Skip to main content
Insects logoLink to Insects
. 2022 Jun 20;13(6):559. doi: 10.3390/insects13060559

Effects of Sublethal Concentrations of Tetracycline Hydrochloride on the Biological Characteristics and Wolbachia Titer in Parthenogenesis Trichogramma pretiosum

Xiaoge Nian 1, Xiaobing Tao 1, Zhuangting Xiao 1, Desen Wang 1,*, Yurong He 1,*
Editor: Travis Glare1
PMCID: PMC9225629  PMID: 35735896

Abstract

Simple Summary

Trichogramma pretiosum is an important natural enemy of lepidopteran pests. Wolbachia is an intracellular endosymbiont that induces parthenogenesis in the parasitoid T. pretiosum. Tetracycline antibiotics are widely used to remove endosymbiont Wolbachia from insect hosts. However, the sublethal effects of tetracycline on the development of T. pretiosum and the population dynamic of Wolbachia in T. pretiosum are still unclear. In our present study, after treatment with sublethal concentrations of tetracycline over ten generations, the biological parameters (longevity, parasitized eggs, and fecundity) of treated females and the percentage of female offspring were significantly lower than those in the control. Moreover, the Wolbachia titer in females sharply declined after two generations of antibiotic treatments and decreased to a lower level even after ten successive generations of antibiotic treatments. In addition, the control group with a higher Wolbachia titer produced more female offspring than the tetracycline treatment groups with a lower Wolbachia titer. These results provide new insights into the complex interaction between arthropods and Wolbachia to antibiotic stress.

Abstract

Trichogramma pretiosum Riley is an important natural enemy and biological control agent of lepidopteran pests. Wolbachia is an intracellular endosymbiont that induces parthenogenesis in the parasitoid T. pretiosum. In this paper, the sublethal effects of the antibiotic tetracycline hydrochloride on the development and reproduction of T. pretiosum were studied. Emerged females were fed with sublethal concentrations (LC5, LC15, and LC35) of tetracycline for ten generations. The biological parameters (longevity, parasitized eggs, and fecundity) of treated females significantly reduced compared with the control Moreover, the percentage of female offspring in the treatments significantly reduced, but the percentage of male offspring significantly increased. In addition, the Wolbachia titer sharply reduced after two generations of antibiotic treatments, but it could still be detected even after ten successive generations of antibiotic treatments, which indicated that Wolbachia was not completely removed by sublethal concentrations of tetracycline. The control lines with higher Wolbachia titers produced more female offspring than the tetracycline treatments with lower Wolbachia titers, indicating that the Wolbachia titer affected the sex determination of T. pretiosum. Our results show that sublethal concentrations of tetracycline had adverse effects on the development of T. pretiosum, and Wolbachia titers affected the sexual development of T. pretiosum eggs.

Keywords: T. pretiosum, Wolbachia, tetracycline, sublethal concentrations

1. Introduction

The Trichogramma genus (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) consists of over 600 species of egg parasitoids. Many of them are widely used in biological control programs against agriculture and forestry pests, including Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, Neuroptera, and Diptera [1]. Trichogramma species are divided into two groups according to their reproductive mode. Generally, the most common reproductive mode is arrhenotoky, where females originate from fertilized diploid eggs and males originate from unfertilized haploid eggs [2]. Thelytoky, known as thelytokous parthenogenesis, is also a form of parthenogenesis [3]. In this case, thelytoky can be under the control of parthenogenesis-inducing (PI) Wolbachia, which can change the gamete duplication of their hosts, resulting in nearly 100% female offspring without mating [4,5,6,7]. However, the frequency of infection with Wolbachia in Trichogramma wasps is low, and there are 16 thelytokous Trichogramma species induced by a natural Wolbachia infection [8,9,10]. Compared with bisexual lines, thelytokous Trichogramma are usually viewed as superior biological control agents due to the following reasons: (1) they have a potentially higher rate of reproduction because all of their offspring are female; (2) the costs of mass-rearing production are reduced because the host does not need to “waste” resources on males; and (3) the field population of thelytokous Trichogramma may be easier to establish because released females can produce generations of female offspring without mating.

Wolbachia pipientis are the most abundant endosymbiotic bacteria that are ubiquitous in arthropods and nematodes [7]. Approximately 60% of insect species have been infected by Wolbachia around the world [11]. Wolbachia is primarily transmitted vertically from mother to offspring via the host egg cytoplasm [12,13]. Wolbachia induces various types of reproductive modifications in hosts, including cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) [14,15], male killing [16], feminization [17], and parthenogenesis induction (PI) [4,18], to increase the reproductive success of infected females. The most common way to study Wolbachia functions is to compare the physiological differences between infected and uninfected strains. The naturally Wolbachia-infected Trichogramma bourarachae had a higher fecundity than their uninfected counterparts [19]. In contrast, the arrhenotokous strains of Trichogramma deion, T. pretiosum, and T. cordubensis, which were obtained by feeding antibiotics to Wolbachia-infected strains for several generations, produced more offspring than their thelytokous counterparts [20,21]. Trichogramma kaykai females had a shorter longevity and low parasitism and emergence rates when they were infected with Wolbachia [22,23]. Moreover, Wolbachia-infected Trichogramma brassicae would parasitize fewer host eggs compared with its bisexual strain [24]. Ning et al. [25] found that Wolbachia was a direct factor that caused the occurrence of intersexes in T. pretiosum. However, it was unclear whether Wolbachia was completely eliminated because the Wolbachia titer was not tested in either female or male offspring in the above studies. In recent years, Real-Time RCR (RT-PCR) and other molecular techniques have been widely applied to detect the endosymbiont Wolbachia titer and explore its function. Wang et al. [26] used RT-PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization to test the Wolbachia titer and found that Wolbachia was advantageous to Encarsia formosa fertility because the higher the Wolbachia titer, the higher the proportion of female offspring. Li et al. [27] monitored the population dynamics of Wolbachia in Laodelphax striatellus during and after successive tetracycline treatments; the results showed that Wolbachia could be eliminated within the first two generations, and it was not recovered in the following generations. Taken together, these finding clearly indicate that Wolabchia can influence host reproduction, physiology, and gene transcription to increase its own survival.

In the present study, the naturally Wolbachia-infected T. pretiosum (T. preW+) population was used as a study subject. Absolute quantitative PCR (AQ-PCR) was applied to detect the population dynamics of the Wolbachia titer in T. pretiosum under successive stress treatments of tetracycline. In addition, longevity, parasitized eggs, the fecundity of females, the sex ratio of offspring, the life table parameters (R0, rm, λ, T, and DT), and the Wolbachia titer were evaluated in every two generations. The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to investigate whether Wolbachia affected the biological characteristics of T. preW+, (2) to investigate whether Wolbachia could be removed using long-term tetracycline treatments to obtain an uninfected line, (3) and to explore the interaction of the Wolbachia titer and the parthenogenesis of T. preW+. Our research aimed to provide a new insight into the complex interaction between Wolbachia and its host.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Rearing and Maintenance of T. pretiosum

T. pretiosum Riley infected with Wolbachia were provided by the Pest Biological Control Laboratory of South China Agricultural University. The stock population was reared on the eggs of Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in glass culture tubes (2.5 × 7.5 cm: 2.5 cm diameter and 7.5 cm height, plugged with cotton) at 25 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 5% relative humidity (RH), and a 14: 10 h light–dark photoperiod in a growth chamber. To rear C. cephalonica, we referred to the method proposed by Wang et al. [28]. The eggs of C. cephalonica were collected daily and stored at 4 °C in a refrigerator. The eggs were exposed to UV radiation for 1 h to kill the embryos before parasitoid rearing and experiments.

To obtain virgin T. pretiosum adults, parasitized C. cephalonica eggs were placed individually in small glass tubes (1.0 × 5.5 cm) before emergence. Several tiny 25% honey–water drops were brushed on the wall of the tube as food for emerging wasps. All experiments were carried out at 25 ± 1 °C and 70 ± 5% RH with a photoperiod of 14: 10 h (L: D) in a growth chamber.

2.2. Determination of LC5, LC15, and LC35 of Tetracycline Hydrochloride

The antibiotic used in the experiment was tetracycline hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich). Tetracycline was diluted with 25% honey–water into the following five concentrations: 1.5 mg mL−1, 2 mg mL−1, 3 mg mL−1, 4 mg mL−1, and 6 mg mL−1. Furthermore, 25% honey–water was used as the control treatment. A total of 30 newly emerged T. pretiosum females (<6 h old) were tested for each tetracycline concentration. After being fed for 24 h, the number of dead parasitoids was counted, and the concentration responses (LC5, LC15, and LC35) were calculated. Three replicates were carried out for each concentration treatment.

2.3. Tetracycline Treatments

Sublethal concentrations of tetracycline were prepared: LC5 (25% honey–water with tetracycline of 0.79 mg mL−1), LC15 (25% honey–water with tetracycline of 1.37 mg mL−1), and LC35 (25% honey–water with tetracycline of 2.46 mg mL−1). Furthermore, 25% honey–water was used as the control. A flowchart of the tetracycline treatments is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A flow chart of tetracycline treatment for T. pretiosum.

Approximately 100 newly emerged females (<6 h old) were placed in a glass tube (2.5 × 7.5 cm) and fed with each tetracycline concentration for 24 h. An egg card with surplus C. cephalonica eggs was inserted into each tube to be parasitized for 24 h. Next, the parasitized egg card was labeled and maintained in the small glass tube (1.0 × 5.5 cm) until adult emergence (F1 generation). Approximately 100 newly emerged females from the F1 generation in each concentration were placed in in a glass tube (2.5 × 7.5 cm) and fed with the same tetracycline concentration for 24 h. Then, one C. cephalonica egg card was offered and parasitized for 24 h in each treatment, and the parasitized egg sheets were maintained in a growth chamber until adult emergence (F2 generation).

The newly emerged F2 females (<6 h old) were divided into three assays.

  • (1)

    The first assay was carried out to evaluate the sublethal effects of tetracycline on the parasitoid.

The details are as follows: 30 females from the F2 generation in each concentration were placed individually into membrane-forming glass dactylethrae (2.3 × 7.4 cm) with a superfluous C. cephalonica eggs card and supplied with 25% honey–water solution. The parasitized egg cards were renewed every 24 h until the female died. All the parasitized egg cards were incubated in a growth chamber until adult emergence. The longevity, parasitism capacity, and the fecundity (number of offspring produced per female) of the females were assessed. The sex ratio (SR) of offspring was also recorded for all the emerged adults. Based on the adults’ antennae characteristics [6,25], SR was calculated using the formulas: SR (% female) = [number of females/(number of females + number of males + number of intersex)] × 100; SR (% male) = [number of males/(number of females + number of males + number of intersex)] × 100; SR (% intersex) = [number of intersex/(number of females + number of males + number of intersex)] × 100.

  • (2)

    The second assay was conducted to detect the Wolbachia titer using AQ-RCR (see quantification of Wolbachia below for details).

  • (3)

    The third assay was conducted to keep the F2 generation in order to obtain the F3 generation.

Approximately 100 newly emerged females from the F2 generation in each concentration were placed in in a glass tube (2.5 × 7.5 cm) and fed with the same tetracycline concentration for 24 h. Then, one C. cephalonica egg card was offered and parasitized for 24 h in each treatment, and the parasitized egg sheets were maintained until adult emergence (F3 generation). Moreover, the females of the previous generation were treated with same tetracycline concentration for 24 h to obtain the next generation, which was repeated up to the F10 generation. The longevity, number of parasitized eggs, the fecundity of females, SR (% female, % male, and % intersex), and the Wolbachia titer in were evaluated every two generations after treatment.

2.4. Quantifications of Wolbachia

Total DNA extraction was performed in groups containing the same amount of females to reduce the possible variations in the efficiency of the extraction method. gDNA was extracted from T. pretiosum adults (n = 10 adults/concentration/generation/biological replicate) using a TIANamp Genomic DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech; Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The special primers for the Wolbachia surface protein (Wsp) were the forward primer (Wsp-F) 5′-TGGTCCAATAAGTGATGAAGAAAC-3′ and the Wsp reverse primer (Wsp-R) 5′-AAAAATTAAACGCTACTCCA-3′. PCR amplification consisted of 12.5 μL 2 × TaqPCRMasterMix, 1μL 10 mM Wsp-F, 1 μL 10 mM Wsp-R, 1 μL DNA template, and 9.5 μL ddH2O in a final volume of 25 μL. The PCR condition was as follows: 95 °C for 3 min (1 cycle); 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 40 s, and 72 °C for 1 min (35 cycles); and 72 °C for 10 min (final extension). gDNA concentration and quality were assessed using a Nanodrop 2000/2001 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, United States) and by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis using Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer at a constant voltage (80 V). The target gene from each symbiont was amplified, and the obtained PCR product was purified. The purified products were inserted into the pClone007 blunt vector (Tsingke Biotech, Beijing, China), and they were transformed into TransB (DE3) (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) chemically competent cells, which were grown in a Luria–Bertani (LB) culture medium supplemented with 100 μg mL−1 ampicillin. Suitable colonies were isolated, cultivated in LB liquid medium, and subjected to plasmid extraction using a high-purity plasmid DNA extraction kit according to the manual protocol (Tsingke Biotech, Beijing, China). The obtained plasmids were subjected to PCR amplification, followed by verification of the insert size on a 1% agarose gel electrophoresis as described earlier. Plasmids containing the correct insert size were used to produce a dilution standard curve for detected Wolbachia titers.

The number of copies (N) of the target genes per microliter was determined using the following equation:

N=X g/uL DNA size of the clone in bp x 660  6.023 × 1023

(X is the Quantity of DNA in g μL−1. The fragment size of the clone is equal to the plasmid plus the inserted. 660 g mol−1 is the average number weight of 1 DNA bp. 6.023 × 1023 is the number of elementary entities in 1 mol (Avogadro constant).

AQ-PCR was used to measure the Wolbachia titer. The symbiont titer was obtained as a measure of the number of copies of the selected target gene using PCR-CFX 96 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, United States). The 20 μL AQ-PCR reaction system consisted of 10 μL SuperReal PreMix Plus (2 ×) (Tiangen Biotech; Beijing, China), 1 μL 10 mM forward primer (5′-AGTGGTTGAAGATATGCC-3′), 1 μL 10 mM reverse primer (5′-AGAGTTTGATTTCTGGGG-3′), 1 μL DNA, and 7 μL ddH2O. The AQ-PCR condition was 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 64 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 25 s, and then 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min, and 95 °C for 15 s. This was repeated three times for each sample, and the whole experiment was repeated three times.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All the data were checked for normality and homogeneity of variances before analysis. The Wsp gene copy number per sample was considered as the Wolbachia titer. The toxicity of tetracycline and the Wolbachia titer were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The data on longevity, parasitized eggs, the fecundity of the females, and sex ratio were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with tetracycline concentrations and generations as the factors in the analysis. Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test was used to determine the statistically significant differences between means. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 22.0) [29].

Daily schedules of mortality and fecundity were integrated into a life table format [30] and used to calculate life table parameters: probability of an individual surviving to age x (lx), a female at age x (mx), net reproduction rate (R0 = ∑lxmx), mean generation time (T = ∑xlxmx/∑lxmx), intrinsic rate of natural increase (rm = lnR0/T), finite rate of increase (λ = erm), and doubling time (DT = ln2/rm).

3. Results

3.1. Concentration–Mortality Response

Concentration–mortality data from the bioassays of the tetracycline treatments showed a good regression fit to the probit model for T. pretiosum adults. The slope of the regression line indicated how fast mortality occurred as the concentration increased. The sublethal concentration LC5, LC15, and LC35 values of tetracycline were 0.79 mg mL−1, 1.37 mg mL−1, and 2.46 mg mL−1, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1.

Toxicity of tetracycline to T. pretiosum females.

Antibiotic Slope LC5 (mg mL−1)
(95%CI)
LC15 (mg mL−1)
(95%CI)
LC35 (mg mL−1)
(95%CI)
Tetracycline 2.56 (0.36) 0.79 (0.36–1.21) 1.37 (0.79–1.85) 2.46 (1.82–3.00)

3.2. Sublethal Effects of Tetracycline on Biological Parameters of Treated Female Parasitoids and Their Offspring

The dynamics of female longevity, the number of parasitized eggs, fecundity, and the sex ratio (% female, % male and % intersex) of offspring were investigated under successive stress treatments of sublethal concentrations (LC5, LC15, and LC35) of tetracycline in every two generations (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The effects of sublethal concentrations of tetracycline on development and reproduction of T. pretiosum. (a) Longevity, (b) number of parasitized eggs, (c) fecundity, (d) sex ratio (% female), (e) sex ratio (% male), and (f) sex ratio (% intersex) of T. pretiosum treatment with sublethal concentrations (LC5, LC15, and LC35) of tetracycline. CK: non-tetracycline. The values are means ± SEM; means with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Both tetracycline concentrations (F = 84.20; df = 3, 621; p < 0.001) and generations (F = 25.57; df = 4, 621; p < 0.001) significantly impacted the average longevity of T. pretiosum females, as did the interaction of tetracycline concentrations with generations (F = 2.65; df = 12, 621; p < 0.05) (Table 2). The average survival durations were 10.08 ± 1.12–12.8 ± 0.81, 3.03 ± 0.39–8.10 ± 1.17, 6.67 ± 1.07–14.54 ± 0.58, and 1.29 ± 0.08–8.33 ± 1.16 days for the control and tetracycline LC5-, LC15-, and LC35-fed females, respectively. The average longevity decreased significantly with the increase in tetracycline concentration. When treated with tetracycline LC5, the longevity of T. pretiosum females decreased significantly during the first six generations (p < 0.05), and there were no significant differences found during the following four generations compared with the control. Feeding T. pretiosum females with tetracycline LC15 and LC35 significantly shortened their longevity over the ten generations (all p < 0.05) (Figure 2a). For parasitism, both tetracycline concentrations (F = 117.65; df = 3, 621; p < 0.001) and generations (F = 28.27; df = 4, 621; p < 0.001) significantly impacted the average number of eggs parasitized by T. pretiosum, as did the interaction (F = 3.24; df = 12, 621; p < 0.001) (Table 2). The average numbers of eggs parasitized by T. pretiosum were 100.8 ± 10.09–122.8 ± 10.36, 33.00 ± 7.54–138.2 ± 7.69, 5.34 ± 2.58–55.13 ± 9.21, and 0.58 ± 0.34–59.13 ± 11.2 per female for the control and tetracycline LC5, LC15, and LC35 treatments, respectively. When feeding T. pretiosum females with tetracycline LC5, the average number of parasitized eggs decreased significantly during the first six generations compared with that of females fed with only honey–water (p < 0.05). In addition, parasitized eggs significantly reduced when treated with tetracycline LC15 and LC35 during the ten generations (all p < 0.05) (Figure 2b). Similar to parasitism, both tetracycline concentrations (F = 107.65; df = 3, 621; p < 0.001) and generations (F = 27.97; df = 4, 621; p < 0.001) significantly impacted the fecundity of T. pretiosum, and the interaction of tetracycline concentrations with generations also significantly impacted the fecundity (F = 3.06; df = 12, 621; p < 0.001) (Table 2). A significant reduction in fecundity was also observed when the egg-laying females of T. pretiosum were exposed to various tetracycline treatments. T. pretiosum females in the control group produced more offspring than those in the tetracycline LC5 treatment group, which only occurred during the first six generations (p < 0.05) and not in the following four generations. With an increase in the tetracycline concentration, T. pretiosum produced less offspring over the ten generations. The number of T. pretiosum progeny per female ranged from 5.44 ± 2.45 to 52.13 ± 9.05 and from 1.58 ± 0.84 to 56.4 ± 10.51 for tetracycline LC15 and LC35 treatments, respectively, and these values were significantly lower than those of the control (from 90.53 ± 8.41 to 110.80 ± 9.27 per female) (all p < 0.05) (Figure 2c).

Table 2.

Analysis of effects of tetracycline concentrations and generations on biological parameters of treated female parasitoids and their offspring.

Variable Source of Variation df F p-Value
Longevity Tetracycline concentration (A) 3 84.2 <0.001
Generation (B) 4 25.57 <0.001
(A) × (B) 12 2.65 0.002
Number of parasitized eggs Tetracycline concentration (A) 3 117.65 <0.001
Generation (B) 4 28.27 <0.001
(A) × (B) 12 3.24 <0.001
Fecundity Tetracycline concentration (A) 3 107.65 <0.001
Generation (B) 4 27.97 <0.001
(A) × (B) 12 3.06 <0.001
Sex ratio (% female) Tetracycline concentration (A) 3 131.05 <0.001
Generation (B) 4 12.8 <0.001
(A) × (B) 12 2.17 0.012
Sex ratio (% male) Tetracycline concentration (A) 3 121.41 <0.001
Generation (B) 4 15.15 <0.001
(A) × (B) 12 2.72 0.001
Sex ratio (% intersex) Tetracycline concentration (A) 3 1.1 0.347
Generation (B) 4 2.7 0.03
(A) × (B) 12 1.76 0.053

Females exposed to 25% honey–water produced only females during the first three days, and they subsequently produced very few males and intersex offspring. However, females exposed to antibiotic treatments (tetracycline LC5, LC15, and LC35) produced male and intersex offspring during the first two days, and they subsequently produced more males and intersex offspring. Both tetracycline concentrations (F = 131.05; df = 3, 401; p < 0.001) and generations (F = 12.80; df = 4, 401; p < 0.001) significantly impacted the proportion of female offspring, as did the interaction (F = 2.17; df = 12, 401; p < 0.05) (Table 2). After being fed tetracycline, the proportion of female offspring significantly decreased in the control as the generations increased (Figure 2d). In contrast, the proportion of male offspring in the tetracycline treatments was significantly higher than that in the control over the ten generations (all p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the male ratio among the tetracycline treatments under the tested generation (Figure 2e). In addition, the tetracycline concentrations (F = 121.41; df = 3, 401; p < 0.001), generations (F = 15.15; df = 4, 401; p < 0.001), and the interaction of tetracycline concentrations with generations (F = 2.72; df = 12, 401; p < 0.05) significantly impacted the proportion of male offspring (Table 2). As for the intersex percentage of offspring, there was no significant difference among the tetracycline treatments over the ten generations compared with the control. The intersex percentages were 1.94 ± 0.65–2.76 ± 0.55%, 1.76 ± 0.23–5.93 ± 1.60%, 1.04 ± 0.71–8.02 ± 2.70%, and 0.87 ± 0.65–5.05 ± 3.80% for the control and tetracycline LC5, LC15 and LC35 treatments, respectively (Figure 2f).

3.3. Sublethal Effects of Tetracycline on Life Table Parameters of T. pretiosum

The life table parameters of T. pretiosum treated with sublethal concentrations of tetracycline were calculated, and the results are shown in Table 3. Under successive stress treatments of sublethal concentrations of tetracycline, the net reproduction rate (R0), intrinsic rate of natural increase (rm), finite rate of increase (λ), mean generation time (T), and doubling time (DT) of T. pretiosum were significantly lower than those in the control over the ten generations. The higher the concentration of tetracycline, the smaller the population parameter in each generation. In addition, the life table parameters of T. pretiosum slightly increased as the number of treated generations increased, indicating that the adaptability of T. pretiosum to tetracycline gradually increased.

Table 3.

Life table parameters of T. pretiosum treatment with sublethal concentrations of tetracycline for ten generations.

Generation Tetracycline Concentration R 0 rm λ T (d) DT
F2 CK 76.48 0.29 1.34 14.77 2.37
LC5 7.55 0.18 1.20 11.51 3.83
LC15 2.75 0.09 1.09 11.50 7.67
LC35 2.40 0.08 1.08 11.56 8.63
F4 CK 70.61 0.30 1.35 14.39 2.30
LC5 13.73 0.23 1.26 11.50 3.00
LC15 10.27 0.20 1.23 11.50 3.45
LC35 5.17 0.15 1.15 11.62 4.60
F6 CK 82.94 0.32 1.37 13.90 2.16
LC5 16.04 0.24 1.27 11.77 2.88
LC15 12.07 0.20 1.22 12.36 3.45
LC35 3.66 0.11 1.12 11.54 6.27
F8 CK 84.15 0.30 1.34 14.98 2.30
LC5 11.69 0.21 1.23 11.90 3.29
LC15 8.65 0.18 1.19 12.25 3.83
LC35 4.60 0.13 1.14 11.55 5.30
F10 CK 87.83 0.31 1.36 14.56 2.23
LC5 23.11 0.26 1.30 12.05 2.23
LC15 10.09 0.19 1.21 11.96 3.63
LC35 15.70 0.21 1.23 13.05 3.29

R0: net reproduction rate; rm: intrinsic rate of natural increase; λ: finite rate of increase; T: mean generation time; DT: doubling time.

3.4. Sublethal Effects of Tetracycline on Wolbachia Titer in T. pretiosum

The Wolbachia titers in T. pretiosum treated with sublethal concentrations of tetracycline were determined by assessing the copy number of the Wsp gene using AQ-PCR. The results are shown in Table 4. After treatment with tetracycline LC5, LC15, and LC35, the copy numbers of Wsp in females were significantly lower than those in the control during the first two generations. The Wolbachia titer was still at a lower level after females fed tetracycline LC5 for ten generations. However, after exposure to tetracycline LC15 and LC35, Wolbachia titers showed varying degrees of ups and downs as the treatment times increased.

Table 4.

Dynamics of Wolbachia titer in T. pretiosum treated with sublethal concentrations of tetracycline for ten generations.

Generation Tetracycline Concentration Copies μL−1 Significance
F2 CK 10,241.97 ± 373.91 a
LC5 259.51 ± 80.29 b
LC15 74.55 ± 7.31 b
LC35 32.75 ± 1.36 b
F4 CK 10,005.82 ± 298.34 a
LC5 89.78 ± 20.81 b
LC15 387.12 ± 26.01 b
LC35 111.22 ± 9.20 b
F6 CK 11,003.97 ± 425.56 a
LC5 71.12 ± 0.87 b
LC15 242.76 ± 20.71 b
LC35 91.52 ± 2.84 b
F8 CK 10,653.92 ± 303.91 a
LC5 28.77 ± 3.56 c
LC15 75.4 ± 2.82 c
LC35 686.84 ± 33.86 b
F10 CK 10,846.11 ± 429.88 a
LC5 83.75 ± 7.20 b
LC15 42.44 ± 1.45 b
LC35 469.23 ± 57.71 b

The values are means ± SEM; means with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

In our current study, the Wolbachia titer in T. pretiosum sharply reduced after two generations of antibiotic treatments. However, it could be detected at a lower dose even after ten successive generations of antibiotic treatments, indicating that tetracycline did not completely remove Wolbachia from T. pretiosum. In a previous study, Wolbachia in arthropods was removed by antibiotics at different concentrations and time durations [30]. Similar results were reported by Wang et al. [26], Zhong and Li [31], and Zha et al. [32]. However, several studies have shown that Wolbachia can be successfully eliminated by antibiotic treatments. It is also possible for tetracycline treatment success to vary depending on the Wolbachia strain—some strains appear to be more resistant than others. For example, tetracycline has been used to remove the Wolbachia endosymbionts from Litomosoides sigmodontis [33]. Li et al. [27] monitored the population dynamics of Wolbachia in Laodelphax striatellus under successive stress treatments of tetracycline, and they found that Wolbachia density in females and males decreased to 0 after using tetracycline treatment over two generations. Pike and Kingcombe [34] found that Wolbachia could be successfully eliminated from Folsomia candida using rifampicin over two generations. Grenier et al. [35] showed that Wolbachia was not recovered in Trichogramma at the 14th generation after the 1st generation was treated with tetracycline treatment.

In addition, different types of antibiotics have different effects. The mode of action of tetracycline is to inhibit protein synthesis by preventing the association of aminoacyl-tRNA with the bacterial ribosome [36,37]. In contrast, the mode of action of rifampicin is to interfere with nucleic acid synthesis by binding to prokaryotic DNA-dependent RNA polymerase, as well as inhibiting the transcription of DNA to message RNA [33,38]. These different modes of action could explain why different antibiotics produce different effects. For example, rifampicin was found to be effective in eliminating Wolbachia from Folsomia candida, whereas tetracycline at the same concentration was not [34]. Previous studies showed that Wolbachia could be removed by feeding insects sugar water containing antibiotics, but the complete elimination of Wolbachia required at least three to six successive generations of antibiotic treatment [39,40,41]. Liu et al. [42] described a novel approach to eliminate Wolbachia from Nasonia vitripennis by feeding pupae with rifampicin to two generations. Therefore, different antibiotics and methods could be used to try to eliminate Wolbachia from T. pretiosum in further research.

In Figure 1, the line treated with tetracycline LC5 developed a greater longevity and fecundity by F10 despite having very low Wolbachia titers. Unfortunately, because there was no Wolbachia-free line in the experiment, we were unable to determine the direct effects of tetracycline on fitness and the effects of Wolbachia removal. However, after ten generations of antibiotic treatment, we successfully obtained the bisexual recovery strain of T. pretiosum through backcrossing females from an isofemale line with males for several generations. Although the female adults of this bisexual strain had recovered to produce female and male offspring normally, Wolbachia could still be detected at a very low concentration using AQ-PCR (unpublished data), implying that Wolbachia could have evolved to be essential for their hosts. Moreover, the dose-dependent effects of tetracycline on longevity and fecundity (but not on the Wolbachia titer or sex ratio) suggested that tetracycline treatment had substantial sublethal effects on fitness, but it was unclear what concentration was required to have an effect on Wolbachia itself. The changes in longevity and fecundity across generations also suggested a selection response to the sublethal doses of tetracycline. In addition, Wolbachia titers showed varying degrees of increases and decreases in progeny after exposure to tetracycline LC15 and LC35 as treatment times increased. It might be that different individuals developed different levels of resistance to tetracycline. Due to the long-term co-adaptation between Wolbachia and their native hosts, the removal of Wolbachia could have adverse effects on the hosts.

We also found that Wolbachia affected sex determination in T. pretiosum. The sex ratio of offspring became more male-biased as the Wolbachia titer decreased. The main factor of sex determination in Hymenoptera is haplodiploidy. Unfertilized eggs develop into haploid males, and fertilized eggs develop into females. Another common sex-determination model in Hymenoptera is complementary sex determination (CSD). Heterozygous diploid eggs develop into females, and homozygous diploid eggs develop into males, but the males are inviable or sterile [6]. Ning et al. [25] speculated that the sex determination mechanisms of Trichogramma wasps might conform to genome imprinting. In this model, haploid eggs only contain a maternally imprinted sex-determination gene, and then they develop into males. Diploid eggs contain a maternally imprinted sex-determination gene and a paternally derived nonimprinted copy, and then they develop into diploid females. In addition, genomic imprinting is usually caused by DNA methylation in organisms [43]. With regard to T. preW+ in this study, we assumed that genome imprinting was retained in the offspring, and Wolbachia inhibited the effects of genome imprinting. When tetracycline treatments reduced the Wolbachia titer, the effect of parental generation genome imprinting became stronger, and more male offspring were produced. Furthermore, the genomic conflict between Wolbachia and the host’s nuclear genome has been proposed to explain the influence of Wolbachia on sex determination in Trichogramma. Because Wolbachia is cytoplasmically inherited, cytoplasmic genes are only transmitted through females and result in a female bias, while nuclear genes favor a balanced sex ratio by inhibiting the action of cytoplasmic elements [44]. In this case, Wolbachia would try to increase its transmission level, whereas the nuclear genes of hosts would try to suppress Wolbachia. In addition, numerous studies have shown that high temperatures decrease Wolbachia titers in Trichogramma wasps and produce more males and intersexes, resulting in a change in the original reproduction method and the sex ratio of offspring [25,45]. The sex determination in thelytokous reproduction associated with bacteria is more complicated, and the mechanism is not fully understood at present [3,46,47].

In conclusion, we used AQ-PCR to detect the Wolbachia titer, and we discovered that tetracycline treatments were able to partially remove Wolbachia from T. pretiosum. Our results clearly show that sublethal concentrations of tetracycline have adverse effects on the development of T. pretiosum and that the Wolbachia titer affects the sexual development of T. pretiosum eggs.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the editors and reviewers for the modifications of and suggestions regarding the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.N. and Y.H.; methodology, X.N. and Y.H.; software, X.N. and D.W.; validation, X.N., X.T., and Z.X.; formal analysis, X.N. and D.W.; investigation, X.N., X.T., and Z.X.; resources, X.N., X.T., and Z.X.; data curation, X.N. and D.W.; writing—original draft preparation, X.N., D.W., and Y.H.; writing—review and editing, X.N. and Y.H.; visualization, X.N. and Y.H.; supervision, X.N., D.W., and Y.H.; project administration, X.N., D.W., and Y.H.; funding acquisition, Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong (Grant No. 2021A1515010784), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31772219), and the Guangdong Provincial Special Fund for Modern Agriculture Industry Technology Innovation Teams (Grant No. 2019KJ125).

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Smith S.M. Biological control with trichogramma: Advances, successes, and potential of their use. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1996;41:375–406. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.002111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Perlman S.J., Kelly S.E., Hunter M.S. Population biology of cytoplasmic incompatibility: Maintenance and spread of cardinium symbionts in a parasitic wasp. Genetics. 2008;178:1003–1011. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.083071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ma W.J., Pannebakker B.A., van de Zande L., Schwander T., Wertheim B., Beukeboom L.W. Diploid males support a two-step mechanism of endosymbiont-induced thelytoky in a parasitoid wasp. BMC Evol. Biol. 2015;15:84. doi: 10.1186/s12862-015-0370-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Werren J.H., Baldo L., Clark M.E. Wolbachia: Master manipulators of invertebrate biology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008;6:741–751. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Russell J.E., Stouthamer R. The genetics and evolution of obligate reproductive parasitism in Trichogramma pretiosum infected with parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia. Heredity. 2010;106:58–67. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2010.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tulgetske G.M., Stouthamer R. Characterization of intersex production in Trichogramma kaykai infected with parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia. Naturwissenschaften. 2012;99:143–152. doi: 10.1007/s00114-011-0880-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zug R., Hammerstein P. Still a host of hosts for Wolbachia: Analysis of recent data suggests that 40% of terrestrial arthropod species are infected. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e38544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vavre F., de Jong J.H., Stouthamer R. Cytogenetic mechanism and genetic consequences of thelytoky in the wasp Trichogramma cacoeciae. Heredity. 2004;93:592–596. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ma W.J., Schwander T. Patterns and mechanisms in instances of endosymbiont-induced parthenogenesis. J. Evol. Biol. 2017;30:868–888. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xiao Z.T., Wang D.S., He Y.R. First discovery of Trichogramma oleae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in the wild in China and detection of its endosymbiont Wolbachia. Acta Entomol. Sin. 2021;64:409–418. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hilgenboecker K., Hammerstein P., Schlattmann P., Telschow A., Werren J.H. How many species are infected with Wolbachia?—A statistical analysis of current data. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2008;281:215–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01110.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hughes D.P., Pamilo P., Kathirithamby J. Horizontal transmission of Wolbachia by strepsipteran endoparasites? A response to Noda et al., 2001. Mol. Ecol. 2004;13:507–509. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.02083.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Narita S., Shimajiri Y., Nomura M. Strong cytoplasmic incompatibility and high vertical transmission rate can explain the high frequencies of Wolbachia infection in Japanese populations of Colias erate poliographus (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) Bull. Entomol. Res. 2008;99:385–391. doi: 10.1017/S0007485308006469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sasaki T., Kubo T., Ishikawa H. Interspecific transfer of Wolbachia between two lepidopteran insects expressing cytoplasmic incompatibility: A Wolbachia variant naturally infecting Cadra cautella causes male killing in Ephestia kuehniella. Genetics. 2002;162:1313–1319. doi: 10.1093/genetics/162.3.1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zheng Y., Wang J.L., Liu C., Wang C.P., Walker T., Wang Y.F. Differentially expressed profiles in the larval testes of Wolbachia infected and uninfected Drosophila. BMC Genom. 2011;12:595. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hurst G.D.D., Jiggins F.M., Hinrich Graf von der Schulenbury J., Bertrand D., West S.A., Goriacheva I.I., Zakharov I.A., Werren J.H., Stouthamer R., Majerus M.E.N. Male-killing Wolbachia in two species of insect. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 1999;266:735–740. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0698. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Narita S., Kageyama D., Nomura M., Fukatsu T. Unexpected mechanism of symbiont-induced reversal of insect sex: Feminizing Wolbachia continuously acts on the butterfly Eurema hecabe during larval development. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007;73:4332–4341. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00145-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ahmed M.Z., Li S.J., Xue X., Yin X.J., Ren S.X., Jiggins F.M., Greeff J.M., Qiu B.L. The intracellular bacterium Wolbachia uses parasitoid wasps as phoretic vectors for efficient horizontal transmission. PLoS Pathog. 2015;10:e1004672. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vavre F., Girin C., Boulétreau M. Phylogenetic status of a fecundity-enhancing Wolbachia that does not induce thelytoky in Trichogramma. Insect Mol. Biol. 1999;8:67–72. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.1999.810067.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Silva I.M.M.S., Van Meer M.M.M., Roskam M.M., Hoogenboom A., Gort G., Stouthamer R. Biological control potential of Wolbachia-infected versus uninfected wasps: Laboratory and greenhouse evaluation of Trichogramma cordubensis and T. deion strains. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2010;10:223–238. doi: 10.1080/09583150050044501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stouthamer R. Influence of microbe-associated parthenogenesis on the fecundity of Trichogramma deion and T. pretiosum. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2011;67:183–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1993.tb01667.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hohmann C.L., Luck R.F., Stouthamer R. Effect of Wolbachia on the survival and reproduction of Trichogramma kaykai Pinto & Stouthamer (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) Neotrop. Entomol. 2001;30:607–612. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kazuki M., Yohsuke T. Comparison of life history characters of arrhenotokous and Wolbachia-associated thelytokous Trichogramma kaykai pinto and stouthamer (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2004;4:765–769. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Farrokhi S., Ashouri A., Shirazi J., Allahyari H., Huigens M.E. A comparative study on the functional response of Wolbachia-infected and uninfected forms of the parasitoid wasp Trichogramma brassicae. J. Insect Sci. 2010;10:167. doi: 10.1673/031.010.14127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ning S.F., Zhou J.C., Liu Q.Q., Zhao Q., Dong H. Gradual, temperature-induced change of secondary sexual characteristics in Trichogramma pretiosum infected with parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7567. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang X.X., Qi L.D., Jiang R., Du Y.Z., Li Y.X. Incomplete removal of Wolbachia with tetracycline has two-edged reproductive effects in the thelytokous wasp Encarsia formosa (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) Sci. Rep. 2017;7:44014. doi: 10.1038/srep44014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li Y., Liu X., Guo H. Population dynamics of Wolbachia in Laodelphax striatellus (Fallén) under successive stress of antibiotics. Curr. Microbiol. 2019;76:1306–1312. doi: 10.1007/s00284-019-01762-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang D.S., He Y.R., Guo X.L., Luo Y.L. Acute toxicities and sublethal effects of some conventional insecticides on Trichogramma chilonis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) J. Econ. Entomol. 2012;105:1157–1163. doi: 10.1603/EC12042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Finney D.J. Probit Analysis: A Statistical Treatment of the Sigmoid Response Curve. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1972. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li Y.Y., Floate K.D., Fields P.G., Pang B.P. Review of treatment methods to remove Wolbachia bacteria from arthropods. Symbiosis. 2014;62:1–15. doi: 10.1007/s13199-014-0267-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhong Y., Li Z.X. Infuences of tetracycline on the reproduction of the B biotype of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2013;48:241–246. doi: 10.1007/s13355-013-0180-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zha X.F., Zhang W.J., Zhou C.Y., Zhang L.Y., Xiang Z.H., Xia Q.Y. Detection and characterization of Wolbachia infection in silkworm. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2014;37:573–580. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572014000400014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hoerauf A., Nissen-Pähle K., Schmetz C., Henkle-Dührsen K., Blaxter M.L., Büttner D.W., Gallin M.Y., Al-Qaoud K.M., Lucius R., Fleischer B. Tetracycline therapy targets intracellular bacteria in the filarial nematode Litomosoides sigmodontis and results in filarial infertility. J. Clin. Investig. 1999;103:11–18. doi: 10.1172/JCI4768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pike N., Kingcombe R. Antibiotic treatment leads to the elimination of Wolbachia endosymbionts and sterility in the diplodiploid collembolan Folsomia candida. BMC Biol. 2009;7:54. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-7-54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Grenier S., Gomes S.M., Pintureau B., Lassablière F., Bolland P. Use of tetracycline in larval diet to study the effect of Wolbachia on host fecundity and clarify taxonomic status of Trichogramma species in cured bisexual lines. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2002;80:13–21. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2011(02)00039-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chopra I., Roberts M. Tetracycline antibiotics: Mode of action, applications, molecular biology, and epidemiology of bacterial resistance. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2001;65:232–260. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.65.2.232-260.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kohanski M.A., Dwyer D.J., Collins J.J. How antibiotics kill bacteria: From targets to networks. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010;8:423–435. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Campbell E.A., Korzheva N., Mustaev A., Murakami K., Nair S., Goldfarb A., Darst S.A. Structural mechanism for rifampicin inhibition of bacterial RNA polymerase. Cell. 2001;104:901–912. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00286-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Werren J.H., Loehlin D.W. Curing Wolbachia infections in Nasonia (parasitoid wasp) Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2009;10:pdb.prot5312. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot5312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Werren J.H., Loehlin D.W. The parasitoid wasp Nasonia: An emerging model system with haploid male genetics. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2009;10:pdb.emo134. doi: 10.1101/pdb.emo134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kyei-poku G.K., Floate K.D., Benkel B., Goettel M.S. Elimination of Wolbachia from Urolepis rufipes (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) with heat and antibiotic treatments: Implications for host reproduction. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2010;13:341–354. doi: 10.1080/0958315031000110355. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liu H.Y., Wang Y.K., Zhi C.C., Xiao J.H., Huang D.W. A novel approach to eliminate Wolbachia infections in Nasonia vitripennis revealed different antibiotic resistance between two bacterial strains. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2014;355:163–169. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Heimpel G.E., de Boer J.G. Sex determination in the hymenoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2008;53:209–230. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Stouthamer R., Russell J.E., Vavre F., Leonard N. Intragenomic conflictin populations infected by parthenogenesis inducing Wolbachia ends with irreversible loss of sexual reproduction. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010;10:229. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Almeida R.P., Stouthamer R. Phylogeny of the Trichogramma endosymbiont Wolbachia, an alpha-proteobacteria (Rickettsiae) Braz. J. Biol. 2018;78:421–428. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.166671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Giorgini M., Monti M.M., Caprio E., Stouthamer R., Hunter M.S. Feminization and the collapse of haplodiploidy in an asexual parasitoid wasp harboring the bacterial symbiont Cardinium. Heredity. 2009;102:365–371. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2008.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Verhulst E.C., Beukeboom L.W., van de Zande L. Maternal control of haplodiploid sex determination in the wasp Nasonia. Science. 2010;328:620–623. doi: 10.1126/science.1185805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Insects are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES