Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 1;11:e70661. doi: 10.7554/eLife.70661

Figure 18. Benchmarking of computational performance.

Figure 18.

Data with varying number of cells and frames were processed through Minian and CaImAn. The run time (top) and peak memory usage (bottom) were recorded and plotted as a function of frame number. For both pipelines, the run time scales linearly as a function of the number of frames and remains similar across the pipelines. However, the peak memory usage for CaImAn also scales linearly as the number of frames increases, while Minian maintains a relatively constant peak memory usage across different frame numbers and cell numbers.

Figure 18—source data 1. Raw memory usage and running time with different datasets for both pipelines.