Skip to main content
PMC home page
Sports Medicine and Health Science logoLink to Sports Medicine and Health Science
. 2022 Mar 27;4(2):75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.smhs.2022.03.002

Match and training injury incidence in rugby league: A systematic review, pooled analysis, and update on published studies

Doug A King a,b,c,e,∗, Trevor N Clark d, Patria A Hume a,b, Karen Hind e
PMCID: PMC9219278  PMID: 35782281

Abstract

In studies reporting rugby league injuries, match injuries varied depending upon participation level. To review and update pooled data estimates for rugby league injury epidemiology and add information for participation levels in match and training environments. A systematic review and pooled analysis for published studies reporting rugby league match and training injuries. Searches were performed in the PubMed, CINHAL, ScienceDirect, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, SpringerLink, and Wiley Online databases. Studies were considered if they reported on rugby league match or training injuries between Jan 1990 to June 2021. Two authors (DK, TC) extracted the study characteristics, numerical data and assessed the article quality, by adhering to the protocol for systematic review of observational studies (MOOSE) and the STrengthening and Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. The 46 studies included a combined exposure of 419,037 h and 18,783 injuries incorporating 158,003 match-hr and 15,706 match injuries (99.4 [95%CI: 97.9–101.0] per 1000 match-hr) and 264,033 training-hr and 3077 training injuries (11.8 [95%CI: 11.4–12.2] per 1000 training-hr). Of included studies, 47.9% utilised a medical attention/treatment injury definition. There was a five-fold difference in injuries for the semi-professional participation level (431.6 per 1000 match-hr) compared with professional (RR: 4.92; p < 0.001) and elite (RR: 3.77; p < 0.001) participation levels. The hooker recorded the highest pooled injury incidence (93.1 per 1000 match-hr). Compared to the 2014 analysis there was a 10-fold increase for head-neck region (RR: 10.7; p < 0.001) injury incidence, and more injuries for the ball carrier (RR: 1.1; p = 0.008) and tackler (RR: 1.2; p = 0.001). There was a three-fold decrease in injury incidence in the first half (RR: 2.9; p < 0.001) and a two-fold decrease in the second half (RR: 2.3; p < 0.001) of matches. While rugby league match and training injury incidence had decreased since 2014, the increase in head injuries, and greater injury rate at the semi-professional level, mean further injury prevention interventions are needed.

Keywords: Rugby league, Injury epidemiology, Match, Training, Pooled analysis, Concussion

Highlights

  • •

    Based on 46 studies, updated estimates of injury incidence for rugby league-related activities ranged from 14.6 per 1000 match-hr (Junior) to 431.6 per 1000 match-hr (Semi-Professional) participation levels for match activities and 5.3 per 1000 training-hr (Professional) to 97.1 per 1000 training-hr (Elite) participation levels for training activities.

Compared with the pooled analysis in 2014, the current analysis showed:

  • •

    The hooker playing position continues to have the highest match injury risk (93.1 per 1000 match-hr).

  • •

    The lower limb (64.5 per 1000 match-hr) continues to be the body region with the highest injury risk.

  • •

    The quadriceps was the most reported injury site (28.5 per 1000 match-hr).

  • •

    The incidence of concussion in studies reporting on rugby league match injuries increased (7.7 vs. 11.6 per 1000 match-hr); and

  • •

    Most concussions took 28 days to recover, which conflicts with the Concussion in Sport Consensus Statement that reported 80%–90% of all concussions recover in seven to ten days.

Abbreviations

CI

Confidence Interval

hr

hour

MOOSE

Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology

mTBI

mild Traumatic Brain Injury

PRISMA

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

PROSPERO

Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews

RR

Risk Ratio

SPSS

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

STROBE

STrengthening and Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology

Introduction

Rugby league is an international collision sport, with junior, amateur, semi-professional and professional levels of competition.1 It is a challenging contest comprising of intense bouts of activity such as tackling and sprinting, interspersed with short bouts of lower intensity activities such as jogging and walking.2 Individual players undergo an average of 29–55 physical collisions (tackles and ball-carries) per game.3 Rugby league has a high incidence of injury, especially when compared with other collision sports like rugby union,4 as a consequence of the physical collisions.5 As a result, there is a constant risk of injuries occurring6 and the injury incidence varies depending upon the participation level5 for both match (17 to 8255,8 per 1000 match hr) and training (12.29 to 105.810 per 1000 training hr) injuries. A previously utilised strategy11 is to combine the information provided by epidemiological studies into a single estimate,12,13 termed a pooled analysis.14 To achieve this technique, it is recommended that all studies included in the analysis be on common grounds, have similar definitions, have a comparable population, and have adequate and specific exposure data.15 By pooling the data, the information provided can then be statistically re-analysed providing more precise injury data.12 Pooled analysis has been applied previously to rugby league injury epidemiological studies.11,16, 17, 18 This approach has been reported to produce an overall estimation of injuries recorded by incorporating data provided by the studies utilised.19 The limitations of a pooled analysis methodology have been described elsewhere,12,20 and they include differences in: study design (observation vs. self-reported injury);21,22 injury type, site and severity definitions; data collection methods and times; data recording medium and the maintenance of the data medium; identification of data utilised. Despite these limitations, the strength of a pooled analysis is that it provides more accurate estimates of injury rates than the individual studies that provided the data.11 Therefore, it can be utilised to compare against other pooled studies to obtain a combined estimator of the quantitative effect of the relative risk of injuries in rugby league match and training activities.12,23

The purpose of this study was to review and update the pooled data estimates on rugby league injury epidemiology and to provide additional information for semi-professional, amateur, and junior participation levels in both match and training environments. Specifically, this included estimates of injury incidence, injury severity, site and type, and the comparison of injury rates for player positions and for the different rugby league participation levels.

Methods

The methodology utilised in this pooled analysis was similar to previous pooled analysis studies reporting rugby league injuries11,17,18 and followed steps described by Friedenreich23 and Blettner et al.24 An additional advantage to utilising a pooled analysis approach is that the same statistical model can be utilised with data from methodologically diverse studies.25 The review was submitted with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 3rd July 2021 (CRD42021265640). Guidelines for reporting systematic reviews (PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses26) and observational studies (MOOSE: Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology27) were followed. The PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines contain checklists that were utilised for conducting and reviewing the included studies.

Articles were identified from an initial search of the online databases from January 1990 to June 2021 (see Fig. 1). The search was undertaken with the key search terms of ‘Rugby League’, ‘rugby’, ‘league’ AND (Match OR Training) AND (injury OR injur∗ OR athletic injuries OR athlet∗ injur∗) AND (incidence OR epidemiology OR epidemiol∗ OR "injury incidence" OR injury rate). The reference lists of those articles retrieved for inclusion in this review were also hand-searched to identify any other relevant articles. Key articles were retrieved via online databases and through hand-searching reference lists and these were also used for further searches using the Web of Science Cited Reference function. During the second stage of the literature search, the titles and abstracts of articles were reviewed to assess eligibility for inclusion in this review.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

PRISMA 202026 flow diagram for the identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion for the literature reporting on rugby league match and training injuries.

To establish some control over the heterogeneity of the studies,27 the following inclusion criteria were established. Published studies that reported the incidence of injury in rugby league match and training activities were collated and included in the pooled analysis if they met the following criteria: (a) Available in English; (b) Reported the match or training time exposure enabling calculation of rugby league player time injury rates; and (c) Reported injuries as a result of match or training injuries. Studies were excluded from this review if it was identified that the publication: (a) Was unavailable in English; (b) Did not provide match or training exposure enabling calculation of player time rates; (c) Did not report on injuries that occurred because of match or training activities; (d) Combined male and female sex, match or did not differentiate between match and training exposure and; (e) Was a case study; (f) Utilised previously published data on concussions; (g) Was a meta-analysis or systematic review of rugby league injuries; and (h) Conference abstracts or Theses.

All references were downloaded into a dedicated EndNote library (Endnote, X9.3.3; Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America). The library was reviewed, and duplicate records were identified and removed. All publications identified were initially screened by publication title and abstract to identify eligibility. The full-text versions of the remaining articles were then retrieved and evaluated against the inclusion criteria. Those studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the review. The references of all relevant articles were searched for further articles. In cases of discrepancies of eligibility, another author assessed the publication to screen for eligibility.

Two authors (DK, TC) extracted the study characteristics, numerical data and assessed the quality, by adhering to the protocol for systematic review of observational studies (MOOSE).27 This approach enabled a more precise estimate of the effects of influential factors and considered confounding factors (i.e., participation level and age) and the heterogeneity of the studies.25

All included studies were independently assessed by two authors (DK, TC) reporting on the article quality utilizing the STrengthening and Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement.28 The statement provides a 22-item checklist guidance on the reporting of observational studies in order to facilitate a critical appraisal of the study and for the interpretation of the results. Following the appraisal, the included studies were categorised as either poor, moderate, or good quality based on the percentage of fulfilled items on the STROBE checklist, with cut-off values of <50%, 50%–80%, and >80% respectively.29 Any disagreements in the scores were discussed between the authors to identify a mutual rating.

Those studies meeting the inclusion criteria underwent data extraction for information pertaining to participation level, and injury definition utilised, reported injuries and player position/group.

Not all studies included in the systematic review and pooled analysis utilised the standardized method for injury reporting (i.e., per 1000 match or training hr of exposure). As a result, calculations were required to convert some study data to the standardized method for injury reporting to enable a pooled analysis to be conducted. Authors were contacted for further information on some papers30, 31, 32 to enable these calculations to be conducted. If the authors did not respond,30, 31, 32 the data were excluded from the review and pooled analysis.

To enable meaningful comparisons, the sports injury definitions of the included studies were categorised into broad groups.33 These groups consisted of: (1) Medical attention/treatment injury (any injury that requires the assistance of sports medicine personnel with or without time loss from training or completion); (2) Full-inclusive time-loss injury (any injury that results in time lost from the competition and/or training); (3) Semi-inclusive time-loss injury (any injury that results in time lost from competition only); and (4) All-inclusive injury (an injury that requires the assistance of sports medicine personnel and/or that which results in time loss from the competition and/or training).

All studies were reviewed for any concussion/mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) definition. Studies that only reported on concussions in rugby league were included in the review if they provided match or training exposures hours to enable a pooled analysis. Any definitions that were utilised were compared.

To enable meaningful comparisons, the sports injury definitions of the included studies were categorised into broad groups.34 These groups consisted of: (1) Transient (Injuries that result in no matches/training activities missed); (2) Minor (Injuries that result in one match/one week of training activities missed); (3) Moderate (Injuries that result in two to four matches/two to four weeks of training activities missed); and (4) Major (Injuries that result in five or more matches/five or more training activities missed).

Included studies were categorized based on the participation level34 as reported in the study. The categories included were: (1) Junior (up to age 12 yr played under a mini-modified or modified rules version of rugby league); (2) Amateur (played under rugby league international competition rules but not receiving any payment for participation); (3) Semi-Professional (from 16 yr old and playing under international competition rules and receiving moderate remuneration for participation as well as additional employment to generate income); (4) Elite (playing under international competition rules and receiving remuneration for participation and/or some additional employment); and (5) Professional (from 18 yr old and playing under international competition rules and receiving remuneration for participation as the primary source of income) levels of participation.

A combined estimate of injuries within a specific sport through pooled analysis14 provides more precise evidence and meaningful information about the sport, whilst controlling for between-study variation due to individual sub-cohort characteristics.24 A pooled analysis of rugby league studies that reported injuries was undertaken for studies where homogeneity occurred in terms of the injury definition utilised and the reporting of injury incidence was per 1000 match or training-hr. This strategy has been previously utilised in rugby-15s,35,36 rugby league11,17,18 and women's rugby union37 epidemiological studies to combine the information provided into a single estimate.13,24

The pooled calculation of the incidence of concussion was undertaken to report the incidence per 1000 h and 95% confidence intervals (CI).38 To compare between injury rates, risk ratios (RRs) were used. To test for significant differences between studies and player positions, chi-squared (χ2) goodness-of-fit tests were utilised. All statistics were carried out using the SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) statistical software packages. Statistical significance was set as p < 0.05.

Results

Of the 46 studies included in this review (see Fig. 1) 38 studies reported injuries that occurred during match activities (4 junior,7,39, 40, 41 13 amateur,42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54 5 semi-professional,2,8,10,55,56 3 elite,4,57,58 13 professional3,9,16,59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68) and 12 studies reported injuries that occurred during training activities (3 amateur,50,69,70 3 semi-professional,8,10,71 2 elite,72,73 4 professional16,74, 75, 76). Four studies reported on both match and training injuries.8,16,51,69 When pooled, there was a combined exposure of 406,184 exposure hr and 17,455 injuries. The 157,291 match-hr and 15,815 reported match injuries resulted in an injury incidence of 89.2 (95%CI: 87.7–90.7) per 1000 match-hr. The 264,033 training-hr and 3077 reported training injuries corresponded to an injury incidence of 11.8 (95%CI: 11.4–12.2) per 1000 training-hr. All the studies included in the pooled analysis were observational in design.

Studies that were reviewed but not included in this analysis only reported on collision injuries,77, 78, 79, 80, 81 did not report match exposure hr,7,30, 31, 32,82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90 did not report injury data,57,77,91, 92, 93 reported head impact biomechanics,94, 95, 96, 97 reported data already included in this review,98, 99, 100 utilised a survey questionnaire,101, 102, 103 were reviews,1,6,11,17,18,104, 105, 106 or reported on self-reported injuries.107,108

Nearly half (45.7%) of included studies2,8, 9, 10,16,39,40,43, 44, 45, 46, 47,56,63, 64, 65,68, 69, 70, 71, 72 utilised a medical attention/treatment injury definition. Nearly a quarter (23.9%) of studies4,48,49,53,55,57,58,66,74, 75, 76 utilised a full-inclusive time-loss injury definition, and 4.3% of studies54,59 utilised an all-inclusive injury definition. A quarter (26.1%) of included studies utilised a semi-inclusive injury definition,3,7,60, 61, 62,73 reported no injury definition41,42,50, 51, 52 or reported a medical attention/treatment injury definition67 and a modified concussion definition. Four included studies41,50, 51, 52 utilised the concussion in sports consensus statement definition.

The pooled injury incidence of 89.2 (95%CI: 87.7–90.7) per 1000 match-hr varied by participation level (see Table 1). There was a five-fold difference in injuries recorded at the semi-professional participation level (431.6 [95%CI: 417.2–446.5] per 1000 match-hr) when compared with professional (RR: 4.92 [95%CI: 4.77–5.08]; p < 0.001) and elite (RR: 3.77 [95%CI: 3.47–3.09]; p < 0.001) participation levels.

Table 1.

Gender and participation level for match and training injuries by number of studies, number of participants, injuries recorded, exposure hours and injury incidence with 95% confidence interval for included published rugby league studies.

Activity Gender/Participation level Studies
 Participants
 Injuries
 Match exposure
 Injury Incidence
n n n hr Rate (95%CI)
Match Injuriesa
 Gender
Male2, 3, 4,7, 8, 9, 10,16,39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68 37 4349 15,605 157,673 99.0 (97.4–100.5)
Female46 1 100 101 329 306.8 (252.4–372.9)
 Participation level
Professional3,4,9,16,59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68 14 1209 9,044bcde 103,144 87.7 (85.9–89.5)
Elite57,58 2 266 559acde 4881 114.5 (105.4–124.4)
Semi-Professional2,8,10,55,56 5 663 3,346abde 7752 431.6 (417.2–446.5)
Amateur42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54 13 2144 2,362abce 15,918 155.4 (149.3–161.8)
Junior7,39, 40, 41 4 167 395abcd 27,028 14.6 (13.2–16.1)
Total 38 4449 15,706 158,003 99.4 (97.9–101.0)
Training Injuriesb
 Gender
Male8,10,16,50,68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 12 1429 3077 264,033 11.7 (11.2–12.1)
 Participation Level
Professional16,68,74, 75, 76 4 162 755bcd 199,877 3.8 (3.6–6.1)
Elite72,73 2 403 1,022acd 10,528 97.1 (91.3–103.2)
Semi-Professional8,10,71 3 295 1,116abd 22,268 50.1 (47.3–53.1)
Amateur50,69,70 3 569 184abc 31,360 5.9 (5.1–6.8)
Total 12 1429 3077 264,033 11.7 (11.2–12.1)
Open in a new tab

CI: Confidence Interval; (a) = per 1000 match-hr; (b) = per 1000 training-hr; Significant difference (p < 0.05) than (a) = Professional; (b) = Elite; (c) = Semi-Professional; (d) = Amateur; (e) = Junior.

Forwards (172.2 [95%CI: 165.9–178.8] per 1000 match-hr) recorded a higher pooled injury incidence than backs (RR = 1.36 [95%CI: 1.29–1.43], p < 0.001) (see Table 2). Semi-professional backs recorded more injuries (276.9 [95%CI: 259.9–294.9] per 1000 match-hr) than professional (RR: 5.22 [95%CI: 4.72–5.77]; p < 0.001) backs. The hooker recorded the highest pooled injury incidence (93.1 [95%CI: 76.8–113.0] per 1000 match-hr) (see Supplementary. Table 1) but this varied by participation level. The prop forward recorded the highest injury incidence (159.8 [95%CI: 126.7–201.7] per 1000 match-hr) at the amateur level. The fullback at the amateur level (157.6 [95%CI: 113.1–219.5] per 1000 match-hr) recorded more injuries when compared with the semi-professional (RR: 1.67 [95%CI: 1.07–2.61]; p = 0.034) and professional (RR: 3.55 [95%CI: 2.15–5.87]; p < 0.001) participation levels. Hit-Up Forwards recorded the highest injury incidence at the Junior level (286.3 [95%CI: 200.2–409.5] per 1000 match-hr) compared with the semi-professional (RR: 5.62 [95%CI: 3.85–8.22]; p < 0.001) and professional (RR: 8.61[95%CI: 5.88–12.60]; p < 0.001) participation levels.

Table 2.

Summary of pooled analysis of match injuries by total and participation level per 1000 match-hr with 95% confidence intervals and number of studies by player role, injury region, top four reported injury type and injury cause, injury severity and injury period for included published rugby league studies.

Total
 Professional
 Elite
 Semi-Professional
 Amateur
 Junior
Rate (95%CI) n Rate (95%CI) n Rate (95%CI) n Rate (95%CI) n Rate (95%CI) n Rate (95%CI) n
Player Role
 Forwards 172.2g (165.9–178.8) 19 77.4bcdeg (71.6–83.8) 5 91.9acdeg (72.8–115.9) 1 382.7abdeg (361.1–405.6) 3 198.2abcg (186.1–211.2) 8 235.4abc (170.6–324.9) 1
 Backs
 127.8f (122.7–133.0) 19
 53.1cdef (48.6–57.9) 5
 42.1cdef (30.7–57.9) 1
 276.9abdef (259.9–294.9) 3
 158.3abcf (148.3–169.1) 8
 185.4abc (132.5–259.5) 1
Injury region
 Head-Neck 37.8 (36.4–39.3) 32 29.1bcde (27.4–30.8) 9 7.4acde (5.3–10.2) 2 68.6abde (63.0–74.7) 5 53.3abce (49.8–57.1) 13 15.1abcd (10.1–22.8) 3
 Upper Limb 32.8 (31.3–34.3) 25 25.6bcd (23.9–30.8) 7 12.8acde (10.0–16.3) 2 72.8abde (67.0–79.0) 5 31.4abc (28.5–34.7) 9 23.7bc (17.0–33.2) 2
 Lower Limb 65.6 (63.5–67.8) 25 54.3bcde (51.7–56.9) 7 27.3acde (23.1–32.3) 2 157.2abde (148.7–166.3) 5 50.0abc (46.2–54.1) 9 38.4abc (29.5–50.0) 2
 Chest-Back-Other
 16.3 (15.3–17.4) 25
 15.4bde (26.5–30.5) 8
 5.2ace (3.5–7.6) 2
 17.8be (15.1–21.0) 5
 20.8ae (18.4–23.5) 9
 11.2abcd (6.8–18.2) 2
Injury type
 Haematomas 44.1 (41.6–46.7) 13 9.8bcde (8.0–12.1) 2 12.2acd (9.5–15.6) 2 137.5abde (127.7–148.0) 3 44.7abce (11.5–26.5) 3 14.0acd (9.0–21.6) 2
 Contusion 38.3 (36.5–40.1) 20 21.5bcde (19.9–23.3) 7 8.4acd (5.8–12.1) 1 80.5abde (74.3–87.2) 3 100.0abce (91.9–108.9) 7 5.6acd (2.8–11.2) 2
 Strain 39.2 (37.6–40.9) 26 20.5bcde (19.3–21.7) 9 9.2acd (6.9–12.2) 2 110.0abde (102.7–117.7) 4 44.3abce (40.7–48.1) 9 11.2acd (6.8–18.2) 2
 Sprain
 37.2 (35.7–38.8) 27
 22.2bcde (21.0–23.5) 9
 18.5acde (15.1–22.7) 2
 69.7abde (63.9–75.9) 4
 33.5abc (30.4–36.8) 10
 32.1abc (24.1–42.9) 2
Injury Cause
 Ball Carrier 58.2 (55.8–60.7) 25 24.6cd (22.6–26.9) 7 16.5cd (12.6–21.4) 1 117.4abde (110.0–125.3) 5 140.3abce (130.3–151.1) 10 19.5cd (13.0–29.3) 2
 Tackler 36.3 (34.5–38.3) 25 14.2cd (12.6–15.9) 7 13.2cd (9.8–17.7) 1 78.2abe (72.2–84.6) 5 82.7abe (75.1–91.0) 10 13.6cd (8.3–22.1) 2
 Collision Player 35.8 (32.7–39.2) 10 N/R 3.6cde (2.0–3.3) 1 55.1bde (50.1–60.6) 5 16.5bc (9.4–29.0) 3 10.1bc (5.6–1.8) 1
 Collision Other
 25.8 (23.1–28.7) 8
 N/R
 3.3c (1.8–5.9) 1
 41.5bde (37.2–46.3) 5
 2.2c (0.6–8.9) 1
 1.8c (0.5–7.3) 1
Injury Severity
 Transient 114.7 (112.2–117.2) 21 70.3bcd (68.2–72.5) 9 32.5acde (24.6–42.8) 1 485.1abde (467.3–503.5) 4 382.5abce (358.2–408.5) 6 88.1bcd (61.6–126.0) 1
 Missed-Match
 36.1 (34.7–37.5) 25
 22.6bcde (21.4–23.8) 9
 210.4acde (188.7–234.6) 1
 78.4adeb (71.5–86.1) 4
 86.1abc (78.3–94.7) 9
 119.0abc (90.5–156.6) 2
Injury period
 1st half 161.7i (152.4–171.5) 11 N/R N/R 90.2dei (74.5–109.1) 1 175.3ci (164.6–186.7) 9 211.5c (152.5–293.1) 1
 2nd half 183.3h (173.5–193.7) 11 N/R N/R 139.5deh (119.7–162.6) 1 191.4ch (180.2–203.3) 9 223.2c (162.4–306.7) 1
Open in a new tab

CI: Confidence Interval; n = number of studies; N/R = not reported; Significant difference (p < 0.05) than (a) = Professional; (b) = Elite; (c) = Semi-Professional; (d) = Amateur; (e) = Junior; (f) = forwards; (g) = backs; (h) = 1st half; (i) = 2nd half.

The lower limb (65.6 [95%CI: 63.5–67.8] per 1000 match-hr) was the most reported pooled injury site with the quadriceps (28.5 [95%CI: 26.4–30.8] per 1000 match-hr) reported as the most injured injury location (see Table 2 and Supplementary Table 2). Semi-professional players recorded more injuries to the knee (54.7 [95%CI: 49.7–60.2] per 1000 match-hr) than players at the junior (RR: 2.80 [95%CI: 1.92–4.08]; p < 0.001), amateur (RR: 3.02 [95%CI: 2.56–3.57]; p < 0.001), professional (RR: 3.26 [95%CI: 2.85–3.73]; p < 0.001), and elite (RR: 7.22 [95%CI: 5.19–10.04]; p < 0.001) participation levels. Amateur players recorded a higher incidence of injury to the head (49.1 [95%CI 45.0–53.5] per 1000 match-hr) than players at the professional (RR: 1.73 [95%CI: 1.55–1.93]; p < 0.001), semi-professional (RR: 2.00 [95%CI: 1.66–2.40]; p < 0.001), junior (RR: 3.73 [95%CI: 2.39–5.81]; p < 0.001), and elite (RR: 7.46 [95%CI: 5.25–10.59]; p < 0.001) participation levels.

Hematomas (44.1 [95%CI: 41.6–46.7] per 1000 match-hr) were the most reported pooled injury type, but this varied by participation level (see Table 2 and Supplementary Table 3). Amateur players recorded more fracture-dislocations (18.5 [95%CI: 15.3–22.3] per 1000 match-hr) than semi-professional, (RR: 1.38 [95%CI: 1.03–1.85]; p = 0.034), elite (RR: 2.99 [95%CI: 2.01–4.45]; p < 0.001) and professional (RR: 1.59 [95%CI: 1.30–1.95]; p < 0.001) participation levels. There were fewer concussions reported at the elite (3.6 [95%CI: 2.3–5.7] per 1000 match-hr) than professional (RR: 2.47 [95%CI: 1.55–3.95]; p < 0.001), semi-professional (RR: 2.97 [95%CI: 1.75–5.04]; p < 0.001), amateur (RR: 3.08 [95%CI: 1.85–5.12]; p < 0.001), and junior (RR: 3.12 [95%CI: 1.61–6.03]; p < 0.001) participation levels.

The tackle was the most common injury cause with the ball carrier (58.2 [95%CI: 55.8–60.7] per 1000 match-hr) having the highest injury rate (see Table 2 and Supplementary Table 3). Amateur players recorded more injuries as the ball carrier (140.3 [95%CI: 130.3–151.1] per 1000 match-hr) than players at the semi-professional (RR: 1.20 [95%CI: 1.09–1.31]; p < 0.001), professional (RR: 6.94 [95%CI: 6.14–7.85]; p < 0.001), junior (RR: 7.20 [95%CI: 4.78–10.85]; p < 0.001) and elite (RR: 8.52 [95%CI: 6.50–11.18]; p < 0.001) participation levels.

Players at the elite level recorded more missed match injuries (210.4 [95%CI: 188.7–234.6] per 1000 match-hr) than players at the junior (RR: 1.77[95%CI: 1.34–2.33]; p < 0.001), amateur (RR: 2.44 [95%CI: 2.14–2.79]; p < 0.001), semi-professional (RR: 2.68 [95%CI: 2.35–3.06]; p < 0.001) and professional (RR: 9.32 [95%CI: 8.35–10.41]; p < 0.001) participation levels (see Table 2 and Supplementary Table 3). Players at the semi-professional level (485.1 [95%CI: 467.3–503.5] per 1000 match-hr) recorded more transient injuries than players at the amateur (RR: 1.27 [95%CI: 1.20–1.34]; p < 0.001), junior (RR: 6.36 [95%CI: 5.93–6.83]; p < 0.001), professional (RR: 8.93 [95%CI: 8.56–9.32]; p < 0.001) and elite (RR: 34.81 [95%CI: 26.83–45.93]; p < 0.001) participation levels.

Not all participation levels reported injury match period (see Table 2 and Supplementary Table 3). There were more injuries reported in second (183.3 [95%CI: 173.5–193.7] vs. 161.7 [95%CI: 152.4–171.5] per 1000 match-hr) than the first half of matches (RR: 1.13 [95%CI: 1.05–1.22]; p = 0.002).

Training injuries varied by participation level (see Table 3). Players at the elite level (97.1 [95%CI: 91.3–103.2] per 1000 training-hr) recorded significantly more training injuries than players at the professional (RR: 22.18 [95%CI: 20.32–24.20]; p < 0.001), semi-professional (RR: 1.94 [95%CI: 1.79–2.10]; p < 0.001) and amateur (RR: 16.54 [95%CI: 14.16–19.33]; p < 0.001) participation levels.

Table 3.

Summary of pooled analysis of training injuries by total and participation level per 1000 training-hr with 95% confidence intervals and number of studies by player role, injury region, top four reported injury type and injury cause, injury severity and injury period for included published rugby league studies.

Total
 Professional
 Elite
 Semi-Professional
 Amateur
Rate (95%CI) n Rate (95%CI) n Rate (95%CI) n Rate (95%CI) n Rate (95%CI) n
Player Role
 Forwards 9.9f (9.0–10.9) 4 N/R N/R 25.9df (23.2–28.9) 1 3.2c (2.6–3.9) 3
 Backs
 7.6e (6.8–8.5) 4
 N/R
 N/R
 19.3de (17.0–22.0) 1
 2.6c (2.1–3.2) 3
Injury region
 Head-Neck 0.8 (0.7–0.9) 10 0.3bcd (0.2–0.4) 2 8.8acd (7.2–10.8) 2 1.8abd (1.3–2.4) 3 0.7abc (0.5–1.1) 3
 Upper Limb 1.0 (0.9–1.2) 9 0.2bcd (0.2–0.3) 2 9.6acd (7.9–11.7) 2 2.4ab (1.9–3.2) 3 2.8ab (2.0–3.9) 2
 Lower Limb 8.1 (7.7–8.5) 9 10.6bc (9.4–11.9) 2 65.8acd (61.1–70.9) 2 36.2abd (33.7–38.7) 3 8.6bc (7.2–10.4) 2
 Chest-Back-Other
 1.7 (1.6–1.9) 9
 0.7bc (0.6–0.8) 2
 12.8acd (10.8–15.2) 2
 6.0abd (5.0–7.1) 3
 0.8bc (0.4–1.4) 2
Injury type
 Abrasion 8.0 (6.9–9.3) 4 N/R 11.5c (9.6–13.7) 2 4.3b (3.2–5.8) 2 N/R
 Blister 6.6 (5.3–8.4) 2 N/R 6.6 (5.3–8.4) 2 N/R N/R
 Strain 4.2 (4.0–4.5) 10 0.8bcd (0.7–0.9) 3 25.9ab (23.0–29.2) 2 23.2ad (21.3–25.3) 3 5.0abc (3.9–6.3) 2
 Haematomas
 2.7 (2.1–3.5) 5
 0.3bc (0.0–2.5) 1
 3.4a (2.5–4.7) 2
 2.6a (1.8–3.9) 2
 N/R
Injury Cause
 Overexertion 17.9 (16.6–19.3) 5 N/R 33.4cd (30.1–37.1) 2 20.5bd (18.4–22.8) 2 0.1bc (0.0–0.6) 1
 Contact 13.9 (10.5–18.3) 1 N/R N/R 13.9 (10.5–18.3) 1 N/R
 Collision Other 8.6 (7.2–10.3) 3 N/R 8.7 (7.1–10.7) 2 8.2 (5.7–11.7) 1 N/R
 Fall
 8.3 (7.3–9.5) 4
 N/R
 10.6c (8.8–12.8) 2
 6.8d (5.6–8.2) 2
 N/R
Injury Severity
 Transient 8.2 (7.8–8.5) 9 2.4bcd (2.2–2.6) 3 83.4acd (75.0–92.8) 1 46.7abd (43.9–49.6) 3 4.6abc (3.6–5.9) 2
 Missed Match
 2.0 (7.3–9.5) 10
 1.0bcd (0.9–1.2) 3
 27.2acd (22.5–32.7) 1
 3.4ab (2.7–4.3) 3
 3.6ab (3.0–4.3) 3
Training Period
 1st half 2.5f (2.0–3.1) 3 N/R N/R N/R 2.5f (2.0–3.1) 3
 2nd half 3.3e (2.8–4.1) 3 N/R N/R N/R 3.3e (2.8–4.1) 3
Open in a new tab

CI: Confidence Interval; n = number of studies; N/R = not reported; Significant difference (p < 0.05) than (a) = Professional; (b) = Elite; (c) = Semi-Professional; (d) = Amateur; (e) = 1st half; (f) = 2nd half.

Forwards (9.9 [95%CI: 9.0–10.9] per 1000 training-hr) recorded more pooled injuries than backs (7.6 [95%CI: 6.8–8.5] per 1000 training-hr; RR = 1.31 [95%CI: 1.13–1.51], p < 0.001) (see Table 3). There were more injuries recorded by semi-professional forwards than amateur forwards (RR: 8.12 [95%CI: 6.50–10.16]; p < 0.001).

The most common pooled injury region was the lower limb (8.1 [95%CI: 7.7–8.5] per 1000 training-hr). Elite level participants (65.8 [95%CI: 61.1–70.9] per 1000 training-hr) recorded more lower limb training injuries when compared with those at the semi-professional (RR = 1.82 [95%CI: 1.65–2.01], p < 0.001), professional (RR = 6.20 [95%CI: 5.41–7.12], p < 0.001), and amateur (RR = 7.62 [95%CI: 6.26–9.28], p < 0.001) participation levels (Table 3). The quadriceps (10.9 [95%CI: 10.1–11.8] per 1000 training-hr) recorded the highest pooled injury site. There were more injuries recorded to the quadriceps at the elite (31.5 [95%CI: 28.3–35.1] per 1000 training-hr) than the semi-professional (RR = 2.02 [95%CI: 1.73–2.36], p < 0.001) and professional (RR = 20.37 [95%CI: 15.14–27.40], p < 0.001) participation levels (Supplementary Table 4). There were more injuries recorded to the head−neck body region at the elite (8.8 [95%CI: 7.2–10.8] per 1000 training-hr) than the amateur (RR = 4.62 [95%CI: 2.43–8.81], p < 0.001) and professional (RR = 9.81 [95%CI: 6.32–15.23], p < 0.001) participation levels (Supplementary Table 4).

Abrasions (8.0 [95%CI: 6.9–9.3] per 1000 training-hr) were the most common pooled injury type although this varied by participation level (see Table 3 and Supplementary Table 4). Amateur (5.0 [95%CI: 3.9–6.3] per 1000 training-hr) and semi-professional (23.2 [95%CI: 21.3–25.3] per 1000 training-hr) participants recorded strains as the most common injury type whereas the elite level recorded sprains (29.0 [95%CI: 25.9–32.4] per 1000 training-hr) and the professional level recorded other (3.6 [95%CI: 2.5–5.0] per 1000 training-hr) as the most common injury types. There were fewer concussions recorded at the professional level (0.01 [95%CI: 0.00–0.04] per 1000 training-hr) than at the amateur (RR: 37.09 [95%CI: 3.86–356.53]; p < 0.001), semi-professional (RR: 44.01 [95%CI: 2.75–703.50]; p < 0.001), and elite (RR: 76.79 [95%CI: 8.97–657.28]; p < 0.001) participation levels.

The most common pooled injury cause was overexertion (17.9 [95%CI: 16.6–19.3] per 1000 training-hr) (see Table 3). There were more overexertion injuries reported at elite (33.4 [95%CI: 30.1–37.1] per 1000 training-hr) than semi-professional (RR: 1.63 [95%CI: 1.41–1.90]; p < 0.001), and amateur (RR: 387.13 [95%CI: 54.39–3755.45]; p < 0.001) participation levels. More injuries were recorded as the tackler at the amateur (2.9 [95%CI: 2.1–4.0] per 1000 training-hr) than elite (RR: 1.91 [95%CI: 1.07–3.43]; p = 0.027), semi-professional (RR: 5.34 [95%CI: 1.29–22.11]; p = 0.01), and professional (RR: 134.22 [95%CI: 84.83–212.37]; p < 0.001) participation levels (see Supplementary Table 5).

There were more transient injuries at elite (46.7 [95%CI: 43.9–49.6] per 1000 training-hr) than semi-professional (RR: 1.79 [95%CI: 1.59–2.01]; p < 0.001), amateur (RR: 18.19 [95%CI: 13.85–23.88]; p < 0.001), and professional (RR: 34.66 [95%CI: 30.25–39.71]; p < 0.001) participation levels (see Table 3). The elite level recorded more moderate injuries (2.4 [95%CI: 1.3–4.5] per 1000 training-hr) than the amateur (RR: 2.46 [95%CI: 1.08–5.61]; p = 0.027), semi-professional (RR: 4.54 [95%CI: 1.96–10.50]; p = 0.001), and professional (RR: 11.10 [95%CI: 5.52–22.30]; p < 0.001) participation levels (see Supplementary Table 5).

Only the amateur level reported the training period when the injuries occurred (see Table 3). There were more injuries recorded in the second (3.3 [95%CI: 2.8–4.1] vs 2.5 [95%CI: 2.0–3.1] per 1000 training-hr) than the first half of training periods (RR: 1.36 [95%CI: 1.02–0.83]; p = 0.038).

Differences between the 2014 pooled analysis for rugby league18 and the current analysis are given in Table 4. There was a two-fold increase in the incidence of match injuries to forwards (RR: 2.3 [95%CI: 2.2–2.5]; p < 0.001) when compared to the previous analysis. There was a 10-fold increase in the incidence of injuries to the head-neck region (RR: 10.7 [95%CI: 10.1–11.3]; p < 0.001), more injuries were recorded by the ball carrier (RR: 1.1 [95%CI: 1.0–1.2]; p = 0.008) and the tackler (RR: 1.2 [95%CI: 1.1–1.4]; p < 0.001), and a three-fold decrease in the incidence of injuries in the first half (RR: 2.9 [95%CI: 2.7–3.1]; p < 0.001) and a two-fold decrease in the second half (RR: 2.3 [95%CI: 2.2–2.5]; p < 0.001) of matches when compared to the previous analysis.

Table 4.

Summary of pooled analysis of current study with previous pooled analysis18 of rugby league match and training injuries by player role, injury region, injury type, injury cause, injury severity and injury period for injury incidence per 1000 h with 95% confidence interval for published rugby league studies.

Match related injuries
 Training related injuries
2021
 201418
 2021
 201418
Total
 Total
 Total
 Total
Rate (95%CI) n Rate (95%CI) n Rate (95%CI) n Rate (95%CI) n
Total IR
 89.2∗ (87.7–101.7) 38
 147.6# (145.1–150.2) 26
 11.8∗ (11.4–12.2) 12
 12.6# (12.2–13.1) 11
Player Role
 Forwards 172.2∗ (165.9–178.8) 18 155.8# (147.6–164.4) 10 9.9 (9.0–10.9) 4 8.5 (6.9–10.3) 2
 Backs
 127.8∗ (122.7–133.0) 18
 112.4# (106.0–119.2) 10
 7.6 (6.8–8.5) 4
 6.7 (5.3–8.3) 2
Injury region
 Head-Neck 37.8∗ (36.4–39.3) 32 34.4# (32.8–36.1) 20 0.8 (0.7–0.9) 10 0.7 (0.6–0.9) 8
 Upper Limb 32.8∗ (31.3–34.3) 25 34.6# (32.8–36.5) 20 1.0 (0.9–1.2) 9 0.9 (0.8–1.0) 8
 Lower Limb 65.9∗ (63.5–67.8) 25 69.1# (66.6–71.7) 20 8.1∗ (7.7–8.5) 9 5.7# (5.4–6.1) 8
 Chest-Back-Other
 16.3∗ (15.3–17.4) 25
 18.3# (17.0–19.7) 20
 1.7∗ (1.6–1.9) 9
 1.4# (1.3–1.6) 8
Injury type
 Contusion 38.7∗ (37.0–40.6) 21 28.3# (26.6–30.0) 17 1.3∗ (1.2–1.5) 9 2.5# (2.3–2.7) 7
 Strain 39.2∗ (37.6–40.9) 24 33.4# (31.7–35.2) 17 4.2∗ (4.0–4.5) 10 3.6# (3.4–3.9) 7
 Sprain 37.2∗ (35.7–38.8) 25 27.5# (25.9–29.2) 17 3.1∗ (2.9–3.4) 11 2.7# (2.5–2.9) 6
 Concussion
 11.6∗ (10.8–12.5) 26
 7.7# (6.9–8.6) 18
 0.1 (0.0–0.1) 6
 0.1 (0.0–0.1) 6
Injury Cause
 Ball Carrier 58.2∗ (55.8–60.7) 25 49.0# (45.6–52.5) 14 0.5∗ (0.4–0.6) 7 2.4# (1.8–3.2) 4
 Tackler
 36.3∗ (34.5–38.3) 25
 27.7# (24.7–29.8) 14
 0.5∗ (0.4–0.6) 6
 2.0# (1.4–2.7) 4
Injury Severity
 Transient 114.7∗ (112.2–117.2) 21 196.9# (191.5–202.3) 14 8.2∗ (7.8–8.5) 9 7.4# (7.0–7.8) 9
 Missed-Match
 36.1∗ (34.7–37.5) 25
 70.2# (67.5–72.9) 18
 2.0∗ (1.8–2.1) 10
 2.5# (2.3–2.7) 9
Injury period
 1st half 161.7∗ (152.4–171.5) 11 461.3# (438.0–485.7) 8 2.5∗ (2.0–3.1) 3 11.3# (9.0–14.2) 2
 2nd half 183.3∗ (173.5–193.7) 11 423.4# (401.1–446.9) 8 3.3∗ (2.8–4.1) 3 15.4# (12.7–18.8) 2
Open in a new tab

CI: Confidence Interval; IR = Injury Rate; n = number of studies; Significant difference (p ​< ​0.05) than (∗) 2014 pooled analysis; (#) = 2021 pooled analysis.

When reviewing training injuries (see Table 4) there were more training injuries recorded (RR: 1.5 [95%CI: 1.4–1.6]; p = 0.006) than the previous analysis. There were more injuries recorded to the lower limb body region (RR: 1.4 [95%CI: 1.3–1.5]; p < 0.001), more sprains (RR: 1.2 [95%CI: 1.2–1.3]; p = 0.006) there was a five-fold decrease (RR: 4.8 [95%CI: 3.4–6.8]; p < 0.001) for injuries to the ball carrier and a four-fold decrease (RR: 4.1 [95%CI: 2.8–6.0]; p < 0.001) for injuries to the tackler when compared with the previous analysis.

Discussion

The aim of this review was to systematically update the incidence of injuries in rugby league as the previous study18 was published nearly 10 years ago. In doing so, we found that the incidence of rugby league injuries continues to vary by participation level from 14.6 per 1000 match-hr at the junior level to 431.6 per 1000 match-hr at the semi-professional level, with an overall pooled injury incidence of 99.4 per 1000 match-hr. This was similar to the previous pooled review18 with 14.4 per 1000 match-hr at the junior level of participation to 358.5 per 1000 match-hr at the semi-professional level. However, the overall injury incidence for that pooled analysis was notably higher at 147.6 per 1000 match-hr18 (see Table 4). This was similar for the training injuries with the recent study showing that professional level recording 3.8 per 1000 training-hr to 97.1 per 1000 training-hr at the elite level with an overall pooled injury incidence of 11.8 per 1000 training-hr. When compared with the previous study, there was a similar variation in the injury incidence with 3.8 per 1000 training-hr at the professional level to 65.2 per 1000 training-hr at the semi-professional level. The overall pooled injury incidence (11.8 per 1000 training-hr) was similar but there were meaningful differences observed.

There was a four-fold difference in the incidence of match injuries at the semi-professional compared with elite and professional participation levels. Pooled data analysis for matches indicated injuries occurred most to the hooker, from being tackled, and resulted in lower limb injury that was most commonly at the quadriceps, with haematomas and abrasions most common. There were more injuries in the 4th quarter of matches. For training injuries, there was a 22-fold increase in injury risk at the elite compared with the professional, and a 16-fold increase compared with the amateur participation levels. Overexertion (also termed cumulative trauma disorder)109 was the most common pooled injury cause, although there were significantly more (p < 0.001) reported at the elite level. There were more pooled transient than missed-match injuries reported at the elite level. Transient injuries accounted for 75.4% match and 79.4% training injuries.

Like previous studies18,45,68 transient injuries accounted for the majority of the match (75.4%) and training (79.4%) injuries. The inclusion of both missed-match and transient injuries in rugby league studies has been previously suggested34 but this also acts as a guide to the health care management and appointment of essential primary care personnel.21 Missed-match injuries still require assessment, management, and sometimes onward-referral to other health care service providers.21 This has resource implications on the healthcare practitioner when dealing with these injuries.22

The finding that the pooled concussion incidence was 11.6 per 1000 match-hr and 0.1 per 1000 training-hr was higher for the match (7.7 per 1000 match-hr) related injuries but lower (0.1 per 1000 training-hr) for training (0.3 per 1000 training-hr) related injuries than previous pooled analysis reviews.17,18 At the amateur level, the minimum stand-down period from a concussion was 21 days as stipulated by the national ruling body, and this was monitored in some studies using a saccadic reading application.41,52 It was reported that no player was able to return to training and/or match participation unless they had equalled or improved their reading time.41,52 As a result, some players took longer to recover from a concussion. This was similar in a recent study reporting on women's rugby union,110 where the mean missed-match duration for concussions was 28.9 ± 3.7 days and similar to a previous study111 where the majority of concussions took 28 days to recover. This finding is in conflict with the Concussion in Sport Consensus statement where it identified that 80%–90% of all concussions recover in seven to ten days.112,113 No study reported the concussion injury burden, yet this information may be useful in further studies to identify the burden of concussions on rugby league participants.

Although the incidence of concussion remained the same (0.1 per 1000 training-hr) in studies reporting on rugby league training, the incidence of concussion in studies reporting on rugby league match injuries increased between the two studies (7.7 vs. 11.6 per 1000 match-hr). This may be related to the increased awareness of this injury for all sporting codes.114 Despite attempts to standardise the definition of concussion through the Concussion in Sports Group, there have been several variations produced.115 Twenty-seven studies4,10,16,17,30,39, 40, 41,43,46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55,58, 59, 60, 61, 62,64,67,68 reported concussions in match activities, and six studies10,16,69,70,72,73 reported concussions in training activities, only four of these studies50, 51, 52,67 provided a definition for concussion, and three of these50, 51, 52 utilised the Concussion in Sport Consensus definition. However, given that none of the other studies reported the concussion definition utilised, and there is no universal definition of concussion, the incidence of concussion may be higher than reported depending upon the methodological definitions utilised. Factors that need to be considered in regards to concussion reporting that may influence the results are the definition of a concussion (time loss vs. non-time loss), the knowledge of the people making the assessment, the availability of medical services to the team (as this will vary at the different participation levels) and the willingness of the player to report the signs of concussion.115

Three studies30, 31, 32 had identified limitations and unsuccessful attempts were undertaken to contact the authors for further clarification. Studies reported match and training injuries and calculated match player-hr but did not provide the exposure hr. By combining match and training data, there is a masking of differences between match and training injury exposure which renders inter-study comparisons meaningless.33 In addition, there was a notable concern with one study31 where the authors reported that they reclassified recorded concussions and descriptions of head injuries as suspected concussions. As a result, the data reported were not utilised in the pooled analysis for junior rugby league groups as there was no identification for match and training injuries and the number of reported concussions may have been different from what was reported by the team trainers. Future studies reporting on junior rugby league injuries need to consider separating match and training injuries and provide the reported injuries from the trainers involved.

The pooled analysis approach undertaken in this study produces an overall estimate of the injuries recorded by combining the data provided by the selected studies.19 As shown by this pooled analysis the incidence of injuries in rugby league is lower than the previous review and analysis of rugby league injuries (99.4 per 1000 match-hr) but like the previous study, the injury rate varied depending on the level of participation. The limitations with the use of a pooled analysis methodology have been previously described.24 Issues such as differences in study design (observation vs. self-reported injury);116 injury type, site and severity definitions; data collection methods and times; data recording medium and the maintenance of the data medium were considered and addressed through identification of the data utilised.11,16 An important issue in reporting rugby league injuries are the methodological approaches that each study utilised.34 Although there have been suggestions for the undertaking of epidemiological studies in rugby league, there remains a variation in the definitions utilised and this can limit interstudy comparisons.34 Epidemiological studies conducted at the semi-professional and professional levels of participation involve medical personnel such as medical doctors and physiotherapists while amateur and junior level participation studies typically do not have these personnel available.17 The variability of the medical providers available at the side-line may also influence the assessment of concussion as what may be a concussion to one person may not be to another.117 Despite these limitations, the strength of a pooled analysis is that it provides more accurate estimates of injury rates than the individual studies that provided the data.11 It can be utilised as comparisons against other pooled studies and to obtain a combined estimator of the quantitative effect of the relative risk of injuries in rugby league match and training activities.23,24

Conclusions

The current pooled analysis examined a broad spectrum of published rugby league studies incorporating both match and training injuries at the professional, elite, semi-professional, amateur and junior levels of participation. The combined estimation of injuries within rugby league through a pooled analysis enables more precise evidence, and meaningful information about the injuries in match and training activities in rugby league. The finding that the incidence of rugby league injuries continued to vary by participation level with an overall pooled injury incidence of 99.4 per 1000 match-hr. This was similar for the training injuries with the recent study identifying an overall pooled injury incidence of 11.8 per 1000 training-hr. Pooled data analysis for matches indicated injuries occurred most to the hooker, from being tackled, and resulted in lower limb injury that was most commonly at the quadriceps, with haematomas and abrasions most common. There were more injuries reported in the 4th quarter of matches. The paucity of studies reporting on women's rugby league highlights an area of future research that is warranted. The inclusion of studies reporting specifically on concussions highlights the increasing awareness of this injury in sport and how the reporting can differ depending upon the injury definition and participation level. No study reported the concussion injury burden, yet this information may be useful in further studies to identify the burden of concussions on rugby league participants. Future studies reporting on rugby league injuries should consider incorporating a more detailed analysis of the activity, time, player position, and field position to assist with injury prevention programmes.

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Submission statement

As corresponding author, I hereby state that the manuscript has not been published previously, that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere including electronically in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the copyright-holder.

Authors' contribution

Contributor statement: According to the definition given by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), the authors listed above qualify for authorship based on making one or more of the substantial contributions to the intellectual content of:

(i) Conception and design (DK, TC); and/or

(ii) Acquisition of data (DK); and/or

(iii) Analysis and interpretation of data (DK, TC, PH); and/or

(iv) Participated in drafting of the manuscript (DK, TC, PH, KH); and/or

(v) Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content (DK, TC, PH, KH).

Data availability statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Conflict of interest

DK, TC, PH and KH declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhs.2022.03.002.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (53.2KB, docx)

References

  • 1.King D.A., Hume P.A., Milburn P.D., et al. Match and training injuries in rugby league: a review of published studies. Sports Med. 2010;40(2):163–178. doi: 10.2165/11319740-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.King D., Gabbett T. Injuries in the New Zealand semi-professional rugby league competition. N Z J Sports Med. 2009;36(1):6–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gissane C., Jennings D., Jennings S., et al. Physical collisions and injury rates in professional super league rugby, the demands of different player positions. Clev Med J. 2001;4:147–155. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Seward H., Orchard J., Hazard H., et al. Football injuries in Australia at the elite level. Med J Aust. 1993;159(5):298–301. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1993.tb137863.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gabbett T.J. Incidence of injury in junior and senior rugby league players. Sports Med. 2004;34(12):849–859. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434120-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gabbett T.J. Science of rugby league football: a review. J Sports Sci. 2005;23(9):961–976. doi: 10.1080/02640410400023381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Raftery M., Parker R., Stacey E., et al. The New Children's Hospital; Westmead: 1999. Incidence of Injury in Junior Rugby League in the Penrith and District Junior Rugby League Area: A Report Submitted to the NSW Sporting Injuries Committee and Australian Rugby League: Children's Hospital Institute of Sports Medicine, Research and Development office. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gabbett T.J. Incidence of injury in semi-professional rugby league players. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37(1):36–44. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.37.1.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hodgson Phillips L., Standen P., Batt M. Effects of seasonal change in rugby league on the incidence of injury. Br J Sports Med. 1998;32(2):144–148. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.32.2.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gabbett T.J. Influence of training and match intensity on injuries in rugby league. J Sports Sci. 2004;22(5):409–417. doi: 10.1080/02640410310001641638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gissane C., Jennings D., Kerr K., et al. A pooled data analysis of injury incidence in rugby league football. Sports Med. 2002;32(3):211–216. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200232030-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Blettner M., Sauerbrei W., Schlehofer B., et al. Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28(1):1–9. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McElvenny D.M., Armstrong B.G., Jarup L., et al. Meta-analysis in occupational epidemiology: a review of practice. Occup Med (Lond). 2004;54(5):336–344. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqh049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Checkoway H. Data pooling in occupational studies. J Occup Med. 1991;33(12):1257–1260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wong O., Raabe G.K. Application of meta-analysis in reviewing occupational cohort studies. Occup Environ Med. 1996;53(12):793–800. doi: 10.1136/oem.53.12.793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gissane C., Hodgson L., Jennings D. Time-loss injuries versus non-time-loss injuries in the first team rugby league football: a pooled data analysis. Clin J Sport Med. 2012;22(5):414–417. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318261cace. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.King D., Hume P., Gissane C., et al. Semi-professional rugby league players have higher concussion risk than professional or amateur participants: a pooled analysis. Sports Med. 2017;47(2):197–205. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0576-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.King D., Gissane C., Clark T., et al. The incidence of match and training injuries in rugby league: a pooled analysis of published studies. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2014;9(2):417–431. doi: 10.1260/1747-9541.9.2.417. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Elwood M. third ed. Oxford University Press Inc.; New York: 2007. Critical Apprasial of Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shapiro S. Meta-analysis/Shmeta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;140(9):771–778. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Powell J., Dompier T. Analysis of injury rates and treatment patterns for time-loss and non-time-loss injuries among collegiate student athletes. J Athl Train. 2004;39(1):56–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dompier T., Powell J., Barron M., et al. Time-loss and non-time-loss injuries in youth football players. J Athl Train. 2007;42(3):395–402. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Friedenreich C.M. Methods for pooled analyses of epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology. 1993;4(4):295–302. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199307000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Blettner M., Sauerbrei W., Schlehofer B., et al. Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28(1):1–9. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Giacco D., McCabe R., Kallert T., et al. Friends and symptom dimensions in patients with psychosis: a pooled analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;134:178–189. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Stroup D.F., Berlin J.A., Morton S.C., et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–2012. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.von Elm E., Altman D., Egger M., et al. The Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement. Guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–349. doi: 10.1016/j.clinepi.2007.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Olmos M., Antelo M., Vazquez H., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies on the prevalence of fractures in coeliac disease. Dig Liver Dis. 2008;40(1):46–53. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2007.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Orr R., Cheng H.L. Incidence and characteristics of injuries in elite Australian junior rugby league players. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(3):212–217. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Orr R., Hamidi J., Levy B., et al. Epidemiology of injuries in Australian junior rugby league players. J Sci Med Sport. 2021;24(3):241–246. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Booth M., Orr R. Time-loss injuries in sub-elite and emerging rugby league players. J Sports Sci Med. 2017;16(2):295–301. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Brooks J.H., Fuller C.W. The influence of methodological issues on the results and conclusions from epidemiological studies of sports injuries: illustrative examples. Sports Med. 2006;36(6):459–472. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200636060-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.King D.A., Gabbett T.J., Gissane C., et al. Epidemiological studies of injuries in rugby league: suggestions for definitions, data collection and reporting methods. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12(1):12–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Williams S., Trewartha G., Kemp S., et al. A meta-analysis of injuries in senior men's professional rugby union. Sports Med. 2013;43(10):1043–1055. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0078-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Freitag A., Kirkwood G., Scharer S., et al. Systematic review of rugby injuries in children and adolescents under 21 years. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(8):511–519. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.King D., Hume P., Cummins C., et al. Match and training injuries in women's rugby union: a systematic review of published studies. Sports Med. 2019;49(10):1559–1574. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01151-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Twellaar M., Verstappen F., Huson A. Is prevention of sports injuries a realistic goal? A four-year prospective investigation of sports injuries among physical education students. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24(4):528–534. doi: 10.1177/036354659602400419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gabbett T.J. Incidence of injury in junior rugby league players over four competitive seasons. J Sci Med Sport. 2008;11(3):323–328. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.King D. Incidence of injuries in the 2005 New Zealand national junior rugby league competition. N Z J Sports Med. 2006;34(1):21–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.King D., Hume P., Gissane C., et al. Use of the King-Devick test for sideline concussion screening in junior rugby league. J Neurol Sci. 2015;357(1-2):75–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.06.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Alexander D., Kennedy M., Kennedy J. Rugby league football injuries over two competitive seasons. Med J Aust. 1980;2:334–345. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1980.tb77020.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cummins C., King D., Clark T. Injuries in New Zealand amateur rugby league matches by positional groups. N Z J Sports Med. 2017;44(2):66–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gabbett T.J. Incidence, site, and nature of injuries in amateur rugby league over three consecutive seasons. Br J Sports Med. 2000;34(2):98–103. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.34.2.98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gabbett T.J. Incidence of injury in amateur rugby league sevens. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36(1):23–26. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.36.1.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.King D., Gabbett T. Injuries in a national women's rugby league tournament: an initial investigation. N Z J Sports Med. 2007;34(2):18–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.King D.A., Gabbett T.J., Dreyer C., et al. Incidence of injuries in the New Zealand national rugby league sevens tournament. J Sci Med Sport. 2006;9(1-2):110–118. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2005.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.King D., Gabbett T. Amateur rugby league match injuries in New Zealand. N Z J Sports Med. 2009;36(1):16–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.King D., Gissane C. Injuries in amateur rugby league matches in New Zealand: a comparison between a division one and a division two premier grade teams. Clin J Sport Med. 2009;19(4):277–281. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181a7c6b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.King D., Hume P., Cummins C., et al. Concussion incidence for two levels of senior amateur rugby league in New Zealand, 2008-2011. Sports Med Rehabil J. 2018;3(1):1026. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.King D., Clark T., Gissane C. Use of a rapid visual screening tool for the assessment of concussion in amateur rugby league: a pilot study. J Neurol Sci. 2012;320(1-2):16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2012.05.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.King D., Gissane C., Hume P.A., et al. The King-Devick test was useful in management of concussion in amateur rugby union and rugby league in New Zealand. J Neurol Sci. 2015;351(1-2):58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.02.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.King D., Clark T. Injuries in amateur representative rugby league over three years. N Z J Sports Med. 2012;39(2):48–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tee J.C., Till K., Jones B. Incidence and characteristics of injury in under-19 academy level rugby league match play: a single season prospective cohort study. J Sports Sci. 2019;37(10):1181–1188. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1547100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gabbett T.J. Influence of playing position on the site, nature, and cause of rugby league injuries. J Strength Condit Res. 2005;19(4):749–755. doi: 10.1519/R-16504.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gabbett T.J. Influence of injuries on team playing performance in rugby league. J Sci Med Sport. 2004;7(3):340–346. doi: 10.1016/s1440-2440(04)80029-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Estell J., Shenstone B., Barnsley L. Frequency of injuries in different age-groups in an elite rugby league club. Aust J Sci Med Sport. 1995;27(4):95–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gabbett T.J., Domrow N. Risk factors for injury in subelite rugby league players. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(3):428–434. doi: 10.1177/0363546504268407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Fitzpatrick A.C., Naylor A.S., Myler P., et al. A three-year epidemiological prospective cohort study of rugby league match injuries from the European Super League. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(2):160–165. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gibbs N. Injuries in professional rugby league. A three-year prospective study of the South Sydney professional rugby league football club. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21(5):696–700. doi: 10.1177/036354659302100510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gissane C., Jennings D., Kerr K., et al. Injury rates in rugby league football: impact of change in playing season. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(6):954–958. doi: 10.1177/03635465030310063501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gissane C., Jennings D., White J., et al. Injury in summer rugby league football: the experiences of one club. Br J Sports Med. 1998;32(2):149–152. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.32.2.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gissane C., White J., Kerr K., et al. Health and safety implications of injury in professional rugby league football. Occup Med (Lond) 2003;53(8):512–517. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqg103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Gissane C., Jennings D., Standing P. Incidence of injury in rugby league football. Physio. 1993;79:305–310. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hodgson L., Standen P.J., Batt M.E. An analysis of injury rates after the seasonal change in rugby league. Clin J Sport Med. 2006;16(4):305–310. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200607000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Orchard J., Hoskins W. Rugby league injuries at state of origin level. Sport Health. 2007;27(2):19–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Savage J., Hooke C., Orchard J., et al. The incidence of concussion in a professional Australian rugby league team, 1998-2012. J Sports Med. 2013;2013:304576. doi: 10.1155/2013/304576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Stephenson S., Gissane C., Jennings D. Injury in rugby league: a four year prospective survey. Br J Sports Med. 1996;30(4):331–334. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.30.4.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Clark T., King D. Incidence of training injuries in a New Zealand amateur rugby league team over three consecutive years. J Aust Strength Cond. 2017;25(7):26–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.King D.A., Gabbett T.J. Training injuries in New Zealand amateur rugby league players. J Sci Med Sport. 2008;11(6):562–565. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gabbett T.J. Training injuries in rugby league: an evaluation of skill-based conditioning games. J Strength Condit Res. 2002;16(2):236–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Gabbett T.J. Reductions in pre-season training loads reduce training injury rates in rugby league players. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38(6):743–749. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2003.008391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gabbett T., Domrow N. Relationships between training load, injury, and fitness in sub-elite collision sport athletes. J Sports Sci. 2007;25(13):1507–1519. doi: 10.1080/02640410701215066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Gabbett T.J., Godbolt R.J. Training injuries in professional rugby league. J Strength Condit Res. 2010;24(7):1948–1953. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ddad65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Killen N.M., Gabbett T.J., Jenkins D.G. Training loads and incidence of injury during the preseason in professional rugby league players. J Strength Condit Res. 2010;24(8):2079–2084. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ddafff. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gabbett T.J. The development and application of an injury prediction model for noncontact, soft-tissue injuries in elite collision sport athletes. J Strength Condit Res. 2010;24(10):2593–2603. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181f19da4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Gabbett T.J., Jenkins D.G., Abernethy B. Physical collisions and injury in professional rugby league match-play. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14(3):210–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Oxendale C.L., Twist C., Daniels M., et al. The relationship between match-play characteristics of elite rugby league and indirect markers of muscle damage. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016;11(4):515–521. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.King D., Hume P., Clark T. The effect of player positional groups on the nature of tackles that result in tackle-related injuries in professional rugby league matches. J Sports Med Phys Fit. 2011;51(3):435–443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.King D., Hume P.A., Clark T. Nature of tackles that result in injury in professional rugby league. Res Sports Med. 2012;20(2):86–104. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2012.660824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.King D., Hume P., Clark T. Video analysis of tackles in professional rugby league matches by player position, tackle height and tackle location. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2010;10(3):214–254. doi: 10.1080/24748668.2010.11868519. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Longworth T., McDonald A., Cunningham C., et al. Do rugby league players under-report concussion symptoms? A cross-sectional study of elite teams based in Australia. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2021;7(1):e000860. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Gibbs N. Common rugby league injuries. Recommendations for treatment and preventative measures. Sports Med. 1994;18(6):438–450. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199418060-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.King D., Gissane C., Brughelli M., et al. Sport-related concussions in New Zealand: a review of 10 years of Accident Compensation Corporation moderate to severe claims and costs. J Sci Med Sport. 2014;17(3):250–255. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.King D.A., Hume P.A., Gianotti S., et al. Neck back and spine injuries in amateur rugby league: a review of nine years of Accident Compensation Corporation injury entitlement claims and costs. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14(2):126–129. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.King D., Hume P., Milburn P., et al. Rugby league injuries in New Zealand: variations in injury claims and costs by ethnicity, gender, age, district, body site, injury type and occupation. N Z J Sports Med. 2009;36(2):48–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.King D.A., Hume P.A., Milburn P., et al. Rugby league injuries in New Zealand: a review of 8 years of Accident Compensation Corporation injury entitlement claims and costs. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(8):595–602. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.061481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.King D.A., Hume P.A., Milburn P., et al. Women's rugby league injury claims and costs in New Zealand. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(14):1016–1023. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.064683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Lythe M., Norton R. Rugby league injuries in New Zealand. N Z J Sports Med. 1992;20:6–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Welch M., Cummins C., Thornton H., et al. Training load prior to injury in professional rugby league players: analysing injury risk with machine learning. ISBS Proc Arch. 2018;36(1):Article 59. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Inglis P.R., Doma K., Deakin G.B. The incidence and occurrence of injuries to junior rugby league players in a tropical environment. J Hum Kinet. 2019;67(1):101–110. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2018-0075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Gabbett T., Jenkins D., Abernethy B. Physical collisions and injury during professional rugby league skills training. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13(6):578–583. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Gabbett T.J., Ullah S., Finch C.F. Identifying risk factors for contact injury in professional rugby league players--application of a frailty model for recurrent injury. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15(6):496–504. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.King D., Hume P., Gissane C., et al. Head impacts in a junior rugby league team measured with a wireless head impact sensor: an exploratory analysis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017;19(1):13–23. doi: 10.3171/2016.7.PEDS1684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.King D., Hume P., Gissane C., et al. Measurement of head impacts in a senior amateur rugby league team with an instrumented patch: exploratory analysis. ARC J Res Sports Med. 2017;2(1):9–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 96.King D.A., Hume P.A., Gissane C., et al. Head impact exposure from match participation in women's rugby league over one season of domestic competition. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(2):139–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.King D., Hume P., Cummins C., et al. Head impact exposure comparison between male and female amateur rugby league participants measured with an instrumented patch. J Sports Med Therapy. 2019;4(1):024–037. doi: 10.29328/journal.jsmt.1001039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.King D., Hume P.A., Clark T.N., et al. Use of the King-Devick test for the identification of concussion in an amateur domestic women's rugby union team over two competition seasons in New Zealand. J Neurol Sci. 2020;418:117162. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Gissane C., Jennings D., Cumine A., et al. Differences in the incidence of injury between rugby league forwards and backs. Aust J Sci Med Sport. 1997;29(4):91–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.King D., Clark T., Kellman M., et al. Stress and recovery changes of injured and non-injured amateur representaitve rugby league players over a competition season. N Z J Sports Med. 2017;43(2):57–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 101.King D., Gissane C., Clark T. Concussion in amateur rugby league players in New Zealand: a review of player concussion history. N Z J Sports Med. 2014;40(2):8–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Meir R.A., McDonald K.N., Russell R. Injury consequences from participation in professional rugby league: a preliminary investigation. Br J Sports Med. 1997;31(2):132–134. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.31.2.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.King D., Hume P., Clark T. Player perspectives on return to play after a match or training injury in amateur rugby league. N Z J Sports Med. 2010;37(2):48–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Hoskins W., Pollard H., Hough K., et al. Injury in rugby league. J Sci Med Sport. 2006;9(1-2):46–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.King D., Hume P., Milburn P., et al. A review of the physiological and anthropometrical characteristics of rugby league players. Sth Afr J Res Sport Phys Ed Recr. 2009;31(2):49–67. doi: 10.10520/EJC108904. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Kirkwood G., Parekh N., Ofori-Asenso R., et al. Concussion in youth rugby union and rugby league: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(8):506–510. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Norton R., Wilson M. Rugby league injuries and patterns. N Z J Sports Med. 1995;22:37–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 108.King D., Hume P., Clark T. Player perspectives on return to play after a match or training injury in amateur rugby league. N Z J Sports Med. 2010;37(2):48–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Gregory P.L. Overuse"--an overused term? Br J Sports Med. 2002;36(2):82–83. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.36.2.82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.King D., Hume P., Clark T., et al. Use of the Recovery-Stress Questionnaire - sport (RESTQ-Sport) and King-Devick Test to monitor changes during recovery of concussion in an amateur women's rugby union team. JSM Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;5(1):1014. [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Kara S., Crosswell H., Forch K., et al. Less than half of patients recover within 2 weeks of injury after a sports-related mild traumatic brain injury: a 2-year prospective study. Clin J Sport Med. 2020;30(2):96–101. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.McCrory P., Meeuwisse W.H., Aubry M., et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th international conference on concussion in sport held in Zurich, November 2012. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(5):250–258. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.McCrory P., Meeuwisse W., Dvorak J., et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport-the 5th international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, October 2016. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(11):838–847. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Tjarks B.J., Dorman J.C., Valentine V.D., et al. Comparison and utility of King-Devick and ImPACT(R) composite scores in adolescent concussion patients. J Neurol Sci. 2013;334(1-2):148–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.King D., Brughelli M., Hume P., et al. Assessment, management and knowledge of sport-related concussion: systematic review. Sports Med. 2014;44(4):449–471. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0134-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Dompier T.P., Powell J.W., Barron M.J., et al. Time-loss and non-time-loss injuries in youth football players. J Athl Train. 2007;42(3):395–402. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Orchard J. In: BJSM Group Blogs. Khan K., editor. 2012. Concussion: how do we reconcile risk-averse policies with risk-taking sports?https://blogs.bmj.com/bjsm/2012/03/15/concussion-how-do-we-reconcile-risk-averse-policies-with-risk-taking-sports/ Accessed July 3, 2021. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (53.2KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Articles from Sports Medicine and Health Science are provided here courtesy of Chengdu Sport University

RESOURCES