Abstract
Much higher risk of cancer has been found in diabetes patients. Insulin receptor (IR) and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) have been extensively studied in both breast cancer and diabetes therapies. Interestingly, a recent study proposed that IR/IGF1R ratio is an important factor for breast cancer prognosis. Women with higher IR/IGF1R ratio showed poor breast cancer prognosis as well as hyperinsulinemia. Here, we propose a novel mechanism that oncogenic protein TRIP-Br1 renders breast cancer cells and insulin deficient mice to have higher IR/IGF1R ratio by positively and negatively regulating IR and IGF1R expression at the protein level, respectively. TRIP-Br1 repressed IR degradation by suppressing its ubiquitination. Meanwhile, TRIP-Br1 directly interacts with both IGF1R and NEDD4-1 E3 ubiquitin ligase, in which TRIP-Br1/NEDD4-1 degrades IGF1R via ubiquitin/proteasome system. TRIP-Br1-mediated higher IR/IGF1R ratio enhanced the proliferation and survival of breast cancer cells. In conclusion, current study may provide an important information in the regulatory mechanism of how breast cancer cells have acquired higher IR/IGF1R ratio.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13045-022-01303-6.
Keywords: Breast cancer, IR, IGF1R, TRIP-Br1, NEDD4-1
To the editor,
The relationship between breast cancer and diabetes has been extensively studied. Women with diabetes are at a greater risk of developing breast cancer than those without diabetes [1–3]. Interestingly, a recent study suggested that the IR/IGF1R ratio is a key factor in breast cancer prognosis, by evaluating IR/IGF1R ratio in over 500 patients with breast cancer [4]. They showed that breast cancer patients with a higher IR/IGF1R ratio due to elevated IR expression not only have hyperinsulinemia but are also more susceptible to enhance tumorigenesis [4]. It was reported that TRIP-Br1 plays an important role in diabetes [5]. In addition, TRIP-Br1 is one of the most up-regulated genes in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes [6]. Moreover, high levels of TRIP-Br1 were detected in various subtypes of breast cancer [7, 8]. In this study, we explored the regulatory mechanism of TRIP-Br1 in controlling the IR/IGF1R ratio in breast cancer cells.
IR and IGF1R expression levels were normalized in MCF10A to compare the IR/IGF1R ratio in breast cancer cell lines. In particular, cancer cell lines with very high levels of TRIP-Br1 showed a much higher IR/IGF1R ratio than the others (Fig. 1A, B). Our data revealed that MEFWT-TRIP-Br1 cells showed a higher IR expression levels, compared to MEFKO-TRIP-Br1 cells (Fig. 1C, D) (Additional file 1: Fig. S1A–C). TRIP-Br1 wild-type mice also showed approximately 2–4-fold higher IR expression levels in adipocyte and heart tissue samples compared with TRIP-Br1 knockout mice (Fig. 1E, F) (Additional file 1: Fig. S1D–F). Further study revealed that TRIP-Br1 increased IR protein level by suppressing proteasome-mediated degradation of IR (Additional file 1: S1G, H). Interestingly, IR silencing elevates IGF1R expression, resulting in a lower IR/IGF1R ratio (Additional file 1: Fig. S1I, J). On contrast, TRIP-Br1 negatively affects IGF1R expression, eventually increasing the IR/IGF1R ratio (Fig. 1G, H). While TRIP-Br1 overexpression significantly decreased IGF1R expression, TRIP-Br1 silencing greatly increased IGF1R expression (Additional file 1: Fig. S2A–F). Furthermore, TRIP-Br1 knockout mice showed elevated IGF1R in adipocytes (~ 20-fold at IGF1R-pro and ~ two-fold at IGF1R-β) and the heart (~ two-fold) compared to control mice (Fig. 1I, J) (Additional file 1: Fig. S2G, H). In addition, MCF7WT-TRIP-Br1 cells showed the higher IR but lower IGF1R expression at protein level, resulting in a high IR/IGF1R ratio, compared with MCF7KD-TRIP-Br1 cells (Fig. 1K, L). However, TRIP-Br1 does not affect IR and IGF1R at the transcriptional level (Additional file 1: Fig. S2I).
Interestingly, the IGF1R expression levels greatly increased when TRIP-Br1 and/or NEDD4-1 E3 ligase were silenced (Fig. 1M, N). Co-immunoprecipitation experiments reveled a direct interaction between TRIP-Br1 and IGF1R, as well as NEDD4-1, while no direct interaction was observed between TRIP-Br1 and IR. This data imply that TRIP-Br1 may serve as an adaptor protein to bring NEDD4-1 close enough to IGF1R (Fig. 1O). Co-immunofluorescence experiments support the notion that TRIP-Br1 facilitates NEDD4-1/IGF1R interaction (Fig. 1P, Q). We also show that TRIP-Br1/NEDD4-1 degraded IGF1R mainly through the proteasome/ubiquitination pathway rather than through a lysosomal pathway (Fig. 1R, S) (Additional file 1: Fig. S3C–H and Additional file 2).
Animal experiments indicated that TRIP-Br1 enhanced tumor progression, where a high IR/IGF1R ratio was detected (Fig. 2A, B) (Additional file 1: Fig. S4A, B). In agreement with the in vitro observations, an approximately ten-fold higher IR/IGF1R ratio, due to the higher IR but lower IGF1R, was detected in wild-type TRIP-Br1 producing cancer cells grown in nude mice (Fig. 2C, D). Our extended study showed a similar effect of TRIP-Br1 on the IR/IGF1R ratio in insulin-deficient mice mimicking patients with diabetes, implying that TRIP-Br1 may be a potential target for the treatment of both diabetes and breast cancer (Fig. 2E–H) (Additional file 1: Fig. S5A–D).
We further explored the relationship between TRIP-Br1 and the IR/IGF1R ratio by analyzing 317 tumor single cells from 11 breast cancer patients. They were divided into four representative subtypes as shown in GSE75688 datasets (Additional file 1: Table S1) [9]. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) tumor cells showed a positive correlation between the TRIP-Br1 expression and the IR/IGF1R ratio but luminal A (LumA) subtypes cells revealed the opposite results (Fig. 2I) (Additional file 1: Fig. S6A, B). However, bioinformatics analysis (http://timer.cistrome.org/) from the database, with as many as 568 patients, showed that LumA cells show an inverse relationship between TRIP-Br1 and IGF1R expression, similar to our in vitro results (Additional file 1: Fig. S6C). Our bioinformatics analysis revealed that TRIP-Br1 positively correlated with the IR/IGF1R ratio but inversely with survival time in breast cancer patients (n = 152). However, no significant relationship was observed in lung (n = 396) or liver cancer (n = 130) (Additional file 1: Fig. S7). This implies that TRIP-Br1 may be a breast cancer-specific oncogenic adaptor protein.
In conclusion, our findings provide valuable insights on the regulatory mechanisms of the IR/IGF1R ratio. TRIP-Br1-mediated higher IR/IGF1R ratio increased the survival rate of breast cancer cells, resulting in a worse prognosis for breast cancer patients. Therefore, the TRIP-Br1-mediated IR/IGF1R ratio appears to be a predictive factor for the prognosis and progression of cancer. Summary model is shown in Fig. 2J (Additional file 2).
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. Huang (Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China) for providing TRIP-Br1 knockout mice (RRID: MGI:4437096). We thank Editage (www.editage.co.kr) for English language editing.
Abbreviations
- CQ
Chloroquine
- EMT
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition
- IDM
Insulin deficient mice
- IGF1R
Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor
- IR
Insulin receptor
- LumA
Luminal A (ER+/HER−)
- MG132
N-Benzyloxycarbonyl-l-leucyl-l-leucyl-l-leucinal
- NEDD4-1
Neural precursor cell expressed developmentally downregulated protein 4-1
- TNBC
Triple-negative breast cancer (ER−/HER−)
- TRIP-Br1
Transcriptional regulator interacting with the PHD-bromodomain 1
Author contributions
NTNQ and SJ were responsible for designing, conducting the research, extracting and analyzing data, interpreting results, and writing the manuscript. BL and NHA contributed in handling animal experiment. HOL and HHE participated in the interpretation of single cell analysis. DJ, TJ, and YC contributed in molecular experiment. NTNQ, SJ, SHV, and NHA contributed the revision. MSL made substantial contribution to the conception of the study and the experimental design, revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2016R1A5A1011974 and NRF-2020R1A2C1102100).
Availability of supporting data
All the data supporting the findings of this study within the article, and its additional files are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethical approval and consent to participate
This project was approved by Sookmyung Women's University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee: SMU-IACUC (SMWU-IACUC-1701-043-03, SMWU-IACUC-1701-043-02, SMWU-IACUC-1701-043-01).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Thi Ngoc Quynh Nguyen and Samil Jung contributed equally to this work
References
- 1.Bronsveld HK, Jensen V, Vahl P, Bruin ML, Cornelissen S, Sanders J, et al. Diabetes and breast cancer subtypes. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(1):e0170084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Martin SD, McGee SL. Metabolic reprogramming in type 2 diabetes and the development of breast cancer. J Endocrinol. 2018;237(2):35–46. doi: 10.1530/JOE-18-0037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Garg SK, Maurer H, Reed K, Selagamsetty R. Diabetes and cancer: two diseases with obesity as a common risk factor. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16(2):97–110. doi: 10.1111/dom.12124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gallagher EJ, Fei K, Feldman SM, Port E, Friedman NB, Boolbol K, et al. Insulin resistance contributes to racial disparities in breast cancer prognosis in US women. Breast Cancer Res. 2020;22(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01281-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fernandez-Marcos PJ, Pantoja C, Gonzalez-Rodriguez A, Martin N, Flores JM, Valverde AM, et al. Normal proliferation and tumorigenesis but impaired pancreatic function in mice lacking the cell cycle regulator sei1. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(1):e8744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bosi E, Marchetti P, Rutter GA, Eizirik DL. The gene signatures of human alpha cells in types 1 and 2 diabetes indicate disease-specific pathways of alpha cell dysfunction. 10.1101/2022.02.22.481528v1 (2022) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 7.Jung S, Li C, Duan J, Lee S, Kim K, Park Y, et al. TRIP-Br1 oncoprotein inhibits autophagy, apoptosis, and necroptosis under nutrient/serum-deprived condition. Oncotarget. 2015;6(30):29060–29075. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mongre RK, Mishra CB, Jung S, Lee BS, Quynh NTN, Anh NH, et al. Exploring the role of TRIP-Brs in human breast cancer: an investigation of expression, clinicopathological significance, and prognosis. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2020;19:105–126. doi: 10.1016/j.omto.2020.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chung WS, Eum HH, Lee HO, Lee KM, Lee HB, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq enables comprehensive tumour and immune cell profiling in primary breast cancer. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):15081. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All the data supporting the findings of this study within the article, and its additional files are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.