Skip to main content
Nutrition Journal logoLink to Nutrition Journal
letter
. 2022 Jun 21;21:41. doi: 10.1186/s12937-022-00797-7

Comments on “Diet quality in relation to the risk of hypertension among Iranian adults: cross-sectional analysis of Fasa PERSIAN cohort study”

Saeed Ghobadi 1, Alireza Jafari 2,
PMCID: PMC9210721  PMID: 35725533

Dear editors,

We enthusiastically read the research of Motamedi et al. [1] that was published in the valuable Nutrition Journal. This cross-sectional study used the data of the Fasa Cohort Study as a branch of the Prospective Epidemiological Research Study in Iran (PERSIAN) cohort. The authors presented associations between the diet qualities, assessed by Mediterranean dietary score, dietary diversity score, healthy eating index-2015, and diet quality index-international with the risk of hypertension in an Iranian population. However, there are some concerns regarding the methodology and interpretation of the present study.

Firstly, in the dietary intake assessment part of the methods, the authors used a block food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to assess the diet qualities of their study population, but this FFQ was not validated for use in the Iranian population. The authors cited reference [25] to support the validity of 125-item food frequency questionnaires (FFQ); however, the study conducted by Willett et al. [2] was 61-item FFQ, and their findings should be interpreted with caution. Therefore, this study could have been strengthened by providing further information on the validity of the FFQ to use in this sample of the Iranian population.

Secondly, binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify the relationship between dietary quality indices and the risk of hypertension, but it has not been clarified how the confounders were selected for building the models. It is expected that crude effect size in multivariable models changes by at least 10% after adjusting covariates [3]. In addition, it is mentioned that independent variables with a P-value less than 0.2 should be considered for the multivariable analysis [4]. Also, we wonder why some confounders such as drugs and other agents affecting blood pressure were not controlled.

Finally, although daily energy intake has been considered the main confounders in all adjusted models, the authors have not presented the distribution of energy intake in the article. We found that in another article [5] has been published on the same population, the mean of daily energy intake was higher than 3500 and 2800 (kcal/day) in men and women, respectively. Therefore, when comparing the calculated energy intakes with other articles on the Iranian population [6, 7], energy intakes are far too high in respondents. We believe that the average energy intake in this study may be over-reported.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

AJ and SGH conceived and wrote the paper and approved the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Saeed Ghobadi, Email: sghobadi70@gmail.com.

Alireza Jafari, Email: ar-jafari@alumnus.tums.ac.ir.

References

  • 1.Motamedi A, Ekramzadeh M, Bahramali E, Farjam M, Homayounfar R. Diet quality in relation to the risk of hypertension among Iranian adults: cross-sectional analysis of Fasa PERSIAN cohort study. Nutr J. 2021;20(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12937-021-00717-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Willett WC, Sampson L, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Bain C, Witschi J, et al. Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;122(1):51–65. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee PH. Is a cutoff of 10% appropriate for the change-in-estimate criterion of confounder identification? J Epidemiol. 2014;24(2):161–167. doi: 10.2188/jea.je20130062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jewell, NP. Statistics for Epidemiology. 1st ed: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2004. 10.1201/9781482286014.
  • 5.Yazdanpanah MH, Farjam M, Naghizadeh MM, Jedi F, Mohebi K, Homayounfar R. Sleep duration and anthropometric indices in an Iranian population: the Fasa PERSIAN cohort study. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):16249. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95796-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mirmiran P, Hadavi H, Mottaghi A, Azizi F. Advanced glycation end products and risk of general and abdominal obesity in Iranian adults: Tehran lipid and glucose study. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019;33:21. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.33.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nojomi M, TehraniBanihashemi A, Niksima H, Hashemian M, Mottaghi A, Malekzaddeh R. The relationship between dietary patterns, dietary quality index, and dietary inflammatory index with the risk of all types of cancer: Golestan cohort study. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021;35:48. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.35.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Nutrition Journal are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES