Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Jun 24;17(6):e0269628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269628

Spatio-temporal dynamics of pathogenic variants associated with monogenic disorders reconstructed with ancient DNA

Draga Toncheva 1,2,*, Maria Marinova 3, Plamenka Borovska 4, Dimitar Serbezov 1
Editor: Klaus Brusgaard5
PMCID: PMC9231702  PMID: 35749392

Abstract

Genetic disease burden in ancient communities has barely been evaluated despite an ever expanding body of ancient genomes becoming available. In this study, we inspect 2729 publicly available ancient genomes (100 BP—52000 BP) for the presence of pathogenic variants in 32643 disease-associated loci. We base our subsequent analyses on 19 variants in seven genes—PAH, EDAR, F11, HBB, LRRK2, SLC12A6 and MAOA, associated with monogenic diseases and with well-established pathogenic impact in contemporary populations. We determine 230 homozygote genotypes of these variants in the screened 2729 ancient DNA samples. Eleven of these are in the PAH gene (126 ancient samples in total), a gene associated with the condition phenylketonuria in modern populations. The variants examined seem to show varying dynamics over the last 10000 years, some exhibiting a single upsurge in frequency and subsequently disappearing, while others maintain high frequency levels (compared to contemporary population frequencies) over long time periods. The geographic distribution and age of the ancient DNA samples with established pathogenic variants suggests multiple independent origin of these variants. Comparison of estimates of the geographic prevalence of these variants from ancient and contemporary data show discontinuity in their prevalence and supports their recurrent emergence. The oldest samples in which a variant is established might give an indication of their age and place origin, and an EDAR gene pathogenic variant was established in a sample estimated to be 33210–32480 calBCE. Knowledge about the historical prevalence of variants causing monogenic disorders provides insight on their emergence, dynamics and spread.

Introduction

Ancient DNA has in recent years become a valuable tool for addressing key questions about human evolutionary and demographic history. Ancient human DNA can also yield valuable information about the health and disease of ancient communities. The number and distribution of pathogenic alleles causing disease in contemporary populations have however hardly been evaluated in ancient DNA samples. Such effort will indicate the age, place of origin and pattern of spread for many pathogenic variants and thus illuminate their evolutionary past. This will help explain the differences in the prevalence of many common and rare genetic diseases that contemporary human population exhibit.

By analyzing the disease burden of 147 ancient genomes, Berens et al. (2017) estimated that the overall hereditary disease risks of ancient hominins were similar to modern-day humans, but they also observed a temporal trend whereby genomes from the recent past had a higher probability to be healthier than genomes from the deep past [1]. Homozygotes for the P1104A polymorphism of TYK2 gene are at higher risk to develop clinical forms of tuberculosis, and Kerner et al. (2021) establish that, while the frequency of this pathogenic variant has fluctuated markedly over the last 10,000 years in Europe, it`s frequency has decreased dramatically after the Bronze Age [2].

Population sizes and migration rates were small in ancient compared to modern populations. The small effective population sizes would lead to increased levels of homozygosity, including pathogenic alleles in homozygous state, and thus to more efficient selection against these mutations. A large-scale human exome analysis, however, inferring the age of more than one million autosomal single nucleotide variants (SNVs), estimated that approximately 86% of SNVs predicted to be deleterious arose in the past 5000–10000 years [3]. The effect of recent and explosive population growth, combined with weak purifying selection, is the most probable cause of this excess of rare functional variants [4, 5]. It can therefore be speculated that the occurrence of rare diseases has varied substantially among different ancient communities as well as among different time periods.

The majority of rare genetic disease-causing genes however seem to be evolutionarily ancient and ubiquitously expressed in human tissues [6]. The number of genes with variants associated with rare diseases has been considerably increased with the advent of NGS technologies and is currently around 4000 [6]. Rare monogenic diseases (Orphan diseases) are considerable health burden in contemporary populations as the majority of these are marked by severe clinical manifestations, lead to disabilities and often have lethal outcome.

The aim of the present study was to detect and establish the prevalence of pathogenic mutations associated with monogenic diseases in ancient genome-wide DNA samples. This will give an assessment of the disease burden in ancient communities, as well as indicate the temporal dynamics of these pathogenic variants. This will also give an estimate of their minimum age and place of origin. We subsequently compare the prevalence estimates of these mutations in ancient communities to that in contemporary populations.

Materials and methods

A total of 2729 ancient genome-wide samples were examined [7]. The age distribution of the samples examined (100 BP—15000 BP) is shown on Fig 1.

Fig 1. The age distribution of all samples examined (n = 2729) from 100 BP—52000 BP.

Fig 1

The DNA sequences were screened for the presence of 369554 disease associated variants taken from the publicly available database of genes and variants associated with human diseases DisGeNet [8]. Genotype data was available for 32644 of these variants in the ancient genome sequences. From these were selected frameshift, missense, splice acceptor, splice donor, splice region, start loss, stop gain and stop loss variants, as all these types of mutations lead to changes in the composition or length of the produced amino acid sequence. We employ the online platform VarSome [9] to select variants for which there is strong evidence of pathogenic impact, i.e. pathogenic computational verdict based on 11 pathogenic predictions from BayesDel-addAF, DANN, DEOGEN2, EIGEN, FATHMM-MK, LIST-S2, M-CAP, MVP, MutationAssessor, MutationTaster and PrimateAI. The exome allele frequencies of these variants in contemporary populations is taken from Genome Aggregation Database online resource (v.21.1) [10].

Results

The selection procedure to assemble a set of monogenic disorders associated variants with well-established pathogenic effect yielded 19 unique variants (Table 1). We establish 230 homozygote genotypes of these variants in the screened 2729 ancient DNA samples. Eleven of these are in the PAH gene (125 ancient samples in total), a gene associated with the condition phenylketonuria in modern populations. Four variants are in the EDAR gene associated with hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (83 ancient samples in total), one in the F11 gene associated factor XI deficiency, a rare bleeding disorder (in 4 samples), one in the НВВ gene, associated with beta thalassemia, one in the SLC12A6 gene causing Andermann syndrome (in 8 samples), and one variant in one sample in the MAOA gene, associated with mild intellectual disability and behavioral problems. Thirteen ancient genotypes were established to accommodate 2 different pathogenic variants and one 1000 old genotype from Bolivia was even found to accommodate 3 different variants. The oldest sample with detected pathogenic variant is a 33210–32480 calBCE old sample from Goyet cave in Belgium harboring the variant rs121908450 variant in the EDAR gene (Table 1). The PAH gene rs5030851 variant and EDAR gene rs121908452 and rs121908453 variants are established in closely aged samples from vastly different geographical regions, suggesting multiple origin of these variants (Table 1).

Table 1. Pathogenic variants associated with monogenic diseases established in homozygote state in the analyzed 2729 ancient genome-wide sequencing samples.

dbSNP Gene Alleles oldest Place of oldest sample containing pathogenic variant nr. of ancient homozygote genotypes
rs5030846 PAH G/A 9000–7500 BCE Vasilevka, Ukraine 18
rs5030850 PAH G/A 10420–9450 calBCE Coquimbo, Los Vilos, Los Rieles, Chile 11
rs5030851 PAH G/A 6773–5886 BCE Karelia, Yuzhnyy Oleni Ostrov, Russia 24
rs5030853 PAH C/A 1800–1700 BCE Hazor, Israel 4
rs5030858 PAH G/A 6500–6200 BCE Northwest Anatolia, Marmara, Turkey 29
rs5030859 PAH C/T 6361–6050 calBCE Hajduka Vodenica, Serbia 21
rs76296470 PAH G/A 11820–11610 calBCE Grotte du Bichon, Switzerland 15
rs5030857 PAH G/A 2575–2469 calBCE Gamo Highlands, Mota Cave, Ethiopia 1
rs62514952 PAH C/A 2500–1900 BCE Lochenice, Czech Republic 1
rs62642932 PAH C/T 5841–5636 calBCE Zvejnieki, Latvia 1
rs62642933 PAH A/C 3082–2909 calBCE Parkhai, Turkmenistan 1
rs121908456 EDAR C/A 1000–800 BCE Swat Valley, Katelai, Pakistan 1
rs121908452 EDAR G/A 11820–11610 calBCE Grotte du Bichon, Switzerland 18
rs121908453 EDAR C/T 8210–7836 calBCE Ganj Dareh, Iran 20
rs121908450 EDAR C/T 33210–32480 calBCE Goyet cave, Belgium 45
rs121965063 F11 G/T 7300–6200 BCE Motza, Israel 4
rs63749819 HBB T/- 7250–6390 calBCE Washington State, Kennewick, Columbia River, US 7
rs121908428 SLC12A6 G/A 12230–11830 calBCE Veneto, Villabruna, Italy 8
rs72554632 MAOA C/T 3264–2916 calBCE Elo Bashi, Russia 1
Total 230

The variants examined show varying dynamics over the last 10000 years, some exhibiting a single upsurge in frequency and subsequently disappearing while others maintain high frequency levels (compared to contemporary population frequencies) over long time periods. The temporal dynamics (100 BP-10000 BP) of the established pathogenic variants in the PAH gene in ancient samples are shown on Fig 2.

Fig 2. Temporal dynamics (100 BP- 10000 BP) of the established PAH gene pathogenic variants in ancient samples.

Fig 2

The frequency trajectories are plotted using bins of 1,000 years and sliding windows of 500 years. Uncertainty of the frequency estimation is indicated by a gray colored area, representing the normal approximation of the 95% binomial proportion CI.

Compared to the overall contemporary population frequencies, as well as the frequencies in different geographical regions [10], the average frequencies of the pathogenic variants in the PAH established in ancient samples have a tendency to be higher. Fig 3 shows the overall ancient frequency of the 11 pathogenic variants in the PAH gene and the contemporary frequencies from different geographical regions.

Fig 3. Average frequencies of the 11 pathogenic PAH gene variants estimated from ancient samples (white bars) and contemporary population frequencies (overall and from different geographic regions [10]).

Fig 3

Geographical distribution of pathogenic mutations in ancient communities

The considered pathogenic variants are detected in samples from various geographical regions on different continents. Fig 4 shows the geographical position of the ancient samples in which homozygotes of any of the 11 variants in the PAH gene are detected presented, for the sake of clarity, in three time periods (100–3000 BCE, 3000–5000 BCE and 5000–14000 BCE).

Fig 4. Geographical position of ancient DNA samples (n = 126) in which homozygote genotypes of the 11 pathogenic variants in the PAH gene were established, allocated to 3 different time periods (BP–Before Present).

Fig 4

Map image obtained from Pixabay [11].

Discussion

The aim of the present study was to examine the publicly available ancient genome-wide data, spanning 100 BP– 52000 BP, for the prevalence of 19 variants that are confirmed to have pathogenic effect in contemporary populations. By doing so, we get an appraisal of the temporal frequency and prevalence dynamics of these variants, and get an indication of their age and place origin.

Eleven of the 19 examined variants are in the phenylketonuria associated PAH gene. Some genotypes lead to disease in all environments (high-penetrance Mendelian disorders), disease risk may however only arise by a specific combination between environment and genotype. Phenylketonuria (PKU) manifests only in the presence of mutations that render both copies of the phenylalanine hydroxylase enzyme non-functional and a diet that includes phenylalanine. Low phenylalanine diet may therefore explain how individuals that are homozygous for one or more pathogenic PAH gene variant might have been able to survive. In addition, alleles that contribute to disease in modern environments may not have had the same effects in past environments, e.g. fully penetrant mutations in contemporary populations may have had reduced penetrance in ancient human communities. It should also be noted that in general genomic health does not necessarily equate to phenotypic health, especially when comparing populations exhibiting large genetic distances.

Information about a variant`s age is valuable in interpreting it’s functional and selective importance, as has been demonstrated by the relationship between the age and frequency of variants in different geographical regions [12]. The instance furthest back in time a variant has been demonstrated gives an estimate of the minimum age of the variant. We establish the variant rs121908450 of the EDAR gene in a DNA sample from Goyet cave in Belgium estimated to be 33210–32480 calBCE (cf. Table 1). Non-recessive deleterious variants have high probability of being purged within a few generations, but both fully and nearly recessive very pathogenic mutations are expected to be purged in small populations [13, 14]. Alleles can also be efficiently removed from populations after bottleneck events [15]. Recent simulation studies have demonstrated that variants annotated as damaging or deleterious were notably absent among older variants (>1,000 generations, or 20000–30000 years) for a given frequency. This also seems consistent with previous findings and theoretical expectations [16, 17]. Parallel to our results for the EDAR gene rs121908450 variant, a recent study [2] estimated the age of a TYK2 gene variant that in homozygous state entails higher risk of developing clinical forms of TB to be ~30,000 years old. Small effective population sizes of ancient human communities facilitates random genetic drift rather than selection, and small populations therefore accumulate deleterious mutations [18]. Also, the efficiency of purging in small natural populations might be lessened as genetic drift and consanguineous mating generates linkage and identity disequilibrium [19]. This, possibly in combination with a bottleneck event followed by explosive population growth, might have led to high frequency of PAH gene rs5030853 and rs5030857 variants estimated in contemporary Ashkenazi Jewish population (cf. Fig 3)

A recent study aimed at dating shared ancestry along with genomic variants in population-scale sequencing data [12] found that, when estimated in independent samples, ages of variants are highly correlated. This agrees with the assumption that, for the majority of alleles, mutations occurred only once in a population`s history and thus the age of an allele refers to a fixed point in time [20]. Most individuals carrying an allele would do so through common ancestry if population size is small, as is the case of ancient human communities, and given that the mutation rate is not extremely high. This might be the case for West Eurasian populations where, by around 800 generations ago (16000–24000 years), there is very little structure remaining [12]. We however establish same mutations in ancient DNA genomes from vastly different geographical regions (cf. Fig 4) suggesting that these mutations might have arisen independently multiple times. A comparison between the estimated contemporary and ancient geographical distribution of the considered variants also suggests discontinuity in their prevalence. The PAH gene rs5030858 variant, for example, was established in a number of samples from various ancient Asian cites but seems to be absent from contemporary Asians (cf. Figs 3 and 4).

Functional variants are expected to be significantly younger than nonfunctional variants of the same frequency, and variants at high frequency are expected, on average, to be younger than lower-frequency variants [16]. The above considerations might explain why this would not always be the case. We do not finds any relationship between the earliest time a variant was established and it`s frequency (Pearson’s product-moment correlation r = - 0.251, p = 0.33). Substantial heterogeneity in the relationship between frequency and age have been demonstrated by simulations, suggesting the influence of (often unknown) demographic variables, and this may further be confounded by the mode and strength of selection on particular alleles [12].

The evolutionary approach represents a promising alternative to investigating the genetic sources of present-day disparities between individuals and populations in susceptibility to disease. This approach could however be limited by genetic discontinuity due to temporal and geographic sampling bias, an issue inherent to ancient DNA studies. Inferences about the geographical prevalence of the considered mutations might further be biased by large population replacements [21, 22]. And not least our analyses might have partially been affected by aDNA genome incompleteness and by differential aDNA quality from different geographical regions, again issues inherent to all ancient DNA studies.

Conclusion

Molecular genetic variation in genome-wide ancient DNA data have been used to evaluate demographic history, divergence and migration patterns of ancient human populations but rarely to assess the genomic health of ancient communities. The prevalence of many common and rare genetic diseases differs among human populations. Diverse genetic and demographic, as well as cultural and environmental, histories give rise to these differences. Synthesizing our growing knowledge of evolutionary history with genetic medicine, while accounting for environmental and social factors, will help to achieve the promise of personalized genomics and permit DNA sequences of individuals to inform clinical decisions. Precision medicine is essentially evolutionary medicine and reaching its full potential necessitates the impact of evolutionary processes also to be considered.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Ancient samples analyzed in this study.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Ancient samples containing pathogenic variants considered in this study.

(XLSX)

Data Availability

The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from David Reich Lab (https://reich.hms.harvard.edu/datasets).

Funding Statement

The authors have received no specific financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  • 1.Berens AJ, Cooper TL, Lachance J. The genomic health of ancient hominins. Human biology. 2017;89(1):7–20. doi: 10.13110/humanbiology.89.1.01 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kerner G, Laval G, Patin E, Boisson-Dupuis S, Abel L, Casanova J-L, et al. Human ancient DNA analyses reveal the high burden of tuberculosis in Europeans over the last 2,000 years. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 2021;108(3):517–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.02.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fu W, O’Connor TD, Jun G, Kang HM, Abecasis G, Leal SM, et al. Analysis of 6,515 exomes reveals the recent origin of most human protein-coding variants. Nature. 2013;493(7431):216–20. doi: 10.1038/nature11690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tennessen JA, Bigham AW, O’Connor TD, Fu W, Kenny EE, Gravel S, et al. Evolution and Functional Impact of Rare Coding Variation from Deep Sequencing of Human Exomes. Science. 2012;337(6090):64. doi: 10.1126/science.1219240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Keinan A, Clark AG. Recent Explosive Human Population Growth Has Resulted in an Excess of Rare Genetic Variants. Science. 2012;336(6082):740. doi: 10.1126/science.1217283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lee CE, Singleton KS, Wallin M, Faundez V. Rare Genetic Diseases: Nature’s Experiments on Human Development. iScience. 2020;23(5):101123–. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Allen Ancient DNA Resource 2021 [version 50.0:[Available from: https://reich.hms.harvard.edu/allen-ancient-dna-resource-aadr-downloadable-genotypes-present-day-and-ancient-dna-data.
  • 8.Piñero J, Ramírez-Anguita JM, Saüch-Pitarch J, Ronzano F, Centeno E, Sanz F, et al. The DisGeNET knowledge platform for disease genomics: 2019 update. Nucleic acids research. 2020;48(D1):D845–D55. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz1021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kopanos C, Tsiolkas V, Kouris A, Chapple CE, Albarca Aguilera M, Meyer R, et al. VarSome: the human genomic variant search engine. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(11):1978–80. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alföldi J, Wang Q, et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature. 2020;581(7809):434–43. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.OpenClipart. World Map, Continents. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Albers PK, McVean G. Dating genomic variants and shared ancestry in population-scale sequencing data. PLoS biology. 2020;18(1):e3000586–e. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hedrick PW. LETHALS IN FINITE POPULATIONS. Evolution. 2002;56(3):654–7. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01374.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kimura M, Maruyama T, Crow JF. THE MUTATION LOAD IN SMALL POPULATIONS. Genetics. 1963;48(10):1303–12. doi: 10.1093/genetics/48.10.1303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kirkpatrick M, Jarne P. The Effects of a Bottleneck on Inbreeding Depression and the Genetic Load. The American naturalist. 2000;155(2):154–67. doi: 10.1086/303312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mathieson I, McVean G. Demography and the age of rare variants. PLoS genetics. 2014;10(8):e1004528–e. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kiezun A, Pulit SL, Francioli LC, van Dijk F, Swertz M, Boomsma DI, et al. Deleterious alleles in the human genome are on average younger than neutral alleles of the same frequency. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(2):e1003301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Whitlock MC. FIXATION OF NEW ALLELES AND THE EXTINCTION OF SMALL POPULATIONS: DRIFT LOAD, BENEFICIAL ALLELES, AND SEXUAL SELECTION. Evolution. 2000;54(6):1855–61. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb01232.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Comeron JM, Williford A, Kliman RM. The Hill–Robertson effect: evolutionary consequences of weak selection and linkage in finite populations. Heredity. 2008;100(1):19–31. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6801059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Alakoç YD, Aka PS, Eğin Y, Akar N. Factor V Leiden in an Urartian, dating back to 1000 BC. Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis: official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. 2010;16(6):679–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Allentoft ME, Sikora M, Sjögren K-G, Rasmussen S, Rasmussen M, Stenderup J, et al. Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia. Nature. 2015;522(7555):167–72. doi: 10.1038/nature14507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.González-Fortes G, Tassi F, Trucchi E, Henneberger K, Paijmans JLA, Díez-del-Molino D, et al. A western route of prehistoric human migration from Africa into the Iberian Peninsula. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2019;286(1895):20182288. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Klaus Brusgaard

28 Mar 2022

PONE-D-21-35662Spatio-temporal dynamics of pathogenic variants associated with monogenic disorders reconstructed with ancient DNAPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Draga Toncheva,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please address reviewer comments appropriately. Especially consider the question raised on temporal dynamics. A discussion on sequencing quality in relation to the generated data.  

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 12 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Klaus Brusgaard

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please include your tables as part of your main manuscript and remove the individual files. Please note that supplementary tables (should remain/ be uploaded) as separate "supporting information" files.

3. We note that Figure 4 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure 4 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.  

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

4. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is an interesting paper. May be 'at the discussion section ' papers dealing with the human passage between Asia-to Europe/ Africa to Europe. It would be interesting to add at the discussion section 'FVL in Urartian bacck to 3000 BC' as a reference

Reviewer #2: Thanks a lot for this interesting work. I just have my doubts with the proposed temporal dynamics of the traits. Since we still have only access to a limited number of ancient human genomes which are in some periods overrepresented I am wondering how much one can really infer already with the current dataset temporal dynamics. At least I would like to see a statement on the above mentioned limitations. In addition I was missing a supplementary table presenting your findings on single individuum level. I could imagine that some colleagues would be interested to check whether there deposited ancient human remains carried a disease SNP. Thanks in advance for addressing these minor comments.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Jun 24;17(6):e0269628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269628.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


4 May 2022

To the Editors of “PLOS ONE”

Dear Sirs,

Thank you for reviewing our manuscript and for letting us resubmit a revised version. We find all comments by the reviewers to be very helpful and constructive. We have taken up their suggestions, and the manuscript has been revised accordingly. Notably, we now clearly acknowledge that sample bias, inherent to all ancient DNA studies, might have affected our inferences on the temporal dynamics and geographic prevalence of the considered mutations. We have now also included supplementary tables that will allow interested researchers to recreate our analyses on the deposited ancient human genome-wide data. We believe that these changes have resulted in a much better version of the manuscript which we hope is more befitting for publication in PLOS ONE.

Sincerely,

Prof. Draga Toncheva

Еditor`s comments:

3. We note that Figure 4 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

Our reply: Figure 4 uses a very rudimentary world map that is not copyrighted.

Reviewer #1: This is an interesting paper. May be 'at the discussion section ' papers dealing with the human passage between Asia-to Europe/Africa to Europe.

Our reply: We have now added to references dealing with ancient migrations from Asia and from Africa to Europe that might have impacted our inferences in the Discussion part of the manuscript, Line 206

It would be interesting to add at the discussion section 'FVL in Urartian back to 3000 BC' as a reference

Our reply: We have now referred to this study in the Discussion part of the manuscript, Line 184

Reviewer #2: Thanks a lot for this interesting work. I just have my doubts with the proposed temporal dynamics of the traits. Since we still have only access to a limited number of ancient human genomes which are in some periods overrepresented I am wondering how much one can really infer already with the current dataset temporal dynamics. At least I would like to see a statement on the above mentioned limitations.

Our reply: Temporal as well as geographic discontinuity is inherent to all ancient DNA studies, and we recognize our inferences might be to a certain extend biased. Nevertheless, the considered variants show very differential dynamics indicating that these are at least to a degree independent of the temporal sampling bias. Still, we have modified the text to convey that uncertainty in the inferences about temporal dynamics (Line 31, Line 81, and Line 145). We state in the Discussion part that sample bias might have affected our inferences about the temporal dynamics and geographical prevalence. (Line 206-207)

In addition I was missing a supplementary table presenting your findings on single individuum level. I could imagine that some colleagues would be interested to check whether there deposited ancient human remains carried a disease SNP. Thanks in advance for addressing these minor comments.

Our reply: We have now included as supplementary tables all the ancient samples considered (n=2729), their sex, estimated age, region they were sampled and the published articles they have been used in, Supplementary table S1. Also is included a table with all samples in which any of the considered pathogenic variants were established (n=230), Supplementary table S2.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_rviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Klaus Brusgaard

25 May 2022

Spatio-temporal dynamics of pathogenic variants associated with monogenic disorders reconstructed with ancient DNA

PONE-D-21-35662R1

Dear Dr. Draga Toncheva,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Klaus Brusgaard

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Klaus Brusgaard

14 Jun 2022

PONE-D-21-35662R1

Spatio-temporal dynamics of pathogenic variants associated with monogenic disorders reconstructed with ancient DNA

Dear Dr. Toncheva:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Klaus Brusgaard

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Ancient samples analyzed in this study.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Table. Ancient samples containing pathogenic variants considered in this study.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_rviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from David Reich Lab (https://reich.hms.harvard.edu/datasets).


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES