Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Medicine logoLink to Journal of Clinical Medicine
editorial
. 2022 Jun 10;11(12):3339. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123339

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Clinical Potential and Applications

Anna Caroli 1
PMCID: PMC9224775  PMID: 35743409

Since its discovery in the 1980s [1], diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), a non-invasive imaging method that does not require any tracer injection, has experienced exponential growth, becoming a pillar of modern clinical imaging.

DWI enables the investigation of tissue microstructure. In fact, during their random, diffusion-driven displacements, water molecules microscopically probe the tissue structure, interacting with cell membranes, thus providing unique information on the tissue’s functional architecture [2].

DWI is based on Einstein’s diffusion equation [3], assuming free diffusion as in a glass of water, with the distribution of molecular displacements obeying a Gaussian law. However, this is not the case in biological tissues since molecular displacements are hindered by many obstacles, such as cell membranes, fibers, or macromolecules. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) concept [1] uses Einstein’s equation to model diffusion MRI signals while emphasizing that the DWI-based diffusion coefficient in the tissue is no longer the free diffusion coefficient of water. ADC, intrinsically reflecting the interaction of water molecules with tissue elements, proved high sensitivity to pathologic or physiologic conditions and is still widely used.

Within each image voxel, different types of incoherent motion, such as blood microcirculation in the capillary networks, on top of molecular diffusion, contribute to DWI signal attenuation [4]. Just as with water molecule displacements, blood flow in randomly oriented capillaries follows a random walk called pseudodiffusion. Since the pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*) is an order of magnitude higher than the water diffusion coefficient (D), true diffusion can be separated from pseudodiffusion through the use of intra-voxel incoherent motion (IVIM) models [5,6], providing information in addition to the summary ADC parameter.

Although diffusion is a 3D process, it is only measured in one dimension at a time. However, in some tissues, such as white matter fibers of the brain, diffusion may be anisotropic, with diffusion effects strongly depending on the gradient pulse directions. Anisotropic diffusion cannot be simply measured along three perpendicular axes; rather, it requires the use of a tensor. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) [7] provides information on the main diffusion directions for each image voxel, therefore enabling the assessment of the direction of the tissue fibers, denoted by the fastest diffusion.

Even though its main clinical field of application has historically been neuroscience, where it is extremely useful for investigating neurological disorders such as acute brain ischemia or probing human brain connectivity [8,9,10], in recent years, diffusion MRI has experienced remarkable momentum, rapidly becoming an imaging modality of choice for a variety of other organs.

DWI has been widely used in cancer imaging to detect, characterize, and stage malignant lesions, or even assess the response to therapy, in various anatomical districts besides the brain [11], such as the breast [12,13], lung [14,15], liver [16], pancreas [17], kidney [18], gallbladder [19], thyroid [20], head and neck [21,22], prostate [23,24], vertebral bone marrow [25], musculoskeletal soft tissue [26], nasopharynx [27], ovaries [28], cervix [29], and rectum [30], as well as in the whole body [31].

DWI and DTI have also seen a wide spectrum of non-oncological applications throughout the body, including but not limited to the kidney [32], liver [33,34], and breast [35]. DWI has proven promising to detect and stage fibrosis [36,37] as well as to characterize inflammation [38,39]. Moreover, thanks to its non-invasiveness, DWI has been widely adopted in the pediatric population [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47].

The collection of articles published in this Special Issue further highlights the clinical potential of DWI in the brain and beyond. A few review papers on the genito-urinary system [48], ovarian cancer [49], and non-myelopathic cervical spinal cord compression [50] are included to complement what has been published so far.

Several original papers explore novel DWI applications in different clinical contexts. Ota and colleagues [51] investigated the capability of diffusion-based virtual MR elastography (VMRE) in the characterization of liver tumors, finding that its combination with MR elastography, and therefore the combination of stiffness and microstructure information, improved discriminant performance between hepatocellular carcinoma and metastases. Thiel and colleagues [52] showed DWI/DTI’s potential to identify patients at risk for contrast-induced nephropathy development shortly after iodine-containing X-ray contrast medium administration. Diffusion MRI, reflecting acute changes in the renal microstructure even before alterations in laboratory parameters, could become part of a multi-modality-based clinical protocol alongside clinical information, routine renal parameters, and advanced urinary injury markers and may help facilitate the appropriate therapy in at-risk patients. Mani and colleagues [53] used DWI combined with blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) MRI to non-invasively assess differences in kidney graft diffusion, perfusion, and oxygenation over time between kidney transplant recipients treated with ciclosporin or everolimus. Despite negative preliminary findings due to the limited sample size, the study findings showed an improvement in graft diffusivity over time and a tendency for ameliorated tissue oxygenation after the switch to everolimus, suggesting an impact of the immunosuppressive regimen on fMRI parameters of the kidney graft. Quattrini and colleagues [54] used DTI to detect white matter microstructural impairment of the triple network system in patients with borderline personality disorder, finding more pronounced diffusion alterations in patients with higher behavioral dysregulation. Anfigeno and colleagues [55] provided preliminary evidence in favor of DWI’s potential to non-invasively detect renal parenchymal involvement in pediatric patients with febrile urinary tract infection. DWI showed higher sensitivity to areas of pyelonephritis compared to ultrasound, even if the latter still maintains an important role in the pyelonephritis diagnostic process.

This Special Issue also includes two preclinical contributions. Schmidbauer and colleagues [56] showed the potential of multiparametric MRI—DWI in combination with T1 and T2 mapping—for non-invasive monitoring of long-term changes in renal allografts in a translational mouse model and for guiding invasive assessment by allograft biopsy. The authors also highlighted the added value of combining ADC quantitative assessment with histogram-based analysis, finding an association between evidence of inflammation and interstitial fibrosis in allografts with chronic rejection and increased ADC heterogeneity, likely because of the heterogeneous texture of chronic allograft rejection. Merchant and colleagues [57] highlighted IVIM-DTI’s potential in assessing peripheral nerve injury and regenerative potential in a preclinical rodent model. The authors could separate microcirculation (denoted by a faster-decaying diffusion signal) from tissue microstructure (denoted by a slower-decaying signal, also found in postmortem nerves lacking perfusion) in normal sciatic nerves, highlighting the benefit and need to combine IVIM with DTI to simultaneously but separately characterize the behavior of the two compartments, which are both highly anisotropic.

The paper by Li and colleagues [58] showed the preliminary feasibility and promise of radiomics-based analysis applied to quantitative kidney diffusion-weighted MRI. Radiomics, using specific algorithms to extract features from medical images inherently capturing spatial information, may uncover patterns, textures, or characteristics that may serve as digital fingerprints of disease, in addition to individual DWI biomarkers such as ADC.

Last, the paper by Thieleking and colleagues [59] provided interesting insights into DWI/DTI challenges. Indeed, this inter-site comparability study performed on healthy subjects reported systematic global and regional differences in common DTI outcome measures between different scanners, sequences, and processing pipelines. Since regionally inhomogeneous variations may considerably confound physiological effects and pathological changes, this paper highlights the need to harmonize DWI data acquisition and analysis to augment imaging data reliability and replicability, in particular in the context of multicenter longitudinal clinical studies, and to estimate normative values for clinical practice. Recent DWI harmonization efforts and consensus standardization initiatives in different clinical contexts, such as the spine [60], the kidney [61], the breast [35], and whole-body DWI in cancer [62], have pointed the way forward.

In conclusion, besides illustrating diffusion MRI’s clinical potential in both acute and chronic settings and providing an overview of possible diffusion applications in different clinical contexts, the current Special Issue also highlights cross-cutting challenges of its routine use in clinical practice for diagnosis, disease staging, disease progression monitoring, as well as for potentially guiding tailored therapy management. DWI and DTI, providing valuable qualitative and quantitative information to probe tissue microstructures, should be combined with other imaging modalities in a multiparametric approach to gain the best insight into the pathophysiology. Thanks to its non-invasiveness and versatility, multiparametric MRI seems the best way forward, except for multi-morbid patients with specific contraindications. Its combination with anatomical sequences is needed for the optimal localization of pathological areas; moreover, its combination with other sequences providing complementary information on tissue/organ microstructure and function (such as T1 and T2 mapping, MR elastography, BOLD, or functional MRI) is strongly recommended. Special care should be taken in the acquisition protocol, in particular to fat suppression and the choice of optimal b values. Moreover, since a long acquisition time could be a challenge, both in terms of the availability of the scan time and acceptability by unwell patients, the acquisition time needs to be short enough to be compliant with clinical practice.

Given the potential of DWI as an effective imaging biomarker, its exponential growth is expected to continue over the years, extending to additional clinical contexts, opening new fascinating research avenues, and ultimately increasing its use in clinical practice.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Le Bihan D., Breton E., Lallemand D., Grenier P., Cabanis E., Laval-Jeantet M. MR Imaging of Intravoxel Incoherent Motions: Application to Diffusion and Perfusion in Neurologic Disorders. Radiology. 1986;161:401–407. doi: 10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Le Bihan D. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and beyond: What Diffusion MR Imaging Can Tell Us about Tissue Structure. Radiology. 2013;268:318–322. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Einstein A. Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Movement. Dover Publications; New York, NY, USA: 1956. (Dover Books on Physics Series). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Le Bihan D., Breton E., Lallemand D., Aubin M.L., Vignaud J., Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of Diffusion and Perfusion in Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging. Radiology. 1988;168:497–505. doi: 10.1148/radiology.168.2.3393671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Iima M., Le Bihan D. Clinical Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion MR Imaging: Past, Present, and Future. Radiology. 2016;278:13–32. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015150244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Le Bihan D. What Can We See with IVIM MRI? Neuroimage. 2019;187:56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Basser P.J., Mattiello J., LeBihan D. MR Diffusion Tensor Spectroscopy and Imaging. Biophys. J. 1994;66:259–267. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80775-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Le Bihan D., Johansen-Berg H. Diffusion MRI at 25: Exploring Brain Tissue Structure and Function. Neuroimage. 2012;61:324–341. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Drake-Pérez M., Boto J., Fitsiori A., Lovblad K., Vargas M.I. Clinical Applications of Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Neuroradiology. Insights Imaging. 2018;9:535–547. doi: 10.1007/s13244-018-0624-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gaddamanugu S., Shafaat O., Sotoudeh H., Sarrami A.H., Rezaei A., Saadatpour Z., Singhal A. Clinical Applications of Diffusion-Weighted Sequence in Brain Imaging: Beyond Stroke. Neuroradiology. 2022;64:15–30. doi: 10.1007/s00234-021-02819-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hu R., Hoch M.J. Application of Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging in the Pretreatment and Post-Treatment of Brain Tumor. Radiol. Clin. N. Am. 2021;59:335–347. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2021.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Baxter G.C., Graves M.J., Gilbert F.J., Patterson A.J. A Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion MRI for Breast Lesion Characterization. Radiology. 2019;291:632–641. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ma W., Mao J., Wang T., Huang Y., Zhao Z.H. Distinguishing between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions Using Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur. J. Radiol. 2021;141:109809. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liang J., Li J., Li Z., Meng T., Chen J., Ma W., Chen S., Li X., Wu Y., He N. Differentiating the Lung Lesions Using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: A Meta-Analysis. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:799. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07308-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jiang W., Han Z., Tang X., Yin H., Zhang J. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Diagnostic Algorithm in Patients with Suspected Pleural Malignancy. Eur. Radiol. 2021;31:9038–9047. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08013-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nalaini F., Shahbazi F., Mousavinezhad S.M., Ansari A., Salehi M. Diagnostic Accuracy of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Value in Differentiating Malignant from Benign Solid Liver Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Br. J. Radiol. 2021;94:20210059. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhu M., Zhang C., Yan J., Sun J., Zhao X., Zhang L., Yin L. Accuracy of Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur. Radiol. 2021;31:7746–7759. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07880-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ye J., Kumar B.S., Li X.-B., Li H.-M., Zhou Y.-W., Liu L.-Q. Clinical Applications of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosis of Renal Lesions–A Systematic Review. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging. 2017;37:459–473. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kuipers H., Hoogwater F.J., Holtman G.A., van der Hoorn A., de Boer M.T., de Haas R.J. Clinical Value of Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Differentiation between Benign and Malignant Gallbladder Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Acta Radiol. 2021;62:987–996. doi: 10.1177/0284185120950115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Meyer H.-J., Wienke A., Surov A. Discrimination between Malignant and Benign Thyroid Tumors by Diffusion-Weighted Imaging—A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2021;84:41–57. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2021.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Surov A., Meyer H.J., Wienke A. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Distinguishing between Malignant and Benign Lesions in the Head and Neck Region: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Oncol. 2019;9:1362. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Baba A., Kurokawa R., Kurokawa M., Hassan O., Ota Y., Srinivasan A. ADC for Differentiation between Posttreatment Changes and Recurrence in Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2022;43:442–447. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ueno Y., Tamada T., Sofue K., Murakami T. Diffusion and Quantification of Diffusion of Prostate Cancer. Br. J. Radiol. 2022;95:20210653. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tamada T., Ueda Y., Ueno Y., Kojima Y., Kido A., Yamamoto A. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Prostate Cancer. Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. Biol. Med. 2021. online ahead of print . [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 25.Suh C.H., Yun S.J., Jin W., Lee S.H., Park S.Y., Ryu C.-W. ADC as a Useful Diagnostic Tool for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Vertebral Bone Marrow Lesions and Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur. Radiol. 2018;28:2890–2902. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5330-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang Q., Xiao X., Liang Y., Wen H., Wen X., Gu M., Ren C., Li K., Yu L., Lu L. Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion MRI for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Nonfatty Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Cancer. 2021;12:7399–7412. doi: 10.7150/jca.62131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lee M.K., Choi Y., Jung S.-L. Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Predicting Treatment Response in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:18986. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98508-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hu X., Liang Z., Zhang C., Wang G., Cai J., Wang P. The Diagnostic Performance of Maximum Uptake Value and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Ovarian or Adnexal Masses: A Meta-Analysis. Front. Oncol. 2022;12:840433. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.840433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Harry V.N., Persad S., Bassaw B., Parkin D. Diffusion-Weighted MRI to Detect Early Response to Chemoradiation in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gynecol. Oncol. Rep. 2021;38:100883. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schurink N.W., Lambregts D.M.J., Beets-Tan R.G.H. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Rectal Cancer: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. Br. J. Radiol. 2019;92:20180655. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wang K., Lee E., Kenis S., Hallam S., Haroon A., Wan S., Rabin N., Rojas-Garcia A., Padhani A., Adeleke S. Application of Diffusion-Weighted Whole-Body MRI for Response Monitoring in Multiple Myeloma after Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur. Radiol. 2022;32:2135–2148. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08311-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Caroli A., Schneider M., Friedli I., Ljimani A., De Seigneux S., Boor P., Gullapudi L., Kazmi I., Mendichovszky I.A., Notohamiprodjo M., et al. Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Diffuse Renal Pathology: A Systematic Review and Statement Paper. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2018;33:ii29–ii40. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang Y.X.J., Huang H., Zheng C.-J., Xiao B.-H., Chevallier O., Wang W. Diffusion-Weighted MRI of the Liver: Challenges and Some Solutions for the Quantification of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion. Am. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2021;11:107–142. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gourtsoyianni S., Santinha J., Matos C., Papanikolaou N. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Texture Analysis: Current Role for Diffuse Liver Disease. Abdom. Radiol. 2020;45:3523–3531. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02772-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Baltzer P., Mann R.M., Iima M., Sigmund E.E., Clauser P., Gilbert F.J., Martincich L., Partridge S.C., Patterson A., Pinker K., et al. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Breast-a Consensus and Mission Statement from the EUSOBI International Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Working Group. Eur. Radiol. 2020;30:1436–1450. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06510-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jiang H., Chen J., Gao R., Huang Z., Wu M., Song B. Liver Fibrosis Staging with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Abdom. Radiol. 2017;42:490–501. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0913-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jiang K., Ferguson C.M., Lerman L.O. Noninvasive Assessment of Renal Fibrosis by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound Techniques. Trans. Res. 2019;209:105–120. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2019.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lefebvre T., Hébert M., Bilodeau L., Sebastiani G., Cerny M., Olivié D., Gao Z.-H., Sylvestre M.-P., Cloutier G., Nguyen B.N., et al. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted MRI for the Characterization of Inflammation in Chronic Liver Disease. Eur. Radiol. 2021;31:1347–1358. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07203-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Choi S.H., Kim K.W., Lee J.Y., Kim K.-J., Park S.H. Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Enterography for Evaluating Bowel Inflammation in Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2016;22:669–679. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Meoded A., Orman G., Huisman T.A.G.M. Diffusion Weighted and Diffusion Tensor MRI in Pediatric Neuroimaging Including Connectomics: Principles and Applications. Semin. Pediatr. Neurol. 2020;33:100797. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2020.100797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Moritani T. Advanced Diffusion of the Pediatric Brain and Spine. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am. 2021;29:465–492. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2021.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chaturvedi A. Pediatric Skeletal Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Part 2: Current and Emerging Applications. Pediatr. Radiol. 2021;51:1575–1588. doi: 10.1007/s00247-021-05028-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kim P.H., Yoon H.M., Jung A.Y., Lee J.S., Cho Y.A. Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Evaluation of Bowel Inflammation in Paediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Crohns Colitis. 2022;16:68–78. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bazzi K., Wong E., Jufas N., Patel N. Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Residual and Recurrent Cholesteatoma in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;118:90–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.12.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dury R.J., Lourdusamy A., Macarthur D.C., Peet A.C., Auer D.P., Grundy R.G., Dineen R.A. Meta-Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Pediatric Medulloblastoma, Ependymoma, and Pilocytic Astrocytoma. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2021 doi: 10.1002/jmri.28007. online ahead of print . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Van Nimwegen L.W.E., Mavinkurve-Groothuis A.M.C., de Krijger R.R., Hulsker C.C.C., Goverde A.J., Zsiros J., Littooij A.S. MR Imaging in Discriminating between Benign and Malignant Paediatric Ovarian Masses: A Systematic Review. Eur. Radiol. 2020;30:1166–1181. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06420-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Damasio M.B., Ording Müller L.-S., Augdal T.A., Avni F.E., Basso L., Bruno C., Ključevšek D., Littooij A.S., Franchi-Abella S., Lobo L.M., et al. European Society of Paediatric Radiology Abdominal Imaging Task Force: Recommendations for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Focal Renal Lesions in Children. Pediatr. Radiol. 2020;50:297–304. doi: 10.1007/s00247-019-04552-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.De Perrot T., Sadjo Zoua C., Glessgen C.G., Botsikas D., Berchtold L., Salomir R., De Seigneux S., Thoeny H.C., Vallée J.-P. Diffusion-Weighted MRI in the Genitourinary System. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11:1921. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gagliardi T., Adejolu M., de Souza N.M. Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Ovarian Cancer: Exploiting Strengths and Understanding Limitations. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11:1524. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Valošek J., Bednařík P., Keřkovský M., Hluštík P., Bednařík J., Svátková A. Quantitative MR Markers in Non-Myelopathic Spinal Cord Compression: A Narrative Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11:2301. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ota T., Hori M., Le Bihan D., Fukui H., Onishi H., Nakamoto A., Tsuboyama T., Tatsumi M., Ogawa K., Tomiyama N. Diffusion–Based Virtual MR Elastography of the Liver: Can It Be Extended beyond Liver Fibrosis? J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:4553. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Thiel T.A., Schweitzer J., Xia T., Bechler E., Valentin B., Steuwe A., Boege F., Westenfeld R., Wittsack H.-J., Ljimani A. Evaluation of Radiographic Contrast-Induced Nephropathy by Functional Diffusion Weighted Imaging. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:4573. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mani L.-Y., Cotting J., Vogt B., Eisenberger U., Vermathen P. Influence of Immunosuppressive Regimen on Diffusivity and Oxygenation of Kidney Transplants—Analysis of Functional MRI Data from the Randomized ZEUS Trial. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11:3284. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Quattrini G., Magni L.R., Lanfredi M., Pedrini L., Carcione A., Riccardi I., Corbo D., Gasparotti R., Rossi R., Pievani M., et al. Aberrant Structural Connectivity of the Triple Network System in Borderline Personality Disorder Is Associated with Behavioral Dysregulation. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11:1757. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Anfigeno L., Sertorio F., Basso L., Fontana A., Bodria M., Pistorio A., Ghiggeri G.M., Damasio M.B. Diffusion-Weighted MRI in the Evaluation of Renal Parenchymal Involvement during Febrile Urinary Tract Infections in Children: Preliminary Data. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:2239. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Schmidbauer M., Rong S., Gutberlet M., Chen R., Bräsen J.H., Hartung D., Meier M., Wacker F., Haller H., Gueler F., et al. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Mapping of T1 and T2 Relaxation Time for Evaluation of Chronic Renal Allograft Rejection in a Translational Mouse Model. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:4318. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Merchant S., Yeoh S., Mahan M.A., Hsu E.W. Simultaneous Quantification of Anisotropic Microcirculation and Microstructure in Peripheral Nerve. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11:3036. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Li L.-P., Leidner A.S., Wilt E., Mikheev A., Rusinek H., Sprague S.M., Kohn O.F., Srivastava A., Prasad P.V. Radiomics-Based Image Phenotyping of Kidney Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps: Preliminary Feasibility & Efficacy. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11:1972. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Thieleking R., Zhang R., Paerisch M., Wirkner K., Anwander A., Beyer F., Villringer A., Witte A.V. Same Brain, Different Look?—The Impact of Scanner, Sequence and Preprocessing on Diffusion Imaging Outcome Parameters. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:4987. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cohen-Adad J., Alonso-Ortiz E., Abramovic M., Arneitz C., Atcheson N., Barlow L., Barry R.L., Barth M., Battiston M., Büchel C., et al. Generic Acquisition Protocol for Quantitative MRI of the Spinal Cord. Nat. Protoc. 2021;16:4611–4632. doi: 10.1038/s41596-021-00588-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ljimani A., Caroli A., Laustsen C., Francis S., Mendichovszky I.A., Bane O., Nery F., Sharma K., Pohlmann A., Dekkers I.A., et al. Consensus-Based Technical Recommendations for Clinical Translation of Renal Diffusion-Weighted MRI. Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. Biol. Med. 2020;33:177–195. doi: 10.1007/s10334-019-00790-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Barnes A., Alonzi R., Blackledge M., Charles-Edwards G., Collins D.J., Cook G., Coutts G., Goh V., Graves M., Kelly C., et al. UK Quantitative WB-DWI Technical Workgroup: Consensus Meeting Recommendations on Optimisation, Quality Control, Processing and Analysis of Quantitative Whole-Body Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Cancer. Br. J. Radiol. 2018;91:20170577. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES