Abstract
Introduction
The clinical course of patients with a SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection varies widely, from symptom-free to severe courses that can lead to death. Laboratory values of SARS-CoV-2 patients such as lymphocyte counts or C-reactive protein (CRP) do not allow a prediction of the actual course of the disease. To identify a possible predictive marker for the differentiation and prognosis of illness with influenza-like symptoms with and without SARS-CoV-2 infections in general practice, we will analyse the concentrations of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) levels, laboratory and clinical parameters, temperature, oxygen saturation, breathing rate and concomitant symptoms in patients with flu-like symptoms with and without a SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Methods and analysis
This is a single-centre, two-arm, parallel longitudinal cohort study with a total of 44 patients. 22 patients with flu-like symptoms without a SARS-CoV-2 infection and 22 patients with flu-like symptoms with a SARS-CoV-2 infection will be recruited. The primary objective is to compare cfDNA levels in ambulatory patients in general practice with flu-like symptoms with SARS-CoV-2 infection with those with influenza like symptoms without a SARS-CoV-2 infection during the disease (day 7 and day 14). The secondary objective is to determine whether there is a correlation between cfDNA concentrations on the one hand, and laboratory and clinical parameters on the other hand. cfDNA, differential blood count, high-sensitive CRP and erythrocyte sedimentation rate will be measured in blood samples, concomitant symptoms will be surveyed via a self-assessment questionnaire, and oxygen saturation, breathing rate and examination of the lungs will be reported by treating physicians.
Ethics and dissemination
Ethical approval was issued on 1 March 2021 by the Ethics Committee Essen under the number 21-9916-BO. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed open-access journals and presented at national and international conferences.
Trial registration number
DRKS00024722.
Keywords: molecular biology, cell biology, general medicine (see internal medicine), covid-19
Strengths and limitations of this study.
Measurement of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is cost-effective and requires only minimal amounts of blood, which in the future can be collected in the primary care physician’s office.
Clinical and serological parameters (high-sensitive CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and a differential blood count) are collected in a setting (family practice) where patients with mild or moderate symptoms are predominantly treated, but where no suitable prognostic markers are available at this time.
The success of the study should be ensured by the close follow-up and home visits of the patients by the general practitioner and the short duration of the study.
cfDNA is already a well-established biomarker that is associated with various diseases and has been used in different research areas, such as oncology, non-invasive prenatal diagnosis, organ transplantation, autoimmune diseases, trauma, coronary heart disease and diabetes.
The limitation of the study due to missing laboratory values at t1 and t2 in the case of a severe disease course requiring hospitalisation is addressed by conducting the analysis according to the intention-to-treat principle and assessing hospitalisation as the main outcome.
Introduction
The current SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic is confronting humanity with a new dimension of medical, economic and social problems.1 Among humans, the virus spreads rapidly and causes varying degrees of severity of symptoms and illness in patients.2 3 Thus, the clinical course of patients with a SARS-CoV-2 infection can vary widely, from symptom-free courses to severe courses that can lead to death. The incubation period of the virus ranges from 1 to 14 days, the duration of viral excretion can last from 8 to 37 days and the time from disease onset to discharge or death ranges from 15 to 25 days.4 5 Furthermore, it has been shown that mortality rates correlate with increasing age and pre-existing concomitant diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, overweight and hypertension.2 3 6 In the course of analysing laboratory values of SARS-CoV-2 patients, such as measurements of lymphocyte counts, C-reactive protein (CRP), as well as secondary bacterial infections it was found that the analysis and evaluation of these do not allow an assessment of the actual course of the disease.7 8 In order to be able to better assess the course of this disease, it would be important to find a predictive marker that could be used to determine the severity of the disease at the earliest possible stage.
One marker that could play an important role in this determination is cell-free DNA (cfDNA), which is usually released from cells by apoptosis, necrosis, NETosis, as well as active secretion.9 10 It comprises a high variability of fragmented molecules that contain valuable information about gene expression and the nucleosome pattern in relation to their tissue of origin.11–13 Numerous studies have already demonstrated that cfDNA levels are associated with various diseases and have been used in various research areas, such as oncology, non-invasive prenatal diagnosis, organ transplantation, autoimmune diseases, trauma, coronary heart disease and diabetes.11–16
Recent studies have investigated the role of cfDNA as a potential marker for therapeutic targets of SARS-CoV-2 in order to develop new therapeutic strategies for the disease.17 In their study, Chen et al profiled and analysed for the first-time plasma cfDNA of mild and severe COVID-19 patients. They found that in comparison between mild and severe COVID-19 patients, Interleukin-37 signalling was one of the most relevant pathways. Their data thus revealed potential tissue involvement, provided insights into mechanism on COVID-19 progression and highlighted utility of cfDNA as a non-invasive biomarker for disease severity inspections.18 In a further study, Andargie et al showed that cfDNA levels correlated positively with COVID-19 disease severity, CRP and D-dimer, and that the cfDNA profile at admission identified patients who subsequently required intensive care or died during hospitalisation. They conclude that cfDNA could be used as a potential diagnostic biomarker to map sources of injury and as a prognostic biomarker to predict COVID-19 trajectory and outcome by providing mechanistic information about COVID-19-induced tissue injury.19 However, in this study, cfDNA levels were not measured in patients before they presented at the hospital. Our study will instead focus on patients who visit their general practitioner (GP’s) office with mild flu-like symptoms. In addition to the studies on cfDNA levels and SARS-CoV-2, further studies have measured the impact of influenza on cfDNA levels. Again, it was shown that patients had significantly increased cfDNA levels.19 20 The aim of our study is to determine if cfDNA levels differ in patients with mild or moderate influenza symptoms when either SARS-CoV-2 infection or infection with another common respiratory pathogen is present or if these concentrations are similar to each other.
Methods
Design
This is a single-centre, two-arm, parallel cohort study with a 1:1 allocation ratio to be conducted between August 2021 and April 2022; 22 patients with flu-like symptoms without a SARS-CoV-2 infection and 22 patients with flu-like symptoms with a SARS-CoV-2 infection will be included (n=44, age over 18 years) (see figure 1). Due to our study design, no randomisation is needed. Thus, no blinding will be performed.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of the study design. cfDNA, cell-free DNA; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; hsCRP, high-sensitive CRP.
Patients
Setting of the study and characteristics of participants
This single-centre study will be conducted at the University Hospital in Essen. Patients who visit their general practice in Mülheim an der Ruhr with flu-like symptoms will be asked to complete a screening questionnaire to check if they met the inclusion criteria. If they meet the eligibility criteria, they will be included in the study. Written informed consent will be obtained by the principal investigator from all patients willing to participate in the study.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
All persons enrolled in the study must provide full written informed consent and are required to complete a baseline screening questionnaire to assess their eligibility.
Inclusion criteria are as follows:
Age 18–99 years.
Consent given by the patient or legal representative for blood draw, oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal swab for a rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen test and subsequent qPCR, if applicable.
Sufficient knowledge of the German language to understand the study content and instructions.
Exclusion criteria are as follows:
-
Severe acute or chronic illness with known elevated cfDNA levels due to the underlying disease, for example:
Tumour disease.
Severe renal insufficiency
Severe/moderate inflammatory diseases
Autoimmune diseases
Rheumatological diseases
Intervention description
All patients included in this study will receive a point-of-care antigen rapid test for SARS-CoV-2 (Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test) and a subsequent RT-PCR on the day of initial presentation. Afterwards, patients will be assigned either to the group ‘SARS-CoV-2 positive with flu-like symptoms’ or to the group ‘SARS-CoV-2 negative with flu-like symptoms’ depending on the test results. For cost reasons, the patients in the SARS-CoV-2 negative with influenza symptoms group cannot be tested for other respiratory pathogens. However, data from the Robert Koch Institute indicate the frequency of possible respiratory pathogens. Thus, in the 10th calendar week of 2022, a total of 72 (60%) of the 121 sent in sentinel samples (national reference centre influenza) identified respiratory viruses, including most frequently SARS-CoV-2 (n=32, 26 %), followed by rhinoviruses (n=20, 17 %), human metapneumoviruses (hMPV) (n=18, 15%), human seasonal coronaviruses (hCoV) (n=6, 5%), influenza A(H3N2) viruses (n=4, 3%), parainfluenza viruses (n=3, 2%) and respiratory syncytial viruses (n=2, 2%).21 Taking into account the other weekly reports from 2022, hMPV (7%–16%), rhinoviruses (7%–22%) and hCoV (1%–17%) dominated in addition to SARS-CoV-2. Influenza viruses in particular play a subordinate role as pathogens of respiratory tract infections (<5%).22
All patients will have venous blood (15.3 mL) collected on three different visits to determine cfDNA concentrations as well as the inflammation markers high-sensitive CRP (hsCRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and a differential blood count (t0=day of recruitment, t1=after 7 days, t2=after 14 days). In addition, temperature, oxygen saturation and respiratory rate will be measured at all three visits and patients must complete a questionnaire about current symptoms.23 The blood samples t0 were collected at the day when the patients came to the general practice with having symptoms occurring in the last 24–48 hours. Blood samples will then be centrifuged directly at the GP’s office at 1600 rpm to obtain the necessary blood plasma to avoid possible lysis of the cells. The samples will be stored at −20°C until the required case numbers are reached and will thereafter be transported to Mainz. Once there, the samples will be stored in the freezer at −80°C until the further analysis for the same purpose of the study objectives is performed. The cfDNA concentrations, including non-disease-specific qualitative aspects such as integrity of DNA, will be determined at the Department of Sports Medicine, Prevention and Rehabilitation at the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz using a self-established qPCR.9 The material will be processed in a S2 laboratory.
After 6 months, patients with a SARS-CoV-2 infection will be contacted again by telephone to inquire about possible long-term symptoms (post-COVID-19-syndrome according to the NICE guidelines24) and again to determine cfDNA levels in patients who remain symptomatic. Special note will be made of whether there has been a new SARS-CoV-2 infection or a vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in the meantime.
Analysis will be done intention to treat, as it may not be possible to retrieve blood samples from the patients at t1 or t2 due to hospitalisation or other circumstances. All participants can discontinue their participation in the trial at any time for any reason without prejudice to current or future medical care. The investigator may discontinue patients’ participation in the trial for any reason for their safety or in their best interest. If participants express a desire to withdraw from the study, they will receive instructions to complete an ‘end-of-study’ visit, which will also be voluntary. All participants can receive any concomitant treatment at any time during the trial. However, participants must indicate at each study visit whether they are receiving any concomitant drug therapy.
In the context of this research project, the participants will be insured for potential damages of the biomaterial collection as well as for commuting accidents in accordance with § 2 Para. 1 No. 13b Social Security Code (SGB) VII. After the trial, the patients will receive their primary care by the GP as usual. There is thus no need to provide any additional post-trial care.
Measurement of cfDNA concentrations
CfDNA concentrations will be determined at the Department of Sports Medicine, Prevention and Rehabilitation at the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, in a S2 laboratory. We will use validated qPCR assays to determine the concentrations of a 90 and 222 bp fragment in diluted EDTA plasma samples without prior DNA isolation.20 As described in Neuberger et al, the assays specifically target repetitive sequences, which facilitates highly sensitive cfDNA detection from small amounts of diluted plasma. No DNA isolation is required which saves time, costs and avoids the loss of DNA due to the isolation procedure. The assays show repeatability ≤11.6% (95% CI 8.1 to 20.3), and intermediate precision ≤12.1% (95% CI 9.2 to 17.7). Moreover, the robustness of the assays was demonstrated by incurred sample reanalysis, indicating sufficient validity and sensitivity to quantify cfDNA in the study samples. The blood samples t0 were collected at the day when the patients came to the general practice with having symptoms occurring in the last 24–48 hours. These samples than were directly centrifuged in the general practice.
Participant timeline
The symptomatic participant timeline is presented in table 1.
Table 1.
Research timeline for each participant
| Timepoint | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 (when symptomatic 6 months after positive PCR result) |
| Consent collection | X | |||
| Demographics, medical history, disease characteristics | X | |||
| Point-of-care antigen rapid test for SARS-CoV-2 | X | |||
| Additional RT-qPCR | X | |||
| cfDNA determinations | X | X | X | X |
| hsCRP, ESR, temperature, oxygen saturation and breathing rate | X | X | X | |
| Differential blood count | X | X | X | |
| Concomitant symptoms | X | X | X | |
| Questionnaire | X | X | X | X |
cfDNA, cell-free DNA; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; hsCRP, high-sensitive CRP.
Outcomes
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome is the determination of cfDNA concentrations in patients with flu-like symptoms with SARS-CoV-2 infection with those with influenza like symptoms without a SARS-CoV-2 infection in general practice using a self-established qPCR from EDTA plasma. These cfDNA concentrations will be determined at t0 (day 0), t1 (day 7) and t2 (day 14). We investigate the difference in cfDNA at t0 between the two cohorts as primary outcome.
Secondary outcome measures
The secondary objective is to analyse whether there is a correlation between cfDNA concentrations with symptoms/wellness and the severity of the disease. To this end, we will determine whether there is an association between cfDNA concentrations and the variables mentioned below:
High-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP, collected at t0, t1 and t2). hsCRP is a routine inflammatory biomarker and will be measured in the patients’ blood samples.
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR, collected at t0, t1 and t2) at day 0, day 7 and day 14. ESR is a routine inflammatory biomarker and will be measured in the patients’ blood samples.
Differential blood count, especially regarding lymphocyte and neutrophil granulocytes. Lymphopenia and neutropenia appear to be associated with a severe COVID-19 course.25
Temperature taken at day 0, day 7 and day 14. Several studies suggest that high fever increases the risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome and should be controlled accordingly at an early stage.26 27
Oxygen saturation measured at day 0, day 7 and day 14, because impairment of oxygen is associated with critical illness.28 Thus, a target spO2 of 92%–96% is recommended.29
Breathing rate measured at day 0, day 7 and day 14. It has long been known that determining the respiratory rate is a simple way to assess the prognosis in pneumonia or other lung diseases.30
Concomitant symptoms (collected at t0, t1 and t2). Concomitant symptoms will be queried via a self-assessment questionnaire23 where the patients can report any current concomitant symptoms which then have to be rated on a Likert scale.
To assess the severity of dyspnoea, the American Thoracic Society’s Dyspnoea Scale will be used. The examiner will apply the WHO Clinical Progression Scale to assess the patient’s general condition.31 After 6 months, the recruited patients who were SARS-CoV-2 positive will be contacted again by telephone and asked about their condition. In symptoms that could be attributed to a post-Covid-19 syndrome are present, the cfDNA concentration will be determined again in these patients.
Safety
Adverse event reporting and harms
The risk of the venous blood sampling required for the cfDNA determination can be considered minimal. As with any other venous blood draw, pain may occur during the blood draw. Bruising may also occur, especially if there is insufficient compression on the puncture site after blood collection. In very rare cases, the blood draw may result in infection of the puncture site (thrombophlebitis) or nerve injury. However, there are no serious complications associated with blood sampling. The swab for the SARS-CoV-2 Ag rapid test and the subsequent RT-PCR will be performed by a GP who is experienced in this procedure. Rarely, minor bleeding can occur during nasopharyngeal swabbing; serious injuries do not occur if the procedure is performed correctly. The investigator will assess the severity of each adverse event and will report all serious and non-serious adverse events in the electronic case report form. The investigator will also assess the causal relationship of the serious adverse events to the trial intervention. Termination criteria have not been defined, as it does not seem reasonable for the planned study with a short survey period.
Sample size calculation
With respect to the group with flu-like symptoms without a SARS-CoV-2 infection, we expect—with a relatively high variance—a twofold increase in cfDNA concentrations compared with healthy subjects. A group comparable to this can be found, for example, in the group of chronic inflammatory and currently non-acute diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus. In one study, we showed that lupus patients had a mean cfDNA level of 44.7 ng/mL with a SD of 53.5 ng/mL.16 We hypothesise that a SARS-CoV-2 infection will increase the levels by 100% once more compared with the cohort with influenza-like symptoms without a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Furthermore, we want to be sure enough to obtain group sizes of at least 22 participants in each intervention group (total n=44) and to adjust for any dropouts during the study. Sample size is planned by a two-sample t-test on a two-sided significance level of α=5% to achieve a power of more than 80%. We therefore plan to include a total of around 35 patients of comparable age and sex in both the group with a positive and the group with a negative test.
Recruitment will take place in the general practice in Mülheim an der Ruhr via the respective principal physician. We plan to include a total of 44 patients until April 2022.
Plans to promote participant retention and complete follow-up
Participants will benefit from the study as they will know immediately whether a SARS-CoV-2 infection is present via point-of-care diagnostics (Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test: sensitivity: 96.52 %, specificity: 99.68 %) which will be subsequently validated by RT-qPCR. During the study, the patients will be cared for in their home environment by their GP. If participants express a desire to withdraw from the study, they will be asked to complete an ‘end-of-study’ visit. Data collected up to the time of withdrawal will remain in the trial database and be included in data analysis, unless otherwise indicated by the participant.
Data management
Trial data will be collected in the electronic case report form by the principal investigator at the Institute of General Practice at the University Hospital in Essen. Source documents, defined as any original document or object making it possible to prove the existence or accuracy of data or facts recorded during the research, will be kept by the principal physician according to the regulations in force. All questionnaire data will be entered twice by two different persons to ensure the dual control principle. Using a software tool, a third person will check the agreement between the two data sets resulting from the double entry. In cases where entries deviate from one another, the third person will determine the correct entry by looking at the questionnaire. In cases where the questionnaire answers are ambiguous, two persons will decide what should be entered by discussion until a consensus is reached. All data concerning participant information will be stored in locked file cabinets accessible only by the principal investigator. All collected data will be pseudonymised and will therefore be traceable only by means of a code. All files containing names or other personal identifiers, such as the informed consent forms, will be stored separately from the data containing this code number.
Statistical methods
Statistical methods for primary and secondary outcomes
The statistical analysis of the data will be performed with the statistical programme SPSS, R or SAS using a pseudonymised data set. A correlation of the cfDNA concentration with the presence or absence of a SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as a correlation of these results with the data obtained from the questionnaires will be determined. Descriptive statistics will summarise all study variables.
All data will be tested for normal distribution before and after log transformation using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with the Lilliefors correction. If the assumption of normally distributed data cannot be rejected, arithmetic group means±SD will be calculated. If the normality test fails in at least one of the study groups compared, all data will be expressed as group medians with IQRs given in parentheses. Between-group comparisons of primary and secondary outcomes will be performed at t0 and at two consecutive time points independently (t1, t2) using unpaired Student’s t-tests (comparing two groups, normally distributed) or the Mann-Whitney U test (comparing two groups, not normally distributed) or analysis of variance (three groups) and χ2 tests for numerical and categorical data, respectively. P values will be considered statistically significant if p≤0.05. We plan to perform a subgroup analysis for the concomitant symptoms and the cfDNA levels at t0, t1 and t2 in the event of differences within each arm.
Statistical analyses will be carried out according to the intention-to-treat approach and therefore will include all participants. The extent of missing data will be analysed. We will explore missing data patterns and determine the type of missing data. We will use multiple imputation to substitute missing values.
Patient and public involvement
No patients were involved in the development of the research questions. The results of the temperature measurement, the oxygen saturation and breathing rate of each individual patient will be communicated to the patient directly after the examination by the attending physician. The laboratory and clinical parameters and the levels of the cfDNA will be disseminated after they have been measured.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge support by the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Duisburg-Essen.
Footnotes
Contributors: DD is the principal investigator; she conceived the study, obtained funding, led the proposal and protocol development, and assisted in manuscript preparation and revision. EN contributed to the study concept and design and assisted in manuscript preparation and revision. JidS assisted in manuscript revision. EG contributed to the study concept and design and assisted in manuscript preparation. PS contributed to the acquisition and analysis of qualitative data and the development of the intervention and assisted in manuscript preparation and revision. SB contributed to the study concept and design and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. This study is funded entirely by the University of Essen and the University of Mainz.
Competing interests: None declared.
Patient and public involvement: Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting or dissemination plans of this research.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement
The study principal investigator and the coinvestigators will have access to the full study data and materials. The authors will be willing to share the individual-level study data after completion and publication of primary and secondary analyses. No data are available.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Consent obtained directly from patient(s).
Ethics approval
This study involves human participants and was approved by Ethics Committee Essen under the reference number 21-9916-BO Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.
References
- 1.Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med 2020;382:727–33. 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York city area. JAMA 2020;323:323. 10.1001/jama.2020.6775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tian H, Liu Y, Li Y, et al. An investigation of transmission control measures during the first 50 days of the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Science 2020;368:638–42. 10.1126/science.abb6105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Young BE, Ong SWX, Kalimuddin S, et al. Epidemiologic features and clinical course of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore. JAMA 2020;323:1488. 10.1001/jama.2020.3204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020;395:1054–62. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, et al. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy region, Italy. JAMA 2020;323:1574. 10.1001/jama.2020.5394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vincent J-L, Taccone FS. Understanding pathways to death in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:430–2. 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30165-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Phua J, Weng L, Ling L, et al. Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): challenges and recommendations. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:506–17. 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30161-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Breitbach S, Sterzing B, Magallanes C, et al. Direct measurement of cell-free DNA from serially collected capillary plasma during incremental exercise. J Appl Physiol 2014;117:119–30. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00002.2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Breitbach S, Tug S, Simon P. Circulating cell-free DNA: an up-coming molecular marker in exercise physiology. Sports Med 2012;42:565–86. 10.2165/11631380-000000000-00000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Snyder MW, Kircher M, Hill AJ, et al. Cell-free DNA comprises an in vivo nucleosome footprint that informs its tissues-of-origin. Cell 2016;164:57–68. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sun K, Jiang P, Cheng SH, et al. Orientation-aware plasma cell-free DNA fragmentation analysis in open chromatin regions informs tissue of origin. Genome Res 2019;29:418–27. 10.1101/gr.242719.118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sun K, Jiang P, Chan KCA, et al. Plasma DNA tissue mapping by genome-wide methylation sequencing for noninvasive prenatal, cancer, and transplantation assessments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015;112:E5503–12. 10.1073/pnas.1508736112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Michal M, Simon P, Gori T, et al. Psychodynamic motivation and training program (PMT) for the secondary prevention in patients with stable coronary heart disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of feasibility and effects. Trials 2013;14:314. 10.1186/1745-6215-14-314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Helmig S, Frühbeis C, Krämer-Albers E-M, et al. Release of bulk cell free DNA during physical exercise occurs independent of extracellular vesicles. Eur J Appl Physiol 2015;115:2271–80. 10.1007/s00421-015-3207-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tug S, Helmig S, Menke J, et al. Correlation between cell free DNA levels and medical evaluation of disease progression in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Cell Immunol 2014;292:32–9. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2014.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zuo Y, Yalavarthi S, Shi H, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps in COVID-19. JCI Insight 2020. 10.1172/jci.insight.138999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen X. Time-series plasma cell-free DNA analysis reveals disease severity of COVID19 patients. Medrxiv 2020. 10.1101/2020.06.08.20124305 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Andargie TE, Tsuji N, Seifuddin F, et al. Cell-free DNA maps COVID-19 tissue injury and risk of death and can cause tissue injury. JCI Insight 2021;6. 10.1172/jci.insight.147610. [Epub ahead of print: 08 04 2021]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhang N. Circulating rather than alveolar extracellular DNA levels predict outcomes in influenza: a cohort study. J Infect Dis 2020. 10.21203/rs.2.19578/v1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.ARE-Wochenbericht. Available: https://influenza.rki.de/Wochenberichte/2021_2022/2022-10.pdf
- 22.Wochenberichte Der AgI. Available: https://influenza.rki.de/wochenberichte.aspx
- 23.Jeong H, Lee J, Kim J, et al. Self-Assessment questionnaire for efficient and safe evaluation of patients with mild COVID-19. Infect Chemother 2020;52:212. 10.3947/ic.2020.52.2.212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.NICE Guidel . LNI for H and Ce. COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing the long-term effects of COVID-19. 188, 2020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Singh K, Mittal S, Gollapudi S, et al. A meta-analysis of SARS-CoV-2 patients identifies the combinatorial significance of D-dimer, C-reactive protein, lymphocyte, and neutrophil values as a predictor of disease severity. Int J Lab Hematol 2021;43:324–8. 10.1111/ijlh.13354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Suardi LR, Pallotto C, Esperti S, et al. Risk factors for non-invasive/invasive ventilatory support in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: a retrospective study within a multidisciplinary approach. Int J Infect Dis 2020;100:258–63. 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, et al. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med 2020;180:934. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Petrilli CM, Jones SA, Yang J, et al. Factors associated with hospital admission and critical illness among 5279 people with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York City: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2020;369:m1966. 10.1136/bmj.m1966 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shenoy N, Luchtel R, Gulani P. Considerations for target oxygen saturation in COVID-19 patients: are we under-shooting? BMC Med 2020;18:260. 10.1186/s12916-020-01735-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Strauß R, Ewig S, Richter K, et al. The prognostic significance of respiratory rate in patients with pneumonia. Dtsch Aerzteblatt Online 2014. 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Marshall JC, Murthy S, Diaz J, et al. A minimal common outcome measure set for COVID-19 clinical research. Lancet Infect Dis 2020;20:e192–7. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30483-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The study principal investigator and the coinvestigators will have access to the full study data and materials. The authors will be willing to share the individual-level study data after completion and publication of primary and secondary analyses. No data are available.

