Skip to main content
Veterinary World logoLink to Veterinary World
. 2022 May 20;15(5):1215–1220. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.1215-1220

Antibiotic resistance and associated resistance determinants in different Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from pigs in Argentina

Julián Parada 1,2,, Marcelo Galas 3,4, Diego Faccone 2,3, Pablo Tamiozzo 1, Alicia Carranza 1
PMCID: PMC9210835  PMID: 35765497

Abstract

Background and Aim:

Salmonellosis is one of the most common foodborne diseases in the world, and the increasing antibiotic resistance in Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica recovered from food animals constitutes an important risk from a One Health approach. This study aimed to characterize antibiotic resistance and some of its associated resistance determinants in different S. enterica serovars isolated from pigs in Argentina.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective study was conducted on Salmonella strains isolated between 2011 and 2015 from pigs in the Pampean region of Argentina. The antimicrobial susceptibility patterns to 21 antimicrobials and some antibiotic resistance determinants were characterized in 55 Salmonella isolates, representing 58 farms.

Results:

We identified 56% (n=30) of the strains as multidrug-resistant, where resistance to tetracycline (62%, n=34), ampicillin (53%, n=29), nalidixic acid (53%, n=29), chloramphenicol (33%, n=18), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (31%, n=17) was most common. The wide range of resistance to ampicillin correlates with the presence of TEM type β-lactamases in the strains. However, high susceptibility was found in the new generation of β-lactams. Fluoroquinolone resistance is a major concern. Most strains with decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin showed gyrA mutations and plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance gene qnrB.

Conclusion:

Here, we identified broad resistance to some antibiotics frequently used in human therapeutics and several easily transferable resistance mechanisms that could endanger public health.

Keywords: environment, health, livestock, salmonellosis

Introduction

Salmonellosis is one of the two most common foodborne diseases in the world. In the European Union alone, 91,857 cases of non-typhoidal salmonellosis were reported in humans in 2018; almost one in three cases could be attributed to the consumption of fresh pork products [1]. The previous studies found that approximately 7-8% of the pork at retail markets in Argentina is contaminated with Salmonella spp. [2,3], but few studies have characterized this pathogen in local pig production farms [4,5]. Both pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria have become increasingly resistant to antibiotics in recent years because of increased administration of antibiotics, especially prophylactic in-feed antibiotics, in animal agriculture [6]. The European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network recently reported increasingly prevalent Salmonella strains resistant to antibiotics such as quinolones, ampicillin, sulfonamides, and tetracyclines [7]. Increased antibiotic-resistant strains of Salmonella enterica in food animals endanger public health. Epidemiological knowledge about zoonotic pathogens and their antibiotic resistance is fundamental to a One Health approach.

Antibiotic resistance occurs when bacteria undergo mutations or acquire genes through horizontal transfer, where integrons carrying resistance gene cassettes are considered the most common forms of mobile gene element transfer. Typically, Gram-negative bacteria produce β-lactamases, such as TEM enzymes, that hydrolyze drugs, such as penicillin and older cephalosporins, resulting in resistance to β-lactam antibiotics [8]. Fluoroquinolone resistance is associated with specific point mutations within the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) of DNA gyrase (gyrA), leading to not only target alterations that reduce the binding affinity of the drugs but also the presence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) encoding genes of the qnr alleles [9]. These acquired antimicrobial resistance determinants are public health hazards because plasmids whose genes encode antibiotic resistance can expand such resistance through horizontal transmission [10]. For example, food animals may be consumed and their antibiotic resistance genes are transferred to the human gut microbiota [11].

This study aimed to characterize antibiotic resistance and some of its associated resistance determinants in different S. enterica subsp. enterica serovars isolated from pigs in Argentina.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

The working protocol and the used techniques comply with the regulations of the Subcommittee on Animal Bioethics under the Ethics Committee of Scientific Research, as established in Resolution 376/22 of the Superior Council of the National University of Rio Cuarto.

Study period and location

This study was conducted from March 2018 to May 2021, at the National University of Río Cuarto, Córdoba, Argentina.

Study population

We retrospectively analyzed antibiotic resistance and its genetic bases in strains of Salmonella isolated from pigs between 2011 and 2015 in the Pampean region of Argentina. We selected isolates of clinical origin (n=11), recovered from cases of lung (6), liver (1), kidney (1), and intestinal (3) lesions, and mesenteric lymph nodes (n=9). Pigs were periodically monitored at slaughterhouses and admitted to the Pathology Department Diagnosis Service. We also included 35 strains from a previous study of 1518 fecal samples collected at 52 commercial farrow-to-finish pig farms in the region, where 22 farms tested positive for Salmonella spp. [4]. Isolates from clinical cases were recovered using conventional bacteriology with sheep blood agar and MacConkey agar, and mesenteric lymph nodes and fecal samples were analyzed according to ISO 6579:2002 standard. All isolates were serotyped according to the ninth edition of the White-Kauffmann-Le Minor scheme (Pasteur Institute, France). The serovars of the 55 Salmonella strains selected were Salmonella Anatum (9), Salmonella Brandenburg (2), Salmonella Bredeney (1), Salmonella Choleraesuis (8), Salmonella Derby (7), Salmonella Glostrup (3), Salmonella Heidelberg (2), Salmonella Infantis (1), Salmonella Livingstone (1), Salmonella Montevideo (1), Salmonella Oranienburg (2), Salmonella Panama (2), Salmonella Rissen (3), and Salmonella Typhimurium (13).

Antimicrobial susceptibility

The antimicrobial susceptibility evaluation of each strain/serovar was assessed using the Kirby-Baüer method (diffusion in Mueller-Hinton agar) according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines for the following antibiotics (n=21): Ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, piperacillin-tazobactam, cephalothin, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, ertapenem, imipenem, gentamicin, amikacin, azithromycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin (CIP), levofloxacin, nalidixic acid (NAL), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, fosfomycin, and nitrofurantoin. Susceptibility breakpoint levels were those described for Enterobacterales by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [12]. A strain of Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was incorporated to evaluate the quality of the process. A multidrug-resistant (MDR) strain was defined as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories.

Gene amplification and sequencing

The invA gene was amplified to confirm all Salmonella isolates. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to detect genes encoding antibiotic resistance: Tem to detect transferable β-lactamases, intl1 to detect Class 1 integron, qnrB to detect PMQR, and amino acid substitutions of QRDRs in gyrA.

All target genes were amplified using PCR with 1× DNA Taq buffer, 1 U of DNA Taq polymerase (Inbio Highway, Tandil, Buenos Aires, Argentina), 1.5 mM of MgCl2, 200 μM of dNTPs, 10 pmoL of each primer [13,14] (Table-1), and 2.5 μL of template DNA, for a total volume of 25 µL. DNA was physically extracted by boiling, and the PCR conditions were as follows: Incubation at 94°C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, annealing temperature according to the target gene (Table-1) for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min.

Table 1.

Primers, annealing temperatures, and references for each target gene.

Primer Target gene Sequence (5’-3’) Reference Annealing temperature (°C)
OT-1 tem TTG GGT GCA CGA GTG GGT TA [13] 55
OT-2 TAA TTG TTG CCG GGA AGC TA
qnrB-F qnrB CCG ACC TGA GCG GCA CTG A Antimicrobial Service, INEI-ANLIS “Dr. Carlos G. Malbran,” Argentina 55
qnrB-R CGC TCC ATG AGC AAC GAT GCC T
intI1F intI1 ATC ATC GTC GTA GAG ACG TCG G [14] 55
intI1R GTC AAG GTT CTG GAC CAG TTG C
gyrA-F gyrA Enterobacteriaceae ACG TAT TGG GCA AYG ACT GGA Antimicrobial Service, INEI-ANLIS “Dr. Carlos G. Malbran,” Argentina 50
gyrA-R CAA CGA AAT CGA CCG TCT CTT

GyrA was amplified in all strains resistant to NAL. The ADN Puriprep GP-kit (Inbio Highway) was used to purify PCR products before sequencing. Amplified fragments were sequenced in both directions (5´-3´ and 3´-5´) (ABI 3130×l, Applied Biosystem, INTA Castelar, Argentina), and sequences were edited using BioEdit, aligned with ClustalW, and analyzed to detect mutations.

Results

Antimicrobial susceptibility

Of the strains identified, 56% were MDR, including all strains of S. Typhimurium, S. Heidelberg, and S. Panama, and 75% of S. Choleraesuis (Figure-1). One strain of S. Typhimurium (S50) was resistant to seven antibiotics and showed decreased susceptibility to another three antibiotics (Figure-1). Resistance to tetracycline (62%) was most frequently observed, followed by resistance to ampicillin (52%), NAL (52%), chloramphenicol (33%), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (31%). Resistance to aminoglycosides was observed only for gentamicin in all S. Typhimurium strains. High susceptibility was found to β-lactams, except for ampicillin, and only one strain was resistant to fosfomycin (Figure-1).

Figure-1.

Figure-1

Antibiotic susceptibility of Salmonella strains from pig origin, showing the different categories: Black=Resistant, Gray=Susceptible with extended exposition, White=Susceptible; and also presence (black) or absence (white) of target resistance genes. The origins of the strain were field (F), slaughterhouse (Sth), and clinical cases (C).

Antibiotic resistance genes

The gene encoding transferable β-lactamase TEM was detected in 49% of the analyzed strains and 93% of ampicillin-resistant Salmonella. Class 1 integrons were present in 27% of the strains, of which 80% were MDR (Figure-1). In 30 isolates resistant to NAL, 21 had a gyrA mutation, and 53% of NAL-resistant strains showed the qnrB gene. Mechanisms generated by both genes (gyrA and qnrB) were present in 76% of strains resistant to CIP. The most observed gyrA mutation was Ser83Tyr (12/21, 57%), followed by Ser83Phe (7/21, 33%) and Asp87Gly (1/21, 5%) in the 21 Salmonella strains resistant to quinolones. A double mutation Ser83Tyr+Asp72Glu was noted in one strain.

Discussion

Salmonella threatens public health by causing not only clinical foodborne diseases worldwide but also extensive antibiotic resistance, which has been recently confirmed in strains isolated from various livestock species. Pork is an important protein source in Argentina, but its antibiotic resistance in the country and the underlying mechanisms of Salmonella isolated from pigs remain unclear. This study presents antibiotic resistance data from isolates collected from Argentinian in-farm pigs. Unlike other studies, this approach does not include Salmonella contamination from other sources, such as during transport to the abattoir or a stay in the lairage.

More than half of the isolates were MDR, which is consistent with the previous studies reported in other countries [15,16]. A study in Argentina found that 88% of Salmonella isolated from two pig farms was MDR and showed greater resistance to β-lactams than the present study [2]. However, all strains in the present study showed non-susceptibility to drugs in three or more antimicrobial categories if we consider the most virulent serovars, such as Typhimurium, which was also the most frequently isolated serovar from farms.

The strong relationship between serovar and decreased sensitivity to multiple antibiotics has been described previously [10,17]. S. Typhimurium is usually the most resistant serovar. Yet, our study detected strong resistance patterns in less virulent serovars such as Derby or Brandenburg. Interestingly, S. Panama showed consistent MDR, which was recently linked to infection of extraintestinal sites in humans, causing septicemia, meningitis, and osteomyelitis [18].

Tetracycline resistance was the most common resistance phenotype and widely distributed among Salmonella strains recovered from pigs, even in apparently less virulent serovars, such as S. Montevideo and S. Glostrup. Resistance to this drug has been reported from not only in this region and Brazil [19] but also worldwide [9,20]. Meanwhile, resistance to ampicillin, gentamicin, and quinolones is also consistent with reports in other countries, as shown by Salmonella strains isolated from clinical cases in pigs in the United States [17]. Resistance to sulfonamides has been reported worldwide [17,20]. We found lower levels here, even though high levels of resistance to sulfonamides have been reported in Salmonella isolated from retail market samples in Argentina [3].

Recent studies reported increasing resistance to β-lactams and cephalosporins such as ceftiofur [2,9]. Here, we found a relatively low susceptibility to ampicillin, which could be attributed to the presence of transferable β-lactamase TEM in resistant strains, yet resistance to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins was not observed. Class A β-lactamase enzymes catalyze the hydrolysis of the amide bond present in the β-lactam ring, yielding an ineffective inhibitor of the penicillin-binding proteins that target penicillins and early generation cephalosporins. The resulting high-level bacterial resistance spreads among Enterobacteriaceae, as we also found in this study [8]. These findings have significant implications for human health because this large class of antibiotics is used to treat human infections. The administration of these antibiotics has increased since most of the isolates in the present study were collected from farms more than 5 years ago. We detected extensive susceptibility to carbapenems, which agrees with other studies [20]. However, increased resistance to cephalosporins and carbapenems in the European Union in recent years warrants continued surveillance of this group of antibiotics in this region [1].

Resistance to fluoroquinolones is concerning, as quinolone-resistant strains increase in livestock production, such as CIP found in the present study and reported in Brazil, where more than 90% of the Salmonella isolates from pigs were resistant to CIP [19]. This class of antibiotics is also widely administered to humans, who are susceptible to many mechanisms of resistance transfer.

We analyzed QRDRs for gyrA mutations and found that codon 83 was the most frequent hot spot, corresponding to 90% of the mutations and all of them in NAL-resistant strains. This finding is consistent with a previous study, but we found a considerably lower proportion of codon 87 mutations [15]. The Ser83Phe mutation is frequently reported in S. Typhi strains, whose decreased susceptibility to CIP was detected in clinical cases in Peru [21].

Most strains with decreased susceptibility to CIP showed a combination of both gyrA mutations and PMQR gene qnrB, which together may enhance their mechanisms [15]. PMQR encoding genes of the qnr alleles, such as the qnrB19 gene, are associated with the expansion of CIP-resistant Salmonella strains in the United States [10]. Different variants of these plasmids in Argentina were characterized from Enterobacteriaceae clinical strains isolated from clinical cases, but CIP resistance in Salmonella from local pigs remains poorly characterized [16]. Future molecular studies should characterize the qnrB genes in this subset of strains.

Conclusion

This study detected widespread antibiotic resistance in S. enterica serovars isolated from Argentinian pigs. We also identified resistance determinants, such as gyrA mutations and the qnrB gene, which will guide future molecular studies. These findings highlight the need to control antibiotic use in livestock production to prevent resistance transfer to humans.

Authors’ Contributions

AC, MG, and JP: Designed the experiment and performed the susceptibility analysis. JP, DF, and PT: Performed molecular experiments. All authors were involved in analysis of the data, and writing and reviewing of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the [Funding Agency Nº 1] SECyT-UNRC, Río Cuarto, Argentina, under grants (Nº083/20); [Funding Agency Nº 2] GRFT-Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina, under grants (exp Nº 0279-011245/2019).

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Veterinary World remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliation.

References

  • 1.EFSA and ECDC (European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control) The European Union One Health 2018 Zoonoses Report. EFSA J. 2019;17(12):5926. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Colello R, Ruiz M.J, Padín V.M, Rogé A.D, Leotta G, Padola N.L, Etcheverría A.I. Detection and characterization of Salmonella serotypes in the production chain of two pig farms in Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:1370. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Favier G.I, Estrada C.L, Otero V.L, Escudero M.E. Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and molecular characterization by PCR and pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of Salmonella spp. isolated from foods of animal origin in San Luis, Argentina. Food Control. 2013;29(1):49–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Parada J, Carranza A, Alvarez J, Pichel M, Tamiozzo P, Busso J, Ambrogi A. Spatial distribution and risk factors associated with Salmonella enterica in pigs. Epidemiol. Infect. 2017;145(3):568–574. doi: 10.1017/S0950268816002612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vico J.P, Lorenzutti A.M, Zogbi A.P, Aleu G, Sánchez I.C, Caffer M.I, Rosmini M.R, Mainar-Jaime R.C. Prevalence, associated risk factors, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of non-typhoidal Salmonella in large scale swine production in Córdoba, Argentina. Res. Vet. Sci. 2020;130:161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ricker N, Trachsel J, Colgan P, Jones J, Choi J, Lee J, Coetzee J.F, Howe A, Brockmeier S.L, Loving C.L, Allen H.K. Toward antibiotic stewardship:Route of antibiotic administration impacts the microbiota and resistance gene diversity in swine feces. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020;7:255. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) and ECDC (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control) The European Union summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2016. EFSA J. 2018;16(2):5182. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Palzkill T. Structural and mechanistic basis for extended-spectrum drug-resistance mutations in altering the specificity of TEM, CTX-M, and KPC ?-lactamases. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2018;5:16. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2018.00016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang J, Sheng H, Xu W, Huang J, Meng L, Cao C, Zeng J, Meng J, Yang B. Diversity of serotype, genotype, and antibiotic susceptibility of Salmonella prevalent in pickled ready-to-eat meat. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:2577. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Elnekave E, Hong S.L, Lim S, Hayer S.S, Boxrud D, Taylor A.J, Lappi V, Noyes N, Johnson T.J, Rovira A, Davies P, Perez A, Alvarez J. Circulation of plasmids harboring resistance genes to quinolones and/or extended-spectrum cephalosporins in multiple Salmonella enterica serotypes from swine in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019;63(4):e02602–18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02602-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hu Y, Yang X, Lu N, Zhu B. The abundance of antibiotic resistance genes in human guts has a correlation to the consumption of antibiotics in an animal. Gut Microbes. 2014;5(2):245–249. doi: 10.4161/gmic.27916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals. 5th ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Arlet G, Philippon A. Construction by polymerase chain reaction and intragenic DNA probes for three main types of transferable β-lactamases (TEM, SHV, CARB) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1991;82(1):19–25. doi: 10.1016/0378-1097(91)90414-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Reyes A, Bello H, Domínguez M, Mella S, Zemelman S, González G. Prevalence and types of Class 1 integrons in aminoglycoside-resistant Enterobacteriaceae from several Chilean hospitals. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003;51(2):317–321. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yin M, Yang B, Wu Y, Wang L, Wu H, Zhang T, Tuohetaribayi G. Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella enterica serovar in retail meats in a market place in Uighur, Xinjiang, China. Food Control. 2016;64:165–172. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zwe Y.H, Yen Tang V.C, Aung K.T, Gutierrez R.A, Ching N.L, Yuk H.G. Prevalence, sequence types, antibiotic resistance and, gyrA mutations of Salmonella isolated from retail fresh chicken meat in Singapore. Food Control. 2018;90:233–240. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hong S, ovira A, Davies P, Ahlstrom C, Muellner P, Rendahl A, Olsen K, Bender J.B, Wells S, Perez A, Alvarez J. Serotypes and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica recovered from clinical samples from cattle and swine in Minnesota, 2006 to 2015. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0168016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pulford C.V, Perez-Sepulveda B.M, Rodwell E.V, Weill F.X, Baker K.S, Hinton J.C.D. Salmonella enterica serovar Panama, an understudied serovar responsible for extraintestinal salmonellosis worldwide. Infect. Immun. 2019;87(9):e00273–19. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00273-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Filho J.B.P, Yamatogi R.S, Possebon F.S, Fernandes S.A, Tiba-Casas M.R, Lara G.H.B, Ribeiro M.G, Pinto J.P.A. Frequency, serotyping and antimicrobial resistance pattern of Salmonella from feces and lymph nodes of pigs. Pesq. Vet. Bras. 2016;36(12):1165–1170. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bonardi S, Alpigiani I, Bruini I, Barilli E, Brindani F, Cavallini P, Bolzoni L, Pongolini S. Detection of Salmonella enterica in pigs at slaughter and comparison with human isolates in Italy. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016;218:44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.García C, Lejon V, Horna G, Astocondor L, Vanhoof R, Bertrand S, Jacobs J. Intermediate susceptibility to ciprofloxacin among Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi isolates in Lima, Peru. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014;52(3):968–970. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02663-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Veterinary World are provided here courtesy of Veterinary World

RESOURCES