Skip to main content
PMC home page
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2022 Jun 20;7(6):1137–1139. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2022.2079436

Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of Wisteriopsis reticulata (Fabaceae): an IRLC legumes

Shanshan Zhu a, Aowei Liu b, Xiao Xie b, Maoqin Xia a,✉, Haimin Chen b,✉
PMCID: PMC9225703  PMID: 35756451

Abstract

The inverted repeat‐lacking clade (IRLC) species are characterized by the loss of an IR region in their plastomes, which has long been of great interest. Wisteriopsis reticulata is one of the members of the tribe Wisterieae, which belongs to Fabaceae and is well-known as IRLC. Here, we reported and characterized the complete chloroplast genome of W. reticulata using the genome skimming approach. The chloroplast genome is 132,477 bp in length and lacks one copy of IR region. The genome encoded 112 unique genes including 89 protein-coding genes, 29 transfer RNA genes and four ribosomal RNA genes. Phylogenetic results supported the monophyly of the tribe Wisterieae (IRLC) and confirmed that W. reticulata belongs to the genus Wisteriopsis.

Keywords: Wisteriopsis reticulata, chloroplast genome, IRLC

The chloroplast genome (cp genome) of angiosperms generally has a conserved quadripartite structure with a large single‐copy (LSC) region and a small single‐copy (SSC) region separated by two inverted repeat (IR) regions (Yurina and Odintsova 1998; Jansen et al. 2005). However, some taxa have lost an IR region in their cp genome, which named the inverted repeat‐lacking clade (IRLC) and included ca. 56 genera and more than 4000 species (Wojciechowski et al., 1999; Wojciechowski et al. 2000; Xia et al. 2021). Wisterieae, belongs to Fabaceae, is well-known as IRLC (Compton et al. 2019). Wisteriopsis reticulata (Benth.) Compton & Schrire 2019 is one of the members of the Wisterieae, previously known as Millettia reticulata Benth. Pl. Jungh. 1852 and Callerya reticulata (Benth.) Schot 1994 (Compton et al. 2019). It is a woody climber with racemes of pea-like flowers and serves as a folk Chinese medicine. It is used to treat many kinds of blood disorders and also auto-immune diseases. Given that genetic information is of great significance in species taxonomy, we reported and characterized the complete cp genome of W. reticulata, and inferred the phylogenetic relationships of this species.

The fresh leaves of W. reticulata were collected from the Zijingang Campus of Zhejiang University (Hangzhou, China, 30°17′55.19″ N, 120°5′6.08″ E). The specimen and DNA sample of this species were deposited at the Herbarium of Zhejiang University (HZJU) under the voucher number HZU0243 (contact person and email: Shanshan Zhu, 21407009@zju.edu.cn). The total genomic DNA was extracted following the CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle 1987) and was then sequenced (paired-end, PE 150 bp) on the BGISEQ-500 platform at Beijing Genomics Institute (Shenzhen, China). Finally, about 3.0 Gb clean data were obtained and assembled into complete cp genome by using the Getorganelle v1.7.4 pipeline (Jin et al. 2020). Gene annotation was performed using the GeSeq (Tillich et al. 2017) and manually checked with the start/stop codons in Geneious v9.0.2 (http://www.geneious.com). The annotated cp genome sequence and the Illumina paired-end sequencing data was registered into the NCBI with the accession number OL022306 and BioProject codes PRJNA783869.

The cp genome of W. reticulata was 132,477 bp in length consisting of two single-copy regions (LSC with 87,993 bp; SSC with 19,082 bp) and one repeat region (IR with 25,402 bp). The genome size was much shorter than that of many other angiosperm cp genomes because it has lost one copy of IR region. The GC content of the complete cp genome, LSC, SSC, and IR were 34.2, 32.9, 29.8 and 41.9%, respectively. The genome encoded 112 unique genes including 89 protein-coding genes, 29 tRNA genes and 4 rRNA genes. Ten protein-coding genes and five tRNA genes contained one single intron, whereas two genes (pafl, clpP) had two introns.

A total of 29 complete cp genomes in Wisterieae (Fabaceae) together with four cp genomes of Millettia species were applied to infer the phylogenetic position of W. reticulata. Millettia species were selected as outgroups. The sequence alignment was conducted with MAFFT v7.407 (Katoh and Standley 2013). The maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were performed using IQ-TREE v. 2.1.2 (Minh, 2020) (Figure 1). The best fitting model was chosen by using MODELFINDER (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017). Support values for each internal branch were evaluated using 1000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates. Our phylogenetic analyses supported the monophyly of the tribe Wisterieae, which is one of the earliest diverged groups of IRLC (Duan et al. 2021). Within Wisterieae, the phylogenetic tree supported five main clades that were largely consistent with previous analyses (Compton et al. 2019; Duan et al. 2021). Noticeably, Afgekia sericea did not belong to any clade but was closely related to clades C + D. In addition, our results indicated that W. reticulata was the basal taxa within Wisteriopsis with 100% bootstrap, which provided stronger evidence for this species taxonomy at complete chloroplast genome level. Namely, W. reticulata should belongs to the genus Wisteriopsis rather than Millettia or Callerya. Moreover, the chloroplast genomes resource could be utilized for DNA barcoding, conservation genetics, and breeding of W. reticulata in the future.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on 29 complete chloroplast genome sequences of Wisterieae and four outgroups. Relative branch lengths are indicated. Numbers near the nodes represent ML bootstrap value.

Ethical approval

The collection of plant material has been carried out in accordance with guidelines provided by Zhejiang University and followed national regulations.

Author contributions

Chen H. conceived and designed the project. Xia M. collected samples and performed sequencing. Liu A., Xie X. and Zhu S. analyzed and interpretated the data. Zhu S. wrote the manuscript. Chen H. and Xia M. revised the manuscript.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the Ningbo Public Welfare Project (Grant No. 202002N3042) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2020M681826).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The genome sequence data that support the findings of this study are openly available in GenBank of NCBI at (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under the accession no. OL022306. The associated BioProject, SRA, and Bio-Sample numbers are PRJNA783869, SRR17044436, and SAMN23455509, respectively.

References

  1. Compton JA, Schrire BD, Kálmán K, Félix F, Malakasi P, Mattapha S, Sirichamorn Y.. 2019. The Callerya group redefined and tribe Wisterieae (Fabaceae) emended based on morphology and data from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. PhytoKeys. 125:1–112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL.. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull. 19:11–15. [Google Scholar]
  3. Duan L, Li SJ, Su C, Sirichamorn Y, Han LN, Ye W, Lôc PK, Wen J, Compton JA, Schrire B, et al. 2021. Phylogenomic framework of the IRLC legumes (Leguminosae subfamily Papilionoideae) and intercontinental biogeography of tribe Wisterieae. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 163:1055–7903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jansen RK, Raubeson LA, Boore JL, DePamphilis CW, Chumley TW, Haberle RC, Wyman SK, Alverson A, Peery R, Herman SJ, et al. 2005. Methods for obtaining and analyzing whole chloroplast genome sequences. Methods Enzymol. 395:348–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jin JJ, Yu WB, Yang JB, Song Y, Depamphilis CW, Yi TS, Li DZ.. 2020. GetOrganelle: a fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biol. 21(1):1–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, Haeseler A v, Jermiin LS.. 2017. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods. 14(6):587–589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Katoh K, Standley DM.. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 30(4):772–780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, Haeseler A v, Lanfear R.. 2020. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol. 37(5):1530–1534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tillich M, Lehwark P, Pellizzer T, Ulbricht-Jones ES, Fischer A, Bock R, Greiner S.. 2017. GeSeq - versatile and accurate annotation of organelle genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 45(W1):W6–W11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wojciechowski MF, Sanderson MJ, Hu JM.. 1999. Evidence on the monophyly of Astragalus (Fabaceae) and its major subgroups based on nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS and chloroplast DNA trnL intron data. Syst Bot. 24(3):409–437. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wojciechowski MF, Sanderson MJ, Steele KP, Liston A.. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of the “temperate herbaceous tribes” of Papilionoid legumes: a supertree approach. In: Herendeen PS, Bruneau A, editors. Advances in legume systematics, Part 9. Kew, Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens; p. 277–298. [Google Scholar]
  12. Xia MQ, Liao RY, Zhou JT, Lin HY, Li JH, Li P, Fu CX, Qiu YX.. 2021. Phylogenomics and biogeography of Wisteria: Implications on plastome evolution among inverted repeat‐lacking clade (IRLC) legumes. J Syst Evol. 0:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yurina NP, Odintsova MS.. 1998. Comparative structural organization of plant chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes. Genetika. 34:1–16. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequence data that support the findings of this study are openly available in GenBank of NCBI at (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under the accession no. OL022306. The associated BioProject, SRA, and Bio-Sample numbers are PRJNA783869, SRR17044436, and SAMN23455509, respectively.

Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES