Abstract
Aims
Adverse cardiovascular events have day/night patterns with peaks in the morning, potentially related to endogenous circadian clock control of platelet activation. Circadian nuclear receptor Rev-erbα is an essential and negative component of the circadian clock. To date, the expression profile and biological function of Rev-erbα in platelets have never been reported.
Methods and results
Here, we report the presence and functions of circadian nuclear receptor Rev-erbα in human and mouse platelets. Both human and mouse platelet Rev-erbα showed a circadian rhythm that positively correlated with platelet aggregation. Global Rev-erbα knockout and platelet-specific Rev-erbα knockout mice exhibited defective in haemostasis as assessed by prolonged tail-bleeding times. Rev-erbα deletion also reduced ferric chloride-induced carotid arterial occlusive thrombosis, prevented collagen/epinephrine-induced pulmonary thromboembolism, and protected against microvascular microthrombi obstruction and infarct expansion in an acute myocardial infarction model. In vitro thrombus formation assessed by CD41-labelled platelet fluorescence intensity was significantly reduced in Rev-erbα knockout mouse blood. Platelets from Rev-erbα knockout mice exhibited impaired agonist-induced aggregation responses, integrin αIIbβ3 activation, and α-granule release. Consistently, pharmacological inhibition of Rev-erbα by specific antagonists decreased platelet activation markers in both mouse and human platelets. Mechanistically, mass spectrometry and co-immunoprecipitation analyses revealed that Rev-erbα potentiated platelet activation via oligophrenin-1-mediated RhoA/ERM (ezrin/radixin/moesin) pathway.
Conclusion
We provided the first evidence that circadian protein Rev-erbα is functionally expressed in platelets and potentiates platelet activation and thrombus formation. Rev-erbα may serve as a novel therapeutic target for managing thrombosis-based cardiovascular disease.
Key question
Adverse cardiovascular events have day/night patterns with peaks in the morning, potentially related to endogenous circadian clock control of platelet activation. Whether circadian nuclear receptor Rev-erba is present in platelets and regulates platelet function remains unknown.
Key finding
We provide the first evidence that Rev-erba is functionally expressed in platelets and acts as a positive regulator of platelet activation/thrombus formation through the oligophrenin-1-mediated RhoA/ERM signalling pathway.
Take home message
Our observations highlight the importance of circadian clock machinery in platelet physiology and support the notion that Rev-erba may serve as a novel therapeutic target for managing thrombosis-based cardiovascular diseases.
Keywords: Circadian, Rev-erbα, Blood platelets, Platelet activation, Thrombosis
Structured Graphical Abstract
See the editorial comment for this article ‘Chrono-pharmacology-based antiplatelet therapy for acute myocardial infarction’, by Simon Tual-Chalot and Konstantinos Stellos, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac120.
Translational Perspective.
Adverse cardio-cerebrovascular thrombotic events have day/night patterns with peaks in the morning, potentially related to endogenous circadian clock control of platelet activation. Our study identified circadian nuclear receptor Rev-erbα as a new functional protein being expressed in both human and mouse platelets and exhibiting a circadian rhythm that positively correlated with platelet aggregation. Rev-erbα was significantly upregulated in platelets from acute myocardial infarction patients, with a peak at early morning. Pharmacological inhibition or genetic ablation of Rev-erbα decreases platelet activation and thrombus formation in various thrombosis models. Consistent results of antiplatelet actions were obtained by Rev-erbα-specific antagonists in human platelets. Thus, Rev-erbα may serve as a novel therapeutic target for managing thrombosis-based cardiovascular diseases.
Introduction
Platelets, which are derived from megakaryocytes, are anucleate blood cells that physiologically contribute to haemostasis at sites of vascular injury.1 However, the pathological activation of platelets triggers occlusive thrombosis and results in ischaemic events, such as myocardial infarction and stroke, which are the leading causes of death globally. Such adverse cardiovascular events follow the day/night pattern with a peak in the early morning, potentially related to endogenous circadian clock control of platelet activation.2,3 Multiple measures of platelet activation show strong time-of-day variation, including platelet aggregation and platelet activation markers [i.e. β-thromboglobulin (βTG), platelet factor 4 (PF4), glycoprotein Ib (GPIb), P-selectin, and activated αIIbβ3], which also peak in the early morning at ∼9 a.m.4–6
The circadian clock is a ubiquitous endogenous timing system sustaining circadian oscillation that coordinates physiological processes. Circadian nuclear receptor Rev-erbα (also known as nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D member 1; NR1D1) is a unique member of the nuclear receptor superfamily that was originally cloned in pituitary tissue recognized as a key clock component that provided a feedback loop to consolidate the rhythms of circadian oscillators.7 Recently, several new functions of Rev-erbα beyond its roles in circadian rhythm were identified, and implied in the pathogenesis of various disorders, such as neoplastic diseases,8 inflammatory diseases,9 and cardiometabolic diseases.10,11 To date, the expression profile and biological function of circadian nuclear receptor Rev-erbα in platelets have never been reported.
In this study, we aim to investigate whether Rev-erbα is expressed by platelets and regulates platelet function. We report our findings that platelet-expressed Rev-erbα displays a circadian rhythm that positively correlates with platelet aggregation. Moreover, Rev-erbα acts as a positive regulator of platelet activation and thrombus formation by regulating oligophrenin-1 (OPHN-1)-mediated RhoA/ERM (ezrin/radixin/moesin) signalling pathway.
Methods
Human studies
All human samples used in this study were processed under Institutional Review Board–approved protocols at Shanghai Jiao Tong University. All study participants were recruited after providing informed consent and with approval by the Ethics Committee of Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and the study was conducted according to the criteria set by the Declaration of Helsinki (2013).
To test the presence of Rev-erbα in human platelets, positive controls including human brain, kidney, and liver samples were obtained from fresh surgical specimens removed for brain, kidney, and liver neoplasia. Normal tissues were collected at least 2 cm away from tumour tissues and were residual tissues that would otherwise have been discarded. Tissues were immediately frozen and stored at −80°C until they were used for analysis. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients before tissue harvest.
To examine the diurnal oscillation of Rev-erbα expression in human platelets, we performed two sets of studies. The first series of studies was conducted among six male and six female healthy volunteers. To avoid potential interference from other confounding factors, we only included volunteers who: (i) aged 20–35 years; (ii) were non-smokers and teetotallers; (iii) had not taken antiplatelet/anticoagulant drugs or other medications in the previous 2 weeks; and (iv) had normal sleep/wake rhythm and none of them had travelled between time zones 3 months before the study.12 On the day before the study, subjects were admitted to the Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center of Renji Hospital. Blood samples were drawn without stasis from an antecubital vein via indwelling needles. Washed human platelets and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) were prepared as described in the Supplementary material online.
The second series of studies was conducted in 12 male and 8 female patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). ST-elevation myocardial infarction was defined as a clinical syndrome of myocardial ischaemia in association with persistent ECG ST-segment elevations (≥2 mm in two contiguous precordial leads or ≥1 mm in two peripheral leads).13 To avoid possible interference by other confounding factors, we included patients with first episodes of acute anterior myocardial infarction and in the age range of 50–65 years, and excluded patients if they had: (i) known hypertension, heart failure, structural heart disease, acute pericardial disease, aorta dissection, and diabetes mellitus; and (ii) any history of severe renal or hepatic dysfunction, haematological disorders, infectious disease, autoimmune disease, neurological disease, and cancer. During the same period, healthy donors matched with age and sex were recruited as controls under a separate Institutional Review Board protocol.
Animal studies
All animal experiments were conducted in compliance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines on the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication, 8th Edition, 2011), with approval by the Animal Ethics Committee of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. All mice were housed at 24 ± 2°C and 40 ± 5% humidity under a 12-h light/dark cycle with access to diet and water ad libitum. Both male and female mice, aged 8–12-week-old, were used in this study.
C57BL/6J wild type (WT) mice were from Jackson Laboratory. Global Rev-erbα knockout (Rev-erbα−/−) mice on a C57BL/6J background were kindly provided by Dr Ueli Schibler (University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland).14 The littermate Rev-erbα+/+ mice were used as controls. To generate platelet-specific Rev-erbα knockout (Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre+) mice, Rev-erbαfl/fl mice were crossed with the mice carrying the PF4Cre transgene (Jackson Laboratory). The littermate Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre− mice were used as controls. The blood samples were collected from the abdominal aorta as described in the Supplementary material online.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Data normality were determined by the Shapiro–Wilk test. When comparing two sets of data, Student's t-test (parametric data) or Mann–Whitney U-test (nonparametric data) were used. Multiple group comparisons were performed by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's, Dunnett's, or Bonferroni's multiple comparisons. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed by the GraphPad Prism 8 software.
Detailed materials and methods are presented in the Supplementary material online.
Results
Rev-erbα is present in human platelets
To our knowledge, the presence of circadian nuclear receptor Rev-erb (including two isoforms: Rev-erbα and Rev-erbβ) in platelets has never been reported. To test the presence of Rev-erbα in platelets, we performed quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and western blotting on total mRNA and protein, obtained from human platelets. The human brain, kidney, and liver samples served as positive controls.15 As shown in Figure 1A, Rev-erbα mRNA was detected in human platelets. Immunoblotting confirmed the presence of a Rev-erbα protein band at ∼78 kDa in positive controls (human brain, kidney, and liver samples), as well as in human platelets (Figure 1B). This 78 kDa band disappeared on preincubation of the antibody with its immunogenic peptide in human platelets, indicating the specificity of the reaction (Figure 1C). The localization of Rev-erbα in human platelets was further analysed by in situ immunofluorescence microscopy. In resting platelets, Rev-erbα was found to be dispersed throughout the platelet cytoplasm in a punctate arrangement. While in response to physiological platelet agonists (i.e. U46619, a thromboxane A2 receptor agonist), the localization of Rev-erbα appeared to partially translocate towards the plasma membrane (Figure 1D). We did not observe gender differences in the expression of Rev-erbα in human platelets (Supplementary material online, Figure S1A). Additionally, we detected the presence of the Rev-erbβ subtype in human platelets (Supplementary material online, Figure S2A and B).
The diurnal oscillation of platelet Rev-erbα is associated with the circadian variation in platelet aggregation
Because Rev-erbα protein is an integral component of the circadian rhythm system,16 we further examined the diurnal oscillation of platelet Rev-erbα expression throughout the day. Importantly, human platelet Rev-erbα expression followed a circadian rhythm-dependent pattern, with a peak corresponding to clock time 9 a.m. (Figure 1E and F). To investigate whether the diurnal oscillation of platelet Rev-erbα expression is implicated in the circadian rhythm of platelet activation, agonist-induced platelet aggregation responses were examined. A similar circadian variation in platelet activation (agonist-induced aggregation responses, Figure 1G) and thrombus propensity (in vitro thrombus formation assay, Figure 1H) was observed in human platelets, with a peak at 9 a.m. In contrast to that of Rev-erbα, Rev-erbβ expression did not show obvious circadian rhythm-dependent patterns in human platelets (Supplementary material online, Figure S2C). Thus, although both Rev-erbα and Rev-erbβ subtypes are present in human platelets, only Rev-erbα expression displays circadian variation.
Adverse cardiovascular events (i.e. acute myocardial infarction) have day/night patterns with peaks in the morning, potentially related to endogenous circadian clock control of platelet activation.6,17 Thus, we further determined the expression of Rev-erbα in patients with acute STEMI. As shown in Figure 1I and J, Rev-erbα was significantly upregulated in platelets from acute STEMI patients, with the peak at early morning. No gender differences were observed in the diurnal oscillation pattern of Rev-erbα expression in human platelets (Supplementary material online, Figure S1B and C). Together, these data indicate that human platelet Rev-erbα shows a circadian rhythm that positively correlates with platelet aggregation.
Rev-erbα is present in mouse platelets
We further determined the expression profile of circadian nuclear receptor Rev-erbα in mouse platelets. As shown in Figure 2A and B, Rev-erbα mRNA and protein were detected in mouse platelets. The Rev-erbα protein appeared at an expected molecular weight of ∼78 kDa in platelets obtained from mice, but was not detected in platelets obtained from Rev-erbα-deficient mice (Figure 2C). In situ immunofluorescence confirmed the presence of Rev-erbα in mouse platelets. Similar to the human platelets, Rev-erbα was found to be dispersed throughout the platelet cytoplasm in a punctate arrangement in resting mouse platelets, and appeared to partially translocate towards the plasma membrane upon stimulation by agonists (Figure 2D).
Next, we examined the diurnal oscillation of Rev-erb expression in mouse platelets throughout the day by qRT-PCR and western blotting (Supplementary material online, Figure S3A and Figure 2E). For mice, we used zeitgeber time (ZT), which is a standardized 24-h notation of the phase in an entrained circadian cycle.18 The Rev-erbα expression followed a circadian rhythm-dependent pattern in mouse platelets, with a peak at ZT4 and a trough at ZT16. We did not observe gender differences in Rev-erbα expression and circadian variation in mouse platelets (Supplementary material online, Figure S1D and E). Platelets are anucleate cells derived from megakaryocytes.19 Thus, we examined Rev-erbα expression in mouse megakaryocytes. We did not observe gender differences in Rev-erbα expression in mouse megakaryocytes (Supplementary material online, Figure S1F). We further examined the diurnal oscillation of Rev-erbα expression in mouse megakaryocytes throughout the day (Supplementary material online, Figure S3B and Figure 2F). Similarly, Rev-erbα expression demonstrated a diurnal oscillation in mouse megakaryocytes. Moreover, a day/night fluctuation in the platelet aggregation rates and in vitro thrombus propensity was also observed in mice, with a peak at ZT4 (Figure 2G and H). Deletion of Rev-erbα impaired the diurnal oscillation of platelet aggregation and thrombus propensity (Figure 2I and J). Although we also detected the presence of Rev-erbβ subtype in mouse platelets (Figure 2K), its expression did not show obvious circadian rhythm-dependent patterns in mouse platelets (Figure 2L). Together, our data confirm that Rev-erbα is present in mouse platelets, and displays a circadian rhythm that positively correlates with platelet aggregation.
Rev-erbα deletion in mice prolongs bleeding time
To determine whether Rev-erbα is involved in regulating platelet function, global Rev-erbα knockout mice (Rev-erbα−/−) were first used. Rev-erbα−/− mice were fertile and healthy without visible abnormalities, spontaneous bleeding or thrombosis. Compared with Rev-erbα+/+ mice, Rev-erbα−/− mice exhibited significantly prolonged tail-bleeding time, and larger ratios of bleeding time ≥15 min (Supplementary material online, Figure S4A and B). However, Rev-erbα−/− mice and Rev-erbα+/+ littermates did not differ in platelet counts, average platelet sizes, white blood cell counts, red blood cell counts, haemoglobin, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), or international normalized ratio (INR) (Supplementary material online, Figure S4C–J). To further confirm the role of platelet-expressed Rev-erbα, we generated conditional Rev-erbα knockout mice (Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre+), in which Cre-recombinase was under the control of the platelet factor 4 (PF4) promoter, recombining almost exclusively in platelets and megakaryocytes (Figure 3A). The platelet-specific deletion of Rev-erbα was confirmed at DNA, mRNA, and protein levels (Figure 3B and C). No statistical differences were detected in the expression of other circadian proteins between Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre− and Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre+ platelets (Supplementary material online, Figure S5).
Consistently, Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre+ mice exhibited a prolonged bleeding time (Figure 3D) and larger ratios of bleeding time ≥15 min following tail transection when compared with Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre− mice (Figure 3E). Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre+ and Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre− mice did not differ in platelet counts (Figure 3F), average platelet sizes (Figure 3G), the platelet microstructures (α-granules and dense granules) (Figure 3H and I) or the expression levels of the major platelet membrane proteins, CD41, and GPVI (Figures 3J). These results suggest that Rev-erbα deletion impairs haemostasis without altering platelet counts and microstructures.
Rev-erbα deletion in mice decreases thrombus propensity
We used different thrombosis models to determine the effects of Rev-erbα deficiency on thrombus propensity. In the first model, the time to occlusion in the FeCl3-induced carotid artery thrombosis assay was analysed using the laser speckle imaging technique.20 The mean time to occlusion in Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre+ mice was significantly longer than that in Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre− mice (11.30 ± 2.96 min vs. 6.86 ± 0.71 min; P < 0.05) (Figure 4A). The thrombus cross-sectional area of the FeCl3-injured carotid artery segment in Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre+ mice was significantly smaller than that in Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre− mice (Figure 4B). In the second model, a collagen/epinephrine-induced thromboembolism assay was performed in the absence of endothelial influence. The inability of Evan's blue dye to penetrate the lungs because of obstruction (i.e. pink colour) was severer in Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre− mice than that in Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre+ mice (Figure 4C). Moreover, the number of pulmonary vasculature thrombi in the pulmonary sections of Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre+ mice was less than that in the pulmonary sections of Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre− mice (Figure 4D). To further evaluate the thrombus growth in the absence of the influence of the endothelium, we assayed in vitro thrombus formation by perfusing whole blood through a microfluidic device coated with fibrillar collagen.21 The number of CD41-labelled platelets in a thrombus (a measure of thrombus size determined based on the fluorescence intensity of CD41-labelled platelets) in Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre+ mouse blood was significantly lower than that in Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre− mouse blood (Figure 4E). These results indicate that Rev-erbα acts as a positive regulator of thrombus formation. The prothrombotic role of platelet-expressed Rev-erbα was further confirmed using a platelet depletion/reconstitution mouse model (detailed in Supplementary material online, Figures S6 and S7).
Microvascular microthrombi obstruction contributes to myocardial infarct expansion and heart dysfunction.22 Thus, we further evaluated the effects of platelet Rev-erbα deletion in a model of acute myocardial infarction.22 Acute myocardial infarction was induced by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery, and microthrombi obstruction, infarct area, myocardial viability, and cardiac function were evaluated as described previously.22 Compared with Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre− mice, Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre+ mice exhibited less microthrombi (Figure 5A), reduced infarct area, and improved myocardial viability and cardiac dysfunction (Figure 5B). Thus, platelet Rev-erbα deletion protects against microvascular microthrombi obstruction and infarct expansion in a model of acute myocardial infarction.
Rev-erbα deletion decreases platelet aggregation and multiple aspects of platelet activation
Platelet aggregation
The prothrombotic mechanisms of Rev-erbα were further studied by analysing platelet function in Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre− and Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre+ mice. The Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre− and Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre+ platelets were stimulated with various physiological agonists. The platelet aggregation responses in washed mouse platelets were analysed using light transmission aggregometry. Compared with that of Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre− platelets, the aggregation of Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre+ platelets significantly decreased upon stimulation with low concentrations of U46619 (0.1 and 0.15 μg/ml) (Figure 6A). Similar results were obtained on the aggregation of Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre+ platelets in response to low concentrations of thrombin, collagen or ADP (shown in Supplementary material online, Figure S8A–C). The aggregation defects were overcome by a high dose of agonists. These results suggest that Rev-erbα deletion inhibits platelet aggregation.
Platelet α-granule release
Platelet α-granule release was evaluated by detecting the expression of P-selectin, a glycoprotein, that is, located within the α-granule membrane of non-activated platelets and translocated to the platelet surface in activated platelets.23 Compared with that of Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre− platelets, P-selectin surface expression of Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre+ platelets was significantly decreased upon stimulation with agonists, as assessed by the flow cytometric analysis (Figure 6B).
Fibrinogen-binding and JON/A-binding
Integrin αIIbβ3 is the most abundant glycoprotein on the platelet surface that mediates multiple aspects of platelet signalling.24 Integrin αIIbβ3 inside-out activation was evaluated by measuring fibrinogen-binding using flow cytometry detection of Alexa Fluor 647-labelled fibrinogen-binding and PE-labelled JON/A-binding to platelets. In response to agonist treatment, fibrinogen-binding and JON/A-binding on Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre+ platelets were significantly lower than those on Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre− platelets (Figure 6C).
Clot retraction
Clot retraction is an outside-in signalling event downstream of αIIbβ3 integrin activation.25 Compared with Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre− platelets, the Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre+ platelets exhibited significantly decreased clot retraction in PRP (Figure 6D). Collectively, these results suggest that genetic Rev-erbα inhibition impairs platelet aggregation and activation.
Pharmacological inhibition of Rev-erbα decreases platelet aggregation and multiple aspects of platelet activation
We further tested the effects of pharmacological Rev-erbα inhibition in both mouse and human platelets. To date, only two Rev-erbα antagonists, SR8278, and GSK2945, have been described.26,27 SR8278 was identified as the first Rev-erbα antagonist for probing Rev-erbα function;26 however, whether GSK2945 is an agonist or antagonist is not conclusive so far.27,28 Thus, we selected SR8278 as a pharmacological inhibitor in our study, and performed molecular docking research to investigate the binding affinity and the target binding sites between SR8278 and the Rev-erbα receptor. The crystal structure of human Rev-erbα (Homo sapiens, PDB id: 3N00) was downloaded from the RCSB Protein Data Bank (PDB, https://www.rcsb.org/). The mouse Rev-erbα structure (Mus musculus) was obtained by homology modelling due to no crystal structure in PDB. The docking scores, which represent the affinity between SR8278 and Rev-erbα proteins, were −6.8520 kcal/mol for humans and −6.5848 kcal/mol for mice (Supplementary material online, Figure S9A). According to the two-dimensional interaction map, human Rev-erbα complexed with SR8278, with an arene–arene interaction at Phe128 of human Rev-erbα, and a H-bond at Met166 of human Rev-erbα. Moreover, there existed hydrophobic interactions between SR8278 and human Rev-erbα, which were helpful to make the ligands bind in the pocket more stably (Supplementary material online, Figure S9B). Taken together, the molecular docking confirmed the stable interaction between SR8278 and Rev-erbα.
Next, washed platelets were pre-treated with Rev-erbα antagonist SR8278 (10–50 μM) before platelet activation tests. SR8278 concentration dependently inhibited mouse platelet aggregation induced by U46619 (0.15 μg/ml) (Figure 7A). Treatment with 30 and 50 μM SR8278 significantly inhibited the U46619-induced α-granule release, as evidenced by reduced P-selectin expression in mouse platelets (Figure 7B). Moreover, treatment with 10, 30, or 50 μM SR8278 inhibited integrin αIIbβ3 inside-out activation (i.e. fibrinogen-binding and JON/A-binding) induced by U46619 in mouse platelets (Figure 7C). Furthermore, SR8278 concentration dependently decreased the average ratio of clot retraction of PRP (Figure 7D).
To corroborate the role of Rev-erbα in human platelet aggregation and activation, SR8278-pre-treated human platelets were subjected to various platelet activation tests. SR8278 concentration dependently inhibited agonist-induced aggregation responses (Figure 7E), P-selectin expression (Figure 7F), fibrinogen-binding, PAC-1 binding (Figure 7G), and clot retraction (Figure 7H). Note that the effective concentrations of Rev-erbα-specific antagonist SR8278 on human platelet aggregation/activation were higher than those on mouse platelet aggregation/activation. Together, these results suggest that pharmacological inhibition of Rev-erbα significantly inhibits human and mouse platelet aggregation and activation.
Rev-erbα regulates OPHN-1-mediated RhoA/ERM signalling in platelets
To further elucidate the potential molecular mechanisms of the role of Rev-erbα in platelet activation, the Rev-erbα-interacting proteins were characterized using immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry. Based on the results of mass spectrometry and the protein–protein interaction network analysis using String and UniProt, OPHN-1 was identified as a potential candidate for further analysis (Figure 8A). Oligophrenin-1 is a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) in platelets that exhibits strong GTPase-stimulating activity towards the Rho-family small GTPases RhoA, which was crucial for platelet activation.29 The results of the co-immunoprecipitation revealed that Rev-erbα coimmunoprecipitated with OPHN-1 in both mouse and human platelets and this interaction significantly increased upon stimulation with agonist U46619 (Figure 8B). To further identify the role of Rev-erbα in OPHN-1 mediated signalling, the activity of RhoA, a main downstream target of OPHN-1, was analysed. Rev-erbα deletion significantly downregulated the activity of RhoA (Figure 8C) without altering RhoA expression in mouse platelets (Figure 8D). Besides, the phosphorylation levels of ERM (ezrin/radixin/moesin) proteins, a downstream effector of RhoA, were significantly downregulated in Rev-erbαfl/flPF4Cre+ platelets stimulated with U46619 at the corresponding time points (Figure 8E). Similar results were obtained in the pharmacological inhibition experiments with Rev-erbα-specific antagonists in human platelets. Pre-treatment by SR8278 inhibited the activity of RhoA (Figure 8F) without affecting RhoA expression (Figure 8G), and reduced the phosphorylation levels of ERM (Figure 8H) in human platelets in a concentration-dependent manner. However, SR8278 lost its inhibition ability on platelet aggregation, RhoA activation, and ERM phosphorylation in OPHN-1−/+ platelets (Supplementary material online, Figure S10). Taken together, these results suggest that Rev-erbα potentiates platelet activation via an OPHN-1-mediated RhoA/ERM signalling pathway.
Discussion
In the present work, we identified a novel role of the circadian nuclear receptor Rev-erbα in platelets. The novel contributions included the following: we detected two isoforms of Rev-erb (Rev-erbα and Rev-erbβ) in platelets from both humans and mice; however, only Rev-erbα showed a circadian rhythm that positively correlated with platelet aggregation. Global and platelet-specific knockout of Rev-erbα in mice decreased platelet activation and inhibited thrombus formation in multiple thrombosis models. Consistently, pharmacological inhibition of Rev-erbα by specific antagonists decreased human and mouse platelet aggregation and activation. Mechanistically, mass spectrometry and co-immunoprecipitation analyses revealed that Rev-erbα potentiated platelet activation via an OPHN-1-mediated RhoA/ERM signalling pathway (Structured Graphical abstract). Collectively, the current study provides the first evidence that Rev-erbα is expressed by platelets, positively regulates platelet activation, and contributes to thrombus formation through a non-genomic OPHN-1/RhoA/ERM signalling pathway.
Epidemiological studies revealed that adverse thrombotic events (i.e. acute myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke) had day/night patterns, with peak onset in the early morning.2,30 In accordance with the morning peak in adverse cardiovascular events, previous studies revealed that the highest platelet responses were shown in the morning hours, while the lowest were observed in the evening.31–33 Moreover, surface markers expressed on the activated platelet, including activated αIIbβ3, P-selectin, and GPIb, reached a morning peak. The present study confirmed a circadian variation in platelet aggregation and thrombus propensity in human platelets, with a peak in the early morning at ∼9 a.m. However, the potential mechanism under the diurnal variation of platelets has not been appreciated.
Circadian rhythms are driven by the rhythmic oscillation of the endogenous circadian clock. In addition to the master circadian clock in the brain's hypothalamus, components of the circadian clock machinery are also expressed in various peripheral tissues and cells.34 As a main peripheral circadian component, Rev-erbα belongs to the nuclear receptor superfamily (also known as nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group D, member 1; NR1D1).14,16 Rev-erbα was initially considered to be an orphan nuclear receptor until 2007, when lipophilic haem was found as a physiologically relevant ligand of Rev-erbα.35 Before long, a synthetic ligand for Rev-erbα (i.e. SR8278) was identified,26 opening the door to novel pharmacological therapies based on Rev-erbα activity manipulation. Besides its classical functions on circadian rhythm, recent studies uncovered several new and unique functions and a broad involvement in the pathogenesis of various diseases.11,36,37 Here, we reported our new findings that Rev-erbα was present in human and mouse platelets. Importantly, the expression of Rev-erbα showed a circadian rhythm that positively correlated with the platelet aggregation. Moreover, Rev-erbα was significantly upregulated in platelets from acute STEMI patients, with a peak at early morning. Collectively, these data identified circadian nuclear receptor Rev-erbα as a new functional protein expressed in platelets.
To determine whether platelet-expressed Rev-erbα mediates platelet activation or acts as an antiplatelet signal, we generated global and conditional Rev-erbα knockout mice. Although Rev-erbα deletion did not affect platelet counts, average platelet sizes and its microstructures, agonist-induced aggregation and multiple aspects of platelet activation were significantly impaired. Moreover, Rev-erbα depletion inhibited the ability of platelets to form thrombi in different in vivo thrombosis models, presented by prolonged mean time to carotid artery occlusion, less pulmonary vasculature thrombi formation, and resulted in significant protection against microvascular microthrombi obstruction and infarct expansion in a model of acute myocardial infarction. Of clinical relevance, we further examined the effects of pharmacological inhibition of Rev-erbα in human platelets. Consistent results of antiplatelet actions were obtained by Rev-erbα-specific antagonist SR8278 in human platelets. These lines of evidence convincingly pointed out a previously unrecognized role of Rev-erbα as a positive regulator contributing to platelet activation and thrombus formation.
As a transcription factor, Rev-erbα has been well characterized to function by transcriptionally regulating downstream gene targets in nucleated cells.38 Binding via the DBD to the ROR response element DNA sequence (RORE), Rev-erbα would recruit nuclear receptor corepressor to play a critical role in transcriptional control in various nucleated cells. However, platelets are anucleate cells, and thus, it is quite interesting to investigate how circadian nuclear receptor Rev-erbα regulates anucleate platelet functions. Based on the results of mass spectrometry and the protein–protein interaction network analysis, OPHN-1 was identified as a candidate protein for Rev-erbα actions in platelets. Co-immunoprecipitation analyses confirmed that Rev-erbα interacted with OPHN-1 in both mouse and human platelets, and this interaction significantly increased upon stimulation with agonists. Oligophrenin-1 is a RhoGAP-regulating cytoplasmic protein that exhibits strong GTPase-stimulating activity towards the Rho-family small GTPases RhoA.29 As a main downstream target of OPHN-1, RhoA regulates actin cytoskeleton and promotes actin remodelling in platelets,38 which is crucial for platelet activation. RhoA deletion decreased platelet aggregation and multiple aspects of platelet activation,39 while OPHN-1 deletion promoted thrombus formation through aberrant Rho activation.40 Here, genetic deletion or pharmacological inhibition of Rev-erbα significantly downregulated the activity of RhoA without altering RhoA expression in platelets. Moreover, the phosphorylation levels of ERM proteins, a downstream effector of RhoA, were significantly downregulated. ERM signalling is regulated by Rho via phosphorylation at Thr558 of the moesin phosphatase, and implicated in the formation of filopodia and lamellipodia in platelets.41,42 All together, these results revealed that Rev-erbα potentiated platelet activation, at least partially, via an OPHN-1/RhoA/ERM signalling pathway.
The involvement of Rev-erbα in regulating cell functions has also been reported in other cell types.11,43–45 Rev-erbα was shown to be a positive regulator that contributed to the amyloid plaque deposition in Alzheimer's disease by targeting microglial cells.46 However, it functioned as a negative regulator in pulmonary inflammation43 and neuroinflammation.44 Thus, the role of Rev-erbα in regulating cell functions may depend on the cell types, and platelet-targeted Rev-erbα inhibition would be an optimal choice for clinical implications.45
Clinical implications of this study
The current experimental findings are scientifically and clinically important. The identification of circadian nuclear receptor Rev-erbα as a novel functional protein in platelets may broaden our understanding of the multiple biological functions of Rev-erbα. Our observations, along with the recent findings regarding the diurnal oscillation of platelet aggregation,6,47,48 highlight the importance of circadian clock machinery in platelet physiology. Importantly, the finding of the ability of regulating platelet aggregation and thrombus formation, which often precipitates stroke or myocardial infarction, supports that Rev-erbα may serve as a novel therapeutic target for managing thrombosis-based cardiovascular diseases.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We are greatly appreciative of Prof. Junling Liu in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, Key Laboratory of Cell Differentiation, and Apoptosis of Chinese Ministry of Education, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, for his expertise in platelet biology and activation.
Contributor Information
Jianfeng Shi, Division of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
Renyang Tong, Division of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
Meng Zhou, Division of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
Yu Gao, Division of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
Yichao Zhao, Division of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
Yifan Chen, Division of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
Wenhua Liu, Division of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
Gaoxiang Li, Division of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
Dong Lu, Institute of Interdisciplinary Integrative Medicine Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Guofeng Meng, Institute of Interdisciplinary Integrative Medicine Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Liuhua Hu, Division of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
Ancai Yuan, Division of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
Xiyuan Lu, Division of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
Jun Pu, Division of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material is available at European Heart Journal online.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (81625002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81930007, 91839301, 81470389, 81800307, 81500221), the Shanghai Outstanding Academic Leaders Program (18XD1402400), Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty (shslczdzk06204), and the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (201409005200).
Conflict of interest: none declared.
Author contributions
J.P. conceived the study; J.S., R.T., M.Z., and Y.G. performed the experiments; J.S., R.T., M.Z., Y.G., and W.L. analysed the data; Y.Z., Y.C., D.L., G.M., G.L., A.Y., and L.H. prepared the figures; J.S., R.T., and M.Z. drafted the manuscript; J.P. reviewed the manuscript.
References
- 1. van der Meijden PEJ, Heemskerk JWM. Platelet biology and functions: new concepts and clinical perspectives. Nat Rev Cardiol 2019;16:166–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Thosar SS, Butler MP, Shea SA. Role of the circadian system in cardiovascular disease. J Clin Invest 2018;128:2157–2167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Crnko S, Du Pré BC, Sluijter JPG, Van Laake LW. Circadian rhythms and the molecular clock in cardiovascular biology and disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 2019;16:437–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Tofler GH, Brezinski D, Schafer AI, Czeisler CA, Rutherford JD, Willich SN, et al. Concurrent morning increase in platelet aggregability and the risk of myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death. N Engl J Med 1987;316:1514–1518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Scheer FAJL, Michelson AD, Frelinger AL, Evoniuk H, Kelly EE, McCarthy M, et al. The human endogenous circadian system causes greatest platelet activation during the biological morning independent of behaviors. PLoS One 2011;6:e24549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Jafri SM, VanRollins M, Ozawa T, Mammen EF, Goldberg AD, Goldstein S. Circadian variation in platelet function in healthy volunteers. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:951–954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Burris TP. Nuclear hormone receptors for heme: REV-ERBalpha and REV-ERBbeta are ligand-regulated components of the mammalian clock. Mol Endocrinol 2008;22:1509–1520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Sulli G, Rommel A, Wang X, Kolar MJ, Puca F, Saghatelian A, et al. Pharmacological activation of REV-ERBs is lethal in cancer and oncogene-induced senescence. Nature 2018;553:351–355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Yu D, Fang X, Xu Y, Xiao H, Huang T, Zhang Y, et al. Rev-erbα can regulate the NF-κB/NALP3 pathway to modulate lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury and inflammation. Int Immunopharmacol 2019;73:312–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Solt LA, Wang Y, Banerjee S, Hughes T, Kojetin DJ, Lundasen T, et al. Regulation of circadian behaviour and metabolism by synthetic REV-ERB agonists. Nature 2012;485:62–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Montaigne D, Marechal X, Modine T, Coisne A, Mouton S, Fayad G, et al. Daytime variation of perioperative myocardial injury in cardiac surgery and its prevention by Rev-Erbα antagonism: a single-centre propensity-matched cohort study and a randomised study. Lancet 2018;391:59–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Wang N, Sun Y, Zhang H, Wang B, Chen C, Wang Y, et al. Long-term night shift work is associated with the risk of atrial fibrillation and coronary heart disease. Eur Heart J 2021;42:4180–4188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Pu J, Ding S, Ge H, Han Y, Guo J, Lin R, et al. Efficacy and safety of a pharmaco-invasive strategy with half-dose alteplase versus primary angioplasty in ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction: EARLY-MYO trial (Early routine catheterization after alteplase fibrinolysis versus primary PCI in acute ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction). Circulation 2017;136:1462–1473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Preitner N, Damiola F, Lopez-Molina L, Zakany J, Duboule D, Albrecht U, et al. The orphan nuclear receptor REV-ERBalpha controls circadian transcription within the positive limb of the mammalian circadian oscillator. Cell 2002;110:251–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lazar MA, Hodin RA, Darling DS, Chin WW. A novel member of the thyroid/steroid hormone receptor family is encoded by the opposite strand of the rat c-erbA alpha transcriptional unit. Mol Cell Biol 1989;9:1128–1136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Duez H, Staels B. Rev-erb-alpha: an integrator of circadian rhythms and metabolism. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2009;107:1972–1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Muller JE, Stone PH, Turi ZG, Rutherford JD, Czeisler CA, Parker C, et al. Circadian variation in the frequency of onset of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1985;313:1315–1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Nakanishi H, Ni J, Nonaka S, Hayashi Y. Microglial circadian clock regulation of microglial structural complexity, dendritic spine density and inflammatory response. Neurochem Int 2021;142:104905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Deutsch VR, Tomer A. Megakaryocyte development and platelet production. Br J Haematol 2006;134:453–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Forrester KR, Tulip J, Leonard C, Stewart C, Bray RC. A laser speckle imaging technique for measuring tissue perfusion. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004;51:2074–2084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hastings SM, Griffin MT, Ku DN. Hemodynamic studies of platelet thrombosis using microfluidics. Platelets 2017;28:427–433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Qi Z, Hu L, Zhang J, Yang W, Liu X, Jia D, et al. PCSK9 (Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin 9) enhances platelet activation, thrombosis, and myocardial infarct expansion by binding to platelet CD36. Circulation 2021;143:45–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Polgar J, Matuskova J, Wagner DD. The P-selectin, tissue factor, coagulation triad. J Thromb Haemost 2005;3:1590–1596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Huang J, Li X, Shi X, Zhu M, Wang J, Huang S, et al. Platelet integrin αIIbβ3: signal transduction, regulation, and its therapeutic targeting. J Hematol Oncol 2019;12:26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Flevaris P, Stojanovic A, Gong H, Chishti A, Welch E, Du X. A molecular switch that controls cell spreading and retraction. J Cell Biol 2007;179:553–565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Kojetin D, Wang Y, Kamenecka TM, Burris TP. Identification of SR8278, a synthetic antagonist of the nuclear heme receptor REV-ERB. ACS Chem Biol 2011;6:131–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Zhang T, Zhao M, Lu D, Wang S, Yu F, Guo L, et al. REV-ERB α regulates CYP7A1 through repression of liver receptor homolog-1. Drug Metab Dispos 2018;46:248–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Trump RP, Bresciani S, Cooper AWJ, Tellam JP, Wojno J, Blaikley J, et al. Optimized chemical probes for REV-ERBα. J Med Chem 2013;56:4729–4737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Aslan JE. Platelet Rho GTPase regulation in physiology and disease. Platelets 2019;30:17–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Morning peak in the incidence of myocardial infarction: experience in the ISIS-2 trial. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group . Eur Heart J 1992;13:594–598. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Budkowska M, Lebiecka A, Marcinowska Z, Woźniak J, Jastrzębska M, Dołęgowska B. The circadian rhythm of selected parameters of the hemostasis system in healthy people. Thromb Res 2019;182:79–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Paschos GK, FitzGerald GA. Circadian clocks and vascular function. Circ Res 2010;106:833–841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Curtis AM, Fitzgerald GA. Central and peripheral clocks in cardiovascular and metabolic function. Ann Med 2006;38:552–559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Reppert SM, Weaver DR. Molecular analysis of mammalian circadian rhythms. Annu Rev Physiol 2001;63:647–676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Kojetin DJ, Burris TP. REV-ERB and ROR nuclear receptors as drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2014;13:197–216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Pourcet B, Zecchin M, Ferri L, Beauchamp J, Sitaula S, Billon C, et al. Nuclear receptor subfamily 1 Group D member 1 regulates circadian activity of NLRP3 inflammasome to reduce the severity of fulminant hepatitis in mice. Gastroenterology 2018;154:1449–1464.e20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Zhang T, Yu F, Xu H, Chen M, Chen X, Guo L, et al. Dysregulation of REV-ERBα impairs GABAergic function and promotes epileptic seizures in preclinical models. Nat Commun 2021;12:1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Wang S, Li F, Lin Y, Wu B. Targeting REV-ERBα for therapeutic purposes: promises and challenges. Theranostics 2020;10:4168–4182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Pleines I, Hagedorn I, Gupta S, May F, Chakarova L, van Hengel J, et al. Megakaryocyte-specific RhoA deficiency causes macrothrombocytopenia and defective platelet activation in hemostasis and thrombosis. Blood 2012;119:1054–1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Fotinos A, Klier M, Gowert NS, Münzer P, Klatt C, Beck S, et al. Loss of oligophrenin1 leads to uncontrolled Rho activation and increased thrombus formation in mice. J Thromb Haemost 2015;13:619–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Jeon S, Kim S, Park J-B, Suh P-G, Kim YS, Bae C-D, et al. RhoA and Rho kinase-dependent phosphorylation of moesin at Thr-558 in hippocampal neuronal cells by glutamate. J Biol Chem 2002;277:16576–16584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Nakamura F, Huang L, Pestonjamasp K, Luna EJ, Furthmayr H. Regulation of F-Actin binding to platelet moesin in vitro by both phosphorylation of threonine 558 and polyphosphatidylinositides. Mol Biol Cell 1999;10:2669–2685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Wang Q, Sundar IK, Lucas JH, Muthumalage T, Rahman I. Molecular clock REV-ERBα regulates cigarette smoke-induced pulmonary inflammation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. JCI Insight 2021;6:145200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Kim J, Jang S, Choi M, Chung S, Choe Y, Choe HK, et al. Abrogation of the circadian nuclear receptor REV-ERBα exacerbates 6-hydroxydopamine-induced dopaminergic neurodegeneration. Mol Cells 2018;41:742–752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Wang F, Li X, Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Chen X, Yang J, et al. Nanoscaled polyion complex micelles for targeted delivery of recombinant hirudin to platelets based on cationic copolymer. Mol Pharm 2010;7:718–726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Lee J, Kim DE, Griffin P, Sheehan PW, Kim D-H, Musiek ES, et al. Inhibition of REV-ERBs stimulates microglial amyloid-beta clearance and reduces amyloid plaque deposition in the 5XFAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Cell 2020;19:e13078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Diurnal variation in platelet aggregation responses . Lancet 1988;332:1405–1406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Ohkura N, Oishi K, Sudo T, Hayashi H, Shikata K, Ishida N, et al. CLOCK regulates circadian platelet activity. Thromb Res 2009;123:523–527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.