Skip to main content
Journal of Fungi logoLink to Journal of Fungi
. 2022 May 25;8(6):565. doi: 10.3390/jof8060565

Regulatory Roles of Histone Modifications in Filamentous Fungal Pathogens

Yiling Lai 1,2,*,, Lili Wang 1,3,, Weilu Zheng 1,3,, Sibao Wang 1,2,*
Editor: Ulrich Kück
PMCID: PMC9224773  PMID: 35736048

Abstract

Filamentous fungal pathogens have evolved diverse strategies to infect a variety of hosts including plants and insects. The dynamic infection process requires rapid and fine-tuning regulation of fungal gene expression programs in response to the changing host environment and defenses. Therefore, transcriptional reprogramming of fungal pathogens is critical for fungal development and pathogenicity. Histone post-translational modification, one of the main mechanisms of epigenetic regulation, has been shown to play an important role in the regulation of gene expressions, and is involved in, e.g., fungal development, infection-related morphogenesis, environmental stress responses, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, and pathogenicity. This review highlights recent findings and insights into regulatory mechanisms of histone methylation and acetylation in fungal development and pathogenicity, as well as their roles in modulating pathogenic fungi–host interactions.

Keywords: filamentous fungal pathogens, histone methylation, histone acetylation, fungal pathogenicity, pathogenic fungi–host interactions

1. Introduction

Filamentous fungal pathogens such as phytopathogenic fungi and entomopathogenic fungi, have a great impact on crop agriculture. Phytopathogenic fungi cause serious plant diseases that severely decrease crop yield and quality [1]. In contrast, entomopathogenic fungi that specifically infect insects are a promising environmentally friendly alternative in controlling agricultural pests [2]. Better understanding of the underlying mechanisms in fungal pathogenicity and fungi–host/environment interactions is of benefit for the prevention of crop diseases caused by phytopathogenic fungi, as well as the development of approaches to improve the efficacy of insect–pathogenic fungi.

To successfully infect and colonize the host (plants or insects), pathogenic fungi have evolved complicated and delicate infection strategies which involve host cuticle adhesion and degradation, infection structure differentiation, suppression of host immunity by effectors and toxins, stress management, and nutrient assimilation [3]. The dynamic infection process requires rapid and fine-tuning regulation of their gene expression programs in response to the changing host environment and defenses [4,5,6]. Gene expressions through a variety of regulatory mechanisms at transcriptional levels have been elucidated, among which the histone modifications, one of the main epigenetic regulatory mechanisms, appear to be important especially in shaping fungal pathogenicity [5,6]. Epigenetic regulations refer to changes in gene expression that do not involve changes to the underlying DNA sequence—a change in phenotype without a change in genotype, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs (ncRNA)-associated gene silencing [5,6]. Here, we describe recent progress in studies of epigenetic regulation in filamentous fungal pathogens, especially in phytopathogenic fungi and entomopathogenic fungi, with a focus on the roles of histone modifications in fungal development and pathogenicity, as well as fungi–host interactions. Since most histone modification enzymes are first identified in model yeasts and nonpathogenic model fungi, and are also well studied in human opportunistic fungi, these important research progresses are also briefly introduced in this review.

2. Histone Modifications

In eukaryotic cells, genomic DNA is packed into a highly organized nucleoprotein complex known as chromatin. As the basic structural subunit of the chromatin, each nucleosome consists of around 146 base pairs of DNA wrapped around an octamer of core histone proteins, including two subunits of each histone H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. Post-translational modifications of histone N-terminal tails, such as methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination, regulate chromatin architecture, and consequently, the accessibility of the transcription machinery to DNA [7] (Figure 1). In general, open chromatin (euchromatin) enables gene transcription, while closed chromatin (heterochromatin) leads to gene repression [8,9]. Different modifications to the same site and multiple modifications to different sites coordinate or antagonize to form a “histone code” that mediates a complicated and precise gene regulation web, which finally impacts intracellular biological processes and phenotypic plasticity in response to stimuli from the environment and the interacting host [10]. Many different types of post-translational histone modifications have been described, of which the best understood in filamentous fungal pathogens are the histone lysine methylation and lysine acetylation.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A schematic model of histone lysine methylation and acetylation and their regulatory roles in filamentous fungal pathogens. Histone lysine methyltransferases (HKMTs), histone lysine demethyltransferases (HKDMs), histone acetylases (HATs), and histone deacetylases (HDACs) for each lysine residue reported in filamentous fungal pathogens are depicted. Detailed information about these enzymes for respective lysine residues in specific fungal species is included in the text. These histone modifications affect chromatin structures to regulate gene transcription. In general, modifications with methylation of H3K4, H3K36, and H3K79, as well as histone acetylation, result in a relaxed and open chromatin (euchromatin) that provides accessibility to the transcription machinery and thus enables gene activation. In contrast, modifications with methylation of H3K9, H3K27, and H4K20, as well as histone deacetylation, lead to a condensed and less accessible chromatin (heterochromatin) that restricts DNA accessibility to the transcription machinery and represses gene transcription. Gene regulation mediated by histone modifications finally controls multiple phenotypic plasticity, including conidiation, biosynthesis of secondary metabolite toxins, infection structure differentiation, effector production, stress responses, and virulence in filamentous fungal pathogens. SM, secondary metabolite; DON, deoxynivalenol; ROS, reactive oxygen species.

2.1. Histone Methylation

Histone lysine methylation is a dynamic and reversible histone modification, which plays an important role in modulating the accessibility of DNA to the transcription machinery and providing signal or docking sites for chromatin remodelers, and subsequently regulates gene transcription. The site-specific methylation is catalyzed by histone lysine methyltransferases (HKMTs), mostly with a catalytic Set (Su(var)3–9, enhancer-of-zeste and trithorax) domain, which transfer a methyl group from S-Adenosyl-l-Methionine (SAM) to the lysine residues on the N-terminal of H3 or H4 [11]. Based on the relationship between sequence and domain structures, including the catalytic domain, HKMTs discovered so far can be classified into six groups: KMT1-6 [12]. Conversely, the methyls on histone lysine residues are removed by histone lysine demethyltransferases (HKDM). HKDMs can be classified into five groups: KDM1-5, based on the same guidelines used to classify KMTs [13]. Histone lysine methylation sites discovered in fungi include H3K4, K9, K36, K79, and H4K20. Monomethylation, demethylation, and trimethylation (me1/2/3) can occur on these sites [7]. Depending on their modifying histone lysine sites and methyl number, histone methylation can either activate or repress gene transcription. Methylation at all these sites is reported to regulate fungal pathogenicity, which is herein discussed as follows.

2.1.1. H3K4 Methylation

H3K4 methylation is specifically catalyzed by the KMT2 proteins, typified by Set1 that functions as a key component of the COMPASS (Complex Proteins Associated with Set1) complex. COMPASS is a highly conserved protein complex in eukaryotes, which was first discovered in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [14]. COMPASS is composed of Set1 protein and three structure proteins Swd3, Bre2, and Swd1, which function together to identify substrates [15]. Two types of enzymes, KDM1 and KDM5, are reported to catalyze H3K4 demethylation in filamentous fungi [16,17]. The role H3K4 methylation plays in the fungi–host interaction has been reported in various pathogenic fungi. In the human opportunistic pathogen Candida albicans, Set1-mediated H3K4me3 activates mitochondrial protein genes to establish defenses against oxidative stress from host cells during infection [18]. Set1-mediated H3K4me3 in another opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida glabrata, is necessary for the azole-induced expression of ergosterol biosynthesis genes that mediate drug resistance [19]. In phytopathogenic fungi, virulence of the wheat and barley pathogen Fusarium graminearum [20], the rice pathogen Fusarium fujikuroi [21], the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae [22], and the Brassica anthracnose pathogen Colletotrichum higginsianum is positively regulated by H3K4 methylation [23]. H3K4me deposited by methyltransferase FgSet1 activates the transcription of genes related to biosynthesis of two toxins, deoxynivalenol (DON) and aurofusarin in F. graminearum [20]. In F. fujikuroi, the methyltransferase Set1 and the demethylase KDM5 are antagonists for H3K4me [21]. H3K4me2/3 at gibberellic acids (GAs) clusters activates the GA gene expression, which increases the biosynthesis of the toxin GA and contributes to fungal pathogenicity. Furthermore, H3K4me3 activates the transcription of the conidiation-specific transcription factor gene aba1 and increases conidiation. H3K4me catalyzed by MoSet1 together with other COMPASS subunits (MoBre2, MoSPP1, and MoSwd2) at the TSS region of pathogenicity related genes facilitates infection structure formation in M. oryzae [22,24]. CclA, a S. cerevisiae Bre2 homolog in C. higginsianum, is required for the genome-wide H3K4me3 that facilitates vegetative growth (spore gemination, mycelial growth, and asexual sporulation), as well as fungal virulence (appressorial penetration on host plant), yet inhibits the production of some secondary metabolites, including terpenoid compounds [23]. Methylation of H3K4 (H3K4me) can also regulate fungal pathogenicity in a negative way. In the phytopathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea, which causes gray mold disease in more than 200 plant species, knockout of the H3K4 demethylase gene Jar1 (belonging to KDM5 family) causes abnormal genome-wide H3K4me accumulation and attenuates fungal virulence [17]. The mutant displays defects in stress adaptation, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and infection structure (appressorium and infection cushion) formation resulting from the downregulation of genes related with ROS production, stress response, carbohydrate transmembrane transport, and secondary metabolites, etc. In entomopathogenic fungi, only positive regulation of H3K4me on fungal pathogenicity has been reported. In the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium robertsii, the infection-related morphogenesis is under coordinated regulation by the KMT2-Cre1-Hyd4 regulatory pathway [25]. KMT2-mediated H3K4me3 upregulates the expression of the key transcription factor Cre1 that further activates the downstream hydrophobin gene hyd4 to facilitate fungal appressorium formation and virulence. Similarly, the Set1/KMT2-Cre1-hydrophobin regulatory pathway is later shown to regulate fungal virulence in another important entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana [26]. In addition, Set1/KMT2 also modulates asexual cycle and stress responses in B. bassiana.

2.1.2. H3K9 Methylation

H3K9 methylation is specifically catalyzed by KMT1 proteins, the biggest family in HKMT, exemplified by Schizosaccharomyces pombe Clr4 (Cryptic loci regulator 4) and Neurospora crassa DIM5 (Defective In Methylation 5) [7]. H3K9 methylation is usually considered as a hallmark of gene repression. It is closely associated with DNA methylation and heterochromatin formation, which maintains genome stability [27]. Normal genome-wide H3K9me distribution is essential for both pathogens and symbionts in fungi–host interactions. In the entomopathogenic fungus B. bassiana, deletion of dim5 downregulates genes related to cuticle infection and cell wall composition that contribute to fungal virulence [28]. In the phytopathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea, the loss of dim5 results in nearly abolished H3K9me3 and causes downregulation of pathogenicity genes associated with host signal sensing, host tissue colonization, stress response, toxin synthesis, and response to host immunity [29]. In the maize pathogen Fusarium verticillioides, H3K9me3 is largely attenuated by dim5 disruption, leading to significant defects in fungal virulence, and unexpectedly, increased expression of melanin synthesis genes for osmotic stress tolerance [30]. In the mango pathogen Fusarium mangiferae, the loss of kmt1 almost completely inhibits the biosynthesis of the toxins fusapyrone and deoxyfusapyrone [31]. In the plant endosymbiotic fungus Epichloë festucae, genes associated with biosynthesis of lolitrems, and ergot alkaloids are silenced via H3K9me3 catalyzed by Clr4 (KMT1) under non-symbiotic culture conditions. These genes are activated by the removal of H3K9me3 when the fungus interacts with the plant host [32]. Expression of effector genes in Leptosphaeria maculans, which causes stem canker of oilseed rape, is also repressed by DIM5 and HP1 (Heterochromatin Protein 1) involved in heterochromatin formation and maintenance during axenic growth [33].

2.1.3. H3K27 Methylation

H3K27 methylation is catalyzed by KMT6 that functions as a key component of the PRC2 (Polycomb Repressive Complex 2) complex. In N. crassa, PRC2 is composed of the Set-domain-containing component Ezh1 or Ezh2 (belonging to KMT6 family) with methyltransferase activity, as well as three other proteins, Eed, Npf, and Su(z)12 [34]. Npf is dispensable but is essential to the formation of local H3K27me3 at the telomeres or subtelomeres of chromosomes [35]. Ezh2 homolog, together with other PRC2 members, in budding yeast were first discovered in human opportunistic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans [36]. Similar to H3K9 methylation, H3K27 methylation is also considered as a gene silencing marker. Secondary metabolism gene clusters in fungi are usually modified with H3K27 methylation, which regulates the synthesis of metabolites [37]. Regulation of H3K27me on the target genes also affects fungi–host interactions. In the plant endosymbiotic fungus E. festucae, H3K27me3 catalyzed by EzhB (KMT6), together with H3K9me3 catalyzed by ClrD (KMT1), silences lolitrems and ergot alkaloids gene clusters under axenic growth condition. H3K27me3 diminishes so that alkaloid biosynthesis is induced in planta [32]. In plant pathogens, H3K27me is also pivotal in fungal pathogenicity. KMT6 in M. oryzae is responsible for H3K27me3 which silences virulence-associated genes (such as effectors) during vegetative growth. During the infection process, H3K27me3 is removed, immediately activating the virulence-related genes [38]. Similar biological function of KMT6-mediated H3K27 methylation in fungal virulence has also been reported in Ustilaginoidea virens and F. graminearum [39,40]. Furthermore, deletion of F. graminearum BP1, a reader of H3K27me, attenuates fungal virulence [40].

2.1.4. H3K36 Methylation

H3K36 methylation is catalyzed by Set2 (belonging to the KMT3 family) conserved from yeasts to human. In fact, Set2 is also an RNA polymerase II-interacting protein, which interacts with the C terminal domain of RNA polymerase II during transcription elongation [41]. H3K36 methylation catalyzed by Set2 is also produced during transcription elongation. In yeasts, the single methyltransferase Set2 catalyzes H3K36me1/2/3 [41]. However, in filamentous fungi, another histone methyltransferase which is homologous to Drosophila melanogaster Ash1 (discs absent, small or homeotic-1) is also identified to catalyze H3K36 methylation [42,43]. H3K36me1/2 and H3K36me2/3 demethylation are catalyzed by KDM2 and KDM4, respectively, in fungi [13]. H3K36 methylation regulates both gene activation and silencing, which influences fungal normal growth and the interaction between fungi and hosts. In the model fungus N. crassa, transcription of the circadian gene frequency (frq) is repressed by Set2-mediated H3K36me so that frq is transcribed in a rhythmic manner, which ensures normal development of the fungus [44]. The H3 lysine 36 trimethylation (H3K36me3) catalyzed by Set2 facilitates host colonization in F. verticillioides and E. festucae. In F. verticillioides, genes involved in toxin and pigment synthesis (Fumonisin B1 (FB1) and bikaverin) are activated by Set2-mediated H3K36me3 [45]. In E. festucae, transcription of effector genes can be regulated in both positive and negative ways by Set2-mediated H3K36me [46]. Ash1, another H3K36 methyltransferase, functions together with Set2 to activate the expression of toxin synthesis related genes in the plant pathogen F. fujikuroi [43]. Besides H3K36 methyltransferases, H3K36 demethyltransferases also takes an active part in fungi–host interactions. KDM4 homolog in B. cinerea that demethylates H3K36me3 has been proved to affect fungal virulence and stress response in a positive way by regulating light-responsive genes [47].

2.1.5. H3K79 Methylation

H3K79 methylation is specifically catalyzed by the Dot1 (disruptor of telomeric silencing 1) protein (belonging to the KMT4 family), which is the only histone methyltransferase without a SET domain [48]. Methylation at this site is unique as it is located at the globular domains of histone H3 instead of unstructured histone tails. Dot1 was first discovered in S. cerevisiae [49] and Dot1-mediated H3K79 methylation is found to activate genes by preventing SIR proteins (related with heterochromatin formation) to bind DNA regions [50,51]. The role of Dot1 and H3K79 methylation in filamentous fungi is poorly understood. In the industrial filamentous fungus Penicillium oxalicum, the loss of Dot1 downregulates genes involved in extracellular glycoside hydrolase biosynthesis [52]. In Aspergillus flavus, an opportunistic fungal pathogen of oil crops and animals, Dot1 positively regulates fungal colonization on maize seeds, indicating that Dot1 might be associated with fungal pathogenicity [53].

2.1.6. H4K20 Methylation

H4K20 methylation is specifically catalyzed by the KMT5 family. While fruit flies and mammals possess two types of KMT5, KMT5A and KMT5B/C, responsible for H4K20me1 and H4K20me2/3, respectively [54], fungi possess only one KMT5, named as Set9, which catalyzes H4K20me1/2/3 [55]. KMT5-mediated H4K20 methylation is usually considered as a gene silencing mark. Studies on H4K20 methylation in fungi mainly focus on its role in the cell cycle and DNA repair. In the fission yeast S. pombe, H4K20me2 catalyzed by Set9 participates in the cell cycle checkpoint. When DNA damage is detected at the checkpoint, H4K20me2 and H2A phosphorylation sites are exposed and bind with the Crb2 protein (related to DNA damage checkpoint) to start DNA repair [55]. In the rice blast fungus M. oryzae, KMT5 is proved to be responsible for H4K20me3. Deletion of kmt5 slightly inhibits fungal vegetative growth but has no impact on conidium germination, conidiation, appressorium formation, or pathogenicity [22]. Recently, in the phytopathogenic fungus F. graminearum, KMT5 has been reported to catalyze H4K20me1/2/3 and be required for full virulence on wheat [56].

2.2. Histone Acetylation

Histone acetylation/deacetylation is one of the best-characterized dynamic and reversible histone modifications established by the opposing functions of histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs). In general, histone acetylation is associated with transcriptional activation, whereas histone deacetylation has the opposite effect on gene transcription.

2.2.1. Histone Acetyltransferases (HATs)

Histone acetyltransferases (HATs) are enzymes that acetylate lysines within the amino-terminal tails of histone proteins by transferring an acetyl group from acetyl-coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) to form ɛ-N-acetyl lysine. This modification neutralizes the positive charge of lysines and results in a more relaxed, open, and transcriptionally active chromatin (euchromatin) structure, enabling active gene transcription [57]. There are two general categories of HATs based on their cellular locations and functions: type A and type B. Type A HATs are located in the nucleus and acetylate nucleosomal histones. Type B HATs are cytoplasmic enzymes that acetylate newly synthesized histones leading to their transport from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, where they are deposited onto newly replicated DNA and have no direct impact on transcription. Based on the homology of conserved structural motifs, type A HATs can be further classified into five families: GNAT (Gcn5-related N-acetyltransferases), MYST (MOZ, YBF2/SAS3, SAS2, and TIP60), p300/CBP (CREB-binding protein), basal transcription factors, and nuclear receptor coactivators [58]. Among them, HATs belonging to GNAT, MYST, as well as the p300/CBP family, have been well-studied in filamentous fungi, which are summarized as follows.

  • GNAT Family

HATs of GNAT family have high similarity with yeast histone acetyltransferase Gcn5 (General control non-derepressible 5). Gcn5 acts as the catalytic subunit and coordinates with other different regulatory factors in multiple high-molecular-weight protein complexes such as SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5-Acetyltransferase), ADA (Ada2-Gcn5-Ada3), and SLIK/SALSA (SAGA-like). Gcn5 can acetylate nucleosomal H2B lysines K11, K16, H3 lysines K9, K14, K18, K23, and K27 in either the manner of acting alone or being associated with the HAT complexes. Because of different histone sites targeted by Gcn5 for transcriptional regulation, Gcn5 has been found to be functionally differentiated in the fungi that adapt to different hosts and environments. Gcn5 was the first identified HAT via a screen of sensitive yeast mutants in growth under conditions of amino acid limitation. Deletion of gcn5 can not derepress the expressions of amino acid biosynthesis genes [59]. Additionally, Gcn5 can also regulate the cell cycle, pseudohyphal development and adaptation to environmental stimuli in yeast [60,61]. In the human opportunistic fungus C. neoformans, Gcn5 regulates the expression of specific genes such as Kre61 that encode a β-glucan synthase involved in cell wall biosynthesis, which enables the fungus to respond appropriately to hosts [62]. To sense the N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) on host cell surface and survive in various host niches, the commensal and pathogenic yeast of humans, C. albicans GCN5-related N-acetyltransferase can bind GlcNAc through its N-terminal β-N-acetylglucosaminidase domain, which further activates N-acetyltransferase activity in the C-terminal GCN5-related N-acetyltransferase domain, resulting in promoter histone acetylation and transcription of all GlcNAc-induced genes [63].

Growing evidence implicates the regulatory role of Gcn5 in fungal morphogenesis, stress responses, and virulence of pathogenic filamentous fungi. Fungal conidia are required for the infection cycle of a filamentous fungal pathogen on plants and insects. Gcn5 in the SAGA complex activates an asexual development pathway by acetylating H3K14 on the chromatin of brlA promoter, the central transcription factor gene regulating fungal conidiation [64]. In B. bassiana, the absence of gcn5 blocks the normal infection against Galleria mellonella through cuticular penetration, which could be largely attribute to the repression of two cuticle-degrading proteinase genes, CDEP1 and CDEP2, in the Δgcn5 mutant (although whether they are direct targets of GCN5 is not confirmed) [64]. Another GNAT family HAT, Spt10, has also been characterized in B. bassiana, which modulates development, cell cycle progression, multi-stress responses, and virulence [65]. Deletion of gcn5 in Ustilago maydis (corn smut) results in long mycelial cells and fuzz-like colonies and influences dimorphism and virulence [66]. In the phytopathogenic fungus A. flavus, Gcn5 is also crucial for morphological development, aflatoxin biosynthesis, stress responses, and pathogenicity [67]. F. graminearum Gcn5 is essential for the acetylation of H3K9, H3K18, and H3K27. Deletion of FgGcn5 results in reduced perithecium formation, increased sensitivity to oxidative and osmotic stresses, and most importantly, no production of the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON) that is a virulence factor enabling the fungus to spread from infected florets into the wheat rachis [68].

Interestingly, several studies show that alterations of histone acetylation in fungi could be triggered by the interacting bacteria via targeting fungal Gcn5. The intimate contact between Aspergillus nidulans and the soil-dwelling bacterium Streptomyces rapamycinicus triggers the fungal SAGA/ADA complex containing Gcn5 and Ada2 proteins, and subsequently leads to an increased acetylation of H3K9 specific for the induction of the secondary metabolite gene cluster involved in orsellinic acid biosynthesis in A. nidulans [69]. The bacterium Pseudomonas piscium isolated from the wheat head microbiome secrets the compound phenazine-1-carboxamide that directly inhibits the activity of Gcn5 in F. graminearum, leading to the deregulation of histone acetylation, repression of gene expression, and suppression of fungal growth and pathogenicity [70]. Therefore, the findings that the bacteria-induced or repressed gene expressions in fungi are mediated by histone acetylation via Gcn5, have revealed a possible mechanism by which fungi integrate stimuli from interacting species. However, whether plant or insect hosts could also target fungal Gcn5 to manipulate the pathogen global transcription still remains unknown, and therefore needs more attention. A comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying the fungi–microbe interactions will provide new opportunities to control plant diseases caused by pathogenic fungi.

Notably, HATs of the GNAT family can also catalyze non-histone proteins [71]. Gcn5 directly acetylates Rph1, the Jmjc-domain-containing demethylase that catalyzes the removal of H3K36me2/me3, and subsequently the autophagic degradation of Rph1 dependent on the Gcn5-containing SAGA complex results in the derepression of DNA-damage genes to regulate cell homeostasis under DNA damage stress [72]. Autophagy in M. oryzae is important for the establishment of rice blast disease, and Gcn5 negatively regulates light- and nitrogen-starvation-induced autophagy by acetylating the autophagy protein Atg7 in cytoplasm [73]. In contrast, another histone acetyltransferase Hat1, which encodes a subunit of a type B HAT, is phosphorylated by the protein kinase Gsk1 and translocated with the protein chaperone Ssb1 into the cytoplasm to acetylate Atg3 and Atg9, both of which are critical for appressorium development and pathogenicity of M. oryzae [74].

  • MYST Family

The MYST family is named after the founding members, including MOZ (monocytic leukemia zinc-finger protein), YBF2 (yeast binding factor 2)/SAS3 (something about silencing 3), SAS2 (something about silencing 2), and TIP60 (Tat interactive protein-60). The MYST proteins are the largest HAT family, mediate a diverse variety of biological functions, and preferentially acetylate histones H4 and H2A [75]. These MYST-related proteins show a high degree of sequence conservation in the acetyl-CoA binding and zinc finger regions [76]. In fungi, the most studied MYST histone acetyltransferases are SAS2, SAS3, and ESA1 (essential Sas2-related acetyltransferase 1).

Sas2 is the catalytic subunit of the SAS HAT complex (Sas2p-Sas4p-Sas5p) and responsible for the acetylation of H4K16 [77]. Sas2 is implicated in the regulation of transcriptional silencing via interacting with the chromatin assembly factor Asf1 to promote silencing at the HML mating-type loci and telomeres, since deletion of Sas2 leads to the derepression of HML and a telomere proximal reporter gene [76]. Sas2 also regulates DNA replication and cell cycle progression [78]. In the necrotrophic fungal pathogen B. cinerea, Sas2 regulates the transcription of plant cell wall degradation and oxidative stress-response genes by controlling the acetylation level of H4K16, thereby affecting the virulence and oxidative sensitivity [79].

Sas3, as a catalytic subunit of the NuA3 (nucleosomal acetyltransferase of histone H3) complex, is responsible for H3 acetylation (specifically acetylate H3K9 and H3K14) [80]. Since Sas3 and Gcn5 have overlapping patterns of acetylation, deletion of Sas3 alone does not produce any remarkable phenotypic changes in S. cerevisiae. However, its simultaneous disruption of Gcn5 causes extensive, global loss of H3 acetylation and cell cycle arrest that is synthetically lethal to cells [81]. Unlike Sas3 deletion in yeast, Sas3 disruption in M. oryzae alone has a profound effect on pre-penetration development, including asexual reproduction, germination, and appressorium formation [82]. In F. graminearum, Sas3 is indispensable for the acetylation of H3K4, while FgGcn5 is essential for the acetylation of H3K9, H3K18, and H3K27. Both are required for DON biosynthesis and pathogenicity [68]. Two Mysts in A. flavus, including MystA (Sas2 orthologue) and MystB (Sas3 orthologue), with opposite functions have been identified. MystA acetylates H4K16 and plays a negative role in sclerotia formation and aflatoxin B1 production, while MystB acetylates H3K14, H3K18, and H3K23 and positively affects sclerotia formation and aflatoxin B1 production [83]. Deletion of Hat1, the Sas3 homolog in the insect pathogen M. robertsii, results in a decrease in global H3 acetylation and activation of orphan secondary metabolite genes [84]. Mst2 (Sas3 orthologue) in B. bassiana has shown to mediate global gene transcription and/or post-translation through H3K14 acetylation, which enables regulating multiple stress responses and plays an essential role in sustaining the biological control potential of the fungus against arthropod pests [85].

Esa1 is the catalytic subunit of the NuA4 (nucleosomal acetyltransferase of histone H4) complex that is more complex and consists of 13 proteins. Esa1/NuA4 is capable of acetylating multiple sites, most notably H4K5, K8 and K12, H2AK7 and H2BK16 [86]. Esa1 is involved in chromatin remodeling, transcriptional activation, and elongation [87,88]. In S. cerevisiae, Esa1 is essential for cell viability and cell cycle progression and regulates telomeric heterochromatin plasticity via H4K12 acetylation [89,90,91]. Esa1 contributes mainly to acetylation of H4K5 and H4K12, and the esa1 mutant exhibits sensitivity to thermal, genotoxic, and oxidative stresses in C. albicans [92]. Overexpression of Esa1 increases secondary metabolites production through enhancing H4K12 acetylation in A. nidulans [93]. H4 acetylation mediated by NuA4 complex is important for fungal growth, conidiation, sexual development, and pathogenicity in F. graminearum [94]. Interestingly, Esa1 is also implicated in acetylating non-histone substrates. In yeast, Esa1 controls key metabolic target-regulating gluconeogenesis by acetylating K19 and 514 of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase [95]. Esa1 is required for autophagy by acetylating the autophagy signaling component Atg3 in S. cerevisiae [96], which resembles the role of Gcn5 in the acetylation of Atg7 in M. oryzae [73]. However, further research is needed to explore whether Esa1-mediated acetylation in autophagy regulation also plays an important role in pathogenic fungi.

  • Rtt109

Rtt109 (regulator of Ty1 transposition gene product 109, a structural homolog of p300/CBP) is fungal-specific, responsible for the acetylation of H3K9, H3K27, and mostly H3K56 [97]. Activation of the acetyltransferase activity of Rtt109 needs two histone chaperones, Asf1 (anti-silencing function protein 1) and Vps75 (vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 75). Distinct histone chaperones help direct Rtt109 substrate selection for different biological processes; Rtt109-Asf1 acetylates H3K56, while Rtt109-Vps75 acetylates H3K9 and H3K27 [98,99]. Rtt109-mediated H3K56 acetylation correlates with actively transcribed genes and associates with the elongating form of polymerase II [97]. Yeast cells lacking Rtt109 increase genomic instability and sensitivity to DNA damage stress [100]. Rtt109 regulates environmentally stimulated white-opaque switching and is required for C. albicans pathogenicity, suggesting a unique target for therapeutic antifungal compounds [101,102]. In the human opportunistic pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus, the loss of Rtt109 also attenuates virulence in the G. mellonella model, as well as hypersensitivity to genotoxic agent [103]. Deletion of rtt109 in B. bassiana abolishes H3K56 acetylation and triggers H2A-S129 phosphorylation that affects global gene activity, and consequently results in increased sensitivity to multiple stresses and reduced virulence through normal cuticle infection [104]. In addition, Rtt109 mediates morphogenesis, aflatoxin synthesis, and pathogenicity by acetylating H3K9 in A. flavus [105].

2.2.2. Histone Deacetylases (HDACs)

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are a group of enzymes that catalyze the deacetylation by removing acetyl residues from the ε-amino group of lysine residues in the histone N-terminal tails. This restores the positive charge on the histone tails [106]. In contrast to histone acetylation, deacetylation causes histones to tightly bind to the DNA, which leads to highly condensed chromatin (heterochromatin) and DNA not accessible for transcription. HDACs are found in large multi-protein complexes with transcriptional co-repressors, and are generally related to transcription repression [58]. Based on phylogenetic analysis and sequence homology, HDACs are divided into four classes [107]. Class I HDACs are homologous to yeast Rpd3 (Reduced potassium dependency 3), which contain HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, and HDAC8. Class II HDACs are homologous to yeast Hda1 (Histone deacetylase 1), which include HDAC4, HDAC5, HDAC6, HDAC7, HDAC9, and HDAC10. Class I and II HDACs depend on the presence of Zn2+ that acts as a coactivator for deacetylase activity. Class III HDACs are homologous to yeast Sir2 (NAD+-dependent silent information regulator 2). Class I, II, and III HDACs have been extensively studied in fungi. However, Class IV HDAC has only one member, HDAC11, that is highly conserved and presents in all eukaryotes except fungi [108].

  • Class I HDACs

Rpd3 (Reduced potassium dependency 3) is the founding member of the Class I HDACs in S. cerevisiae, which deacetylates the histones H3 and H4 [109]. In filamentous fungi, the fungus-specific C-terminal region with only a few acidic amino acids is required for both the nuclear localization and catalytic activity of the enzyme [110]. Rpd3 functions in two distinct complexes. The smaller complex (Rpd3S) is recruited to nucleosomes with Set2 mediated-H3K36 methylation via its unique subunit Eaf3, leading to the deacetylation of transcribed regions and repression of intragenic transcription initiation [111,112]. In contrast, the large complex (Rpd3L) is recruited to promoters by site-specific DNA binding proteins to function in transcription repression [113,114]. Yeast Rpd3 functions as an important co-factor with different factors in the regulatory network that controls gene expression in response to environmental stress [115]. In B. bassiana, Rpd3 plays essential roles in regulating transcription and posttranscriptional lysine modification of genes in the central development pathway, and the deletion of Rpd3 causes severe growth defects, reduction in conidiation, and drastic attenuation in virulence [116]. Dep1, a component of Rpd3L complex, controls vegetative development, ROS accumulation, and pathogenesis in F. pseudograminearum [117]. However, Rpd3 disruption in several filamentous fungi, such as A. nidulans, A. fumigatus, B. cinerea and M. oryzae, is lethal [110,118,119]. Overexpression of Rpd3 in B. cinerea and M. oryzae results in dramatically impaired infection structure formation, oxidative stress response, and virulence [118,120]. Transcription of enzymatic genes are negatively controlled by Rpd3-mediated H3 deacetylation in B. cinerea [118]. Moreover, Rpd3 is implicated to be potentially involved in the TOR (target of rapamycin)-mediated signaling pathway to regulate fungal reproduction and pathogenic development in M. oryzae [119]. The line of evidence shows that Rpd3 is essential for the survival of plant pathogenic fungi, suggesting that RPD3 could be a promising target for identification and development of new agrochemicals that can effectively control fungal diseases in crop plants [121].

Hos2 (Hda one similar 2), another member of Class I HDACs, is a component of the Set3 (Su(var)3–9, enhancer-of-zeste and trithorax 3) complex (Set3C) [122]. Hos2 specifically deacetylates the H3 and H4 lysines, and antagonizes the MYST acetyltransferase Esa1 in the DNA damage response [123,124]. In contrast to other Class I HDACs, Hos2 is directly required for gene activation in S. cerevisiae [123]. Growing lines of evidence indicate that Hos2 plays important roles in fungal pathogenicity. In Cochliobolus carbonum, a fungal pathogen of maize, Hos2 affects extracellular depolymerase expression and virulence [125]. F. graminearum HDF1, an ortholog of Hos2, is involved in spore formation, DON production, and plant infection [126]. The Set3/Hos2 complex has distinct regulatory functions in different pathogenic fungi. Set3C in C. albicans attenuates cAMP-PKA signaling to repress yeast-to-filament transition and modulate white–opaque switching [127,128]. However, in U. maydis, Hos2 acts as a downstream component of the cAMP-PKA pathway to directly control the expression of mating-type genes via H4K16 deacetylation, and thus is required for the dimorphic switch and pathogenic development [129]. The relationship whereby Hos2 functions downstream of cAMP pathway has also been found in M. oryzae, indicating that it is likely to be conserved in filamentous fungal pathogens [130]. M. oryzae Hos2, as the core component of the Tig1 complex, deacetylates H3K18 and H4K16 and is required for full virulence through transcriptional regulation of ROS detoxifying genes and effector genes [130,131]. Moreover, Hos2 in B. bassiana not only directly deacetylates H4K16 but also indirectly affects H3K56 acetylation and phosphorylation of H2A serine129 (H2A-S129) and cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) tyrosine 15 (CDK1-Y15), which further regulates sensitivity to DNA damage and oxidative stress, cell cycle, and fungal virulence [132]. When penetration into the insect hemocoel occurs, M. robertsii HDAC1 is downregulated due to the decreased HAT1-mediated H3K4 acetylation in its promoter bound chromatin, which further leads to the derepression of H3K56 acetylation and activation of the regulatory protein COH1 (colonization of hemocoel 1) gene. COH1 physically contacts the transcription factor COH2 (colonization of hemocoel 2) to reduce COH2 stability, which thus switches off genes for cuticle penetration and switches on key genes for hemocoel colonization. This regulatory cascade precisely controls a distinct set of genes of M. robertsii in response to cuticle and hemocoel microenvironments during infection of insects [133].

  • Class II HDACs

HDA is a Class II histone deacetylase complex consisting of three subunits: the catalytic subunit Hda1 (Histone deacetylase 1) and accessory factors Hda2 and Hda3. HDA complex specifically deacetylates acetylated lysines on H3 (K9, K14, K18, K23, and K27) and H2B (K11 and K16) [134], and antagonizes and competes with Gcn5 for space on promoters [135]. Disruption of HDA increases promoter H3K18 acetylation and transcriptional activation in the trehalose metabolic pathway, which results in resistance to DNA damage and osmotic stresses and finally promotes yeast longevity [136]. Hda1 functions as a central mediator controlling mating and virulence by transcriptionally regulating genes required for adaptation and virulence [137]. Several studies show that Hda1 can modulate the expression of secondary metabolite genes, either positively or negatively in filamentous fungal pathogens [138,139,140,141]. Hda1 in F. fujikuroi is required for normal germination, vegetative growth, and fungal virulence [139]. In U. maydis, Hda1 is essential for teliospore development, and acts as a repressor of the biotrophic marker gene mig1 that encodes a small, secreted, cysteine-containing hydrophilic protein specifically expressed during infection [142,143].

Some Class I and Class II HDACs have also been proved to target nonhistone proteins. Rpd3 has been identified as a negative regulator of autophagy since deletion of Rpd3 increases Atg3 acetylation and accelerates autophagy in yeast [96]. Hda1 and Rpd3 deacetylate Hsp90, an essential molecular chaperone required for drug resistance and pathogenesis in C. albicans, leading to its compromised chaperone function [144]. The acetylation and deacetylation state of Eaf1 (the platform protein of NuA4) at K173, regulated via the opposing actions of Esa1/NuA4 and Hda1, mediates merge and separation of the NuA4 and SWR1 (ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex) in C. albicans that controls the expression of hypha-specific genes to modulate the yeast-hyphal transition [145].

  • Class III HDACs

Class III HDACs are sirtuin family enzymes that are related to the transcriptional repressor Sir2 (Silent information regulator 2) in budding yeast [146]. In contrast to Class I and II HDACs, the sirtuins catalyze deacetylation by a different mechanism that depends on the cofactor NAD+ [147]. Sir2 deacetylates lysines on H3 and H4 histones, and generally represses transcription via the promotion of heterochromatin formation [148]. Sir2-dependent hypoacetylated heterochromatin also represses rDNA recombination and controls genome stability at the telomeric and subtelomeric regions [149,150,151]. This is particularly important for microbial pathogens that utilize genome plasticity as a strategy to rapidly and reversibly adapt to different environmental niches [149]. Therefore, Sir2 has been involved in the regulation of fungal virulence. In C. albicans, Sir2 controls phenotypic switching and chromosome stability by organizing chromatin structure [152]. In the opportunistic fungal pathogen C. glabrata, Sir2 suppresses the expression of EPA1 that encodes the major epithelial adhesin important for fungal survival and proliferation in the host environment [153]. The loss of Sir2 in C. neoformans shortens the replicative lifespan, impairs fitness, and decreases virulence [154,155]. Aside from pathogenic yeasts, the regulatory role of Sir2 in filamentous fungal pathogens has been poorly studied. In M. oryzae, Sir2 is dispensable for appressorium development and rice cuticle penetration but is essential for biotrophic growth due to its role in neutralizing host ROS [156]. The underlying mechanism is that Sir2 deacetylates a JmjC domain-containing protein (a histone demethylase) to alleviate SOD1 (superoxide dismutase) transcript repression and detoxify host ROS. In B. bassiana, Sir2 regulates a distinct set of cellular targets that affect conidiation, carbon utilization, stress responses, blastospore development, and virulence [157]. In addition to deacetylation of specific histone lysines (H3K9, H3K56, H4K5, H4K12, and H4K16), Sir2 can also target a large set of cytoplasmic proteins, including a benzoquinone oxidoreductase implicated in the detoxification of cuticular compounds and two fungal LysM effectors critical for virulence.

Since HDACs are involved in regulating genes required for fungal survival, development, and pathogenicity, they are considered as potential targets of antifungal agents [107]. The epigenetic manipulation by HDAC inhibitors (HDACIs) is emerging as a promising approach in the control of pathogenic fungi [158]. Trichostatin A (TSA), suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA), and sodium butyrate (NaBut) that can manipulate fungal histone acetylation levels, have been discovered as antifungal compounds [159,160]. TSA and SAHA mainly play a role in hijacking the activity of Class I and II HDACs by binding to the Zn2+ sites via a hydroxamic acid group [158]. NaBut is a short chain fatty acid and inhibits HDACs activity, while its precise action mechanism remains unknown [158]. TSA treatment significantly delays the growth and germination of the human opportunistic fungus A. fumigatus via the inhibition of the RpdA C-terminal [110]. TSA treatment also enhances C. albicans sensitivity to azoles and the related antifungals [161]. Treatment of the rice blast fungus M. oryzae with HDAC inhibitors of the Rpd3/Hda1 family and TSA results in the inhibition of appressorium formation and decreased pathogenicity, respectively [162]. In the human pathogenic fungus C. neoformans, both of TSA and NaBut can attenuate fungal virulence by affecting their growth at 37 °C, capsule expansion, and melanin synthesis [163]. Furthermore, NaBut conducts a more stable and intense effect than TSA on the damage of virulence factors in C. neoformans. Otherwise, a synthetic fungal-specific HDACI, MGCD290, described to be specific for Hos2 in Candida species, also functions as an inhibitor of several clinical pathogens’ growth, such as Candida and Aspergillus species, in combination with fluconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole [164]. Apart from the wide application of HDACIs in clinical fungal pathogens, the impact of epigenetic modifying agents on phytopathogenic fungi and entomopathogenic fungi, as well as their applications, have not been fully understood, which still require further studies.

3. Concluding Remarks and Perspectives

Epigenetic mechanisms such as histone modifications have been elucidated to play a pivotal role in regulating gene expression in filamentous fungal pathogens, and thus modulate a wide range of biological processes, including fungal sporulation, morphological differentiation, environmental stress responses, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, and pathogenicity (Figure 1, Table 1). Precise control of gene expressions is important for fungal pathogens to cope with host defense, as well as the changing host environmental conditions, such as osmotic and oxidative stresses, to facilitate infection. The roles of histone modifications in pathogenic fungi are summarized in Table 2.

Table 1.

Enzymes of histone methylation and acetylation and their regulatory roles in filamentous fungal pathogens.

Histone Modifications Enzymes Phenotypic Plasticity Ref. No.
Conidiation Secondary Metabolite
Synthesis
Infection Structure Differentiation Effector Production Stress Response Virulence
Histone methylation KMT1 + * +/− + - + + [28,29,30,31,33]
KMT2 + + + ND + + [18,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]
KMT3 + + ND ND ND + [43,45]
KMT4 + + ND ND - + [53]
KMT5 ND + ND ND - + [56]
KMT6 + ND ND - - + [38,39]
Histone demethylation KDM4 + ND + ND + + [47]
KDM5 + + + ND + + [17,21]
Histone acetylation Gcn5 + + ND ND + + [64,65,66,67,68]
Sas2 ND - ND ND + + [79,83]
Sas3 + +/− + ND + + [68,82,83,84,85]
Esa1 + + ND ND ND + [94]
Rtt109 + + ND ND + + [104,105]
Histone deacetylation Rpd3 +/− ND - ND - +/− [116,117,118,119,120]
Hos2 + + + + +/− + [125,126,129,130,131,132]
Hda1 + +/− ND - ND + [138,139,140,141,142,143]
Sir2 + ND + ND + + [156,157]

* +, positively regulation; −, negatively regulation; ND, not detected.

Table 2.

Pathogenic fungal species included in this review and the respective virulence factors directly regulated by histone modification enzymes.

Fungal Classification Fungal Species Enzymes Modifications Virulence Factors Ref. No.
Phytopathogenic fungi Aspergillus flavus KMT4 ND * ND [53]
Gcn5 H3K14 ac ND [67]
Sas2 H4K16 ac aflatoxin [83]
Sas3 H3K14/K18/K23 ac aflatoxin [83]
Rtt109 H3K9 ac ND [105]
Botrytis cinerea KDM5 H3K4deme ND [17]
KMT1 H3K9me ND [29]
KDM4 H3K36deme ND [47]
Sas2 H4K16 ac ND [79]
Rpd3 H3K9/K14/K27 deac, H3K/H4K deac ND [118]
Colletotrichum higginsianum CclA/COMPASS H3K4me ND [23]
Cochliobolus carbonum Hos2 ND ND [125]
Fusarium fujikuroi KMT2, KDM5 H3K4me/deme GA [21]
KMT3, Ash1 H3K36me GA [43]
Hda1 H3K9 deac ND [139]
Fusarium graminearum KMT2 H3K4me DON [20]
KMT5 H4K20me ND [56]
Gcn5 H3K9/K18/K27 ac DON [68]
Sas3 H3K4 ac DON [68]
Esa1 H4K ac ND [94]
Hos2 ND ND [126]
Fusarium mangiferae KMT1 H3K9me ND [31]
Fusarium pseudograminearum Dep1/Rpd3L ND ND [117]
Fusarium verticillioides KMT1 H3K9me ND [30]
KMT3 H3K36me FB1 [45]
Leptosphaeria maculans KMT1 H3K9me Effectors (AvrLm1, AvrLm4-70) [33]
Magnaporthe oryzae KMT2 H3K4me VelC, MgCONx2, MGG_04682 [22]
KMT6 H3K27me Effectors (BAS4, BAS2, AVR-Pi9, SLP1) [38]
KMT5 H4K20me ND [22]
Gcn5 non-histone ac Atg7 [73]
Hat1 non-histone ac Atg3, Atg9 [74]
Sas3 ND ND [82]
Rpd3 ND ND [119,120]
Hos2 H3K18/H4K16 deac ND [130,131]
Sir2 non-histone deac Jmjc [156]
Ustilago maydis Gcn5 ND ND [66]
Hos2 H4K16 deac mating-type genes [129]
Hda1 ND mig1 [142,143]
Ustilaginoidea virens KMT6 H3K27me Effectors (Uv8b_6470, Uv8b_2964, Uv8b_2286, Uv8b_3638, Uv8b_562) [39]
Entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana KMT2 H3K4me ND [26]
KMT1 H3K9me ND [28]
Gcn5 H3K9/K14/K18/K27 ac CDEP1, CDEP2 [64]
Spt10 H3K56 ac ND [65]
Sas3 H3K14 ac ND [85]
Rtt109 H3K56 ac ND [104]
Rpd3 H3K9/K14/K27 deac, H4K12 deac ND [116]
Hos2 H4K16 deac ND [132]
Sir2 H3K9/K56 deac, H4K5/K12/K16 deac ND [157]
Metarhizium robertsii KMT2 H3K4me Cre1 [25]
Sas3 ND ND [84]
HAT1 H3K4 ac HDAC1 [133]
HDAC1 H3K56 deac COH1 [133]
Human opportunistic pathogens Aspergillus fumigatus Rtt109 H3K9/K56 ac ND [103]
Rpd3 ND ND [110]
Candida albicans KMT2 H3K4me SOM1, TOM5 [18]
Gcn5 non-histone ac GlcNAc [63]
Esa1 H4K5/K12 ac ND [92]
Rtt109 H3K56 ac ND [101,102]
Hos2/Set3C ND ND [127,128]
Hda1, Rpd3 non-histone deac Hsp90 [144]
Esa1/Hda1 non-histone ac/deac Eaf1 [145]
Sir2 ND ND [152]
Candida glabrata Sir2 ND EPA1 [153]
Cryptococcus neoformans KMT6 H3K27me ND [36]
Gcn5 ND Kre61 [62]
Sir2 ND ND [154,155]

* ND, not detected; me, methylation; deme, demethylation; ac, acetylation; deac, deacetylation.

Histone modifications regulate gene transcription via changing the chromatin structure and controlling the access of transcription factors to gene promoters [9,106]. Generally, methylation of H3K4, H3K36, and H3K79, as well as histone acetylation, activate gene transcription, while methylation of H3K9, H3K27, and H4K20, as well as histone deacetylation, are associated with transcriptional repression. Histone modifications usually distribute across the fungal genome and regulate global gene expression. Single deletion of genes responsible for histone modifications usually has pleiotropic effects on asexual development and virulence in filamentous fungal pathogens, and their key targets contributing to fungal pathogenicity are not identified in most studies. Several studies have revealed that histone modifications can directly regulate several key genes involved in secondary metabolite biosynthesis, appressorium formation, and adaptation to the host microenvironment [25,37,133]. Therefore, fully understanding the function of histone modifications in fungal development and pathogenicity requires further identification of their key targets. Furthermore, although enzymes for histone modifications are highly conserved in fungi, they regulate various aspects of growth, development, and pathogenesis in different filamentous fungal pathogens. How these enzymes are recruited to the specific gene bound chromatin has not been fully understood. Since most of these enzymes do not contain DNA-binding motifs, it is implicated that they have to associate with other regulatory factors, such as transcription factors that bind their corresponding DNA elements, chromatin binding proteins that recognize the existing histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs that interact with specific DNA sequences, for specific and timely recruitment to target genes [165,166,167,168].

It is becoming clearer that the antagonistic activity of modification writers and their corresponding erasers determines the dynamic regulation of gene expression in fungi [124,135,145]. However, the coordinated functions of different layers of epigenetic modifications, i.e., crosstalk among DNA methylation, histone modifications, ncRNAs, and other regulatory factors, remain to be addressed in the regulation of fungal pathogenicity. Increasing evidence has shown that multiple regulatory modifications are tightly interconnected to regulate gene transcription [169]. Recent studies in entomopathogenic fungi illustrate novel cascades that histone modifications directly regulate transcription factors to manipulate infection-related morphogenesis and response to distinct host microenvironments during infection, respectively [25,133]. Furthermore, the specific environment-sensing pathways that control fungal virulence via epigenetic regulators remain poorly characterized. Several studies indicate that histone modification activity integrates with the upstream signaling pathways such as the cAMP-PKA pathway to control pathogenic development and fungal virulence [22,127,129]. Whether other signaling pathways activate or are regulated by epigenetic regulatory components in response to host environmental cues needs further investigation.

In addition, small RNAs (sRNAs), another type of epigenetic regulator, have been recently recognized as trafficking effectors to mediate bidirectional transkingdom RNAi in interacting organisms [170,171]. These small regulatory molecules can be encapsulated in extracellular vesicles and translocated between filamentous fungal pathogens and their hosts. Fungal sRNAs are delivered into host cells to suppress host immunity for successful infection [172,173]. Conversely, host sRNAs serve as a defense strategy by exporting them to the invading fungus to suppress virulence genes [174,175,176]. Interestingly, fungal small secreted protein-type effectors are likely to hijack host epigenetic components and induce epigenetic changes in the host to enhance host susceptibility and facilitate pathogen infection [177]. The plant pathogen Verticillium dahliae is able to secrete an effector (secretory silencing repressor 1, VdSSR1) to the plant nucleus to interfere with the nuclear export of AGO1-miRNA complexes, resulting in the inhibition of antifungal RNAi and increased virulence in plants [178]. The cytoplasmic effector PsAvh23 produced by the soybean root rot pathogen Phytophthora sojae binds to the ADA2 subunit of SAGA complex in the host, and disrupts the association of ADA2 with the catalytic subunit GCN5 to suppress H3K9 acetylation and thus increase plant susceptibility [179]. PsAvh52, another early-induced RxLR effector secreted from P. sojae, recruits a host cytoplasmic transacetylase into the nucleus that acetylates histones H2A and H3, and thus promotes susceptibility to the pathogen [180]. Nuclear Localized Effector1 (RiNLE1) of the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus Rhizophagus irregularis is translocated into the host nucleus where it interacts with the plant core nucleosome protein H2B and impairs the mono-ubiquitination of H2B, which results in the suppression of defense gene expression [181]. Aside from effectors, filamentous fungal pathogens have also utilized toxins to cause host transcriptional reprogramming via altering the action of epigenetic enzymes. Phytopathogenic fungi are known to produce HDAC inhibitors such as HC toxin to interfere with host defense gene expression through inhibiting HDAC activity in maize [6,182]. In turn, it has also been reported that the interacting bacteria can target fungal Gcn5 to change fungal histone acetylation that results in the induction of secondary metabolite synthesis or inhibition of fungal pathogenicity [69,70]. However, the molecular mechanism that allows host plants or insects to trigger epigenetic changes, especially histone modifications in filamentous fungal pathogens, is far from being completely understood. Functional characterization of effectors (sRNAs and proteins) and their target epigenetic components in the interacting species are expected to illustrate the molecular bases underlying transcriptional reprogramming in pathogenic fungi–host interactions, which will further provide novel targets for prevention of fungal plant diseases and genetic improvement in entomopathogenic fungi for more effective control of insect pests.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L., L.W. and W.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.L. and S.W.; supervision, Y.L. and S.W.; project administration, Y.L. and S.W.; funding acquisition, Y.L. and S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant Nos. 2020YFC1200100, 2018YFA0900502), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants Nos. 31970470, 32021001), Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (grant no. 2021272), and the Shanghai Talent Development Funding (grant no. 2020121).

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Peng Y., Li S.J., Yan J., Tang Y., Cheng J.P., Gao A.J., Yao X., Ruan J.J., Xu B.L. Research Progress on Phytopathogenic Fungi and Their Role as Biocontrol Agents. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:670135. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.670135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang C., Wang S. Insect Pathogenic Fungi: Genomics, Molecular Interactions, and Genetic Improvements. Annu. Rev. Èntomol. 2017;62:73–90. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Butt T., Coates C., Dubovskiy I., Ratcliffe N. Entomopathogenic Fungi: New insights into host-pathogen interactions. Adv. Genet. 2016;94:307–364. doi: 10.1016/bs.adgen.2016.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lai Y., Chen H., Wei G., Wang G., Li F., Wang S. In vivo gene expression profiling of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana elucidates its infection stratagems in Anopheles mosquito. Sci. China Life Sci. 2017;60:839–851. doi: 10.1007/s11427-017-9101-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gómez-Díaz E., Jordà M., Peinado M.A., Rivero A. Epigenetics of Host–Pathogen Interactions: The Road Ahead and the Road Behind. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1003007. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhu Q.-H., Shan W.-X., Ayliffe M.A., Wang M.-B. Epigenetic Mechanisms: An Emerging Player in Plant-Microbe Interactions. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2016;29:187–196. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-08-15-0194-FI. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Freitag M. Histone Methylation by SET Domain Proteins in Fungi. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2017;71:413–439. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-102215-095757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Audia J.E., Campbell R.M. Histone Modifications and Cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2016;8:a019521. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a019521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell. 2007;128:693–705. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jiang Z.W., Liu X.G., Zhou Z.J. The Regulation of Histone Modifications. Prog. Biochem. Biophys. 2009;2009:1252–1259. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1206.2009.00188. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brosch G., Loidl P., Graessle S. Histone modifications and chromatin dynamics: A focus on filamentous fungi. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2008;32:409–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00100.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mohan M., Herz H.-M., Shilatifard A. SnapShot: Histone lysine methylase complexes. Cell. 2012;149:498–498.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Allis C.D., Berger S.L., Cote J., Dent S., Jenuwien T., Kouzarides T., Pillus L., Reinberg D., Shi Y., Shiekhattar R., et al. New Nomenclature for Chromatin-Modifying Enzymes. Cell. 2007;131:633–636. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shilatifard A. Molecular implementation and physiological roles for histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) methylation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2008;20:341–348. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.03.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ruthenburg A., Allis C.D., Wysocka J. Methylation of Lysine 4 on Histone H3: Intricacy of Writing and Reading a Single Epigenetic Mark. Mol. Cell. 2007;25:15–30. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Storck W.K., Bicocca V.T., Rountree M.R., Honda S., Ormsby T., Selker E.U. LSD1 prevents aberrant heterochromatin formation in Neurospora crassa. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:10199–10210. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hou J., Feng H., Chang H., Liu Y., Li G., Yang S., Sun C., Zhang M., Yuan Y., Sun J., et al. The H3K4 demethylase Jar1 orchestrates ROS production and expression of pathogenesis-related genes to facilitate Botrytis cinerea virulence. New Phytol. 2020;225:930–947. doi: 10.1111/nph.16200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kim J., Park S., Kwon S.H., Lee E.-J., Lee J.-S. Set1-mediated H3K4 methylation is required for Candida albicans virulence by regulating intracellular level of reactive oxygen species. Virulence. 2021;12:2648–2658. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2021.1980988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Baker K.M., Hoda S., Saha D., Gregor J.B., Georgescu L., Serratore N.D., Zhang Y., Cheng L., Lanman N.A., Briggs S.D. The Set1 Histone H3K4 Methyltransferase Contributes to Azole Susceptibility in a Species-Specific Manner by Differentially Altering the Expression of Drug Efflux Pumps and the Ergosterol Gene Pathway. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2022;66:e0225021. doi: 10.1128/aac.02250-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu Y., Liu N., Yin Y., Chen Y., Jiang J., Ma Z. Histone H3K4 methylation regulates hyphal growth, secondary metabolism and multiple stress responses in Fusarium graminearum. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;17:4615–4630. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Janevska S., Güldener U., Sulyok M., Tudzynski B., Studt L. Set1 and Kdm5 are antagonists for H3K4 methylation and regulators of the major conidiation-specific transcription factor gene ABA1 in Fusarium fujikuroi. Environ. Microbiol. 2018;20:3343–3362. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pham K.T.M., Inoue Y., Vu B.V., Nguyen H.H., Nakayashiki T., Ikeda K., Nakayashiki H. MoSET1 (histone H3K4 methyltransferase in Magnaporthe oryzae) regulates global gene expression during infection-related morphogenesis. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005385journal. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dallery J., Adelin É., Le Goff G., Pigné S., Auger A., Ouazzani J., O’Connell R.J. H3K4 trimethylation by CclA regulates pathogenicity and the production of three families of terpenoid secondary metabolites in Colletotrichum higginsianum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2019;20:831–842. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhou S., Liu X., Sun W., Zhang M., Yin Y., Pan S., He D., Shen M., Yang J., Zheng Q., et al. The COMPASS-like complex modulates fungal development and pathogenesis by regulating H3K4me3-mediated targeted gene expression in Magnaporthe oryzae. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2021;22:422–439. doi: 10.1111/mpp.13035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lai Y., Cao X., Chen J., Wang L., Wei G., Wang S. Coordinated regulation of infection-related morphogenesis by the KMT2-Cre1-Hyd4 regulatory pathway to facilitate fungal infection. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eaaz1659. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz1659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ren K., Mou Y., Tong S., Ying S., Feng M. SET1/KMT2 -governed histone H3K4 methylation coordinates the lifecycle in vivo and in vitro of the fungal insect pathogen Beauveria bassiana. Environ. Microbiol. 2021;23:5541–5554. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gessaman J.D., Selker E.U. Induction of H3K9me3 and DNA methylation by tethered heterochromatin factors in Neurospora crassa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:E9598–E9607. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715049114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ren K., Mou Y.-N., Tong S.-M., Ying S.-H., Feng M.-G. DIM5/KMT1 controls fungal insect pathogenicity and genome stability by methylation of histone H3K4, H3K9 and H3K. Virulence. 2021;12:1306–1322. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2021.1923232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang X., Liu X., Zhao Y., Cheng J., Xie J., Fu Y., Jiang D., Chen T. Histone H3 Lysine 9 Methyltransferase DIM5 Is Required for the Development and Virulence of Botrytis cinerea. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:1289. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gu Q., Ji T., Sun X., Huang H., Zhang H., Lu X., Wu L., Huo R., Wu H., Gao X. Histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferase FvDim5 regulates fungal development, pathogenicity and osmotic stress responses in Fusarium verticillioides. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2017;364:fnx184. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Anna K.A., Friederike L., Svetlana K., Joseph S., Hans-Ulrich H., Lena S. Biosynthesis of fusapyrone depends on the H3K9 methyltransferase, FmKmt1, in Fusarium mangiferae. Front. Fungal Biol. 2021;2:671796. doi: 10.3389/ffunb.2021.671796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chujo T., Scott B. Histone H3K9 and H3K27 methylation regulates fungal alkaloid biosynthesis in a fungal endophyte-plant symbiosis. Mol. Microbiol. 2014;92:413–434. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Soyer J.L., El Ghalid M., Glaser N., Ollivier B., Linglin J., Grandaubert J., Balesdent M.-H., Connolly L.R., Freitag M., Rouxel T., et al. Epigenetic Control of Effector Gene Expression in the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Leptosphaeria maculans. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Aramayo R., Selker E.U. Neurospora crassa, a Model System for Epigenetics Research. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013;5:a017921. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jamieson K., Rountree M.R., Lewis Z.A., Stajich J.E., Selker E.U. Regional control of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Neurospora. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:6027–6032. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303750110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dumesic P.A., Homer C.M., Moresco J., Pack L.R., Shanle E.K., Coyle S.M., Strahl B.D., Fujimori D.G., Yates J.R., 3rd, Madhani H.D. Product Binding Enforces the Genomic Specificity of a Yeast Polycomb Repressive Complex. Cell. 2014;160:204–218. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Connolly L.R., Smith K.M., Freitag M. The Fusarium graminearum Histone H3 K27 Methyltransferase KMT6 Regulates Development and Expression of Secondary Metabolite Gene Clusters. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhang W., Huang J., Cook D.E. Histone modification dynamics at H3K27 are associated with altered transcription of in planta induced genes in Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS Genet. 2021;17:e1009376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Meng S., Liu Z., Shi H., Wu Z., Qiu J., Wen H., Lin F., Tao Z., Luo C., Kou Y. UvKmt6-mediated H3K27 trimethylation is required for development, pathogenicity, and stress response in Ustilaginoidea virens. Virulence. 2021;12:2972–2988. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2021.2008150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tang G., Yuan J., Wang J., Zhang Y.-Z., Xie S.-S., Wang H., Tao Z., Liu H., Kistler H.C., Zhao Y., et al. Fusarium BP1 is a reader of H3K27 methylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:10448–10464. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Venkatesh S., Workman J.L. Set2 mediated H3 lysine 36 methylation: Regulation of transcription elongation and implications in organismal development. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2013;2:685–700. doi: 10.1002/wdev.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bicocca V.T., Ormsby T., Adhvaryu K.K., Honda S., Selker E.U. ASH1-catalyzed H3K36 methylation drives gene repression and marks H3K27me2/3-competent chromatin. eLife. 2018;7:e41497. doi: 10.7554/eLife.41497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Janevska S., Baumann L., Sieber C.M.K., Münsterkötter M., Ulrich J., Kämper J., Güldener U., Tudzynski B. Elucidation of the Two H3K36me3 Histone Methyltransferases Set2 and Ash1 in Fusarium fujikuroi Unravels Their Different Chromosomal Targets and a Major Impact of Ash1 on Genome Stability. Genetics. 2018;208:153–171. doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.1119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sun G., Zhou Z., Liu X., Gai K., Liu Q., Cha J., Kaleri F.N., Wang Y., He Q. Suppression of WHITE COLLAR-independent frequency Transcription by Histone H3 Lysine 36 Methyltransferase SET-2 Is Necessary for Clock Function in Neurospora. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:11055–11063. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.711333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gu Q., Wang Z., Sun X., Ji T., Huang H., Yang Y., Zhang H., Tahir H.A.S., Wu L., Wu H., et al. FvSet2 regulates fungal growth, pathogenicity, and secondary metabolism in Fusarium verticillioides. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2017;107:24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2017.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lukito Y., Lee K., Noorifar N., Green K.A., Winter D.J., Ram A., Hale T.K., Chujo T., Cox M.P., Johnson L.J., et al. Regulation of host-infection ability in the grass-symbiotic fungus Epichloë festucae by histone H3K9 and H3K36 methyltransferases. Environ. Microbiol. 2020;23:2116–2131. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schumacher J., Studt L., Tudzynski P. The putative H3K36 demethylase BcKDM1 affects virulence, stress responses and photomorphogenesis in Botrytis cinerea. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2018;123:14–24. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2018.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Vlaming H., Van Leeuwen F. The upstreams and downstreams of H3K79 methylation by DOT1L. Chromosoma. 2016;125:593–605. doi: 10.1007/s00412-015-0570-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Singer M.S., Kahana A., Wolf A.J., Meisinger L.L., Peterson S.E., Goggin C., Mahowald M., Gottschling D.E. Identification of High-Copy Disruptors of Telomeric Silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1998;150:613–632. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.2.613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kitada T., Kuryan B.G., Tran N.N.H., Song C., Xue Y., Carey M., Grunstein M. Mechanism for epigenetic variegation of gene expression at yeast telomeric heterochromatin. Genes Dev. 2012;26:2443–2455. doi: 10.1101/gad.201095.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.van Welsem T., Frederiks F., Verzijlbergen K.F., Faber A.W., Nelson Z.W., Egan D.A., Gottschling D.E., van Leeuwen F. Synthetic Lethal Screens Identify Gene Silencing Processes in Yeast and Implicate the Acetylated Amino Terminus of Sir3 in Recognition of the Nucleosome Core. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008;28:3861–3872. doi: 10.1128/MCB.02050-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Li Y., Hu Y., Zhao K., Pan Y., Qu Y., Zhao J., Qin Y. The Indispensable Role of Histone Methyltransferase PoDot1 in Extracellular Glycoside Hydrolase Biosynthesis of Penicillium oxalicum. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:2566. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Liang L., Liu Y., Yang K., Lin G., Xu Z., Lan H., Wang X., Wang S. The Putative Histone Methyltransferase DOT1 Regulates Aflatoxin and Pathogenicity Attributes in Aspergillus flavus. Toxins. 2017;9:232. doi: 10.3390/toxins9070232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hyun K., Jeon J., Park K., Kim J. Writing, erasing and reading histone lysine methylations. Exp. Mol. Med. 2017;49:e324. doi: 10.1038/emm.2017.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang Y., Jia S. Degrees make all the difference: The multifunctionality of histone H4 lysine 20 methylation. Epigenetics. 2009;4:273–276. doi: 10.4161/epi.4.5.9212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bachleitner S., Sulyok M., Sørensen J.L., Strauss J., Studt L. The H4K20 methyltransferase Kmt5 is involved in secondary metabolism and stress response in phytopathogenic Fusarium species. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2021;155:103602. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2021.103602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Roth S.Y., Denu J.M., Allis C.D. Histone Acetyltransferases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2001;70:81–120. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Jeon J., Kwon S., Lee Y.-H. Histone Acetylation in Fungal Pathogens of Plants. Plant Pathol. J. 2014;30:1–9. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.RW.01.2014.0003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Georgakopoulos T., Thireos G. Two distinct yeast transcriptional activators require the function of the GCN5 protein to promote normal levels of transcription. EMBO J. 1992;11:4145–4152. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05507.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Xue-Franzén Y., Henriksson J., Bürglin T.R., Wright A.P. Distinct roles of the Gcn5 histone acetyltransferase revealed during transient stress-induced reprogramming of the genome. BMC Genom. 2013;14:479. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wang L.-C., Montalvo-Munoz F., Tsai Y.-C., Liang C.-Y., Chang C.-C., Lo W.-S. The Histone Acetyltransferase Gcn5 Regulates ncRNA-ICR1 and FLO11 Expression during Pseudohyphal Development in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BioMed Res. Int. 2015;2015:284692. doi: 10.1155/2015/284692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.O’Meara T.R., Hay C., Price M.S., Giles S., Alspaugh J.A. Cryptococcus neoformans Histone Acetyltransferase Gcn5 Regulates Fungal Adaptation to the Host. Eukaryot. Cell. 2010;9:1193–1202. doi: 10.1128/EC.00098-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Su C., Lu Y., Liu H. N-acetylglucosamine sensing by a GCN5-related N-acetyltransferase induces transcription via chromatin histone acetylation in fungi. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:12916. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Cai Q., Wang J.-J., Fu B., Ying S.-H., Feng M.-G. Gcn5-dependent histone H3 acetylation and gene activity is required for the asexual development and virulence of Beauveria bassiana. Environ. Microbiol. 2018;20:1484–1497. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Cai Q., Wang J.-J., Xie J.-T., Jiang D.-H., Keyhani N.O. The Spt10 GNAT Superfamily Protein Modulates Development, Cell Cycle Progression and Virulence in the Fungal Insect Pathogen, Beauveria bassiana. J. Fungi. 2021;7:905. doi: 10.3390/jof7110905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.González-Prieto J.M., Rosas-Quijano R., Domínguez A., Ruiz-Herrera J. The UmGcn5 gene encoding histone acetyltransferase from Ustilago maydis is involved in dimorphism and virulence. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2014;71:86–95. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2014.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lan H., Sun R., Fan K., Yang K., Zhang F., Nie X.Y., Wang X., Zhuang Z., Wang S. The Aspergillus flavus Histone Acetyltransferase AflGcnE Regulates Morphogenesis, Aflatoxin Biosynthesis, and Pathogenicity. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:1324. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kong X., Van Diepeningen A.D., Van Der Lee T.A.J., Waalwijk C., Xu J., Xu J., Zhang H., Chen W., Feng J. The Fusarium graminearum Histone Acetyltransferases Are Important for Morphogenesis, DON Biosynthesis, and Pathogenicity. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:654. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Nützmann H.-W., Reyes-Dominguez Y., Scherlach K., Schroeckh V., Horn F., Gacek A., Schümann J., Hertweck C., Strauss J., Brakhage A.A. Bacteria-induced natural product formation in the fungus Aspergillus nidulans requires Saga/Ada-mediated histone acetylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:14282–14287. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103523108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Chen Y., Wang J., Yang N., Wen Z., Sun X., Chai Y., Ma Z. Wheat microbiome bacteria can reduce virulence of a plant pathogenic fungus by altering histone acetylation. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:3429. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05683-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Liang M., Zhang S., Dong L., Kou Y., Lin C., Dai W., Zhang L.-H., Deng Y.Z. Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics of Lysine Acetylome Identifies Substrates of Gcn5 in Magnaporthe oryzae Autophagy and Epigenetic Regulation. mSystems. 2018;3:e00270-18. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00270-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Li F., Zheng L.-D., Chen X., Zhao X., Briggs S.D., Du H.-N. Gcn5-mediated Rph1 acetylation regulates its autophagic degradation under DNA damage stress. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:5183–5197. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zhang S., Liang M., Naqvi N.I., Lin C., Qian W., Zhang L.-H., Deng Y.Z. Phototrophy and starvation-based induction of autophagy upon removal of Gcn5-catalyzed acetylation of Atg7 in Magnaporthe oryzae. Autophagy. 2017;13:1318–1330. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1327103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Yin Z., Chen C., Yang J., Feng W., Liu X., Zuo R., Wang J., Yang L., Zhong K., Gao C., et al. Histone acetyltransferase MoHat1 acetylates autophagy-related proteins MoAtg3 and MoAtg9 to orchestrate functional appressorium formation and pathogenicity in Magnaporthe oryzae. Autophagy. 2019;15:1234–1257. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1580104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sapountzi V., Côté J. MYST-family histone acetyltransferases: Beyond chromatin. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2010;68:1147–1156. doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0599-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Osada S., Sutton A., Muster N., Brown C.E., Yates J.R., 3rd, Sternglanz R., Workman J.L. The yeast SAS (something about silencing) protein complex contains a MYST-type putative acetyltransferase and functions with chromatin assembly factor ASF1. Genes Dev. 2001;15:3155–3168. doi: 10.1101/gad.907201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Cavero S., Herruzo E., Ontoso D., San-Segundo P.A. Impact of histone H4K16 acetylation on the meiotic recombination checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb. Cell. 2016;3:606–620. doi: 10.15698/mic2016.12.548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zou Y., Bi X. Positive roles of SAS2 in DNA replication and transcriptional silencing in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:5189–5200. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Wang G., Song L., Bai T., Liang W. BcSas2-mediated histone H4K16 acetylation is critical for virulence and oxidative stress response of Botrytis cinerea. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2020;33:1242–1251. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-06-20-0149-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.John S., Howe L., Tafrov S.T., Grant P.A., Sternglanz R., Workman J.L. The something about silencing protein, Sas3, is the catalytic subunit of NuA3, a yTAF(II)30-containing HAT complex that interacts with the Spt16 subunit of the yeast CP (Cdc68/Pob3)-FACT complex. Genes Dev. 2000;14:1196–1208. doi: 10.1101/gad.14.10.1196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Howe L., Auston D., Grant P., John S., Cook R.G., Workman J.L., Pillus L. Histone H3 specific acetyltransferases are essential for cell cycle progression. Genes Dev. 2001;15:3144–3154. doi: 10.1101/gad.931401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Dubey A., Lee J., Kwon S., Lee Y., Jeon J. A MYST family histone acetyltransferase, MoSAS3, is required for development and pathogenicity in the rice blast fungus. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2019;20:1491–1505. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Chen X., Wu L., Lan H., Sun R., Wen M., Ruan D., Zhang M., Wang S. Histone acetyltransferases MystA and MystB contribute to morphogenesis and aflatoxin biosynthesis by regulating acetylation in fungus Aspergillus flavus. Environ. Microbiol. 2021;24:1340–1361. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Fan A., Mi W., Liu Z., Zeng G., Zhang P., Hu Y., Fang W., Yin W.-B. Deletion of a Histone Acetyltransferase Leads to the Pleiotropic Activation of Natural Products in Metarhizium robertsii. Org. Lett. 2017;19:1686–1689. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Wang J.-J., Cai Q., Qiu L., Ying S.-H., Feng M.-G. The histone acetyltransferase Mst2 sustains the biological control potential of a fungal insect pathogen through transcriptional regulation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017;102:1343–1355. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8703-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Suka N., Suka Y., Carmen A.A., Wu J., Grunstein M. Highly Specific Antibodies Determine Histone Acetylation Site Usage in Yeast Heterochromatin and Euchromatin. Mol. Cell. 2001;8:473–479. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00301-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Nourani A., Utley R.T., Allard S., Côté J. Recruitment of the NuA4 complex poises the PHO5 promoter for chromatin remodeling and activation. EMBO J. 2004;23:2597–2607. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ginsburg D.S., Govind C.K., Hinnebusch A.G. NuA4 Lysine Acetyltransferase Esa1 Is Targeted to Coding Regions and Stimulates Transcription Elongation with Gcn5. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009;29:6473–6487. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01033-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Smith E.R., Eisen A., Gu W., Sattah M., Pannuti A., Zhou J., Cook R.G., Lucchesi J.C., Allis C.D. ESA1 is a histone acetyltransferase that is essential for growth in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:3561–3565. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Clarke A.S., Lowell J.E., Jacobson S.J., Pillus L. Esa1p Is an Essential Histone Acetyltransferase Required for Cell Cycle Progression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999;19:2515–2526. doi: 10.1128/MCB.19.4.2515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Zhou B.O., Wang S.-S., Zhang Y., Fu X.-H., Dang W., Lenzmeier B.A., Zhou J.-Q. Histone H4 Lysine 12 Acetylation Regulates Telomeric Heterochromatin Plasticity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1001272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Wang X., Chang P., Ding J., Chen J. Distinct and Redundant Roles of the Two MYST Histone Acetyltransferases Esa1 and Sas2 in Cell Growth and Morphogenesis of Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell. 2013;12:438–449. doi: 10.1128/EC.00275-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Soukup A.A., Chiang Y.-M., Bok J.W., Reyes-Dominguez Y., Oakley B.R., Wang C.C.C., Strauss J., Keller N.P. Overexpression of the Aspergillus nidulans histone 4 acetyltransferase EsaA increases activation of secondary metabolite production. Mol. Microbiol. 2012;86:314–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08195.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Jiang H., Xia A., Ye M., Ren J., Li D., Liu H., Wang Q., Lu P., Wu C., Xu J.-R., et al. Opposing functions of Fng1 and the Rpd3 HDAC complex in H4 acetylation in Fusarium graminearum. PLoS Genet. 2020;16:e1009185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Lin Y.-Y., Lu J.-Y., Zhang J., Walter W., Dang W., Wan J., Tao S.-C., Qian J., Zhao Y., Boeke J.D., et al. Protein Acetylation Microarray Reveals that NuA4 Controls Key Metabolic Target Regulating Gluconeogenesis. Cell. 2009;136:1073–1084. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Yi C., Ma M., Ran L., Zheng J., Tong J., Zhu J., Ma C., Sun Y., Zhang S., Feng W., et al. Function and Molecular Mechanism of Acetylation in Autophagy Regulation. Science. 2012;336:474–477. doi: 10.1126/science.1216990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Schneider J., Bajwa P., Johnson F.C., Bhaumik S.R., Shilatifard A. Rtt109 Is Required for Proper H3K56 Acetylation: A chromatin mark associated with the elongating RNA polymerase II. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:37270–37274. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C600265200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.D’Arcy S., Luger K. Understanding histone acetyltransferase Rtt109 structure and function: How many chaperones does it take? Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2011;21:728–734. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Kolonko E.M., Albaugh B.N., Lindner S.E., Chen Y., Satyshur K.A., Arnold K.M., Kaufman P.D., Keck J.L., Denu J.M. Catalytic activation of histone acetyltransferase Rtt109 by a histone chaperone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:20275–20280. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009860107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Han J., Zhou H., Horazdovsky B., Zhang K., Xu R.-M., Zhang Z. Rtt109 Acetylates Histone H3 Lysine 56 and Functions in DNA Replication. Science. 2007;315:653–655. doi: 10.1126/science.1133234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.da Rosa J.L., Boyartchuk V.L., Zhu L.J., Kaufman P.D. Histone acetyltransferase Rtt109 is required for Candida albicans pathogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:1594–1599. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912427107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Stevenson J.S., Liu H. Regulation of white and opaque cell-type formation in Candida albicans by Rtt109 and Hst3. Mol. Microbiol. 2011;81:1078–1091. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07754.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Zhang Y., Fan J., Ye J., Lu L. The fungal-specific histone acetyltransferase Rtt109 regulates development, DNA damage response, and virulence in Aspergillus fumigatus. Mol. Microbiol. 2020;115:1191–1206. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Cai Q., Wang J.-J., Shao W., Ying S.-H., Feng M.-G. Rtt109-dependent histone H3 K56 acetylation and gene activity are essential for the biological control potential of Beauveria bassiana. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018;74:2626–2635. doi: 10.1002/ps.5054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Sun R., Wen M., Wu L., Lan H., Yuan J., Wang S. The Fungi-specific histone Acetyltransferase Rtt109 mediates morphogenesis, Aflatoxin synthesis and pathogenicity in Aspergillus flavus by acetylating H3K9. IMA Fungus. 2021;12:9. doi: 10.1186/s43008-021-00060-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Bannister A.J., Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 2011;21:381–395. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Seto E., Yoshida M. Erasers of Histone Acetylation: The Histone Deacetylase Enzymes. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014;6:a018713. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Núñez-Álvarez Y., Suelves M. HDAC11: A multifaceted histone deacetylase with proficient fatty deacylase activity and its roles in physiological processes. FEBS J. 2021;289:2771–2792. doi: 10.1111/febs.15895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Rundlett S.E., Carmen A.A., Kobayashi R., Bavykin S., Turner B.M., Grunstein M. HDA1 and RPD3 are members of distinct yeast histone deacetylase complexes that regulate silencing and transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:14503–14508. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Bauer I., Varadarajan D., Pidroni A., Gross S., Vergeiner S., Faber B., Hermann M., Tribus M., Brosch G., Graessle S. A Class 1 Histone Deacetylase with Potential as an Antifungal Target. MBio. 2016;7:e00831-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00831-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Keogh M.-C., Kurdistani S., Morris S.A., Ahn S.-H., Podolny V., Collins S., Schuldiner M., Chin K., Punna T., Thompson N.J., et al. Cotranscriptional Set2 Methylation of Histone H3 Lysine 36 Recruits a Repressive Rpd3 Complex. Cell. 2005;123:593–605. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Carrozza M.J., Li B., Florens L., Suganuma T., Swanson S.K., Lee K.K., Shia W.-J., Anderson S., Yates J., Washburn M., et al. Histone H3 Methylation by Set2 Directs Deacetylation of Coding Regions by Rpd3S to Suppress Spurious Intragenic Transcription. Cell. 2005;123:581–592. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Kadosh D., Struhl K. Targeted Recruitment of the Sin3-Rpd3 Histone Deacetylase Complex Generates a Highly Localized Domain of Repressed Chromatin In Vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998;18:5121–5127. doi: 10.1128/MCB.18.9.5121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Carrozza M.J., Florens L., Swanson S.K., Shia W.-J., Anderson S., Yates J., Washburn M.P., Workman J.L. Stable incorporation of sequence specific repressors Ash1 and Ume6 into the Rpd3L complex. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Gene Struct. Expr. 2005;1731:77–87. doi: 10.1016/j.bbaexp.2005.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Alejandro-Osorio A.L., Huebert D.J., Porcaro D.T., Sonntag M.E., Nillasithanukroh S., Will J.L., Gasch A.P. The histone deacetylase Rpd3p is required for transient changes in genomic expression in response to stress. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R57. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-5-r57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Cai Q., Wang Z.-K., Shao W., Ying S.-H., Feng M.-G. Essential role of Rpd3-dependent lysine modification in the growth, development and virulence of Beauveria bassiana. Environ. Microbiol. 2018;20:1590–1606. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Zhang Y., Wang L., Liang S., Zhang P., Kang R., Zhang M., Wang M., Chen L., Yuan H., Ding S., et al. FpDep1, a component of Rpd3L histone deacetylase complex, is important for vegetative development, ROS accumulation, and pathogenesis in Fusarium pseudograminearum. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2020;135:103299. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2019.103299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Zhang N., Yang Z., Zhang Z., Liang W. BcRPD3-Mediated Histone Deacetylation Is Involved in Growth and Pathogenicity of Botrytis cinerea. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:1832. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Lee S.H., Farh M.E.-A., Lee J., Oh Y.T., Cho E., Park J., Son H., Jeon J. A Histone Deacetylase, Magnaporthe oryzae RPD3, Regulates Reproduction and Pathogenic Development in the Rice Blast Fungus. MBio. 2021;12:e0260021. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02600-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Lin C., Cao X., Qu Z., Zhang S., Naqvi N.I., Deng Y.Z. The Histone Deacetylases MoRpd3 and MoHst4 Regulate Growth, Conidiation, and Pathogenicity in the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. mSphere. 2021;6:e0011821. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00118-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Shanmugam G., Kim T., Jeon J. In Silico Identification of Potential Inhibitor Against a Fungal Histone Deacetylase, RPD3 from Magnaporthe oryzae. Molecules. 2019;24:2075. doi: 10.3390/molecules24112075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Pijnappel W.P., Schaft D., Roguev A., Shevchenko A., Tekotte H., Wilm M., Rigaut G., Séraphin B., Aasland R., Stewart A.F. The S. cerevisiae SET3 complex includes two histone deacetylases, Hos2 and Hst1, and is a meiotic-specific repressor of the sporulation gene program. Genes Dev. 2001;15:2991–3004. doi: 10.1101/gad.207401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Wang A., Kurdistani S.K., Grunstein M. Requirement of Hos2 Histone Deacetylase for Gene Activity in Yeast. Science. 2002;298:1412–1414. doi: 10.1126/science.1077790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Torres-Machorro A.L., Clark L.G., Chang C.S., Pillus L. The Set3 Complex Antagonizes the MYST Acetyltransferase Esa1 in the DNA Damage Response. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2015;35:3714–3725. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00298-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Baidyaroy D., Brosch G., Ahn J.-H., Graessle S., Wegener S., Tonukari N.J., Caballero O., Loidl P., Walton J.D. A Gene Related to Yeast HOS2 Histone Deacetylase Affects Extracellular Depolymerase Expression and Virulence in a Plant Pathogenic Fungus. Plant Cell. 2001;13:1609–1624. doi: 10.1105/TPC.010168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Li Y., Wang C., Liu W., Wang G., Kang Z., Kistler H., Xu J.-R. The HDF1 Histone Deacetylase Gene Is Important for Conidiation, Sexual Reproduction, and Pathogenesis in Fusarium graminearum. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2011;24:487–496. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-10-10-0233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Hnisz D., Majer O., Frohner I.E., Komnenovic V., Kuchler K. The Set3/Hos2 Histone Deacetylase Complex Attenuates cAMP/PKA Signaling to Regulate Morphogenesis and Virulence of Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000889. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Hnisz D., Schwarzmüller T., Kuchler K. Transcriptional loops meet chromatin: A dual-layer network controls white-opaque switching in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 2009;74:1–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06772.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Elías-Villalobos A., Fernández-Álvarez A., Moreno-Sánchez I., Helmlinger D., Ibeas J.I. The Hos2 Histone Deacetylase Controls Ustilago maydis Virulence through Direct Regulation of Mating-Type Genes. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1005134. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Lee J., Lee J.-J., Jeon J. A histone deacetylase, MoHOS2 regulates asexual development and virulence in the rice blast fungus. J. Microbiol. 2019;57:1115–1125. doi: 10.1007/s12275-019-9363-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Ding S.-L., Liu W., Iliuk A., Ribot C., Vallet J., Tao A., Wang Y., Lebrun M.-H., Xu J.-R. The Tig1 Histone Deacetylase Complex Regulates Infectious Growth in the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Plant Cell. 2010;22:2495–2508. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.074302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Cai Q., Tong S.-M., Shao W., Ying S.-H., Feng M.-G. Pleiotropic effects of the histone deacetylase Hos2 linked to H4-K16 deacetylation, H3-K56 acetylation, and H2A-S129 phosphorylation in Beauveria bassiana. Cell. Microbiol. 2018;20:e12839. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Zhang X., Meng Y., Huang Y., Zhang D., Fang W. A novel cascade allows Metarhizium robertsii to distinguish cuticle and hemocoel microenvironments during infection of insects. PLoS Biol. 2021;19:e3001360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Wu J., Suka N., Carlson M., Grunstein M. TUP1 Utilizes Histone H3/H2B–Specific HDA1 Deacetylase to Repress Gene Activity in Yeast. Mol. Cell. 2001;7:117–126. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00160-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Islam A., Turner E.L., Menzel J., Malo M.E., Harkness T.A. Antagonistic Gcn5-Hda1 interactions revealed by mutations to the Anaphase Promoting Complex in yeast. Cell Div. 2011;6:13. doi: 10.1186/1747-1028-6-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Yu R., Cao X., Sun L., Zhu J.-Y., Wasko B.M., Liu W., Crutcher E., Liu H., Jo M.C., Qin L., et al. Inactivating histone deacetylase HDA promotes longevity by mobilizing trehalose metabolism. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:1981. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22257-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Brandão F., Esher S.K., Ost K.S., Pianalto K., Nichols C.B., Fernandes L., Bocca A.L., Poças-Fonseca M.J., Alspaugh J.A. HDAC genes play distinct and redundant roles in Cryptococcus neoformans virulence. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:5209. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21965-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Lee I., Oh J.-H., Shwab E.K., Dagenais T.R.T., Andes D., Keller N.P. HdaA, a class 2 histone deacetylase of Aspergillus fumigatus, affects germination and secondary metabolite production. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2009;46:782–790. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2009.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Studt L., Schmidt F.J., Jahn L., Sieber C.M.K., Connolly L.R., Niehaus E.-M., Freitag M., Humpf H.-U., Tudzynski B. Two Histone Deacetylases, FfHda1 and FfHda2, Are Important for Fusarium fujikuroi Secondary Metabolism and Virulence. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013;79:7719–7734. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01557-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Maeda K., Izawa M., Nakajima Y., Jin Q., Hirose T., Nakamura T., Koshino H., Kanamaru K., Ohsato S., Kamakura T., et al. Increased metabolite production by deletion of an HDA1-type histone deacetylase in the phytopathogenic fungi, Magnaporthe oryzae (Pyricularia oryzae) and Fusarium asiaticum. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2017;65:446–452. doi: 10.1111/lam.12797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Li X., Pan L., Wang B., Pan L. The Histone Deacetylases HosA and HdaA Affect the Phenotype and Transcriptomic and Metabolic Profiles of Aspergillus niger. Toxins. 2019;11:520. doi: 10.3390/toxins11090520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Reichmann M., Jamnischek A., Weinzierl G., Ladendorf O., Huber S., Kahmann R., Kämper J. The histone deacetylase Hda1 from Ustilago maydis is essential for teliospore development. Mol. Microbiol. 2002;46:1169–1182. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03238.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Torreblanca J., Stumpferl S., Basse C.W. Histone deacetylase Hda1 acts as repressor of the Ustilago maydis biotrophic marker gene mig1. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2003;38:22–32. doi: 10.1016/S1087-1845(02)00505-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Robbins N., Leach M.D., Cowen L.E. Lysine Deacetylases Hda1 and Rpd3 Regulate Hsp90 Function thereby Governing Fungal Drug Resistance. Cell Rep. 2012;2:878–888. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.08.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Wang X., Zhu W., Chang P., Wu H., Liu H., Chen J. Merge and separation of NuA4 and SWR1 complexes control cell fate plasticity in Candida albicans. Cell Discov. 2018;4:45. doi: 10.1038/s41421-018-0043-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Blander G., Guarente L. The Sir2 Family of Protein Deacetylases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2004;73:417–435. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Borra M.T., Langer M.R., Slama J.T., Denu J.M. Substrate Specificity and Kinetic Mechanism of the Sir2 Family of NAD+-Dependent Histone/Protein Deacetylases. Biochemistry. 2004;43:9877–9887. doi: 10.1021/bi049592e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Rusche L.N., Kirchmaier A.L., Rine J. The Establishment, Inheritance, and Function of Silenced Chromatin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2003;72:481–516. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Beneitez V.F., Gourlay S., Berman J., Buscaino A. Sir2 regulates stability of repetitive domains differentially in the human fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:9166–9179. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Foss E.J., Lao U., Dalrymple E., Adrianse R.L., Loe T., Bedalov A. SIR2 suppresses replication gaps and genome instability by balancing replication between repetitive and unique sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:552–557. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614781114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Smith K.M., Kothe G.O., Matsen C.B., Khlafallah T.K., Adhvaryu K.K., Hemphill M., Freitag M., Motamedi M.R., Selker E.U. The fungus Neurospora crassa displays telomeric silencing mediated by multiple sirtuins and by methylation of histone H3 lysine 9. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2008;1:5–20. doi: 10.1186/1756-8935-1-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Perez-Martin J., Uría J.A., Johnson A.D. Phenotypic switching in Candida albicans is controlled by a SIR2 gene. EMBO J. 1999;18:2580–2592. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.9.2580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Gallegos-García V., Pan S.-J., Juárez-Cepeda J., Ramírez-Zavaleta C.Y., Martin-Del-Campo M.B., Martínez-Jiménez V., Castaño I., Cormack B., Peñas A.D.L. A Novel Downstream Regulatory Element Cooperates with the Silencing Machinery to Repress EPA1 Expression in Candida glabrata. Genetics. 2012;190:1285–1297. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.138099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Arras S.D.M., Chitty J., Wizrah M.S.I., Erpf P.E., Schulz B., Tanurdzic M., Fraser J.A. Sirtuins in the phylum Basidiomycota: A role in virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:srep46567. doi: 10.1038/srep46567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Bouklas T., Jain N., Fries B.C. Modulation of Replicative Lifespan in Cryptococcus neoformans: Implications for Virulence. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:98. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Fernandez J., Marroquin-Guzman M., Nandakumar R., Shijo S., Cornwell K.M., Li G., Wilson R.A. Plant defence suppression is mediated by a fungal sirtuin during rice infection by Magnaporthe oryzae. Mol. Microbiol. 2014;94:70–88. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Cai Q., Tian L., Xie J., Huang Q., Feng M., Keyhani N.O. A fungal sirtuin modulates development and virulence in the insect pathogen, Beauveria bassiana. Environ. Microbiol. 2021;23:5164–5183. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Poças-Fonseca M.J., Cabral C.G., Manfrão-Netto J.H.C. Epigenetic manipulation of filamentous fungi for biotechnological applications: A systematic review. Biotechnol. Lett. 2020;42:885–904. doi: 10.1007/s10529-020-02871-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Tsuji N., Kobayashi M., Nagashima K., Wakisaka Y., Koizumi K. A new antifungal antibiotic, trichostatin. J. Antibiot. 1976;29:1–6. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.29.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Kim H.-J., Bae S.-C. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: Molecular mechanisms of action and clinical trials as anti-cancer drugs. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2010;3:166–179. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Smith W.L., Edlind T.D. Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Enhance Candida albicans Sensitivity to Azoles and Related Antifungals: Correlation with Reduction in CDR and ERG Upregulation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002;46:3532–3539. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.11.3532-3539.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Izawa M., Takekawa O., Arie T., Teraoka T., Yoshida M., Kimura M., Kamakura T. Inhibition of histone deacetylase causes reduction of appressorium formation in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2009;55:489–498. doi: 10.2323/jgam.55.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Brandão F.A., Derengowski L.S., Albuquerque P., Nicola A.M., Silva-Pereira I., Poças-Fonseca M.J. Histone deacetylases inhibitors effects on Cryptococcus neoformans major virulence phenotypes. Virulence. 2015;6:618–630. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2015.1038014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Pfaller M.A., Messer S.A., Georgopapadakou N., Martell L.A., Besterman J.M., Diekema D.J. Activity of MGCD290, a Hos2 Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor, in Combination with Azole Antifungals against Opportunistic Fungal Pathogens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009;47:3797–3804. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00618-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Beisel C., Paro R. Silencing chromatin: Comparing modes and mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011;12:123–135. doi: 10.1038/nrg2932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Song Z.-T., Sun L., Lu S.-J., Tian Y., Ding Y., Liu J.-X. Transcription factor interaction with COMPASS-like complex regulates histone H3K4 trimethylation for specific gene expression in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:2900–2905. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419703112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Brien G., Gambero G., O’Connell D., Jerman E., Turner S.A., Egan C.M., Dunne E.J., Jurgens M.C., Wynne K., Piao L., et al. Polycomb PHF19 binds H3K36me3 and recruits PRC2 and demethylase NO66 to embryonic stem cell genes during differentiation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012;19:1273–1281. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Kaneko S., Bonasio R., Saldana-Meyer R., Yoshida T., Son J., Nishino K., Umezawa A., Reinberg D. Interactions between JARID2 and Noncoding RNAs Regulate PRC2 Recruitment to Chromatin. Mol. Cell. 2013;53:290–300. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Moore L.D., Le T., Fan G. DNA Methylation and Its Basic Function. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38:23–38. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Weiberg A., Wang M., Lin F.-M., Zhao H., Zhang Z., Kaloshian I., Huang H.-D., Jin H. Fungal Small RNAs Suppress Plant Immunity by Hijacking Host RNA Interference Pathways. Science. 2013;342:118–123. doi: 10.1126/science.1239705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Wang M., Weiberg A., Lin F.-M., Thomma B.P.H.J., Huang H.-D., Jin H. Bidirectional cross-kingdom RNAi and fungal uptake of external RNAs confer plant protection. Nat. Plants. 2016;2:16151. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Wang B., Sun Y., Song N., Zhao M., Liu R., Feng H., Wang X., Kang Z. Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici microRNA-like RNA 1 (Pst-milR1), an important pathogenicity factor of Pst, impairs wheat resistance to Pst by suppressing the wheat pathogenesis-related 2 gene. New Phytol. 2017;215:338–350. doi: 10.1111/nph.14577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Cui C., Wang Y., Liu J., Zhao J., Sun P., Wang S. A fungal pathogen deploys a small silencing RNA that attenuates mosquito immunity and facilitates infection. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:4298. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12323-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Zhang T., Zhao Y.-L., Zhao J.-H., Wang S., Jin Y., Chen Z.-Q., Fang Y.-Y., Zhao J.-H., Ding S.-W., Guo H.-S. Cotton plants export microRNAs to inhibit virulence gene expression in a fungal pathogen. Nat. Plants. 2016;2:16153. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Wang Y., Cui C., Wang G., Li Y., Wang S. Insects defend against fungal infection by employing microRNAs to silence virulence-related genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2021;118:e2023802118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023802118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Cai Q., Qiao L., Wang M., He B., Lin F.-M., Palmquist J., Huang S.-D., Jin H. Plants send small RNAs in extracellular vesicles to fungal pathogen to silence virulence genes. Science. 2018;360:1126–1129. doi: 10.1126/science.aar4142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Ramirez-Prado J.S., Piquerez S.J.M., Bendahmane A., Hirt H., Raynaud C., Benhamed M. Modify the Histone to Win the Battle: Chromatin Dynamics in Plant–Pathogen Interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 2018;9:355. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Zhu C., Liu J.-H., Zhao J.-H., Liu T., Chen Y.-Y., Wang C.-H., Zhang Z.-H., Guo H.-S., Duan C.-G. A fungal effector suppresses the nuclear export of AGO1–miRNA complex to promote infection in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2022;119:e2114583119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2114583119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Kong L., Qiu X., Kang J., Wang Y., Chen H., Huang J., Qiu M., Zhao Y., Kong G., Ma Z., et al. A Phytophthora Effector Manipulates Host Histone Acetylation and Reprograms Defense Gene Expression to Promote Infection. Curr. Biol. 2017;27:981–991. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Li H., Wang H., Jing M., Zhu J., Guo B., Wang Y., Lin Y., Chen H., Kong L., Ma Z., et al. A Phytophthora effector recruits a host cytoplasmic transacetylase into nuclear speckles to enhance plant susceptibility. eLife. 2018;7:e40039. doi: 10.7554/eLife.40039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Wang P., Jiang H., Boeren S., Dings H., Kulikova O., Bisseling T., Limpens E. A nuclear-targeted effector of Rhizophagus irregularis interferes with histone 2B mono-ubiquitination to promote arbuscular mycorrhization. New Phytol. 2021;230:1142–1155. doi: 10.1111/nph.17236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Ransom R.F., Walton J.D. Histone Hyperacetylation in Maize in Response to Treatment with HC-Toxin or Infection by the Filamentous Fungus Cochliobolus carbonum. Plant Physiol. 1997;115:1021–1027. doi: 10.1104/pp.115.3.1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Journal of Fungi are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES