length values (mm) of styloid process (SP) in different age groups and across gender from 486 cases in the general population.

Total: 486 panoramic radiographs Female (n = 272)
Male (n = 214)
p value
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
Age 46.8 ±16.8 50.1 ±18.6 0.025∗
Styloid process (mm)
 Right 29 ±0.7 30 ±0.7 0.195
 Left 29 ±0.7 29 ±0.7 0.231
 Right & Left (Means) 29 ±0.7 29.5 ±0.7 0.160
Elongation of SP (>30 mm) No. % No. %
 Right 41.5% (202/486) 109 22.4% 93 19.1% 0.021∗
 Left 36.2% (176/486) 98 20.1% 78 16.1% 0.024∗

Mann–Whitney U test. ∗p < 0.05 significantly difference, ∗∗p < 0.01 more significantly difference.

Table 2.

Means length values (mm) of styloid process (SP) length measured on digital panoramic images in different age groups and across gender from 539 cases (including 53 cases with symptoms).

Styloid process
(n = 486)
Eagle syndrome
(n = 53)
Total (n = 539)
p value
No. % No. % No. %
Age (mean ± SD) 48.2 ±17.7 67.9 ±17.8 50.2 ±18.6 <0.001∗∗
Sex 0.580
 Female 272 (55.97%) 27 (50.94%) 299 (55.47%)
 Male 214 (44.03%) 26 (49.06%) 240 (44.53%)
Age <0.001∗∗
 Age <20 23 (4.73%) 0 (0.00%) 23 (4.27%)
 Age 21-40 157 (32.30%) 2 (3.77%) 159 (29.50%)
 Age 41-60 181 (37.24%) 19 (35.85%) 200 (37.11%)
 Age >60 125 (25.72%) 32 (60.38%) 157 (29.13)
Styloid process (mm) (mean ± SD) (mean ± SD)
 Right 30 ±0.7 32 ±0.8 30 ±0.7 0.008∗∗
 Left 29 ±0.7 33 ±0.8 29 ±0.7 <0.001∗∗
 Right & Left (mean) 29.5 ±0.7 32.5 ±0.8 29.5 ±0.7 0.001∗∗
Styloid process <0.001∗∗ 0.646
 Right = Left 7 (1.44%) 0 (0.00%) 7 (1.30%)
 Right < Left 206 (42.39%) 24 (45.28%) 230 (42.67%)
 Right > Left 273 (56.17%) 29 (54.72%) 302 (56.03%)

Chi–Square test. Mann–Whitney U test. ∗p < 0.05 significantly difference, ∗∗p < 0.01 more significantly difference.

Table 3.

Means length values (mm) of styloid process (SP) length across different ages in the 539 cases.

Age related factor Mean Median IQR p value Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc test
1 vs 2 1 vs 3 1 vs 4 2 vs 3 2 vs 4 3 vs 4
Styloid process (Right) <0.001∗∗ 0.288 0.004∗∗ 0.002∗∗ 0.025∗ 0.010∗ 1.000
1.Age <20 26 ± 0.7 25 (23–27)
2.Age 21-40 28 ± 0.7 28 (23–32)
3.Age 41-60 30 ± 0.7 30 (25–34)
4.Age >60 30 ± 0.7 30 (26–33)
Styloid process (Left) <0.001∗∗ 0.182 0.005∗∗ 0.001∗∗ 0.096 0.005∗∗ 1.000
1.Age <20 26 ± 0.7 24 (21–28)
2.Age 21-40 28 ± 0.7 27 (23–31)
3.Age 41-60 30 ± 0.7 28 (25–33)
4.Age >60 30 ± 0.6 29 (27–33)
Styloid process (mean) <0.001∗∗ 0.178 0.002∗∗ 0.001∗∗ 0.030∗ 0.005∗∗ 1.000
1.Age <20 26 ± 0.7 24 (22–27)
2.Age 21-40 28 ± 0.7 27 (23–31)
3.Age 41-60 30 ± 0.6 29 (25–34)
4.Age >60 30 ± 0.6 30 (27–33)

Kruskal Wallis test. ∗p < 0.05 significantly difference, ∗∗p < 0.01 more significantly difference.

Discussion

The styloid complex includes the SP of the temporal bone, the stylohyoid ligament and the lesser horn of the hyoid bone. Basically, the styloid process is a long cylindrical cartilaginous bone located at the floor of temporal bone. The ligaments attached to the SP are involved in oral functions of mastication and swallowing.11,21 The elongation of SP and adjacent structures including stylohyoid ligament could directly provoke dysphagia, tinnitus and otalgia that was first described by Italian surgeon Pietro Marchetti (1652) but WW Eagle provide a comprehensive description of the symptoms and known as Eagle's syndrome as well in 1937.5, 6, 7 Elongation of the styloid process is not the main etiology of neck and cervicofacial pain. But most studies agreed on SP's possible compression on nearby neural and vascular structures.22,23 Symptoms due to elongated SP sometimes are indistinguishable with some disorders like facial neuralgia, or oral and temporomandibular diseases.

Elongated SP can be detected by both physical and radiographic examinations. An unusual palpable SP in the tonsillar fossa indicates the possibility of SP elongation.21,24 Clinically, palpation of the elongated tip of SP exacerbates painful symptoms, and the elongated SP is typically confirmed by radiographic imaging.13,19 Orthopanotomographs are the most useful clinical examination in diagnosing bone disorders related to facial structures like in the maxillary, mandibular and TMJ area.2, 3, 4,7,13, 14, 15, 16,18,25 It is widely used to determine SP elongation and their ossification such as Kursoglu et al. on Turkish, More & Asrani on Indian, Vieira et al. on Brazilain, AlZarea et al. on Saudian, Gracco et al. on Italian and Anoun et al. on Lebanese population (Table 4). Newly developed CBCT provides a reliable visualization of the orientation and dimensions of the styloid apparatus, but panoramic radiography can further provide realistic images allowing different angulations, and the ease in replicating measurements regarding lengths of the styloid process.19,20 Our present study is in compliance with experiences of reported studies, and further utilized panoramic images to evaluate the length of SP in a regular and normal bone structure situation.

Table 4.

Prevalence of Styloid Process (SP) elongation reported in of previous studies.

Authors Population Study Model Samples Elongated SP > 30 mm (%)
Eagle5 (1949) American Panoramic 254 4.0
Kaufman et al.10 (1970) American Panoramic 484 28.0
Correll et al.31 (1979) American Panoramic 1771 18.2
O'Carroll et al.36 (1984) American Panoramic 479 78.5
Keur et al.33 (1986) Australian Panoramic 1135 30.0
Monsour & Young13 (1986) Australian Panoramic 670 21.1
Ferrairo et al.32 (1990) Italian Panoramic 286 84.4
Kursoglu et al.1 (2005) Turkish Panoramic 55 83.6
Ilguy et al.34 (2005, 2013) Turkish Pano/CT 860/69 3.7
Gokce et al.25 (2008) Turkish Panoramic 698 7.7
Balcioglu et al.24 (2009) Turkish Pano/skull 227 3.3
Sisman et al.38 (2009) Turkish Panoramic 149 7.7
More & Asrani2 (2010) Indian Panoramic 500 19.4
Bagga et al.37 (2012) Indian Panoramic 2706 79.5 B; 20.5 U
Oztas & Orhan3 (2012) Turkish Panoramic 2000 67.5
Roopashri et al.7 (2012) Indian Panoramic 300 78.5 B; 21.5 U
Vieira et al.28 (2015) Brazilian Panoramic 736 43.89
AlZarea et al.30 (2017) Saudi Arabian Panoramic 198 42.7 R; 52.4 L
Gracco et al.15 (2017) Italian Panoramic 600 33.0
Mathew et al.35 (2017) South Indian Panoramic 100 35.0
Patra et al.12 (2017) Indian Pano/skull 50 10.0
Jamal et al.16 (2018) Saudi Arabian Panoramic 1971 47.8 R; 52.5 L
Asutay et al.39 (2019) Turkish Panoramic 3678 7.01
Hettiarachchi et al.17 (2019) Sri Lanka Panoramic 100 24.6
Sharma et al.4 (2019) Nepalese Panoramic 1061 57.5 R; 42.3 L
Sridevi et al.18 (2019) Indian Panoramic 500 55.8
Aoun et al.9 (2020) Lebanese Panoramic 489 15.5
Rai et al.8 (2020) NW Indian Panoramic 1000 27.3
Chen et al. present study Taiwanese Panoramic 539 41.5 R; 36.2 L

Previous studies are generally reported the normal SP is approximately 20–30 mm in length. Variations ranged from 16 to 35 mm depending on genetic background or geographic region.4,7,8,18,26, 27, 28 In Japanese population, SP was reported to be 16 mm in length and that report is also the first study on styloid process in Asia regions.29 Our present study found that in the Taiwanese population, SP measured 30 ± 0.7 mm on the right side, and 29 ± 0.7 mm on the left side. The mean of both sides measured at 29.5 ± 0.7 mm (range from 13.9 to 52.2 cm). That figure almost matched the average length of the styloid process. Our results are similar to those in the Kaufmann study reported in 1970 and AlZarea in 2017.10,30 Interestingly, our findings of equal SP lengths on both sides being only 1.44%, and the right side being longer than the left side (56.17 vs 42.39%) in the general population. On the other hand, the SP lengths of those patients referred from ENT with symptomatic Eagle syndrome were 32 ± 0.8 mm on the right side and 33 ± 0.8 mm on the left side. These measurements indicated that patients with symptoms showed a tendency of longer SP with statistically significant difference with the general population (p = 0.001), particularly on the left side (p < 0.001).

The overall elongation of styloid process was postulated to be related to ossification of either the SP or the adjacent stylohyoid ligament.8,29,31,32 Thresholds of elongated SP varied in the literatures, but in general, measurements >30 mm is considered elongated.10,14,21,22,27,31,33 The prevalence of styloid process elongation varied greatly across reports, from 3.3% to 84.4% as showed in Table 4. Panoramic radiographic assessments revealed elongated SP that varied across populations and ethnic groups. Our findings demonstrate the prevalence of elongated SP was 41.5% (202/486) on right side and 36.2% (176/486) on the left side (Table 1). Our results are similar with those studies of Vieira et al., at 2015 and AlZarea et al., at 2017 but a little lower than the average in other researches.28,30

The exact cause of SP elongation is not clear, but cartilaginous calcification and ossification might be due to local chronic irritations related to endocrine disorders (gender-specific), osseous tissue calcification and formation, traumatic mechanical stress and aging.14,27,30,34,35 Correll (1979) and O'Carroll (1984) reported a significant correlation of SP length with the calcium deposition among 80-year-old patients.31,36, 37, 38 Bozkir (1999) revealed only 4% elongated SP was found in those patients with edentulous ridge.14 Most reports overlooked the relationship with gender, and only a few reported that clinical symptoms are detected more readily in females. The ratio between female and male had been reported to 1:3.1,39 Our present study revealed similar findings. In the general population, the elongated SP was 30 ± 0.7 mm in male and 29 ± 0.7 mm in female. But females developed SP elongation situations that were easier to observe than males (22.4% vs 19.1% on right side and 20.1% vs 16.0% on left side). Almost 50% of symptomatic patients showed detectable elongated SPs. However, exact anomaly or anatomic variations remain to be identified.

In comparison with other studies, the limitations of our study are not able to consider and analyze the morphology of prolonged SPs because of huge variations attributed to technical reasons such as differences and magnifications of panoramic machine provides, difficulties on digital and manual calibration. Therefore, we have only sufficed to screen for the elongated vs non-elongated processes and compared the relationship between with age, gender and laterality.

The future may be focus on precise measurement the different types of calcification and ossification of styloid process using more advanced imaging technologies.

Based on the findings of our present study, it may be concluded that the mean of SP length in Taiwanese population is 29.5 mm. The mean elongated SP of those with symptomatic Eagle syndrome patients is 32.5 mm, which is longer than the general population. We found no difference between the right and left sides, although such elongation appeared more prevalent and longer in the age groups of 41–60 and > 60 years. Therefore, older patients and patients with symptoms likely have styloid process elongation situations. In addition, the prevalence of elongated SP is 41.5% on the right side and 36.2% on the left side.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors gave no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Biostatistics Task Force of Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan for their data analysis.

References

  • 1.Kursoglu P., Unalan F., Erdem T. Radiological evaluation of the styloid process in young adults resident in Turkey's Yeditepe University faculty of dentistry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100:491–494. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.05.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.More C.B., Asrani M.K. Evaluation of the styloid process on digital panoramic radiographs. Indian J Radiol Imag. 2010;20:261–265. doi: 10.4103/0971-3026.73537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Oztas B., Orhan K. Investigation of the incidence of stylohyoid ligament calcifications with panoramic radiographs. J of Invest & Clin Dent. 2012;3:30–35. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1626.2011.00081.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sharma B.R., Singh S., Timilsina M., Sharma P., Sharma K. Measurement of length of styloid process by orthopantomography. J GMCN. 2019;12:17–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Eagle W.W. Symptomatic elongated styloid process. Report of two cases of styloid process-carotid artery syndrome with operation. Arch Otolaryngol. 1949;49:490–503. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1949.03760110046003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Graf C.J. Glossopharyngeal neuralgia and ossification of the stylohyoid ligament. J Neruosurg. 1959;16:448–453. doi: 10.3171/jns.1959.16.4.0448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Roopashri G., Vaishali M.R., Priscilla M., Baig M., Shankar U. Evaluation of elongated styloid process on digital panoramic radiographs. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012;13:618–622. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rai S., Misra D., Singh N., Khatri M., Tyagi K., Mallick P. Prevalence and calcification of stylohyoid complex in North West part of India and its correlation with general and dental health condition. JIAOMR. 2020;29:174–179. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aoun G., Srour N., El-Outa A., Nasseh I. Styloid process elongation in a sample of Lebanese population: a consideration for the prevention of Eagle syndrome. Medicine & Pharm Report. 2020;93:410–415. doi: 10.15386/mpr-1666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kaufmann S.M., Elzay R.P., Irish E.P. Styloid process variation: radiologic and clinical study. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970;191:4460–4463. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1970.00770040654013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rath G., Anand C. Abnormal styloid process in a human skull. Surg Radiol Anat. 1991;13:227–229. doi: 10.1007/BF01627991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Patra A., Singla R.K., Kaur H., Bansal R., Singla M. Elongated styloid process: a morphometric study, with radiological evaluation in dry human skulls, with its clinical implications. IJARS. 2017;6:AO07–AO13. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Monsour P.A., Young W.G. Variability of the styloid process and stylohyoid ligament in panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986;61:522–526. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(86)90399-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bozkir M.G., Boga H., Dere F. The evaluation of elongated styloid process in panoramic radiographs in edentulous patients. J Med Sci. 1999;29:481–485. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gracco A., Stefani A., Bruno G., Balasso P., Alessandri-Bonetti G., Stellini E. Elongated styloid process evaluation on digital panoramic radiograph in a North Italian population. Oral Med & Pathology. 2017;9(3):e400–e404. doi: 10.4317/jced.53450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jamal B.T., Ravikumar K.K., Alyawar S.H., et al. Prevalence of elongated styloid process and elongation pattern on digital panoramic radiographs in Saudi population, Jeddah. Int J Social Rehab. 2018;3:37–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hettiarachchi P.V.K.S., Jayasinghe R.M., Fonseka M.C., Jayasinghe R.D., Nanyakkara C.D. Evaluation of the styloid process in a Sri Lankan population using digital panoramic radiographs. J Oral Biol Craniofacial Res. 2019;9:73–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2018.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sridevi K., Mahesh N., Krishnaveni B., Deepika D.N., Thejasri V., Leninson B.H. Evaluation of styloid process and its anatomical variations: a digital panoramic study with systemic review. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019;9:256–262. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_8_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Basekim C.C., Mutlu H., Gungor A., et al. Evaluation of styloid process by three-dimensional computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:134–139. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2354-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gozil R., Yener N., Calguner E. Morphological characteristics of styloid process evaluated by computerized axial tomography. Ann Anat. 2001;183:527–535. doi: 10.1016/S0940-9602(01)80060-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Scaf G., Freitas D.Q., Monteiro Loffredo L.C. Diagnostic reproducibility of the elongated styloid process. J Appl Oral Sci. 2003;11:120–124. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572003000200007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Moffat D.A., Ramssden R.T., Shaw H.J. The styloid process syndrome: aetiological factors and surgical management. J Larngol Otol. 1977;91:279–294. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100083699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bernfeld K. Definition and pathogenesis of a new disease, the so called: styloid-symptom complex. Z Laryngol Rhinol. 1982;23:107–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Balcioglu H.A., Kilic C., Akyol M., Ozan H., Kokten G. Length of the styloid process and anatomical implications for Eagle's syndrome. Folia Morphol. 2009;68:265–270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gokce C., Sisman Y., Ertas E.T., Akgunlu F., Ozturk A. Prevalence of styloid process elongation on panoramic radiography in the Turkey population from Cappadocia region. Eur J Dermatol. 2008;2:18–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Grossman J.R., Tarsitano J.J. The Styloid-Stylohyoid syndrome. J Oral Surg. 1977;35:555–560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rizzatti-Barbosa C.M., Ribeiro M.C., Silva-Concilio L.R., Di Hipolito O., Ambrosano G.M. Is an elongated stylohyoid process prevalent in the elderly? A radiographic study in Brazilian population. Gerodontology. 2005;22:112–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2005.00046.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vieira E.M.M., Guedes O.A., Morais S., Musis C.R., Albuquerque P.A.A., Borges A.H. Prevalence of elongated styloid process in a central Brazilian population. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9:90–92. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14599.6567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kikuchi H., Kemmotsu O. Elongated styloid process. Pain Clin. 1991;12:65–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.AlZarea B.K. Prevalence and pattern of the elongated styloid process among geriatric patients in Saudi Arabia. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:611–617. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S129818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Correll R.W. Mineraliztion of the stylohyoid stylomandibular ligament complex. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1979;48:286–291. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(79)90025-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ferrario V.F., Sigurta D., Daddona A., Dalloca L., Miani A., Tafuro F. Calcification of the stylohyoid ligament: incidence and morphoquantitative evaluations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990;69:524–529. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(90)90390-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Keur J.J., Campbell J.P.S., Mc Carthy J.F., Ralph W.J. The clinical significance of the elongated styloid process. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986;61:399–404. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(86)90426-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ilguy M., Ilguy D., Guler N., Bayirli G. Incidence of the type and calcification patterns in patients with elongated styloid process. J Int Med Res. 2005;33:96–102. doi: 10.1177/147323000503300110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mathew A.L., Cherian S.A., Joseph B.B. Styloid process elongation and calcification patterns in a South Kerala population – radiographic aspects. J Oral Med. 2017;1:1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.O'Carroll M.K.O. Calcification in the stylohyoid ligament. Oral Surg. 1984;58:617–621. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(84)90089-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bagga M.B., Kumar C.A., Yeluri G. Clinicoradiologic evaluation of styloid process calcification. Imaging Sci Dent. 2012;42:155–161. doi: 10.5624/isd.2012.42.3.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sisman Y., Gokce C., Tarim Ertas E., Sipahioglu M., Akgunlu F. Investigation of elongated styloid process prevalence in patients with torus palatines. Clin Oral Invest. 2009;13:269–272. doi: 10.1007/s00784-008-0232-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Asutay F., Erdem N.F., Atalay Y., Acar A.H., Asutay H. Prevalence of elongated styloid process and Eagle syndrome in East Eagean population. Bezmialem Sci. 2019;7:28–32. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Dental Sciences are provided here courtesy of Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China

RESOURCES