Abstract
Background and Aim:
Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) transplantation and their hepatogenic differentiated cells (HDCs) can be applied for liver injury repair by tissue grafting. Regenerative potentiality in liver cirrhosis models was widely investigated; however, immunomodulation and anti-inflammation in acute hepatitis remain unexplored. This study aimed to explore the immunomodulatory and evaluate twice intravenous (IV) or intrahepatic (IH) administration of either BM-MSCs or middle-stage HDCs on aflatoxin (AF) acute hepatitis rat model.
Materials and Methods:
BM-MSCs viability, phenotypes, and proliferation were evaluated. Hepatogenic differentiation, albumin, and mmmmmmmm-fetoprotein gene expression were assessed. AF acute hepatitis was induced in rats using AFB1 supplementation. The transplantation of BM-MSCs or their HDCs was done either by IV or IH route. Hepatic ultrasound was performed after 3-weeks of therapy. Cytokines profile (tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α], interleukin [IL]-4, and IL-10) was assessed. Hepatic bio-indices, serum, and hepatic antioxidant activity were evaluated, besides examining liver histological sections.
Results:
Acute AFB1 showed a significant increase in TNF-α (p<0.01), liver enzyme activities (p<0.05), as well as decrease in IL-4, IL-10, and antioxidant enzyme activities (p<0.05). Cytokines profile was ameliorated in groups treated with IV and IH BM-MCs, showed a negative correlation between IL-4 and TNF-α (p<0.05), and a positive correlation between IL-10 upregulation and TNF-α (p<0.01). In IV HDCs treated group, positive correlations between IL-4 and IL-10 downregulation and TNF-α were observed. However, in IH HDCs group, a significant positive correlation between IL-4 and IL-10 upregulation and TNF-α, were recorded (p<0.05). In addition, IV BM-MSCs and IH HDCs treatments significantly increased antioxidant enzymes activity (p<0.05). IV and IH BM-MSCs significantly ameliorated liver transaminase levels, whereas IH HDCs significantly ameliorated alanine aminotransferase activity and nitric oxide concentration (p<0.05).
Conclusion:
The administration routes of BM-MSCs did not demonstrate any significant difference; however, the IH route of HDCs showed significant amelioration from the IV route. On the other hand, it showed noticeable anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory improvements in aflatoxicosis rats. Therefore, it can be concluded that acute hepatitis can be treated by a noninvasive IV route without the expense of hepatogenic differentiation. Further research using clinical trials that address several problems regarding engraftment and potentiation are needed to determine the optimal manipulation strategy as well as to achieve better long term effects.
Keywords: acute hepatitis, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell, cytokines, hepatogenic differentiation, rat model
Introduction
Many hepatotoxic agents, including viruses, medications, and toxins, can lead to acute liver injury due to the apoptosis of huge hepatic cells [1]. Aflatoxins (AFs) are secondary metabolites produced by fungal Aspergillus species, commonly Aspergillus flavus [2]. These fungi grow well in farm-to-table food with the aid of tropical climates [2,3]. As approximately 18 types of AFs are known [4], AFB1 is considered the most widespread toxin [5]. AFB1 affects many tissues, but the liver is the characteristic organ, in which it has been reported to cause hepatocellular malformation after long-term exposure [6]. It is known for its “short-term intoxication” that targets the liver and is marked by acute hepatic failure, degeneration, apoptosis, necrosis, bile duct proliferation, and even death on exposure for a brief period and at high dosage. AFB1 has been reported to interfere with the immune system of both humans and animals. Several studies have recorded a decline in the immunomodulatory factors following AFB1 exposure, such as the decrease in the activity of T or B lymphocytes [7], suppression of macrophage or neutrophil effector functions [8], and modification of inflammatory cytokine synthesis [9], thereby impairing natural killer cells; and increasing risk to diseases. Therefore, understanding the events accompanying short-term exposure to AFB1 is necessary. In spite of the availability of many physical and chemical approaches, they are still restricted along with inadequate effectiveness and cost inferences [10]. These limitations highlight the importance of searching for other alternative approaches [11]. Liver transplantation is a highly effective strategy in several conditions, but lack of donors, high costs required, and rejection of the transplanted organ limit its application [12]. Hepatocyte transplantation could be an alternative to improve liver regeneration; however, there is a deficiency of in vitro high-quality principal hepatocytes due to the difficulty of their in vitro expansion and the ease of losing their hepatic properties [13]. Hence, liver transplantation and hepatocyte transplantation are inhibited by the scarcity of tissue and cell resources. As a solution, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their derivatives, including hepatogenic differentiated cells (HDCs) can be used for non-AF liver injury repair in individuals or animal models by grafting into liver tissue, differentiating as well as secreting anti-inflammatory and antioxidant factors, and enhancing in vivo liver regeneration as reported by Hu and Li [1]. Several lines of evidence have shown that MSCs and HDCs are useful tools in regenerative medicine that targets liver injury [14].
MSCs can be purified from numerous tissues, including bone marrow (BM), umbilical cord blood and tissue, adipose tissue, and amniotic fluid [15]. MSCs are known for their self-renewal and multipotency and can differentiate into numerous somatic cells, such as osteocytes, chondrocytes, adipocytes, and hepatocytes, according to Hu and Li [16]. Yang et al. [17] illustrated that in vivo transplantation of MSCs is not only restricted to protection from inflammatory damage but also plays a pivotal function in tissue repair. Research has shown that injured or healthy hepatic conditions affect the response of MSCs, as indicated by the significant reduction in mortality from acute liver injury induced by carbon tetrachloride in mice after allogeneic MSCs implantation into affected tissues, while fewer MSCs were grafted into the normal liver [18]. Thus, MSCs have been proven to be effective for the treatment of liver failure in both animal models and clinical trials, as documented by Kholodenko et al. [19]. However, research has shown that engrafted MSCs rarely undergo hepatogenic differentiation at the sites of liver injury and are efficiently cleared from the liver after 1 month of injection [20]. Moreover, Baertschiger et al. [21] found that intrahepatic (IH) injection promises stable engraftment of MSCs undergoing myofibroblast differentiation. Other studies reported that this problem could be overcome by the in vitro hepatogenic differentiation of MSCs before in vivo transplantation.
On the other hand, BM-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs) can undergo functional HDCs, which are predicted to be a potential source of cells in regenerative medicine, tissue engineering, and effective clinical treatment of chronic hepatic injury [22]. After hepatogenic differentiation, MSCs restore liver function and exert immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic, antioxidative, and antiapoptotic effects in hepatocytes [23]. Most previous trials used MSCs or differentiated cells for chronic hepatitis models because of the potentiality of these cells to replace the fibrosed tissues [19]. However, the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties of MSCs have not been effectively utilized in such models [1], which can be attributed to the fact that in vivo acute inflammation effectively enhances cell recruitment, whereas chronic inflammation significantly prevents local cell recruitment. Hence, these anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties could be superior and cleared in acute inflammation. It was clear that regenerative potentiality in liver cirrhosis models was widely investigated; however, immunomodulation and anti-inflammation in acute hepatitis remain unexplored.
This study aimed to clarify the degree of effectiveness of these cells in the treatment using an acute aflatoxicosis rat model. In addition, the effects of two routes of administration of either BM-MSCs or middle-stage HDCs in rats with induced aflatoxicosis were explored to determine the effective administration route and types of MSCs for cell-based therapy.
Materials and Methods
Ethical approval
This study was approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of National Research Centre (Protocol Number: 19/151), Cairo, Egypt.
Study period and location
This study was conducted from February to September 2021 in National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt.
Chemicals
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA).
Isolation of rat BM-MSCs
The albino rats were procured from animal house of National Research Centre, Egypt. BM-derived all-nucleated cells were isolated from the femurs of healthy albino rats with an average weight of 120 g according to the method of Lee et al. [24]. The isolated cells were expanded by culturing at 10×106 cell density into 100-mm culture dishes (Greiner Bio-One, Austria) in an expansion medium consisting of alpha minimum essential medium (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) containing 20% fetal bovine serum, L-glutamine (2 mM), 2-mercaptoethanol (55 μM), and penicillin/streptomycin. The cells were incubated in 5% CO2 at 37°C for 2-days; the detached cells were discarded by changing the medium and the adherent cells remained in culture for 2-3 weeks. Several passages were performed by subculturing the colony-forming adherent cells in the expansion medium. Subsequently, BM-MSCs were collected at the third passage (P3) on reaching 80% confluence to be exposed for their characterization and proliferation assays.
Viability and phenotypic analysis of BM-MSCs
Rat BM-MSCs were detached, collected, and centrifuged at 300 × g for 5 min and then suspended in the expansion medium. The viability of BM-MSCS was evaluated in an aliquot using Trypan blue stain by counting the stained live cells and excluding the unstained dead cells as reported by Al-Mutairi et al. [25]. For BM-MSC, surface antigen phenotypic analysis and cell markers were assessed [26]. After being washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, PH 7.4; 137-mM NaCl, 2.7-mM KCl, 10-mM Na2HPO4, and 1.8-mM KH2PO4) (Lonza, Germany) containing 1% bovine serum albumin (ALB) (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.2×106 cells were stained with anti-CD34, anti-CD45, anti-CD29, anti-CD73, and anti-CD90 antibodies (BD Biosciences, USA). A FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) was used to examine conjugated cells as well as determine the proportions of positive and negative populations. A negative sample with untreated isotype cells was used as a control.
Proliferation assay using bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) integration
The proliferative 80% confluent BM-MSCs (P3) were estimated using the BrdU integration assay kit (Invitrogen, USA). Seeding of cells was performed for 2-3 days at a density of 1×104/well on two-well chambered slides (Nunc Lab Tek, Denmark) followed by a 24 h incubation with diluted BrdU staining solution. The number of positively stained cells and that of total cells were counted in ten consecutive images. The proliferation capacity of BM-MSCs was represented as the proportion of BrdU positive cells to the total nucleated cells as explained by Akiyama et al. [27].
Hepatogenic differentiation of BM-MSCs
HDCs were induced through three stages, namely, conditioning, differentiation, and maturation, as described previously by Khajeniazi et al. [28]. BM-MSCs (P3) were seeded on collagen Type I coated flasks (Falcon, USA) with an expansion medium at a density of 5×103 until confluence. Cell conditioning (first stage) was induced by preculturing for 2-days with serum-free Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium (IMDM; Gibco, USA) containing 10-ng/mL of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF2; ITSI-Biosciences, USA) and 20-ng/mL of epidermal growth factor; ITSI-Biosciences. The cells were subjected to 7-days of incubation in IMDM supplemented with 10-ng/mL bFGF2, 20-ng/mL hepatocyte growth factor (HGF; ITSI-Biosciences), and 0.61 g/L nicotinamide (Lonza) to induce cell differentiation (second stage). The maturation stage (third stage) was induced by incubation of cells for up to 21-days in IMDM, including 20-ng/mL HGF, 20-ng/mL of oncostatin M (ITSI-Biosciences), 50-mg/mL of insulin transferrin selenium (Lonza), and 1-μM/L dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich). The medium was changed twice a week during the second and third stages. HDCs were morphologically and functionally evaluated at 3 time points: On day 7 (end of differentiation stage –to prematuration stage), day 14 (middle of maturation stage), and day 21 (end of maturation stage).
Characterization of HDCs
Morphology under inverted microscope
The morphological changes of the HDCs were monitored at the three different time points of hepatogenic differentiation and maturation under inverted microscope (Olympus, Japan).
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
The hepatic markers were assessed using RT-PCR for ALB and 〈-fetoprotein (AFP) genes on day 21 (end of maturation stage) by amplifying the complementary DNA with specific primers as described in Table-1.
Table 1.
Gene | Primer | Accession number | Amplicon size (bp) |
---|---|---|---|
ALB | GGCACAGTGCTTGCAGAATTTCAG (F) CACAGACGGTTCAGGATGGCAG (R) |
NM-134326.2 | 272 bp |
AFP | TCTGAAACGCCATCGAAATGCC (F) AATGTAAATGTCGGCCAGTCCCT (R) |
NM-012493.2 | 285 bp |
The cells were harvested and stored at −20°C on RNA LATER™ (Thermo Scientific, Germany) to protect cell RNA for further extraction for detection of ALB and AFP gene expression. According to standard protocols; the total cellular RNA was extracted using RNeasy Protect Cell Mini Kit (Invitrogen, catalog no. 12183018A). cDNA synthesis was performed for equal quantities of total RNA in all samples using the Revert-aid first strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen, catalog no.12594025) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The optimal conditions for denaturation, annealing, and extension steps were carried out using a thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, USA). Five minutes of denaturation were performed at 94°C with 28 cycles for AFP; the denaturation was performed at 94°C for 15-s with 40 cycles for ALB. The annealing and extension were performed at 66°C for 10-s and at 72°C for 20-s, respectively, followed by 7 min of final extension at 72°C. Electrophoresis on agarose gels was used for the separation of PCR products. Relative quantification was normalized against the housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as an internal control and according to Xu et al. [29].
Metabolic activity of HDCs
The concentrations of ALB and urea in the culture media were used as indices for the metabolic function of HDCs on day 7 (end of differentiation stage), day 14 (middle of maturation stage), and day 21 (end of maturation stage) of hepatogenic induction. Urea assay was performed by incubating HDCs in a medium containing 5-mmol/L of ammonium chloride in 5% CO2 at 37°C. After 24-h, the supernatant was collected to measure urea concentration colorimetrically using a urea assay kit (BioMerieux, France) according to the manufacturer’s directions. ALB concentrations were determined in the collected media using a bromocresol green colorimetric assay (BioMerieux) following the manufacturer’s directions.
Injection of BM-MSCs and middle-stage HDCs
BM-MSCs (P3) were used to reach 80% confluence. Middle-stage HDCs were used. Two routes of administration were used in rats after anesthesia was induced with xylazine at 0 mg/kg. An intravenous (IV) injection was performed after washing the tail with xylol for further protrusion of the four tail veins. A suspension of 2×106 cells in 0.5 mL of PBS was prepared and injected slowly into two tail veins. IH injection was performed by determining the injection site on the upper right quadrant of the liver along the left rib edge. Rats were anesthetized with xylazine at 10 mg/kg, and their skin was sterilized with 70% alcohol and shaved before injection. A suspension of 2×106 cells in 0.5 mL PBS was prepared and injected into the liver over 15 min with a syringe at a 30° angle. After injection in both IV and IH routes, gentle pressure was applied on the site of injection using cotton balls to prevent draining and subsequent leakage of the cell suspensions.
Experimental design
The study was carried out on 48 adult male albino rats weighing 120-150 g. The rats were fed with a standard pellet diet, given water ad libitum and kept in standard environmental conditions. They were equally divided into six groups: The first group was supplemented with olive oil and used as control, whereas the other five groups were supplemented with 100 µg/kg body weight AFB; (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in olive oil once daily for 7 days [30]. The experimental rats were divided as follows: In Group 2, each rat was injected with 0.5 mL PBS (AFB1 control) (half of the animals received IV injections, whereas the other half received IH injections). In Group 3, each rat was injected with 2×106 BM-MSCs into the tail veins twice at 2-week intervals (IV BM-MSCs). In Group 4, each rat was injected intrahepatically with 2×106 BM-MSCs at 2-week intervals (IH BM-MSCs). In Group 5, each rat was injected with 2×106 middle-stage HDCs into the tail veins twice at 2-week intervals (IV middle-stage HDCs). In Group 6, each rat was injected intrahepatically with 2×106 middle-stage HDCs twice at 2-week intervals (IH middle-stage HDCs). Three weeks after the last injection, all rats were subjected to ultrasonography (USG) examination. Blood samples were collected from all rats and sera were extracted through 3000-rpm centrifugation for 20 min. All rats were humanely killed by cervical dislocation. The guidelines of the National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research were followed by the authors, who are well trained in animal care and handling. Animal welfare was taken into consideration to minimize the rats’ discomfort and distress, with sodium pentobarbital anesthesia used during the experiment. Body weight, temperature, and behavioral changes were used as specific endpoint criteria and were monitored daily throughout the experiment. Immediate euthanization was performed when any animal reached the endpoint criteria. Specimens of the liver were dissected from each rat for histological and tissue antioxidant activities analyses.
USG examination
The rat livers were detected using USG after 3 weeks of therapy [31]. Scanning of the liver was performed using a Doppler USG scanner equipped with a 12 MHz linear array transducer. Gray color and spectral modes were used. All scanning parameters, such as gain, the field of view, and time gain control, were independently optimized. Details of the location, shape, boundaries, and architecture of liver lesions were noted. Color and power flow modes were used to quantify the hepatic blood flow end foci. The peak systolic velocity, end-diastolic velocity (EDV), time average maximum velocity (TAMV), mean velocity (V), systolic/diastolic flow (S/D), resistance index (RI), pulsatility index (PI), G mean, and G peak were measured.
Cytokine profile
Assay of cytokines levels in the collected rats’ sera was performed using ELISA kits for tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (catalog no ERT2010-1, Assaypro, USA), interleukin (IL)-4 (RAB0301, Sigma, USA and IL-10 (catalog no ERI3010-1, Assaypro, USA). The manufacturer’s directions were performed, and the color difference was determined at 450 nm using a microplate ELISA reader (BIO-TEK, INC., ELx, 800UV, USA).
Hepatic bio-indices
Levels of serum total protein, ALB, cholesterol (Chol), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), triglyceride (TG), nitric oxide (NO), and malondialdehyde (MDA) were measured calorimetrically using kits of (BioMerieux). Globulin and albumin/globulin (A/G) ratio were calculated. The dissected liver samples were weighed and homogenized in PBS (pH 7.4) to yield 20% (w/v) homogenate [32]. Cooling centrifugation was performed at 4°C for 10 min at 1700 rpm. MDA was determined in the supernatant to exhibit lipid peroxidation in the liver.
Hepatic and serum antioxidant activities
The supernatant of liver homogenate was further diluted with PBS to 2% dilution. Hepatic glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and reduced GSH activities were then determined using SPECTRUM kits (BioMerieux). The absorbencies were estimated spectrophotometrically at 450 nm. Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and GSH activities were evaluated in the collected sera using SPECTRUM kits (BioMerieux). Absorbencies were spectrophotometrically measured at 340 nm, 560 nm, and 520 nm, respectively.
Histological assay
Specimens of the collected livers were subjected to histological analysis. Five micro milliliters thickness paraffin slides were processed, followed by hematoxylin-eosin stain to evaluate the amelioration of inflammatory lesions as explained by Bancroft and Marilyn [33].
Statistical analysis
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 19.0 was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics and simple one-way analysis of variance were performed. The descriptive values of data were expressed as mean±standard error. Post hoc analysis using the Mann–Whitney test was performed to compare two of the six groups and, with p<0.05 and p<0.01 reflecting a significant difference. Minitab 21.0 was used to determine the coefficients of correlations between TNF-α and the bio-index parameters, antioxidant activities, and cytokine profiles.
Results
Isolation and proliferation of BM-MSCs
BM-MSCs were regularly observed by an inverted microscope (Optika, Italy), and they continued to multiply to reach 80% confluence after 14 days (Figure-1a). Trypan blue examination showed that cell viability at the third passage was 97.11±4.08% on reaching 80% confluence. The percentage of BrdU +ve cells with brown stained nucleus was 72.14 (Figure-1b). Flow cytometric analysis showed the percentages of +ve stained cells that indicated the marker of mesenchymalization of isolated cells (Figure-1). Results revealed that BM-MSCs negatively expressed CD34 (4.4%) and CD45 (1.7%) markers while positively expressed CD29 (88.2%), CD73 (83.1%), and CD90 (74.9%) markers (Figure-1).
Morphological changes of HDCs
The morphology of BM-MSCs was changed from spindle-shaped to oblateness after differentiation to HDCs (Figure-2). The cells were developed from their original cylindrical shape to spherical-shaped cells on day 7 (Figure-2a). This morphology changed to oblateness often in cells from day 14 (Figure-2b) to be more compact, polygonal shapes like on day 21 of maturation of HDCs (Figure-2c). Hepatic specific markers measurement indicated that the protein expression of ALB and AFP (Figure-2d) could be detected as measured by RT-PCR on day 21 of maturation of HDCs. +ve linear correlation of ALB secretion and urea synthesis was obtained by the progress of differentiation. The rates of ALB were significantly higher (p<0.01) on days 14 (1.237±0.14 µg/dL) and day 21 (1.601±0.18 µg/dL) than on day 7 (0.102±0.03 µg/dL) (Figure-2e). Similarly, urea synthesis (Figure-2f) was significantly higher (p<0.01) at day 14 (1.024±0.19 mg/dL) and day 21 (1.136±0.30 mg/dL) than that at day 7 (0.013±0.002) mg/dL) (Figure 2).
USG examination
Hepatic parenchyma
The hepatic parenchyma of healthy control rat livers showed medium echogenicity, with a regular homogeneous surface according to USG (Figure-3a). By contrast, acute aflatoxicosis rat model livers showed enlargement and congestion with a starry sky appearance throughout the hyperechogenic heterogeneous parenchyma, dilated hepatic veins, and an irregular surface line (Figure-3b). Moreover, in the 4th week after injection, USG revealed that the liver of IV BM-MSCs-injected rats had a starry sky appearance throughout the hyperechogenic homogeneous parenchyma (Figure-3c), whereas that of IH BM-MSCs injected rats had a normal lobe with a hypoechogenic homogeneous parenchyma and a regular surface line (Figure-3d). Moreover, USG at 4 weeks after IV HDCs injection showed a congested liver with a hyperechogenic parenchyma and a slightly irregular liver surface line (Figure-3e). Conversely, USG at 4 weeks after IH HDCs injection demonstrated an improvement as shown by a medium echogenic homogeneous hepatic parenchyma and a regular surface line (Figure-3f).
Hepatic blood flow
Color and spectral Doppler USG results showed normal hepatic venous flow direction and waveform picture in healthy rats in which the hepatic venous waveform was phasic, and the direction of flow was predominantly antegrade. A tetra-inflectional waveform (A, S, V, and D waves) was observed that was mostly below the baseline at spectral Doppler. The A wave was an upward pointing with a peak corresponding to the maximum retrograde hepatic venous flow above the baseline. The S wave was the next wave on the waveform. Its initial downward-sloping resembles antegrade hepatic venous flow and considered the largest downward-pointing wave in the cycle. The v wave was the third wave on the waveform. The D wave was the 4th and the smaller last downward-pointing wave that attributed to antegrade hepatic venous flow. The distance between the A wave and peak −ve excursion S wave was normal referring to normal phasicity (Figure-4a). However, in acute aflatoxicosis rat model, the hepatic venous waveform was phasic, and the direction of flow was antegrade that corresponded to the three waves (A, S, D). Abnormally mild decreased phasicity was noticed in the hepatic vein of acute aflatoxicosis rat model. This low phasicity was attributed to mild decrease in the distance between the A wave and peak −ve S wave excursion as shown in the spectral Doppler USG (Figure-4b). At the 4th week following IV MSCs injection of rats, the hepatic venous waveform showed phasic, and the direction of blood flow was antegrade that corresponded to the three waves (A, S, and D) by Color and Spectral Doppler USG. In addition, a pulsatile waveform of hepatic vein was observed but the S wave was not as deep as the D wave leading to with “decreased S wave” that was specific for tricuspid regurgitation (Figure-4c). However, Color and spectral Doppler USG illustrated normal hepatic venous flow direction and waveform at the 4th week in IH MSCs injected rats. The hepatic venous waveform was phasic and predominantly antegrade with tetrainflectional waveform (A, S, V, and D waves) that was mostly below the baseline at spectral Doppler. Particularly, the A wave was upward-pointing wave with a peak of maximum retrograde hepatic venous flow. The S wave showed downward-sloping corresponding to antegrade hepatic venous flow. The v wave was the third wave on the waveform. The D wave was the 4th and last wave and corresponded to antegrade hepatic venous flow as well as it was the smaller of the two downward-pointing waves. The distance between the A wave and peak −ve excursion S wave was normal referring to normal phasicity (Figure-4d). On the other hand, IV HDCs injected rats showed phasic waveform with antegrade direction of hepatic venous flow which corresponded to the three waves (A, S, and D) by Color and Spectral Doppler USG at the 4th week of injection. Abnormally moderate decreased phasicity in the hepatic vein was also observed by Spectral Doppler USG as the A wave was downward-pointing wave and the most decreased was the distance between the A wave and the −ve S wave peak (Figure-4e). However, normal hepatic venous flow direction and waveform was observed by Color and spectral Doppler USG at the 4th week in IH HDCs injected rats. The hepatic venous waveform was phasic and predominantly antegrade with tetra-inflectional waveform (A, S, V, and D waves). Particularly, the A wave was upward-pointing with a peak corresponding to maximum retrograde flow of hepatic vein. The S wave was the next wave on the waveform with downward-sloping corresponding to antegrade hepatic venous flow. The v wave was the third wave on the waveform and the D wave was the 4th and last one corresponding to antegrade flow of hepatic vein and is the smaller downward-pointing wave on the waveform. In addition, the distance between the A wave and peak −ve excursion S wave was normal referring to normal phasicity (Figure-4f).
Blood flow parameters
A picture of high blood flow was noticed in acute AFB1 that represented by elevated PSV, TAMV, PI, G mean and G peak as well as declined EDV, S/D, and RI. Both IV and IH injection of BM-MSCs resulted in a significant decrease of PSV and TAMV and increase of EDV, S/D, and RI in IV BM-MSCs and IH BM-MSCs groups comparing to AFB1 control group. However, no changes appeared after IV injection of middle-stage HDCs. On the other hand, IH injection of middle-stage HDCs led to the decline of PSV, TAMV, and G peak as well as elevation of EDV, S/D, and RI in IH middle-stage HDCs group comparing to AFB1 control group (Table-2).
Table 2.
Parameters | Healthy control (n=8) | AFB1 (n=8) | AFB1+IV BM-MSCs (n=8) | AFB1+IH BM-MSCs (n=8) | AFB1+IV HDCs (n=8) | AFB1+IH HDCs (n=8) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSV (cm/s) | 25.72±1.18 | 58.36*±6.41 | 38.41a±2.48 | 32.85a±3.76 | 49.61±3.29 | 29.95a±2.81 | 0.0032 |
EDV (cm/s) | 9.18±2.03 | 2.01*±0.42 | 8.52a±1.93 | 9.78a±2.46 | 3.93±1.05 | 8.96a±1.77 | 0.0014 |
TAMV (cm/s) | 8.05±0.64 | 14.25*±1.51 | 7.08a±1.28 | 8.42a±1.13 | 15.42±3.07 | 8.93a±0.72 | 0.0011 |
Mean V (cm/s) | 15.62±1.28 | 19.04±3.38 | 14.90±2.18 | 16.48±2.38 | 18.76±3.58 | 15.33±1.49 | 0.0913 |
S/D | 2.74±0.71 | 0.31*±0.07 | 1.23a±0.25 | 3.51a±1.02 | 0.66±0.13 | 0.43a±0.05 | 0.0011 |
RI | 1.83±0.27 | 0.61*±0.13 | 1.53a±0.22 | 1.84a±0.33 | 0.76±0.19 | 1.87a±0.39 | 0.0013 |
PI | 1.02±0.16 | 2.92*±0.53 | 1.78±0.37 | 1.46±0.18 | 2.79±0.52 | 1.88±0.33 | 0.0422 |
G Mean (mmHg) | 0.12±0.03 | 0.29*±0.04 | 0.17±0.03 | 0.24±0.05 | 0.25±0.05 | 0.19±0.02 | 0.0321 |
G Peak (mmHg) | 0.25±0.07 | 0.73*±0.15 | 0.39±0.04 | 0.33±0.08 | 0.63±0.14 | 0.26a±0.02 | 0.0824 |
• In the same row significantly different than control at P<0.01. and
is significantly different than AFB1 at P<0.01. AFB1=Aflatoxin B1, IV=Intravenous, IH=Intrahepatic, BM-MSCs=Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, HDCs=Hepatogenic differentiated cells, PSV=Peak systolic velocity, EDV=End diastolic velocity, TAMV=Time average maximum velocity, V=Mean velocity, S/D=Systolic/diastolic flow, RI=Resistance index, PI=Pulsatility index
Cytokines profile and correlation to TNF-α
AFB1 group was associated with a significant increase of the pro-inflammatory cytokine (TNF-α) and a significant decline in the anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4 and IL-10) at p<0.05. IH therapy with HDCs ameliorated the levels of cytokines as indicated by a significant decrease in the serum TNF-α level (p<0.05) and a significant increase of IL-10 level (p<0.05) comparing to AFB1 group (Table-3).
Table 3.
Parameters | Healthy control (n=8) | AFB1 (n=8) | AFB1+IV BM-MSCs (n=8) | AFB1+IH BM-MSCs (n=8) | AFB1+IV HDCs (n=8) | AFB1+IH HDCs (n=8) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNF-a | 10.99±2.11 | 15.61*±1.31 | 11.32±1.91 | 14.21±2.30 | 16.87±2.12 | 10.25a±1.63 | 0.0382 |
IL-4 | 12.47±1.33 | 8.36*±1.54 | 11.99±2.22 | 10.52±1.49 | 7.31±1.47 | 11.85±1.64 | 0.0461 |
IL-10 | 8.35±1.20 | 5.85*±1.23 | 7.32±1.25 | 7.33±1.86 | 5.66±1.70 | 9.07a±1.58 | 0.0419 |
• In the same row, significantly different than control at P<0.01. And
is significantly different than AFB1 at P<0.05. AFB1=Aflatoxin B1, IV=Intravenous, IH=Intrahepatic, BM-MSCs=Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, HDCs=Hepatogenic differentiated cells, TNF=Tumor necrosis factor, IL=Interleukin
In AFB1 group, a significant −ve correlation was observed in IL-4 (p<0.05) and a significant downregulation +ve correlation in IL-10 (p<0.01) to TNF-α. The results indicated amelioration of cytokines concentration in IV BM-MSCs and IH BM-MCs treated groups with −ve correlation in IL-4 (p<0.05) and a significant upregulation +ve correlation in IL-10 (p<0.01) to TNF-α. In the IV HDCs treated group, a downregulation +ve correlation was recorded in both IL-4 and IL-10 to TNF-α. However, a significant upregulation +ve correlation was recorded in both IL-4 and IL-10 (p<0.05) to TNF-α of IH HDCs treated group (Figure-5 and Table-4).
Table 4.
Parameters | Healthy control (n=8) | AFB1 (n=8) | AFB1+IV BM- MSCs (n=8) | AFB1+IH BM- MSCs (n=8) | AFB1+IV HDCs (n=8) | AFB1+IH HDCs (n=8) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IL-4 | −0.547a | −0.855 | −0.774 | −0.754 | 0.111 | 0.938 |
IL-10 | −0.500b | 0.944 | 0.808 | 0.852 | 0.974 | 0.826 |
Chol | 0.888 | 0.900a | 0.900a | 1.000b | 0.951 | 0.721a |
ALT | 0.849 | 1.000 | 0.947 | 0.900 | 0.791 | 1.000 |
AST | 0.999 | 1.000 | 0.999a | 0.999a | 1.000 | −1.000a |
ALP | 0.990 | 0.996a | 0.979 | 0.952 | −1.000 | 0.987 |
TG | 0.999 | 1.000a | 0.845 | 1.000b | −0.833 | 0.934 |
NO | 0.994 | 0.997 | 1.000 | 0.900a | −0.751a | 1.000 |
MDA | 0.956 | 0.912 | 1.000b | 0.999b | −0.971b | 1.000b |
GSH | 0.990 | −0.996 | −1.000 | −0.853b | 1.000b | −0.984b |
TAC | 1.000 | −0.766a | −1.000b | −0.912b | 0.853 | −0.862 |
Values of correlation coefficient with
and
are significantly correlated with TNF-α. AFB1=Aflatoxin B1, IV=Intravenous, IH=Intrahepatic, BM-MSCs=Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, HDCs=Hepatogenic differentiated cells, IL=Interleukin, Chol=Cholesterol, ALT=Alanine aminotransferase, AST=Aspartate aminotransferase, ALP=Alkaline phosphatase, TG=Triglyceride, NO=Nitric oxide, MDA=Malondialdehyde, GSH=Reduced glutathione, TAC=Total antioxidant capacity
Hepatic bio-indices and correlations with TNF-α
AFB1 injection led to alterations in some liver function parameters. A significant decrease in ALB concentration (p<0.05) and a significant increase in ALT, AST (p<0.05), and NO (p<0.01) were observed. IV injection of BM-MSCs significantly ameliorated ALT and AST activities (p<0.05). By contrast, IH injection of BM-MSCs significantly ameliorated ALT (p<0.05), AST (p<0.01), and NO (p<0.01) compared with AFB1 control. IV therapy with HDCs did not affect the bio-index parameters and liver enzyme activities whereas, IH therapy with HDCs significantly increased ALB concentration (p<0.05) and decreased ALT activity (p<0.05) and NO concentration (p<0.01) to approximately normal levels. Serum MDA significantly increased (p<0.01) in the AFB1 group compared with that in the healthy control group. IH injection of HDCs restored the serum level of MDA (p<0.01) (Table-5).
Table 5.
Parameters | Healthy control (n=8) | AFB1 (n=8) | AFB1+IV BM - MSCs (n=8) | AFB1+IH BM - MSCs (n=8) | AFB1+IV HDCs (n=8) | AFB1+IH HDCs (n=8) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total protein (g/dL) | 6.14±1.25 | 6.44±1.85 | 6.53±1.44 | 6.48±1.84 | 7.01±1.77 | 6.99±1.08 | 0.1942 |
ALB (g/dL) | 4.55±1.02 | 3.18*±0.51 | 3.15±0.61 | 3.66±0.88 | 3.46±0.61 | 4.11a±1.14 | 0.0421 |
Globulin (g/dL) | 3.45±0.11 | 3.98±0.24 | 3.11±0.14 | 3.60±0.42 | 3.15±0.32 | 3.47±0.51 | 0.0933 |
A\G ratio | 1.2±0.05 | 0.94±0.04 | 1.01±0.10 | 1.01±0.12 | 1.10±0.11 | 1.40±0.20 | 0.5426 |
Chol (mg/dL) | 89.11±11.52 | 90.34±13.04 | 85.22±6.75 | 75.17±8.55 | 81.05±11.43 | 89.38±12.42 | 0.7114 |
ALT/GPT (U/L) | 65.90±4.68 | 89.07*±6.52 | 64.11a±8.51 | 61.99a±8.01 | 91.15±9.54 | 69.03a±8.52 | 0.0030 |
AST/GOT (U/L) | 133.47±12.54 | 164.12*±14.20 | 148.25a±14.25 | 131.38b±12.55 | 178.13±14.85 | 180.24±18.26 | 0.0061 |
ALP (U/dl) | 124.16±18.58 | 134.55±19.35 | 118.62±20.84 | 124.85±21.77 | 133.01±18.25 | 130.84±20.74 | 0.4430 |
TG (mg/dL) | 31.06±3.55 | 34.15±4.51 | 33.84±2.40 | 31.42±3.42 | 30.45±5.21 | 32.14±4.20 | 0.3216 |
NO (umol/L) | 16.05±3.25 | 25.48**±2.09 | 23.84±1.52 | 14.65b±2.87 | 12.88±3.10 | 11.65b±2.84 | 0.0241 |
MDA (nmol/mL) | 0.489±0.021 | 0.981**±0.01 | 0.882±0.01 | 0.771±0.01 | 0.731±0.06 | 0.431b±0.031 | 0.0077 |
In the same row,
and
are significantly different than control at P<0.05 and P<0.01 respectively and
and
are significantly different than AFB1 at P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively. AFB1=Aflatoxin B1, IV=Intravenous, IH=Intrahepatic, BM-MSCs=Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, HDCs=Hepatogenic differentiated cells, ALB=Albumin, A/G=Albumin/globulin, Chol=Cholesterol, ALT=Alanine aminotransferase, AST=Aspartate aminotransferase, ALP=Alkaline phosphatase, TG=Triglyceride, NO=Nitric oxide, MDA=Malondialdehyde
The level of the bio-indices and enzyme activities in the serum of AFB1 rats correlated with TNF-α (Figures-6 and 7; Table-4). In the AFB1 group, significant +ve correlations were observed between Chol, ALP, and TG upregulation and TNF-α (p<0.05). However, significant −ve correlations were observed between Chol, TG, and NO serum levels and TNF-α (p<0.01) after IV HDCs therapy (Figure-6).
In AFB1, significant +ve correlations of ALT, AST, and ALP upregulation with TNF-α (p<0.05) were recorded. Amelioration of these liver enzymes was observed after treatment with IV and IH BM-MSCs indicating a significant +ve correlation between downregulation and TNF-α (p<0.05). After IV HDCs therapy, significant +ve correlations between ALT and AST downregulation and TNF-α, as well as a significant −ve correlation between ALP serum level and TNF-α were recorded. After IH HDCs therapy, the downregulation of ALT and ALP serum levels was significantly positively correlated with TNF-α (p<0.05), but the AST was significantly negatively correlated with TNF-α (Figure-7).
Serum antioxidant activities and correlation to TNF-α
In AFB1 group, serum GSH and TAC activities were significantly decreased at (p<0.05) and (p<0.01), respectively, compared to the healthy control group. Treatment with IV injection of BM-MSCs improved the serum activities of GSH and TCA as indicated by a significant increase in their serum levels at (p<0.05) and (p<0.01), respectively. Treatment with IH injection of HDCs restored serum antioxidant activities as accompanied by a significant elevation in serum GSH (p<0.05) comparing to AFB1 group (Table-6).
Table 6.
Parameters | Healthy control (n=8) | AFB1 (n=8) | AFB1+IV BM-MSCs (n=8) | AFB1+IH BM-MSCs (n=8) | AFB1+IV HDCs (n=8) | AFB1+IH HDCs (n=8) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSH (nmol/mL) | 33.51±2.64 | 20.18*±3.73 | 32.86a±2.11 | 27.55±3.09 | 23.76±1.65 | 30.33a±2.17 | 0.0125 |
TAC (mM/L) | 1.76+0.24 | 0.48**+0.03 | 1.54b+0.36 | 0.76+0.03 | 0.54+0.08 | 0.56+0.07 | 0.0331 |
In the same row,
and
are significantly different than control at P<0.05 and P<0.01 respectively and
and
are significantly different than AFB1 at P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively. AFB1=Aflatoxin B1, IV=Intravenous, IH=Intrahepatic, BM-MSCs=Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, HDCs=Hepatogenic differentiated cells, GSH=Reduced glutathione, TAC=Total antioxidant capacity
In acute the AFB1 rat model, a significant −ve correlation in GSH and TAC serum activities to TNF-α were observed. Furthermore, a significant −ve correlation in GSH and TAC serum activities to TNF-α was observed in IV BM-MSCs, IH BM-MSCs, and IH HDCs treated rats. However, a significant upregulation +ve correlation of GSH and TAC serum activities (p<0.05) to TNF-α was noticed in IV HDCS treated rats (Figure-8).
Tissue antioxidant enzymes
For the activities of the antioxidant enzymes (GSH-Px, CAT, and SOD) in hepatic tissue, it was noticed that AFB1 injection resulted in a significant decrease in the antioxidant activities of CAT (p<0.01), SOD, GSH, and GSH-Px (p<0.05) compared to the healthy control group. IV therapy with BM-MSCs significantly increased the antioxidant activities of CAT, SOD, and GSH-Px activities (p<0.05). IH therapy of BM-MSCs and IV therapy of HDCs did not ameliorate the toxic effect of AFB1. However, IH therapy of HDCs significantly restored the antioxidant activities of SOD and GSH-Px (p<0.05) without change in CAT activity comparing to AFB1 control group (Table-7).
Table 7.
Parameters | Healthy control (n=8) | AFB1 (n=8) | AFB1+IV BM-MSCs (n=8) | AFB1+IH BM-MSCs (n=8) | AFB1+IV HDCs (n=8) | AFB1+IH HDCs (n=8) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAT (nmol/min/g tissue) | 34.60±4.11 | 21.44**±2.71 | 31.95a±2.15 | 23.26±2.06 | 26.19±2.28 | 28.12±3.08 | 0.0113 |
SOD (U/g tissue) | 8.11±1.17 | 5.19*±1.06 | 7.14a±0.35 | 5.90±1.23 | 5.06±1.97 | 8.22a±0.97 | 0.0120 |
GSH (mM/g tissue) | 7.47±1.51 | 4.95*±0.82 | 6.66±1.30 | 4.57±0.87 | 5.52±0.72 | 7.01a±1.04 | 0.0141 |
GSH-Px (U/g tissue) | 65.42±5.39 | 45.22*±3.62 | 60.22a±4.81 | 48.16±3.25 | 51.63±5.63 | 58.31a±4.17 | 0.0139 |
MDA (nmol/g tissue) | 33.85±3.11 | 35.74±2.15 | 31.06±2.05 | 31.83±1.89 | 32.16±3.77 | 32.22±2.16 | 0.4620 |
In the same row,
and
are significantly different than control at P<0.05 and P<0.01 respectively and
is significantly different than AFB1 at P<0.05. AFB1=Aflatoxin B1, IV=Intravenous, IH=Intrahepatic, BM-MSCs=Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, HDCs=Hepatogenic differentiated cells, CAT=Catalase, SOD=Superoxide dismutase, GSH=Reduced glutathione, GSH-Px=Glutathione peroxidase, MDA=Malondialdehyde
Gross and microscopic examination of liver of rat with acute aflatoxicosis rats and after therapy
The gross examination revealed that injection of AFB1 resulted in swollen hepatomegaly with severe congestion and dark borders as well as, the histopathological examination of livers showed extensive necrosis of hepatocytes. Liver restored to nearly normal gross appearance and size after 4 weeks in IV BM-MSCs and IH BM-MSCs groups. In addition, liver histopathological examination showed few inflammatory cells infiltration in IV BM-MSCs and apparently normal hepatocytes with few mononuclear cells infiltrating the portal area in IH BM-MSCs. In the IV HDCs group, livers appeared swollen, congested, and enlarged by gross examination and showed apparently normal hepatocytes by histopathological examination. IH HDCs group showed nearly normal healthy gross appearance of the liver with the disappearance of congestion and showed Kupffer cell hyperplasia (arrowhead) by histopathological examination (Figure-9)
Discussion
The liver is the principal organ to receive absorbed toxins after oral ingestion; consequently, it is usually subjected to acute hepatitis [34]. Aflatoxicosis is a pathological problem categorized under hepatocellular abnormalities characterized by the infiltration of inflammatory cells, apoptosis, and necrosis. Different scientific approaches have been used to treat liver injuries, but none has been found to be superior. Stem cell transplantation, which is relatively new, is considered to be an effective alternative therapy for hepatic diseases. To date, more than 1000 clinical trials have used MSC therapy in regenerative medicine; of these, approximately 80 clinical trials have targeted liver disease [35]. Most of the trials used liver cirrhosis models, but data on acute hepatitis remain scanty. Although BM-MSCs have the in vitro ability to differentiate into functional and morphological liver cells, whether BM-MSC injection or transplantation can alleviate acute degenerated hepatocytes in vivo is still controversial. A significant number of recently published papers support that BM-MSCs therapy in different types of hepatitis works through the secretion of soluble suppressive factors through cell-to-cell contact [36] or by a paracrine mechanism that alters the function of the immune cells [37]. In addition to the descriptive problems, the optimal administration route for therapy in animal models with hepatitis remains controversial and requires further investigation to achieve better effects [38].
In this study, BM-MSCs exhibited 97.11%±4.08 viability at the third passage on reaching 80% confluence using Trypan blue stain. The proliferation rate was 72.14% after BrdU incorporation assay. Flow cytometric analysis showed the percentage of positively stained cells that served as the markers of mesenchymalization of isolated cells. The results revealed that BM-MSCs negatively expressed CD34 (4.4%) and CD45 (1.7%) markers while positively expressed CD29 (88.2%), CD73 (83.1%), and CD90 (74.9%). These data substantiate the use of isolated cells to complete the experiments as indicated previously by Abo-Aziza et al. [39] and Zaki et al. [40].
In vitro hepatogenic differentiation of BM-MSCs indicated their transformation from spindle to oblate. The cells developed from their original cylindrical shape into spherically shaped cells on day 7. This morphological change progressed to oblateness on day 14 to be more compact and to a pseudo-polygonal shape on day 21 of maturation of HDCs. Hepatic specific marker measurement indicated that the protein expression of ALB and AFP could be measured through RT-PCR on day 21 of maturation of HDCs. The functional properties of ALB secretion and urea synthesis were analyzed to evaluate the hepatic specific function of HDCs. A +ve linear correlation between ALB secretion and urea synthesis was determined by the progress of differentiation. The rates of ALB secretion and urea synthesis were significantly higher on days 14 and 21 than they were on day 7. These results indicated that ALB secretion and urea synthesis increased significantly with the development of differentiation steps to reach the maximum at the maturation of HDCs. These data are consistent with those of the previous studies on the expression of ALB and urea [41] as well as that of AFP [29]. Hepatocyte like cells (HLCs) have multiple hepatic functions, such as releasing ALB and AFP and promoting the regeneration of multiple liver cells by declining the degeneration process, as indicated by Chetty et al. [42].
Acute AFB1 toxicity was associated with a significant increase in TNF-α as well as a decrease in IL-4 and IL-10. IH therapy with HDCs resulted in a significant decrease in the serum TNF-α level and a significant increase in the IL-10 level. In the AFB1 group, a significant −ve correlation between IL-4 and TNF-α and a significant +ve correlation between IL-10 downregulation and TNF-α were observed. These results indicated amelioration of cytokine concentration in the IV and IH BM-MCs treated groups with a −ve correlation between IL-4 and TNF-α as well as a significant +ve correlation between IL-10 upregulation and TNF-α. In the IV HDCs group, +ve correlations between IL-4 and IL-10 downregulation and TNF-α were recorded. By contrast, in the IHDCs group, significant +ve correlations between both IL-4 and IL-10 upregulation and TNF-α were recorded. In a previous study, MSCs reduced liver injury and lowered IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α levels in a lipopolysaccharide-induced acute liver failure rat model [15]. A study conducted by Teshima et al. [43] reported that transplantation of MSCs isolated from adipose tissue through the peripheral vein decreased the levels of IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and interferon γ (pro-inflammatory cytokines) and increased the levels of IL-4 and IL-10, HGF, and vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-inflammatory cytokines) in an acute liver failure animal model, whereas transplantation through the splenic vein significantly increased the number of MSCs engrafted in the liver compared with transplantation via the peripheral vein. IV injection has been established as the most suitable administration route for improving liver function and decreasing TNF-α [44]. Different types of cytokines, including TNF-α; in addition to the infiltration of leukocytes, are released by inflamed hepatic tissues and effectively promote the migration of MSCs into the site of injury, as reported by Squillaro et al. [45]. However, another study reported that intraportal injection was superior to tail vein injection for improving the therapeutic effects of MSCs on liver dysfunction [46]. The possible mechanisms by which stem cells decrease the proliferation of anti-inflammatory cytokines and T cells are through cell-to-cell contact and paracrine mechanisms, as discussed previously by Hu et al. [47]. MSCs have been reported to produce prostaglandin E2, resulting in increased production of IL-10 as an anti-inflammatory cytokine and diminished production of TNF-α, interferon γ, and IL-12 [48]. In the same way, transplantation of HLCs eliminated CCl4-induced liver fibrosis and conserved the function of the liver via the release of transforming growth factors β 1, IL-6, and IL-10 [49].
Dose and repetition of MSC transplantation also affect the efficiency of treatment; for example, a study conducted by Zhu et al. [48], injection of 1×106 MSCs significantly reduced liver injury by concanavalin, whereas that of a low number MSCs (2×105) had no effect. Repeated injection of MSCs for three times significantly improved survival and liver necrosis compared with single-dose infusion [50]. HLCs have multiple hepatic functions, such as promoting the renewal of multiple liver cells by lessening inflammation, necrosis, and apoptosis [42]. These inflammatory cells impair liver function and worsen inflammation-induced liver injury; therefore, MSC transplantation is directed to suppress these inflammatory cells and can help improve the sequelae of acute hepatitis [51]. In this study, the liver of the acute AFB1 control group showed swollen hepatomegaly with severe congestion and dark borders with a gross appearance with extensive necrosis of hepatocytes. The liver was restored to a nearly normal gross appearance and size after 4 weeks in the IV BM-MSCs and IH BM-MSCs groups, with few inflammatory cells infiltrating in IV BM-MSCs and apparently normal hepatocytes with few mononuclear cells infiltrating the portal area in IH BM-MSCs. In the IV HDCs group, the liver appeared swollen, congested, and enlarged and showed apparently normal hepatocytes. The IH HDCs group showed a nearly normal healthy gross appearance of the liver with the disappearance of congestion and Kupffer cell hyperplasia.
A general trend for the activities of the antioxidant enzymes (GSH-Px, CAT, and SOD) in hepatic tissue was observed. Acute AFB1 resulted in a decrease in the antioxidant enzyme activities compared with the healthy control group. IV therapy with BM-MSCs significantly increased the activities of CAT, SOD, and GSH-Px. IH therapy with BM-MSCs and IV therapy with HDCs did not ameliorate the toxic effect of AFB1. By contrast, IH therapy with HDCs significantly restored the activities of SOD and GSH-Px but did not lead to any change in CAT activity compared with the AFB1 control group. For the activities of the antioxidant enzymes in serum, GSH and TAC activities were significantly decreased in the acute AFB1 control group compared with those of the healthy control group. IV injection of BM-MSCs improved the activities of GSH and TCA. IH injection of HDCs was accompanied by a significant increase in serum GSH compared with the AFB1 control group.
In the acute AFB1 rat model, significant −ve correlations between GSH and TAC serum activities and TNF-α were observed. The same results were observed in rats treated with IV BM-MSCs, IH BM-MSCs, and IH HDCs. However, significant +ve correlations between GSH and TAC serum activity upregulation and TNF-α were found in IV HDCs rats. The antioxidant ability of BM-MSCs to ameliorate the bad effect of reactive oxygen species in tissues has been reported in humans [52] and in various animal models [53]. The possible mechanisms of protection were mainly through the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor and NO [54], and elevation of SOD and MDA [55], and reduction of hepatocyte apoptosis in vitro and in vivo [56].
Regarding hepatic bio-indices, a significant decrease in ALB concentration and significant increase in ALT, AST, and NO were observed. IV injection of BM-MSCs significantly ameliorated ALT and AST activities. By contrast, IH injection of BM-MSCs significantly ameliorated ALT, AST, and NO compared with the acute AFB1 control group. IV therapy with HDCs did not affect the bio-index parameters and liver enzyme activities. Conversely, IH therapy with HDCs significantly increased ALB concentration and decreased ALT activity and NO concentration to approximately normal levels. These data are parallel with those of several previous works. BM-MSCs diminished liver transaminases (ALT and AST) and improved liver histopathology in mice with acute liver failure [57]. Transplantation of HLCs also ameliorated liver function by decreasing the expression of ALT, AST, and ammonia in mice with acute liver failure [58], CCl4-treated rats and mice [59,60], and rats with acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure [61]. In addition, MSCs significantly down-regulated the levels of liver transaminases and improved the histological images of mice with concanavalin A-induced hepatitis [62]. MSCs have also been found to reduce the serum concentrations of ammonia, ALT, AST, and total bilirubin in acute hepatitis animal models [37]. MSCs and HLCs upgraded liver function and saved CCl4-treated mice with liver damage by engraftment into the injured liver compared with the infusion of the liver with primary hepatocytes [63]. HLCs derived from MSCs significantly decreased liver dysfunction and enhanced the expression of ALB [64]. However, Brückner et al. [65] reported that HLCs decreased the portal venous pressure but had no effect on the activation of HSCs. In addition, Liu et al. [66] found that MSCs decreased the expression of transaminases, TNF-α and IL-6 and increased the expression of GSH and SOD. Transplantation through the splenic vein significantly decreased the levels of serum liver enzymes and increased the number of engrafted MSCs in the liver [43].
These data are in congruence with our finding that IV injection of HDCs and IH injection of MSCs yield similar results. We concluded that acute toxicity does not cause any prominent alteration due to its short duration. Therefore, the administration routes of MSCs, whether differentiated or not, do not significantly differ. In our opinion, acute toxicity can be treated through a non-invasive IV route without hepatogenic differentiation.
Regarding hepatic bio-indices and their correlations with TNF-α, in the acute AFB1 group, significant +ve correlations were observed between Chol, ALP, and TG upregulation and TNF-α. After treatment with IV BM-MSCs, IH BM-MSCs, and IH HDCs, significant −ve correlations were observed between Chol, TG, and NO serum levels and TNF-α. After treatment with IV and IH BM-MSCs, significant +ve correlations between ALT, AST, and ALP serum levels and TNF-α were recorded. After IV HDCs therapy, only a significant +ve correlation between ALT and AST serum level upregulation and TNF-α was observed, whereas a significant −ve correlation between ALP serum level and TNF-α was observed. After IH HDCs therapy, ALT and ALP serum upregulation showed significant +ve correlations with TNF-α but AST and TNF-α exhibited a significant negative correlation. Liver function is significantly improved after HLCs transplantation in mice with acute liver injury by stimulating anti-inflammatory cytokine secretion [49]. HLC transplantation in a partially hepatectomy-induced acute liver injury model significantly reduced lipid accumulation and restored liver capacity, thereby enhancing hepatocyte survival, preventing apoptosis, and eventually prolonging the survival of the animals [67]. HDCs transplantation also significantly reduced liver fibrosis by upregulating the expression of HGFs and lowering the serum levels of fibronectin and hepatic AFP [68]. Although HDCs have been proven to be effective in repairing liver injury in various diseases, the undifferentiated MSCs could be more effective because of the higher sensitivity of HDCs to in vitro and in vivo harsh environments [1].
The echogenicity of liver conditions refers to the transmission of USG waves in relation to surrounding tissues. Based on echogenicity, a structure can be characterized as hyperechoic; (white on the screen), hypoechoic; (gray), or anechoic (black). This study revealed that normal groups had homogeneous hepatic parenchyma with medium-level echogenicity and a straight hepatic surface, as previously described by Lessa et al. [69] and Mannheimer et al. [70]. The results of normal blood flow parameters using USG are also parallel with those of a previous study of Sonhaye et al. [71], and the finding on abnormal blood flow due to acute hepatitis is comparable with that of previous study of Lessa et al. [69]. Some images of acute hepatitis appeared to be normal in USG examination, which is also comparable with data reported in the study of Palmentieri et al. [72], indicating that USG has a high sensitivity for the detection of marked hepatitis or the presence of fibrosis but that its sensitivity decreases when hepatitis is mild or acute.
Conclusion
BM-MSCs and their derivatives, including HDCs can be used for acute AF liver injury repair in individuals or animal models by grafting into liver tissue, differentiating and secreting anti-inflammatory and antioxidant factors, and enhancing in vivo liver regeneration and immunomodulation. Furthermore, the administration routes of BM-MSCs did not demonstrate any significant difference; however, IH route of HDCs showed significant amelioration than IV route. Due to the sole effect of TNF-α as a prominent inflammatory mediator: correlated with most measured data, thereby providing a general picture of amelioration in the form of +ve or −ve correlation with up or down-regulation. Therefore, it can be concluded that MSCs and HDCs are useful tools in regenerative medicine that target acute liver injury and toxicity. However, acute hepatitis can be treated by a non-invasive IV route without the expense of hepatogenic differentiation. Further research using clinical trials that address several problems regarding engraftment and potentiation is needed to determine the optimal manipulation strategy in animal models and achieve better long-term effects with low doses of drugs.
Authors’ Contributions
FAMA and AAZ: Designed the study. FAMA: Cultured rat BM-MSCs and examined their viability and phenotypic analysis and proliferation. FAMA: Differentiated and characterized hepatogenic cells. AAZ, RMA, and AF: ConductedRT-PCR. FAMA, AAZ, and AF: Determined metabolic activity of HDCs. FAMA: Managed USG examination. RMA: Determined cytokine profile. FAMA, RMA, and AF: Measured hepatic bio-indices and serum antioxidant activities. AF: Histological assay. AAZ: Interpretation of data and statistical analysis. FAMA and AAZ: Drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to National Research Centre, Egypt, for providing the necessary facilities for the study. The authors are thankful to Dr. Amal Abo El-Maaty, National Research Centre, Egypt, for her help in USG imaging. This study was funded by National Research Centre, Egypt, through a project grant no. “12050414”.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Veterinary World remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliation.
References
- 1.Hu C, Li L. Improvement of mesenchymal stromal cells and their derivatives for treating acute liver failure. J. Mol. Med. (Berl) 2019;97(8):1065–1084. doi: 10.1007/s00109-019-01804-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mutegi C.K, Cotty P.J, Bandyopadhya R. Prevalence and mitigation of aflatoxins in Kenya (1960-to date) World Mycotox. J. 2018;11(3):341–357. doi: 10.3920/WMJ2018.2362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gong Y.Y, Watson S, Routledge M.N. Aflatoxin exposure and associated human health effects, a review of epidemiological studies. Food Saf. 2016;4(1):14–27. doi: 10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.2015026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Luo Y, Liu X, Li J. Updating techniques on controlling mycotoxins a review. Food Control. 2018;89(2):123–132. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ostry V, Malir F, Toman J, Grosse Y. Mycotoxins as human carcinogens the IARC monographs classification. Mycotox. Res. 2017;33(1):65–73. doi: 10.1007/s12550-016-0265-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rushing B.R, Selim M.I. Aflatoxin B1:A review on metabolism, toxicity, occurrence in food, occupational exposure, and detoxification methods. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019;124(1):81–100. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.11.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Reddy R.V, Taylor M.J, Sharma R.P. Studies of immune function of CD-1 mice exposed to aflatoxin B1. Toxicol. 1987;43(2):123–132. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(87)90002-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cusumano V, Rossano F, Merendino R.A, Arena A, Costa G.B, Mancuso G, Baroni A, Losi E. Immunobiological activities of mould products:Functional impairment of human monocytes exposed to aflatoxin B1. Res. Microbiol. 1996;147(5):385–391. doi: 10.1016/0923-2508(96)84713-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bossou Y.M, Serssar Y, Allou A, Vitry S, Momas I, Seta N, Menotti J, Achard S. Impact of mycotoxins secreted by Aspergillus molds on the inflammatory response of human corneal epithelial cells. Toxins. 2017;9(7):197. doi: 10.3390/toxins9070197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bata Á, Lásztity R. Detoxification of mycotoxin-contaminated food and feed by microorganisms. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1999;10(6-7):223–228. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ben Salah-Abbès J, Jebali R, Sharafi H, Noghabi K.A, Oueslati R, Abbès S. Immuno-physiological alterations from AFB1 in rats counteracted by treatments with Lactobacillus paracasei BEJ01 and montmorillonite clay mixture. J. Immunotoxicol. 2016;13(5):628–637. doi: 10.3109/1547691X.2016.1145157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Volarevic V, Nurkovic J, Arsenijevic N, Stojkovic M. Concise review:Therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of acute liver failure and cirrhosis. Stem Cells. 2014;32(11):2818–2823. doi: 10.1002/stem.1818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ferrer J.R, Chokechanachaisakul A, Wertheim J.A. New tools in experimental cellular therapy for the treatment of liver diseases. Curr. Transplant. Rep. 2015;2(2):202–210. doi: 10.1007/s40472-015-0059-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ma H.C, Wang X, Wu M.N, Zhao X, Yuan X.W, Shi X.L. Interleukin-10 contributes to therapeutic effect of mesenchymal stem cells for acute liver failure via signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling pathway. Chin. Med. J. 2016;129(8):967–975. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.179794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhang Z.H, Zhu W, Ren H.Z, Zhao X, Wang S, Ma H.C, Shi X.L. Mesenchymal stem cells increase expression of heme oxygenase-1 leading to anti-inflammatory activity in treatment of acute liver failure. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2017;8(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13287-017-0524-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hu C, Li L. In vitro and in vivo hepatic differentiation of adult somatic stem cells and extraembryonic stem cells for treating end-stage liver diseases. Stem Cells Int. 2015;2015(2015):871972. doi: 10.1155/2015/871972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yang J.F, Cao H.C, Pan Q.L, Yu J, Li J, Li L.J. Mesenchymal stem cells from the human umbilical cord ameliorate fulminant hepatic failure and increase survival in mice. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis. Int. 2015;14(2):186–193. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(15)60354-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pascual-Miguelañez I, Salinas-Gomez J, Fernandez-Luengas D, Villar-Zarra K, Clemente L.V, Garcia-Arranz M, Olmo D.G. Systemic treatment of acute liver failure with adipose derived. stem cells. J. Investig. Surg. 2015;28(2):120–126. doi: 10.3109/08941939.2014.987407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kholodenko I.V, Kurbatov L.K, Kholodenko R.V, Manukyan G.V, Yarygin K.N. Mesenchymal stem cells in the adult human liver:Hype or hope? Cells. 2019;8(10):1127. doi: 10.3390/cells8101127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.di Bonzo L.V, Ferrero I, Cravanzola C, Mareschi K, Rustichell D, Novo E, Sanavio F, Cannito S, Zamara E, Bertero M, Davit A, Francica S, Novelli F, Colombatto S, Fagioli F, Parola M. Human mesenchymal stem cells as a two-edged sword in hepatic regenerative medicine:Engraftment and hepatocyte differentiation versus profibrogenic potential. Gut. 2008;57(2):223–231. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.111617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Baertschiger R.M, Serre-Beinier V, Morel P, Bosco D, Peyrou M, Clément S, Sgroi A, Kaelin A, Buhler L.H, Gonelle-Gispert C. Fibrogenic potential of human multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells in injured liver. PLoS One. 2009;4(8):e6657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hu C, Zhao L, Wu Z, Li L. Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells and their derivatives effectively promotes liver regeneration to attenuate acetaminophen-induced liver injury. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020;11(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-01596-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hu C, Li L. Preconditioning influences mesenchymal stem cell properties in vitro and in vivo. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018;22(3):1428–1442. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee S.H, Cha S.H, Kim C.L, Lillehoj H.S, Song J.Y, Lee K.W. Enhanced adipogenic differentiation of bovine bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. App. Anim. Res. 2015;2(1):15–21. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Al-Mutairi K.S, Tariq I.A, Zaki A.A. Osteogenic/adipogenic differentiation of intact and ovariectomized young and adult female rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSC) Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2019;10(2):253–265. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yamaza T, Alatas F.S, Yuniartha R, Yamaza H, Fujiyoshi J.K, Yanagi Y, Yoshimaru K, Hayashida M, Matsuura T, Aijima R, Ihara K, Ohga S, Shi S, Nonaka K, Taguchi T. In vivo hepatogenic capacity and therapeutic potential of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth in liver fibrosis in mice. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2015;6(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s13287-015-0154-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Akiyama K, You Y.O, Yamaza T, Chen C, Tang L, Jin Y, Chen X.D, Gronthos S, Shi S. Characterization of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in suspension. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2012;3(5):1–13. doi: 10.1186/scrt131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Khajeniazi S, Soleimani M, Ghaderi M, Shahrabi-Farahani M, Allameh A. Comparison of the differentiation potential and characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells isolated from human umbilical cord blood and bone marrow to hepatocyte-like cells. Mol. Biochem. Diagn. 2014;1(2):123–133. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xu L, Wang S, Sui X, Chen G, Tu Y.K, Huang Y.T, Eriksen K.G, Bernstein R.M, Prentice A.M, Wild C.P, Xu Y, Routledge M.N, Gong Y.Y. Mesenchymal stem cell-seeded regenerated silk fibroin complex matrices for liver regeneration in an animal model of acute liver failure. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9(17):14716–14723. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b02805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rotimi O.A, Rotimi S.O, Goodrich J.M, Adelani I.B, Agbonihale E, Talabi G. Time-course effects of acute aflatoxin B1 exposure on hepatic mitochondrial lipids and oxidative stress in rats. Front. Pharmacol. 2019;10(5):467. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shin H.S, Shin K.S, Lee J.E, Min J.H, You S.K, Shin B.S. Hepatic toxocariasis with atypical CT and MR imaging findings:A case report. Investig. Magnet. Res. Imagine. 2018;22(1):113–118. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yilmaz İ, Hatipoglu H.S, Taslidere E, Karaaslan M. Comparing the regenerative effects of Silymarin and Apricot on liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in rats. Biomed. Res. 2018;29(7):1465–1473. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bancroft J.D, Marilyn A. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. 5th ed. London, Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gu X, Manautou J.E. Molecular mechanisms underlying chemical liver injury. Expert. Rev. Mol. Med. 2012;14(1):e4. doi: 10.1017/S1462399411002110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Eom Y.W, Kang S.H, Kim M.Y, Lee J.I, Baik S.K. Mesenchymal stem cells to treat liver diseases. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020;8(8):563. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tanimizu N, Ichinohe N, Suzuki H, Mitaka T. Prolonged oxidative stress and delayed tissue repair exacerbate acetaminophen-induced liver injury in aged mice. Aging (Albany NY) 2020;12(19):18907–18927. doi: 10.18632/aging.103973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hu C, Wu Z, Li L. Mesenchymal stromal cells promote liver regeneration through regulation of immune cells. Inter. J. Biol. Sci. 2020;16(5):893–903. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.39725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kang S.H, Kim M.Y, Eom Y.W, Baik S.K. Mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of liver disease:Present and perspectives. Gut Liver. 2020;14(3):306–315. doi: 10.5009/gnl18412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Abo-Aziza F.A.M, Zaki A.A, Abo El-Maaty A.M. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell (BM-MSC):A tool of cell therapy in hydatid experimentally infected rats. Cell Reg. 2019;8(2):58–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cr.2019.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zaki A.A, Tariq I.A, Abo-Aziza F.A.M. Comparative characterization and osteogenic/adipogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from male rat hair follicles and bone marrow. Cell Reg. 2020;9(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13619-020-00051-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ishkitiev N, Yaegaki K, Calenic B, Nakahara T, Ishikawa H, Mitiev V, Haapasalo M. Deciduous and permanent dental pulp mesenchymal cells acquire hepatic morphologic and functional features in vitro. J. Endod. 2010;36(3):469–474. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chetty S.S, Praneetha S, Govarthanan K, Verma R.S, Murugan A.V. Non-invasive tracking and regenerative capabilities of transplanted human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells labeled with I-III-IV semiconducting nanocrystals in liver-injured living mice. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019;11(9):8763–8778. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b19953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Teshima T, Matsumoto H, Michishita M, Matsuoka A, Shiba M, Nagashima T, Koyama H. Allogenic adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate acute hepatic injury in dogs. Stem Cells Int. 2017;2017(12):3892514. doi: 10.1155/2017/3892514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhao W, Li J.J, Cao D.Y, Li X, Zhang L.Y, He Y, Yue S.Q, Wang D.S, Dou K.F. Intravenous injection of mesenchymal stem cells is effective in treating liver fibrosis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012;18(10):1048–1058. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i10.1048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Squillaro T, Peluso G, Galderisi U. Clinical trials with mesenchymal stem cells:An update. Cell Transplant. 2016;25(5):829–848. doi: 10.3727/096368915X689622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang Y, Lian F, Li J, Fan W, Xu H, Yang X, Liang L, Chen W, Yang J. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells transplantation via portal vein improves microcirculation and ameliorates liver fibrosis induced by CCl4 in rats. J. Transl. Med. 2012;10(1):133. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hu C, Wu Z, Li L. Pre?treatments enhance the therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cells in liver diseases. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2020;24(1):40–49. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhu X, He B, Zhou X, Ren J. Effects of transplanted bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in animal models of acute hepatitis. Cell Tissue Res. 2013;351(3):477–486. doi: 10.1007/s00441-012-1524-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhang S, Zhu Z, Wang Y, Liu S, Zhao C, Guan W, Zhao Y. Therapeutic potential of Bama miniature pig adipose stem cells induced hepatocytes in a mouse model with acute liver failure. Cytotechnology. 2018;70(4):1131–1141. doi: 10.1007/s10616-018-0201-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Miryounesi M, Piryaei A, Pournasr B, Aghdami N, Baharvand H. Repeated versus single transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells in carbon tetrachloride?induced liver injury in mice. Cell Biol. Int. 2013;37(4):340–347. doi: 10.1002/cbin.10048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhao X, Shi X, Zhang Z, Ma H, Yuan X, Ding Y. Combined treatment with MSC transplantation and neutrophil depletion ameliorates D-GalN/LPS-induced acute liver failure in rats. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2016;40(6):730–738. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2016.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Nowak W.N, Taha H, Kachamakova-Trojanowska N, Stępniewski J, Markiewicz J.A, Kusienicka A, Szade K, Szade A, Bukowska-Strakova K, Hajduk K, Klóska D, Kopacz A, Grochot-Przęczek A, Barthenheier K, Cauvin C, Dulak J, Józkowicz A. Murine bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells respond efficiently to oxidative stress despite the low level of heme oxygenases 1 and 2. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2018;29(2):111–127. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ayatollahi M, Hesami Z, Jamshidzadeh A, Gramizadeh B. Antioxidant effects of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell against carbon tetrachloride-induced oxidative damage in rat livers. Int. J. Org. Transplant. Med. 2014;5(4):166–173. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.McIlhenny S, Zhang P, Tulenko T, Comeau J, Fernandez S, Policha A, Ferroni M, Faul E, Bagameri G, Shapiro I, DiMuzio P. eNOS transfection of adipose-derived stem cells yield bioactive nitric oxide production and improved results in vascular tissue engineering. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2015;9(11):1277–1285. doi: 10.1002/term.1645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhang S, Dong Z, Peng Z, Lu F. Anti-aging effect of adipose-derived stem cells in a mouse model of skin aging induced by D-galactose. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Quintanilha L.F, Takami T, Hirose Y, Fujisawa K, Murata Y, Yamamoto N, Goldenberg R.C, Terai S, Sakaida I. Canine mesenchymal stem cells show antioxidant properties against thioacetamide?induced liver injury in vitro and in vivo. Hepatol. Res. 2014;44(10):E206–E217. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zare H, Jamshidi S, Dehghan M.M, Saheli M, Piryaei A. Bone marrow or adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells:Comparison of the therapeutic potentials in mice model of acute liver failure. J. Cell. Biochem. 2018;119(7):5834–5842. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Banas A, Teratani T, Yamamoto Y, Tokuhara M, Takeshita F, Osaki M, Kato T, Okochi H, Ochiya T. Rapid hepatic fate specification of adipose-derived stem cells and their therapeutic potential for liver failure. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2009;24(1):70–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05496.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kim S.J, Park K.C, Lee J.U, Kim K.J, Kim D.G. Therapeutic potential of adipose tissue-derived stem cells for liver failure according to the transplantation routes. J. Korean Surg. Soc. 2011;81(3):176–186. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2011.81.3.176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Guo D.L, Wang Z.G, Xiong L.K, Pan L.Y, Zhu Q, Yuan Y.F, Liu Z.S. Hepatogenic differentiation from human adipose-derived stem cells and application for mouse acute liver injury. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2017;45(2):224–232. doi: 10.3109/21691401.2016.1138495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Salomone F, Barbagallo I, Puzzo L, Piazza C, Volti G.L. Efficacy of adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in rats with acetaminophen liver injury. Stem Cell Res. 2013;11(3):1037–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2013.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Yoshizumi Y, Yukawa H, Iwaki R, Fujinaka S, Kanou A, Kanou Y, Yamada T, Nakagawa S, Ohara T, Nakagiri K, Ogihara Y, Tsutsui Y, Hayashi Y, Ishigami M, Baba Y, Ishikawa T. Immunomodulatory effects of adipose tissue-derived stem cells on concanavalin A-induced acute liver injury in mice. Cell Med. 2017;9(1-2):21–33. doi: 10.3727/215517916X693159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Xu F, Liu J, Deng J, Chen X, Wang Y, Xu P, Cheng L, Fu Y, Cheng F, Yao Y, Zhang Y, Huang M, Yu D, Wei Y, Deng H. Rapid and high-efficiency generation of mature functional hepatocyte-like cells from adipose-derived stem cells by a three-step protocol. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2015;6(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13287-015-0181-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Yuan J, Li W, Huang J, Guo X, Li X, Lu X, Huang X, Zhang H. Transplantation of human adipose stem cell-derived hepatocyte-like cells with restricted localization to liver using acellular amniotic membrane. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2015;6(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s13287-015-0208-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Brückner S, Zipprich A, Hempel M, Thonig A, Schwill F, Roderfeld M, Roeb E, Christ B. Improvement of portal venous pressure in cirrhotic rat livers by systemic treatment with adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. Cytotherapy. 2017;19(12):1462–1473. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2017.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Liu W.H, Song F.Q, Ren L.N, Guo W.Q, Wang T, Feng Y.X, Tang L.J, Li K. The multiple functional roles of mesenchymal stem cells in participating in treating liver diseases. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2015;19(3):511–520. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Tautenhahn H.M, Brückner S, Baumann S, Winkler S, Otto W, von Bergen M, Bartels M, Christ B. Attenuation of postoperative acute liver failure by mesenchymal stem cell treatment due to metabolic implications. Ann. Surg. 2016;263(3):546–556. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Salem N.A, Ahmed H.H, Aglan H.A, ElShebiney S.A. Nanofiber?expanded stem cells mitigate liver fibrosis:Experimental study. Tissue Cell. 2016;48(5):544–551. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2016.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Lessa A.S, Paredes B.D, Dias J.V, Carvalho A.B, Quintanilha L.F, Takiya C.M, Tura B.R, Rezende G.F, Campos de Carvalho A.C, Resende C.M, Goldenberg R.C. Ultrasound imaging in an experimental model of fatty liver disease and cirrhosis in rats. BMC Vet. Res. 2010;6(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-6-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Mannheimer E.G, Quintanilha L.F, Carvalho A.B, Paredes B.D, Gonçalves de Carvalho F, Takyia C.M, Resende C.M, Ferreira da Motta Rezende G, Campos de Carvalho A.C, Schanaider A, dos Santos Goldenberg R.C. Bone marrow cells obtained from cirrhotic rats do not improve function or reduce fibrosis in a chronic liver disease model. Clin. Transplant. 2011;25(1):54–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.01191.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Sonhaye L, Boube A.H, Amadou A, Kolou B, Djibril M, Ntimon B, Tchaou M, Garba N, Agoda-Koussema L, Adjenou K. Doppler ultrasound of hepatic vessels in the diagnosis of cirrhosis of the liver in Togo. Open J. Radiol. 2018;8(1):53–63. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Palmentieri B, de Sio I, La Mura V, Masarone M, Vecchione R, Bruno S, Torella R, Persico M. The role of bright liver echo pattern on ultrasound B-mode examination in the diagnosis of liver steatosis. Dig. Liver Dis. 2006;38(7):485–489. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2006.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]