ABSTRACT
Various studies have manifested that microRNAs (miRNAs) are involved in the modulation of the occurrence and development of osteosarcoma (OS). However, whether miR-22-3p is associated with OS growth remains unclear. In the study, the potential molecular mechanisms of miR-22-3p in OS was explored. It was affirmed that miR-22-3p was associated with distant metastasis and tumor size in OS patients, and reduced in OS tissues and cells while transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) was elevated. Elevated miR-22-3p repressed OS cell progression, and the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, while elevated TCF7L2 was opposite. MiR-22-3p targeted TCF7L2 in OS. In functional rescue experiments, knockdown of miR-22-3p on OS progression and promotion of Wnt/β-catenin were reversed by simultaneous knockdown of TCF7L2. Transplantation experiments in nude mice showed that elevated miR-22-3p repressed OS tumor growth and decreased TCF7L2, Wnt and β-catenin. Shortly, this study suggest that miR-22-3p refrains the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by targeting TCF7L2 and thereby preventing OS deterioration. MiR-22-3p/TCF7L2 axis is supposed to be a candidate molecular target for future OS treatment.
KEYWORDS: MicroRNA-22-3p, transcription factor 7-like 2, osteosarcoma, Wnt/β-catenin, proliferation
Graphical Abstract
Highlights
Descending miR-22-3p but elevated TCF7L2 were in OS.
MiR-22-3p targeted the expression of TCF7L2 in OS.
MiR-22-3p repressed OS proliferation, invasion and migration via modulating TCF7L2.
MiR-22-3p prevented the activation of wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in OS via controlling TCF7L2.
1. Introduction
Osteosarcoma (OS), a bone tumor, performing in adolescents and children, is characterized by rapid progression, high malignancy, poor prognosis, and a tendency to develop lung metastases [1,2]. Although the survival in patients with OS could be prolonged via surgery or radiation therapy, the OS prognosis is still poor, mainly owing to the chemical resistance of OS, especially in patients with metastatic cancer [3–5]. Due to these factors, it is crucial to explore the potential mechanism of OS progression for new therapeutic methods and targets.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) not encoding genes repress post-transcriptional translation of mRNA by binding to specific sites of target genes and thus influence disease progression [6–8]. Recently, exploring the character of miRNAs in cancer development has become a research hotspot. Recent studies have manifested that both bioengineered miR-34a-5p and −124-3p can suppress tumor growth and spontaneous lung metastasis of raw OS [9]. Wang Y et al. reported that miR-557 depresses malignant behavior of OS cells by reducing HOXB9 and inactivating the EMT process [10]. In addition, other studies have suggested that miR-485-3p can suppress c-Met and AKT3/mTOR signaling for knockout of glycolysis and metastasis of OS [11]. As a member of the miRNA family, miR-22-3p has been clarified to be under-expressed in various cancers and to take part in the development of cancers. A recent study reported the suppression of the growth of triple-negative breast cancer via ncRNA treatment with miR-22-3p [12]. Du Y et al. found that exogenous up-regulation of miR-22-3p constrains LINC01137 in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and OSCC progression [13]. In addition, other studies have informed that miR-22-3p controls GINS2 to suppress the proliferation and strengthen apoptosis of bladder cancer [14]. However, no studies have reported the differential expression and biological function of miR-22-3p in OS.
Wnt, a type of secretory glycoproteins, serves as either autocrine or paracrine [15]. After secretion, Wnt interacts with cell surface specific receptors, inducing β-catenin accumulation [16]. β-catenin, a multifunctional protein, enters the nucleus and regulates gene expression in a free status, in which the abnormality or activation may cause tumors [17,18]. Recently, there are a great many studies reporting that miRNA can be affective in the malignant phenotype of cancer with interaction of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [19–21]. In the meantime, miR-22-3p has been announced to control Wnt/β-catenin pathway in glioblastoma, whereas the character of miR-22-3p on Wnt/β-catenin pathway in OS is
still ambiguous.
Based on this, the biological function of miR-22-3p/transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) axis in OS by silencing or elevating miR-22-3p and TCF7L2, was explored originally in this study. In addition, the effect of miR-22-3p/TCF7L2 axis on the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in OS was examined.
2. Methods
2.1. Clinical tissue collection
During 2011’2014, Primary OS and para-cancerous tissues were obtained from biopsies of 43 patients diagnosed with primary OS from Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. Prior to surgery, the patient did not receive chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Fresh tissues were frozen and preserved in liquid nitrogen immediately after surgery. Ahead of the study, written informed consent was achieved from each patient, and all study protocols were approved by the Medical School Committee of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University.
2.2. Cell culture
Human OS cell lines (MG63, U-2OS, HOS, and SaOS-2) and human normal osteoblast cell lines (hFOB1.19) (the US Typical Culture Preservation Center) were incubated in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd.) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI)-1640 (Hyclone; Cytiva) with 10% FBS separately.
2.3. Cell transfection
Small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting TCF7L2 and si-TCF7L2/NC, TCF7L2 overexpressing plasmid and pcDNA3.1-TCF7L2/NC, and analogue and inhibitor of miR-22-3p and its NC were applied. MG63 and HOS cells (5 × 106 cells/mL) were seeded into a 6-well plate and transfected with the reagents with 70% confluence and Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen) and the manufacturer’s instructions accordingly. Then MG63 and HOS cells were collected for subsequent studies. The above plasmids were synthesized and provided by Shanghai Genomics Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The above oligonucleotides were purchased from RioboBio (Guangzhou, China).
2.4. Flow cytometry
MG63 and HOS cells were detached with 0.25% trypsin and cell suspension was prepared. After centrifugation at 1200 × g, apoptosis was assessed applying the Annexin V-fluoresceinisothiocyanat (FITC) kit (BD Biosciences) on the grounds of the manufacturer’s protocol. The cells were incubated with a binding buffer including 5 µL Annexin V fluoresceinisothiocyanat (FITC) and 5 µL propidium iodide (PI) in darkness. The cell apoptosis was then detected within 1 h with FACSCalibur flow cytometry (BD Biosciences) and analyzed via CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).
2.5. Cell counting kit (CCK)-8 assay
MG63 and HOS cells were seeded (2 × 104 cells/well) into 96-well plates and cultured. After incubation of 0, 24, 48, and 72 h, 10 μL CCK-8 (Biyuntian Biotechnology Institute) was added to the well and cultured for 4 h. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm with a microplate meter. Each well value was read for 3 times.
2.6. Cell scratch test
MG63 and HOS cell migration was detected by scratch assay. Shortly, the 6-well plate was marked and horizontal lines were drawn evenly with a ruler, passing through the wells approximately every 0.5’1 cm. At least five lines were through each well. The cells were incubated overnight in labeled petri dishes on the outsoles, and in serum-free medium. The wound area was recorded at 0 h and 24th h by phase contrast microscopy (Olympus MK, Tokyo, Japan).
2.7. Transwell
Transwell chamber (8 µm well; BD Biosciences) was adopted to identify cell invasion [22]. In brief, 5 × 104MG63 and HOS cells were seeded in a matrigel-coated upper incubator in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium. Meanwhile, RPMI-1640 medium (500 µL) with 10% FBS was spread in the lower chamber. Then the invasive cells in the lower chamber were fixed with 100% methanol and left with 0.1% stained crystal violet. The stained cells were counted via a light microscope in five randomly selected areas.
2.8. Real-time quantitative fluorescence PCR (RT-qPCR)
RT-qPCR was performed as previously described [23]. The RNA from cells and tissues was extracted with Trizol Extract® Reagents (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). RNA was reversely transcribed into cDNA via cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) with the manufacturer’s protocol accordingly. MiR-22-3p was detected via mirVana™RT-qPCR miRNA assay kit (Catalog No. AM1558, Ambion; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and standardized with U6 as an internal reference, and mRNA expression was examined via the SYBR Premixture Ex Taq™ kit (catalog number DRR041A, Takara Bio, Inc.) with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Gene expression was calculated using 2−ΔΔCT. The gene primer sequences were shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Primer sequence (5’ 3’) | |
---|---|
GAPDH | Forward: 5’-ATGGGGAAGGTGAAGGTCG-3’ |
Reverse: 5’-TTACTCCTTGGAGGCCATGTG-3’ | |
U6 | Forward: 5’-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACATATACT-3’ |
Reverse: 5’-ACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTGTC-3’ | |
MiR-22-3p | Forward: 5’- AAGCTGCCAGTTGAAGAACTGT-3’ |
Reverse: 5’- CAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGT-3’ | |
TCF7L2 | Forward: 5’- CTCCTCATCAATTGCACAGC’3’ |
Reverse: 5’- GGAGCTGTGGGAATGTAACC −3’ |
2.9. Western blot
Total proteins were extracted from cells and tissues using Radio-Immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysates (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was implemented for determination of protein concentrations. The protein (30 µg) was isolated by 10% sulfate polyacrylamide gel electropheresis (SDS-PAGE), electroblotted onto Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane, which were then blocked with 5% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBST) (0.1% Tween-20; Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd.), and incubated with the following primary antibodies: GAPDH (ab8245, Abcam), TCF7L2 (13,838-1-AP, Proteintech), Wnt (ab15251, Abcam), β-catenin (ab32572, Abcam) and the membrane- horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-bound secondary antibody (ab6721, Abcam). The protein bands were observed via the enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Pierce; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Protein expression was quantified with GAPDH as a sample control and Imagej software (version 4.0; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.).
2.10. Xenografted tumors in nude mice
Twelve five-week-old nude mice were achieved from Hunan SJA Experimental Animal Co., Ltd and kept under laboratory conditions. All animal experiments and programs have been reviewed and approved by the Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Animal Care and Use Committee. After adaptive feeding for one week, HOS cells (2 × 106 cells) statically expressing mimic-NC and miR-22-3p-mimic were seeded into nude mice by subcutaneous injection (n = 6). The long and short diameters of tumors in mice were recorded weekly with a vernier caliper. Volume = (long diameter × short diameter)2 × 0.5 [24]. Four weeks later, the mice were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (30 mg/kg) and the tumors were weighed. The tumor tissues were preserved in 4% paraformaldehyde.
2.11. Immunohistochemistry
The fresh tumor sample was embedded in paraffin and cut into 4 μm sections. The sections were incubated with anti-TCF7L2 (13,838-1-AP, Proteintech), Wnt (ab15251, Abcam), β-catenin (ab32572, Abcam), counterstained with hematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich), and imaged via a microscope (Leica Microsystems), Mannheim, Germany).
2.12. Dual luciferase report experiment
The dual luciferase reporting assay was implemented as described afore [25]. The wild-type reporter gene (TCF7L2-WT) and mutant reporter gene (TCF7L2-MUT) of the TCF7L2 3ʹuntranslated regions (UTR) region containing miR-22-3p binding site were purchased from SynthGene Biotech (Nanjing, China). The sequence of WT-TCF7L2wasACAUACAAGGUGAAGGCAGCUG;The sequence of MUT-TCF7L2 was ACAUACAAGGUGAACCGUCGAG.TCF7L2-WT or -MUT was co-transfected with miR-22-3p-mimic or mimic-NC into MG63 and HOS cells using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen) on the grounds of the kit method. Then the relative luciferase activity of the cells was measured via a luciferase assay system (Promega, Shanghai, China).
2.13. Data analysis
The experimental results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. SPSS 22 software was applied for data analysis, including Student’s t test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey’s test for multiple variance corrections on the samples. The difference between the experimental groups was considered significant when P < 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. MiR-22-3p is of reduction in OS
MiR-22-3p in OS was firstly examined, exposing that miR-22-3p in OS was apparently reduced (Figure 1(a, b)), and implicated with distant metastasis of OS and tumor size (Table 2).
Table 2.
Clinical pathologic parameters | Group | Cases (n = 45) | MiR-22-3p expression |
P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
High expression group (n = 21) | Low expression group (n = 22) | ||||
Age (years) | < 20 | 27 | 11 | 16 | 0.1677 |
20 or more | 16 | 10 | 6 | ||
Gender | Male | 32 | 13 | 19 | 0.0661 |
Female | 11 | 8 | 3 | ||
Tumor size | < 8 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 0.0014 |
8 or more | 23 | 6 | 17 | ||
Distant metastasis | Yes | 29 | 11 | 18 | 0.0395 |
No | 14 | 10 | 4 | ||
Entering stage | I + II | 17 | 9 | 8 | 0.6633 |
III | 26 | 12 | 14 | ||
Differentiation state | High | 18 | 11 | 7 | 0.1719 |
Low | 25 | 10 | 15 |
3.2. Overexpression of miR-22-3p curbs OS growth and the Wnt/β-catenin pathway
Next, the biological function of miR-22-3p was analyzed in OS. HOS cells with the highest miR-22-3p expression and MG63 cells with the lowest miR-22-3p were selected for functional verification experiment. First, MiR-22-3p in MG63 and HOS cells was upregulated (Figure 2(a)). There was a great deal of studies clarifying that up-regulated miR-22-3p constrains MG63 and HOS cell progression (Figure 2(b-e)). A large number of studies have been published that abnormal activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway can promote malignant behavior of cancer [26]. Therefore, the influence of elevated miR-22p-3p on Wnt/β-catenin pathway in MG63 and HOS cells was examined by Western blot, letting out that Wnt and β-catenin proteins in MG63 and HOS cells were prohibited via overexpression of miR-22-3p (Figure 2(f)), further suggesting that elevated miR-22-3p constrains OS growth and Wnt/β catenin pathway.
3.3. TCF7L2 is excessively expressed in OS and targeted by miR-22-3p
Next, the downstream target gene of miR-22-3p was researched. TCF7L2 is a familiar oncogene overexpressed in breast cancer, nephroblastoma, and gastric cancer [27–29], but its role in OS remains unsure. Therefore, TCF7L2 expression was first examined, clarifying that (Figure 3(a, b)) TCF7L2 in OS tissues and cells was clearly strengthened in contrast with adjacent normal tissues and cells, whereas suppressed via elevated miR-22-3p in MG63 and HOS cells (Figure 3(c, d)). Based on this, it was speculated that TCF7L2 might be the target gene of miR-22-3p. Through bioinformatics website http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/ it was forecast the targeted binding sites between miR-22-3p and TCF7L2 (Figure 3(e)). The dual luciferase reporter experiment clarified (Figure 3(f)) that co-transfection of WT-TCF7L2 and miR-22-3p-mimic would reduce the luciferase activity, while that of MUY-TCF7L2 and miR-22-3p-mimic had no influences on the luciferase activity. These results suggest that TCF7L2 is the downstream target gene of miR-22-3p.
3.4. Upregulation of TCF7L2 promotes OS malignant behavior and activates Wnt/β catenin pathway
The biological function of TCF7L2 was analyzed in OS. TCF7L2 was elevated via transfection of pcDNA 3.1-TCF7L2 in MG63 and HOS cells (Figure 4(a)). It was in a great many of studies proclaiming that the up-regulation of TCF7L2 facilitated the proliferation, migration and invasion, but prohibited the apoptosis rate of MG63 and HOS cells (Figure 4(b-e)). In the meantime, Wnt and β-catenin proteins were elevated via up-regulation of TCF7L2 (figure 4(f)). These results conclude that up-regulation of TCF7L2 can accelerate OS development and activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.
3.5. The accelerating effect of miR-22-3p knockdown on OS is reversed via simultaneously repressive TCF7L2
For investigating whether miR-22-3p controls OS development by targeting TCF7L2, TCF7L2 was silenced while declining miR-22-3p. As manifested in Figure 5(a), TCF7L2 was strengthened via silencing of miR-22-3p. however, miR-22-3p was not influenced via depression of TCF7L2. What’s more, depressed miR-22-3p facilitated the proliferation, invasion and migration but inhibited apoptosis of MG63 and HOS cells, which was reversed by simultaneous silencing of TCF7L2 (Figure 5(b-e)). Western blot conveyed that Wnt and β-catenin proteins in MG63 and HOS cells were up-regulated via miR-22-3p silencing, but prohibited via TCF7L2 silencing (Figure 5(f)), declaring that miR-22-3p can repress the malignant behavior of OS by controlling TCF7L2.
3.6. The repressive effect of elevated miR-22-3p on OS is reversed via the simultaneous overexpression of TCF7L2
Subsequently, miR-22-3p-mimic and oe-TCF7L2 were co-transfected into MG63 and HOS cells. As clarified in Figure 6(a), the repressive effect of elevated miR-22-3p on TCF7L2 expression was prevented via simultaneous overexpression of TCF7L2.Functional experiments manifested that the repressive effect of elevated miR-22-3p on OS proliferation, invasion and migration and the facilitation of apoptosis were reversed via overexpression of TCF7L2 (Figures 6(b-f)). Shortly, MiR-22-3p repressed OS malignant activities via modulating TCF7L2.
3.7. MiR-22-3p restrains OS tumor growth in vivo
Finally, the influence of miR-22-3p/TCF7L2 axis on OS tumor growth was further examined in a xenograft assay in nude mice. As suggested in Figure 7(a-c), elevated miR-22-3p repressed tumor volume and weight. In addition, TCF7L2, Wnt and β-catenin in tumors were prohibited via elevated miR-22-3p (Figure 7(d)). Briefly, miR-22-3p represses OS growth by regulating TCF7L2 in vivo.
4. Discussion
MiRNA, a type of abundant and relatively stable non-coding RNA in tissues and blood, is once regarded as the metabolic by-products of biological processes [30]. However, recently, increasing studies have clarified the emphasis of miRNA in various diseases, especially in cancers [31,32]. MiRNAs are able to influence the proliferation, apoptosis, metastasis and drug resistance of cancer by binding with downstream proteins [33]. In this study, it was affirmed that miR-22-3p depressed OS progression via knockout of TCF7L2. Furthermore, miR-22-3p prohibited the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in OS cells by targeting TCF7L2.
Malignant proliferation of cancer cells will consume plenty of nutrients and energy in the body and cause the failure of other organs in the body. Previous studies have manifested that up-regulated miR-22-3p constrains malignant proliferation in gastric cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia [34–36]. It was confessed in this study that the up-regulated miR-22-3p depressed the proliferation ability and tumor growth of OS cells, which further revealed the tumor suppressive influence of miR-22-3p. A recent study has published that the number of invaded and migrated cells in colorectal cancer is declined via upregulation of miR-22-3p [37]. Enhanced invasion and migration can facilitate the spread of cancer cells and cause serious damage to normal tissues. In this study, up-regulated miR-22-3p constrained the invasion and migration of OS, suggesting that miR-22-3p is a crucial regulator of distal metastasis and malignant invasion of cancer. Notably, a recent research has manifested that miR-22-3p is related to the regulation of chemical resistance of bladder cancer [38]. Tumor chemical resistance is an key resistance to cancer treatment at present. It is speculated that miR-22-3p also plays a similar role in OS, which needs to be explored in subsequent studies. MiRNAs are frequently controlled by circular RNAs (circRNAs) or long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which can act as sponges of miRNAs to adsorb miRNA expression in the body [39]. MiR-22-3p is controlled by circRNAs or lncRNAs in all kinds of diseases. For example, lncRNA transcripts of myocardial infarction (lncMIAT) can impact diabetic cardiomyopathy by constraining miR-22-3p for the up-regulation of Death-associated protein kinase 2 (DAPK2) [40]. CircRNA mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 5 (CircMAP3K5), as a sponge for miR-22-3p, facilitates intimal hyperplasia throughTen-Eleven-Translocation (TET)2-mediated smooth muscle cell differentiation [41]. CircRNA Enolase 1 (ENO1) regulating the miR-22-3p/eNO1 axis accelerates glycolysis and tumor progression of lung adenocarcinoma [42]. Therefore, there may be a variety of competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA)s controlling miR-22-3p in OS to affect the biological progress, and the upstream regulatory molecules of miR-22-3p need to be further explored.
TCF7L2 is a nuclear transcription factor found to be abnormally expressed in liver, breast and colorectal cancers [43–45]. In this study, it was manifested that TCF7L2 was the downstream target gene of miR-22-3p. The up-regulation of TCF7L2 facilitated OS development, explaining a proto-oncogene role of TCF7L2 in OS. There is a great deal of studies revealing that TCF7L2 facilitates disease development with interaction of Wnt/β-catenin pathway. These include brain development, mental disorders, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, weight gain and insulin resistance [44–47]. TCF transcription factor family is the main nuclear mediator of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [48] TCF7 and TCF7L2 can perform as both activators and repressors of Wnt targets, depending on the context [49]. It was discovered in the study that miR-22-3p prevented the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in OS cells via targeted regulation of TCF7L2. It was speculated that TCF7L2 is cancer-promoting in OS with controlling the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. However, it is not clear whether Wnt/β-catenin is the only target of TCF7L2, which requires to be further examined in subsequent Wnt/β-catenin knockout models. It is advised that miR-22-3p/TCF7L2 serves as a potential target for OS therapy, but the other key target genes of miR-22-3p is not supposed to be ruled out. What’s more, Wnt/β-catenin also participates in cancer drug resistance and EMT [50]. Therefore, miR-22-3p/TCF7L2 may be crucial in OS resistance and EMT as well, whereas whose specific mechanism needs to be further explored [51].
5. Conclusion
In short, it is suggested that miR-22-3p restrains OS cell progression and prevents Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation via suppression of TCF7L2. In the future, miR-22-3p/TCF7L2 axis can be applied as a hopeful target for OS treatment.
Funding Statement
The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.
Disclosure statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- [1].Ritter J, Bielack S.. Osteosarcoma. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:vii320’5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Corre I, Verrecchia F, Crenn V, et al. The osteosarcoma microenvironment: a complex but targetable ecosystem. Cells. 2020;9(4):976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Kager L, Tamamyan G, Bielack S. Novel insights and therapeutic interventions for pediatric osteosarcoma. Future Oncol. 2017;13(4):357’368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Karadurmus N, Sahin U, Bahadir Basgoz B, et al. Is there a role of high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of Ewing’s sarcoma and osteosarcomas? Journal of B.U.ON.: official journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology. 2018;23(5): 1235’1241 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Lilienthal I, Herold N. Targeting Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Treatment Efficacy and Resistance in Osteosarcoma: a Review of Current and Future Strategies. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(18). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Correia de Sousa M, Gjorgjieva M, Dolicka D, et al. Deciphering miRNAs’ Action through miRNA Editing. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(24):6249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Mishra S, Yadav T, Rani V. Exploring miRNA based approaches in cancer diagnostics and therapeutics. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;98:12’23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Lu T, Rothenberg M. MicroRNA. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141(4):1202’1207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Li P, Tu M, Ho P, et al. In vivo fermentation production of humanized noncoding RNAs carrying payload miRNAs for targeted anticancer therapy. Theranostics. 2021;11(10):4858’4871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Wang Y, Hao W, Wang H. miR-557 suppressed the malignant behaviours of osteosarcoma cells by reducing HOXB9 and deactivating the EMT process. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2021;49(1):230’239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Wang Q, Liu M, Bu J, et al. miR-485-3p regulated by MALAT1 inhibits osteosarcoma glycolysis and metastasis by directly suppressing c-MET and AKT3/mTOR signalling. Life Sci. 2021;268:118925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Gorur A, Bayraktar R, Ivan C, et al. ncRNA therapy with miRNA-22-3p suppresses the growth of triple-negative breast cancer. Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids. 2021;23:930’943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Du Y, Yang H, Li Y, et al. Long non-coding RNA LINC01137 contributes to oral squamous cell carcinoma development and is negatively regulated by miR-22-3p. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2021;44(3):595’609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Tian Y, Guan Y, Su Y, et al. TRPM2-AS Promotes Bladder Cancer by Targeting miR-22-3p and Regulating GINS2 mRNA Expression. <![cdata[oncotargets and Therapy]]>. 2021;14:1219’1237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Duchartre Y, Kim Y, Kahn M. The Wnt signaling pathway in cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;99:141’149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Nusse R, Clevers H. Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling, Disease, and Emerging Therapeutic Modalities. Cell. 2017;169(6):985’999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Harb J, Lin P, Hao J. Recent Development of Wnt Signaling Pathway Inhibitors for Cancer Therapeutics. Curr Oncol Rep. 2019;21(2):12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Polakis P. Wnt signaling in cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4(5). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Wang J, Xie S, Liu J, et al. MicroRNA-4429 suppresses proliferation of prostate cancer cells by targeting distal-less homeobox 1 and inactivating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. BMC Urol. 2021;21(1):40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Wang H, Yang Q, Li J, et al. MicroRNA-15a-5p inhibits endometrial carcinoma proliferation, invasion and migration via downregulation of VEGFA and inhibition of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Oncol Lett. 2021;21(4):310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Cheng C, Li W, Peng X, et al. miR-1254 induced by NESG1 inactivates HDGF/DDX5-stimulated nuclear translocation of β-catenin and suppresses NPC metastasis. Molecular therapy. Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development. 2021;20:615’624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Dang Y, Ouyang X, Ren W, et al. LncRNA AFAP1-AS1 Modulates the Proliferation and Invasion of Gastric Cancer Cells by Regulating AFAP1 via miR-205-5p. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;13:5163’5175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Zhang W, Liu Q, Zhao J, et al. Long Noncoding RNA AATBC Promotes the Proliferation and Migration of Prostate Cancer Cell Through miR-1245b-5p/CASK Axis. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;13:5091’5100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Zhou B, Ge Y, Shao Q, et al. Long noncoding RNA LINC00284 facilitates cell proliferation in papillary thyroid cancer via impairing miR-3127-5p targeted E2F7 suppression. Cell Death Discov. 2021;7(1):156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Wang X, Yang P, Zhang D, et al. LncRNA SNHG14 promotes cell proliferation and invasion in colorectal cancer through modulating miR-519b-3p/DDX5 axis. J Cancer. 2021;12(16):4958’4970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Tortelote G, Reis R, de Almeida Mendes F, et al. Complexity of the Wnt/β‑catenin pathway: searching for an activation model. Cell Signal. 2017;40:30’43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Zhu S, Zhang J, Gao X, et al. Silencing of long noncoding RNA MYLK-AS1 suppresses nephroblastoma via down-regulation of CCNE1 through transcription factor TCF7L2. J Cell Physiol. 2021;236(8):5757’5770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Wu D, Jia H, Zhang Z, et al. Circ-PRMT5 promotes breast cancer by the miR-509-3p/TCF7L2 axis activating the PI3K/AKT pathway. J Gene Med. 2021;23(2):e3300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Wu Q, Ma J, Wei J, et al. lncRNA SNHG11 Promotes Gastric Cancer Progression by Activating the Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway and Oncogenic Autophagy. Mol Ther. 2021;29(3):1258’1278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Cao T, Zhen X. Dysregulation of miRNA and its potential therapeutic application in schizophrenia. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2018;24(7):586’597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Tutar Y. miRNA and cancer; computational and experimental approaches. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2014;15(5):429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Ferrante M, Conti G. Environment and Neurodegenerative Diseases: an Update on miRNA Role. MicroRNA (Shariqah, United Arab Emirates). 2017;6(3):157’165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Rupaimoole R, Slack F. MicroRNA therapeutics: towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16(3):203’222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Saccomani V, Grassi A, Piovan E, et al. miR-22-3p Negatively Affects Tumor Progression in T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Cells. 2020;9(7). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].He W, Zhang Y, Xia S. LncRNA NNT-AS1 promotes non-small cell lung cancer progression through regulating miR-22-3p/YAP1 axis. Thorac Cancer. 2020;11(3):549’560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Zhang W, Zhan F, Li D, et al. RGMB-AS1/miR-22-3p/NFIB axis contributes to the progression of gastric cancer. Neoplasma. 2020;67(3):484’491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Sha Q, Chen L, Xi J, et al. Long non-coding RNA LINC00858 promotes cells proliferation, migration and invasion by acting as a ceRNA of miR-22-3p in colorectal cancer. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019;47(1):1057’1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Xiao J, Niu S, Zhu J, et al. miR‑22‑3p enhances multi‑chemoresistance by targeting NET1 in bladder cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2018;39(6):2731’2740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Han T, Hur K, Cho H, et al. Epigenetic Associations between lncRNA/circRNA and miRNA in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(9). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Zhou X, Zhang W, Jin M, et al. lncRNA MIAT functions as a competing endogenous RNA to upregulate DAPK2 by sponging miR-22-3p in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(7):e2929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Zeng Z, Xia L, Fan S, et al. Circular RNA CircMAP3K5 acts as a MicroRNA-22-3p sponge to promote resolution of intimal hyperplasia Via TET2-mediated smooth muscle cell differentiation. Circulation. 2021;143(4):354’371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Zhou J, Zhang S, Chen Z, et al. CircRNA-ENO1 promoted glycolysis and tumor progression in lung adenocarcinoma through upregulating its host gene ENO1. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(12):885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Malakar P, Stein I, Saragovi A, et al. Long noncoding RNA MALAT1 regulates cancer glucose metabolism by enhancing mTOR-Mediated translation of TCF7L2. Cancer Res. 2019;79(10):2480’2493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Zheng A, Song X, Zhang L, et al. Long non-coding RNA LUCAT1/miR-5582-3p/TCF7L2 axis regulates breast cancer stemness via Wnt/β-catenin pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Wenzel J, Rose K, Haghighi E, et al. Loss of the nuclear Wnt pathway effector TCF7L2 promotes migration and invasion of human colorectal cancer cells. Oncogene. 2020;39(19):3893’3909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Bem J, Brożko N, Chakraborty C, et al. Wnt/β-catenin signaling in brain development and mental disorders keeping TCF7L2 in mind. FEBS Lett. 2019;593(13):1654’1674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Li R, Ou J, Li L, et al. The Wnt signaling pathway effector TCF7L2 mediates olanzapine-Induced weight gain and insulin Resistance. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Archbold HC, Yang YX, Chen L, et al. How do they do Wnt they do?: regulation of transcription by the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. [J].Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2012;204. 74’109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Fei L, van Den Broek O, Destrée O, et al. Distinct roles for Xenopus Tcf/Lef genes in mediating specific responses to Wnt/β-catenin signalling in mesoderm development. [J].Development. 2005;132(24):5375’5385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Zhong Z, Virshup D. Wnt Signaling and Drug Resistance in Cancer. Mol Pharmacol. 2020;97(2):72’89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Teeuwssen M, Fodde R. Wnt signaling in ovarian cancer stemness, EMT, and therapy resistance. J Clin Med. 2019;8(10). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]