Functional regulations between genetic alteration-driven genes and drug target genes acting as prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer

Abstract

Differences in genetic molecular features including mutation, copy number alterations and DNA methylation, can explain interindividual variability in response to anti-cancer drugs in cancer patients. However, identifying genetic alteration-driven genes and characterizing their functional mechanisms in different cancer types are still major challenges for cancer studies. Here, we systematically identified functional regulations between genetic alteration-driven genes and drug target genes and their potential prognostic roles in breast cancer. We identified two mutation and copy number-driven gene pairs (PARP1-ACSL1 and PARP1-SRD5A3), three DNA methylation-driven gene pairs (PRLR-CDKN1C, PRLR-PODXL2 and PRLR-SRD5A3), six gene pairs between mutation-driven genes and drug target genes (SLC19A1-SLC47A2, SLC19A1-SRD5A3, AKR1C3-SLC19A1, ABCB1-SRD5A3, NR3C2-SRD5A3 and AKR1C3-SRD5A3), and four copy number-driven gene pairs (ADIPOR2-SRD5A3, CASP12-SRD5A3, SLC39A11-SRD5A3 and GALNT2-SRD5A3) that all served as prognostic biomarkers of breast cancer. In particular, RARP1 was found to be upregulated by simultaneous copy number amplification and gene mutation. Copy number deletion and downregulated expression of ACSL1 and upregulation of SRD5A3 both were observed in breast cancers. Moreover, copy number deletion of ACSL1 was associated with increased resistance to PARP inhibitors. PARP1-ACSL1 pair significantly correlated with poor overall survival in breast cancer owing to the suppression of the MAPK, mTOR and NF-kB signaling pathways, which induces apoptosis, autophagy and prevents inflammatory processes. Loss of SRD5A3 expression was also associated with increased sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. The PARP1-SRD5A3 pair significantly correlated with poor overall survival in breast cancer through regulating androgen receptors to induce cell proliferation. These results demonstrate that genetic alteration-driven gene pairs might serve as potential biomarkers for the prognosis of breast cancer and facilitate the identification of combination therapeutic targets for breast cancers.

Introduction

The differences in the genetic molecular features of patients, such as DNA methylation, mutation and copy number alterations (CNA), have been shown to be associated with clinical responses to anti-cancer drugs^1–3. Genomic alterations, including mutations and copy number amplification or deletion, can contribute to genomic instability (GI) in breast cancer (BRCA)⁴. These variations lead to expression dysregulation of oncogenes or suppressor genes, which plays important roles in the growth and survival of breast cancer cells⁵. For example, copy number deletions or mutations of key DNA damage repair genes (such as BRCA1 and BRCA2) and genome caretaker genes (for example, ATM, CHEK2, and TP53) have been found in BRCA patients, and these mutations have been shown to play a crucial role in promoting GI and BRCA tumorigenesis^6–8. Mutation or over-expression of EZH2, a transferase involved in histone methylation, has also been linked to BRCA risk^9,10, and blocking EZH2 activity has been shown to slow tumor growth of BRCA¹⁰. NBN gene amplification in ovarian cancer tumors was observed in ovarian cancer patients. NBN overexpression in breast and ovarian cancer cells leads to BRCA1-dependent olaparib resistance¹¹. Mutation of BCL2 is associated with resistance to venetoclax in patients with progressive chronic lymphocytic leukemia¹². In addition to gene mutation, epigenetic changes including DNA methylation aberrations that include hypermethylation and hypomethylation of cancer-related genes can also result in carcinogenesis, and these changes can serve as prognostic biomarkers of various cancers^13,14. For example, aberrant methylation of the tumor suppressor gene SFRP1 in BRCA has been directly associated with the loss of SFRP1 expression and poor prognosis in BRCA^15,16. SFRP1 has been demonstrated to antagonize the Wnt signaling pathway and to regulate the transcriptional activity of T-cell factor/lymphocyte enhancer factor, ultimately contributing to tumor initiation and progression^17,18. DNA methylation-regulated MCTP1 promotes the drug-resistance of esophageal cancer cells^19,20. On the other side, drug response gene-associated genomic markers play important roles in serving as guidelines for drug selection of personalized therapies, accurate prognosis and dynamic drug response monitoring^21,22. For example, epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) is a drug response gene (DRG) for monitoring the humanized monoclonal antibody trastuzumab. Its amplification can promote tumor progression and metastasis, and it is a predictive marker of the treatment benefits from HER2-targeted therapies in breast cancers²³. Moreover, PARP1, a drug response gene of PARP inhibitors, can inhibit BRCA1/2-mediated DNA repair by homologous recombination, thereby inducing tumor cell apoptosis^8,24,25. The combination of targeting genetic alteration-driven genes and drug response genes represents a novel treatment strategy for cancers. For example, the AT-rich interactive domain 1A gene (ARID1A) is mutated in over 50% of ovarian clear cell carcinomas and ARID1A mutational status has been shown to correlate with response to an enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) inhibitor. It has been reported that the inhibition of the EZH2 methyltransferase acts in a synthetic lethal manner in ARID1A-mutated ovarian cancer cells²⁶. Therefore, we identified the functional correlation between genetic alteration-driven genes and DRGs in BRCA and characterized their potential prognostic values. In total, we identified 15 genetic alteration-driven gene pairs as prognostic biomarkers of BRCA including 2 both mutation and copy number-driven gene pairs, 3 DNA methylation-driven gene pairs, 6 mutation-driven gene pairs and 4 copy number-driven gene pairs. In particular, copy number amplification and mutation-driven PARP1-associated gene pairs (PARP1-SRD5A3 and PARP1-ACSL1) significantly correlated with poor overall survival in BRCA through inducing cell proliferation and suppressing the MAPK, mTOR and NF-kB signal pathways. Loss of SRD5A3 expression was associated with increased sensitivity to a PARP1 inhibitor. Moreover, copy number deletion in ACSL1 was associated with increased resistance to the PARP1 inhibitor. These results show that genetic alteration-driven gene pairs might serve as potential biomarkers for the prognosis of BRCA and refining combination therapeutic targets for BRCA.

Results

Identifying genetic alteration-driven genes in breast cancer

Using linear models for microarray data (LIMMA) with a false discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted P value of less than 0.05 and a fold change more than 2 as thresholds, we identified 2388 differentially expressed genes including 1020 upregulated genes and 1368 downregulated genes in BRCA (tumor group = 1085; normal group = 112); 1442 differentially methylated genes, including 670 significantly hypermethylated genes and 770 significantly hypomethylated genes, were also identified using a Student's t-test (two-tailed). Among these genes, 101 differentially methylated genes were determined to be DNA methylation-driven genes whose expression showed inverse correlations with their methylation levels (Pearson’s correlation test, adjusted P < 0.05). For example, we found that the gene cell death-inducing DFFA-like effector a (CIDEA) exhibited hypermethylation in promoter CpG islands (CGIs) and decreased expression in breast tumor samples relative to normal tissues (LIMMA; fold change = 0.03; FDR = 7.51e−199; Fig. 1A). We also obtained methyl-CpG binding domain protein sequencing (MBD-seq) data on a BRCA cohort consisting of 77 patients and 10 normal controls from Victor Jin et al.²⁷ and confirmed the elevated methylation levels of the CIDEA gene using Student’s t-test (P = 0.0051). CIDEA has been reported to be a member of a class of proapoptotic proteins, and immunotherapeutic treatments have been shown to increase CIDEA expression and apoptosis in BRCA cells^28,29. Functional analysis showed that DNA methylation-driven genes were significantly enriched for terms including leukocyte transendothelial migration, angiogenesis and negative regulation of tumor necrosis factor production (Fig. S1). We also identified 3348 significantly differentially expressed CNA genes, including 715 copy number amplified genes and 2633 copy number deleted genes, using GISTIC 2.0. Among these genes, 119 CNA-driven genes were found to overlap in the CNA gene list and the differentially expressed gene list. For example, the proapoptotic gene caspase-12 (CASP12) was significantly down regulated by simultaneous copy number deletion in BRCA (Fig. 1B). Functional analysis showed that CNA-driven genes were significantly enriched in MAPK signaling pathway, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance and NF-kappa B signaling pathway (Fig. S1). We also identified 8543 significantly mutated genes from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) by removing silent mutations. Among these, 596 mutation-driven genes were identified via overlapping the somatic mutation gene list with the differentially expressed gene list. Functional analysis showed that mutation-driven genes were significantly enriched for PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, pathways in cancer, MAPK signaling pathway and cell adhesion (Fig. S1). These DNA methylation-driven genes, CNA-driven genes and mutation-driven genes were thus defined as genetic alteration-driven genes in BRCA. There were 8 genes, including angiopoietin-like 5 (ANGPTL5), family with sequence similarity 107 member A (FAM107A), fibronectin leucine-rich transmembrane protein 2 (FLRT2), glycophorin C (GYPC), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), junctional adhesion molecule 3 (JAM3), sodium channel voltage-gated beta 2 (SCN2B) and serpin family B member 9 (SERPINB9), which exhibited both DNA methylation alterations and CNA (hypergeometric test P = 0.01). We also identified 46 genes, such as prolactin receptor (PRLR), phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate-dependent Rac exchanger 1 (PREX1), coiled-coil domain containing 8 (CCDC8), homeobox A5 (HOXA5) and phospholipase C delta 1 (PLCD1), which were driven by both DNA methylation alterations and mutation alterations (hypergeometric test P = 9.4e−26). We identified 44 genes (such as PARP1, CBX8, EGR3, NRG1 and IL1R1) that were driven by both CNA and mutation (hypergeometric test P = 2.9e−20). Finally, we identified two genes (ANGPTL5 and FAM107A) that are driven by DNA methylation alteration, CNA and mutation (Fig. S2). For example, CBX8, a central part of the polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1), was significantly upregulated by simultaneous copy number amplification and mutations in BRCA (Fig. 1B). Recent studies have shown that upregulation of CBX8 can promote BRCA metastasis via the WNK2/MMP2 pathway³⁰.

Figure 1.

Genetic alteration and gene expression alteration of CIDEA, CBX8 and CASP12 in BRCA. (A) DNA methylation and expression data for the gene CIDEA in breast cancer. The DNA methylation data are plotted for each probe separately and the data is linked to the genomic location of the probe. A chi-squared test was used to compare if there was a difference in the methylation distribution between normal and tumor samples. The samples are ordered by the sample type using MEXPRESS. (B) Genetic alteration and gene expression alteration of CBX8 and CASP12 using UCSC Xena.

Identifying functional regulations between genetic alteration-driven genes and drug response genes

To characterize the functional correlation between genetic alteration-driven genes and DRGs in BRCA, the mutual predictability method was used based on a weighted functional linkage network in visANT (Fig. S3; see “Materials and methods”). The genetic alteration-driven networks including the top 100 functional correlations between genetic alteration-driven genes and DRGs and their associated drugs were used for subsequent analysis (Fig. 2A–D). In the methylation alteration-driven network, we found that genetic alteration-driven gene pairs were related with to eight drugs used in the treatment of BRCA. For example, PRLR, a type I cytokine receptor, showed loss of DNA methylation, mutation and upregulated expression in BRCA cells (Fig. 3A,B). Recent studies have shown that blocking PRLR using antibodies such as fluoxymesterone has potent PRLR-specific antitumor activity in cases of BRCA³¹. PRLR-associated gene pairs such as PRLR-CDKN1C, PRLR-SOCS2, PRLR-MAPK13 and PRLR-GNRHR have been shown to regulate cell proliferation, apoptosis, T cell inhibition, and the JAK-STAT and PI3K-AKT signaling pathways (Fig. 3A). Cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1C (CDKN1C) showed an increased in DNA methylation and downregulated expression in BRCA (Fig. 3B). This gene is a strong inhibitor of several G1 cyclin/Cdk complexes and a negative regulator of cell proliferation. Suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 (SOCS2) showed an increase in DNA methylation and downregulated expression in BRCA, and this cytokine-inducible negative regulator of cytokine receptor signaling has been shown to be negatively associated with activation of the JAK-STAT pathway. Mitogen-activated protein kinase 13 (MAPK13), which can inhibit T cell activation, showed a loss of DNA methylation and upregulated expression in BRCA. Additionally, PRLR and SOCS2 could promote the expression of phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), which can protect tumor cells from T cell-mediated immune surveillance, and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies. PRLR has also been shown to have negative associations with the infiltration levels of activated CD8 T cells (Spearman’s correlation test: R = − 0.34, P < 2.2e−16) and activated CD4 T cells (Spearman’s correlation test: R = − 0.24, P = 5.55e−16; Fig. 3C) in BRCA using TISIDB database. Using a cohort of 298 urothelial cancer patient treated with the PD-L1 blockade cancer immunotherapy agent atezolizumab, we found that PRLR showed significant gene expression differences between 68 responders and 230 non-responders (fold change = 1.5, moderated t-test P = 0.049; Fig. 3D). This was consistent with a recent study demonstrated that both the tumor antigen PRLR and T cell surface CD3 antigen could recruit and activate T cells to kill PRLR expressing BRCA cells³¹. In the CNA alteration-driven network, we found that CNA-driven gene pairs were related to six drugs used in the treatment of BRCA, including the pairs PARP1-ACSL1, B3GALNT2-SRD5A3, IPOR2-SRD5A3, CASP12-SRD5A3 and PARP1-SRD5A3. For example, SRD5A3-associated gene pairs such as ADIPOR2-SRD5A3, CASP12-SRD5A3 and PARP1-SRD5A3 can all regulate cell proliferation and apoptosis. Adiponectin receptor 2 (ADIPOR2) showed copy number amplification and upregulated expression in BRCA cells³². ADIPOR2 is a receptor for adiponectin C1Q and collagen domain containing (ADIPOQ), an adipocytokine secreted by adipocytes in the breast tumor microenvironment, which negatively regulates cancer cell growth. Recent studies have shown that ADIPOQ treatment can lead to cytotoxic autophagy and tumor growth inhibition in BRCA³³. The β1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase II (B3GALNT2) gene showed copy number amplification and upregulated expression in BRCA cells. Studies have also shown that B3GALNT2 transfers N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) in a β1,3 linkage to N-acetylglucosamine, which plays a critical role in the growth of BRCA cells³⁴. In the mutation-driven network, we found that genetic alteration-driven genes pairs were related with 27 drugs used in the treatment of BRCA. For example, SRD5A3-associated gene pairs such as AKR1C3-SRD5A3, PRLR-SRD5A3 and ABCA1-SRD5A3, could regulate steroid hormone biosynthesis signaling pathway, invasion, metastasis and acquisition of therapeutic drug resistance, as well as apoptosis. Aldo–keto reductase family 1 member C3 (AKR1C3) is known as a hormone activity regulator and prostaglandin F synthase that regulates the occupancy of hormone receptors and cell proliferation³⁵. The overexpression of AKR1C3 has been reported to be correlated with poor prognosis in BRCA³⁶. ABCB1 encodes the multidrug resistance protein (MDR1), which is frequently involved in transcriptional fusions in recurrent BRCA. This has important implications for chemotherapy choice in disease relapse and the clinical development of targeted agents³⁷. Overexpression of MDR1 has been associated with olaparib resistance in both cell lines and animal models³⁸.

Figure 2.

Genetic alteration-driven networks. (A) DNA methylation-driven network. (B) Copy number-driven network. (C) Mutation-driven network. (D) Combined genetic alteration-driven network. The node size represents the degree of genes. The green edges represent gene pairs between genetic alteration-driven genes and drug target genes. The red edges represent gene pairs between genetic alteration-driven genes and target genes of breast cancer drugs. The node fill color indicates the genetic alteration and the node edge color corresponds to expression difference.

Figure 3.

PRLR-associated functional regulations in the methylation alteration-driven network. (A) PARP1-associated gene pairs (green line) can regulate cell proliferation, apoptosis, T cell inhibition, and the JAK-STAT and PI3K-AKT signaling pathways⁸¹. (B) Genetic alteration and gene expression alteration of genes using UCSC Xena. (C) Spearman’s correlations between of PRLR expression and immune cell levels across human breast cancers. (D) Expression differences of PRLR between responders and non-responders to immunotherapy using TISIDB.

Functional regulations between genetic alteration-driven genes and drug target genes are associated with disease prognosis in breast cancer

We next sought to evaluate the potentially prognostic value of functional regulations between genetic alteration-driven genes and drug target genes using multivariate Cox regression analysis with the covariates age, estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status and pathologic stage (see “Materials and methods”). We found 15 gene pairs between genetic alteration-driven genes and drug target genes (PARP1-ACSL1, PARP1-SRD5A3, PRLR-CDKN1C, PRLR-PODXL2, PRLR-SRD5A3, ADIPOR2-SRD5A3, CASP12-SRD5A3, SLC39A11-SRD5A3, B3GALNT2-SRD5A3, SLC19A1-SLC47A2, SLC19A1-SRD5A3, AKR1C3-SLC19A1, ABCB1-SRD5A3, NR3C2-SRD5A3 and AKR1C3-SRD5A3), which were able to significantly distinguish patients in high-risk groups from those in low-risk groups in terms of overall survival (Fig. 4, Table 1). This involved 15 genes, including PARP1, ACSL1, SRD5A3, ADIPOR2, SLC39A11, B3GALNT2, CASP12, CDKN1C, PRLR, PODXL2, SLC19A1, SLC47A2, AKR1C3, ABCB1 and NR3C2. There were many hub genes in these prognostic gene pairs, such as PARP1, PRLR, SRD5A3 and ABCB1 (Fig. 4). For example, PRLR is a hub gene in the DNA methylation-driven network that showed a loss of DNA methylation, mutation and upregulated expression (LIMMA; fold change = 4.19; FDR = 1.56e−82) in BRCA. The higher expression group of PRLR-SRD5A3 [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.66; 95%, confidence interval (CI) 0.47–0.92; log-rank test P = 0.01], PRLR-CDKN1C (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.49–0.94; log-rank test P = 6.8e−03) and PRLR-PODXL2 (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.50–0.97; log-rank test P = 0.01) pairs had a significantly decreased overall survival (Fig. 4; Table 1), which increased their prognostic value compared to SRD5A3 (P = 0.03; log-rank test), PRLR (P = 0.19; log-rank test), CDKN1C (P = 0.20; log-rank test) or PODXL2 (P = 0.71; log-rank test) alone (Fig. S4). The multidrug resistance protein 1 (ABCB1) is often mutated in BRCA, and is related to the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition mechanism and cancer metastasis. The higher risk group ABCB1-SRD5A3 showed significantly shorter survival times than the lower risk group (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.47–0.91; log-rank test P = 6.7e−03), which increased the prognostic value of this pair compared to SRD5A3 (P = 0.03; log-rank test) or ABCB1 (P = 0.11; log-rank test) alone (Fig. S4). These results suggest that genetic alteration-driven gene pairs play important roles in BRCA and can act as potential prognostic biomarkers of BRCA.

Figure 4.

Survival analysis of genetic alteration-driven gene pairs in a TCGA cohort. Comparison of overall survival among patients with high (red) or low (blue) risk scores for each genetic alteration-driven gene pair by Kaplan–Meier analysis (with log-rank values) in a cohort of breast cancer patients from TCGA.

Table 1.

The information of pairs of genetic alteration-driven genes and drug response genes associated with survival in breast cancer.

Gene pairs	Genetic alterations	Univariate cox analysis				Multivariate cox analysis
		P.value a		HR (95%CI)		P.value b		FDR	HR (95%CI)
PARP1–ACSL1
Low or High	PARP1: Mutation; copy number amplification; High expression ACSL1: copy number deletion; Low expression	0.024		0.72(0.52–1.004)		0.021		0.042	0.68(0.49–0.94)
PARP1–SRD5A3
Low or High	PARP1: Mutation; copy number amplification; High expression SRD5A3: High expression	0.0064		0.63(0.46–0.8794)		0.0046		0.028	0.62(0.45–0.86)
ADIPOR2–SRD5A3
Low or High	ADIPOR2: copy number amplification; High expression SRD5A3: High expression	0.0034		0.61(0.442–0.8508)		0.0052		0.028	0.63(0.45–0.87)
SLC39A11–SRD5A3
Low or High	SLC39A11: copy number amplification; High expression SRD5A3: High expression	0.0037		0.62(0.4434–0.8544)		0.0092		0.029	0.65(0.47–0.90)
B3GALNT2–SRD5A3
Low or high	B3GALNT2: copy number amplification; High expression SRD5A3: High expression	0.013		0.66(0.4784–0.9172)		0.011		0.029	0.65(0.47–0.91)
CASP12–SRD5A3
Low or High	CASP12: copy number Deletion; Low expression SRD5A3: High expression	0.01		0.65(0.4695–0.9024)		0.018		0.040	0.67(0.48–0.93)
CDKN1C–PRLR
Low or High	CDKN1C: DNA Hypermethyation; Low expression PRLR: DNA Hypomethyation; Mutation; High expression	0.0073		0.64(0.4611–0.8864)		0.019		0.031	0.67(0.49–0.94)
PODXL2–PRLR
Low or High	PODXL2: DNA Hypomethyation; High expression PRLR: DNA Hypomethyation; Mutation; High expression	0.015		0.67(0.4790.9232)		0.031		0.031	0.70(0.50–0.97)
SLC19A1–SLC47A2
Low or High	SLC19A1: Mutation; High expression SLC47A2: Mutation; Low expression	0.00035		0.54(0.3849–0.7566)		0.0016		0.032	0.58(0.41–0.81)
SLC19A1–SRD5A3
Low or High	SLC19A1: Mutation; High expression SRD5A3: High expression	0.0021		0.59(0.4239–0.8263)		0.005		0.033	0.62(0.44–0.86)
AKR1C3–SLC19A1
Low or high	AKR1C3: Mutation; Low expression SLC19A1: Mutation; High expression	0.0018		0.59(0.4186–0.8199)		0.0067		0.034	0.63(0.45–0.88)
ABCB1–SRD5A3
Low or High	ABCB1:Mutation; Low expression SRD5A3: High expression	0.0072		0.64(0.4615–0.8862)		0.011		0.038	0.65(0.47–0.91)
PRLR–SRD5A3
Low or High	PRLR: DNA Hypomethyation; Mutation; High expression SRD5A3: High expression	0.012		0.66(0.4717–0.91)		0.012		0.038	0.66(0.47–0.92)
NR3C2–SRD5A3
Low or high	NR3C2: Mutation; Low expression SRD5A3: High expression	0.0024		0.60(0.4335–0.8355)		0.013		0.038	0.66(0.47–0.92)
AKR1C3–SRD5A3
Low or high	AKR1C3: Mutation; Low expression SRD5A3: High expression	0.0079		0.64(0.46–0.89)		0.016		0.041	0.67(0.48–0.93)

HR: hazard ratio.

^aP.value: Univariate Cox regression analysis.

^bP.value: Multivariate Cox regression analysis (including age, ER, PR, pathological stage), FDR: FDR correction for P.value^b.

Genetic alteration-driven PARP1-associated functional regulations could be potential targets for combination therapy and prognostic markers in BRCA

Differences in molecular features including mutation, CNA and DNA methylation can explain the interindividual variability in response to anti-cancer drugs between cancer patients. We therefore sought to investigate the association between genetic alteration-driven gene pairs and treatment efficacy and prognostic indicators. For example, we identified 28 genetic alteration-driven PARP1-associated functional regulations (such as PARP1-ACSL1, PARP1-SRD5A3 and PARP1-CASP12) in BRCA. RARP1 (poly(ADP-ribose)-polymerase 1) is upregulated by simultaneous copy number amplification and gene mutation of RARP1 in BRCA (Fig. 5A–C). RARP1 can regulate apoptosis, autophagy, and the MAPK and mTOR signaling pathways through P38, ERK1/2, JNK, mTOR and LC3 (Fig. 5B). Recent studies have shown that PARP1 can promote cancer progression through impacting on DNA repair, apoptosis inhibition, and maintaining the activity of the MAPK signaling pathway³⁹. Clinically speaking, PARP1 inhibitors, such as olaparib, have been approved by the FDA or are currently in clinical trials for the treatment of advanced breast and ovarian cancers⁴⁰. The PARP1-associated gene ACSL1 showed copy number deletion and downregulated expression in BRCA (Fig. 5A–C). ACSL1 regulates AKT, P38, ERK1/2, JNK, NF-κB and GMCSF to activate inflammatory processes, MAPK signaling and the NF-κB signaling pathway (Fig. 5B). Recent studies have shown that ACSL1 can significantly affect phosphorylation of P38, ERK1/2, and NF-κB in BRCA MDA-MB-231 cells. ACSL1 has also been reported to play a crucial role in the regulation of GMCSF production, which is associated with the inflammatory process that is involved in tumor growth ⁴¹. Simultaneous suppression of the MAPK, NF-κB and mTOR signaling pathways have indeed been shown to inhibit migration, invasion and have anti-inflammatory effects in multiple cancer types^42–44. To identify the association between ACSL1 and the drug response of the PARP1 inhibitor talazoparib, we perform an analysis of variance (ANOVA) using data from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity Cancer (GDSC) database to correlate drug response [inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) values of talazoparib] with genetic alterations (mutations and CNA) in cancer cells. To this end, we found that copy number deletion in ACSL1 was associated with increased resistance to PARPi talazoparib (two-way ANOVA P = 1.49e−3, Fig. 5D). The talazoparib IC₅₀ value was markedly increased in pan-cancer samples that had ASCL1 copy number deletion (two-way ANOVA P = 1.89e−4, Fig. 5D). Moreover, based on expression data from 1632 BRCA patients treated with chemotherapy and using the response data from Balázs Győrffy et al.⁴⁵, we found that patients who did not respond to therapy by means of relapse-free survival at 5 years showed lower expression of ACSL1 compared with responders (moderated t-test P = 6.3e−6; Fig. 5E). We also found that patients with higher expression of the functional regulation unit PARP1-ACSL1 significantly correlated with poorer overall survival (multivariate cox analysis FDR = 0.04; HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.49–0.94; log-rank test P = 0.023; Fig. 5F). However, there was no prognostic significance of the individual genes PARP1 (P = 0.74; log-rank test) or ACSL1 (P = 0.26; log-rank test). These results indicated that combination targeting of PARP1 and ACSL1 may be a potential therapeutic strategy to improve the overall survival in BRCA through suppressing the MAPK, mTOR and NF-kB signal pathways to induce apoptosis, autophagy and prevent the inflammatory processes involved in cancer metastasis. Indeed, a recent study showed that the combination of PARP inhibitors (such as olaparib) and metformin could increase the efficacy of PARP inhibitors and tumor sensitivity to immunotherapy in triple-negative BRCA⁴⁶. Metformin has been reported to increase the expression of ACSL1 mRNA to relieve cardiomyocyte injury based on data from the comparative toxicogenomics database (CTD)⁴⁷. Additionally, PARP1-associated gene SRD5A3 (steroid 5 alpha-reductase 3) was found to be significantly up-regulated (LIMMA; fold change = 2.57; FDR = 7.73e−127) in human BRCA. SRD5A3 can convert testosterone to dihydrotestosterone and suppress apoptosis and induces cell proliferation through regulating androgen receptor (AR) and kallikrein-related peptidase 3 (KLK3) or PSA (Fig. 5B). Indeed, knockdown of SRD5A3 expression could inhibit the growth and cell proliferation of prostate cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma cells^48,49. To characterize whether the PARP1-associated gene SRD5A3 could modulate sensitivity to PARP inhibitor (PARPi) treatment, we obtained data from a genome-wide clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) knockout screen with PARP1 inhibitor olaparib in HeLa cells (GSE145743) ⁵⁰. Using DrugZ, which is an algorithm to identify synergistic and inhibitory chemical interactions from CRISPR screens⁵¹, we found that loss of SRD5A3 expression was associated with increased sensitivity to the PARPi olaparib (P = 0.03), indicating a synthetic lethal interaction between PARP1 and SRD5A3 with PARPi treatment. Combination inhibition of PARP1 and SRD5A3 might therefore be a potential therapeutic strategy for BRCA that acts through suppressing cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis. Accordingly, patients with higher expression of PARP1-SRD5A3 were significantly correlated with poorer overall survival in BRCA (log-rank test P = 0.006; multivariate cox P = 0.005, Fig. 4). The PARP1-SRD5A3 pair (multivariate cox analysis FDR = 0.03; HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.45–0.86; log-rank test P = 0.006) increased the prognostic value compared to SRD5A3 (P = 0.03; log-rank test) or PARP1 (P = 0.74; log-rank test) alone (Fig. S3). Therefore, the genetic alteration-driven gene pairs PARP1-ACSL1 and PARP1-SRD5A3 might serve as potential biomarkers for the prognosis and combination therapy of BRCA.

Figure 5.

PARP1-associated functional regulations could be potential targets for combination therapy and prognostic markers of breast cancer. (A) The gene expression profile across all tumor samples and paired normal tissues. Each dot represents the expression of each sample. Asterisks represent FDR < 0.05. (B) PARP1-associated functional regulations (green line) affect multiple important biological pathways⁸¹. (C) Genetic alteration and gene expression alteration of genes using UCSC Xena. (D) Association between genetic alteration of genes and drug sensitivity of PARP1 inhibitor analyzed using ANOVA based on GDSC. The size of each point is proportional to the number of altered cell lines (ASCL1 loss, P = 1.49e−3). The magnitude of the effect that each genetic event has on cell line IC₅₀ values in response to the drug. The effect size is proportional to the difference in the mean IC₅₀ between wild-type and altered cell lines. Numbers less than 0 indicate drug sensitivity, and numbers greater than 0 indicate drug resistance. (E) Expression levels of ACSL1, CASP12 and SRD5A3 in breast cancer patients in relation to response to chemotherapy treatment. Patients were classified as responder or nonresponder according to their 5-year relapse-free survival. P values were calculated using Mann–Whitney U test. (F) Kaplan–Meier curve based on the expression status of one gene or a multi-gene signature in BRCA.

In addition, CASP12, a proapoptotic gene, is an upstream negative regulator of PARP1. CASP12 was significantly downregulated by simultaneous copy number deletion in BRCA (fold change = 2.57, FDR = 7.73e−127; Fig. 5A). CASP12 plays important roles in both downregulating inflammation through repressing the proinflammatory cytokines IL-18 and IL-1β and executing ER stress-triggered apoptosis through regulating CASP3, CASP7 and PARP1 (Fig. 5B). Both of CASP12 and PARP1 are targets of thymoquinone and paclitaxel based on the CTD database. The combination of thymoquinone and paclitaxel has also been reported to significantly induce apoptosis and inhibit tumor growth compared to each agent alone by affecting the expression and the activity of Caspase-3, Caspase-7, and Caspase-12 in BRCA cells⁵². The PARP1 inhibitor lapatinib plus paclitaxel reduced the risk of progression compared with paclitaxel alone (HR 0.44; P < 0.0001)⁵³. Using expression data from 1632 BRCA patients with chemotherapy and response data from Balázs Győrffy et al.⁴⁵, we found that patients who did not respond to therapy showed higher expression levels of SRD5A3 (moderated t-test P = 3.9e−6), but lower expression levels of CASP12 compared with responders (moderated t-test P = 3.7e−2; Fig. 5E). These results establish functional links between genetic alteration-driven genes PARP1, ACSL1, CASP12 and SRD5A3, could be potential targets for combination therapy and prognostic markers for BRCA that function by partly inducing apoptosis and anti-inflammatory effects in BRCA.

Discussion

Here, we identified genetic alteration-driven genes for BRCA, including 101 methylation alteration-driven genes, 119 CNA-driven genes and 596 mutation-driven genes. Then, we systematically identified genetic alteration-driven gene pairs and constructed genetic alteration-driven networks including genetic alteration-driven genes, DRGs and their associated drugs for BRCA. There were many hub genes in these genetic alteration-driven networks, including PARP1, PRLR, SRD5A3 and ABCB1, which are important for BRCA. In the methylation alteration-driven network, PRLR showed loss of DNA methylation, mutation and upregulated expression in BRCA cells. PRLR-associated gene pairs such as PRLR-CDKN1C, PRLR-SOCS2, PRLR-MAPK13 and PRLR-GNRHR could regulate cell proliferation, apoptosis, T cell inhibition, and the JAK-STAT and PI3K-AKT signaling pathways. The PRLR-SOCS2 pair could promote the expression of PI3K and PD-L1, which could protect tumor cells from T cell-mediated immune surveillance, and ICB therapies. In the CNV alteration-driven network, SRD5A3-associated gene pairs such as ADIPOR2-SRD5A3, CASP12-SRD5A3 and PARP1-SRD5A3 could regulate cell proliferation and apoptosis. In the mutation-driven network, gene pairs such as AKR1C3-SRD5A3, PRLR-SRD5A3 and ABCA1-SRD5A3 could regulate the steroid hormone biosynthesis signaling pathway, invasion, metastasis, the acquisition of therapeutic drug resistance and apoptosis.

We identified 15 genetic alteration-driven gene pairs as independent prognostic biomarkers of BRCA, which included two mutation and copy number-driven gene pairs (PARP1-ACSL1 and PARP1-SRD5A3), three DNA methylation-driven gene pairs (PRLR-CDKN1C, PRLR-PODXL2 and PRLR-SRD5A3), six gene pairs between mutation-driven genes and drug target genes (SLC19A1-SLC47A2, SLC19A1-SRD5A3, AKR1C3-SLC19A1, ABCB1-SRD5A3, NR3C2-SRD5A3 and AKR1C3-SRD5A3), and four copy number-driven gene pairs (ADIPOR2-SRD5A3, CASP12-SRD5A3, SLC39A11-SRD5A3 and GALNT2-SRD5A3). For example, PRLR was a hub gene in the DNA methylation-driven network that showed a loss of DNA methylation, mutation and upregulated expression in BRCA. The PRLR has been reported to control cell proliferation, migration, and inhibit apoptosis^54–59. Disruption of PRLR signaling pathways have also been linked to tumorigenesis and BRCA development⁶⁰. In accordance, suppression of PRLR expression by shRNA reduced the growth, invasiveness and tumourigenicity of breast cancer T47D cells⁶¹, which highlights PRLR as a therapeutic target for breast cancer^62,63. Targeting both the tumor antigen PRLR and the T cell surface CD3 antigen could recruit and activate T cells to kill PRLR expressing breast cancer cells³¹. SOCS2 showed a gain of DNA methylation and downregulated expression in breast cancers. Studies have showed that SOCS2 is JAK-STAT regulator and plays a critical regulatory role in antitumor immunity by priming T cells^64,65. CDKN1C showed gain of DNA methylation and downregulated expression in breast cancers. Previous evidence has shown that downregulated CDKN1C correlates with poor overall survival, immune infiltration and therapeutic response in breast cancer patients^66,67. The higher expression group of PRLR-SRD5A3, PRLR-CDKN1C and PRLR-PODXL2 pairs had significantly shorter survival times than lower expressers. In particular, RARP1 was found to be upregulated by simultaneous copy number amplification and gene mutation, which regulates apoptosis, autophagy, and the MAPK and mTOR signaling pathways, leading to mammary microcalcification. It has been demonstrated that mammary microcalcification is not only the earliest detectable radiological sign for BRCA screening but the phenomenon, ectopic breast mineralization, may reflect the underling events during mammary carcinogenesis. The prognostic relevance of genetic alteration-driven gene pair signatures, together with their mRNA quantitation, might result from relevant biological processes that contribute to the molecular heterogeneity of human BRCA³⁵. Therefore, breast microcalcification is plausible as having prognostic significance in BRCA patients and is associated with unfavorable genetic and molecular characteristics, complex subgross morphology, high histology tumor grade, increased metastatic potential, decreased disease-free and overall survival and hence the choice of treatment plan^68,69. RARP1 is upregulated by simultaneous copy number amplification and gene mutation of the RARP1 in breast cancers. PARP1 has been reported to be overexpressed and to be associated with poor overall survival of breast cancer patients ^70,71. Recent findings have showed that the activation of PARP1 increases the transcription of some proliferation and DNA repair genes in breast cancer cells, which enables cancer cells to rapidly divide and resist DNA damaging agents⁷². In addition, inhibition of PARP1 can cause a significant reduction in tumor growth as shown by a xenograft experiment in MCF-7 cells⁷³, and this can act as a novel and promising radiosensitization strategy in inflammatory breast cancer⁷⁴. PARP1 inhibitors have been approved by the FDA or are in clinical trials for the treatment of advanced BRCA. We found that PARP1-associated gene pairs were associated with sensitivity to PARPi and significantly correlated with overall survival in BRCA. For example, copy number deletion in ACSL1 was associated with increased resistance to PARP1 inhibitors. ACSL1 has been reported to play a crucial role in the regulation inflammatory process that is involved in tumor growth and metastasis in BRCA by regulating lipid metabolism and patients. High ACSL1 expression has also been reported to be correlated with poor prognosis in BRCA⁷⁵. Loss of SRD5A3 expression was associated with increased sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. Representative immunohistochemistry images confirmed that SRD5A3 protein expression was high in BRCA tissues and this high SRD5A3 expression was related to poorer prognosis⁷⁶. The PARP1-ACSL1 and PARP1-SRD5A3 pairs significantly correlated with poor overall survival in BRCA through inducing apoptosis, preventing the inflammatory processes and inducing cell proliferation, respectively. These results establish functional links between the genetic alteration-driven genes PARP1, ACSL1 and SRD5A3, which could be potential targets for combination therapy and prognostic markers in BRCA by partly inducing apoptosis and anti-inflammatory effects in BRCA.

Materials and methods

Identification of genetic alteration-driven genes in breast cancer

We used RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data from 1085 patients and 112 normal samples from TCGA. We used LIMMA (a Bioconductor package in R), which uses a linear model to estimate the mean and variance of gene expression in different groups, to perform differential analysis. We thus identified differentially expressed genes between BRCA and normal samples with the threshold for FDR-adjusted P value < 0.05 and a fold change > 2. Genome-wide DNA methylation data on BRCA were measured using the Infinium HumanMethylation27 BeadChip. The differences in DNA methylation levels (β value) of gene promoters between BRCA and normal samples were analyzed using a Student's t-test. Genes showing differentially methylated regions with an FDR < 0.05 and inverse correlations between expression and methylation were termed DNA methylation-driven genes. CNA were assessed using SNP 6.0 Arrays and level 3 copy number data from the TCGA data portal⁷⁷. Identification of significant copy number changes in BRCA were based on GISTIC 2.0, which is software designed for discovering new cancer genes targeted by somatic copy number alterations (SCNA)⁷⁷. GISTIC 2.0 was used by setting the confidence level to 99% for a range of q-value thresholds spanning from 0.05 to 0.45 in increments of 0.1 to identify whether there were significantly amplified or deleted regions within a chromosome. Focal amplification or deletion for all hg19 samples was determined by setting the broad length cutoff to 0.5 and the confidence level to 0.9, with all other parameters restricted to their default values. Differentially expressed genes located in copy number altered regions were called CNA-driven genes. We obtained somatic mutation genes by removing silent mutations from TCGA. Significantly mutated genes with differential expressions were termed mutation-driven genes. These DNA methylation-driven genes, CNA-driven genes and mutation-driven genes were termed genetic alteration-driven gene in BRCA.

Identifying enriched pathways and functions of genetic alteration-driven genes

To identify enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways of genetic alteration-driven genes, we performed analyses using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID)⁷⁸, which conducts a statistical test based on Fisher's exact test to measure gene-enrichment in annotation terms. KEGG pathways were considered to be significant if they had a reported FDR < 0.05 and enrichment scores higher than 1. We performed analyses using KEGG Orthology Based Annotation System (KOBAS 3.0)⁷⁹, a functional enrichment analysis tool, to identify enriched Gene Ontology (GO) terms for genetic alteration-driven genes. A hypergeometric test was used to determine the significance of the results obtained and p-values were corrected using FDR, with an FDR < 0.05 considered significant.

Identifying functional regulations between genetic alteration-driven genes and drug target genes in breast cancer

The mutual predictability method was used to characterize the functional correlation between genetic alteration-driven genes and DRGs in BRCA. A weighted functional linkage network in which a linked gene pair showed high probability sharing the same biological process was obtained from the visANT database (Integrative Visual Analysis Tool for Biological Networks and Pathways; http://www.visantnet.org/visantnet.html)⁸⁰. We used the mutual predictability to measure the extent to which genetic alteration-driven genes could be used to identify BRCA DRGs, and vice versa. For genetic alteration-driven genes, we identified and ranked their direct neighbors using the weight of edges in the functional linkage network. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plot showed the sensitivity and specificity variation by using different weight cutoffs on the ranked list. The true (or false) positive rates represent BRCA DRGs (or non-DRGs) above a particular weight cutoff, respectively. The true (or false) negative rates represent non-DRGs (or BRCA DRGs) below a particular weight cutoff, respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) values were used to evaluate the predictive performance of genetic alteration-driven genes for BRCA DRGs. Similarly, we also calculated AUC values to evaluate the predictive performance of BRCA DRGs as for genetic alteration-driven genes. Finally, the geometric mean of mutual predicted AUC values was used as a mutual predictability score to characterize the functional correlation between genetic alteration-driven gene and DRG in BRCA. The top 100 functional correlations between genetic alteration-driven genes and DRGs using mutual predictability scores were selected as candidate functional gene pairs in BRCA for subsequent analysis.

Identifying functional regulations between genetic alteration-driven genes and drug response genes acting as prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer

First, univariate Cox regression analyses were conducted for genetic alteration-driven gene and DRG with their expression values as variables. The effect of the genes with P-value < 0.1 at the univariate analysis on the overall outcome was tested in multivariate Cox regression analysis. For each functional regulation between a genetic alteration-driven gene and a DRG, a multivariate Cox regression was performed to calculate the contribution of each gene to survival prediction. The risk score of each functional regulation was established based on a linear combination of the expression levels and the multivariable Cox regression coefficient as a weight. Subsequently, multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to evaluate whether functional regulations could be independent of other clinicopathological variables including age (young ≤ 55; old > 55), ER status, PR status and pathologic stage (early stage I/II; late stage III/IVV). According to the median risk score of selected functional regulations, the patients with BRCA were classified into a high-risk group and a low-risk group. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were then generated, and a log-rank test was performed to reveal alterations in survival time between patients using the R package survival and survminer. Functional regulations between genetic alteration-driven genes and DRGs with FDR < 0.05 were identified as prognostic biomarkers of BRCA. Time-dependent ROC curve analyses were made to assess the predictive capacity of each gene pair by using the R package timeROC.

Ethical compliance

All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines.

Author contributions

L.W., H.Z. and L.Y. designed the study, implemented the algorithm, and performed the analysis. L.Y., J.S., F.L., H.Z., Y.P., S.N. and L.W. wrote and revised the manuscript. H.X., C.Z., X.Y., L.W., and S.L. help to collect the data and prepare the figures and tables. All authors read, reviewed, and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Training Program for Young Innovative Talents in Regular Undergraduate colleges and universities of Heilongjiang Province (UNPYSCT-2020174); the China Postdoctoral Science Special Foundation (2019T120280 and 2020T130161); the Hei Long Jiang Postdoctoral Special Foundation (LBH-TZ1018 and LBH-Z17218)); the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M631943 and 2018M641860); the Hei Long Jiang Postdoctoral Foundation (LBH-Z17110).

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA repository (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-13835-5.