Abstract

Solid-contact ion-selective electrodes (SCISEs) can overcome essential limitations of their counterparts based on liquid contacts. However, attaining a highly reproducible and predictable E0, especially between different fabrication batches, turned out to be difficult even with the most established solid-contact materials, i.e., conducting polymers and large-surface-area conducting materials (e.g., carbon nanotubes), that otherwise possess excellent potential stability. An appropriate batch-to-batch E0 reproducibility of SCISEs besides aiding the rapid quality control of the electrode manufacturing process is at the core of their “calibration-free” application, which is perhaps the last major challenge for their routine use as single-use “disposable” or wearable potentiometric sensors. Therefore, here, we propose a new class of solid-contact material based on the covalent functionalization of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) with a chemically stable redox molecule, (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl (TEMPO). This material combines the advantages of (i) the large double-layer capacitance of MWCNT layers, (ii) the adjustable redox couple ratio provided by the TEMPO moiety, (iii) the covalent confinement of the redox couple, and (iv) the hydrophobicity of the components to achieve the potential reproducibility and stability for demanding applications. The TEMPO-MWCNT-based SC potassium ion-selective electrodes (K+-SCISEs) showed excellent analytical performance and potential stability with no sign of an aqueous layer formation beneath the ion-selective membrane nor sensitivity toward O2, CO2, and light. A major convenience of the fabrication procedure is the E0 adjustment of the K+-SCISEs by the polarization of the TEMPO-MWCNT suspension prior to its use as solid contact. While most E0 reproducibility studies are limited to a single fabrication batch of SCISEs, the use of prepolarized TEMPO-MWCNT resulted also in an outstanding batch-to-batch potential reproducibility. We were also able to overcome the hydration-related potential drifts for the use of SCISEs without prior conditioning and to feature application for accurate K+ measurements in undiluted blood serum.
Introduction
Ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) with ionophore-based polymeric sensing membranes are at the core of monitoring the concentration of ions in the clinical, environmental, and process analysis fields. Currently, the development of ISEs largely shifted from fundamental mechanistic investigations and implementation of new ionophores toward application-based development of the existing ISEs. In this respect, their out-of-laboratory deployment that includes applications for wearable and disposable ion sensors is especially of perspective.1−3 Such applications call for low-cost, miniaturized, mass-produced ISEs with excellent potential stability, reliability, and little or no maintenance. Generally, these requirements can be best met by replacing the classical symmetrical liquid contact (LC)-based configuration employing an internal solution with a solid contact (SC).4
Containing the inner solution in a hydrogel matrix represented an ingenious intermediate solution as it preserved the well-defined inner boundary potential of the liquid contact electrodes while enabling their mass production by automated drop-casting.5 Still the small volume of the initially dry hydrogel posed difficulties for their immediate use because upon placing them in an aqueous solution, the transmembrane water uptake led to the swelling of the hydrogel and consequently to a significant potential drift. The poor attachment of the ion-selective membranes to the hydrogel and the establishment of the osmotic balance in the sample posed additional difficulties. While all of these issues were solved in clinical blood electrolyte analyzers achieving excellent analytical performances using flow-through systems to mechanically secure the respective ISEs and regularly calibrate them,6,7 their application as a disposable single-use or wearable sensor is by far not trivial. Therefore, these applications remain an important niche for solid-contact ISEs (SCISEs), which are expected to provide a similarly stable phase boundary potential of the inner membrane interface as their LC counterparts and at the same time facilitate and simplify the mass production of miniaturized ISEs.
Owing to significant advances in solid-contact materials, state-of-the-art solid-contact ISEs (SCISEs) at present largely reached this goal.8 An extremely broad range of materials were implemented including various conducting polymers,9−16 carbon black,17 intercalation compounds,18 carbon nanotubes,19,20 graphene,21 nanostructured conducting materials,22−25 and redox molecules.26−28 However, controlling and reproducing the standard potentials (E0) of SCISEs that is straightforward for LCISEs remained challenging. While calibration solves this problem for laboratory applications, for single-use, disposable sensors as well as for wearable sensors, the individual calibration of each electrode may not be possible and especially not practical. Thus, the development of so-called “calibration-free” SCISEs,29 with appropriate electrode-to-electrode reproducibility, contours as perhaps the greatest challenge before mass-produced SCISEs will be commercially available for everyday use in wearable, disposable, and field-deployed analytical devices.29,30 By calibration-free sensors, we mean calibration of a small, but representative number of electrodes and the extrapolation of these calibration parameters for large fabrication batches. To achieve this goal, the SCISEs should feature highly reproducible calibration parameters and while the slopes are generally close to the theoretical Nernstian value, the E0 of SCISEs may vary tens or even hundreds of mVs. Since for a singly charged analyte ion 1 mV error in the measured potential of an ISE with theoretical response translate into an error of 4% in concentration, the importance of the E0 reproducibility becomes obvious. Accordingly, it received lately major attention29 for the main types of the potential stabilizing mechanism of the solid-contact materials, i.e., redox (conducting polymers, redox polymers/materials/molecules) and capacitive (large-surface-area conductors, e.g., carbon nanotubes, graphene, etc.).
The quest for suitable materials was complemented by methodological approaches that generally involve the application of an external potential11,31 or short-circuiting32 to adjust the E0, i.e., to drive externally the potential of a large number of SCISEs connected together in solution toward the same potential. While such procedures were shown to be applicable for both capacitive and redox-type solid contacts,33 they are suited only to compensate for small differences (a few mVs) in the E0 values after SCISE fabrication. Moreover, the potential value to which the SCISEs are polarized is critical, i.e., if it falls far from the equilibrium potential of the electrodes, it will lead to a very temporary improvement followed by drifting and diverging potential responses.
The exact origin of the E0 differences of SCISEs made with the exact same fabrication procedure and materials is not known, but it is likely to be caused by small chemical, geometrical, and morphological differences/heterogeneities of the respective SCISEs including variations in the redox state and surface functionality of SC materials, as well as the degree of interpenetration between the ion-selective membrane and SC.34 Given the uncertainties in most industrial manufacturing procedures, some sort of adjustment to level small differences may be needed for most mass fabricated SCISEs. Besides calibration-free applications, the reproducibility and even adjustment of E0 values of large fabrication batches is beneficial also in terms of quality control. However, it is rather unpractical to apply potential leveling for fully prepared SCISEs, i.e., to contact all electrodes and place them in an electrolyte solution. It would be much more convenient if a “potential preadjusted” solid contact is applied on the substrate electrode during fabrication that largely devoids further actions with the fabricated SCISEs. In principle, this is possible with redox-active SC materials by adjusting the ratio of the oxidized and reduced forms. However, this is not trivial with conducting polymers that show a broad continuum of redox potentials35,36 rather than well-defined redox peaks, while it is also desired to avoid extraction of molecular redox couples into the ion-selective membrane that may affect their selectivity. These requirements may be best addressed by covalent confinement of redox molecules to a solid support as we proposed recently by covalent functionalization of MWCNTs with ferrocene groups.37 However, for long-term potential stability, an extremely stable and reversible redox functionality is required that is not susceptible to light and oxidation by molecular oxygen,38 along with ensuring the appropriate hydrophobicity of the SC materials.
Here, we introduce (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl (TEMPO)-functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes (TEMPO-MWCNTs) as a novel solid contact material for the fabrication of ion-selective electrodes with highly reproducible standard potential (E0). Covalent grafting of TEMPO to MWCNTs combines the advantages of both redox and high-capacitance materials but prevents the leaching of the redox-active compound from the solid contact layer into the ion-selective membrane (ISM). In terms of chemical stability,39 as well as pH,40 light, and oxygen insensitivity,41 TEMPO outperforms many other redox-active compounds (e.g., ferrocene42), making it an “ideal” candidate for the redox functionalization of MWCNTs. Here, we explore the feasibility of using TEMPO-MWCNT as solid contact in cation-selective electrodes by addressing the batch-to-batch potential reproducibility of SCISEs. In this respect, we investigate the preadjustment of the potential of TEMPO-MWCNT in suspension prior to their drop-cast on the substrate transducer, which could be a major benefit and convenience in terms of large-scale SCISE fabrication.
Experimental Section
Chemicals and Materials
High-molecular-weight PVC (HMW PVC), potassium ionophore I (Valinomycin), bis(2-ethylhexyl) sebacate (DOS), tetrahydrofuran (THF) (all selectophore grade), anhydrous acetonitrile (ACN, 99.5%), anhydrous dimethylformamide (DMF, 99.8%), sulfuric acid (H2SO4, ACS reagent, 95–98%), N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC, 98%), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), 4-amino-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (4-amino-TEMPO, free radical), silver nitrate (AgNO3), and tetraethylammonium nitrate (TEANO3) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (TBAPF6, for electrochemical analysis, ≥99%) and nitric acid (≥69%) were obtained from Fluka. Potassium tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate (KTFAB, 97%) was received from Alfa Aesar. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) were purchased from HeJi, Inc. (30–50 nm diameter, 0.5–200 μm length, M4905). Human serum was received from HyTest Ltd. (Lot. 15/05-8TFS) and Merck Millipore (Lot. 3733758). Absolute ethanol and methanol (AR grade) were obtained from Molar Chemicals Ltd. (Halásztelek, Hungary). The aqueous solutions were prepared with deionized water (DIW) with a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ cm.
Synthesis of TEMPO-Functionalized MWCNTs (TEMPO-MWCNT)
For the synthesis of TEMPO-functionalized MWCNTs (Figure 1), we adapted a previously reported procedure43 changing the MWCNT preactivation step. Briefly, 0.4 g of pristine MWCNTs was oxidized to form carboxylic surface functionalities by stirring in cc. HNO3/cc. H2SO4 (3:1 (V/V %), 32 mL) at 100 °C for 2 h. The suspension was cooled to room temperature and added to deionized water (350 mL). The carboxylated MWCNTs (MWCNT-COOH) were isolated after three repeated sequences of centrifugation (7000 rcf, 30 min), supernatant removal, and DIW washing. The aqueous suspension was dried at 60 °C overnight, resulting in 230 mg of MWCNT-COOH. MWCNT-COOH (30 mg) was sonicated in 5 mL of dry dimethylformamide for 5 min, and then the carboxyl groups were activated by excess amounts of EDC (7.8 mg) and NHS (5.2 mg). The suspension was stirred at room temperature for 2 h, and then 4-amino-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl free radical (12.9 mg, dissolved in 1.5 mL of dry DMF) was added. The suspension was stirred for another 72 h at room temperature, and then the TEMPO-MWCNTs were separated by centrifugation at 25 000 rcf (for every 1 mL of the DMF suspension, 1 mL of methanol was added for adequate separation). The product was washed four times with methanol and dried at 60 °C for 12 h to obtain 21.7 mg of TEMPO-MWCNTs. The dried synthetic batches of TEMPO-MWCNTs were stored under ambient conditions with no special precautions.
Figure 1.
Schematic of the chemical functionalization of MWCNTs with TEMPO group.
K+-Selective SCISE Fabrication
Glassy carbon (GC) electrodes (⌀1.6 mm, incorporated in a polyether ether ketone (PEEK) body with an outer diameter of 6.0 mm; Bio-Logic Science Instruments) were polished with 0.3 μm alumina suspension and then rinsed with ethanol and water. The electrodes were sonicated for 5 min in DIW, then rinsed again with DIW and ethanol, and finally dried under N2 stream. Potassium ion-selective membranes (K+-ISM) were prepared with the following composition: 32.9% (w/w) HMW PVC, 65.7% DOS, 1.06% valinomycin, and 0.34% KTFAB. The components were dissolved in THF to prepare an ISM cocktail with 20% dry weight. TEMPO-MWCNTs were accurately weighed in and sonicated in dry THF for 20 min to produce a 5 mg/mL suspension. Such suspensions were always freshly made before electrode preparations to devoid concentration changes due to solvent evaporation. This suspension (25 μL) was drop-cast onto the glassy carbon electrode confining it with a custom-made polypropylene (PP) mask to the conductive GC surface (Scheme S1). The PP mask was removed after the MWCNT layer dried, and 40 μL of the ISM cocktail was deposited onto the MWCNT-SC layer in two consecutive steps (2 × 20 μL) and allowed to dry overnight, which resulted in ca. 220 μm thick ISMs. Coated-wire ion-selective electrodes were made following the same procedure but without the solid-contact layer deposition.
Potentiometric Measurements
Potentiometric measurements were conducted in stirred solutions using a 16-channel high-input impedance voltmeter (1015 Ω, Lawson Laboratories, Malvern, PA), and the reference electrode in aqueous solutions was a Ag|AgCl|3 M KCl||1 M LiOAc double-junction electrode (no. 6.0729.100, Metrohm AG). The potential stability of TEMPO-MWCNT-based SCISEs was monitored in a 0.01 M KCl solution. The gas (O2 and CO2) sensitivity of the TEMPO-MWCNT-based SCISEs was studied by bubbling air, CO2 (generated from dry ice in a balloon), or Ar through a solution of 0.01 M KCl. The light sensitivity of the TEMPO-MWCNT-SCISEs was also determined in 0.01 M KCl by switching illumination: room light (20 min), darkness (20 min), intense cold light (20 min; 12 W, 850 lumen). Potentiometric selectivity coefficients were determined with the separate solution method in 0.1, 0.01, and 0.001 M chloride salts of K+, and the interfering ions Li+, Na+, NH4+, and Mg2+. The potentiometric aqueous layer test was done with fully conditioned K+-SCISEs by changing the solution from 0.1 M KCl to 0.1 M NaCl, and then back to 0.1 M KCl.
Potentiostatic/Galvanostatic Measurements
Cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and chronopotentiometric measurements were done with a Reference 600 Potentiostat/Galvanostat (Gamry Instruments, Warminster, PA) using a three-electrode cell. The cyclic voltammetric curves of the TEMPO-MWCNT layers were measured in 0.1 M TBAPF6 in ACN with different scan rates (25–200 mVs–1), using a Pt wire and Ag|0.01 M AgNO3||0.1 M TEANO3 as counter and reference electrodes, respectively. The impedance spectra of TEMPO-MWCNT layers were recorded in 0.1 M TBAPF6 in ACN within the frequency range of 1000 kHz to 10 mHz, at open-circuit potential with 20 mV AC amplitude (rms) (using Ag wire as a quasi-reference and Pt wire as a counter electrode). The chronopotentiometric measurements of the TEMPO-MWCNT-based SCISEs were performed in 0.01 M KCl by applying +1 nA for 60 s and then −1 nA for 60 s. In this case, Ag/AgCl wire was used as the reference electrode and Pt wire as the counter electrode.
Results and Discussion
Characterization of the TEMPO-MWCNT Solid Contact
The cyclic voltammetric curves (CVs) of the TEMPO-MWCNT modified glassy carbon electrodes (Figure 2A) in 0.1 M TBAPF6 in acetonitrile revealed a pair of well-defined redox peaks centered around 0.42 V, attributed to the reversible oxidation of the TEMPO groups (Figure 2A, inset), superposed on the large capacitive current background of the MWCNT layer. Repeated cycles showed no change in the recorded CVs, confirming the covalent attachment of the TEMPO and the overall stability of the drop-cast TEMPO-MWCNT layer on the electrode surface. The peak currents were found to be proportional to the square root of the scan rate (Figure S1), indicating that the current is limited by the diffusion of the counter ion accompanying the redox reaction of the TEMPO group, which is in a good agreement with previous findings.43
Figure 2.

(A) Cyclic voltammograms of the TEMPO-MWCNT layer measured in 0.1 M TBAPF6 in acetonitrile. Inset: Redox reaction of the TEMPO group.45,46 (B) Electrochemical impedance spectrum of the TEMPO-MWCNT layer in 0.1 M TBAPF6 (ACN). The TEMPO-MWCNT layer was made by drop-casting 20 μL of 5 mg/mL TEMPO-MWCNT suspension in THF onto GC electrodes.
The capacitance of the solid contact, i.e., of the TEMPO-MWCNT layer on GC electrodes, was investigated by EIS (Figure 2B) as a high capacitance has also a potential stabilizing effect as shown previously for purely capacitive CNT-based SCISEs.44 The areal capacitance was calculated from the impedance values in the low-frequency (10–100 mHz) part of the EIS spectrum, where the capacitive behavior is dominant. We found that the areal capacitance (29.7 mF cm–2) improved considerably compared to other modified MWCNTs such as octadecylamine-modified MWCNTs (7.66 mF cm–2)33 and ferrocene-functionalized MWCNTs (12.33 mF cm–2).37 Chronopotentiometric reverse pulse experiments9 (Figure S2) confirmed the high capacitance proving also the very low polarizability of the TEMPO-MWCNT-based SCISEs (0.8 mV min–1) compared to “coated-wire” electrodes (229.8 mV min–1), using the very same composition K+-selective membrane.
Potential Reproducibility and Stability of TEMPO-MWCNT-Based SCISEs
We compared the potential reproducibility and stability of three batches of TEMPO-MWCNT-based SCISEs: without any pretreatment, 48 h short circuit, and with prepolarized MWCNT-TEMPO suspension as the solid contact. For a rigorous side-by-side comparison, since the short-circuited electrodes had to be inherently kept in 10 mM KCl for 48 h, the other two types of electrode batches were also placed in 10 mM KCl for 48 h, i.e., the onset of the measurements in Figure 3 (t = 0) follows this 48 h interval. We found that the potential reproducibility of the TEMPO-MWCNT-based SCISEs was already remarkably good (SD = 1.68 mV, n = 5) (Figure 3a) without applying any special pretreatment (except conditioning). For comparison, SCISEs based on state-of-the-art purely capacitive octadecyl-modified MWCNT (OD-MWCNT)-based solid contacts had SD values of ca. 4–5 mV without pretreatment.33 Similar results were reported for MWCNT-based SCISEs47 and other carbon-based nanomaterials such as colloid-imprinted mesoporous carbon48 and ordered mesoporous carbon spheres.49 Thus, the redox functionalization of carbon nanotubes is clearly beneficial compared with purely capacitive contacts and that applies also for the short-term potential stability that improved from 980 ± 600 μV/h (OD-MWCNT) to −335 ± 7 μV/h for TEMPO-MWCNT. Short-circuiting the K+-SCISEs during conditioning in KCl solution is an effective way to further improve the potential reproducibility, and if necessary, this can be made after fabrication and before packaging. Figure 3b shows that following a 48 h short-circuiting, the SD of the potential was 0.42 mV (n = 5; with a potential stability of −133 ± 8 μV/h). The potential reproducibility is among the best reported values so far8,29 and outperforms attempts with other modified CNT-based solid contacts, e.g., OD-MWCNT (SD = 1.56 mV)33 and Fc-MWCNT (SD = 1.85 mV).37 However, despite the excellent results, as stated earlier, the application of any post-treatment to the SCISEs is inconvenient and costly fabrication-wise. Therefore, we explored the leveling of SCISEs to the same E0 by polarizing the continuously stirred TEMPO-MWCNT suspension for 20 min at 75 mV, which is the “equilibrium” potential determined in the same suspension before the polarization, using a two-electrode cell with large-surface-area Pt coil and Ag coil serving as working and quasi-reference electrodes, respectively. The K+-SCISEs prepared by drop-casting the prepolarized TEMPO-MWCNT possessed practically the same reproducibility (SD = 0.43 mV, n = 5) (Figure 3c) as the short-circuited SCISEs, and furthermore, the potential stability was significantly improved (−70 ± 7 μV/h).
Figure 3.
Potential stability of the TEMPO-MWCNT-based K+-SCISEs: (a) without any pretreatment; (b) after short-circuiting them for 48 h in 10 mM KCl; (c) prepared from a TEMPO-MWCNT suspension prepolarized at 75 mV for 20 min. For rigorous comparison with the short-circuited electrodes, the potential curves are plotted for all batches after a 48 h conditioning in 10 mM KCl solution.
Of note, such performance needs conditioning of the SCISEs because at first contact with a solution, the hydration of the dry membrane50 results in a positive potential drift of ca. 50 mV in 60 min (Figure 4A). The threshold potential drift of 0.3 mV/min reported earlier for highly hydrophobic PEDOT derivative-based SC to determine the equilibration time at first contact with an aqueous solution,16 however, was reached in ca. 25 min. Very importantly, we found that even during the drift, the excellent potential reproducibility was preserved and the drift could be rigorously reproduced during drying–hydration cycles of the ion-selective membrane (Figure 4A, inset). In principle, the asymmetric configuration of the SCISEs makes them generally prone to hydration-related potential drift. This phenomenon is largely overlooked despite being clearly a limitation for applications requiring out-of-shelf, immediate use of SCISEs without any conditioning. The very few studies that addressed the initial potential drift of SCISEs tried to alleviate this problem through the adjustment of the SC and membrane layer thickness as shown by Guzinski et al.51 or additionally using a special flow-through cell,14 but IS membranes less prone to water uptake52 or very thin IS membranes53 may also lead to a faster potential stabilization. Here, we investigated as a more general concept the prehydration of the ISMs during their preparation and/or storage. In the first case, 0.5% w/w DIW was added in the THF-formulated membrane cocktail and drop-cast on the SC (the water content was chosen based on the maximal water uptake reported for plasticized PCV membranes54). In the second case, 10 μL of DIW was dropped onto the IS membrane surface. In both cases, the electrodes were sealed using a 3D-printed cylindrical enclosure to avoid the drying of the ISM during storage. Since planar sensors, e.g., glucose sensors, are often commercialized individually sealed in an aluminum foil blister, both procedures are, in principle, compatible with packaging technologies. The preliminary results of using such prehydrated electrodes (stored for at least 24 h) right after removing the sealing, without any conditioning, were very promising, i.e., the initial drift of the unconditioned electrodes (ca. 54 mV/h) was reduced dramatically to −0.4 and 4.0 mV/h for electrodes stored with a drop of DIW and adding DIW to the membrane cocktail, respectively. It is remarkable that the prehydration can be done with pure water and these simple procedures lead to electrodes that are immediately operational and with reproducible potentials (SD = 1.26 mV, n = 4).
Figure 4.

(A) Potential transients of TEMPO-MWCNT-based K+-SCISEs recorded at their first contact with an aqueous solution (10 mM KCl): (a) prepared from a TEMPO-MWCNT suspension prepolarized at 75 mV and (b) without any pretreatment. The electrode potentials of the batch with prepolarized suspension were shifted with a constant value of +100 mV to facilitate the separate assessment of the transients of the two different electrode batches. The inset shows the reproducibility of the initial potential drift by comparing the potential transients of the same electrode at first contact with the 10 mM KCl solution (red) and after drying the membrane under ambient conditions for 48 h (black). (B) Potential measurements with prehydrated electrode membranes during storage (a) and by additionally adding 5% w/w water into the drop-cast membrane cocktail (b).
The calibration of the SCISEs revealed reproducible Nernstian slopes down to 10–6 M and a limit of detection of ca. 2.4 × 10–7 M. Remarkably, as shown in Figure 5 for short-circuited K+-SCISEs, the potential reproducibility proved to be excellent throughout the whole concentration range (10–9–10–1 M). Since most often there is a marked potential divergence of SCISEs for the low concentration range, this is an additional indication of the high level of control over SCISE fabrication that can be attained using TEMPO-MWCNT as solid contact.
Figure 5.

Calibration curve of TEMPO-MWCNT-based K+-SCISEs (n = 6). The electrodes were short-circuited for 48 h in 0.01 M KCl solution before calibration.
However, it is rather common to obtain a good E0 reproducibility for a single fabrication batch consisting of a small number of electrodes. It is more challenging, as emphasized recently,29 to secure the same reproducibility for multiple fabrication batches separated by longer intervals. Despite strictly following the same fabrication protocols, most often significant changes in the E0 values are observed for the different electrode batches (often hidden by relative potential scales). Therefore, we investigated whether the well-defined potential adjustment possibility offered by redox solid contacts can be exploited to address the interbatch reproducibility issue. We compared the E0 and the slope of the calibration curve for two parallel batches of TEMPO-MWCNT-based K+-SCISEs: (i) with 48 h short-circuiting, but without prepolarization and (ii) using the prepolarized TEMPO-MWCNT suspension (Figure 6A). In the case of the short-circuited ISEs, both batches (n = 5) had excellent single-batch E0 reproducibility (SD = 0.6–0.7 mV), but the average E0 values of the two batches differed drastically (ca. 30 mV) (Table S1), resulting ultimately in an extremely large interbatch SD of 18 mV (n = 10). However, using TEMPO-MWCNT suspensions prepolarized at the same potential for the SCISE preparation, i.e., setting the ratio of the oxidized and reduced forms to the same value, can theoretically address this issue. Two batches of 6 K+-SCISE each were prepared with a week interval using prepolarized TEMPO-MWCNT suspensions to test this assumption. The difference in their average E0 value was only 1.5 mV, which is a spectacular improvement with respect to the electrodes that were made without adjusting the potential of the redox-functionalized CNT suspension (30 mV).
Figure 6.

(A) Left: Extrapolated potential values (the intercept is indicative of their E0) of two parallel batches of K+-SCISEs based on TEMPO-MWCNT solid contact with prepolarization (red) and w/o prepolarization (black). Right: Corresponding average E0 values and their standard deviation for the individual batches of TEMPO-MWCNT-based K+-SCISEs and interbatch values. (B) Calibration curves of three batches of 6 K+-SCISEs each (n = 18) based on drop-casting the prepolarized TEMPO-MWCNT suspension. The time span between the preparation of the first and last batch was ca. 1 year.
To expand the time frame between electrode batches, a new set of electrodes (n = 6) was fabricated using the same procedure ca. a year later. Of note, the potential of the TEMPO-MWCNT was within 5 mV in all batches compared to the initial value of 75 mV, chosen for prepolarization. Comparing the potentiometric responses with the earlier batches revealed practically the same Nernstian response for all of the 18 electrodes, as shown in Figure 6B, with an SD of 2.13 mV for the potential response (Table 1). This supports the efficiency of TEMPO-MWCNT suspension prepolarization in improving the potential reproducibility of the relevant SCISEs and shows the prospective of this approach for their convenient and reliable preparation with excellent batch-to-batch potential reproducibility.
Table 1. Calibration Parameters of Three Batches of 6 K+-SCISEs Each Made Using Suspension Polarized TEMPO-MWCNT as Solid Contact.
| 1st batch (n = 6) |
2nd batch (n = 6) after 1 week |
3rd batch (n = 6) after ca. 1 year |
for all 18 electrodes |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| average | SD | average | SD | average | SD | average | SD | |
| E0 (mV) | 378.2 | 0.57 | 379.7 | 1.15 | 382.2 | 1.94 | 380.0 | 2.13 |
| slope (mV/dec) | 58.0 | 0.1 | 57.8 | 0.2 | 59.5 | 0.1 | 58.4 | 0.8 |
Investigating the medium-term stability of the electrodes (1 week), we found that the K+-SCISE prepared using prepolarized TEMPO-MWCNT suspension again outperformed their counterparts made without prepolarization, but using short-circuiting. The standard deviation of the potential was 0.79 mV at the end of 1-week continuous measurement, which is insignificantly larger than 0.71 mV registered at start.
Potentiometric Water Layer, Gas and Light Sensitivity Tests
The excellent reproducibility and consistency of the potential responses determined in ambient laboratory conditions made very unlikely that the prepared electrodes are susceptible to the formation of an aqueous layer beneath the ion-selective membrane nor that they are sensitive to light fluctuations and ambient gases that readily permeate through the ion-selective membrane. Indeed, the potentiometric water layer test55 of the fully conditioned TEMPO-MWCNT-based K+-SCISEs revealed no evidence of an aqueous layer formation (Figure 7A) as shown by the staircase-type potential responses as a result of changing back and forth between primary (0.1 M KCl) and interfering ion (0.1 M NaCl) solutions. Of note, the logarithmic selectivity coefficients (Table S2) of the TEMPO-MWCNT-based K+ SCISEs for the most relevant interfering ions in biological samples were found to be in agreement with the expected values.37 However, the coated-wire electrodes used as control (measured in parallel under the same solutions with TEMPO-MWCNT-based K+-SCISEs) showed the characteristic potential drifts of an electrode with an aqueous layer beneath the ISM.
Figure 7.

(A) Potentiometric aqueous layer test of TEMPO-MWCNT-based K+-SCISEs (solid line) and a simple coated-wire K+-ISE (dashed line). (B) Light sensitivity and (C) CO2 and O2 sensitivity of TEMPO-MWCNT-based K+-SCISEs measured in 0.01 M KCl (stirred solution). RE: Ag|AgCl|3 M KCl||1 M LiOAc.
The lack of light sensitivity (photovoltaic effect) of various carbon nanotube-based electrodes is well documented. However, owing to the redox functionalization of the MWCNTs, the respective K+-SCISEs were tested by exposing the electrodes to various light intensities. The qualitative measurements revealed no potential changes whatsoever due to light intensity changes (Figure 7B). The effect of the main ambient gases (O2 and CO2) was also tested by bubbling air and CO2 sequentially in 0.01 M KCl separated by Ar flushing steps. Figure 7C clearly indicates no significant change in the potential even after drastic changes in the dissolved gas concentrations.
Conclusions
Overall, the TEMPO-MWCNT-based K+-SCISEs due to the inherent potential stabilizing effect of the redox groups grafted on the carbon nanotubes had an excellent within-batch potential reproducibility (SD = 1.68 mV), which was further improved by short-circuiting the electrodes with each other (SD = 0.42 mV, n = 5) for 48 h or, most appealingly, by adjusting the potential of the TEMPO-MWCNT suspension prior to electrode fabrication (SD = 0.43 mV, n = 5). While short-circuiting the electrodes together is efficient in leveling small potential differences, it can be applied for a fabrication batch and it is rather inconvenient, i.e., the electrodes need to be placed into a solution, electrically contacted, and then washed before packaging. However, the prepolarization of the TEMPO-MWCNT suspension prior to its use for electrode fabrication can be applied for different fabrication batches and results in a remarkable reproducibility of the respective K+-SCISEs. Therefore, taking advantage of the inherent capacitive and redox potential stabilizing mechanisms of TEMPO-MWCNT solid contacts, and covalent confinement of the redox moiety appears to be a feasible approach for convenient, large-scale fabrication of solid-contact ion-selective electrodes with state-of-the-art analytical performance and outstanding potential reproducibility, which are important prerequisites for their calibration-free application as single-use or wearable sensors. In this respect, we show preliminary results in terms of reducing the membrane hydration-related initial potential drift of unconditioned SCISEs by prehydrating the membranes during preparation and/or storage as well as calibration-free measurements of K+ concentration in blood serum revealing competitive accuracy (see the Supporting Information).
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the National Research, Development, and Innovation Fund of Hungary under Grant TKP2021-EGA-02. Further support was received from National Research, Development and Innovation Fund through ÚNKP-21-3 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c00395.
TEMPO-MWCNT SCISE fabrication process, TEMPO-MWCNT solid-contact CV characterization, TEMPO-MWCNT SCISE chronopotentiograms, selectivity coefficients, potential reproducibility (short-circuited), and blood serum measurements (experimental details, calibration curves, measurement curves) (PDF)
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Sempionatto J. R.; Jeerapan I.; Krishnan S.; Wang J. Wearable Chemical Sensors: Emerging Systems for On-Body Analytical Chemistry. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 378–396. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parrilla M.; Cuartero M.; Crespo G. A. Wearable potentiometric ion sensors. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 110, 303–320. 10.1016/j.trac.2018.11.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lyu Y.; Gan S. Y.; Bao Y.; Zhong L. J.; Xu J. A.; Wang W.; Liu Z. B.; Ma Y. M.; Yang G. F.; Niu L. Solid-Contact Ion-Selective Electrodes: Response Mechanisms, Transducer Materials and Wearable Sensors. Membranes 2020, 10, 128 10.3390/membranes10060128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lindner E.; Gyurcsányi R. E. Quality control criteria for solid-contact, solvent polymeric membrane ion-selective electrodes. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2009, 13, 51–68. 10.1007/s10008-008-0608-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lindner E.; Cosofret V. V.; Ufer S.; Buck R. P.; Kusy R. P.; Ash R. B.; Nagle H. T. Flexible (Kapton-based) microsensor arrays of high stability for cardiovascular applications. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1993, 89, 361–367. 10.1039/ft9938900361. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Uhlig A.; Lindner E.; Teutloff C.; Schnakenberg U.; Hintsche R. Miniaturized Ion-Selective Chip Electrode for Sensor Application. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 4032–4038. 10.1021/ac960957d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mansouri S. Application of miniaturized sensors in clinical and laboratory setting for measuring blood analytes including glucose and lactate. Ann. Biol. Clin. 2003, 61, 193–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shao Y. Z.; Ying Y. B.; Ping J. F. Recent advances in solid-contact ion-selective electrodes: functional materials, transduction mechanisms, and development trends. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 4405–4465. 10.1039/C9CS00587K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bobacka J. Potential Stability of All-Solid-State Ion-Selective Electrodes Using Conducting Polymers as Ion-to-Electron Transducers. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 4932–4937. 10.1021/ac990497z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bobacka J.; McCarrick M.; Lewenstam A.; Ivaska A. All-solid-state poly(vinyl chloride) membrane ion-selective electrodes with poly(3-octylthiophene) solid internal contact. Analyst 1994, 119, 1985–1991. 10.1039/an9941901985. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- He N.; Papp S.; Lindfors T.; Höfler L.; Latonen R. M.; Gyurcsányi R. E. Pre-Polarized Hydrophobic Conducting Polymer Solid-Contact Ion Selective Electrodes with Improved Potential Reproducibility. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 2598–2605. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Papp S.; Bojtár M.; Gyurcsányi R. E.; Lindfors T. Potential Reproducibility of Potassium-Selective Electrodes Having Perfluorinated Alkanoate Side Chain Functionalized Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxytiophene) as a Hydrophobic Solid Contact. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 9111–9118. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutter J.; Lindner E.; Gyurcsányi R. E.; Pretsch E. A polypyrrole-based solid-contact Pb2+-selective PVC-membrane electrode with a nanomolar detection limit. Anal. Bioanal.Chem. 2004, 380, 7–14. 10.1007/s00216-004-2737-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gyurcsányi R. E.; Rangisetty N.; Clifton S.; Pendley B. D.; Lindner E. Microfabricated ISEs: critical comparison of inherently conducting polymer and hydrogel based inner contacts. Talanta 2004, 63, 89–99. 10.1016/j.talanta.2003.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zielińska R.; Mulik E.; Michalska A.; Achmatowicz S.; Maj-Zurawska M. All-solid-state planar miniature ion-selective chloride electrode. Anal. Chim. Acta 2002, 451, 243–249. 10.1016/S0003-2670(01)01407-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guzinski M.; Jarvis J. M.; D’Orazio P.; Izadyar A.; Pendley B. D.; Lindner E. Solid-Contact pH Sensor without CO2 Interference with a Superhydrophobic PEDOT-C-14 as Solid Contact: The Ultimate ″Water Layer″ Test. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 8468–8475. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paczosa-Bator B. All-solid-state selective electrodes using carbon black. Talanta 2012, 93, 424–427. 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ishige Y.; Klink S.; Schuhmann W. Intercalation Compounds as Inner Reference Electrodes for Reproducible and Robust Solid-Contact Ion-Selective Electrodes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 4831–4835. 10.1002/anie.201600111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crespo G. A.; Macho S.; Rius F. X. Ion-selective electrodes using carbon nanotubes as ion-to-electron transducers. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 1316–1322. 10.1021/ac071156l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yuan D.; Anthis A. H. C.; Ghahraman Afshar M.; Pankratova N.; Cuartero M.; Crespo G. A.; Bakker E. All-Solid-State Potentiometric Sensors with a Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Inner Transducing Layer for Anion Detection in Environmental Samples. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 8640–8645. 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ping J. F.; Wang Y. X.; Wu J.; Ying Y. B. Development of an all-solid-state potassium ion-selective electrode using graphene as the solid-contact transducer. Electrochem. Commun. 2011, 13, 1529–1532. 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.10.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yin T. J.; Pan D. W.; Qin W. All-Solid-State Polymeric Membrane Ion-Selective Miniaturized Electrodes Based on a Nanoporous Gold Film as Solid Contact. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 11038–11044. 10.1021/ac5029209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matzeu G.; Zuliani C.; Diamond D. Solid-Contact Ion-Selective Electrodes (ISEs) based on Ligand Functionalised Gold Nanoparticles. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 159, 158–165. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ye J. J.; Li F. H.; Gan S. Y.; Jiang Y. Y.; An Q. B.; Zhang Q. X.; Niu L. Using sp(2)-C dominant porous carbon sub-micrometer spheres as solid transducers in ion-selective electrodes. Electrochem. Commun. 2015, 50, 60–63. 10.1016/j.elecom.2014.10.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zeng X. Z.; Yu S. Y.; Yuan Q.; Qin W. Solid-contact K+-selective electrode based on three-dimensional molybdenum sulfide nanoflowers as ion-to-electron transducer. Sens. Actuators, B 2016, 234, 80–83. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.04.153. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zou X. U.; Cheong J. H.; Taitt B. J.; Bühlmann P. Solid Contact Ion-Selective Electrodes with a Well-Controlled Co(II)/Co(III) Redox Buffer Layer. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 9350–9355. 10.1021/ac4022117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jaworska E.; Naitana M. L.; Stelmach E.; Pomarico G.; Wojciechowski M.; Bulska E.; Maksymiuk K.; Paolesse R.; Michalska A. Introducing Cobalt(II) Porphyrin/Cobalt(III) Corrole Containing Transducers for Improved Potential Reproducibility and Performance of All-Solid-State Ion-Selective Electrodes. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 7107–7114. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zou X. U.; Zhen X. V.; Cheong J. H.; Bühlmann P. Calibration-Free Ionophore-Based Ion-Selective Electrodes With a Co(II)/Co(III) Redox Couple-Based Solid Contact. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 8687–8692. 10.1021/ac501625z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rousseau C. R.; Bühlmann P. Calibration-free potentiometric sensing with solid-contact ion-selective electrodes. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2021, 140, 116277 10.1016/j.trac.2021.116277. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cheong Y. H.; Ge L. Y.; Lisak G. Highly reproducible solid contact ion selective electrodes: Emerging opportunities for potentiometry - A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1162, 338304 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vanamo U.; Bobacka J. Electrochemical control of the standard potential of solid-contact ion-selective electrodes having a conducting polymer as ion-to-electron transducer. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 122, 316–321. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.134. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vanamo U.; Bobacka J. Instrument-free control of the standard potential of potentiometric solid-contact ion-selective electrodes by short-circuiting with a conventional reference electrode. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 10540–10545. 10.1021/ac501464s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Papp S.; Kozma J.; Lindfors T.; Gyurcsányi R. E. Lipophilic Multi-walled Carbon Nanotube-based Solid Contact Potassium Ion-selective Electrodes with Reproducible Standard Potentials. A Comparative Study. Electroanalysis 2020, 32, 867–873. 10.1002/elan.202000045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hu J. B.; Stein A.; Bühlmann P. Rational design of all-solid-state ion-selective electrodes and reference electrodes. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 76, 102–114. 10.1016/j.trac.2015.11.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hu J.; Zou X. U.; Stein A.; Bühlmann P. Ion-Selective Electrodes with Colloid-Imprinted Mesoporous Carbon as Solid Contact. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 7111–7118. 10.1021/ac501633r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vorotyntsev M. A.; Heinze J. Charging process in electron conducting polymers: dimerization model. Electrochim. Acta 2001, 46, 3309–3324. 10.1016/S0013-4686(01)00623-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kozma J.; Papp S.; Gyurcsányi R. E. Solid-contact ion-selective electrodes based on ferrocene-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Electrochem. Commun. 2021, 123, 106903 10.1016/j.elecom.2020.106903. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bashkin J. K.; Kinlen P. J. Oxygen-stable ferrocene reference electrodes. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 4507–4509. 10.1021/ic00347a034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Clayden J.; Greeves N.; Warren S. G.. Organic Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford; New YorK, 2012; xxv, 1234p. [Google Scholar]
- Gerken J. B.; Pang Y. T. Q.; Lauber M. B.; Stahl S. S. Structural Effects on the pH-Dependent Redox Properties of Organic Nitroxyls: Pourbaix Diagrams for TEMPO, ABNO, and Three TEMPO Analogs. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 7323–7330. 10.1021/acs.joc.7b02547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nutting J. E.; Rafiee M.; Stahl S. S. Tetramethylpiperidine N-Oxyl (TEMPO), Phthalimide N-Oxyl (PINO), and Related N-Oxyl Species: Electrochemical Properties and Their Use in Electrocatalytic Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 4834–4885. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zotti G.; Schiavon G.; Zecchin S.; Favretto D. Dioxygen-decomposition of ferrocenium molecules in acetonitrile: The nature of the electrode-fouling films during ferrocene electrochemistry. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1998, 456, 217–221. 10.1016/S0022-0728(98)00279-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ali G. A. M.; Megiel E.; Romanski J.; Algarni H.; Chong K. F. A wide potential window symmetric supercapacitor by TEMPO functionalized MWCNTs. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 271, 31–39. 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.08.123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Crespo G. A.; Macho S.; Bobacka J.; Rius F. X. Transduction Mechanism of Carbon Nanotubes in Solid-Contact Ion-Selective Electrodes. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 676–681. 10.1021/ac802078z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barhdadi R.; Comminges C.; Doherty A. P.; Nédélec J. Y.; O’Toole S.; Troupel M. The electrochemistry of TEMPO-mediated oxidation of alcohols in ionic liquid. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2007, 37, 723–728. 10.1007/s10800-007-9307-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tsunaga M.; Iwakura C.; Tamura H. Electrode reactions of nitroxide radicals at platinum in acetonitrile. Electrochim. Acta 1973, 18, 241–245. 10.1016/0013-4686(73)80020-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sakač N.; Karnas M.; Jozanovic M.; Medvidovic-Kosanovic M.; Martinez S.; Macan J.; Sak-Bosnar M. Determination of anionic surfactants in real samples using a low-cost and high sensitive solid contact surfactant sensor with MWCNTs as the ion-to-electron transducer. Anal. Methods 2017, 9, 2305–2314. 10.1039/C7AY00099E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hu J. B.; Ho K. T.; Zou X. U.; Smyrl W. H.; Stein A.; Bühlmann P. All-Solid-State Reference Electrodes Based on Colloid-Imprinted Mesoporous Carbon and Their Application in Disposable Paper-based Potentiometric Sensing Devices. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 2981–2987. 10.1021/ac504556s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang Z. D. Y.; Xi X.; Qiu S.; Wu D. Q.; Tang W.; Guo X. J.; Su Y. Z.; Liu R. L. Ordered mesoporous carbon sphere-based solid-contact ion-selective electrodes. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 13674–13684. 10.1007/s10853-019-03752-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guzinski M.; Jarvis J. M.; Pendley B. D.; Lindner E. Equilibration Time of Solid Contact Ion-Selective Electrodes. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 6654–6659. 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guzinski M.; Jarvis J. M.; Perez F.; Pendley B. D.; Lindner E.; De Marco R.; Crespo G. A.; Acres R. G.; Walker R.; Bishop J. PEDOT(PSS) as Solid Contact for Ion-Selective Electrodes: The Influence of the PEDOT(PSS) Film Thickness on the Equilibration Times. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 3508–3516. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lindfors T.; Szücs J.; Sundfors F.; Gyurcsányi R. E. Polyaniline Nanoparticle-Based Solid-Contact Silicone Rubber Ion-Selective Electrodes for Ultratrace Measurements. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 9425–9432. 10.1021/ac102099p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lauks I. R. Microfabricated Biosensors and Microanalytical Systems for Blood Analysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 317–324. 10.1021/ar9700670. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- He N.; Lindfors T. Determination of Water Uptake of Polymeric Ion-Selective Membranes with the Coulometric Karl Fischer and FT-IR-Attenuated Total Reflection Techniques. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 1006–1012. 10.1021/ac3027838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fibbioli M.; Morf W. E.; Badertscher M.; de Rooij N. F.; Pretsch E. Potential drifts of solid-contacted ion-selective electrodes due to zero-current ion fluxes through the sensor membrane. Electroanalysis 2000, 12, 1286–1292. . [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


