Abstract
Two PIEZO mechanosensitive cation channels, PIEZO1 and PIEZO2, have been identified in mammals, where they are involved in numerous sensory processes. While structurally similar, PIEZO channels are expressed in distinct tissues and exhibit unique properties. How different PIEZOs transduce force, how their transduction mechanism varies, and how their unique properties match the functional needs of the tissues they are expressed in remain all-important unanswered questions. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans has a single PIEZO ortholog (pezo-1) predicted to have 12 isoforms. These isoforms share many transmembrane domains but differ in those that distinguish PIEZO1 and PIEZO2 in mammals. We used transcriptional and translational reporters to show that putative promoter sequences immediately upstream of the start codon of long pezo-1 isoforms predominantly drive green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression in mesodermally derived tissues (such as muscle and glands). In contrast, sequences upstream of shorter pezo-1 isoforms resulted in GFP expression primarily in neurons. Putative promoters upstream of different isoforms drove GFP expression in different cells of the same organs of the digestive system. The observed unique pattern of complementary expression suggests that different isoforms could possess distinct functions within these organs. We used mutant analysis to show that pharyngeal muscles and glands require long pezo-1 isoforms to respond appropriately to the presence of food. The number of pezo-1 isoforms in C. elegans, their putative differential pattern of expression, and roles in experimentally tractable processes make this an attractive system to investigate the molecular basis for functional differences between members of the PIEZO family of mechanoreceptors.
Keywords: PIEZO, pezo-1, mechanosensation, pharyngeal glands, pharyngeal pumping, behavior
Introduction
The ability to accurately sense and respond to mechanical forces is of utmost importance for a wide range of biological processes important for survival. Mechanoreceptor proteins are instrumental in sensing mechanical forces, and they are the most versatile class of sensory transductors. Mechanoreceptors play crucial roles in many processes ranging from gating predator–prey interaction (e.g., tail flip by crayfish, or C-start escape by fish) (Currie 1991; Katoh et al. 2013) to monitoring limb position (Woo et al. 2015) and internal organ pressure (e.g., crop volume in flies) (Wang et al. 2020a). The discovery of the mammalian mechanotransduction channel proteins (PIEZO) in 2010 not only fueled a rush of mechanotransduction research (Coste et al. 2010), but recently was also acknowledged by the 2021 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet 2021). PIEZO receptors have been implicated in sensory transduction across taxa. In mammals, PIEZOs mediate touch sensation (through Merkel cells and the nerve cells that innervate them) (Vásquez et al. 2014; Woo et al. 2014), muscle length sensation (through muscle spindles) (Woo et al. 2015), micturition in the bladder (Marshall et al. 2020), pain sensation, and more (Chesler et al. 2016; Murthy et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2019).
The two mammalian PIEZO channels (PIEZO1 and PIEZO2) are large (840 kDa) homotrimeric proteins assembled from three ∼280 kDa monomers. Each monomer contributes to a central nonselective cation channel and has a peripheral domain that crosses the membrane dozens of times (Soattin et al. 2016). While similar in structure, the two mammalian PIEZO channels have distinct mechanically-activated currents and are differentially expressed. PIEZO1 is expressed in lungs, bladder, pancreas, blood cells, vascular tissue, and skin, while PIEZO2 is highly expressed in sensory dorsal root ganglia and other neural tissues (Coste et al. 2010). The exact mechanisms for force transduction in PIEZO receptors are not completely understood. Two different nonexclusive models propose force transduction by PIEZOs: the force-from-lipid and the force-from-filament paradigms (Cox et al. 2017). In the force-from-lipid paradigm, the channel is activated by deformations on the associated lipid membrane that surrounds the peripheral propeller part of the channel. Work with PIEZO1 receptors endogenously expressed in different cell types (Romero et al. 2019) and overexpressed in HEK293 cells (Ridone et al. 2020) suggest that these channels indeed operate according to the force-from-lipid paradigm (Syeda et al. 2016). Although PIEZO1 and PIEZO2 channel functions are modulated by the plasma membrane (Romero et al. 2019; Ridone et al. 2020), PIEZO2 appears to require an intact cytoskeleton for normal function, lending support to the force-from-filament paradigm. However, it remains unresolved if PIEZO1 requires such cytoskeletal interaction (Eijkelkamp et al. 2013; Romero et al. 2019; Wang et al. 2020b). Functional differences between PIEZO1 and PIEZO2 appear to be the result of differences in the sequence of their beam (i.e., the long helix connecting the blades with the pore domain; Romero et al. 2019). In addition, PIEZO2 is differentially spliced to produce at least 16 isoforms with unique properties that are themselves expressed in specific tissues (Szczot et al. 2017). It is not presently known if differences between the transmembrane domains of PIEZO channels contribute to their function, and whether these differences lead to distinct patterns of expression.
The nematode Caenorhabditiselegans has a single ortholog of PIEZO receptors (pezo-1) recently shown to be mechanosensitive (Millet et al. 2021). pezo-1 has 12 predicted isoforms (a–l, Figure 1A). Like PIEZO receptors (Figure 1B), PEZO-1 has a highly conserved pore domain and a blade domain comprising 36 (predicted) transmembrane helices (Wang et al. 2019). PEZO-1 is expressed throughout the body of C. elegans, including the somatic sheath cells and spermathecal cells where it plays an important role in ovulation (Bai et al. 2020). All 12 pezo-1 isoforms share the conserved pore domain but differ in the number of transmembrane segments associated with the blade component of the channels (Figure 1C). It is not presently known if pezo-1 isoforms are differentially expressed, or the extent to which they might display functional specializations resembling those seen in the mammalian PIEZO1 and PIEZO2. Using transcriptional reporter strains, we found that green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression driven by putative promoter regions upstream of short pezo-1 isoform start codon occurred primarily in the nervous system, while GFP expression driven by putative promoters upstream of the start codon of long pezo-1 isoforms largely took place in mesodermal tissues. Differential expression was also apparent in tissues of the digestive system including the pharyngeal gland cells, where RNA interference (RNAi)-knock down of long pezo-1 isoform expression resulted in loss of food-dependent gland activation. We propose C. elegans as an amenable in vivo system for the physiological and behavioral study of one of the most complex mechanoreceptors known. Insights about PEZO-1 isoform function will inform our understanding of the way PIEZO1 and PIEZO2 operate in mammals.
Methods and materials
Animal strains and cultivation
The following strains were used: N2 (WT), AVG09, AVG10, AVG11, AVG22, AVG23, TU3311, COP1367, COP1553, COP1524, OH15500, AG405, AG406, and AG467. Strains COP1367, COP1553, and COP1524 were a kind gift of Dr Vásquez at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Memphis. For strain description, refer to Supplementary Table S1. L4 larvae were picked on the day before filming. The following day, gravid hermaphrodites were tested on day 1 of adulthood. Unless otherwise noted, animals were cultivated on standard NGM agar plates with OP50 Escherichiacoli food in a room maintained within 20–22°C and between 30% and 37% humidity.
Construction of strains
To determine the pattern of expression of different pezo-1 isoforms, we built several transcriptional reporter strains (Figure 1A and Supplementary Table S1). We selected the putative promoter regions immediately upstream of the start codon of targeted isoforms, and used these regions to drive expression of a GFP reporter. This approach has been extensively used to report the putative cellular expression patterns of target genes (Hobert 2002; Boulin et al. 2006).
Transcriptional reporter strains
The putative expression pattern for the longest pezo-1 isoforms (a–h) was assessed using a ∼5 kb promoter upstream of the gene start codon. There is a large intronic region (>4 kb) upstream of isoforms i and j of pezo-1. Predicting the presence of an intronic regulatory region, we designed primers targeting isoforms i and j by amplifying the ∼5 kb intronic region immediately upstream of their predicted start codon (Ppezo-1iandj in Figure 1A). We next constructed a reporter strain using the 5 kb upstream of the start codon of isoform k, and similarly another ∼5 kb promoter sequence immediately upstream of the start codon of isoform l, the shortest predicted isoform (Ppezo-1k and Ppezo-1l, respectively). We used standard PCR-fusion (Hobert 2002) to merge these different putative promoter sequences to GFP to generate the reporter strains AVG10 (Ppezo-1a–h::GFP::unc54_3′UTR), AVG11 (Ppezo-1iandj::GFP::unc54_3′UTR), AVG23 (Ppezo-1k::GFP::unc54_3′UTR), and AVG22 (Ppezo-1l: GFP::unc54_3′UTR). We note that the AVG strains in this work are extrachromosomal, and that for each strain, we imaged multiple individuals from a single transgenic line in order to assess mosaicism or variation in array expression. Here, we report the totality of labeled tissues observed across multiple animals expressing the same array (N = 21, N = 9, and N = 6 for isoforms a–h, i–j, and k, respectively). We found that individual lines expressing the same construct showed similar expression patterns.
Activity reporter strain
To generate the activity reporter strain targeting pharyngeal gland cells (AVG09), a truncated (1.6 kb) promoter upstream of the pezo-1 long isoforms start codon was used to drive GCaMP6s expression in gland cells (as well as uterus and anal cells) without confounding signals from overlaying body wall and pharyngeal musculature.
Statistical analysis
All the bars report means and variation is given as SEM throughout. All statistical analysis was performed using Sigmaplot 11 (Aspire Software). Comparisons between two different treatments were performed by planned, two-tailed paired, or unpaired t-tests to compare two groups that were normally distributed and had similar variance. Samples that failed the normality or equal variance tests were compared using the Mann–Whitney Rank Sum Test. Comparison between multiple parametric datasets were done using One-Way or Two-Way ANOVAs (depending on the number of treatments) and followed by Holm–Sidak all-pairwise post hoc tests. To compare nonparametric datasets, we used One-Way ANOVA on Ranks. These were followed with Dunn’s post hoc tests (all Pairwise comparisons) as these accommodated different sample sizes. In all cases, P-values are reported following the convention: *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.001. For all electrophysiological data, outliers were identified by ROUT with Q = 0.5%. Please refer to Supplementary Table S4 for summary statistics for Two-Way ANOVAs and description of tests conducted in this study. All raw measurements are available in a Supplementary Excel File (Supplementary File S1).
Bioinformatics
Protein sequence comparisons were obtained through the protein similarity tool using ENSEMBL (Yates et al. 2020) and incorporated into WormBase (Harris et al. 2020). Functional protein domains were predicted using SMART and GenomeNet Motif search tools (Schultz et al. 2000; Kanehisa and Sato 2020). We should point out that the widely available RNAi clone targeting pezo-1 and distributed through the Source Bioscience RNAi library was found to target an incorrect sequence. Source Bioscience provided us with a new and validated strain (see Supplementary Table S3) targeting the region of the gene consistent with isoforms a through h (N terminus, Figure 1A). This new validated clone is now available through Source Biosciences. While the dsRNA clone targets pezo-1a–h, it does not target the shorter isoforms (i–l). Gene expression levels for pezo-1 were obtained using The C. elegans Neuronal Gene Expression Map & Network (CeNGEN, Supplementary Table S5, Hammarlund et al. 2018).
Gene knockdown
RNAi by feeding was conducted as previously described (Conte et al. 2015). Day 1 adult worms were allowed to lay eggs on RNAi plates for 1 h, and the eggs were then grown on the same agar plates containing IPTG and seeded with bacteria containing RNAi empty control vector (L4440), or a vector targeting the gene of interest.
Filming
We used a Flea2 camera (Point Grey, Vancouver) mounted on an Olympus SZX12 stereomicroscope to acquire sequences of (1032 × 776 pixels) TIFF images. Crawling animals were individually filmed at 30 Hz.
Calcium imaging
All calcium comparisons were conducted on animals filmed under identical illumination and magnification conditions (alternating strains during the same filming session). Calcium signals were recorded with the aid of an X-cite 120 PC Q light source. We used ImageJ to measure GCaMP6s signals. We measured the brightness of the pharyngeal glands, which is an indirect measurement of calcium in the cells, by drawing an area of interest around them and then obtained a background fluorescence measurement by moving said area of interest just outside the worm and measuring this area as well. We used ImageJ to obtain maximal brightness of the gland cells, the background immediately lateral to the worm near the gland cells, and by calculating and reporting the ratio of maximal brightness of the pharyngeal glands to the maximal brightness of the background.
Confocal imaging
We used a Leica SP8 confocal microscope to acquire 40× image stacks with a 1.3 zoom. Imaged volume was 139 µm × 56.7 µm × 38.9 µm (X, Y, and Z, respectively). Stacks consisted of 85 × 0.46 µm steps. Pixel sizes were 0.136, 0.136, and 0.457 µm for X, Y, and Z, respectively. For animals with constructs targeting the pezo-1a–h isoforms, we imaged 21 animals, for those targeting pezo-1iandj isoforms, we imaged 6 animals, and for those targeting the pezo-1k isoforms, we imaged 6 animals. The number of animals reflect the extent of tissue labeling and the variability of tissues tagged between animals (with strains displaying consistent and limited labeling requiring fewer samples). Confocal images were analyzed offline using Leica Application Suite X.
Electropharyngeogram
Ten to fifteen mid-L4 hermaphrodites were picked onto 35 mm Modified Youngren's, Only Bacto-peptone (MYOB) plates seeded with OP50 bacteria and allowed to lay eggs for 6 h before all adults were removed from the plates. The synchronized F1 population was washed off from MYOB plates after 72 h of growth at 20°C. The collected worms were rinsed three times with M9. The worm pellets were incubated in 10 mM or 5 mM serotonin (InVivo Biosystems, Inc.) for at least 20 min. Pharyngeal pumping was recorded with the ScreenChip system (SKC101A, InVivo Biosystems, Inc.) by following a lab-optimized protocol. The automated data were acquired with NemAcquire (InVivo Biosystems, Inc.) and analyzed by NemAnalysis software (InVivo Biosystems, Inc.). All tested strains were repeated at least three times.
Image analysis
Nonconfocal images were analyzed using ImageJ.
Behavioral experiments
Pharyngeal pumping
Worms were placed in agar plates on OP50 E. coli bacterial lawns and allowed to feed for 30 min prior to imaging. Animals were filmed using a FlyCap camera (Media Cybernetics) to acquire a series of TIFF images at 40× magnification and 30 fps for 15 s. A minimum of 10 animals were recorded for each condition. Pharyngeal pumping was measured blind to treatment using ImageJ software and using the motion of the terminal pharynx grinder as the visual cue. For all pharyngeal pumping experiments (34 assays; 10–62 animals/assay; N = 536), we note that sample size was not correlated with pharyngeal pumping frequency variability (Pearson Product Moment of SEM vs. sample size P > 0.05; and linear regression between the two variables r2 = 0.0008).
Defecation assay
We transferred day-1 adult hermaphrodite worms into NGM agar plates seeded with OP50 E.coli and allowed the worms to feed for 30 min before imaging. Animals (>10 per condition) were imaged at 30 fps for 10 min. Five consecutive posterior body contractions (pBocs) were measured for each animal. The pBoc period was calculated as the average time between consecutive pBocs.
Egg-laying assay
The rate of egg laying was assayed by placing 10 day-1 adult worms in a copper ring (measuring 1.4 cm in diameter) over a bacterial lawn. Worms were allowed to lay eggs for 60 min after which they were removed, and the number of eggs counted. We then divided the number of eggs by the number of worms, divided by the number of minutes to get eggs laid per minute. Ten assays were performed for each strain.
Food density assay
We centrifuged 2 ml of overnight cultured OP50 E.coli for 2 min at 10,000 rpm and discarded the supernatant. The bacterial pellet was resuspended in 50 μl of liquid NGM and its optical density at 600 nm was measured using a Thermo Fisher Nanodrop. We made five serial dilutions of this stock and measured their optical density as above. A 30 μl drop of each dilution was placed on an NGM agar plate and allowed to dry for 30 min. Worms were transferred into the lowest OP50 density plate and allowed to feed for 30 min prior to imaging. Pharyngeal pumping was filmed for each worm as described above. After all (N ≥ 10) worms were filmed, they were transferred into the plate with the next higher food concentration and the process was repeated until all the animals were filmed in all food concentrations.
For measuring the activation of the pharyngeal gland cells under different food concentrations, we performed the experiments as above but used a fluorescent light to film the pharyngeal gland cells (as described above). Because these animals were reimaged at increasing concentrations, we were concerned that changes in fluorescence could be indicative of fluorophore bleaching rather than the potential changes in cytoplasmic calcium we were interested in measuring. We therefore repeated this experiment but this time placing 10–15 animals in plates of each food concentration at the same time before filming them. Animals were allowed to feed for 30 min before filming with a fluorescent light as described above.
Food availability assay
For the food presence assay, 10–15 animals were allowed to feed on OP50 E. coli lawns on NGM agar plates for 30 min. Their pharyngeal pumping (or pharyngeal gland fluorescence) was filmed as described above to produce the “on food 1” condition. The animals were then individually transferred to an NGM agar plate without food for 15 min. After this time, their pharyngeal pumping (or pharyngeal gland fluorescence) was again filmed to produce the “off food” condition. Animals were then transferred back to a bacterial OP50 lawn where they were filmed one final time within 1 min of being reintroduced to produce the “on food 2” condition.
Results
The WormBase annotated genome browser identifies up to 12 predicted pezo-1 isoforms (Figure 1A) (Harris et al. 2020). Protein comparisons of PEZO-1 with human and flies (using Ensembl and aligned nucleotide to protein with BLASTX) returned the human PIEZO1 and PIEZO2, and the Drosophila Piezo proteins (Figure 1B) (Harris et al. 2020; Yates et al. 2020). All isoforms share the C-terminus which encodes the conserved pore domain and differ mostly in the number of transmembrane segments within the blade domain of PIEZOs channels (Figure 1C) (Kamajaya et al. 2014). In C. elegans, the different pezo-1 isoforms can be divided into long and short isoform groups. The long isoform group comprises the eight longest isoforms (a–h) with over 30 transmembrane segments. The four remaining shorter isoforms (i–l) have between 8 and 20 transmembrane segments and differ in their predicted translational start sites.
Promoter fusion constructs targeting different pezo-1 isoforms have complementary expressions in gastrointestinal tissues
GFP expression driven by promoters targeting different pezo-1 isoforms was detected in tissues associated with the digestive and reproductive systems. However, while expression was largely colocalized to the same organ systems, GFP expression patterns within these organs were distinct in strains targeting different isoforms. Below, we provide a description of the tissues we identified as activating the promoter and expressing GFP, which we imaged using a Leica SP8 confocal microscope.
Transcriptional reporters targeting long pezo-1a–h isoforms
Using a promoter immediately upstream of the start codon of the eight longest pezo-1 isoforms, we drove expression of GFP in several mesodermal tissues (Figure 2), including the body wall and pharyngeal muscles, pharyngeal glands and valve, and uterine and defecation tissues. Our findings are consistent with those described in a recent preprint by Millet et al. (2021). Based on their unique morphology and location, we identified GFP expression in pharyngeal muscles (pm3-8), pharyngeal glands (dg1, vg1s, vg2s), pharyngeal-intestinal valve (vpi) cells, AMsh, and AMso glial cells (Figure 2, B–D). We also tentatively identified pharyngeal neurons M1 and I4 (Figure 2E). Medially, we saw labeling of the HSN neuron, the vulval muscles, uterine muscles, and intestine (Figure 2G). Posteriorly, we saw labeling in cells involved in defecation (Figure 2H). Based on their morphology and position, we tentatively identified these as rectD, K, F, B, U, and Y (N = 21) (Figure 2H). In addition to GFP-based transcriptional reporters, we used the CRISPR/Cas9-generated AG467 (integrated) strain which used mScarlet to tag the C terminus of PEZO-1 proteins. Imaging of AG467 (N = 6) showed PEZO-1 proteins localized to the vicinity of the pharyngeal grinder, to the quadrants of the pharyngeal bulb occupied by the gland cells, and to the tip of the nose of the worm where the amphid sheath is located (Figure 2I). We conclude that reporters upstream of long pezo-1 isoforms drive gene expression largely in muscles and other mesodermal tissues, although some neuronal expression was also seen.
Transcriptional reporters targeting short pezo-1iandj isoforms
We used a putative promoter ∼5 kb sequence immediately upstream of the start codon of pezo-1 isoforms i and j (Figure 1A). This resulted in a pattern of GFP fluorescence distinct from the one obtained above. GFP expression was mainly restricted to pharyngeal muscles and sensory neurons (N = 9, Figure 3, A–F). In the pharynx, we saw GFP labeling of the pm3 muscle cells, the mc1 marginal cells in the corpus, a structure responsible for generating suction forces during the ingestion of suspended bacteria (Figure 3B) (Raizen et al. 2012), and in a neuron consistent in location and morphology with I4 (Figure 3C). A ventral cell located posterior to the terminal bulb and extending a process dorso-anteriorly toward the pharyngeal-intestinal valve (consistent with the excretory gland) was also labeled (asterisk in Figure 3F). Based on their location and characteristic extensive branching, we identified the anterior and posterior mechanoreceptors FLP and PVD (respectively) as also expressing GFP (Figure 3, B and E). Posteriorly, we tentatively identified a phasmid neuron consistent with the PHC neuron’s morphology and location, as well as other cells associated with the uterus and anus, as expressing GFP (Figure 3D). Unlike the other transcriptional constructs, GFP expression in these animals was visible as early as prezle-stage embryos (Figure 3G). As with constructs targeting longer isoforms, we observed similar patterns between promoter-driven GFP expression, and mScarlet-tagged PEZO-1 localization (Figure 3H). We conclude that enhancer regions upstream of short pezo-1 isoforms drive GFP expression primarily in sensory and other neurons (in addition to a few mesodermal tissues).
Transcriptional reporters targeting additional pezo-1 isoform expression
We used a promoter immediately upstream of the start codon of pezo-1 isoform k to drive GFP expression. We saw labeling of pharyngeal isthmus muscles, pharyngeal glands, and cells with morphology and position consistent with arcade cells (Figure 4A). We also saw GFP labeling in ventral neurons and in body wall muscles, where GFP colocalized with a Pmyo-3::mCherry body wall co-injection marker (N = 6, Figure 4B).
We also used a promoter region spanning ∼5 kb upstream of the start codon of the shortest proposed isoform of pezo-1, l (Figure 1A, Supplementary Table S2); however, we were unable to detect GFP expression in these animals. This could mean that this proposed isoform does not constitute a real isoform. Alternatively, the promoter region used to drive GFP expression could have missed a necessary regulatory sequence, or lacked the appropriate cellular environment to result in activation and GFP expression (e.g., stress, age).
Loss of pezo-1 long isoforms results in abnormal defecation and egg-laying frequencies
After observing GFP expression in the pharynx, anal cells, and uterus, we investigated pezo-1 necessity for processes mediated by these tissues. To this end, we used a two-pronged approach. We used RNAi to reduce pezo-1 expression in tissues that are nonrefractive to RNA (e.g., muscles) (Conte et al. 2015, please see note on methods regarding the pezo-1 RNAi clone). Additionally, we used loss of function (LF) and gain of function (GOF) mutants generated through CRISPR/Cas9. While LF strains were produced by introducing large deletions, the GOF mutant was (a kind gift from Dr Valeria Vásquez) generated by substituting an Arg 2373 for Lys (R2373K) to match similar GOF mutations in the human Piezo1 channel that result in increased cation permeability (see characterization in Millet et al. 2021).
Loss of long pezo-1 isoforms increases defecation frequency
To investigate the potential involvement of pezo-1 in defecation, we measured pBoc period duration in a pezo-1 whole-gene knockout (AG405), a whole-gene GOF mutant (COP1524), and three pezo-1 long isoform (a–h) knockout mutants (COP1367, COP1553, and AG406). Interestingly, while mutations targeting only long pezo-1 isoforms resulted in shorter defecation periods (i.e., increased defecation frequency), LF and GOF mutations affecting both long and short isoforms had no significant effect on pBoc period (Figure 5A). These data suggest that mutations that only affect long isoforms, but spare short ones, disrupt pBoc period.
Loss of pezo-1 decreased egg-laying frequency
We next evaluated the effect of pezo-1 mutations on egg-laying frequency. Here again, we found a difference between mutations affecting all isoforms equally, and mutations affecting only long isoforms. Only one of the three CRISPR/Cas9-generated mutants affecting only long isoforms of pezo-1 produced a significant decrease in egg-laying rate. However, mutations resulting in whole-gene knockout, or a whole-gene GOF, had a significantly greater effect reducing egg-laying frequency than mutations affecting only long isoforms (Figure 5B). As above, these data suggest that genetic manipulations affecting long pezo-1 isoforms while sparing shorter isoforms produce a different effect than mutations affecting all isoforms. Furthermore, GOF and LF mutations affecting all isoforms equally produce similar effects.
Long isoforms (pezo-1 a – h) may be involved in pharyngeal pumping
Wild-type animals treated postembryonically (L1 through adulthood) with dsRNA targeting pezo-1a–h showed a significantly increased pharyngeal pumping frequency when compared to control treatment (L4440) worms (Figure 6A). Our behavioral experiments were carried out on standard cultivation plates and OP50 E.coli (food) concentrations (A600 ≈ 0.7). However, worms are known to alter their pharyngeal pumping frequency as a function of food availability (You et al. 2006). To investigate if pezo-1 plays a role in pharyngeal responses to changes in food density, we allowed worms to feed on OP50 E.coli diluted to different concentrations. We began by placing worms in a diluted bacterial lawn and transferred them into higher density lawns every 30 min. We found that at low food density (A600 = 0.3), the pharyngeal pumping rates of WT animals were not significantly different from that of animals with LF or GOF mutations in pezo-1 (Figure 6B). As the bacterial lawn density increased, wild-type animals decreased their pharyngeal pumping rate (red in Figure 6B). However, the six pezo-1 mutant strains displayed differing levels of inability to reduce pharyngeal pumping rates in response to increased food density (Figure 6B). A recent manuscript described a similar observation for pezo-1 mutants when fed bacteria of increasing sizes (Millet et al. 2021).
To further characterize the pharyngeal pumping phenotype of pezo-1 mutants, we performed electropharyngeogram (EPG) recording from wild-type (N2) and pezo-1 mutants. Unlike unrestrained animals in our previous experiments (filmed while freely moving in bacterial lawns on agar plates), worms immersed in liquid media (e.g., inside our EPG chips) do not normally engage in pharyngeal pumping unless they are chemically induced to do so by neuromodulators (Vidal-Gadea et al. 2011). We found that when physically restrained in a microfluidic chip and induced to pump by 10 mM ectopic serotonin, pharyngeal pumping by pezo-1 mutants had no significant difference from wild-type controls in mean pump frequency, duration, or interpump intervals (Supplementary File S1). Recent work by Millet et al. (2021) showed that pharyngeal phenotypes of similarly-restrained pezo-1 mutants were dependent on ectopic serotonin concentration. We therefore repeated our EPG recordings reducing ectopic serotonin concentration to 5 mM and found that under low serotonin conditions, several pezo-1 mutants displayed impaired pharyngeal pumping (Figure 6, C–E). Interestingly, the phenotypes observed in these mechanically-immobilized, liquid-immersed, and ectopic serotonin-induced animals were the opposite of the phenotype observed in unrestrained, spontaneously feeding animals. Namely, pezo-1 mutants here displayed lower (rather than higher) than wild-type pumping frequencies, and increased pump duration and inter-pump intervals. Our data suggest that mutations affecting pezo-1 function result in pharyngeal pumping frequency defects in animals feeding at high food concentrations, or when pharyngeal pumping is induced by low (5 mM) ectopic serotonin application.
Pharyngeal gland activation decreases as food concentration increases
The pharyngeal glands are an essential component of food processing and given the necessity of pezo-1 for normal pharyngeal pumping, we hypothesized that it may also be involved in regulating pharyngeal gland activity. The role of pharyngeal glands during food consumption is not well understood owing to the experimental challenge of assessing their activity. To investigate the role of pezo-1 in pharyngeal gland activity, we constructed the AVG09 strain in which a truncated (1.6 kb) putative promoter upstream of the pezo-1 long isoforms start codon was used to drive GCaMP6s expression in gland cells (Figure 7A). We used this strain to record calcium transients in the pharyngeal gland cells in freely crawling animals to assess pharyngeal gland activation during feeding. One limitation of this approach is that, due to the close proximity between pharyngeal gland cells, we were unable to achieve single cell resolution and therefore report the activation status of all five pharyngeal cells together.
We began by characterizing normal gland function. As shown above (Figure 6B), pharyngeal pumping frequency is reduced in control worms when they are transferred to bacterial food of increasing density in 30-min intervals. Similarly, AVG09 also showed a reduction in pharyngeal pumping rate with increasing food density (Figure 7B). To test whether changes in food density also affect pharyngeal gland activity in the AVG09 strain, we cultured the worms in food of different densities and compared the fluorescence of the calcium sensor GCaMP6s in pharyngeal gland cells across different food densities. Mirroring the drop in pharyngeal pumping rate (Figure 7B), the fluorescence of pharyngeal gland cells decreased with higher food densities (Figure 7C). To ensure that the decrease in fluorescence seen in worms repeatedly transferred to plates of increasing food density was not the result of photobleaching, we repeated the experiment but this time assigned different groups of worms and bacteria of different densities (rather than feeding the same worms different density bacteria sequentially as done in Figure 7C). This produced similar results as before (Supplementary File S2), suggesting that gland cell activation indeed decreases with increasing food density.
Long pezo-1a – h isoforms might be involved in food-dependent activation of pharyngeal gland cells
Our results above indicate that pharyngeal pumping frequency and pharyngeal gland activation both decrease with increased ingested food density (concentration). This suggests that the presence or absence of food should be reflected in pharyngeal gland activation as well. We found that in animals fed HT115 E. coli with the control RNAi plasmid (L4440), the brightness of the pharyngeal glands decreased significantly 15 min after worms were removed from food (off food, Figure 7D red circles). To investigate the potential role of pezo-1 in the response of the glands to the presence of food, we repeated the experiment in pezo-1a–h-knocked down animals (fed HT115 E. coli with the pezo-1 RNAi plasmid). We found that in this treatment, pharyngeal gland brightness was reduced in the presence of food when compared to control animals, and did not significantly change after animals were removed from food for 15 min. Pharyngeal brightness significantly increased when control animals were reintroduced to food (on food 2, red circles in Figure 7D, Two-way ANOVA, see Supplementary Table S4 for statistics).
Our results are consistent with normal pezo-1 expression being important for pharyngeal pumping, defecation, and egg-laying. Furthermore, whole-gene gain and LF experiments suggest that loss of one class of isoforms (e.g., long) appears to be more deleterious than loss or GOF mutations affecting all isoforms equally, hinting perhaps at an antagonistic role for different classes of isoforms in at least some of their functions.
Discussion
Caenorhabditis elegans has a single ortholog (pezo-1) of the mammalian PIEZO channels which has a fair amount of conservation with human PIEZO1 and PIEZO2 as well as with the Drosophila Piezo channel (Figure 1). The greatest degree of conservation is for the pore domain (Kamajaya et al. 2014). Up to 12 different isoforms are predicted for pezo-1 (Harris et al. 2020). This large number of isoforms is consistent with mammals, where PIEZO2, for example, was shown to be alternatively spliced and expressed in different tissues (Szczot et al. 2017). Alternative splicing of ion channels is also known to occur in C. elegans (Johnson et al. 2011). We explored the possibility that different pezo-1 isoforms may be expressed differentially by using putative promoter regions upstream of the start codon of single or groups of isoforms to drive GFP expression. We found that the constructs targeting long pezo-1 isoforms (a–h) displayed largely mesodermal GFP expression, similar to known PIEZO1 expression in mammals (Hennes et al. 2019). Expression included muscle, gonads, and glands (Figure 2). In contrast, constructs targeting shorter pezo-1 isoforms resulted in GFP expression in sensory neurons (Figure 3). These results are consistent with recent findings in worms by Millet et al. (2021), and in mammals where different isoforms are expressed in different germ layers, suggesting similarly distinct functions for different isoforms in C. elegans (Coste et al. 2010).
Our study was not able to target individual isoforms, but rather grouped the longest eight isoforms (a–h) because of their shared start codon. The putative promoter regions for the remaining (shorter) isoforms (and their predicted start codons) are distributed across a 10-kb region. For the purpose of this study, we used a putative promoter sequence immediately upstream of the i and j isoforms start codon, the k isoform start codon, and the smaller, l, isoform start codon. We designed our promoter sequences trying to maximize the region upstream of the putative isoform translational start site, while minimizing overlap with other known genes or isoforms. It is, however, possible that our constructs could have erred by either including regulatory sequences belonging to other isoforms, or by neglecting downstream regulatory regions important for the transcription of a targeted isoform. Therefore, tissues identified in this (and similarly designed) work remain putative awaiting cell-specific qPCR validation. Indeed, a CRISPR knock-in strain (AG467), which tags the fluorescent reporter mScarlet at C termini of PEZO-1 and is predicted to encompass all isoforms because of their common stop site, shows broader PEZO-1 protein expression than what our combined transcriptional reporter strains identified (Bai et al. 2020). Similarly, RNA-based reports for L1–L4 larvae obtained from the CenGen database highlight additional tissues that express pezo-1 (Supplementary Table S5, Hammarlund et al. 2018).
Consistent with the patterns of expression detected above, we found that normal expression of long pezo-1 isoforms was required for normal defecation frequency. Specifically, a loss of long isoforms (through LF mutations) reduced defecation frequency. However, loss of all isoforms, or GOF mutation affecting all isoforms, did not have an impact on defecation frequency. These results suggest a potential functional antagonism between long and short pezo-1 isoforms.
Unlike defecation (where loss of pezo-1 led to increased contraction frequencies), we found that genetic manipulations of pezo-1 resulted in decreased egg-laying frequencies. A GOF mutation affecting all isoforms also decreased egg-laying frequency, suggesting that pezo-1 levels must be carefully regulated to preserve normal egg-laying function. It remains unclear if this effect is related to reports of reduced brood size for pezo-1 knockout mutants, where brood size in mutants was tightly linked to ovulation (Bai et al. 2020).
We found that wild-type animals decreased their pharyngeal pumping frequency as the density of the food surrounding them increased (Figures 6B, red and 7B). The idea of animals modulating pharyngeal pumping based on the amount of food within the pharynx has been previously explored by Scholz and colleagues. These authors used a microfluidic chip and found that increasing the flow rate of liquid containing bacteria resulted in a significant decrease in pharyngeal pumping (Scholz et al. 2016). These results are consistent with our findings of potentially increased food in the pharynx leading to a decrease in its rate of pumping.
We further found that mutations targeting long isoforms of pezo-1 expression altered pharyngeal pumping frequencies in a context-dependent manner. Loss of pezo-1a–h signaling (through mutation or RNAi) in freely crawling worms feeding on OP50 resulted in abnormally elevated pharyngeal pumping rates when food density was high, but not when food density was low (Figure 6B). In contrast, EPGs from the same animals showed abnormally low pharyngeal pumping frequencies for pezo-1 mutants in the presence of 5 mM serotonin (Figure 6C), but no effect in the presence of 10 mM serotonin (Supplementary File S1). Work by Millet et al. (2021) recently showed that the frequency of serotonin-induced pharyngeal pumping depends on its concentration (with higher frequencies resulting from higher serotonin concentrations). This group found a similar pharyngeal pumping phenotype for pezo-1 mutants. Specifically, they found that mutants fed standard E. coli displayed greater than wild-type pharyngeal pumping frequencies, but the same animals fed large (incompletely divided) E. coli displayed a lower than wild-type pharyngeal pumping frequency (Millet et al. 2021).
There are several differences between pharyngeal pumping experiments that might account for the different phenotypes observed for freely moving and (ectopic) serotonin-activated pezo-1 mutants. Considering neuromodulation, for example, worms crawling on an agar plate will slow down to feed upon entering a bacterial lawn (a response mediated by dopamine, termed basal slowing response). However, when worms become starved, they perform an enhanced slowing response which is instead mediated by serotonin (Sawin et al. 2000). We previously showed that when worms transition to liquid environments (such as the interior of a microfluidic device used for all EPG experiments), the altered balance between dopaminergic and serotonergic modulation leads to the inhibition of many behaviors (including foraging and pharyngeal pumping; Vidal-Gadea et al. 2011, 2012). Under these aquatic conditions, ectopic serotonin application is required for most electropharyngeal recordings (Lee et al. 2017; Ortiz et al. 2018; Millet et al. 2021). It remains unclear the extent to which ectopic serotonin-induced pharyngeal pumping in microfluidic devices resembles the endogenous modulation of unrestrained animals under normal (i.e., basal slowing) or starved (i.e., enhanced slowing) conditions. Additionally, several key differences between freely moving and ectopic serotonin-activated assays further confound their comparison. For example, worms on a plate feed on bacteria and experience the chemical and mechanical sensory inputs associated with their mastication and ingestion. In contrast, most studies of worms on microfluidic chips consist of worms in liquid media lacking bacteria and the associated sensory (chemical and mechanical) inputs they would normally derive from them. We think this is a relevant point in the context of a mechanosensor which might be responsible for sensing food-derived mechanical forces within the pharyngeal cavity. Furthermore, in addition to mechanosensation, Millet et al. (2021) report an osmolarity-dependent effect for pezo-1 mutants where increased pharyngeal frequency in pezo-1 mutants in a microfluidic device was observed only when the pharyngeal contents were at 320 mOsm (i.e., nearly isosmolar with the worm) but not at lower osmolarities (150 and 260 mOsm). Finally, unlike freely crawling worms, animals in a microfluidic device are physically restrained. Based on the broad expression of pezo-1 we established in this manuscript, it is possible that mechanical immobilization within these devices would activate many pezo-1 (and other) mechanoreceptors in the musculature and nervous system of these animals that could indirectly affect pharyngeal pumping. We therefore feel that differences in the valence of pezo-1 phenotypes for freely crawling animals and animals in microfluidic devices are not necessarily in conflict but might reflect differences in the way these animals are being tested. Clearly, each approach has much to contribute to our understanding of C. elegans gastrointestinal physiology.
While the aim of this work was not to compare or equate two different techniques, we propose a possible explanation that might reconcile unrestrained and microfluidic chip observations. High pharyngeal pumping frequencies in microfluidic devices compared to lower frequencies on bacterial lawns result from ectopic serotonin baths initiating a “post-starvation feeding program” with high frequency pumping in these devices (Avery and Horvitz 1989; Raizen et al. 2012). In this context, the absence of mechanical feedback in the pharynx (due to the lack of food) results in a higher pharyngeal pumping rate in control animals (i.e., by mimicking low food density) and lower than control pumping rates in pezo-1 mutants (which may be unable to detect pharyngeal contents). Conversely, for unrestrained animals in bacterial lawns (and without ectopic serotonergic modulation), absence of mechanical feedback caused by pezo-1 mutations would result in these mutants being unable to reduce pharyngeal pumping rates in response to increased food density, leading to a higher-than-normal pumping rate when food density increases. Food-induced pumping modulation has been shown before. For example, worms decrease pumping frequency when transferred from bacteria of low nutritional value to bacteria of high nutritional value (You et al. 2006). Based on our combined results, we propose that in the pharynx, pezo-1 may play a role in discerning the contents of the pharynx. If this is the case, this would be a conserved function for pezo-1, as recent work in D. melanogaster revealed that the fly ortholog of PIEZO is similarly involved in the modulation of feeding. Mutations impairing Drosophila’s Piezo also result in increases in pharyngeal pumping frequency (Wang et al. 2020a).
The pharyngeal glands also appeared to express pezo-1, where it was found to be required for their normal function. The pharyngeal gland cells are thought to aid in food lubrication and digestion, and they send processes to the different pharyngeal compartments (Raharjo et al. 2011).
The role of PIEZO channels in mechanoreception constitutes a new and thriving field of inquiry. It is clear that these channels mediate an extensive array of physiological processes across taxa. In C. elegans, pezo-1 was implicated in male mating (Brugman 2020) and ovulation (Bai et al. 2020). The present study represents an initial investigation into the differential expression and function of pezo-1 isoforms. In the digestive system of C. elegans, pezo-1 may enable different organs to independently detect and respond to the presence and quality of food. PEZO-1 thus appears to reflect the mammalian PIEZOs not only in structure but also in function. Caenorhabditiselegans is thus a promising system to study how differences between different PIEZO isoforms endow these channels with the properties that tune them to the different functions and may inform studies in mammals about these properties as well.
Data availability
Strains are available upon request. The authors affirm that all data necessary for confirming the conclusions of the article are present within the article, figures, and tables.
Supplementary material is available at G3 online.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Some strains were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (funded by NIH Grant P40 OD010440). We thank Dr Andy Golden for feedback on the manuscript. We thank Dr Valeria Vásquez for the worm strains.
K.H. and A.G.V.-G.: performed experiments, analyzed data, wrote manuscript. A.S.: performed experiments. J.A.: constructed strains. X.B.: performed experiments, constructed strains, analyzed data. R.B.: performed experiments, analyzed data. J.J.: performed experiments. C.B.: constructed strains. E.H., A.F., P.F., S.M., and E.M.F.: performed experiments. M.B. and W.S.: wrote manuscript.
Funding
Funding was provided by the National Insitutes of Health, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases award 1R15AR068583-01A1, and the National Science Foundation, Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences award 1818140 to A.G.V.-G. This work was supported, in part, by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (X.B. and R.B.).
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Literature cited
- Avery L, Horvitz HR.. 1989. Pharyngeal pumping continues after laser killing of the pharyngeal nervous system of C. elegans. Neuron. 3:473–485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bai X, Bouffard J, Lord A, Brugman K, Sternberg PW, et al. 2020. Caenorhabditis elegans PIEZO channel coordinates multiple reproductive tissues to govern ovulation. Elife. 9:e53603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boulin T, Etchberger JF, Hobert O.. 2006. Reporter gene fusions. In: The C. elegans Research Community WormBook, editor. WormBook. doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.106.1. http://www.wormbook.org (Accessed: 2021 December 19). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Brugman KI. 2020. pezo-1 function in Caenorhabditis elegans [Ph.D. thesis]. Pasadena, CA: California Institute of Technology. doi: 10.7907/fz4z-c850. [DOI]
- Chesler AT, Szczot M, Bharucha-Goebel D, Čeko M, Donkervoort S, et al. 2016. The role of PIEZO2 in human mechanosensation. N Engl J Med. 375:1355–1364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Conte D Jr, MacNeil LT, Walhout AJM, Mello CC.. 2015. RNA interference in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 109:26.3.1–26.3.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coste B, Mathur J, Schmidt M, Earley TJ, Ranade S, et al. 2010. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science. 330:55–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cox CD, Bavi N, Martinac B.. 2017. Origin of the force: the force-from-lipids principle applied to Piezo channels. Curr Top Membr. 79:59–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Currie SN. 1991. Vibration-evoked startle behavior in larval lampreys. Brain Behav Evol. 37:260–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eijkelkamp N, Linley JE, Torres JM, Bee L, Dickenson AH, et al. 2013. A role for Piezo2 in EPAC1-dependent mechanical allodynia. Nat Commun. 4:1682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hammarlund M, Hobert O, Miller DM, Sestan N.. 2018. The CeNGEN project: the complete gene expression map of an entire nervous system. Neuron. 99:430–433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harris TW, Arnaboldi V, Cain S, Chan J, Chen WJ, et al. 2020. WormBase: a modern model organism information resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 48: D762–D767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hennes A, Held K, Boretto M, De Clercq K, Van den Eynde C, et al. 2019. Functional expression of the mechanosensitive PIEZO1 channel in primary endometrial epithelial cells and endometrial organoids. Sci Rep. 9:1779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hobert O. 2002. PCR fusion-based approach to create reporter gene constructs for expression analysis in transgenic C. elegans. Biotechniques. 32:728–730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson BE, Glauser DA, Dan-Glauser ES, Halling DB, Aldrich RW, et al. 2011. Alternatively spliced domains interact to regulate BK potassium channel gating. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108:20784–20789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamajaya A, Kaiser JT, Lee J, Reid M, Rees DC.. 2014. The structure of a conserved piezo channel domain reveals a topologically distinct beta sandwich fold. Structure. 22:1520–1527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanehisa M, Sato Y.. 2020. KEGG Mapper for inferring cellular functions from protein sequences. Protein Sci. 29:28–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katoh E, Sbragaglia V, Aguzzi J, Breithaupt T.. 2013. Sensory biology and behaviour of Nephrops norvegicus. Adv Mar Biol. 64:65–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee KS, Iwanir S, Kopito RB, Scholz M, Calarco JA, et al. 2017. Serotonin-dependent kinetics of feeding bursts underlie a graded response to food availability in C. elegans. Nat Commun. 8:14221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Letunic I, Bork P.. 20 years of the SMART protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D493–D496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marshall KL, Saade D, Ghitani N, Coombs AM, Szczot M, et al. 2020. PIEZO2 in sensory neurons and urothelial cells coordinates urination. Nature. 588:290–295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Millet JR, Romero LO, Lee J, Bell B, Vásquez V.. 2021. C. elegans PEZO-1 is a mechanosensitive ion channel involved in food sensation. J Gen Physiol. 154:e202112960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Min S, Oh Y, Verma P, Whitehead SC, Yapici N, et al. 2021. Control of feeding by Piezo-mediated gut mechanosensation in Drosophila. Elife. 10:e63049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murthy SE, Loud MC, Daou I, Marshall KL, Schwaller F, et al. 2018. The mechanosensitive ion channel Piezo2 mediates sensitivity to mechanical pain in mice. Sci Transl Med. 10:eaat9897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ortiz B, Hincks J, Vayndorf E, Taylor BE, Harris MB.. 2018. Pharyngeal pumping in the nematode C. elegans: resolving treatment effects through variability assessment. FASEB J. 32:862.5.29042451 [Google Scholar]
- Raharjo WH, Ghai V, Dineen A, Bastiani M, Gaudet J.. 2011. Cell architecture: surrounding muscle cells shape gland cell morphology in the Caenorhabditis elegans pharynx. Genetics. 189:885–897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raizen D, Song B, Trojanowski N, You Y.. 2012. Methods for measuring pharyngeal behaviors. In: The C. elegans Research Community WormBook, editor. WormBook. doi:10.1895/wormbook.1.154.1. http://www.wormbook.org (Accessed: 2021 December 19). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Ridone P, Pandzic E, Vassalli M, Cox CD, Macmillan A, et al. 2020. Disruption of membrane cholesterol organization impairs the activity of PIEZO1 channel clusters. J Gen Physiol. 152:e201912515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Romero LO, Massey AE, Mata-Daboin AD, Sierra-Valdez FJ, Chauhan SC, et al. 2019. Dietary fatty acids fine-tune Piezo1 mechanical response. Nat Commun. 10:1200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sawin ER, Ranganathan R, Horvitz HR.. 2000. C. elegans locomotory rate is modulated by the environment through a dopaminergic pathway and by experience through a serotonergic pathway. Neuron. 26:619–631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scholz M, Lynch DJ, Lee KS, Levine E, Biron D.. 2016. A scalable method for automatically measuring pharyngeal pumping in C. elegans. J Neurosci Methods. 274:172–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schultz J, Copley RR, Doerks T, Ponting CP, Bork P.. 2000. SMART: a web-based tool for the study of genetically mobile domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:231–234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soattin L, Fiore M, Gavazzo P, Viti F, Facci P, et al. 2016. The biophysics of piezo1 and piezo2 mechanosensitive channels. Biophys Chem. 208:26–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Syeda R, Florendo MN, Cox CD, Kefauver JM, Santos JS, et al. 2016. Piezo1 channels are inherently mechanosensitive. Cell Rep. 17:1739–1746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szczot M, Pogorzala LA, Solinski HJ, Young L, Yee P, et al. 2017. Cell-type-specific splicing of Piezo2 regulates mechanotransduction. Cell Rep. 21:2760–2771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet. 2021. Press release: the Nobel prize in physiology or medicine. 2021. NobelPrize.org. Nobel Prize Outreach AB 2021. (Accessed: 2021 October 22). https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2021/press-release/ (Accessed: 2021 December 19).
- Vásquez V, Scherrer G, Goodman MB.. 2014. Sensory biology: it takes Piezo2 to tango. Curr Biol. 24:R566–R569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vidal-Gadea AG, Davis S, Becker L, Pierce-Shimomura JT.. 2012. Coordination of behavioral hierarchies during environmental transitions in Caenorhabditis elegans. Worm. 1:5–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vidal-Gadea AG, Topper S, Young L, Crisp A, Kressin L, et al. 2011. Caenorhabditis elegans selects distinct crawling and swimming gaits via dopamine and serotonin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108:17504–17509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang L, Zhou H, Zhang M, Liu W, Deng T.. 2019. Structure and mechanogating of the mammalian tactile channel P IEZO2. Nature. 573:225–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J, Jiang J, Yang X, Wang L, Xiao B.. 2020b. Tethering Piezo channels to the actin cytoskeleton for mechanogating via the E-cadherin-β-catenin mechanotransduction complex. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.12.092148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang P, Jia Y, Liu T, Jan YN, Zhang W.. 2020a. Visceral mechano-sensing neurons control Drosophila feeding by using Piezo as a sensor. Neuron. 108:640–650.e644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woo SH, Lukacs V, de Nooij JC, Zaytseva D, Criddle CR, et al. 2015. Piezo2 is the principal mechanotransduction channel for proprioception. Nat Neurosci. 18:1756–1762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woo S-H, Ranade S, Weyer AD, Dubin AE, Baba Y, et al. 2014. Piezo2 is required for Merkel-cell mechanotransduction. Nature. 509:622–626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yates AD, Achuthan P, Akanni W, Allen J, Allen J, et al. 2020. Ensembl 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 48:D682–D688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- You YJ, Kim J, Cobb M, Avery L.. 2006. Starvation activates MAP kinase through the muscarinic acetylcholine pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans pharynx. Cell Metab. 3:237–245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang M, Wang Y, Geng J, Zhou S, Xiao B.. 2019. Mechanically activated Piezo channels mediate touch and suppress acute mechanical pain response in mice. Cell Rep. 26:1419–1431.e1414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Strains are available upon request. The authors affirm that all data necessary for confirming the conclusions of the article are present within the article, figures, and tables.
Supplementary material is available at G3 online.