Skip to main content
Clinical Kidney Journal logoLink to Clinical Kidney Journal
. 2022 Jun 3;15(9):1685–1697. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfac135

Evolving spectrum but persistent high mortality of COVID-19 among patients on kidney replacement therapy in the vaccine era: the Spanish COVID-19 KRT Registry

Borja Quiroga 1,#, Alberto Ortiz 2,#, Carlos Jesús Cabezas-Reina 3, María Carmen Ruiz Fuentes 4, Verónica López Jiménez 5, Sofía Zárraga Larrondo 6, Néstor Toapanta 7, María Molina Gómez 8, Patricia de Sequera 9,, Emilio Sánchez-Álvarez 10,; the Spanish COVID-19 KRT Registry collaborative group
PMCID: PMC9214101  PMID: 35999961

ABSTRACT

Background

Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) conferred a high risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related mortality early in the pandemic. We evaluate the presentation, treatment and outcomes of COVID-19 in patients on KRT over time during the pandemic.

Methods

This registry-based study involved 6080 dialysis and kidney transplant (KT) patients with COVID-19, representing roughly 10% of total Spanish KRT patients. Epidemiology, comorbidity, infection, vaccine status and treatment data were recorded, and predictors of hospital admission, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality were evaluated.

Results

Vaccine introduction decreased the number of COVID-19 cases from 1747 to 280 per wave. Of 3856 (64%) COVID-19 KRT patients admitted to the hospital, 1481/3856 (38%) were admitted during the first of six waves. Independent predictors for admission included KT and the first wave. During follow-up, 1207 patients (21%) died, 500/1207 (41%) during the first wave. Among vaccinated patients, mortality was 19%, mostly affecting KT recipients. Overall, independent predictors for mortality were older age, disease severity (lymphopaenia, pneumonia) and ICU rejection. Among patient factors, older age, male sex, diabetes, KT and no angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) were independent predictors of death. In KT recipients, individual immunosuppressants were independent predictors of death. Over time, patient characteristics evolved and in later pandemic waves, COVID-19 was mainly diagnosed in vaccinated KT recipients; in the few unvaccinated dialysis patients, ICU admissions increased and mortality decreased (28% for the first wave and 16–22% thereafter).

Conclusions

The clinical presentation and outcomes of COVID-19 during the first wave no longer represent COVID-19 in KRT patients, as the pandemic has become centred around vaccinated KT recipients. Vaccines lowered the incidence of diagnosed COVID-19 and mortality. However, mortality remains high despite increased access to ICU care.

Keywords: COVID-19, dialysis, kidney transplant, mortality, SARS-CoV-2

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

Graphical Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and, specifically, those needing kidney replacement therapy (KRT) were among those having the highest mortality during the first wave of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, a time when healthcare systems were frequently overwhelmed, limiting access to intensive care units (ICU), empirical therapy was later found to be ineffective and vaccination was not available [1–3]. However, dynamic factors such as new virus variants, decreased saturation of healthcare systems, approval of effective treatments and more importantly, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines may have modified the nature and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients on KRT [4].

Specific characteristics of KRT patients may have modified SARS-CoV-2 exposure and outcomes differentially from the general population over time through the pandemic [5]. On one hand, KRT patients present multiple comorbidities and poly-medication that may increase fragility and haemodialysis (HD) patients have limited ability to shield due to their need to access healthcare facilities thrice weekly [6, 7]. On the other hand, KRT patients have been excluded from the prescription of certain drugs and even from mechanical ventilation or ICU admission because of their worse prognosis, especially when healthcare systems were overwhelmed [8]. Finally, the response of kidney transplant recipients (KT recipients) to vaccines may be suboptimal, at least from the point of view of antibody development [9]. Only an analysis of presentation and outcomes of COVID-19 in KRT patients over the successive pandemic waves may identify persistent risk factors for adverse outcomes as well as characterizing the current prognosis of patients with CKD on KRT.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the dynamic presentation features and outcomes across the six waves of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Spain in a registry-based population of patients on KRT. As Spain was one of the earliest and hardest-hit countries and currently is one of the countries with the highest uptake of vaccines (80% of the total population on 29 December 2021), changes over time in Spain may be of special interest to understand the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and healthcare measures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Spanish COVID-19 KRT Registry is an initiative of the Spanish Society of Nephrology open to all nephrology and dialysis centres in Spain. It was set up on 18 March 2020 with a prospective design. It includes all patients treated with in-centre HD, home HD (HHD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) or kidney transplant recipients (KT recipients) that have developed a confirmed SARS-Cov-2 infection. Diagnosis of COVID-19 was based on the positivity of one of the following tests: reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), rapid antigen tests or SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibodies before vaccination.

This analysis included the full cohort until 12 December 2021. During follow-up, local coordinators were asked to immediately report cases from their centres through a centralized web page (www.senefro.org) only accessible to registered users. Until now, the Spanish Public Health Institute has defined six pandemic waves [10], according to the following dates: first wave from 31 January 2020, second wave from 1 July 2020, third wave from 1 December 2020, fourth wave from 1 March 2021, fifth wave from 1 June 2021 and sixth wave from 1 November 2021. These dates were used for the present analysis.

Variables

At baseline, epidemiological factors (sex and age), KRT (KT, HD, PD and HHD), KRT vintage and cause of CKD, concomitant treatments [angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)] and immunosuppressive drugs were recorded.

At diagnosis, symptoms, lymphopaenia (total lymphocyte count <500/mm3) and pneumonia were registered. Prescribed medications for SARS-CoV-2 infection and, in KT, the need for adjustment of immunosuppressants were also collected. Invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation was registered.

Vaccination

In Spain, the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination started on 27 December 2020. The following four vaccines have been used: BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech®), mRNA-1273 (Moderna®), ChAdOx1-S (AstraZeneca®) or Ad26.COV.2 (Janssen®) [9]. Prescription of individual vaccines was guided by local public health authorities and mainly driven initially by vaccine availability and later by successive modifications of the age range for ChAdOx1-S. Vaccination status was collected during the present study and considered when the full vaccination schedule was completed before SARS-CoV-2 infection. The course of the first full (i.e. two doses except for Ad26.COV.2) vaccine schedule was uneven, as decisions were taken at the regional level and not all regions assigned the same priority to patients on KRT or to the different KRT modalities. However, for KRT patients, it was generally completed in the first semester of 2021 [9]. The booster dose was generally administered to KRT patients from October to early November 2021, i.e., before the sixth wave.

Outcomes

During follow-up, the following outcomes were registered in patients infected by SARS-CoV-2: admission to hospital, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality. Investigators could report that patients had been rejected for ICU admission.

Ethics

The registry was approved by the Regional Ethical Committee of Asturias.

Statistics

Data are expressed as mean (standard deviation) or median [interquartile range (IQR)] depending on the distribution of the variables, tested with the Shapiro–Wilk test. Categorical variables were compared using the Fisher test and continuous variables with t-test or Mann–Whitney, according to the variable distribution. For comparison of continuous variables from more than two groups, ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis tests were used.

Univariate logistic regressions were performed for assessing associations between the outcomes (admission, ICU admission and mortality) and the registered variables. To identify factors associated with admission, ICU admission and mortality differentially over time, two different analyses were performed. The first analysis compared the first with subsequent waves. The rationale is that the first wave differed from other waves in several aspects: the healthcare system was overwhelmed, health authorities were advising against the widespread use of face masks, and there was use of potentially toxic ineffective drugs and a lack of awareness about the need to prevent thrombosis. The second analysis compared the first three waves with the subsequent waves. The rationale is to compare the waves before and after vaccine availability.

Multivariate regression models were adjusted for variables with P < .1 in univariate analyses and those considered confounders.

The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics

A total of 6080 KRT patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were included (36% female, age 63 ± 15 years). Among them, 2832 (46%) were KT recipients, 3063 (50%) were on in-centre HD, 173 (3%) on PD and 22 (<1%) on HHD. Prior to infection, 501 (8%) patients had received a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Table 1). Baseline characteristics for the successive pandemic waves are shown in Table 1. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was common among those infected in the fifth and sixth waves. Differences between KRT modalities are shown in Supplementary data, Table S1. SARS-CoV-2-infected KT recipients were younger but had longer KRT vintage than HD patients and also had a higher rate of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics, infection related variables and outcomes in different waves

Total (n = 6080) First (n = 1914) Second (n = 1930) Third (n = 1397) Fourth (n = 330) Fifth (n = 471) Sixth (n = 38) P
Sex (male), n (%) 3901 (64) 1236 (64) 1226 (63) 901 (65) 204 (62) 312 (66) 22 (58) .719
Age (years) 63 ± 15 67 ± 14 62 ± 15 64 ± 15 60 ± 14 58 ± 15 60 ± 15 <.001
Diabetic kidney disease, n (%) 1199 (21) 408 (25) 378 (21) 282 (21) 56 (17) 72 (16) 3 (8) <.001

KRT, n (%):

 

 KT

 

 HD

 

 PD

 

 HHD

2831 (47)

 

3054 (50)

 

173 (3)

 

22 (<1)

648 (34)

 

1198 (63)

 

62 (3)

 

6 (<1)

922 (48)

 

946 (49)

 

52 (3)

 

10 (<1)

644 (46)

 

703 (5)

 

46 (3)

 

4 (<1)

217 (66)

 

108 (33)

 

5 (1)

 

0 (0)

369 (78)

 

93 (20)

 

7 (1)

 

2 (0)

31 (81)

 

6 (16)

 

1 (3)

 

0 (0)

<.001
Haemodialysis unit location (external), n (%) 1460 (53) 488 (48) 462 (52) 392 (58) 55 (52) 61 (68) 2 (40) <.001
KRT vintage (months) 44 (17–95) 38 (15–83) 45 (17–97) 45 (18–97) 48 (18–110) 53 (19–111) 60 (61–101) <.001

Symptoms at onset, n (%)

 

Asymptomatic

 

Fever

 

Cough/rhinorrhoea

 

Dyspnoea

 

Gastrointestinal

1225 (22)

 

3525 (60)

 

3512 (60)

 

2196 (39)

 

1279 (23)

259 (15)

 

1300 (71)

 

1161 (63)

 

742 (43)

 

424 (24)

498 (28)

 

1037 (56)

 

1004 (54)

 

629 (35)

 

419 (23)

339 (26)

 

677 (50)

 

792 (59)

 

492 (38)

 

236 (18)

58 (19)

 

188 (59)

 

212 (67)

 

130 (42)

 

71 (23)

68 (16)

 

298 (66)

 

319 (71)

 

193 (44)

 

120 (27)

3 (9)

 

25 (68)

 

24 (69)

 

10 (29)

 

9 (26)

<.001

 

<.001

 

<.001

 

<.001

 

<.001

Lymphopenia, n (%) 3584 (63) 1358 (75) 1037 (57) 725 (56) 196 (63) 257 (58) 11 (38) <.001
Pneumonia, n (%) 3148 (53) 1260 (68) 843 (45) 616 (45) 179 (56) 238 (52) 12 (39) <.001
Hospital admission, n (%) 3856 (64) 1481 (78) 1104 (58) 757 (55) 207 (64) 292 (63) 15 (47) <.001
ICU admission, n (%)a 561 (15) 127 (9) 179 (17) 123 (17) 39 (19) 90 (32) 3 (21) <.001
ICU rejection, n (%)a 431 (12) 208 (16) 77 (7) 109 (16) 15 (8) 19 (7) 1 (8) <.001
Mechanical ventilation, n (%)a 656 (19) 210 (17) 170 (17) 143 (22) 46 (25) 84 (31) 3 (23) <.001

Treatment at onset, n (%)

 

lopinavir/ritonavir

 

Hydroxychloroquine

 

Interferon

 

Tocilizumab

 

Steroids

 

No treatment

611 (12)

 

1425 (27)

 

60 (4)

 

468 (9)

 

2565 (48)

 

1740 (35)

596 (35)

 

1419 (80)

 

5 (<1)

 

172 (11)

 

587 (35)

 

253 (16)

9 (1)

 

5 (<1)

 

0 (0)

 

132 (8)

 

862 (50)

 

705 (44)

1 (<1)

 

1 (<1)

 

0 (0)

 

79 (7)

 

661 (53)

 

539 (45)

0 (0)

 

0 (0)

 

0 (0)

 

33 (11)

 

183 (61)

 

92 (32)

5 (1)

 

0 (0)

 

0 (0)

 

52 (14)

 

261 (63)

 

135 (34)

0 (0)

 

0 (0)

 

0 (0)

 

0 (0)

 

11 (41)

 

16 (57)

<.001

 

<.001

 

<.001

 

<.001

 

<.001

 

<.001

Baseline ACEi, n (%) 768 (13) 231 (12) 246 (13) 158 (12) 49 (15) 80 (18) 4 (11) .014
Baseline ARB, n (%) 1343 (23) 384 (21) 455 (24) 317 (24) 72 (23) 106 (24) 9 (25) .181
Previous NSAID, n (%) 181 (3) 63 (3) 61 (3) 43 (3) 6 (2) 7 (2) 1 (3) .326

Immunosuppression, n (%)

 

Prednisone

 

Ciclosporin

 

Tacrolimus

 

Mycophenolate

 

mTORi

 

Azathioprine

2268 (81)

 

3 (<1)

 

2449 (95)

 

1945 (76)

 

412 (16)

 

29 (1)

461 (74)

 

0 (0)

 

511 (92)

 

382 (69)

 

124 (22)

 

8 (1)

745 (82)

 

0 (0)

 

814 (96)

 

654 (77)

 

114 (13)

 

11 (1)

531 (83)

 

2 (<1)

 

564 (96)

 

446 (76)

 

93 (16)

 

3 (<1)

181 (83)

 

1 (<1)

 

198 (97)

 

156 (76)

 

35 (17)

 

3 (1)

323 (89)

 

0 (0)

 

333 (96)

 

281 (81)

 

44 (13)

 

3 (1)

27 (90)

 

0 (0)

 

29 (100)

 

23 (79)

 

2 (7)

 

1 (3)

<.001

 

.219

 

.006

 

.001

 

<.001

 

.470

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, n (%) 500 (8%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 8 (1) 66 (20) 396 (84) 30 (79) <.001
Immunosuppressants adjusted, n (%) 458 (65) 13 (72) 16 (42) 78 (60) 88 (69) 246 (67) 17 (81) .015
Mortality, n (%) 1207 (21) 500 (28) 292 (16) 265 (20) 52 (17) 94 (22) 4 (19) <.001
Mortality in vaccinated, n (%) 86 (19) NA NA 1 (12) 8 (12) 75 (21) 2 (15) .382
Mortality in symptomatic patients, n (%) 1010 (25) 412 (30) 244 (20) 225 (25) 46 (20) 80 (25) 3 (19) <.001

a% of admitted.

Data are displayed as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range) unless otherwise indicated. KRT; kidney replacement therapy, KT, kidney transplant; HD, in-centre haemodialysis; PD, peritoneal dialysis; HHD, home haemodialysis; ICU, intensive care unit; ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB: angiotensin receptor blockers; NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; mTORi, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors; NA, not applicable.

Regarding immunosuppressive drugs, KT recipients were mostly receiving prednisone (81%), tacrolimus (95%) and mycophenolate (76%) for chronic immunosuppression before developing COVID-19 (Table 1). The chronic immunosuppressive medication of KT recipients that were diagnosed with COVID-19 evolved during the pandemic: over time the percentage of patients on prednisone (P < .001), tacrolimus (P = .006) and mycophenolate (P = .001) increased and the percentage of patients on mTORi inhibitors (P < .001) decreased. Most of these differences were evident between the first and subsequent waves (Supplementary data, Table S2). However, only prednisone was significantly more frequent for chronic immune suppression during the vaccine era (Supplementary data, Table S2). In fact, chronic immune suppression with prednisone was observed in 80% of KT recipients before vaccines became available (waves 1–3) and in 88% in waves 4–5, when over 85% of KT recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were vaccinated.

Changing patterns of SARS-CoV-2 infection and treatment

Figure 1 shows the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Spanish COVID-19 KRT Registry and in the general Spanish population [3]. In the KRT cohort, more SARS-CoV-2 infections occurred during the first wave than in subsequent waves (P < .001), unlike in the general population. The pandemic affected more frequently in-centre HD patients in the initial wave and KT recipients from the fourth wave, i.e. after the vaccine had become available (Fig. 2) (Supplementary data, Tables S2 and S3). Following the availability of vaccines, the number of COVID-19 cases among KRT patients decreased dramatically. However, an interesting pattern is observed in which most COVID-19 cases in KT recipients in the fifth and sixth waves occurred among vaccinated persons, while in the sixth wave, i.e. after the booster had been offered, most infections in HD occurred in unvaccinated patients.

FIGURE 1:

FIGURE 1:

SARS-CoV-2 infections over time in the COVID-19 Spanish KRT Registry and in the general Spanish population during the pandemic.

FIGURE 2:

FIGURE 2:

SARS-CoV-2 cases and vaccination status among kidney transplant recipients and haemodialysis. Continuous lines refer to total cases in the different cohorts. Bars indicate the percentage of vaccination among infected patients. KT, kidney transplant; HD, haemodialysis.

Symptoms varied across waves. A total of 1025 (22%) patients were asymptomatic and the frequency increased from the first wave (15%) to the second and third wave (28% and 26%, respectively), likely representing changes in HD units screening patterns, and then decreased to 9% (P < .001). In this regard, KT recipients and patients on PD were less likely to be asymptomatic (P < .001) and had higher rates of pneumonia (P < .001) (Supplementary data, Table S1). A total of 3148 (53%) patients developed pneumonia (Table 1). The most common symptoms were fever (60%) and cough/rhinorrhoea (60%).

The prescription of drugs to treat COVID-19 changed during the pandemic. Lopinavir/ritonavir (35%) and hydroxychloroquine (80%) were used only in the first wave and then became obsolete (P < .001 for both). Steroids (48%) were the most frequent treatment initiated for the cytokine storm phase of COVID-19, while 35% of patients were untreated (Table 1). KT recipients were treated more frequently with drugs targeting the cytokine storm (i.e. steroids or tocilizumab) than the other cohorts (P < .001 for both) (Supplementary data, Table S1).

Among KT recipients, 458 (65%) required an adjustment of immunosuppressive treatment during the infection, the most common being a reduction or withdrawal of mycophenolate in 384 (98%), followed by a reduction in calcineurin inhibitors [tacrolimus in 232 (68%) patients, cyclosporine in 5 (20%)] and an increase in steroid dose in 289 (82%) patients. A decrease/withdrawal of mTOR inhibitors was uncommon (3 patients, 5%).

Factors associated with admission

Among infected patients, 3856 (64%) were admitted to hospital. Factors associated to admission are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Factors associated with outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection in univariate analysis

Hospital admission ICU admission Mortality
OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Sex (male) 1.30 (1.17–1.45) <.001 1.13 (0.93–1.36) .226 1.25 (1.10–1.43) .001
Age (per year) 1.02 (1.02–1.03) <.001 0.97 (0.96–0.97) <.001 1.06 (1.05–1.06) .001
Diabetic kidney disease (yes) 1.39 (1.21–1.59) <.001 0.82 (0.65–1.03) .093 1.43 (1.23–1.66) <.001
KRT (KT) 1.15 (1.03–1.28) .010 3.75 (3.07–4.59) <.001 0.73 (0.64–0.83) <.001
Haemodialysis unit location (in-centre) 0.76 (0.65–0.89) .001 0.98 (0.68–1.42) .932 1.02 (1.00–1.44) .045
KRT vintage (per month) 1.00 (1.00–1.00) .331 1.00 (1.00–1.00) .055 1.00 (0.99–1.00) .871
Lymphopaenia (yes) 15.1 (13.3–17.3) <.001 3.75 (2.59–5.42) <.001 6.52 (5.35–7.95) <.001
Pneumonia (yes) 104 (82–132) <.001 11.6 (6.80–19.9) <.001 10.7 (8.8–13.07) <.001

Treatment during admission (yes):

 

Lopinavir/ritonavir

 

Hydroxychloroquine

 

Interferon

 

Tocilizumab

 

Steroids

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28.0 (16.1–48.7)

 

7.05 (5.84–8.51)

 

33.7 (4.67–243)

 

93.3 (29.9–290)

 

26.1 (21.5–31.7)

<.001

 

<.001

 

<.001

 

<.001

 

<.001

2.34 (1.95–2.83)

 

1.83 (1.58–2.12)

 

3.52 (2.15–5.76)

 

2.98 (2.43–3.65)

 

3.49 (3.02–4.04)

<.001

 

<.001

 

<.001

 

<.001

 

<.001

Baseline ACEi (yes) 1.09 (0.93–1.28) .265 1.11 (0.85–1.44) .431 0.92 (0.76–1.12) .39
ACEi withdrawal at admission (yes) 2.94 (1.68–5.15) <.001 5.09 (3.17–8.19) <.001
Baseline ARB (yes) 0.88 (0.77–0.99) .047 1.47 (1.19–1.81) <.001 0.75 (0.63–0.88) <.001
ARB withdrawal at admission (yes) 3.43 (2.28–5.17) <.001 4.38 (3.08–6.21) <.001
Previous NSAID (yes) 1.06 (0.77–1.45) .701 0.19 (0.07–0.53) .001 0.95 (0.65–0.14) .805

Immunosuppressive medication (yes)

 

Prednisone-free regimen

 

CNI-free regimen

 

mTORi-free regimen

 

Mycophenolate-free regimen

0.82 (0.69–0.99)

 

1.39 (0.93–2.10)

 

0.86 (0.68–1.08)

 

1.15 (0.95–1.39)

.046

 

.110

 

.199

 

.148

0.71 (0.52–0.97)

 

0.78 (0.45–1.36)

 

1.56 (1.11–2.19)

 

0.56 (0.42–0.75)

.030

 

.380

 

.011

 

<.001

0.78 (0.59–1.02)

 

1.18 (0.74–1.89)

 

1.51 (1.10–2.07)

 

0.87 (0.67–1.11)

.075

 

.480

 

.011

 

.260

SARS-CoV-2 wave (first) 2.61 (2.30–2.96) <.001 0.41 (0.33–0.51) .001 1.74 (1.53–1.99) <.001
ICU admission (yes) 3.78 (3.13–4.58) <.001
ICU rejection (yes) 17.0 (12.9–22.3) <.001
Vaccination status (yes) 0.89 (0.74–1.09) .261 2.74 (2.09–3.58) <.001 0.88 (0.69–1.13) .315

The increased OR of UCI admission in univariate analysis among the vaccinated appears to be related to the availability of vaccines in most recent pandemic waves, in which ICU access was easier than in previous waves when the healthcare system was overwhelmed.

KRT; kidney replacement therapy; KT, kidney transplant; ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB; angiotensin receptor blockers; NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; CNI, calcineurin inhibitors; mTORi, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; OR (95%CI), odds ratio (95% confidence interval).

A total of 658 (11%) patients required mechanical ventilation. Mechanical ventilation use increased over time (P < .001) (Table 1), potentially reflecting improved capacities of healthcare facilities to absorb the case load.

In multivariate analysis, patient (older age, male sex, KT recipient), COVID-19 severity (baseline lymphopaenia, pneumonia) and pandemic (first wave) factors were independent predictors for admission (Table 3). Sensitivity analyses exploring different pandemic wave categories yielded similar results (Supplementary data, Tables S4 and S5).

Table 3.

Multivariate logistic regression for outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection

Hospital admission ICU admission Mortality
OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Age (per year) 1.01 (1.01–1.02) <.001 0.97 (0.96–0.98) <.001 1.05 (1.04–1.06) <.001
Sex (male) 1.21 (1.01–1.46) .034
KRT (KT) 1.81 (1.46–2.23) <.001 2.90 (2.28–3.68) <.001
Lymphopenia (yes) 5.58 (4.64–6.65) <.001 3.23 (2.16–4.82) <.001 1.98 (1.48–2.64) <.001
Pneumonia (yes) 50.7 (39.4–65.4) <.001 16.9 (8.64–33.4) <.001 2.87 (2.15–3.83) <.001
KRT vintage (month) 0.99 (0.99–0.99) .008
SARS-CoV-2 wave (first) 1.57 (1.28–1.93) <.001 0.43 (0.34–0.54) <.001
ICU rejection (yes) 13.1 (9.81–17.5) <.001

Models adjusted for diabetic kidney disease. KRT, kidney replacement therapy; KT, kidney transplant; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; OR (95% CI): odds ratio (95% confidence interval).

Factors associated with ICU admission

Among infected patients, 562 (9%) were admitted to ICU, corresponding to 15% of patients admitted to hospital. In 439 patients (7%) were rejected from ICU admission despite severity criteria for ICU admission. The pattern of ICU admissions also evolved during the pandemic, being lower during the first wave (in which rejection from ICU was higher), likely reflecting overwhelmed healthcare systems (Supplementary data, Table S2).

Factors associated with ICU admission are summarized in Table 2. Multivariate analysis identified patient (younger age, KT recipient, shorter KRT vintage), COVID-19 severity (baseline lymphopaenia, pneumonia) and pandemic (infection outside the first wave) factors as independent predictors for ICU admission (Table 3). Sensitivity analyses exploring different pandemic wave categories yielded similar results (Supplementary data, Tables S6 and S7).

Factors associated with mortality

During follow-up, 1207 patients (21%) died, 4539 (74%) recovered and 344 (6%) were lost to follow-up. Figure 3 shows the mortality in the Spanish COVID-19 KRT Registry and COVID-19 mortality in the general Spanish population [3]. COVID-19 mortality among KRT patients was more frequent during the first wave (28%) than in other waves (18%) (P < .001) (Supplementary data, Table 2) and grossly paralleled those of the general population. From the fourth wave, i.e. after vaccines became available, the number of deaths decreased dramatically and occurred mainly in KT recipients (Fig. 4). However, among breakthrough diagnosed with COVID-19 in the vaccinated, mortality was 19% (Table 1). Of the 86 vaccinated KRT patients that died, a majority (77, 89%) were KT recipients (Supplementary data, Table 1).

FIGURE 3:

FIGURE 3:

COVID-19 mortality over time in the COVID-19 Spanish KRT Registry and in the general Spanish population during the pandemic.

FIGURE 4:

FIGURE 4:

SARS-CoV-2 deaths and vaccination status among kidney transplant recipients and haemodialysis patients. Continuous lines refer to total deaths in the different cohorts. Bars indicate the percentage of vaccination among patients dying from COVID-19. KT, kidney transplant; HD, haemodialysis.

COVID-19 mortality was higher in HD and PD (24 and 22%, respectively) than in KT (18%) or HDD (14%) patients (P < .001). Patient (male sex, older age, diabetic kidney disease, in-centre HD), COVID-19 severity (baseline lymphopaenia, pneumonia), COVID-19 treatment (ACEi and ARB withdrawal, ICU rejection) and pandemic (first wave) factors were also associated to mortality.

In multivariate analysis, patient factors (older age), COVID-19 severity (baseline lymphopaenia, pneumonia) and COVID-19 treatment (ICU rejection) factors were independent predictors of mortality (Table 3). Sensitivity analyses exploring different pandemic wave categories yielded similar results (Supplementary data, Tables S8 and S9).

While COVID-19 severity is an expected driver of mortality, the identification of additional patient factors associated with mortality, potentially by increasing disease severity, may be of interest. Focussing only on patient factors, multivariate analysis identified older age, male sex, diabetes and KT as independent risk factors for death, while ARB use was protective (Supplementary data, Table S10). An analysis focussed on KT recipient factors confirmed the higher risk conferred by older age, male sex and diabetes and, additionally, identified an association with immunosuppressants: mTORi-free and calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens were associated with mortality, while prednisone-free regimens were associated with lower mortality (Supplementary data, Table S11).

DISCUSSION

The key finding of our study is that, although lower than in the first wave, the mortality of KRT patients diagnosed with COVID-19 remains high (around 19% for vaccinated KRT patients) despite advances in treatment and higher availability of ICU care in the era of vaccines. This is 13-fold higher than the 1.55% mortality of confirmed COVID-19 in the general population in Spain [11]. However, the vaccine era witnessed a dramatic decrease in the number of diagnosed COVID-19 cases in the KRT population as compared with the general population, as well as in the absolute number of deaths, and mortality of vaccinated KRT patients was for the most part limited to KT recipients. Thus, a shift was observed from HD patients to KT recipients, for both cases and deaths, likely reflecting the lower efficacy of vaccines in KT recipients [9]. In this regard, the increased prevalence of chronic immunosuppressive regimens containing steroids among COVID-19-infected KT recipients over time should be considered in the context of reports that associate chronic immunosuppressive regimens containing steroids with poorer humoral responses to vaccines [9]. In contrast, almost half of the HD patients infected in the fifth wave and most of the few HD patients infected in the sixth wave were unvaccinated, supporting the efficacy of booster vaccine doses in this population.

Several changes in the presentation, treatment and outcomes of COVID-19 were evident over time and through the successive pandemic waves. One of the most striking features was the shift in the KRT patient population with COVID-19. The first wave mainly affected HD patients while the fifth and sixth waves, following vaccination, were the KT recipient waves. In the first wave, the healthcare system was unprepared to prevent the spread of the virus, but HD patients needed to access healthcare facilities thrice weekly and could not shield themselves [7, 12, 13, 14]. The more recent shift to KT recipients appears related to their suboptimal response to vaccines [9]. In this regard, although the case fatality ratio was similar among vaccinated KT recipients and vaccinated HD patients, there were 8.5-fold more deaths among vaccinated KT recipients than among vaccinated HD patients, likely reflecting the higher number of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections despite vaccination in KT recipients. To put these data into perspective, the number of KT recipients with functioning grafts in Spain is 1.35-fold higher than the number of patients on HD [15].

A key finding is a potential role of therapeutic nihilism in the high mortality of KRT patients during the first COVID-19 wave, especially among HD and PD patients. In this regard, KT recipients were admitted more frequently, with more symptoms and more frequent pneumonia and received more ICU care, but mortality was lower than in PD or HD patients. Multivariate analysis identified refusal of ICU care as an independent risk factor for death, among other patient and disease severity factors. Difficult decisions had to be made early in the COVID-19 pandemic when ICUs were overwhelmed. This observation is confirmed in our data, where young patients were more frequently accepted for ICU admission. However, we should strive to prevent the rejection of KRT patients during the first pandemic wave becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy and KRT patients being refused advanced life support in the future because of that earlier high mortality. Indeed, our data show that KRT patients with COVID-19 during the first wave were 2.3-fold less likely to be admitted to ICUs than in subsequent waves. In this regard, in the most recent pandemic waves, when vaccines are available and therapies such as dexamethasone are widely used [16], most KRT patients with breakthrough COVID-19 survived. Moreover, in KRT patients, unlike in the general population, additional comorbidities, such as diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease and chronic lung disease, do not further add to the risk of death and the impact of older age on the risk of death is up to 6-fold lower than in the general population [1, 3].

Beyond access to advanced life support, other treatment factors may influence the risk of death. In addition to the prescription of antivirals or steroids, adjustment of chronic immunosuppression could be a successful strategy in KT recipients. In this regard, mTORi-free and calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens were associated with higher mortality, while steroid-free regimens were consistently associated with lower hospital admissions, lower ICU admissions and lower mortality. Data on the prevalence of chronic immunosuppressive regimens containing steroids among infected KT recipients over time also points to the negative impact of steroids-containing immune suppressive regimens on sensitivity to COVID-19 and also, to severe and potentially lethal COVID-19. This may be, at least in part, related to reports that associate steroids-containing immunosuppressive regimens with poorer humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines [9]. Interestingly, steroids are beneficial when used acutely in COVID-19 [17]. This controversy can be understood in light of the anti-inflammatory effect of high doses of corticosteroids on the cytokine storm phase of COVID-19, in contrast to the chronic immunosuppression with steroids prescription that may dampen antiviral and vaccine responses. Regarding acute steroid prescription, an indication bias should be noted, as they were prescribed to treat severe COVID-19, and we believe that this underlies the association with mortality. Among other pre-existent therapies, baseline use of ARBs was a patient factor associated with lower mortality in the full KRT population, albeit not in KT recipients. While this should be confirmed in a wider KRT population, there is biological plausibility for the relationship, since angiotensin receptor-1 (AT-1), the target of ARBs, was recently shown to facilitate SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells mediated by soluble angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (sACE2) [18]. Thus, ARBs could potentially interfere with this port of entry of SARS-CoV-2 into cells and we can only speculate that, based on the clinical observation, this viral entry pathway may be more relevant in dialysis patients. This hypothesis merits being pursued in further research as it may be clinically relevant.

The main impact of vaccines appeared to be the reduction in the number of cases, as mortality among vaccinated KRT patients diagnosed with COVID-19 was similar to among non-vaccinated KRT patients diagnosed with COVID-19. However, mortality among vaccinated COVID-19 patients was almost exclusively found in KT recipients, pointing to a suboptimal response to vaccination in those patients who died despite vaccination. Thus, as the pandemic shifts from the wider KRT population to vaccinated KT recipients, the urge to optimize the vaccination regimens increases. This may imply transient adaptation of immune suppression regimens, more common use of the mRNA-1273 vaccine, additional booster doses or novel vaccines [9].

The presentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the case fatality ratio may have been influenced by the criteria used to perform diagnostic tests. Thus, early in the pandemic, testing seemed to be reserved for more symptomatic patients, given supply chain issues. Later, testing of even asymptomatic patients was performed in HD units for outbreak monitoring, but not in at-home dialysis or KT recipients [19, 20]. This may explain the lower likelihood of being asymptomatic and higher rates of pneumonia in KT recipients and PD patients. Indeed, asymptomatic infections in the second and third waves were 26–28% and decreased to ˂20% when the epidemiological context changed and preventive screening protocols became outdated. However, the combination of strictly observed isolation measures (e.g. masks during transport to and from dialysis centres and during HD sessions) and vaccines appears to be more effective in the KRT population than vaccines in combination with more relaxed measures in the general population, as judged by the lower number of infections recorded upon vaccine implementation in KRT patients than in the general population. Thus, vaccination and booster doses should continue to be promoted in KRT patients and isolation measures should be maintained. In this regard, early in the pandemic lack of face masks during transport to and from dialysis and suboptimal personal protective equipment were identified as risk factors for infection in KRT patients and healthcare personnel [7, 11, 12].

Some limitations should be acknowledged. In this registry-based study, inherent bias includes some incomplete data, limited variables (such as body mass index or treatment duration) or loss of follow-up. However, first, this is a multicentric prospective study involving a large cohort of patients on KRT infected by SARS-CoV-2 in Spain, corresponding to roughly 10% of Spanish patients on KRT [12], so data and conclusions are thought to be representative. Second, information on vaccination dates or antibody response is not available. In Spain, the first vaccine dose was administered at the end of December 2020, but widespread vaccination started in January 2021 and reached KRT patients at some point between February and April 2021. Third, subclinical or asymptomatic infections probably went unnoticed, especially beyond the third wave, when systematic periodic screening of HD units was no longer performed, so the studied outcomes could be overestimated. However, this makes the data more comparable to the general population, for which widespread screening of asymptomatic individuals is not performed [15]. Fourth, the sixth wave data predate the introduction and expansion of the Omicron variant in Spain and thus, the impact of this strain is not reflected in the data. Finally, some variables, such as rejection from ICU admission, did not have a universal definition and should be analysed from a subjective point of view.

In conclusion, the features of the COVID-19 pandemic in KRT patients (patient characteristics, treatment and outcomes) keep evolving, shifting towards vaccinated KT recipients and unvaccinated dialysis patients. Vaccines are associated with a lower incidence of diagnosed COVID-19, but mortality remains high despite ICU care, although most patients survive. Further improvement in KRT patient outcomes may be obtained by optimizing vaccination and immune suppression protocols in KT recipients, promoting vaccination and boosting dialysis patients and providing access to life support care if needed.

Supplementary Material

sfac135_Supplemental_File

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We want to thank all the implicated Spanish centres for their altruist collaboration. A.O. research is supported by FIS/Fondos FEDER [PI18/01366, PI19/00588, PI19/00815, DTS18/00032, ERA-PerMed-JTC2018 (KIDNEY ATTACK AC18/00064 and PERSTIGAN AC18/00071, ISCIII-RETIC REDinREN RD016/0009)], Sociedad Española de Nefrología, FRIAT, Comunidad de Madrid en Biomedicina B2017/BMD-3686 CIFRA2-CM. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) RICORS program to RICORS2040 (RD21/0005/0001), FEDER funds.

APPENDIX

The Spanish COVID-19 KRT Registry collaborative group:

Victoria Oviedo
Antoni Bordils Gil
Maria Luisa Navarro López
María Isabel Martínez Marín
Amparo Bernat García
Isabel Berdud Godoy
Mª Victoria Guijarro Abad
María del Mar Rodríguez de Oña
Elena Vaquero Párrizas
María Antonia Fernández Solís
Jose Antonio Gomez Puerta
Alvaro Ossorio Anaya
Elena Calvo
Carmen Cabré Menéndez
Nuria García Fernández
Paloma Leticia Martín Moreno
Mª José Fernández-Reyes Luis
Cristina Lucas Álvarez
Guadalupe Tabernero fernández
Manuel Heras Benito
Pilar Fraile Gómez
Joaquin Manrique Escola
Enrique Pelaez Perez
Luz María Cuiña Barja
Teresa Cordal Martinez
Maria Jesus Castro Vilanova
Silvia Moreno Loshuertos
Francisco Javier Ahijado Hormigos
Ana Roca Muñoz
Carlos Jesús Cabezas Reina
Jesús Grande Villoria
Ana Isabel Díaz Mareque
Anabertha Narváez Benítez
Argimiro Gándara Martínez
Mª Gloria Rodríguez Goyanes
Maria Crucio Lopez
Alfonso Iglesias
Laureano Perez Oller
Carlos Antonio Soto Montañez
Juan Villaro Gumpert
Ana Beatriz Muñoz Díaz
Gustavo Useche Bonilla
Maria Noel Martina Lingua
Diana Pazmiño Zambrano
Sandra Castellano Gasch
Guadalupe Caparrós Tortosa
Silvia Soto Alarcón
Mercedes Albaladejo Pérez
Ignacio Cidraque Vella
Cristina Canal Girol
Silvia Benito García
Montserrat Picazo Sánchez
Anna Patrícia Balius Matas
Núria Garra Moncau
Rodrigo Avellaneda Campos
Ana María Ramos Verde
Laura Muñiz Pacios
Alfonso Pobes Martínez de Salinas
Maria Jimenez Herrero
Liliana Morán Caicedo
Mª Dolores Prados Garrido
Mariana Garbiras
Laura Sanchez Rodríguez
Maria Dolores Albero Molina
Elena Gutiérrez Solis
Ana Hernández Vicente
Angel.M Sevillano Prieto
Teresa Bada Bosch
Hernando Trujillo Cuéllar
Helena Díaz Cambre
Cassandra Emma Puig Hooper
Adriana Maria Cavada Bustamante
Boris Gonzales Gandía
Miguel Rodeles del Pozo
Miquel Blasco Pelicano
José Jesús Broseta Monzó
Jaime Sanz García
Jose Antonio Herrero Calvo
Isabel Maria Pérez Flores
Virginia López de la Manzanara Pérez
Javier Vian Pérez
Sara Huertas Salazar
Armando Coca Rojo
R. Alvarez
Miguel Angel González Rico
Ana Isabel Martinez Diaz
Elena Giménez Civera
Ignacio Lopez Alejaldre
Claudio José Hornos Hornos
Zakariae Koraichi Rabie Senhaji
Enriqueta González Rodríguez
Andrea Patricia Zapata Balcázar
Cecilia Montoyo Castillo
David Tura Rosales
Raúl Edilberto Alvarado Gutiérrez
Rafael Garcia Maset
Rosa Garcia Osuna
Maria Eugenia Palacios Gómez
Sergio García Marcos
Francisco Roca Oporto
Manuel Ramirez de Arellano Serna
Elena Olivar Pérez
Oihana Larrañaga Zabaleta
Mº Dolores Arenas Jiménez
Marta Crespo Barrio
Silvia Collado Nieto
María Dolores Redondo Pachón
Anna Buxeda i Porras
Laura Llinàs Mallol
Alberto Mendoza-Valderrey
Carola Arcal Cunillera
Basilio Martin Urcuyo
Adelaida Morales Umpiérrez
Aránzazu Márquez Corbella
Eva Gavela Martínez
Julia Kanter
Sandra Beltrán Catalán
Mercedes Gonzalez Moya
July Vanessa Osma Capera
Alejandro Valero Anton
Elena Castillón Lavilla
Juan Casas Todolí
Amir Shabaka Fernández
Ainhoa Hernando Rubio
Inmaculada Lorenzo Gonzalez
Francisco Llamas fuentes
Francisco Javier Centellas Pérez
Ana Pérez Rodríguez
Alejandra Rodriguez
Jorge Reichert
Rosa Sanchez Hernández
Luis Fernando Domínguez Reina
Antonio Franco Esteve
Eduardo Muñoz de Bustillo Llorente
Dioné González Ferri
Alejandro Pérez Alba
Luis Guillermo Piccone Saponara
María Esperanza Moral Berrio
Silvia Ros Ruiz
Leonidas Cruzado Vega
Eduardo Bosque Muñoz
Joaquín de Juan Ribera
Josefa Martin Rivas
Inés Aragoncillo Sauco
Luis Alberto Sánchez Cámara
Antonio Pérez Pérez
Mª José Navarro Parreño
Gracia Mª Alvarez Fernández
Marisol Ros Romero
Diana Manzano Sánchez
Maria Molina Gomez
Javier Juega
Andrés Villegas Fuentes
Laura Espinosa Román
Cristóbal Donapetry García
Pablo Castro de la Nuez
Antonio Crespo Navarro
Neus Rodriguez Farre
Jesus Martin Garcia
Antonio Gascón Mariño
Secundino Cigarran Guldris
Margarita Montserrat Pousa Ortega
Roberto Holgado Salado
Margarita Delgado Cordova
Natalia Blanco Castro
Elvira Esquivias de Motta
Veronica Lopez Jimenez
Belen Gómez Giralda
María Verónica Torres Jaramillo
Juan Cristobal Santacruz Mancheno
Beatriz María Durá Gúrpide
Paula Munguía Navarro
Belen Moragrega
Marta Luzon Alonso
Fernando Gil Catalinas
Emma Huarte Loza
Cecilia Dall'Anese Siegenthaler
Pedro Jesús Labrador Gómez
Silvia González Sanchidrián
Yanina García Marcote
Bruna Natacha Leite Costa
Joan Manuel Gascó Company
Juan Rey Valeriano
Sheila Cabello Pelegrin
Paloma Livianos Arias-Camisón.
Maria Teresa García Falcón
Ana Rodriguez-Carmona
Antía López Iglesias
Felipe Sarró Sobrín
Maria Luisa Martin Conde
Javier Arrieta Lezama
Iñigo Moina Eguren
Olga Gonzalez Peña
Maria del Carmen Díaz Corte
Maria Luisa Suarez Fernandez
Pedro Vidau Arguelles
Elena Astudillo Cortés
Lucía Sobrino Díaz
Alba Rivas Oural
Luis Fernando Morán Fernández
Oscar Rolando Durón Vargas
Clara Sanz García
Adriana Maria Cavada Bustamante
Carmen Robledo Zulet
Oscar García Uriarte
Maria Begoña Aurrekoetxea Fernandez
Maria Isabel Jimeno Martín
Guillermo Alcalde Bezhold
Rosa Maria Ruiz-Calero Cendrero
Roman Hernandez Gallego
Maria Victoria Martin Hidalgo-Barquero
Pedro Abáigar Luquin
Emilio Sanchez
Sagrario García Rebollo
María Lourdes Pérez Tamajón
Alejandra Maxorata Alvarez Gonzalez
Greissi Jeniree Garcia Bonilla
Eva Alvarez
Sofía Zarraga Larrondo
Alfonso Cubas Alcaraz
Mª Teresa Naya Nieto
Fernando Henriquez Palop
Raquel Santana Estupiñán
Ernesto Francisco Valga Amado
Gabriel De Arriba De La Fuente
Marta Sánchez Heras
Concepción Alamo Caballero
Maria Pilar Perez del Barrio
Clara María Moriana Domínguez
Sara Blázquez Roselló
Gema Velasco Barrero
Jary Perello Martinez
Manuel Ramos Díaz
Marina Almenara Tejederas
Martín Giorgi González
Beatriz Diez Ojea
Vicente Paraíso Cuevas
Fernando Tornero Molina
David rodríguez Santarelli
Jessica Isabel Urdaneta Colmenares
Luis Alberto Blázquez Collado
Maria Teresa Rodrigo De Tomas
Fernando Simal Blanco
Marta Albalate Ramón
Patricia de Sequera Ortiz
Rafael Lucena Valverde
Raquel Diaz Mancebo
Rocio Echarri Carrillo
Gabriel Ledesma Sanchez
Ernesto Jose Fernandez Tagarro
Iván Chamorro Bucheli
Joan Albert Fernández Roig
Isabel Garcia Mendez
Carlos Jimenez Martin
María Ovidia López Oliva
Mª Elena González García
Maria Auxiliadora Bajo Rubio
Laura Alvarez García
Jesus Calviño Varela
Juan Carlos Ruiz San Millán
Celestino Piñera Haces
Rosa Palomar Fontanet
Rosalía Valero San Cecilio
M. Jose Aladrén Regidor
Alejandro Soria Villén
Cristina Medrano Villarroya
Orlando Siverio Morales
Diego Rodríguez Puyol
María Pérez Fernández
Jose Portoles Perez
Charo Llopez Carratala
Auxiliadora Mazuecos
Juan Manuel Cazorla Lopez
Maríaa Gabriela Sánchez Márquez
Carolina Lancho Novillo
Lien Winderickx
Carlos Íñiguez Villalón
Cristina Galeano Álvarez
Sara Jiménez Álvaro
Esmeralda Castillo Rodríguez
Daniel Eduardo Villa Hurtado
Milagros Fernandez Lucas
Alberto Rodríguez Benot
Sagrario Soriano Cabrera
Raquel Ojeda López
Jose Luis Pérez Canga
Ana Cristina Andrade López
Anna Gallardo Pérez
Aniana Oliet Palá
Maria Sanchez Sanchez
Juan Manuel Buades Fuster
Maria Eugenia Palacios Gómez
Felisa Martínez Sanchez
Cristina Jimeno Griñó
Adoración Martínez Losa
Isabel María Saura Luján
Luis Gil Sacaluga
Gabriel Bernal Blanco
Maria Jose Marco Guerrero
Ana Isabel Martínez Puerto
Mª Jesús Moyano Franco
Elena Araceli Jiménez Víbora
Nuria Aresté Fosalba
Maria de los Ángeles Rodríguez Pérez
Ramos Escorihuela
Ramón Jesús Devesa Such
Isabel Beneyto Castelló
Edoardo Melilli
María José Soler Romeo
Francesc Moreso Mateos
Nestor Gabriel Toapanta Gaibor
Alfonso Pobes Martínez de Salinas
Begoña Rincón Ruiz
Mªcarmen Ruiz Fuentes
Ramón López-Menchero Martínez
Miguel Angel Suarez Santistebam
Carlos Jarava Mantecón
Fernando Fernandez Giron
Omar Miranda Espinal
Juan Carlos Martínez Ocaña
Raúl García Castro
Florentino Villanego Fernández
Montserrat Belart Rodríguez
Camino García Monteavaro

Contributor Information

Borja Quiroga, IIS-La Princesa, Nephrology Department, Hospital de la Princesa,  Madrid, Spain.

Alberto Ortiz, IIS-Fundación Jimenez Diaz, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Fundación Renal Iñigo Alvarez de Toledo-IRSIN, REDinREN, Instituto de Investigación Carlos III, Madrid,  Spain.

Carlos Jesús Cabezas-Reina, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario de Toledo,  Toledo, Spain.

María Carmen Ruiz Fuentes, Nephrology Department, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada,  Spain.

Verónica López Jiménez, Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Universidad de Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, RICORS2040 (RD21/0005/0012), Malaga, Spain.

Sofía Zárraga Larrondo, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Bizkaia, Spain.

Néstor Toapanta, Nephrology Department, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona,  Spain.

María Molina Gómez, Nephrology Department, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol (HUGTiP) & REMAR-IGTP Group, Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institude (IGTP), Can Ruti Campus, Badalona Barcelona, Spain.

Patricia de Sequera, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor – Universidad Complutense de Madrid,  Madrid, Spain.

Emilio Sánchez-Álvarez, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes,  Gijón, Spain.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data are available upon a reasonable request.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

B.Q. has received honoraria for conferences, consulting fees and advisory boards from Vifor-Pharma, Astellas, Amgen, Bial, Ferrer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Sandoz, Laboratorios Bial, Esteve, Sanofi-Genzyme and Otsuka. He is the present secretary of the Spanish Society of Nephrology. A.O. has received grants from Sanofi and consultancy or speaker fees or travel support from Advicciene, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Amicus, Amgen, Fresenius Medical Care, GSK, Bayer, Sanofi-Genzyme, Menarini, Kyowa Kirin, Alexion, Idorsia, Chiesi, Otsuka, Novo-Nordisk and Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma, and is Director of the Catedra Mundipharma-UAM of diabetic kidney disease and the Catedra AstraZeneca-UAM of chronic kidney disease and electrolytes. He is the former Editor-in-Chief of CKJ. M.M.G. has received honoraria for conferences, consulting fees and advisory boards from Astellas and Chiesi. P.deS. reports honorarium for conferences, consulting fees and advisory boards from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Baxter, Braun, Fresenius, Nipro, Vifor-Pharma. She is the present president of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (S.E.N.). E.S.-Á. has received honoraria for conferences, consulting fees and advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Vifor, Astellas, Novo Nordisk and Baxter.

C.J.C.-R., M.C.R.F., V.L.J., N.T. and S.Z.L. do not present any disclosure.

REFERENCES

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

sfac135_Supplemental_File

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon a reasonable request.


Articles from Clinical Kidney Journal are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES