Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 6.
Published in final edited form as: Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2021 Dec 23;38(Suppl 1):e9189. doi: 10.1002/rcm.9189

Discovery Proteomics of Human Placental Tissue

Allyson L Mellinger 1, Krista McCoy 2, Duy An T Minior 3, Taufika Islam Williams 4,1,**
PMCID: PMC9218992  NIHMSID: NIHMS1809533  PMID: 34486781

Abstract

We describe a label-free proteomics protocol for the interrogation of the placental proteome. Step-by-step directions are provided from tissue clean-up and preparation, proteolytic digestion, nanoLC-MS/MS data collection and data analysis. The workflow has been applied towards exploring differential protein expression patterns in placentas from women who have been exposed to drugs during pregnancy relative to those who have not. We collected twenty tissue specimens, each representing a combination of spatially diverse sections across the placenta. These specimens were analyzed in the work described here, to survey information across the entire organ. This protocol can be scaled up or down as needed.

Introduction

A label-free proteomics workflow for placental tissue analysis is described, one which allows modelling and exploration of toxicant exposure during gestation. Placental tissue from women who have engaged in recreational drug use during pregnancy can be investigated to determine proteins affected by such exposure. Understanding the natural detoxification processes of the human placenta could potentially assist in identifying targets for prenatal therapies to reduce the effects of toxicants on developing foetuses. A label-free proteomic method has been developed to confidently identify a robust number of protein targets within each tissue sample. When considering under-studied systems such as the human placenta, and ailments associated with abnormalities in placental function, discovery-based proteomics can serve as an effective platform for future hypothesis-driven investigations of placental function. Nine different tissue sections from each placenta were combined to form one sample for the work described here, to survey information across the entire placenta. This protocol can be applied to a large amount of placental tissue (~1–2 grams). 16 Although human tissue is specifically described in this protocol, this procedure may be used to study placental tissue from other mammals. However, the protein database against which the data is searched should be appropriate for the organism that is being studied.

  • Label-free Discovery Proteomics

  • Homogenization of >1 g placenta tissue

  • Can be performed in ~3 days’ time, post placental tissue collection and sampling.

Materials

  • Stainless steel beads (Fisher Scientific Catalog # 50-153-2314)

  • Glass scintillation vials (Fisher Scientific Catalog # 03-341-25D)

  • Vivacon-500, 30 kDa MWCO filters (Sartorius Catalog # VN01H22ETO)

  • 1.5 mL Low Retention Eppendorf Tubes (Fisher Catalog # PI90410)

  • 15 mL Falcon Tubes to prepare FASP solutions (Fisher Catalog # 05-527-90)

  • 50 mL Falcon Tubes to prepare FASP solutions (Fisher Catalog # 14-959-49A)

  • Oven, 37°C and 60°C (Fisher Catalog # 11-475-153)

  • Acclaim PepMap™ C18 trap column (Thermo Scientific Catalog # 164946)

  • PepMap™ C18 column (Thermo Scientific Catalog # ES802A)

  • Autosampler vials and caps (Fisher Catalog # C4011-13 and 60180-676)

  • Omni handheld homogenizer probe (Fisher Catalog # 15-340-167)

  • Omni homogenizer tips (Fisher Catalog # 15-340-100)

  • Fisherbrand Isotemp Shaker (Fisher Catalog # 02-217-741)

  • IBI Scientific “The Belly Dancer” Orbital Platform Shaker (Fisher Catalog #15-453-211)

  • Fisherbrand accuSkan FC Filter-Based Microplate Photometer (14-377-575)

  • Thermo Scientific Sorvall Legend Micro 21 Microcentrifuge (Fisher Catalog #75-772-436)

  • Eppendorf Microcentrifuge 5430R (Fisher Catalog #05-100-180)

  • Fisherbrand Model 505 Sonic Dismembrator (Fisher Catalog FB5050110)

  • Analytical balance

  • Graduated cylinders, 10–500 mL are preferable

  • Glass solvent bottle, 1 L

  • Metal spatula to dispense solid reagents

  • Weight boats to measure solid reagents

Chemicals

  • Optima LC/MS Grade water (Fisher Scientific Catalog # W6-4)

  • Optima LC/MS Grade ACN (Fisher Scientific Catalog # A955-4)

  • Formic acid (Fluka Catalog # 94318-50ML)

  • Ammonium bicarbonate (Millipore Sigma # 09830)

  • Sodium deoxycholate (Millipore Sigma # D6750)

  • Acetic acid (Fisher Scientific Catalog # 143-16)

  • Hydrochloric acid (Fisher Scientific Catalog # 60-007-63)

  • Dithiothreitol (BioRad Catalog # 161-0611)

  • Iodoacetamide (BioRad Catalog # 163-2109)

  • Urea (BioRad Catalog # 161-0730)

  • Sequencing Grade Modified Trypsin (Promega Catalog # V5111)

  • Pierce Standard LC/MS Grade BSA Protein Digest (Thermo Scientific Catalog # 88341)

  • Pierce Standard HeLa Protein Digest (Thermo Scientific Catalog # 88329)

  • BCA Protein Concentration Assay (Fisher Scientific Catalog # 23225)

  • Roche Protease Inhibitor (Millipore Sigma Catalog # 04693116001)

  • Halt Protease Inhibitor (Thermo Scientific Catalog # 78430)

  • Phosphate buffer solution (Fisher Scientific Catalog # BP661-10)

  • Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Catalog # 23225)

Method

As with any proteomics sample preparation workflow, the samples, workspace, reagents and equipment should be safeguarded from keratin contamination. Keratin originates from skin and hair as well as dust, clothing and even latex gloves. If keratins are present in high concentrations, they can interfere with mass spectrometry analyses, rendering loss in signal and decreased identification of potentially interesting proteins. In the case of placental tissues, samples should also be adequately rinsed with ample quantities of sterile solution in order to minimize presence of maternal red blood cells (RBCs). Sterile water and phosphate buffered solution (PBS) with Halt protease inhibitor are used during various stages to ensure placental tissues are amply rinsed to minimize risk of contamination. Indeed, the issues with presence of haemoglobin from maternal RBCs can be similar to those with unwanted keratin presence in these proteomics samples. Workspaces and equipment should be kept clean, reagents should be prepared fresh (in clean containers) and gloves should be changed frequently. Leaning over the workspace must be avoided. Reading through the protocol in advance and pre-labelling any containers that are needed is recommended. Samples will change containers multiple times throughout the workflow and so keeping track of samples will be particularly important.

Collection of Tissues for Proteomic Analysis79

A. Placental Collection and Storage

Once a study participant infant is delivered and the study team has confirmed with the maternal medical team that the placenta was not intended for pathology review, the study team collects the umbilical cord and placenta. Placentas should be placed in freezer-safe plastic containers or wrapped in aluminum foil and placed into a plastic freezer bag for temporary storage at 4°C. Samples are transferred to −80°C within 24 hours, in keeping with data from Sjaarda et al., 2018 who determined that refrigeration for up to 24 hours prior to processing/storage does not compromise results. Placentas are kept in secure storage at −80°C until time of sampling. Given the often unpredictable timing of placenta availability and the need to ensure timely collection and storage, it is important to designate key personnel and procedures well in advance in order to maximize efficiency and safeguard the integrity of samples. For the results reported in this study, a total of 64 placental samples were collected between September 2017 and August 2019. Of these, 20 samples (including 7 exposed and 13 controls) met inclusion criteria and were subsequently analyzed using the proteomics workflow detailed here.

B. Placental Sampling Protocol

Processing Time: 30– 60 minutes per placenta

Frozen samples are removed from −80°C and allowed to thaw at 4°C for approximately 18–22 hours. Placentas are placed with umbilical cord side up on a stainless-steel tray placed on top of frozen steel beads to keep tissues cold during processing. Punch biopsies are obtained in a 3×3 grid pattern from the left, middle, and right sides of the placenta per 3 rows, for a total of 9 biopsy samples to represent centrally and peripherally located tissues based on the systematic uniform random approach suggested by Mayhew, 2008. This sufficiently exceeds the minimum 4 samples per placenta to generate representative data suggested by Burton et al., 2014. Each sample is taken with a 6 mm diameter biopsy punch. However, since placentas are different thicknesses, each core varies in mass between approximately 1.2 to 3.8 g. Core samples are rinsed three separate times in PBS with Halt protease inhibitor on ice for 5 minutes each to remove maternal blood and leukocytes, possible confounders for proteomic analysis.9 All nine core samples from each placenta are placed into glass scintillation vials. Samples are stored at −80°C until they are processed.

graphic file with name nihms-1809533-f0003.jpg

Preparation of Placental Tissues for Proteomic nanoLC-MS/MS Analysis

Time Commitment: (2–3 days)

A. Preparation of Buffers Prior to Tissue Processing [A]

Processing time: 30–45 minutes

Buffers should be made fresh on the day of the sample preparation step. To prepare in advance, only measure out dry reagents and make appropriate solutions on the morning of sample preparation.

B. Preparation of Reducing and Alkylating Agent Aliquots prior to Proteolytic Digestion [A]

Processing time: 30–45 minutes

C. Preparation of Protein Solubilisation Buffers prior to Proteolytic Digestion [A]

Processing time: 45–60 minutes

Buffers should be made fresh on the day of digestion, to maintain buffer strength. To prepare in advance, only measure out dry reagents and add water on the morning of digestion.

D. Safety Precautions

BSL2 facilities were used and all contaminated materials and waste were appropriately autoclaved before disposal. Standard laboratory Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) should be worn during these experiments; this includes safety glasses, a clean lab coat or disposable gown, and disposable gloves. Since human tissues were involved, we also recommend masks and hair covers as part of standard PPE. This also minimizes risk of keratin contamination of samples. Homogenization/sonication of tissues should take place under a hood. Upon completion of sampling, excess tissue samples should be appropriately disposed of via approved human tissue waste disposal routes only.

E. Tissue Preparation (1–2 days) [A]

Processing time: 9–10 hours

* End of Day 1 out of 3 *

For a 3-day preparation, consider completing this step separately. This is recommended for larger quantities of samples (> 10). It can be done right after tissues are collected/received. For a 2-day preparation, consider completing as a first step and following with homogenization. All buffers and tissues should be kept on ice in order to prevent degradation of the tissue and indiscriminate cleavage of proteins.

* End of Day 2 out of 3 (or Day 1 out of 2 if tissue washing/homogenization steps are combined) *

F. Filter-Aided Sample Preparation (FASP) and Proteolytic Digestion5,6 [A]

Processing time: 9–10 hours

The remaining procedure should be completed within the same day. The procedure takes a minimum of 7 hours. If using one oven for the entire workflow, make sure that it is set to 60°C prior to beginning. Gloves should always be used and replaced often throughout procedure to avoid contamination. Long hair should be pulled back to minimize keratin contamination. Leaning over the samples and workspace should be avoided to further help with minimizing keratin impurities.

**Change Collection Tubes Under Filter**

All eluents should be kept from this point forward in collection tubes labelled “peptides.” Waste collection tubes can be discarded.

* End of Day 3 out of 3 (or Day 2 out of 2) *

Samples are now ready for nanoLC-MS/MS analysis. An aliquot (~20 μL) of each sample can be added to an appropriately labelled LC-MS autosampler vial and placed in the nanoLC autosampler for analysis. The remaining sample can be stored at −20°C. Two microliter injections are performed during nanoLC-MS/MS experiments.

G. Separation and Analysis by nanoLC-MS/MS [A]

Sample order should be randomized prior to sequencing to avoid bias from sequencing order. See section on “Quality Control” for recommendations on interspersed quality control and blank sample sequencing. Each sample should be subjected to online desalting and reversed-phase nano-LC separation (in a “trap and elute” configuration.) Separated peptides are ionized via electrospray for mass spectrometry analysis. A data dependent acquisition method for untargeted or discovery analysis should be used. The attached files provide recommended settings for a two-hour analytical separation and DDA analysis, with a 140-minute total method length, using an EASY nano-LC system coupled to an Orbitrap Exploris 480 mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific).

Tip: It is helpful to find a systematic way of loading the samples into the autosampler during longer experiments. This prevents degradation of samples that are analyzed later from sitting in the autosampler for more than a few days.

Quality Control (QC)

  • Randomized samples, BSA QC (std. BSA digest) and blanks (MPA) are run as follows: blank, BSA QC, blank, Sample-01, Sample-02, Sample-03, Sample 04, blank, BSA QC, blank, Sample-05, Sample-06, Sample-07, Sample-08, blank, BSA QC, blank… etc. Through the AutoQC software on PanoramaWeb (https://panoramaweb.org/home/), BSA QCs enable the monitoring of such metrics as retention time reproducibility, peak area and FWHM in real time.7 A guide set should first be created (prior to any experiments) from five- seven independent BSA runs with each trap column, analytical column, or solvent change to account for shifts in retention times from these factors. Metrics are expected stay within three standard deviations from the guide set mean value. If these metrics fall outside of three standard deviations or are not reproducible, this could indicate an issue with instrument performance. For example, if major shifts in peptide retention times are visible, this may indicate an issue with the nLC system or columns. Users should troubleshoot the system as needed and consider re-analyzing biological replicates if metrics indicate system deterioration during the experiment. The importance of monitoring system suitability in bottom-up proteomics experiments is discussed further by Bereman and coworkers.10

  • Several standard HeLa digest runs (HeLa QC) are conducted at the beginning and end of experiments to check on proteome coverage. Significant drops in coverage between runs may indicate a deterioration in system suitability.

Label-Free Data Analysis

Data files are now ready to be analyzed using software such as Proteome Discoverer for identification and quantification of proteins. The attached analysis workflow files for use with Proteome Discoverer 2.4 software are summarized in the following figures and tables. The basic parameters listed can be used with alternative search software. The identification of haemoglobin protein may be checked to evaluate degree of interference. While the data shared here is in raw abundance format (i.e., unnormalized) quantification methods should be carefully considered before drawing statistical and biological conclusions from such a dataset. Normalization methods are available in Proteome Discoverer 2.4 (e.g., to the total peptide amount in the Precursor Ions Quantifier node.) Open-source tools such as NormalyzerDe are available to assist in normalization method selection and dataset analysis11.

Supplementary Material

Before During After
LysatePellet
PlacentaBiopsy

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Processing workflow tree

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Consensus workflow tree.

Table 1.

Rinsing Solution, Protease Inhibitor in Water

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
15–30 minutes Measure out water scaled to appropriate amount needed. At least 25 mL per sample will be needed, but if tissues appear very bloody, more might be needed. High quantities of haemoglobin from blood can dominate mass spectrometry signal and diminish identifications of other interesting proteins. Add to glass solvent bottle. Scaling Example: It is a good idea to prepare additional volume for ample supply. For 5 washes of 20 samples: 5 mL × 5 rounds × 20 samples + 50 mL extra volume = 550 mL
Add one Roche Protease Inhibitor Tablet for every 50 mL water per manufacturer’s instructions. Shake until dissolved. If samples are very bloody, additional rinse steps can be applied. For example, it might take 10 wash steps (50 minutes total shaking, 50 mL rinsing solution per sample) to rinse out most of the blood from the sample.
Rinsing solution should always be kept on ice.

Table 2.

Lysis Buffer, 50 mM ABC and 1% SDC (w/v) with Protease Inhibitor, 500 mL

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
15–20 minutes Measure out 2.0 ± 0.1 g ABC and add to glass solvent bottle. If necessary, this step can be scaled down to preserve reagents. The following should be considered when scaling:

 □ 10 mL per sample to submerge sample tissue (more or less, depending on amount of sample)
 □ Volume needed as a blank for protein quantitation method
 □ Volume need to rinse sonicator probe (∼ 3 mL per sample to prepare 3 fresh tubes for rinsing)
Measure out 5.0 ± 0.1 g SDC and add to same glass solvent bottle.
Add 500 mL of water to glass solvent bottle. Shake well until reagents are fully dissolved.
Add 10 (one for every 50 mL buffer) Roche Protease Inhibitor Tablets. Shake until dissolved.
Note that lysis buffer should always be kept on ice.

Table 3.

Reducing Agent, Dithiothreitol (500 mM)

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
15–30 minutes Weigh out 77.1 ± 0.1 mg of dithiothreitol into an Eppendorf tube. Prepared DTT solution can be stored at −20°C for at least 1 month.
Reconstitute in 1 mL of water.
Vortex.
Aliquot solution into Eppendorf tubes in 20 μL volumes and store at −20°C until ready for use.

Table 4.

Alkylating Agent, Iodoacetamide (500 mM)

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
15–30 minutes Prepare in as little light as possible. Compound is sensitive to light. Prepared IAA solution can be stored at −20°C for at least 1 month.
Weigh out 305 ± 0.1 mg of iodoacetamide into a 15 mL Falcon tube.
Reconstitute in 3.3 mL of water.
Vortex.
Aliquot into Eppendorf tubes (volumes appropriate for a 6 μL aliquot per sample, between 30 μL and 150 μL for example) and store at −20°C in the dark until ready for use.

Table 5.

50 mM ABC with 1% (w/v) SDC

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
15–30 minutes Measure out 79.1 ± 0.1 mg ABC and add this to a 50 mL Falcon Tube. Carefully tip the Falcon Tube on its side before adding water. This prevents SDC from getting stuck in the bottom of the Falcon Tube and helps it to dissolve completely.

If necessary, centrifugation can help minimize bubbles from SDC.
Measure out 200.0 ± 0.1 mg SDC and add to same Falcon Tube containing ABC.
Add approximately 10 mL water and vortex until dissolved. Allow bubbles to settle.
Add water until solution reaches the 20 mL mark on the Falcon Tube. Vortex and allow bubbles to settle.

Table 6.

50 mM ABC only

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
15–30 minutes Measure out 79.1 ± 0.1 mg ABC into a 50 mL Falcon Tube. The pH of ABC buffers in this protocol should be about 7.8.
Add approximately 5 mL water and vortex until fully dissolved.
Add water until solution reaches the 20 mL mark on the Falcon Tube.

Table 7.

50 mM ABC and 8M Urea

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
15–20 minutes Measure out 79.1 ± 0.1 mg ABC into 50 mL Falcon Tube. This will seem like a large volume of urea and will take a lot of time to fully dissolve. Add water carefully and slowly to avoid adding over the 20 mL point. Warming in your hands will help with dissolution. Do not heat the solution.
Measure out 9.8 ± 0.1 g urea into same Falcon Tube.
Add 10 mL water and vortex until mostly dissolved.
Bring up to 15 mL mark with water. Vortex for a few minutes until mostly dissolved.
Add water until solution reaches the 20 mL mark on the Falcon Tube.

Table 8.

Rinsing Blood from Samples

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
2–3 hours Prepare rinsing solution fresh on day of use (see above, Table 1). Solution should always be scaled based on the number of samples and kept on ice after preparation. This can be done on a separate day. Depending on how many samples are being processed or how many rinses are required to remove as much visible blood as possible, this step may require longer net processing time.
Add 5 mL protease inhibitor solution to each sample. Samples should be kept on ice throughout entire washing procedure.
Shake samples on BellyDancer shaker at the highest speed possible while on ice for 5 minutes.
Replace inhibitor solution with fresh 5 mL, and repeat process five times for a total of 25 minutes of shaking (or more as needed, see tip).

Table 9.

Tissue Homogenization

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
3–4 hours Prepare lysis buffer (see above, Table 2). Lysis buffer should be kept on ice at all times. This step should take place under a hood.

This can be done on a separate day. Depending on how many samples are being processed, this step may require longer net processing time.
Add 10 mL of cold lysis buffer to each tissue container. Tissue should be submerged in buffer. Tissues should be kept on ice.
Using the Omni handheld homogenizer under a hood, homogenize each sample individually on ice for 4–5 minutes until sample appears homogeneous in solution. Highest speed (35,000 rpm) is recommended for large amounts of tissue.
Replace with a fresh homogenizer probe before the next sample is processed. Place the samples on ice after homogenization.

Table 10.

Tissue Sonication

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
2–3 hours While on ice, probe sonicate each tissue at 20% power for 2 minutes using the Fisherbrand Model 505 Sonic Dismembrator. Sample should appear more homogenous. This step should take place under a hood.

Homogenized samples tend to settle and separate while sitting on ice. Sonication is important to ensure a homogeneous aliquot of tissue homogenate is removed from the sample for analysis.
Aliquot approximately 1.0–1.5 mL sonicated sample into an Eppendorf tube. Immediately place on ice.
In between samples, clean probe with methanol, followed by three clean tubes of fresh lysis buffer.
graphic file with name nihms-1809533-t0004.jpg

Table 11.

Centrifugation and Removal of Lysate

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
2–3 hours Centrifuge all samples at 16,000 × g for 30 minutes at 4°C to form pellets. With high quantities of tissue in 10 mL lysis buffer, concentration risks being higher than the calibration curve of the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit. It is therefore recommended to create a 1:10 diluted sample in Lysis Buffer prior to the total protein quantification assay analysis.
graphic file with name nihms-1809533-t0005.jpg
Remove lysate to a fresh tube and label. Care should be taken not to disturb the pellet. Lysates should be kept on ice, and pellets can be stored at −80°C for potential future analysis, if needed. Lysates of samples are now ready for protein quantitation and digestion.
Quantitation of protein can be performed using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit or using the Nanodrop A280 protein assay. Lysis buffer should be used as a blank. Following protein quantitation, lysates should be stored at −80°C until the beginning of the digestion procedure.

Table 12.

Aliquoting and Diluting

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
30–45 minutes Remove samples from freezer. Once thawed, aliquot volume containing 50 μg of sample into separate Eppendorf Tubes based off measured protein concentrations. This is important to normalize sample protein for the purpose of performing relative quantification of specific proteins detected in nanoLC-MS/MS analysis. With large numbers of samples, it is very important to keep track of labelling. Samples will change containers a few times in this protocol.
Bring samples up to 200 μL final volume with buffer containing 50 mM ABC and 1% (w/v) SDC to solubilize protein. Vortex.

Table 13.

Denaturing Proteins by Breaking Disulfide Bonds between Cysteine Residues

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
45–60 minutes Add 180 μL buffer containing 500 mM ABC and 1% (w/v) SDC to thawed, 20 μL aliquot of DTT. If using more than one aliquot, combine into one Eppendorf tube and vortex. The DTT solution has now been diluted to 50 mM. Prepare one DTT aliquot per 9 samples to account for any volume lost in pipetting steps.
Add 20 μL of 50 mM DTT to each sample to yield a final concentration of 4.5 mM DTT. Vortex each sample.
Incubate samples at 60°C for 30 minutes.
Remove from oven and allow to cool to room temperature before continuing.

Table 14.

Alkylating Reactive Thiols to Prevent Reformation of Disulfide Bonds

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
30–45 minutes If using more than one 500 mM IAA aliquot, combine into one Eppendorf tube and vortex. Perform alkylation in as low of light as possible. IAA is light sensitive.

While samples are incubating with DTT, remove IAA aliquots from freezer and allow to thaw in the dark. Thaw enough aliquots for 6 μL per sample while accounting for any sample lost during pipetting steps (for example, thaw 6 μL × # samples + 5–10 μL).
Add 6 μL IAA to each sample to yield a final IAA concentration of 15 mM. Vortex.
Incubate samples at room temperature in the dark for 20 minutes.

Table 15.

Transferring Samples to MWCO Filtration Units

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
15–30 minutes Label a Vivacon-500 30 kDa MWCO filtration unit (filter and tube) for each sample and passivate by adding 20 μL 50 mM ABC + 1% SDC to the top of each filter. Prepare (label and passivate) filtration units while samples are undergoing 20-minute alkylation reaction. The first collection tubes should be labelled “waste” as these will contain small molecules being washed from protein samples. A second set of collection tubes should be labelled “peptides” and set aside for post-digestion collection.

Note that passivating MWCO filters before use is important to prevent protein loss in the FASP workflow.
Transfer entire volume of each sample to appropriate filtration unit.
Centrifuge sample-containing filtration units at 12,000 × g for 15 minutes.

Table 16.

Washing Twice with Buffer Containing 50 mM ABC and 8 M Urea

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
1–2 hours Add 200 μL 50 mM ABC + 8 M urea to each sample filtration unit. Centrifuge units for 15 minutes at 12,000 × g. There are many steps requiring centrifugation. It is helpful to check off which steps have already been completed to keep track. Keeping an eye on the level of eluted solution can also be helpful since waste should be emptied every two spin cycles (so waste should be emptied a total of 2 times before switching to final collection tubes.). Sometimes, due to filter clogging, the filtration rate may be rather slow. In such a situation, it may be ok to increase the centrifugation speed (for any of the steps requiring centrifugation) to 12,500 × g or 13,000 × g, but no more.

A number of washing steps are encountered in this workflow. Based on the buffer being used, these steps help to clean and denature the protein, getting the sample ready for proteolytic digestion. Note that some buffer components, like urea, are great for protein denaturation but must be removed from the samples prior to proteolytic digestion to prevent inhibition of the protease.
Empty eluent into waste so that it does not reach a volume that touches the filter. Handle the filter very carefully.
Repeat the wash with another 200 μL 50 mM ABC + 8 M urea buffer. Centrifuge units for 15 minutes at 12,000 × g.

Table 17.

Washing Twice with Buffer Containing 50 mM ABC

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
1–2 hours Add 200 μL 50 mM ABC (only ABC) to each sample filtration unit. Centrifuge units for 15 minutes at 12,000 × g. Reconstitute trypsin during last wash step.

Particularly for the last wash step, increase the centrifugation speed to 12,500 × g or 13,000 × g if need be to pass all the wash solution through the filter.
Empty eluent into waste for the second time so that it does not reach a volume that touches the filter. Handle the filter very carefully.
Repeat the wash with another 200 μL 50 mM ABC (only) buffer. Centrifuge units for 15 minutes at 12,000 × g.

Table 18.

Proteolytic Digestion

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
15–30 minutes + 4 hours shaking time Reconstitute trypsin in 200 μL 0.01% acetic acid to stabilize protease and yield a 0.1 μg/μL protease concentration. Vortex. Wrap a small amount of parafilm around tops of filtration units to prevent them from popping open during the 4-hour digestion period. Remove the parafilm before centrifugation (following digestion).
Add 70 μL 50 mM ABC buffer to each filtration unit.
Add 10 μL trypsin solution directly to ABC volume on top of filter for a 1:50 enzyme to protein ratio. Do not pipette on to the sides of the filter.
Shake filtration units at 600 rpm at 37°C for 4 hours on Isotemp Shaker.

Table 19.

Elution of Tryptic Peptides

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
45–60 minutes Centrifuge filtration units for 15 minutes at 12,000 × g to elute peptides. To maximize tryptic peptide recovery, increase the centrifugation speed to 12,500 × g or 13,000 × g if need be to pass all the digest solution through the filter.
Add 15.8 μL 50 mM ABC to elute any remaining peptides on filter. Centrifuge for 15 min at 12,000 × g.

Table 20.

Quenching of Enzyme

Processing time Step Comments / Tips
15–30 minutes Discard filters. Acidifying the peptide solution quenches the trypsin protease.
Add 4.2 μL of 6 M HCl to each sample.

Table 21.

nanoLC Parameters

Sample pickup and Loading
Sample Pickup
Volume 2 μL
Flow 10 μL/min
Sample Loading
Volume 6 μL
Flow 1 μL/min
Max. Pressure 700 Bar
Solvents A: water/acetonitrile + formic acid (98/2 + 0.1 % by volume) B: water/acetonitrile + formic acid (80/20 + 0.1 % by volume)
Gradient
Time Duration Flow (nL/min) %B
0:00 0:00 300 5
2:00 2:00 300 5
107:00 105:00 300 25
122:00 15:00 300 40
123:00 1:00 300 95
124:00 1:00 300 95
140:00 16:00 300 95
Pre-column and Analytical Column
Pre-column Equilibration
Volume 3 μL
Flow 3.00 μL/min
Max. Pressure 700 Bar
Analytical Column Equilibration
Volume 6 μL
Flow - μL/min
Max. Pressure 700 Bar
*

Custom wash used for Autosampler and column heating controlled externally on Easy-Spray Ion Source. Column is kept at 45 °C throughout analysis.

Table 22.

Mass Spectrometric Parameters (Data Dependent Acquisition)

Ion Source Properties
Ion Source Type NSI
Spray Voltage Static
Positive Ion (V) 1800
Gas Mode Static
Sweep Gas (Arb) 0
Ion Transfer Tube Temp (°C) 275
FAIMS Mode Not Installed
Tune Settings
Application Mode Peptide
Method Duration 140
Infusion Mode Liquid Chromatography
Expected LC Peak Width (s) 15
Advanced Peak Determination Checked
Default Charge State 2
Internal Mass Calibration User-defined Lock Mass
Current Lock Mass for Positive Ion Mode 445.12006
Method
Time Range (min) 0–140
Full Scan 2 sec
MIPS
Intensity
Charge State
Dynamic Exclusion
ddMS2
Full Scan Properties
Orbitrap Resolution 120000
Scan Range (m/z) 375–1600
RF Lens (%) 40
AGC Target Custom
Normalized AGC Target (%) 300
Maximum Injection Time Mode Custom
Maximum Injection Time (ms) 100
Microscans 1
Data Type Profile
Polarity Positive
Source Fragmentation Unchecked
MIPS Properties
Monoisotopic peak determination Peptide
Relax restrictions when too few precursors are found Checked
Intensity Properties
Filter Type Intensity Threshold
Intensity Threshold 5.00E+03
Charge State Properties
Include charge state(s) 2–6
Include undetermined charge states unchecked
Dynamic Exclusion Properties
Dynamic Exclusion Mode Custom
Exclude after n times 1
Exclusion duration (s) 20
Mass Tolerance ppm
Low 10
High 10
Exclude isotopes checked
Perform dependent scan on single charge state per precursor only checked
Data Dependent MS2 Scan Properties
Multiplex ions unchecked
Isolation Window (m/z) 1.4
Isolation Offset Off
Collision Energy Mode Fixed
Collision Energy Type Normalized
HCD Collision Energy (%) 30
Orbitrap Resolution 7500
TurboTMT Off
Scan Range Mode Define First Mass
First Mass (m/z) 100
AGC Target Custom
Normalized AGC Target (%) 100
Maximum Injection Time Mode Custom
Maximum Injection Time (ms) 18
Microscans 1
Data Type Centroid

Table 24.

Processing Workflow Nodes and Basic Parameters

Spectrum Files RC
Search Settings
Protein Database Contaminants.fasta; Homo Sapiens (Swiss Prot TaxID=9606)
Enzyme Name Trypsin (Full)
1. Static Modification Carbamidomethyl/ +57.021 Da (C)
Spectrum Selector
General Settings
Precursor Selection Use MS1 Precursor
Provide Profile Spectra TRUE
Spectrum Properties Filter
Min. Precursor Mass 350 Da
Max. Precursor Mass 5000 Da
Peak Filters
S/N Threshold (FT-only) 1.5
Sequest HT
Input Data
Protein Database Contaminants.fasta; Homo Sapiens (Swiss Prot TaxID=9606)
Enzyme Name Trypsin (Full)
Max. Missed Cleavage Sites 2
Min. Peptide Length 6
Max. Peptide Length 144
Tolerances
Precursor Mass Tolerance 5 ppm
Fragment Mass Tolerance 0.02 Da
Spectrum Matching
Weight of a Ions 0.2
Weight of b Ions 1
Weight of x ions 0.2
Weight of y ions 1
Dynamic Modifications
Max. Equal Modifications Per Peptide 2
Max. Dynamic Modifications Per Peptide 3
1. Dynamic Modification Oxidation/ +15.995 Da (M)
2. Dynamic Modification Deamidated/ +0.984 Da (N, Q)
Dynamic Modifications (protein terminus)
1. N-Terminal Modification Acetyl/ +42.011 Da (N-terminus)
2. N-Terminal Modification Met-loss + Acetyl/ −89.030 Da (M)
Static Modifications
1. Static Modification Carbamidomethyl/ +57.021 Da (C)
Percolator
Target/Decoy Strategy
Target/Decoy Selection Concatenated
Validation based on q-Value
Input Data
Maximum Delta CN 0.05
FDR Targets
Target FDR (Strict) 0.01
Target FDR (Relaxed) 0.05

Table 25.

Consensus Workflow Nodes and Basic Parameters

MSF Files
Storage Settings
Spectra to Store Identified or Quantified
Feature Traces to Store All
PSM Grouper
Peptide Group Modifications
Site Probability Threshold 75
Peptide Validator
General Validation Settings
Validation Mode Automatic (Control peptide level error rate if possible)
Target FDR (Strict) for PSMs 0.01
Target FDR (Strict) for Peptides 0.01
Peptide and Protein Filter
Peptide Filters
Peptide Confidence At Least High
Keep Lower Confident PSMs FALSE
Protein Filters
Minimum Number of Peptide Sequences 1
Protein Grouping
Protein Grouping
Apply strict parsimony principle TRUE
Peptide in Protein Annotation
Flanking Residues
Annotate Flanking Residues of the Peptide TRUE
Modifications in Peptide
Protein Modifications Reported Only for Master Proteins
Modifications in Protein
Modification Sites Reported All And Specific
Minimum PSM Confidence High
Report Only PTMs True
Positions in Protein
Protein Positions for Peptides Only for Master Proteins
Feature Mapper
Chromatographic Alignment
Perform RT Alignment TRUE
Maximum RT Shift [min] 2
Feature Linking and Mapping
Minimum S/N Threshold 3
Precursor Ions Quantifier
General Quantification Settings
Peptides to Use All
Precursor Quantification
Precursor Abundance Based On Area
Normalization and Scaling
Normalization Mode Total Peptide Amount
Exclude Peptides from Protein Quantification
For Protein Roll-Up Use All Peptides
Quan Rollup and Hypothesis Testing
Protein Abundance Calculation Summed Abundances
N for Top N 5
Protein Annotation
Annotation Aspects
1. Aspect Biological Process
2. Aspect Cellular Component
3. Aspect Molecular Function
Protein Marker
Contaminant Database
Protein Database Contaminants.fasta
Protein FDR Validator
Confidence Thresholds
Target FDR (Strict) 0.01
Target FDR (Relaxed) 0.05

Table 26.

Summary of Protein Identification Results

Sample Proteins High Confidence Proteins Quantified Proteins Peptides PSMs MS/MS
1 3,144 2,775 2627 23,375 40,593 222,373
2 3,648 3,178 3021 27,178 44,909 225,954
3 3,310 2,937 2788 24,300 42,360 221,100
4 3,267 2,853 2718 23,891 41,239 220,129
5 3,361 2,872 2757 25,485 43,301 217,922
6 3,726 3,266 2088 27,736 45,731 225,942
7 3,376 2,957 2803 24,598 41,500 222,897
8 3,034 2,651 2520 22,169 39,336 224,590
9 3,649 3,166 2982 27,433 45,999 224,925
10 3,225 2,779 2642 24,077 43,041 219,667
11 3,734 3,333 3150 27,411 44,724 224,688
12 3,544 3,110 2938 25,842 43,169 223,632
13 3,706 3,251 3068 27,647 45,761 225,482
14 3,763 3,302 3110 27,789 45,395 224,921
15 3,372 2,938 2779 24,681 43,730 223,157
16 3,285 2,883 2744 24,323 42,589 226,070
17 3,512 2,992 2842 25,502 43,077 224,773
18 3,788 3,324 3145 27,998 46,399 226,754
19 3,158 2,798 2622 22,823 37,952 219,531
20 3,402 2,966 2837 24,998 43,694 223,508
Average 3,450 3,017 2809 25,463 43,225 223,401
Standard Deviation 233 209 251 1,826 2,280 2,530
%CV 6.8 6.9 8.9 7.2 5.3 1.1

Table 27.

Summary of Haemoglobin Identification across Samples

Peptides PSMs
Haemoglobin Sum (averaged over 20 replicates) 107 +/− 8 1,996 +/− 366
Total Sum (averaged over 20 replicates) 25,463 +/− 1826 43,225 +/− 2,280
% of Total Identifications 0.42% 4.60%

Acknowledgements

This work was performed in part by the Molecular Education, Technology and Research Innovation Center (METRIC) at NC State University, which is supported by the State of North Carolina. Research reported in this publication was supported in part by NIEHS under award number P30ES025128, and R15ES028436. Seed funding was also supplied by the Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine within the Department of Pediatrics at East Carolina University/The Brody School of Medicine.

Acronyms and Abbreviations

ABC

Ammonium bicarbonate

AGC

Automatic gain control

BCA

Bicinchoninic acid

DDA

Data dependent acquisition

DTT

Dithiothreitol

FASP

Filter Aided Sample Preparation

HCD

Higher-energy collision-induced dissociation

HCl

Hydrochloric acid

HCOOH

Formic acid

IAA

Iodoacetamide

MPA

Mobile phase A

MPB

Mobile phase B

MWCO filter unit

Molecular weight cut off filter unit

PBS

Phosphate buffered solution

PD

Proteome Discoverer

QC

Quality Control

RBC

Red blood cells

SDC

Sodium deoxycholate

[A]

signifies an important step in this protocol where alternative methods exist that may be used but were not tested here

Footnotes

Raw Data Available for Download

Raw data from placenta and quality control samples along with the BSA sample quality control Skyline file will be available via PanoramaWeb.org under the NCSU-METRIC Project, labelled “20210127- Proteomics of Human Placenta” or via the following link: https://panoramaweb.org/NCSU%20-%20METRIC/METRIC%20Public%20Data/20200127-%20Proteomics%20of%20Human%20Placenta/project-begin.view?

Supplementary Material

140-minute Instrument Method for Discovery Proteomics (also used for HeLa digest QC)

50-minute Instrument Method for BSA digest QC (data analyzed by AutoQC via PanoramaWeb: www.panoramaweb.org)

Proteome Discoverer Label-Free Quant Analysis Workflow for Human Samples (also used for HeLa digest QC)

Homo Sapiens Swiss Prot FASTA file

Contaminants FASTA file

Results Summary Files

Consensus and Processing Workflow Screenshots

NormalyzerDe Analysis Results

References

  • 1.Robinson JM, Ackerman IV WE, Kniss DA, Takizawa T, Vandré DD Proteomics of the Human Placenta: Promises and Realities. Placenta. 2008; 29 (2): 135–143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jin X, Xu Z, Cao J, et al. Proteomics analysis of human placenta reveals glutathione metabolism dysfunction as the underlying pathogenesis for preeclampsia. BBA- Proteins and Proteomics. 2017; 1865: 1207–1214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bian Y, Zheng R, Bayer F, et al. , Robust, reproducible, and quantitative analysis of thousands of proteomes by micro-flow LC-MS/MS. Nat. Comm 2020; 11 (157): 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Luyten LJ, Dieu M, Demazy C, et al. , Optimization of label-free nano LC-MS/MS analysis of the placental proteome. Placenta. 2020; 101: 159–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wiśniewski J, Zougman A, Nagaraj N et al. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat. Methods 2009; 6: 359–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Porter CJ, Bereman MS, Comparison of LC-MS/MS Compatible Detergents with Sodium Deoxycholate for Shotgun Proteomics. J. Proteins and Proteomics. 2014; 151–161. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sjaarda LA, Ahrens KA, Kuhr DL, et al. Pilot study of placental tissue collection, processing, and measurement procedures for large-scale assessment of placental inflammation. PLOS ONE, 2018; 13 (5): 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mayhew TM Taking tissue samples from the placenta: An illustration of principles and strategies. Placenta, 2008; 29 (1): 1–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Burton GJ, Sebire NJ, Myatt L, et al. Optimising sample collection for placental research. Placenta 2014; 35 (1): 9–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bereman MS, Beri J, Sharma V, et al. An Automated Pipeline to Monitor System Performance in Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Proteomic Experiments. J. Proteome Res, 2016; 15 (12): 4763–4769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Willforss JW, Chawade A, Levander F, NormalyzerDE: Online Tool for Improved Normalization of Omics Expression Data and High-Sensitivity Differential Expression Analysis. J. Proteome Res, 2019, 18 (2), 732–740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Before During After
LysatePellet
PlacentaBiopsy

RESOURCES