Skip to main content
Gels logoLink to Gels
. 2022 May 24;8(6):327. doi: 10.3390/gels8060327

Ginger Essential Oil as an Active Addition to Composite Chitosan Films: Development and Characterization

Sawsan Ali Al-Hilifi 1,*, Rawdah Mahmood Al-Ali 1, Anka Trajkovska Petkoska 2
Editors: Shulin Yang, Irene S Fahim
PMCID: PMC9222789  PMID: 35735671

Abstract

The recent interest in food biopackaging is showing an increasing trend, especially in the development of antimicrobial coatings and films. The focus of this study is to assess the potential application of ginger (Zingiber officinale) essential oil (GEO) to polysaccharide films based on chitosan (CHf) and their utilization as an active edible packaging. The films were characterized by different instrumental techniques, and data indicated significant differences (p < 0.05) in the chemical composition of the samples. Forty-seven active compounds from ginger rhizomes were identified in the examined essential oil by gas chromatography mass spectrometer (GC-MS). Fourier transforms infrared spectra (FT-IR) confirmed an interaction between the hydroxyl groups of the phenolic compounds of the essential oil and the amine groups of the bioactive matrix, as shown by the peaks at wavenumbers 1639 cm−1 and 1558 cm−1. X-ray diffraction data suggested a lower crystallinity in the CHf due to the addition of GEO. Differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) analysis revealed that the CHf possessed high thermal stability, especially when different concentrations of GEO were added. The bioactive CHf showed distinct activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Streptococcus sp., Escherichia coli, Salmonella sp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, thus improving the antimicrobial activity to these films. The results provide a comprehensive insight into the importance of films with incorporated EOs as novel types of active food packaging. Antimicrobial food packaging is one of the most promising kinds of active packaging, and acts to reduce, inhibit, or retard any microorganism growth that could contaminate packaged food items.

Keywords: antimicrobial packaging, ginger essential oil, chitosan films, biodegradable materials

1. Introduction

Active packaging (AP) has an attractive option in the food industry over the last few decades. Natural antimicrobial materials combined with edible materials can prevent or control outbreaks of infectious foodborne pathogens, extend the shelf-life of food products and improve the quality and safety standards of the packaged items. The demand for biodegradable and eco-friendly packaging is expected to reach high levels in the food packaging market around the world [1,2,3]. Biopolymers, such as proteins, polysaccharides, and lipids, meet the requirements for biodegradable and edible films and coatings. They can be used individually, or combined with other biopolymers or mixed with other compounds in order to obtain edible films or coatings suitable for food packaging. These films/coatings can cover the entire surface of the food and protect it from mechanical damage and light/UV exposure, serve as a gas/water vapor barrier, and generally improve the quality and safety of packed food products [4,5]. In general, AP represents a transformation of the role of the passive packaging system to one of active defense. It catalyzes the interaction between the environment, packaging, and the product for longer shelf life and/or better quality of packed food. It involves the intentional combination of the absorption or discharging of certain compounds from or into the food packaging system [6,7]. These active systems usually contain active substances that can be released into the packaging interior [8,9,10]. Moreover, biopolymer-based films have proven to be an exceptional matrix for developing functional (active) packaging materials with the inclusion of a variety of additives, such as antioxidants and antimicrobial agents. As they inhibit the spread of pathogenic microbes that cause food spoilage and contamination [11,12], active films can play an important role in packaging and preservation of fresh food, such as fruits, vegetables, dairy products, meat, and meat products [13,14,15,16]. In this context, biocomposite polysaccharide materials are gaining significant attention due to the abundant availability of such biopolymers and their proven track records in various applications [17,18,19,20].

Essential oils (EOs) with antimicrobial attributes present a promising bioactive addition to packaging technology. From a chemical point of view, EOs are composed of secondary metabolites, the majority of which are terpenes (especially monoterpene) containing oxygenated derivatives and other compounds, such as hydrocarbons, ethers, alcohols, aliphatic acid esters, and phenolics, which are responsible for antibacterial activity [21,22,23]. The antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of EOs are numerous, and they can be employed as a substitute for synthetic preservatives in the food industry [24]. Furthermore, EOs can be incorporated into biopolymer materials, such as chitosan, to enhance the antimicrobial effect, and they have Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status [25,26]. Essential oil of ginger (Zingiber officinale), abbreviated here as GEO, is well recognized for its antimicrobial and oxidative actions [27], which are usually attributed to active compounds such as zingiberene, camphene, α-curcumene, and α-phellandrene. In addition, EOs contain mixtures of chemical compounds, such as hydrocarbons and oxygenated monoterpene [28,29]. Chitosan (CH) is a homogeneous polymer of N-acetyl-d-Glucose units linked by β-(1→4) bounds, and can be found in the exoskeletons of crustaceans. CH is a natural, sustainable and biocompatible material with exciting and unique antimicrobial properties, and is used in the pharmaceutical industry, for food packaging, and in environmental conservation [30,31,32]. The activity of CH is due to its reactive amino and hydroxyl functional groups, but it is frequently blended with other polymers [33]. The resistance of bacteria and fungi to chemicals is a major challenge in the treatment of infections, leading to the need for new materials with anti-bacterial properties. The combination of essential oils and chitosan films coating may enhance such materials [34]. The aim of this study is to highlight the effectiveness of antimicrobial chitosan films (CHf) as well as to study their chemical properties. In this work, the authors focus on the development of active biopackaging films using GEO combined with CHf, assessing the effect of this combination on the thermal stability. properties of the produced films. Moreover, the efficiency of GEO-enriched films in inhibiting the growth of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative foodborne pathogenic bacteria is also determined.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemical Components of GEO

GC-MS analysis of GEO showed a composition of different components (Table 1). Oxygenated monoterpenes, monoterpene hydrocarbons, diterpene hydrocarbons, sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, oxygenated sesquiterpenes, diterpene hydrocarbons, and fatty acid esters were all present in this EO. The most essential components were eucalyptol (19.36%), (−)−camphene (15.07%), β-bisabolene (11.52%), zingiberene (9.58%), and cineol (9.18%) (Figure 1). Several compounds found in GEO, such as (−)−camphenein, alpha-curcumen, and α-zingiberene, have known antibacterial properties. Moreover, the antibacterial properties may also be attributed to α-phellandrene, α-pinene, β-selinenol, β-sesquiphellandrene, limonene, and linalool [25,35]. The major chemical constituents of GEO found in the current study were similar to those found in previous studies [36]. The minor variations in concentrations are due to the changes in internal and external factors related to the growth environment, harvest season, and extraction process used. Wang et al. (2020) [25] found that β-phellandrene, α-curcumene, and α-zingiberene in the GEO were concentrationof 2.56%, 12.04%, and 35.65%, respectively [37]. α-Zingiberene has also been identified by Teerarak & Laosinwattana (2019) [38] as one of the most abundant components of this oil.

Table 1.

Chemical composition of GEO using GC/GC-MS analysis.

Components RT/min %
α-Pinene 5.510 4.69
Camphene 5.925 15.07
α-Phellandrene 6494 0.23
β-Pinene 6.590 0.77
β-Myrcene 7.018 2.03
Eucalyptol 8.191 19.36
Norborneol 12.18 4.47
α-Terpineol 12.84 1.97
β-Bisabolene 15.03 11.52
Cineol 14.14 9.18
Lemomol 14.53 0.63
Borneol 15.23 0.33
α-Curcumene 20.29 1.25
α-Zingiberene 20.70 9.58
α-Farnesene 20.93 1.81
Terpinolene 20.97 1.21
γ-Elemene 21.20 0.71
β-Sequiphellandrene 21.35 3.31
Zingiberone 21.93 0.45
Nerolidol 22.26 0.29
Spathulenol 22.57 0.59
Globulol 22.74 0.48
Elemol 23.85 0.46
Β-Selinenol 24.49 1.42
Geraniol 25.25 0.57
Geranialdehyde 26.04 0.29
6-Gingerol 26.40 0.15

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Typical chromatogram of total ion current plot of essential oil isolated from the rhizomes of ginger obtained by GC\GC–MS analysis.

2.2. Chemical Composition of Chitosan

The chemical compounds of fresh shrimp shell and the CH synthesized from it are shown in Table 2. The content of moisture, protein, and ash in the shrimp shell were 44.25%, 33.57%, and 31.40%, respectively, whereas the values of protein and ash (3.72% and 1.48%) decreases in prepared chitosan compared to raw shells. The ash percentage is directly related the calcium carbonate in the shrimp shell [39]. These results indicate the efficiency of the demineralization, which is an essential step in preparing chitosan, as this treatment leads to the removal of the largest amount of calcium carbonate and calcium phosphate, whose concentration in the shell is about 30–50% [40]. These results are similar to the study conducted by Samar et al. (2013) [41] who found moisture, protein and ash contents of 45.65%, 32.45%, and 32.77%, respectively [42].

Table 2.

Chemical composition of shrimp shell and CH.

Samples Parameters (%)
Moisture Ash Protein
Shrimp shell 44.25 ± 2.21 31.40 ± 3.11 33.57 ± 2.87
Chitosan 6.89 ± 1.21 1.48 ± 1.92 3.72 ± 1.89

2.3. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)

FT-IR analysis of the films was used to ascertain the changes generated by the incorporation of GEO into biofilm interactions by separating the IR bands and vibrational shifts related to the incorporation of GEO into the film. The spectrum of bioactive films (Figure 2) revealed distinct bands at around 3500 cm−1 to 3000 cm−1 (NH bond), at 1630–1400 cm−1 (C=O bond) [43,44], at 3398 cm−1 (axial stretch of –OH), and at 3271 cm1 (an asymmetric extension of –NH group). The wide band in the range 3400–3000 cm−1 is attributable to the O–H and N–H stretching vibration. The band in the range 2939 cm−1 to 2875 cm−1 is ascribed to the C–H bond to –NHCOCH3 of the methyl group; the band at 1639 cm−1 indicates amide I and C=O stretching; the band at 1558 cm−1 is attributable to amide II and N–H bending; the band in the range 1423–1382 cm−1 indicates CH2 bending; the band in the range 1083 cm−1 to 898 cm−1 is attributable to skeletal vibration, including the stretching of the C–O group, and the band in the range 1155 cm−1 to 1265 cm−1 to asymmetric stretching of the C–O–C [45,46,47,48]. In general, the incorporation of GEO modulation resulted in slight differences in spectra compared to the control CHf; this may have been due to the small amount of GEO incorporated, CH characteristic peaks prevailed in all samples. Slight changes in absorption peaks were recorded due to the overlapping of chemical bonds, and thus are considered evidence of an interaction between the molecules of different components. The FT-IR spectra of the GEO composition films show a new peak between 1745 cm−1 to 1743 cm–1 that corresponds to the vibration of the C=O bond stretch; this represents an interaction between the hydroxyl and amine groups from CH with the phenolic compounds from the GEO [49].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

FT-IR spectrum of chitosan films with incorporated GEO at different concentrations. (a) Chitosan; (b) Chitosan + 0.1% GEO; (c) Chitosan + 0.2% GEO; (d) Chitosan + 0.3% GEO.

2.4. Thermal Properties of Chitosan Films

The thermal analysis method is one of the physical methods for evaluating a polymer’s endurance and stability within temperature range. In this study, DSC was used to estimate the tolerances of CH and GEO films, as presented in Figure 3 and Table 3. The results show that the CHf recorded the lowest melting point (Tm) at 88.51 °C and endothermic peak at 314.03 °C, which may be attributed to the moisture loss associated with the hydrophilic groups in chitosan and polymer decomposition that accounts for its crystallinity [50]. It is notable that the highest value of the enthalpy of melting (∆H) in the CH/0.3% GEO is 526.02 J/g and the lowest in the CH is 69.01 J/g. The greater the value of the change in the enthalpy in the model, the greater its ability to withstand high temperatures (Figure 3). In other words, the change in the model’s entropy value increases with the increase in the degree of crystallization, and therefore, the more highly crystallized model is more resistant to higher temperatures. Increased crystallinity results in higher elasticity and in a greater tendency toward breakage (lower TS) [51]. It is evident from the results that there is a direct relationship between the oil concentration in the films and crystallization; this may be caused by the movement of CH molecules into polymer segments, thus making it easier to arrange the polymer chain [52].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Differential scanning calorimetry of tested films: (a) Chitosan; (b) Chitosan + 0.1% GEO; (c) Chitosan + 0.2% GEO; (d) Chitosan + 0.3% GEO.

Table 3.

DSC characteristics of examined samples based on CHf/GEO. (a) Chitosan; (b) Chitosan + 0.1% GEO; (c) Chitosan + 0.2% GEO; (d) Chitosan + 0.3% GEO.

Characteristics Film Samples
CH (a) CHf/GEO 0.1% (b) CHf/GEO 0.2% (c) CHf/GEO 0.3% (d)
∆H(J/g) 69.01 104.16 181.55 526.02
Tm 88.51 275.11 280.21 260.01
Ton 279.55 186.71 180.42 188.24
Tp 314.03 281.81 274.53 245.79

2.5. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

X-ray diffraction analysis is used to ascertain the crystal structure of a substance by determining the internal atomic space. XRD patterns of CHf with different amounts of GEO are shown in Figure 4. The blunt peaks at 2θ (ranging between 5–20) are in agreement with the assumption that CH is a molecularly crystallized polysaccharide that contains some crystals embedded in the amorphous region [53]. CH has the advantage of being able to take three forms: hydrated crystalline, anhydrous crystalline and non-crystalline [54]. The control CHf appeared in a crystalline state with a major diffraction peak at 5.7° (2θ). These results were consistent and in agreement with Sun et al. (2017) [55] with a diffraction peak at 8.44°. According to a previous study [56], the diffraction peak at 11.54° is attributable to the anhydrous crystalline, while at 18.34° the diffraction peak is the aqueous crystal character [57]. Moreover, it has been observed that a diffraction peak at 22.8° is considered a typical fingerprint for CHf [58]. It was observed that the diffraction peaks became flatter and less discernible when adding GEO to the films, indicating a decrease in crystallinity with increasing concentrations of GEO. The crystallinity index values of films are usually lower when they are combined with EOs due to the close packing in the polymer chains; this could be attributed to the stronger interaction between active compounds and biopolymers (i.e., H-bonds, Van der Waals), which leads to an improvement in the crystalline 3D-network [59,60].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

X-ray Diffraction patterns of tested films: (a) Chitosan; (b) Chitosan + 0.1% GEO; (c) Chitosan + 0.2% GEO; (d) Chitosan + 0.3% GEO.

2.6. Antimicrobial Activity

The antimicrobial activity of chitosan bioactive films containing GEO is presented in Table 4. CHf with 0.3% GEO showed the lowest antimicrobial activity compared to other films that were studied against the tested microorganisms. The mechanism of antimicrobial activity of CH is based on its positive charges (NH3+) which interfere with the electro-negatively charged cell membrane. Leakage of proteinaceous, ionic, and other intracellular materials causes cell death [61,62,63,64]. CH cannot disperse through agar media, and only species that come into contact with the active areas of CH are affected [65,66,67]. In this study, the growth of the six pathogens was inhibited by all bioactive films to varying degrees depending on GEO concentration. Zone of inhibition increased significantly (p < 0.05) as the concentration of GEO in the films increased. CHf with the highest concentration of GEO (0.3% w/v) effectively inhibited the growth of tested bacteria, resulting in halos from 9.02 mm to 18.35 mm. The antibacterial activity of GEO is thought to be due to its high phenolic content [68,69]. In general, GEO has a stronger effect on Gram-positive bacteria than on Gram-negative bacteria [70]; GEO was found to have antibacterial activity against S. aureus by Trajano et al. [71], while Singh et al. (2008) [72] found strong antimicrobial activity against E. coli, S. aureus, and Yersinia enterocolitica. This could be the result of synergism generated by the mixture of CH and GEO due to the presence of terpenoids that have antibacterial effects, such as zingerone, shogaol, nerolidol, and other phenolic compounds [73,74]. Analysis of red ginger oil with the GC-MS technique by Irawan et al. (2019) [75] found that it also contains compounds such as curcumene (15.6%), zingiberene (10.3%), β-sesquiphellandrene (8.74%), cineole (7.52%), α-pinene (3.12%), and borneol (0.46%), all of which have antibacterial properties. The effect of GEO on microorganisms is due to several mechanisms, including changes to the permeability of the cell membrane, inhibition of intracellular metabolic pathways, and disruption of enzyme systems, which affects the genetic material of the bacteria, because the aromatic and phenolic compounds of the oils affect the cytoplasmic membrane and change its function [76,77]. This is confirmed by Remya1 et al. (2016) [78] who also showed that addition of GEO improves the antibacterial properties of CHf.

Table 4.

Antimicrobial activity of bioactive films with GEO. Note: Different small letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05).

Bacterial Strains
CHf with GEO % Escherichia coli 015:H7 Staphylococcus aureus Salmonella sp. Bacillus subtilis Pseudomonas aeruginosa Streptococcus sp.
inhibition zone (mm)
Control 8.81 ± 0.00 a 11.44 ± 0.11 a 9.77 ± 0.360 a 12.80 ± 0.006 a 10.72 ± 0.008 a 11.38 ± 0.010 a
0.1% 9.02 ± 0.01 b 12.62 ± 0.00 b 11.84 ± 0.017 b 14.66 ± 0.005 b 13.27 ± 0.008 b 15.25 ± 0.00 b
0.2% 11.38 ± 0.01 c 14.91 ± 0.005 c 12.57 ± 0.008 c 15.26 ± 0.021 c 13.36 ± 0.015 b 15.44 ± 0.015 b
0.3% 13.11 ± 0.02 d 17.35 ± 0.01 d 14.95± 0.017 d 17.52 ± 0.008 d 14.90 ± 0.012 c 18.35 ± 0.012 c

3. Conclusions

In this study, the incorporation of GEO into chitosan was successful in the preparation of bioactive films intended for active food packaging. The characterization of biocomposite active films was determined using several methods of analysis. The effect of incorporating GEO into bioactive films based on CHf/GEO was assessed by identifying both the melting temperature (Tm) and an endothermic peak (Tp), which indicated a semi-crystalline structure. The contact angle was reduced by the addition of GEO, and thus it can be concluded that CHf/GEO films have a more hydrophobic surface than pristine CHf. Semi-crystalline polymer crystallographic morphology is noticeably changed by the effect of EO. The molecular interactions that occurred after the addition of GEO were characterized using FT-IR analysis. The films were effective against foodborne pathogens in general. Food packaging is critical for preventing bacterial contamination. Biodegradable food packaging films, such as those described in this work, are promising in the long term because they are composed of environmentally friendly materials. In light of these results, it can be concluded that the addition of GEO to chitosan films opens up a promising future for biodegradable packaging applications with antimicrobial attributes for the packaging of meat, dairy, and horticultural products.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

The shrimp shells used in the study were procured from the local market in Basrah city, Iraq. Shrimp shells were washed with distilled water and dried at 50 °C for 12 h; they were then ground and stored in polyethylene bags at 4 °C until the required tests were performed. Acetic acid, sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, and glycerol were obtained from Sigma (Munich, Germany). Staphylococcus aureus PTCC 1337, Streptococcus sp., Bacillus subtilis, Salmonella sp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli 015:H7 were obtained from the Department of Food Science, University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq. All strains were kept in nutrient broth (Sigma Aldrich, Munich, Germany) at −18 °C until further use.

4.2. Extraction of GEO

The essential oil extraction process was conducted in the laboratories of the Department of Food Science, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah. The ginger rhizomes (Zingiber officinale) were cleaned, washed and peeled, and finally EO was extracted by steam distillation for 3 h using a Clevenger-type apparatus. The EO was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and was later was stored in tightly closed containers at 4 °C prior to further usage.

GC-MS Characterization of GEO

The GEO was analyzed via GC/MS connected to a QP-2010 system and GC-2010 (Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan). A capillary column DB-5 (0.25 mm × 0.25 mm id., film thickness 0.25 µm) was used to separate the GEO. The components of the EO were identified by comparing their mass spectra to the Wiley7n (Wiley, New York, NY, USA) library and NIST 08 lib mass spectral databases (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). The peak area was used to calculate the relative percentages of the main components in the tested samples.

4.3. Chitosan Preparation

The chitin was prepared using the method mentioned by Trung et al. [79] with some modifications. The CH was prepared by three treatments, in which demineralization and deproteinization were the first steps. Namely, the shrimp shells (7.5 g) were treated with 1N HCl in the ratio of 1:4 (w:v) at room temperature for 30 min; then the shells were washed with distilled water four times to remove the mineral and calcium chloride salts. The next step was treatment of the shrimp shells with 1N NaOH 1:10 (w:v) at 65 °C for 1 h to remove proteins; then the solution was filtered through Whatman No.1 to eliminate the insoluble parts; the filtrate was washed with distilled water four times, then dried in an oven at 50 °C to obtain chitin. The preparation of CH involved deacetylation of the chitin [80]. Removing the acetyl groups from the chitin was achieved using 70% NaOH at 5 °C for 12 h. The CH was washed with distilled water more than once to eliminate the base, then it was poured into petri dishes and dried at 50 °C. The CH was ground into a fine powder and stored in light-permeable containers at 5 ± 2 °C before the next analysis.

4.4. Determination of Chemical Composition

Protein, moisture and ash contents of shrimp shells and chitosan were determined according to AOAC (2007) [81].

4.5. Antimicrobial Film Preparation

Bioactive films in this study were prepared by dissolving of 1 g of CH powder in a 100 mL (w/v) solution with 1% acetic acid, and 1% glycerol; stirred at 50 °C for 30 min with a magnetic stirrer until the system was homogenized. Afterward, the solution was cooled to room temperature, then 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3% (v/w) of GEO was added and the solution was homogenized again for 30 min using a magnetic stirrer. The bioactive film solution was placed on petri dishes to dry at 50 °C overnight. The chitosan film without EO was utilized as a control. A final thickness of 4.5 ± 2 mm was determined in all samples. The dried films were peeled off and packed at 25 °C with 55 ± 2% RH for 48 h for further characterization [82].

4.6. Film Characterization

4.6.1. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)

The effective (functional) groups were diagnosed according to Bonilla et al. (2014) [83]. The procedure was conducted in the following way: the film was mixed with potassium bromide KBr in a 100:1 ratio, then pressed under a pressure of 2500 kg/cm2 to obtain a tablet 1 mm in diameter and 1–2 mm thick. It was then measured by FT-IR (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan). FTIR spectra were recorded in the region between 4000 cm−1 to 400 cm−1.

4.6.2. Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC) Analysis

Thermodynamic properties of films were determined using DSC-200F3 (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) at a flow rate of 120 mL/min in a nitrogen atmosphere. The samples were prepared using a standard aluminum pan, and scanned over the temperature range of 30–400 °C with a heating rate of 20 °C/min. The curves of calorimetric analysis were recorded. The melting enthalpy (ΔHm), melting temperature (Tm), and thermal decomposition (Td) of the films were used to calculate the resulting thermoanalytical technique.

4.6.3. X-ray Diffraction Analysis

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were analyzed with an X per T-pro pw 3050 in ambient conditions using Cu- Kα radiation and a nickel monochromatic filtering wave at 40 kV and 20 mA. The biofilms were scanned from 2θ = 5–50 °C with a steep angle of 0.04 °C/min [83].

4.7. Antimicrobial Activity of BioActive Films

In vitro antimicrobial activity of chitosan-based films incorporating GEO was assessed by agar diffusion method, as per previous studies [25]. Inoculums of six spoilage and pathogenic bacteria, namely Escherichia coli 015:H7, Staphylococcus aurous, Salmonella sp., Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomomus aeruginosa, and Streptococcus sp., were prepared in Nutrient broth (Himedia, Mumbia, India) using an overnight culture of bacteria at 37 °C. The bioactive films, after sterilization with UV light, were cut into circular shapes of 6 mm in diameter and placed onto the Nutrient agar in Petri dishes. The Petri dishes had been previously inoculated with the inoculum (0.1 mL) by swabbing with approximately 104–106 CFU/mL of the tested bacteria. The diameter of the inhibition zone (mm) around the disc was measured after 24 h of incubation at 37 °C. Films without GEO were treated using the same protocol and were used as control.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

The results were analyzed statistically using a completely randomized design (CRD) with one factor and three replicates for each analysis. The significant differences between the averages were compared using the LSD test at the 0.05 level and using the (SPSS version 21.0 IBM Corp. Released 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0., IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Agriculture College of Basrah University for their infrastructural support.

Author Contributions

S.A.A.-H.: conceptualization, methodology, validation, investigation, writing original draft, review, writing, and editing. R.M.A.-A.: formal analysis, conceptualization, investigation, software, and data curation. A.T.P.: review, writing, editing, and reviewing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Uranga J., Etxabide A., Guerrero P., de la Caba K. Development of active fish gelatin films with anthocyanins by compression molding. Food Hydrocoll. 2018;84:313–320. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.06.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Braber N.L.V., Di Giorgio L., Aminahuel C.A., Vergara L.I.D., Costa A.O.M., Montenegro M.A., Mauri A.N. Antifungal whey protein films activated with low quantities of water soluble chitosan. Food Hydrocoll. 2020;110:106156. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hosseini S.F., Ghaderi J., G’omez-Guill’en M.C. Trans Cinnamaldehyde-doped quadripartite bio polymeric films: Rheological behavior of film-forming solutions and bio functional performance of films. Food Hydrocoll. 2021;112:106339. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106339. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Siracusa V., Rocculi P., Romani S., Rosa M.D. Biodegradable polymers for food packaging: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2008;19:634–643. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2008.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Al-Ali R.M., Al-Hilifi S.A., Rashed M.M. Fabrication, characterization, and anti-free radical performance of edible packaging-chitosan film synthesized from shrimp shell incorporated with ginger essential oil. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2021;15:2951–2962. doi: 10.1007/s11694-021-00875-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yam K.L., Lee D.S., editors. Emerging Food Packaging Technologies, An Overview. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2012. pp. 1–9. (Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yildirim S., Röcker B., Pettersen M.K., Nilsen-Nygaard J., Ayhan Z., Rutkaite R., Radusin T., Suminska P., Marcos B., Coma V. Active Packaging Applications for Food. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017;17:165–199. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lukic I., Vulic J., Ivanovic J. Antioxidant activity of PLA/PCL films loaded with thymol and/or carvacrol using scCO2 for active food packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life. 2020;26:100578. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2020.100578. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Moslehi Z., Nafchi A.M., Moslehi M., Jafarzadeh S. Aflatoxin, microbial contamination, sensory attributes, and morphological analysis of pistachio nut coated with methylcellulose. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021;9:2576–2584. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jahdkaran E., Hosseini S.E., Nafchi A.M., Nouri L. The effects of methylcellulose coating containing carvacrol or menthol on the physicochemical, mechanical, and antimicrobial activity of polyethylene films. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021;9:2768–2778. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chawla R., Kaur H. Antimicrobial edible films in food packaging: Current scenario an recent nan technological advancements a review. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2021;2:100024. doi: 10.1016/j.carpta.2020.100024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Abdollahzadeh E., Nematollahi A., Hosseini H. Composition of antimicrobial edible films and methods for assessing their antimicrobial activity: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021;110:291–303. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ekramian S., Abbaspour H., Roudi B., Amjad L., Nafchi A.M. An experimental study on characteristics of sago starch film treated with methanol extract from Artemisia sieberi Besser. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2021;15:3298–3306. doi: 10.1007/s11694-021-00895-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Drago E., Campardelli R., Pettinato M., Perego P. Innovations in Smart Packaging Concepts for Food: An Extensive Review. Foods. 2020;9:1628. doi: 10.3390/foods9111628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Trajkovska Petkoska A., Daniloski D., Nathan M.D., Naumovski N., Broach A.T. Edible Packaging: Sustainable Solutions and Novel Trends in Food Packaging. Food Res. Int. 2021;140:109981. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Daniloski D., Petkoska A.T., Lee N.A., Bekhit A.E.-D., Carne A., Vaskoska R., Vasiljevic T. Active edible packaging based on milk proteins: A route to carry and deliver nutraceuticals. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021;111:688–705. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.03.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kumar N., Petkoska A.T., AL-Hilifi S.A., Fawole O.A. Effect of Chitosan–Pullulan Composite Edible Coating Functionalized with Pomegranate Peel Extract on the Shelf Life of Mango (Mangifera indica) Coatings. 2021;11:764. doi: 10.3390/coatings11070764. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huang T., Qian Y., Wei J., Zhou C. Polymeric Antimicrobial Food Packaging and Its Applications. Polymers. 2019;11:560. doi: 10.3390/polym11030560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Boyacı D., Iorio G., Sözbilen G.S., Alkan D., Trabattoni S., Pucillo F., Farris S., Yemenicioğlu A. Development of flexible antimicrobial zein coatings with essential oils for the inhibition of critical pathogens on the surface of whole fruits: Test of coatings on inoculated melons. Food Packag. Shelf Life. 2019;20:100316. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2019.100316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Adiletta G., Di Matteo M., Petriccione M. Multifunctional Role of Chitosan Edible Coatings on Antioxidant Systems in Fruit Crops: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:2633. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Babapour H.J., Jalali H., Mohammadi Nafchi A.M. The synergistic effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles and fennel essential oil on physicochemical, mechanical, and antibacterial properties of potato starch films. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021;9:3893–3905. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Matan N., Rimkeeree H., Mawson J., Chompreeda P., Haruthaithanasan V., Parker M. Antimicrobial activity of cinnamon and clove oils under modified atmosphere conditions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006;107:180–185. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kanatt S.R., Rao M.S., Chawla S.P., Sharma A. Active chitosan–polyvinyl alcohol films with natural extracts. Food Hydrocoll. 2012;29:290–297. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.03.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pintatum A., Laphookhieo S., Logie E., Berghe W.V., Maneerat W. Chemical Composition of Essential Oils from Different Parts of Zingiber kerrii Craib and Their Antibacterial, Antioxidant, and Tyrosinase Inhibitory Activities. Biomolecules. 2020;10:228. doi: 10.3390/biom10020228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang X., Shen Y., Thakur K., Han J., Zhang J.-G., Hu F., Wei Z.-J. Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Ginger Essential Oil against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Molecules. 2020;25:3955. doi: 10.3390/molecules25173955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Motelica L., Ficai D., Oprea O., Ficai A., Trusca R.D., Andronescu E., Holban A.M. Biodegradable Alginate Films with ZnO Nanoparticles and Citronella Essential Oil A Novel Antimicrobial Structure. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:1020. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13071020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sasidharan I., Venugopal V., Menon A.N. Essential oil composition of two unique ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) cultivars from Sikkim. Nat. Prod. Res. 2012;26:1759–1764. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2011.571215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sung S.-Y., Sin L.T., Tee T.-T., Bee S.-T., Rahmat A.R., Rahman W., Tan A.-C., Vikhraman M. Antimicrobial agents for food packaging applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2013;33:110–123. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2013.08.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lago M.A., Sendon R., De Quirós A.R.-B., Silva A.S., Costa H., Sánchez-Machado D.I., Valdez H.S., Angulo I., Aurrekoetxea G.P., Torrieri E., et al. Preparation and Characterization of Antimicrobial Films Based on Chitosan for Active Food Packaging Applications. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2014;7:2932–2941. doi: 10.1007/s11947-014-1276-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Islam S., Bhuiyan M.A.R., Islam M.N. Chitin and Chitosan: Structure, Properties and Applications in Biomedical Engineering. J. Polym. Environ. 2016;25:854–866. doi: 10.1007/s10924-016-0865-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Xu Y.X., Kim K.M., Hanna M.A., Nag D. Chitosan–starch composite film: Preparation and characterization. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2005;21:185–192. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2004.03.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kana J.R., Meimandipour A., Raphaël K.J. Antimicrobial Activity of Chitosan Film Forming Solution Enriched with Essential Oils; an in Vitro Assay. Iran. J. Biotechnol. 2017;15:111–119. doi: 10.15171/ijb.1360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Trung T.S., Tram L.H., Van Tan N., Van Hoa N., Minh N.C., Loc P.T., Stevens W.F. Improved method for production of chitin and chitosan from shrimp shells. Carbohydr. Res. 2020;489:107913. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2020.107913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dutta P.K., Duta J.D., Tripathi V.S. Chitin and chitosan: Chemistry, properties and applications. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2004;63:20–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.AOAC . Official Method of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemistry (A.O.A.C) International. 18th ed. AOAC; Gaithersburg, MD, USA: 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Majid J. Biodegradable whey protein edible films anew biomaterials for food and drug packaging. Iran. J. Pharm. Sci. 2009;5:129–134. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kumarihami H.C., Kim Y.-H., Kwack Y.-B., Kim J., Kim J.G. Application of chitosan as edible coating to enhance storability and fruit quality of Kiwifruit: A Review. Sci. Hortic. 2021;292:110647. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110647. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bonilla J., Fortunati E., Atarés L., Chiralt A., Kenny J.M. Physical, structural and antimicrobial properties of poly vinyl alcohol–chitosan biodegradable films. Food Hydrocoll. 2014;35((Suppl. C)):463–470. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.07.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bergo P., Sobral P.J.A. Effects of plasticizer on physical properties of pigskin gelatin films. Food Hydrocoll. 2007;21:1285–1289. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2006.09.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Seydim A.C., Sarikus G. Antimicrobial activity of whey protein based edible films incorporated with oregano, rosemary and garlic essential oil. Food Res. 2006;26:639–644. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2006.01.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Haghighi H., Biard S., Bigi F., De Leo R., Bedin E., Pfeifer F., Siesler H.W., Licciardello F., Pulvirenti A. Comprehensive characterization of active chitosan-gelatin blend films enriched with different essential oils. Food Hydrocoll. 2019;95:33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.04.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Debbarma J., Kishore P., Binay B.N., Kannuchamyi N., Gudipati V.T. Antibacterial activity of ginger eucalyptus and sweet orange peel essential oils on fish-borne bacterial. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2012;37:1022–1030. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-4549.2012.00753.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mahboubi M. Zingiber officinale Rosc. essential oil, a review on its composition and bioactivity. Clin. Phytosci. 2019;5:6. doi: 10.1186/s40816-018-0097-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Teerarak M., Laosinwattana C. Essential oil from ginger as a novel agent in delaying senescence of cut fronds of the fern (Davallia solida (G. Forst.) Sw.) Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2019;156:110927. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2019.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Avelelas F., Horta A., Pinto L.F.V., Cotrim Marques S.C., Marques Nunes P., Pedrosa R., Leandro S.M. Antifungal and Antioxidant Properties of Chitosan Polymers Obtained from Nontraditional Polybius henslowii Sources. Mar. Drugs. 2019;17:239. doi: 10.3390/md17040239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Knorr D. Use of chitin us polymers in food-A challenge food research and development. Food Technol. 1984;38:85–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Samar M.M., El-Kalyoubi M., Khalaf M., El-Razik M.A. Physicochemical, functional, antioxidant and antibacterial properties of chitosan extracted from shrimp wastes by microwave technique. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2013;58:33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.aoas.2013.01.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chatterjee S., Adhya M., Guha A.K., Chatterjee B.P. Chitosan from Mucor rouxii: Production and physic-chemical characterization. Process Biochem. 2005;40:395–400. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.01.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Binsi K., Ravishankar C.N., Gopal T.K. Development and characterization of an edible composite film based on Chitosan and virgin coconut oil with improved moisture sorption properties. J. Food Sci. 2013;78:E526–E534. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ávila A., Bierbrauer K., Pucci G., López-González M., Strumia M. Study of optimization of the synthesis and properties of bio composite films based on grafted chitosan. J. Food Eng. 2012;109:752–761. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.11.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Silva-Weiss A., Bifani V., Ihl M., Sobral P.J.A., Gómez-Guillén M.C. Structural properties of films and rheology of film-forming solutions based on chitosan and chitosan-starch blend enriched with murta leaf extract. Food Hydrocoll. 2013;31:458–466. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.11.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Woranuch S., Yoksan R. Eugenol-loaded chitosan nanoparticles: II. Application in bio-based plastics for active packaging. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013;96:586–592. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Souza V.G.L., Pires J.R.A., Rodrigues C., Rodrigues P.F., Lopes A., Silva R.J., Caldeira J., Duarte M.P., Fernandes F.B., Coelhoso I.M., et al. Physical and Morphological Characterization of Chitosan/Montmorillonite Films Incorporated with Ginger Essential Oil. Coatings. 2019;9:700. doi: 10.3390/coatings9110700. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Qin Y.-Y., Zhang Z.-H., Li L., Yuan M.-L., Fan J., Zhao T.-R. Physio-mechanical properties of an active chitosan film incorporated with montmorillonite and natural antioxidants extracted from pomegranate rind. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013;52:1471–1479. doi: 10.1007/s13197-013-1137-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Anter H.M., Abu Hashim I.I., Awadin W., Meshali M.M. Novel chitosan oligosaccharide-based nanoparticles for gastric mucosal administration of the phytochemical “apocynin”. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019;14:4911–4929. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S209987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bourbon A.I., Pinheiro A.C., Cerqueira M.A., Rocha C.M., Avides M.C., Quintas M.A., Vicente A.A. Physico-chemical characterization of chitosan-based edible films incorporating bioactive compounds of different molecular weight. J. Food Eng. 2011;106:111–118. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.03.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Stoicai P., Chifriuc M.C., Rapal M., Bleotiu C., Lungu L., Vladi G., Grigores R., Bertesteanu S., Stavropouloue E., Lazar V. Fabrication, characterization and bioevaluation of novel antimicrobial composites based on polycaprolactone, chitosan and essential oils. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2015;20:10521–10535. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nady N., Kandil S.H. Novel Blend for Producing Porous Chitosan-Based Films Suitable for Biomedical Applications. Membranes. 2018;8:2. doi: 10.3390/membranes8010002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Shahzadi K., Wu L., Ge X., Zhao F., Li H., Pang S., Jiang Y., Guan J., Mu X. Preparation and characterization of bio-based hybrid film containing chitosan and silver nanowires. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016;137:732–738. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sun L., Sun J., Chen L., Niu P., Yang X., Guo Y. Preparation and characterization of chitosan film incorporated with thinned young apple polyphenols as an active packaging material. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017;163:81–91. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ziani K., Oses J., Coma V., Mate J.I. Effect of the presence of glycerol and tween 20 on the chemical and physical properties of films based on chitosan with different degree of deascetylation. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2008;41:2159–2165. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2007.11.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mathew S., Brahmakumar M., Abraham T.E. Microstructural imaging and characterization of the mechanical, chemical, thermal, and swelling properties of starch–chitosan blend films. Biopolymers. 2006;82:176–187. doi: 10.1002/bip.20480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Srinivasa P.C., Ramesh M.N., Kumar K.R., Tharanathan R.N. Properties of chitosan films prepared under different drying conditions. J. Food Eng. 2004;63:79–85. doi: 10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00285-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zinn S., Betz T., Medcraft C., Schnell M. Structure determination of trans-cinnamaldehyde by broadband microwave spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015;17:16080–16085. doi: 10.1039/C5CP02582F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Noshirvani N., Ghanbarzadeh B., Gardrat C., Rezaei M.R., Hashemi M., Le Coz C., Coma V. Cinnamon and ginger essential oils to improve antifungal, physical and mechanical properties of chitosan-carboxymethyl cellulose films. Food Hydrocoll. 2017;70:36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.03.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Siripatrawan U., Harte B.R. Physical properties and antioxidant activity of an active film from chitosan incorporated with green tea extract. Food Hydrocoll. 2010;24:770–775. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Romainor A.N.B., Chin S.F., Pang S.C., Bilung L.M. Preparation and Characterization of Chitosan Nanoparticles-Doped Cellulose Films with Antimicrobial Property. J. Nanomater. 2014;2014:130. doi: 10.1155/2014/710459. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wu J., Ge S., Liu H., Wang S., Chen S., Wang J., Li J., Zhang Q. Properties and antimicrobial activity of silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) skin gelatin-chitosan films incorporated with oregano essential oil for fish preservation. Food Packag. Shelf Life. 2014;2:7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2014.04.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Verlee A., Mincke S., Stevens C.V. Recent developments in antibacterial and antifungal chitosan and its derivatives. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017;164:268–283. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Coma V., Martial-Gros A., Garreau S., Copinet A., Salin F., Deschamps A. Edible Antimicrobial Films Based on Chitosan Matrix. J. Food Sci. 2002;67:1162–1169. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb09470.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Burt S. Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004;94:223–253. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Salvia-Trujillo L., Rojas-Graü A., Soliva-Fortuny R., Martín-Belloso O. Physicochemical characterization and antimicrobial activity of food-grade emulsions and nanoemulsions incorporating essential oils. Food Hydrocoll. 2015;43:547–556. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.07.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ribeiro-Santos R., Andrade M., de Melo N.R., Sanches-Silva A. Use of essential oils in active food packaging: Recent advances and future trends. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017;61:132–140. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.11.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Singh G., Kapoor I.P.S., Singh P., de Heluani C.S., de Lampasona M.P., Catalan C.A.N. Chemistry, antioxidant and antimicrobial investigations on essential oil and oleoresins of Zingiber officinale. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008;46:3295–3302. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.López E.I.C., Balcázar M.F.H., Mendoza J.M.R., Ortiz A.D.R., Melo M.T.O., Parrales R.S., Delgado T.H. Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oil of Zingiber officinale Roscoe (Zingiberaceae) Am. J. Plant Sci. 2017;8:1511–1524. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2017.87104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Trajano V.N., Lima O., Leite E., Travassos R. Propriedade antibacteriana de óleos essenciais de especiarias sobre bactérias contaminantes de alimentos. Food Sci. Technol. 2009;29:542–545. doi: 10.1590/S0101-20612009000300014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Irawan A., Barleany D.R., Yulvianti J.M., Jayanudin J. Antimicrobial Activity of Chitosan Based Edible Film Enriched with Red Ginger Essential Oil as An Active Packaging for Food. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2017;8:1525–1530. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Liang J., Wang R., Chen R. The Impact of Cross-linking Mode on the Physical and Antimicrobial Properties of a Chitosan/Bacterial Cellulose Composite. Polymers. 2019;11:491. doi: 10.3390/polym11030491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Irawan A., Barleany D.R., Yulvianti M., Maulana R.C., Fitriani L.Y. AIP Conference Proceedings. Volume 2085. AIP Publishing LLC; Melville, NY, USA: 2019. Chitosan active films containing red ginger extract for shelf-life extension and quality retention of Milkfish (Chanos chanos) p. 02003. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Holley R.A., Patel D. Improvement in shelf-life and safety of perishable foods by plant essential oils and smoke antimicrobials. Food Microbiol. 2005;22:273–292. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2004.08.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tajkarimi M.M., Ibrahim S.A., Cliver D.O. Antimicrobial herb and spice compounds in food. Food Control. 2010;21:1199–1218. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Cao T.L., Yang S.-Y., Bin Song K.B. Development of Burdock Root Inulin/Chitosan Blend Films Containing Oregano and Thyme Essential Oils. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:131. doi: 10.3390/ijms19010131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Remya S., Mohan C.O., Bindu J., Sivaraman G.K., Venkateshwarlu G., Ravishankar C.N. Effect of chitosan based active packaging film on the keeping quality of chilled stored barracuda fish. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016;53:685–693. doi: 10.1007/s13197-015-2018-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request from the authors.


Articles from Gels are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES