Skip to main content
Nanomaterials logoLink to Nanomaterials
editorial
. 2022 Jun 15;12(12):2055. doi: 10.3390/nano12122055

Superconducting- and Graphene-Based Devices

Filippo Giubileo 1
PMCID: PMC9229232  PMID: 35745392

This Special Issue has been organized to collect new or improved ideas regarding the exploitation of superconducting materials, as well as graphene, aiming to develop innovative devices. For instance, several graphene applications can be enhanced by modifying their surface to introduce a non-zero bandgap, tune adhesion and/or hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity, etc. Similarly, contact resistance in graphene-based field effect transistors can be improved by irradiation [1], leading to an improved device performance. Wei Qin et al. [2] conducted a detailed theoretical investigation using first-principles calculations of “Lithium Diffusion in Silicon Encapsulated with Graphene”. They considered monolayer graphene on silicon substrate to simulate the Si microparticles that were encapsulated in a graphene cage, which can be exploited as anodes in lithium-ion batteries. They demonstrated that defective graphene strongly reduces the energy barriers for Li diffusion in Gr or Gr/Si. Abid et al.’s [3] report, entitled “Interface Kinetics Assisted Barrier Removal in Large Area 2D-WS2 Growth to Facilitate Mass Scale Device Production”, employed chemical vapor deposition technique to synthesize mono- and few-layer WS2 with areas up to cm2 on graphene-oxide-coated Si/SiO2 substrates. They show that as-developed WS2 layers are polycrystalline (mono- and few-layer), with single-crystal domains that are triangular and hexagonal in shape. Alejandro Toral-Lopez et al.’s [4] report, on “GFET Asymmetric Transfer Response Analysis through Access Region Resistances”, aimed to exploit graphene-based devices to increase the functionality of Si-technology in the field of radio-frequency electronics. They conducted an in-depth investigation of the role of access regions on the performance of graphene-based field effect transistors (GFETs). They demonstrated that the access region conductivity can be tuned by the back-gate bias, improving the RF performance. Graphene represents a prototype of 2D materials and is still widely investigated. Many layered materials, such as the transition metal dichalcogenides, are largely studied for their use as a conducting channel in nanometric field effect transistors, including MoS2 [5,6,7], ReSe2 [8], WSe2 [9], etc. Regarding superconducting-based devices, Jose C. Verde et al.’s [10] report is entitled “Calculations of Some Doping Nanostructurations and Patterns Improving the Functionality of High-Temperature Superconductors for Bolometer Device Applications”. They propose that high-temperature superconductors (HTS) can be nanostructured (and patterned) to obtain an increased functionality as sensing materials for resistive transition-edge bolometer devices (TES). Calculations have been performed to consider the spatial variations in carrier doping into the CuO2 planes of the YBaCuO perovskite superconductor, demonstrating an improvement in the bolometric parameters with respect to conventional, nonstructured HTS materials. Paola Romano et al. [11] report, “Transport and Point Contact Measurements on Pr1−xCexPt4Ge12 Superconducting Polycrystals” demonstrated that the material has a collective pinning regime with a quasi-2D character for a Ce-doping of about x = 0.07. Moreover, while investigating the properties of metal/superconductor nano-junctions, they showed that the observed conductance features are explained in terms of a superconducting-order parameter with nodal directions, as well as a sign change in the momentum space. Indeed, numerical simulations reported in the framework of Blonder–Tinkham–Klapwijk model show that s-wave pairing and anisotropic s-wave are unsuitable for the reproduction of experimental data obtained at a low temperature. Carlo Barone et al.’s [12] report is entitled “Current-Resistance Effects Inducing Nonlinear Fluctuation Mechanisms in Granular Aluminum Oxide Nanowires”. They measured electric transport and voltage fluctuations in the normal state and in the temperature range of 8–300 K, observing both nonlinear resistivity and two-level tunneling fluctuators. This study helps to improve the fabrication process, therefore reducing the possible sources of decoherence in the superconducting state. This is crucial in quantum technology applications. Sergio Pagano et al.’s [13] report is entitled “Iron-Based Superconducting Nanowires: Electric Transport and Voltage-Noise Properties”. In this work, they fabricated ultra-thin Co-doped BaFe2As2 nanowires and characterized their transport and intrinsic noise properties. They also investigated the ageing effect on device degradation by means of noise spectroscopy. Interestingly, iron-based superconducting nanowire detectors have several advantages, due to their high operating temperature, when used as innovative single-photon detectors working in the visible and infrared spectral region.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Giubileo F., Di Bartolomeo A., Martucciello N., Romeo F., Iemmo L., Romano P., Passacantando M. Contact Resistance and Channel Conductance of Graphene Field-Effect Transistors under Low-Energy Electron Irradiation. Nanomaterials. 2016;6:206. doi: 10.3390/nano6110206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Qin W., Lu W.-C., Xue X.-Y., Ho K.-M., Wang C.-Z. Lithium Diffusion in Silicon Encapsulated with Graphene. Nanomaterials. 2021;11:3397. doi: 10.3390/nano11123397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Abid, Sehrawat P., Julien C.M., Islam S.S. Interface Kinetics Assisted Barrier Removal in Large Area 2D-WS2 Growth to Facilitate Mass Scale Device Production. Nanomaterials. 2021;11:220. doi: 10.3390/nano11010220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Toral-Lopez A., Marin E.G., Pasadas F., Gonzalez-Medina J.M., Ruiz F.G., Jiménez D., Godoy A. GFET Asymmetric Transfer Response Analysis through Access Region Resistances. Nanomaterials. 2019;9:1027. doi: 10.3390/nano9071027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Urban F., Passacantando M., Giubileo F., Iemmo L., Di Bartolomeo A. Transport and Field Emission Properties of MoS2 Bilayers. Nanomaterials. 2018;8:151. doi: 10.3390/nano8030151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Iemmo L., Urban F., Giubileo F., Passacantando M., Di Bartolomeo A. Nanotip Contacts for Electric Transport and Field Emission Characterization of Ultrathin MoS2 Flakes. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:106. doi: 10.3390/nano10010106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Giubileo F., Grillo A., Passacantando M., Urban F., Iemmo L., Luongo G., Pelella A., Loveridge M., Lozzi L., Di Bartolomeo A. Field Emission Characterization of MoS2 Nanoflowers. Nanomaterials. 2019;9:717. doi: 10.3390/nano9050717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Faella E., Intonti K., Viscardi L., Giubileo F., Kumar A., Lam H.T., Anastasiou K., Craciun M.F., Russo S., Di Bartolomeo A. Electric Transport in Few-Layer ReSe2 Transistors Modulated by Air Pressure and Light. Nanomaterials. 2022;12:1886. doi: 10.3390/nano12111886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Urban F., Martucciello N., Peters L., McEvoy N., Di Bartolomeo A. Environmental Effects on the Electrical Characteristics of Back-Gated WSe2 Field-Effect Transistors. Nanomaterials. 2018;8:901. doi: 10.3390/nano8110901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Verde J.C., Viz A.S., Botana M.M., Montero-Orille C., Ramallo M.V. Calculations of Some Doping Nanostructurations and Patterns Improving the Functionality of High-Temperature Superconductors for Bolometer Device Applications. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:97. doi: 10.3390/nano10010097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Romano P., Avitabile F., Nigro A., Grimaldi G., Leo A., Shu L., Zhang J., Di Bartolomeo A., Giubileo F. Transport and Point Contact Measurements on Pr1−xCexPt4Ge12 Superconducting Polycrystals. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:1810. doi: 10.3390/nano10091810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Barone C., Rotzinger H., Voss J.N., Mauro C., Schön Y., Ustinov A.V., Pagano S. Current-Resistance Effects Inducing Nonlinear Fluctuation Mechanisms in Granular Aluminum Oxide Nanowires. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:524. doi: 10.3390/nano10030524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pagano S., Martucciello N., Enrico E., Monticone E., Iida K., Barone C. Iron-Based Superconducting Nanowires: Electric Transport and Voltage-Noise Properties. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:862. doi: 10.3390/nano10050862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nanomaterials are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES