Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2022 Jun 2;56(12):8610–8618. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c00428

Enhanced Light Absorption and Radiative Forcing by Black Carbon Agglomerates

Georgios A Kelesidis †,*, David Neubauer , Liang-Shih Fan §, Ulrike Lohmann , Sotiris E Pratsinis
PMCID: PMC9228049  PMID: 35652563

Abstract

graphic file with name es2c00428_0006.jpg

The climate models of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change list black carbon (BC) as an important contributor to global warming based on its radiative forcing (RF) impact. Examining closely these models, it becomes apparent that they might underpredict significantly the direct RF for BC, largely due to their assumed spherical BC morphology. Specifically, the light absorption and direct RF of BC agglomerates are enhanced by light scattering between their constituent primary particles as determined by the Rayleigh–Debye–Gans theory interfaced with discrete dipole approximation and recent relations for the refractive index and lensing effect. The light absorption of BC is enhanced by about 20% by the multiple light scattering between BC primary particles regardless of the compactness of their agglomerates. The resulting light absorption agrees very well with the observed absorption aerosol optical depth of BC. ECHAM-HAM simulations accounting for the realistic BC morphology and its coatings reveal high direct RF = 3–5 W/m2 in East, South Asia, sub-Sahara, western Africa, and the Arabian peninsula. These results are in agreement with satellite and AERONET observations of RF and indicate a regional climate warming contribution by 0.75–1.25 °C, solely due to BC emissions.

Keywords: black carbon, morphology, optical properties, mass absorption cross-section, radiative forcing

Short abstract

The direct radiative forcing derived here for black carbon nanoparticles accounting for their realistic morphology and coating is essential to quantify and mitigate their global warming contribution.

1. Introduction

Incomplete combustion of fossil or biofuels and open fires release about 8 Tg of black carbon (BC) per year worldwide.1 This is on the same order of magnitude as the global annual production of carbon black (11 Tg).2 BC (also known as mature soot) is made of porous, fractal-like clusters (agglomerates) of nanoparticles3 that are coated with weakly or non-absorbing compounds (e.g., organics, sulfates, ammonium, nitrates, and water) during atmospheric aging.4 Unlike CO2 that has an atmospheric lifetime of 200–1000 years depending on CO2 removal processes,5 BC is a short-lived pollutant with a lifetime of about 4–7 days.6 Therefore, reducing BC emissions can have an immediate impact on global warming7 and delay climate change8 induced by CO2 and other greenhouse gases.

Light absorption and scattering of BC yield together its direct RF, which is used to quantify its climate impact9 and to estimate its 100-year global warming potential.10 The direct RF depends on BC atmospheric burden, absorption forcing efficiency, refractive index, RI, and mass absorption cross-section, MAC1. The latter is the light absorption-equivalent cross-section of BC normalized by its mass and varies significantly with BC composition and morphology.3 At the top of the atmosphere (TOA), the climate may warm by 0.25 ± 0.21 °C for every watt per square meter (W/m2) of Earth’s surface of BC’s direct RF11. Interactions of BC with snow12 and clouds13 are reported by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as a separate global warming contribution and may indirectly increase the BC RF. In fact, recent global climate simulations revealed that BC may indirectly increase the global mean surface temperature by 0.4–0.5 °C through its interactions with clouds.13 In contrast, rapid adjustments, such as the warming of the troposphere and the reduction of low clouds, could reduce the effective RF from BC.14

The contribution of BC to climate change is estimated with the highest uncertainty (∼90%)1 in climate models, limiting their accuracy.15 Specifically, climate models of the 2021 IPCC report16 estimate BC’s RF to range from −0.28 to 0.41 W/m2, increasing the globally averaged TOA temperature up to 0.1 °C in 1750–2019. This large uncertainty can be attributed, next to the uncertainty in BC emissions and lifetime, to BC morphology and composition variations that are neglected by climate models.17 Therefore, the direct RF range in 1750–2011 derived by IPCC models for BC spheres with unrealistic RI (as shown below) is 30% smaller than that obtained based on satellite18 and ground-based19 (AERONET) observations by Bond et al.1 and Chung et al.,20 respectively. Accounting for the coating of BC spheres increased the direct RF but only partly reduced the discrepancy between observations and climate models21 as the latter still neglect the ramified BC morphology. Even though concern about such oversimplifications of BC morphology and RI had been expressed since, at least, 30 years ago,22 they are still used today in climate models.

To account for the morphology and RI of BC in determination of its direct RF, the Rayleigh–Debye–Gans (RDG) theory23 can be used as a more flexible alternative to Mie theory in climate models. This way, recent power laws relating the optical properties of BC to its filamentary structure based on discrete element modeling (DEM)24 and discrete dipole approximation (DDA)25 can be implemented in such models. These laws have been used quite effectively to describe BC formation and growth from a variety of combustion sources24 and even facilitate monitoring of BC emissions by aerosol (e.g., particle mobility and mass analyzers), laser (e.g., light extinction) diagnostics,26 and fire detectors27 accounting for BC morphology and limiting the current uncertainty regarding BC mass and particle size.28 This way, the light absorption and scattering of BC can be estimated quite accurately even though BC is made up of coated polydisperse and fused nanoparticles. Here, the RDG theory is interfaced with DDA simulations (open-source DDSCAT 7.3 code) and recent relations for the RI25 and lensing effect29 of BC to estimate its light absorption and scattering accounting for its morphology and coating by weakly or non-absorbing compounds. The MAC and the global and regional climate impact of emissions of coated BC with realistic morphology and RI are estimated by the RDG theory used in simulations with the global climate model ECHAM-HAM and compared to that impact by coated mass-equivalent BC spheres that are widely used by climate models.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. BC Optical Properties

The MAC is estimated for BC agglomerates using the RDG theory:23,30

2.1. 1

where ρ = 1.8 g/cm3 and RI = 1.66–0.76i are the bulk density and refractive index (at wavelength, λ = 532 nm), respectively, of C-rich BC, while h is the MAC enhancement by the multiple light scattering of the constituent primary particles of BC agglomerates. Eq 1 with h = 1 neglects any absorption enhancement by this multiple internal scattering making it the MAC of mass-equivalent BC spheres. Here, h (Supporting Information, Figure S1, squares) is derived using DEM coupled with DDA.25 Unlike the T-matrix method used for agglomerates of physically bonded (non-overlapping) primary particles,31 DDA can be used to derive the light absorption and multiple light scattering from both physically and chemically bonded BC primary particles.25

In brief, BC spheres and agglomerates of polydisperse and chemically bonded (aggregated) primary particles with mobility diameter, dm = 50–250 nm and dp = 7.5–40 nm, are generated by DEM for BC surface growth and agglomeration.24 This dp range covers the variation of soot dp measured from engines and laboratory flames as summarized by Bond and Bergstrom3 (Figure 1: shaded red bar) and Liu et al.32 (Figure 1: open red bar). The morphology of these open agglomerates having a fractal dimension, Df, of about 1.91 has been validated with microscopy,33 mass-mobility,24 and light scattering27 measurements of diffusion and pre-mixed flame soot. Compact agglomerates of polydisperse primary particles in point contact having the same dp and σg,p with the open agglomerates are generated34 using the open source FracVal algorithm.35 The compact BC agglomerates simulated here34 have Df = 2.76. Their dm is nearly equal (within 2%) to their gyration diameter (Figure 3b in ref (36)) and results in a mass-mobility exponent, Dfm = 2.65 ± 0.01. This is in good agreement with the Dfm values from the analysis37 of mass-mobility measurements of BC agglomerates produced by pre-mixed, diffusion flames and diesel soot generators and compacted by condensation and evaporation of secondary organic aerosols (Df = 2.64–2.73).38 The DDA computations are then performed using the open-source DDSCAT 7.3 code39 for each dm. The particle morphology is represented on a lattice by an array of discrete dipoles interacting with each other through their electric fields.39 The Maxwell’s equations are discretized on the lattice using the volume-integral equation method and solved iteratively.39 For accurate but also efficient DDA computations, the dipole spacing, d, is varied at a constant ratio 2π|RI|d/λ < 0.12, satisfying the precision criteria40 for strongly absorbing materials, such as BC.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Bare BC MAC calculated at λ = 550 nm for spheres (filled purple bar), compact (orange bar), and open agglomerates (green bar) as well as the average MAC from 11 climate models44,4649 for bare spheres (open purple bar). The MAC of open and compact agglomerates are in agreement with those measured for soot from diesel engines and flame reactors and averaged over 17 studies from 1967 to 2005 by Bond and Bergstrom3 (shaded red bar) and over 24 studies from 2002 to 2018 by Liu et al.32 (open red bar).

The DDA-derived optical properties of spheres are identical to those estimated by Mie theory (Figure S1 in ref (27)). Therefore, h is estimated from the ratio of the DDA-derived MAC over that given by the classic RDG theory (eq 1 with h = 1)30 for BC agglomerates of polydisperse single and aggregated primary particles with dm = 50–250 nm and dp = 7.5–40 nm at λ = 532 nm (Figure S1, squares). For dm > 50 nm, BC agglomerates have C-rich composition (C/H > 4) and a ramified morphology.25 Therefore, their h attains its asymptotic value of 1.18 ± 0.03 (Figure S1, broken line and green-shaded area). This is in agreement with the h derived from DDA simulations of agglomerates with monodisperse, single primary particles (triangles).30 The enhancement of the light absorption from compact BC agglomerates (circles) is similar to that from open ones with polydisperse and aggregated (squares) and monodisperse (triangles) primary particles, resulting in an average h = 1.17 ± 0.04 (dot-broken line, orange-shaded area). Therefore, the BC h is not affected by the agglomerate compactness or primary particle polydispersity and aggregation.

The MAC of bare BC spheres and agglomerates derived here at λ = 532 nm are interfaced with an absorption Angstrom exponent of 1.1 to estimate their MAC at λ = 550 nm accounting for the wavelength dependence of C-rich BC.41 Furthermore, the MACc of coated BC is estimated directly from the MAC of emitted BC by a scaling law from DDA simulations:29

2.1. 2

where m and mc are the mass of BC before and after coating with non-absorbing compounds, respectively. Therefore, mc includes the mass of both BC and coating species. Unlike the RDG theory, the DDA is not limited by the dp or dm range.39 Therefore, eq 2 can be used to estimate the BC light absorption for mc/m even up to 50. Eq 2 was validated with laboratory cook stove,42 biomass, diesel generator, ambient traffic,43 and field21 data. The ease or difficulty of BC encapsulation by coatings is not accounted here.

2.2. Absorption Aerosol Optical Depth of BC

The global mean absorption aerosol optical depth, AAOD, of BC is estimated using the BC MAC and average atmospheric burden, N1:

2.2. 3

where N = 0.29 ± 0.11 mg/m2 is obtained based on those reported by recent climate models using lifetimes of 2.2–9.6 days44 (Table S1). This lifetime range is on par with the lifetimes used for hydrophobic and hydrophilic BC45. The AAOD of BC is obtained using eq 3 with the MAC derived here for bare and coated spheres and agglomerates, as well as the average MAC used in climate models for bare44,4649 (Table S2) and coated44 (Table S1) spheres. The BC AAOD estimated this way is compared to that obtained based on ground-based AERONET observations50 of the total AAOD, as well as to the average contribution of BC to the total AAOD derived by recent climate models44 of the AeroCom phase III. These models have been used in the 6th assessment report (AR6) of the IPCC to obtain the direct RF of BC for the period of 1750–2019.16

The uncertainty of AAOD from BC, σAAOD, derived by eq 3 is given by propagation theory, assuming that the BC N and MAC are independent:51

2.2. 4

where σN = 0.11 mg/m2 and σMAC are the uncertainties of N and MAC, respectively. The σN is estimated from the standard deviation of 15 climate models44 (Table S1). The σMAC for bare BC agglomerates is based on the standard deviation of h (Figure S1). The σMAC for coated BC particles accounts also for the standard deviation of the average mc derived by detailed climate modeling.4 It should be noted that the BC emission rate, E, and lifetime, τ, vary also significantly between different climate models, resulting in the large σN = 0.11 mg/m2 (about 40%; Table S1). Unlike E and τ though, the BC MAC can be determined from first principles based on recent computational advances, reducing the total uncertainty of soot’s climate impact estimation bringing its contribution to RF very close to the 2001–2009 satellite record and 2010 AERONET data (Figure 3 or 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

BC absorption aerosol optical depth (AAOD) estimated here for BC spheres with (filled red bar) and without coatings (filled purple bar), as well as for bare (green bar) and coated (blue bar) BC agglomerates compared to those obtained by climate models for bare44,4649 (open purple bar) and coated44 (open red bar) BC spheres, as well as to AAOD observed by the AERONET network44,50 (yellow bar).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Global maps of the direct RF of coated spheres (a) and agglomerates (b) estimated by ECHAM-HAM. Statistically insignificant changes calculated on the basis of interannual variability are marked by dots. Hotspots with direct RF = 2–4 W/m2 assuming coated spheres (a) are seen in East, South Asia, sub-Sahara, western Africa, and the Arabian peninsula. Accounting for the realistic morphology of coated BC (b) increases its direct RF by 22% on average, in excellent agreement with the direct RF observed by AERONET in these regions.1

2.3. Regional Direct RF by ECHAM-HAM Simulations

The global direct RF distributions of bare or coated BC spheres and agglomerates RF in the industrial era are obtained based on the difference of the BC direct radiative effect between 1850 and 2010 using the global coupled aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM in T63 spectral horizontal resolution, which corresponds to a regular 1.875° × 1.875° grid. The model has 31 vertical levels with a top at 10 hPa and uses a time step of 7.5 min13. All simulations are performed with the prescribed climatological sea surface temperature and sea ice extents representative for the years 2000–2015 and aerosol emissions representative for 2010 using CMIP6 aerosol emission data. The setup of the simulations presented here closely follows the one in Neubauer et al.52 The quantification of the direct BC RF follows the protocol in Myhre et al.53 The ECHAM-HAM simulations also account for particles that do not contain BC, including dust, sea salt, sulfates, and organics. Therefore, BC-containing particles make up 0.5 wt % of the total particles (fine and coarse and 5% of the fine alone) in the model.54 Aging of externally mixed BC and mineral dust aerosols is considered by condensation of sulfuric acid and coagulation of bare BC and/or dust particles with internally mixed aerosols that contain soluble materials and converts them into internally mixed particles.13Eq 2 is interfaced with the mass concentrations of BC, sulfates, and organics derived by ECHAM-HAM to obtain the spatial (Figure S2) and the vertical distribution of mc/m (Figure S3: dotted line). In this regard, as the pressure, p, decreases with altitude, mc/m increases from 11 up to 46 from the surface to the tropopause, consistent with the large mass-to-core ratios of 50 measured by Ditas et al.55 The increasing mc/m estimated here for decreasing p is consistent with the high coatings measured above the clouds over urban Eastern China.56 This results also in an up to 400% increase of absorption forcing efficiency with decreasing p (Figure S3: solid line), consistent with previous climate model studies.57 The BC optical properties are accounted for in ECHAM-HAM simulations using the MAC derived at λ = 532 nm for bare or coated BC spheres and agglomerates and the DDA-derived absorption Angstrom exponent of 1.1 to account for the wavelength dependence of C-rich BC light absorption.41 The global and regional direct RF from BC is compared to satellite18 and ground-based AERONET observations,19 respectively, by interfacing the measured BC AAOD with the absorption wavelength dependence of BC, dust, and organic matter,20 as well as with GOCART20 and CAM51 climate models.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Light Absorption by Bare and Coated BC

Bare BC emitted from combustion engines or open flames is rather filamentary with large C/H ratio (>4), bulk density, ρ = 1.8 g/cm3, and RI = 1.66–0.76i.25 However, climate models44,4649 estimate BC light absorption assuming spheres with small imaginary RI parts (Table S2) that are similar to those of H-rich BC (young soot)-containing organic carbon formed at short residence times.41 Such unrealistic BC RI values are still used in almost half of the most recent climate models44 included in the IPCC AR6 (Table S1). These RI combined with ρ = 1.8 g/cm3 result in BC MAC = 4.4 ± 0.7 m2/g (Figure 1: open purple bar). The bare BC MAC values from the IPCC AR6 models44 are almost identical to those4649 used in the IPCC AR5 (Table S2). The average BC MAC from these climate models44,4649 is about 40% smaller than the MAC measured in diesel engines and laboratory flames averaged over 17 studies from 1967 to 2005 by Bond and Bergstrom3 and over 24 studies from 2002 to 2018 by Liu et al.32 The MAC = 5.9 ± 1.6 m2/g (filled purple bar) derived here by DDA for C-rich (equivalent to BC) spheres with RI = 1.66–0.76i still underestimates the measured MAC (red bars) by 21–24%. This underestimation is due to the porous structure of BC agglomerates that enhances the light scattering and subsequent absorption in between their constituent primary particles by up to 18% (Figure S1).

The original RDG theory (eq 1 with h = 1) does not account for the multiple light scattering between BC primary particles in their agglomerates.23 This underestimates the MAC of BC by about 15–21% (Figure S1: h = 1.15–1.21) and results in identical light absorption to that obtained for spheres (6 m2/g, Figure 1: filled purple bar). In contrast, a MAC of 7.1 ± 0.2 m2/g (Figure 1: filled green bar) is obtained for BC agglomerates by the RDG theory (eq 1) using the DDA-derived h = 1.18 ± 0.03. This MAC accounts for the interactions between BC primary particles and agrees with soot measurements from laboratory flames and diesel engines (Figure 1: shaded3 and open32 red bars). The MAC of compact BC agglomerates (orange bar) is identical to that obtained from open ones (green bar). This is consistent with MAC measurements of ramified and compact BC58 from a diffusion flame and confirms that the light absorption of BC is enhanced by the multiple light scattering between BC primary particles regardless of the compactness of their agglomerates. This enhancement is not accounted for by models neglecting the ramified structure of BC.

During atmospheric aging, BC is coated by weakly or non-absorbing compounds, such as organics, sulfates, ammonium, nitrates, and water.4 These non-absorbing compounds have an average refractive index,29RIc, of 1.55 ± 0.32 and a density, ρc, of 1.2 ± 0.2 g/cm3. The standard deviations of RIc and ρc account for their variation with light wavelength and coating composition.59 These coatings enhance BC light absorption based on a DDA-derived power law29 that relates the coated BC mass, mc, and MACc to the bare BC m and MAC (eq 2). The impact of the RIc variation with wavelength or composition (e.g., due to photobleaching) on the MAC enhancement is rather negligible.29 Photobleaching may reduce the imaginary part60 of RIc from 0.1 to 0.

BC agglomerates have larger surface areas than non-BC-containing aerosol spheres due to their ramified structure.33 This may enhance the volatile condensation on the BC surface by up to a factor of 361 and explains the difference in the BC-coating composition compared to that in non-BC-containing particles. According to particle-resolved models that account for the spatial variation of BC composition,4 BC coatings consist on average of 32 vol % of primary and secondary organic aerosols, 5.5% of sulfates, 16% of ammonium, and 46.5% of nitrates. It should be noted that the above-quoted BC-coating composition is the global average. The regional BC-coating composition can vary based on the local aerosol concentrations. For example, nitrate concentrations are high mostly in the urban atmosphere of North America, Europe, India, and East China and rather low in remote regions.62 The average mass fraction of 5.5% used here to account for sulfates in the BC coating is on par with such measurements in China (2.5–10.5% by Wang et al.:63 Figures 2, 6, and 7) and US (1% by Collier et al.:64 Figure 5). Similarly, the mass fraction of 46.5% used here for nitrate coating on BC is on par with the 30–40% nitrate mass fraction measured in the UK (McMeeking et al.:65 Figure 5), as well as with the 40% number-based fraction of nitrate-containing BC measured in China (Gong et al.:66 Table 1). These coatings have, on average, about a 7 times larger volume than the BC core.4 Assuming densities ρ = 1.8 g/cm3 and ρc = 1.2 ± 0.2 g/cm3 for the BC and its coatings,29 respectively, results in mc/m = 5.6 ± 0.8 (Figure S4). The standard deviation of mc/m was derived accounting for the variation of ρc with the coating composition. The mc/m = 5.6 ± 0.8 estimated here is on par with the mc/m = 1.7–9.9 measured over the North China Plain during different seasons.67 This mc/m results in MACc = 10.2 ± 4.1 and 12.3 ± 1.2 m2/g for spheres and agglomerates, respectively. The former is in excellent agreement with the average MACc = 9.8 ± 4.1 m2/g obtained by recent climate models44 assuming coated BC spheres (Table S1). Compacting of BC agglomerates entities by vapor condensation during aging hardly (within 5%) affects their MAC(58) (as shown also in Figure 1: orange vs green bar). Therefore, the MACc of coated ramified agglomerates is assumed to be the same as that of coated restructured ones.

The MACc of coated BC was also obtained for a wide range of mc/m = 1–10 and compared to cook stove data42 (Figure 2). The MACc = 9.2 ± 1.5 m2/g obtained at mc/m = 10 by interfacing eq 2 with the average bare BC MAC = 4.4 ± 0.7 m2/g from IPCC AR5 and AR6 models44,4649 is in excellent agreement with the average MACc = 9.8 ± 4 m2/g used in the IPCC AR6 models44 (Table S1). The MACc obtained for coated BC spheres by IPCC models44,4649 (broken line) underestimates the measured MACc (symbols) by 25–40%. In contrast, the MACc of coated BC agglomerates (solid line) is in excellent agreement with the data for the whole range of mc/m. Furthermore, the MACc = 12.3 ± 1.2 m2/g derived here for coated BC agglomerates having the average coating composition is in good agreement with the mode MACc = 12.7 ± 0.1 m2/g measured before, during, and after daytime photochemical oxidation in China.68 This indicates that the MACc derived here accounting for the realistic BC morphology and coating may provide more accurate estimates of the direct RF from BC than those given in the wider literature.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

MACc of coated BC as a function of its normalized mass, mc/m, derived here for agglomerates (solid line) and by IPCC models44,4649 for spheres (broken line) in comparison to cook stove data (symbols).42 Variation of MACc due to the initial MAC of uncoated spheres and agglomerates is represented by the shaded area. The MACc obtained for coated BC spheres by IPCC models (broken line) underestimates the measured MACc (symbols) by 25–40%. In contrast, the MACc of coated BC agglomerates (solid line) is in excellent agreement with the data for the whole range of mc/m.

Even though the main focus of this paper is the accurate estimation of the BC light absorption and MAC, it should be noted that the BC agglomerate structure and coating also affect its light scattering and phase parameters that are essential for climate modeling. For example, the BC single scattering albedo, SSA, is given by the ratio of the BC external light scattering over its light extinction1 and increases with increasing mc/m (Figure S5a). This is due to the enhanced light scattering by the BC coating.41 The SSA of BC agglomerates (solid line, light green-shaded area) is smaller than that of equivalent spheres (broken line, purple-shaded area) at mc/m = 1–10. This is attributed to the internal light scattering between the constituent primary particles of agglomerates that increases their light absorption (Figure S1) but reduces their external light scattering.

The BC asymmetry factor, g, quantifies the asymmetry of its angular light scattering distribution and is given by its phase parameters.1 The light scattering of BC agglomerates is rather asymmetric as it decreases logarithmically with increasing scattering angle.27 This results in a rather constant g of about 0.84 regardless of mc/m (Figure S5b: solid line, light green-shaded area). In contrast, the light scattering distribution of uncoated BC spheres (broken line, purple-shaded area: mc/m = 1) is rather uniform, resulting in g = 0.19. As mc/m increases and the BC spheres become larger due to their coating, their g increases up to 0.84 at mc/m = 10, in good agreement with the g of coated BC agglomerates having the same coating amount.

3.2. Climate Change Contribution by BC

The good agreement of the MAC from RDG theory with measurements (Figure 1: green vs red bars) supports its use to estimate the global and regional climate impact of BC. The BC climate impact estimated here is benchmarked to that derived by recent climate models for bare and coated BC spheres. Therefore, Figure 3 shows the BC AAOD estimated here by multiplying the average N = 0.29 ± 0.11 mg/m2 obtained by recent climate models using the CMIP6 emission data (Table S1) with MAC = 10.2 ± 4.1 m2/g and 5.9 ± 1.6 m2/g for BC spheres with (filled red bar) and without (filled purple bar) coatings, respectively, and MAC = 12.3 ± 1 m2/g and 7.1 ± 0.2 m2/g for BC agglomerates with (blue bar) and without (green bar) coatings, respectively. Based on the climate models included in the IPCC AR6 (Figure 3 in ref (44)), the BC AAOD is concentrated mostly over land and is negligible in remote regions (e.g., over oceans). Therefore, the estimated BC AAOD can be compared consistently with that from the AERONET network44,50 observation sites that are located over land. The latter has been the main standard so far to assess the accuracy of climate models.69 The BC AAODs = 0.0017 ± 0.007 and 0.003 ± 0.0016 obtained here for bare and coated spheres, respectively, are in excellent agreement with those obtained by climate models for bare44,4649 (open purple bar) and coated spheres44 (open red bar) using the same average N. The good agreement between the AAOD estimated here for bare (Figure 3: filled purple bar) and coated (filled red bar) spheres with those estimated by climate models (open purple44,4649 and red44 bars) evaluated at the same conditions validates our numerical methods for the estimation of BC optical properties and direct RF. Accounting for the ramified BC morphology increases the AAOD of bare and coated BC up to 0.0021 ± 0.0008 and 0.0036 ± 0.0014, respectively. Therefore, the AAOD derived here for coated BC agglomerates is about 30% larger than that obtained by the most recent climate models for coated spheres and is in good agreement with that observed by the AERONET network44,50 (yellow bar). A global mean direct RF = 0.61 ± 0.28 W/m2 from coated BC agglomerates can be obtained by multiplying their AAOD = 0.0036 ± 0.0014 with the average absorption forcing efficiency of 170 ± 43 W/m2/AAOD used in global climate models.1 This direct RF is in excellent agreement with the 0.65 ± 0.15 W/m2 from satellite measurements20 between 2001 and 2009 (Figure S6). It should be noted that the enhancement of the BC AAOD and global mean direct RF due to its agglomerate structure is also valid for the 1750–2019 RF estimates reported in the latest IPCC AR6 using the most recent climate models44 of the AeroCom phase III (Table S1).

The global mean AAOD of BC (Figure 3) affects primarily the climate of regions with high BC emissions, such as East and South Asia, the sub-Sahara, western Africa, South America, and the Arabian peninsula.70 This is elucidated in the global maps of direct RF (Figure 4) obtained using ECHAM-HAM52 simulations for coated BC spheres (a) and agglomerates (b), respectively. The distribution of direct RF depends on the spatial variations of mc/m (Figure S2). The latter is obtained by interfacing eq 2 with the mass concentrations of BC, sulfates, and organics derived by ECHAM-HAM. The spatial distribution of mc/m is identical for coated spheres and agglomerates. The mc/m derived here (Figure S2) ranges from 5 to 25 in regions where the BC direct RF is statistically significant. This is on par with mc/m observations that range from 1.767 to 50.55 Over the Pacific and Atlantic oceans, as well as over Australia, BC is coated by large amounts of sulfates and organics increasing mc/m up to 35 (Figure S2). However, the direct RF induced by such heavily coated BC in these regions is statistically not significant (Figure 4: blue and dotted regions) due to its low mass concentrations and lifetime.45 In contrast, the mc/m of BC emissions over the North and South Poles ranges from 0 to 10 but results in a small, positive direct RF of about 0.1 W/m2. Over the hotspots of BC emissions, that is, East, South Asia, sub-Sahara, western Africa, and the Arabian peninsula, mc/m ranges from 15 to 25. The direct RF derived here assuming coated spheres (Figure 4a) ranges between 2 and 4 W/m2 in the above regions. Accounting for coating of BC nearly doubles the regional direct RF over that of bare BC spheres (Figure S7a), consistent with CAM3-ECA simulations.46 However, the assumption of coated spheres still underestimates the direct RF = 3–5 W/m2 of BC from field observations in these regions by 20–33% in 2005.1 Climate models44 used in the IPCC AR6 make similar assumptions regarding the BC morphology and thus may still underestimate the regional direct RF in 2019.

Accounting for the filamentary structure of BC increases its direct RF by 22% (on average) in the above regions (Figure S7b) compared to that of bare BC spheres (Figure S7a). The enhancement of the direct RF due to the BC agglomerate structure is slightly larger than that of MAC. This can be attributed to the ∼2% increase of the BC absorption forcing efficiency due to the realistic BC morphology. Coating increases the direct RF of BC agglomerates by 70% in the above hotspots (Figure 4b vs Figure S7b), in excellent agreement with the observed direct RF1. The present ECHAM-HAM simulations do not account for nitrate and ammonium emissions.52 Therefore, the mc/m derived by ECHAM-HAM was increased to elucidate the impact of BC coatings containing 46.5% and 16% of nitrates and ammonium, respectively, on BC direct RF (Figure S8) and to be consistent with the global average AAOD simulations shown in Figure 3. Accounting for nitrates and ammonium in BC coatings enhances the direct RF by about 20% (Figure S8), without affecting the agreement between ECHAM-HAM and AERONET observations.1 Furthermore, the present ECHAM-HAM simulations for coated BC agglomerates yield an AAOD of 0.05–0.06 in the Indogangentic plains and an AAOD of 0.036–0.06 in East China (Figure S9). These AAOD values corroborate the AAOD = 0.03–0.06 observed in these regions by Gustafsson and Ramanathan69 based on BC emissions from 2000 to 2014 and by Ramachandran and Rupakheti71 based on emissions from 2010. Most importantly, the substantial direct RF = 3–5 W/m2 estimated here in these hotspots may contribute to regional climate warming by 0.75–1.25 °C. This regional temperature increase was obtained by multiplying the direct RF with a climate sensitivity of 0.25 °C/W/m2 but without accounting for rapid adjustment effects.11 Therefore, accounting for BC morphology and coating is essential to accurately estimate the large global and regional effects of BC on climate.

In conclusion, it is shown, for the first time to our knowledge, how the high observed MAC values of BC can be explained and that the climate impact of BC is dominated by its composition (i.e., RI and coating) and ramified morphology. Specifically, the enhanced light scattering between the constituent primary particles of such filamentary BC determined by the RDG theory and the resulting increased light absorption (by about 20%) agree very well with the observed absorption of BC and enhance its direct RF. Current climate models estimate the global mean AAOD of BC at 0.0014 ± 0.0006 and 0.0028 ± 0.0021 assuming bare and coated spheres, respectively. However, accounting for a realistic BC morphology and coating by weakly or non-absorbing compounds (including water), the AAOD of BC is found to be 0.0036 ± 0.0014, in excellent agreement with satellite20 and AERONET observations.44,50 Most importantly, ECHAM-HAM simulations accounting for the filamentary structure and coating of BC revealed large direct RF = 3–5 W/m2 in East and South Asia, the sub-Sahara, western Africa, and the Arabian peninsula, explaining field observations at these regions.1 The accurate estimation of the BC AAOD and direct RF is enabled here by accounting for a realistic BC structure and also for its coating and RI. The latter is still underestimated by almost half of the climate models44 used in the latest IPCC AR6 report. Therefore, it is essential to account for a realistic BC morphology, RI, and coating to make reliable estimates of the direct and indirect13 impact of BC on global and regional climate.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (206021_183298, 200020_182668, 250320_163243, and 206021_170729) as well as the ETH Zurich and Stavros Niarchos Foundations (ETH-08 14-2). D.N. acknowledges funding from the FORCeS project under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research program with grant agreement 821205. This work was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS) under project ID s903. The ECHAM-HAMMOZ model is developed by a consortium composed of ETH Zurich, Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Forschungszentrum Jülich, University of Oxford, the Finnish Meteorological Institute, and the Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research and managed by the Center for Climate Systems Modeling (C2SM) at ETH Zurich. The authors gratefully acknowledge help from Ms. P. Crepaldi and Mr. C.A. Bruun with the DDA simulations.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.2c00428.

  • Summary of coated BC properties used in recent global climate models from the IPCC AR6;44 summary of bare BC properties used in various climate models from the IPCC AR54649 and AR6;44h of BC as a function of dm for compact and open BC agglomerates of monodisperse30 or polydisperse and aggregated primary particles; global map of mc/m of coated BC agglomerates estimated by interfacing eq 2 with the mass concentrations of BC, sulfates, and organics derived by ECHAM-HAM; distribution of mc/m and absorption forcing efficiency derived by ECHAM-HAM as a function of the altitude pressure; average volume and mass fraction of BC and coating compounds; single scattering albedo, SSA, and asymmetry factor, g, of coated BC as a function of its mc/m; global mean direct RF estimated for bare and coated BC spheres, as well as bare and coated BC agglomerates along with that obtained from 2001–2009 satellite observations;20 global distribution of BC direct RF estimated by ECHAM-HAM assuming BC (a) spheres and (b) agglomerates; global distribution of BC direct RF of BC (a) spheres and (b) agglomerates having coatings of constant 46.5 vol % nitrates, 16% ammonium, and varying amounts of organics and sulfates estimated by ECHAM-HAM; and global distribution of BC AAOD estimated by ECHAM-HAM for coated BC agglomerates (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

es2c00428_si_001.pdf (1,023KB, pdf)

References

  1. Bond T. C.; Doherty S. J.; Fahey D. W.; Forster P. M.; Berntsen T.; DeAngelo B. J.; Flanner M. J.; Ghan S.; Karcher B.; Koch D.; Kinne S.; Kondo Y.; Quinn P. K.; Sarofim M. C.; Schultz M. G.; Schulz M.; Venkataraman C.; Zhang H.; Zhang S.; Bellouin N.; Guttikunda S. K.; Hopke P. K.; Jacobson M. Z.; Kaiser J. W.; Klimont Z.; Lohmann U.; Schwarz J. P.; Shindell D.; Storelvmo T.; Warren S. G.; Zender C. S. Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment. J. Geophys. Res. 2013, 118, 5380–5552. 10.1002/jgrd.50171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. International Carbon Black Association , Carbon Black User’s Guide, www.carbon-black.org, 2016, accessed on April 6, 2022.
  3. Bond T. C.; Bergstrom R. W. Light absorption by carbonaceous particles: An investigative review. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 27–67. 10.1080/02786820500421521. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fierce L.; Bond T. C.; Bauer S. E.; Mena F.; Riemer N. Black carbon absorption at the global scale is affected by particle-scale diversity in composition. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12361. 10.1038/ncomms12361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Solomon S.; Plattner G. K.; Knutti R.; Friedlingstein P. Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106, 1704–1709. 10.1073/pnas.0812721106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rodhe H.; Persson C.; Akesson O. An investigation into regional transport of soot and sulfate aerosols. Atmos. Environ. 1972, 6, 675–693. 10.1016/0004-6981(72)90025-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fesenfeld L. P.; Schmidt T. S.; Schrode A. Climate policy for short- and long-lived pollutants. Nat. Clim. Change 2018, 8, 933–936. 10.1038/s41558-018-0328-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bowerman N. H. A.; Frame D. J.; Huntingford C.; Lowe J. A.; Smith S. M.; Allen M. R. The role of short-lived climate pollutants in meeting temperature goals. Nat. Clim. Change 2013, 3, 1021–1024. 10.1038/Nclimate2034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jacobson M. Z. Strong radiative heating due to the mixing state of black carbon in atmospheric aerosols. Nature 2001, 409, 695–697. 10.1038/35055518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Allen M. R.; Fuglestvedt J. S.; Shine K. P.; Reisinger A.; Pierrehumbert R. T.; Forster P. M. New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants. Nat. Clim. Change 2016, 6, 773–776. 10.1038/Nclimate2998. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Richardson T. B.; Forster P. M.; Smith C. J.; Maycock A. C.; Wood T.; Andrews T.; Boucher O.; Faluvegi G.; Fläschner D.; Hodnebrog O.; Kasoar M.; Kirkevåg A.; Lamarque J. F.; Mülmenstädt J.; Myhre G.; Olivié D.; Portmann R. W.; Samset B. H.; Shawki D.; Shindell D.; Stier P.; Takemura T.; Voulgarakis A.; Watson-Parris D. Efficacy of Climate Forcings in PDRMIP Models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2019, 124, 12824–12844. 10.1029/2019JD030581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Skiles S. M.; Flanner M.; Cook J. M.; Dumont M.; Painter T. H. Radiative forcing by light-absorbing particles in snow. Nat. Clim. Change 2018, 8, 964–971. 10.1038/s41558-018-0296-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lohmann U.; Friebel F.; Kanji Z. A.; Mahrt F.; Mensah A. A.; Neubauer D. Future warming exacerbated by aged-soot effect on cloud formation. Nat. Geosci. 2020, 13, 674–680. 10.1038/s41561-020-0631-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Forster P.; Storelvmo T.; Armour K.; Collins W.; Dufresne J. L.; Frame D.; Lunt D. J.; Mauritsen T.; Palmer M. D.; Watanabe M.; Wild M.; Zhang H.. The Earth’s Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks, and Climate Sensitivity. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: New York, 2021; In Press. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bellouin N.; Quaas J.; Gryspeerdt E.; Kinne S.; Stier P.; Watson-Parris D.; Boucher O.; Carslaw K. S.; Christensen M.; Daniau A.-L.; Dufresne J.-L.; Feingold G.; Fiedler S.; Forster P.; Gettelman A.; Haywood J. M.; Lohmann U.; Malavelle F.; Mauritsen T.; McCoy D. T.; Myhre G.; Mülmenstädt J.; Neubauer D.; Possner A.; Rugenstein M.; Sato Y.; Schulz M.; Schwartz S. E.; Sourdeval O.; Storelvmo T.; Toll V.; Winker D.; Stevens B. Bounding Global Aerosol Radiative Forcing of Climate Change. Rev. Geophys. 2020, 58, e2019RG000660 10.1029/2019RG000660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Naik V. S.; Szopa S.; Adhikary B.; Artaxo P.; Berntsen T.; Collins W. D.; Fuzzi S.; Gallardo L.; Kiendler Scharr A.; Klimont Z.; Liao H.; Unger N.; Zanis P.. Short-Lived Climate Forcers. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: New York, 2021; In Press. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kanakidou M.; Seinfeld J. H.; Pandis S. N.; Barnes I.; Dentener F. J.; Facchini M. C.; Van Dingenen R.; Ervens B.; Nenes A.; Nielsen C. J.; Swietlicki E.; Putaud J. P.; Balkanski Y.; Fuzzi S.; Horth J.; Moortgat G. K.; Winterhalter R.; Myhre C. E. L.; Tsigaridis K.; Vignati E.; Stephanou E. G.; Wilson J. Organic aerosol and global climate modelling: a review. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2005, 5, 1053–1123. 10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kaufman Y. J.; Tanre D.; Gordon H. R.; Nakajima T.; Lenoble J.; Frouin R.; Grassl H.; Herman B. M.; King M. D.; Teillet P. M. Passive remote sensing of tropospheric aerosol and atmospheric correction for the aerosol effect. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 1997, 102, 16815–16830. 10.1029/97JD01496. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Holben B. N.; Tanre D.; Smirnov A.; Eck T. F.; Slutsker I.; Abuhassan N.; Newcomb W. W.; Schafer J. S.; Chatenet B.; Lavenu F.; Kaufman Y. J.; Castle J. V.; Setzer A.; Markham B.; Clark D.; Frouin R.; Halthore R.; Karneli A.; O’Neill N. T.; Pietras C.; Pinker R. T.; Voss K.; Zibordi G. An emerging ground-based aerosol climatology: Aerosol optical depth from AERONET. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2001, 106, 12067–12097. 10.1029/2001JD900014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chung C. E.; Ramanathan V.; Decremer D. Observationally constrained estimates of carbonaceous aerosol radiative forcing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109, 11624–11629. 10.1073/pnas.1203707109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Peng J. F.; Hu M.; Guo S.; du Z.; Zheng J.; Shang D. J.; Levy Zamora M.; Zeng L. M.; Shao M.; Wu Y. S.; Zheng J.; Wang Y.; Glen C. R.; Collins D. R.; Molina M. J.; Zhang R. Y. Markedly enhanced absorption and direct radiative forcing of black carbon under polluted urban environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016, 113, 4266–4271. 10.1073/pnas.1602310113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nelson J. Fractality of Sooty Smoke - Implications for the Severity of Nuclear Winter. Nature 1989, 339, 611–613. 10.1038/339611a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dobbins R. A.; Megaridis C. M. Absorption and Scattering of Light by Polydisperse Aggregates. Appl. Opt. 1991, 30, 4747–4754. 10.1364/Ao.30.004747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kelesidis G. A.; Goudeli E.; Pratsinis S. E. Morphology and mobility diameter of carbonaceous aerosols during agglomeration and surface growth. Carbon 2017, 121, 527–535. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kelesidis G. A.; Pratsinis S. E. Soot light absorption and refractive index during agglomeration and surface growth. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2019, 37, 1177–1184. 10.1016/j.proci.2018.08.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kelesidis G. A.; Pratsinis S. E. Determination of the volume fraction of soot accounting for its composition and morphology. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2021, 38, 1189–1196. 10.1016/j.proci.2020.07.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kelesidis G. A.; Kholghy M. R.; Zuercher J.; Robertz J.; Allemann M.; Duric A.; Pratsinis S. E. Light scattering from nanoparticle agglomerates. Powder Technol. 2020, 365, 52–59. 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kelesidis G. A.; Pratsinis S. E. Santoro flame: The volume fraction of soot accounting for its morphology & composition. Combust. Flame 2022, 240, 112025 10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Chakrabarty R. K.; Heinson W. R. Scaling Laws for Light Absorption Enhancement Due to Nonrefractory Coating of Atmospheric Black Carbon Aerosol. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 121, 218701 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.218701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yon J.; Liu F. S.; Bescond A.; Caumont-Prim C.; Roze C.; Ouf F. X.; Coppalle A. Effects of multiple scattering on radiative properties of soot fractal aggregates. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 2014, 133, 374–381. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2013.08.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mackowski D. W.; Mishchenko M. I. Calculation of the T-matrix and the scattering matrix for ensembles of spheres. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1996, 13, 2266–2278. 10.1364/Josaa.13.002266. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu F. S.; Yon J.; Fuentes A.; Lobo P.; Smallwood G. J.; Corbin J. C. Review of recent literature on the light absorption properties of black carbon: Refractive index, mass absorption cross section, and absorption function. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 33–51. 10.1080/02786826.2019.1676878. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kelesidis G. A.; Goudeli E.; Pratsinis S. E. Flame synthesis of functional nanostructured materials and devices: Surface growth and aggregation. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2017, 36, 29–50. 10.1016/j.proci.2016.08.078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Eggersdorfer M. L.; Pratsinis S. E. The Structure of Agglomerates Consisting of Polydisperse Particles. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 347–353. 10.1080/02786826.2011.631956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Moran J.; Fuentes A.; Liu F.; Yon J. FracVAL: An improved tunable algorithm of cluster-cluster aggregation for generation of fractal structures formed by polydisperse primary particles. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2019, 239, 225–237. 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.01.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Spyrogianni A.; Karadima K. S.; Goudeli E.; Mavrantzas V. G.; Pratsinis S. E. Mobility and settling rate of agglomerates of polydisperse nanoparticles. J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 148, 064703 10.1063/1.5012037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kelesidis G. A.; Furrer F. M.; Wegner K.; Pratsinis S. E. Impact of Humidity on Silica Nanoparticle Agglomerate Morphology and Size Distribution. Langmuir 2018, 34, 8532–8541. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Leung K. K.; Schnitzler E. G.; Dastanpour R.; Rogak S. N.; Jäger W.; Olfert J. S. Relationship between Coating-Induced Soot Aggregate Restructuring and Primary Particle Number. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 8376–8383. 10.1021/acs.est.7b01140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Draine B. T.; Flatau P. J. Discrete-Dipole Approximation for Scattering Calculations. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1994, 11, 1491–1499. 10.1364/Josaa.11.001491. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Doner N.; Liu F. S. Impact of morphology on the radiative properties of fractal soot aggregates. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 2017, 187, 10–19. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.09.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kelesidis G. A.; Bruun C. A.; Pratsinis S. E. Impact of organic carbon on soot light absorption. Carbon 2021, 172, 742–749. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.10.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Saliba G.; Subramanian R.; Saleh R.; Ahern A. T.; Lipsky E. M.; Tasoglou A.; Sullivan R. C.; Bhandari J.; Mazzoleni C.; Robinson A. L. Optical properties of black carbon in cookstove emissions coated with secondary organic aerosols: Measurements and modeling. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 1264–1276. 10.1080/02786826.2016.1225947. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Liu D. T.; Whitehead J.; Alfarra M. R.; Reyes-Villegas E.; Spracklen D. V.; Reddington C. L.; Kong S. F.; Williams P. L.; Ting Y. C.; Haslett S.; Taylor J. W.; Flynn M. J.; Morgan W. T.; McFiggans G.; Coe H.; Allan J. D. Black-carbon absorption enhancement in the atmosphere determined by particle mixing state. Nat. Geosci. 2017, 10, 184–188. 10.1038/ngeo2901. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sand M.; Samset B. H.; Myhre G.; Gliss J.; Bauer S. E.; Bian H. S.; Chin M. A.; Checa-Garcia R.; Ginoux P.; Kipling Z.; Kirkevag A.; Kokkola H.; Le Sager P.; Lund M. T.; Matsui H.; van Noije T.; Olivie D. J. L.; Remy S.; Schulz M.; Stier P.; Stjern C. W.; Takemura T.; Tsigaridis K.; Tsyro S. G.; Watson-Parris D. Aerosol absorption in global models from AeroCom phase III. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2021, 21, 15929–15947. 10.5194/acp-21-15929-2021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Boucher O.; Balkanski Y.; Hodnebrog O.; Myhre C. L.; Myhre G.; Quaas J.; Samset B. H.; Schutgens N.; Stier P.; Wang R. Jury is still out on the radiative forcing by black carbon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016, 113, E5092–E5093. 10.1073/pnas.1607005113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kim D.; Wang C.; Ekman A. M. L.; Barth M. C.; Rasch P. J. Distribution and direct radiative forcing of carbonaceous and sulfate aerosols in an interactive size-resolving aerosol-climate model. J. Geophys. Res. 2008, 113, D16309. 10.1029/2007jd009756. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Chung S. H.; Seinfeld J. H. Global distribution and climate forcing of carbonaceous aerosols. J. Geophys. Res. 2002, 107, 4407. 10.1029/2001JD001397. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Schulz M.; Textor C.; Kinne S.; Balkanski Y.; Bauer S.; Berntsen T.; Berglen T.; Boucher O.; Dentener F.; Guibert S.; Isaksen I. S. A.; Iversen T.; Koch D.; Kirkevag A.; Liu X.; Montanaro V.; Myhre G.; Penner J. E.; Pitari G.; Reddy S.; Seland O.; Stier P.; Takemura T. Radiative forcing by aerosols as derived from the AeroCom present-day and pre-industrial simulations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2006, 6, 5225–5246. 10.5194/acp-6-5225-2006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Textor C.; Schulz M.; Guibert S.; Kinne S.; Balkanski Y.; Bauer S.; Berntsen T.; Berglen T.; Boucher O.; Chin M.; Dentener F.; Diehl T.; Easter R.; Feichter H.; Fillmore D.; Ghan S.; Ginoux P.; Gong S.; Kristjansson J. E.; Krol M.; Lauer A.; Lamarque J. F.; Liu X.; Montanaro V.; Myhre G.; Penner J.; Pitari G.; Reddy S.; Seland O.; Stier P.; Takemura T.; Tie X. Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles within AeroCom. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2006, 6, 1777–1813. 10.5194/acp-6-1777-2006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Chen C.; Dubovik O.; Henze D. K.; Chin M.; Lapyonok T.; Schuster G. L.; Ducos F.; Fuertes D.; Litvinov P.; Li L.; Lopatin A.; Hu Q. Y.; Torres B. Constraining global aerosol emissions using POLDER/PARASOL satellite remote sensing observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019, 19, 14585–14606. 10.5194/acp-19-14585-2019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Bevington P. R.; Robinson D. K.. Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences; McGraw-Hill, 2002, pp. 36–50.
  52. Neubauer D.; Ferrachat S.; Siegenthaler-Le Drian C.; Stier P.; Partridge D. G.; Tegen I.; Bey I.; Stanelle T.; Kokkola H.; Lohmann U. The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3-Part 2: Cloud evaluation, aerosol radiative forcing, and climate sensitivity. Geosci. Model Dev. 2019, 12, 3609–3639. 10.5194/gmd-12-3609-2019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Myhre G.; Samset B. H.; Schulz M.; Balkanski Y.; Bauer S.; Berntsen T. K.; Bian H.; Bellouin N.; Chin M.; Diehl T.; Easter R. C.; Feichter J.; Ghan S. J.; Hauglustaine D.; Iversen T.; Kinne S.; Kirkevåg A.; Lamarque J.-F.; Lin G.; Liu X.; Lund M. T.; Luo G.; Ma X.; van Noije T.; Penner J. E.; Rasch P. J.; Ruiz A.; Seland Ø.; Skeie R. B.; Stier P.; Takemura T.; Tsigaridis K.; Wang P.; Wang Z.; Xu L.; Yu H.; Yu F.; Yoon J.-H.; Zhang K.; Zhang H.; Zhou C. Radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 1853–1877. 10.5194/acp-13-1853-2013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang K.; O’Donnell D.; Kazil J.; Stier P.; Kinne S.; Lohmann U.; Ferrachat S.; Croft B.; Quaas J.; Wan H.; Rast S.; Feichter J. The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM, version 2: sensitivity to improvements in process representations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012, 12, 8911–8949. 10.5194/acp-12-8911-2012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ditas J.; Ma N.; Zhang Y.; Assmann D.; Neumaier M.; Riede H.; Karu E.; Williams J.; Scharffe D.; Wang Q. Q.; Saturno J.; Schwarz J. P.; Katich J. M.; McMeeking G. R.; Zahn A.; Hermann M.; Brenninkmeijer C. A. M.; Andreae M. O.; Pöschl U.; Su H.; Cheng Y. F. Strong impact of wildfires on the abundance and aging of black carbon in the lowermost stratosphere. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2018, 115, E11595–E11603. 10.1073/pnas.1806868115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Liu D. T.; Zhao D. L.; Xie Z. Z.; Yu C. J.; Chen Y.; Tian P.; Ding S.; Hu K.; Lowe D.; Liu Q.; Zhou W.; Wang F.; Sheng J. J.; Kong S. F.; Hu D. W.; Wang Z. Z.; Huang M. Y.; Ding D. P. Enhanced heating rate of black carbon above the planetary boundary layer over megacities in summertime. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 124003. 10.17632/tfk3m6wnjn.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Haywood J. M.; Ramaswamy V. Global sensitivity studies of the direct radiative forcing due to anthropogenic sulfate and black carbon aerosols. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 1998, 103, 6043–6058. 10.1029/97JD03426. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Radney J. G.; You R. A.; Ma X. F.; Conny J. M.; Zachariah M. R.; Hodges J. T.; Zangmeister C. D. Dependence of Soot Optical Properties on Particle Morphology: Measurements and Model Comparisons. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 3169–3176. 10.1021/es4041804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Hallquist M.; Wenger J. C.; Baltensperger U.; Rudich Y.; Simpson D.; Claeys M.; Dommen J.; Donahue N. M.; George C.; Goldstein A. H.; Hamilton J. F.; Herrmann H.; Hoffmann T.; Iinuma Y.; Jang M.; Jenkin M. E.; Jimenez J. L.; Kiendler-Scharr A.; Maenhaut W.; McFiggans G.; Mentel T. F.; Monod A.; Prevot A. S. H.; Seinfeld J. H.; Surratt J. D.; Szmigielski R.; Wildt J. The formation, properties and impact of secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009, 9, 5155–5236. 10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Shamjad P. M.; Satish R. V.; Thamban N. M.; Rastogi N.; Tripathi S. N. Absorbing Refractive Index and Direct Radiative Forcing of Atmospheric Brown Carbon over Gangetic Plain. Acs Earth Space Chem. 2018, 2, 31–37. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Khalizov A. F.; Zhang R. Y.; Zhang D.; Xue H. X.; Pagels J.; McMurry P. H. Formation of highly hygroscopic soot aerosols upon internal mixing with sulfuric acid vapor. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2009, 114, D05208. 10.1029/2008JD010595. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Bellouin N.; Rae J.; Jones A.; Johnson C.; Haywood J.; Boucher O. Aerosol forcing in the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) simulations by HadGEM2-ES and the role of ammonium nitrate. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2011, 116, D20206. 10.1029/2011JD016074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wang J. F.; Liu D. T.; Ge X. L.; Wu Y. Z.; Shen F. Z.; Chen M. D.; Zhao J.; Xie C. H.; Wang Q. Q.; Xu W. Q.; Zhang J.; Hu J. L.; Allan J.; Joshi R.; Fu P. Q.; Coe H.; Sun Y. L. Characterization of black carbon-containing fine particles in Beijing during wintertime. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019, 19, 447–458. 10.5194/acp-19-447-2019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Collier S.; Williams L. R.; Onasch T. B.; Cappa C. D.; Zhang X. L.; Russell L. M.; Chen C. L.; Sanchez K. J.; Worsnop D. R.; Zhang Q. Influence of Emissions and Aqueous Processing on Particles Containing Black Carbon in a Polluted Urban Environment: Insights From a Soot Particle-Aerosol Mass Spectrometer. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2018, 123, 6648–6666. 10.1002/2017JD027851. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. McMeeking G. R.; Morgan W. T.; Flynn M.; Highwood E. J.; Turnbull K.; Haywood J.; Coe H. Black carbon aerosol mixing state, organic aerosols and aerosol optical properties over the United Kingdom. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11, 9037–9052. 10.5194/acp-11-9037-2011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Gong X. D.; Zhang C.; Chen H.; Nizkorodov S. A.; Chen J. M.; Yang X. Size distribution and mixing state of black carbon particles during a heavy air pollution episode in Shanghai. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 5399–5411. 10.5194/acp-16-5399-2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Hu K.; Zhao D. L.; Liu D. T.; Ding S.; Tian P.; Yu C. J.; Zhou W.; Huang M. Y.; Ding D. P. Estimating radiative impacts of black carbon associated with mixing state in the lower atmosphere over the northern North China Plain. Chemosphere 2020, 252, 1226455 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wang Y. Y.; Liu F. S.; He C. L.; Bi L.; Cheng T. H.; Wang Z. L.; Zhang H.; Zhang X. Y.; Shi Z. B.; Li W. J. Fractal Dimensions and Mixing Structures of Soot Particles during Atmospheric Processing. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2017, 4, 487–493. 10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00418. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Gustafsson O.; Ramanathan V. Convergence on climate warming by black carbon aerosols. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016, 113, 4243–4245. 10.1073/pnas.1603570113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Ramanathan V.; Carmichael G. Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon. Nat. Geosci. 2008, 1, 221–227. 10.1038/ngeo156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Ramachandran S.; Rupakheti M. Inter-annual and seasonal variations in columnar aerosol characteristics and radiative effects over the Pokhara Valley in the Himalayan foothills - Composition, radiative forcing, and atmospheric heating. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 264, 114799 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

es2c00428_si_001.pdf (1,023KB, pdf)

Articles from Environmental Science & Technology are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES