Abstract
Background and Aims
Tattoo prevalence has significantly increased over the last decades. Proper tattoo aftercare, such as cleansing, moisturizing, and protection against sunlight, is essential to prevent complications and to keep the beauty of the tattoo. The tolerability, performance, and cosmetic acceptability of two dexpanthenol‐containing dermo‐cosmetic products, a wash and a sun‐care, were investigated on tattooed skin in two separate trials.
Methods
Two single‐center, exploratory, open‐label cosmetic studies were conducted between August and November 2020 to evaluate the dexpanthenol‐containing dermo‐cosmetic products. In the first study, healthy adults applied the 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing wash right after their tattoo session daily for 14 consecutive days. In the second study, healthy adults applied the 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing sun‐care sun protection factor 50+ cream on existing tattoos that were daily exposed to sunlight for 28 consecutive days. Clinical examination by a dermatologist and self‐assessment through subject questionnaires were used to assess the tolerability, acceptance, ease of use, and cosmetic outcomes of both products. Additionally, transepidermal water loss and moisturization assessments were performed to evaluate skin hydration after use of the sun‐care product.
Results
Both study products were well tolerated, and no product related adverse events were reported during the studies. At least 90% of the study participants appreciated the performance of the dexpanthenol‐containing wash and sun‐care product, including moisturizing properties, relief of unpleasant sensations, and preservation of the cosmetic appearance of the tattoo. For the sun‐care, it was shown that its application supported maintaining the skin barrier of tattooed skin, while keeping it hydrated.
Conclusion
The 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing wash and sun‐care products are well tolerated and appreciated by tattooed subjects. Hence, they represent valid options for tattoo aftercare in line with current recommendations and practice.
Keywords: dexpanthenol, moisturization, sun‐care, tattoo aftercare, tolerability, wash
1. INTRODUCTION
Tattoos have grown significantly in popularity over the last decades. As a result, their prevalence has kept increasing on a global scale and reached an overall prevalence of 10%−20%. 1 , 2 Yet, even with appropriate hygiene and strict sanitary precautions, getting a tattoo can be associated with several common acute complications, including bleeding, crusting, itching, edema, pain, burning sensations, scarring, swelling, tenderness, redness, sun sensitivity, and pus‐filled skin area. 3 , 4 , 5 A certain number of these complications are a part of the tattoo healing phase. 6 After all, the process of tattooing consists of puncturing through the epidermis with pigmented particles using solid needles and creating superficial wounds. 7 Tattoo aftercare instructions should therefore support optimal healing and prevent local infection and scarring of the tattooed skin to preserve the esthetic appearance. 8 , 9
However, standardized guidelines on tattoo aftercare are scarce and the advice given can vary both in quality and practicality. 10 To date, the most recently published available guidelines are the European standards on safe and hygienic practice for tattooing. 11 In brief, the tattooed area should be rinsed with water and dabbed dry immediately after the procedure. The tattoo then needs to be protected with a hypoallergenic ointment and covered with a pad, bandage, or plaster for a few hours. Once at home is it advised to gently wash the tattooed skin with cold or lukewarm water and a hypoallergenic mild soap after removal of the dressing. The tattoo needs to be kept moist by using a hypoallergenic ointment or unperfumed moisturizing lotion to prevent the tattoo from drying out. Moisturization of the tattooed skin needs to be repeated daily for 2−3 weeks to support wound healing until skin recovery is complete. Throughout and after the healing process, it is important to avoid sun‐exposure and artificial tanning to reduce the risk of skin barrier dysfunction and subsequent abnormal skin pigmentation, fading, or cracking of the tattoo. 12 , 13
Keeping tattooed skin moist and reduce discomfort sensations while preserving the skin barrier physiology are thus key requirements for proper aftercare and maintenance of the cosmetic appearance of tattoos. 11 The use of topical dexpanthenol has been well studied for these purposes—to date mainly outside of the tattoo research field—and its beneficial characteristics with regard to moisturizing capacity, prevention of skin irritation, and stimulation of skin regeneration have been demonstrated repeatedly. 14 , 15 , 16 The exact mechanism of how dexpanthenol restores and protects the skin barrier is not yet fully elucidated. After absorption, dexpanthenol is rapidly converted into pantothenic acid, a coenzyme A constituent indispensable for the physiological epithelial function. 16 , 17 , 18 Dexpanthenol contributes to skin barrier recovery in dry skin conditions and helps to re‐establish the normal epidermal differentiation. 19 It has a beneficial effect on proteins and lipid components in the stratum corneum by increasing their mobility and retaining high skin permeability, even in dehydrated conditions. 20 As a result, topical dexpanthenol acts as a moisturizer, reduces transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and keeps the skin hydrated, soft, and elastic. 21
These versatile properties make dexpanthenol a suitable candidate for tattoo aftercare, as previously shown for a 5% dexpanthenol‐containing ointment (Bepanthen® Ointment/Bepanthen® Tattoo Intensive Care Ointment; Bayer Consumer Care AG). 22 In this study, Bepanthen® Ointment use after tattooing was associated with a virtually complete skin barrier restoration, was well tolerated, and correlated with well perceived cosmetic performances. 22 In addition, all study subjects presented with an uncomplicated tattoo healing process.
In light of these findings, two additional dexpanthenol‐containing skin care products were developed, a wash product (Bepanthen® Tattoo Gentle Wash; Bayer Consumer Care AG) and a sun‐care cream with sun protection factor (SPF) 50+ (Bepanthen® Tattoo Sun Protect Cream; Bayer Consumer Care AG), to complement tattoo aftercare. The composition of both formulations is provided in Supporting Information: Table 1. The wash was evaluated for mild cleansing and hydration of freshly tattooed skin in addition to standard tattoo aftercare with an ointment. The sun‐care was evaluated to protect tattoos from ultraviolet(UV) rays, replenish tattooed skin with moisture and to preserve the beauty of the tattoo.
The current manuscript presents the results of two original studies assessing the tolerability and performance of the 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing wash (hereafter referred to as wash) and 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing sun‐care SPF50+ cream (hereafter referred to as sun‐care) products. In addition, the effect of the sun‐care on the tattooed skin barrier function and moisturization was evaluated.
2. METHODS
Tolerability and performance of the wash and sun‐care were evaluated in two separate studies. Both studies were designed as single‐center, exploratory, open label cosmetic studies and were conducted at EUROFINS EVIC Product Testing Romania SRL (Bucharest, Romania) between August and November 2020. The trials were performed according to the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki with all its amendments and in accordance with the guidelines for the evaluation of the efficacy of cosmetic products.
In both studies, healthy male and female subjects aged 18−60 years with skin types II−IV according to Fitzpatrick were recruited. No formal calculation was used for the determination of the sample size. The goal to recruit 50 study participants per study was based on historical data for TEWL studies and previous studies in tattoo settings with a similar investigational setup and study products. 22 Subjects with a history of atopic reactions, allergy or skin reactivity, photoreactivity to cosmetic products, or who were breastfeeding, pregnant or planning a pregnancy during the study were not eligible to participate. Informed consent forms were obtained from study participants before study initiation.
2.1. Study 1: 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing wash
The wash was used by subjects on a fresh, black ink tattoo. There were no instructions given regarding the size of the tattoo in cm2, except that it needed to be completed in a maximum of 2 h at the selected tattoo center in Bucharest, Romania (2nd face tattoo & body piercing). Standardized tattoo areas included the upper and lower arms, lower legs, chest, abdomen, and hands. The first application of the investigational product was done at the EUROFINS investigational center under supervision of the investigator at Day 0, 3−4 h after tattoo completion. The wash was thereafter applied daily at home for 14 consecutive days up to 4 times, but not less than 2 times a day according to the product instructions. In addition to the wash, a 5% dexpanthenol‐containing ointment (Bepanthen® Ointment; Bayer Consumer Care AG) was applied daily as a standard of care according to product instructions. Subjects were informed about general tattoo aftercare as stated in the European guidelines. 11 , 22
2.1.1. Tolerability and product performance
A physical examination of the tattoo was performed at every study visit (Day 0, 1, 7, and 14) by a dermatologist to assess visible clinical signs such as erythema, edema, dryness, or desquamation. In addition, sensations of discomfort declared by the subjects were noted, including heating, burning, stinging, itching, redness, and tightness. The intensity of the visible clinical signs and the sensations of discomfort were assessed according to ordinal scales (Supporting Information: Table 2). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded in a daily log and collected at each study visit.
Study participants captured their subjective observations and assessments at each study visit with respect to skin reactions and test product characteristics in a validated questionnaire, based on the guidance provided by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM, 2016). The questions concerning the product cosmetic qualities and performance had to be answered by an ordinal scale (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = slightly disagree, 4 = neither agree or disagree, 5 = slightly agree, 6 = agree, 7 = strongly agree).
2.2. Study 2: 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing sun‐care SPF50+ cream
The sun‐care was evaluated on tattoos (>6 months) that were daily exposed to sunlight for at least 30 min, but no more than 2 h per day during the study period and included areas on the forearms, arms, hand wrists, legs, shoulders, shoulder blades, upper back, feet, and ankles. Application of the product under investigation was done at least once a day, and before and during each sun exposure over the beach and bath time during 28 days.
2.2.1. Tolerability and product performance
The assessments to evaluate the tolerability and product performance were identical to study 1, and were performed on Day 0 and Day 28 of the investigation.
In addition, the study participants assessed the appearance of their tattoo under investigation with regard to color intensity, sharpness of the contour and uniform filling at baseline and at the end of the study through an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 9, with 0 representing the lowest score and 9 equalizing the highest score.
2.2.2. Skin barrier function and moisturization
TEWL analyses were performed with the Tewameter® TM 300 (Courage + Khazaka). Before each measurement, study participants underwent 15−20 min of acclimatization in an unventilated room at a controlled temperature of 20± 2°C and relative humidity of 45 ± 15%. After the acclimatization period, the Tewameter sensor was placed on tattooed skin and left in contact on that specific point for 2 min, recording values every 30 s.
The hydration levels of the upper layers of the skin were measured with a Corneometer® CM 825 (Courage + Khazaka) during which the corneometer probe was applied to the tattooed skin and three consecutive measurements (triangle with the tip down) were conducted.
Measurements were performed at baseline (Day 0) and at the end of the study (Day 28) at the investigation site. In case of multiple tattoos, evaluations were performed on the one chosen at the time of the first visit. Minimalization of potential sources of errors of the measurements, besides ensuring equality of environmental conditions, was optimized by performing measurements on the same precise site of the tattooed area on each time point, following the same pattern, by the same technicians. Test subjects served as their own control.
2.3. Data analysis and statistics
For both studies, a global comparison using analysis of variance with “Visit” as factor was performed on values, followed by a two‐sided Dunnett's test with the baseline visit, Day 0, as reference for comparisons. For the statistical analysis of the instrumental measurements, a Wilcoxon signed‐ranks test for paired samples was performed. The 5% significance degree was used for the statistical tests and 1% for the normality tests. Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 22.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Study 1: 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing wash
3.1.1. Baseline data
Seventy‐three subjects were screened and 68 subjects were included in the study. Fifty‐seven subjects completed the study without major protocol deviations and were analyzed (Figure 1A). Baseline characteristics of the study participants are presented in Table 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of (A) the 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing wash and (B) the 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing sun‐care SPF50+ cream study participants. SPF, sun protection factor.
Table 1.
Subject demographics and baseline characteristics
2.5% dexpanthenol‐ containing wash | 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing sun‐care SPF50+ cream | |
---|---|---|
Number of subjects (n) | 57 | 53 |
Age (years ± SD) | 35.4 ± 9.1 | 38.3 ± 8.1 |
Skin type (Fitzpatrick) | ||
II (n [%]) | 12 (21) | 16 (30) |
III (n [%]) | 41 (72) | 30 (57) |
IV (n [%]) | 4 (7) | 7 (13) |
Sex | ||
Male (n [%]) | 39 (68) | 18 (34) |
Female (n [%]) | 18 (32) | 35 (66) |
Ethnic group, Caucasian (n [%]) | 57 (100) | 53 (100) |
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; SPF, sun protection factor.
3.1.2. Tolerability and product performance
No AEs related to the study product under investigation were reported. The wash was generally well tolerated by all subjects, with only limited clinical signs such as edema, erythema, dryness, and desquamation, and discomfort sensations. These were not severe and expected as a result of the tattooing procedure.
Overall, the wash was very well accepted and appreciated for its cosmetic qualities and performance as illustrated by a majority of participants that indicated to be satisfied with the product (p < 0.001, Table 2). At least 93% of the study participants agreed that the investigational product was easy to apply, gently cleansed their skin, reduced skin irritation, provided beneficial effects such as soothing, cooling, relief of unpleasant sensations, and hydration of the tattooed skin, and they would continue using the wash on a daily basis.
Table 2.
Subject self‐assessment questionnaire concerning product acceptability and performance of the 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing wash at Day 14
No | Question | “Agree”, % (N)a |
---|---|---|
1 | You would say that the investigational product | |
Is easy to apply | 98.2 (56) | |
Is quick to apply/allows quick application | 98.2 (56) | |
Gently cleanses tattooed skin | 98.2 (56) | |
Is convenient to apply to tattooed skin | 98.2 (56) | |
2 | After application, your tattooed skin is | |
Softer | 98.2 (56) | |
Suppler | 94.7 (54) | |
More comfortable | 98.2 (56) | |
Soothed | 98.2 (56) | |
Smooth | 96.5 (55) | |
Less tightened | 98.2 (56) | |
Less irritated | 98.2 (56) | |
Clean | 96.5 (55) | |
3 | After application, would you say that the investigational product | |
Leaves your tattooed skin feeling moisturized | 96.5 (55) | |
Leaves your tattooed skin feeling moisturized immediately after | 96.5 (55) | |
Provides an immediate refreshing sensation | 96.5 (55) | |
Reduces unpleasant skin sensations | 96.5 (55) | |
Is suitable for aftercare of tattooed skin | 96.5 (55) | |
Leaves tattooed skin cleaned | 96.5 (55) | |
4 | Overall, the investigational product | |
Totally satisfies me | 96.5 (55) | |
Is the perfect daily cleansing product for my tattooed skin | 94.7 (54) | |
I would like to continue using this product regularly/daily | 93.0 (53) | |
I would recommend this product to a friend | 96.5 (55) |
The number of subjects and percentage indicated reflect the proportion of subjects that answered “Strongly agree,” “Agree,” or “slightly agree” to the provided question.
3.2. Study 2: 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing sun‐care SPF50+ cream
3.2.1. Baseline data
Sixty‐seven subjects were screened and 56 were included, of which 53 successfully completed the study (Figure 1B). Baseline characteristics of the study participants are presented in Table 1.
3.2.2. Tolerability and product performance
The sun‐care was well tolerated by all study subjects. No AEs were reported during the study. 96.2% of study participants indicated that the sun‐care protected their tattooed skin against UV radiation and preserved the vibrant colors of their tattoo (p < 0.001, Table 3). Study subjects did not perceive any significant difference in tattoo color intensity (p = 0.144), sharpness of the contour (p = 0.336), and uniform filling (p = 0.127) at the end of the study in comparison to baseline assessments after daily product application and sun exposure. Further, 90% or more of the study participants agreed that the product was easy to apply, absorbed nicely, and hydrated the tattooed skin (p < 0.001, Table 3).
Table 3.
Subject self‐assessment questionnaire concerning product acceptability and performance of the 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing sun‐care SPF50+ cream at Day 28
No | Question | “Agree”, % (N)a |
---|---|---|
1 | Was in your opinion the product easy to apply to tattooed skin? | 98.1 (52) |
2 | In your opinion did the product absorb quickly? | 96.2 (51) |
3 | In your opinion did the product leave white streaks after application? | 0.0 (0) |
4 | In your opinion did the product absorb nicely and did not leave any unpleasant residue after application? | 90.6 (48) |
5 | In your opinion did the product effectively protect your tattoo colors against sunlight/UV radiation? | 96.2 (51) |
6 | In your opinion did the product leave your tattooed skin feeling smooth and hydrating? | 96.2 (51) |
7 | In your opinion did the product leave your tattooed skin with vibrant colors? | 96.2 (51) |
Abbreviations: SPF, sun protection factor; UV, ultraviolet.
The number of subjects and percentage indicated reflect the proportion of subjects that answered “Strongly agree,” “Agree,” or “slightly agree” to the provided question.
3.2.3. Skin barrier function and moisturization
TEWL measurements provide an indication of the skin barrier function by assessment of epidermal water loss in vivo under stable environmental conditions. The significant decrease in TEWL from baseline to the end of the study after daily use of the sun‐care (Figure 2A, p = 0.0170) indicated that additional use of the sun‐care contributed to strengthening the skin barrier. Moreover, moisturization evaluation of the skin after use of the sun‐care for 28 days showed no significant difference in hydration level in comparison to baseline (p = 0.263). These results indicate that there was no epidermal hydration loss after repeated sun exposure when using the sun‐care (Figure 2B) and that the skin moisture level was maintained.
Figure 2.
TEWL and corneometric measurements at baseline and the end of the study at Day 28 after application of the 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing sun‐care SPF50+ cream on healed tattooed skin. (a) There is a significant difference in TEWL between baseline and Day 28 (p ≤ 0.001). (b) There is no significant difference in corneometric indice between baseline and Day 28 (p ≤ 0.263). *p ≤ 0.001 in comparison with baseline value.SPF, sun protection factor; TEWL, transepidermal water loss level.
4. DISCUSSION
Tattoos have become mainstream over the last decades. 1 Yet, despite their growing global popularity and overall improved hygiene, getting tattooed still carries risks. 5 Predominant complaints after tattooing include swelling and itching and occur in about 30% of individuals, while 20% of people with tattoos suffer from problems related to sun exposure. 9 This high prevalence might not be unexpected, as some of these complaints are associated with the healing process after tattooing. 6 To minimize potential complaints, proper tattoo aftercare is strongly recommended. 12 Ideally, aftercare should support healing, prevent infections, minimize scarring, and make sure the tattoo color and esthetic appearance is preserved. 8 , 9 , 10
Dexpanthenol has gained tremendous attention in the field of dermatology over the last decades thanks to its moisturizing properties, healing potential, and anti‐inflammatory characteristics. 15 , 16 , 23 As such, many formulations with dexpanthenol have been used for skin care as well as for the promotion of minor wound healing, including abrasions, cuts, and scratches, similar to wounds created by the tattooing process. 10 , 14 , 16 , 19 , 24 A recent publication confirmed the beneficial use of a dexpanthenol‐containing ointment on freshly tattooed skin by demonstrating a virtually complete restoration of the disturbed skin barrier function induced by tattooing. 22
To complement appropriate tattoo aftercare, a dexpanthenol‐containing wash and sun‐care product were developed, and their safety and performance were clinically confirmed.
Effective cleansing of freshly tattooed skin with a mild wash product is an essential part of tattoo aftercare. 11 The 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing wash demonstrated to be suitable for mild effective cleansing of fresh tattoos to complement standard tattoo aftercare with a dexpanthenol‐containing ointment. Daily application of the wash provided comfort and hydration of the tattooed area, and could be used safely, easily, and early on after tattooing in accordance with hygiene requirements for tattoo cleansing. 11 As dexpanthenol has been well documented for its moisturizing properties, addition hereof to the wash may have an additional beneficial effect on providing moisture to the tattooed skin. 16 , 22
Besides cleansing and moisturization of tattooed skin to support optimal healing, preservation of the beauty of tattoos is another important aspect of tattoo aftercare. After all, embellishment of the body is a major motivation for getting a tattoo. 2 Although tattoo fading is a multifactorial process, one of the most common preventable risk factors that affects the cosmetic appearance of tattooed skin is exposure to direct sunlight. 12 , 13 Sun avoidance or protection with at least SPF30 is therefore essential in tattoo aftercare. 11 Surprisingly, excessive sun exposure and indoor tanning is generally higher among young adults with tattoos than the national estimate according to an on‐line national survey conducted in the United States, emphasizing the need for creating awareness regarding protection during sun exposure. 25 In addition, it has been shown that UV exposure has dramatic effects on the cellular cohesion and mechanical integrity of the skin leading to compromised skin barrier function. Sunscreens are effective at preventing erythema and nonmelanoma skin cancer, but their ability to maintain the mechanical barrier properties of the skin is hence also an important property. 26
In the current study, 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing sun‐care SPF50+ cream was demonstrated to maintain the esthetic appearance of existing tattoos by preserving vibrant colors and preventing fading of the tattoos, while it was easy to apply and keeping the tattooed skin smooth and hydrated. Assessment of the skin barrier function showed a decrease in TEWL, or outward diffusion of water through the skin, after 28 days of daily application, an observation which confirms the ability of the 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing sun‐care SPF50+ cream to maintain the skin barrier and prevent the drying out of tattooed skin in addition to providing protection against UV radiation. Corneometer measurements correlate to the water content of the skin, which remained similar between baseline and after 28 days implying that application of the sun‐care maintained the hydration level of the skin during sun exposure, counterbalancing the drying effect of UV exposure.
A limitation of both studies is the lack of a comparison with a tattooed area where a placebo or no application was applied. However, the standard of care for freshly tattooed skin recommends regular moisturization and cleansing of the tattooed area and it would be unethical to not provide this aftercare. In line with this reasoning, it is considered unethical to not apply any protection of the skin against sun exposure. Moreover, comparison of the test products with placebo would entail practical challenges that would influence the reliability of the measurements. As such, the test product and placebo should be intraindividual compared to minimize variability, meaning that the tattoo under investigation should be divided in two test areas, a criterion that would be difficult to meet in tattoos obtained in maximum 2 h as was the case for the evaluation of the 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing wash. Using different formulation of sun protection at the other hand, could lead to different appearance on the site of application. Given that the intention of the current investigation was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of both test products rather than making a comparison with placebo, evaluation of the endpoints based on the comparison of baseline measurements with end‐of‐study results was considered sufficient to address this goal.
In conclusion, these data complement previous observations and provide additional scientific evidence supporting the safe and efficacious use of the dexpanthenol‐containing dermo‐cosmetics in tattoo aftercare. The wash provided mild cleansing of freshly tattooed skin in addition to standard care and the sun‐care preserved the cosmetic appearance of existing tattoos by keeping the skin moist and maintaining the skin barrier. The results of our studies provide scientific evidence for the integration of the 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing wash, in combination with the 5% dexpanthenol ointment, and the 2.5% dexpanthenol‐containing sun‐care SPF50+ cream into tattoo aftercare in line with current guidelines and recommendations.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Conceptualization: Daphné A. Schmid, Marisa P. Domingues, Alina Nanu, and Raffaella de Salvo and Sonja Trapp. Methodology: Daphné A. Schmid, Marisa P. Domingues, Raffaella de Salvo, and Sonja Trapp. Formal Analysis: Alina Nanu and Nicolas Kluger. Investigation: Alina Nanu. Project Administration: Raffaella de Salvo. Writing—review and editing: Daphné A. Schmid, Marisa P. Domingues, Alina Nanu, Nicolas Kluger, Raffaella de Salvo, and Sonja Trapp.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Daphné A. Schmid, Marisa P. Domingues, Raffaella de Salvo and Sonja Trapp are employees of Bayer Consumer Care AG, Basel, Switzerland. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
ETHICS STATEMENT
The studies were performed in accordance with the general principles of medical ethics in clinical research coming from the Declaration of Helsinki (June 1964) and its successive amendments, and according to the recommendations of Colipa—August 1997: “guidelines for the assessment of human skin compatibility.” In addition, the clinical investigation complied with the European Directive 95/46/EC and the Romanian Order No 677/2001 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data.
Supporting information
Supporting information.
Supporting information.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The studies and the writing of the manuscript were funded by Bayer Consumer Care AG, Basel, Switzerland. Writing of the manuscript draft was performed by Leni Vandekerckhove (MediGraphX, Retie, Belgium).
Schmid DA, Domingues MP, Nanu A, Kluger N, de Salvo R, Trapp S. Exploratory evaluation of tolerability, performance, and cosmetic acceptance of dexpanthenol‐containing dermo‐cosmetic wash and sun‐care products for tattoo aftercare. Health Sci. Rep. 2022;5:e635. 10.1002/hsr2.635
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data generated during the studies are disclosed in the publication and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- 1. Kluger N. Epidemiology of tattoos in industrialized countries. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2015;48:6‐20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kluger N, Seité S, Taieb C. The prevalence of tattooing and motivations in five major countries over the world. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33:e484‐e486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Klügl I, Hiller K, Landthaler M, Bäumler W. Incidence of health problems associated with tattooed skin: a nation‐wide survey in German‐speaking countries. Dermatology. 2010;221:43‐50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Laumann AE, Derick A. Tattoos and body piercings in the United States: a national data set. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55:413‐421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kluger N. Acute complications of tattooing presenting in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30:2055‐2063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kluger N, Plantier F, Moguelet P, Fraitag S. Tattoos: natural history and histopathology of cutaneous reactions. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2011;138:146‐154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Rohith MM, Belcher WR, Roy J, et al. Tattoo in forensic science: an Indian perspective. J Forensic Leg Med. 2020;74:102022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kluger N. Cutaneous and systemic complications associated with tattooing. Presse Med. 2016;45:567‐576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Serup J, Carlsen K, Sepehri M. Tattoo complaints and complications: diagnosis and clinical spectrum. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2015;48:48‐60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Liszewski W, Jagdeo J, Laumann AE. The need for greater regulation, guidelines, and a consensus statement for tattoo aftercare. JAMA Dermatology. 2016;152:141‐142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. European Committtee for Standardization . BSI standards publication tattooing—safe and hygienic practice 2020.
- 12. Gonzalez CD, Walkosz BJ, Dellavalle RP. Aftercare instructions in the tattoo community: an opportunity to educate on sun protection and increase skin cancer awareness. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2020;13:22‐23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Biniek K, Levi K, Dauskardt R. Solar UV radiation reduces the barrier function of human skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:17111‐17116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Gorski J, Proksch E, Baron J, Schmid D, Zhang L. Dexpanthenol in wound healing after medical and cosmetic interventions (postprocedure wound healing). Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2020;13:1‐13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Proksch E, Nissen H. Dexpanthenol enhances skin barrier repair and reduces inflammation after sodium lauryl sulphate‐induced irritation. J Dermatolog Treat. 2002;13:173‐178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Proksch E, De Bony R, Trapp S, Boudon S. Topical use of dexpanthenol: a 70th anniversary article. J Dermatolog Treat. 2017;28:766‐773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Abiko Y, Tomikawa M, Shimizu M. Enzymatic conversion of pantothenylalcohol to pantothenic acid. J Vitaminol (Kyoto). 1969;15:59‐69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wollina U. Multiaktive eigenschaften von dexpanthenol‐haltigen externa. Med J Kubicki ‐ Kosm. 2007;:28(3):122‐128. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Proksch E, Berardesca E, Misery L, Engblom J, Bouwstra J. Dry skin management: practical approach in light of latest research on skin structure and function. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020;31:716‐722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Björklund S, Pham QD, Jensen LB, et al. The effects of polar excipients transcutol and dexpanthenol on molecular mobility, permeability, and electrical impedance of the skin barrier. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2016;479:207‐220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ebner F, Heller A, Rippke F, Tausch I. Topical use of dexpanthenol in skin disorders. Am Clin Dermatol. 2002;3:427‐433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Olsavszky R, Nanu EA, Macura‐Biegun A, Kurka P, Trapp S. Skin barrier restoration upon topical use of two 5% dexpanthenol water‐in‐oil formulations on freshly tattooed skin: results from a single‐blind prospective study formal. Wounds Int. 2019;10:33‐39. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Stettler H, Kurka P, Lunau N, et al. A new topical panthenol‐containing emollient: results from two randomized controlled studies assessing its skin moisturization and barrier restoration potential, and the effect on skin microflora. J Dermatolog Treat. 2017;28:173‐180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Baron J, Glatz M, Proksch E. Optimal support of wound healing: new insights. Dermatology. 2020;236:593‐600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Gonzalez C, Rundle C, Pona A, Walkosz B, Dellavalle R. Ultraviolet radiation May cause premature fading of colored tattoos. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2020;36:73‐74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Berkey C, Biniek K, Dauskardt RH. Screening sunscreens: protecting the biomechanical barrier function of skin from solar ultraviolet radiation damage. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2017;39:269‐274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting information.
Supporting information.
Data Availability Statement
The data generated during the studies are disclosed in the publication and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.