Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2022 Jun 3;7(23):20195–20203. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c02074

Design and Development of Gold-Loaded and Boron-Attached Multicore Manganese Ferrite Nanoparticles as a Potential Agent in Biomedical Applications

Okan Icten †,*, Beril Erdem Tuncdemir ‡, Hatice Mergen ‡
PMCID: PMC9201883  PMID: 35721900

Abstract

graphic file with name ao2c02074_0010.jpg

Early diagnosis and effective treatment of cancer are significant issues that should be focused on since it is one of the most deadly diseases. Multifunctional nanomaterials can offer new cancer diagnoses and treatment possibilities. These nanomaterials with diverse functions, including targeting, imaging, and therapy, are being studied extensively in a way that minimize overcoming the limitations associated with traditional cancer diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, the goal of this study is to prepare multifunctional nanocomposites possessing the potential to be used simultaneously in imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and dual cancer therapy such as photothermal therapy (PTT) and boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). In this context, multi-core MnFe2O4 nanoparticles, which can be used as a potential MRI contrast agent and target the desired region in the body via a magnetic field, were successfully synthesized via the solvothermal method. Then, multi-core nanoparticles were coated with polydopamine (PDA) to reduce gold nanoparticles, bind boron on the surface, and ensure the biocompatibility of all materials. Finally, gold nanoparticles were reduced on the surface of PDA-coated MnFe2O4, and boric acid was attached to the hybrid materials for also possessing the ability to be used as a potential agent in PTT and BNCT applications in addition to being an MRI agent. According to the cell viability assay, treatment of the glioblastoma cell line (T98G) with MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA for 24 and 48 h did not cause any significant cell death, indicating good biocompatibility. All analysis results showed that the developed MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA multifunctional material could be a helpful candidate for biomedical applications such as MRI, PTT, and BNCT.

1. Introduction

Cancer is a disease that is the second foremost cause of death globally after cardiovascular diseases. According to the World Health Organization Cancer Report, more than 18 million people were diagnosed with cancer in 2018, and approximately 9.6 million people died due to cancer. Poor clinical outcomes are due to the lack of appropriate tools for early detection and effective cancer treatment.1 However, clinicians believe that early cancer detection can significantly improve the chances of successful treatment and survival.2 In this context, nanomaterials can offer new cancer diagnosis and treatment possibilities. In particular, multifunctional nanomaterials with diverse functions, including targeting, imaging, and therapy, are being studied extensively in a way that minimize overcoming the limitations associated with traditional cancer diagnosis and treatment.3 For cancer treatment, new multifunctional nanoparticles used in many new treatment methods such as photothermal therapy (PTT), magnetic hyperthermia (MH), photodynamic therapy (PDT), and boron or gadolinium neutron capture therapy (BNCT and GdNCT) have been developed to be applied in recent years apart from traditional treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy.4−7 In addition, the preparation of functional nanomaterials that allow simultaneous imaging, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the correct detection of the tumor region in cancer treatment, will positively contribute to the treatment’s effectiveness.8 In this respect, the main aim of this study is to prepare multifunctional nanocomposites possessing the potential to be used simultaneously in imaging such as MRI and dual cancer therapy such as PTT and BNCT.

Nanoscale materials, especially functional materials containing magnetic nanoparticles, are widely used for cancer diagnosis and treatment because of unique properties such as easy synthesis and surface modification, biocompatibility, and easy control by using an external magnet.9−11 One of the applications of magnetic nanoparticles is their use as a T2 contrast agent in MRI, which is one of the most potent non-invasive diagnostic tools because they can effectively increase the relaxation efficiency of the water proton and accordingly shorten the relaxation time of the protons. Compared to iron oxide nanoparticles, manganese ferrite nanoparticles (MnFe2O4) are commonly used as T2 contrast agents and possess high saturation magnetization and excellent T2-negative contrast because they can be shown to be more efficient at promoting transverse relaxivity (r2).12−15 Although the r2 values can be increased by increasing the size of the individual particles, this causes some difficulties, such as large and mononuclear magnetic nanoparticles tend to be polydisperse and agglomerated in suspension. One option to overcome this restraint would be to place multiple magnetic cores on a larger substrate such as silica or an organic layer, resulting in an increase in the total magnetic content per particle and an improvement in high colloidal stability.16,17 In addition to being an MRI agent, MnFe2O4 nanoparticles have been recognized as a magnetic hyperthermia tool in cancer therapy due to the generation of heat under a magnetic field and drug carrier.18

PTT is a highly specific and minimally invasive cancer treatment method depending on the killing of cancer cells by achieving sufficient hyperthermia under laser irradiation compared to the traditional cancer treatment methods such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy.19−21 In recent years, various nanomaterials such as different kinds of gold nanostructures,22 carbon base nanostructures,23 and copper sulfur nanoparticles24 have been developed and studied as PTT agents as they efficiently convert optical energy into thermal energy and increase the effectiveness of photothermal ablation therapy.25 Among these nanostructures, gold-based nanostructures are getting more attention as a photothermal agent in PTT applications because of their low toxicity, biocompatibility, high surface plasmon resonance, and capability of further functionalization.20,26 One of the main challenges in PTT applications depending on the gold nanostructures is the need to accumulate enough gold nanoparticles in the tumor area to increase the thermal effect while reducing the laser intensity to avoid damage to healthy tissues.27 The other challenge is the cytotoxicity issue from the cytotoxic cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) surfactant used to synthesize gold nanoparticles.26,28,29 Considering these challenges related to gold nanoparticles in cancer treatment, one of the main aims of the study is to combine gold nanoparticles with a magnetic core to accumulate them at the desired level in the tumor area and to use a biocompatible polymer such as polydopamine (PDA) for the synthesis of gold nanoparticles. PDA has been applied in biomedical fields due to its high biocompatibility and biodegradability30 in addition to catalytic applications as a carbon source.31−33 Additionally, thanks to the multi-core manganese ferrite nanoparticles in the synthesized hybrid material structure, it can also increase the effectiveness of the treatment as it allows imaging with MRI during PTT applications.

Previous studies have indicated that a single treatment alone cannot be sufficient to destroy especially malignant tumors owing to the individual differences between cancer patients and drug resistance of cancer cells. Therefore, more than one treatment can be simultaneously applied to the patients, creating more effects and increasing the effectiveness of the treatment.34−36 BNCT is an effective cancer treatment method based on 10B isotopes and low-energy neutron beams. The basic principle of BNCT is dependent on the accumulation of 10B isotopes in the cancerous region and then the excitation of these isotopes with low-energy neutrons and the destruction of the cancer cells using high-energy particles [(4He2+) and 7Li3+ ions] produced by excitation without affecting normal cells.37,38 Although there are some nanocomposites, which include boron and gold atoms, that have the potential to be used for the combination of BNCT and PTT methods,20,39−41 very few of them have been seen to be combined with the magnetic core to provide an adequate amount of boron or gold in cancer cells.42,43

In this context, the study aims to first synthesize multi-core manganese ferrite nanoparticles, which can be used as a potential MRI contrast agent and target the desired region in the body, and then to coat these multicore nanoparticles with PDA for reduction of gold nanoparticles, binding of boron atoms on the surface, and ensuring the biocompatibility of all materials. Finally, gold nanoparticles were reduced on the surface of PDA-coated MnFe2O4, and boric acid was attached to the hybrid materials for also possessing the ability to be used as a potential agent in PTT and BNCT applications in addition to being an MRI agent (as shown in Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Schematic description of the synthesis of gold-loaded and boron-attached multicore manganese ferrite nanoparticles (MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA).

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (Merck), MnSO4·H2O (Sigma-Aldrich), CH3COONa·3H2O (Merck), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, average mol wt 40.000, Sigma-Aldrich), tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (TRIS, Sigma-Aldrich), dopamine hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich), HAuCI4·3H2O (Carlo Erba), absolute ethanol (ISOLAB), NaHCO3 (Merck), and H3BO3 (Sigma-Aldrich) were used without any further purification.

2.2. Synthesis of Multicore Manganese Ferrite Nanoparticles (MnFe2O4)

MnFe2O4 nanoparticles were successfully synthesized using the solvothermal method. Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (3.13 g) and MnSO4·H2O (0.79 g) were dissolved in ethylene glycol (60 mL) to form a clear solution, followed by the addition of CH3COONa·3H2O (5.97 g) and PVP (0.9 g). The mixture was stirred vigorously for 30 min, filled in the reactor vessel (Parr 5500), and heated at 200 °C for 5 h. The obtained solid product was washed several times with deionized water and ethanol and dried under a vacuum oven at 70 °C for 24 h.44

2.3. Synthesis of Polydopamine-Coated MnFe2O4 Nanoparticles (MnFe2O4@PDA)

For PDA coating, 75 mg of MnFe2O4 nanoparticles was dispersed in the solution mixture of ethanol (20 mL) and aqueous solution (10 mL) of TRIS (25 mM). 15 mL of aqueous solution with dissolved dopamine hydrochloride (150 mg) was added, and the resulting mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature. The product was collected with an external magnet, washed with deionized water, and dried in a vacuum oven at 40 °C overnight.45

2.4. Synthesis of Gold-Loaded MnFe2O4@PDA Nanoparticles (MnFe2O4@PDA-Au)

75 mg of MnFe2O4@PDA nanoparticles was dispersed in 40 mL of gold solution (15 mg HAuCI4·3H2O) and sonicated for 5 min. The mixture was stirred for 24 h and separated using an external magnet. After being washed with deionized water several times, the final product was dried in a vacuum oven at 40 °C.46

2.5. Synthesis of Boron-Attached MnFe2O4@PDA-Au Nanoparticles (MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA)

27.5 mg of MnFe2O4@PDA-Au nanoparticles was dispersed in 10 mL of deionized water and sonicated for 5 min 3.78 mg of NaHCO3 and 2.81 mg of H3BO3 were added to the mixture, and the final mixture was stirred under a nitrogen atmosphere for 1 h. Then, the water was evaporated using a rotary evaporator, and cold acetone was added to the concentrated mixture. After waiting one night, the final product was separated and dried in a vacuum oven at 40 °C.47

2.6. Characterization

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded with a Rigaku Ultima IV X-ray diffractometer between 2θ: 2 and 70° with 2°/min. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were obtained using a PerkinElmer Spectrum-One instrument. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves were obtained by using a Shimadzu DTG-60H instrument under nitrogen flow (heating rate: 10 °C/min). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analyses were performed with a Tescan GAIA 3 instrument and a Jeol 2100F model instrument (120 kV), respectively. Room-temperature magnetization curves were recorded using the Cryogenic Limited Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS) between ±10 kOe at room temperature. B and Au amounts were determined with the ICP-OES instrument (PerkinElmer Optima 4300 DV model). Zeta potentials were measured using Malvern Nano ZS90. Absorbance at 570 nm was measured with an EnSight Multimode Plate Reader (PerkinElmer).

2.7. In Vitro Cell Culture Experiments

T98G is a glioblastoma cell line, and it is commonly used for cell viability assays.48−53 To determine the effect of MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA nanoparticles on cell viability, T98G cells were cultured in 96-well plates at a density of 50.000 cells/well (100 μL per well), and they were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 10 μg/mL streptomycin, in 5% CO2 in the air, at 37 °C. After 24 h of incubation, media were removed, and cells were treated with 0.1, 0.5, 5, and 10 μg/mL of MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA nanoparticles for 24 and 48 h. Untreated T98G cells were accepted as a control group. After the treatment of cells, media were removed, and an MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay was performed. The formation of formazan crystals is used to determine viable cells using the colorimetric method.54 For the MTT assay, freshly prepared 100 μL of 0.5 mg/mL MTT was added to the well, and plates were incubated for 4 h at 37 °C in the dark. Then, the MTT reagent was removed and replaced with 100 μL of isopropanol to solubilize the converted purple dye in the wells. Absorbance at 570 nm was measured with an EnSight Multimode Plate Reader.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5.01 for Windows (GraphPad Software). The viability of T98G cells in different MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA concentrations was compared using repeated measures variance analysis. The Friedman test was used to compare the viability in each concentration according to the control group, and P < 0.05 was taken at a significance level in all instances.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Preparation of Polydopamine-Coated MnFe2O4 Nanoparticles (MnFe2O4@PDA)

The powder XRD pattern of MnFe2O4 nanoparticles prepared using the solvothermal method is shown in Figure 1a. The observed patterns at 18. 5° (111), 30.2° (220), 35.5° (311), 37.1° (222), 43.1° (400), 53.3° (422), 56.9° (511), and 62.5° (440) matched well with the standard card of MnFe2O4 (JCPDS card no. 74-2403), and no impurity phases or other product phases were observed in the pattern.55,56 After the synthesis of MnFe2O4 nanoparticles was confirmed by XRD analysis, these nanoparticles were coated with PDA, which not only can reduce metals (such as gold) in a solution to metal nanoparticles through catechol functional groups without the need for extra chemicals but also can increase the solubility of the whole structure in the biological environment by providing hydrophilic properties.57 In addition, boron atoms can be attached to the catechol groups of PDA by forming five-membered rings.57 Thus, PDA was chosen as the coating agent to modify MnFe2O4 nanoparticles for these reasons. Figure 2b indicates the FT-IR spectra of MnFe2O4 and MnFe2O4@PDA in the region of 450 to 4000 cm–1 to characterize functional groups. In the blue spectrum related to MnFe2O4 nanoparticles, the broadband at 3600–3000 cm–1 is attributed −to OH stretching vibration due to absorbed water molecules and the peaks at 1650 and 597 cm–1 belong to the C=O stretching of the residual PVP molecules and metal–O (Mn–O or Fe–O) bond vibrations of MnFe2O4 nanoparticles, respectively.58 The other spectrum of MnFe2O4@PDA nanoparticles indicates the new peaks at 1606 and 1510 cm–1, which belong to C=C stretching vibrations of a benzene ring and N–H bending vibrations, respectively, verifying the presence of PDA with MnFe2O4 nanoparticles.20 The confirmation and determination of the PDA coating were performed by TGA, as shown in Figure 1c. While MnFe2O4 nanoparticles showed a total weight loss of 10.3% due to absorbed water (2.3%) on the surface from 25 to 150 °C and residual PVP molecules (8%) from 150 to 1000 °C, MnFe2O4@PDA nanoparticles had 3 and 42.6% weight losses between the same temperatures. The difference in weight loss between 150 and 1000 °C was due to the removal of coated PDA from MnFe2O4 nanoparticles.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

XRD pattern of MnFe2O4 nanoparticles (a), FT-IR spectra (b), and TGA curves (c) of MnFe2O4 and MnFe2O4@PDA nanoparticles.

SEM and TEM images performed to determine the morphology and size of the MnFe2O4 nanoparticles and confirm the PDA coating are shown in Figure 3. The SEM image in Figure 3a shows that MnFe2O4 nanoparticles consisted of a nearly spherical morphology with a size of 100–200 nm. In order to confirm that MnFe2O4 structures were composed of multicore nanoparticles, small-sized particles (approximately 100–130 nm) were selected from TEM analysis. MnFe2O4 structures appeared in bulk in the single nanoparticles with sizes ranging from 10 to 15 nm (Figure 3c). After the PDA coating, it was observed that the particle sizes ranged approximately between 180 and 280 nm (Figure 3b), and the PDA thickness was between 30 and 40 nm (Figure 3d).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

SEM and TEM images of MnFe2O4 (a,c) and MnFe2O4@PDA (b,d) nanoparticles.

3.2. Preparation of Gold-Loaded and Boron-Attached MnFe2O4@PDA Nanoparticles (MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA) and In Vitro Cell Viability of MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA

As detailed in the previous sections, the surface of MnFe2O4 nanoparticles was coated with PDA to reduce gold nanoparticles and attach boron atoms through catechol functional groups. The loading of gold nanoparticles to the MnFe2O4@PDA nanoparticles was first demonstrated by XRD analysis. In Figure 4a, the new phases seen at 38.1°(110), 44.5° (200), and 64.6°(220) exactly matched with the standard card of gold particles (JCPDS 04-0784). The phases related to MnFe2O4 did not change; only the intensity of the phases decreased due to the PDA coating. The room-temperature magnetization curves of MnFe2O4 and MnFe2O4@PDA-Au samples are shown in Figure 4b. The saturation magnetization (σs) values of MnFe2O4 and MnFe2O4@PDA-Au samples were calculated as 58.3 and 35.1 emu/g from the magnetization curves, respectively. As expected, the saturation magnetization value decreased after modifying non-magnetic PDA and gold nanoparticles, but the low coercivity, residual magnetism, and narrow hysteresis areas were related to the soft ferromagnetic properties. The soft ferromagnetic particles could be readily magnetized and demagnetized, allowing them to be used in various applications.59

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

XRD pattern (a) and room-temperature magnetization curves (b) of MnFe2O4 and MnFe2O4@PDA-Au nanoparticles (+:MnFe2O4 and *:Au).

Figure 5 shows the SEM (a,b) and TEM (c,d) images of MnFe2O4@PDA-Au nanoparticles. As can be seen from the SEM images, after loading the gold nanoparticles, the general morphology did not change and remained close to a spherical morphology, sized at nearly 180–280 nm, but small particles were formed on the surfaces. According to TEM analysis, it was confirmed that gold nanoparticles were formed on the PDA surface with a size of approximately 20–30 nm. Depending on the sample preparation for SEM and TEM analyses, MnFe2O4@PDA-Au nanoparticles appear to be aggregated in the solid form. However, different methods such as sonication and dispersing in various suspension environments can be applied for better dispersion of these nanoparticles in the biological environment.60−62

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

SEM (a,b) and TEM (c,d) images of MnFe2O4@PDA-Au nanoparticles.

After the gold nanoparticles were reduced on the surface of MnFe2O4@PDA, boric acid was finally attached to MnFe2O4@PDA-Au via the catechol groups of PDA by forming five-membered rings. The final sample (MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA) was characterized by FT-IR and ICP-OES analyses shown in Figure 6. After boric acid attachment, the new peaks observed at 1080 and 826 cm–1 are related to asymmetric and symmetric B–O vibrations of the tetrahedral BO4 groups, respectively, indicating that boric acid is attached to PDA by converting the BO4 group.47,63 According to ICP-OES analysis (as shown in Figure 6b), the numbers of Au and B per milligram sample were calculated as 2.5 × 1017 and 3.1 × 1017 atoms/mg, respectively, which could make an appropriate candidate for magnetic targeted BNCT and PTT applications.47,64 When higher amounts are required for each application, the amounts of B and Au can be tuned by the PDA thickness.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

FT-IR spectra of MnFe2O4@PDA and MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA nanoparticles (a); Au, and B contents of MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA nanoparticles (b);* values found by ICP-OES analysis.

Zeta potential measurements were also performed to confirm the surface modifications for all samples, as shown in Figure 7. Multicore MnFe2O4 nanoparticles had a negative zeta-potential of −18.7 mV depending on the PVP molecules, and after PDA modification (MnFe2O4@PDA), the negative zeta potential of the nanoparticles increased from −18.7 mV to −27.1 because of the deprotonation of the catechol group of the PDA. However, MnFe2O4@PDA-Au nanoparticles presented a zeta potential of −20.8 mV because the number of catechol groups of the PDA used during the reduction of gold nanoparticles to the surface was reduced. Finally, the negative zeta potential increased up to −30.3 mV owing to the negatively charged tetrahedral BO4 groups after boric acid attachment.65−67 Furthermore, it can be seen that MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA nanoparticles were dispersed uniformly in an aqueous colloidal system with black color, and the dispersed nanoparticles were easily attracted using external magnet (inset in Figure 7d).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Zeta potential distributions of MnFe2O4 (a), MnFe2O4@PDA (b), MnFe2O4@PDA-Au (c), and MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA (d) dispersed in water.

After the designed MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA was successfully characterized by various techniques, T98G cells were used to determine its effect on cell viability. After the treatment with different concentrations of MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA nanoparticles, data were analyzed, and variance analysis of repeated measures was performed using the Friedman test. According to the cell viability assay, treatment with MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA from 0.1 to 10 μg/mL during 24 and 48 h did not cause any significant cell death (Figure 8). The most obvious decrease in the percentages of cell viability was seen at the concentration of 10 μg/mL in both 24 and 48 h treatments (Figure 8), but they were not significant at all. The 48 h treatment caused slight decreases in cell viability than that of the 24 h-treatment for all concentrations; however, it was not significant in all instances. According to the cell viability assay, it can be said that MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA nanoparticles indicate good biocompatibility.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Graph of cell viability results of 24 and 48 h-treated T98G cells with MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA. Untreated T98G cells were set to 100% as a control. The graph was given as the mean ± S.D. of independent experiments (n: 3).

4. Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the surfaces of multicore manganese ferrite nanoparticles can be modified with gold and boron via the catechol groups of PDA. MnFe2O4 structures consisting of single nanoparticles with sizes ranging from 10 to 15 nm were prepared using the solvothermal method and verified with XRD analysis. Multicore MnFe2O4 structures were coated with PDA to provide the reduction of gold nanoparticles, attachment of boron on the surface, and the biocompatibility of all materials. MnFe2O4@PDA nanoparticles indicated the new peaks at 1606 and 1510 cm–1 in the FT-IR spectrum, which belong to C=C stretching vibrations of a benzene ring and N–H bending vibrations, respectively, and a total weight loss of 45.6% in the TGA curve confirmed the existence of PDA. In addition, the shell thickness was determined using TEM between approximately 30 and 40 nm. Au nanoparticles possessing a spherical morphology with sizes ranging from 20 to 30 nm were seen on the PDA surface after Au loading. The MnFe2O4@PDA-Au sample exhibited soft ferromagnetic properties (35.1 emu/g) with low coercivity, residual magnetism, and narrow hysteresis areas, which is suitable for biomedical applications. Finally, after boric acid attachment, the new peaks at 1080 and 826 cm–1 in the FT-IR spectrum related to asymmetric and symmetric B–O vibrations of the tetrahedral BO4 groups, respectively, confirmed that boric acid was attached to PDA by converting the BO4 group. According to the cell viability assay, treatment with MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA from 0.1 to 10 μg/mL during 24 and 48 h did not cause significant cell death. As a result, this designed multifunctional MnFe2O4@PDA-Au-BA may be a suitable candidate for various biomedical applications such as MRI, PTT, and BNCT.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Prof. Dr. Birgul Karan for her support.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Yang K.; Zhang S.; He J.; Nie Z. Polymers and inorganic nanoparticles: A winning combination towards assembled nanostructures for cancer imaging and therapy. Nano Today 2021, 36, 101046. 10.1016/j.nantod.2020.101046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Subramanian A. P.; Jaganathan S. K.; Supriyanto E. Overview on in vitro and in vivo investigations of nanocomposite based cancer diagnosis and therapeutics. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 72638–72652. 10.1039/c5ra11912j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Yu M. K.; Park J.; Jon S. Targeting strategies for multifunctional nanoparticles in cancer imaging and therapy. Theranostics 2012, 2, 3. 10.7150/thno.3463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ding Y.; Zeng L.; Xiao X.; Chen T.; Pan Y. Multifunctional Magnetic Nanoagents for Bioimaging and Therapy. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2021, 4, 1066–1076. 10.1021/acsabm.0c01099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang Q.; Wu J.; Wang J.; Wang X.; Wu C.; Chen M.; Wu Q.; Lesniak M. S.; Mi Y.; Cheng Y. A Neutrophil-Inspired Supramolecular Nanogel for Magnetocaloric–Enzymatic Tandem Therapy. Angew. Chem. 2020, 59, 3732–3738. 10.1002/anie.201915118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hu Y.; Hu H.; Yan J.; Zhang C.; Li Y.; Wang M.; Tan W.; Liu J.; Pan Y. Multifunctional porous iron oxide nanoagents for MRI and photothermal/chemo synergistic therapy. Bioconjugate Chem. 2018, 29, 1283–1290. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Icten O.; Kose D. A.; Matissek S. J.; Misurelli J. A.; Elsawa S. F.; Hosmane N. S.; Zumreoglu-Karan B. Gadolinium borate and iron oxide bioconjugates: Nanocomposites of next generation with multifunctional applications. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2018, 92, 317–328. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.06.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wu L.; Mendoza-Garcia A.; Li Q.; Sun S. Organic phase syntheses of magnetic nanoparticles and their applications. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 10473–10512. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Icten O.Functional nanocomposites: promising candidates for cancer diagnosis and treatment. In Synthetic Inorganic Chemistry; Hamilton E. J. M., Ed.; Elsevier, 2021, pp 279–340. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kalaiselvan C. R.; Thorat N. D.; Sahu N. K. Carboxylated PEG-Functionalized MnFe2O4 Nanocubes Synthesized in a Mixed Solvent: Morphology, Magnetic Properties, and Biomedical Applications. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 5266–5275. 10.1021/acsomega.0c05382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gao J.; Gu H.; Xu B. Multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles: design, synthesis, and biomedical applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1097–1107. 10.1021/ar9000026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Akhlaghi N.; Najafpour-Darzi G. Manganese ferrite (MnFe2O4) Nanoparticles: From synthesis to application-A review. J Ind Eng Chem 2021, 103, 292–304. 10.1016/j.jiec.2021.07.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ma Y.; Xu X.; Lu L.; Meng K.; Wu Y.; Chen J.; Miao J.; Jiang Y. Facile synthesis of ultrasmall MnFe2O4 nanoparticles with high saturation magnetization for magnetic resonance imaging. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 34005–34011. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.08.308. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Peters J. A. Relaxivity of manganese ferrite nanoparticles. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2020, 120-121, 72–94. 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2020.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Yang L.; Ma L.; Xin J.; Li A.; Sun C.; Wei R.; Ren B. W.; Chen Z.; Lin H.; Gao J. Composition tunable manganese ferrite nanoparticles for optimized T 2 contrast ability. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 3038–3047. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Santos E. C. S.; Cunha J. A.; Martins M. G.; Galeano-Villar B. M.; Caraballo-Vivas R. J.; Leite P. B.; Rossi A. L.; Garcia F.; Finotelli P. V.; Ferraz H. C. Curcuminoids-conjugated multicore magnetic nanoparticles: Design and characterization of a potential theranostic nanoplatform. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 879, 160448. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160448. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yoon T.-J.; Lee H.; Shao H.; Hilderbrand S. A.; Weissleder R. Multicore assemblies potentiate magnetic properties of biomagnetic nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 4793–4797. 10.1002/adma.201102948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Iranmanesh P.; Saeednia S.; Mehran M.; Dafeh S. R. Modified structural and magnetic properties of nanocrystalline MnFe2O4 by pH in capping agent free co-precipitation method. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2017, 425, 31–36. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.10.105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu Y.; Xu M.; Chen Q.; Guan G.; Hu W.; Zhao X.; Qiao M.; Hu H.; Liang Y.; Zhu H.; Chen D.; Gold nanorods/mesoporous silica-based nanocomposite as theranostic agents for targeting near-infrared imaging and photothermal therapy induced with laser. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 4747–4761. 10.2147/ijn.s82940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Icten O. The Design of Gold Decorated Iron Borates (Fe3BO6 and FeBO3) for Photothermal Therapy and Boron Carriers. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 2021, 1985–1992. 10.1002/ejic.202100217. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bao Z.; Liu X.; Liu Y.; Liu H.; Zhao K. Near-infrared light-responsive inorganic nanomaterials for photothermal therapy. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 11, 349–364. 10.1016/j.ajps.2015.11.123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ha Lien N. T.; Phan A. D.; Van Khanh B. T.; Thuy N. T.; Trong Nghia N.; My Nhung H. T.; Hong Nhung T.; Quang Hoa D.; Duong V.; Minh Hue N. Applications of mesoporous silica-encapsulated gold nanorods loaded doxorubicin in chemo-photothermal therapy. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 20231–20237. 10.1021/acsomega.0c01939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang Q.; Wang J.; Lv G.; Wang F.; Zhou X.; Hu J.; Wang Q. Facile synthesis of hydrophilic polypyrrole nanoparticles for photothermal cancer therapy. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 3484–3490. 10.1007/s10853-014-8061-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fu J.-j.; Zhang J.-y.; Li S.-p.; Zhang L.-m.; Lin Z.-x.; Liang L.; Qin A.-p.; Yu X.-y. CuS nanodot-loaded thermosensitive hydrogel for anticancer photothermal therapy. Mol. Pharm. 2018, 15, 4621–4631. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b00624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rahimi-Moghaddam F.; Azarpira N.; Sattarahmady N. Evaluation of a nanocomposite of PEG-curcumin-gold nanoparticles as a near-infrared photothermal agent: an in vitro and animal model investigation. Laser Med. Sci. 2018, 33, 1769–1779. 10.1007/s10103-018-2538-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Luo G. F.; Chen W. H.; Lei Q.; Qiu W. X.; Liu Y. X.; Cheng Y. J.; Zhang X. Z. A triple-collaborative strategy for high-performance tumor therapy by multifunctional mesoporous silica-coated gold nanorods. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 4339–4350. 10.1002/adfm.201505175. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Asadi S.; Bianchi L.; De Landro M.; Korganbayev S.; Schena E.; Saccomandi P. Laser-induced optothermal response of gold nanoparticles: From a physical viewpoint to cancer treatment application. J. Biophot. 2021, 14, e202000161 10.1002/jbio.202000161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gao Y.; Li Y.; Chen J.; Zhu S.; Liu X.; Zhou L.; Shi P.; Niu D.; Gu J.; Shi J. Multifunctional gold nanostar-based nanocomposite: synthesis and application for noninvasive MR-SERS imaging-guided photothermal ablation. Biomaterials 2015, 60, 31–41. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Doughty A. C.; Hoover A. R.; Layton E.; Murray C. K.; Howard E. W.; Chen W. R. Nanomaterial applications in photothermal therapy for cancer. Materials 2019, 12, 779. 10.3390/ma12050779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cheng Y.; Zhang S.; Kang N.; Huang J.; Lv X.; Wen K.; Ye S.; Chen Z.; Zhou X.; Ren L. Polydopamine-coated manganese carbonate nanoparticles for amplified magnetic resonance imaging-guided photothermal therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 19296–19306. 10.1021/acsami.7b03087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. He W.; Guo X.; Zheng J.; Xu J.; Hayat T.; Alharbi N. S.; Zhang M. Structural evolution and compositional modulation of ZIF-8-derived hybrids comprised of metallic Ni nanoparticles and silica as interlayer. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 7255–7266. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ding L.; Zheng J.; Xu J.; Yin X.-B.; Zhang M. Rational design, synthesis, and applications of carbon-assisted dispersive Ni-based composites. CrystEngComm 2022, 24, 912–921. 10.1039/d1ce01493e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang M.; Ding L.; Zheng J.; Liu L.; Alsulami H.; Kutbi M. A.; Xu J. Surface modification of carbon fibers with hydrophilic Fe3O4 nanoparticles for nickel-based multifunctional composites. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 509, 145348. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145348. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang X.; Cheng L. Multifunctional two-dimensional nanocomposites for photothermal-based combined cancer therapy. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 15685–15708. 10.1039/c9nr04044g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yang S.; Yang P.; Xie Y.; Zhang B.; Lin J.; Fan J.; Zhao Z. Organic–inorganic hybrid photothermal nanomaterials for combined photothermal and chemotherapy therapy of tumors under the dual biological window. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 18219–18232. 10.1007/s10853-021-06471-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Chen P.-L.; Peng S.-L.; Wu L.-T.; Fan M.-M.; Wang P.; Liu L.-H. Amphiphilic tumor-targeting chimeric peptide-based drug self-delivery nanomicelles for overcoming drug resistance in cancer by synergistic chemo-photodynamic therapy. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 15288–15298. 10.1007/s10853-020-05084-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhu Y.; Lin Y.; Zhu Y. Z.; Lu J.; Maguire J. A.; Hosmane N. S. Boron drug delivery via encapsulated magnetic nanocomposites: a new approach for BNCT in cancer treatment. J. Nanomater. 2010, 2010, 409320. 10.1155/2010/409320. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hsu C.; Lin S.; Peir J.; Liao J.; Lin Y.; Chou F. Potential of using boric acid as a boron drug for boron neutron capture therapy for osteosarcoma. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2011, 69, 1782–1785. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Cioran A. M.; Teixidor F.; Krpetić Ž.; Brust M.; Viñas C. Preparation and characterization of Au nanoparticles capped with mercaptocarboranyl clusters. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 5054–5061. 10.1039/c3dt52872c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Liang L.; Rapakousiou A.; Salmon L.; Ruiz J.; Astruc D.; Dash B. P.; Satapathy R.; Sawicki J. W.; Hosmane N. S. “Click” Assembly of Carborane-Appended Polymers and Stabilization of Gold and Palladium Nanoparticles. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 2011, 3043–3049. WILEY-VCH Verlag Weinheim 10.1002/ejic.201100360. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Cioran A. M.; Musteti A. D.; Teixidor F.; Krpetic Z.; Prior I. A.; He Q.; Kiely C. J.; Brust M.; Vinas C. Mercaptocarborane-capped gold nanoparticles: electron pools and ion traps with switchable hydrophilicity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 212–221. 10.1021/ja203367h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sadeghi M.; Jahanshahi M.; Javadian H. Synthesis and characterization of a novel Fe3O4-SiO2@ Gold core-shell biocompatible magnetic nanoparticles for biological and medical applications. J. Nanomed. Res. 2019, 4, 193–203. 10.22034/NMRJ.2019.03.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Qi B.; Wu C.; Li X.; Wang D.; Sun L.; Chen B.; Liu W.; Zhang H.; Zhou X. Self-Assembled Magnetic Gold Catalysts from Dual-Functional Boron Clusters. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 2285–2290. 10.1002/cctc.201702011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhai Y.; Zhai J.; Zhou M.; Dong S. Ordered magnetic core–manganese oxide shell nanostructures and their application in water treatment. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 7030–7035. 10.1039/b912767d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yue Q.; Wang M.; Sun Z.; Wang C.; Wang C.; Deng Y.; Zhao D. A versatile ethanol-mediated polymerization of dopamine for efficient surface modification and the construction of functional core–shell nanostructures. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 6085–6093. 10.1039/c3tb21028f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zeng T.; Zhang X.-l.; Niu H.-y.; Ma Y.-r.; Li W.-h.; Cai Y.-q. In situ growth of gold nanoparticles onto polydopamine-encapsulated magnetic microspheres for catalytic reduction of nitrobenzene. Appl. Catal., B 2013, 134, 26–33. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.12.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Icten O.; Hosmane N. S.; Kose D. A.; Zumreoglu-Karan B. Magnetic nanocomposites of boron and vitamin C. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 3646–3652. 10.1039/c6nj03894h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wagner P. M.; Monjes N. M.; Guido M. E. Chemotherapeutic Effect of SR9009, a REV-ERB Agonist, on the Human Glioblastoma T98G Cells. ASN Neuro 2019, 11, 1759091419892713. 10.1177/1759091419892713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Bilal I.; Xie S.; Elburki M. S.; Aziziaram Z.; Ahmed S. M.; Balaky S. T. J. Cytotoxic effect of diferuloylmethane, a derivative of turmeric on different human glioblastoma cell lines. Cell. Mol. Biomed. Rep. 2021, 1, 14–22. 10.55705/cmbr.2021.138815.1004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kaushik N. K.; Kim Y. H.; Han Y. G.; Choi E. H. Effect of jet plasma on T98G human brain cancer cells. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2013, 13, 176–180. 10.1016/j.cap.2012.07.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Murad H.; Alghamian Y.; Aljapawe A.; Madania A. Effects of ionizing radiation on the viability and proliferative behavior of the human glioblastoma T98G cell line. BMC Res. Notes 2018, 11, 330. 10.1186/s13104-018-3438-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Okon E.; Kukula-Koch W.; Halasa M.; Jarzab A.; Baran M.; Dmoszynska-Graniczka M.; Angelis A.; Kalpoutzakis E.; Guz M.; Stepulak A.; Wawruszak A. Magnoflorine-Isolation and the Anticancer Potential against NCI-H1299 Lung, MDA-MB-468 Breast, T98G Glioma, and TE671 Rhabdomyosarcoma Cancer Cells. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1532. 10.3390/biom10111532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Emanuelsson I.; Wikvall K.; Friman T.; Norlin M. Vitamin D Analogues Tacalcitol and Calcipotriol Inhibit Proliferation and Migration of T98G Human Glioblastoma Cells. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2018, 123, 130–136. 10.1111/bcpt.13007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Carmichael J.; DeGraff W. G.; Gazdar A. F.; Minna J. D.; Mitchell J. B. Evaluation of a tetrazolium-based semiautomated colorimetric assay: assessment of chemosensitivity testing. Cancer Res. 1987, 47, 936–942. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Kanagesan S.; Aziz S. B. A.; Hashim M.; Ismail I.; Tamilselvan S.; Alitheen N. B. B. M.; Swamy M. K.; Purna Chandra Rao B. Synthesis, characterization and in vitro evaluation of manganese ferrite (MnFe2O4) nanoparticles for their biocompatibility with murine breast cancer cells (4T1). Molecules 2016, 21, 312. 10.3390/molecules21030312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Bao X.; Qiang Z.; Ling W.; Chang J.-H. Sonohydrothermal synthesis of MFe2O4 magnetic nanoparticles for adsorptive removal of tetracyclines from water. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 117, 104–110. 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.03.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Liu R.; Guo Y.; Odusote G.; Qu F.; Priestley R. D. Core–shell Fe3O4 polydopamine nanoparticles serve multipurpose as drug carrier, catalyst support and carbon adsorbent. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 9167–9171. 10.1021/am402585y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Gürbüz M. U.; Koca M.; Elmacı G.; Ertürk A. S. In situ green synthesis of MnFe2O4@ EP@ Ag nanocomposites using Epilobium parviflorum green tea extract: An efficient magnetically recyclable catalyst for the reduction of hazardous organic dyes. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2021, 35, e6230 10.1002/aoc.6230. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Icten O.; Kose D. A.; Zumreoglu-Karan B. Fabrication and characterization of magnetite-gadolinium borate nanocomposites. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 726, 437–444. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.277. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Pradhan S.; Hedberg J.; Blomberg E.; Wold S.; Odnevall Wallinder I. Effect of sonication on particle dispersion, administered dose and metal release of non-functionalized, non-inert metal nanoparticles. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2016, 18, 285. 10.1007/s11051-016-3597-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Sager T. M.; Porter D. W.; Robinson V. A.; Lindsley W. G.; Schwegler-Berry D. E.; Castranova V. Improved method to disperse nanoparticles for in vitro and in vivo investigation of toxicity. Nanotoxicology 2007, 1, 118–129. 10.1080/17435390701381596. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Moore T. L.; Urban D. A.; Rodriguez-Lorenzo L.; Milosevic A.; Crippa F.; Spuch-Calvar M.; Balog S.; Rothen-Rutishauser B.; Lattuada M.; Petri-Fink A. Nanoparticle administration method in cell culture alters particle-cell interaction. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 900. 10.1038/s41598-018-36954-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Köse D. A.; Zümreoglu-Karan B.; Hökelek T.; Şahin E. Boric acid complexes with organic biomolecules: Mono-chelate complexes with salicylic and glucuronic acids. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2010, 363, 4031–4037. 10.1016/j.ica.2010.08.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Ramasamy T.; Ruttala H. B.; Sundaramoorthy P.; Poudel B. K.; Youn Y. S.; Ku S. K.; Choi H.-G.; Yong C. S.; Kim J. O. Multimodal selenium nanoshell-capped Au@ mSiO2 nanoplatform for NIR-responsive chemo-photothermal therapy against metastatic breast cancer. NPG Asia Mater. 2018, 10, 197–216. 10.1038/s41427-018-0034-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Behera M.; Ram S. Inquiring the mechanism of formation, encapsulation, and stabilization of gold nanoparticles by poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) molecules in 1-butanol. Appl. Nanosci. 2014, 4, 247–254. 10.1007/s13204-013-0198-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Cheng G.; Zheng S.-Y. Construction of a high-performance magnetic enzyme nanosystem for rapid tryptic digestion. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6947. 10.1038/srep06947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Zha L.; Qian J.; Wang B.; Liu H.; Zhang C.; Dong Q.; Chen W.; Hong L. In vitro/in vivo evaluation of pH-sensitive Gambogenic acid loaded zein nanoparticles with polydopamine coating. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 587, 119665. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES