Skip to main content
European Heart Journal logoLink to European Heart Journal
. 2022 Apr 5;43(24):2269–2285. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac133

Data standards for acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention: the European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomised Trials (EuroHeart)

Gorav Batra 1,, Suleman Aktaa 2,3,4, Lars Wallentin 5, Aldo P Maggioni 6, Peter Ludman 7, David Erlinge 8, Barbara Casadei 9, Chris P Gale 10,11,12; In collaboration with the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP), Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), EURObservational Research Programme (EORP), ESC Patient Forum, ESC Working Group on Thrombosis and ESC Committee for Young Cardiovascular Professionals
PMCID: PMC9209007  PMID: 35380662

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

Graphical Abstract

Domains of the 2021 EuroHeart acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention data standards with the number of Level 1 (mandatory) variables.

Keywords: Data standards, Data variables, Data definitions, Acute coronary syndrome, Percutaneous coronary intervention, EuroHeart

Abstract

Standardized data definitions are essential for monitoring and benchmarking the quality of care and patient outcomes in observational studies and randomized controlled trials. There are no contemporary pan-European data standards for the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomised Trials (EuroHeart) project of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) aimed to develop such data standards for ACS and PCI. Following a systematic review of the literature on ACS and PCI data standards and evaluation of contemporary ACS and PCI registries, we undertook a modified Delphi process involving clinical and registry experts from 11 European countries, as well as representatives from relevant ESC Associations, including the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC). This resulted in final sets of 68 and 84 ‘mandatory’ variables and several catalogues of optional variables for ACS and PCI, respectively. Data definitions were provided for these variables, which have been programmed as the basis for continuous registration of individual patient data in the online EuroHeart IT platform. By means of a structured process and the interaction with major stakeholders, internationally harmonized data standards for ACS and PCI have been developed. In the context of the EuroHeart project, this will facilitate country-level quality of care improvement, international observational research, registry-based randomized trials, and post-marketing surveillance of devices and pharmacotherapies.

Introduction

Standardized data definitions are essential for the reliable investigation of quality of care and outcomes in observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Heterogeneity in such definitions impedes benchmarking and leads to inconsistencies that directly impact the interpretation of clinical studies and the implementation of their findings.1

With the advent of large-scale registries, administrative databases, and the widespread use of electronic health records in routine clinical practice, opportunities to deliver cost-efficient investigator-initiated observational and randomized studies of both devices and pharmacological treatments have been realized.2–4 Yet, between-country comparisons remain challenging. This is often driven by a variation in the variables and their definitions.5 This restricts the ability to combine and efficiently compare data across databases. In countries where registry-based randomized controlled trials (R-RCTs) are feasible, country-specific definitions of outcomes or disease states that inform patient recruitment can limit the international generalizability of the study findings.6 Standardized data variables and definitions would provide means to overcome these limitations and enable international R-RCTs and the evaluation of the quality of care according to guideline-recommended quality indicators in multi-country observational cohorts.7–10

Currently, there are no contemporary pan-European data standards for cardiovascular disease. The Cardiology Audit and Registration Data Standards (CARDS) was developed in 2004 and was the first European initiative to address this gap in knowledge.11 The European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomised Trials (EuroHeart) is an international collaboration initiated and supported by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) that aims to improve the quality of cardiovascular care through continuous capture of individual patient data.12 EuroHeart is underpinned by a purpose-built IT platform enabling real-time data recording, monitoring of standards of care, data linkages, and the delivery of R-RCTs and observational studies. During the pilot phase, EuroHeart will focus on four clinical domains, the first of which is the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Here, we describe the development process and the resultant standardized data variables and definitions for ACS and PCI based on the EuroHeart methodology for the development of data standards.13

Methods

Working Group composition

A Data Science Group under the auspice of EuroHeart was established in August 2019. This comprised a project chair (C.P.G.), two medical experts (G.B. and S.A.), and a project manager. An international ACS/PCI Working Group was established and included 22 ACS/PCI and registry experts, representing 11 European countries. The selection of the Working Group members was based on ACS and/or PCI expertise and experience of national registries.

Defining data standards

The goal of the development process was to select and define a catalogue of ACS/PCI variables, the extent of which was balanced between all-encompassing and parsimonious. For instance, whereas some registries collect up to 370 variables,14,15 the Data Science Group opted to limit the number of ‘mandatory’ variables to between 50 and 100. Three levels of variables were proposed (Figure 1). Level 1: ‘mandatory’ variables that also are pre-programmed into the EuroHeart IT platform and include quality indicators and variables pertinent to accountability and public reporting of quality of care. Level 2: ‘additional’ variables that are provided together with definitions, but collection not being mandatory and not pre-programmed into the IT platform. Level 3: country- or centre-specific variables that address local regulatory and/or administrative requirements and that are not defined or programmed into the IT platform.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

EuroHeart data standards structure.

Literature search and evaluation of registries

A systematic review of the published literature (1 January 2004–4 August 2020) identified 554 ACS/PCI variables with accompanying definitions. Evaluation of contemporary national registries in Sweden [Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart Disease Evaluated according to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART)], UK [Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP), National Audit of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (NAPCI)], and USA [National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR)] was performed.14–17 Variables defined as quality indicators for ACS were automatically selected as candidate variables.10 Other variables were assessed according to their evidence base, validity, reliability, feasibility, and applicability. Candidate variables were classified according to the time point of care delivery and, where possible, reconciled with Clinical Practice Guidelines and quality indicators.7,8,18,19

Consensus development

The modified Delphi method was used to draw from the candidate variables a final set of ACS/PCI variables. To achieve this, candidate variables were shared with the Working Group, who were asked to assess them for inclusion against the pre-defined criteria and to evaluate the associated definitions. Responses and feedback were evaluated by the Data Science Group and the candidate variable catalogue was updated accordingly. In total, 11 peer-to-peer meetings were held during 2020. The developed variables were thereafter reviewed by the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), ESC Working Group on Thrombosis, Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP), ESC Patient Forum, and ESC Committee for Young Cardiovascular Professionals.

Results

In total, 302 variables were included in the EuroHeart ACS/PCI catalogue: 152 Level 1 ‘mandatory’ variables (68 for ACS and 84 for PCI) with 20 variables common to both datasets, and 150 Level 2 ‘additional’ variables (Graphical Abstract). Tables 1–7 show the ‘mandatory’ variables, with condensed definitions. Detailed information about the ‘mandatory’ variables are provided in Supplementary material online, Tables S1–S7, whereas ‘additional’ variables are provided in Supplementary material online, Tables S8–S14.

Table 1.

Demographics data variables and definitions

Variable Registry Definition and permissible values
Patient identification number ACS/PCI Enter the patient’s national identification number or a registry generated unique patient identification number
Hospital identification number ACS/PCI Enter the hospital’s unique identification number
Date of birth ACS/PCI Enter the patient’s date of birth
Forename ACS/PCI Enter the patient’s forename
Surname(s) ACS/PCI Enter the patient’s surname(s)
Sex ACS/PCI Enter the patient’s sex at birth as either female or male
  • Female

  • Male

Postal code ACS/PCI Enter the postal code for the patient’s current residence

Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, Table S1.

Table 2.

Patient characteristics and comorbidities data variables and definitions

Variable Registry Definition and permissible values
Height ACS/PCI Enter the patient’s height on admission (in cm)
Weight ACS/PCI Enter the patient’s weight on admission (in kg)
Smoking ACS/PCI Enter patient’s tobacco smoking status
  • Never smoked

  • Former smoker

  • Current smoker

  • Unknown

Hypertension ACS/PCI Enter whether the patient is known to have a diagnosis of hypertension made by a healthcare professional prior to this care encounter
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Diabetes mellitus ACS/PCI Enter whether the patient is known to have a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus made by a healthcare professional prior to this care encounter
  • No

  • Diabetes mellitus Type 1

  • Diabetes mellitus Type 2

  • Diabetes mellitus of other/unspecified type

  • Unknown

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ACS/PCI Enter whether the patient is known to have a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) made by a healthcare professional prior to this care encounter
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Moderate or severe chronic kidney disease ACS/PCI Enter whether the patient is known to have a moderate or severe chronic kidney disease prior to this care encounter
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Prior stroke ACS/PCI Enter whether the patient is known to have had a stroke prior to this care encounter. More than one option can be selected
  • No

  • Ischaemic stroke

  • Haemorrhagic stroke

  • Unspecified stroke

  • Unknown

Prior myocardial infarction ACS/PCI Enter whether the patient is known to have had a myocardial infarction prior to this care encounter
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Heart failure ACS/PCI Enter whether the patient is known to have a diagnosis of heart failure made by a healthcare professional prior to this care encounter
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter ACS/PCI Enter whether the patient is known to have a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) made by a healthcare professional prior to this care encounter
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Prior percutaneous coronary intervention ACS/PCI Enter whether the patient is known to have had a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of any type (not diagnostic angiography) performed prior to this care encounter
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Prior coronary artery bypass grafting ACS/PCI Enter whether the patient is known to have had a coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed prior to this care encounter
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, Table S2.

Table 3.

Admission data variables and definitions

Variable Registry Definition and permissible values
Presenting symptoms ACS Enter the patient’s symptoms that prompted this presentation. Select the main reason for presentation
  • Chest pain/discomfort

  • Dyspnoea

  • Cardiac arrest

  • Other

  • Unknown

Cardiac arrest prior to hospital arrival ACS Enter whether the patient had a cardiac arrest prior to hospital arrival
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Symptom onset, date/time ACS Enter the date and time of symptom onset
Arrival method ACS Enter the method of current hospital arrival
  • Self-presenter

  • Ambulance from home/community

  • Transportation from another hospital

  • Already in the hospital

  • Unknown

First contact with ambulance, date/time ACS Enter the date and time of when the ambulance arrived to the patient
Hospital arrival, date/time ACS Enter the date and time when the patient arrived in the hospital
Diagnostic ECG, ST/T morphology ACS Enter the findings of the diagnostic ECG regarding the ST/T morphology. The first option that best describes the findings should be selected
  • Normal

  • ST-segment elevation

  • ST-segment depression

  • T-wave inversion

  • Other

  • Unknown

Diagnostic ECG, QRS morphology ACS Enter the findings of the diagnostic ECG regarding the QRS morphology. The first option that best describes the findings should be selected
  • Normal

  • Ventricular paced rhythm

  • Left bundle branch block (LBBB)

  • Right bundle branch block (RBBB)

  • Pathological Q wave

  • Other

  • Unknown

Diagnostic ECG, rhythm ACS Enter the findings of the diagnostic ECG regarding the rhythm. The first option that best describes the findings should be selected
  • Sinus rhythm

  • Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter

  • Ventricular tachycardia

  • Other

  • Unknown

ECG establishing need for revascularization, date/time ACS Enter the date and time of the first ECG establishing need for coronary revascularization. In cases where imminent revascularization was not indicated, enter the date and time of the first ECG (either before or after hospital arrival)
Heart rate ACS Enter the patient's heart rate (in b.p.m.)
Systolic blood pressure ACS Enter the patient's systolic blood pressure (in millimetres of mercury)
Killip class ACS Enter the patient’s Killip class at the time of hospital admission
  • Killip Class I

  • Killip Class II

  • Killip Class III

  • Killip Class IV

  • Unknown

Thrombolysis, prehospital ACS Enter whether thrombolysis therapy was initiated or administered prior to hospital arrival
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, Table S3.

Table 4.

In-hospital management data variables and definitions

Variable Registry Definition and permissible values
Troponin, elevated ACS Enter whether cardiac troponin was elevated during the hospital stay
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Troponin assay ACS Enter the assay used for analysis of cardiac troponin levels
  • Troponin T

  • Troponin I

  • High-sensitivity Troponin T

  • High-sensitivity Troponin I

  • Unknown

Haemoglobin ACS Enter the first recorded level of haemoglobin during the hospital stay (in g/L)
Creatinine ACS Enter the first recorded level of creatinine during the hospital stay (in µmol/L)
LDL cholesterol ACS Enter the first recorded level of LDL cholesterol during the hospital stay (in mmol/L). This is not necessarily fasting LDL cholesterol
Left ventricular ejection fraction, assessment method ACS Enter the method used to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during hospital stay
  • Not performed

  • Echocardiography

  • Other method

  • Unknown

Left ventricular ejection fraction ACS Enter the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured during the hospital stay by echocardiography, angiography, radionuclide, magnetic resonance imaging, or by other methods
  • ≥50%

  • 41–49%

  • 30–40%

  • <30%

  • Unknown

Coronary anatomy, assessment method ACS Enter the method used to assess the coronary anatomy during the hospital stay
  • Not performed

  • Invasive coronary angiography

  • CT coronary angiography

  • CT coronary angiography-FFR

  • Unknown

Anticoagulants, i.v. or s.c. ACS Enter whether treatment dose anticoagulant therapy was administered during the hospital stay. This should not include prophylactic low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or intra-procedural unfractionated heparin (UFH) or intra-procedural bivalirudin
  • No

  • Unfractionated heparin

  • Low molecular weight heparin

  • Fondaparinux

  • Bivalirudin

  • Other

  • Unknown

Thrombolysis, in-hospital ACS Enter whether thrombolysis therapy was initiated or administered during the hospital stay (after hospital arrival)
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Percutaneous coronary intervention ACS Enter whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed during the hospital stay or is planned after discharge
  • No

  • Yes, during hospital stay

  • Yes, planned after discharge

  • Unknown

Coronary artery bypass grafting ACS Enter whether coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was performed during the hospital stay or is planned after discharge
  • No

  • Yes, during hospital stay

  • Yes, planned after discharge

  • Unknown

Reperfusion treatment, date/time ACS Enter the date and time of the first reperfusion therapy (thrombolysis, PCI, or CABG) that was administered/performed during the hospital stay
In-hospital events, myocardial re-infarction ACS Enter whether the patient had a myocardial re-infarction during the hospital stay
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

In-hospital events, cardiogenic shock ACS Enter whether the patient had an episode of cardiogenic shock during the hospital stay
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

In-hospital events, cardiac arrest ACS Enter whether the patient had cardiac arrest during the hospital stay
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

In-hospital events, major bleeding ACS Enter whether the patient had a major bleeding event during the hospital stay. More than one option can be selected
  • No

  • Fatal bleeding

  • Intracranial haemorrhage

  • Bleeding requiring surgery

  • Bleeding requiring transfusion

  • Other major bleeding

  • Unknown

In-hospital events, new-onset atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter ACS Enter whether a new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) was made during the hospital stay for patients with no prior history of AF or AFL
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, Table S4.

Table 5.

Diagnostic coronary angiography data variables and definitions

Variable Registry Definition and permissible values
Procedure indication PCI Enter the main indication for performing the coronary angiography
  • Stable coronary syndrome

  • Unstable angina

  • NSTEMI

  • STEMI

  • Cardiac arrest with STEMI

  • Cardiac arrest without STEMI

  • Staged procedure

  • Rescue PCI

  • Risk assessment after successful thrombolysis

  • Valvular heart disease

  • Arrhythmia

  • Heart failure/cardiomyopathy

  • Post-cardiac transplantation

  • Other

  • Unknown

Procedure urgency PCI Enter the procedure urgency
  • Elective

  • Urgent

  • Emergency

  • Salvage

  • Unknown

ECG establishing need for revascularization, date/time PCI Enter the date and time of the first ECG establishing need for coronary revascularization
Killip class PCI Enter the patient’s Killip class at the time of hospital admission or during the hospital stay (prior to the procedure)
  • Killip Class I

  • Killip Class II

  • Killip Class III

  • Killip Class IV

  • Unknown

CCS angina grade PCI Enter the grade of angina pectoris according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) grading scale
  • CCS Grade I

  • CCS Grade II

  • CCS Grade III

  • CCS Grade IV

  • Unknown

Creatinine PCI Enter the most recent level of creatinine, but within the last 3 months (in µmol/L)
Circulatory support PCI Enter whether any circulatory support was used during the hospital stay prior to the procedure. More than one option can be selected
  • No

  • Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP)

  • Cardiopulmonary bypass

  • Impella

  • AutoPulse

  • Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)

  • Other

  • Unknown

Inotropes PCI Enter whether inotropic therapy was administered during the hospital stay prior to the procedure
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Arterial access PCI Enter the arterial access(es) punctured/attempted during the procedure. More than one option can be selected
  • Right radial artery

  • Left radial artery

  • Right femoral artery

  • Left femoral artery

  • Right ulnar artery

  • Left ulnar artery

  • Other

  • Unknown

Arterial access, date/time PCI Enter the date and time when the arterial access for the procedure was accomplished
Segments 1–20 PCI Enter the per cent estimate (0–29, 30–49, 50–69, 70–89, 90–99, 100%, N/A) of the most severe stenosis in Segments 1–20 as determined by coronary angiography. This does not include collateral circulation. Not applicable (N/A) may be selected when the segment is not visualized
CABG graft, type PCI Enter whether a CAGB graft is present and enter the type of the graft
  • Venous graft

  • Arterial graft

CABG graft, anastomoses segment PCI Enter the coronary segment to which the bypass graft is attached
  • Segment 1

  • Segment 20

CABG graft, lesion finding PCI Enter the per cent estimate (0–29, 30–49, 50–69, 70–89, 90–99, 100%, N/A) of the most severe stenosis in the graft selected as determined by coronary angiography. Not applicable (N/A) may be selected when the segment is not visualized
Overall finding in the native coronary arteries PCI Automatically generated overall finding in the native coronary arteries based on the responses in Segments 1–20
  • Normal/atheroma

  • 1 vessel disease, not left main coronary artery

  • 2 vessels, not left main coronary artery

  • 3 vessels, not left main coronary artery

  • Left main coronary artery + 1 vessel disease

  • Left main coronary artery + 2 vessel disease

  • Left main coronary artery + 3 vessel disease

  • Isolated left main coronary artery

  • Inconclusive assessment

Chronic total occlusion PCI Enter whether the lesion in the current segment is a chronic total occlusion (CTO)
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Chronic total occlusion, segment PCI Enter the coronary segment in which the lesion is a chronic total occlusion (CTO)
  • Segment 1

  • Segment 20

Restenosis PCI Enter whether the lesion in the current segment is a restenosis
  • No

  • Yes, lesion restenosis

  • Yes, stent restenosis

  • Unknown

Restenosis, segment PCI Enter the coronary segment in which the lesion is a restenosis
  • Segment 1

  • Segment 20

Stent thrombosis PCI Enter whether the lesion in the current segment is a stent thrombosis
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Stent thrombosis, segment PCI Enter the coronary segment in which the lesion is a stent thrombosis
  • Segment 1

  • Segment 20

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection PCI Enter whether there was a spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD)
  • No

  • Yes

  • Suspected

  • Unknown

Invasive intracoronary diagnostics PCI Enter whether any invasive intracoronary diagnostic assessment was performed before the PCI procedure
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Invasive intracoronary diagnostics, method PCI Enter what invasive intracoronary diagnostics method(s) were performed before the PCI procedure. More than one option can be selected
  • Not performed

  • Hyperaemia-based method (e.g. FFR)

  • Hyperaemia-free method (e.g. iFR, DFR, RFR)

  • Coronary flow reserve (CFR)

  • Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)

  • Optical coherence tomography (OCT)

  • Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)

  • Other

  • Unknown

Invasive intracoronary diagnostics, segment PCI Enter what segment(s) intracoronary diagnostics was performed before the PCI procedure. More than one option can be selected
  • Segment 1

  • Segment 20

Invasive intracoronary diagnostics, graft PCI Enter whether invasive intracoronary diagnostics was performed in a graft lesion before the PCI procedure
  • No

  • Venous graft

  • Arterial graft

Invasive intracoronary diagnostics, results PCI Enter the results of the lowest intracoronary physiology measurement (gradient), the minimal lumen area (mm2) as measured by intracoronary imaging methods, or maximum lipid core burden index (max LCBI4mm) for near-infrared spectroscopy before any treatment interventions
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors PCI Enter whether Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors was administered during the procedure
  • No

  • Abciximab

  • Eptifibatide

  • Tirofiban

  • Unknown

Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, Table S5.

Table 6.

Percutaneous coronary intervention and events data variables and definitions

Variable Registry Definition and permissible values
PCI attempted PCI Enter whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was attempted
  • No

  • Yes

Passage of wire, date/time PCI Enter the date and time when the first guidewire successfully crossed the culprit lesion, not the date when flow was restored
Segment attempted PCI Enter the segment attempted during PCI
  • Segment 1

  • Segment 20

Graft attempted PCI Enter whether a graft lesion was attempted during PCI
  • No

  • Venous graft

  • Arterial graft

Type of PCI attempt PCI Enter the type of the procedure performed. More than one option can be selected
  • Plain balloon

  • Drug-eluting balloon

  • Stent

Drug-eluting balloon, type PCI Enter the drug-eluting balloon that was used in the specific segment. (Device names of drug-eluting balloons used in the specific country)
Drug-eluting balloon, diameter PCI Enter the diameter of the drug-eluting balloon. Nominal diameter (in mm) of the drug-eluting balloon that is used should be entered
Stent, type PCI Enter the stent that was used in the specific segment. (Device names of stents used in the specific country)
Stent, diameter PCI Enter the diameter of the stent. Nominal diameter (in mm) of the stent balloon should be entered
Stent, length PCI Enter the length of the stent (in mm)
Adjuvant therapies/equipment PCI Enter if any adjuvant therapies were used during the procedure. More than one option can be selected
  • No

  • Rotablation

  • Orbital atherectomy

  • Lithotripsy

  • Laser

  • Thrombectomy

  • Distal protection device

  • Other

  • Unknown

Lesion success PCI Enter whether the attempted lesion was successfully treated
  • No

  • Yes

TIMI flow, prior to PCI PCI Enter the TIMI flow prior to the PCI procedure
  • TIMI 0

  • TIMI I

  • TIMI II

  • TIMI III

  • Unknown

TIMI flow, after PCI PCI Enter the TIMI flow after the PCI procedure
  • TIMI 0

  • TIMI I

  • TIMI II

  • TIMI III

  • Unknown

Complete revascularization PCI Enter whether a complete revascularization was achieved by the end of the current procedure
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Additional PCI procedures planned PCI Enter whether any additional PCI procedure(s) is planned (either during this hospital stay or after discharge)
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Peri-procedural events PCI Enter whether any events occurred during the procedure. More than one option can be selected
  • No

  • Procedure-related myocardial infarction

  • Vascular access complication

  • Side branch occlusion

  • Coronary perforation

  • Coronary dissection persisting at the end of the procedure

  • Brady-arrhythmia requiring pacing

  • Arrhythmia requiring DC cardioversion

  • Cardiogenic shock

  • Cardiac tamponade

  • Acute surgical intervention from cath lab

  • Stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA)

  • Death

  • Other

  • Unknown

Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, Table S6.

Table 7.

Discharge management data variables and definitions

Variable Registry Definition and permissible values
Hospital discharge, date ACS Enter the date when the patient was discharged from the hospital or died during this hospital stay
In-hospital death ACS Enter whether the patient died during the hospital stay
  • No

  • Yes

Final diagnosis at discharge ACS Enter the final diagnosis at discharge
  • Unstable angina

  • NSTEMI

  • STEMI

  • Other (including no diagnosis of ACS)

Final diagnosis at discharge, ICD-10 code ACS Enter the main final diagnosis at discharge according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10 standard.
  • I20.0 Unstable angina

  • I21.0 Acute transmural myocardial infarction of the anterior wall

  • I21.1 Acute transmural myocardial infarction of the inferior wall

  • I21.2 Acute transmural myocardial infarction of other sites

  • I21.3 Acute transmural myocardial infarction of the unspecified site

  • I21.4 Acute subendocardial myocardial infarction

  • I21.9 Acute myocardial infarction, unspecified

  • I22.0 Subsequent myocardial infarction of the anterior wall

  • I22.1 Subsequent myocardial infarction of the inferior wall

  • I22.8 Subsequent myocardial infarction of other sites

  • I22.9 Subsequent myocardial infarction of the unspecified site

Aspirin at discharge ACS Enter whether the patient was discharged on acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin)
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

P2Y12 inhibitors at discharge ACS Enter whether the patient was discharged on P2Y12 inhibitors
  • No

  • Clopidogrel

  • Prasugrel

  • Ticagrelor

  • Other

  • Unknown

Oral anticoagulants at discharge ACS Enter whether the patient was discharged on oral anticoagulants. Vitamin K antagonists include warfarin
  • No

  • Vitamin K antagonist

  • Dabigatran

  • Rivaroxaban

  • Apixaban

  • Edoxaban

  • Other

  • Unknown

Beta-blockers at discharge ACS Enter whether the patient was discharged on beta-blockers
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at discharge ACS Enter whether the patient was discharged on angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. For combination drugs, enter details about both drug classes
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Angiotensin II receptor blocker at discharge ACS Enter whether the patient was discharged on angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB). For combination drugs (except angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors), enter details about both drug classes
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor at discharge ACS Enter whether the patient was discharged on angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI)
  • No

  • Sacubitril/Valsartan

  • Unknown

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist at discharge ACS Enter whether the patient was discharged on mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA)
  • No

  • Spironolactone

  • Eplerenone

  • Other

  • Unknown

Lipid-lowering treatment at discharge ACS Enter whether the patient was discharged on lipid-lowering treatment. More than one option can be selected
  • No

  • Statins

  • Ezetimibe

  • Fibrates

  • PCSK9 inhibitors

  • Other

  • Unknown

Diuretics at discharge ACS Enter whether the patient was discharged on diuretics. For combination drugs, enter details about both drug classes. More than one option can be selected
  • No

  • Loop diuretics

  • Thiazide diuretics

  • Unknown

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors at discharge ACS Enter whether the patient was discharged on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. For combination drugs, enter details about both drug classes
  • No

  • Yes

  • Unknown

Oral/subcutaneous antidiabetics at discharge ACS Enter whether the patient was discharged on oral or subcutaneous antidiabetic medications. More than one option can be selected. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors are entered separately
  • No

  • Insulin

  • Metformin

  • Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue

  • Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor

  • Sulfonylurea

  • Repaglinide

  • Thiazolidinedione

  • Alpha-glucosidase inhibitor

  • Other

  • Unknown

Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, Table S7.

Demographics

There are seven ‘mandatory’ variables in this section, all of which are common between the ACS and PCI data standards (Table 1). The section will be replicated in the other EuroHeart clinical domains so that time-independent patient information (e.g. date of birth) may be collected once and applied to all subsequent episodes of care. This section allows the use of permanent unique personal identification numbers to identify patients.20 When matching the identification number with other data sources, information such as forename, surname, sex, and postal code may be extracted automatically. The EuroHeart IT platform will generate unique patient identifiers for those countries that do not use them, which once assigned may not be changed or reassigned to other patients. Each patient’s geolocation is collected as their current residential postal code.

Patient characteristics and comorbidities

The patient characteristics and comorbidities section comprises 13 ‘mandatory’ variables collecting comorbidities relevant to ACS and/or PCI (Table 2). The choice of comorbidities was prioritized according to what the Working Group perceived to be information available in an average medical case record. Many of the variables are also relevant when characterizing the patient’s risk and are essential when reporting underlying medical history in observational and randomized trials, when understanding trends in quality improvement, and when assessing treatment strategies.

Admission

Table 3 depicts the ‘mandatory’ variables for the admission section. Information about care time points can be difficult to collect but is important given it is used for the derivation of quality indicators.7,8 Medications at the time of admission form ‘additional’ variables and are defined in Supplementary material online, Table S10.

In-hospital management

This section collects information concerning investigations, treatments, and events occurring in-hospital (Table 4). Laboratory results for diagnosis (e.g. cardiac biomarkers), risk stratification (e.g. serum creatinine), and risk factors modification (e.g. low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) are ‘mandatory’ variables.7,8,18 Laboratory results for specific situations or subgroups (e.g. N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein, cholesterol, glucose, and haemoglobin A1c) are ‘additional’ variables and are detailed in Supplementary material online, Table S11. The 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of ACSs in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation recommends the assessment of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during the hospital stay, and thus forms a ‘mandatory’ variable.7 Categorization of LVEF aligns with the 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure.21 Given that reperfusion is the cornerstone for the management of patients with ACS, five ‘mandatory’ variables are dedicated to the evaluation of the coronary artery anatomy and reperfusion strategy.7,8

Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention

This section has two parts. The first part captures information about invasive coronary angiography (ICA) (Table 5) and includes an interactive diagram of the coronary tree (Figure 2). It provides a solution for the fact that there are international differences in the extent of information recorded in registries (e.g. all ICA procedures in Sweden14 vs. all PCI procedures in the UK16). Equally, the Data Science Group reviewed coronary anatomy visualization tools including the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularisation Investigation (BARI) and the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) schemes describing coronary anatomy.22,23 The consensus of the Working Group was to adopt a simplified 20-segment system adapted from the SWEDEHEART registry, which enables interactive reporting of stenoses found in major coronary arteries (Figure 2).14

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The EuroHeart IT platform and the EuroHeart-percutaneous coronary intervention coronary artery segments.

The second part captures information about the procedural indication, urgency, findings, and complications (Table 6). It collects information such as date, time, and type of the arterial access, given the use of radial access is recommended as a quality indicator in the 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of ACSs in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation.7 In addition, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grades before and following the procedure, and intracoronary equipment and devices used are captured in this section.

Discharge

This section collects information about the final ACS diagnosis and medications prescribed at the time of discharge from the hospital (Table 7). The final diagnosis includes ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and unstable angina [with accompanying World Health Organisations (WHO) standardized International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes]. Medication information includes Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes and drug dosages as ‘additional’ variables (Supplementary material online, Table S14).

Discussion

The adoption of harmonized data collections is central for the continuous improvement of cardiovascular care.24 The lack of internationally recognized data standards has led to large inequalities in monitoring and standards of care within and between European countries and also resulted in expensive and inefficiently coordinated and delivered studies of cardiovascular treatments.25 Currently, there are no contemporary pan-European data standards for ACS and PCI. The EuroHeart project of the ESC, by means of a structured methodology, has defined a catalogue of data standards for ACS and PCI, which will be implemented into a bespoke IT platform to facilitate harmonized country-level quality improvement, international observational and registry-based randomized research, and post-marketing surveillance of devices and pharmacotherapies.

The existing European national cardiovascular registries comprise distinct and discordant entities with differing data variables and definitions.26 This substantially limits their usability in collaborative large-scale studies. Data standards and case report forms presented by CARDS, the EURObservational Research Programme (EORP), and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) have been used in national registries and in clinical trials,11,27,28 but differ in their data variables and definitions. Furthermore, no previous international cardiovascular data standards initiative has provided the means by which data may be efficiently collected in ‘real-world’ settings. Moreover, the ACC/AHA data standards for coronary artery disease and PCI contain over 300 variables that make it difficult to implement in a pragmatic registry.28,29 In contrast, the EuroHeart data standards presented in this article have a restricted number of mandatory ACS/PCI variables, bolted onto an IT platform for effective data collection.

After years of steady decline, the reduction of mortality rates post-myocardial infarction has plateaued in many countries; cardiovascular disease remains the main cause of death worldwide and its burden is increasing in low- to middle-income economies.30 The standardized collection of cardiovascular data and the understanding of how to use observational and randomized data in cardiovascular medicine is a clear unmet need and an important next step towards defining variation in cardiovascular care and facilitating continuous quality improvement.4 The emergence of new devices and drugs for the management of cardiovascular disease provides opportunities for improved outcomes but requires post-marketing surveillance. In addition, the growing complexity and financial burden of traditional randomized controlled trials create a need to develop innovative ways to conduct high-quality, yet cost-effective research. National registries which implement uniform data standards will facilitate rapid and efficient post-marketing surveillance of device therapies and pragmatic R-RCT with pooled data from multiple geographical locations.6

Since 2021, the EuroHeart IT platform collects all ‘mandatory’ variables and supports the development of ‘additional’ variables in participating countries. Furthermore, the EuroHeart IT infrastructure includes applications for clinical reporting in the local healthcare system and provides tools for observational research, R-RCTs, and post-marketing surveillance of drugs and devices. Patient data are collected continuously in the healthcare system on a country level, and the national or regional registry centres are responsible for the storage and data protection according to the existing legal framework. Signed informed consent will not be required for data collection for quality development in most countries. For planned reports presenting the standards of care in different countries participating in EuroHeart, only deidentified and aggregated data will be shared by the participating registries/countries. Thus, for the collaboration on the development of quality of care, no individual patient-level data will be transferred outside the local country/region. However, for prospective research projects, such as R-RCTs or drug and device monitoring, informed consent from participants’ will be required as for any clinical trial. In these cases, selected anonymized individual study data may be transferred for analysis to a central repository according to clinical trial protocols. Finally, as part of mutually agreed international epidemiological research projects and based on ethical and regulatory approval, anonymized retrospective registry cohorts may be transferred to a central repository for pre-defined statistical analysis. In all cases, the national/regional registry parties are responsible for defining the legal framework applicable to their participation in EuroHeart and its various features, and for ensuring that they do not violate either local or international law.

We recognize the limitations of the EuroHeart data standards development process. This includes the use of expert opinion (which may be biased) for the selection of the final data variables and definitions from those identified in the literature review. However, the EuroHeart ACS and PCI data standards were developed using a structured and recognized methodology for selecting the expert panel and for obtaining their opining and feedback. Likewise, the inclusiveness of the Working Group, which comprised experts from many European countries, provided a robustness and transparent framework for the development of the variables and definitions. Despite the data standards being reviewed by the ESC Patient Forum, future Working Groups may benefit from the inclusion of patients and wider members of the multidisciplinary team for ACS and PCI such as nurses and pharmacists. Of note, the data standards proposed in this document are based on the evidence available at the time of development. Accordingly, updates may be required as more and new knowledge becomes available.

Conclusions

This document presents the first set of data standards, developed as part of the EuroHeart project, which aims to harmonize data variables and definitions across common cardiovascular domains. In total, 68 and 84 ‘mandatory’ variables for ACS and PCI domains have been proposed, respectively. Also, several ‘additional’ variables have been defined. Once fully adopted into the EuroHeart IT platform, the data standards will facilitate country-level quality improvement, observational and registry-based randomized research, and post-marketing surveillance of new devices and pharmacotherapies.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at European Heart Journal online.

Supplementary Material

ehac133_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgements

We thank the members of the ACS/PCI Working Group for their expertise when developing the ACS and PCI data standards; Joakim Alfredsson (Sweden), Branko Beleslin (Serbia), Mark de Belder (UK), Ana Djordjevic-Dikic (Serbia), Jorge Ferreira (Portugal), Sudhakar George (UK), Claes Held (Sweden), Alar Irs (Estonia), András Jánosi (Hungary), Zumreta Kušljugić (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Sílvia Monteiro (Portugal), Belma Pojskić (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Svein Rotevatn (Norway), Andrea Rubboli (Italy), Rui Teles (Portugal), José María de la Torre Hernández (Spain), Cristian Udroiu (Romania), Clive Weston (UK), and Troels Yndigegn (Sweden). We also thank Adrian Banning (UK), Scot Garg (UK), David Hildick-Smith (UK), Tim Kinnaird (UK), and Rod Stables (UK) for their support and expertise during the development of the ACS and PCI data standards. We thank Catherine Reynolds (EuroHeart Project Manager, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK), Ebba Bergman and Lan Vu Thi (EuroHeart Project Managers, Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala, Sweden) for their support and contribution to the EuroHeart project. We thank Ida Björkgren (Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala, Sweden) for the editorial support.

Appendix

Data Science Group: Suleman Aktaa (UK), Gorav Batra (Sweden), Chris P. Gale (UK).

Working Group: Joakim Alfredsson (Sweden), Branko Beleslin (Serbia), Mark de Belder (UK), Ana Djordjevic-Dikic (Serbia), David Erlinge (Sweden), Jorge Ferreira (Portugal), Sudhakar George (UK), Claes Held (Sweden), Alar Irs (Estonia), András Jánosi (Hungary), Zumreta Kušljugić (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Peter Ludman (UK), Sílvia Monteiro (Portugal), Belma Pojskić (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Svein Rotevatn (Norway), Andrea Rubboli (Italy), Rui Teles (Portugal), José María de la Torre Hernández (Spain), Cristian Udroiu (Romania), Lars Wallentin (Sweden), Clive Weston (UK), Troels Yndigegn (Sweden).

In collaboration with: The Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP), Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), EURObservational Research Programme (EORP), ESC Patient Forum, ESC Working Group on Thrombosis, and the ESC Committee for Young Cardiovascular Professionals have endorsed and were involved in the review of the EuroHeart ACS/PCI data standards.

Contributor Information

Gorav Batra, Department of Medical Sciences Cardiology and Uppsala Clinical Research Center Uppsala University  Uppsala  Sweden.

Suleman Aktaa, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine University of Leeds  Leeds  UK; Leeds Institute for Data Analytics University of Leeds  Leeds  UK; Department of Cardiology Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust  Leeds  UK.

Lars Wallentin, Department of Medical Sciences Cardiology and Uppsala Clinical Research Center Uppsala University  Uppsala  Sweden.

Aldo P Maggioni, Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists Research Center (ANMCO)  Florence  Italy.

Peter Ludman, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham  Birmingham  UK.

David Erlinge, Department of Cardiology Skåne University Hospital Lund University  Lund  Sweden.

Barbara Casadei, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre University of Oxford  Oxford  UK.

Chris P Gale, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine University of Leeds  Leeds  UK; Leeds Institute for Data Analytics University of Leeds  Leeds  UK; Department of Cardiology Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust  Leeds  UK.

Funding

This work was supported by the European Society of Cardiology.

Conflict of interest: G.B. has nothing to declare with respect to this manuscript. Outside this work, G.B. has received lecture/speaker fees from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim; expert committee fees from Novo Nordisk. S.A. and P.L. have nothing to declare. L.W. has nothing to declare with respect to this manuscript. Outside this work, L.W. reports institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck&Co, and Roche Diagnostics; consulting fees from Abbott. A.P.M. has nothing to declare with respect to this manuscript. Outside this work, A.P.M. received personal fees for participation in committees of studies sponsored by Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Fresenius, Novartis. D.E. has nothing to declare with respect to this manuscript. Outside this work, D.E. reports speaker and advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Chiesi. B.C. has nothing to declare with respect to this manuscript. Outside this work, B.C. has received in kind support from Roche Diagnostics and iRhythm for clinical studies of atrial fibrillation. C.P.G. has nothing to declare with respect to this manuscript. Outside this work, C.P.G. has received grants from Abbott and BMS; honoraria for lectures and scientific advice from Amgen and AstraZeneca.

References

  • 1. Gregson  J, Stone  GW, Ben-Yehuda  O, Redfors  B, Kandzari  DE, Morice  M-C, et al.  Implications of alternative definitions of peri-procedural myocardial infarction after coronary revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol  2020;76:1609–1621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Fröbert  O, Lagerqvist  B, Olivecrona  GK, Omerovic  E, Gudnason  T, Maeng  M, et al.  Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med  2013;369:1587–1597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Erlinge  D, Omerovic  E, Fröbert  O, Linder  R, Danielewicz  M, Hamid  M, et al.  Bivalirudin versus heparin monotherapy in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med  2017;377:1132–1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bowman  L, Baras  A, Bombien  R, Califf  RM, Chen  Z, Gale  CP, et al.  Understanding the use of observational and randomized data in cardiovascular medicine. Eur Heart J  2020;41:2571–2578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Rapsomaniki  E, Thuresson  M, Yang  E, Blin  P, Hunt  P, Chung  S-C, et al.  Using big data from health records from four countries to evaluate chronic disease outcomes: a study in 114 364 survivors of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes  2016;2:172–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. James  S, Rao  SV, Granger  CB. Registry-based randomized clinical trials—a new clinical trial paradigm. Nat Rev Cardiol  2015;12:312–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Collet  J-P, Thiele  H, Barbato  E, Barthélémy  O, Bauersachs  J, Bhatt  DL, et al.  2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J  2020;42:1289–1367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ibanez  B, James  S, Agewall  S, Antunes  MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci  C, Bueno  H, et al.  2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J  2017;39:119–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Aktaa  S, Batra  G, Wallentin  L, Baigent  C, Erlinge  D, James  S, et al.  European Society of Cardiology methodology for the development of quality indicators for the quantification of cardiovascular care and outcomes. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes  2022;8:4–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Schiele  F, Aktaa  S, Rossello  X, Ahrens  I, Claeys  MJ, Collet  J-P, et al.  2020 Update of the quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction: a position paper of the Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care: the study group for quality indicators from the ACVC and the NSTE-ACS guideline group. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care  2021;10:224–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Flynn  MR, Barrett  C, Cosío  FG, Gitt  AK, Wallentin  L, Kearney  P, et al.  The Cardiology Audit and Registration Data Standards (CARDS), European data standards for clinical cardiology practice. Eur Heart J  2005;26:308–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Wallentin  L, Gale  CP, Maggioni  A, Bardinet  I, Casadei  B. EuroHeart: European unified registries on heart care evaluation and randomized trials. Eur Heart J  2019;40:2745–2749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Batra  G, Aktaa  S, Wallentin  L, Maggioni  AP, Wilkinson  C, Casadei  B, et al.  Methodology for the development of international clinical data standards for common cardiovascular conditions: European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomised Trials (EuroHeart). Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes; 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Jernberg  T, Attebring  MF, Hambraeus  K, Ivert  T, James  S, Jeppsson  A, et al.  The Swedish web-system for enhancement and development of evidence-based care in heart disease evaluated according to recommended therapies (SWEDEHEART). Heart  2010;96:1617–1621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wilkinson  C, Weston  C, Timmis  A, Quinn  T, Keys  A, Gale  CP. The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP). Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes  2020;6:19–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ludman  PF. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Registry for audit and quality assessment of percutaneous coronary interventions in the United Kingdom. Heart  2011;97:1293–1297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Messenger  JC, Ho  KKL, Young  CH, Slattery  LE, Draoui  JC, Curtis  JP, et al.  The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) data quality brief: the NCDR data quality program in 2012. J Am Coll Cardiol  2012;60:1484–1488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Thygesen  K, Alpert  JS, Jaffe  AS, Chaitman  BR, Bax  JJ, Morrow  DA, et al.  Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J  2018;40:237–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kastrati  A, Banning  AP, Koller  A, Alfonso  F, Banning  AP, Benedetto  U, et al.  2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J  2018;40:87–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Mills  S, Lee  JK, Rassekh  BM, Zorko Kodelja  M, Bae  G  Kang  M, et al.  Unique health identifiers for universal health coverage. J Heal Popul Nutr  2019;38:22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. McDonagh  TA, Metra  M, Adamo  M, Gardner  RS, Baumbach  A, Böhm  M, et al.  2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J  2021;42:3599–3726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Rogers  WJ, Alderman  EL, Chaitman  BR, DiSciascio  G, Horan  M, Lytle  B, et al.  Bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI): baseline clinical and angiographic data. Am J Cardiol  1995;75:9C–17C. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. CASS Principal Investigators and Their Associates . Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation  1983;68:939–950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Benjamin  EJ, Blaha  MJ, Chiuve  SE, Cushman  M, Das  SR, Deo  R, et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics—2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation  2017;135:e146–e603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Scherer  FM. The pharmaceutical industry—prices and progress. N Engl J Med  2004;351:927–932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Widimsky  P, Wijns  W, Fajadet  J, de Belder  M, Knot  J, Aaberge  L, et al.  Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in Europe: description of the current situation in 30 countries. Eur Heart J  2010;31:943–957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Zeymer  U, Ludman  P, Danchin  N, Kala  P, Maggioni  AP, Weidinger  F. Background and design of the ACCA–EAPCI registry on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care  2018;8:63–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Cannon  CP, Brindis  RG, Chaitman  BR, Cohen  DJ, Cross  JT, Drozda  JP, et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes and coronary artery disease. Circulation  2013;127:1052–1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Dehmer  GJ, Badhwar  V, Bermudez  EA., Cleveland  JC, Cohen  MG, D’Agostino  RS, et al.  2020 AHA/ACC key data elements and definitions for coronary revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Clinical Data Standards for Corona. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes  2020;13:e000059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Timmis  A, Townsend  N, Gale  CP, Torbica  A, Lettino  M, Petersen  SE, et al.  European Society of Cardiology: Cardiovascular disease statistics 2019. Eur Heart J  2020;41:12–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ehac133_Supplementary_Data

Articles from European Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES