Abstract
There is now convincing evidence that the successful development of an effective CMV vaccine will require improved formulation and adjuvant selection that is capable of inducing both humoral and cellular immune responses. Here, we have designed a novel bivalent subunit vaccine formulation based on CMV-encoded oligomeric glycoprotein B (gB) and polyepitope protein in combination with human compatible TLR9 agonist CpG1018. The polyepitope protein includes multiple minimal HLA class I-restricted CD8+ T cell epitopes from different antigens of CMV. This subunit vaccine generated durable anti-viral antibodies, CMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses in multiple HLA expressing mice. Antibody responses included broad TH1 isotypes (IgG2a, IgG2b and IgG3) and potently neutralized CMV infection in fibroblasts and epithelial cells. Furthermore, polyfunctional antigen-specific T cell immunity and antiviral antibody responses showed long-term memory maintenance. These observations argue that this novel vaccine strategy, if applied to humans, could facilitate the generation of robust humoral and cellular immune responses which may be more effective in preventing CMV-associated complications in various clinical settings.
Author summary
Human Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant human pathogen. Generally, in healthy people CMV causes mild symptomatic disease, but during pregnancy CMV can transmit from mother to foetus (1 out of every 200 live births worldwide) and lead to sensorineural hearing loss, vision impairment and central nervous system damage. In transplant patients, CMV can cause serious complications leading to organ rejection and even death. Currently, there is no licensed vaccine available to prevent CMV-associated complications in pregnant women and transplant patients. Here, we have developed a novel bivalent CMV vaccine formulation consisting of recombinant CMVpoly and gB proteins in combination with human compatible adjuvant CpG1018. Preclinical immunogenicity evaluation in multiple HLA expressing mice demonstrated that bivalent CMV vaccine formulation consistently generated robust CMV-specific neutralising antibodies, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses. More importantly, long-term follow-up analysis showed that the CMV vaccine can induce durable CMV-specific humoral and cellular immune responses. Our results support further development of this bivalent subunit CMV vaccine to test safety, immunogenicity and efficacy in humans.
Introduction
Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a betaherpes virus and approximately 60% of adults in developed countries and more than 90% in developing nations are infected with CMV [1]. Primary CMV infection in healthy individuals is usually asymptomatic or clinically manifested with mild symptoms. However, individuals with compromised immune system, such as transplant patients and people infected with HIV, are at increased risk of developing CMV-associated complications. During pregnancy, depending on the serostatus, CMV can transmit vertically from mother to foetus as a result of primary infection, superinfection or reactivation of latent virus and cause congenital infection, neurodevelopmental delay, microcephaly or neonatal hearing loss in childhood [2,3].
CMV has high cell tropism and enters by fusing its envelope glycoproteins, such as gB, gH, gL, gO and UL128/UL130/UL131A with either plasma membrane or endosomal membrane [4,5]. The gB protein is a highly conserved envelope protein, during CMV infection it acts as a fusogenic molecule in association with the gH/gL/gO protein complex. In healthy individuals 70% of total CMV-specific serum antibodies are directed against gB protein and neutralising antibodies against gB protein was shown to inhibit cell-to-cell virus spread and entry of cell-free virus in fibroblasts, endothelial and epithelial cell types [6,7]. CMV infection in healthy individuals induces strong and diversified cellular immune responses which includes high frequencies of CMV-specific CD8+, CD4+ and γδ T cells [8]. Lack of CMV-specific cellular immunity in transplant patients has been shown to have an augmented occurrence of CMV replication episodes and CMV-associated complications. However, over the years adoptive transfer of CMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells has been shown to have a profound benefit in controlling CMV-associated disease in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients [9–14]. In addition, compromised cellular immunity can impair immune control of CMV infection in children with congenital infection and postnatal CMV infection [9]. Collectively, these observations suggest that CMV-specific humoral and cellular responses are key components of protective immunity and an effective CMV vaccine would need to induce both humoral and cellular immunity against multiple antigens. Indeed, a wide array of CMV vaccines have been developed using a number of delivery platforms, such as live attenuated, subunit, DNA plasmid, mRNA and recombinant viral vectors and tested in a number of preclinical and clinical trials [15]. However, successful licensure of a CMV vaccine formulation remains elusive.
In this study, we have engineered a novel artificial recombinant polyepitope protein (CMVpoly), which includes 20 HLA class I-restricted T cell epitopes from multiple CMV antigens expressed as a “string of beads”. We have also engineered CMV gB protein and developed an efficient protein production and purification process to obtain gB as a multimer in solution. CMVpoly and gB protein in combination with human compatible adjuvant CpG1018 was formulated as a bivalent CMV vaccine with the aim to induce CMV-specific cellular and humoral immunity. Our results demonstrated that immunisation with CMV vaccine consistently generated robust CMV-specific neutralising antibodies, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses. More importantly, long-term follow-up analysis showed that the CMV vaccine can induce durable CMV-specific humoral and cellular immune responses.
Results
CMV antigen design
To target a broad repertoire of immunodominant CMV antigens we designed a vaccine formulation that included recombinant CMVpoly and CMV-gB proteins in combination with human compatible adjuvant, CpG1018. The CMVpoly protein is designed to encode 20 HLA class I restricted cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell epitopes from five highly conserved immunodominant antigens (pp65, IE-1, pp150, pp50 and DNAse) (Table 1). CMVpoly targets 16 different HLA class I alleles and they cover 94% of a multi-ethnic population worldwide. To optimise the processing and presentation of CMVpoly protein through HLA class I pathway proteasome liberation amino acids (AD or K or R) were added at the carboxyl-terminus of each epitope (Table 1) [16]. CMVpoly protein was expressed using E. coli BL21-codonPlus (DE3) RP protein expression host and was purified using SP-Sepharose and Q-Sepharose chromatography columns (Fig 1A). To assess processing and presentation of T cell epitopes within CMVpoly, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 10 healthy virus carriers were incubated with CMVpoly protein and then cultured for 14 days in the presence of recombinant IL-2. All 10 healthy virus carriers showed expansion of multiple CMV epitope-specific T cells (Fig 1B) and these T cells showed polyfunctional profile and cytotoxicity against CMV-infected cells (Fig 1C & 1D).
Table 1. List of HLA class I-restricted CD8+ T cell epitopes included in the CMVpoly protein.
Epitope Sequence | Epitope code | HLA restriction | CMV antigen | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
FPTKDVALAD | FPT | HLA B35 | pp65 | [47] |
GPISHGHVLKAD | GPI | HLA A11 | pp65 | [48,49] |
QYDPVAALFAD | QYD | HLA A24 | pp65 | [50] |
YSEHPTFTSQYAD | YSE | HLA A1 | pp65 | [51] |
TPRVTGGGAMR | TPT | HLA B7 | pp65 | [52] |
QIKVRVDMVR | QIK | HLA B8 | IE-1 | [50] |
IPSINVHHYR | IPS | HLA B35 | pp65 | [53] |
TTVYPPSSTAKAD | TTY | HLA A3 | pp150 | [49] |
RPHERNGFTVLR | RPH | HLA B7 | pp65 | [49] |
DELRRKMMYMAD | DEL | B8/B18/B44 | IE-1 | [54] |
VTEHDTLLYK | VTE | HLA A1 | pp50 | [50] |
NLVPMVATVK | NLV | HLA A2 | pp65 | [55] |
VLEETSVMLK | VLE | HLA A2 | IE-1 | [50] |
AYAQKIFKILAD | AYA | A23/A24 | pp65 | [50] |
TRATKMQVIAD | TRA | CW6 | pp65 | [50] |
ARVYEIKCRR | ARY | HLA B27 | DNAse | [50] |
KEVNSQLSLK | KEV | HLA B40 | IE-1 | [56] |
ELKRKMIYMK | ELR | HLA B8 | IE-1 | [57] |
YILEETSVMLK | YIL | HLA A2 | IE-1 | [58] |
QAIRETVELK | QAI | B57/B58 | pp65 | [59] |
CMV gB amino acid sequence from AD169 strain was designed to express extracellular domain (aa 24 to 700) and intracellular domain (aa 776 to 906) as a contiguous sequence. The membrane proximal and transmembrane regions were deleted and native furin cleavage site at aa 456–459 was mutated (RTRR to QTTQ) to enhance the recombinant gB protein secretion (Fig 2A). The CMV gB was expressed in CHO cells and then purified using anion, CHT type II and cation exchange chromatography techniques and purified protein was further characterised by mass photometery analysis and showed that purified CMV gB protein existed as oligomers in solution comprising two species with molecular masses of 398 kDa and 796 kDa, indicating the composition was predominantly a trimeric form of gB in addition to dimers of trimeric gB (Fig 2B). Oligomeric gB protein was also observed using negative-stain electron microscopy (Fig 2C) and SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig 2D).
Assessing CMV vaccine immunogenicity in multiple HLA expressing mice
CMVpoly and gB proteins were formulated with human compatible CpG1018 adjuvant, a type B oligodeoxynucleotides, which acts as a toll-like receptor 9 agonist and has been shown to enhance immunogenicity in various preclinical and clinical trials and also approved for human use [17,18]. In the first set of experiments we assessed the CMV vaccine immunogenicity in multiple HLA expressing mice (HLA A1, A2, A24, B8 and B35). These mice were immunised subcutaneously with two dose prime-boost regimen (day 1 and 21), spleens and blood samples were collected seven days after the booster dose to assess CMV-specific humoral and CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses (Fig 3A). CD8+ T cell responses were recalled with CMV peptide epitopes restricted through HLA A1 (VTE and YSE), A2 (NLV, VLE and YIL), A24 (QYD and AYA), B8 (QIK, ELR and ELK) and B35 (FPT and IPS) alleles. CMV-specific CD4+ T cell responses were recalled with an overlapping gB pepmix. Ex vivo analysis of cellular immune responses indicated that most of the HLA expressing mice generated a broad range (0–2.5%) of antigen-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cell responses (Fig 3B & 3C). In vitro stimulation of splenocytes with HLA matched CMV CD8+ T cell epitopes induced 40 to 200 fold expansion of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells from all HLA expressing mice (Fig 3D). Interestingly, in vitro expanded CMVpoly-specific CD8+ T cells were significantly higher in HLA A24 mice compared to HLA A1, HLA A2 and HLA B35 mice (Fig 3D). In vitro stimulation of splenocytes with gB overlapping peptides also triggered robust expansion of gB-specific IFNγ producing CD4+ T cells in all HLA expressing mice when compared to placebo control mice. Significantly higher frequencies of gB-specific CD4+ T responses were observed in HLA A24 mice when compared to HLA A1, HLA A2, HLA B8 and HLA B35 expressing mice (Fig 3E). Previous studies have shown that protective immunity mediated through CD4+ and CD8+ T cells is associated with production of multiple effector cytokines and impaired polyfunctionality of CMV-specific T cells can reduce control of CMV replication [19–21]. Polyfunctional analysis revealed that the majority of CMV-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells from HLA expressing mice expressed multiple cytokines including IFNγ, TNF and IL2 or IFN-γ and TNF (Fig 4).
To assess whether CMV vaccine formulation can also induce robust humoral immune responses, we evaluated serum anti-gB antibody titres using ELISA. Data presented in Fig 5A shows that the CMV vaccine formulation induced high gB-specific antibody titres in all HLA expressing mice. Higher magnitude of gB-specific antibody responses were observed in HLA A1, A2 and A24 mice while HLA B8 and B35 mice showed slightly lower antibody titres. Antibody isotyping analysis of gB-specific humoral immune response showed broad Th1 like IgG2b subtype in all HLA expressing mice, IgG3 in HLA A24, B8, B35 and A1 mice, and IgG2a predominantly in HLA A2 and A24 mice (Fig 5B). In addition, strong TH2-like IgM and IgG1 also observed in all HLA expressing mice with the exception of IgG1 in HLA A2 expressing mice (Fig 5B). More importantly, these antibodies neutralised CMV and blocked viral infection in fibroblasts and epithelial cells (Fig 5C & 5D). Collectively, comprehensive evaluation of immunogenicity of CMV vaccine formulation in multiple human HLA expressing mice demonstrates that the CMV vaccine formulation is capable of inducing robust CMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells responses and neutralising antibody responses.
Long-term CMV vaccine immunogenicity evaluation in HLA A24 expressing mice
One of the major challenges with previous CMV vaccines was the induction of long-term durable immunity and modest efficacy [22–24]. In fact, durable vaccine-induced immune responses play a central role in minimising waning efficacy of vaccines against diverse pathogens. Therefore, it was important to test the long-term durability of CMV vaccine formulation induced immune responses and number of booster doses required to maintain persistent immune responses against CMV.
(a) Cellular Immune responses
In the next set of experiments, HLA A24 expressing mice were immunised with CMV vaccine or CpG 1018 adjuvant alone (placebo) formulations subcutaneously as outlined in Fig 6A. These animals were systematically monitored for CMV-specific cellular and humoral immune responses on days 28, 42, 48, 84, 133, 203 and 217. Ex vivo analysis of splenocytes with HLA A24 restricted CD8+ T cell epitopes (AYA and QYD) showed that the CMV vaccine formulation induced significantly higher IFNγ producing CMV-specific CD8+ T cell responses compared to the control and these robust T cell responses are maintained during the entire course of follow up with a mean frequency ranging from 0.01% to 3.3% (from day 28 to day 217). While IFNγ producing CMV-specific CD8+ T cell responses were lower on day 42, there was a significant increase in antigen-specific CD8+ T cells with subsequent booster vaccination on days 42 and 210 (Fig 6B).
To confirm ex vivo cellular immune responses, splenocytes from vaccinated mice were stimulated with HLA A24-restricted peptide epitopes (AYA and QYD) and cultured for 10 days in the presence of recombinant IL-2 to allow expansion of antigen-specific T cells. We observed a significant expansion of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells with a mean frequency ranging from 1.9% and 20.05%, demonstrating the CMV vaccine formulation has potential to induce durable, long-term CD8+ T cell responses against CMV (Fig 6C). In addition, the CMV vaccine formulation also induced high frequencies of IFNγ producing CMV gB-specific CD4+ T cells compared to CpG 1018 alone with mean frequency ranging from 0.45% and 3.83% (Fig 6D). There was a substantial increase in ex vivo IFNγ producing CMV gB-specific CD4+ T cell with each booster vaccination on days 28, 49 and 84 (Fig 6D). While these T cell responses slightly declined and plateaued on day 133 and 203, nevertheless after the third booster there was a robust increase in IFNγ producing CMV gB-specific CD4+ T cell responses, indicating that long-term memory gB-specific CD4+ T cells can rapidly mature into effector cells after antigen reencounter (Fig 6D). Additionally, in vitro stimulation of splenocytes with gB overlapping peptides induced expansion of IFNγ producing CMV gB-specific CD4+ T cell responses at all the time points with a mean frequency ranging from 7.17% and 26.55% (Fig 6E). Furthermore, longitudinal polyfunctional analysis revealed that at all the time points CMV-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells expressed multiple cytokines (Fig 7). Majority of these antigen-specific T cells expressed IFNγ, TNF and IL-2 or IFNγ and TNF. Taken together, these results demonstrate that CMV vaccine formulation based on CMVpoly and gB adjuvanted with CpG1018 was highly effective in inducing durable CMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses and majority of these effector cells displayed a polyfunctional profile.
(b)Humoral immune responses
Germinal centres plays a vital role in induction of memory B cells and long-lived plasma cell to secrete the high-affinity antibodies required for long-term serological immunity [25]. Data presented in Fig 8A & 8B shows that the CMV vaccine induced a significantly higher proportion of germinal centre B cells (B220+GL7+Fas+) on days 28, 49 and 84 with a mean frequency ranging from 3.15% to 4.07% and then declined thereafter. Assessment of CMV gB-specific IgG secreting plasma cells in spleens by ELISpot assay indicated that the CMV vaccine formulation induced a significantly higher and sustainable plasma B cell response at all time-points with mean frequencies ranging from 73.3 to 357.7 antibody secreting cells/3x105 splenocytes (Fig 8C). The CMV vaccine also induced long-term gB-specific memory B cell responses with mean frequency ranging from 677 and 6916 antibody secreting cells/3x105 splenocytes (Fig 8D). Interestingly, a dramatic increase in memory B cells was observed following third booster vaccination (Day 217) (Fig 8C & 8D). These observations were consistent with detection of high levels of antibody response against gB protein (Fig 9A). Characterisation of antibody responses revealed that CMV vaccine formulation induced durable and broad TH1 isotypes (IgG2a, IgG2b and IgG3) (Fig 9B–9G). More importantly, these antibodies neutralised CMV and blocked viral entry in fibroblasts and epithelial cells (Fig 10A & 10B). Furthermore, serum antibodies from mice immunised with CMV vaccine formulation exhibited strong binding to cell-associated gB on CMV-infected cells (Fig 10C & 10D). This antibody-mediated binding was significantly higher immediately following booster vaccination on days 28, 49 and 217. Finally, emerging data shows that the gB protein used in gB/MF59 vaccine was in monomeric form, but in naturally infected individuals the gB assumes its native trimeric conformation. Thus, to determine the immunogenicity of the gB multimer, we have performed Western blot analysis using mouse serum. Interestingly, data obtained from Western blot analysis indicated that sera from mice immunised with CMV vaccine weakly reacted to gB monomer; however, a strong reaction was observed to gB trimer, indicating that gB trimer is more immunogenic (Fig 10E). Collectively, these data indicate that CMV vaccine formulation demonstrated its potential to induce durable and qualitative CMV-specific humoral and cellular immune responses.
Discussion
CMV is medically a significant human pathogen and vaccination to reduce congenital infection and CMV-associated disease in transplant patients has been proposed as a potential medical intervention. Our goal in this study was to develop a novel protein based subunit vaccine to induce strong and durable CMV-specific humoral and cellular immune responses. Historically, the induction of potent neutralising antibody responses have been considered as a benchmark for evaluation of vaccine efficacy; however, CMV is not amenable to antibody-dependent immunity alone [26–28]. Cellular immune responses are also needed as CMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells play an important role in reducing virus acquisition, prolonged virus shedding, viral replication and CMV-associated disease in congenital and transplant patients [11,14,20,29]. Therefore we hypothesised that a vaccine designed to induce both humoral and cellular immune responses against multiple CMV antigens may offer better protection. To target multiple immunodominant antigens, we have engineered a novel, artificial CMV-specific antigen; CMVpoly protein. CMVpoly is designed to encode 20 different CD8+ T cell epitopes derived from five different CMV immunodominant antigens which are expressed in various stages of virus replication, therefore it induces a robust and broad repertoire of CMV-specific CD8+ T cell responses. In vitro immunogenicity analysis indicated that CMVpoly triggered robust expansion of polyfunctional CMV-specific CD8+ T cells targeting multiple antigens from seropositive healthy donor PBMC and expanded cells were able to recognise and kill CMV infected cells. Antiviral activity of CMV-specific CD8+ T cells is considered as an important aspect in CMV vaccine development because these effector cells can eliminate virus infected cells and restrict CMV spread via direct cell-to-cell contact [30].
Another focus of this study was to improve immunogenicity of gB protein because CMV gB has been considered as an essential component of prophylactic vaccines due to its crucial role in early stages of viral infection, the cell-to-cell spread of intracellular virions and the fusion of infected cells leading to formation of multinucleated cells [31]. In this study, we have successfully expressed gB protein consisting of extracellular and intracellular domains in CHO cells and purified using a combination of chromatography techniques. The biophysical characterisation of purified gB protein revealed that CMV gB predominantly existed as a trimer or dimer of a trimer in solution. During natural infection native gB homotrimer is required for the fusion activity; therefore, for induction of neutralising antibody responses gB in its trimeric form is considered as the ideal conformation in vaccine development [32,33]. In addition, emerging data shows that trimeric gB induces higher serum titres of gB-specific IgG antibody and neutralising antibody responses compared to monomeric CMV gB [34]. However, although biophysical characterisation of gB protein assumes a trimeric confirmation, a more detailed structural analysis would be needed to confirm whether this molecule acquires native/pre-fusion conformation [35,36].
We combined CMVpoly and oligomeric gB with human compatible adjuvant CpG-ODN 1018 and assessed its immunogenicity in multiple HLA expressing mice. Our initial studies demonstrated that the two doses of CMV vaccine induced strong ex vivo and memory multi-antigen-specific CD8+ and gB-specific CD4+ T cell responses and neutralising antibody responses against AD169 and TB40E CMV strains. More importantly, the CMV-specific T cells from vaccinated mice displayed polyfunctional profiles secreting three (IFNγ+TNF+IL2+) or two (IFNγ+TNF+) cytokines. Previously published studies have shown that protective immunity of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells is associated with production of multiple effector cytokines and impaired polyfunctionality of CMV-specific T cells can compromise control of CMV replication in children with congenital CMV infection [19–21]. One of the most successful CMV vaccine based on gB and oil-in-water emulsion, MF59 adjuvant has been extensively evaluated in multiple clinical trials and has demonstrated 43% to 50% efficacy in adolescents and postpartum women and reduced duration of viremia in SOT patients [22,37,38]. This vaccine efficacy was coincident with the induction of gB-specific neutralising and non-neutralizing (antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis) antibody responses and gB-specific CD4+ T cell responses in multiple clinical cohorts [39–43]. While our CMV vaccine formulation also showed strong gB-specific cellular and humoral immunity, the induction of CMV-specific CD8+ T cell immunity through CMVpoly offers additional advantage over previously designed CMV vaccine formulations.
One of the important attributes for an effective CMV vaccine is generation of durable memory immune responses as protection against CMV in congenital and transplant settings is needed throughout women of child bearing age or course of transplantation. Pre-existing antibody responses are usually considered as a primary line of defence and crucial for prevention of primary infection or reinfection at mucosal surfaces. CMV is a highly cell-associated virus; thus, cytotoxic T cell responses are also important for mediating suppression of viral replication and reactivation by elimination of virus infected cells [44]. Thus, the magnitude of immune response generated through natural immunity to CMV remains an important benchmark for evaluation of efficacy of CMV vaccine. Our long-term follow up studies showed that the CMV vaccine induced durable antigen-specific CD8+ T cell, gB-specific CD4+ T cell, B cell and neutralising antibody responses which were maintained beyond day 210. Interestingly, a clear enhancement of both cellular and humoral immunity was observed after booster immunisations on days 28, 49 and 210. Furthermore, we have also shown that gB-specific antibodies strongly bound to both soluble trimeric gB and gB protein expressed on CMV infected cells. These observations are consistent with recent finding that the protective ability of gB-specific antibodies binding to cell-associated gB correlated with gB/MF59 vaccine efficacy [45]. While the efficacy of gB/MF59 vaccine was initially presumed to be dependent on the induction of neutralising antibody responses; recent investigations conducted using serum from postpartum woman and SOT patients revealed that the vaccine efficacy correlated with the induction of non-neutralising antibodies [42,43]. Subsequent studies have highlighted the importance of pre-fusion gB as a potential vaccine candidate [36,45]. However, the production of gB protein in a pre-fusion conformation remains a significant challenge. The structure of the pre-fusion gB molecule requires stabilization through a fusion inhibitor and a chemical cross-linker [36]. Out of nearly two million particles analysed only 13% were in a pre-fusion conformation and 55% in post-fusion. Further studies are required to determine whether homogeneous gB protein in a pre-fusion conformation can be stably expressed for vaccine formulation. Nevertheless, data presented in this study clearly demonstrates that a oligomeric gB protein can be stably synthesized and can induce both neutralising and non-neutralising antibodies and serum IgG binding to gB protein expressed on the cell surface of virus-infected cells. Furthermore, induction of robust CMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell immunity offers additional benefit in controlling CMV-associated complications. However, future clinical testing in human volunteers will be required to demonstrate that these broad vaccine-induced immune responses can persist and afford protection from CMV-associated complications in pregnant women.
Collectively, the bivalent CMV vaccine formulated with CMVpoly and gB proteins with CpG1018 adjuvant is highly immunogenic in multiple HLA expressing mice and can induce durable and multi-effector humoral and cellular immune responses against CMV. These results clearly support further development of this bivalent subunit CMV vaccine to test safety, immunogenicity and efficacy in humans.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
The study was approved by QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute Human Research Ethics Committee under project number P2282 and all healthy volunteers who offered blood samples gave written informed consent. Ethics approval to conduct animal experiments were obtained from QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute Animal Ethics Committee under project number P2241.
CMVpoly protein expression and purification
Chemically competent E. coli BL21-codonPlus (DE3) RP cells (Agilent Technologies) were transformed with CMVpoly expression vector (pJ404-Atum Bio). Transformed cells were plated on Luria Bertani (LB) agar supplemented with ampicillin (LB-Amp) 100 μg/mL and plates were incubated overnight at 37°C. An isolated colony was picked and inoculated into 10 ml of terrific broth containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin (TB-Amp broth) and grown in a shaker with 37°C and 200 rpm for overnight. A small amount of overnight grown culture was inoculated into 50 mL of TB-Amp broth and grown for 12 hours. About 1% of culture from 50 mL culture transferred into 3 L of TB-Amp broth and culture was grown until OD reached to 0.6 at 600nm. CMVpoly induction was carried out by adding 1 mM/mL of IPTG. These cells were allowed to grow for an additional 4 hours and protein expression levels were determined by analysing un-induced and induced samples on the 12% sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).
At the end of the induction phase, E. coli culture was harvested by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 15 minutes, cell pellet was resuspended in cell lysis buffer (25 mM Tris pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5% TritonX 100, 0.5 mg/mL lysozyme) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and cells were lysed using sonicator. The lysate was analysed on SDS-PAGE and then clarified by centrifugation. Following SDS-PAGE analysis protein was found to be in the pellet in the form of inclusion bodies (IBs). To eliminate the host protein contaminants IBs were washed with TE buffer (25 mM Tris and 5 mM EDTA pH 7.5) and then with 100 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Tris, 4 M urea pH 7.5 buffer. Purified IBs were solubilised in 100 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Tris, 2.5 mM DTT, 8 M urea pH 5.5 buffer, the soluble protein was clarified by centrifugation. CMVpoly protein was purified using SP-Sepharose and Q Sepharose matrix. Purified protein was dialysed against 25 mM glycine buffer pH 3.8, protein was concentrated and filtered through Mustang E membrane (PALL Corporation, NY, USA) to further remove endotoxin contaminants, protein was filter sterilised using 0.22μ membrane filter and then total protein was estimated using BIO-RAD Bradford protein assay kit and UV absorbance at 280 nm and purified protein was stored at -70°C.
gB protein expression and purification
The coding sequence of CMV gB expressing extracellular and intracellular domains from HCMV strain AD169, was codon optimised for mammalian expression to enhance the protein expression and cloned into a mammalian expression vector (Geneart). The native N-terminal signal sequence (i.e., amino acids 1 to 24 of the sequence) was replaced with the heterologous IgG heavy chain signal peptide to secrete the expressed polypeptide into cell culture supernatant. The encoded sequence of the furin cleavage site was mutated from Arg456 to Gln, Arg458 to Thr and Arg459 to Gln. Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) K1 cells were transfected with the modified gB polypeptide plasmid and stable cells expressing modified gB polypeptide were selected with 9 μg/mL blasticidin and 400 μg/mL Zeocin. Modified gB polypeptide was expressed in a 10 L bioreactor in fed-batch mode. On day 12, cell culture was harvested and centrifuged to separate supernatant from cell debris. The supernatant was buffer exchanged into 200 mM Tris-HCL (pH 8.0) and then loaded on Poros 50HQ resin (anion exchange chromatography). The column was washed with 20 mM Tris-HCL, 70 mM NaCl (pH 8.0) buffer, before eluting the protein with 20 mM Tris-HCL, 180 mM NaCl (pH 8.0) buffer. Eluted polypeptide was buffer exchanged with 5 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and passed through a ceramic hydroxyapatite (CHT) Type II to eliminate host cell protein contaminates. To further improve the purity, the modified gB polypeptide was buffer exchanged into 50 mM sodium acetate (NaOAc) (pH 5.0) buffer and then loaded on POROS XS (cation exchange chromatography) column. The modified gB polypeptide bound to the POROS XS column was eluted with 50 mM NaOAc, 500 mM NaCl (pH 5.0) buffer and then buffer exchanged against 25 mM glycine (pH 4.0) buffer. The final purified polypeptide concentration was determined by UV280 using extinction coefficient 1.209, analysed on SDS-PAGE gel and stored at -70°C.
Mass photometry analysis of CMV gB protein
Mass photometry analysis was performed using a Refeyn OneMP instrument (Refeyn Ltd). 10 μL of buffer was applied and then 1 μL of gB sample at 0.04 mg/mL was applied and 5965 frames were recorded.
Negative stain electron microscopy
The gB protein was diluted to 0.004 mg/mL and 5 μL applied to glow-discharged carbon-coated Formvar grids (ProSciTech, Australia), stained with 2% (w/v) uranyl acetate for two minutes, then blotted and air-dried for 10 minutes. Samples were imaged at 150 000x magnification using a JEOL JEM 1011 TEM.
CMVpoly immunogenicity evaluation in vitro
Blood samples were collected from healthy donors and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated using Ficoll-Paque Plus (Cytiva, Uppsala, Sweeden). Isolated PBMC were cryopreserved and then CMV sero-positive status and HLA typing analysis was performed on each PBMC sample. To determine the immunogenicity of CMVpoly protein, cryopreserved CMV seropositive PBMC (6 x 106) were rapidly thawed from 10 different healthy CMV seropositive donors then stimulated with 20 μg of CMVpoly protein. Cells were cultured for 14 days in the presence of IL-2. Recombinant IL-2 was added on day 2 and then supplemented every 3 days thereafter. To determine the frequency of CMV-specific CD8+ T cells, expanded PBMC were re-stimulated with the individual antigen peptides from CMVpoly and incubated for 5 hours in the presence of GolgiPlug, GolgiStop and anti-CD107aFITC (BD Biosciences). Cells were washed then surface stained with antiCD8-PerCP-Cy5.5 (eBioscience), anti-CD4-Pacific Blue (BD Biosciences) and live/dead fixable near-IR dead cell stain (Life Technologies) for 30 minutes at 4°C. Cell were then fixed and permeabilized using Fixation/Permeabilization solution (BD Biosciences) for 15 minutes at 4°C. Cells were washed with Perm/Wash buffer (BD Biosciences) and then intracellularly stained with anti-IFN-γ-Alexa Fluor 700, anti-IL2-PE and anti-TNF-APC (all from BD Biosciences) for a further 30 minutes at 4°C. Finally, cells were washed again and data acquisition was performed using a BD LSRFortessa with FACSDiva software. Data was analysed using FlowJo 10 software (Tree Star). Detailed list of antibodies and source are provided in S1 Table.
In vitro cytotoxicity assay
To determine the ability of CMV-specific CD8+ T cells to kill CMV infected fibroblasts, 6 x 106 PBMC from 3 different healthy CMV seropositive donors were stimulated with 20 μg of CMVpoly protein. Cells were cultured for 14 days in the presence of IL2. HLA restriction of the donor 1 was HLA A 01, A3, B7 and B8; donor 2 HLA A1, A2 and B8 and donor 3 HLA A2, A24 and B40. Antigen specificity of in vitro expanded CMV-specific CD8+ T cells were determined using polyfunctional ICS assay as mentioned above. Fibroblasts expressing HLA A*01:01, A*02:01 and B*08:02 were plated and then treated with IFNγ for upregulation of HLA class I molecules. Fibroblasts were infected with CMV TB40/E strain overnight to allow CMV antigen expression. Uninfected fibroblasts also included as a control. Fibroblasts infected with CMV or uninfected fibroblasts were co-cultured with in vitro expanded CMV-specific CD8+ T cells at 1:1 effector to target ratio for 48 hours in Real Time Cell Analyser (RTCA), xCELLigence (Agilent Technologies Inc, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Cytolysis percentage was calculated using RTCA software.
Evaluation of immunogenicity of CMV vaccine formulated with various combinations of adjuvants
All human HLA expressing mice (HLA A1, HLA A2, HLA A24, HLA B8 and HLA B35) were obtained from Institut Pasteur (Paris, France). Mice were bred and maintained under pathogen-free environment at the QIMR Berghofer. These HLA expressing mice are deficient in expressing mouse MHC class I molecule and contain transgenes of the commonly expressed human HLA class I molecules [46]. In order to evaluate the immunogenic response to the CMVpoly protein and CMV glycoprotein B (gB), proteins were admixed with unmethylated CpG oligodeoxynucleotides 1018 (CpG 1018) (TriLink BioTechnologies). Six to eight week old mice were immunized subcutaneously (s.c.) with 100 μL volume at the base of the tail with CMV vaccine formulation containing 30 μg of CMVpoly and 5 μg of gB protein admixed with 50 μg of CpG 1018 (CMV vaccine formulation). Mice immunised with 50 μg of CpG 1018 adjuvant alone was used as a negative controls (placebo). Mice were tail bled on day 21 and a booster dose was given. Mice were then sacrificed in day 28 and evaluated for immune responses.
To assess the long-term durability of CMV vaccine induced immune responses, HLA A24 mice were immunised with CMV vaccine formulation containing 30 μg of CMVpoly and 5 μg of gB protein admixed with 50 μg of CpG 1018 on day 0 and then boosted on day 21, 42 and 210. Control group mice were injected with CpG1018 adjuvant alone. Mice were sacrificed on day 28, 42, 49, 84, 133, 203 and 217 to evaluate long-term CMV-specific immune responses.
FACS analysis to assess intracellular cytokine expression and germinal centre B cell responses
Following vaccination blood and spleens were collected. Single-cell suspensions were generated by mechanical dissociation of spleens and erythrocytes in spleens were lysed by treating cells with Ammonium Chloride and Tris buffer. Splenocytes were stimulated with 0.2 μg/mL of HLA matching CMV CD8+ T cell peptides (HLA A1-VTE & YSE; HLA A2-NLV, VLE & YIL; HLA A24-QYD & AYA; HLA B8-QIK, ELR & ELK; HLA B35-FPT & IPS) to determine the CMV-specific CD8+ T cell response or with 0.2 μg/mL of gB pepmix (gB overlapping peptides-15mers with 11 aa overlap) to detect CMV-specific CD4+ T cell response in the presence of GolgiPlug and GolgiStop (BD PharMingen) for 6 hours, cells were washed twice, then incubated with APC-conjugated anti-CD3, FITC-conjugated anti-CD4 and PerCP conjugated anti-CD8. Cells were fixed and permeabilized using a BD Cytofix/Cytoperm kit, then incubated with PE conjugated anti-IFN-γ. To assess the expression of multiple cytokines, cells were stained with PerCP conjugated anti-CD8 and BV786 anti-CD4 surface markers and then intracellularly with PE-conjugated anti-IFN-γ, PE-Cy7 conjugated anti-TNF, and APC conjugated anti-IL2. To assess the germinal centre B cell response splenocytes were stained with PE conjugated anti-B220, FITC conjugated anti-GL7 and APC conjugated anti-CD95 (Fas). Cells were acquired on a BD FACSCanto II and data was analysed using FlowJo software (Tree Star). Detailed list of antibodies and source are provided in S1 Table.
In vitro expansion of CMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells following vaccination
Following vaccination, 5 x 106 Splenocytes from immunized mice were isolated and stimulated with 0.2 μg/mL of matching CMV CD8+ T cell peptides or gB pepmix (gB overlapping peptides-15mers with 11 aa overlap) and cell were cultured in a 24 well plate for 10 days at 37°C 10% CO2. Cultures were supplemented with recombinant IL-2 on days 3 and 6 and on day 10 and T cell specificity was assessed using ICS assay.
Mouse IgG ELISpot assay
To measure ex vivo gB-specific antibody secreting cells, PVDF ELISpot plates (Millipore) were treated with 70% ethanol. Plates were washed five times with distilled water, coated with 100 μL/well CMV gB protein (25 μg/mL) or anti-IgG antibody (15 μg/mL) and incubated overnight at 4°C. Plates were blocked with DMEM containing 10% serum, 300,000 cells/well in triplicates from each mouse was added and then incubated for 18 hours in a 37°C humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Cells were removed and plates were washed. Detection antibody anti-IgG conjugated to HRP (MABTECH) was added and incubated for 2 hours at room temperature. Plates were washed; Streptavidin-ALP was added and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour followed by washing and treating plates with substrate solution containing BCIP/NBT (Sigma-Aldrich) until colour development is prominent. Colour development was stopped by washing plates with water and plates were kept for drying overnight. To measure memory B cell response, the spleen cells (5 X 105) were activated with a mixture of R484 and recombinant mouse IL-2 for five days in 24 well plate and then ELISpot was carried out as stated above. Number of spots were counted in an ELISpot reader.
ELISA
Serum total anti-gB antibody and antibody isotype titres were evaluated by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Briefly, 96-well plates pre-coated with 50μL of recombinant HCMV gB protein (2.5 μg/mL of gB protein diluted in phosphate buffer saline) and plates were incubated at 4°C overnight. Plates were washed with phosphate buffer saline containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST) buffer and then blocked with 5% skim milk. The serially diluted serum samples were added and incubated for 2 hours at room temperature. After washing with PBST, plates were incubated with HRP-conjugated sheep anti-mouse Ig antibody (to determine total antibody response) or HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgA, IgM, IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b or IgG3 antibody (SouthernBiotech) (to determine antibody isotype) for 1 hour. These plates were washed and incubated with 3,3’,5,5’-Tetramethylbenzidine substrate solution for 10 mins and then colour development was stopped by adding 1 N HCl. OD at 450 nm was measured using an ELISA reader.
Microneutralisation assay
Neutralizing activity was determined against AD169 and TB40/E strains of CMV. Human fibroblast MRC-5 or human adult retinal pigment epithelial cells (ARPE-19) were plated in 96-well flat-bottomed plates. The next day, serum samples from mice vaccinated with CMV vaccine formulation or placebo were serially diluted and added to a standard number of virus particles (1000 p.f.u. per well) diluted in DMEM with no serum in 96-well U-bottomed plates and incubated for 2 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. As a positive control, virus without serum and a negative-control serum without virus were also included in the test. The serum/CMV mixture was then added to the MRC5 and ARPE-19 cells and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 2 hours. After incubation, the mixture was discarded and the cells washed gently five times with DMEM containing 10% FCS (D10) and a final volume of 200 ml R10 was added to each well, followed by incubation for 16–18 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. The cells were fixed with 100 ml chilled methanol and incubated with Peroxidase Block (Dako) followed by mouse anti-CMV IE-1/IE2 mAb (Chemicon) at room temperature for 3 hours. Cells were then incubated with 50 ml HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse Ig (diluted 1:200 in PBS) per well for 3 hours at room temperature. The cells were stained with 20 ml diaminobenzidine plus substrate (Dako) per well for 10 min at room temperature and positive nuclei that stained dark brown were counted. The neutralizing titre was calculated as the reciprocal of the serum dilution that gave 50% inhibition of IE-1/IE-2-expressing nuclei.
Western blot analysis
To determine the most immunogenic form of oligomeric gB protein a Western blot analysis was performed. The oligomeric forms of purified gB purified protein concentrations ranging from 2 to 0.25 μg were separated on 8% SDS-PAGE under non-reducing conditions. Following gB protein resolution on SDS-PAGE, the gB protein was transferred to Hybond-C nitrocellulose membrane. After transfer, membranes were washed, blocked and the probed with mouse serum (1:3000 dilution). Membranes were washed and then incubated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse Ig antibody, followed by a wash and incubation with Immobilon ECL ultra western HRP substrate. The signal was captured using Invitrogen CL1500 Chemi Gel Doc System.
CMV gB-specific antibodies binding to cell-associated gB on CMV-infected fibroblasts assay
Human fibroblasts cell line, MRC-5 cells were grown to 50% confluency in a T75 flask. Cell were infected with CMV AD169 strain at multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 2.0 at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 2 hours. Following infection cells were washed and incubated with DMEM containing 10% FCS for 48 hours to allow cell-cell virus spared. Infected cells were washed with PBS and then cells were dislodged with trypsin-EDTA. Cells were washed, counted and then resuspended at 106 viable cells/mL. Cells were stained with cell trace violet and incubated for 20 minutes at room temperature. Cells were washed and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes at room temperature. Cells were washed twice, plated 20,000/well in 96-well V-bottom plates, cells were pelleted by centrifugation and supernatant was discarded. Mouse serum samples obtained from HLA A24 mice following immunization with CMV vaccine or placebo from day 21 to 217 were polled and then diluted to 1:512. Diluted serum samples were added to the MRC-5 cells and incubated for 2 hours at 37°C and 5% CO2. Cells were washed and then stained with anti-mouse AF488 IgG (H+L) for 30 minutes at 4°C. Cells were acquired on a BD FACSCanto II and data was analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star). The percentage of CMV gB-specific antibody binding to CMV infected fibroblasts was calculated from the percentage of viable AF 488 positive cells.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the facilities, and the scientific and technical assistance, of the Microscopy Australia Facility at the Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis (CMM), The University of Queensland.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) (1132519 to RK). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Zuhair M, Smit GSA, Wallis G, Jabbar F, Smith C, Devleesschauwer B, Griffiths P. 2019. Estimation of the worldwide seroprevalence of cytomegalovirus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Med Virol 29:e2034. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kenneson A, Cannon MJ. 2007. Review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Rev Med Virol 17:253–276. doi: 10.1002/rmv.535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Manicklal S, Emery VC, Lazzarotto T, Boppana SB, Gupta RK. 2013. The "silent" global burden of congenital cytomegalovirus. Clin Microbiol Rev 26:86–102. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00062-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Compton T, Nepomuceno RR, Nowlin DM. 1992. Human cytomegalovirus penetrates host cells by pH-independent fusion at the cell surface. Virology 191:387–395. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(92)90200-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ryckman BJ, Jarvis MA, Drummond DD, Nelson JA, Johnson DC. 2006. Human cytomegalovirus entry into epithelial and endothelial cells depends on genes UL128 to UL150 and occurs by endocytosis and low-pH fusion. J Virol 80:710–722. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.2.710-722.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Britt WJ, Vugler L, Butfiloski EJ, Stephens EB. 1990. Cell surface expression of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) gp55-116 (gB): use of HCMV-recombinant vaccinia virus-infected cells in analysis of the human neutralizing antibody response. J Virol 64:1079–1085. doi: 10.1128/JVI.64.3.1079-1085.1990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Navarro D, Paz P, Tugizov S, Topp K, La Vail J, Pereira L. 1993. Glycoprotein B of human cytomegalovirus promotes virion penetration into cells, transmission of infection from cell to cell, and fusion of infected cells. Virology 197:143–158. doi: 10.1006/viro.1993.1575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dasari V, Smith C, Khanna R. 2013. Recent advances in designing an effective vaccine to prevent cytomegalovirus-associated clinical diseases. Expert Rev Vaccines 12:661–676. doi: 10.1586/erv.13.46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lidehall AK, Engman ML, Sund F, Malm G, Lewensohn-Fuchs I, Ewald U, Totterman TH, Karltorp E, Korsgren O, Eriksson BM. 2013. Cytomegalovirus-specific CD4 and CD8 T cell responses in infants and children. Scand J Immunol 77:135–143. doi: 10.1111/sji.12013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lim EY, Jackson SE, Wills MR. 2020. The CD4+ T Cell Response to Human Cytomegalovirus in Healthy and Immunocompromised People. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10:202. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chen SF, Holmes TH, Slifer T, Ramachandran V, Mackey S, Hebson C, Arvin AM, Lewis DB, Dekker CL. 2016. Longitudinal Kinetics of Cytomegalovirus-Specific T-Cell Immunity and Viral Replication in Infants With Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 5:14–20. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piu089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sommerer C, Schmitt A, Huckelhoven-Krauss A, Giese T, Bruckner T, Wang L, Schnitzler P, Meuer S, Zeier M, Schmitt M. 2021. Peptide Vaccination against Cytomegalovirus Induces Specific T Cell Response in Responses in CMV Seronegative End-Stage Renal Disease Patients. Vaccines (Basel) 9. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9020133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nakamura R, La Rosa C, Longmate J, Drake J, Slape C, Zhou Q, Lampa MG, O’Donnell M, Cai JL, Farol L, Salhotra A, Snyder DS, Aldoss I, Forman SJ, Miller JS, Zaia JA, Diamond DJ. 2016. Viraemia, immunogenicity, and survival outcomes of cytomegalovirus chimeric epitope vaccine supplemented with PF03512676 (CMVPepVax) in allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation: randomised phase 1b trial. Lancet Haematol 3:e87–98. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00246-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Smith C, Beagley L, Rehan S, Neller MA, Crooks P, Solomon M, Holmes-Liew CL, Holmes M, McKenzie SC, Hopkins P, Campbell S, Francis RS, Chambers DC, Khanna R. 2019. Autologous Adoptive T-cell Therapy for Recurrent or Drug-resistant Cytomegalovirus Complications in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Single-arm Open-label Phase I Clinical Trial. Clin Infect Dis 68:632–640. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Plotkin SA, Wang D, Oualim A, Diamond DJ, Kotton CN, Mossman S, Carfi A, Anderson D, Dormitzer PR. 2020. The Status of Vaccine Development Against the Human Cytomegalovirus. J Infect Dis 221:S113–S122. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dasari V, Smith C, Schuessler A, Zhong J, Khanna R. 2014. Induction of innate immune signatures following polyepitope protein-glycoprotein B-TLR4&9 agonist immunization generates multifunctional CMV-specific cellular and humoral immunity. Hum Vaccin Immunother 10:1064–1077. doi: 10.4161/hv.27675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Campbell JD. 2017. Development of the CpG Adjuvant 1018: A Case Study. Methods Mol Biol 1494:15–27. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6445-1_2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hsieh SM, Liu MC, Chen YH, Lee WS, Hwang SJ, Cheng SH, Ko WC, Hwang KP, Wang NC, Lee YL, Lin YL, Shih SR, Huang CG, Liao CC, Liang JJ, Chang CS, Chen C, Lien CE, Tai IC, Lin TY. 2021. Safety and immunogenicity of CpG 1018 and aluminium hydroxide-adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 S-2P protein vaccine MVC-COV1901: interim results of a large-scale, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial in Taiwan. Lancet Respir Med doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00402-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Huygens A, Lecomte S, Tackoen M, Olislagers V, Delmarcelle Y, Burny W, Van Rysselberge M, Liesnard C, Larsen M, Appay V, Donner C, Marchant A. 2015. Functional Exhaustion Limits CD4+ and CD8+ T-Cell Responses to Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection. J Infect Dis 212:484–494. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gibson L, Barysauskas CM, McManus M, Dooley S, Lilleri D, Fisher D, Srivastava T, Diamond DJ, Luzuriaga K. 2015. Reduced frequencies of polyfunctional CMV-specific T cell responses in infants with congenital CMV infection. J Clin Immunol 35:289–301. doi: 10.1007/s10875-015-0139-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Snyder LD, Chan C, Kwon D, Yi JS, Martissa JA, Copeland CA, Osborne RJ, Sparks SD, Palmer SM, Weinhold KJ. 2016. Polyfunctional T-Cell Signatures to Predict Protection from Cytomegalovirus after Lung Transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 193:78–85. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201504-0733OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pass RF, Duliege AM, Boppana S, Sekulovich R, Percell S, Britt W, Burke RL. 1999. A subunit cytomegalovirus vaccine based on recombinant envelope glycoprotein B and a new adjuvant. J Infect Dis 180:970–975. doi: 10.1086/315022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pass RF, Zhang C, Evans A, Simpson T, Andrews W, Huang ML, Corey L, Hill J, Davis E, Flanigan C, Cloud G. 2009. Vaccine prevention of maternal cytomegalovirus infection. N Engl J Med 360:1191–1199. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Boeckh M, Wilck MB, Langston AA, Chu AH, Wloch MK, Guterwill DF, Smith LR, Rolland AP, Kenney RT. 2012. A novel therapeutic cytomegalovirus DNA vaccine in allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Infect Dis 12:290–299. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70344-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.McHeyzer-Williams LJ, McHeyzer-Williams MG. 2005. Antigen-specific memory B cell development. Annu Rev Immunol 23:487–513. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vanarsdall AL, Chin AL, Liu J, Jardetzky TS, Mudd JO, Orloff SL, Streblow D, Mussi-Pinhata MM, Yamamoto AY, Duarte G, Britt WJ, Johnson DC. 2019. HCMV trimer- and pentamer-specific antibodies synergize for virus neutralization but do not correlate with congenital transmission. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:3728–3733. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814835116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Boeckh M, Bowden RA, Storer B, Chao NJ, Spielberger R, Tierney DK, Gallez-Hawkins G, Cunningham T, Blume KG, Levitt D, Zaia JA. 2001. Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of a cytomegalovirus-specific monoclonal antibody (MSL-109) for prevention of cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 7:343–351. doi: 10.1016/s1083-8791(01)80005-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hughes BL, Clifton RG, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Dinsmoor MJ, Reddy UM, Pass R, Allard D, Mallett G, Fette LM, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Varner MW, Goodnight WH, Tita ATN, Costantine MM, Swamy GK, Gibbs RS, Chien EK, Chauhan SP, El-Sayed YY, Casey BM, Parry S, Simhan HN, Napolitano PG, Macones GA, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child H, Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units N. 2021. A Trial of Hyperimmune Globulin to Prevent Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection. N Engl J Med 385:436–444. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1913569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tu W, Chen S, Sharp M, Dekker C, Manganello AM, Tongson EC, Maecker HT, Holmes TH, Wang Z, Kemble G, Adler S, Arvin A, Lewis DB. 2004. Persistent and selective deficiency of CD4+ T cell immunity to cytomegalovirus in immunocompetent young children. J Immunol 172:3260–3267. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.5.3260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Murrell I, Bedford C, Ladell K, Miners KL, Price DA, Tomasec P, Wilkinson GWG, Stanton RJ. 2017. The pentameric complex drives immunologically covert cell-cell transmission of wild-type human cytomegalovirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:6104–6109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704809114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Reuter N, Kropff B, Schneiderbanger JK, Alt M, Krawczyk A, Sinzger C, Winkler TH, Britt WJ, Mach M, Thomas M. 2020. Cell Fusion Induced by a Fusion-Active Form of Human Cytomegalovirus Glycoprotein B (gB) Is Inhibited by Antibodies Directed at Antigenic Domain 5 in the Ectodomain of gB. J Virol 94. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01276-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chandramouli S, Ciferri C, Nikitin PA, Calo S, Gerrein R, Balabanis K, Monroe J, Hebner C, Lilja AE, Settembre EC, Carfi A. 2015. Structure of HCMV glycoprotein B in the postfusion conformation bound to a neutralizing human antibody. Nat Commun 6:8176. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Si Z, Zhang J, Shivakoti S, Atanasov I, Tao CL, Hui WH, Zhou K, Yu X, Li W, Luo M, Bi GQ, Zhou ZH. 2018. Different functional states of fusion protein gB revealed on human cytomegalovirus by cryo electron tomography with Volta phase plate. PLoS Pathog 14:e1007452. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cui X, Cao Z, Wang S, Lee RB, Wang X, Murata H, Adler SP, McVoy MA, Snapper CM. 2018. Novel trimeric human cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B elicits a high-titer neutralizing antibody response. Vaccine 36:5580–5590. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.07.056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Burke HG, Heldwein EE. 2015. Crystal Structure of the Human Cytomegalovirus Glycoprotein B. PLoS Pathog 11:e1005227. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liu Y, Heim KP, Che Y, Chi X, Qiu X, Han S, Dormitzer PR, Yang X. 2021. Prefusion structure of human cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B and structural basis for membrane fusion. Sci Adv 7. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf3178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bernstein DI, Munoz FM, Callahan ST, Rupp R, Wootton SH, Edwards KM, Turley CB, Stanberry LR, Patel SM, McNeal MM, Pichon S, Amegashie C, Bellamy AR. 2016. Safety and efficacy of a cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B (gB) vaccine in adolescent girls: A randomized clinical trial. Vaccine 34:313–319. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Griffiths PD, Stanton A, McCarrell E, Smith C, Osman M, Harber M, Davenport A, Jones G, Wheeler DC, O’Beirne J, Thorburn D, Patch D, Atkinson CE, Pichon S, Sweny P, Lanzman M, Woodford E, Rothwell E, Old N, Kinyanjui R, Haque T, Atabani S, Luck S, Prideaux S, Milne RS, Emery VC, Burroughs AK. 2011. Cytomegalovirus glycoprotein-B vaccine with MF59 adjuvant in transplant recipients: a phase 2 randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 377:1256–1263. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60136-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Baraniak I, Gomes AC, Sodi I, Langstone T, Rothwell E, Atkinson C, Pichon S, Piras-Douce F, Griffiths PD, Reeves MB. 2019. Seronegative patients vaccinated with cytomegalovirus gB-MF59 vaccine have evidence of neutralising antibody responses against gB early post-transplantation. EBioMedicine 50:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.11.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sabbaj S, Pass RF, Goepfert PA, Pichon S. 2011. Glycoprotein B vaccine is capable of boosting both antibody and CD4 T-cell responses to cytomegalovirus in chronically infected women. J Infect Dis 203:1534–1541. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Frey SE, Harrison C, Pass RF, Yang E, Boken D, Sekulovich RE, Percell S, Izu AE, Hirabayashi S, Burke RL, Duliege AM. 1999. Effects of antigen dose and immunization regimens on antibody responses to a cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B subunit vaccine. J Infect Dis 180:1700–1703. doi: 10.1086/315060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nelson CS, Huffman T, Jenks JA, Cisneros de la Rosa E, Xie G, Vandergrift N, Pass RF, Pollara J, Permar SR. 2018. HCMV glycoprotein B subunit vaccine efficacy mediated by nonneutralizing antibody effector functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:6267–6272. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800177115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Baraniak I, Kropff B, Ambrose L, McIntosh M, McLean GR, Pichon S, Atkinson C, Milne RSB, Mach M, Griffiths PD, Reeves MB. 2018. Protection from cytomegalovirus viremia following glycoprotein B vaccination is not dependent on neutralizing antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:6273–6278. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800224115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Silva MC, Schroer J, Shenk T. 2005. Human cytomegalovirus cell-to-cell spread in the absence of an essential assembly protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:2081–2086. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409597102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jenks JA, Nelson CS, Roark HK, Goodwin ML, Pass RF, Bernstein DI, Walter EB, Edwards KM, Wang D, Fu TM, An Z, Chan C, Permar SR. 2020. Antibody binding to native cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B predicts efficacy of the gB/MF59 vaccine in humans. Sci Transl Med 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 46.Boucherma R, Kridane-Miledi H, Bouziat R, Rasmussen M, Gatard T, Langa-Vives F, Lemercier B, Lim A, Berard M, Benmohamed L, Buus S, Rooke R, Lemonnier FA. 2013. HLA-A*01:03, HLA-A*24:02, HLA-B*08:01, HLA-B*27:05, HLA-B*35:01, HLA-B*44:02, and HLA-C*07:01 monochain transgenic/H-2 class I null mice: novel versatile preclinical models of human T cell responses. J Immunol 191:583–593. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wynn KK, Fulton Z, Cooper L, Silins SL, Gras S, Archbold JK, Tynan FE, Miles JJ, McCluskey J, Burrows SR, Rossjohn J, Khanna R. 2008. Impact of clonal competition for peptide-MHC complexes on the CD8+ T-cell repertoire selection in a persistent viral infection. Blood 111:4283–4292. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-11-122622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hebart H, Daginik S, Stevanovic S, Grigoleit U, Dobler A, Baur M, Rauser G, Sinzger C, Jahn G, Loeffler J, Kanz L, Rammensee HG, Einsele H. 2002. Sensitive detection of human cytomegalovirus peptide-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses by interferon-gamma-enzyme-linked immunospot assay and flow cytometry in healthy individuals and in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood 99:3830–3837. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.10.3830 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Longmate J, York J, La Rosa C, Krishnan R, Zhang M, Senitzer D, Diamond DJ. 2001. Population coverage by HLA class-I restricted cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitopes. Immunogenetics 52:165–173. doi: 10.1007/s002510000271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Elkington R, Walker S, Crough T, Menzies M, Tellam J, Bharadwaj M, Khanna R. 2003. Ex vivo profiling of CD8+-T-cell responses to human cytomegalovirus reveals broad and multispecific reactivities in healthy virus carriers. J Virol 77:5226–5240. doi: 10.1128/jvi.77.9.5226-5240.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Crough T, Fazou C, Weiss J, Campbell S, Davenport MP, Bell SC, Galbraith A, McNeil K, Khanna R. 2007. Symptomatic and asymptomatic viral recrudescence in solid-organ transplant recipients and its relationship with the antigen-specific CD8(+) T-cell response. J Virol 81:11538–11542. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00581-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Weekes MP, Wills MR, Mynard K, Carmichael AJ, Sissons JG. 1999. The memory cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) response to human cytomegalovirus infection contains individual peptide-specific CTL clones that have undergone extensive expansion in vivo. J Virol 73:2099–2108. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.3.2099-2108.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gavin MA, Gilbert MJ, Riddell SR, Greenberg PD, Bevan MJ. 1993. Alkali hydrolysis of recombinant proteins allows for the rapid identification of class I MHC-restricted CTL epitopes. J Immunol 151:3971–3980. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kern F, Surel IP, Faulhaber N, Frommel C, Schneider-Mergener J, Schonemann C, Reinke P, Volk HD. 1999. Target structures of the CD8(+)-T-cell response to human cytomegalovirus: the 72-kilodalton major immediate-early protein revisited. J Virol 73:8179–8184. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.10.8179-8184.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wills MR, Carmichael AJ, Mynard K, Jin X, Weekes MP, Plachter B, Sissons JG. 1996. The human cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) response to cytomegalovirus is dominated by structural protein pp65: frequency, specificity, and T-cell receptor usage of pp65-specific CTL. J Virol 70:7569–7579. doi: 10.1128/JVI.70.11.7569-7579.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Nastke MD, Herrgen L, Walter S, Wernet D, Rammensee HG, Stevanovic S. 2005. Major contribution of codominant CD8 and CD4 T cell epitopes to the human cytomegalovirus-specific T cell repertoire. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:77–86. doi: 10.1007/s00018-004-4363-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Saulquin X, Ibisch C, Peyrat MA, Scotet E, Hourmant M, Vie H, Bonneville M, Houssaint E. 2000. A global appraisal of immunodominant CD8 T cell responses to Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus by bulk screening. Eur J Immunol 30:2531–2539. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Prod’homme V, Retiere C, Imbert-Marcille BM, Bonneville M, Hallet MM. 2003. Modulation of HLA-A*0201-restricted T cell responses by natural polymorphism in the IE1(315–324) epitope of human cytomegalovirus. J Immunol 170:2030–2036. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.4.2030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Rist M, Cooper L, Elkington R, Walker S, Fazou C, Tellam J, Crough T, Khanna R. 2005. Ex vivo expansion of human cytomegalovirus-specific cytotoxic T cells by recombinant polyepitope: implications for HCMV immunotherapy. Eur J Immunol 35:996–1007. doi: 10.1002/eji.200425746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.