Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract.
Domains of the 2021 EuroHeart acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention data standards with the number of Level 1 (mandatory) variables.
Keywords: Data standards, Data variables, Data definitions, Acute coronary syndrome, Percutaneous coronary intervention, EuroHeart
Abstract
Standardized data definitions are essential for monitoring and benchmarking the quality of care and patient outcomes in observational studies and randomized controlled trials. There are no contemporary pan-European data standards for the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomised Trials (EuroHeart) project of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) aimed to develop such data standards for ACS and PCI. Following a systematic review of the literature on ACS and PCI data standards and evaluation of contemporary ACS and PCI registries, we undertook a modified Delphi process involving clinical and registry experts from 11 European countries, as well as representatives from relevant ESC Associations, including the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC). This resulted in final sets of 68 and 84 ‘mandatory’ variables and several catalogues of optional variables for ACS and PCI, respectively. Data definitions were provided for these variables, which have been programmed as the basis for continuous registration of individual patient data in the online EuroHeart IT platform. By means of a structured process and the interaction with major stakeholders, internationally harmonized data standards for ACS and PCI have been developed. In the context of the EuroHeart project, this will facilitate country-level quality of care improvement, international observational research, registry-based randomized trials, and post-marketing surveillance of devices and pharmacotherapies.
Introduction
Standardized data definitions are essential for the reliable investigation of quality of care and outcomes in observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Heterogeneity in such definitions impedes benchmarking and leads to inconsistencies that directly impact the interpretation of clinical studies and the implementation of their findings.1
With the advent of large-scale registries, administrative databases, and the widespread use of electronic health records in routine clinical practice, opportunities to deliver cost-efficient investigator-initiated observational and randomized studies of both devices and pharmacological treatments have been realized.2–4 Yet, between-country comparisons remain challenging. This is often driven by a variation in the variables and their definitions.5 This restricts the ability to combine and efficiently compare data across databases. In countries where registry-based randomized controlled trials (R-RCTs) are feasible, country-specific definitions of outcomes or disease states that inform patient recruitment can limit the international generalizability of the study findings.6 Standardized data variables and definitions would provide means to overcome these limitations and enable international R-RCTs and the evaluation of the quality of care according to guideline-recommended quality indicators in multi-country observational cohorts.7–10
Currently, there are no contemporary pan-European data standards for cardiovascular disease. The Cardiology Audit and Registration Data Standards (CARDS) was developed in 2004 and was the first European initiative to address this gap in knowledge.11 The European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomised Trials (EuroHeart) is an international collaboration initiated and supported by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) that aims to improve the quality of cardiovascular care through continuous capture of individual patient data.12 EuroHeart is underpinned by a purpose-built IT platform enabling real-time data recording, monitoring of standards of care, data linkages, and the delivery of R-RCTs and observational studies. During the pilot phase, EuroHeart will focus on four clinical domains, the first of which is the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Here, we describe the development process and the resultant standardized data variables and definitions for ACS and PCI based on the EuroHeart methodology for the development of data standards.13
Methods
Working Group composition
A Data Science Group under the auspice of EuroHeart was established in August 2019. This comprised a project chair (C.P.G.), two medical experts (G.B. and S.A.), and a project manager. An international ACS/PCI Working Group was established and included 22 ACS/PCI and registry experts, representing 11 European countries. The selection of the Working Group members was based on ACS and/or PCI expertise and experience of national registries.
Defining data standards
The goal of the development process was to select and define a catalogue of ACS/PCI variables, the extent of which was balanced between all-encompassing and parsimonious. For instance, whereas some registries collect up to 370 variables,14,15 the Data Science Group opted to limit the number of ‘mandatory’ variables to between 50 and 100. Three levels of variables were proposed (Figure 1). Level 1: ‘mandatory’ variables that also are pre-programmed into the EuroHeart IT platform and include quality indicators and variables pertinent to accountability and public reporting of quality of care. Level 2: ‘additional’ variables that are provided together with definitions, but collection not being mandatory and not pre-programmed into the IT platform. Level 3: country- or centre-specific variables that address local regulatory and/or administrative requirements and that are not defined or programmed into the IT platform.
Figure 1.
EuroHeart data standards structure.
Literature search and evaluation of registries
A systematic review of the published literature (1 January 2004–4 August 2020) identified 554 ACS/PCI variables with accompanying definitions. Evaluation of contemporary national registries in Sweden [Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart Disease Evaluated according to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART)], UK [Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP), National Audit of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (NAPCI)], and USA [National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR)] was performed.14–17 Variables defined as quality indicators for ACS were automatically selected as candidate variables.10 Other variables were assessed according to their evidence base, validity, reliability, feasibility, and applicability. Candidate variables were classified according to the time point of care delivery and, where possible, reconciled with Clinical Practice Guidelines and quality indicators.7,8,18,19
Consensus development
The modified Delphi method was used to draw from the candidate variables a final set of ACS/PCI variables. To achieve this, candidate variables were shared with the Working Group, who were asked to assess them for inclusion against the pre-defined criteria and to evaluate the associated definitions. Responses and feedback were evaluated by the Data Science Group and the candidate variable catalogue was updated accordingly. In total, 11 peer-to-peer meetings were held during 2020. The developed variables were thereafter reviewed by the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), ESC Working Group on Thrombosis, Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP), ESC Patient Forum, and ESC Committee for Young Cardiovascular Professionals.
Results
In total, 302 variables were included in the EuroHeart ACS/PCI catalogue: 152 Level 1 ‘mandatory’ variables (68 for ACS and 84 for PCI) with 20 variables common to both datasets, and 150 Level 2 ‘additional’ variables (Graphical Abstract). Tables 1–7 show the ‘mandatory’ variables, with condensed definitions. Detailed information about the ‘mandatory’ variables are provided in Supplementary material online, Tables S1–S7, whereas ‘additional’ variables are provided in Supplementary material online, Tables S8–S14.
Table 1.
Demographics data variables and definitions
Variable | Registry | Definition and permissible values |
---|---|---|
Patient identification number | ACS/PCI | Enter the patient’s national identification number or a registry generated unique patient identification number |
Hospital identification number | ACS/PCI | Enter the hospital’s unique identification number |
Date of birth | ACS/PCI | Enter the patient’s date of birth |
Forename | ACS/PCI | Enter the patient’s forename |
Surname(s) | ACS/PCI | Enter the patient’s surname(s) |
Sex | ACS/PCI | Enter the patient’s sex at birth as either female or male
|
Postal code | ACS/PCI | Enter the postal code for the patient’s current residence |
Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, Table S1.
Table 2.
Patient characteristics and comorbidities data variables and definitions
Variable | Registry | Definition and permissible values |
---|---|---|
Height | ACS/PCI | Enter the patient’s height on admission (in cm) |
Weight | ACS/PCI | Enter the patient’s weight on admission (in kg) |
Smoking | ACS/PCI | Enter patient’s tobacco smoking status
|
Hypertension | ACS/PCI | Enter whether the patient is known to have a diagnosis of hypertension made by a healthcare professional prior to this care encounter
|
Diabetes mellitus | ACS/PCI | Enter whether the patient is known to have a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus made by a healthcare professional prior to this care encounter
|
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | ACS/PCI | Enter whether the patient is known to have a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) made by a healthcare professional prior to this care encounter
|
Moderate or severe chronic kidney disease | ACS/PCI | Enter whether the patient is known to have a moderate or severe chronic kidney disease prior to this care encounter
|
Prior stroke | ACS/PCI | Enter whether the patient is known to have had a stroke prior to this care encounter. More than one option can be selected
|
Prior myocardial infarction | ACS/PCI | Enter whether the patient is known to have had a myocardial infarction prior to this care encounter
|
Heart failure | ACS/PCI | Enter whether the patient is known to have a diagnosis of heart failure made by a healthcare professional prior to this care encounter
|
Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter | ACS/PCI | Enter whether the patient is known to have a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) made by a healthcare professional prior to this care encounter
|
Prior percutaneous coronary intervention | ACS/PCI | Enter whether the patient is known to have had a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of any type (not diagnostic angiography) performed prior to this care encounter
|
Prior coronary artery bypass grafting | ACS/PCI | Enter whether the patient is known to have had a coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed prior to this care encounter
|
Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, Table S2.
Table 3.
Admission data variables and definitions
Variable | Registry | Definition and permissible values |
---|---|---|
Presenting symptoms | ACS | Enter the patient’s symptoms that prompted this presentation. Select the main reason for presentation
|
Cardiac arrest prior to hospital arrival | ACS | Enter whether the patient had a cardiac arrest prior to hospital arrival
|
Symptom onset, date/time | ACS | Enter the date and time of symptom onset |
Arrival method | ACS | Enter the method of current hospital arrival
|
First contact with ambulance, date/time | ACS | Enter the date and time of when the ambulance arrived to the patient |
Hospital arrival, date/time | ACS | Enter the date and time when the patient arrived in the hospital |
Diagnostic ECG, ST/T morphology | ACS | Enter the findings of the diagnostic ECG regarding the ST/T morphology. The first option that best describes the findings should be selected
|
Diagnostic ECG, QRS morphology | ACS | Enter the findings of the diagnostic ECG regarding the QRS morphology. The first option that best describes the findings should be selected
|
Diagnostic ECG, rhythm | ACS | Enter the findings of the diagnostic ECG regarding the rhythm. The first option that best describes the findings should be selected
|
ECG establishing need for revascularization, date/time | ACS | Enter the date and time of the first ECG establishing need for coronary revascularization. In cases where imminent revascularization was not indicated, enter the date and time of the first ECG (either before or after hospital arrival) |
Heart rate | ACS | Enter the patient's heart rate (in b.p.m.) |
Systolic blood pressure | ACS | Enter the patient's systolic blood pressure (in millimetres of mercury) |
Killip class | ACS | Enter the patient’s Killip class at the time of hospital admission
|
Thrombolysis, prehospital | ACS | Enter whether thrombolysis therapy was initiated or administered prior to hospital arrival
|
Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, Table S3.
Table 4.
In-hospital management data variables and definitions
Variable | Registry | Definition and permissible values |
---|---|---|
Troponin, elevated | ACS | Enter whether cardiac troponin was elevated during the hospital stay
|
Troponin assay | ACS | Enter the assay used for analysis of cardiac troponin levels
|
Haemoglobin | ACS | Enter the first recorded level of haemoglobin during the hospital stay (in g/L) |
Creatinine | ACS | Enter the first recorded level of creatinine during the hospital stay (in µmol/L) |
LDL cholesterol | ACS | Enter the first recorded level of LDL cholesterol during the hospital stay (in mmol/L). This is not necessarily fasting LDL cholesterol |
Left ventricular ejection fraction, assessment method | ACS | Enter the method used to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during hospital stay
|
Left ventricular ejection fraction | ACS | Enter the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured during the hospital stay by echocardiography, angiography, radionuclide, magnetic resonance imaging, or by other methods
|
Coronary anatomy, assessment method | ACS | Enter the method used to assess the coronary anatomy during the hospital stay
|
Anticoagulants, i.v. or s.c. | ACS | Enter whether treatment dose anticoagulant therapy was administered during the hospital stay. This should not include prophylactic low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or intra-procedural unfractionated heparin (UFH) or intra-procedural bivalirudin
|
Thrombolysis, in-hospital | ACS | Enter whether thrombolysis therapy was initiated or administered during the hospital stay (after hospital arrival)
|
Percutaneous coronary intervention | ACS | Enter whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed during the hospital stay or is planned after discharge
|
Coronary artery bypass grafting | ACS | Enter whether coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was performed during the hospital stay or is planned after discharge
|
Reperfusion treatment, date/time | ACS | Enter the date and time of the first reperfusion therapy (thrombolysis, PCI, or CABG) that was administered/performed during the hospital stay |
In-hospital events, myocardial re-infarction | ACS | Enter whether the patient had a myocardial re-infarction during the hospital stay
|
In-hospital events, cardiogenic shock | ACS | Enter whether the patient had an episode of cardiogenic shock during the hospital stay
|
In-hospital events, cardiac arrest | ACS | Enter whether the patient had cardiac arrest during the hospital stay
|
In-hospital events, major bleeding | ACS | Enter whether the patient had a major bleeding event during the hospital stay. More than one option can be selected
|
In-hospital events, new-onset atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter | ACS | Enter whether a new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) was made during the hospital stay for patients with no prior history of AF or AFL
|
Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, Table S4.
Table 5.
Diagnostic coronary angiography data variables and definitions
Variable | Registry | Definition and permissible values |
---|---|---|
Procedure indication | PCI | Enter the main indication for performing the coronary angiography
|
Procedure urgency | PCI | Enter the procedure urgency
|
ECG establishing need for revascularization, date/time | PCI | Enter the date and time of the first ECG establishing need for coronary revascularization |
Killip class | PCI | Enter the patient’s Killip class at the time of hospital admission or during the hospital stay (prior to the procedure)
|
CCS angina grade | PCI | Enter the grade of angina pectoris according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) grading scale
|
Creatinine | PCI | Enter the most recent level of creatinine, but within the last 3 months (in µmol/L) |
Circulatory support | PCI | Enter whether any circulatory support was used during the hospital stay prior to the procedure. More than one option can be selected
|
Inotropes | PCI | Enter whether inotropic therapy was administered during the hospital stay prior to the procedure
|
Arterial access | PCI | Enter the arterial access(es) punctured/attempted during the procedure. More than one option can be selected
|
Arterial access, date/time | PCI | Enter the date and time when the arterial access for the procedure was accomplished |
Segments 1–20 | PCI | Enter the per cent estimate (0–29, 30–49, 50–69, 70–89, 90–99, 100%, N/A) of the most severe stenosis in Segments 1–20 as determined by coronary angiography. This does not include collateral circulation. Not applicable (N/A) may be selected when the segment is not visualized |
CABG graft, type | PCI | Enter whether a CAGB graft is present and enter the type of the graft
|
CABG graft, anastomoses segment | PCI | Enter the coronary segment to which the bypass graft is attached
|
CABG graft, lesion finding | PCI | Enter the per cent estimate (0–29, 30–49, 50–69, 70–89, 90–99, 100%, N/A) of the most severe stenosis in the graft selected as determined by coronary angiography. Not applicable (N/A) may be selected when the segment is not visualized |
Overall finding in the native coronary arteries | PCI | Automatically generated overall finding in the native coronary arteries based on the responses in Segments 1–20
|
Chronic total occlusion | PCI | Enter whether the lesion in the current segment is a chronic total occlusion (CTO)
|
Chronic total occlusion, segment | PCI | Enter the coronary segment in which the lesion is a chronic total occlusion (CTO)
|
Restenosis | PCI | Enter whether the lesion in the current segment is a restenosis
|
Restenosis, segment | PCI | Enter the coronary segment in which the lesion is a restenosis
|
Stent thrombosis | PCI | Enter whether the lesion in the current segment is a stent thrombosis
|
Stent thrombosis, segment | PCI | Enter the coronary segment in which the lesion is a stent thrombosis
|
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection | PCI | Enter whether there was a spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD)
|
Invasive intracoronary diagnostics | PCI | Enter whether any invasive intracoronary diagnostic assessment was performed before the PCI procedure
|
Invasive intracoronary diagnostics, method | PCI | Enter what invasive intracoronary diagnostics method(s) were performed before the PCI procedure. More than one option can be selected
|
Invasive intracoronary diagnostics, segment | PCI | Enter what segment(s) intracoronary diagnostics was performed before the PCI procedure. More than one option can be selected
|
Invasive intracoronary diagnostics, graft | PCI | Enter whether invasive intracoronary diagnostics was performed in a graft lesion before the PCI procedure
|
Invasive intracoronary diagnostics, results | PCI | Enter the results of the lowest intracoronary physiology measurement (gradient), the minimal lumen area (mm2) as measured by intracoronary imaging methods, or maximum lipid core burden index (max LCBI4mm) for near-infrared spectroscopy before any treatment interventions |
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors | PCI | Enter whether Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors was administered during the procedure
|
Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, Table S5.
Table 6.
Percutaneous coronary intervention and events data variables and definitions
Variable | Registry | Definition and permissible values |
---|---|---|
PCI attempted | PCI | Enter whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was attempted
|
Passage of wire, date/time | PCI | Enter the date and time when the first guidewire successfully crossed the culprit lesion, not the date when flow was restored |
Segment attempted | PCI | Enter the segment attempted during PCI
|
Graft attempted | PCI | Enter whether a graft lesion was attempted during PCI
|
Type of PCI attempt | PCI | Enter the type of the procedure performed. More than one option can be selected
|
Drug-eluting balloon, type | PCI | Enter the drug-eluting balloon that was used in the specific segment. (Device names of drug-eluting balloons used in the specific country) |
Drug-eluting balloon, diameter | PCI | Enter the diameter of the drug-eluting balloon. Nominal diameter (in mm) of the drug-eluting balloon that is used should be entered |
Stent, type | PCI | Enter the stent that was used in the specific segment. (Device names of stents used in the specific country) |
Stent, diameter | PCI | Enter the diameter of the stent. Nominal diameter (in mm) of the stent balloon should be entered |
Stent, length | PCI | Enter the length of the stent (in mm) |
Adjuvant therapies/equipment | PCI | Enter if any adjuvant therapies were used during the procedure. More than one option can be selected
|
Lesion success | PCI | Enter whether the attempted lesion was successfully treated
|
TIMI flow, prior to PCI | PCI | Enter the TIMI flow prior to the PCI procedure
|
TIMI flow, after PCI | PCI | Enter the TIMI flow after the PCI procedure
|
Complete revascularization | PCI | Enter whether a complete revascularization was achieved by the end of the current procedure
|
Additional PCI procedures planned | PCI | Enter whether any additional PCI procedure(s) is planned (either during this hospital stay or after discharge)
|
Peri-procedural events | PCI | Enter whether any events occurred during the procedure. More than one option can be selected
|
Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, Table S6.
Table 7.
Discharge management data variables and definitions
Variable | Registry | Definition and permissible values |
---|---|---|
Hospital discharge, date | ACS | Enter the date when the patient was discharged from the hospital or died during this hospital stay |
In-hospital death | ACS | Enter whether the patient died during the hospital stay
|
Final diagnosis at discharge | ACS | Enter the final diagnosis at discharge
|
Final diagnosis at discharge, ICD-10 code | ACS | Enter the main final diagnosis at discharge according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10 standard.
|
Aspirin at discharge | ACS | Enter whether the patient was discharged on acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin)
|
P2Y12 inhibitors at discharge | ACS | Enter whether the patient was discharged on P2Y12 inhibitors
|
Oral anticoagulants at discharge | ACS | Enter whether the patient was discharged on oral anticoagulants. Vitamin K antagonists include warfarin
|
Beta-blockers at discharge | ACS | Enter whether the patient was discharged on beta-blockers
|
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at discharge | ACS | Enter whether the patient was discharged on angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. For combination drugs, enter details about both drug classes
|
Angiotensin II receptor blocker at discharge | ACS | Enter whether the patient was discharged on angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB). For combination drugs (except angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors), enter details about both drug classes
|
Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor at discharge | ACS | Enter whether the patient was discharged on angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI)
|
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist at discharge | ACS | Enter whether the patient was discharged on mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA)
|
Lipid-lowering treatment at discharge | ACS | Enter whether the patient was discharged on lipid-lowering treatment. More than one option can be selected
|
Diuretics at discharge | ACS | Enter whether the patient was discharged on diuretics. For combination drugs, enter details about both drug classes. More than one option can be selected
|
Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors at discharge | ACS | Enter whether the patient was discharged on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. For combination drugs, enter details about both drug classes
|
Oral/subcutaneous antidiabetics at discharge | ACS | Enter whether the patient was discharged on oral or subcutaneous antidiabetic medications. More than one option can be selected. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors are entered separately
|
Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, Table S7.
Demographics
There are seven ‘mandatory’ variables in this section, all of which are common between the ACS and PCI data standards (Table 1). The section will be replicated in the other EuroHeart clinical domains so that time-independent patient information (e.g. date of birth) may be collected once and applied to all subsequent episodes of care. This section allows the use of permanent unique personal identification numbers to identify patients.20 When matching the identification number with other data sources, information such as forename, surname, sex, and postal code may be extracted automatically. The EuroHeart IT platform will generate unique patient identifiers for those countries that do not use them, which once assigned may not be changed or reassigned to other patients. Each patient’s geolocation is collected as their current residential postal code.
Patient characteristics and comorbidities
The patient characteristics and comorbidities section comprises 13 ‘mandatory’ variables collecting comorbidities relevant to ACS and/or PCI (Table 2). The choice of comorbidities was prioritized according to what the Working Group perceived to be information available in an average medical case record. Many of the variables are also relevant when characterizing the patient’s risk and are essential when reporting underlying medical history in observational and randomized trials, when understanding trends in quality improvement, and when assessing treatment strategies.
Admission
Table 3 depicts the ‘mandatory’ variables for the admission section. Information about care time points can be difficult to collect but is important given it is used for the derivation of quality indicators.7,8 Medications at the time of admission form ‘additional’ variables and are defined in Supplementary material online, Table S10.
In-hospital management
This section collects information concerning investigations, treatments, and events occurring in-hospital (Table 4). Laboratory results for diagnosis (e.g. cardiac biomarkers), risk stratification (e.g. serum creatinine), and risk factors modification (e.g. low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) are ‘mandatory’ variables.7,8,18 Laboratory results for specific situations or subgroups (e.g. N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein, cholesterol, glucose, and haemoglobin A1c) are ‘additional’ variables and are detailed in Supplementary material online, Table S11. The 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of ACSs in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation recommends the assessment of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during the hospital stay, and thus forms a ‘mandatory’ variable.7 Categorization of LVEF aligns with the 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure.21 Given that reperfusion is the cornerstone for the management of patients with ACS, five ‘mandatory’ variables are dedicated to the evaluation of the coronary artery anatomy and reperfusion strategy.7,8
Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention
This section has two parts. The first part captures information about invasive coronary angiography (ICA) (Table 5) and includes an interactive diagram of the coronary tree (Figure 2). It provides a solution for the fact that there are international differences in the extent of information recorded in registries (e.g. all ICA procedures in Sweden14 vs. all PCI procedures in the UK16). Equally, the Data Science Group reviewed coronary anatomy visualization tools including the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularisation Investigation (BARI) and the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) schemes describing coronary anatomy.22,23 The consensus of the Working Group was to adopt a simplified 20-segment system adapted from the SWEDEHEART registry, which enables interactive reporting of stenoses found in major coronary arteries (Figure 2).14
Figure 2.
The EuroHeart IT platform and the EuroHeart-percutaneous coronary intervention coronary artery segments.
The second part captures information about the procedural indication, urgency, findings, and complications (Table 6). It collects information such as date, time, and type of the arterial access, given the use of radial access is recommended as a quality indicator in the 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of ACSs in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation.7 In addition, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grades before and following the procedure, and intracoronary equipment and devices used are captured in this section.
Discharge
This section collects information about the final ACS diagnosis and medications prescribed at the time of discharge from the hospital (Table 7). The final diagnosis includes ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and unstable angina [with accompanying World Health Organisations (WHO) standardized International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes]. Medication information includes Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes and drug dosages as ‘additional’ variables (Supplementary material online, Table S14).
Discussion
The adoption of harmonized data collections is central for the continuous improvement of cardiovascular care.24 The lack of internationally recognized data standards has led to large inequalities in monitoring and standards of care within and between European countries and also resulted in expensive and inefficiently coordinated and delivered studies of cardiovascular treatments.25 Currently, there are no contemporary pan-European data standards for ACS and PCI. The EuroHeart project of the ESC, by means of a structured methodology, has defined a catalogue of data standards for ACS and PCI, which will be implemented into a bespoke IT platform to facilitate harmonized country-level quality improvement, international observational and registry-based randomized research, and post-marketing surveillance of devices and pharmacotherapies.
The existing European national cardiovascular registries comprise distinct and discordant entities with differing data variables and definitions.26 This substantially limits their usability in collaborative large-scale studies. Data standards and case report forms presented by CARDS, the EURObservational Research Programme (EORP), and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) have been used in national registries and in clinical trials,11,27,28 but differ in their data variables and definitions. Furthermore, no previous international cardiovascular data standards initiative has provided the means by which data may be efficiently collected in ‘real-world’ settings. Moreover, the ACC/AHA data standards for coronary artery disease and PCI contain over 300 variables that make it difficult to implement in a pragmatic registry.28,29 In contrast, the EuroHeart data standards presented in this article have a restricted number of mandatory ACS/PCI variables, bolted onto an IT platform for effective data collection.
After years of steady decline, the reduction of mortality rates post-myocardial infarction has plateaued in many countries; cardiovascular disease remains the main cause of death worldwide and its burden is increasing in low- to middle-income economies.30 The standardized collection of cardiovascular data and the understanding of how to use observational and randomized data in cardiovascular medicine is a clear unmet need and an important next step towards defining variation in cardiovascular care and facilitating continuous quality improvement.4 The emergence of new devices and drugs for the management of cardiovascular disease provides opportunities for improved outcomes but requires post-marketing surveillance. In addition, the growing complexity and financial burden of traditional randomized controlled trials create a need to develop innovative ways to conduct high-quality, yet cost-effective research. National registries which implement uniform data standards will facilitate rapid and efficient post-marketing surveillance of device therapies and pragmatic R-RCT with pooled data from multiple geographical locations.6
Since 2021, the EuroHeart IT platform collects all ‘mandatory’ variables and supports the development of ‘additional’ variables in participating countries. Furthermore, the EuroHeart IT infrastructure includes applications for clinical reporting in the local healthcare system and provides tools for observational research, R-RCTs, and post-marketing surveillance of drugs and devices. Patient data are collected continuously in the healthcare system on a country level, and the national or regional registry centres are responsible for the storage and data protection according to the existing legal framework. Signed informed consent will not be required for data collection for quality development in most countries. For planned reports presenting the standards of care in different countries participating in EuroHeart, only deidentified and aggregated data will be shared by the participating registries/countries. Thus, for the collaboration on the development of quality of care, no individual patient-level data will be transferred outside the local country/region. However, for prospective research projects, such as R-RCTs or drug and device monitoring, informed consent from participants’ will be required as for any clinical trial. In these cases, selected anonymized individual study data may be transferred for analysis to a central repository according to clinical trial protocols. Finally, as part of mutually agreed international epidemiological research projects and based on ethical and regulatory approval, anonymized retrospective registry cohorts may be transferred to a central repository for pre-defined statistical analysis. In all cases, the national/regional registry parties are responsible for defining the legal framework applicable to their participation in EuroHeart and its various features, and for ensuring that they do not violate either local or international law.
We recognize the limitations of the EuroHeart data standards development process. This includes the use of expert opinion (which may be biased) for the selection of the final data variables and definitions from those identified in the literature review. However, the EuroHeart ACS and PCI data standards were developed using a structured and recognized methodology for selecting the expert panel and for obtaining their opining and feedback. Likewise, the inclusiveness of the Working Group, which comprised experts from many European countries, provided a robustness and transparent framework for the development of the variables and definitions. Despite the data standards being reviewed by the ESC Patient Forum, future Working Groups may benefit from the inclusion of patients and wider members of the multidisciplinary team for ACS and PCI such as nurses and pharmacists. Of note, the data standards proposed in this document are based on the evidence available at the time of development. Accordingly, updates may be required as more and new knowledge becomes available.
Conclusions
This document presents the first set of data standards, developed as part of the EuroHeart project, which aims to harmonize data variables and definitions across common cardiovascular domains. In total, 68 and 84 ‘mandatory’ variables for ACS and PCI domains have been proposed, respectively. Also, several ‘additional’ variables have been defined. Once fully adopted into the EuroHeart IT platform, the data standards will facilitate country-level quality improvement, observational and registry-based randomized research, and post-marketing surveillance of new devices and pharmacotherapies.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material is available at European Heart Journal online.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank the members of the ACS/PCI Working Group for their expertise when developing the ACS and PCI data standards; Joakim Alfredsson (Sweden), Branko Beleslin (Serbia), Mark de Belder (UK), Ana Djordjevic-Dikic (Serbia), Jorge Ferreira (Portugal), Sudhakar George (UK), Claes Held (Sweden), Alar Irs (Estonia), András Jánosi (Hungary), Zumreta Kušljugić (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Sílvia Monteiro (Portugal), Belma Pojskić (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Svein Rotevatn (Norway), Andrea Rubboli (Italy), Rui Teles (Portugal), José María de la Torre Hernández (Spain), Cristian Udroiu (Romania), Clive Weston (UK), and Troels Yndigegn (Sweden). We also thank Adrian Banning (UK), Scot Garg (UK), David Hildick-Smith (UK), Tim Kinnaird (UK), and Rod Stables (UK) for their support and expertise during the development of the ACS and PCI data standards. We thank Catherine Reynolds (EuroHeart Project Manager, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK), Ebba Bergman and Lan Vu Thi (EuroHeart Project Managers, Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala, Sweden) for their support and contribution to the EuroHeart project. We thank Ida Björkgren (Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala, Sweden) for the editorial support.
Appendix
Data Science Group: Suleman Aktaa (UK), Gorav Batra (Sweden), Chris P. Gale (UK).
Working Group: Joakim Alfredsson (Sweden), Branko Beleslin (Serbia), Mark de Belder (UK), Ana Djordjevic-Dikic (Serbia), David Erlinge (Sweden), Jorge Ferreira (Portugal), Sudhakar George (UK), Claes Held (Sweden), Alar Irs (Estonia), András Jánosi (Hungary), Zumreta Kušljugić (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Peter Ludman (UK), Sílvia Monteiro (Portugal), Belma Pojskić (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Svein Rotevatn (Norway), Andrea Rubboli (Italy), Rui Teles (Portugal), José María de la Torre Hernández (Spain), Cristian Udroiu (Romania), Lars Wallentin (Sweden), Clive Weston (UK), Troels Yndigegn (Sweden).
In collaboration with: The Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP), Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), EURObservational Research Programme (EORP), ESC Patient Forum, ESC Working Group on Thrombosis, and the ESC Committee for Young Cardiovascular Professionals have endorsed and were involved in the review of the EuroHeart ACS/PCI data standards.
Contributor Information
Gorav Batra, Department of Medical Sciences Cardiology and Uppsala Clinical Research Center Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden.
Suleman Aktaa, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine University of Leeds Leeds UK; Leeds Institute for Data Analytics University of Leeds Leeds UK; Department of Cardiology Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds UK.
Lars Wallentin, Department of Medical Sciences Cardiology and Uppsala Clinical Research Center Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden.
Aldo P Maggioni, Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists Research Center (ANMCO) Florence Italy.
Peter Ludman, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.
David Erlinge, Department of Cardiology Skåne University Hospital Lund University Lund Sweden.
Barbara Casadei, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Chris P Gale, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine University of Leeds Leeds UK; Leeds Institute for Data Analytics University of Leeds Leeds UK; Department of Cardiology Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds UK.
Funding
This work was supported by the European Society of Cardiology.
Conflict of interest: G.B. has nothing to declare with respect to this manuscript. Outside this work, G.B. has received lecture/speaker fees from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim; expert committee fees from Novo Nordisk. S.A. and P.L. have nothing to declare. L.W. has nothing to declare with respect to this manuscript. Outside this work, L.W. reports institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck&Co, and Roche Diagnostics; consulting fees from Abbott. A.P.M. has nothing to declare with respect to this manuscript. Outside this work, A.P.M. received personal fees for participation in committees of studies sponsored by Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Fresenius, Novartis. D.E. has nothing to declare with respect to this manuscript. Outside this work, D.E. reports speaker and advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Chiesi. B.C. has nothing to declare with respect to this manuscript. Outside this work, B.C. has received in kind support from Roche Diagnostics and iRhythm for clinical studies of atrial fibrillation. C.P.G. has nothing to declare with respect to this manuscript. Outside this work, C.P.G. has received grants from Abbott and BMS; honoraria for lectures and scientific advice from Amgen and AstraZeneca.
References
- 1. Gregson J, Stone GW, Ben-Yehuda O, Redfors B, Kandzari DE, Morice M-C, et al. Implications of alternative definitions of peri-procedural myocardial infarction after coronary revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:1609–1621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Fröbert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK, Omerovic E, Gudnason T, Maeng M, et al. Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1587–1597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Erlinge D, Omerovic E, Fröbert O, Linder R, Danielewicz M, Hamid M, et al. Bivalirudin versus heparin monotherapy in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1132–1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bowman L, Baras A, Bombien R, Califf RM, Chen Z, Gale CP, et al. Understanding the use of observational and randomized data in cardiovascular medicine. Eur Heart J 2020;41:2571–2578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Rapsomaniki E, Thuresson M, Yang E, Blin P, Hunt P, Chung S-C, et al. Using big data from health records from four countries to evaluate chronic disease outcomes: a study in 114 364 survivors of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 2016;2:172–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. James S, Rao SV, Granger CB. Registry-based randomized clinical trials—a new clinical trial paradigm. Nat Rev Cardiol 2015;12:312–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Collet J-P, Thiele H, Barbato E, Barthélémy O, Bauersachs J, Bhatt DL, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2020;42:1289–1367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2017;39:119–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Aktaa S, Batra G, Wallentin L, Baigent C, Erlinge D, James S, et al. European Society of Cardiology methodology for the development of quality indicators for the quantification of cardiovascular care and outcomes. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 2022;8:4–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Schiele F, Aktaa S, Rossello X, Ahrens I, Claeys MJ, Collet J-P, et al. 2020 Update of the quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction: a position paper of the Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care: the study group for quality indicators from the ACVC and the NSTE-ACS guideline group. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2021;10:224–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Flynn MR, Barrett C, Cosío FG, Gitt AK, Wallentin L, Kearney P, et al. The Cardiology Audit and Registration Data Standards (CARDS), European data standards for clinical cardiology practice. Eur Heart J 2005;26:308–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Wallentin L, Gale CP, Maggioni A, Bardinet I, Casadei B. EuroHeart: European unified registries on heart care evaluation and randomized trials. Eur Heart J 2019;40:2745–2749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Batra G, Aktaa S, Wallentin L, Maggioni AP, Wilkinson C, Casadei B, et al. Methodology for the development of international clinical data standards for common cardiovascular conditions: European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomised Trials (EuroHeart). Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes; 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Jernberg T, Attebring MF, Hambraeus K, Ivert T, James S, Jeppsson A, et al. The Swedish web-system for enhancement and development of evidence-based care in heart disease evaluated according to recommended therapies (SWEDEHEART). Heart 2010;96:1617–1621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Wilkinson C, Weston C, Timmis A, Quinn T, Keys A, Gale CP. The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP). Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 2020;6:19–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ludman PF. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Registry for audit and quality assessment of percutaneous coronary interventions in the United Kingdom. Heart 2011;97:1293–1297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Messenger JC, Ho KKL, Young CH, Slattery LE, Draoui JC, Curtis JP, et al. The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) data quality brief: the NCDR data quality program in 2012. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1484–1488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2018;40:237–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kastrati A, Banning AP, Koller A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2018;40:87–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Mills S, Lee JK, Rassekh BM, Zorko Kodelja M, Bae G Kang M, et al. Unique health identifiers for universal health coverage. J Heal Popul Nutr 2019;38:22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2021;42:3599–3726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Rogers WJ, Alderman EL, Chaitman BR, DiSciascio G, Horan M, Lytle B, et al. Bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI): baseline clinical and angiographic data. Am J Cardiol 1995;75:9C–17C. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. CASS Principal Investigators and Their Associates . Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 1983;68:939–950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017;135:e146–e603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Scherer FM. The pharmaceutical industry—prices and progress. N Engl J Med 2004;351:927–932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Widimsky P, Wijns W, Fajadet J, de Belder M, Knot J, Aaberge L, et al. Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in Europe: description of the current situation in 30 countries. Eur Heart J 2010;31:943–957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Zeymer U, Ludman P, Danchin N, Kala P, Maggioni AP, Weidinger F. Background and design of the ACCA–EAPCI registry on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2018;8:63–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Cannon CP, Brindis RG, Chaitman BR, Cohen DJ, Cross JT, Drozda JP, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes and coronary artery disease. Circulation 2013;127:1052–1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Dehmer GJ, Badhwar V, Bermudez EA., Cleveland JC, Cohen MG, D’Agostino RS, et al. 2020 AHA/ACC key data elements and definitions for coronary revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Clinical Data Standards for Corona. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2020;13:e000059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Timmis A, Townsend N, Gale CP, Torbica A, Lettino M, Petersen SE, et al. European Society of Cardiology: Cardiovascular disease statistics 2019. Eur Heart J 2020;41:12–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.