Abstract
Background: Himalayan Viola species (Banksha) are traditionally important herbs with versatile therapeutic benefits such as antitussive, analgesic, antipyretic, antimalarial, anti-inflammatory, and anticancerous ones. The current investigation was focused on exploring polyphenolic profiles, antioxidant, and antimicrobial potentials of wild viola species at 15 gradient locations (375–1829 m). Methods: Morphological, physiochemical, and proximate analyses were carried out as per WHO guidelines for plant drug standardization. Total polyphenolic and flavonoid content were carried out using gallic acid and rutin equivalent. UPLC-DAD was used to profile the targeted polyphenols (gallic acid, vanillic acid, syringic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, rutin, quercetin, luteolin, caffeic acid, and epicatechin). Similarly, all samples were screened for antioxidant and antimicrobial activity. Statistical analysis was used to correlate polyphenolic and targeted activities to assess Viola species adaptation behavior patterns. Results: Viola canescens (V. canescens) and Viola pilosa (V. pilosa) were found abundantly at their respective sites. Among flowers and leaves, flowers of V. canescens and V. pilosa showed higher total polyphenolic and flavonoid content (51.4 ± 1.13 mg GAE/g and 65.05 ± 0.85 mg RE/g, and 33.26 ± 0.62 mg GAE/g and 36.10 ± 1.41 mg RE/g, respectively). Furthermore, UPLC-DAD showed the uppermost content of p-coumaric acid in flowers and ferulic acid in leaves, while rutin was significant in both the tissues. Conclusions: The adaptive behavior of Viola species showed variability in morphological characters with the altitudes, while targeted polyphenols and activities were significant at mid-altitudes. This research helps in the selection of right chemotype for agrotechnological interventions and the development of nutraceutical products.
Keywords: Viola species Banksha, adaptation, polyphenols, antioxidants, antibacterial
1. Introduction
From ancient times, natural products have long been recognized as an abundant source of therapeutic medicines [1]. However, the use of traditional drugs is limited due to lack of authenticity and quality [2]. The use of advanced sophisticated analytical tools enabled us to fill this gap and correlate the pharmaceutical properties of traditional medicines with their bioactive products [3]. On the other hand, increasing population, urbanization, and unrestricted collection of raw material from wild plants results in over-exploitation of natural flora [4]. Some of the natural calamities also diminish the species from their habitats. Hence, the scientific intervention and management of traditional medicinal plant resources have become a matter of urgency. The Indian subcontinent is one of the mega biodiversity centers of the world’s biodiversity wealth. Out of 17,000 species of higher plants reported to occur in India only, 7500 are known to have medicinal properties [5,6]. Still, several medicinally important plants available are not exploited for their chemical and therapeutic potential [7]. These plants are locally used by the villagers or communities for their needs based on their experiences and traditional knowledge without awareness among them for their conservation. Moreover, some of the medicinal plants adapted to different environmental conditions and produce specific metabolites to fight the biotic and abiotic stresses [8]. During these processes, the quality of the raw material may change and need to be assessed.
The family Violaceae, consisting of around 800 species having more than 25 genera, are distributed throughout the world [9]. Viola species (sweet violet and Banafshe in Farsi) are found in the temperate northern hemisphere (Iran, Iraq, Andes, Australia, Hawaii, Malaysia, China, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, and India). In India, it is distributed in the Himalayan range from Jammu and Kashmir to Meghalaya, including Himachal Pradesh [10] and Uttarakhand. Previously, the therapeutic potential of Viola species (V. odorata [11], V. canescens [12], V. cinerea [13], V. Serpens [14], and V. pilosa [15]) were documented. These species have demulcent, astringent carminative, diuretic, antipyretic, anti-asthmatic, purgative, diaphoretic, and anticancerous properties. In traditional and folk practices, these species are used against stomach acidity, eczema, epilepsy, rheumatism, jaundice, and respiratory problems [12,14,16]. Viola species contains alkaloid, glycoside, flavonoids, terpenes, saponins, methyl salicylate, amino acids, essential oil, mucilage, and vitamin C etc. [17,18,19,20]. Thus, huge demand for Viola at the national and international level created the interest of scientists in its conservation, domestication, and quality control through agrotechnological and quality-control interventions. In respect, Viola species (Violaceae) of temperate Himalaya have been focused on to assess their adaptation pattern, chemical ecology, and therapeutic potentials.
2. Results and Discussions
Viola species are important spices of therapeutic benefits particularly to treat fever, cough, and respiratory problems. Traditionally, and in tribes of the Himalayas around the world, Viola is used in home remedies and is very popular in the Indian system of medicine. Two Viola species (V. canescens and V. pilosa) were observed at gradient altitudes (altitude of 375 to 1829 m; 15 locations). V. canescens were noticed majorly throughout the Himalaya while V. pilosa were observed only in midrange (750–1300 m). Some of the earlier reports highlighted the presence of V. serpens at nearby altitudinal locations such as Ghumarwin, Awahdevi, and Patta [14], but these species were not noticed in the current study areas. Thus, further elaborative study will be conducted to cover the whole Viola vicinity of the Himalayas in upcoming research. The study area, presence of Viola species, and collected materials are represented in Figure 1, Table 1, and Supplementary Table S1. It was observed that the forest-shady locations and hill roadsides with moisture at low and high altitudes showed the presence of V. canescens, while high mountain pasture with sun phase at mid-altitudes showed V. pilosa. Morphological variations were also observed in the Viola species at various altitudes. The color of the flower varies in the genus, differentiating from violet through various shades of blue, yellow, white, and cream, while some types are bi and tricoloured [15,21,22]. In the study areas, V. canescens were observed in violet color flowers with petals while leaves are alternate, stipules, and persistent, whereas flowers of V. pilosa were noticed as whitish in color with alternate leaves.
Table 1.
Sample Code | Sample Location | Species | Altitudes (m) | Mineral Nutrients (mg/kg) |
Antioxidant Activity | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fe | Mn | Zn | Cu | Mg | Ni | Na | K | Ca | DPPH IC50 (mg/mL) | ABTS IC50 (mg/mL) | ||||
DKRV1 | Berthin, Bilaspur | V. canescens | 375 | 414.16 | 49.22 | 123.46 | 21.3 | 1878.96 | 0.00 | 391.32 | 155.4 | 1252.0 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.18 ± 0.00 |
DKRV2 | Telkar, hamirpur | V. canescens | 478 | 447.44 | 44.20 | 130.98 | 19.46 | 1851.70 | 0.00 | 424.92 | 153.8 | 1325.2 | 0.39 ± 0.04 | 0.17 ± 0.02 |
DKRV3 | Berru, Hamirpur | V. canescens | 492 | 1406.58 | 43.68 | 135.74 | 17.6 | 1893.52 | 6.40 | 547.16 | 162.6 | 1137.8 | 0.40 ± 0.00 | 0.21 ± 0.02 |
DKRV4 | Ghumarwin, Bilaspur | V. canescens | 699 | 1909.76 | 40.50 | 113.00 | 19 | 1861.58 | 9.06 | 341.76 | 93.9 | 845.10 | 0.31 ± 0.06 | 0.14 ± 0.05 |
DKRV5 | Bijni, Mandi | V. canescens | 782 | 1366.32 | 34.48 | 108.40 | 23.16 | 1860.74 | 3.36 | 403.68 | 126.0 | 2817.3 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | 0.21 ± 0.01 |
DKRV6 | Chabutra, Hamirpur | V. canescens | 787 | 1938.40 | 38.34 | 129.60 | 22.7 | 1878.40 | 7.54 | 240.32 | 126.1 | 1672.4 | 0.39 ± 0.08 | 0.06 ± 0.00 |
DKRV7 | Paddar, Mandi | V. canescens | 793 | 418.80 | 43.86 | 173.22 | 25.02 | 1872.60 | 2.98 | 409.16 | 165.2 | 2290.8 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.00 |
DKRV8 | Pandoh, Mandi | V. canescens | 858 | 1295.88 | 39.50 | 100.42 | 21.3 | 1839.68 | 5.26 | 404.36 | 123.8 | 2564.8 | 0.33 ± 0.03 | 0.29 ± 0.02 |
DKRV9 | Batour, Mandi | V. canescens | 940 | 3840.42 | 54.74 | 105.94 | 22.7 | 2053.30 | 1.10 | 365.06 | 99.00 | 2032.0 | 0.47 ± 0.00 | 0.18 ± 0.09 |
DKRV10 | Chauntra, Mandi | V. canescens | 1220 | 1268.02 | 20.42 | 126.36 | 23.62 | 2003.28 | 1.10 | 283.74 | 168.3 | 2248.9 | 0.32 ± 0.05 | 0.07 ± 0.002 |
DKRV11 | Kamand, Mandi | V. pilosa | 1269 | 1858.66 | 37.82 | 118.68 | 24.56 | 2079.14 | 4.12 | 760.76 | 111.3 | 2132.0 | 0.30 ± 0.04 | 0.10 ± 0.00 |
DKRV12 | Kullu | V. canescens | 1279 | 863.92 | 39.34 | 123.46 | 21.78 | 1856.08 | 1.86 | 1583.76 | 154.0 | 1893.7 | 0.28 ± 0.04 | 0.15 ± 0.01 |
DKRV13 | Chandpur, Kangra | V. canescens | 1482 | 610.78 | 18.74 | 181.96 | 26.4 | 1801.26 | 0.00 | 298.48 | 133.8 | 556.86 | 0.37 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.03 |
DKRV14 | Gulera, Chamba | V. canescens | 1639 | 660.32 | 43.68 | 120.38 | 26.86 | 1840.82 | 0.00 | 380.52 | 131.5 | 2103.4 | 0.40 ± 0.02 | 0.24 ± 0.02 |
DKRV15 | Barot, Mandi | V. pilosa | 1829 | 545.76 | 20.58 | 139.58 | 27.8 | 1827.96 | 0.00 | 275.76 | 118.8 | 605.06 | 0.37 ± 0.02 | 0.28 ± 0.02 |
DKRL1 | Berthin, Bilaspur | V. canescens | 375 | 3361.24 | 91.56 | 194.10 | 25.48 | 2455.92 | 0.00 | 495.8 | 173.4 | 8095.9 | 0.52 ± 0.11 | 0.59 ± 0.30 |
DKRL2 | Telkar, hamirpur | V. canescens | 478 | 3342.66 | 82.86 | 219.90 | 23.62 | 2425.56 | 0.00 | 488.78 | 171.9 | 7640.8 | 0.97 ± 0.03 | 0.78 ± 0.39 |
DKRL3 | Berru, Hamirpur | V. canescens | 492 | 3568.7 | 52.40 | 208.54 | 17.6 | 2021.22 | 0.00 | 242.60 | 183.4 | 7861.2 | 1.22 ± 0.25 | 0.89 ± 0.45 |
DKRL4 | Ghumarwin, Bilaspur | V. canescens | 699 | 6085.36 | 215.78 | 238.96 | 44.46 | 1972.48 | 1.10 | 373.06 | 77.6 | 16824 | 0.96 ± 0.01 | 0.75 ± 0.38 |
DKRL5 | Bijni, Mandi | V. canescens | 782 | 6460.04 | 94.24 | 262.76 | 29.64 | 1953.56 | 0.00 | 261.92 | 86.7 | 13070 | 0.60 ± 0.01 | 0.43 ± 0.22 |
DKRL6 | Chabutra, Hamirpur | V. canescens | 787 | 5664.24 | 123.88 | 317.28 | 35.66 | 2366.08 | 0.00 | 377.28 | 109.6 | 13930 | 1.36 ± 0.04 | 0.76 ± 0.39 |
DKRL7 | Paddar, Mandi | V. canescens | 793 | 5049.6 | 122.70 | 448.30 | 22.7 | 2030.84 | 0.00 | 301.44 | 106.4 | 8564.4 | 0.63 ± 0.03 | 0.54 ± 0.27 |
DKRL8 | Pandoh, Mandi | V. canescens | 858 | 5075.14 | 73.98 | 217.60 | 19.92 | 1936.18 | 0.72 | 321.56 | 91.7 | 9065.1 | 0.73 ± 0.06 | 0.66 ± 0.33 |
DKRL9 | Batour, Mandi | V. canescens | 940 | 4258.44 | 73.16 | 261.08 | 20.84 | 1892.24 | 3.36 | 412.86 | 104.2 | 10130 | 0.53 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.17 |
DKRL10 | Chauntra, Mandi | V. canescens | 1220 | 4462.04 | 74.32 | 381.48 | 20.84 | 1901.00 | 2.60 | 359.14 | 111.5 | 9146.3 | 1.23 ± 0.15 | 0.39 ± 0.20 |
DKRL11 | Kamand, Mandi | V. pilosa | 1269 | 4241.42 | 51.56 | 287.34 | 16.68 | 1895.64 | 1.48 | 390.52 | 64.9 | 14495 | 0.64 ± 0.02 | 0.92 ± 0.46 |
DKRL12 | Kullu | V. canescens | 1279 | 1824.6 | 50.88 | 203.32 | 26.40 | 1840.68 | 2.22 | 534.06 | 137.3 | 2301.5 | 0.81 ± 0.01 | 1.09 ± 0.55 |
DKRL13 | Chandpur, Kangra | V. canescens | 1482 | 4647.82 | 75.50 | 322.96 | 23.16 | 1858.34 | 10.2 | 410.34 | 97.0 | 13433 | 0.49 ± 0.01 | 0.23 ± 0.12 |
DKRL14 | Gulera, Chamba | V. canescens | 1639 | 1353.16 | 116.18 | 116.54 | 25.48 | 1854.10 | 6.02 | 360.32 | 54.9 | 8621.5 | 0.59 ± 0.02 | 0.67 ± 0.34 |
DKRL15 | Barot, Mandi | V. pilosa | 1829 | 5145.58 | 57.42 | 239.88 | 18.06 | 1841.24 | 2.60 | 370.02 | 94.5 | 11318 | 0.68 ± 0.06 | 0.44 ± 0.22 |
n = 3, Hg, Cd, As and Pb were absent in all the samples TPC—total phenolic content; TFC—total flavonoid content.
The preliminary phytochemical analysis of Viola species revealed the presence of carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, tannins, steroids, terpenoids, alkaloids, saponins, phenols, and flavonoids. The flavonoids and phenolics showed dominancy in preliminary tests. Thus, total phenolics content (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC) were estimated in the samples of trans-Himalayas to monitor polyphenolic regulations at gradient altitudes. The results were derived from a calibration curve (flowers: y = 0.014x − 0.0592, r2 = 0.99 and leaves: 0.0109x − 0.028, r2 = 0.99) of gallic acid (0–100 µg/mL) and expressed in gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per gram dry extract weight for phenolics and for flavonoids; the results were derived from the calibration curve (flowers: y = 0.0034x − 0.0058, r2= 0.98 and leaves: y = 0.0014x − 0.0087, r2 = 0.98) of rutin (0–100 µg/mL) and expressed in rutin equivalent per gram dry extract weight. The highest phenolic content in V. canescens leaves was recorded (58.75 ± 1.78 mg GAE/g) at an altitude of 1482 m and in flowers (51.4 ± 1.13 mg GAE/g) at an altitude of 1279 m. The TFC was highest (65.05 ± 0.85 mg RE/g) at 1279 m in the case of flower and at 940 m in leaves (270.02 ± 18.40 mg RE/g). The TPC and TFC were observed higher in the case of V. canescens as compared with V. pilosa (Figure 2). All the locations exhibited significant TPC and TFC with variable amounts. The content was initially found to be decreased with the increase in altitudes and then increased to some extent at middle altitude. Additional increase in altitude again decreased the content. This fluctuation in the TPC and TFC might be due to the environmental effects or stressful conditions at high altitude [23]. A clear fluctuation can be seen at gradient elevations as depicted in Table 1 and Figure 2. Furthermore, trace elements are mineral nutrients required by the plants to perform vital metabolic processes. Besides biological functions, these elements are utilized by the people of the current world towards the treatments of metabolic disorders. Around forty elements found to be essential to the living systems [24] and four heavy metals (As. Pb. Hg and Cd) were found toxic beyond certain limits. These toxic heavy metals were not found in fifteen locations. Nine trace elements (Fe, Zn, Mg, Mn, Cu, Ni, Ca, Na, and K) were found in the leaves and flowers of Viola species. These elements were varied at gradient altitudes and the trend of their presence revealed a wave-like pattern. The elemental variations are depicted in Table 1, Supplementary Figures S1 and S2.
2.1. Antioxidant Activity
Plant antioxidants decreased absorbance, which showed the reduction capability of DPPH and ABTS radicals. V. canescens showed better antioxidant potential than V. Pilosa, and flowers have more antioxidants than leaves. In the DPPH assay, low altitude flowers (375 m) showed the highest scavenging activity (IC50 0.24 ± 0.01, mg/mL), but in the case of leaves it was at altitudes of 1482 m (IC50 0.49 ± 0.01, mg/mL). Whereas in ABTS assay, the highest potential of flowers was shown at altitudes of 787 m and 1220 m (IC50 0.06 and 0.07 ± 0.002, mg/mL, respectively), and leaves showed at an altitude of 1482 m (IC50 0.23 ± 0.12, mg/mL). The alterations of antioxidant activities at varied altitudes are shown in Table 1. The variation in activity might be due to the environmental factors and presence of antioxidant metabolites. Among all the altitudinal samples, 1482 m showed significant results of flower and leaf and appears to be a favorable location for V. canescens cultivation, while 1829 m is suitable for V. pilosa cultivation (Supplementary Figure S3).
2.2. Polyphenols Determination
The phenolics and flavonoids were identified and quantified in Viola species collected from gradient altitudinal locations. Three flavonoids (quercetin, luteolin, and rutin) and six phenolic acids (epicatechin, vanillic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, syringic acid, and caffeic acid) were identified in the flowers collected from various locations. Polyphenols are majorly synthesized by the shikimic acid pathway. They are helpful in plant growth and have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities [25,26]. The p-coumaric acid was found higher in flowers (5.02 ± 0.05–23.406 ± 1.77 mg/g) of all altitudes, and ferulic acid (1.78 ± 0.05–14.97 ± 1.2 mg/g) in leaves, as compared with other targeted metabolites. It was also observed that syringic acid and quercetin were not present in flowers, except at 1279 m, while quercetin was absent in leaves. Furthermore, caffeic acid was not quantifiable in leaves of all altitudes, except 1220 and 1482 m. Rutin (Vit. P), a bioflavonoid, was significant in flowers and leaves (0.19 ± 0.01–4.68 ± 0.00, 0.23 ± 0.00–10.63 ± 0.7 mg/g, respectively), and luteolin (0.43 ± 0.03 mg/g) in leaves. The variations of targeted metabolites in flowers and leaves at gradient altitudes were observed (Table 2; Figure 3). The UPLC-DAD chromatograms of both the flowers and leaves samples were depicted in the Supplementary Figure S4a,b, while schematic biosynthesis of the targeted metabolites was also depicted in Scheme 1.
Table 2.
Sample Code | Altitudes (Meters) | Species | Polyphenols (mg/g), Rt | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vanillic Acid (5.74) |
Syringic Acid (6.09) |
Caffeic Acid (6.45) |
Epicatechin (6.63) |
p-Coumaric acid (8.21) | Ferulic Acid (8.40) |
Rutin (9.05) |
Quercetin (11.95) | Luteolin (11.998) | Total | |||
DKRV1 | 375 | V. canescens | NQ | NQ | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 15.67 ± 0.99 | 0.03 ± 0.001 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | ND | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 16.24 ± 1.03 |
DKRV2 | 478 | V. canescens | NQ | NQ | NQ | 0.11 ± 0.00 | 2.06 ± 0.08 | 0.02 ± 0.001 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | ND | 0.09 ± 0.00 | 2.54 ± 0.10 |
DKRV3 | 492 | V. canescens | NQ | NQ | ND | 0.04 ± 0.002 | 12.13 ± 0.66 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.47 ± 0.01 | ND | 0.09 ± 0.00 | 12.73 ± 0.672 |
DKRV4 | 699 | V. canescens | 0.3 ± 0.01 | ND | ND | 0.08 ± 0.003 | 14.29 ± 1.2 | 0.02 ± 0.001 | 0.37 ± 0.02 | ND | 0.10 ± 0.00 | 14.84 ± 1.234 |
DKRV5 | 782 | V. canescens | ND | NQ | ND | 0.04 ± 0.001 | 10.38 ± 0.76 | ND | 0.19 ± 0.01 | ND | ND | 10.61 ± 0.771 |
DKRV6 | 787 | V. canescens | ND | NQ | 0.05 ± 0.002 | 0.29 ± 0.013 | 15.39 ± 1.11 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.39 ± 0.00 | ND | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 16.14 ± 1.125 |
DKRV7 | 793 | V. canescens | 0.01 ± 0.001 | ND | 0.10 ± 0.003 | 0.29 ± 0.015 | 19.25 ± 1.23 | ND | 0.49 ± 0.03 | ND | ND | 20.12 ± 1.27 |
DKRV8 | 858 | V. canescens | 0.04 ± 0.002 | ND | ND | 0.18 ± 0.012 | 20.28 ± 1.66 | ND | 0.59 ± 0.02 | ND | ND | 21.05 ± 1.694 |
DKRV9 | 940 | V. canescens | 0.03 ± 0.001 | ND | 0.02 ± 0.001 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 13.90 ± 0.88 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | ND | ND | 14.30 ± 0.902 |
DKRV10 | 1220 | V. canescens | 0.06 ± 0.0021 | ND | 0.01 ± 0.0 | 0.04 ± 0.00 | 5.51 ± 0.05 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.65 ± 0.05 | ND | ND | 6.30 ± 0.112 |
DKRV11 | 1269 | V. pilosa | 0.05 ± 0.00 | NQ | 0.01 ± 0.0 | ND | 17.18 ± 1.33 | ND | 0.51 ± 0.01 | ND | ND | 17.71 ± 1.34 |
DKRV12 | 1279 | V. canescens | 0.05 ± 0.002 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | ND | ND | 6.49 ± 0.43 | ND | 4.55 ± 0.04 | 0.02 ± 0.0 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 11.28 ± 0.482 |
DKRV13 | 1482 | V. canescens | 0.03 ± 0.001 | ND | 0.05 ± 0.003 | 0.18 ± 0.007 | 16.61 ± 1.21 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.47 ± 0.01 | ND | ND | 17.32 ± 1.231 |
DKRV14 | 1639 | V. canescens | 0.04 ± 0.001 | ND | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.05 ± 0.00 | 23.41 ± 1.77 | ND | 0.54 ± 0.01 | ND | ND | 24.01 ± 1.782 |
DKRV15 | 1829 | V. pilosa | 0.01 ± 0.00 | ND | 0.04 ± 0.002 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 5.02 ± 0.05 | ND | 4.68 ± 0.00 | ND | ND | 9.99 ± 0.062 |
DKRL1 | 375 | V. canescens | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.04 ± 0.003 | ND | ND | ND | 4.91 ± 0.06 | 1.12 ± 0.09 | ND | 0.06 ± 0.001 | 6.16 ± 0.155 |
DKRL2 | 478 | V. canescens | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.02 ± 0.001 | ND | ND | ND | 11.68 ± 1.1 | 0.40 ± 0.02 | ND | 0.04 ± 0.003 | 12.15 ± 1.124 |
DKRL3 | 492 | V. canescens | 0.04 ± 0.001 | 0.01 ± 0.001 | NQ | ND | ND | 5.56 ± 0.34 | 0.38 ± 0.01 | ND | 0.04 ± 0.004 | 6.02 ± 0.356 |
DKRL4 | 699 | V. canescens | ND | 0.03 ± 0.002 | ND | ND | ND | 11.12 ± 0.8 | 0.99 ± 0.04 | ND | 0.09 ± 0.002 | 12.21 ± 0.844 |
DKRL5 | 782 | V. canescens | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 0.05 ± 0.004 | NQ | 0.07 ± 0.002 | ND | 8.99 ± 0.65 | 4.21 ± 0.11 | ND | 0.23 ± 0.00 | 13.58 ± 0.766 |
DKRL6 | 787 | V. canescens | 0.05 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | NQ | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.08 ± 0.002 | 7.10 ± 0.33 | 0.97 ± 0.06 | ND | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 8.36 ± 0.402 |
DKRL7 | 793 | V. canescens | ND | 0.03 ± 0.001 | ND | 0.09 ± 0.005 | 0.13 ± 0.06 | 8.36 ± 0.23 | 2.85 ± 0.09 | ND | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 11.66 ± 0.406 |
DKRL8 | 858 | V. canescens | 0.08 ± 0.001 | 0.05 ± 0.003 | ND | 0.05 ± 0.003 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 8.40 ± 0.22 | 0.75 ± 0.03 | ND | 0.05 ± 0.00 | 9.53 ± 0.267 |
DKRL9 | 940 | V. canescens | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.12 ± 0.001 | ND | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.82 ± 0.06 | 6.61 ± 0.54 | 3.46 ± 0.14 | ND | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 11.41 ± 0.761 |
DKRL10 | 1220 | V. canescens | 0.04 ± 0.001 | 0.03 ± 0.002 | 0.09 ± 0.005 | 0.06 ± 0.002 | 1.62 ± 0.09 | 8.55 ± 0.66 | 10.63 ± 0.7 | ND | 0.34 ± 0.03 | 21.37 ± 1.49 |
DKRL11 | 1269 | V. pilosa | 0.06 ± 0.003 | 0.02 ± 0.001 | ND | 0.01 ± 0.00 | ND | 3.32 ± 0.21 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | ND | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 3.96 ± 0.244 |
DKRL12 | 1279 | V. canescens | 0.03 ± 0.002 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 1.78 ± 0.05 | 0.23 ± 0.00 | ND | 0.14 ± 0.00 | 2.18 ± 0.052 |
DKRL13 | 1482 | V. canescens | ND | 0.09 ± 0.004 | 0.02 ± 0.003 | ND | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 14.97 ± 1.2 | 1.42 ± 0.05 | ND | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 17.29 ± 1.307 |
DKRL14 | 1639 | V. canescens | ND | 0.01 ± 0.00 | NQ | ND | ND | 3.52 ± 0.15 | 0.46 ± 0.04 | ND | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 4.25 ± 0.2 |
DKRL15 | 1829 | V. pilosa | ND | 0.02 ± 0.001 | NQ | 0.01 ± 0.00 | ND | 2.41 ± 0.11 | 1.62 ± 0.01 | ND | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 4.36 ± 0.131 |
n = 3; ND: not detected; NQ: not quantifiable; Rt: Retention time.
2.3. Antimicrobial Activity
Viola species collected from the different areas were assessed for antibacterial potential against pathogenic bacteria, i.e., Gram-positive (B. subtilis and S. aureus) and Gram-negative (S. typhimurium and E. coli). The zone of inhibition was depicted in Table 3, Supplementary Table S2 and Supplementary Figure S5. The Viola flower and leaves extracts were potentially inhibiting the bacterial growth. The flower samples DKRV7 (793 m), DKRV9 (940 m), DKRV12 (1279 m), and DKRV13 (1482 m) showed a maximum 5.0 mm zone of inhibition (radius, mm) against B. subtilis and 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 2.5 mm against S. aureus at a concentration of 6 mg crude flower extract. In the case of leaves extract, the most effective samples were from an altitude of DKRL1 (375 m), DKRL13 (1482 m), and DKRL14 (1639 m), which showed a 4.0 mm zone of inhibition against B. subtilis and 3.0, 4.0, and 4.0 mm against S. aureus. Gram-positive bacteria exhibited a zone of inhibition in all extracts, while Gram-negative bacteria displayed no zone of inhibition. The most effective leaf and flower extracts’ minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were also evaluated. MICs at 5 mg concentration showed a zone of inhibition in crude extract of all the selected leaf and flower samples. The flower extracts showed a wide zone of inhibition as compared with leaf extracts. In this study, it was also observed that the zone of inhibition is directly proportional to the altitude in the case of the collected flower samples. In a few cases, activity was dropped or decreased, which may be because of the environmental conditions of those altitudes (Table 3). In the leaf extracts, the zone of inhibition was found in all the selected samples, but there is no such correlation with altitude. The Viola species were previously reported for their strong antimicrobial agent, which may be due to their phenolics, flavonoids, alkaloids, cyclotide, and saponins [27,28]. Cyclotides derived from V. odorata exhibited antibacterial efficacy against pathogenic bacteria such as E. coli, P. aeroginosa, and S. aureus [27]. The aerial parts of V. odorata used as an aqueous extract exhibited antimicrobial activity against S.aureus, B. subtilis, E. coli, and S. flexneri [29]. Furthermore, the antimicrobial activity of Viola was also observed against the respiratory tract pathogen [30].
Table 3.
Zone of Inhibition in Radius (mm) | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Flowers | DKRV1 | DKRV2 | DKRV3 | DKRV4 | DKRV5 | DKRV6 | DKRV7 | DKRV8 | DKRV9 | DKRV10 | DKRV11 | DKRV12 | DKRV13 | DKRV14 | DKRV15 a | DKRV15 b | |
Species | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. pilosa | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. pilosa | V. pilosa | |
Altitudes | 375 | 478 | 492 | 699 | 722 | 787 | 793 | 858 | 940 | 1220 | 1269 | 1279 | 1482 | 1639 | 1829 | ||
Gram +ve bacteria | B. subtilis MTCC121 | 0 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.5 | 2.25 | 2.25 | 5.25 | 4.125 | 4.75 | 3.25 | 2.25 | 5 | 5 | 4.25 | 4.25 | 0 |
S. aures MTCC96 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.25 | 2.25 | 2.25 | 1.75 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.25 | 3.25 | 0 | |
Gram -ve bacteria | S. typhimurium MTCC733 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
E. coli MTCC43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Leaves | DKRL1 | DKRL2 | DKRL3 | DKRL4 | DKRL5 | DKRL6 | DKRL7 | DKRL8 | DKRL9 | DKRL10 | DKRL11 | DKRL12 | DKRL13 | DKRL14 | DKRL115 a | DKRL15 b | |
Species | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. pilosa | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. pilosa | V. pilosa | |
Gram + ve bacteria | B. subtilis MTCC121 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2.5 |
S. aures MTCC96 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2.5 | |
Gram − ve bacteria | S. typhimurium MTCC733 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
E. coli MTCC43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (mm) against Gram + bacteria | |||||||||||||||||
Samples | DKRL1 | DKRL7 | DKRL13 | DKRL14 | DKRV7 | DKRV9 | DKRV12 | DKRV13 | |||||||||
Species | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | V. canescens | |||||||||
Amount | Altitudes | 375 | 793 | 1482 | 1639 | 793 | 940 | 1482 | 1639 | ||||||||
5 mg | B. subtilis MTCC121 | 1.25 ± 0.35 | 2.0 ± 0.0 | 1.25 ± 0.35 | 1.25 ± 0.35 | 2.25 ± 0.35 | 2.12 ± 0.18 | 3.25 ± 0.35 | 1.25 ± 0.35 | ||||||||
S. aures MTCC96 | 1.25 ± 0.35 | 1.37 ± 0.18 | 1.25 ± 0.35 | 2.25 ± 0.35 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 1.25 ± 0.35 | 1.5 ± 0.71 | 0.75 ± 0.35 | |||||||||
6 mg | B. subtilis MTCC121 | 4.5 ± 0.71 | 3.0 ± 0.0 | 4.25 ± 0.35 | 4.25 ± 0.35 | 5.25 ± 0.35 | 5.25 ± 0.0 | 4.75 ± 0.35 | 5.12 ± 0.18 | ||||||||
S. aures MTCC96 | 3.0 ± 0.0 | 3.0 ± 0.0 | 4.25 ± 0.35 | 4.25 ± 0.35 | 1.25 ± 0.35 | 2.25 ± 0.0 | 2.5 ± 0.0 | 2.5 ± 0.0 |
2.4. Adaptive, Correlation, Similarities, and Variations Insights of Viola Species at Gradient Altitudes
The adaptive parameters, such as morphological characteristics, extractives, chemical representations, phenolic, flavonoids, antioxidant, and antimicrobial insights at gradient elevations, were correlated through statistical analysis. It was observed that V. canescens was dominant in most of the locations in the alpine Himalayan. The V. pilosa was found only at two locations among fifteen in the studied areas. Furthermore, leaves were found decreased with an increased altitude, while flowers did not have much difference (Figure 4).
The extractive yield in 70% ethanol was found significant between the range 25–45% (SI-1), and phytochemical analysis of extracts represents the chemical compounds as present in the initial preliminary studies. Furthermore, leaves and flowers showed a significant amount of polyphenols, flavonoids, and antioxidant activity, which were correlated with the altitudes and correlation coefficient depicted in Figure 5. Leaves contain more polyphenols, but the antioxidant activity was found to be highest in flowers. This might be due to the contribution of other classes of molecules present in flowers. Additional inter-relationship between the antimicrobial activity of leaves and flowers was noticed. An increase in the antimicrobial activity of flowers decreases the antimicrobial potential of leaves and vice versa. The accumulation of metabolites and bioactivities at specific altitudes and locations might be due to the requirements of the environment for survivability. The adaptation to specific environments alters the chemistry and structure of the species. Hence, Viola species showed different trends for both flowers and leaves at varying altitudes.
Furthermore, the quantitative data (TPC, TFC, targeted polyphenols, and antioxidant activity) obtained from the Viola species were analyzed with multivariate statistical techniques, which revealed the similarities, discriminations, and correlations among the samples collected from varying altitudes. It was observed that leaves or flowers at gradient altitudes have qualitative similarities and quantitative differences. The targeted components showed associations and variations among the gradient altitudinal samples. The dominancy of p-coumaric acid and rutin was observed in flowers, while ferulic acid, luteolin, and quercetin in leaves among the targeted polyphenols was observed (Figure 6). The statistical analysis (PCA, PCoA, stacked charts, and matrix plot) visualized the clear differences among the leaves and flowers of Viola species. The results of the principal component analysis (PCA and PCoA) showed that the samples were different and observed in quadrants of the score plot (Figure 6). Both parts lie in the right (flowers) and left quadrants, which further divided into positive and negative planes of the respective quadrants. The study revealed that fifteen altitudinal samples were representatives of chemotypes and were grouped into four distinct clusters (flowers-2 cluster and leaves-2 cluster) in PCA and PCoA. Cluster-3 was the largest cluster, comprising 10 chemotypes, followed by cluster-1 (8 chemotypes), cluster-2 (6 chemotypes), and cluster 4 (5 chemotypes). The cluster sets were positively and negatively influenced by their metabolite content. Cluster-1 and 3 were positively correlated and clusters-2 and 4 were negatively correlated with metabolites and found environmentally adopted nutritionally enriched chemotypes (Figure 6). The eigenvalues of the measured metabolites in samples of different locations observed the variation between the principal component (PC) axes. The PCA of the PC samples’ axes along with the major percent variation PC1 are: eigenvalue (%): 93.58 (79.82), 14.30 (12.20), 4.38 (3.74), 3.16 (2.70), 1.06 (0.90), 0.65 (0.56), and others were <0.5 (0.05), while from the coordinate PCoA: PCo1; eigenvalue (%): 2714.1 (79.82), 414.89 (12.20), 127.26 (3.74), 91.71 (2.69), 30.64 (0.90), 19.01 (0.55), 1.28 (0.04), and others were <1 (0.05). The hierarchical clustering analysis showed the association of flowers and leaves. Multivariate statistical analysis deciphered the equipotent potential of leaves and flowers. Stacked plot (Figure 6) showed the clear qualitative and quantitative similarities, correlations, and variations among the different samples collected from the vicinity of the western Himalaya of Himachal Pradesh, India.
3. Experimental
3.1. Chemicals
All the chemicals used were of analytical grade. The chemicals such as 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), ascorbic acid, 2,4,6-tri (2-pyridyl)-s-triazine (TPTZ), ABTS radical + [(2,2′-Azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt], gallic acid, vanillic acid, syringic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, rutin, quercetin, luteolin, caffeic acid, epicatechin, aluminium trichloride, potassium acetate, anhydrous sodium carbonate, sodium acetate, ferric chloride hexahydrate, folin-ciocalteu reagent, dragendorff’s reagent, mercuric chloride, potassium iodide, chloroform, ammonia, glacial acetic acid, iodine, ethanol, methanol, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, and sodium hydroxide were purchased from Merck-Sigma-Aldrich, India.
3.2. Collection and Authentication
The plant samples of Viola species were collected from gradient habitats (altitude of 375 to 1829 m; 15 locations) of the northwestern Himalayas of Himachal Pradesh, India. Above-ground parts of the plants were collected during the flowering stage (February–April, 2019). The plant specimens were collected from the deep vicinity of the Viola (5 m × 5 m plots) × 10 = 10 samples from each location. These samples were morphologically validated and submitted for authentication at the institute’s plant authentication department (Department of Environmental Technology, CSIR-IHBT, Palampur, H.P. India). The plant specimens were identified as V. canescens and V. pilosa at gradient altitudes of Himachal Pradesh, India. The voucher specimen numbers PLP16476, PLP16471, PLP16472, PLP16475, PLP16475, and PLP16474 represented V. canescens, while PLP16477 and PLP16473 as V. pilosa. Furthermore, plant materials were collected for the analyses with the following information: morphological description, phase of plant development at the time of sampling, and the specific habitat descriptions.
3.3. Extraction and Sample Preparation
Sample Preparation
The plant material was collected and cleaned, flowers and leaves were separated for analysis and dried at room temperature, further crushed into powder, and stored in an airtight glass container. The flowers and leaves were macerated for 24 h with 70% ethanol. The solvents of the extracts were evaporated on a vacuum rotatory evaporator under reduced pressure. The yields are depicted in the Supplementary Table S1.
3.4. Preliminary Phytochemical Analysis, Total Phenolic, and Flavonoid Contents
Various phytochemical tests were performed to identify the presence of primary and secondary metabolites in the plant extract of Viola species using the standard protocol. Furthermore, the phenolic acids and flavonoids represent the presence of polyphenols. Hence, the content of total polyphenolic and flavonoid in the different samples of Viola species at gradient elevations were analyzed as gallic acid and rutin equivalent (mg/g), as described by Sharma et al. [31,32].
3.5. Mineral and Trace Element Analysis
The trace elements (Na, Cu, Zn, Ca, Mn, Fe, Mg, and K) and heavy metals (Pb, Cd as toxic, and Ni, Cr as essential) were analyzed in the raw material of Viola species collected from gradient altitudes as described in the AOAC method using atomic absorption spectroscopy [33].
3.6. Determination of Polyphenolic Traits in Viola Samples Using UPLC-DAD Method
The identification and quantification of selected phenolic acids and flavonoids (gallic acid, vanillic acid, syringic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, rutin, quercetin, luteolin, caffeic acid, and epicatechin) in samples were performed by Waters Acquity UPLC, H-class system. The analytical column used was the Acquity BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.8 µm). The detection wavelength was set at 270 nm. The gradient elution system was used, mobile phase A contained 0.1% formic acid in the water, and mobile phase B was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (ACN). The gradient started from 0 min at 5% B maintained till 0.3 min; the concentration of B increased to 30% from 0.3 min to 9 min, then 30% B to 70% B; 9–11 min, 50% B; from 11–12 min, 50% B, then at 12.2 min, mobile phase maintained to initial conditions, 5% B, maintained till 16 min elution was performed at a solvent flow rate of 0.30 mL/min. The targeted compounds were identified using retention time and UV spectrum (λmax). The quantification of compounds was performed by calibration curve and area under the peak. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate.
3.7. Antioxidant Activity
Free Radical Scavenging Activity
DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activity of various samples was performed by the method described in Kumar et al., [34]. The different extracts of Viola species (1 mg/mL each) were diluted (5–200 μL for flowers and 10–100 μL; 25–250 μL for leaf ABTS and DPPH, respectively), and MeOH was added to make a total volume of 200,100 and 250 μL, respectively. In each dilution 1 mL of DPPH and 0.7 mL of ABTS, solution was mixed well and incubated at 37 °C at for 30 min in dark conditions. Additional absorbance was measured at 517 and 734 nm, respectively, in a 96-well plate using a Synergy H1 microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA). The ascorbic acid (1 mg/mL) in ethanol was taken as a reference standard. The standard calibration curves were prepared and IC50 values of samples were calculated. The experiment was repeated thrice.
3.8. Antimicrobial Activity
The antimicrobial activity was performed using disc diffusion method with minor modification as reported earlier [35,36]. The bacterial cultures such as the Bacillus subtilis121, Staphylococcus aureus96, Salmonella typhimurium733, and Escherichia coli43 were procured from MTCC (Microbial type culture collection), Chandigarh. Briefly, the 100 μL bacterial culture (cell density 1.5 × 108 CFU/mL) was used to prepare a lawn with the aid of a sterile cotton swab on a nutrient agar plate. The nutrient agar plates were allowed to stand for bacterial culture absorption for 8–10 min. The agar diffusion wells were punched in seeded plates with the help of sterile gel puncture (6 mm). The crude samples of a plant extract with the final concentration of 6.0 mg were used in each well. The plates were incubated for 10–12 h at 37 °C and further tested for the zone of inhibition. Methanol was used as a solvent control. The zone of inhibition for different leaf and flower extracts against different bacteria were measured in millimeters for further analysis. An agar well (6 mm) with no inhibition zone was regarded as having no antimicrobial activity. All tests were conducted in triplicates. Furthermore, based on the preliminary screening, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for each bacterial sample was determined. The methanolic extract of the samples that indicated potent antimicrobial activity were further tested, and the measurement of MIC, the concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, and 6.0 mg, were used. The least concentration was observed and noted as the MIC value where the extract indicated an inhibition region. All samples were subjected to triplicate.
3.9. Adaptive Correlation, Similarities, and Variational Insights of Viola Species at Gradient Altitudes
The adaptive parameters such as morphological characteristics, extractives, chemical representations, phenolics, flavonoids, antioxidant, and antimicrobial insights at gradient elevations were correlated through statistical analysis (PCA, PCoA, HCA, correlations, stacked plots, etc.). The datasets of targeted metabolites were subjected to statistical analysis through Past 4.02 software.
4. Conclusions
Viola genus is the largest genus, containing 500 species belonging to the Violaceae family and distributed throughout the globe. Viola species are also found in the Indian continent and are commonly known as Banksha/Bansfa/Banafsa/Banfsha. The western Himalayas have one of the richest repositories of Viola and were studied earlier by several groups. Hence, the study of Viola in the northwestern Himalayas of Himachal Pradesh, India was conducted to explore its species and their chemical and therapeutic potentials. The 15 gradient altitudinal locations in Himachal Pradesh, India were surveyed, which resulted only two Viola species (V. canescens and V. pilosa). Among them, V. canescens was found abundant in the targeted locations, while V. pilosa was observed in two locations. Flowers and leaves parts of both the species were found with alterations in morphology, polyphenolics, elemental, antioxidant, and antimicrobial patterns at gradient altitudes. The targeted polyphenols, nutritional components, and activities discriminated both the parts and revealed that it could be due the environmental conditions of the respective locations. Furthermore, the overuse and uncontrolled exploitation of these plant species may make them extinct in the future. Thus, the current findings help to select the right chemotype and environment for agrotechnological interventions to promote its cultivation and conservation.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27123867/s1, Table S1. Voila species study area; Figure S1. Micro-nutrients in Viola species at gradient altitudes (in ppm), Figure S2. Macro-nutrients in Viola species at gradient altitudes (in ppm); Figure S3. ABTS & DPPH based antioxidant activity of (IC50 µg/mL) of Viola species; Figure S4a UPLC-DAD Chromatograms of flowers samples of Viola species (DKRL1-DKRL15); Figure S4b UPLC-DAD Chromato-grams of flowers samples of Viola species (DKRV1-DKRV15); Table S2. MIC’s of the most effective plant extract against S. aureus & B. subtilis; Figure S5. Antimicrobial activity (Zone of inhibition of flowers and leaves) of Viola species.
Author Contributions
R.K.: collection, survey, experimentation, data analysis, and manuscript writing; M.K.: experiment and data analysis; S.K.: antimicrobial activity, D.S.: antimicrobial activity, data validation, and manuscript editing; D.K.: conceptualization, data validation, manuscript editing, and supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Sample Availability
Samples are available from the authors.
Funding Statement
The authors are thankful to Director CSIR-IHBT for his valuable support as HCP0007 (CSIR-Project) and DST-INSPIRE (No. DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/2018/IF180988), Department of Science & Technology, New Delhi, for the funding and award of INSPIRE Fellowship.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Shakya A.K. Medicinal plants: Future source of new drugs. Int. J. Herb. Med. 2016;4:59–64. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kunle O.F., Egharevba H.O., Ahmadu P.O. Standardization of herbal medicines-A review. Int. J. Biodivers. Conserv. 2012;4:101–112. doi: 10.5897/IJBC11.163. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Benzie I.F., Wachtel-Galor S. Herbal Medicine: Biomolecular and Clinical Aspects. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Corlett R.T. Plant diversity in a changing world: Status, trends, and conservation needs. Plant Divers. 2016;38:10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2016.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shiva M.P. Inventory of Forestry Resources for Sustainable Management and Biodiversity Conservation. Indus Publishing Company; New Delhi, India: 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kala C.P., Dhyani P.P., Sajwan B.S. Developing the medicinal plants sector in northern India: Challenges and opportunities. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2006;2:32. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-2-32. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Adhami S., Siraj S., Farooqi H. Unexplored medicinal plants of potential therapeutic importance: A review. Trop. J. Nat. Prod. Res. 2018;2:3–11. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ramakrishna A., Ravishankar G.A. Influence of abiotic stress signals on secondary metabolites in plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2011;6:1720–1731. doi: 10.4161/psb.6.11.17613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mabberley D.J. The Plant-Book: A Portable Dictionary of the Vascular Plants. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Guleria I., Kumari S., Verma R., Kumari A. Further insight into the distribution and morphology of some Viola species occurring in Himachal Pradesh, Western Himalaya, India. Int. J. Phytomed. 2019;11:169–176. doi: 10.5958/0975-6892.2019.00021.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Salve T., Rathod V., Tike S.K., Kadam R., Khade R. A review article on Banafsha (Viola odarata Linn.) PunarnaV Int. Peer Rev. Ayurvd J. 2019;2:1–8. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Masood M., Arshad M., Asif S., Chaudhari S.K. Viola canescens: Herbal Wealth to Be Conserved. J. Bot. 2014;6:345451. doi: 10.1155/2014/345451. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Marwat S.K. Ethno phytomedicines for treatment of various diseases in DI Khan district. Sarhad J. Agric. 2008;24:305–315. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kumar P., Digvijay S. Assessment of genetic diversity of Viola serpens Wall. In Himachal Pradesh using molecular markers. World J. Pharm. Res. 2014;3:2716–2726. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kandpal A., Chaubey S., Pandey M. A Brief knowledge of Banafsha (Viola odorata Linn.) & Other viola species. Int. J. Ayurveda Pharma Res. 2017;5:73–78. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Singh A., Dhariwal S.N. Traditional uses, antimicrobial potential, Pharmacological properties and Phytochemistry of Viola odorata: A Mini Review. Int. J. Phytopharm. 2018;7:103–105. doi: 10.31254/phyto.2018.7120. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Prajapati N.D., Purohit S.S., Sharma A.K., Kumar T. A Hand Book of Medicinal Plants. 3rd ed. Agrobios Hindustan Printing Press; Jodhpur, India: 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stuart M. The Encyclopedia of Herbs and Herbalism. Macdonald and Co (Publishers) Ltd.; London, UK: 1989. p. 281. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ireland D.C., Colgrave M.L., Craik D.J. A novel suite of cyclotides from Viola odorata: Sequence variation and the implications for structure, function and stability. Biochem. J. 2006;400:1–12. doi: 10.1042/BJ20060627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Karioti A., Furlan C., Vincieri F.F., Bilia A.R. Analysis of the constituents and quality control of Viola odorata aqueous preparations by HPLC-DAD and HPLC-ESI-MS. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2011;399:1715–1723. doi: 10.1007/s00216-010-4473-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sharma R., Verma S., Kumar D. Polyphenolics and therapeutic insights in different tissues extract and fractions of Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze (Kangra Tea) Food Biosci. 2021;27:101164. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2021.101164. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sharma S., Joshi R., Kumar D. Metabolomics insights and bioprospection of Polygonatum verticillatum: An important dietary medicinal herb of alpine Himalaya. Int. Food Res. J. 2021;148:110619. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gautam M., Katoch S., Chahota R.K. Comprehensive nutritional profiling and activity directed identification of lead antioxidant, antilithiatic agent from Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc. Int. Food Res. J. 2020;137:109600. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kumar D., Sharma A., Joshi R., Nadda G., Kumar D. A comprehensive search of the primary and secondary metabolites and radical scavenging potential of Trillium govanianum Wall. ex D. Don. Chem. Biodivers. 2021;18:e2100300. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.202100300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Qadir A.M., Shahzadi S.K., Bashir A., Munir A., Shahzad S. Evaluation of phenolic compounds and antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of some common herbs. Int. J. Anal. Chem. 2017:3475738. doi: 10.1155/2017/3475738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sharma S., Patial V., Singh D., Sharma U., Kumar D. Antimicrobial homoisoflavonoids from the rhizomes of Polygonatum verticillatum. Chem. Biodivers. 2018;15:e1800430. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201800430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Farzad M., Griesbach R., Weiss M. Floral color change in Viola cornutaL. (Violaceae): A model system to study regulation of anthocyanin production. Plant Sci. 2002;162:225–231. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(01)00557-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rizwan K., Khan A.S., Ahmad I., Rasool N., Ibrahim M., Zubair M., Jaafar H.Z.E., Manea R. A Comprehensive Review on Chemical and Pharmacological Potential of Viola betonicifolia: A Plant with Multiple Benefits. Molecules. 2019;24:3138. doi: 10.3390/molecules24173138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jaakola L., Hohtola A. Effect of latitude on flavonoid biosynthesis in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33:1239–1247. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02154.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hseu Z.Y., Chen Z.S., Tsai C.C., Tsui C.C., Cheng S.F., Liu C.L., Lin H.T. Digestion methods for total heavy metals in sediments and soils. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2002;141:189–205. doi: 10.1023/A:1021302405128. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Stagos D. Antioxidant Activity of Polyphenolic Plant Extracts. Antioxidants. 2019;9:19. doi: 10.3390/antiox9010019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ferreira P.S., Victorelli F.D., Fonseca-Santos B., Chorilli M. A review of analytical methods for p-coumaric acid in plant-based products, beverages, and biological matrices. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2019;49:21–31. doi: 10.1080/10408347.2018.1459173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zarrabi M., Dalirfardouei R., Sepehrizade Z., Kermanshahi R.K. Comparison of the antimicrobial effects of semipurified cyclotides from I ranian Viola odorata against some of plant and human pathogenic bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2013;115:367–375. doi: 10.1111/jam.12251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Parsley N.C., Sadecki P.W., Hartmann C.J., Hicks L.M. Viola “inconspicua” no more: An analysis of antibacterial cyclotides. J. Nat. Prod. 2019;82:2537–2543. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b00359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ramezani M., Zarrinkamar F., Bagheri M., Rajabnia R. Study of environment temperature effect on the antibacterial activity of water extract of different organs of Viola odorata in the different stages of growth. J. Babol Univ. Med. Sci. 2012;14:16–21. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gautam S.S., Kumar S. The antibacterial and phytochemical aspects of Viola odorata Linn. extracts against respiratory tract pathogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;82:567–572. doi: 10.1007/s40011-012-0064-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.